A Comparative Evaluation of TRPS1 and GATA3 in adenoid cystic, secretory, and acinic cell carcinomas of the breast and salivary gland

TRPS1 Immunohistochemistry in Salivary Gland Neoplasms: Analysis on Cytology Cell Blocks and Surgical Follow-Up Correlation

INTRODUCTION

In this study we aim to analyze the TRPS1 immunostaining of salivary gland tumors (SGT) on cytology cell blocks and compare the staining pattern on subsequent surgical resections.

METHODS

Malignant SGTs, oncocytomas and basal cell adenomas diagnosed on fine needle aspiration were retrieved from 2019 to 2021 database. Cases with surgical follow-up were selected. TRPS1 staining was performed on cytology cell blocks and surgical specimens. Scoring was interpreted by two pathologists independently.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised of 58 cases: 45 malignant and 13 benign. TRPS1 scoring was interpreted for 44 cytology and 51 surgical cases. 14 cytology cases lacked tumor cells on deeper levels. For 7 cases, surgical blocks were not retrievable. TRPS1 positivity for cytology and surgical cases were 52% and 47% respectively. In the malignant cohort, TRPS1 was positive in 21/32 (66%) cytology cases and 21/43 (56%) surgical cases. All cases of basal cell adenocarcinoma, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and salivary duct carcinoma were TRPS1 positive on cytology. All cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma were TRPS1 positive on surgical resections. In the benign cohort, TRPS1 was positive in 2/12 (17%) cytology cases; however, none of the surgically resected benign cases showed reactivity (0/8). Cytology-surgical correlation of TRPS1 staining was done in 37 cases. We found 21 concordant and 16 discordant cases. Discordance was highest in mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

TRPS1 is not an entirely specific marker for breast carcinoma. TRPS1 positivity was noted in a substantial number of salivary gland malignant neoplasms. Cases demonstrating discordance in TRPS1 staining pattern on cytology-surgical correlation warrant further exploration.

TRPS1 expression in cytologic specimens of salivary duct carcinoma and other salivary gland tumors

Recent studies suggest that trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is sensitive immunomarker for breast carcinoma (BC). Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) of salivary gland can share similar morphologic and immunophenotypic features with BC. This study aimed to assess the expression of TRPS1 in SDC and other salivary gland tumors (SGTs). Cytology cases and selected surgical specimens of SGTs were retrieved. Forty-three cases were selected and TRPS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on cell blocks and some histologic specimens. Of those 43 cases, all 13 SDC cases showed TRPS1 expression except for one case. The remaining 30 cases include pleomorphic adenoma (n = 7), Warthin tumor (n = 4), basal cell adenoma (n = 3), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 2), secretory carcinoma (n = 5), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 4), and acinic cell carcinoma (n = 5). Three of thirty cases were negative for TRPS1 while the remainder showed variable expression of TRPS1 ranging from focal weak to diffuse strong staining. The three negative cases include a case of secretory carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma and Warthin tumor. Our study confirmed that TRPS1 expression is present in SDC and other SGTs, indicating an overlapping immunoprofile with breast cancer. Additionally, it may not help differentiate SDC or SGTs from each other. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Frequent Immunohistochemical Expression of Transcriptional Repressor GATA Binding 1 in Salivary Gland Neoplasms: A Sensitive but Nonspecific Marker

CONTEXT.—

Salivary gland (SG) neoplasms (SGNs) display considerable immunophenotypic diversity. A significant proportion of SG carcinomas develop metastases, with increased diagnostic difficulty at metastatic sites. Transcriptional repressor GATA binding 1 (TRPS1), a novel immunohistochemical marker for breast cancer, has been found to stain certain SGNs.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate TRPS1 and SRY-related HMG-box 10 (SOX10) immunoexpression in various SGNs and non-SG carcinomas, head and neck paragangliomas, and head and neck mucosal melanomas.

DESIGN.—

TRPS1 immunoreactivity score (IRS) was determined as negative or low, intermediate, or high positive; SOX10 was reported as negative or positive.

RESULTS.—

One hundred forty-eight SGNs, 5 breast carcinomas, 105 nonbreast-non-SG carcinomas, including 33 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), 6 head and neck paragangliomas, and 6 head and neck mucosal melanomas, were assessed for TRPS1. All 23 benign SGNs showed TRPS1 positivity, with the majority having high-positive IRS (17 of 23 cases; 74%). Among 125 SG carcinomas, 115 of 125 (92%) were TRPS1 positive, with high-positive IRS in 94 of 125 (75%), intermediate-positive IRS in 15 of 125 (12%), and low-positive IRS in 6 of 125 (5%). Among nonbreast-non-SG carcinomas, HNSCC, lung, thyroid, kidney, and ovarian carcinomas showed frequent TRPS1 staining. Nearly half of HNSCCs had high (11 of 18; 33%) or intermediate (4 of 18; 12%) positive IRS. Mean IRS in SG carcinomas was significantly higher than that in nonbreast-non-SG carcinomas (P < .001). None of the TRPS1-positive nonbreast-non-SG carcinomas expressed SOX10.

CONCLUSIONS.—

TRPS1 is positive in most benign and malignant SGNs. Its expression in several nonbreast-non-SG carcinomas indicates that it lacks specificity for breast and SG carcinomas, even if considering only high-positive IRS. Addition of SOX10 can increase the discriminatory utility of TRPS1.

Expression of TRPS1 in Metastatic Tumors of the Skin: An Immunohistochemical Study of 72 Cases

TRPS1 (Tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome 1) is a GATA transcriptional activator gene encoding for a protein used as a sensitive immunohistochemical marker of breast carcinomas. In dermatopathology, TRPS1 is used as a marker of mammary and extramammary Paget's disease and is also expressed by a variety of primary cutaneous tumors, mostly of adnexal origin. So far, very limited data exist on the expression of TRPS1 in metastatic skin tumors. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 in 72 cutaneous metastatic tumors from the breast (n: 19) and other origins (n: 53) in order to assess its diagnostic usefulness. The intensity of TRPS1 immunostaining was expressed as a histoscore: the product of the percentage of positive cells (scored semi-quantitatively 0-4) and the staining intensity (scored 0-3). In normal skin, nuclear TRPS1 expression was predominantly observed in cells of adnexal structures (pilosebaceous follicles and sweat glands). Eighteen (18/19, 94.7%) metastatic breast carcinomas showed diffuse and strong TRPS1 positivity (histoscore 12). Lower reactivity was found in some other metastases, including from the lung (11/22), the female genital tract (3/4), and the kidney (2/4), whereas most (20/22) metastases from the digestive system and peritoneum, along with a case of metastatic prostate carcinoma, were negative. These results suggest that a high histoscore for TRPS1 is in favor of the mammary origin of metastatic cutaneous carcinoma. Although TRPS1 is not absolutely specific or sensitive to a particular primary, we consider that it can be added to a panel of other markers when investigating the origin of a cutaneous metastasis, namely when this is the first manifestation of the neoplastic disease.

A Comprehensive Review of TRPS1 as a Diagnostic Immunohistochemical Marker for Primary Breast Carcinoma: Latest Insights and Diagnostic Pitfalls

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 (trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1) protein is usually used by pathologists to confirm breast origin for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) or metastatic carcinomas of unknown primary. However, recent studies have reported TRPS1 expression in a variety of non-breast lesions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of TRPS1 expression across various tumor types, highlighting both its diagnostic utility and potential pitfalls that may arise in clinical practice.

METHODS

A thorough search of the PubMed database on TRPS1 immunoexpression in tumor pathology was conducted. While the gene itself has been known for several decades, most studies regarding its use in immunohistochemistry emerged in the late 2010s. Particular emphasis was placed on case reports and cohort studies that examined the implications of TRPS1 expression in non-breast tissues, as well as variations in the results between commercially available TRPS1 clones, which may influence the staining intensity and specificity.

RESULTS

TRPS1 demonstrated a strong diagnostic utility in identifying primary breast lesions, particularly in TNBC cases. However, its expression in a growing number of non-breast cancers, such as lung adenocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma, as well as up to 96% of synovial sarcomas with SS18-SSX fusion, emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting TRPS1 positivity and suggests a multi-marker approach in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

While TRPS1 remains a highly sensible immunohistochemical marker for confirming breast primary lesions, pathologists should be aware of its low specificity and incorporate complementary diagnostic methods in order to ensure accurate clinical management. Further research should focus on elucidating the molecular pathways regulating TRPS1 expression in various tumor types, which may better define its clinical utility.

TRPS1, a sensitive marker for different histological and molecular types of breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

We explored Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) expression in special types of breast carcinoma, and analyzed the correlation between TRPS1 and androgen receptor (AR) expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

TRPS1 expression was analyzed in 801 patients with special types of breast carcinoma. A total of 969 TNBC were used to analyze the correlation between the expression of TRPS1 and AR. TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1975 cases of breast cancer with different molecular types.

RESULTS

A total of 801 special types of breast cancers were stained with TRPS1.TRPS1 was positive in 100% (63/63) of mucinous carcinoma, 100% (7/7) adenoid cystic carcinomas (4 classic adenoid cystic carcinomas and 3 solid-basaloid adenoid cystic carcinomas), 100% (4/4) tubular carcinomas, 100% (2/2) secretory carcinomas, and 99.59% (243/244) invasive lobular carcinomas, 99.26% (267/269) invasive micropapillary carcinomas, 97.44% (38/39) ER-positive neuroendocrine tumors, 94.44% (34/36) metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs), 63.73% (65/102) apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 was negative in all triple-negative neuroendocrine carcinomas (0/7).TRPS1 was positive in 92.86% (26/28) of metastatic special types of breast cancer. TRPS1 and AR expression were analyzed in 969 cases of TNBC. 90.40% were positive for TRPS1, and 42.41% were positive for AR. A significant inverse correlation between TRPS1 and AR expression was shown in TNBC (p < .001). TRPS1 showed a higher positive rate (93.13%) in TNBC compared to GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) and forkhead box transcription Factor C 1 (FOXC1).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for most special types of breast carcinoma. TRPS1 was positive in 63.73% of apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 and AR expression was inversely correlated in TNBC.

TRPS1 expression in MPNST is correlated with PRC2 inactivation and loss of H3K27me3

Initially described as a highly specific immunohistochemical marker for carcinomas of mammary origin, trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) has subsequently been detected in a variety of other non-mammary tumors. In this study, we examined the immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 in 114 peripheral nerve sheath tumors, including 43 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), 58 schwannomas, including 9 cellular neurofibromas, and 13 neurofibromas, including 1 atypical neurofibroma. Notably, TRPS1 was expressed in 49% of MPNSTs and was absent in all schwannomas and neurofibromas. All MPNSTs showed TRPS1 labeling in >50% of nuclei, with 95% of cases demonstrating diffuse labeling. Most cases (67%) showed weak TRPS1 immunoreactivity, while a smaller subset showed moderate (24%) or strong (9%) intensity staining. Analysis of publicly available gene expression datasets revealed higher levels of TRPS1 mRNA in MPNSTs with PRC2 inactivation. In keeping with this finding, TRPS1 expression was more commonly observed in MPNSTs with loss of H3K27me3, suggesting a potential relationship between TRPS1 and the PRC2 complex. This study further broadens the spectrum of TRPS1-expressing tumors to include MPNST.

Diagnostic utility and sensitivities of matrix Gla protein (MGP), TRPS1 and GATA3 in breast cancer: focusing on metastatic breast cancer, invasive breast carcinoma with special features, and salivary gland-type tumours

Matrix Gla protein (MGP) and trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) have recently emerged as novel breast-specific immunohistochemical (IHC) markers, particularly for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metaplastic carcinoma. The present study aimed to validate and compare the expression of MGP, TRPS1 and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) in metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC), invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) with special features, including special types of invasive breast carcinoma (IBC-STs) and invasive breast carcinoma of no special type with unique features, and mammary and non-mammary salivary gland-type tumours (SGTs). Among all enrolled cases, MGP, TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable high positivity for ER/PR-positive (p=0.148) and HER2-positive (p=0.310) breast carcinoma (BC), while GATA3 positivity was significantly lower in TNBC (p<0.001). Similarly, the positive rates of MGP and TRPS1 in MBCs (99.4%), were higher than in GATA3 (90.9%, p<0.001). Among the IBC-STs, 98.4% of invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) were positive for all three markers. Among neuroendocrine tumours (NTs), all cases were positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, while MGP positivity was relatively low (81.8%, p=0.313). In the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NC) subgroup, all cases were positive for GATA3 and MGP, while one case was negative for TRPS1. All carcinomas with apocrine differentiation (APOs) were positive for GATA3 and MGP, while only 60% of the cases demonstrated moderate staining for TRPS1. Among mammary SGTs, MGP demonstrated the highest positivity (100%), followed by TRPS1 (96.0%) and GATA3 (72.0%). Positive staining for these markers was also frequently observed in non-mammary SGTs. Our findings further validate the high sensitivity of MGP and TRPS1 in MBCs, IBC-STs, and breast SGTs. However, none of these markers are capable of distinguishing between mammary and non-mammary SGTs.