Differential clinicopathologic features in microsatellite-unstable gastric cancers with and without MLH1 methylation

Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in gastric adenosquamous carcinoma

Primary gastric adenosquamous carcinoma (GASC) is a rare tumor that exhibits aggressive behavior and currently lacks standardized therapeutic recommendations. Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and positive PD-L1 expression confer sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, their statuses in GASC remain uncertain. In this study, clinical features, MMR/MSI status, MLH1 methylation, two T-cell markers, and PD-L1 expression of 30 GASC cases were collected from three institutions. Additionally, 196 gastric adenocarcinomas (GACs) were collected for comparison. The median age of GASC patients was 62 years, with 76.7% being males, and 56.7% at stage III. dMMR/MSI-high with MLH1 hypermethylation was observed in 33.3% GASCs, and was significantly associated with older age, female, distal location, larger size, deeper tumor invasion, and higher CD3 and CD8 densities and PD-L1 expression. Both glandular and squamous components of all dMMR GASCs showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression. No significant difference in overall survival was observed between dMMR and mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR) GASC patients, while inferior overall survival was observed in pMMR GASC treated with surgery alone compared to those receiving chemotherapy. When comparing to GAC, GASC exhibited clinicopathological features indicative of more aggressive behavior (larger size, poorly tumor differentiation, deeper tumor invasion and more lymph node metastases). A significantly higher frequency of dMMR was found in GASC (33.3%) than that in GAC (16.3%). This study offers a comprehensive perspective on the clinicopathological features of GASC, emphasizing a subset of GASC associated with dMMR and MLH1 hypermethylation. Immunotherapy might be a promising strategy for GASC.

MLH1 Methylation Status and Microsatellite Instability in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Background/Objectives: The purpose of the current study was to compare the methylation of five regions of the CpG island of MLH1 with the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: The study analyzed 138 CRC tumor samples. DNA extraction was performed, followed by bisulfite conversion. MLH1 gene methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), and the resulting fragments were analyzed using polyacrylamide gels. MSI was evaluated using multiplex PCR, and the fragments were run through capillary electrophoresis. R studio (v4.4.1) and SPSS (v29.0) software were used for the statistical analysis, and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The study showed 75.4% unmethylated, 21% partially methylated, and 3.6% fully methylated samples, with region A frequently methylated. MSI was observed in 7.2% of cases (MSI-H: 5.8%, MSI-L: 1.4%). BAT-26 was the most unstable marker. A significant difference between MLH1 methylation and MSI-H (p < 0.01) was identified, but there was no relationship with specific MLH1 regions. Conclusions: No differences were identified when analyzing specific methylation regions in relation to MSI. This study is the first to describe MSI frequency in Mexican patients regardless of age.

Heterogeneity and Adjuvant Therapeutic Approaches in MSI-H/dMMR Resectable Gastric Cancer: Emerging Trends in Immunotherapy

Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the world's most common and fatal malignant tumors. With a refined understanding of molecular typing in recent years, microsatellite instability (MSI) has become a major molecular typing approach for gastric cancer. MSI is well recognized for its important role during the immunotherapy of advanced GC. However, its value remains unclear in resectable gastric cancer. The reported incidence of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in resectable gastric cancer varies widely, with no consensus reached on the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with MSI-H/dMMR resectable GC. It has been established that MSI-H/dMMR tumor cells can elicit an endogenous immune antitumor response and ubiquitously express immune checkpoint ligands such as PD-1 or PD-L1. On the basis of these considerations, MSI-H/dMMR resectable GCs are responsive to adjuvant immunotherapy, although limited research has hitherto been conducted. In this review, we comprehensively describe the differences in geographic distribution and pathological stages in patients with MSI-H/dMMR with resectable gastric cancer and explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy on MSI-H/dMMR to provide a foothold for the individualized treatment of this patient population.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

A virtual biopsy study of microsatellite instability in gastric cancer based on deep learning radiomics

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop and validate a virtual biopsy model to predict microsatellite instability (MSI) status in preoperative gastric cancer (GC) patients based on clinical information and the radiomics of deep learning algorithms.

METHODS

A total of 223 GC patients with MSI status detected by postoperative immunohistochemical staining (IHC) were retrospectively recruited and randomly assigned to the training (n = 167) and testing (n = 56) sets in a 3:1 ratio. In the training set, 982 high-throughput radiomic features were extracted from preoperative abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and screened. According to the deep learning multilayer perceptron (MLP), 15 optimal features were optimized to establish the radiomic feature score (Rad-score), and LASSO regression was used to screen out clinically independent predictors. Based on logistic regression, the Rad-score and clinically independent predictors were integrated to build the clinical radiomics model and visualized as a nomogram and independently verified in the testing set. The performance and clinical applicability of hybrid model in identifying MSI status were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve (DCA).

RESULTS

The AUCs of the clinical image model in training set and testing set were 0.883 [95% CI: 0.822-0.945] and 0.802 [95% CI: 0.666-0.937], respectively. This hybrid model showed good consistency in the calibration curve and clinical applicability in the DCA curve, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using preoperative imaging and clinical information, we developed a deep-learning-based radiomics model for the non-invasive evaluation of MSI in GC patients. This model maybe can potentially support clinical treatment decision making for GC patients.

Prédispositions génétiques au cancer gastrique et leur association au type histologique

About 5% of gastric cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Histology is paramount in this context, as major susceptibility genes are associated with specific subtypes. Germline pathogenic variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1 cause Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC). Major advances have been made in the past ten years regarding HDGC. Penetrance estimates for diffuse cancer are now lower than previously thought, at 30-40%. Surveillance upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is now an acceptable alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy. Indeed, its sensitivity in detecting advanced disease is satisfactory assuming it is performed by an expert and according to a specific protocol. The risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer is increased in patients with Lynch syndrome, although it is much lower than the risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. Intestinal-type gastric cancers are also observed in excess in patients with hereditary polyposis, the main one being APC-associated familial adenomatous polyposis. The main and most clinically relevant manifestations in patients with polyposes remain colorectal and duodenal polyps and carcinomas, well ahead of gastric cancer. Finally, recent data point towards increased gastric cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors

Simple Summary

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific, as most of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Therefore, the identification of MSI/dMMR requires additional diagnostic tools to identify LS. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS and present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with current strategies, which should be taken into account in order to improve the diagnosis of LS.

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific to it, as approximately 80% of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Methods leading to the diagnosis of LS have considerably evolved in recent years and so have tumoral tests for LS screening and for the discrimination of LS-related to MSI-sporadic tumors. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS, including the clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. We present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with the current strategies, which should be taken into account to improve the diagnosis of LS and avoid inappropriate clinical management.

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

In the CLASSIC and MAGIC trials, microsatellite instability (MSI)-high status was a favorable prognostic and potential negative predictive factor for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer (GC). Given the low prevalence of MSI-high status in GC and its association with other positive prognostic variables, large data sets are needed to draw robust evidence of its prognostic/predictive value.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a multinational, individual-patient-data meta-analysis of the prognostic/predictive role of MSI in patients with resectable GC enrolled in the MAGIC, CLASSIC, ARTIST, and ITACA-S trials. Prognostic analyses used multivariable Cox models (MVM). The predictive role of MSI was assessed both in an all-comer population and in MAGIC and CLASSIC trials by MVM testing of the interaction of treatment (chemotherapy plus surgery v surgery) with MSI.

RESULTS

MSI status was available for 1,556 patients: 121 (7.8%) had MSI-high status; 576 were European, and 980 were Asian. In MSI-high versus MSI-low/microsatellite stable (MSS) comparisons, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% (95% CI, 63.8% to 80.7%) versus 52.3% (95% CI, 49.7% to 55.1%); the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.5% (95% CI, 70.0% to 85.8%) versus 59.3% (95% CI, 56.6% to 62.1%). In MVM, MSI was associated with longer DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.76; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.73; P = .008), as were pT, pN, ethnicity, and treatment. Patients with MSI-low/MSS GC benefitted from chemotherapy plus surgery: the 5-year DFS compared with surgery only was 57% versus 41% (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79), and the 5-year OS was 62% versus 53% (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94). Conversely, those with MSI-high GC did not: the 5-year DFS was 70% versus 77% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.04), and the 5-year OS was 75% versus 83% (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.55 to 4.12).

CONCLUSION

In patients with resectable primary GC, MSI is a robust prognostic marker that should be adopted as a stratification factor by clinical trials. Chemotherapy omission and/or immune checkpoint blockade should be investigated prospectively in MSI-high GCs according to clinically and pathologically defined risk of relapse.

[Epidemiology of microsatellite instability across solid neoplasms]

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, regardless of the tumor type. While clinical characteristics of MSI cancer patients have been largely described in tumor localizations frequently associated with this genetic phenotype (i.e. colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer), it remains poorly characterized in other neoplasms. Pan-tumor high-throughput genome sequence analyses have contributed to the broadening of knowledge about the landscape of MSI. This review aims at synthetizing the literature concerning the frequency of MSI status in solid cancers, according to the cancer stage and the hereditary or sporadic origin of the mismatch repair deficiency. We then check for other cancers frequently associated with MSI and describe the clinical and pathological characteristics that should suggest a MSI phenotype.

MLH1 Promoter Methylation and Prediction/Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta and Bioinformatic Analysis

Background: The promoter methylation of MLH1 gene and gastric cancer (GC)has been investigated previously. To get a more credible conclusion, we performed a systematic review and meta and bioinformatic analysis to clarify the role of MLH1 methylation in the prediction and prognosis of GC.

Methods: Eligible studies were targeted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, BIOSIS, CNKI and Wanfang Data to collect the information of MLH1 methylation and GC. The link strength between the two was estimated by odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quantity assessment. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were employed for bioinformatics analysis on the correlation between MLH1 methylation and GC risk, clinicopathological behavior as well as prognosis.

Results: 2365 GC and 1563 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR of MLH1 methylation in GC was 4.895 (95% CI: 3.149-7.611, P<0.001), which considerably associated with increased GC risk. No significant difference was found in relation to Lauren classification, tumor invasion, lymph node/distant metastasis and tumor stage in GC. Analysis based on GEO and TCGA showed that high MLH1 methylation enhanced GC risk but might not related with GC clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Conclusion:MLH1 methylation is an alive biomarker for the prediction of GC and it might not affect GC behavior. Further study could be conducted to verify the impact of MLH1 methylation on GC prognosis.

Meta-analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Several associations between microsatellite instability (MSI) and other clinicopathological factors have been reported in gastric cancer, but the results have been ambiguous. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the relationship between MSI and overall survival and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane and Ovid databases until 31 January 2016 was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The articles were screened independently according to PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were evaluated independently by two reviewers for risk of bias according to the Quality In Prognosis Study tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 studies with a total of 18 612 patients were included. MSI was found in 9·2 per cent of patients (1718 of 18 612), and was associated with female sex (odds ratio (OR) 1·57, 95 per cent c.i. 1·31 to 1·89; P < 0·001), older age (OR 1·58, 2·20 to 1·13; P < 0·001), intestinal Laurén histological type (OR 2·23, 1·94 to 2·57; P < 0·001), mid/lower gastric location (OR 0·38, 0·32 to 0·44; P < 0·001), lack of lymph node metastases (OR 0·70, 0·57 to 0·86, P < 0·001) and TNM stage I-II (OR 1·77, 1·47 to 2·13; P < 0·001). The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival of patients with MSI versus those with non-MSI gastric cancer from 21 studies was 0·69 (95 per cent c.i. 0·56 to 0·86; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

MSI in gastric cancer was associated with good overall survival, reflected in several favourable clinicopathological tumour characteristics.

Ten-eleven translocation 1 dysfunction reduces 5-hydroxymethylcytosine expression levels in gastric cancer cells

A sixth base, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), is formed by the oxidation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) via the catalysis of the ten-eleven translocation (TET) protein family in cells. Expression levels of 5hmC are frequently depleted during carcinogenesis. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the depletion of 5hmC expression in gastric cancer cells remains unclear, and further research is required. The present study examined the expression levels of 5mC and 5hmC and the expression levels of TET1 and TET2 in gastric cancer tissues using immunohistochemistry. The results revealed that 5hmC expression levels were markedly lower in gastric cancer tissues compared with corresponding adjacent normal tissues. Furthermore, a decrease in 5hmC expression levels was associated with a decrease in TET1 protein expression levels in gastric cancer tissues. The ectopic expression level of TET1 may increase the 5hmC expression level in gastric cancer cells. In addition, the results revealed that TET1 protein expression was markedly different in regards to subcellular localization, and mislocalization was significantly associated with the depletion of 5hmC expression levels in gastric cancer. Together, the results of the present study indicated that TET1 dysfunction reduces 5hmC expression levels, and this phenomenon may serve a crucial role in gastric cancer progression.

Deletion in HSP110 T17: correlation with wild-type HSP110 expression and prognostic significance in microsatellite-unstable advanced gastric cancers

Deletion of the HSP110 T₁₇ mononucleotide repeat has recently been identified as a prognostic marker that is correlated with wild-type HSP110 (HSP110wt) expression in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between deletion of the HSP110 T₁₇ repeat and expression of HSP110wt using DNA testing and immunohistochemistry and to determine the prognostic implications of HSP110 T₁₇ deletion in MSI-H advanced gastric cancers (GCs). The status of HSP110wt expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using an HSP110wt-specific antibody in 142 MSI-H advanced GCs. The size of the HSP110 T₁₇ repeat deletion was analyzed in 96 MSI-H advanced GCs; deletions were divided into small (0-2base pairs) and large deletions (3-5base pairs). Low and high expressions of HSP110wt were detected in 38 (26.8%) and 104 (73.2%) of the 142 cases, respectively. The HSP110 T₁₇ deletion was observed in 45 (46.9%) of the 96 MSI-H GC samples. Tumors with high expression of HSP110wt showed a tendency to have small or no deletion of HSP110 T₁₇. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, tumors with a large HSP110 T₁₇ deletion were associated with favorable overall survival and disease-free survival compared with those with small/no deletion of HSP110 T₁₇. However, HSP110 T₁₇ deletion size was not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. In summary, deletion of the HSP110 T₁₇ repeat was frequently observed in MSI-H GCs, and HSP110 T₁₇ deletion size was inversely correlated with HSP110wt expression status. Large HSP110 T₁₇ was not a prognostic indicator in MSI-H GCs.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Microsatellite Instable Gastric Carcinomas Revisited: Urgent Need for Standardization

Microsatellite instable gastric cancer (MSI-GC) is a specific molecular subtype of GC. We studied the phenotypes, genotypes, and clinicopathologic characteristics of MSI-GC in a white GC cohort and compared our findings with an extended literature review. The study cohort consisted of 482 patients. Specimens were available from 452 cases and were used for immunostaining (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) and molecular biological analyses (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, NR-27; Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization). Thirty-four (7.5%) GCs were MSI. Loss of MLH1 and/or PMS2 was found in 30 (88%) MSI-GC, 3 (9%) showed loss of MSH2 and/or MSH6. One (3%) MSI-GC was identified only by molecular biological testing. A single case was heterogeneous and contained microsatellite-stable and instable tumor areas. Twenty-one (62%) MSI-GCs showed unusual histologic features. MSI-GC was not found in diffuse-type or Epstein-Barr virus-positive GC. MSI-GC was significantly more prevalent in elderly patients, distal stomach, and was associated with a significantly lower number of lymph node metastases and a significantly better overall and tumor-specific survival. MSI-GC constitutes a small but relevant subgroup of GC with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics. Our literature review illustrates the shortcomings of missing standardized testing algorithms with prevalences of MSI-GC ranging from 0% to 44.5%. Future studies should test the hypothesis that patients with MSI-GCs may not need adjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy. However, this will require a standardized, quality-controlled diagnostic algorithm of MSI for GC.

Genetic differences stratified by PCR-based microsatellite analysis in gastric intramucosal neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Although genetic alterations in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been extensively studied, those in patients with intramucosal neoplasia (IMN) are still poorly understood.

METHODS

We evaluated genetic differences in 158 IMNs, including 51 low-grade dysplasias, 58 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), 30 intramucosal cancers (IMCs), and 19 mixed tumors (composed of IMC and HGD within the same tumor), using PCR-based microsatellite analysis [allelic imbalance (AI) and microsatellite instability (MSI)]. We classified the DNA methylation status as a hypermethylated epigenome, a moderately methylated epigenome, or a hypomethylated epigenome. In addition, p53 overexpression, β-catenin nuclear localization, and mucin expression were also examined.

RESULTS

From cluster analysis, the IMNs examined were categorized into four subgroups as follows. Tumors in subgroup 1 were characterized by MSI-high status, a hypermethylated epigenome, and loss or reduction of expression of MLH-1. Tumors in subgroup 2 showed a mixed pattern consisting of AI and MSI. In contrast, tumors in subgroup 3, which showed accumulation of multiple AIs, were closely associated with HGD, IMC, or mixed tumor and exhibited nuclear expression of β-catenin. Tumors in subgroup 4, which were generally low-grade dysplasias, exhibited a low frequency of AIs and no MSI. Although the mucin phenotype was not correlated with any subgroup, expression of mucin was associated with some subgroups. Overexpression of p53 was common in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The approach described herein was useful for studying genetic differences in IMNs. In addition, we suggest that stratification of genetic differences may help to identify genetic molecular profiles in IMNs.

Immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for molecular subtyping of gastric adenocarcinoma

The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network recently classified gastric adenocarcinoma into 4 molecular subtypes: Epstein-Barr virus-positive tumors, microsatellite-unstable tumors, tumors with chromosomal instability, and genomically stable tumors. We theorized that immunohistochemistry might be useful in similar categorization and that that HER2 expression might relate to subtype. We stained 104 gastric adenocarcinomas for MLH1, p53, and EBER in situ hybridization. We grouped them based on staining pattern and compared the groups. Cases were categorized as follows: group 1 (EBER positive), 7 cases (7%); group 2 (MLH1 deficient), 17 cases (16%); group 3 (aberrant p53 staining, EBER negative, retained MLH1), 40 cases (38%); group 4 (unremarkable staining), 40 cases (38%). This distribution was comparable to that found by the Research Network after accounting for the TP53 mutation rate in the chromosomal instability group. Group 1 patients had significantly longer follow-up times (median, 70 months versus 13 months for other groups; P = .0324). No group 2 cases overexpressed HER2. In group 3, 3 of 40 cases were HER2 immunohistochemistry positive, but 7 of 27 were HER2 positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Staining offers an efficient, reasonably accurate alternative for molecular subtyping of gastric adenocarcinoma, although some cases with chromosomal instability cannot be identified. These findings have potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Clinicopathological and molecular alterations in early gastric cancers with the microsatellite instability-high phenotype

The relevance of the clinicopathological and molecular features of early gastric cancers (EGCs) having the microsatellite instability (MSI)‐high phenotype has not been clearly defined in sporadic gastric carcinogenesis. Here, we examined the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of EGC according to MSI status in 330 patients with EGC (intestinal‐type adenocarcinoma). Tumors were classified as MSI‐high (45 cases), MSI‐low (9 cases), or microsatellite stable (MSS; 276 cases). The specimens were examined using a combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐microsatellite assays and PCR‐pyrosequencing to detect chromosomal allelic imbalances in multiple cancer‐related chromosomal loci, MSI, gene mutations (KRAS and BRAF) and methylation status [high methylation epigenome (HME), intermediate methylation epigenome and low methylation epigenome]. In addition, the expression levels of various target proteins were examined using immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, EGC with the MSI phenotype showed distinct papillary features. The expression of gastric mucin was more frequent in EGC with the MSI phenotype, while p53 overexpression was common in EGCs, irrespective of MSI status. The frequency of HME was significantly higher in EGCs with the MSI phenotype than in EGCs with the MSS phenotype. Although there was a low frequency of allelic imbalance in EGCs with the MSI phenotype, some markers of allelic imbalance were more frequently detected in EGCs with the MSI‐high phenotype than in EGCs with the MSS phenotype. KRAS and BRAF mutations were rare in EGCs. Thus, the MSI phenotype in EGC is a major precursor lesion in gastric cancer and is characterized by distinct clinicopathological and molecular features.

What's new?

The relevance of the clinicopathological and molecular features of early gastric cancers with the microsatellite instability (MSI)‐high phenotype remains to be clarified in sporadic gastric carcinogenesis. This study shows that early gastric cancers with the MSI‐high phenotype exhibit distinct histological features and accumulation of both genomic damage and MSI within the same tumors. In regions with genomic damage, the frequencies of 3p and 22q AI were significantly higher in the MSI‐high phenotype than in the microsatellite stable phenotype. The treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancers having the MSI‐high phenotype may thus need to differ from patients with colorectal cancer.

ZNF695 methylation predicts a response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to definitive chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is one of the standard treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with a response to dCRT have a better prognosis than those resistant to dCRT while survival benefits for patients with residual tumors are limited. Nevertheless, few molecular markers to predict the response to dCRT are currently available. Here, we aimed to establish a DNA methylation marker to predict the response to dCRT.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients were divided into screening (n = 43) and validation (n = 61) sets. A genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using an Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Methylation levels were measured by quantitative methylation-specific PCR and normalized by the fraction of cancer cells in a sample.

RESULTS

The genome-wide methylation analysis of seven responders and eight non-responders identified 18 genomic regions specifically (un)methylated in the responders. Among these, methylation of the promoter CpG island of ZNF695 was significantly associated with the response to dCRT in the screening set (P = 0.004), and a cutoff value was determined. In the validation set, the association was successfully validated (P = 0.021), and a high specificity (90 %) for the prediction of responders was obtained using the prefixed cutoff value. In addition, a multivariate analysis showed that ZNF695 methylation was an independent predictive factor for the response to dCRT (OR 7.55, 95 % CI 2.12-26.9, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

ZNF695 methylation was significantly associated with the response to dCRT and is a promising predictive marker for the response to dCRT.

Perspectives on new biomarkers in gastric cancer: Diagnostic and prognostic applications

Gastric cancer is considered one of the most deadly tumors worldwide. Even with the decline in its incidence, the mortality rate of this disease has remained high, mainly due to its late diagnosis and to the lack of precise prognostic markers. The main purpose of this review is to present genetic, epigenetic and proteomic molecular markers that may be used in a diagnostic and prognostic manner and to discuss the pros and cons of each type of marker for improving clinical practice. In this sense, we observed that the use of genetic markers, especially mutations and polymorphisms, should be carefully considered, as they are strongly affected by ethnicity. Proteomic-based markers show promise, but the higher costs of the associated techniques continue to make this approach expensive for routine use. Alternatively, epigenetic markers appear to be very promising, as they can be detected in bodily fluids as well as tissues. However, such markers must be used carefully because epigenetic changes may occur due to environmental factors and aging. Despite the advances in technology and its access, to date, there are few defined biomarkers of prognostic and diagnostic use for gastric tumors. Therefore, the use of a panel of several approaches (genetic, epigenetic and proteomic) should be considered the best alternative for clinical practice.

The analysis of microsatellite instability in extracolonic gastrointestinal malignancy

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic feature of sporadic and familial cancers of multiple sites and is related to defective mismatch repair (MMR) protein function. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a familial form of MMR deficiency that may present with a spectrum of MSI positive cancers including gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. The incidence of high level MSI (MSI-H) in colorectal carcinoma is well defined in both familial and sporadic cases and these tumours portend a better overall prognosis in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). There are certain morphological features that suggest MSI-H CRC and international guidelines have been established for the evaluation of MSI in CRC. The prevalence and morphological features of extracolonic GI MSI-H tumours are less well documented. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the guidelines for the assessment of MSI in CRC are appropriate for application to extracolonic GI malignancies. This review aims to summarise the recent literature on MSI in extracolonic LS-related GI tract malignancies with special attention to the assessment of the MMR system by evaluation of specific microsatellite markers and/or immunohistochemical evaluation of MMR protein expression. The reported prevalence of sporadic and LS-related MSI-H tumours along with their associated unique morphological patterns and related prognostic or therapeutic implications will be discussed.