Stereotactic body radiotherapy is effective salvage therapy for patients with prior radiation of spinal metastases

Radiation therapy, radiosurgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapies for metastatic spine tumors: WFNS Spine committee recommendations

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to formulate the most current, evidence-based recommendations regarding radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and chemotherapy for patients with metastatic spine tumors.

METHODS

A systematic literature using PRISMA methodology was performed from 2010-2023 using the search terms "radiosurgery," "radiation therapy," "external beam radiation therapy," or "stereotactic body radiation therapy" in conjunction with "spinal," "spine," "metastasis," "metastases," or "metastatic."

RESULTS

Spinal metastases should be managed in a multidisciplinary team consisting of spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists and oncologists. Patients identified as potential candidates for SRS/EBRT using internationally recognized frameworks and criteria should be assessed by surgeons to see if surgical cyto-reduction/ separation surgery can be achieved. Choices for treatment of recurrence include re-irradiation with SBRT vs EBRT, surgical debulking, additional chemotherapy or palliative care. There is a lack of current clinical evidence to support the routine use of targeted therapies in the management of metastatic spinal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving the management of spinal metastasis will lead to increased quality of life and improved survival. This review provides current, evidence-based guidelines on radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and chemotherapy for patients with metastatic spine tumors.

Reirradiation of bone metastasis: A narrative review of the literature

Patients with bone metastasis are prevalent among those receiving palliative radiotherapy (RT), with approximately 20 % requiring reirradiation (reirradiation). The goal of bone reirradiation may be local control (oligoreoccurrence or oligoprogression of a previously treated lesion or in a previous treatment field) or symptomatic (threatening or painful progression). Published data on bone reirradiation indicate almost two-thirds of overall pain response. The primary organ at risk (especially for spine treatment) is the spinal cord. The risk of radiation myelitis is<1 % for cumulative doses of<50Gy. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and stereotactic RT (SRT) appear to be safer than three-dimensional RT (3DRT), although randomized trials comparing these techniques in reirradiation are lacking. Reirradiation requires multidisciplinary assessment. Alternative treatments for bone metastases (surgery, interventional radiology, etc.) must be considered. Patients should have a performance status≤2, with at least a 1-month interval between treatments. The planning process involves reviewing previous RT plans, cautious dose adjustments, and precise target delineation and dose distribution to minimize toxicity. Cumulative dosimetry, patient consent, and vigilant post-treatment monitoring and dose reporting are crucial.

The Role of CT and MR Imaging in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Spine: From Patient Selection and Treatment Planning to Post-Treatment Monitoring

Spine metastases (SMs) are common, arising in 70% of the cases of the most prevalent malignancies in males (prostate cancer) and females (breast cancer). Stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT, has been incorporated into clinical treatment algorithms over the past decade. SBRT has shown promising rates of local control for oligometastatic spinal lesions with low radiation dose to adjacent critical tissues, particularly the spinal cord. Imaging is critically important in SBRT planning, guidance, and response monitoring. This paper reviews the roles of imaging in spine SBRT, including conventional and advanced imaging approaches for SM detection, treatment planning, and post-SBRT follow-up.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastasis: A systematic review of the literature

Background

Advances in local and systemic therapies continue to improve overall survival for patients with cancer, increasing the incidence of spine metastases. Up to 15% of patients with solid tumors develop spinal metastases. Spinal metastases can be particularly devastating for quality of life given the potential pain, neurological deficits from spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome, spinal instability, and pathological fractures that may result. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without adding less invasive surgical techniques for stabilization or separation has gained favor. SBRT uses smaller, more precise treatment volumes, allowing for higher doses per fracture, thus increasing ablative abilities.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science to identify all articles investigating the effectiveness of SBRT in providing local disease control, pain control, and relief of spinal cord compression for patients with metastatic disease of the spine.

Results

The review yielded 84 articles that met inclusion criteria. The evidence indicates SBRT provides excellent local control and pain control for patients with spine metastesis, and this remains true for patients with spinal cord compression managed with surgical separation followed by postoperative spine SBRT.

Conclusion

While not all patients are appropriate candidates for SBRT, carefully considering appropriate frameworks that consider the patient's overall prognosis can guide a multidisciplinary team toward the patients who will benefit the most from this treatment modality.

A multi-centre retrospective study of long-term outcomes of spinal re-irradiation with SABR

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a highly conformal technique utilising a high dose per fraction commonly employed in the re-treatment of spinal metastases. This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of re-irradiation with SABR to previously treated spinal metastases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients at three Australian centres who have undergone spinal SABR after previous spinal radiotherapy to the same or immediately adjacent vertebral level. Efficacy was determined in terms of rates of local control, while safety was characterised by rates of serious complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-three spinal segments were evaluated from 32 patients. Median follow-up for all patients was 2.6 years, and median overall survival was 4.3 years. Eleven of 33 (33.3%) treated spinal segments had local progression, with a local control rate at 12 months of 71.4% (95% C.I. 55.2%-92.4%). Four patients (16.7%) went on to develop cauda equina or spinal cord compression. Thirteen out of 32 patients (40.6%) experienced acute toxicity, of which 12 were grade 2 or less. Five out of 30 spinal (16.7%) segments with follow-up imaging had a radiation-induced vertebral compression fracture. There was one case of radiation myelitis which occurred in a patient who had mediastinal radiotherapy with a treatment field which overlapped their prior spinal radiation.

CONCLUSION

The patients in this study experienced long median survival, durable tumour control and high rates of freedom from long-term sequelae of treatment. These results support the use of SABR in patients who progress in the spine despite previous radiotherapy.

Re-irradiation spine stereotactic body radiotherapy following high-dose conventional radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

 We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) following high-dose conventional radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Twenty-one patients met the following eligibility criteria: with an irradiation history of 50 Gy2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) or more, diagnosed MESCC in the cervical or thoracic spines, and treated with re-irradiation SBRT of 24 Gy in 2 fractions between April 2018 and March 2023. Prior treatment was radiotherapy alone, not including surgery. The primary endpoint was a 1-year local failure rate. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Since our cohort includes one treatment-related death (TRD) of esophageal perforation, the cumulative esophageal dose was evaluated to find the dose constraints related to severe toxicities.

RESULTS

 The median age was 68, and 14 males were included. The primary tumor sites (esophagus/lung/head and neck/others) were 6/6/7/2, and the median initial radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy2 EQD2 (range: 50-105 Gy2, 60-70/ > 70 Gy2 were 11/4). Ten patients underwent surgery followed by SBRT and 11 SBRT alone. At the median follow-up time of 10.4 months, 17 patients died of systemic disease progression including one TRD. No radiation-induced myelopathy or nerve root injuries occurred. Local failure occurred in six patients, with a 1-year local failure rate of 29.3% and a 1-year OS of 55.0%. Other toxicities included five cases of vertebral compression fractures (23.8%) and one radiation pneumonitis. The cumulative esophageal dose was recommended as follows: Dmax < 203, D0.035 cc < 187, and D1cc < 167 (Gy3 in biological effective dose).

CONCLUSION

 Re-irradiation spine SBRT may be effective for selected patients with cervical or thoracic MESCC, even with high-dose irradiation histories. The cumulative dose assessment across the original and re-irradiated esophagus was recommended to decrease the risk of severe esophageal toxicities.

Spinal Reirradiation-Mediated Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Reirradiation of the spine is carried out in 42% of patients who do not respond to treatment or have recurrent pain. However, there are few studies and data on the effect of reirradiation of the spine and the occurrence of acute and chronic side-effects caused by reirradiation, such as myelopathy, in these patients. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the safe dose in terms of biological effective dose (BED), cumulative dose and dose interval between BED1 and BED2 to decrease or prevent myelopathy and pain control in patients undergoing radiation therapy in the spinal cord. A search was carried out using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, Cochrane Collaboration library electronic databases, Magiran, and SID from 2000 to 2022 to recognise qualified studies. In total, 17 primary studies were applied to estimate the pooled effect size. The random effects model showed that the pooled BED in the first stage, the BED in the second stage and the cumulative BED1 and BED2 were estimated at 77.63, 58.35 and 115.34 Gy, respectively. Studies reported on dose interval. The results of a random effects model showed that the pooled interval was estimated at 13.86 months. The meta-analysis revealed that using appropriate BED1 and/or BED2 in a safe interval between the first and second phases of treatment can have an influential role in preventing or reducing the effects of myelopathy and regional control pain in spinal reirradiation.

Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a possible treatment option for patients who develop recurrence within or at the edge of a previously irradiated volume. Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy is the result of technological advances in robotic precision, real-time imaging, non-invasive, highly customizable treatment plan, and delivery with sub-millimeter accuracy. This article reviews the radiobiologic, technical, and clinical aspects of robotic-based SABR re-irradiation for various anatomical sites. An extensive literature search was performed to identify articles on the utilization of robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for patients undergoing re-irradiation. The reported prescription dose and fractionation data along with outcomes such as overall survival, local control rates, and toxicities were qualitatively reviewed. The findings consistently indicate that re-irradiation using robotic SABR provides encouraging survival rates with minimal toxicity in the clinical setting of various anatomical sites delivered using locally non-invasive means where other treatment options are scarce.

Re-irradiation Using Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends

The objective of this research is to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to examine the current research topics and trends pertaining to stereotactic-based re-irradiation. A bibliometric search was conducted for re-irradiation-related literature published in English from the WoSCC database from 1991 to 2022, using VOSviewer to visualize the results. The extracted information comprises the publication year, overall citation count, average citation rate, keywords, and research domains. We conducted a literature review to identify trends in research on re-irradiation. A total of 19,891 citations were found in 924 qualifying papers that came from 48 different nations. The number of publications and citations has grown steadily since 2008 with the highest number of publications in the year 2018. Similarly, a substantial increase in the number of citations has increased since 2004 and the citation growth rate has been positive between 2004 and 2019 with a peak in 2013. The top authorship patterns were six authors (111 publications and 2498 citations), whereas the highest number of citations per publication was attained with an authorship pattern of 17 authors (C/P = 41.1). The collaboration patterns analysis showed that the largest proportion of publications emanated from the United States with 363 publications (30.9%), followed by Germany with 102 publications (8.7%), and France with 92 publications (7.8%). The majority of the analyzed studies were focused on the brain (30%), head and neck (13%), lung (12%), and spine (10%) and there have been emerging studies on the use of re-irradiation for lung, prostate, pelvic and liver utilizing stereotactic radiotherapy. The main areas of interest have changed over time and are now based on a multidisciplinary approach that integrates advanced imaging techniques, stereotactic treatment delivery, the toxicity of organs at risk, quality of life, and treatment outcomes.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Benefits and Limitations

Progress in biological cancer characterization, targeted systemic therapies and multimodality treatment strategies have shifted the goals of radiotherapy for spinal metastases from short-term palliation to long-term symptom control and prevention of compilations. This article gives an overview of the spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) methodology and clinical results of SBRT in cancer patients with painful vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression, oligometastatic disease and in a reirradiation situation. Outcomes after dose-intensified SBRT are compared with results of conventional radiotherapy and patient selection criteria will be discussed. Though rates of severe toxicity after spinal SBRT are low, strategies to minimize the risk of vertebral compression fracture, radiation induced myelopathy, plexopathy and myositis are summarized, to optimize the use of SBRT in multidisciplinary management of vertebral metastases.

Reirradiation on spine metastases: an Italian survey on behalf of palliative care and reirradiation study groups of Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)

AIM

This survey derived from the collaboration between the Palliative Care and Reirradiation Study Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Its aim was to obtain a real "snapshot" on the treatments of spinal metastases, focusing on reirradiation, among radiation oncologists in Italy.

METHODS

The survey was elaborated on SurveyMonkey's online interface and was sent via e-mail to all Radiation Oncologists of AIRO that were invited to anonymously fill in the electronic form within 60 days. The questionnaire was prepared by the AIRO "Palliative care" and "Reirradiation" Study Groups and it consisted of 36 questions, 19 single-choice questions, 10 multiple-choice questions and 6 open questions. The data were analyzed and represented with tables and graphs.

RESULTS

The survey shows that palliative radiotherapy remains a field of interest for most ROs in the Italian centers. 3D Conventional Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) alone or in combination with other techniques is the primary choice for patients with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. For patients with a life expectancy of more than six months, there is an increased use of new technologies, such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Factors considered for retreatment are time between first and second treatment, dose delivered to spine metastasis and spinal cord in the first treatment, vertebral stability, symptoms, and/or performance status. The most feared complication are myelopathy followed by vertebral fracture and local recurrence. This explain an increasing focus on patient selection and the use of high technology in the treatment of metastatic patients.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and image-guided radiotherapy allow the administration of ablative RT doses while sparing the constraints of healthy tissue in spinal metastases. However, there is still an unclear and heterogeneous reality in the reirradiation of spinal metastases. A national registry with the aim of clarifying the most controversial aspects of vertebral metastasis retreatments will enable better management of these patients and design more targeted study designs.

Could conventionally fractionated radiation therapy coupled with stereotactic body radiation therapy improve local control in bone oligometastases?

PURPOSE

To describe clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) applied alone or as a boost after a conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) for the treatment of bone oligometastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with SBRT from January 2007 to December 2015 in the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine in France. The inclusion criteria involved adults treated with SBRT for one to three bone metastases from a histological proven solid tumor and a primary tumor treated, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score inferior or equal to 2. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), bone progression incidence (BPI), skeletal related events free survival (SRE-FS), toxicity and pain response were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients and 52 bone metastases were treated. Twenty-three metastases (44.2%) received SBRT alone mainly for non-spine metastases and 29 (55.8%) a combination of CFRT and SBRT mainly for spine metastases. The median follow-up time was 22months (range: 4-89months). Five local failures (9.6%) were observed and the cumulative incidences of local recurrence at 1 and 2years respectively were 4.4% and 8% with a median time of local recurrence of 17months (range: 4-36months). The one- and two-years OS were 90.8% and 87.4%. Visceral metastasis (HR: 3.40, 95% confidence interval [1.10-10.50]) and a time from primary diagnosis (TPD)>30months (HR: 0.22 [0.06-0.82]) were independent prognostic factors of OS. The 1 and 2years PFS were 66.8% and 30.9% with a median PFS time of 18months [13-24]. The one- and two-years BPI were 27.7% and 55.3%. In multivariate analysis, unfavorable histology was associated with worse BPI (HR: 3.19 [1.32-7.76]). The SRE-FS was 93.3% and 78.5% % at 1 and 2years. The overall response rate for pain was 75% in the evaluable patients (9/12). No grade≥3 toxicity nor especially no radiation induced myelopathy (RIM), two patients developed asymptomatic vertebral compression fractures.

CONCLUSION

The sole use of SBRT or its association with CFRT is an efficient and well-tolerated treatment that allows high LC for bone oligometastases.

Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy

To determine which treatment technique and modality would offer better dosimetric results and be preferable for spinal stereotactic body therapy (SBRT) depending on the three different regions of the vertebrae. Linear accelerator (LINAC)- and CyberKnife (CK)-based treatment techniques were compared in terms of their dosimetric quality, treatment efficiency, and delivery accuracy. Thirty previously treated patients were included in this study. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used for LINAC-based treatment, whereas CK-based treatment plans were generated for two different collimator systems: fixed and multileaf collimator (MLC). The plans were compared based on spinal cord sparing, dose homogeneity, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), monitor unit (MU), and beam-on time. The percentage volumes of V2Gy, V5Gy (representing volume low of the dose spillage region), V10Gy, and V20Gy (representing the volume of the high-dose spillage region) of the healthy tissue were analyzed. The CI and GI of the VMAT plans were better than those of the IMRT plans. For spinal cord sparing, the VMAT and MLC-based CK (CK-MLC) techniques were superior. The percentage of low-dose spillage regions was the lowest for IMRT and fixed cone-based CK (CK-FIX) plans. The percentage of the high-dose spillage region was the lowest for the VMAT and CK-MLC plans. In terms of treatment efficiency, the VMAT and CK-MLC plans were superior to the IMRT and CK-FIX plans. The VMAT technique lowered the MU and beam-on time values. The plan delivery accuracy of the VMAT and CK-FIX plans was better than that of the IMRT plans. VMAT is the best option for LINAC-based spinal SBRT. For CK-based spinal SBRT, MLC-based plans are preferred. If the clinic has both treatment modalities and the patient can tolerate long treatment times, CK-MLC-based treatment should be chosen because of its superiority in sparing the spinal cord and sharp dose fall-off.

Dosimetric analysis of MR-LINAC treatment plans for salvage spine SBRT re-irradiation

PURPOSE

We investigated the feasibility of thoracic spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Elekta Unity magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MRL) in patients who received prior radiotherapy. We hypothesized that Monaco treatment plans can improve the gross tumor volume minimum dose (GTVmin) with spinal cord preservation and maintain consistent plan quality during daily adaptation.

METHODS

Pinnacle clinical plans for 10 patients who underwent thoracic spine SBRT (after prior radiotherapy) were regenerated in the Monaco treatment planning system for the Elekta Unity MRL using 9 and 13 intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams. Monaco adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow plans were generated using magnetic resonance imaging with a simulated daily positional setup deviation, and these adaptive plans were compared with Monaco reference plans. Plan quality measures included target coverage, Paddick conformity index, gradient index, homogeneity index, spinal cord D_0.01cc , esophagus D_0.01cc , lung V10, and skin D_0.01cc .

RESULTS

GTVmin values from the Monaco 9-beam and 13-beam plans were significantly higher than those from Pinnacle plans (p < 0.01) with similar spinal cord dose. Spinal cord D_0.01cc , esophagus D_0.01cc , and lung V10 did not statistically differ among the three plans. The electron-return effect did not induce remarkable dose effects around the lungs or skin. While in the ATP workflow, a large increase in GTVmin was observed at the cost of a 10%-50% increase in spinal cord D_0.01cc , in the ATS workflow, the spinal cord dose increase was maintained within 3% of the reference plan.

CONCLUSION

These findings show that MRL plans for thoracic spine SBRT are safe and feasible, allowing tumor dose escalation with spinal cord preservation and consistent daily plan adaptation using the ATS workflow. Careful plan review of hot spots and lung dose is necessary for safe MRL-based treatment.

Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM).

METHODS

We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM.

RESULTS

There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1-5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence.

CONCLUSION

RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases: a review on patient selection and the optimal methodology

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has excellent local control and low toxicity for spinal metastases and is widely performed for spinal oligometastases. However, its additional survival benefit to standard of care, including systemic therapy, is unknown because the results of large-scale randomized controlled trials regarding SBRT for oligometastases have not been reported. Consequently, the optimal patient population among those with spinal oligometastases and the optimal methodology for spine SBRT remain unclear. The present review article discusses two topics: evidence-based optimal patient selection and methodology. The following have been reported to be good prognostic factors: young age, good performance status, slow-growing disease with a long disease-free interval, minimal disease burden, and mild fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in positron emission tomography. In addition, we proposed four measures as the optimal SBRT method for achieving excellent local control: (i) required target delineation; (ii) recommended dose fraction schedule (20 or 24 Gy in a single fraction for spinal oligometastases and 35 Gy in five fractions for lesions located near the spinal cord); (iii) optimizing dose distribution for the target; (iv) dose constraint options for the spinal cord.

Palliative Radiation for Cancer Pain Management

Bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer-related pain. Radiation therapy (RT) is a very common and effective treatment to relieve pain. Conventionally fractionated RT typically consists of the following regimens: 8 Gy in a single treatment, 20 Gy in five fractions, 24 Gy in six fractions, or 30 Gy in ten fractions. All treatment regimens have similar rates of pain relief (range 50-80%), with single-fraction treatment often requiring retreatment. While many painful bony metastases can be managed with RT alone, some may be more complex, often requiring multidisciplinary management, including the need for surgical stabilization or augmentation prior to RT. There are multiple assessment tools including the neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision framework, which allows clinicians to assess the proper course of treatment for these patients. For patients with good prognosis, oligometastatic disease, or those presenting with more radioresistant tumors, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be another option, which offers ablative doses of radiation delivered over several treatments. This chapter reviews the fundamentals of RT for palliation.

Cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes of spinal metastases re-irradiation : Systematic review on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors which may affect disease-related outcomes of re-irradiation (reRT) in patients with previously irradiated vertebral metastases.

METHODS

A computerized search of the literature was performed by searching for terms related to reRT and spinal metastases in MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and the Cochrane database from 1995 to 2019. Studies including at least 10 patients who had received reRT at the same site of initial radiotherapy for vertebral metastases with localized external beam radiotherapy were included. To determine the pooled ≥G3 acute and late toxicity rate, pain relief, local control, and overall survival, a meta-analysis technique of single-arm studies was performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies including 1373 patients met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The pooled pain relief, neurological improvement, 1‑year local control, and 1‑year overall survival rates were 74.3%, 73.8%, 78.8%, and 54.6%, respectively, with moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. No difference in heterogeneity was evidenced for pain relief or local control after omitting studies not using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or studies delivering biologically effective dose (BED) < 45 Gy₁₀, whereas heterogeneity for 1‑year OS was lower after omitting studies not using SBRT and delivering BED < 45 Gy₁₀. The pooled results of grade ≥ 3 acute and late toxicity were 0.4% (95% confidence interval: 0.1-1.2%) and 2.2% (95% confidence interval: 1.2-37%), respectively, with low heterogeneity among studies.

CONCLUSION

While this systematic review confirmed that reRT is both safe and effective for treating patients with recurrent spinal metastases, it could not identify factors which may affect outcomes of reRT in this patient population.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in 1 to 5 fractions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed-indexed articles from 1995 to 2018 were eligible for data extraction if they contained SBRT dosimetric details correlated with actuarial 2-year local tumor control rates. Logistic dose-response models of collected data were compared in terms of physical dose and 3-fraction equivalent dose.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 24 articles with 2619 spinal metastases. Physical dose TCP modeling of 2-year local tumor control from the single-fraction data were compared with data from 2 to 5 fractions, resulting in an estimated α/β = 6 Gy, and this was used to pool data. Acknowledging the uncertainty intrinsic to the data extraction and modeling process, the 90% TCP corresponded to 20 Gy in 1 fraction, 28 Gy in 2 fractions, 33 Gy in 3 fractions, and (with extrapolation) 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The estimated TCP for common fractionation schemes was 82% at 18 Gy, 90% for 20 Gy, and 96% for 24 Gy in a single fraction, 82% for 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 78% for 27 Gy in 3 fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal SBRT with the most common fractionation schemes yields 2-year estimates of local control of 82% to 96%. Given the heterogeneity in the tumor control estimates extracted from the literature, with variability in reporting of dosimetry data and the definition of and statistical methods of reporting tumor control, care should be taken interpreting the resultant model-based estimates. Depending on the clinical intent, the improved TCP with higher dose regimens should be weighed against the potential risks for greater toxicity. We encourage future reports to provide full dosimetric data correlated with tumor local control to allow future efforts of modeling pooled data.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Management of Spinal Metastases: A Review

Importance

Rising cancer incidence combined with improvements in systemic and local therapies extending life expectancy are translating into more patients with spinal metastases. This makes the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases and development of new therapies increasingly important. Spinal metastases may cause significant pain and reduced quality of life and lead to permanent neurological disability if compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve root occurs. Until recently, treatments for spinal metastases were not optimal and provided temporary local control and pain relief. Spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective approach associated with an improved therapeutic ratio, with evolving clinical application.

Objective

To review the literature of spinal SABR for spinal metastases, discuss a multidisciplinary approach to appropriate patient selection and technical considerations, and summarize current efforts to combine spinal SABR with systemic therapies.

Evidence Review

The MEDLINE database was searched to identify articles reporting on spinal SABR to September 30, 2018. Articles including clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and consensus recommendations were selected for relevance to multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases.

Results

Fifty-nine unique publications with 5655 patients who underwent SABR for spinal metastases were included. Four comprehensive frameworks for patient selection were discussed. Spinal SABR was associated with 1-year local control rates of approximately 80% to 90% in the de novo setting, greater than 80% in the postoperative setting, and greater than 65% in the reirradiation setting. The most commonly discussed adverse effect was development of a vertebral compression fracture with variable rates, most commonly reported as approximately 10% to 15%. High-level data on the combination of SABR with modern therapies are still lacking. At present, 19 clinical trials are ongoing, mainly focusing on combined modality therapies, radiotherapy prescription dose, and oligometastic disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that spinal SABR may be an effective treatment option for well-selected patients with spinal metastases, achieving high rates of local tumor control with moderate rates of adverse effects. Optimal management should include review by a multidisciplinary care team.

Outcomes after reirradiation of spinal metastasis with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a retrospective single institutional study

This study was aimed at assessing the feasibility and toxicity of using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for reirradiation of spinal metastatic tumors. We conducted a retrospective review, from our institutional database, of the data of patients who received reirradiation, with overlap of some prescribed isodose lines to the vertebra from the initial radiation therapy, between 2007 and 2019. We identified 40 patients with spinal metastatic tumors, of whom 2 had 2 metastatic vertebral lesions each, totaling up to 42 target lesions. The median dose to spinal cord at the initial radiation therapy was 30 Gy. SBRT based on the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique was used for reirradiation to spare the spinal cord. All patients received a prescription dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Among the 40 cases who had pain, pain relief was obtained in 24 (60%) after reirradiation. Neurologic improvement was obtained in 8 of 15 cases (53%). The adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Reirradiation was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients experiencing adverse events ≥grade 2 in severity, including 1 patient with grade 3 pain, and another patient with grade 3 spinal fracture. None of the patients developed radiation myelopathy. Our data demonstrated that reirradiation of spinal metastasis using SBRT provided effective pain relief and neurologic improvement, with minimal toxicity.

Low risk of radiation myelopathy with relaxed spinal cord dose constraints in de novo, single fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) offers high rates of local control in a critical anatomic area by delivering precise, ablative doses of radiation for treatment of spine metastases. However, the dose tolerance of the spinal cord (SC) after SSRS with relation to radiation myelopathy (RM) is not well-described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent single fraction, de novo SSRS from 2012-2017 and received >12 Gy Dmax to the SC, defined using MRI-CT fusion without PRV expansion. The standard SC constraint was D0.01cc ≤ 12 Gy. Local control was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Bayesian analysis was used to compute posterior probabilities for RM.

RESULTS

A total of 146 SSRS treatments among 132 patients were included. The median SC Dmax was 12.6 Gy (range, 12.1-17.1 Gy). The SC Dmax was >12 and <13 Gy for 109 (75%) treatments, ≥13 and <14 Gy for 28 (19%) treatments, and ≥14 Gy for 9 (6%) treatments. The 1-year local control rate was 94%. With a median follow-up time of 42 months, there were zero (0) RM events observed. Assuming a prior 4.3% risk of RM, the true rate of RM for SC Dmax of ≤14 Gy was computed as <1% with 98% probability.

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest series of patients treated with single fraction, de novo SSRS, there were no cases of RM observed with a median follow-up of 42 months. These data support safe relaxation of MRI-defined SC dose up to D0.01cc ≤ 12 Gy, which corresponds to <1% risk of RM.

Mature Imaging-Based Outcomes Supporting Local Control for Complex Reirradiation Salvage Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Upon progression after upfront radiotherapy to spinal metastases, low-dose re-irradiation conventional external beam radiation (cEBRT) provides limited clinical benefit. Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for dose escalation in the salvage setting with the potential for improved local control.

OBJECTIVE

To report mature clinical and imaging-based outcomes for salvage SBRT.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of consecutive patients with spinal metastases treated with re-irradiation spine SBRT having failed either cEBRT (n = 60 with 1 prior course and n = 17 with 2 or more prior cEBRT courses), or prior SBRT (n = 6) to the same spinal segment. The primary outcome was local failure (LF), and secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and the rate of vertebral compression fracture (VCF).

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients with 83 spinal segments treated with salvage SBRT were reviewed. The crude risk of LF was 18%, and actuarial LF rates at 6, 12, and 24 mo were 7%, 14%, and 19%, respectively. The presence of extensive paraspinal disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.1, 95% CI 1.5-34) significantly predicted for LF. The median OS was 13.2 (95% CI 6.1-16.3) mo, and the presence of neurological deficits (HR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.8-12.1) and brain metastases (HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3) were significant prognostic factors. The crude risk of VCF was 4%, and radiation myelopathy was not observed.

CONCLUSION

These data support the safety and efficacy of spinal re-irradiation with SBRT including patients with prior SBRT and multiple courses of prior cEBRT.

Precision Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Spinal Tumors: Mechanism, Efficacy, and Issues

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR/SBRT) is a revolutionary technique for tumor therapy. Its advantages are especially beneficial for the treatment spinal tumors. It has a wide range of indications in radiotherapy alone and in preoperative and postoperative treatments for spinal tumor. The mechanism of stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal tumors is special, and completely different from traditional radiotherapy. Compared with traditional radiotherapy, SBRT creates more DNA double-strand breaks, leads to less DNA damage repair, and also has anti-vascular effects, in situ vaccine effects and abscopal effect. In the present study, the literature regarding SABR for the treatment of spinal tumors is summarized, and we reviewed characteristics of SABR and spinal tumors, as well as the clinical efficacy and toxicity of SABR in treating spinal tumors. In addition, we proposed several issues around the SABR treatment of spinal tumor, the standard of treatment dose, and the post-treatment follow-up. We also made predictions with respect to future management of spinal tumors, SABR development, multi-modality integration between SABR and other treatments, and other future development trends, thereby providing future research directions as a contribution to the field.

Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Spine Metastases: Defining Dose and Dose Constraints

When treating solid tumor spine metastases, stereotactic high-dose-per-fraction radiation, given in a single fraction or in a hypofractionated approach, has proved to be a highly effective and safe therapeutic option for any tumor histology, in the setting of de novo therapy, as salvage treatment of local progression after previous radiation, and in the postoperative setting. There are variations in practice based on the clinical presentation, goals of therapy, as well as institutional preferences. As a biologically potent therapy, a thoughtful and careful attention to detail with patient selection, treatment planning, and delivery is crucial for treatment success.

Treatment intensity and control rates in combining external-beam radiotherapy and radioactive iodine therapy for metastatic or recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the treatment outcomes of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) for metastatic or recurrent lesions of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

METHODS

Between August 1997 and March 2018, 73 lesions (distant metastases, 50; regional lymph-node metastases, 17; postoperative tumor-bed recurrences, 6) in 36 patients that had received EBRT with or without RAIT were reviewed. Doses of EBRT were 8-70 Gy (median 40 Gy). Seventeen patients received RAIT after EBRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time of imaging studies was 14 months (range 1-110 months). Two-year overall survival rates and control rates of EBRT sites were 71% and 62%, respectively. Two-year control rates for EBRT of < 30 Gy (n = 7), 30 Gy (n = 13), 31-49 Gy (n = 25), 50 Gy (n = 20), and > 50 Gy (n = 8) were 0%, 56%, 53%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in control rates between < 30 Gy and 30 Gy (p = 0.003), and between 50 Gy and > 50 Gy (p = 0.037). Control rates of > 50 Gy were significantly better compared to ≤ 50 Gy (p = 0.021). Two-year control rates with (n = 28) and without (n = 45) post-EBRT RAIT were 89% and 45%, respectively (p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, EBRT of > 50 Gy and post-EBRT RAIT were significant independent factors for favorable control of EBRT sites (hazard ratio [HR], 5.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-27.1; p = 0.028 and HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.28-6.98; p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EBRT of > 50 Gy and post-EBRT RAIT appeared to be useful for long-term control of EBRT sites for metastatic or recurrent lesions of DTC.

Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance

Background and purpose

Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy.

Materials and methods

Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs).

Results

The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7-1.0 mm and 0.4-0.7°.

Conclusion

With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy.

Systematic Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) might improve pain and local control in patients with bone metastases compared to conventional radiotherapy, although an overall estimate of these outcomes is currently unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting pain response and local control among patients with bone metastases from solid-organ tumors who underwent SBRT in 1-6 fractions. All studies prior to April 15, 2017, were included. Study quality was assessed by predefined criteria, and pain response and local control rates were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 2619 studies were screened; 57 were included (reporting outcomes for 3995 patients) of which 38 reported pain response and 45 local control rates. Local control rates were high with pain response rates above those previously reported for conventional radiotherapy. Marked heterogeneity in study populations and delivered treatments were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate. Reported toxicity was limited. Of the pain response studies, 73.7% used a retrospective cohort design and only 10.5% used the international consensus endpoint definitions of pain response. The median survival within the included studies ranged from 8 to 30.4 months, suggesting a high risk of selection bias in the included observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the potential benefit of SBRT over conventional palliative radiotherapy in improving pain due to bone metastases. Given the methodological limitations of the published literature, however, large randomized trials are now urgently required to better quantify this benefit.

Dosimetric study for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator versus volumetric modulated arc therapy

Background Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) given in 1-5 fractions is an effective treatment for vertebral metastases. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) improves soft tissue contrast, which translates into accurate delivery of spine SBRT. Here we report on clinical implementation of MRgRT for spine SBRT, the quality of MRgRT plans compared to TrueBeam based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in the treatment of spine metastases and benefits of MRgRT MR scan. Patients and methods Ten metastatic lesions were included in this study for plan comparison. Lesions were spread across thoracic spine and lumbosacral spine. Three fraction spine SBRT plans: 27Gy to planning target volume (PTV) and 30Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV) were generated on the ViewRay MRIdian Linac system and compared to TrueBeamTM STx based VMAT plans. Plans were compared using metrics such as minimum dose, maximum dose, mean dose, ratio of the dose to 50% of the volume (R50), conformity index, homogeneity index and dose to the spinal cord. Results MRIdian plans achieved equivalent target coverage and spinal cord dose compared to VMAT plans. The maximum and minimum PTV doses and homogeneity index were equivalent for both planning systems. R50 was lower for MRIdian plans compared to VMAT plans, indicating a lower spread of intermediate doses with MRIdian system (5.16 vs. 6.11, p = 0.03). Conclusions MRgRT can deliver high-quality spine SBRT plans comparable to TrueBeam volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.

Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear.

METHODS

Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average.

RESULTS

The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.

Clinical results of carbon-ion radiotherapy with separation surgery for primary spine/paraspinal sarcomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of combination of carbon-ion radiotherapy with separation surgery (CIRT-SS) in patients with primary spinal/paraspinal sarcoma (PSPS) and epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC).

METHODS

CIRT-SS was performed in 11 consecutive patients. Patients treated in the primary and salvage settings were categorized into Group A (n = 8) and Group B (n  = 3), respectively. Clinical results and imaging findings were collected, with a particular focus on ESCC grade, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs), and the locoregional control (LRC) rate and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period from the start of CIRT-SS was 25 months (7-57 months). ESCC was improved by SS in all cases. No patients exhibited radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM), but three developed Grade 3 vertebral compression fracture (VCF) during follow-up. Locoregional recurrences were observed in four patients [Group A: 1 (12.5%), Group B: 3 (100%)]. Over the entire follow-up period, three patients developed distant metastases and two patients died. The 2-year LRC rate and OS were 70% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CIRT-SS in the primary setting achieved acceptable LRC and OS without RIM in patients with PSPS and with ESCC. VCF was the most frequent AE associated with CIRT-SS.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Oligometastatic Spine Metastases: An Overview

The oligometastatic state is hypothesized to represent an intermediary state of cancer between widely metastatic disease and curable, localized disease. Advancements in radiotherapy have allowed for delivery of high precision, dose escalated treatment known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to targets throughout the body with excellent rates of local control. Recently, the first phase II randomized trial comparing conventional radiotherapy to comprehensive SBRT of oligometastatic disease demonstrated an overall survival and progression free survival advantage. The spine is a common site of metastasis, and a complex site for SBRT given the adjacent spinal cord and the tumor embedded within the bone tissue putting the patient at risk of fracture. Although there are expert spine SBRT guidelines for practice, there are as yet no reported randomized trials that proves superiority as compared to conventional radiation. The use of SBRT in patients with oligometastatic disease and spinal metastases is the focus of this review.

Neuroimaging and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastasis

Historically, management options for spinal metastases include surgery for stabilization and decompression and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). EBRT is palliative in nature, as it lacks accurate targeting such that the prescribed radiation doses must be limited in order to maintain safety. Modern advancement in imaging and radiotherapy technology have facilitated the development of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which provides increased targeted precision for radiation delivery to tumors resulting in lower overall toxicity, particularly to regional structures such as the spinal cord and esophagus, while delivering higher, more effective, and radically ablative radiation doses.Over the past decade, SBRT has been increasingly utilized as a method of treating spinal metastases either as the primary modality or following surgical intervention in both de novo and reirradiation setting. Numerous studies suggest that SBRT is associated with an 80% to 90% rate of 1-year local control across clinical scenarios. For example, studies of SBRT as the primary treatment modality suggest long-term local control rate of 80% to 95% for spinal metastases. Similarly, SBRT in the adjuvant setting following surgery is associated with local control rates ranging from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, because SBRT allows for lower dose to the spinal cord, it has also been used in patients who have had prior radiation therapy, with studies showing 66% to 93% local control in this scenario.

Diabetes increases the risk of serious adverse events after re-irradiation of the spine

INTRODUCTION

In this study we investigate the risk of radiation-induced serious adverse event of the spine in a large cohort of consecutive retreated patients with palliative radiotherapy (RT) for metastatic cancer in the spine.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2010 to 2014, 2387 patients received spinal irradiation with a palliative intent for metastatic spinal cord compression at our institution. The patients were reviewed for prior RT and 220 patients had received re-irradiation of the spine. Clinical and treatment data were obtained from the patients' records and the RT planning system.

RESULTS

Patients had metastatic disease from breast, prostate, lung, hematological or other cancers (22.7%, 21.8%, 21.4%, 3.2% and 30.9%, respectively). Median follow-up was 99 days. Median cumulative EQD2 was 57.6 Gy₂; range: 20.0-90.0 Gy. Spinal events related to re-irradiation were observed in fourteen patients; six patients were diagnosed with radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM) and nine patients with radiation-induced vertebral fracture (RIF). In a multivariate analysis, diabetes was related to increased risk of toxicity (HR = 7.9; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of RIM and RIF (6 and 9 out of 220 patients, respectively) was low in our cohort of re-irradiated patients. Patients with diabetes had a higher risk of adverse events which should be considered before re-irradiation of the spine.

Local control and vertebral compression fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases

PURPOSE

We aimed to retrospectively assess the incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCF), examine clinicopathologic factors potentially associated with VCF, and evaluate treatment response in patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases (spMets).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 78 patients with 125 spMets at baseline and subsequent assessments. Patients received SBRT doses of 16 or 18 Gy. Patients with pre-existing VCF and co-existing local progression were excluded. Spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) was used for spMets categorization. Response to SBRT and VCF were assessed according to the Positron Emission tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Genant scores, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess local control of disease and vertebral compression fracture-free survival (FFS).

RESULTS

We treated 103 cases with single spMets and 11 cases involving double spMets with SBRT. Progressive disease was reported in 3.2% and 8.2% of the cases in the first and last PET/CT reports, respectively. The distribution of treatment response in the remaining patients was: complete response in 30.6% of patients, partial response in 47.1% of patients, and stable disease in 22.3% of patients in the first PET/CT; complete response in 62.3% of patients, partial response in 16.7% of patients, and stable disease in 21% of patients at the last monitoring. Local failures were observed in 15 (12%) of cases. Median SINS was 5 (range: 1-13); majority of patients in our cohort (70.4%) were categorized as stable according to SINS, five (4%) patients had Grade 3 VCF at a median time of 16 months after SBRT (range: 2-22 months), and 60% of VCF occurred after an interval of at least 12 months after SBRT. No bisphosphonate usage was significantly associated with VCF (r = -0.204; p = 0.022). Median FFS was 21 months. Univariate analyses indicated that female gender (p < 0.001), bisphosphonate use (p = 0.005), >6 months of bisphosphonates use (p = 0.002), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.023) were associated with higher FFS. Female gender (p = 0.007), >6 months of bisphosphonates usage (p = 0.018), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.044) retained independent significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that spine SBRT with doses of 16-18 Gy promises good local control of disease with acceptable VCF rates. Lowest vertebral body collapse score, female gender, and >6 months of bisphosphonate use were significantly associated with longer FFS.

Feasibility of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with large tumors in multiple vertebrae undergoing re-irradiation: Dosimetric challenge using 3 different beam delivery techniques

The objective of the present study was to report whether the adequate spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans were generated with feasible treatment duration for patients with large vertebral metastases undergoing re-irradiation. For 5 cases, the re-irradiation plans using static-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and CyberKnife with a total prescribed dose (PD) of 24 Gy applied in 2 fractions were generated. A minimum dose to 95% of the evaluated planning target volume (PTV_evl) that was >70% of PD (D₉₅ > 70% PD) was defined as minimum criterion. For the dose tolerance of the spinal cord or thecal sac, which could affect the risk of radiation myelopathy, a volume-dose constraint of 12.2 Gy was set for the planning organ-at-risk volume of the spinal cord (PRV_cord) or thecal sac and limited to 0.035 cc (D_{0.035 cc}< 12.2 Gy) on the re-irradiation plans. For assessing the impact of the stricter dose constraint of PRV_cord on the plan quality, we generated plans with a PRV_cord dose constraint of D_{0.035 cc} < 17.0 Gy, which was employed for patients with no previous history of radiation therapy (RT). Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis was performed for the PTV_evl and spinal cord. Median PTV_evl of all cases was 242.3 cc (range; 159.2 to 722.4 cc). Two out of 5 cases had a PTV_evl >500 cc. The constraint of the PRV_cord D_0.035cc was met in all re-irradiation plans; however, a comparison between the re-irradiation plan for patients with large vertebral metastases and the plan for cases with no RT history showed that the decrease of the target dose coverage was correlated with the stricter dose constraint of the PRV_cord. For SIMRT and VMAT, the re-irradiation plans met the goal of the PTV_evl D₉₅. On the other hand, CyberKnife plans could not achieve the constraints of the PTV_evl D₉₅. This discrepancy is due to the constraint of treatment duration, which is defined as the comfortable duration for patients with large spinal metastases. Regardless of the delivery method used, treatment plan quality is impacted to a greater extent by the dose tolerance of the spinal cord than by the size of the tumor.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Malignancies

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery have become important treatment options for the treatment of spinal malignancies. A better understanding of dose tolerances with more conformal technology have allowed administration of higher and more ablative doses. In this review, the framework for approaching a patient with spinal metastases and primary tumors will be discussed as well as details on the delivery of this treatment.

Local response and pathologic fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for spinal metastases - a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial, which analyzed bone density following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) as part of palliative management of painful spinal metastases.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this single-institutional randomized exploratory trial (NCT02358720). Participants were randomly assigned to receive SBRT (single-fraction 24 Gy) or 3DCRT (30 Gy/10 fractions). Quantitative bone density was evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months in both irradiated and unirradiated spinal bodies, along with rates of pathologic fractures and vertebral compression fractures.

RESULTS

As compared to baseline, bone density became significantly higher at 3 and 6 months following SBRT by a median of 33.8% and 72.1%, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). These figures in the 3DCRT cohort were 32.9% and 41.2%, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). There were no statistical differences in bone density between SBRT and 3DCRT at 3 (p = 0.629) or 6 months (p = 0.327). Subgroup analysis of osteolytic metastases showed an increase in bone density relative to baseline in the SBRT (but not 3DCRT) arm. Bone density in unaffected vertebrae did not show substantial changes in either group. The 3-month incidence of new pathological fractures was 8.7% in the SBRT arm vs. 4.3% in the 3DCRT arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high ablative doses in the SBRT arm, the significant increase in bone density after 3 and 6 months was similar to that of 3DCRT. Our trial demonstrated a moderate rate of subsequent pathological fracture after SBRT. Future randomized investigations with larger sample sizes are recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02358720 on 9nd of February 2015.

Long-Term Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spine Metastases: Radiation Dose-Response for Late Toxicity

PURPOSE

To document the 5- and 10-year rates of late toxicity and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) in long-term survivors after stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was performed on 562 patients treated with SRS for spine metastases between April 2001 and July 2011. Selecting those with at least 5-year survival after SRS, included were 43 patients who collectively underwent 84 treatments at 54 spine sites. Most were treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery to a median dose of 16 Gy (range, 12-24 Gy), and 56% of sites had received prior external beam radiation therapy. Late toxicities and VCFs occurring in the absence of tumor progression were recorded. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of late complications.

RESULTS

Nine patients (17% of treatment sites) developed grade ≥2 late toxicities at a median time of 12.8 months (range, 4.2-59.0 months). Actuarial 5- and 10-year rates of grade ≥2 late toxicity were 17% and 17%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only cumulative biologically effective dose (BED₃) > 200 Gy (or EQD2_2Gy [2-Gy equivalent dose calculated using an α/β ratio of 2] > 130 Gy) was associated with grade ≥2 late toxicity (P = .036). Maximum point BED₃ > 110 Gy (or EQD2_2Gy > 70 Gy) to spinal cord or cauda equina was associated with grade ≥2 late neuropathy (P = .017). Nine VCFs (18%) occurred at a median time of 10.2 months (range, 3.2-57.2 months), with 5- and 10-year VCF rates of 17% and 17%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiosurgery for primary treatment and reirradiation of spinal metastases is associated with a moderate risk of late toxicity with 10-year follow-up. Risk of late toxicity significantly increases with cumulative BED₃ > 200 Gy and spinal cord or cauda equina point BED₃ > 110 Gy. Patients remain at moderate risk of VCF up to 5 years after treatment, with a plateau in incidence thereafter up to 10 years.

The role of radiation therapy in bone metastases management

Bone metastases represent an important complication of malignant tumours. Despite improvement in surgical techniques and advances in systemic therapies, management of patients with bone metastatic disease remains a powerful cornerstone for the radiation oncologist. The primary goal of radiation therapy is to provide pain relief, preserving patients quality of life.

Comparison of four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: Dosimetric and efficiency analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric differences between four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): CyberKnife (CK), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) with dynamic jaws (HT-D) and fixed jaws (HT-F).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Data from 10 patients were utilized. All patients were planned for 24 Gy in two fractions, with the primary objectives being: (a) restricting the maximum dose to the cord to ≤ 17 Gy and/or cauda equina to ≤ 20 Gy, and (b) to maximize the clinical target volume (CTV) to receive the prescribed dose. Treatment plans were generated by separate dosimetrists and then compared using velocity AI. Parameters of comparison include target volume coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), treatment time (TT) per fraction, and monitor units (MU) per fraction.

RESULTS

PTV D2 and D5 were significantly higher for CK compared to VMAT, HT-F, and HT-D (P < 0.001). The average volume of CTV receiving the prescription dose (CTV D95) was significantly less for VMAT compared to CK, HT-F and HT-D (P = 0.036). CI improved for CK (0.69), HT-F (0.66), and HT-D (0.67) compared to VMAT (0.52) (P = 0.013). CK (41.86) had the largest HI compared to VMAT (26.99), HT-F (20.69), and HT-D (21.17) (P < 0.001). GI was significantly less for CK (3.96) compared to VMAT (6.76) (P = 0.001). Likewise, CK (62.4 min, 14059 MU) had the longest treatment time and MU per fraction compared to VMAT (8.5 min, 9764 MU), HT-F (13 min, 10822 MU), and HT-D (13.5 min, 11418 MU) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both CK and HT plans achieved conformal target coverage while respecting cord tolerance. Dose heterogeneity was significantly larger in CK. VMAT required the least treatment time and MU output, but had the least steep GI, CI, and target coverage.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo spinal metastases: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to provide an objective summary of the published literature pertaining to the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) specific to previously untreated spinal metastases.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, of the literature found in a search of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2015. The search strategy was limited to publications in the English language.

RESULTS

A total of 14 full-text articles were included in the analysis. All studies were retrospective except for 2 studies, which were prospective. A total of 1024 treated spinal lesions were analyzed. The median follow-up time ranged from 9 to 49 months. A range of dose-fractionation schemes was used, the most common of which were 16–24 Gy/1 fraction (fx), 24 Gy/2 fx, 24–27 Gy/3 fx, and 30–35 Gy/5 fx. In studies that reported crude results regarding in-field local tumor control, 346 (85%) of 407 lesions remained controlled. For studies that reported actuarial values, the weighted average revealed a 90% 1-year local control rate. Only 3 studies reported data on complete pain response, and the weighted average of these results yielded a complete pain response rate of 54%. The most common toxicity was new or progressing vertebral compression fracture, which was observed in 9.4% of cases; 2 cases (0.2%) of neurologic injury were reported.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of prospective data specific to SBRT in patients with spinal metastases not otherwise irradiated. This systematic review found that SBRT is associated with favorable rates of local control (approximately 90% at 1 year) and complete pain response (approximately 50%), and low rates of serious adverse events were found. Practice guidelines are summarized based on these data and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society consensus.

Modern approaches to the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is an oncologic emergency requiring prompt treatment to maximize neurologic function, ambulatory function and local control. Traditionally, options for MESCC included external beam radiation therapy with or without surgery. Surgery has usually been reserved for the patient with optimal performance status, single level MESCC or mechanical instability. Advances in external beam radiation therapy such as the development of stereotactic body radiation therapy have allowed for the delivery of high-dose radiation, allowing for both long-term pain and local control. Surgical advances, such as separation surgery, minimal access spine surgery and percutaneous instrumentation, have decreased surgical morbidity. This review summarizes the latest advances and evidence in MESCC to enable modern management.