Concomitant, specific determination of growth hormone and pegvisomant in human serum

A multivariable prediction model for pegvisomant dosing: monotherapy and in combination with long-acting somatostatin analogues

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant (PEGV), a growth hormone receptor antagonist, requires an appropriate dose titration. PEGV doses vary widely among individual patients, and various covariates may affect its dosing and pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of the PEGV dose required to normalize insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels during PEGV monotherapy and in combination with long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs).

DESIGN

Two retrospective cohorts (Rotterdam + Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS), total n = 188) were meta-analyzed as a form of external replication to study the predictors of PEGV dosing in addition to LA-SSA, the LAS (n = 83) was used to study the predictors of PEGV monotherapy dosing. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of the PEGV dose required to normalize IGF-I levels.

RESULTS

For PEGV dosing in combination with LA-SSA, IGF-I levels, weight, height and age, were associated with the PEGV normalization dosage (P ≤ 0.001, P ≤ 0.001, P = 0.028 and P = 0.047 respectively). Taken together, these characteristics predicted the PEGV normalization dose correctly in 63.3% of all patients within a range of ±60 mg/week (21.3% within a range of ±20 mg/week). For monotherapy, only weight was associated with the PEGV normalization dose (P ≤ 0.001) and predicted this dosage correctly in 77.1% of all patients within a range of ±60 mg/week (31.3% within a range of ±20 mg/week).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we show that IGF-I levels, weight, height and age can contribute to define the optimal PEGV dose to normalize IGF-I levels in addition to LA-SSA. For PEGV monotherapy, only the patient's weight was associated with the IGF-I normalization PEGV dosage.

The Effect of the Exon-3-Deleted Growth Hormone Receptor on Pegvisomant-Treated Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The common exon 3 deletion polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor (d3-GHR) is associated with disease severity in acromegaly patients. The GHR antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV) is highly effective in treating severe acromegaly. Response to PEGV treatment seems to be influenced by d3-GHR and appears to be more responsive to PEGV, although available results remain conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of d3-GHR on the responsiveness of acromegaly patients to PEGV by compiling the evidence derived from the largest available studies.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature identified three published studies and one conference abstract. Acromegaly patients (n = 324, 49.7% d3-GHR carriers) were treated with either PEGV monotherapy or PEGV combined with long-acting somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. A meta-analysis of raw data from these studies was performed.

RESULTS

No significant effect of the d3-GHR was observed while bringing insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels below the upper limit of normal with PEGV, which was defined as the lowest IGF-I level during PEGV treatment (mean difference: -2.3%; 95% CI: -6.5 to 1.8, p = 0.270). The PEGV dose required to achieve the lowest IGF-I levels was also not significantly influenced by individuals carrying d3-GHR (mean difference: 4.1 mg weekly; 95% CI: -5.1 to 13.2, p = 0.385). For both outcomes, separate analysis of PEGV monotherapy and combination treatment gave similar results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the d3-GHR polymorphism has no effect on biochemical disease control in acromegaly, as it is not of added value for either the prediction of PEGV responsiveness or the determination of the required PEGV dose.

Circulating levels of pegvisomant and endogenous growth hormone during prolonged pegvisomant therapy in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly induces gradual elevations in endogenous serum growth hormone (GH) levels and whether serum pegvisomant levels predict the therapeutic outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (6 women), mean age 46·3 years (range: 23·2-76·2), were studied. For each patient, four hospital visits were identified including 'active disease' (no treatment) and last follow-up. At each visit, 12 blood samples were drawn during 3 h including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Eight patients received a somatostatin analogue in addition to pegvisomant on the last visit.

RESULTS

Median (range) pegvisomant doses (mg/day) were 10 (10-10), 15 (10-15) and 15 (10-15) at visits 2, 3 and 4, respectively, and the mean duration of pegvisomant treatment was 17·5 ± 3·2 (SEM) months. Serum IGF-I changed significantly during the treatment period with the highest level at baseline and lowest levels at visits 3 and 4. GH levels increased in a dose-dependent manner during pegvisomant treatment and decreased at visit 4. Changes in IGF-I levels correlated negatively with changes in serum pegvisomant levels between visits. Serum pegvisomant at each visit correlated with baseline growth hormone levels, whereas no associations between serum pegvisomant and either dose, gender, age or body weight were found.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Serum GH levels increased initially, but remained stable during prolonged pegvisomant treatment in patients with acromegaly, (2) serum pegvisomant levels predicted the reduction in serum IGF-I during treatment and (3) the interindividual variation in serum pegvisomant levels seems not predicted by either age, gender or body composition.

GH activity and markers of inflammation: a crossover study in healthy volunteers treated with GH and a GH receptor antagonist

INTRODUCTION

The GH/IGF1 axis may modulate inflammatory processes. However, the relationship seems complicated as both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects have been demonstrated.

METHODS/DESIGN

Twelve healthy volunteers (mean age 36, range 27-49 years) were treated in random order with increasing doses of GH for 3 weeks (first week 0.01  mg/kg per day, second week 0.02  mg/kg per day, and third week 0.03  mg/kg per day) or a GH receptor antagonist (pegvisomant; first week 10  mg/day and last two weeks 15  mg/day), separated by 8 weeks of washout. Circulating levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα (TNFA)), interleukin 6 (IL6), and IL1β (IL1B) and the acute phase proteins (APPs) C-reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin, orosomucoid, YKL40 (CHI3L1), and fibrinogen were measured.

RESULTS

During GH treatment, IGF1 (median 131 (Inter-quartile range (IQR) 112-166) vs 390 (322-524) μg/l, P=0.002) increased together with TNFα (0.87 (0.74-1.48) vs 1.27 (0.80-1.69) ng/l, P=0.003), IL6 (1.00 (0.83-1.55) vs 1.35 (0.80-4.28) ng/l, P=0.045), and fibrinogen (9.2 (8.8-9.6) vs 11.1 (9.4-12.4) μM, P=0.002). By contrast, orosomucoid decreased (18.0 (15.5-24.3) vs 15.0 (15.0-17.0) μM, P=0.018). CRP, YKL40, and haptoglobin were unchanged. During pegvisomant treatment, IGF1 decreased (139 (117-171) vs 91 (78-114) ng/ml, P=0.005). Orosomucoid (21.0 (16.3-23.8) vs 22.0 (17.0-29.3) μM, P=0.036) and CRP (1.00 (0.62-1.77) vs 1.43 (0.71-3.29) mg/l, P=0.074) increased without an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines.

CONCLUSIONS

GH/IGF1 action appears to modulate the initial stage of the inflammatory response as well as downstream processes elucidated by levels of APPs. The data suggest a complicated relationship not allowing any simple conclusions as to whether GH/IGF1 actions have mainly pro- or anti-inflammatory effects in vivo.

Fat content in liver and skeletal muscle changes in a reciprocal manner in patients with acromegaly during combination therapy with a somatostatin analog and a GH receptor antagonist: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Pegvisomant is a GH antagonist, which is used for the treatment of acromegalic patients. It effectively blocks the hepatic and peripheral effects of GH, but transient elevations in circulating liver enzymes of unknown pathogenesis may occur, which seems to be more prevalent when the treatment is combined with a somatostatin analog (SA). Accumulation of intrahepatic lipid is a known cause of elevated liver enzymes, and there is evidence to suggest that GH impacts lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to measure lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle in acromegalic patients before and after cotreatment with pegvisomant and SA as compared with SA monotherapy.

DESIGN

Eighteen acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy were randomized in a parallel study over 24 wk to 1) unchanged SA monotherapy, or 2) cotreatment with pegvisomant (15-30 mg twice a week) and SA (half the usual dosage).

SETTING

This was an investigator-initiated study in a single tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intrahepatic lipid (IHL) and intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) was assessed by ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RESULTS

IHL increased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.002). The increase was positively correlated to weekly pegvisomant dose (r² = 0.52; P = 0.01). By contrast, IMCL decreased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.01). These changes related neither to insulin sensitivity nor inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Cotreatment with pegvisomant and a reduced SA dose increase IHL and decrease IMCL compared with SA monotherapy. The clinical implications remain unclear, but increased IHL may be causally linked to the transient elevations in liver enzymes observed during pegvisomant treatment.

Cotreatment with pegvisomant and a somatostatin analog (SA) in SA-responsive acromegalic patients

CONTEXT

Cotreatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant and a somatostatin analog (SA) has proven feasible. Previous studies in the field have focused on patients with an insufficient response to SA monotherapy in whom pegvisomant was added without changing the SA dose.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to study whether patients sufficiently controlled on SA monotherapy can be transferred to combination therapy with low-dose pegvisomant and a reduced SA dose.

DESIGN

Eighteen acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy, mean ± se aged 54 ± 3 yr, were randomized in a parallel study over 24 wk to unchanged SA monotherapy or cotreatment with pegvisomant (15-30 mg twice a week) and SA (half the usual dosage).

SETTING

This was an investigator-initiated study in a single tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Glucose tolerance, substrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, body composition, and quality of life were measured.

RESULTS

Median pegvisomant dose was 52.5 mg/wk (range 30-60). IGF-I (micrograms per liter) was comparable both at baseline (P = 0.88) and after 24 wk of treatment (P = 0.48). The change in IGF-I between baseline and wk 24 also did not differ between groups (P = 0.15). Apart from increased peak insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test in the cotreatment group, no substantial differences between the two groups were detected. Moderately elevated liver enzymes were found in 17% of the patients on pegvisomant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy can maintain safe IGF-I levels during 24 wk of cotreatment with low-dose pegvisomant and a 50% reduced SA dose. This treatment modality, however, does not seem to provide significant benefits for the patients.

GH receptor blocker administration and muscle-tendon collagen synthesis in humans

CONTEXT

The growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis stimulates collagen synthesis in tendon and skeletal muscle, but no studies have investigated the effect of reducing IGF-I on collagen synthesis in healthy humans.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesised, that a GH blockade would decrease IGF-I and collagen synthesis in the connective tissue of skeletal muscle and tendon.

DESIGN

The study was randomised and double blinded.

PARTICIPANTS

20 healthy young males completed the study.

INTERVENTION

The participants were randomised to 2 weeks of GH receptor blocker supplementation (pegvisomant, 5 mg/day, n=9) or placebo (n=11).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) were measured before and after pegvisomant/placebo supplementation. Fractional synthesis rates (FSR) for collagen and myofibrillar protein were determined with stable isotopes in tendon and muscle, and mRNA for collagen (COL1A1 and COL3A1) as well as IGF-I isoforms (Ea and Ec) were measured in skeletal muscle.

RESULTS

Pegvisomant decreased serum IGF-I by 20% (p<0.01) and serum IGFBP-3 by 10% (p<0.05). Pegvisomant supplementation had no effect on collagen synthesis in tendon and skeletal muscle, nor was muscle myofibrillar protein synthesis affected. Similarly, pegvisomant supplementation had no effect on mRNA expression of IGF-I and collagen in skeletal muscle.

CONCLUSION

GH receptor blocker administration in healthy humans resulted in a moderate decrease in serum IGF-I. Collagen synthesis in tendon and skeletal muscle, as well as skeletal muscle IGF-I and collagen mRNA expression, was unaffected by GH receptor blocker supplementation.

Impact of growth hormone receptor blockade on substrate metabolism during fasting in healthy subjects

CONTEXT

Experimental studies in GH-deficient patients and in healthy subjects receiving somatostatin-infusion suggest that GH is an important regulator of substrate metabolism during fasting. These models may not adequately reflect the selective effects of GH, and GH receptor (GHR) blockade offers a new model to define the metabolic role of GH.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of GHR blockade on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity during fasting.

DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 10 healthy young men.

INTERVENTION

After 36 h of fasting with saline or pegvisomant (GHR blockade), the subjects were studied during a 4-h basal period and 2.5-h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

MAIN OUTCOME

We measured whole-body and forearm glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism, peripheral insulin sensitivity, and acyl and desacyl ghrelin.

RESULTS

GHR blockade significantly suppressed circulating free fatty acids (1226 +/- 83 vs. 1074 +/- 65 micromol/liter; P = 0.03) and ketone bodies (3080 +/- 271 vs. 2015 +/- 235 micromol/liter; P <or= 0.01), as well as forearm uptake of free fatty acids (0.341 +/- 0.150 vs. 0.004 +/- 0.119 micromol/100 ml x min; P < 0.01) and lipid oxidation (1.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.1 mg/kg x min; P = 0.03) in the basal period. By contrast, IGF-I levels in either serum or peripheral tissues were not impacted by GHR blockade, and protein metabolism was also unaffected. Basal glucose levels were elevated by GHR blockade, but insulin sensitivity was similar; this was associated with an increased acyl/desacyl ghrelin ratio.

CONCLUSION

GHR blockade, without changes in circulating or tissue IGF-I levels, selectively suppresses lipid mobilization and oxidation after short-term fasting. This supports the notion that stimulation of lipolysis is a primary and important effect of GH.