Alloantibodies and the outcome of cadaver kidney allografts

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.

Inhibition of B-cell proliferation and antibody production by mesenchymal stromal cells is mediated by T cells

Bone marrow (BM)-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), endowed with immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties, represent a promising tool in immunoregulatory and regenerative cell therapy. Clarifying the interactions between MSCs and B-lymphocytes may be crucial for designing innovative MSC-based strategies in conditions in which B cells play a role, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rejection of kidney transplantation. In this study, we show that, both in healthy subjects and in patients, in vitro B-cell proliferation, plasma-cell differentiation, and antibody production are inhibited by BM-derived MSCs when peripheral blood lymphocytes are stimulated with CpG, but not when sorted B cells are cultured with MSCs+CpG. Inhibition is restored in CpG+MSC cocultures when sorted T cells are added to sorted B cells, suggesting that this effect is mediated by T cells, with both CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells playing a role. Moreover, cell-cell contact between MSCs and T cells, but not between MSCs and B cells, is necessary to inhibit B-cell proliferation. Thus, the presence of functional T cells, as well as cell-cell contact between MSCs and T cells, are crucial for B-cell inhibition. This information can be relevant for implementing MSC-based therapeutic immune modulation in patients in whom T-cell function is impaired.

Issues in solid-organ transplantation in children: translational research from bench to bedside

In this review, we identify important challenges facing physicians responsible for renal and cardiac transplantation in children based on a review of the contemporary medical literature. Regarding pediatric renal transplantation, we discuss the challenge of antibody-mediated rejection, focusing on both acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. We review new diagnostic approaches to antibody-mediated rejection, such as panel-reactive antibodies, donor-specific cross-matching, antibody assays, risk assessment and diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection, the pathology of antibody-mediated rejection, the issue of ABO incompatibility in renal transplantation, new therapies for antibody-mediated rejection, inhibiting of residual antibodies, the suppression or depletion of B-cells, genetic approaches to treating acute antibody-mediated rejection, and identifying future translational research directions in kidney transplantation in children. Regarding pediatric cardiac transplantation, we discuss the mechanisms of cardiac transplant rejection, including the role of endomyocardial biopsy in detecting graft rejection and the role of biomarkers in detecting cardiac graft rejection, including biomarkers of inflammation, cardiomyocyte injury, or stress. We review cardiac allograft vasculopathy. We also address the role of genetic analyses, including genome-wide association studies, gene expression profiling using entities such as AlloMap®, and adenosine triphosphate release as a measure of immune function using the Cylex® ImmuKnow™ cell function assay. Finally, we identify future translational research directions in heart transplantation in children.

The Presence of Anti-HLA Antibodies before and after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation from HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donors

Although anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (anti-HLA Abs) are important factors responsible for graft rejection in solid organ transplantation and play a role in post-transfusion complications, their role in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has not been finally defined. Enormous polymorphism of HLA-genes, their immunogenicity and heterogeneity of antibodies, as well as the growing number of allo-HSCTs from partially HLA-mismatched donors, increase the probability that anti-HLA antibodies could be important factors responsible for the treatment outcomes. We have examined the incidence of anti-HLA antibodies in a group of 30 allo-HSCT recipients from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors. Anti-HLA Abs were identified in sera collected before and after allo-HSCT. We have used automated DynaChip assay utilizing microchips bearing purified class I and II HLA antigens for detection of anti-HLA Abs. We have detected anit-HLA antibodies against HLA-A, B, C, DR, DQ and DP, but no donor or recipient-specific anti-HLA Abs were detected in the studied group. The preliminary results indicate that anti-HLA antibodies are present before and after allo-HSCT in HLA-mismatched recipients.

Monitoring tolerance and rejection in organ transplant recipients

To avoid toxic side effects caused by permanent immunosuppressive treatment, research in transplantation focuses on new treatment strategies inducing tolerance or allowing drug weaning. Implementing drug minimization into clinical routine can be only safely achieved when guided by biomarkers reflecting the individual immune reactivity. We review recently described biomarkers and assays allowing identification of patients suitable for drug weaning or at risk of rejection. However, the majority of described biomarkers and assays have not been validated in prospective clinical trials. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to design and perform prospective multicenter trials to validate the identified biomarkers across different laboratories.

HLA antibodies in pediatric heart transplantation

We have analyzed the impact of anti-HLA antibodies present in the patients' circulation prior and/or following heart transplantation in a population of 108 pediatric recipients. Anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies were monitored by traditional CDC using donor and panel T and B lymphocytes and by SPA for detection of DSA. There was a highly significant correlation between the development of AMR and presence of CDC- or SPA-detected DSA. However, the fraction of the transplant population which remained AMR-free was much higher among patients with SPA-detected compared to CDC-detected DSA. Furthermore, long-term graft survival was negatively affected only by cytotoxic, complement-fixing anti-HLA class I antibodies developing following transplantation. Anti-HLA class I or class II antibodies detected by SPA had no effect on long-term survival rates.

Pre- and posttransplantation allosensitization in heart allograft recipients: major impact of de novo alloantibody production on allograft survival

The involvement of humoral response in allograft rejection has been suggested by both immunologic and histochemistry studies. In the present study, we explored the role of alloantibodies in a large cohort of heart allograft recipients followed for 15 years. Sequential samples of sera were obtained from 950 recipients of heart allografts before and after transplantation at the time when protocol endomyocardial biopsies were performed. The presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was investigated using complement mediated cytotoxicity and solid phase assay (SPA). Our data reveal an inverse correlation between the development of alloantibodies after transplantation and heart allograft survival. The 15-year graft survival was highest in patients who never developed alloantibodies (70%) or who displayed them only before transplantation (71%); graft survival in recipients who showed antibodies both before and after transplantation (56%), or only after transplantation (47%), was lower. The deleterious effect of antibodies on graft survival started 8 years after transplantation, suggesting that the production of de novo antibodies may have been triggered by some later event. We found that patients with de novo antibodies appearing more than 1 year after transplantation had the poorest survival. Furthermore, the development of de novo antibodies was preceded in 76% of these patients by cellular rejection grade 3 or higher, according to the International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grading criteria. Development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) had a significant negative impact on graft survival (16% in AMR(+) vs 63% in AMR(-) patients, p = 0.0008). Of the 23 patients with AMR, 21 displayed cytotoxic donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of diagnosis, and in 18 of these cases SPA showed that they were directed against the donors' HLA. The data demonstrate that the detection of alloantibodies permits a better definition of AMR in heart allograft recipients. Identification of patients at risk for developing AMR is of great importance for early treatment of rejection episodes.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).

The use of immunoglobulin therapy for patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: an evidence-based practice guideline

This guideline for the use of immunoglobulin (IG) for sensitized patients undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) is an initiative of the Canadian Blood Services and the National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products of Canada to (1) provide guidance for Canadian practitioners involved in the care of patients undergoing SOT and transfusion medicine specialists on the use of IG and (2) standardize care, limit adverse events, and optimize patient care. A systematic expert and bibliography literature search up to July 2008 was conducted, with 791 literature citations and 45 reports reviewed. To validate the recommendations, the guideline was sent to physicians involved in SOT in Canada and a patient representative. The recommendations identify (1) sensitized patients undergoing SOT that would have a better survival and decreased morbidity by receiving IG preoperatively, postoperatively, and for the treatment of organ rejection; (2) patients who may not have any benefit from receiving IG; and (3) potential adversities to IG.

Alloantibodies and outcomes of deceased donor kidney allografts

Analysis of the anti-HLA antibody status of 100 recipients of kidneys from deceased donors demonstrated that presensitization and the development of alloantibodies after transplantation are associated with the development of antibody mediated as well as cellular rejection. This finding indicates that the humoral arm of the immune response is also involved in cell-mediated rejection and/or that there may be a continuum between these two forms of rejection. Most episodes of rejection were successfully reversed in our population, as shown by the overall 3-year actuarial survival of 98% in nonsensitized and 91% in sensitized recipients, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive antibody studies.

Relevance of different antibody detection methods for the prediction of antibody-mediated rejection and deceased-donor kidney allograft survival

Presensitizing alloantibodies may represent a grave danger in organ transplantation, increasing the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. However, not all antibodies are harmful to the graft. In our study of a cohort of 325 deceased-donor renal allograft recipients, the patients were determined eligible to receive an allograft based on a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch (XM). Yet at the time of transplantation, many candidates displayed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) by more sensitive methods, such as solid-phase assays (SPA, Luminex) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). The majority of the patients who were DSA positive by either SPA (67%) or FCXM (66%) presented an AMR-free clinical course posttransplantation. Among the patients who developed AMR (N = 29), 76% proved clinically manageable and did not lose the graft. Analysis of the DSA mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of Luminex indicated no statistically significant difference between patients who experienced AMR episodes and those who did not. Importantly, many of the patients with AMR did not test positive for DSA by SPA (20/29) or FCXM (14/29). Despite false-positive and false-negative results, the detection of DSA by SPA or FCXM was positively associated with AMR, but not with actuarial graft survival. The field of organ transplantation has always struggled to reconcile two opposing goals: improving transplantation outcome while increasing access to transplantation. SPA and FCXM appear to be oversensitive and defining patients as "sensitized" according to these methods would block access to transplantation for many candidates who would otherwise benefit greatly from receiving the allograft. Nevertheless, SPA and FCXM are invaluable tools, assisting clinicians in gauging AMR risk and tailoring immunosuppression of the posttransplantation immunological monitoring accordingly.

Tailoring antibody testing and how to use it in the calculated panel reactive antibody era: the Northwestern University experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with human leukocyte antigen antibodies constitute a significantly disadvantaged population among those awaiting renal transplantation. We speculated that more understanding of the patients' antibody makeup would allow a more "immunologic" evaluation of crossmatch data, facilitate the use of virtual crossmatch (XM), and lead to more transplantability of these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the transplantability and transplant outcome of two consecutive patient populations transplanted in our center. Group I (n=374) was evaluated using solid-phase base testing for determination of percentage panel reactive antibody ("PRA screen") with limited antibody identification testing. Group II (n=333) was tested in a more comprehensive manner with major emphasis on antibody identification, antibody strength assignment, and the use of pronase for crossmatch.

RESULTS

Given this approach, 49% (166/333) of the transplanted patients in group II were sensitized compared with 40% (150/374) of the recipients in group I; P=0.012. Transplant outcome at 1-year posttransplant was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that comprehensive evaluation of human leukocyte antigen sensitization and application of immunologic in analyzing compatibility between donor and recipient can increase the transplantability of sensitized patients while maintaining similar outcome. Our approach is in line with United Network for Organ Sharing new guidelines for calculated panel reactive antibody and virtual XM analysis. We hope this report will prompt additional transplant programs to consider how they will use the new United Network for Organ Sharing algorithms.

Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection: from association to causation

Considerable research has established an association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. Two new major developments now provide evidence that this relationship is in fact causative. First, recent studies of serial serum samples of 346 kidney transplant patients from four transplant centers show that de novo antibodies, can be detected before rejection. Moreover, serial testing revealed that when antibodies were not present, 528 patient years of good function was demonstrable in 149 patients. Second, among 90 patients whose grafts chronically failed, 86% developed antibodies before failure. To assess the likelihood of a causal link, we applied the nine widely accepted Bradford Hill criteria and conclude that the evidence supports a causal connection between human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection. The clinical implication is significant because we hope this review will stimulate centers to begin the one remaining task of showing that antibody removal will indeed prevent chronic failure.

Poor graft outcome in recipients with de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after living related kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now widely recognized as a major problem in organ transplantation. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between newly developing anti-HLA antibodies post-transplantation (de novo Abs) and the outcome of living related kidney transplantation (LRKT). The subjects included 87 patients who had received living donor kidney allografts at our institution. Panel reactive Ab assay (Flow-PRA) and graft biopsies were performed in all the recipients before and 6 months after the LRKT. The incidence of AMR, the donor specificity and time of appearance of the de novo Abs were retrospectively studied. Among the 87 LRKT recipients, 47 (54%) showed negative/negative (N/N) results, 15 (17%) showed positive/positive (P/P) results, 12 (14%) showed positive/negative results (P/N), and 13 (15%) showed negative/positive (N/P) results (de novo Abs) in the pre-/post-transplant Flow-PRA analysis. Among the 13 cases with de novo Abs, 5 (38%) had donor-specific Abs (DSA) and the remaining 8 (62%) had nondonor-specific Abs, as determined by LAB single antigen analysis. Eighty percent of the recipients with DSA showed evidence of AMR in the graft biopsies. The 5-year graft survival rate of the recipients with de novo Abs (N/P) was 69%, as compared with 96% in the N/N, 88% in the P/N and 93% in the P/P recipient groups (P = 0.009). LRKT recipients developing de novo Abs, especially those with DSA, showed a much higher incidence of AMR and a worse prognosis. Cautious monitoring for the appearance of anti-HLA Abs should be adopted after transplantation, even in patients without anti-HLA Abs prior to the transplantation.

Renal retransplantation: a retrospective monocentric study

Approximately 10% to 20% of all annual renal transplantations are retransplantations and up to 20% of patients on waiting lists need a repeat kidney because of previous graft failure. The immunological risk is much greater among retransplanted patients than first-time kidney recipients. It is likely that retransplantation will become even more prevalent in the future. However, clinical studies or retrospective data are rare in this patient population. We retrospectively investigated 50 recipients after second or third renal transplantations in our center since 2001. Immunosuppression was performed with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and induction therapy with either thymoglobulin (2.5 mg/kg body weight; n = 27) or 20 mg basiliximab on days 0 and 4 (n = 22) after renal transplantation; 1 patient was treated with antithymoglobulin Fresenius after combined liver-kidney transplantation. Acute rejection occurred in 12 recipients (44.4%) after thymoglobulin and in 7 recipients (31.8%) after basiliximab induction therapy (P < .05). In 4 (14.8%) thymoglobulin- and 5 (22.7%) basiliximab-treated recipients, vascular rejections were observed (P = NS). Patients with basiliximab treatment showed improved renal function at 1 year after transplantation: serum creatinine 134.3 mumol/L versus 199.6 mumol/L in the thymoglobulin group (P < .05). Over the observation period the renal function remained stable or improved in both groups if rejection treatment was successful. However, allograft failure was higher in the basiliximab-treated group, namely, 18.1% versus 14.8% in thymoglobulin-treated patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In 3 (11.1%) thymoglobulin- and 4 (18.2%) basiliximab-treated patients cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections complicated the follow-up (P = NS). In the follow-up period of 5 years, no malignant diseases were seen in either group. Three basiliximab-treated recipients died in the first year due to sepsis or cardiovascular complications. Two thymoglobulin-treated patients developed BK virus nephropathy in the follow-up period. In conclusion, we observed a high immunological risk and rejection risk among retransplanted kidney recipients in our center. Particularly, severe vascular rejections with a harmful long-term impact on allograft function were observed in this population. Induction treatment seems to be successful to reduce risk and achieve better results. Single-shot thymoglobulin may be preferable to reduce severe vascular rejection and prevent allograft failure than basiliximab with the same infection rate.

A pig allograft model of antibody-mediated rejection

Allograft rejection caused by antibodies in sensitised individuals remains a real problem in human allotransplantation. There would be value in a simple model of this process to evaluate the mechanisms involved in antibody-mediated damage and the development of accommodation, as well as the impact of potential interventions. We have thus developed a novel large animal model of this process using an allosensitisation system. Two inbred lines of miniature pigs that carry different major histocompatibility antigen haplotypes were used. Pigs of one line were sensitised by the sequential subcutaneous injection of major histocompatibility antigen-mismatched allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from the other inbred line. We demonstrated that this generated high titres of allospecific antibodies. We then transplanted carotid arteries from donors syngeneic to the priming cells into the sensitised animals. After 48 h these vessels showed a profound mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltrate in both intima and media, fibrin deposition, and luminal compromise with thrombus and antibody deposition. The mean endothelial surface affected by this process was 59.2%. No such pathology was seen in any of the controls. This model is technically simple to perform with few post-operative complications. It provides proof-of-principle of a model of antibody-mediated rejection which will be of potential value in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the process and the efficacy of interventions to prevent or treat it.

Renal transplantation in patients with pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches

The clinical significance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month post-transplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSA-negative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring post-transplant.

Kidney graft recipients with pretransplantation HLA CLASS I antibodies and high soluble CD30 are at high risk for graft loss

In the present study, we investigated whether pretransplantation HLA class I and class II antibodies and pretransplantation levels of soluble CD30 (sCD30) and IgA anti-Fab autoantibodies are predictive of kidney allograft survival. Pretransplantation sera of 504 deceased-donor kidney recipients were tested for IgG HLA class I and class II antibodies, sCD30, and IgA anti-Fab levels using the CTS 4 ELISA kit. Kidney graft survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression. Regardless of the presence of HLA class II antibodies, recipients with high HLA class I reactivity had lower 1-year graft survival than recipients with low reactivity (p < 0.01). Recipients with high sCD30 had lower 5-year graft survival rate than those with low sCD30 (p < 0.01). The sCD30 effect was observed in presensitized and nonsensitized recipients, demonstrated a synergistic effect with HLA class I antibodies (p < 0.001), and appeared to be neutralized in recipients with no HLA class II mismatches. IgA anti-Fab did not influence kidney graft survival. Our results indicate that high pretransplantation sCD30 levels and HLA class I positivity increase the risk of kidney graft loss regardless of other factors. Consequently, such determinations should be routinely performed to estimate recipients' risks of graft rejection before transplantation.

Anti-CD25 treatment and FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells in heart transplantation

The interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (IL-2Ra, CD25) plays a major part in shaping the dynamics of T cell populations following immune activation, due to its role in T cell proliferation and survival. Strategies to blunt the effector responses in transplantation have been developed by devising pharmaceutical agents to block the IL-2 pathways. However, such strategies could adversely affect the CD25(+)FOXP3(+)T regulatory (T reg) populations which also rely on intereukin-2 signaling for survival. The present study shows that a cohort of heart allograft recipients treated with Daclizumab (a humanized anti-CD25 antibody) display FOXP3 expression patterns consistent with functional T regulatory cell populations. High levels of FOXP3 were observed to correlate with lower incidence of and recovery from acute rejection, as well as lower levels of anti-donor HLA antibody production. Therefore, T reg populations appear fully functional in patients treated with Daclizumab, even when 5 doses were administered. By comparison, patients treated with fewer doses or no Daclizumab had a higher incidence of acute rejection, antibody production and graft failure. Therefore, our data indicates that Daclizumab treatment does not interfere with the generation of regulatory T cells and has a beneficial effect on heart allograft survival.

Rituximab therapy for acute humoral rejection after kidney transplantation

A pilot study was performed on eight consecutive renal-transplant (RT) patients presenting with acute humoral rejection (AHR) to assess the efficacy of monoclonal anti-B cell antibodies, such as rituximab (375 mg/m weekly) for 3 to 5 consecutive weeks, in addition to plasma exchange (PE), steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. AHR was associated with increased serum creatinine, the appearance of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), and the presence of C4d in a transplant biopsy. After a follow-up of 10 months (range 7-23), patient and graft survivals were 100% and 75%, respectively. Renal function improved in six cases in which serum creatinine decreased from 297+/-140 to 156+/-53 micromol/L (P=0.015); graft loss occurred in two cases; and four patients had infectious complications. At last follow-up, DSA had disappeared or decreased in four cases. Rituximab therapy, in addition to PE, might be of benefit for RT patients presenting with AHR.

Cadaveric kidney transplantation: five years experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

In the past, the majority of renal transplantations in Iran were from living donors, but recently cadaveric donation of organs is increasing. We reviewed our experience on kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors for the past 5 years in our center.

METHODS

Between July 1998 and September 2004, 122 kidneys were removed from 61 cases of brain-dead patients and transplanted in 114 patients with end-stage renal disease in our center. Two kidneys had tumoral involvement and were discarded. Three kidneys were transplanted in other centers and three patients received en bloc kidney transplantations. In addition, we performed nine cases of heart, one case of liver, and one case of lung transplantations. All the recipients were followed for at least 1 year and posttreatment renal function and graft survival were determined.

RESULTS

All cadaveric donors were brain dead due to car (30%) and motocycle (70%) accidents, with ages ranging from 5 to 56 years (mean, 24/4 years). The mean warm and total cold ischemia times were 7 minutes and 8.1 hours, respectively. The mean distance between harvesting center and our hospital was 65 km. The 1-year graft survival was 92.3%, with mean serum creatinine of 1.76 +/- 0.79 at 1 year. Of other transplanted organs, the liver and lung recipients died 24 hours and 45 days after operation. Among heart recipients, four are still alive.

CONCLUSION

Cadaveric donors in developing countries including Iran can be excellent sources of organ donation.

Accommodation of grafts: implications for health and disease

Accommodation refers to the acquired resistance of a graft to immune-mediated injury. It is typically observed after antibodies that would cause rejection of a graft are removed from a recipient and then later return. In addition to being induced in this manner, accommodation can occur spontaneously, without depleting antibodies. Indeed, we postulate spontaneous accommodation may be the most common outcome of clinical organ transplantation. The paper reviews the current understanding of accommodation, emphasizing recent advances and important questions. Among the recent advances are the discoveries of potentially broader relevance of accommodation for biology and immunology and pathways by which accommodation may be achieved. To investigate these pathways and to understand how accommodation begins and how it evolves, clinical organ transplants might offer a useful and incisive model.

Antibody-mediated rejection following renal transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) accounts for 20-30% of all acute rejection episodes following renal transplantation. AMR is generally less responsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy, resulting in poor allograft survival. Introduction of C4d immunostaining of renal allograft biopsies and the demonstration of donor-specific antibodies in the recipients have increased our ability to diagnose AMR. Therapeutic options are evolving and include plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption and rituximab, together with intensification of immunosuppression with a tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil combination. Future studies might further define optimal therapeutic approach in renal transplant recipients presenting with AMR.

Luminex technology for anti-HLA antibody screening: Evaluation of performance and of impact on laboratory routine

The recent introduction of new technologies such as Luminex has provided alternative methods to the Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) test for HLA specific antibody detection. In this study we compared the results obtained with CDC to those obtained using a Luminex method with the aim of evaluating the impact of this new technology on antibody screening policies in our transplant setting.A total of 1,421 sera, acquired from patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant or following transplantation, were tested by both methodologies. CDC was performed using a whole lymphocyte population comprising a panel of 52 cells. The percentage panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and antibody specificity were evaluated using Lambda Scan Analysis software. For the Luminex method sera screening and identification of antibody specificity were carried out using the LABScreen Mixed and LABScreen PRA respectively. The overall concordance between the results obtained using the CDC and the Luminex methods was 85%. HLA antibody specificity was confirmed in 96% of the sera which tested positive using the Luminex system and serum positivity corresponded with a previous sensitisation event in these individuals. Using the Luminex method 18% of patients on the waiting list were considered and managed as sensitised as compared to 7% when testing with CDC alone. The Luminex method was able to detect a number of antibody specificities significantly more frequently than the CDC method and in addition the CDC method failed to detect some of the antibody specificities detected by the Luminex system. Based on this comparison study we have incorporated the Luminex methodology into our screening strategy.