Radiotherapy for management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas: why, when, and where?

A pattern of local failure after preoperative 5 × 5 Gy in soft tissue sarcomas: A long-term real-world experience

Introduction

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is used to improve local control (LC) and facilitate limb-sparing procedures in patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS). While conventional preoperative RT delivers 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions, alternative hypofractionated regimens are under investigation. A 5x5 Gy regimen has been investigated in STS, but its long-term LC rates appear suboptimal. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of patients with local recurrence (LR) after 5x5 Gy and to identify potential RT-related factors affecting efficacy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received 5x5 Gy and underwent surgery for localized extremity and truncal STS in three clinical trials and institutional records. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were evaluated. We assessed the quality of RT plans and recurrence patterns.

Results

Among 174 patients who experienced LR after 5x5 Gy, pleomorphic sarcoma (23 %), myxofibrosarcoma (17.8 %), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (12 %) were the most common pathologic diagnoses. No LR was observed in patients with myxoid liposarcoma. Almost all analyzed plans met the quality criteria. Most patients (86.2 %) had in-volume recurrences, suggesting inadequate tumor cell eradication rather than insufficient margins or poor target coverage. Dose equivalence analysis suggested that 5x5 Gy (EQD2 = 37.5 Gy for STS, assuming alpha/beta ratio of 4 Gy) may be insufficient, especially for radioresistant subtypes.

Conclusions

The primary factor contributing to LR after 5x5 Gy appears to be insufficient total dose. Future clinical trials should explore dose escalation beyond 5 Gy per fraction, except in myxoid liposarcoma where 5x5 Gy remains effective.

Development and the need for implementation of a health-related quality of life measurement strategy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma undergoing preoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours. Treatment strategies are based on histological subtype, patient performance status, tumour location, and size. Common treatment modalities include surgery, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. While disease control and survival remain primary research focuses, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is equally important. Accurately assessing HRQoL outcomes is particularly difficult due to the heterogeneity of STS, variations in treatment, tumour location and surgical interventions, and the prevalence of these rare cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To address this gap, a sarcoma-specific tool was developed complementing the most used cancer-generic EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, with additional items tailored to the specific challenges of radiotherapy and surgery in sarcoma patients. The final questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30, and additional EORTC Item Library items addressing stiffness, pain in muscles and bones, scar pain, as well as items of the PRO-CTCAE. The selection was made with significant input from patients with STS who underwent radiotherapy previously and with input from clinicians who were present at the multidisciplinary consultation.

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

The newly developed HRQoL tool is currently undergoing validation within the SCOPES trial (NTC04425967), evaluating HRQoL outcomes in patients undergoing standard versus hypofractionated radiotherapy. This tool will lead to better understanding the full impact of treatment on sarcoma patients and hopefully, ultimately improve their HRQoL. Moreover, it provides a standardized framework that can be utilized across studies, facilitating the comparison of HRQoL data and enabling more consistent and comprehensive insights into patient outcomes.

The impact of CT-based adipose tissue distribution and sarcopenia on treatment outcomes in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic and predictive value of obesity and sarcopenia remains poorly defined in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (HR-STS). We sought to correlate clinical outcomes with CT-based body composition parameters in patients with HR-STS undergoing a multimodal preoperative therapy. The impact of radiologic and histopathologic response to preoperative treatment was correlated with individual fat and muscle distribution.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced non-abdominal HR-STS and treatment with preoperative chemotherapy + regional hyperthermia (RHT) +/- radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgery between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Body composition parameters measured on baseline CT scans were correlated with clinical outcomes including event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as radiologic and histopathologic treatment response.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were included. Body composition parameters showed no significant correlation with radiologic or histopathologic treatment response. High total fat indices such as the total fat index (TFI, HR 3.56, p = 0.005) and high total fat to muscle ratio (FMR, HR 3.22, p = 0.020) were strongly associated with poor OS. Parameters for sarcopenia including skeletal muscle index (SMI) were not significantly linked to survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

High fat indices and a high FMR are strong predictors of poor OS in patients with HR-STS. Larger studies are warranted to further clarify the prognostic impact of sarcopenia and the predictive value of body composition parameters on preoperative treatment response.

LDH and hemoglobin outperform systemic inflammatory indices as prognostic factors in patients with soft tissue sarcoma undergoing neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The current understanding of the prognostic value of routine pre-treatment laboratory parameters in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (HR-STS) is limited. We sought to analyze several inflammatory biomarkers in a large cohort of HR-STS patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgical resection.

METHODS

123 patients with locally advanced high-risk undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), and synovial sarcoma (SS) who underwent preoperative chemotherapy and regional hyperthermia (RHT) between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. The association of several pre-treatment laboratory parameters with radiologic treatment response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed.

RESULTS

Low pre-treatment hemoglobin (HR 2.51, p = 0.018; HR 2.78, p = 0.030) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, HR 0.29, p = 0.0044; HR 0.23, p = 0.010) were significantly associated with EFS and OS in the multivariable analysis. Systemic inflammatory indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) did not have a significant impact on survival. Low C-reactive protein (CRP) and high albumin values were associated with poor radiologic response according to RECIST (p = 0.021 and p = 0.010, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment LDH and hemoglobin are strong independent predictors of survival in HR-STS patients. Systemic inflammatory indices based on circulating immune cells may not serve as reliable prognostic factors for HR-STS patients undergoing curative-intent treatment. Higher pre-treatment albumin levels and lower CRP values may reflect a reduced inflammatory status and could be associated with a poorer radiologic response to preoperative treatment.

The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma-The Way to Hypofractionation

For patients with nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who are at high risk of local recurrence, the standard of care for limb-conserving local management is combined radiotherapy and surgery. Radiotherapy for STS entails 5 weeks of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (25 × 2 Gy) preoperatively or 6 or more weeks postoperatively. There is growing interest in the use of preoperative hypofractionated regimes, viz. shorter courses with higher daily doses, for STS. Recent studies have investigated ultrahypofractionation (UHF, ≥ 5 Gy per fraction) and moderate hypofractionation (MHF, > 2 Gy but < 5 Gy per fraction) for STS. Regimens that are designed to be isoeffective for tumor control indeed result in equivalent local relapse-free survival. However, as the daily dose increases, the impacts to normal tissues and potential for toxicities increase owing to differences in fraction-size sensitivity between STS and normal tissues (e.g., skin, subcutaneous tissue, vascular structures, and bone). This article reviews the key studies informing the debate about hypofractionation for STS. We evaluate the current data that reveal relatively small patient cohorts, short follow-up time, and inconsistent toxicity reporting. A randomized, controlled investigation of conventional fractionation, MHF, and UHF is needed. The current phase 2 data confirm that any such study should have co-primary endpoints of both local relapse-free survival as well as immediate- and long-term toxicities because the fundamental question being investigated with significant increase in daily fraction size while maintaining isoeffective total dose (~ 50 Gy equivalent) is: what are the dose impacts to late-responding normal tissues that may result in decrements to physical functioning for patients?

Heterogeneity in response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy between soft tissue sarcoma histotypes: associations between radiology and pathology findings

OBJECTIVE

To investigate imaging biomarkers of tumour response by describing changes in imaging and pathology findings after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) and exploring their correlations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumour diameter, volume, and tumour-to-muscle signal intensity (SI) ratio were collected before and after radiotherapy in a cohort of 107 patients with intermediate/high-grade STS and were correlated with post-radiotherapy pathology findings (percentage of necrosis, viable cells, and fibrosis) using Spearman Rank test. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual viable cells present, whereas the presence of < 10% viable cells was defined as near-complete pathologic response (near-pCR).

RESULTS

Median amount of necrosis, viable cells, and fibrosis after nRT were 10%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. 7% of patients achieved pCR and 22% near-pCR. No changes in tumour volume were found except for subtypes myxoid liposarcoma (mLPS) -Δ54.47%, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) +Δ24.22% and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (dLPS) +Δ35.91%. The median change of tumour-to-muscle SI ratio was -19.7% for the entire population, whereas it was -19.55% and -36.26% for UPS and mLPS, respectively. Correlations (positive and negative) were found between change in volume and the presence of necrosis or fibrosis (rs = 0.44; rs = -0.44), as well as between tumour-to-muscle SI ratio and viable cells (rs = 0.33) or fibrosis (rs = -0.28).

CONCLUSION

STS displays extensive heterogeneity in response patterns after nRT. In some subgroups, particularly UPS and mLPS, tumour size changes or tumour-to-muscle SI ratio are significantly linked with the percentage of viable cells, fibrosis, or necrosis.

KEY POINTS

Question How do primary soft tissue sarcomas (STS) respond to neoadjuvant therapy, and what correlations exist between pathological findings and imaging characteristics in assessing treatment response? Findings mLPS shrank post-nRT; undifferentiated pleomorphic and dLPSs enlarged. Volume increase correlated with higher necrosis and lower fibrosis; tumour-to-muscle intensity ratio correlated with viable cells. Clinical relevance These findings emphasise the extensive heterogeneity in STS response to nRT across different subtypes. Preoperative correlations between tumour volume and SI changes with necrosis, fibrosis, and viable cells can aid in more precise treatment assessment and prognostication.

Pandemic driven preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Moderate hypofractionation was adopted to reduce hospital visits during the COVID-19 pandemic aiming to maintain treatment efficacy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients, shifting preoperative schedules from 25 fractions of 2 Gy to 14-15 fractions of 3 Gy. This study evaluates the clinical implications and outcomes of this schedule, focusing on wound complications, radiation toxicity, local tumour control, and distant metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was collected from patients treated between 01 and 01-2020 and 31-12-2023. Outcomes included wound complications within 120 days post-surgery, local-recurrence, distant metastases and radiation toxicity. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with wound complications. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastases were estimated with a competing risk model.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were analysed, with a mean age of 74 years (standard deviation (SD)± 11). Tumours were mainly localized in the lower extremities (64 %), mean size 103 mm (SD±58). Median follow-up was 29 months (range 2-50). A R0 resection margin was achieved in 77 % of the operated patients. The wound complication rate was 33 %, with moderate complications in 13 patients and severe in 6. The cumulative incidences of local recurrence and distant metastases at 2 years were 7.6 % (standard error (SE) 3.7 %) and 29 % (SE 6 %, Fig. 1) respectively. Acute grade 3 dermatitis occurred in one patient (1.5 %)and two patients experienced late grade 3 toxicity (fractures, 3.0 %). Twenty patients developed distant metastases, two diagnosed before start of the treatment. Eighteen patients died, with six deaths from distant metastases and one from the primary tumour.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative moderate hypofractionation for STS during COVID-19 showed promising results, with no increase in postoperative wound complications and favourable local failure rates.

Visual pathology reports for improved collaboration at multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (TB) are the standard for discussing complex head and neck cancer cases. During TB, imaging and microscopic pathology is reviewed, but there is typically no visualization of the resected cancer.

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted to investigate the utility of visual pathology reports at weekly TB for 10 consecutive weeks. Faculty-level participants completed a pre-survey and post-survey to assess understanding of resected cancer specimens.

RESULTS

Providers (n = 25) across seven medical specialties completed pre-survey and post-survey. Following intervention, providers reported significant improvement in understanding of anatomic orientation of the specimen and sites of margin sampling (mean 47.4-96.1, p < 0.001), ability to locate the site of a positive margin (mean 69.5-91.1, p < 0.001), and confidence in treatment plans created (mean 69.5-89.2, p < 0.001) with the addition of visual pathology reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual pathology reports improve provider understanding of resected cancer specimens at multidisciplinary TB.

Imaging of Peripheral Intraneural Tumors: A Comprehensive Review for Radiologists

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Intraneural tumors (INTs) pose a diagnostic challenge, owing to their varied origins within nerve fascicles and their wide spectrum, which includes both benign and malignant forms. Accurate diagnosis and management of these tumors depends upon the skills of the radiologist in identifying key imaging features and correlating them with the patient's clinical symptoms and examination findings.

METHODS

This comprehensive review systematically analyzes the various imaging features in the diagnosis of intraneural tumors, ranging from basic MR to advanced MR imaging techniques such as MR neurography (MRN), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

RESULTS

The article emphasizes the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions using characteristic MRI features, such as the "target sign" and "split-fat sign" for tumor characterization. The role of advanced multiparametric MRI in improving biopsy planning, guiding surgical mapping, and enhancing post-treatment monitoring is also highlighted. The review also underlines the importance of common diagnostic pitfalls and highlights the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to achieve an accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment strategy, and post-therapy surveillance planning.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we illustrate the main imaging findings of intraneural tumors, focusing on specific MR imaging features that are crucial for an accurate diagnosis and the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

The sarcoma ring trial: a case-based analysis of inter-center agreement across 21 German-speaking sarcoma centers

PURPOSE

The management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) improves patient survival. The German Cancer Society (DKG) certifies sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, promoting high standards of care. This study investigated the variability in treatment recommendations for localized STS across different German-speaking tertiary sarcoma centers.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional case-based survey study, 5 anonymized patient cases with imaging data of localized STS were presented to MTBs of 21 German-speaking tertiary referral hospitals. Centers provided recommendations on treatment sequence and modalities, along with the consensus level within their MTB. Agreement percentages were calculated, and consensus levels were rated on a scale of 1 to 10.

RESULTS

Five patient cases were discussed resulting in 105 recommendations. Agreement percentages for case 1 to 5 were 14.3%, 61.9%, 33.3%, 52.4% and 9.3%, with a median agreement percentage of 33.3%. Grouping pre- and postoperative therapies as "perioperative" and including recommendations with and without regional hyperthermia raised the median agreement to 47.6%. The mean consensus level within each center across all 5 cases was 9.5.

CONCLUSION

This first case-based analysis of inter-center agreement for STS management in German-speaking countries reveals low inter-center agreement but high intra-center consensus. Our study includes nearly all tertiary sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, affirming its strong external validity. These findings suggest potential and clinically very relevant differences in treatment standards among sarcoma centers. Enhanced case-based exchanges and collaborative efforts are needed to reduce discrepancies and standardize the management of STS patients.

Optimal Setup and Parameters of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Translational Evaluation of a Tumor Progression Model for Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Purpose

Defining a microscopic tumor infiltration boundary is critical to the success of radiation therapy. Currently, radiation oncologists use margins to geometrically expand the visible tumor for radiation treatment planning in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Image-based models of tumor progression would be critical to personalize the treatment radiation field to the pattern of sarcoma spread. Evaluation of these models is necessary to demonstrate feasibility in the clinical setting. This study presents an imaging protocol for the preclinical evaluation of a tumor progression model in extremity STS.

Methods and Materials

We recruited 7 healthy volunteers and acquired diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) images of the thigh on a magnetic resonance imaging scanner used for imaging cancer patients in a radiation oncology department. We developed a protocol that includes positioning the patient, configuring the radiofrequency coils, and setting the DW-MRI sequence parameters. To find the optimal parameter configuration, the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the directional variability (DV) of the principal eigenvector of the diffusion tensor were calculated.

Results

The mean SNR across all trials and 12 thigh muscles was 41, with a range of 12 to 72. The mean DV was 13° and ranged from 11° to 23°. The longest scan time was 22 minutes and 58 seconds, and the shortest was 11 minutes and 46 seconds. For the high-resolution image with a voxel volume of 1.3 × 1.3 × 6 mm3 and 38 slices, the optimal parameters were found to be a repetition time of 8000 ms, 12 signal averages, and 6 gradient directions. This configuration resulted in a scan time of 11 minutes and 46 seconds, an SNR of 34, and a DV of 13°.

Conclusions

A DW-MRI scan duration acceptable for imaging cancer patients was achieved with an image quality suitable for reproducible modeling of tumor infiltration. The developed protocol can be used for preclinical evaluation in STS patients.

Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Hypofractionated radiation therapy is being used more frequently for many common cancer sites. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy treatment regimens have remained the standard of care when radiation therapy is indicated for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The aim of this study was to systematically review published data on the use of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy as part of a curative treatment paradigm in patients with STS. Herein, we summarize current evidence for the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy in the preoperative treatment of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a database search for prospectively or retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of STS treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy. Studies evaluating STS of all histologic subtypes affecting extremities or trunks were included in the search. Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for inclusion in this review. Patient, treatment, toxicity, and outcome data were recorded and collated from selected studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles are included in this review. Nine prospective trials have been published since 2020. Dose fractionations range from 25 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 28-42.75 Gy in 8-15 fractions. Local control and overall survival outcomes are consistent with historical data for conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Acute toxicity and wound complication rates are in keeping with acceptable results. Late toxicity data are limited and require longer follow-up. Rates of pathologic complete response are promising across all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing body of evidence supporting hypofractionation as safe and effective in the preoperative treatment of STS. This review highlights potential areas that could be further investigated to optimize preoperative treatment for STS.

Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20-22 fractions of 3/2.5/2-2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity. With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED4 (p < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, p < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005-0.682, p = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events. HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.

Moderately hypofractionated, preoperative radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (HYPORT-STS): Updated local control, late toxicities, and patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Moderately hypofractionated, preoperative radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (HYPORT-STS; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03819985) investigated a radiobiologically equivalent, moderately hypofractionated course of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) 15 × 2.85 Gy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Here, the authors report longer term follow-up to update local control and report late toxicities, as well as functional and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

HYPORT-STS was a single-center, open-label, single-arm, prospective phase 2 clinical trial that enrolled 120 eligible adult patients with localized STS of the extremities or superficial trunk between 2018 and 2021. Patients received a 3-week course of preoperative RT followed by surgery 4-8 weeks later. End points and follow-up were analyzed from the date of surgery.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 43 months (interquartile range, 37-52 months), and the 4-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 93%. Overall RT-related late toxicities improved with time from local therapy (p < .001), and few patients had grade ≥2 toxicities (9%; n = 8 of 88) at 2 years. These included: 2% grade ≥2 skin toxicity, 2% fibrosis, 3% lymphedema, and 1% joint stiffness. Four patients (3%) had bone fractures. Both functional outcomes, as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (p < .001), and quality of life, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (p < .001), improved with time from treatment, and both measures were better in follow-up at 2 years compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow up suggests that moderately hypofractionated preoperative RT for patients with STS is safe and effective. Higher grade late toxicities affect a minority of patients. Late toxicities decrease over time, whereas functional outcomes and health-related quality of life seem to improve with more time from combined modality treatment.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

What Is the Prognostic Value of the Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma? An Institutional Study Using the EORTC-STBSG Response Score

Background/Objectives: The relationship between pathologic findings in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after neoadjuvant treatment and oncological outcomes remains uncertain due to varying evaluation methods and cut-off values. This study aims to assess pathologic findings after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in STS using the EORTC-STBSG response score and evaluate its prognostic value. Methods: Clinical and outcome data from 44 patients were reviewed. Resected specimens were re-evaluated to measure viable cells, necrosis, fibrosis, and hyalinization. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to correlate outcomes with pathologic response. Results: The median percentages of viable cells, necrosis, and fibrosis/hyalinization were 20%, 11%, and 40%, respectively. A pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ≤5% viable cells, was achieved in 25% of cases. Local recurrence occurred in 33% of cases, with a significantly higher rate of 64% after R1 resection compared to 22% after R0 resection. Distant metastases were observed in 42% of patients, primarily in the lungs. The 3-year rates for LRFS, DMFS, and OS were 65%, 54%, and 67%, respectively. A correlation between outcomes and tumor size, grade and histological subtype was observed. Classifying pathologic response by the EORTC-STBSG score failed to show an association with outcomes. Patients achieving pCR showed lower risk of LR and improved OS. Conclusions: While the EORTC-STBSG score did not show a prognostic value, resection specimens with ≤5% viable cells were linked to improved LRFS and OS.

Neo-adjuvant radiation and intratumoral immunotherapy followed by surgery-NARIS trial for extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is a rare malignant nonepithelial disease, calling for combined modality treatments with surgery to further improve local control rates and long-term survival, especially in patients with multiple local recurrences with or without risk of amputation. In this double-arm, open-label, Phase II clinical trial, we will enroll 30 patients with pathologically confirmed ESTS without nodal involvement or distant metastases. Patients are randomly assigned to the combination treatment group or the radiation monotherapy group. Additionally, tumor and biological samples will be obtained directly before and after neoadjuvant therapy, allowing for studies of immune response and primary drug resistance mechanisms.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200060659 (http://www.chictr.org.cn) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Progress in histology specific treatments in soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogenous group of rare tumors, primarily treated with surgery. Preoperative radiotherapy is often recommended for extremity high-risk STS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, typically based on doxorubicin with ifosfamide, has shown efficacy in limbs and trunk wall STS. Second-line chemotherapy, commonly utilized in the metastatic setting, is mostly histology-driven. Molecular targeted agents are used across various histologies, and although the use of immunotherapy in STS is still in its early stages, there is increasing interest in exploring its potential.

AREAS COVERED

This article involved an extensive recent search on PubMed. It explored the current treatment landscape for localized and metastatic STS, focusing on the combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for both extremity and retroperitoneal tumors, and with a particular emphasis on the most innovative histopathology driven therapeutic approaches. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials identified via clinicaltrials.gov are included.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently there have been advancements in the treatment of STS, largely driven by the outcomes of clinical trials. However further research is imperative to comprehend the effect of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy in various STS, as well as to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from these treatments.

Local relapse patterns after preoperative radiotherapy of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas: Prognostic role of imaging and pathologic response factors

Purpose

To retrospectively identify clinical, pathologic, or imaging factors predictive of local relapse (LR) after preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Methods and Materials

This is a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent preoperative RT and surgery for limb or trunk wall STS between 2007 and 2018 in French Sarcoma Group centers and were enrolled in the "Conticabase". Patterns of LR were investigated taking into account the multimodal response after preoperative RT. Diagnostic and surgical samples were compared after systematic review by expert pathologists and patients were stratified by tumor grade. Log-rank tests and Cox models were used to identify prognostic factors for radiation response and LR.

Results

257 patients were included; 17 % had low-grade (LG), 72.5 % had high-grade (HG) sarcomas. In HG group, tumors were larger, mostly undifferentiated, and displayed more necrosis and perilesional edema after RT. Median follow-up was 32 months. Five-year cumulative incidence of LR was 20.3 % in the HG group versus 9.7 % in the LG group (p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, trunk wall location (HR 6.79, p = 0.012) and proportion of viable tumor cellularity ≥ 20 % (HR 3.15, p = 0.018) were associated with LR. After adjusting for tumor location, combination of histotype and cellularity rate significantly correlated with LR. We described three prognostic subgroups for HG sarcomas, listed from the highest to lowest risk: undifferentiated sarcoma (US) with cellularity rates ≥ 20 %; non-US (NUS) with cellularity rates ≥ 20 % or US with cellularity rates < 20 %; and NUS with cellularity rates < 20 %, which shared similar prognostic risks with LG sarcomas.

Conclusions

HG and LG tumors have different morphological and biological behaviors in response to RT. Combination of cellularity rate with histotype could be a major prognostic for LR. Patients with undifferentiated HG sarcomas with cellularity rates ≥ 20 % after preoperative RT had the highest risk of LR and disease-specific death.

Optical Surface-guided Radiation Therapy for Upper and Lower Limb Sarcomas: An Analysis of Setup Errors and Clinical Target Volume-To-Planning Target Volume Margins

Purpose

To assess the clinical benefits of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) in terms of setup error, positioning time, and clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods and Materials

Fifty consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy were selected retrospectively. Treatment setup was performed with either laser-based imaging only (control group), or with laser-based and daily optical surface-based imaging (SGRT group). Pretreatment cone beam computed tomography images were acquired daily for the first 3 to 5 fractions and weekly thereafter, with the frequency adjusted as necessary. Translational and rotational errors were collected. CTV-PTV margin was calculated using the formula, 2.5Σ + 0.7σ.

Results

Each group consisted of 10 and 15 upper and lower limb STSs, respectively. For patients with upper limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.64 ± 1.34 mm, 1.10 ± 1.50 mm, and 1.24 ± 1.45 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.48 ± 3.16 mm, 2.84 ± 2.85 mm, and 3.14 ± 3.29 mm in control group in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively. Correspondingly, for patients with lower limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.21 ± 1.65 mm, 1.39 ± 1.71 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.10 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.81 ± 2.60 mm, 2.93 ± 3.28 mm, and 3.53 ± 3.75 mm in control group, respectively. The calculated CTV-PTV margins of the SGRT group and control group were 5.0, 3.8, 4.1 versus 5.9, 9.1, 10.1 mm for upper limb sarcomas; and 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 mm versus 6.3, 9.6, and 11.4 mm for lower limb sarcomas in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusions

Daily optical surface guidance can effectively improve the setup accuracy of extremity STS patients, and safely reduce the required CTV-PTV margins.

Development and benchmarking of a Deep Learning-based MRI-guided gross tumor segmentation algorithm for Radiomics analyses in extremity soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Volume of interest (VOI) segmentation is a crucial step for Radiomics analyses and radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning. Because it can be time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability, we developed and tested a Deep Learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) algorithm to reproducibly predict the primary gross tumor as VOI for Radiomics analyses in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

METHODS

A DLBAS algorithm was trained on a cohort of 157 patients and externally tested on an independent cohort of 87 patients using contrast-enhanced MRI. Manual tumor delineations by a radiation oncologist served as ground truths (GTs). A benchmark study with 20 cases from the test cohort compared the DLBAS predictions against manual VOI segmentations of two residents (ERs) and clinical delineations of two radiation oncologists (ROs). The ROs rated DLBAS predictions regarding their direct applicability.

RESULTS

The DLBAS achieved a median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.88 against the GTs in the entire test cohort (interquartile range (IQR): 0.11) and a median DSC of 0.89 (IQR 0.07) and 0.82 (IQR 0.10) in comparison to ERs and ROs, respectively. Radiomics feature stability was high with a median intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97, 0.95 and 0.94 for GTs, ERs, and ROs, respectively. DLBAS predictions were deemed clinically suitable by the two ROs in 35% and 20% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the DLBAS algorithm provides reproducible VOI predictions for radiomics feature extraction. Variability remains regarding direct clinical applicability of predictions for RT treatment planning.

Assessment of local complications with preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma in extremities: A randomized comparative clinical trial

Background

Radiotherapy is considered a cornerstone as adjuvant or neo adjuvant to surgery in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). Wound complications are the most agonizing complication that may have an impact on patient's functional outcome following radiotherapy. The best care for ESTS is by combining extensive surgical excision with safety margin and radiotherapy either preoperative (neoadjuvant) or postoperative. Preoperative radiotherapy allows for lower dose of radiation over smaller fields which is supposed to decrease long-term complications. However, several studies have shown that early complications which include wound dehiscence, infection, seroma and burn may be more frequent with preoperative radiotherapy than with postoperative radiotherapy. Most of these studies were retrospective. This study aims to prospectively assess and compare the early complications associated with radiotherapy in both techniques.

Hypothesis

Preoperative radiotherapy is not inferior to postoperative radiotherapy regarding early wound complications.

Patients and methods

Between January 2021 and June 2022, we prospectively studied 22 patients and categorized them into two groups, group A (preoperative radiotherapy) and group B (postoperative radiotherapy). We included patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma in skeletally mature patients who were randomized into two groups with follow up 9-12 months. Wound complications, local complications, recurrence, time for wound healing and survival rate were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 25.

Results

22 patients were included, 10 in group A and 12 in group B, their mean age was 46.4 years with mean follow up 9 months. The major wound complications were higher in group A (preoperative radiotherapy). in comparison with group B (postoperative radiotherapy), however, this was not statistically significant. While other local complications were higher in group B, it was also statistically insignificant. Time for wound healing was higher in group A more than group B and was statistically significant (p value = 0.011).

Conclusion

No increase in the wound complications rate with preoperative radiotherapy by using low fractionated doses of radiotherapy and increasing interval before surgery to six weeks, although there is increased risk of delayed wound healing time after surgery. The size and site of the tumor may increase the risk of wound complications unrelated to the type of radiotherapy.

Level of evidence

II: clinical trial.

Preoperative sequential chemotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with comprehensive surgical resection for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective study

Introduction

The management of soft tissue sarcomas presents considerable therapeutic challenges. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant sequential chemotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy in conjunction with extensive surgical resection for the treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcomas.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 31 high-risk soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at our institution from June 2021 to June 2023. The cohort consisted of 21 males and 10 females with a mean age of 55.7 years and included both initial and recurrent disease presentations. Our treatment regimen comprised two to three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy coupled with hypofractionated radiotherapy, delivered at 5 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 25-35 Gy across 5-7 days, prior to surgical resection aimed at achieving wide margins. Data collection was systematic, covering surgical outcomes, chemoradiotherapy-related complications, and prognostic factors.

Results

All patients completed the prescribed course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. 29% patients experienced grade 3+ chemotherapy toxicity, necessitating a reduction or interruption in their chemotherapy regimen. Limb preservation was accomplished in 30 patients finally. Response evaluation using RECIST 1.1 criteria post-neoadjuvant therapy revealed 9.7% with PD, 58.1% with SD, 29% with a PR, and 3.2% with a CR, culminating in an ORR of 32.2%. Postoperative complications included superficial wound infections in four patients and deep incisional infections in another four. 6 patients had developed metastasis, and 3 patients were still alive. Two experienced local recurrence. One-year DFS was 79.3%, with a one-year OS rate of 89.6%.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant sequential chemotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy followed by extensive surgical resection represents an effective treatment paradigm for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas. This multimodal approach not only facilitates tumor reduction but also significantly reduces the risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Complications and Risk Factors in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities Treated with Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities (ESTSs) pose significant challenges in treatment and management due to their diverse nature and potential complications. This study aimed to assess complications associated with multimodal treatments involving surgery and radiotherapy (RT) and to identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed nonmetastatic ESTS patients treated with surgery and pre- or post-operative RT between 2007 and 2020 in Strasbourg, France. Complications, including wound complications (WCs), lymphedema, acute and chronic RT-related complications, and fractures, were meticulously evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients diagnosed with localized ESTSs were included, with a median age of 64 years (range 21-94 years). ESTSs primarily occurred proximally (74.6%) and in the lower limbs (71%). The median follow-up was 5.5 years. WCs occurred in 22.5% of patients, with proximal and lower extremity tumors being significant risk factors. Acute RT-related complications included radiodermatitis, with grade ≥ 2 occurring in 43.1% of patients, which was associated with superficial tumors. Three patients had an edema grade ≥ 2. Chronic complications included telangiectasias (21.7%) and fibrosis (38.7%), with higher rates associated with larger PTVs and higher RT doses, respectively. Fractures occurred in 5 patients, mainly in the tibia (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment of ESTSs demonstrated excellent tolerance, with manageable side effects. Numerous risk factors have been highlighted, providing insights for optimizing treatment strategies and enhancing patient care in this rare disease.

Update on Dosing and Fractionation for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over 5-6 weeks with daily doses of 1.8-2.0 Gy to a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy is standard of care for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. One exception is myxoid liposarcomas where the phase II DOREMY trial applying a preoperative dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (3-4 weeks treatment) has achieved excellent local control rates of 100% after a median follow-up of 25 months.Hypofractionated preoperative RT has been investigated in a number of phase II single-arm studies suggesting that daily doses of 2.75-8 Gy over 1-3 weeks can achieve similar oncological outcomes to conventional neoadjuvant RT. Prospective data with direct head-to-head comparison to conventional neoadjuvant RT investigating oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles is eagerly awaited.For the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas, RT is not the standard of care. The randomized multi-center STRASS trial did not find a benefit in abdominal recurrence-free survival by the addition of preoperative RT. However, for the largest histological subgroup of well-differentiated and grades I and II dedifferentiated liposarcomas, the STRASS trial and the post-hoc propensity-matched STREXIT analysis have identified a possible benefit in survival by preoperative RT. These patients deserve to be informed about the pros and cons of preoperative RT while the longer follow-up data from the STRASS trial is awaited.

Novel Definitive Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-painting (HARD) for Unresected Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Purpose

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are historically radioresistant, with surgery being an integral component of their treatment. With their low α/β, STS may be more responsive to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT), which is often limited by long-term toxicity risk to surrounding normal tissue. An isotoxic approach using a hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) regimen allows for dosing based on clinical risk while sparing adjacent organs at risk.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively identified patients from 2019 to 2022 with unresected STS who received HARD with dose-painting to high, intermediate, and low-risk regions of 3.0 Gy, 2.5 Gy, and 2.0 to 2.3 Gy, respectively, in 20 to 22 fractions. Clinical endpoints included local control, locoregional control, progression free survival, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes.

Results

Twenty-seven consecutive patients were identified and had a median age of 68 years and tumor size of 7.0 cm (range, 1.2-21.0 cm). Tumors were most often high-grade (70%), stage IV (70%), located in the extremities (59%), and locally recurrent (52%). With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, there was a 3-year locoregional control rate of 100%. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival were 44.9% and 23.3%, respectively. There were 5 (19%) acute and 2 (7%) late grade 3 toxicities, and there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities at any point.

Conclusions

The HARD regimen is a safe method of dose-escalating STS, with durable 3-year locoregional control. This approach is a promising alternative for unresected STS, though further follow-up is required to determine long-term control and toxicity.

FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma?

FLASH is an emerging treatment paradigm in radiotherapy (RT) that utilizes ultra-high dose rates (UHDR; >40 Gy)/s) of radiation delivery. Developing advances in technology support the delivery of UHDR using electron and proton systems, as well as some ion beam units (eg, carbon ions), while methods to achieve UHDR with photons are under investigation. The major advantage of FLASH RT is its ability to increase the therapeutic index for RT by shifting the dose response curve for normal tissue toxicity to higher doses. Numerous preclinical studies have been conducted to date on FLASH RT for murine sarcomas, alongside the investigation of its effects on relevant normal tissues of skin, muscle, and bone. The tumor control achieved by FLASH RT of sarcoma models is indistinguishable from that attained by treatment with standard RT to the same total dose. FLASH's high dose rates are able to mitigate the severity or incidence of RT side effects on normal tissues as evaluated by endpoints ranging from functional sparing to histological damage. Large animal studies and clinical trials of canine patients show evidence of skin sparing by FLASH vs. standard RT, but also caution against delivery of high single doses with FLASH that exceed those safely applied with standard RT. Also, a human clinical trial has shown that FLASH RT can be delivered safely to bone metastasis. Thus, data to date support continued investigations of clinical translation of FLASH RT for the treatment of patients with sarcoma. Toward this purpose, hypofractionated irradiation schemes are being investigated for FLASH effects on sarcoma and relevant normal tissues.

Are We Ready for Life in the Fast Lane? A Critical Review of Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma

This critical review aims to summarize the relevant published data regarding hypofractionation regimens for preoperative radiation therapy (RT) prior to surgery for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity or superficial trunk. We identified peer-reviewed publications using a PubMed search on the MeSH headings of "soft tissue sarcoma" AND "hypofractionated radiation therapy." To obtain complication data on similar anatomical radiotherapeutic scenarios we also searched "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "melanoma" as well as "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "breast cancer." We then used reference lists from relevant articles to obtain additional pertinent publications. We also incorporated relevant abstracts presented at international sarcoma meetings and relevant clinical trials as listed on the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Detailed data are presented and contextualized for ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to local control, wound complications, and amputation rates. Comparative data are also presented for late toxicities including: fibrosis, joint limitation, edema, skin integrity, and bone fracture or necrosis. These data are compared to a standard regimen of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions delivered over 5 weeks. This analysis supports the continued use of a standard regimen for preoperative RT for STS of 25 × 2 Gy over 5 weeks without concurrent chemotherapy. Use of concurrent chemotherapy with preoperative RT for STS should be reserved for well-designed clinical trials. A randomized trial of ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated pre op RT for STS is warranted, but it is critical for the primary endpoint (or co-primary endpoint) to be late toxicity to: bone, soft tissue, joint, and skin.

Preoperative radiation therapy increases adherence in patients with high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery and radiation therapy remain the standard of care for patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma that are >5 cm. Radiation therapy is time and labor-intensive for patients, and social determinants of health may affect adherence. The aim of this study was to define demographic, clinical, and treatment factors associated with the completion of radiation therapy and determine if preoperative radiation therapy improved adherence compared to postoperative radiation therapy.

METHODS

The cohort included patients in the National Cancer Database with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma >5 cm without nodal or distant metastases who received limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy with microscopically negative R0 margins. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with radiation therapy sequencing and adherence (defined as completion of 50 Gy preoperative radiation therapy or at least 60 Gy postoperative radiation therapy). A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model assessed overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 2,145 patients, 47.1% received preoperative radiation therapy (n = 1,010), and 52.9% (n = 1135) received postoperative radiation therapy. A greater proportion of patients treated with preoperative (77.2%) versus postoperative radiation therapy (64.9%, P < .0001) received the recommended dose. More patients with private insurance (49.8% vs 35.3% Medicaid vs 44.9% Medicare, P = .011) and patients treated at an academic medical center (52.6% vs 47.4%, P < .001) received preoperative radiation therapy. Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy had lower odds of receiving insufficient doses of radiation therapy (odds ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.27-0.47]). Neither radiation therapy adherence nor sequencing were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy were more likely to complete therapy and receive an optimal dose than patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative radiation therapy improves adherence and should be widely considered in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma, particularly in patients at risk for not completing therapy.

3D Specimen Scanning and Mapping in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the primary treatment for bone and soft tissue tumors. Negative margin status is a key factor in prognosis. Given the three-dimensional (3D) anatomic complexity of musculoskeletal tumor specimens, communication of margin results between surgeons and pathologists is challenging. We sought to perform ex vivo 3D scanning of musculoskeletal oncology specimens to enhance communication between surgeons and pathologists.

METHODS

Immediately after surgical resection, 3D scanning of the fresh specimen is performed prior to frozen section analysis. During pathologic grossing, whether frozen or permanent, margin sampling sites are annotated on the virtual 3D model using computer-aided design (CAD) software.

RESULTS

3D scanning was performed in seven cases (six soft tissue, one bone), with specimen mapping on six cases. Intraoperative 3D scanning and mapping was performed in one case in which the location of margin sampling was shown virtually in real-time to the operating surgeon to help achieve a negative margin. In six cases, the 3D model was used to communicate final permanent section analysis. Soft tissue, cartilage, and bone (including lytic lesions within bone) showed acceptable resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual 3D scanning and specimen mapping is feasible and may allow for enhanced documentation and communication. This protocol provides useful information for anatomically complex musculoskeletal tumor specimens. Future studies will evaluate the effect of the protocol on positive margin rates, likelihood that a re-resection contains additional malignancy, and exploration of targeted adjuvant radiation protocols using a patient-specific 3D specimen map.

Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5-60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination.

RESULTS

All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1-2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiation treatment for STS is feasible and well tolerated and associates encouraging rates of pathologic response that could have a favorable impact on final outcomes.

Effect of radiotherapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis and overall survival in 1200 extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients. Retrospective analysis using IPTW-adjusted models

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant (NRTX) and adjuvant radiotherapy (ARTX) reduce local recurrence (LR) risk in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), yet their impact on distant metastasis (DM) and overall survival (OS) is less well defined. This study aimed at analysing the influence of NRTX/ARTX on all three endpoints using a retrospective, multicentre eSTS cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1200 patients (mean age: 60.7 ± 16.8 years; 44.4 % females) were retrospectively included, treated with limb sparing surgery and curative intent for localised, high grade (G2/3) eSTS. 194 (16.2 %), 790 (65.8 %), and 216 (18.0 %) patients had received NRTX, ARTX and no RTX, respectively. For the resulting three groups (no RTX vs. NRTX, no RTX vs. ARTX, NRTX vs. ARTX) Fine&Gray models for LR and DM, and Cox-regression models for OS were calculated, with IPTW-modelling adjusting for imbalances between groups.

RESULTS

In the IPTW-adjusted analysis, NRTX was associated with lower LR-risk in comparison to no RTX (SHR [subhazard ratio]: 0.236; p = 0.003), whilst no impact on DM-risk (p = 0.576) or OS (p = 1.000) was found. IPTW-weighted analysis for no RTX vs. ARTX revealed a significant positive association between ARTX and lower LR-risk (SHR: 0.479, p = 0.003), but again no impact on DM-risk (p = 0.363) or OS (p = 0.534). IPTW-weighted model for NRTX vs. ARTX showed significantly lower LR-risk for NRTX (SHR for ARTX: 3.433; p = 0.003) but no difference regarding DM-risk (p = 1.000) or OS (p = 0.639).

CONCLUSION

NRTX and ARTX are associated with lower LR-risk, but do not seem to affect DM-risk or OS. NRTX may be favoured over ARTX as our results indicate better local control rates.

Toxicity, normal tissue and dose-volume planning parameters for radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STSE) are left with high incidence of toxicities after Radiotherapy (RT). Understanding the normal tissue dose relationship with the development of long-term toxicities may enable better RT planning in order to reduce treatment toxicities for STSE. This systematic review of the literature aims at reporting the incidence of acute and late toxicities and identifying RT delineation guidance the normal tissues structures and dose-volume parameters for STSE.

METHODS

A literature search of PUBMED-MEDLINE for studies that reported data on RT toxicity outcomes, delineation guidelines and dose-volume parameters for STSE from 2000 to 2022. Data has been tabulated and reported.

RESULTS

Thirty of 586 papers were selected after exclusion criteria. External beam RT prescriptions ranged from 30 to 72 Gy. The majority of studies reported the use of Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) (27%). Neo-adjuvant RT was used in 40%. The highest long-term toxicities were subcutaneous and lymphoedema, reported when delivering 3DCRT. IMRT had a lower incidence of toxicities. Normal tissue outlining such as weight-bearing bones, skin and subcutaneous tissue, corridor and neurovascular bundle was recommended in 6 studies. Nine studies recommended the use of dose-volume constraints, but only one recommended evidence-based dose-volume constraints.

CONCLUSION

Although the literature is replete with toxicity reports, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on normal tissue and dose-volume parameters and strategies to reduce the normal tissues irradiation when optimising RT plans for STSE are poor compared to other tumour sites.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Re-excised Soft-tissue Sarcoma After Unplanned Resection

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) re-excised after unplanned tumor resection (UPR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2015, we retrospectively evaluated patients with STS of limb or trunk who underwent post-UPR re-excision in our expert center and received or not aRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 121 months (IQR 94-165). Among the 145 patients, 37 were not treated with aRT (no-RT) and 108 received aRT with a median radiation dose of 50 Gy (IQR 50-60). At 10 years, patients in the aRT and no-RT groups showed a cumulative incidence of local failure (10y-LF) of 14.7% and 37.7%, and a local recurrence-free survival (10y-LRFS) of 61.3% and 45.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified aRT and age ≥70 years as independent predictors of both LF and LRFS, while grade 3 and deep-seated tumor were independent predictors of LRFS. In overall population, 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (10y-DMFS) and overall survival (10y-OS) were 63.7% and 69.4%. In multivariate analyses, age ≥70 years, grade 3, and deep-seated lesion were associated with shorter DMFS and OS. Acute severe adverse events were not significantly increased in aRT group (14.8% vs. 18.1%, P = .85) but dramatically increased if radiation dose exceeded 50 Gy (risk ratio 2.96 compared to ≤50 Gy, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In STS patients re-excised after UPR, 50 Gy aRT was safe and associated with reduced LF and longer LRFS. It seems to be beneficial even in absence of residual disease or in absence of initial adverse prognostic factors.

Photon and Proton irradiation in Patient-derived, Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Sarcoma Models

BACKGROUND

Despite their heterogeneity, the current standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) follows a one fits all approach for all STS subtypes. Sarcoma patient-derived three-dimensional cell culture models represent an innovative tool to overcome challenges in clinical research enabling reproducible subtype-specific research on STS. In this pilot study, we present our methodology and preliminary results using STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures that were exposed to different doses of photon and proton radiation. Our aim was: (i) to establish a reproducible method for irradiation of STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures and (ii) to explore the differences in tumor cell viability of two different STS subtypes exposed to increasing doses of photon and proton radiation at different time points.

METHODS

Two patient-derived cell cultures of untreated localized high-grade STS (an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and a pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS)) were exposed to a single fraction of photon or proton irradiation using doses of 0 Gy (sham irradiation), 2 Gy, 4 Gy, 8 Gy and 16 Gy. Cell viability was measured and compared to sham irradiation at two different time points (four and eight days after irradiation).

RESULTS

The proportion of viable tumor cells four days after photon irradiation for UPS vs. PLS were significantly different with 85% vs. 65% (4 Gy), 80% vs. 50% (8 Gy) and 70% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Proton irradiation led to similar diverging viability curves between UPS vs. PLS four days after irradiation with 90% vs. 75% (4 Gy), 85% vs. 45% (8 Gy) and 80% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Photon and proton radiation displayed only minor differences in cell-killing properties within each cell culture (UPS and PLS). The cell-killing effect of radiation sustained at eight days after irradiation in both cell cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pronounced differences in radiosensitivity are evident among UPS and PLS 3D patient-derived sarcoma cell cultures which may reflect the clinical heterogeneity. Photon and proton radiation showed similar dose-dependent cell-killing effectiveness in both 3D cell cultures. Patient-derived 3D STS cell cultures may represent a valuable tool to enable translational studies towards individualized subtype-specific radiotherapy in patients with STS.

Midterm Results of High-Dose-Rate Intraoperative Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

According to the literature only sparse data are available on the use of high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (IOHDR-BT) as a boost to external-beam irradiation (EBRT) in combination with a wide resection in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Applying a retrospective study design, we investigated all patients who between 2010 and 2016 underwent marginal resection of a high-grade STS and intraoperative radiotherapy, followed by EBRT. We included only patients with a traceable follow-up time of at least two years. Of 89 patients, 35 met our inclusion criteria and showed an average follow-up of four years.

RESULTS

We found an overall 2-year local control rate of 94.3%. The local recurrence rate for R0 resections was 6%, whereas recurrences occurred in 13% of R1 resections and in 100% of R2 resections. One affected patient received only intraoperative radiotherapy. The recurrence rate by tumour entity was 36% for LPS, 11% for myxofibrosarcoma and 17% for undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

The treatment regimen consisting of limb-preserving surgery, IORT and pre- or postoperative radiotherapy consistently shows excellent local control rates.

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for epithelioid sarcoma: are we any closer to a non-surgical cure?

INTRODUCTION

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma subtype, predominantly occurring in children and young adults. Despite optimal management of localized disease, approximately 50% of patients develop advanced disease. The management of advanced ES remains challenging due to limited response to conventional chemotherapy and despite novel oral EZH2 inhibitors that have better tolerability but similar efficacy to chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature review using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Web of Science databases. We have focused on the role of chemotherapy, targeted agents such as EZH2 inhibitors, potential new targets and immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of therapies currently undergoing clinical investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

ES is a soft tissue sarcoma with a heterogeneous pathological, clinical, and molecular presentation. In the current era of precision medicine, more trials with targeted therapies and a combination of chemotherapy or immunotherapy with targeted therapies are required to establish optimal treatment for ES.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Extremity Osteoradionecrosis after Limb-Sparing Surgery and Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a major complication after radiotherapy. Most studies on ORN have focused on patients with mandibular lesions, with few studies including patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We included 198 patients with extremity STS who underwent limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy between 2004 and 2017. The incidence rate of extremity ORN was 3.5% (7/198), with most lesions (6/7) located in the lower extremities. The mean follow-up time was 62 months. Clinical presentations included chronic ulcers, soft tissue necrosis, sinus discharge, bone nonunion, and pathological fractures. Compared with the non-ORN group, the ORN group had a significantly higher total radiation dose (68 Gy vs. 64 Gy, p = 0.048) and greater use of intraoperative periosteal stripping (p = 0.008). Repeat surgeries and subsequent soft tissue reconstruction or limb amputation were performed as treatments. The risk and management of ORN in patients with extremity STS was ignored previously. Because the disease is complex and affects both clinicians and patients, careful surveillance should be undertaken.

Neoadjuvant pazopanib in nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (ARST1321): A report of major wound complications from the Children's Oncology Group and NRG Oncology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The impact upon wound healing of targeted molecular therapies, when incorporated into neoadjuvant therapy of soft tissue sarcoma, is largely unknown. Here, we describe wound complications following addition of pazopanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) +/- chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

Wound complications were evaluated on dose-finding and randomized arms of ARST1321, a phase II/III study incorporating neoadjuvant RT, +/- pazopanib, +/- ifosfamide/doxorubicin (ID) for sarcoma therapy.

RESULTS

Of 85 evaluable patients, 35 (41%) experienced postoperative wound complications. Most (57%) were grade III. Randomization to pazopanib + RT + ID carried a 50% wound complication rate (17/34, with 47% grade III), compared to 22% (5/23) with ID + RT alone. In nonchemotherapy study arms, pazopanib + RT resulted in a 59% wound complication rate versus 25% for those receiving RT alone. Grade III wound complications occurred among 26% (15/58) of all patients receiving pazopanib. Wound complications occurred a median of 35 days postoperatively. Some occurred following diagnostic biopsies and at remote surgical sites.

CONCLUSION

The addition of pazopanib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT resulted in a higher wound complication rate following therapy of soft tissue sarcoma. The rate of grade III complications remained comparable to that reported in contemporary literature.

Local relapse of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall operated on with wide margins without radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The quality of surgical margins is the most important factor affecting local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Despite this, there is no universally accepted consensus on the definition of an adequate surgical margin or on which patients should be offered radiation therapy. This study focuses on local control and its prognostic factors in patients with trunk wall and extremity STS.

METHODS

Adult patients with a final diagnosis of trunk wall or extremity STS referred to a single tertiary referral centre between August 1987 and December 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients were treated according to a protocol instituted in 1987. The classification of surgical margins and indications for radiation therapy were based on anatomy and strict definition of surgical margins as metric distance to the resection border. Local treatment was defined as adequate if patients received either surgery with wide margins alone or marginal surgery combined with radiation therapy. Margins were considered wide if the tumour was excised with pathological margins greater than 2.5 cm or with an uninvolved natural anatomical barrier. After treatment, patients were followed up with local imaging and chest X-ray: 5 years for high-grade STS, 10 years for low-grade STS.

RESULTS

A total of 812 patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.8 (range 0.5-19.5) years. Forty-four patients had a grade 1 tumour: there were no instances of recurrence in this group thus they were excluded from further analysis. Five-year local control in the 768 patients with grade 2-3 STS was 90.1 per cent in patients receiving adequate local treatment according to the protocol. Altogether, 333 patients (43.4 per cent) were treated with wide surgery alone and their 5-year local control rate was 91.1 per cent. Among patients treated with wide surgery alone, deep location was the only factor adversely associated with local relapse risk in multivariable analysis; 5-year local control was 95.3 per cent in superficial and 88.3 per cent in deep-sited sarcomas (hazards ratio 3.154 (95% c.i. 1.265 to 7.860), P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

A high local control rate is achievable with surgery alone for a substantial proportion of patients with STS of the extremities or superficial trunk wall.

Outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk treated by (neo)adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy with curative intent

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a relatively rare group of malignant tumors. Currently, there is very little published clinical data, especially in the context of curative multimodal therapy with image-guided, conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who received preoperative or postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for STS of the extremities or trunk with curative intent were included in this single centre retrospective analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate survival endpoints. Multivariable proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between survival endpoints and tumour-, patient-, and treatment-specific characteristics.

RESULTS

86 patients were included in the analysis. The most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic high-grade sarcoma (UPS) (27) and liposarcoma (22). More than two third of the patients received preoperative radiation therapy (72%). During the follow-up period, 39 patients (45%) suffered from some type of relapse, mainly remote (31%). The two-years overall survival rate was 88%. The median DFS was 48 months and the median DMFS was 51 months. Female gender (HR 0.460 (0.217; 0.973)) and histology of liposarcomas compared to UPS proved to be significantly more favorable in terms of DFS (HR 0.327 (0.126; 0.852)).

CONCLUSION

Conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality in the preoperative or postoperative management of STS. Especially for the prevention of distant metastases, the establishment of modern systemic therapies or multimodal therapy approaches is necessary.

Haemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcoma: Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors for survival

INTRODUCTION

Haemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcomas (HSTS) are characterised by aggressive local growth and highly metastatic behaviour. We aimed to describe oncological outcomes and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review including 64 patients treated with palliation (n = 7), with limb salvage surgery (LSS) (n = 9), with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) + LSS (n = 12), with LSS + adjuvant RT (n = 30) or amputation (n = 6). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). After uni- and multivariate analysis, prognostic factors affecting OS, MFS and LRFS were identified.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 years (IQR 23 years) with median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 28 months). All cases were high grade. Eight (13%) had pulmonary metastases at presentation and another 40 (63%) developed metastases after median 9 months (IQR 19 months). Median OS was 12 months (IQR 38 months), and estimated OS after two-years was 15.9% and 52.9% for patients with and without metastatic disease at presentation, respectively. Improved OS was associated with negative resection margins (p = 0.031), RT (p = 0.045), neoadjuvant RT (versus adjuvant RT, p = 0.044) and amputation (versus LSS, p < 0.001). MFS was 35.1% after two-years. LR occurred in 18 of 51 (35.3%) patients with surgically treated localised disease. LRFS was 63.4% after two-years and significantly affected by a negative margin (p = 0.042) and RT (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Haemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcomas should be excised, either with amputation or LSS with a clear resection margin. If LSS is attempted, neoadjuvant RT reduces the risk of tumour spillage and early LR, enhances the feasibility of achieving clear resection margins, and offers superior overall survival compared to adjuvant RT.

Radiogenomics in lung cancer: Where are we?

Huge technological and biomedical advances have improved the survival and quality of life of lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. However, during treatment planning, a probability that the patient will experience adverse effects is assumed. Radiotoxicity is a complex entity that is largely dose-dependent but also has important intrinsic factors. One of the most studied is the genetic variants that may be associated with susceptibility to the development of adverse effects of radiotherapy. This review aims to present the current status of radiogenomics in lung cancer, integrating results obtained in association studies of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) related to radiotherapy toxicities. We conclude that despite numerous publications in this field, methodologies and endpoints vary greatly, making comparisons between studies difficult. Analyzing SNPs from the candidate gene approach, together with the study in cohorts limited by the sample size, has complicated the possibility of having validated results. All this delays the incorporation of genetic biomarkers in predictive models for clinical application. Thus, from all analysed SNPs, only 12 have great potential as esophagitis genetic risk factors and deserve further exploration. This review highlights the efforts that have been made to date in the radiogenomic study of radiotoxicity in lung cancer.

Correlation of radiological and histopathological response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the association between radiological and histopathological response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), as well as the prognostic value of the different response evaluation methods on the oncological outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients with localized STS of the extremity and trunk wall, treated with nRT followed by resection were included. The radiological response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 (RECIST) and MR-adapted Choi (Choi), histopathologic response was evaluated according to the EORTC-STBSG recommendations. Oncological outcome parameters of interest were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

For 107 patients, complete pre- and postoperative pathology and imaging datasets were available. Most tumors were high-grade (77%) and the most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma/not otherwise specified (UPS/NOS, 40%), myxoid liposarcoma (MLS, 21%) and myxofibrosarcoma (MFS, 16%). When comparing RECIST to Choi, the response was differently categorized in 58%, with a higher response rate (CR + PR) with Choi. Radiological responders showed a significant lower median percentage of viable cells (RECIST p = .050, Choi p = .015) and necrosis (RECIST p < .001), and a higher median percentage of fibrosis (RECIST p = .005, Choi p = .008), compared to radiological non-responders (SD + PD). RECIST, Choi, fibrosis, and viable cells were not significantly associated with altered oncological outcome, more necrosis was associated with poorer OS (p = .038).

CONCLUSION

RECIST, Choi and the EORTC-STBSG response score show incongruent results in response evaluation. The radiological response was significantly correlated with a lower percentage of viable cells and necrosis, but a higher percentage of fibrosis. Apart from necrosis, radiological nor other histopathological parameters were associated with oncologic outcomes.

Clinical analysis of multimodal treatment for localized synovial sarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Several prognostic factors for survival in synovial sarcoma have been proposed, but the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a matter of debate. The study aim was to clarify the effect of high-dose ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with localized synovial sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five tertiary musculoskeletal oncology hospitals participated in this retrospective study. The records of the patient diagnosed with synovial sarcoma without metastasis at diagnosis from 1990 to 2011 have been collected and reviewed. Overall, distant failure-free, and local failure-free survivals were calculated, and prognostic factors for each survival were evaluated by performing univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study with a median follow-up period of 67 months (range, 5-267 months) for all surviving patients. The 5-year overall, distant failure-free, and local failure-free survival rates were 79.7%, 66.3%, and 98.4%, respectively. Univariate analyses demonstrated that high-dose ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy was significantly associated with better overall (p = 0.014) and distant failure-free survival (p = 0.0043) than that of low-dose or no ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy if we analyzed only patients with tumors >5 cm in size. Addition of radiotherapy was not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses, but it did improve the overall survival of the patients with R1 resection (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

Patients with localized synovial sarcoma >5 cm in size had better overall and distant failure-free survival after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy containing high-dose ifosfamide comparing to low-dose or no ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy. The addition of adjuvant radiotherapy was beneficial for the patients who received R1 resection. Alternatively, adjuvant radiotherapy could be avoided for patients who achieved an R0 margin.

The benefit for radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres: A systematic review and clinical practice guidelines from the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association

Patients with sarcoma are best managed at specialised sarcoma centres as supported by published literature. Optimal management requires multidisciplinary team input to formulate the diagnosis and treatment sequencing taking into consideration multiple clinical and pathologic factors. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact on outcomes of radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres. A systematic review was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central databases for publications from 1990 to February 2022 that evaluated the local control, survival and toxicity of radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres. A total of 21 studies were included (17 cancer registry studies, four retrospective comparative studies). Four studies reported the local recurrence endpoint when radiotherapy was part of limb conservation treatment and showed better conformity to clinical practice guidelines and an improved local recurrence free rate when radiotherapy treatment is supported through, but may not be necessarily delivered at a specialised sarcoma centres. Only one retrospective study analysed toxicity specifically and demonstrated that patients who received preoperative radiotherapy at community centres compared to radiotherapy at a specialised sarcoma centre were more likely to develop a major wound complication. Fourteen studies reported overall survival, and 12 of these showed significantly better 5-year overall survival for patients managed at specialised sarcoma centres, however the specific impact of radiotherapy delivered at sarcoma centres could not be determined. In conclusion, patients with sarcoma should be managed through specialised sarcoma centres for better oncological outcomes. Radiotherapy in specialised sarcoma centre is associated with a lower rate of wound complications and may contribute to improved oncological outcomes as part of the limb conservation treatment at a specialised sarcoma centre.

Hypofractionated, 3-week, preoperative radiotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (HYPORT-STS): a single-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen of 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions for 5 weeks for soft tissue sarcomas results in excellent local control, with major wound complications occurring in approximately 35% of patients. We aimed to investigate the safety of a moderately hypofractionated, shorter regimen of radiotherapy, which could be more convenient for patients.

METHODS

This single-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (HYPORT-STS) was done at a single tertiary cancer care centre (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA). We administered preoperative radiotherapy to a dose of 42·75 Gy in 15 fractions of 2·85 Gy/day for 3 weeks (five fractions per week) to adults (aged ≥18 years) with non-metastatic soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or superficial trunk and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3. The primary endpoint was a major wound complication occurring within 120 days of surgery. Major wound complications were defined as those requiring a secondary operation, or operations, under general or regional anaesthesia for wound treatment; readmission to the hospital for wound care; invasive procedures for wound care; deep wound packing to an area of wound measuring at least 2 cm in length; prolonged dressing changes; repeat surgery for revision of a split thickness skin graft; or wet dressings for longer than 4 weeks. We analysed our primary outcome and safety in all patients who enrolled. We monitored safety using a Bayesian, one-arm, time-to-event stopping rule simulator comparing the rate of major wound complications at 120 days post-surgery among study participants with the historical rate of 35%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03819985, recruitment is complete, and follow-up continues.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 18, 2018, and Jan 6, 2021, we assessed 157 patients for eligibility, of whom 120 were enrolled and received hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy. At no time did the stopping rule computation indicate that the trial should be stopped early for lack of safety. Median postoperative follow-up was 24 months (IQR 17-30). Of 120 patients, 37 (31%, 95% CI 24-40) developed a major wound complication at a median time of 37 days (IQR 25-59) after surgery. No patient had acute radiation toxicity (during radiotherapy or within 4 weeks of the radiotherapy end date) of grade 3 or worse (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 4.0) or an on-treatment serious adverse event. Four (3%) of 115 patients had late radiation toxicity (≥6 months post-surgery) of at least grade 3 (CTCAE or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme): femur fractures (n=2), lymphoedema (n=1), and skin ulceration (n=1). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Moderately hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy delivered to patients with soft tissue sarcomas was safe and could therefore be a more convenient alternative to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Patients can be counselled about these results and potentially offered this regimen, particularly if it facilitates care at a sarcoma specialty centre. Results on long-term oncological, late toxicity, and functional outcomes are awaited.

FUNDING

The National Cancer Institute.

Surgical treatment of undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma in a young 17-year-old woman: A case report

This case report describes the clinical case of a 17-year-old woman with an undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma in the left supratrocanteric area. The young woman came for observation at our plastic surgery hospital with a large vascular mass visible on her left side which also made walking difficult. Our patient reports the onset of the mass about two months earlier and its growth very quickly. In this case report, we will analyze the demolitive and reconstructive surgical procedures in order to guarantee our patient radical surgery and the possibility of continuing radiotherapy and any specific chemotherapy to avoid the risk of relapse and metastasis over time.