Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care: Knowledge and Practices among General Practitioners in Western Australia

A qualitative study of perceptions of the care pathway for familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis, treatment, and family cascade screening

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic condition that carries increased risk for premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular events, and death. Due to low uptake of evidence-based practices, up to 80% of FH patients remain undiagnosed and most are undertreated. This project aimed to understand patient and clinician perceptions across the care pathway of evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of FH, to inform implementation strategy design for two clinical trials seeking to increase evidence-based care.

METHODS

With input from FH experts, we identified key points along the FH care pathway that might be targeted with broad-scale implementation efforts, including: (a) identification of the need for screening; (b) completion of screening test(s); (c) diagnosis; (d) connection to treatment; and (e) family cascade screening (a process used to identify and screen relatives of individuals diagnosed with FH). Then, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had participated in a prior FH quality improvement initiative and with clinicians who treat high cholesterol. We analyzed data using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 21 patients and 17 clinicians. Patient themes offered insights related to the impact of family history, reactions to a diagnosis of high cholesterol and/or FH, experiences with FH treatment and clinical care, perceptions of tools to diagnose FH, motivations and preferences for FH screening efforts, and reactions to family screening. Clinician themes offered insights into the perceived value of FH screening and diagnosis, current FH-related practice and context, and attitudes toward tools to aid clinical practice. In both sets of interviews, confusion and misconceptions about what makes FH unique and its clinical implications were common, as were concerns about logistics and competing priorities.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative inquiry generated insights into several modifiable patient and clinician determinants of engagement with evidence-based implementation along the FH care pathway, many of which can be targeted with behavioral economics strategies that simplify complex decisions and by addressing informational and emotional needs. These findings offer actionable insights to inform future implementation research that seeks to close the evidence-to-practice gap in diagnosis and delivery of evidence-based care for FH.

Enhanced identification of familial hypercholesterolemia using central laboratory algorithms

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a highly prevalent genetic disorder resulting in markedly elevated LDL cholesterol levels and premature coronary artery disease. FH underdiagnosis and undertreatment require novel detection methods. This study evaluated the effectiveness of using an LDL cholesterol cut-off ≥99.5th percentile (sex- and age-adjusted) to identify clinical and genetic FH, and investigated underutilization of genetic testing and undertreatment in FH patients.

METHODS

Individuals with at least one prior LDL cholesterol level ≥99.5th percentile were selected from a laboratory database containing lipid profiles of 590,067 individuals. The study comprised three phases: biochemical validation of hypercholesterolemia, clinical identification of FH, and genetic determination of FH.

RESULTS

Of 5614 selected subjects, 2088 underwent lipid profile reassessment, of whom 1103 completed the questionnaire (mean age 64.2 ± 12.7 years, 48% male). In these 1103 subjects, mean LDL cholesterol was 4.0 ± 1.4 mmol/l and 722 (65%) received lipid-lowering therapy. FH clinical diagnostic criteria were met by 282 (26%) individuals, of whom 85% had not received guideline-recommended genetic testing and 97% failed to attain LDL cholesterol targets. Of 459 individuals consenting to genetic validation, 13% carried an FH-causing variant, which increased to 19% in clinically diagnosed FH patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of a substantial number of previously undiagnosed and un(der)treated clinical and genetic FH patients within a central laboratory database highlights the feasibility and clinical potential of this targeted screening strategy; both in identifying new FH patients and in improving treatment in this high-risk population.

Unexpected gaps in knowledge of familial hypercholesterolaemia among Dutch general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) warrants early diagnosis to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment of FH persist. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of FH care among general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands.

METHODS

An internationally standardised, online questionnaire was sent to Dutch GPs between February 2021 and July 2022. The survey assessed knowledge and awareness of FH, encompassing general familiarity, awareness of management guidelines, inheritance, prevalence, CVD risk, and clinical practice related to FH. Comparative analysis was performed using data on primary care physicians from Western Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Of the 221 participating GPs, 62.4% rated their familiarity with FH as above average (score > 4 on a 1-7 scale), with 91.4% considering themselves familiar with FH treatment and referral guidelines. Correct identification of the FH definition, typical lipid profile, inheritance pattern, prevalence and CVD risk was reported by 83.7%, 87.8%, 55.7%, 19.5%, and 13.6% of the respondents, respectively. Of the participants, 58.4% answered fewer than half of the 8 knowledge questions correctly. Dutch GPs reported greater FH familiarity and guideline awareness compared with their international counterparts but exhibited similar low performance on FH knowledge questions.

CONCLUSION

Despite the Netherlands' relatively high FH detection rate, substantial knowledge gaps regarding FH persist among Dutch GPs, mirroring global trends. Enhanced FH education and awareness in primary care are imperative to improve FH detection and ensure adequate treatment. Targeting the global suboptimal understanding of FH might require international efforts.

A mixed methods study of the awareness and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in Irish general practice

Introduction

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common genetic disorders, with an estimated global prevalence of 1:200-500, which leads to premature cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, public and professional awareness of FH is often lacking, with an estimated 20,000 largely undiagnosed cases in Ireland.

Purpose

The overall aim of the project was to test the feasibility of a model of care that would include electronic record screening, clinical assessment, and coding of possible FH patients across a network of general practices in Ireland. In addition, a secondary aim was to gauge the awareness and knowledge of FH across the network.

Methods

This study took part in multiple phases, employing a mixed methods design. The study included a validated questionnaire, tailored online educational resources, a retrospective chart review of patients with a history of elevated LDL cholesterol (LDLc) and an active review with a selection of those patients. Results were analyzed using SPSS V27, where descriptive statistics and relevant correlation tests were employed.

Results

Eighteen general practices agreed to take part in the study. In the initial survey, respondents rated their personal and practice familiarity with FH as slightly below average. Around one-third of respondents were not aware of FH guidelines. Of over 55,000 adult patient records searched, only 0.2% had a recorded FH diagnosis and 3.9% had ever had an LDLc above 4.9 mmol/l. Eight practices completed 198 chart reviews. Among these, 29.8% of patients had a family history recorded, and 22.2% had a family history of CVD recorded. Female patients had higher averages for highest and recent LDLc. Seventy patients underwent a clinical review-with 27% of these patients identified as "probable" or "definite FH." There was a statistically significant (p = 0.002) relationship between FH status and whether the patient had other CVD risk factors.

Conclusion

General practitioners in Ireland had similar levels of awareness of FH compared to findings from elsewhere. The activities discussed encouraged clinicians to consider FH when talking to their patients, especially those with elevated LDLc at an early age. Broader awareness of the condition could increase conversations about FH and benefit patient outcomes.

Introducing genetic testing with case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: qualitative study of patient and health professional experience

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited condition causing elevated cholesterol, premature heart disease, and early death. Although FH can be effectively treated, over 80% of people with FH remain undetected.

AIM

To explore patient and health professional experiences of introducing genetic testing with case finding for FH in primary care.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study in UK general practice.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of 41 participants (24 patients and 17 health professionals) from eight practices, using an electronic case-finding tool (FAMCAT) to identify patients with higher likelihood of having FH and who were then offered diagnostic genetic testing in primary care. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

While prior awareness of FH was low, patients were unsurprised to be identified as being at risk, and positive about being offered genetic testing by their practice. Patients not found to have FH were relieved, although some felt frustrated that their high cholesterol lacked a clear cause. Those confirmed to have FH largely expected and accepted this outcome. Practitioners saw detection of FH as an important new opportunity for preventive care. They found the case-finding tool easy to apply and noted patients' high uptake of genetic testing. While they were comfortable referring appropriate patients for further specialist management, GPs sought clearer definition about responsibility for identification and long- term care of FH in future care pathways.

CONCLUSION

Introducing genetic testing with electronic case finding for FH in primary care was positively experienced by patients and practitioners. Further development of this approach could help improve detection of FH in the general population.

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Knowledge and Information Needs Among Healthcare Providers

BACKGROUND

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of life-threatening genetic disorders responsible for severe dysfunctions of the immune system. Despite the expansion of newborn screening in the U.S., there are gaps in healthcare providers' knowledge of SCID.

METHODS

We recruited 277 U.S. healthcare providers for an online survey. The survey assessed providers' experience with SCID patients, knowledge about SCID, and needs and preferred formats for SCID-related informational resources. We examined differences between providers who have seen 2 or more patients with SCID (SCID provider group) and those who have seen 0-1 SCID patients (non-SCID provider group).

RESULTS

Overall, 210 (75.8%) providers were included in the non-SCID provider group, and 121 (57.6%) of these providers were pediatricians. Compared to the SCID provider group, non-SCID provider group reported lower mean rating of SCID knowledge (x̄ = 4.8 vs. x̄ = 8.6, p < 0.0001) and higher informational needs. The largest informational needs identified by the non-SCID provider group were "understanding specific type of SCID" and "understanding what to expect across the lifespan." In the SCID provider group, the highest rated informational need was "family support referrals." Participants in the non-SCID provider group identified scientific publications and websites as preferred formats, with some variation between medical specialties.

CONCLUSION

Based on their experience with treating SCID patients, providers have varying levels of SCID knowledge and different informational needs. For providers who have encountered few SCID patients, informational needs start early, usually immediately after receiving a positive newborn screening result. These findings provide useful direction for the development and preferred outlets for receiving SCID-related information, with some variations between different types of providers. Results from this study will serve as a guide for creating relevant and accessible SCID resources for providers who can utilize them to improve care for SCID patients.

Screening for potential familial hypercholesterolaemia in general practice: an observational study on prevalence and management

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder causing premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The estimated prevalence of probable or definite FH is 1:200-250 individuals, according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria for FH. In Denmark approximately 12% of cases are identified.

AIM

To provide knowledge of the prevalence and management of FH in general practice.

DESIGN & SETTING

A collaboration between six general practice clinics and the department of cardiology at Bispebjerg hospital in Denmark.

METHOD

A total of 9652 patient records were screened for hypercholesterolaemia. All patients with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥5.0 mmol/l were included in the study population and their records were investigated in order to perform a diagnostic score according to the DLCN criteria.

RESULTS

It was found that 2382 individuals had a lipid measurement available, and 236 of those had an LDL-C ≥5.0 mmol/l. In total, 34 individuals were found to have probable or definite FH (DLCN score ≥5). Only three individuals had been diagnosed and treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Of 236 individuals with high LDL-C, only 25 individuals met their treatment target. By excluding patients with signs of secondary hypercholesterolaemia, a subgroup of 115 individuals with potential primary hypercholesterolaemia was established. Among those, 21 individuals were found to have probable or definite FH (1:114 individuals).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that there is a massive lack of recognition of FH in general practice. Despite a measured high LDL-C, the diagnosis is rarely made and only a few patients are treated accordingly. Of the patients undergoing treatment, only a few reached their treatment target.

Validity and reliability of an adapted questionnaire measuring knowledge, awareness and practice regarding familial hypercholesterolaemia among primary care physicians in Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Primary care physicians (PCP) play an important role in detecting Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) early. However, knowledge, awareness and practice (KAP) regarding FH among Malaysian PCP are not well established, and there was no validated tool to assess their FH KAP. Thus, the aim of this study was to adapt an FH KAP questionnaire and determine its validity and reliability among Malaysian PCP.

METHODS

This cross-sectional validation study involved Malaysian PCP with ≥ 1-year work experience in the primary care settings. In Phase 1, the original 19-item FH KAP questionnaire underwent content validation and adaptation by 7 experts. The questionnaire was then converted into an online survey instrument and was face validated by 10 PCP. In Phase 2, the adapted questionnaire was disseminated through e-mail to 1500 PCP. Data were collected on their KAP, demography, qualification and work experience. The construct validity was tested using known-groups validation method. The hypothesis was PCP holding postgraduate qualification (PCP-PG-Qual) would have better FH KAP compared with PCP without postgraduate qualification (PCP-noPG-Qual). Internal consistency reliability was calculated using Kuder Richardson formula-20 (KR-20) and test-retest reliability was tested on 26 PCP using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

During content validation and adaptation, 10 items remained unchanged, 8 items were modified, 1 item was moved to demography and 7 items were added. The adapted questionnaire consisted of 25 items (11 knowledge, 5 awareness and 9 practice items). A total of 130 out of 1500 PCP (response rate: 8.7%) completed the questionnaire. The mean percentage knowledge score was found to be significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared with PCP-noPG-Qual (53.5, SD ± 13.9 vs. 35.9, SD ± 11.79), t(128) = 6.90, p < 0.001. The median percentage awareness score was found to be significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared with PCP-noPG-Qual (15.4, IqR ± 23.08 vs. 7.7, IqR ± 15.38), p = 0.030. The mean percentage practice score was significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared with PCP-noPG-Qual (69.2, SD ± 17.62 vs. 54.4, SD ± 19.28), t(128) = 3.79, p < 0.001. KR-20 value was 0.79 (moderate reliability) and average Kappa was 0.796 (substantial agreement).

CONCLUSION

This study has proven that the 25-item adapted FH KAP questionnaire is valid and reliable. It can be used to measure and establish FH KAP among PCP in Malaysia.

Advances, gaps and opportunities in the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia: overview of current and future screening and detection methods

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies reaffirm that familial hypercholesterolemia is more prevalent than initially considered, with a population frequency of approximately one in 300. The majority of patients remains unidentified. This warrants critical evaluation of existing screening methods and exploration of novel methods of detection.

RECENT FINDINGS

New public policy recommendations on the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia have been made by a global community of experts and advocates. Phenotypic tools for diagnosing index cases remain inaccurate. Genetic testing is the gold standard for familial hypercholesterolemia and a new international position statement has been published. Correction of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) for the cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may increase the precision of the phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Cascade cotesting for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a) levels provides a new opportunity to stratify risk in families. Digital technology and machine learning methods, coupled with clinical alert and decision support systems, lead the way in more efficient approaches for detecting and managing index cases. Universal screening of children, combined with child-parent cascade testing, appears to be the most effective method for underpinning a population strategy for maximizing the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia.

SUMMARY

Detection of familial hypercholesterolemia can be enhanced by optimizing current diagnostic algorithms, probing electronic health records with novel information technologies and integrating universal screening of children with cascade testing of parents and other relatives.

Awareness, treatment rates, and compliance to treatment in patients with serum LDL cholesterol higher than 250 mg/dL, and possible, probable, or definite familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterized by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). It is underdiagnosed and undertreated despite relatively high prevalance and significant association with increased mortality. We aimed to determine treatment status and compliance in patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL and FH.

DESIGN

Patients older than 18 years old and have a serum LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL between January 2010 to December 2016 were identified from the hospital database. A phone survey was performed. Demographic features, smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, cardiovascular disease (CVD), use of medication for dyslipidemia, and CVD and high cholesterol levels in the family were questioned. Dutch Lipid Clinical Network Criteria was used to classify patients. The study was registered to Clinicaltrials.gov in July 2020 (NCT04494464).

RESULTS

1365 patients with a LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were identified. Patients that could not be reached and who refused to interview were excluded and the data of 367 patients were analyzed. There were 248 (67.6%) female and 119 (32.4%) male patients and mean age was 50.52 ± 11.66. LDL-C was ≥330 mg/dL in 50 (13.6%) and 250-329 mg/dL in 317 (86.4%) patients. Forty (10.9%) patients were classified as definite, 181 (49.3%) as probable and 146 (39.8%) as possible FH. 213 (58.0%) patients were not receiving lipid-lowering treatment, and 162 (76.1%) stated that medication was never recommended previously, 30 (14.1%) had stopped medication him/herself and 21 (9.8%) had stopped medication with the advice of the physician. Among patients with definite/probable FH, 84 (38.0%) had CVD and the rate of lipid-lowering drug use in these patients was 58.3%.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were not taking lipid-lowering drugs. Similar with many other studies, diagnosis, and treatment rates of FH patients were very low in our study. Further national studies are required to increase awareness of the disease in both physicians and patients.

Assessment of medical intern's knowledge, awareness and practice of familial hypercholesterolemia at academic institutes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Background

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a serious under-diagnosed disease characterized by raised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature coronary artery diseases (CAD). The scarcity of FH reported patients in Saudi Arabia indicates lack of FH awareness among physicians.

Objective

The goal of this research was to assess knowledge, awareness, and practice (KAP) about FH disorder among Saudi medical interns and to identify areas that need educational attention.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved 170 Saudi medical interns (83 males and 87 females) from academic institutes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The interns were asked to fill an online FH-KAP questionnaire. Total score for each separate domain measured by adding correct answers.

Results

Although, knowledge of FH definition (76.5%) and classical lipid profile (52.4%) were reasonable; knowledge on inheritance (43.5%), prevalence (12.4%) and CAD risks (7.1%) were poor. Knowledge score was significantly higher in female than male (7.5 ± 3 vs. 5.3 ± 2.6, P < 0.001). Regarding awareness, 54.1% were familiar with FH disorder, 50.6% with the presence of lipid clinic but only 16.5% were acquainted with guidelines. Furthermore, in the practice domain 82.9% selected statin as first line treatment and 62.9% chose routinely checking the rest of the family, while 15.3% chose ages 13–18 years to screen for hypercholesterolemia in patients with a positive family history of premature CAD.

Conclusion

Substantial defects in FH-KAP among Saudi medical interns were found, emphasizing the importance of professional training. Extensive and constant medical education programs as early as an internship are required to close the gap in CAD prevention.

Barriers to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Current Perspectives on Improving Patient Care

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a frequent disorder associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Different clinical diagnosis criteria are available, and cost of genetic testing has been reduced in the last years; however, most cases are not diagnosed worldwide. Patients with FH are at high cardiovascular risk and the risk can be reduced with lifelong lifestyle and pharmacological treatment. Statins and ezetimibe are available as generic drugs in most countries reducing the cost of treatment. However, the use of high-intensity statins combined with ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, if necessary, is low for different reasons that contribute to a high number of patients not reaching LDL-C targets according to guidelines. On the other hand, cardiovascular risk varies greatly in families with FH; therefore, risk stratification strategies including cardiovascular imaging is another element to consider for improving care and management of FH. There are numerous barriers depending on the awareness, knowledge, perception of risk, management and care of patients living with FH that impact in the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder. In this contemporary review, we analyze different barriers in the diagnosis and care of patients to improve patients’ care and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and describe recent advances and strategies to improve the gaps in the care of FH, including global collaboration and advocacy.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in 2020: A Leading Tier 1 Genomic Application

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is caused by a major genetic defect in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) clearance pathway. Characterised by LDL-cholesterol elevation from birth, FH confers a significant risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD) if overlooked and untreated. With risk exposure beginning at birth, early detection and intervention is crucial for the prevention of CAD. Lowering LDL-cholesterol with lifestyle and statin therapy can reduce the risk of CAD. However, most individuals with FH will not reach guideline recommended LDL-cholesterol targets. FH has an estimated prevalence of approximately 1:250 in the community. Multiple strategies are required for screening, diagnosing and treating FH. Recent publications on FH provide new data for developing models of care, including new therapies. This review provides an overview of FH and outlines some recent advances in the care of FH for the prevention of CAD in affected families. The future care of FH in Australia should be developed within the context of the National Health Genomics Policy Framework.

Knowledge, awareness and practice regarding familial hypercholesterolaemia among primary care physicians in Malaysia: The importance of professional training

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to determine knowledge, awareness and practice (KAP) regarding familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) among Malaysian primary care physicians (PCP), and to compare KAP between PCP with postgraduate qualification (PCP-PG-Qual) and PCP without PG qualification (PCP-noPG-Qual).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving PCP with ≥1-year working experience in Malaysian primary care settings. An adapted and validated 25-item FH-KAP questionnaire was disseminated during primary care courses. Total score for each domain was calculated by summing-up the correct responses, converted into percentage scores. Normality distribution was examined and comparisons of mean/median percentage scores were made between the two groups of PCP.

RESULTS

A total of 372 PCP completed the questionnaire. Regarding knowledge, 77.7% correctly defined FH. However, only 8.3% correctly identified coronary artery disease risk in untreated FH. The mean percentage knowledge score was significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared to PCP-noPG-Qual (48.9, SD ± 13.92 vs. 35.2, SD ± 14.13), t(370) = 8.66, p < 0.001. Regarding awareness, 39% were aware of the NICE FH guideline and only 27.2% were aware of FH diagnostic criteria. The median percentage awareness score was significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared to PCP-noPG-Qual (15.4, IqR ± 23.08 vs. 7.7, IqR ± 11.54), p = 0.013. Regarding practice, only 19.1% stratified FH patients as high risk irrespective of other risk factors. The mean percentage practice score was significantly higher in PCP-PG-Qual compared to PCP-noPG-Qual (52.4, SD ± 12.92 vs. 42.7, SD ± 16.63), t(370) = 9.65, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial gaps in FH-KAP among Malaysian PCP were identified, with PCP-PG-Qual having better knowledge, awareness and practice than PCP-noPG-Qual, emphasising the importance of professional training and certification.

Awareness of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Among Healthcare Providers Involved in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Victoria, Australia

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common underdiagnosed autosomal dominant lipid disorder carrying a significant risk of premature coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of heterozygous FH of healthcare providers in coronary care units (CCUs).

Methods

Medical staff working in CCUs in 4 sizable metropolitan health networks in Melbourne, Australia, were requested to complete a structured anonymised questionnaire with regard to FH. The results were tabulated and analysed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23 (IBM, New York, NY).

Results

A total of 121 participants (67% response rate) completed the survey. Some 76% claimed to be at least modestly familiar with FH, and more than half of them adequately described FH; however, only 16% and 43%, respectively, were aware of the prevalence of FH and existence of lipid guidelines. In regard to epidemiological knowledge and update in the management of FH in CCUs, knowledge was suboptimal. In regard to FH care, General Practitioners were rated by 72% of participants as the first most efficient healthcare provider in the management of FH, and cardiologists were rated by 54% of participants as the second most efficient healthcare provider in the management of FH. Some 36% of respondents advocated a form of alert system in laboratory reports to facilitate the diagnosis of FH.

Conclusions

This survey identified substantial gaps in the knowledge and awareness of FH among healthcare providers involved in the management of acute coronary syndrome. Focused education and clinical training are warranted to raise awareness of FH among healthcare providers working in CCUs.

Assessment of family physicians' awareness and knowledge of familial hypercholesterolemia in governmental hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited and complex multifactorial disease that can lead to early onset of coronary artery disease (CAD). Diagnosis, treatment, and management of FH require a well-trained physician with high awareness of the disease and different risk factors to avoid complications.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study evaluated family physicians' awareness and knowledge of FH using self-administered questionnaires in governmental hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during 2018.

Results

A total of 225 family physicians completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 58.4%. The mean age of respondents was 31.3 years and more than 59.1% were men. Although 72.4% of physicians rated their familiarity with FH as average and above, 48.4% of all participants had poor FH knowledge, while only 51.6% had acceptable FH knowledge. About 65.8% of physicians reported that they routinely take a detailed family history, perform a physical examination, and screen close relatives. Awareness of various clinical algorithms for diagnosis of patients with FH was very low at 52.0%. The mean FH knowledge and familiarity scores were significantly higher (P < 0.001) among participants who were older, had higher training levels, or longer years in practice.

Conclusions

The current study revealed significant deficits in FH familiarity, awareness, knowledge, and practice among Saudi physicians. FH educational programs directed at all physicians involved in FH patients' management are necessary to improve physicians' knowledge of all aspects of FH management, including the importance of a mechanism for identifying people at risk for a genetic condition by a process of systematic family tracing.

Improving the detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a dominantly inherited disorder of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) catabolism, which if untreated causes lifelong elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), accelerated atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular disease. Recent evidence suggests the prevalence of heterozygous FH is ∼1:220, making FH the most common autosomal dominant condition. Lowering LDL-c with statin and lifestyle therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. Furthermore, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors significantly lower LDL-c in addition to statin therapy, and early outcome data suggest improved vascular outcomes with these agents in FH patients in addition to statins. However, the vast majority of people with FH still remain undiagnosed. The onus is on clinicians to identify kindreds with FH, as PCSK9 inhibitors, although expensive, are funded for patients with FH in Australia. Multiple strategies for detecting FH have been proposed. The detection of index cases can be achieved through applying electronic screening tools to general practice databases, universal screening of children during immunisation, and targeted screening of patients with premature cardiovascular disease. Advances in genomic technology have decreased costs of genetic testing, improved the understanding of the pathogenesis of FH and facilitated cascade screening. However, awareness of FH amongst clinicians and the general public still requires optimisation. This review outlines recent advances in FH detection, including emerging strategies and challenges for the next decade.

Barriers to the identification of familial hypercholesterolemia among primary care providers

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is severely underdiagnosed in the USA. Primary care providers are well-positioned to identify FH cases; however, universal FH screening is not routinely implemented in practice. The aim of the present study was to identify perceived barriers to FH screening among primary care physicians in Minnesota. A questionnaire assessed FH screening practices, knowledge, and perceived barriers to FH screening. The questionnaire, sent electronically to internal and family medicine physicians in Minnesota (N = 1932) yielded a conservative estimated response rate of 9% (N = 173). Although 92% of participants reported themselves responsible for identifying individuals with FH, 30% did not routinely perform screening in practice. Only 50% of participants were able to correctly identify the risk of FH to first-degree relatives of individuals with FH. Challenges incorporating lipid and family history data was the most frequently endorsed barrier to FH screening (34%). A majority of participants endorsed a clinical decision support system that flags individuals at high risk for FH (62%) and an algorithm with cholesterol levels and lipid disorders (56%) as means of facilitating FH screening. Although the generalizability of the findings is unknown, the results underscore the need for increased provider education regarding FH and suggest an FH screening strategy incorporating a clinical decision support system, screening algorithm, and support from other healthcare providers.

[Familial hypercholesterolemia: An under-diagnosed and under-treated disease. Survey of 495 physicians]

INTRODUCTION

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most frequent genetic diseases with a prevalence of 1/250. It is characterized by a very high cholesterol level since birth and is often complicated by cardiovascular diseases (CV) in young patients. While early diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic management can avoid CV complications, HF is largely under-diagnosed and therefore under-treated.

METHODS

To investigate the management of HF in France, we conducted a survey with 495 general practitioners (n=200) and specialists (n=295).

RESULTS

The results revealed: a large underestimation of the CV risk and a high therapeutic inertia in the management of the affected patients. The practitioners reported a real need for more information about the disease.

CONCLUSION

Given the high frequency of HF and the associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, general practitioners have a decisive role to play for the identification and the management of these patients. The recent publication of HAS recommendations on family screening procedures and care of HF patients should improve the management of this disease.

An enquiry based on a standardised questionnaire into knowledge, awareness and preferences concerning the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia among primary care physicians in the Asia-Pacific region: the "Ten Countries Study"

OBJECTIVE

To determine physicians' knowledge, awareness and preferences regarding the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) in the Asia-Pacific region.

SETTING

A formal questionnaire was anonymously completed by physicians from different countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific. The survey sought responses relating to general familiarity, awareness of management guidelines, identification (clinical characteristics and lipid profile), prevalence and inheritance, extent of elevation in risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and practice on screening and treatment.

PARTICIPANTS

Practising community physicians from Australia, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Philippines, Hong Kong, China, Vietnam and Taiwan were recruited to complete the questionnaire, with the UK as the international benchmark.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

An assessment and comparison of the knowledge, awareness and preferences of FH among physicians in 10 different countries/regions.

RESULTS

1078 physicians completed the questionnaire from the Asia-Pacific region; only 34% considered themselves to be familiar with FH. 72% correctly described FH and 65% identified the typical lipid profile, with a higher proportion of physicians from Japan and China selecting the correct FH definition and lipid profile compared with those from Vietnam and Philippines. However, less than half of the physician were aware of national or international management guidelines; this was significantly worse than physicians from the UK (35% vs 61%, p<0.001). Knowledge of prevalence (24%), inheritability (41%) and CVD risk (9%) of FH were also suboptimal. The majority of the physicians considered laboratory interpretative commenting as being useful (81%) and statin therapy as an appropriate cholesterol-lowering therapy (89%) for FH management.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified important gaps, which are readily addressable, in the awareness and knowledge of FH among physicians in the region. Implementation of country-specific guidelines and extensive work in FH education and awareness programmes are imperative to improve the care of FH in the region.

Assessment of physicians' awareness and knowledge of familial hypercholesterolemia in Saudi Arabia: Is there a gap?

Background

The scarcity of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) cases reported in Saudi Arabia might be indicative of a lack of awareness of this common genetic disease among physicians.

Objective

To assess physicians’ awareness, practice, and knowledge of FH in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted among physicians at four tertiary hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between March 2016 and May 2016 using a self-administered questionnaire.

Results

A total of 294 physicians completed the survey (response rate 90.1%). Overall, 92.9% of the participants have poor knowledge of FH while only 7.1% have acceptable knowledge. The majority (68.7%) of physicians rated their familiarity with FH as average or above average, and these had higher mean knowledge scores than participants with self-reported below average familiarity (mean 3.4 versus 2.6) (P < 0.001). Consultant physicians were 4.2 times more likely to be familiar with FH than residents or registrars (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 1.9–9.1, P < 0.001). Physicians who currently managed FH patients had higher mean knowledge scores compared to those without FH patients in their care (3.5 versus 2.9) (P = 0.006). In addition, there were statistically significant differences between physicians’ mean knowledge scores and their ages, levels of training, and years in practice. Moreover, a substantial deficit was identified in the awareness of various clinical algorithms to diagnose patients with FH, cascade screening, specialist lipid services, and the existence of statin alternatives, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.

Conclusion

A substantial deficit was found in the awareness, knowledge, practice, and detection of FH among physicians in Saudi Arabia. Extensive educational programs are required to raise physician awareness and implement best practices; only then can the impact of these interventions on FH management and patient outcome be assessed.

[Familial hypercholesterolemia: A largely underestimated cardiovascular risk]

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a monogenic autosomal dominant dyslipidemia characterized by a permanent and isolated increase of cholesterol carried by low-density lipoproteins. The prevalence of its heterozygous form is estimated between 1/500 and 1/250, and in the absence of specific treatment, this form is responsible for an increase by a factor of 13 of the risk of premature coronary artery disease compared to patients non-affected by the disease.

OBJECTIVES

To perform an inventory of the knowledge of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in France for physicians involved in the management of the disease.

METHODS

A survey was conducted (by phone and internet) among a representative sample of 495 physicians (cardiologists, endocrinologists/diabetologists, gynecologists, general practitioners) who, in parallel, completed 579 patient records.

RESULTS

Thirty-two percent (95% CI [27.8; 36.2]) of physicians reported the difference between polygenic hypercholesterolemia and familial hypercholesterolemia. The presence of tendinous xanthomas, a key element of diagnosis, was spontaneously mentioned by 44% (95% CI [34; 54.2]) of cardiologists. Six percent (95% CI [2.2; 12.6]) of them gave a correct estimate of the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia. The likelihood of transmission of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, when one parent is affected, was known for 59% (95% CI [48.7; 68.7]) of surveyed cardiologists. A cascade screening was performed systematically by 4% (95% CI [1.1; 9.9]) of them. Eighteen percent (95% CI [11; 26.9]) of cardiologists gave an accurate estimation of cardiovascular risk of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Fifty-seven percent (95% CI [46.7; 66.8]) of cardiologists admitted being misinformed about the heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and 83% (95% CI [74.1; 89.7]) expressed a need for information about this disease.

CONCLUSION

The lack of knowledge of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and its associated cardiovascular risk is probably the cause of a diagnostic default leading to inappropriate management of this disease.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in the Era of Genetic Testing

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a relatively common autosomal dominant genetic condition leading to premature ischaemic vascular disease and mortality if left untreated. Currently, a universal consensus on the diagnostic criteria of FH does not exist but the diagnosis of FH largely relies on the evaluation of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, a careful documentation of family history, and the identification of clinical features. Diagnosis based purely on lipid levels remains common but there are several limitations to this method of diagnosis both practically and in the proportion of false-negatives and false-positives detected, resulting in substantial under-diagnosis of FH. In some countries, diagnostic algorithms are supplemented with genetic testing of the index case as well as genetic and lipid testing of relatives of the index case. Such "cascade" screening of families following identification of index cases appears to not only improve the rate of diagnosis but is also cost-effective. Currently, we observe a great variation in the excess mortality among patients with FH, which likely reflects a combination of additional genetic and environmental effects on risk overlaid on the risk associated with FH. Current accepted drug therapies for FH include statins and PSCK9 inhibitors. Further work is required to evaluate the cardiovascular disease risk in patients with genetically diagnosed FH and to determine whether a risk-based approach to the treatment of FH is appropriate.

Progress in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia: 2016

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common autosomal dominant condition, with a prevalence of between one in 200 and one in 350 people in the general population. Untreated FH is associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). The prevalence of homozygous or compound heterozygous FH is now considered to be about one in 300 000 people. Treating children with FH reduces progression of atherosclerotic CVD and future CVD events. Most individuals with FH are undiagnosed, which together with the recent frequency data in the population and in individuals with premature coronary disease creates a public health challenge and mandates a key role for primary care. Childhood is the optimal period for detecting FH, since low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) concentrations better differentiate affected from unaffected individuals. In an Australian community setting, over 70% of adults with an LDL-c level ≥ 6.5 mmol/L have clinical FH; of these, 30% have a detectable mutation. The community laboratory has an important role in identifying FH, with interpretive comments leading to additional reductions in LDL-c concentrations, and a phone call from the pathologist to the general practitioner improving detection of cases. Cascade screening using DNA testing is cost-effective and acceptable to screenees. Next generation genetic sequencing may differentiate people with polygenic hypercholesterolaemia alone from those with FH. Smoking, hypertension, elevated lipoprotein(a) levels, chronic kidney disease and diabetes are additional atherosclerotic CVD risk factors in FH. Equations for assessing absolute risk of CVD in primary prevention underestimate risk in FH. The adult LDL-c goal is a greater than 50% reduction in LDL-c levels, followed by a target of < 2.5 mmol/L, or < 1.8 mmol/L for individuals with CVD or other CVD risk factors. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors significantly reduce LDL-c and lipoprotein(a) levels in people with FH. Registries are essential for improving the care of people with FH.

Increasing the Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Using General Practice Electronic Databases

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common autosomal co-dominant condition that causes premature cardiovascular disease. Awareness of FH is poor and only 10-15% of the affected population is identified. Electronic health records provide an opportunity to increase detection and awareness in general practice OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simple electronic extraction tool can increase detection of FH in general practice.

METHOD

An extraction tool applied to general practice electronic health records (EHR) to screen for FH, total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels in association with entered diagnostic criteria and demographic data in five general practices.

RESULTS

Of 157,290 active patients examined, 0.7% (n=1081) had an LDL-c>5.0 mmol/L representing 1 in 146 of active patients. An additional 0.8% (n=1276) patients were at possible risk of FH. Of those with an LDL-c>5.0 mmol/L 43.7% of patients had no record of being prescribed statins. Twenty patients (0.013%) had a clinical diagnosis of FH entered in the EHR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at high risk of FH can be identified by a simple electronic screening method in general practice. Clinical data entry is variable in general practice. Targeted screening enables clinical assessment of patients at risk of cardiovascular disease and using the DLCNS will enable primary care to increase identification of FH. Approximately one in five patients extracted using this method, are likely to have phenotypically probable FH, making it a useful screening tool.

An online questionnaire survey of UK general practitioners' knowledge and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia

OBJECTIVE

Early diagnosis and treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) is known to be associated with reduced mortality from premature coronary artery disease, but HeFH remains underdiagnosed. This survey aims to determine knowledge and current management of HeFH in general practice.

SETTING

An online questionnaire was administered to general practitioners' (GPs') in the North West of England to assess their knowledge and management of HeFH.

PARTICIPANTS

Practising GPs in the North West of England were contacted by email and invited to complete an online questionnaire. Recruitment discontinued when the target of 100 was reached.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

An assessment of the knowledge and current management of HeFH in GPs.

RESULTS

100 GP responses were analysed. Although only 39% considered themselves to have reasonable knowledge of HeFH, 89% knew that HeFH was a genetic disorder and 74% selected the correct lipid profile for diagnosing the condition. More than half (61%) were aware of current guidelines on HeFH. Gaps in knowledge were evident when only 30% correctly identified the prevalence of HeFH and half were not aware of the pattern of inheritance. Increased cardiovascular risk was underestimated by majority. 33% thought that they had HeFH patients in their practice confirming underdiagnosis of the condition. Statin therapy was recognised by 94% to be the right medication for treating HeFH. The majority (82%) regarded GPs to be the most effective healthcare professional for early recognition of HeFH.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs have an above-average knowledge of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and almost universally consider that they have a key role in the early recognition of undiagnosed HeFH patients in the community. However, there are gaps in awareness that need to be addressed to further enhance the care of FH in the community.

Drug treatment and adherence of subjects <40 years with diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed at describing the therapeutic approach in young adult patients diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and their adherence and persistence to treatment.

METHODS

From regional administrative databases, individuals aged ≤40 years, who received exemption for HeFH between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2011, and concomitantly started statin treatment, were identified. Within the first year of treatment, we evaluated therapeutic changes, adherence as MPR (medication possession ratio), persistence as continuous drug coverage without gaps ≥60 days, and influencing factors using log binomial models.

RESULTS

Of 1404 patients, 42.4% were initially treated with a high-efficacy statin. 23.4% of patients showed at least one treatment change. Mean MPR was 68.7% (29.9), and patients showing continued statin use were 47.0%. Therapy modification was significantly associated with a past cardiovascular event (relative risk, RR [95% confidential interval] 2.28 [1.69-3.09]) and at least one lipid test (RR 1.82 [1.31-2.53]). MPR ≥80% was significantly associated with the first statin prescribed (atorvastatin RR 1.28 [1.09-1.51] and rosuvastatin RR 1.21 [1.01-1.44], vs. simvastatin), a past cardiovascular event (RR 1.33 [1.12-1.59]), at least one therapy change (RR 1.28 [1.15-1.43]), at least a lipid test (RR 1.26 [1.07-1.49]). A similar pattern was observed for persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of young adult HeFH patients showed that therapy change was quite frequent, and probably reflected adjustments according to individual response. Adherence and persistence were inadequate, even in this population at high cardiovascular risk, and they need to be improved through proper patient education and shared treatment decision-making approach.

Rapid identification of familial hypercholesterolemia from electronic health records: The SEARCH study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about prevalence, awareness, and control of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To address these knowledge gaps, we developed an ePhenotyping algorithm for rapid identification of FH in electronic health records (EHRs) and deployed it in the Screening Employees And Residents in the Community for Hypercholesterolemia (SEARCH) study.

METHODS

We queried a database of 131,000 individuals seen between 1993 and 2014 in primary care practice to identify 5992 (mean age 52 ± 13 years, 42% men) patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL, triglycerides <400 mg/dL and without secondary causes of hyperlipidemia.

RESULTS

Our EHR-based algorithm ascertained the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria for FH using structured data sets and natural language processing for family history and presence of FH stigmata on physical examination. Blinded expert review revealed positive and negative predictive values for the SEARCH algorithm at 94% and 97%, respectively. The algorithm identified 32 definite and 391 probable cases with an overall FH prevalence of 0.32% (1:310). Only 55% of the FH cases had a diagnosis code relevant to FH. Mean LDL-C at the time of FH ascertainment was 237 mg/dL; at follow-up, 70% (298 of 423) of patients were on lipid-lowering treatment with 80% achieving an LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL. Of treated FH patients with premature CHD, only 22% (48 of 221) achieved an LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

In a primary care setting, we found the prevalence of FH to be 1:310 with low awareness and control. Further studies are needed to assess whether automated detection of FH in EHR improves patient outcomes.

Progress in the care of common inherited atherogenic disorders of apolipoprotein B metabolism

Familial hypercholesterolaemia, familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) and elevated lipoprotein(a) are common, inherited disorders of apolipoprotein B metabolism that markedly accelerate the onset of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). These disorders are frequently encountered in clinical lipidology and need to be accurately identified and treated in both index patients and their family members, to prevent the development of premature ASCVD. The optimal screening strategies depend on the patterns of heritability for each condition. Established therapies are widely used along with lifestyle interventions to regulate levels of circulating lipoproteins. New therapeutic strategies are becoming available, and could supplement traditional approaches in the most severe cases, but their long-term cost-effectiveness and safety have yet to be confirmed. We review contemporary developments in the understanding, detection and care of these highly atherogenic disorders of apolipoprotein B metabolism.

Knowledge gaps in the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia. A UK based survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Untreated individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) are at increased risk of developing premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). Early diagnosis and treatment can result in a normal life expectancy. A recent survey commissioned by the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) reported a lack of awareness of FH in the general population. We conducted a survey to assess knowledge among healthcare professionals involved in the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk and disease in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A survey designed to assess knowledge of diagnostic criteria, risk assessment, the role of cascade screening, and management options for patients with FH was distributed to 1000 healthcare professionals (response rate 44.3%). The same survey was redistributed following attendance at an educational session on FH.

RESULTS

151 respondents (40.5%) reported having patients under their care who would meet the diagnostic criteria for FH, but just 61.4% recognized that cardiovascular risk estimation tools cannot be applied in FH, and only 22.3% understood the relative risk of premature CVD compared to the general population. Similarly, just 65.9% were aware of recommendations regarding cascade screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence and associated risk of FH continue to be underestimated, and knowledge of diagnostic criteria and treatment options is suboptimal. These results support the recent Consensus Statement of the EAS and production of quality standards by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Further work is required to formulate interventions to improve FH awareness and knowledge, and to determine the effect these interventions have on patient outcomes.

Translational Research for Improving the Care of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The "Ten Countries Study" and Beyond

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common and serious form of inherited hyperlipidaemia. Dominantly inherited with high penetrance, untreated FH leads to premature death from coronary artery disease due to accelerated atherosclerosis from birth. Despite its importance, there is still a major shortfall in awareness, detection and treatment of FH worldwide. International models of care for FH have recently been published, but their effective implementation requires the garnering of more knowledge about the condition. The "Ten Countries Study" aims to investigate diagnostic, epidemiological and service aspects, as well as physician practices and patient experiences of FH in several countries in the Asia-Pacific Region and the Southern Hemisphere. Five observational studies are being undertaken that will systematically investigate the following aspects of FH: the phenotypic predictors of low-density lipoprotein receptor mutations, the point prevalence in available community populations, current knowledge and clinical practices among primary care physicians, availability and utilisation of services and facilities, and patient perceptions and personal experiences of the condition. The information gathered will inform better clinical practice and will enable the development of country-specific models of care for FH.

Interpretative comments specifically suggesting specialist referral increase the detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an under-diagnosed inherited condition characterised by elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and premature coronary artery disease. The requesting general practitioner of individuals with extremely elevated LDL-cholesterol measured by St John of God Pathology receives an interpretative comment on the lipid results highlighting possible FH. We sought to determine whether specifically recommending referral to the regional Lipid Disorders Clinic (LDC) increased referral and FH detection rates. A prospective case-control study of individuals with LDL-cholesterol ≥6.5 mmol/L was conducted. All individuals received an interpretative comment highlighting the possibility of FH. The cases comment also suggested LDC referral, and a subset of cases received the LDC's fax number (fax-cases) in addition. There were 231 individuals with an LDL-cholesterol ≥6.5 mmol/L; 96 (42%) controls and 135 (58%) cases, of which 99 were fax-cases. Twenty-four (18%) cases were referred to clinic compared with eight (8%) controls (p = 0.035). After specialist review and genetic testing, four probable and four definite FH individuals were detected amongst controls, compared with seven possible, eight probable and nine definite FH amongst cases. Genetic testing was performed in 31 (94%) individuals, 13 (42%) had a causative mutation identified. Interpretative commenting specifically recommending specialist review augments the detection of FH in the community.

Knowledge and Awareness of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia among Registered Medical Practitioners in Tamil Nadu: Are They Suboptimal?

INTRODUCTION

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common monogenic disorder causing premature Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). However, the majority of people with FH are undiagnosed and under treated.

AIM

To determine awareness, knowledge and practices of registered medical practitioners regarding FH in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Physicians from a southern state of India (Tamil Nadu) who see the general cases were requested to complete a structured online survey questionnaire based on the outcomes on screening, diagnostic and service aspects of FH.

RESULTS

A total of 133 physicians were surveyed, 27.9% perceived themselves to have above average familiarity with FH and 71.4% correctly described FH. 41.4% of physicians were unaware and unsure whether they had FH patients under their care. The awareness of specific aspects of FH were as follows: heritability 35.3%, prevalence 31.6%, typical lipid profile 34.6%, CVD relating to FH13.5%, genetic testing 33.1%, cascade screening 41.4%, preventive, management and referral services for FH 12.8%, 49.6% of them thought that the age for screening young people for FH should be 13 to 18 years. 84.2% selected GP's as the most effective health care provider for the early detection and care of FH as being useful. 69.2% selected interpretive commenting on lipid profile to highlight patients at risk of FH. 91.7% and 19.5% of physicians identified statins as monotherapy and statin with ezetimibe as combination therapy for FH, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study identified substantial deficit in the awareness and knowledge of FH among primary care physicians in Tamil Nadu. Extensive and continuous medical education programs are required to close the gap in coronary prevention.

The hinterland of familial hypercholesterolaemia: what do we not know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is the commonest autosomal dominant disorder in man, but many questions about familial hypercholesterolaemia remain to be answered. Guidelines are increasing in importance as healthcare becomes standardized. The review suggests areas that require more investigation or where pertinent guidelines may need to be reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is commoner than previously thought, but its epidemiology needs further investigation against a background of changing environmental and lifestyle factors that may bear on its phenotypic expression. Screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia may be more difficult than might be thought as cascade testing may not capture all cases effectively and universal screening appears compelling, but requires testing and evaluation. Cardiovascular disease guidelines are moving to being risk based, but familial hypercholesterolaemia stands alone as defined by large database of lipids-cholesterol criteria. A risk-based approach may need to be considered for familial hypercholesterolaemia, but a good evidence base is required. The effects of older therapies on prognosis in familial hypercholesterolaemia are based on surrogate as opposed to cardiovascular disease outcomes. Novel efficacious but expensive therapies are on the horizon, but no specific outcome trials in familial hypercholesterolaemia are planned and they may not be cost-effective outside very severe familial hypercholesterolaemia. Further research is also required to trial and test different models of care for familial hypercholesterolaemia.

SUMMARY

Despite familial hypercholesterolaemia being a common genetic condition, aspects of basic epidemiology, risk assessment, treatment, and models of care remain uncertain.

Challenges in the care of familial hypercholesterolemia: a community care perspective

Familial hyperchoelsterolaemia (FH) remains under-diagnosed and under-treated in the community setting. Earlier evidence suggested a prevalence of 1:500 worldwide but newer evidence suggests it is more common. Less than 15% of FH patients are ever diagnosed, with children and young adults rarely tested despite having the most to gain given their lifetime exposure. Increasing awareness among primary care teams is critical to improve the detection profile for FH. Cascade testing in the community setting needs a sustainable approach to be developed to facilitate family tracing of index cases. The use of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria score to facilitate a phenotypic diagnosis is the preferred approach adopted in Australia and eliminates the need to undertake genetic testing for all suspected FH cases.

The potential role of an expert computer system to augment the opportunistic detection of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia from a community laboratory

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common monogenic cause of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, most individuals with FH remain undiagnosed. We sought to determine if an expert system (ES) at a community laboratory could identify information relevant for estimating an individual's likelihood of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria (DLCNC).

METHODS

An ES (RippleDown®) retrospectively analysed laboratory results and clinical details on the current and previous lipid requests from a community laboratory in Western Australia, over 12months.

RESULTS

84,823 individuals had ≥1 LDL-cholesterol request with data available on 84,083 (99.1%). Clinical details were provided on 71,282 (84.8%) individuals' current or previous requests. History relevant to the DLCNC was present in 883 (1.1%) individuals, with premature CVD and non-cardiac vascular disease present in 177 and 64 individuals, respectively. Statin therapy was reported in 5118 individuals; 112 individuals with a current LDL-cholesterol of <6.5mmol/L had a previous LDL-cholesterol of ≥6.5mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The ES was able to identify information that increased the likelihood of FH in 5471 cases. The ability to detect individuals with premature CVD and to classify them based on their highest LDL-cholesterol may augment FH detection, although further investigation is required to confirm this.

Systematic detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary health care: a community based prospective study of three methods

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), a co-dominantly inherited disease of cholesterol that markedly increases risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD), is significantly under-diagnosed. Primary health care is increasingly seen as a setting in which to increase the detection rate of index cases. We report a prospective study of three methods of case detection using pre-existing primary health care services in one community.

METHODS

Three methods of case detection were tested: pathology laboratory database search, workplace health checks and general practice database search. People identified at risk by each of the three screening methods were offered detailed assessment for FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria score (DLCNCS).

RESULTS

1316 participants underwent detailed assessment for FH. The proportion of at risk people identified for further assessment was in decreasing order: GP (659 of 2494, 26.4%), workplace assessment (60 of 268, 22.4%) and pathology database (597 of 4517, 13.2%) p<0.001. Eight-six (6.5%) were identified as clinical FH (DLCNCS>5) of which 59 had genetic testing and 11 of 59, 18.6%, were confirmed to have a mutation causing FH. Pathology database detected the greatest number of clinical FH (51 of 86, 59.3%) and mutation positive participants (8 of 11, 72.7%).

CONCLUSION

Screening within primary health care was successful in detecting participants with FH. An integrated case detection model combining screening of pathology and GP databases is proposed.

Significant gaps in awareness of familial hypercholesterolemia among physicians in selected Asia-Pacific countries: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by high plasma cholesterol levels and a very high risk of early heart disease. The prevalence of FH is estimated to be at least 1:500, with at least 3.6 million individuals in the Asia-Pacific region.

OBJECTIVE

To assess awareness, knowledge, and perception of FH among practicing physicians in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.

METHODS

Physicians from 3 economically developed Asian countries were requested to anonymously complete a structured Internet-based survey regarding FH. This survey sought responses on the clinical description, inheritance, prevalence, cardiovascular disease risk, practices, and opinions on screening.

RESULTS

Of 230 physicians surveyed, 47% were aware of the heritability, 27% of the prevalence, and 13% of the risk of cardiovascular disease relating to FH. The majority (70%) perceived themselves to have an above-moderate familiarity with FH. Primary care physicians (59%) and lipid specialists (41%) were perceived as the best providers for caring for FH, including cascade screening services, with a lesser role perceived for cardiologists, endocrinologists, and no significant role for nursing staff. Only 35% of physicians were aware of specialist clinical services for lipid disorders in their geographic area.

CONCLUSION

Extensive education and training programs are required to complement the implementation of region-specific models of care for FH in Asia. Further enhancement of existing lipid services and facilities are also warranted to optimise service models.

Optimising the detection and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia: central role of primary care and its integration with specialist services

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common monogenic lipid disorder associated with premature coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the majority of people with FH are undiagnosed or undertreated. Early cholesterol lowering therapy reduces cardiovascular disease mortality in FH. Low awareness and knowledge of FH in specialty and general practice highlights the need for strategies to improve the detection and management of FH. We present an algorithm describing a multidisciplinary approach to FH detection and management. We highlight the role of primary care, and where GPs can work with preventive cardiologists to improve care of FH. Novel strategies to detect index cases with FH are presented including the community laboratory, highlighting patients at high risk of FH, and targeted FH detection through searching the general practice database. General practitioners request over 90% of LDL cholesterol measurements in the community. Once an individual with FH is detected only a small proportion of patients require specialty management with the majority of patients suitably managed in primary care. However, it is crucial to screen family members, as 50% of first-degree family members are expected to have FH due to the autosomal dominant inheritance.