Genetic basis of SMARCB1 protein loss in 22 sinonasal carcinomas

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of SMARCB1-Deificient Sinonasal Carcinomas -A Systematic Study from a Single Institution Cohort

BACKGROUND

SMARCB1-deficient and SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinomas are rare, with only a few systematic studies available in the literature. Secondary EWSR1 gene abnormalities have been reported in SMARCB1-deficient tumors. This study aimed to systematically investigate SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas in a single-institution cohort, perform clinicopathologic characterization, and explore the underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHOD

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of INI1 and BRG1 was performed on tissue microarrays containing tumor tissue from 149 consecutive sinonasal carcinomas. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and EWSR1 gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were conducted on SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas. Clinicopathologic characterization was studied.

RESULT

Of the 149 sinonasal carcinomas, 7 (4.7%) showed SMARCB1 loss, while none demonstrated SMARCA4 loss. All patients were male and presented with advanced-stage tumors. Four SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas exhibited basaloid morphology, two displayed eosinophilic tumor morphology, and one had mixed morphology. Homozygous and heterozygous SMARCB1 deletions were identified in 4/6 and 2/6 cases respectively. Heterozygous loss involving genes neighboring SMARCB1 gene, including EWSR1, was observed in four cases. One tumor showed a heterozygous loss of the entire chromosome 22q. EWSR1 FISH assay revealed concordant heterozygous EWSR1 loss in these five cases.

CONCLUSION

SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas account for 4.7% of sinonasal carcinomas in this single-institution cohort, while SMARCA4-deficient tumors are even rarer, with none identified. SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas exhibit a broad spectrum of morphologic and immunohistochemical features. These carcinomas show complex genetic alterations, with homozygous SMARCB1 deletions present in the majority of cases.

SMARCB1-deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: Expanding the Pathologic Spectrum With a Series of 32 Cases

SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC) is a recently recognized rare malignancy. Despite growing awareness, SDSC remains susceptible to misdiagnosis owing to its rarity and overlapping features with diverse mimics. A retrospective review of the clinical and pathologic features of 32 SDSC including 4 SMARCB-1 deficient adenocarcinoma (SDAC) cases was performed. The patients were aged 19 to 76 years with a male predominance. Most tumors arose in the naso-ethmoid (75%), and advanced stage (93.6%), with frequent multi-sinus (90.5%) involvement. Histologically, tumors exhibited diverse morphologies, including basaloid (50%), rhabdoid (25%), and undifferentiated (12.5%) types. SDAC cases showed glandular differentiation with intraluminal and stromal mucin. Empty vacuoles (62.5%), pagetoid spread (31.3%), eosinophilic-granular bodies (18.8%), hyaline globules (15.2%), and florid glomeruloid neovascularization (15.6%) were additional findings. Yolk sac-like areas were encountered in 18.6%. Immunohistochemically, tumors were defined by a complete loss of SMARCB1 (100%); a variable reactivity for p40 (65.6%), synaptophysin (13.6%), glypican3 (6.1%), and CD34 (6.1%) was present. Notably, >90% of our patients had different initial diagnoses before referral. Lymph node metastasis, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis were seen in 23.3%, 24.1%, and 27.6% patients, respectively; 37.9% died of disease. In conclusion, SDSCs are rare and aggressive sinonasal malignancies that display a wide histologic spectrum including glandular differentiation. This study expands on the morphologic spectrum of SDSC by analyzing a large cohort of 32 cases, adding comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical data, and highlighting features to improve diagnostic accuracy. The emergence of targeted therapies, such as EZH2 inhibitors, further underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis.

Analysis of ASCL1/NEUROD1/POU2F3/YAP1 Yields Novel Insights for the Diagnosis of Olfactory Neuroblastoma and Identifies Sinonasal Tuft Cell-Like Carcinoma

The diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal small round epithelial/neuroepithelial malignancies depend on the expression of conventional neuroendocrine markers (NEMs), such as synaptophysin, chromogranin A, INSM1, and CD56/NCAM1. However, these tumors remain diagnostically challenging because of overlapping histologic and immunohistochemical features. The transcriptional regulators ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 are novel NEM (nNEM) used for the subtyping of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Here, we assessed the immunoexpression of nNEM in 76 sinonasal malignancies, including 27 olfactory neuroblastomas (ONB), 14 small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNEC), 2 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 12 sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUC), 7 olfactory carcinomas (OC), 11 SWI/SNF-deficient carcinomas, and 3 neuroendocrine tumors. We correlated nNEM expression with the extent of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation, as defined by averaged conventional NEM expression (NE-high: H-score, ≥150; NE-low: H-score, <150). Dominant NE subtypes were defined by the nNEM with the highest H-score. Coexpression of 2 nNEM with <100 H-score difference defined a codominant NE subtype. NE differentiation positively correlated with NEUROD1 and negatively with YAP1 expression (P < .0001). ONB were NE-high (96%), and all were NEUROD1-dominant/POU2F3-negative/ASCL1-negative (low)/YAP1-negative (low). In contrast to ONB, all OC were NE-low, mostly (71%) codominant subtypes, NEUROD1-low (negative) (100%, P = .0001), and YAP1 high (71%; P = .0001). Most notably, all SNUC were POU2F3-(co)dominant/NEUROD1-negative irrespective of the IDH2 mutations. Sinonasal tumors with high POU2F3 expression showed enrichment for "tuft cell carcinoma" and tuft cell signatures (P = .009). Similar to SCLC, SCNEC was heterogeneous in terms of nNEM expression comprising several molecular subtypes, including ASCL1-(co)dominant (43%) cases. All SWI/SNF-deficient carcinomas were consistently ASCL1/NEUROD1/POU2F3-negative and YAP1-positive. ASCL1/NEUROD1/POU2F3/YAP1 are useful markers in the differential diagnosis of ONB, SNUC, OC, and SWI/SNF-deficient carcinomas. Subsets of SNUC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas may represent tuft cell-like carcinomas, suggesting that the tuft cell could be explored as the cell of origin for these tumors. The therapeutic vulnerabilities associated with POU2F3 expression in SCLC suggest that a similar approach might be considered for POU2F3-positive carcinomas of the sinonasal tract. Given their diagnostic and possible therapeutic relevance, nNEM have the potential to transform the way we approach the diagnosis and management of sinonasal small round epithelial/neuroepithelial malignancies.

Outcomes of SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas in a Southeast Asian cohort

BACKGROUND

SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas are rare, genetically distinct, and aggressive entities.

METHODS

SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 immunohistochemistry was retrospectively performed on a cohort of undifferentiated, poorly differentiated, and poorly defined sinonasal carcinomas. Survival outcomes were compared between SMARCB1/SMARCA4 (SWI/SNF complex)-deficient and -retained groups.

RESULTS

Eight SWI/SNF complex-deficient (six SMARCB1-deficient, two SMARCA4-deficient) cases were identified among 47 patients over 12 years. Triple-modality treatment was more frequently utilized in SWI/SNF complex-deficient carcinomas than in SWI/SNF complex-retained carcinomas (71.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21.3 (IQR 9.9-56.0) months, SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas showed comparable recurrence rates (57.1% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.839), time-to-recurrence (7.3 [IQR 6.6-8.3] vs. 9.1 [IQR 3.9-17.4] months, p = 0.531), and overall survival (17.7 [IQR 11.8-67.0] vs. 21.6 [IQR 8.9-56.0] months, p = 0.835) compared to SWI/SNF complex-retained sinonasal carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Triple-modality treatment may improve survival in SWI/SNF complex-deficient sinonasal carcinomas.

Outcomes of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: Largest single-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

We evaluate outcomes of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas in the largest single-institution study.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma between 1998 and 2024. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free probability (RFP) at 1 and 5 years were measured by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 47 patients with a median age of 53. Initial pathological diagnosis was altered in 33%. Twelve (34%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with one partial response. Curative surgical approach was undertaken in 73%. Definitive chemoradiation was administered in 20%. DSS at 1 and 5 years was 93% and 45%, respectively. RFP at 1 and 5 years was 73% and 33%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, cranial nerve involvement (p = 0.01 for DSS) remained significantly worse for DSS and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

SMARCB1-deficient tumors had limited response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cranial nerve involvement was associated with worse prognosis. Optimal treatment is unclear. Surgery should be offered to patients with resectable disease.

SWI/SNF Complex-Deficient Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis

Inactivating alterations in the SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) Chromatin Remodeling Complex subunits have been described in multiple tumor types. Recent studies focused on SMARC subunits of this complex to understand their relationship with tumor characteristics and therapeutic opportunities. To date, pancreatic cancer with these alterations has not been well studied, although isolated cases of undifferentiated carcinomas have been reported. Herein, we screened 59 pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas for alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related (SMARCB1 [BAF47/INI1], SMARCA4 [BRG1], SMARCA2 [BRM]) proteins and/or genes using immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing. Cases with alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related proteins/genes were compared with cases without alterations, as well as with 96 conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). In all tumor groups, mismatch repair and PD-L1 protein expression were also evaluated. Thirty of 59 (51%) undifferentiated carcinomas had a loss of SWI/SNF complex-related protein expression or gene alteration. Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas had rhabdoid morphology (vs 9/29 [31%] SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinomas; P < .001) and all expressed cytokeratin, at least focally. Immunohistochemically, SMARCB1 protein expression was absent in 16/30 (53%) cases, SMARCA2 in 4/30 (13%), and SMARCA4 in 4/30 (13%); both SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 protein expressions were absent in 1/30 (3%). Five of 8 (62.5%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas that displayed loss of SMARCB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry were found to have corresponding SMARCB1 deletions by next-generation sequencing. Analysis of canonical driver mutations for PDAC in these cases showed KRAS (2/5) and TP53 (2/5) abnormalities. Median combined positive score for PD-L1 (E1L3N) was significantly higher in the undifferentiated carcinomas with/without SWI/SNF deficiency compared with the conventional PDACs (P < .001). SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas were larger (P < .001) and occurred in younger patients (P < .001). Patients with SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma had worse overall survival compared with patients with SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinoma (P = .004) and PDAC (P < .001). Our findings demonstrate that SWI-/SNF-deficient pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas are frequently characterized by rhabdoid morphology, exhibit highly aggressive behavior, and have a negative prognostic impact. The ones with SMARCB1 deletions appear to be frequently KRAS wild type. Innovative developmental therapeutic strategies targeting this genomic basis of the SWI/SNF complex and the therapeutic implications of EZH2 inhibition (NCT03213665), SMARCA2 degrader (NCT05639751), or immunotherapy are currently under investigation.

FGFR1/2/3-rearranged carcinoma of the head and neck: expanded histological spectrum crossing path with high-risk HPV in the sinonasal tract

AIMS

Oncogenic FGFR1/2/3 rearrangements are found in various cancers. Reported cases in head and neck (HN) are mainly squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) with FGFR3::TACC3 fusions, a subset of which also harbour high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). However, the knowledge of the clinicopathological spectrum of FGFR-rearranged head and neck carcinomas (FHNC) is limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective MSK-fusion clinical sequencing cohort 2016-23 was searched to identify malignant tumours in the HN region harbouring FGFR1/2/3 fusion. FHNC were characterised by histological examination, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Three FHNC were identified. Two cases (cases 1 and 2) involved sinonasal tract and were high-grade carcinomas with squamous, basaloid, glandular and/or ductal-myoepithelial features. Case 1 arose in a 79-year-old man and harboured FGFR2::KIF1A fusion. Case 2 arose in a 58-year-old man, appeared as HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma (HMSC), and was positive for FGFR2::TACC2 fusion and concurrent high-risk HPV, non-type 16/18. Case 3 was FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive keratinising SCCs arising in the parotid of a 60-year-old man. All three cases presented at stage T4. Clinical follow-up was available in two cases; case 1 remained disease-free for 41 months post-treatment and case 3 died of disease 2 months after the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

FHNC include a morphological spectrum of carcinomas with squamous features and may occur in different HN locations, such as parotid gland and the sinonasal tract. Sinonasal cases can harbour FGFR2 rearrangement with or without associated high-risk HPV. Timely recognition of FHNC could help select patients potentially amenable to targeted therapy with FGFR inhibitors. Further studies are needed (1) to determine if FGFR2 rearranged/HPV-positive sinonasal carcinomas are biologically distinct from HMSC, and (2) to elucidate the biological and clinical significance of FGFR2 rearrangement in the context of high-risk HPV.

Top 10 Basaloid Neoplasms of the Sinonasal Tract

BACKGROUND

Basaloid neoplasms of the sinonasal tract represent a significant group of tumors with histological overlap but often with different etiologies (i.e., viral, genetics), clinical management, and prognostic significance.

METHODS

Review.

RESULTS

"Basaloid" generally refers to cells with coarse chromatin in round nuclei and sparse cytoplasm, resembling cells of epithelial basal layers or imparting an "immature" appearance. Tumors with this characteristic in the sinonasal tract are represented by a spectrum of benign to high-grade malignant neoplasms, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, NUT carcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, SWI/SNF complex-deficient carcinomas, and adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

In some instances, histology alone may be sufficient for diagnosis. However, limited biopsy material or fine-needle aspiration specimens may be particularly challenging. Therefore, often other diagnostic procedures, including a combination of histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), DNA and RNA testing, and molecular genetics are necessary to establish an accurate diagnosis.

SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Carcinomas

The classification of poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas and their nonepithelial mimics has experienced tremendous developments during the last 2 decades. These recent developments paved the way for an increasingly adopted approach to a molecular-based or etiology-based refined classification of the many carcinoma variants that have been historically lumped into the sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma category. Among these new achievements, recognition of carcinoma subtypes driven by defects in the Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex represents a major highlight. This resulted in a new definition of 4 sinonasal entities driven solely or predominantly by Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable complex deficiency: (1) SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (lacking gland formation and frequently displaying a non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic/oncocytoid morphology, but no features of other definable subtypes), (2) SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma (with unequivocal glands or yolk sac-like pattern), (3) SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated (sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma-like) carcinoma (lacking glandular or squamous immunophenotypes), and (4) SMARCA4-deficient subset (~80%) of sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. Fortunately, diagnostic loss of all these proteins can be detected by routine immunohistochemistry, so that genetic testing is not mandatory in routine practice. This review summarizes the main demographic, clinicopathological, and molecular features of these new entities.

Molecular Basis and Rationale for the Use of Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy in Sinonasal Cancers

Despite the progress of surgery, radiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the prognosis for advanced sinonasal cancers (SNCs) remains poor. In the era of precision medicine, more research has been conducted on the molecular pathways and recurrent mutations of SNCs, with the aim of understanding carcinogenesis, helping with diagnosis, identifying prognostic factors, and finding potentially targetable mutations. In the treatment of SNC, immunotherapy is rarely used, and no targeted therapies have been approved, partly because these tumors are usually excluded from major clinical trials. Data on the efficacy of targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors are scarce. Despite those issues, a tumor-agnostic treatment approach based on targeted drugs against a detected genetic mutation is growing in several settings and cancer subtypes, and could also be proposed for SNCs. Our work aims to provide an overview of the main molecular pathways altered in the different epithelial subtypes of sinonasal and skull base tumors, focusing on the possible actionable mutations for which potential target therapies are already approved in other cancer types.

SMARCB1 (INI-1)-Deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

(1) Background: SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a rare sinonasal malignancy; since its discovery and description in 2014, less than 200 cases have been identified. It is almost impossible to perform randomized-controlled trials on novel therapy to improve treatment outcomes in view of its rarity. We performed a systematic review of all the published case reports/series and included our patients for survival analysis. (2) Methods: In this systematic review, we searched from PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for individual patient data to identify and retrieve all reported SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma. Clarification on treatment details and the most updated survival outcomes from all authors of the published case reports/series were attempted. Survival analysis for overall survival (OS) and identification of OS prognostic factors were performed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022306671). (3) Results: A total of 67 publications were identified from the systematic review and literature search. After excluding other ineligible and duplicated publications, 192 patients reported were considered appropriate for further review. After excluding duplicates and patients with incomplete pretreatment details and survival outcomes, 120 patients were identified to have a complete set of data including baseline demographics, treatment details, and survival outcomes. Together with 8 patients treated in our institution, 128 patients were included into survival analysis. After a median follow up of 17.5 months (range 0.3-149.0), 50 (46.3%) patients died. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 84.3% (95% CI % 77.6-91.0), 62.9% (95% CI 53.1-72.7), and 51.8% (95% CI 40.8-62.8), respectively, and the median OS was 39.0 months (95% CI 28.5-49.5). Males (p = 0.029) and T4b disease (p = 0.013) were significant OS prognostic factors in univariable analysis, while only T4b disease (p = 0.017) remained significant in multivariable analysis. (4) Conclusions: SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is an extremely aggressive sinonasal malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis and a multimodality treatment strategy are essential for a better treatment and survival outcome.

Proceedings of the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology, Los Angeles, CA, March 20, 2022: SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Neoplasms: An Overview

The pathology of poorly differentiated sinonasal malignancies has been the subject of extensive studies during the last decade, which resulted into significant developments in the definitions and histo-/pathogenetic classification of several entities included in the historical spectrum of "sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUC)" and poorly differentiated unclassified carcinomas. In particular, genetic defects leading to inactivation of different protein subunits in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have continuously emerged as the major (frequently the only) genetic player driving different types of sinonasal carcinomas. The latter display distinctive demographic, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. To date, four different SWI/SNF-driven sinonasal tumor types have been recognized: SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient carcinoma (showing frequently non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic, oncocytoid or rhabdoid undifferentiated morphology), SMARCB1-deficient adenocarcinomas (showing variable gland formation or yolk sac-like morphology), SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma (lacking any differentiation markers and variably overlapping with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and SNUC), and lastly, SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. These different tumor types display highly variable immunophenotypes with SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas showing variable squamous immunophenotype, while their SMARCA4-related counterparts lack such features altogether. While sharing same genetic defect, convincing evidence is still lacking that SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient teratocracinosarcoma might belong to the spectrum of same entity. Available molecular studies revealed no additional drivers in these entities, confirming the central role of SWI/SNF deficiency as the sole driver genetic event in these aggressive malignancies. Notably, all studied cases lacked oncogenic IDH2 mutations characteristic of genuine SNUC. Identification and precise classification of these entities and separating them from SNUC, NUT carcinoma and other poorly differentiated neoplasms of epithelial melanocytic, hematolymphoid or mesenchymal origin is mandatory for appropriate prognostication and tailored therapies. Moreover, drugs targeting the SWI/SNF vulnerabilities are emerging in clinical trials.

Molecular Biomarkers in Sinonasal Cancers: New Frontiers in Diagnosis and Treatment

Purpose of Review

Sinonasal tumors are rare and heterogeneous diseases which pose challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Despite significant progress made in surgical, oncological, and radiotherapy fields, their prognosis still remains poor. Therefore, alternative strategies should be studied in order to refine diagnosis and improve patient care.

Recent Findings

In recent years, in-depth molecular studies have identified new biological markers, such as genetic abnormalities and epigenetic variations, which have allowed to refine diagnosis and predict prognosis. As a consequence, new histological entities have been described and specific subgroup stratifications within the well-known histotypes have been made possible. These discoveries have expanded indications for immunotherapy and targeted therapies in order to reduce tumor spread, thus representing a valuable implementation of standard treatments.

Summary

Recent findings in molecular biology have paved the way for better understanding and managing such rare and aggressive tumors. Although further efforts need to be made in this direction, expectations are promising.

IDH2 R172 Mutations Across Poorly Differentiated Sinonasal Tract Malignancies: Forty Molecularly Homogenous and Histologically Variable Cases With Favorable Outcome

IDH2 R172 mutations occur in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), sinonasal adenocarcinomas, and olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). We performed a clinical, pathologic, and genetic/epigenetic analysis of a large IDH2-mutated sinonasal tumor cohort to explore their distinct features. A total 165 sinonasal/skull base tumors included 40 IDH2 mutants studied by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and genome-wide DNA methylation, and 125 IDH2 wild-type tumors used for comparison. Methylation profiles were analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding dimensionality reduction and assessed for copy number alterations (CNA). Thirty-nine histologically assessable cases included 25 (64.1%) SNUC, 8 (20.5%) LCNEC, 2 (5.1%) poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, 1 (2.7%) ONB, and 3 (7.7%) IDH2-mutated tumors with ONB features. All cases were high-grade showing necrosis (82.4%), prominent nucleoli (88.9%), and median 21 mitoses/10 HPFs. AE1/AE3 and/or CAM 5.2 were positive in all and insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) in 80% cases. All IDH2 mutants formed one distinct group by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding dimensionality reduction separating from all IDH2 wild-type tumors. There was no correlation between methylation clusters and histopathologic diagnoses. Recurrent CNA included 1q gain (79.3%), 17p loss (75.9%), and 17q gain (58.6%). No CNA differences were observed between SNUC and LCNEC. IDH2 mutants showed better disease-specific survival than SMARCB1-deficient (P=0.027) and IDH2 wild-type carcinomas overall (P=0.042). IDH2-mutated sinonasal tumors are remarkably homogeneous at the molecular level and distinct from IDH2 wild-type sinonasal malignancies. Biology of IDH2-mutated sinonasal tumors might be primarily defined by their unique molecular fingerprint rather than by their respective histopathologic diagnoses.

INI1-Deficient Thyroid Carcinoma is an Aggressive Disease with Epithelioid and Rhabdoid Phenotype. A Case Report, Survey of INI1 Expression in Thyroid Lesions and Literature Review

Integrase interactor 1 (INI1)-deficient carcinomas, recently described in several sites including the head and neck, are associated with basaloid or rhabdoid histology and aggressive behavior irrespective of origin. INI1-deficient thyroid carcinoma is extremely rare. We present here the phenotype and genotype of an INI1-deficient thyroid carcinoma and report on the INI1 protein expression in various thyroid lesions. Case report with clinicopathologic and molecular characterization and INI1 assessment in 184 thyroid lesions. A 67-year-old woman presented with globus sensation due to a large thyroid mass with extrathyroid extension, focal necrosis and cervical and mediastinal nodal involvement. Histologically, tumor cells had a solid, alveolar and pseudopapillary architecture in a myxoid stroma, exhibited monomorphic epithelioid and focal rhabdoid/plasmacytoid morphology and lacked glandular, squamous or follicular cell differentiation. Tumor cells were positive for AE1/AE3 and CK18 but negative for TTF1, thyroglobulin and PAX8. INI1 nuclear expression was absent. A frameshift SMARCB1/INI1 mutation was detected. In addition, TET2 and Notch1 mutations were present but alterations of BRAF, RET, PAX8/PPAR8 or RAS were not identified. Patient death occurred 14 months after diagnosis from post-therapeutic complications. None of the 184 benign and malignant thyroid lesions tested, including 12 poorly and undifferentiated thyroid carcinomas, were INI1-deficient. INI1-deficient thyroid carcinoma shares the phenotype, genotype and biology of other INI1-deficient tumors. Epithelioid and plasmacytoid/rhabdoid changes are most frequent whereas basaloid morphology is not reported, in contrast with sinonasal tumors. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated thyroid tumors with epithelioid or rhabdoid morphology should be tested for INI1 protein expression to better characterize these aggressive neoplasms and identify patients eligible for targeted therapy.

Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs) are clinically aggressive diseases, the classification of which has recently been redefined. They now include both poorly differentiated NENs (neuroendocrine carcinoma, NECs) and high proliferating well-differentiated NENs (called grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors, G3 NETs, in the digestive system). In the last decade, the "molecular revolution" that has affected all fields of medical oncology has also shed light in the understanding of HG NENs heterogeneity and has provided new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, useful in the management of these malignancies. Considering the kaleidoscopic aspects of HG NENs in various anatomical sites, this review systematically addresses the genomic landscape of such neoplasm throughout the more common thoracic and digestive locations, as well as it will consider other rare but not exceptional primary sites, including the skin, the head and neck, and the urogenital system. The revision of the available literature will then be oriented to understand the translational relevance of molecular data, by analyzing conceptual issues, clinicopathological correlations, and unmet needs in this field.

SWI/SNF-deficient head and neck neoplasms: An overview

With wide-spread use of next generation sequencing tools in surgical pathology, a variety of neoplasms have been increasingly recognized to be associated with specific recurrent defining genetic abnormalities. This has led to recognition of new genetically defined entities and refinements of preexisting heterogeneous neoplastic categories. Among these, neoplasms associated with inactivating mutations involving different subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have received special attention. In the head and neck area, SMARCB1 (INI1) and SMARCA4 (BRG1) are the main two SWI/SNF components responsible for several recently described highly aggressive undifferentiated malignancies with predilection for the soft tissue of the neck (SMARCB1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumors in children and rare epithelioid sarcoma cases in adults) and the sinonasal tract (SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma including a small subset of adenocarcinomas, SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma). Molecular studies confirmed paucity of additional genetic abnormalities in these diseases underlining the central role of SWI/SNF deficiency as the primary and frequently sole genetic driver of these lethal diseases. Initiation of clinical trials using drugs that target the SWI/SNF collapse encourages recognition and correct classification of these morphologically frequently overlapping malignancies and underpins the role of SWI/SNF immunohistochemistry as emerging powerful adjunct tool in surgical pathology of the head and neck.