The impact of pre-transplant allosensitization on outcomes after lung transplantation

Advancing precision in histocompatibility and immunogenetics: a comprehensive review of the UCLA exchange program

Precise typing of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) is crucial for clinical hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantations, transfusion medicine, HLA-related disease association, and drug hypersensitivity analysis. The UCLA Cell Exchange program has played a vital role in providing educational and proficiency testing surveys to HLA laboratories worldwide for the past 5 decades. This article highlights the significant contribution of the UCLA Cell and DNA Exchange Programs in advancing HLA antibody testing, genotyping, crossmatches, and, more recently, virtual crossmatches. Additionally, we discuss future directions of the UCLA Cell Exchange program to support histocompatibility testing to adapt to the fast-evolving field of immunotherapy, tolerance and xenotransplantation.

Lung transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies: a 9-year single-center experience

Pretransplant allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) increases the recipient's waiting list time and mortality in lung transplantation. Rather than waiting for crossmatch-negative donors, since 2013, recipients with preformed donor-specific antiHLA antibodies (pfDSA) have been managed with repeated IgA- and IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin (IgGAM) infusions, usually in combination with plasmapheresis before IgGAM and a single dose of antiCD20 antibody. This retrospective study presents our 9-year experience with patients transplanted with pfDSA. Records of patients transplanted between February 2013 and May 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients with pfDSA and those without any de novo donor-specific antiHLA antibodies. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Of the 1,043 patients who had undergone lung transplantation, 758 (72.7%) did not develop any early donor-specific antiHLA antibodies, and 62 (5.9%) patients exhibited pfDSA. Among the 52 (84%) patients who completed treatment, pfDSA was cleared in 38 (73%). In pfDSA vs control patients and at 8-year follow-up, respectively, graft survival (%) was 75 vs 65 (P = .493) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (%) was 63 vs 65 (P = .525). In lung transplantation, crossing the preformed HLA-antibody barrier is safe using a treatment protocol based on IgGAM. Patients with pfDSA have a good 8-year graft survival rate and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, similar to control patients.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a form of lung allograft rejection that is emerging as an important risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and decreased long-term survival. In this review, we provide a brief overview of our current understanding of its pathophysiology with an emphasis on donor-specific antibodies before moving on to focus on the current diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Our goal is to discuss the limitations of our current knowledge and explore how novel diagnostic and therapeutic options aim to improve outcomes through earlier definitive diagnosis and preemptive targeted treatment.

Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation

(1) Calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) is a measure of sensitization based on unacceptable antigens (UAs). Determination of UAs based on single-antigen bead assays at allele or antigen levels may be inappropriate. We aimed to introduce eplets for better assessment of sensitization; (2) 900 recipients and 1427 donors were enrolled for candidate or donor pools, respectively. Eplets were from the HLA Epitope Registry. UAs were determined by anti-HLA antibodies identified using LIFECODES Single Antigen (LSA) kits. CPRA values were calculated using a simplified method of donor filtering; (3) HLA antigens containing all eplets of an HLA antigen in LSA kits (LSA antigen) were defined as eplet-predicted (EP) antigens, the reactivity of which could be predicted by that LSA antigen. High reactivity concordance was found between LSA and EP antigens. More HLA antigens were covered by EP antigens in the population than LSA antigens. CPRA values at the EP level were higher than at the allele level and lower than at the antigen level. The EP antigens facilitated UA determination for non-LSA antigens and avoided acute rejection; (4) UA determination using EP antigens can lead to more accurate assessment of sensitization, enabling a high probability of compatible organs and a low risk of adverse outcomes.

Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle

Lung transplantation is the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage chronic lung diseases. However, chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading obstacle to improved long-term outcomes. Traditionally, lung allograft rejection has been considered primarily as a manifestation of cellular immune responses. However, in reality, an array of complex, interacting and multifactorial mechanisms contribute to its emergence. Alloimmune-dependent mechanisms, including T-cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, as well as non-alloimmune injuries, have been implicated. Moreover, a role has emerged for autoimmune responses to lung self-antigens in the development of chronic graft injury. The aim of this review is to summarise the immune processes involved in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, with advanced insights into the role of innate immune pathways and crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity, and to identify gaps in current knowledge.

Lung Retransplantation

Lung retransplantation remains the standard treatment of irreversible lung allograft failure. The most common indications for lung retransplantation are acute graft failure, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and postoperative airway complications. Careful patient selection with regards to indications, anatomy, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (specifically renal dysfunction), and immunologic consideration are of utmost importance. The conduct of the lung retransplantation operation is arduous with special considerations given to operative approach, type of surgery (single vs bilateral), use of extracorporeal circulatory support, and hematological management. Outcomes have improved significantly for most patients, nearing short and midterm outcomes of primary lung recipients in select cases.

Markers of rejection of a lung allograft: state of the art

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) affects approximately 50% of all lung transplant recipients by 5 post-operative years and is the leading cause of death in lung transplant recipients. Early CLAD diagnosis or ideally prediction of CLAD is essential to enable early intervention before significant lung injury occurs. New technologies have emerged to facilitate biomarker discovery, including epigenetic modification and single-cell RNA sequencing. This review examines new and existing technologies for biomarker discovery and the current state of research on biomarkers for identifying lung transplant rejection.

The allograft injury marker CXCL9 determines prognosis of anti-HLA antibodies after lung transplantation

Despite the common detection of non-donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (non-DSAs) after lung transplantation, their clinical significance remains unclear. In this retrospective single-center cohort study of 325 lung transplant recipients, we evaluated the association between donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) and non-DSAs with subsequent CLAD development. DSAs were detected in 30% of recipients and were associated with increased CLAD risk, with higher HRs for both de novo and high MFI (>5000) DSAs. Non-DSAs were detected in 56% of recipients, and 85% of DSA positive tests had concurrent non-DSAs. In general, non-DSAs did not increase CLAD risk in multivariable models accounting for DSAs. However, non-DSAs in conjunction with high BAL CXCL9 levels were associated with increased CLAD risk. Multivariable proportional hazards models demonstrate the importance of the HLA antibody-CXCL9 interaction: CLAD risk increases when HLA antibodies (both DSAs and non-DSAs) are detected in conjunction with high CXCL9. Conversely, CLAD risk is not increased when HLA antibodies are detected with low CXCL9. This study supports the potential utility of BAL CXCL9 measurement as a biomarker to risk stratify HLA antibodies for future CLAD. The ability to discriminate between high versus low-risk HLA antibodies may improve management by allowing for guided treatment decisions.

Approaching the sensitized lung patient: risk assessment for donor acceptance

The presence of HLA antibodies is widely recognized as a barrier to solid organ transplantation, and for lung transplant candidates, it has a significant negative impact on both waiting time and waiting list mortality. Although HLA antibodies have been associated with a broad spectrum of allograft damage, precise characterization of these antibodies in allosensitized candidates may enhance their accessibility to transplant. The introduction of Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays has significantly improved antibody detection sensitivity and specificity, but SAB alone is not sufficient for risk-stratification. Functional characterization of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is paramount to increase donor accessibility for allosensitized lung candidates. We describe here our approach to evaluate sensitized lung transplant candidates. By employing state-of-the-art technologies to assess histocompatibility and determine physiological properties of circulating HLA antibodies, we can provide our Clinical Team a better risk assessment for lung transplant candidates and facilitate a "road map" to transplant. The cases presented in this paper illustrate the "individualized steps" taken to determine calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA), titer and complement-fixing properties of each HLA antibody present in circulation. When a donor is considered, we can better predict the risk associated with potentially crossing HLA antibodies, thereby allowing the Clinical Team to approach allosensitized lung patients with an individualized medicine approach. To facilitate safe access of sensitized lung transplant candidates to potential donors, a synergy between the histocompatibility laboratory and the Clinical Team is essential. Ultimately, donor acceptance is a decision based on several parameters, leading to a risk-stratification unique for each patient.

Complications of Lung Transplantation: Update on Imaging Manifestations and Management

As lung transplantation has become the most effective definitive treatment option for end-stage chronic respiratory diseases, yearly rates of this surgery have been steadily increasing. Despite improvement in surgical techniques and medical management of transplant recipients, complications from lung transplantation are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Some of these complications can be classified on the basis of the time they typically occur after lung transplantation, while others may occur at any time. Imaging studies, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory evaluation, are key components in diagnosing and monitoring these conditions. Therefore, radiologists play a critical role in recognizing and communicating findings suggestive of lung transplantation complications. A description of imaging features of the most common lung transplantation complications, including surgical, medical, immunologic, and infectious complications, as well as an update on their management, will be reviewed here. Keywords: Pulmonary, Thorax, Surgery, Transplantation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Lung Transplantation and the Era of the Sensitized Patient

Long term outcomes in lung transplant are limited by the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Within the past several decades, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been recognized as a risk factor for CLAD. The presence of HLA antibodies in lung transplant candidates, "sensitized patients" may predispose patients to AMR, CLAD, and higher mortality after transplant. This review will discuss issues surrounding the sensitized patient, including mechanisms of sensitization, implications within lung transplant, and management strategies.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a widely recognized form of lung allograft rejection, with mounting evidence for AMR as an important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and markedly decreased long-term survival. Despite the recent development of the consensus diagnostic criteria, it remains a challenging diagnosis of exclusion. Furthermore, even after diagnosis, treatment directed at pulmonary AMR has been nearly exclusively derived from practices with other solid-organ transplants and other areas of medicine, such that there is a significant lack of data regarding the efficacy for these in pulmonary AMR. Lastly, outcomes after AMR remain quite poor despite aggressive treatment. In this review, we revisit the history of AMR in lung transplantation, describe our current understanding of its pathophysiology, discuss the use and limitations of the consensus diagnostic criteria, review current treatment strategies, and summarize long-term outcomes. We conclude with a synopsis of our most pressing gaps in knowledge, introduce recommendations for future directions, and highlight promising areas of active research.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation has been recognized as an important risk factor for poor outcomes over the past 20 years. Recently, this has been a focus of intense research, and the purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of humoral responses and important recent findings as well as to identify areas of future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have identified donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) as an important biomarker associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Importantly, ddcfDNA levels are noted to be elevated approximately 3 months before the onset of clinical allograft dysfunction, making ddcfDNA a particularly appealing biomarker to predict the onset of AMR. Additional notable recent findings include the identification of an independent association between the isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from respiratory specimens and the development of DSA. This finding provides potential insights into crosstalk between innate and alloimmune responses and identifies a potential therapeutic target to prevent the development of DSA.

SUMMARY

Progress in the field of humoral responses after lung transplantation has been slow, but ongoing and future research in this area are critically necessary to improve patient outcomes in the future.

Desensitization and management of allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits the success of lung transplantation. Among the risk factors associated with CLAD, we recognize pretransplant circulating antibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will summarize current data surrounding management of desensitization, ACR, AMR, and CLAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies in managing in highly sensitized patients waiting for lung transplant include avoidance of specific HLA antigens and reduction of circulating anti-HLA antibodies at time of transplant. Several multimodal approaches have been studied in the treatment of AMR with a goal to clear circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and to halt the production of new antibodies. Different immunosuppressive strategies focus on influence of the host immune system, particularly T-cell responses, in order to prevent ACR and the progression of CLAD.

SUMMARY

The lack of significant evidence and consensus limits to draw conclusion regarding the impact of specific immunosuppressive regimens in the management of HLA antibodies, ACR, and CLAD. Development of novel therapeutic agents and use of multicenter randomized clinical trials will allow to better define patient-specific treatments and improve the length and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Clinical Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in the Presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies

Rationale: There is significant variation in approach to pre-lung transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), with some centers declining to cross any DSA. We implemented a protocol for transplantation for candidates with pretransplant DSA so long as a prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, regardless of number, specificity, class, or mean fluorescence intensity.Objectives: To compare post-transplant outcomes including overall survival, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival, antibody-mediated rejection, and acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients where pretransplant DSA was and was not present.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. For recipients with pretransplant DSA, if the prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, the donor offer was accepted and plasmapheresis was performed within 24 hours of transplantation and continued until retrospective crossmatch results returned. Immunosuppression and post-transplant management were not otherwise modified.Results: Of the 203 included recipients, 18 (8.9%) had pretransplant DSA. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity was 4,000 (interquartile range, 2,975-5,625; total range, 2,100-17,000). The median number of DSA present per patient was one (interquartile range, 1-2). The presence of pretransplant DSA was not associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3.4) or decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-2.1). Recipients with pretransplant DSA were more likely to require prolonged mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 7.0; 95% CI, 2.3-21.6) and to have antibody-mediated rejection requiring treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.0-55.8).Conclusions: A protocol of accepting donor offers for lung transplant candidates with preformed, complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch-negative DSA is associated with increased need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and antibody-mediated rejection without affecting short-term overall or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival.

The impact of HLA-DR mismatch status on retransplant-free survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome‒free survival among sensitized lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Donor‒recipient HLA-DR locus matching may be protective against bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients. It is unknown whether this benefit is more significant among sensitized (calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRAs) of >0%) and highly sensitized (CPRAs of ≥80%) recipients who may be at a higher risk for BOS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent lung transplantation between May 5, 2005 and May 31, 2019. Retransplant-free survival and BOS-free survival were compared among recipients with 0 vs ≥1 DR mismatches, grouped according to sensitization.

RESULTS

Among all 20,355 included recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was associated with improved retransplant-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74-0.93, p = 0.002) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96, p = 0.007). Among sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was also associated with improved retransplant-free survival (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.97, p = 0.02) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67-1.00, p = 0.04). There was however no difference in retransplant-free or BOS-free survival between sensitized and non-sensitized recipients with 0 DR mismatches. Among highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with retransplant-free or BOS-free survival. Among sensitized and highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with reduced use of plasmapheresis or reduced biopsy-proven, treated acute cellular rejection compared with non-sensitized recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-DR matching is associated with a similar improvement in retransplant-free and BOS-free survival among non-sensitized and sensitized lung transplant recipients. DR matching does not confer a more substantial retransplant-free or BOS-free survival benefit to highly sensitized recipients than to non-sensitized recipients.

Association between Allosensitization and Waiting List Outcomes among Adult Lung Transplant Candidates in the United States

Rationale: Allosensitization may be a barrier to lung transplant. Currently, consideration is not given to allosensitization when assigning priority on the lung transplant waiting list. Objectives: We aimed to examine the association between allosensitization and waiting list outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults listed for lung transplant at our center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016. We screened candidates for human leukocyte antigen antibodies before listing and examined the association between allosensitization and waiting list outcomes, including likelihood of transplant and death on the waiting list, using a competing risk model. Calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) was used as a continuous measure of allosensitization. Results: Among 746 candidates who were listed for lung transplant during the study period, 263 (35%) were allosensitized, and 483 (65%) were not. In unadjusted analysis, allosensitized candidates had a decreased likelihood of transplant compared with nonallosensitized candidates (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.83; P < 0.001) and were more likely to die on the waiting list (sHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.08-2.58; P < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, increasing CPRA was associated with an increased risk of death and a decreased likelihood of transplant (sHR for death, 1.15 per 10% increase in CPRA; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22; P < 0.001; sHR for transplant, 0.89 per 10% increase in CPRA; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Broad allosensitization was associated with longer waiting times, decreased likelihood of transplant, and increased risk of death among candidates on the waiting list for lung transplant. Consideration of allosensitization in organ allocation strategies might help mitigate this increased risk in highly allosensitized candidates.

Developments in lung transplantation over the past decade

With an improved median survival of 6.2 years, lung transplantation has become an increasingly acceptable treatment option for end-stage lung disease. Besides survival benefit, improvement of quality of life is achieved in the vast majority of patients. Many developments have taken place in the field of lung transplantation over the past decade. Broadened indication criteria and bridging techniques for patients awaiting lung transplantation have led to increased waiting lists and changes in allocation schemes worldwide. Moreover, the use of previously unacceptable donor lungs for lung transplantation has increased, with donations from donors after cardiac death, donors with increasing age and donors with positive smoking status extending the donor pool substantially. Use of ex vivo lung perfusion further increased the number of lungs suitable for lung transplantation. Nonetheless, the use of these previously unacceptable lungs did not have detrimental effects on survival and long-term graft outcomes, and has decreased waiting list mortality. To further improve long-term outcomes, strategies have been proposed to modify chronic lung allograft dysfunction progression and minimise toxic immunosuppressive effects. This review summarises the developments in clinical lung transplantation over the past decade.

Many developments have taken place in lung transplantation over the last decade: indications have broadened, donor criteria expanded, allocations systems changed, and novel therapeutic interventions implemented, leading to improved long-term survivalhttp://bit.ly/2vnpwc1

Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a significant form of acute allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation. The development of consensus diagnostic criteria has created a uniform definition of AMR; however, significant limitations of these criteria have been identified. Treatment modalities for AMR have been adapted from other areas of medicine and data on the effectiveness of these therapies in AMR are limited. AMR is often refractory to these therapies, and graft failure and death are common. AMR is associated with increased rates of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and poor long-term survival. In this review, we discuss the history of AMR and describe known mechanisms, application of the consensus diagnostic criteria, data for current treatment strategies, and long-term outcomes. In addition, we highlight current gaps in knowledge, ongoing research, and future directions to address these gaps. Promising diagnostic techniques are actively being investigated that may allow for early detection and treatment of AMR. We conclude that further investigation is required to identify and define chronic and subclinical AMR, and head-to-head comparisons of currently used treatment protocols are necessary to identify an optimal treatment approach. Gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of AMR continue to exist and future research should focus on these aspects.

Early Identification of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: The Need of Biomarkers

A growing number of patients with end-stage lung disease have benefited from lung transplantation (LT). Improvements in organ procurement, surgical techniques and intensive care management have greatly increased short-term graft survival. However, long-term outcomes remain limited, mainly due to the onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), whose diagnosis is based on permanent loss of lung function after the development of irreversible lung lesions. CLAD is associated with high mortality and morbidity, and its exact physiopathology is still only partially understood. Many researchers and clinicians have searched for CLAD biomarkers to improve diagnosis, to refine the phenotypes associated with differential prognosis and to identify early biological processes that lead to CLAD to enable an early intervention that could modify the inevitable degradation of respiratory function. Donor-specific antibodies are currently the only biomarkers used in routine clinical practice, and their significance for accurately predicting CLAD is still debated. We describe here significant studies that have highlighted potential candidates for reliable and non-invasive biomarkers of CLAD in the fields of imaging and functional monitoring, humoral immunity, cell-mediated immunity, allograft injury, airway remodeling and gene expression. Such biomarkers would improve CLAD prediction and allow differential LT management regarding CLAD risk.

Detection and clinical impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies in lung transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There is significant variability in lung transplant centers' approach to HLA antibodies, creating heterogeneity regarding their clinical significance. Some institutions use beads coated with multiple HLA to screen candidate sera and then use single antigen bead (SAB) to determine antibody identity if the pre-screen is positive. Other centers do not pre-screen, using SAB alone, which may detect low-level antibodies of unknown significance. The primary objective of this study was to review the current literature to identify sources of heterogeneity in the identification of pre- and post-lung transplant HLA antibodies, particularly regarding antibody-detection methods. A random effects model meta-analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between pre-transplant HLA antibodies and the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and dnDSA and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Each outcome was stratified by the method of antibody detection (pre-screen followed by SAB vs SAB alone). We identified 13 cohort studies with a total of 3039 patients. The use of pre-screening followed by SAB testing and the use of induction immunosuppression were associated with lower prevalence of dnDSA. Patients with pre-transplant HLA antibodies were more likely to develop dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.86, P < .001). dnDSA was associated with CLAD (HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.37-2.97, P < .001). When considering studies using SAB alone, however, pre-transplant antibody status was no longer associated with dnDSA and dnDSA was no longer associated with CLAD. Based on the current literature, SAB-alone testing may detect less clinically relevant antibodies than pre-screening followed by SAB.

Acute rejection

Despite induction immunosuppression and the use of aggressive maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, acute allograft rejection following lung transplantation is still a problem with important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. As well as causing early graft loss and mortality, acute rejection also initiates the chronic alloimmune responses and airway-centred inflammation that predispose to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), also known as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is a major source of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Cellular responses to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the allograft have traditionally been considered the main mechanism of acute rejection, but the influence of humoral immunity is increasingly recognised. As with other several other solid organ transplants, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a well-accepted and distinct clinical entity in lung transplantation. While acute cellular rejection (ACR) has defined histopathological criteria, transbronchial biopsy is less useful in AMR and its diagnosis is complicated by challenges in the measurement of antibodies directed against donor HLA, and a determination of their significance. Increasing awareness of the importance of non-HLA antigens further clouds this issue. Here, we review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of ACR and AMR in lung transplantation, and discuss future potential biomarkers of both processes that may forward our understanding of these conditions.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.