Florid lobular carcinoma in situ: molecular profiling and comparison to classic lobular carcinoma in situ and pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ

Clinical management and oncologic outcomes of pure pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: Results from a large single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Pure pleomorphic (PLCIS) and florid (FLCIS) lobular carcinoma in situ, without concurrent invasive carcinoma (IC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), are rare. We collected the largest and most comprehensive single-institution cohort to analyze oncological outcomes and management strategies.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with pure PLCIS and/or FLCIS and treated at our institution between 2012 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics, along with recurrence risk, were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 303 patients were diagnosed with PLCIS and/or FLCIS on surgical specimens. Among them, 144 PLCIS and 116 FLCIS cases were associated with IC or DCIS, leaving 43 (14.2 %) pure P-/FLCIS cases (20 PLCIS, 17 FLCIS, and six mixed cases). Pure P-/FLCIS diagnosed on core-biopsy had a 31.3 % upgrade ratio on surgical specimens to IC (86.7 %) or DCIS (13.3 %). Median lesion size was 15 mm. Mastectomy was performed in four cases, while 90.7 % underwent wide local excision, with 14 % positive margin rate. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in four cases, with no positive nodes. No adjuvant treatment was administered, as per multidisciplinary decision. After a median follow-up of 53 months, local recurrence (LR) occurred in 14 % of cases. Margin involvement strongly predicted LR, which was higher in patients with final positive margins (5/6, 83.3 % vs. 0/31, 0 % in patients with clear margins, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 31.3 % upgrade ratio from pure P-/FLCIS to IC/DCIS recommends surgical excision. Axillary surgery should be omitted. Positive margins are strongly associated with LR. Surgery with negative margins is the mainstay of treatment. Larger multicentric studies are needed.

Non-invasive Lobular Neoplasia: Review and Updates

Non-invasive lobular neoplasia (LN) encompasses atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS), florid lobular carcinoma in situ (FLCIS), and pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS). Lobular neoplasia is a neoplastic epithelial proliferation of the terminal duct lobular unit. A defining feature is discohesion due to the loss of E-cadherin, a protein that facilitates cell-to-cell adhesion. Lobular neoplasia is both a risk factor and a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast carcinoma. Classic LN, characterized by small, non-cohesive monomorphic cells, includes ALH and classic LCIS. While classic LN is usually not seen on imaging and, therefore, is diagnosed incidentally, FLCIS and PLCIS are typically the imaging targets, most often manifesting as calcifications. Unlike classic LN, which is typically hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, FLCIS and PLCIS may present with less favorable phenotypes. While ALH and CLCIS diagnosed on concordant core biopsy are generally managed with surveillance with or without chemoprevention, complete surgical excision is recommended for FLCIS and PLCIS due to high upgrade rates to invasive carcinoma. Accurate classification of non-invasive breast neoplastic lesions is essential for guiding treatment. This review provides an overview of the clinical features, pathology, and management of lobular neoplasia, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnosis and individualized patient care.

"Lobular lesions of the breast: From the classic to the variants"

The aim of this review is to provide the surgical pathologist an overview of lobular lesions, from in situ to invasive carcinoma and the variants, by discussing the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, morphology, immunohistochemistry, known molecular data as well as the treatment recommendations. The recognition of histologic variants of both in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma has expanded the differential diagnosis. Awareness of these different entities is important as treatment recommendations continue to evolve.

Upgrade Rates of Variant Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Compared to Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed in Core Needle Biopsies: A 10-Year Single Institution Retrospective Study

The primary aim of this study was to determine the upgrade rates of variant lobular carcinoma in situ (V-LCIS, ie, combined florid [F-LCIS] and pleomorphic [P-LCIS]) compared with classic LCIS (C-LCIS) when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The secondary goal was to determine the rate of progression/development of invasive carcinoma on long-term follow-up after primary excision. After institutional review board approval, our institutional pathology database was searched for patients with "pure" LCIS diagnosed on CNB who underwent subsequent excision. Radiologic findings were reviewed, radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) correlation was performed, and follow-up patient outcome data were obtained. One hundred twenty cases of LCIS were identified on CNB (C-LCIS = 97, F-LCIS = 18, and P-LCIS = 5). Overall upgrade rates after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS were 14% (14/97), 44% (8/18), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Of the total cases, 79 (66%) were deemed rad-path concordant. Of these, the upgrade rate after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS was 7.5% (5 of 66), 40% (4 of 10), and 0% (0 of 3), respectively. The overall upgrade rate for V-LCIS was higher than for C-LCIS (P = .004), even for the cases deemed rad-path concordant (P value: .036). Most upgraded cases (23 of 24) showed pT1a disease or lower. With an average follow-up of 83 months, invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast was identified in 8/120 (7%) cases. Six patients had died: 2 of (contralateral) breast cancer and 4 of other causes. Because of a high upgrade rate, V-LCIS diagnosed on CNB should always be excised. The upgrade rate for C-LCIS (even when rad-path concordant) is higher than reported in many other studies. Rad-path concordance read, surgical consultation, and individualized decision making are recommended for C-LCIS cases. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma after LCIS diagnosis is small (7% with ∼7-year follow-up), but active surveillance is required to diagnose early-stage disease.

Update on lobular lesions of the breast

The current histological classification of in-situ and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) includes different morphological variants, some of which have been recently described. In this review, we will focus upon: (i) the diagnostic criteria of non-invasive lobular neoplasia and treatment implications across different countries; (ii) utility and limitations of immunohistochemistry; (iii) recently described variants of ILC; and (iv) the significance of lobular differentiation in invasive carcinoma for clinical management.

The morphologic spectrum of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) observations on clinical significance, management implications and diagnostic pitfalls of classic, florid and pleomorphic LCIS

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive proliferation of atypical dyscohesive epithelial cells characterized by loss or functional alteration of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. The morphologic spectrum of LCIS encompasses classic (C-LCIS), florid (F-LCIS) and pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS), as recently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consensus Group. Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is also part of this spectrum.This article highlights the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the three forms of LCIS and summarizes their management implications and prognosis, with emphasis on F-LCIS and P-LCIS.

Apocrine lesions of the breast

Apocrine change is recognised in benign, atypical and malignant lesions of the breast. Apocrine metaplasia, a frequent finding in the breast of women over the age of 25 years, is most commonly seen in benign cysts with a simple or papillary configuration. Apocrine change is also recognised in other benign lesions including sclerosing adenosis, now known as apocrine adenosis. Apocrine atypia usually refers to cytological atypia in which there is at least threefold variation in nuclear size but architectural atypia may also occur. The distinction between atypical apocrine hyperplasia and non-high-grade apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ may be difficult due to the relative rarity of these entities and the lack of validated diagnostic criteria. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) with apocrine change is considered to be a variant of pleomorphic LCIS. An apocrine variant of encapsulated papillary carcinoma is also recognised. Apocrine change is described in invasive carcinoma, including no special type, lobular, micropapillary and mucinous variants. The recent WHO 2019 update recognises 'carcinoma with apocrine differentiation' as a special type breast carcinoma based on the presence of apocrine morphology in at least 90% of the tumour. Tumours with apocrine morphology are usually but not always hormone receptor negative. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status is variable. Molecular studies have identified breast tumours with apocrine features and high expression of androgen receptor mRNA including 'luminal androgen receptor tumours' and 'molecular apocrine tumours'. The term 'pure apocrine carcinoma' has been proposed to describe an invasive carcinoma with apocrine morphology that is oestrogen and progesterone receptor negative and androgen receptor positive. HER-2 status may be positive or negative. This article reviews the pathology of benign, atypical and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria including an approach to evaluation of apocrine lesions on needle core biopsy, and recent advances in our understanding of invasive apocrine carcinoma.

Morphologic subtypes of lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy: clinicopathologic features and findings at follow-up excision

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is currently classified as classic (CLCIS), florid (FLCIS), and pleomorphic (PLCIS). Given the rarity of FLCIS and PLCIS, information on their clinico-pathologic features and biologic potential remains limited. We evaluated the upgrade rates at excision of FLCIS and PLCIS diagnosed on inhouse core needle biopsy (CNB) and their clinical presentation and follow-up. Over a period of 11 and a half years, there were a total of 36 inhouse CNBs with pure PLCIS (n = 8), FLCIS (n = 24), or LCIS with pleomorphic features (LCIS-PF) (n = 4). The upgrade rates to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were 25% for PLCIS (2/8), 17% for FLCIS (4/24), and 0% for LCIS-PF (0/4). The overall upgrade rate of PLCIS and FLCIS combined was 19% (6/32). All but one case (not upgraded at excision) were radiologic-pathologic concordant. Apocrine features, previously reported only in PLCIS, were also noted in FLCIS. HER2 overexpression was seen in 13% of cases. This study highlights the more aggressive biologic features of PLCIS and FLCIS compared to CLCIS and supports surgical management for these lesions.

Lobular Breast Cancer: Histomorphology and Different Concepts of a Special Spectrum of Tumors

Simple Summary

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is a special type of breast cancer (BC) that was first described in 1941. The diagnosis of ILC is made by microscopy of tumor specimens, which reveals a distinct morphology. This review recapitulates the developments in the microscopic assessment of ILC from 1941 until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC, provide an overview on ILC variants, and highlight advances which have contributed to a better understanding of ILC as a special histologic spectrum of tumors.

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the most common special histological type of breast cancer (BC). This review recapitulates developments in the histomorphologic assessment of ILC from its beginnings with the seminal work of Foote and Stewart, which was published in 1941, until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC and their implications. These concepts include (i) BC arising from mammary lobules, (ii) BC growing in dissociated cells and single files, and (iii) BC defined as a morpho-molecular spectrum of tumors with distinct histological and molecular characteristics related to impaired cell adhesion. This review also provides a comprehensive overview of ILC variants, their histomorphology, and differential diagnosis. Furthermore, this review highlights recent advances which have contributed to a better understanding of the histomorphology of ILC, such as the role of the basal lamina component laminin, the molecular specificities of triple-negative ILC, and E-cadherin to P-cadherin expression switching as the molecular determinant of tubular elements in CDH1-deficient ILC. Last but not least, we provide a detailed account of the tumor microenvironment in ILC, including tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels, which are comparatively low in ILC compared to other BCs, but correlate with clinical outcome. The distinct histomorphology of ILC clearly reflects a special tumor biology. In the clinic, special treatment strategies have been established for triple-negative, HER2-positive, and ER-positive BC. Treatment specialization for patients diagnosed with ILC is just in its beginnings. Accordingly, ILC deserves greater attention as a special tumor entity in BC diagnostics, patient care, and cancer research.

Updates on Lobular Neoplasms, Papillary, Adenomyoepithelial, and Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast

CONTEXT.—

This review article is a result of the breast pathology lectures given at the Sixth Chinese American Pathologists Association annual diagnostic pathology course in October 2020 (held virtually due to the coronavirus disease 2019).

OBJECTIVE.—

To update recent developments, in this review article, the authors wrote minireviews in the following 4 areas: lobular neoplasm, adenomyoepithelial lesions, papillary lesions, and fibroepithelial lesions.

DATA SOURCES.—

The sources include extensive literature review, personal research, and experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

With the wide practice of screening mammography, these lesions are not uncommon in image-guided core biopsies and excisional specimens. Many recent developments have emerged in understanding these lesions. We aim to provide readers with concise updates for each of these lesions with a focus on recent updates in definitions, diagnostic criteria, management, and molecular profiles that are most relevant to the daily practice of pathology and patient management.

Management of Lobular Neoplasia Found on Core Needle Biopsy Performed for Calcifications Using Precise Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the upgrade rate of calcified lobular neoplasia (LN) versus incidental noncalcified classic LN found on core needle biopsy performed for the evaluation of suspicious calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 390 consecutive image-guided breast core needle biopsies with microcalcifications as the target that were performed between December 2009 and July 2017. In 81 of the 390 core biopsies, the highest-risk lesion was LN that then underwent either excision or imaging follow-up. Core biopsy results were compared with excision and imaging follow-up findings. An upgrade of LN was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma. RESULTS. Of 81 LN diagnosed on core biopsy performed for calcifications, 16 had calcifications within the LN. Fifteen of these 16 cases underwent surgical excision, and three (3/15, 20.0%) were upgraded on excision. Of the 64 core biopsies showing incidental noncalcified LN with benign concordant entities containing calcifications, 42 underwent surgical excision, and one LN (1/42, 2.4%) was upgraded. Twenty-three total lesions (one calcified LN and 22 noncalcified LN) were followed with imaging rather than excision. No cancers were detected among the follow-up group. One case was deemed to have discordant findings on radiologic-pathologic review and was sent for excision, which showed invasive cancer with tubulolobular and lobular features. CONCLUSION. Women undergoing stereotactic core needle biopsy for calcifications revealing noncalcified incidental classic LN and a benign concordant entity that could explain the presence of the target calcifications have a low risk of upgrade and may be followed with imaging. Surgical excision should be offered to women who have LN with calcifications.

Lobular Breast Cancer: A Review

Invasive lobular carcinoma accounts for 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancers, with a marked increase in incidence rates over the past two decades. Distinctive biological hallmarks of invasive lobular carcinoma include the loss of cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin leading to cells with a discohesive morphology, proliferating into single-file strands and estrogen receptor positivity. These key molecular features can make diagnosis difficult, as invasive lobular carcinoma is challenging to detect both physically and with current standard imaging. Treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma strongly favors endocrine therapy due to low chemosensitivity and lower rates of pathological response as a result. This review will summarize the distinct biological and molecular features of invasive lobular carcinoma, focusing on the diagnostic challenges faced and the subsequent surgical and medical management strategies. Prospective therapeutic options will also be explored, highlighting how furthering our understanding of the unique biology of lobular breast carcinoma is essential in guiding and informing the treatment of patients in the future.

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: the increasing importance of this special subtype

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast cancer cases. ILCs are noted for their lack of E-cadherin function, which underpins their characteristic discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, tumours are luminal in molecular subtype, being oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive, and HER2 negative. Since last reviewing the lobular literature (McCart Reed et al., Breast Cancer Res 17:12, 2015), there has been a considerable increase in research output focused on this tumour type, including studies into the pathology and management of disease, a high-resolution definition of the genomic landscape of tumours as well as the evolution of several potential therapeutic avenues. There abounds a huge amount of new data, which we will review herein.

Lobular carcinoma in situ: diagnostic criteria and molecular correlates

Lobular neoplasia (LN) is an atypical proliferation of small, dyscohesive epithelial cells within the terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU), with or without pagetoid extension and encompasses both lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). LN is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast carcinoma and the diagnosis of LN confers an increased risk of invasive carcinoma development, compared to the general population. Diagnostic challenges arise in the accurate classification of LCIS into classic, pleomorphic and florid subtypes, in distinguishing between LCIS and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and in the appropriate use and interpretation of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry. Due to the paucity of robust data on the natural history of LCIS, and hence its clinical significance, the management is often pragmatic rather than entirely evidence-based and requires a multidisciplinary approach. In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic and molecular features of LCIS and address the key challenges that arise in the diagnosis and management of LCIS.

Apocrine Variant of Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Further Clinical, Histopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Characterization of an Emerging Entity

To date, the apocrine variant of lobular carcinoma in situ (AP-LCIS) has been cursorily described as a subtype of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). We retrospectively reviewed 34 cases of AP-LCIS (including 23 associated with invasive lobular carcinoma) to fully characterize it. AP-LCIS typically presented with screen-detected calcifications in older women (mean age: 65 y) and was characterized by distended terminal duct lobular units with relatively large "pleomorphic" cells, central necrosis, and calcifications. AP-LCIS cells exhibited abundant eosinophilic occasionally granular cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Synchronous classic and/or florid LCIS was identified in 24/34 (70%) AP-LCIS, and in 9/11 (82%) pure AP-LCIS. Most (68%) cases of AP-LCIS were estrogen receptor-positive (50% strongly), 35% were progesterone receptor-positive, 26% were human epidermal growth factor 2-positive, 18% demonstrated high-proliferation rate (Ki67: >15%), and 90% were androgen receptor-positive. Aurora kinase A, immunoreactive in 38% of AP-LCIS cases, was not significantly associated with recurrence, development of invasion, or nodal positivity (P>0.05). Compared with conventional (nonapocrine) pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (P-LCIS), aurora kinase A was expressed in a significantly greater proportion of P-LCIS (100%). AP-LCIS and P-LCIS did not otherwise differ in clinicopathologic features. Next-generation sequencing utilizing the Oncomine Comprehensive Panel v2, performed on 27 AP-LCIS cases, showed no specific molecular findings. In a mean follow-up of 57 months, 2 (of 11, 18%) pure AP-LCIS cases recurred (2 both in situ and invasive) and none metastasized or proved fatal. AP-LCIS should be regarded as another high-grade LCIS similar to P-LCIS in many respects, and pending additional studies should be managed similarly.

Descriptive study comparing outcomes of classic and nonclassic lobular carcinoma in situ (florid and pleomorphic) initially diagnosed on core needle biopsy

The lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) subtypes include classic (CLCIS), pleomorphic (PLCIS), and florid LCIS (FLCIS). The CLCIS is considered a breast cancer risk factor, but clinical significance and natural history of other LCIS subtypes are unclear. The outcome data on PLCIS and FLCIS is limited. The aim of current study is to compare excision and follow-up findings of CLCIS and nonclassic LCIS (NCLCIS). The breast needle biopsies (NBs) with LCIS during 01/2007-12/2017 were identified. The imaging, clinical findings, and outcome were compared between CLCIS and NCLCIS. A total of 36 NBs from 32 patients with NCLCIS (14 PLCIS & 22 FLCIS) and 73 NBs from 68 patients with CLCIS were identified. The NCLCIS patients were older (57 vs 52 years; P = .02) and presented more often with calcifications (78% vs 44%; P = .01). Seven (19%) PLCIS were initially diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The microscopic invasion was frequent with NCLCIS (25%). No invasion was identified in NBs with CLCIS. A separate concurrent NBs with a carcinoma (29% vs 6%; P = .018) or ductal atypia (12% vs 3%; P = .1) was more frequent with CLCIS. The upgrade rate (invasion or DCIS) was higher with NCLCIS (25% vs 4%). Four NCLCIS developed ipsilateral recurrences: 2 NCLCIS, 1 IDC, and 1 ILC (50; 10-96 months). No breast event was reported in 24 pure CLCIS (60; 8-144 months). Invasive carcinoma with NCLCIS, unlike CLCIS, is always lobular type. Recurrences following NCLCIS are ipsilateral lobular tumors. NCLCIS subtypes are nonobligate precursors to invasive lobular carcinoma.

Genomic profiling of pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ reveals highly recurrent ERBB2 and ERRB3 alterations

Pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS) and florid LCIS (F-LCIS) are morphologic variants distinguished from classic LCIS by marked nuclear pleomorphism and/or an expansile growth pattern with or without necrosis. Given the rarity of these LCIS variants, little data exist regarding their molecular pathogenesis, natural history, and optimal management. The purpose of this study was to genomically profile LCIS variants to gain further insight into their biology. Nineteen cases of pure LCIS variants (17 P-LCIS, 2 F-LCIS) diagnosed on core needle biopsy at our institution from 2006 to 2017 were included, five of which were upgraded to invasive cancer at excision. Macrodissected lesions were analyzed by a hybrid-capture next generation sequencing assay that surveyed exonic sequences of 447 genes for mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) and 191 regions across 60 genes for structural rearrangements. LCIS variants were all confirmed as E-cadherin negative by immunohistochemistry. Receptor profiles among the 17 P-LCIS cases included HR+/HER2- (nine cases), HR+/HER2+ (three cases), HR-/HER2+ (two cases), and HR-/HER2- (three cases). The two F-LCIS cases were HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+. All LCIS variants had genetic alterations consistent with a lobular phenotype including 1q gain (16 cases), 16q loss (18 cases), and CDH1 mutations (18 cases). Highly recurrent ERBB2 alterations were noted including mutations (13 cases) and amplifications (six cases). Other significant alterations included mutations in PIK3CA (six cases), RUNX1 (four cases), ERBB3 (four cases), and CBFB (three cases), as well as amplification of CCND1 (five cases). A TP53 mutation was identified in one case of HR-/HER2+ P-LCIS with signet ring cell features that lacked 1q gain and 16q loss. P-LCIS and F-LCIS contain genetic alterations characteristic of lobular neoplasia; however, these LCIS variants are distinguished from classical LCIS reported in the literature by their highly recurrent ERBB2 alterations.

Non-invasive lobular neoplasia of the breast: Morphologic features, clinical presentation, and management dilemmas

The designation of noninvasive lobular neoplasia applies to atypical epithelial proliferations composed of noncohesive cells secondary to loss or functional alteration of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. The morphologic spectrum of noninvasive lobular neoplasia encompasses atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and classic lobular carcinoma in situ (classic LCIS) and two LCIS variants, namely florid LCIS (F-LCIS) and pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS), as defined in the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Breast 5th ed. Herein, we review the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of noninvasive lobular neoplasia, with special emphasis on F-LCIS and P-LCIS. We also review imaging features, management at core needle biopsy, upgrade rates at surgical excision, and clinical management dilemmas.

Genetic analysis of pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ variants: frequent ERBB2/ERBB3 alterations and clonal relationship to classic lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma

Pleomorphic (PLCIS) and florid (FLCIS) lobular carcinoma in situ are rare histologic variants of LCIS that are considered more aggressive than classic LCIS (CLCIS), but optimal treatment is controversial. The genetic drivers of these lesions and their clonal relationships to paired CLCIS and ILC have not been characterized. We used capture-based next-generation sequencing to profile 16 LCIS variants (ten PLCIS, six FLCIS), including paired synchronous ILC and CLCIS in 11 and nine cases, respectively. Recurrent pathogenic alterations included CDH1 (9/10 PLCIS, 6/6 FLCIS), PIK3CA (7/10 PLCIS, 2/6 FLCIS), ERBB2 (6/10 PLCIS, 2/6 FLCIS; six mutations, two amplifications), ERBB3 (1/10 PLCIS, 2/6 FLCIS), FOXA1 (4/10 PLCIS, 1/6 FLCIS), TP53 (3/10 PLCIS), and CCND1 (2/10 PLCIS, 1/6 FLCIS). Mutational profiles and mean copy number alterations (CNA) were similar between LCIS variants with and without ILC. Compared with ILC in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), PLCIS, FLCIS, and associated ILC were enriched for ERBB2 mutations, and PLCIS was enriched for TP53 and FOXA1 mutations. Shared pathogenic mutations and CNA were identified between the LCIS variant and ILC in all cases, and between CLCIS and the LCIS variant/ILC in 89%. CLCIS to PLCIS progression was associated with increased mean nonsynonymous mutations and additional pathogenic alterations and/or CNA in 80%. Mean nonsynonymous mutations and CNA were similar between PLCIS and ILC, although additional pathogenic mutations were associated with invasion in a subset (43%). FLCIS harbored additional clonal pathogenic mutations in only 1/3 cases, and these were not shared with ILC, which was genetically divergent. In another case, ILC was genetically more similar to CLCIS than FLCIS. The results highlight clonal relationships between PLCIS/FLCIS and CLCIS, and implicate PLCIS as a genetically advanced ILC precursor. Frequent ERBB2/ERBB3 alterations in PLCIS and FLCIS are consistent with more aggressive behavior and may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: The Spectrum of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications

This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, 4 pathologists with expertise in breast pathology and a breast surgeon with a clinical and research interest in lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), met by conference call in September 2019 to develop recommendations for evaluating and reporting LCIS. Herein, we summarize the diagnostic criteria of classic LCIS and LCIS subtypes according to the most recent WHO criteria, discuss how best to distinguish LCIS from ductal carcinoma in situ in problematic cases (including the uses and limitations of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry), and review outcome and management issues for patients with LCIS.

Pre-operative management of Pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: Report of a large multi-institutional series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic and Florid Lobular carcinoma in situ (P/F LCIS) are rare variants of LCIS, the exact nature of which is still debated.

AIM

To collect a large series of P/F LCIS diagnosed on preoperative biopsies and evaluate their association with invasive carcinoma and high grade duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Data obtained were compared with those reported in the literature.

METHODS

A multi-institutional series of P/F LCIS was retrieved. All cases were diagnosed on pre-operative biopsies, which was followed by an open surgical excision. Data on post-operative histopathology were available. A literature review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 117 cases were collected; invasive carcinoma and/or DCIS was present in 78/117 cases (66.7%). Seventy cases of P/F LCIS were pure on biopsy and 31 of these showed pathological upgrade in post-surgical specimens. Pre-operative biopsy accuracy was 47/78 (60.3%); pre-operative biopsy underestimation of cancer was 31/78 (39,7.%). In the literature review papers, invasive carcinoma or DCIS was associated with 274 of 418 (65.5%) cases of P/F LCIS. Pre-operative biopsy accuracy was 66% (181/274) whereas pre-operative biopsy underestimation of cancer was 33.9% (93/274).

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here indicate that P/F LCIS is frequently associated with invasive carcinoma or high grade DCIS and that pre-operative biopsy is associated with an underestimation of malignancy. Open surgery is indicated when P/F LCIS is diagnosed pre-operatively.

Rabbit monoclonal E-cadherin antibody: A cost-effective alternative to mouse monoclonal antibody in distinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ from lobular carcinoma in situ

Rabbit monoclonal antibody (RabMAb) demonstrates higher sensitivity without sacrificing specificity than mouse monoclonal antibody (MMAb). MMAb against E-cadherin stain is heavily utilized in distinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). We aimed to compare the E-cadherin stain using RabMAb vs MMAb in distinguishing DCIS from LCIS. One hundred and seventeen in situ breast carcinomas (55 DCIS, 58 LCIS, and 4 DCIS and LCIS) were studied. Sections from a representative block of each were stained with RabMAb [EP700Y] and MMAb [36B5]. Scanned images of stained slides were compared in tandem. All DCIS cases (59/59) showed comparable staining by RabMAb and MMAb. Comparable staining was also observed in all but one case of LCIS (61/62; 98%). One case of pleomorphic LCIS showed mostly complete, weak to moderately intense membranous staining with RabMAb and fragmented, weak membranous staining with MMAb. Consistently better staining quality was observed in slides stained by RabMAb vs MMAb. RabMAb and MMAb against E-cadherin were diagnostically equivalent with the exception of one case where RabMAb may have led to diagnostic misinterpretation. However, the not insignificant cost savings and easier interpretation using RabMAb may justify the risk of misinterpretation of increased staining in rare cases, largely avertable with proper training.

Evaluating agreement, histological features, and relevance of separating pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ subtypes

Morphological variants of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) include classical (CLCIS), pleomorphic (PLCIS) and florid type (FLCIS). Treatment guidelines suggest managing PLCIS and FLCIS like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); therefore accurate identification of LCIS subtypes is critical. However, the significance of separating PLCIS from FLCIS is not clear. Also, interobserver agreement in identifying LCIS subtypes, using contemporary criteria, is not known. We aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement amongst breast pathologists in diagnosing LCIS subtypes and use the agreement data to justify LCIS classification for management purposes. Six breast pathologists independently reviewed 50 hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides comprised of a mix of LCIS subtypes. After reviewing published criteria, participants diagnosed PLCIS, CLCIS and apocrine change in a marked region of interest and FLCIS based on entire section. PLCIS was identified in 8 to 37 slides with overall moderate agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.565) and pairwise κ (Cohen's) ranging from -.008 to 0.492. FLCIS was diagnosed in 15-26 slides with overall substantial agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.687) and pairwise κ ranging from -.068 to 0.706. Both FLCIS and PLCIS coexisted in 45% of slides with consensus on non-classical LCIS. Comedo-type necrosis (odds ratio = 5.5) and apoptosis (odds ratio = 1.8) predicted FLCIS. We found moderate and substantial agreement in diagnosing PLCIS and FLCIS respectively. Objective histological features linked with aggressive behavior were more frequent with FLCIS. PLCIS and FLCIS patterns frequently coexist, contain similar molecular aberrations, and are managed similarly (like DCIS); therefore, combining FLCIS and PLCIS into one category (non-classical LCIS) should be considered.

Lobular Carcinoma In Situ

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a risk factor and a nonobligate precursor of breast carcinoma. The relative risk of invasive carcinoma after classic LCIS diagnosis is approximately 9 to 10 times that of the general population. Classic LCIS diagnosed on core biopsy with concordant imaging and pathologic findings does not mandate surgical excision, and margin status is not reported. The identification of variant LCIS in a needle core biopsy specimen mandates surgical excision, regardless of radiologic-pathologic concordance. The presence of variant LCIS close to the surgical margin of a resection specimen is reported, and reexcision should be considered.

Current Concepts in Diagnosis, Molecular Features, and Management of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast With a Discussion of Morphologic Variants

Context.—

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) refers to a neoplastic proliferation of cells that characteristically shows loss of E-cadherin expression and has long been regarded as a risk factor for invasive breast cancer. Long-term outcome studies and molecular data have also implicated LCIS as a nonobligate precursor to invasive carcinoma. In the past few decades, pleomorphic and florid LCIS have been recognized as morphologic variants of LCIS with more-aggressive histopathologic features, less-favorable biomarker profiles, and more-complex molecular features compared with classic LCIS. There is still a lack of consensus regarding certain aspects of managing patients with LCIS.

Objectives.—

To review recently published literature on LCIS and to provide an overview of the current morphologic classification of LCIS, recent molecular advances, and trends in patient management.

Data Sources.—

Sources included peer-reviewed, published journal articles in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) and published guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (Fort Washington, Pennsylvania).

Conclusions.—

Lobular carcinoma in situ represents a marker for increased risk of breast cancer, as well as a nonobligate precursor to invasive carcinoma. Morphologic variants of LCIS—florid and pleomorphic LCIS—are genetically more-complex lesions and are more likely to be associated with invasive carcinoma. Further investigation into which molecular alterations in LCIS are associated with progression to invasive carcinoma is needed to help guide medical and surgical management.

Update on Immunohistochemical Analysis in Breast Lesions

CONTEXT

- The utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast lesions needs to be updated with exceptions among these lesions. Biomarker studies with IHC in triple-negative breast carcinoma may help develop targeted therapies for this aggressive breast cancer. The distinction of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to the breast and invasive breast carcinoma has significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. The determination can be challenging because both primary tumors can express estrogen receptor and/or HER2 by IHC, creating a diagnostic dilemma.

OBJECTIVES

- To provide a practical update on the use of IHC markers in differential diagnoses in breast lesions, including benign, atypical, precancerous, and malignant tumors; to highlight recently published research findings on novel IHC markers in triple-negative breast carcinoma cases; and to reinforce the importance of IHC use as an ancillary tool in distinguishing metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to the breast from primary breast carcinoma using real case examples.

DATA SOURCES

- PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review and authors' research data and personal experiences were used in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

- Immunohistochemistry has an important role in making differential diagnoses in breast lesions in morphologically equivocal settings; recognizing IHC expression status in the exceptions among these lesions will aid in the correct diagnosis of challenging breast cases. Studies suggest that androgen receptor, p16, p53, GATA3, and PELP1 may have potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value in triple-negative breast carcinoma cases; these findings may provide insight and a greater understanding of the tumor biology in triple-negative breast carcinomas. In distinguishing metastatic estrogen receptor-positive or HER2⁺ lung adenocarcinoma to the breast from primary breast carcinoma, napsin A, TTF-1, and GATA3 comprise a useful IHC panel.

PIK3CA mutations are common in lobular carcinoma in situ, but are not a biomarker of progression

Background

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive breast lesion that is typically found incidentally on biopsy and is often associated with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). LCIS is considered by some to be a risk factor for future breast cancer rather than a true precursor lesion. The aim of this study was to identify genetic changes that could be used as biomarkers of progression of LCIS to invasive disease using cases of pure LCIS and comparing their genetic profiles to LCIS which presented contemporaneously with associated ILC, on the hypothesis that the latter represents LCIS that has already progressed.

Methods

Somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) were assessed by SNP array in three subgroups: pure LCIS, LCIS associated with ILC and the paired ILC. In addition exome sequencing was performed on seven fresh frozen samples of LCIS associated with ILC, to identify recurrent somatic mutations.

Results

The copy number profiles of pure LCIS and LCIS associated with ILC were almost identical. However, four SCNAs were more frequent in ILC than LCIS associated with ILC, including gain/amplification of CCND1. CCND1 protein over-expression assessed by immunohistochemical analysis in a second set of samples from 32 patients with pure LCIS and long-term follow up, was associated with invasive recurrence (P = 0.02, Fisher’s exact test). Exome sequencing revealed that PIK3CA mutations were as frequent as CDH1 mutations in LCIS, but were not a useful biomarker of LCIS progression as they were as frequent in pure LCIS as in LCIS associated with ILC. We also observed heterogeneity of PIK3CA mutations and evidence of sub-clonal populations in LCIS irrespective of whether they were associated with ILC.

Conclusions

Our data shows that pure LCIS and LCIS co-existing with ILC have very similar SCNA profiles, supporting the hypothesis that LCIS is a true precursor lesion. We have provided evidence that over-expression of CCND1 may identify a subgroup of patients with pure LCIS who are more likely to develop invasive disease, in contrast to PIK3CA mutations, which occur too early in lobular tumorigenesis to be informative.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0789-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Atypical epithelial hyperplasia of the breast: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Atypical epithelial hyperplasia (AEH) of the breast is considered benign histological lesions with breast cancer risk. This review focuses on clinical signification and management of AEH that remains controversial.

AREAS COVERED

A review of published studies was performed using medline database. In this review, we fully describe the current evidence available. In particular, we describe 1) data from immunohistochemistry and molecular studies that suggest AEH is a precursor of breast cancer; 2) epidemiological studies demonstrate low rate of breast cancer in women with AEH; 3) surgical excision is necessary after diagnosis of AEH, such as lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia, on core needle biopsy; 4) although current recommendations are evolving to fewer (if not no) excisions for flat epithelial with atypia and classic lobular neoplasia found on percutaneous biopsy (without radiologic indications for excision). Expert commentary: HEA management steel need prospective evidences, but recent retrospective data give some clue for less invasive management for some of HEA.

Management of atypical lobular hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and lobular carcinoma in situ

Atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ are rare proliferative breast lesions, growing inside ducts and terminal ducto-lobular units. They represent a marker of increased risk for breast cancer and a non-obligate precursor of malignancy. Evidence available on diagnosis and management is scarce. They are frequently found incidentally associated with other lesions, but can be visible through mammography, ultrasound or magnetic resonance. Due to the risk of underestimation, surgical excision is often performed. The analysis of imaging and histopathological characteristics could help identifying low-risk cases, for which surgery is not necessary. Chemopreventive agents can be used for risk reduction. Careful imaging follow up is mandatory; the role of breast MRI as screening modality is under discussion.

[Benign proliferative breast disease with and without atypia]

In the last few years, diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH], flat epithelial atypia [FEA], lobular neoplasia: atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH], lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS], radial scar [RS], usual ductal hyperplasia [UDH], adenosis, sclerosing adenosis [SA], papillary breast lesions, mucocele-like lesion [MLL]) have increased with the growing number of breast percutaneous biopsies. The management of these lesions is highly conditioned by the enlarged risk of breast cancer combined with either an increased probability of finding cancer after surgery, either a possible malignant transformation (in situ or invasive cancer), or an increased probability of developing cancer on the long range. An overview of the literature reports grade C recommendations concerning the management and follow-up of these lesions: in case of ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS, RS, MLL with atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: surgical excision is recommended; in case of a diagnostic based on vacuum-assisted core biopsy with complete disappearance of radiological signal for FEA or RS without atypia: surgical abstention is a valid alternative approved by multidisciplinary meeting. In case of ALH (incidental finding) associated with benign lesion responsible of radiological signal: abstention may be proposed; in case of UDH, adenosis, MLL without atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: the concordance of radiology and histopathology findings must be ensured. No data is available to recommend surgery; in case of non-in sano resection for ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS (except pleomorphic type), RS, MLL: surgery does not seem to be necessary; in case of previous ADH, ALH, LCIS: a specific follow-up is recommended in accordance with HAS's recommendations. In case of FEA and RS or MLL combined with atypia, little data are yet available to differ the management from others lesions with atypia; in case of UDH, usual sclerosing adenosis, RS without atypia, fibro cystic disease: no specific follow-up is recommended in agreement with HAS's recommendations.

Molecular drivers of lobular carcinoma in situ

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is considered to be a risk factor for the development of invasive breast carcinoma, but it may also be a non-obligate precursor to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Many LCIS lesions do not progress to ILC, and the molecular changes that are necessary for progression from LCIS to ILC are poorly understood. Disruption in the E-cadherin complex is the hallmark of lobular lesions, but other signaling molecules, such as PIK3CA and c-src, are consistently altered in LCIS. This review focuses on the molecular drivers of lobular carcinoma, a more complete understanding of which may give perspective on which LCIS lesions progress, and which will not, thus having immense clinical implications.

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology, biomarkers and 'omics

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast is the most common 'special' morphological subtype of breast cancer, comprising up to 15% of all cases. Tumours are generally of a good prognostic phenotype, being low histological grade and low mitotic index, hormone receptor positive and HER2, p53 and basal marker negative, and with a generally good response to endocrine therapy. Despite this, clinicians face countless challenges in the diagnosis and long-term management of patients, as they encounter a tumour that can be difficult to detect through screening, elicits a very invasive nature, a propensity for widespread metastatic colonisation and, consequently, in some studies a worse long-term poor outcome compared with invasive carcinoma of no special type. Here we review the morphological and molecular features that underpin the disparate biological and clinical characteristics of this fascinating tumour type.

[Breast surgeon role in the management of high-risk breast lesions]

Diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions have increased these last years with the augmentation of breast percutaneous biopsies. They are lesions that confer an enlarged risk of breast cancer, either because of an increased probability of finding cancer after open surgery, a possible evolution toward in situ or invasive cancer, or because of an increased probability of developing breast cancer over the long term. Much progress has been made these last years in their histological diagnostic, classification and pathogenesis. Nevertheless, no consensus exists to date on the management of these "high-risk" lesions. In particular, surgical indications and follow-up modalities remain controversial for each histological type. In this review, the principal factors that could impact surgical decision and long-term follow-up are discussed with areas of controversy highlighted.