EUS-assisted band ligation of small duodenal stromal tumors and follow-up by EUS

Management of small subepithelial tumors by endoscopic banding without resection and single-incision needle-knife-assisted biopsy sampling: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) without resection combined with single-incision needle-knife (SINK) biopsy sampling may have a positive impact on small GI subepithelial tumor (SET) management, but the method needs to be tested. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of this strategy in small-sized SETs.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter observational cohort study in 7 centers included patients with SETs ≤15 mm (confirmed by EUS) between March 2017 and March 2020. The primary outcome was clinical success at 4 weeks, defined as complete SET disappearance on EUS. Secondary outcomes were long-term (1-year) clinical success, technical difficulty level, clinical impact, yield pathology, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 273 patients screened, 122 (62.3% women; mean age, 60.9 ± 13.2 years) were included with SETs (mean size, 9 ± 2.8 mm; gastric location, 77%; superficial layer dependence, 63%). The primary endpoint was achieved in 73.6% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-81.2). At the 1-year follow-up, the success rate was 68.4% (95% CI, 59.1-76.8). A favorable clinical impact was observed in 97 cases (79.5%; 95% CI, 71.3-86.3). Pathology diagnosis was known in 70%. Potentially malignant lesions were present in 24.7%. The related adverse events rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 1.3-9.3; all mild: 2 bleeding, 2 abdominal pain). On multivariable analysis, the ≤10-mm SET group was associated with a greater success rate (1 year, 87%; relative risk, 5.07; 95% CI, 2.63-9.8) and clinical impact rate (92.7%; relative risk, 6.15; 95% CI, 2.72-13.93).

CONCLUSIONS

EBL plus SINK biopsy sampling seems to be feasible and safe, and it may offer a favorable clinical impact in small-sized SETs. In particular, SETs ≤10 mm are the best candidates. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03247231.).

A deep learning-based system to identify originating mural layer of upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors under EUS

Background and Objective

EUS is the most accurate procedure to determine the originating mural layer and subsequently select the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, it requires superb technical and cognitive skills. In this study, we propose a system named SMT Master to determine the originating mural layer of SMTs under EUS.

Materials and Methods

We developed 3 models: deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) 1 for lesion segmentation, DCNN2 for mural layer segmentation, and DCNN3 for the originating mural layer classification. A total of 2721 EUS images from 201 patients were used to train the 3 models. We validated our model internally and externally using 283 images from 26 patients and 172 images from 26 patients, respectively. We applied 368 images from 30 patients for the man-machine contest and used 30 video clips to test the originating mural layer classification.

Results

In the originating mural layer classification task, DCNN3 achieved a classification accuracy of 84.43% and 80.68% at internal and external validations, respectively. In the video test, the accuracy was 80.00%. DCNN1 achieved Dice coefficients of 0.956 and 0.776 for lesion segmentation at internal and external validations, respectively, whereas DCNN2 achieved Dice coefficients of 0.820 and 0.740 at internal and external validations, respectively. The system achieved 90.00% accuracy in classification, which is comparable with that of EUS experts.

Conclusions

Our proposed system has the potential to solve difficulties in determining the originating mural layer of SMTs in EUS procedures, which relieves the EUS learning pressure of physicians.

Case report: Desmoid fibromatosis diagnosed in a 27-year-old male after being mistaken for a gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Despite being distinct lesions, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and desmoid fibromatosis may appear similar on imaging when they involve the stomach wall or bowel. As a result, they may be confused with one another when initially diagnosed. This report aims to present a case where a desmoid tumour was mistaken for a gastric GIST in a 27-year-old gentleman despite extensive investigation prior to exploratory laparotomy, and why differentiation through pathology, with a focus on the immunohistochemistry profile, is key for proper prognostication and appropriate management, including timely investigation for associated diseases such as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in patients with desmoid tumours.

Endoscopic banding without resection (BWR) technique for treatment of diminutive neuroendocrine tumors in the duodenum

Endoscopic treatment of diminutive (less than 10 mm) duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended because of the risk of metastatic potential. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are alternatives to surgical management but have significant adverse event rates. We evaluated the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of the 'banding without resection' (BWR) technique and assessed outcomes for the treatment of diminutive duodenal NETs. Our study included eight patients referred for endoscopic treatment of incidentally discovered, biopsy proven, diminutive duodenal bulb NETs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in all patients showed duodenal bulb NETs located in the deep mucosa and submucosal layers without any nodal metastasis. The BWR technique was successfully performed in all patients with technical feasibility, with the assistance of submucosal saline lift in three patients when the lesion was smaller than 5 mm in size, without any immediate or delayed adverse events. Complete resection with no residual lesion was confirmed at short-term (median 2.3 months) and long-term (median 4.2 years) follow-up intervals by repeat endoscopy, biopsy, and EUS exam. The BWR technique appears to be a safe, feasible, and effective therapy for endoscopic treatment of diminutive duodenal bulb NETs in the absence of local and distant metastasis.

Endoscopic band ligation without resection in selected patients for small and superficial upper gastrointestinal tract lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in carefully selected patients who would benefit from this method of resection.

METHODS

Patients with early upper gastrointestinal and small (< 15 mm) lesions treated with EBL (Duette® Multi-Band Mucosectomy) were prospectively recruited and retrospectively analyzed between 2010 and 2015. All cases were discussed in a multidisciplinary cancer committee and it was concluded that, owing to patient conditions, surgery was not possible and that not conducting histology would not change the clinical management. A first endoscopic control with biopsies was planned at 4-8 weeks. If there was no persistence of the lesion, new controls were programmed at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The group (n = 12) included 5 esophagus lesions (adenosquamous carcinoma, n = 1; carcinoma squamous, n = 2; adenocarcinoma, n = 2); 4 gastric lesions (high grade dysplasia, n = 1; adenocarcinoma, n = 2; neuroendocrine tumor [NET], n = 1), and 3 duodenal lesions (NETs) (n = 3). The mean tumor diameter was 9.6 ± 2.8 mm (range 4-15). Only one minor adverse event was described. At first follow-up (4-8 weeks), there was 91.6% and 75% of endoscopic and histological remission, respectively. At 6-month follow-up there was 70% of both endoscopic remission and negative biopsies. And at 12 months, there was 100% and 75% of endoscopic and histological remission, respectively. Persisting lesions were T1 cancers. The median follow-up was 30.6 months.

CONCLUSION

EBL without resection is an easy and safe technique that should be considered in patients with multiple morbidities and small superficial UGI lesions.

Ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation for treatment of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria: a preliminary study

An innovative ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation (EE-L) technique was developed for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal subepithelial lesions (smaller than 12 mm) originating from muscularis propria by combining endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic enucleation techniques. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of EE-L technique in the treatment of esophageal subepithelial lesions (smaller than 12 mm) originating from muscularis propria. Forty-seven esophageal subepithelial lesions (smaller than 12 mm) originating from the muscularis propria in 44 patients were treated with EE-L between September 2010 and September 2012. The lesion was first aspirated into the transparent cap attached to the tip of endoscope. The elastic band was then released around its base. The purpose of ligation was to force the lesion to assume a polypoid form with a pseudostalk. Endoscopic enucleation was then performed until the tumor was completely enucleated from muscularis propria using a hook knife and forceps. All tumors (median diameter: 8.2 ± 2.3 mm, range: 4-12 mm) were enucleated completely. Histopathology identified 45 tumors (95.7%) as leiomyoma, 2 (4.3%) tumors as gastrointestinal stromal tumor with very low risk. The mean time of the EE-L procedure was 12.5 ± 4.6 minutes (range: 6-23 minutes). Two patients experienced self-limiting, non-life-threatening hemorrhage after EE-L. No perforation and massive hemorrhage requiring further endoscopic or surgical intervention occurred. There were no recurrences during the 6-24 months follow-up period. EE-L offers the option of localized treatment of small esophageal muscularis propria tumors (smaller than 12 mm) with relatively few complications and low mortality, and provides the advantage of allowing a histopathological diagnosis. All the resected lesions in this study had a benign pathology.

Ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation for the treatment of colorectal submucosal tumours originating in the muscularis propria

AIM

A ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation (EE-L) technique was developed and was evaluated to determine its efficacy and safety for treating colorectal submucosal tumours (< 10 mm) originating in the muscularis propria.

METHOD

EE-L was used to treat 13 patients between January 2011 and January 2014. The tumour was sucked into a transparent cap and ligated at its base by a rubber band ligature attached to the tip of the endoscope. With the creation of a pseudo-stalk, the tumour was then enucleated using endoscopic dissection and the wound was closed with clips.

RESULTS

All tumours [median diameter 6.8 (4-10) mm] were successfully enucleated [procedure time 19 (11-27) min]. Histopathological examination identified 11 (84.6%) to be leiomyoma and 2 (15.4%) low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours. No perforations or massive haemorrhage occurred and there were no recurrences during a follow-up of 3-39 months.

CONCLUSION

EE-L is a successful technique for the removal of small colorectal tumours in the muscularis propria with few complications and enables a histopathological diagnosis. In this study, all the resected lesions had a benign pathology.

Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are usually discovered fortuitously during routine endoscopy, including various non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered to be the best imaging procedure to characterize SMTs and to determine the need for further treatment. In this review, the following issues will be addressed: The role of EUS in diagnosis for SMTs, tissue diagnosis for SMTs and the influence of EUS on endoscopic resection techniques for SMTs.

The role of hemoclips reinforcement in the ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation for small GISTs in gastric fundus

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography- (EUS-) assisted band ligation has been proven to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) apart from the relatively high risk of the postligation perforation of the gastric fundus. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of hemoclip reinforcement in treating small GISTs in the gastric fundus.

METHOD

During a standard endoscopy, a transparent cap attached to the endoscopic tip was placed over the lesion to exert sustained maximal aspiration before a rubber band was released. Once a definite ligation was confirmed by EUS, the tumor was enucleated. Four to 6 hemoclips were placed on the folds around the ligation band to reduce the tension of the ligation site.

RESULTS

The small GISTs were resected completely in 192 patients. Two cases of delayed perforation were found 72 hours after the procedure and successfully treated with an ordinary conservative method.

CONCLUSION

Hemoclip-reinforced endoscopic band ligation with systematic follow-up using EUS appears to be a simple and effective technique for the resection of small GISTs in the gastric fundus.

Endoscopic removal of symptomatic gastric heterotopic pancreas: a report of nine cases

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic removal of symptomatic gastric heterotopic pancreas (HP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2011, 9 patients with suspected symptomatic HP were enrolled in the study. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed to clarify the HP tissue location and to choose the endoscopic resection method. Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed to remove the HP tissue. Symptoms in the enrolled patients were assessed before and after endoscopic removal of the HP tissue. Tumor pathology and complications were recorded after the treatment. A standard follow-up was scheduled at 1 week and 2 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Removal of suspected HP with endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was successful in all 9 cases. Abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and bleeding occurred in 6 patients, 2 patients, and 1 patient, respectively, after treatment and were relieved by symptomatic treatment. There were no other unpredictable complications. The symptoms related to HP, including epigastric pain, bloating, and postprandial fullness, were relieved significantly after the treatment. During follow-up, there was no recurrence of HP in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe and effective method to treat gastric lesions suspected to be HP with symptoms. The symptoms, such as epigastric pain, bloating, and postprandial fullness were well resolved after endoscopic treatment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: Surgical management and survival results

AIM: To provide long-term survival results of operable duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs) in a tertiary center in China.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, the pathological data of 28 patients with DGISTs who had been treated surgically at the Second Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) from June 1998 to December 2006 were reviewed. All pathological slides were examined by a single pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. In patients whose diagnosis was not confirmed by immunohistochemistry at the time of resection, representative paraffin blocks were reassembled, and sections were studied using antibodies against CD117 (c-kit), CD34, smooth muscle actin (SMA), vimentin, S-100, actin (HHF35), and desmin. Operative procedures were classified as wedge resection (WR, local resection with pure closure, without duodenal transection or anastomosis), segmental resection [SR, duodenal transection with Roux-Y or Billroth II gastrojejunostomy (G-J), end-to-end duodenoduodenostomy (D-D), end-to-end or end-to-side duodenojejunostomy (D-J)], and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, Whipple operation with pancreatojejunostomy). R0 resection was pursued in all cases, and at least R1 resection was achieved. Regional lymphadenectomy was not performed. Clinical manifestations, surgery, medical treatment and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Related studies in the literature were reviewed.

RESULTS: There were 12 males and 16 females patients, with a median age of 53 years (20-76 years). Their major complaints were “gastrointestinal bleeding” (57.2%) and “nonspecific discomfort” (32.1%). About 14.3%, 60.7%, 17.9%, and 7.1% of the tumors originated in the first to fourth portion, respectively, with a median size of 5.8 cm (1.6-20 cm). Treatment was by WR in 5 cases (17.9%), SR in 13 cases (46.4%), and by PD in 10 cases (35.7%). The morbidity and mortality rates were 35.7% and 3.6%, respectively. The median post-operative stay was 14.5 d (5-47 d). During a follow-up of 61 (23-164) mo, the 2-year and 5-year relapse-free survival was 83.3% and 50%, respectively. Eighty-four related articles were reviewed.

CONCLUSION: Surgeons can choose to perform limited resection or PD for operable DGISTs if clear surgical margins are achieved. Comprehensive treatment is necessary.

Selective endoscopic ligation for treatment of upper gastrointestinal protuberant lesions

This study explored the clinical value of endoscopic ligation for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (GI) protuberant lesions in children. According to the appearance and size of lesions, we used different ligation techniques for the treatment of the lesions. Endoscopic ultrasonography was used for preliminary characterization of the lesions. One case diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome was successfully treated by a detachable snare. Two cases with semi-pedunculated or broad-base lesions originating from the submucosal layer of the upper GI were treated with endoscopic variceal ligation; endoscopic examination showed that one case had complete healing 11 wk after ligation, while an ulcer scar was observed at the ligation site after 6 wk in the other case. All lesions were successfully ligated at the first attempt. No significant complications occurred either during or after the procedure. Selective endoscopic ligation of upper GI lesions is an effective and safe treatment for upper GI protuberant lesions in children.

Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are usually discovered fortuitously during routine endoscopy, including various non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered to be the best imaging procedure to characterize SMTs and to determine the need for further treatment. In this review, the following issues will be addressed: The role of EUS in diagnosis for SMTs, tissue diagnosis for SMTs and the influence of EUS on endoscopic resection techniques for SMTs.

A gist of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have been recognized as a biologically distinctive tumor type, different from smooth muscle and neural tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). They constitute the majority of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors of the GIT and are known to be refractory to conventional chemotherapy or radiation. They are defined and diagnosed by the expression of a proto-oncogene protein detected by immunohistochemistry which serves as a crucial diagnostic and therapeutic target. The identification of these mutations has resulted in a better understanding of their oncogenic mechanisms. The remarkable antitumor effects of the molecular inhibitor imatinib have necessitated accurate diagnosis of GIST and their distinction from other gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors. Both traditional and minimally invasive surgery are used to remove these tumors with minimal morbidity and excellent perioperative outcomes. The revolutionary use of specific, molecularly-targeted therapies, such as imatinib mesylate, reduces the frequency of disease recurrence when used as an adjuvant following complete resection. Neoadjuvant treatment with these agents appears to stabilize disease in the majority of patients and may reduce the extent of surgical resection required for subsequent complete tumor removal. The important interplay between the molecular genetics of GIST and responses to targeted therapeutics serves as a model for the study of targeted therapies in other solid tumors. This review summarizes our current knowledge and recent advances regarding the histogenesis, pathology, molecular biology, the basis for the novel targeted cancer therapy and current evidence based management of these unique tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the role of the gastroenterologist in diagnosis and risk stratification

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that are best classified as sarcomas with variable aggressiveness. They are typically treated with surgical resection and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors or, for advanced/metastatic GISTs, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone. Gastroenterologists are often the first to detect GISTs and are, therefore, tasked with diagnosis and facilitation of early intervention. Diagnostic tools including various imaging techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-assisted tissue sampling are critical for an accurate diagnosis. In the case of small tumors, EUS-assisted resection or ligation techniques to treat asymptomatic small tumors have been described. This paper reviews current evidence for the diagnosis and management of GISTs, with an emphasis on the role of the gastroenterologist.

EUS for choosing best endoscopic treatment of mesenchymal tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract

AIM: To evaluate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the choice of endoscopic therapy strategies for mesenchymal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS: From July 2004 to September 2010, 1050 patients with upper gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) were diagnosed using EUS. Among them, 201 patients underwent different endoscopic therapies based on the deriving layers, growth patterns and lesion sizes.

RESULTS: Using EUS, we found 543 leiomyomas and 507 stromal tumors. One hundred and thirty-three leiomyomas and 24 stromal tumors were treated by snare electrosection, 6 leiomyomas and 20 stromal tumors were treated by endoloop, 10 stromal tumors were treated by endoscopic mucosal resection and 8 stromal tumors were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Complete resection of the lesion was achieved in all cases. Of the mesenchymal tumors, 90.38% diagnosed by EUS were also identified by pathohistology. All wounds were closed up nicely and no recurrence was found in the follow-up after 2 mo.

CONCLUSION: EUS is an effective means of diagnosis for upper GIMTs and is an important tool in choosing the endoscopic therapy for GIMTs, by which the lesions can be treated safely and effectively.