1
|
Wang JH, Sherry AD, Bazyar S, Sutera P, Radwan N, Phillips RM, Deek MP, Lu J, Dipasquale S, Deville C, DeWeese TL, Song DY, Wang H, Hobbs RF, Malek R, Dudley SA, Greco SC, Antonarakis ES, Marshall CH, Denmeade S, Paller CJ, Carducci MA, Pienta KJ, Oz OK, Ramotar M, Leenstra JL, Park SS, Abramowitz MC, Desai N, Berlin A, Stish BJ, Tang C, Tran PT, Kiess AP. Outcomes of Radium-223 and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancers: The RAVENS Phase II Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol 2025:JCO2500131. [PMID: 40334149 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-00131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2025] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/25/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) without androgen deprivation therapy for oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Most patients with bone metastatic (BM) omCSPC recur with additional bone disease after MDT. We hypothesized the BM-targeting alpha-emitter radium-223 dichloride (Ra223) could target subclinical bone disease and delay progression. METHODS This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label phase II RCT. Eligible men with recurrent omCSPC with ≥one bone metastasis (≤three on conventional imaging and/or ≤five on molecular imaging) were randomly assigned (1:1) to stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) MDT alone or SABR MDT with Ra223 (six cycles). Primary end point was composite PFS. RESULTS From August 9, 2019, to March 2, 2023, 64 patients were randomly assigned, 33 to SABR MDT and 31 to SABR MDT/Ra223 balancing for key covariates. Most SABR MDT/Ra223 patients (87%) received six cycles of Ra223. The median PFS was 11.8 months with SABR MDT and 10.5 months with SABR MDT/Ra223 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.42 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.56]; P = .24). Seven patients (11%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (no grade 4 or 5), 2 of 33 (6%) with SABR and 5 of 30 (17%) with SABR MDT/Ra223. Patients with high-risk (HiRi) pathogenic mutations in ATM, BRCA1/2, RB1, or TP53 had worse PFS (HR, 5.95 [95% CI, 1.83 to 19.3]; P = .003). Greater T-cell receptor (TCR) unique productive rearrangements were prognostic for improved PFS independent of the treatment arm (aHR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96]; P = .04). CONCLUSION Adding Ra223 to SABR MDT in BM omCSPC does not delay progression of disease. We provide evidence for an HiRi mutational signature and TCR repertoire as prognostic biomarkers in omCSPC treated with SABR MDT, highlighting the importance of collecting biological correlates in RCTs for omCSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarey H Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Soha Bazyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Noura Radwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ryan M Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Jiayun Lu
- Department of Oncology, Division of Quantitative Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shirl Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Theodore L DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Division of Quantitative Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Robert F Hobbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Reem Malek
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sara A Dudley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Stephen C Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Catherine H Marshall
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Samuel Denmeade
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Channing J Paller
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Michael A Carducci
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Current address Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Orhan K Oz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Matthew Ramotar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew C Abramowitz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ana P Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toosi A, Harsini S, Divband G, Bénard F, Uribe CF, Oviedo F, Dodhia R, Weeks WB, Lavista Ferres JM, Rahmim A. Computer-Aided Detection (CADe) of Small Metastatic Prostate Cancer Lesions on 3D PSMA PET Volumes Using Multi-Angle Maximum Intensity Projections. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1563. [PMID: 40361490 PMCID: PMC12071532 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17091563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2025] [Revised: 04/28/2025] [Accepted: 04/29/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop and evaluate a novel computer-aided detection (CADe) approach for identifying small metastatic biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa) lesions on PSMA-PET images, utilizing multi-angle Maximum Intensity Projections (MA-MIPs) and state-of-the-art (SOTA) object detection algorithms. METHODS We fine-tuned and evaluated 16 SOTA object detection algorithms (selected across four main categories of model types) applied to MA-MIPs as extracted from rotated 3D PSMA-PET volumes. Predicted 2D bounding boxes were back-projected to the original 3D space using the Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) algorithm. A fine-tuned Medical Segment-Anything Model (MedSAM) was then also used to segment the identified lesions within the bounding boxes. RESULTS The proposed method achieved a high detection performance for this difficult task, with the FreeAnchor model reaching an F1-score of 0.69 and a recall of 0.74. It outperformed several 3D methods in efficiency while maintaining comparable accuracy. Strong recall rates were observed for clinically relevant areas, such as local relapses (0.82) and bone metastases (0.80). CONCLUSION Our fully automated CADe tool shows promise in assisting physicians as a "second reader" for detecting small metastatic BCR PCa lesions on PSMA-PET images. By leveraging the strength and computational efficiency of 2D models while preserving 3D spatial information of the PSMA-PET volume, the proposed approach has the potential to improve detectability and reduce workload in cancer diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirhosein Toosi
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.T.); (C.F.U.)
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;
- AI for Good Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA; (F.O.); (R.D.); (W.B.W.); (J.M.L.F.)
| | | | | | - François Bénard
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada;
| | - Carlos F. Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.T.); (C.F.U.)
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada;
| | - Felipe Oviedo
- AI for Good Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA; (F.O.); (R.D.); (W.B.W.); (J.M.L.F.)
| | - Rahul Dodhia
- AI for Good Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA; (F.O.); (R.D.); (W.B.W.); (J.M.L.F.)
| | - William B. Weeks
- AI for Good Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA; (F.O.); (R.D.); (W.B.W.); (J.M.L.F.)
| | - Juan M. Lavista Ferres
- AI for Good Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA; (F.O.); (R.D.); (W.B.W.); (J.M.L.F.)
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.T.); (C.F.U.)
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koh MJ, Pilkington P, Koh MJ, Lawlor MK, Creswell M, O’Connor T, Zwart A, Danner M, Kumar D, Suy S, Carrasquilla M, Collins SP. Safety and early efficacy of involved-field SBRT for nodal oligo-recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1434504. [PMID: 39484030 PMCID: PMC11524995 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1434504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Following treatment for localized prostate cancer, a subset of men will develop recurrent disease in the abdominopelvic nodes. For radiation therapy (RT), the optimal treatment volume, fractionation schedule, and dose remain unanswered questions. We report early outcomes for patients treated with involved-field stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (IF-SBRT) for nodal oligo-recurrent (NOR) prostate cancer. Methods Between January 2018 and October 2023, 67 patients with a median age of 75 with NOR prostate cancer treated with 74 courses of IF-SBRT at Georgetown were eligible for this analysis. NOR was defined as any volume of disease that could be safely treated within an IF. All patients were treated with five-fraction IF-SBRT (27.5-35 Gy). The IF treatment volume was defined as the nodal basin containing the gross disease as well as the immediately adjacent basins. Disease progression was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise above the pretreatment baseline or initiation of a second treatment. Local control and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Detection of pre-SBRT NOR was ascertained by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (38%), fluciclovine (50%), or MRI/CT (12%). Median follow-up was 50 months (1-262). The median pre-salvage PSA was 6.5 ng/mL (range, 0.1-335). The median number of involved nodes was 3 (range, 1-16). The local control at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 93%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival was 78% and 50%, respectively. Twenty percent of treatment courses were followed by acute Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity: diarrhea (9%) and/or nausea (14%). Two patients (3%) experienced late Grade 2 nausea. On univariate analysis, measures of disease volume such as hormone sensitivity (p = 0.03), increasing involved node number (p = 0.008), and abdominal treatment (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with GI toxicity. Conclusions With the widespread adoption of PSMA agents, NORs are likely to increase. The optimal combination of local and systemic therapy in this population is unknown. With a favorable toxicity profile, IF-SBRT represents a safe and convenient local therapy treatment option for an elderly patient population. Patient- and treatment-related factors such as a large number of involved nodes and/or abdominal treatment may be associated with an increased risk of GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Ji Koh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Padraig Pilkington
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Min Jung Koh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mary-Kate Lawlor
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Michael Creswell
- Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timothy O’Connor
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alan Zwart
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Malika Danner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lopez-Valcarcel M, Valcarcel FJ, Velasco J, Zapata I, Rodriguez R, Cardona J, Gil B, Cordoba S, Benlloch R, Hernandez M, Santana S, Gomez R, De la Fuente C, Garcia-Berrocal MI, Regueiro C, Romero J. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for pelvic nodal oligorecurrence in prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:445-453. [PMID: 39895963 PMCID: PMC11785391 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.101528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Background This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of oligometastatic pelvic node prostate cancer to delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Materials and methods Pelvic lymph node metastases were identified by 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT), and patients were not receiving ADT. SABR was administered using linear accelerators with intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy, at a prescribed dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions over 2 weeks. Response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 criteria, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were monitored post-SABR. Toxicity and quality of life were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Toxicity (CTCAE) v.5.0 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires QLQ-C30/QLQ-PR25, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and T-test were used for statistical analysis. Results Between June 2015 and November 2023, 56 patients with 85 lesions were treated at our institution. Median follow-up was 30 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 24-33.6]. Prostatectomy was the radical treatment in 85.7% of patients, and radiotherapy in 14.3%. Response rates were 67.1% for complete response, 27.4% for partial response, and 1.4% for stable disease. In-field progression was observed in only 3 lesions (3.5%). The median time to biochemical relapse post-SABR was 15 months (95% CI: 11.4-18.6). Three-year pelvic nodal and distant progression-free survival were 62.5% and 80%, respectively. There was a significant decrease in PSA levels after SABR compared to pretreatment levels (0.77 vs. 2.16 ng/mL respectively, p = 0.001). No grade ≥ 2 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. The median global health status score was 83.33 points at both time points analysed. Conclusion SABR can delay the ADT and provide excellent local control while preserving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Lopez-Valcarcel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco J Valcarcel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Velasco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irma Zapata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Rodriguez
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Cardona
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Gil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofia Cordoba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Benlloch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofia Santana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina De la Fuente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Isabel Garcia-Berrocal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Regueiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trapp C, Aebersold DM, Belka C, Casuscelli J, Emmett L, Eze C, Fanti S, Farolfi A, Fendler W, Grosu AL, Guckenberger M, Hruby G, Kirste S, Koerber SA, Kroeze S, Peeken JC, Rogowski P, Scharl S, Shelan M, Spohn SKB, Strouthos I, Unterrainer L, Vogel M, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. Whole pelvis vs. hemi pelvis elective nodal radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-positive nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy - a retrospective multi-institutional propensity score analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:3770-3781. [PMID: 38940843 PMCID: PMC11445306 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06802-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite growing evidence for bilateral pelvic radiotherapy (whole pelvis RT, WPRT) there is almost no data on unilateral RT (hemi pelvis RT, HPRT) in patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Nevertheless, in clinical practice HPRT is sometimes used with the intention to reduce side effects compared to WPRT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is currently the best imaging modality in this clinical situation. This analysis compares PSMA-PET/CT based WPRT and HPRT. METHODS A propensity score matching was performed in a multi-institutional retrospective dataset of 273 patients treated with pelvic RT due to nodal recurrence (214 WPRT, 59 HPRT). In total, 102 patients (51 in each group) were included in the final analysis. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) < post-RT nadir + 0.2ng/ml, metastasis-free survival (MFS) and nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS Median follow-up was 29 months. After propensity matching, both groups were mostly well balanced. However, in the WPRT group there were still significantly more patients with additional local recurrences and biochemical persistence after prostatectomy. There were no significant differences between both groups in BRFS (p = .97), MFS (p = .43) and NRFS (p = .43). After two years, BRFS, MFS and NRFS were 61%, 86% and 88% in the WPRT group and 57%, 90% and 82% in the HPRT group, respectively. Application of a boost to lymph node metastases, a higher RT dose to the lymphatic pathways (> 50 Gy EQD2α/β=1.5 Gy) and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significantly associated with longer BRFS in uni- and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this analysis presents the outcome of HPRT in nodal recurrent prostate cancer patients and shows that it can result in a similar oncologic outcome compared to WPRT. Nevertheless, patients in the WPRT may have been at a higher risk for progression due to some persistent imbalances between the groups. Therefore, further research should prospectively evaluate which subgroups of patients are suitable for HPRT and if HPRT leads to a clinically significant reduction in toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital,University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center , University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center , University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center , University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programm, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Lena Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Marco Vogel
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center , University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fink CA, Wegener D, Sauer LD, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Liermann J, Müller AC, Zips D, Debus J, Herfarth K, Koerber SA. Pelvic Irradiation for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: Long-Term Results of the Prospective PLATIN-4 and PLATIN-5 Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1011-1017. [PMID: 37863242 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After radical prostatectomy (RP), adjuvant or salvage radiation treatment in node-positive prostate cancer is offered to prevent systemic disease. Prospective long-term survival and toxicity data on patients with radiation for nodal disease are still scarce. This study evaluates safety and feasibility of salvage radiation therapy to the pelvic lymph nodes in node-positive prostate cancer after RP. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2009 and 2018, 78 patients with lymph node recurrence after RP (PLATIN-4 trial) or after RP and prostate bed radiation therapy (PLATIN-5 trial) were treated with salvage pelvic lymph node radiation therapy with boost to the involved nodes as field abutment (PLATIN-5) and boost to the prostate bed (PLATIN-4). Androgen deprivation therapy was started 2 months before radiation and recommended for 24 months. The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility of the intensity modulated radiation therapy-image guided radiation therapy technique based on the rate of treatment discontinuations and incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3+ toxicity. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS No treatment discontinuations were reported in either trial. Median overall survival was not reached in PLATIN-4 and was 117 months in PLATIN-5. Median progression-free survival was 66 months in PLATIN-4 and 39 months in PLATIN-5. Late grade 3+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in 4% of patients at 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Salvage radiation therapy to the prostate bed and pelvic lymphatic drainage combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy is a curative treatment option for patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP, with excellent in-field disease control. Pelvic lymph node radiation therapy as field abutment after prostate bed radiation therapy is feasible with long-term survival and no high-grade toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas D Sauer
- University of Heidelberg, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kishan AU, Siva S, Hofman MS, Nagarajah J, Kiess AP, Tran P, Calais J. The Potential Contribution of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Managing Oligometastatic Disease. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.123.266772. [PMID: 38360048 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
There is a growing understanding of the oligometastatic disease state, characterized by the presence of 5 or fewer lesions. Advanced molecular imaging techniques, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen PET, refines the ability to detect oligometastatic recurrences (oligorecurrences) early. These developments have led to the exploration of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligorecurrent disease as an alternative to or as a means of delaying systemic therapy. Unfortunately, MDT often does not provide a durable cure, and progression-particularly progression in multiple new areas-remains a concern. Simultaneously, developments in radioligand therapy (RLT) have led to studies showing overall survival benefits with α-emitting and β-emitting RLT in advanced, high-volume, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The success of RLT in late-stage disease suggests that earlier use in the disease spectrum may be impactful. Specifically, integration of RLT with MDT might reduce progression, including polymetastatic progression, in the setting of oligorecurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Ana P Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Phuoc Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klyuzhin IS, Chaussé G, Bloise I, Harsini S, Ferres JL, Uribe C, Rahmim A. PSMA-Hornet: Fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images. Med Phys 2024; 51:1203-1216. [PMID: 37544015 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging represents a valuable source of information reflecting disease stage, response rate, and treatment optimization options, particularly with PSMA radioligand therapy. Quantification of radiopharmaceutical uptake in healthy organs from PSMA images has the potential to minimize toxicity by extrapolation of the radiation dose delivery towards personalization of therapy. However, segmentation and quantification of uptake in organs requires labor-intensive organ delineations that are often not feasible in the clinic nor scalable for large clinical trials. PURPOSE In this work we develop and test the PSMA Healthy organ segmentation network (PSMA-Hornet), a fully-automated deep neural net for simultaneous segmentation of 14 healthy organs representing the normal biodistribution of [18 F]DCFPyL on PET/CT images. We also propose a modified U-net architecture, a self-supervised pre-training method for PET/CT images, a multi-target Dice loss, and multi-target batch balancing to effectively train PSMA-Hornet and similar networks. METHODS The study used manually-segmented [18 F]DCFPyL PET/CT images from 100 subjects, and 526 similar images without segmentations. The unsegmented images were used for self-supervised model pretraining. For supervised training, Monte-Carlo cross-validation was used to evaluate the network performance, with 85 subjects in each trial reserved for model training, 5 for validation, and 10 for testing. Image segmentation and quantification metrics were evaluated on the test folds with respect to manual segmentations by a nuclear medicine physician, and compared to inter-rater agreement. The model's segmentation performance was also evaluated on a separate set of 19 images with high tumor load. RESULTS With our best model, the lowest mean Dice coefficient on the test set was 0.826 for the sublingual gland, and the highest was 0.964 for liver. The highest mean error in tracer uptake quantification was 13.9% in the sublingual gland. Self-supervised pretraining improved training convergence, train-to-test generalization, and segmentation quality. In addition, we found that a multi-target network produced significantly higher segmentation accuracy than single-organ networks. CONCLUSIONS The developed network can be used to automatically obtain high-quality organ segmentations for PSMA image analysis tasks. It can be used to reproducibly extract imaging data, and holds promise for clinical applications such as personalized radiation dosimetry and improved radioligand therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan S Klyuzhin
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- AI for Health, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA
- Deparment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Guillaume Chaussé
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ingrid Bloise
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sara Harsini
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Carlos Uribe
- Deparment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Deparment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Deparment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simunic M, Joshi JT, Merkens H, Colpo N, Kuo HT, Lum JJ, Bénard F. PSMA imaging as a non-invasive tool to monitor inducible gene expression in vivo. EJNMMI Res 2024; 14:3. [PMID: 38177950 PMCID: PMC10767034 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01063-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Simunic
- Department of Hematology, Clinic for Internal Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre, Spinciceva 1, 21000, Split, Croatia
| | - Jay T Joshi
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Research Institute, 2410 Lee Avenue, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada
| | - Helen Merkens
- BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Nadine Colpo
- BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Hsiou-Ting Kuo
- BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Julian J Lum
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Research Institute, 2410 Lee Avenue, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada
| | - François Bénard
- BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zapatero A, Conde Moreno AJ, Barrado Los Arcos M, Aldave D. Node Oligorecurrence in Prostate Cancer: A Challenge. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4159. [PMID: 37627187 PMCID: PMC10453311 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Within the oligometastatic state, oligorecurrent lymph node disease in prostate cancer represents an interesting clinical entity characterized by a relatively indolent biology that makes it unique: it can be treated radically, and its treatment is usually associated with a long period of control and excellent survival. Additionally, it is an emergent situation that we are facing more frequently mainly due to (a) the incorporation into clinical practice of the PSMA-PET that provides strikingly increased superior images in comparison to conventional imaging, with higher sensitivity and specificity; (b) the higher detection rates of bone and node disease with extremely low levels of PSA; and (c) the availability of high-precision technology in radiotherapy treatments with the incorporation of stereotaxic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotaxic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) technology that allows the safe administration of high doses of radiation in a very limited number of fractions with low toxicity and excellent tolerance. This approach of new image-guided patient management is compelling for doctors and patients since it can potentially contribute to improving the clinical outcome. In this work, we discuss the available evidence, areas of debate, and potential future directions concerning the utilization of new imaging-guided SBRT for the treatment of nodal recurrence in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almudena Zapatero
- Health Research Institute, University Hospital La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Diego Aldave
- University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu Y, Klyuzhin I, Harsini S, Ortiz A, Zhang S, Bénard F, Dodhia R, Uribe CF, Rahmim A, Lavista Ferres J. Automatic segmentation of prostate cancer metastases in PSMA PET/CT images using deep neural networks with weighted batch-wise dice loss. Comput Biol Med 2023; 158:106882. [PMID: 37037147 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Automatic and accurate segmentation of lesions in images of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has the potential to enable personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy and advanced treatment response monitoring. The aim of this study is to develop a convolutional neural networks-based framework for fully-automated detection and segmentation of metastatic prostate cancer lesions in whole-body PET/CT images. METHODS 525 whole-body PET/CT images of patients with metastatic prostate cancer were available for the study, acquired with the [18F]DCFPyL radiotracer that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). U-Net (1)-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained to identify lesions on paired axial PET/CT slices. Baseline models were trained using batch-wise dice loss, as well as the proposed weighted batch-wise dice loss (wDice), and the lesion detection performance was quantified, with a particular emphasis on lesion size, intensity, and location. We used 418 images for model training, 30 for model validation, and 77 for model testing. In addition, we allowed our model to take n = 0,2, …, 12 neighboring axial slices to examine how incorporating greater amounts of 3D context influences model performance. We selected the optimal number of neighboring axial slices that maximized the detection rate on the 30 validation images, and trained five neural networks with different architectures. RESULTS Model performance was evaluated using the detection rate, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and sensitivity. We found that the proposed wDice loss significantly improved the lesion detection rate, lesion-wise DSC and lesion-wise sensitivity compared to the baseline, with corresponding average increases of 0.07 (p-value = 0.01), 0.03 (p-value = 0.01) and 0.04 (p-value = 0.01), respectively. The inclusion of the first two neighboring axial slices in the input likewise increased the detection rate by 0.17, lesion-wise DSC by 0.05, and lesion-wise mean sensitivity by 0.16. However, there was a minimal effect from including more distant neighboring slices. We ultimately chose to use a number of neighboring slices equal to 2 and the wDice loss function to train our final model. To evaluate the model's performance, we trained three models using identical hyperparameters on three different data splits. The results showed that, on average, the model was able to detect 80% of all testing lesions, with a detection rate of 93% for lesions with maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) greater than 5.0. In addition, the average median lesion-wise DSC was 0.51 and 0.60 for all the lesions and lesions with SUVmax>5.0, respectively, on the testing set. Four additional neural networks with different architectures were trained, and they both yielded stronger performance of segmenting lesions whose SUVmax>5.0 compared to the rest of lesions. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that prostate cancer metastases in PSMA PET/CT images can be detected and segmented using CNNs. The segmentation performance strongly depends on the intensity, size, and the location of lesions, and can be improved by using specialized loss functions. Specifically, the models performed best in detection of lesions with SUVmax>5.0. Another challenge was to accurately segment lesions close to the bladder. Future work will focus on improving the detection of lesions with lower SUV values by designing custom loss functions that take into account the lesion intensity, using additional data augmentation techniques, and reducing the number of false lesions by developing methods to better separate signal from noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixi Xu
- Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA.
| | - Ivan Klyuzhin
- Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carlos F Uribe
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ma TM, Czernin J, Felix C, Alano R, Wilhalme H, Valle L, Steinberg ML, Dahlbom M, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Cao M, Calais J, Kishan AU. LUNAR: a randomized Phase 2 study of 177 Lutetium-PSMA Neoadjuvant to Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer (clinical trial protocol). BJU Int 2023. [PMID: 36797449 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of 177 Lu-PNT2002, a novel radiolabelled small molecule that binds with high affinity to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to all sites of metastasis, vs SBRT alone, in men with oligorecurrent metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS The 177 Lutetium-PSMA Neoadjuvant to Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer (LUNAR) trial is an open-label, randomized, stratified, two-arm, single-centre, Phase 2 trial to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant 177 Lu-PNT2002 plus SBRT vs SBRT alone in men with oligorecurrent mHSPC. Key eligibility criteria include one to five lesions identified on a PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan centrally reviewed by a board-certified nuclear medicine physician. Key exclusion criteria include castrate-resistant disease, de novo oligometastatic disease and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 6 months of trial enrolment. The trial aims to enrol 100 patients who will be centrally randomized to one of the two treatment arms, in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the control arm receive SBRT to all sites of disease. Patients in the experimental arm receive two cycles of neoadjuvant 177 Lu-PNT2002 (6.8 GBq) 6-8 weeks apart, followed by an interval PSMA PET/CT in 4-6 weeks and dose-adapted SBRT to all sites of disease 1-2 weeks later. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are radiographic and prostate-specific antigen-based progression, acute and late physician-scored toxicity, patient-reported quality of life, ADT-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, locoregional control, and duration of response. Enrolment in the study commenced in September 2022. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The addition of 177 Lu-PNT2002 to metastasis-directed therapy alone may potentially further forestall disease progression. The results of this Phase 2 trial will determine, for the first time in a randomized fashion, the added benefit of 177 Lu-PNT2002 to SBRT in patients with oligorecurrent mHSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Graduate Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Carol Felix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rejah Alano
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Holly Wilhalme
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luca Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Magnus Dahlbom
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Graduate Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Graduate Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoshida S, Takahara T, Arita Y, Toda K, Kimura K, Fujiwara M, Tanaka H, Yokoyama M, Matsuoka Y, Yoshimura R, Fujii Y. Patterns of recurrence in genuine and induced oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with progressive site-directed therapy. Int J Urol 2023; 30:204-210. [PMID: 36314128 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe oncological outcomes after progressive site-directed therapy (PSDT) in genuine and induced oligometasatic (OM)-castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS Thirty-seven patients with OM-CRPC treated with PSDT were retrospectively analyzed, and oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns on whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI) were evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-two (59%) were classified as genuine OM-CRPC and 15 (41%) as induced OM-CRPC. A 50% decline in PSA after PSDT was observed in 21 (95%) genuine OM-CRPCs and 7 (47%) induced OM-CRPCs (p = 0.0005). At a median observation period of 7.3 months, median PSA progression-free survival were 10.9 months in the genuine OM-CRPCs and 4.8 months in the induced OM-CRPCs (p = 0.015). Among the patients who developed PSA progression after PSDT, 11 of 15 in the genuine OM-CRPCs (73%) and 11 of 14 in the induced OM-CRPCs (79%) underwent WB-DWI at PSA progression. The median numbers of newly detected metastases were 2 (range: 1-5) in the genuine OM-CRPCs and 4 (range: 1-40) in the induced OM-CRPCs (p = 0.049). Only one new metastasis appeared in 5 patients from the genuine OM-CRPCs (46%) and 1 from the induced OM-CRPCs (9.1%, p = 0.048). In 7 of 9 patients from the genuine OM-CRPCs (78%) and 7 of 8 patients from the induced OM-CRPCs (88%) who had bone metastases alone, the newly detected metastasis limited to the bone. CONCLUSIONS Genuine OM-CRPC had better oncological outcomes after PSDT than induced OM-CRPC, and the number of lesions detected at recurrence was limited. Induced OM-CRPC might be a disseminated condition with micrometastases at OM diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Takahara
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tokai University School of Engineering, Kanagawa, Japan.,Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Center, Yaesu Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Arita
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuma Toda
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichiro Kimura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiro Fujiwara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minato Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoh Matsuoka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li M, Fan Y, Trapp C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Ma J, Buchner A, Lu S, Xu B, Stief C, Wang X, Zhou C, Belka C, Rogowski P. Elective nodal radiotherapy with a gapless radiation field junction for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 39:100571. [PMID: 36605290 PMCID: PMC9807861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of subsequent elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) for nodal recurrences after previous radiotherapy with a defined planning approach for a gapless radiation field junction. Methods Patients with 1) previous radiotherapy of prostate or prostatic fossa and subsequent pelvic ENRT or 2) previous pelvic radiotherapy and subsequent ENRT to paraaortic lymph nodes (LN) and gapless junction of both radiation fields were analyzed. The cumulative maximum dose (Dmax-cum) and the maximum cumulative dose in 1 cc (D1cc-cum) were estimated. Absolute toxicity and the toxicity exceeding baseline were evaluated. Results Twenty-two patients with PSMA-PET/CT-staged nodal oligorecurrence after prior radiotherapy were treated with pelvic (14 patients) or paraaortic ENRT (9 patients). One patient was treated sequentially at both locations. Median time between first and second RT was 20.2 months. Median doses to the lymphatic pathways and to PET-positive LN were 47.5 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively. The planning constraint of an estimated Dmax-cum ≤ 95 Gy and of D1cc-cum < 90 Gy were achieved in 23/23 cases and 22/23 cases, respectively. Median follow-up was 33.5 months. There was no additional acute or late toxicity ≥ grade 3. Worst acute toxicity exceeding baseline was grade 1 in 68.2% and grade 2 in 22.7% of patients. Worst late toxicity exceeding baseline was grade 1 in 31.8% and grade 2 in 18.2% of patients. Conclusion ENRT for nodal recurrences after a previous radiotherapy with gapless junction of radiation fields seems to be feasible, applying the dose constraints Dmax-cum ≤ 95 Gy and D1cc-cum < 90 Gy without grade 3 acute or late toxicities exceeding baseline.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADT, androgen deprivation therapy
- CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events
- CTV, clinical target volume
- D1cc-cum, maximum cumulative dose in 1 cc
- Dmax-cum, cumulative maximum dose
- ENRT
- ENRT, elective nodal radiotherapy
- EQD2, equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions
- Gapless radiation field junction
- IGRT, image-guided radiotherapy
- IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- LN, lymph nodes
- Nodal oligorecurrence
- OAR, organs at risk
- PSA, prostate-specific antigen
- PSMA-PET/CT
- PSMA-PET/CT, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- RT, radiotherapy
- Reirradiation
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy
- SIB, simultaneous integrated boost
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
|
15
|
Zamagni A, Bonetti M, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Galietta E, Strigari L, Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Cammelli S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic radiotherapy of nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:845-863. [PMID: 35980556 PMCID: PMC9637632 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastases-directed therapies can delay the initiation or switch of systemic treatments and allow local control (LC) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with lymph nodes (LN) oligometastases. We performed a systematic review on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS were selected. Data on ADT-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were also collected from the selected studies. Fifteen studies were eligible (414 patients), 14 of them were retrospective analyses. A high heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient selection and treatment. In one study SBRT was delivered as a single 20 Gy fraction, while in the others the median total dose ranged between 24 and 40 Gy delivered in 3-6 fractions. LC and PFS were reported in 15 and 12 papers, respectively. LC was reported as a crude percentage in 13 studies, with 100% rate in seven and 63.2-98.0% in six reports. Five studies reported actuarial LC (2-year LC: 70.0-100%). PFS was reported as a crude rate in 11 studies (range 27.3-68.8%). Actuarial 2-year PFS was reported in four studies (range 30.0-50.0%). SBRT tolerability was excellent, with only two patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and two patients with grade 3 late toxicity. SBRT for LN oligorecurrences from PCa in safe and provides optimal LC. However, the long-term effect on PFS and OS is still unclear as well as which patients are the best candidate for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Zamagni
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mattia Bonetti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Erika Galietta
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bogdanova NV, Radmanesh H, Ramachandran D, Knoechelmann AC, Christiansen H, Derlin T, von Klot CAJ, Merten R, Henkenberens C. The Prognostic Value of Liquid Biopsies for Benefit of Salvage Radiotherapy in Relapsed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174095. [PMID: 36077632 PMCID: PMC9454496 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Around 30% of patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer relapse will benefit from local PET/CT-guided ablative radiotherapy (RT) with improved progression-free and ADT (Androgene Deprivation Therapy)-free survivals. Therefore, there is an urgent need for predictive testing for therapeutic benefits prior to initiation. Various tests have already been established on tumor specimens for the prediction of prostate cancer’s behavior or therapy outcome. However, in imaging-proven relapse tumor tissue from the local recurrence or metastases is often not available. Hence, there is a need for a liquid biopsy-based testing. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of CTCs- associated mRNA and blood-derived RNA for the benefit of PSMA PET-guided salvage RT in oligometastatic prostate cancer relapses. Significant correlations were found between the relative transcript levels of several investigated genes and clinicopathological parameters. Furthermore, distinct “transcriptional signatures” were found in patients with temporary and long-term benefits from RT. Abstract To assess the prognostic value of “liquid biopsies” for the benefit of salvage RT in oligometastatic prostate cancer relapse, we enrolled 44 patients in the study between the years 2016 and 2020. All the patients were diagnosed as having an oligometastatic prostate cancer relapse on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET-CT and underwent irradiation at the Department of Radiotherapy at the Hannover Medical School. Tumor cells and total RNA, enriched from the liquid biopsies of patients, were processed for the subsequent quantification analysis of relative transcript levels in real-time PCR. In total, 54 gene transcripts known or suggested to be associated with prostate cancer or treatment outcome were prioritized for analysis. We found significant correlations between the relative transcript levels of several investigated genes and the Gleason score, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) value, or UICC stage (tumor node metastasis -TNM classification of malignant tumors from Union for International Cancer Control). Furthermore, a significant association of MTCO2, FOXM1, SREBF1, HOXB7, FDXR, and MTRNR transcript profiles was found with a temporary and/or long-term benefit from RT. Further studies on larger patients cohorts are necessary to prove our preliminary findings for establishing liquid biopsy tests as a predictive examination method prior to salvage RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V. Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Hoda Radmanesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Dhanya Ramachandran
- Gynecology Research Unit, Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Roland Merten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)-511-532-3590
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pêtre A, Quivrin M, Briot N, Boustani J, Martin E, Bessieres I, Cochet A, Créhange G. Salvage involved-field and extended-field radiotherapy in PET-positive nodal recurrent prostate cancer: outcomes and patterns of failure. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101040. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
18
|
Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3. [PMID: 35440642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is highly sensitive in identifying disease recurrence in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after primary therapy and is rapidly being adopted in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the documented impact of PSMA-PET on patient management and outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and intermediate and long-term outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS MBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies reporting on the impact of PSMA-PET on the management and outcomes of patients with BCR after definitive primary therapy. Outcome measures assessed included biochemical response to therapy after PET and BCR-free survival (BRFS). The proportions of patients in whom management changed, and the proportion of patients in whom each outcome measure was obtained were tabulated and pooled into meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies with 3680 men reported change in management after PSMA-PET and 27 studies with 2639 men reported on at least one outcome measure and had follow-up data. PSMA-PET was positive in 2508/3680 (68.2%). The pooled proportion of change in management after PSMA-PET was 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0-63.9%). A decrease in serum PSA was documented in 72.4% of men (95% CI, 63.4-81.5%), and complete biochemical response in 23.3% (95% CI, 14.6-32.0%) at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 11 months, respectively. The pooled BRFS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 49.1-71.4%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION In conclusion, PSMA PET is positive in more than 2/3 of men with BCR and impacts patient management in more than half of the men. BRFS after PET-directed management is 60% at a median of 20 months after salvage therapy, and complete biochemical response may be achieved in up to a quarter of men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pozdnyakov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Emerging Role of Next-Generation Imaging in Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:33-42. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01156-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
20
|
Toxicity and Efficacy of Local Ablative, Image-guided Radiotherapy in Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Targeted Positron Emission Tomography-staged, Castration-sensitive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The OLI-P Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:44-51. [PMID: 34785189 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local ablative radiotherapy (aRT) of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is very promising and has become a focus of current clinical research. OBJECTIVE We hypothesize that aRT is safe and effective in gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)-staged oligometastatic PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A nonrandomized, prospective, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial recruited patients with oligometastatic PCa (five or fewer lymph node or osseous metastases) after local curative therapy, without significant comorbidity and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), at two German centers from 2014 to 2018. INTERVENTION All PSMA-PET-positive metastases were treated with aRT. No systemic therapy was initiated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity (grade ≥2) 24 mo after aRT. A one-sided single-sample test of proportions was planned to test whether the endpoint occurs in <15% of the patients. Key secondary endpoints were time to progression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and time to ADT, which were associated with potential prognostic factors by Cox regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 72 patients, 63 received aRT (13% dropout rate). The median follow-up was 37.2 mo. No treatment-related grade ≥2 toxicity was observed 2 yr after treatment. The median time to PSA progression and time to ADT were 13.2 and 20.6 mo, respectively. Of the patients, 21.4% were free of PSA progression after 3 yr. CONCLUSIONS It was observed that aRT is safe, and midterm PSA progression and ADT-free time were achieved in one of five patients. Randomized clinical trials are indicated to further evaluate the option of delaying ADT in selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY In this clinical trial, 63 patients with up to five metastases of prostate cancer without androgen deprivation therapy were included. We showed that local ablative radiotherapy is safe and that one in five patients had no recurrent prostate-specific antigen value after 3 yr. Local ablative radiotherapy might be an option to avoid systemic therapy in selected patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cozzi S, Botti A, Timon G, Blandino G, Najafi M, Manicone M, Bardoscia L, Ruggieri MP, Ciammella P, Iotti C. Prognostic factors, efficacy, and toxicity of involved-node stereotactic body radiation therapy for lymph node oligorecurrent prostate cancer : An investigation of 117 pelvic lymph nodes. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:700-709. [PMID: 34757443 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01871-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal radiotherapy regimen is not yet defined in the setting of oligorecurrent prostate cancer (oligorPC). There is evidence of high variability in treatment protocols among different centers worldwide, and no international consensus guidelines on treatment volumes, radiation schedules, and techniques. The purpose of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of involved-pelvic-node stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligorPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with pelvic node oligorPC following primary surgery, radical radiotherapy, or salvage radiotherapy for biochemical or local relapse of prostate cancer who underwent involved-node SBRT with biological effective dose (BED) > 100 Gy, with or without concurrent and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), were retrospectively evaluated. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS), possible prognostic factors, and toxicity outcomes were investigated. RESULTS From November 2012 to December 2019, 74 patients fitted the selection criteria. A total of 117 lesions were treated. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 6-89). Concurrent ADT was administered in 58.1% of patients. The 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year DPFS was 77%, 37%, and 19%, respectively; the 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year OS was 98%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. The presence of a single target lesion was associated with a statistically significant impact on OS. No in-field recurrence occurred. Patients who reached early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (< 3 months after SBRT) had a lower 3‑year survival (p = 0.004). The value of PSA nadir after SBRT and the time between primary treatment and SBRT had an impact on bPFS. Concomitant ADT was associated with improved DPFS. No acute or early late (> 6 months) genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events of any grade were reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for oligorPC, with a 100% local control rate in our series. It is not possible to clearly assess the opportunity to postpone ADT prescription in patients with two or more nodal metastases. The number of secondary lesions, time-to-nadir PSA, PSA nadir value, and the time interval between primary treatment and SBRT were identified as prognostic factors. Future prospective randomized studies are desirable to better understand the still open questions regarding the oligorecurrent prostate cancer state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Timon
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Iran
| | - Moana Manicone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healtcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
De Meerleer G, Berghen C, Briganti A, Vulsteke C, Murray J, Joniau S, Leliveld AM, Cozzarini C, Decaestecker K, Rans K, Fonteyne V, De Hertogh O, Bossi A. Elective nodal radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e348-e357. [PMID: 34339655 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In patients with prostate cancer who have a high risk of pelvic nodal disease, the use of elective whole pelvis radiotherapy is still controversial. Two large, randomised, controlled trials (RTOG 9413 and GETUG-01) did not show a benefit of elective whole pelvis radiotherapy over prostate-only radiotherapy. In 2020, the POP-RT trial established the role of elective whole pelvis radiotherapy in patients who have more than a 35% risk of lymph node invasion (known as the Roach formula). POP-RT stressed the importance of patient selection. In patients with cN1 (clinically node positive) disease or pN1 (pathologically node positive) disease, the addition of whole pelvis radiotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy significantly improved survival compared with androgen deprivation therapy alone, as shown in large, retrospective studies. This patient population might increase in the future because use of the more sensitive prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT will become the standard staging procedure. Additionally, the SPORTT trial suggested a benefit of whole pelvis radiotherapy in biochemical recurrence-free survival in the salvage setting. A correct definition of the upper field border, which should include the bifurcation of the abdominal aorta, is key in the use of pelvic radiotherapy. As a result of using modern radiotherapy technology, severe late urinary and intestinal toxic effects are rare and do not seem to increase compared with prostate-only radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Christof Vulsteke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Julia Murray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne M Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Kato Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy and Experimental Cancer Research, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Verviers, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease was originally defined by Hellman and Weichselbaum as an intermediate-state existing between locally confined and widely disseminated malignancy, whose natural history could be positively impacted with systemic and importantly local therapies such as radiation. Currently oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is defined clinically by lesion enumeration and several subgroups exist: de novo (synchronous) oligometastatic disease present at initial diagnosis, oligorecurrent (metachronous) disease arising after definitive therapy to the prostate, and oligoprogressive disease where isolated lesions progress in a background of otherwise stable disease. In this review we highlight current knowledge and the potential future of local therapies, such as radiation to the primary prostate and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), in the disease management of OPCa for all 3 subgroups. In addition, we examine more recent studies classifying the patterns of failure and natural history of OPCa following treatment with local therapies. Finally, while current clinical definitions of OPCa dominate, we introduce studies attempting to elucidate a more biological definition of OPCa to allow for improved selection of patients to treat with local therapies and to better inform precision combination approaches with systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Pirasteh A, Lovrec P, Pedrosa I. Imaging and its Impact on Defining the Oligometastatic State. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:186-199. [PMID: 34090645 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Successful treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is facilitated through timely detection and localization of disease, both at the time of initial diagnosis (synchronous OMD) and following the initial therapy (metachronous OMD). Hence, imaging plays an indispensable role in management of patients with OMD. However, the challenges and complexities of OMD management are also reflected in the imaging of this entity. While innovations and advances in imaging technology have made a tremendous impact in disease detection and management, there remain substantial and unaddressed challenges for earlier and more accurate establishment of OMD state. This review will provide an overview of the available imaging modalities and their inherent strengths and weaknesses, with a focus on their role and potential in detection and evaluation of OMD in different organ systems. Furthermore, we will review the role of imaging in evaluation of OMD for malignancies of various primary organs, such as the lung, prostate, colon/rectum, breast, kidney, as well as neuroendocrine tumors and gynecologic malignancies. We aim to provide a practical overview about the utilization of imaging for clinicians who play a role in the care of those with, or at risk for OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Pirasteh
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Petra Lovrec
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Departments of Radiology, Urology, and Advanced Imaging Research Center. University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ahmed ME, Phillips RM, Sharma V, Davis BJ, Karnes RJ. Oligometastatic prostatic cancer recurrence: role of salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) and radiation therapy-stereotactic body radiation therapy (RT-SBRT). Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:199-205. [PMID: 33742974 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Metastases directed therapy (MDT) is an increasingly utilized modality in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) recurrence. The purpose of our review is to discuss the recent literature on the safety and oncologic outcomes of this treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS Metastases directed therapy, in particular, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and salvage lymph node dissection (sLND), has shown promising efficacy in patients with OMPC. Many case series report favorable outcomes with MDT as compared to hormonal deprivation therapy alone or surveillance. Of the few case series investigating the use of MDT as part of a multimodality approach in castrate-resistant OMPC, more favorable outcomes in comparison to the use of systemic treatment alone are reported. SUMMARY With the recent advances in imaging techniques, particularly molecular imaging, management of OMPC has progressed rapidly in the last few years. The feasibility and benefits of MDT in OMPC have been demonstrated in prospective and retrospective series. Further prospective studies investigating the role of MDT to define optimal patient subgroups and management strategies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan M Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:575-580. [PMID: 33914101 PMCID: PMC8219546 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.
Collapse
|
27
|
Radiotherapy in the Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: What Is the Standard of Care? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:87-93. [PMID: 31977391 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Systemic therapy has historically been the backbone of treatment for patients with metastatic disease. However, recent evidence suggests metastasis-directed therapy in those with oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) may improve progression-free and overall survival. Within prostate cancer-specific cohorts, metastasis-directed therapy also appears to delay the time to initiation of androgen deprivation therapy while also generally being associated with a mild toxicity profile and has thus garnered interest as a means to delay systemic therapy. Here we review the evidence surrounding the use of radiation therapy to metastatic sites in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
28
|
Oligometastatic and Oligoprogression Disease and Local Therapies in Prostate Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:137-143. [PMID: 32205538 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of metastatic disease is rapidly advancing, with recent evidence supporting an oligometastatic state currently defined by patients having a limited (typically ≤5) number of metastatic deposits. The optimal management of these patients is also shifting toward increased integration of local therapies, with emerging evidence suggesting metastasis-directed therapy can improve overall survival. Additionally, the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy within castration-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer cohorts appears to forestall the need to initiate systemic therapy, which has unfavorable side effect profiles, such as androgen deprivation therapy, while itself being associated with little toxicity. We review the literature surrounding the use of metastasis-directed therapy in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer by reviewing the evidence for its use within 3 subgroups: de novo synchronous, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
|
29
|
Matushita CS, da Silva AMM, Schuck PN, Bardisserotto M, Piant DB, Pereira JL, Cerci JJ, Coura-Filho GB, Esteves FP, Amorim BJ, Gomes GV, Brito AET, Bernardo WM, Mundstock E, Fanti S, Macedo B, Roman DH, Tem-Pass CS, Hochhegger B. 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:705-729. [PMID: 33566470 PMCID: PMC8321470 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina S Matushita
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Ana M Marques da Silva
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.,Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Phelipi N Schuck
- Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | - Diego B Piant
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | | | - George B Coura-Filho
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto do Câncer de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Barbara J Amorim
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | - Wanderley M Bernardo
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Mundstock
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine-DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruna Macedo
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Diego H Roman
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Cinthia Scatolin Tem-Pass
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Henkenberens C, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Giordano FA, Sarria GR, Schmeel LC, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of PSMA PET-Guided Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:664225. [PMID: 33954116 PMCID: PMC8089391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) to all PSMA ligand positive metastases for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods A total of 42 patients developed oligometastatic mCRPC and received PSMA PET-guided RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and second-line systemic treatment free survival (SST-FS). Results A total of 141 PSMA ligand-positive metastases were irradiated. The median follow-up time was 39.0 months (12-58 months). During the follow-up five out of 42 (11.9%) patients died of progressive mPCa. Five out of 42 (11.9%) patients showed no biochemical responses and presented with a PSA level ≥10% of the baseline PSA at first PSA level measurement after RT and were classified as non-responders. The median PSA level before RT was 4.79 ng/mL (range, 0.4-46.1), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range, <0.07-32.8; p=0.002). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after PSMA ligand-based RT was 2.75 ng/mL (range, 0.27-53.0; p=0.24) and was not significantly different (p=0.29) from the median PSA level (4.79 ng/mL, range, 0.4-46.1) before the PSMA ligand-based RT. The median bPFS was 12.0 months after PSMA ligand PET-based RT (95% CI, 11.2-15.8) and the median SST-FS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.5). Conclusion In well-informed and closely followed-up patients, PSMA PET-guided RT represents a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic mCRPC to delay further systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rogowski P, Roach M, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Shi R, Buchner A, Stief C, Belka C, Li M. Radiotherapy of oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:50. [PMID: 33750437 PMCID: PMC7941976 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to improved imaging sensitivity, the term "oligometastatic" prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients. METHODS A systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence. FINDINGS Evidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called "synchronous" versus "metachronous" oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS To our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H 1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708 USA
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rowe LS, Harmon S, Horn A, Shankavaram U, Roy S, Ning H, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Citrin DE, Choyke P, Turkbey B. Pattern of failure in prostate cancer previously treated with radical prostatectomy and post-operative radiotherapy: a secondary analysis of two prospective studies using novel molecular imaging techniques. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:32. [PMID: 33568190 PMCID: PMC7874470 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01733-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate Membrane Specific Antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have shown high accuracy in identifying recurrent lesions after definitive treatment in prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to outline patterns of failure in a group of post-prostatectomy patients who received adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy (PORT) and subsequently experienced biochemical recurrence, using 18F-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI. METHODS PCa patients with biochemical failure post-prostatectomy, and no evident site of recurrence on conventional imaging, were enrolled on two prospective trials of first and second generation 18F-PSMA PET agents (18F-DCFBC and 18F-DCFPyL) in combination with MRI between October 2014 and December 2018. The primary aim of our study is to characterize these lesions with respect to their location relative to previous PORT field and received dose. RESULTS A total of 34 participants underwent 18F-PSMA PET imaging for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PORT, with 32/34 found to have 18F-PSMA avid lesions. On 18F-PSMA, 17/32 patients (53.1%) had metastatic disease, 8/32 (25.0%) patients had locoregional recurrences, and 7/32 (21.9%) had local failure in the prostate fossa. On further exploration, we noted 6/7 (86%) of prostate fossa recurrences were in-field and were encompassed by 100% isodose lines, receiving 64.8-72 Gy. One patient had marginal failure encompassed by the 49 Gy isodose. CONCLUSIONS 18F-PSMA PET imaging demonstrates promise in identifying occult PCa recurrence after PORT. Although distant recurrence was the predominant pattern of failure, in-field recurrence was noted in approximately 1/5th of patients. This should be considered in tailoring radiotherapy practice after prostatectomy. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02190279 and NCT03181867. Registered July 12, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02190279 and June 8 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03181867 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay S. Rowe
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B2-3500, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2 Canada
| | - Stephanie Harmon
- Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Adam Horn
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 8901 Rockville Pike USA
| | - Uma Shankavaram
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room 1002, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B2-3500, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Holly Ning
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B2-3500, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Deborah E. Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B2-3500, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Peter Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive Magnuson Clinical Center, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Carrasquilla M, Creswell ML, Pepin AN, Wang E, Forsthoefel M, McGunigal M, Bullock E, Lei S, Collins BT, Lischalk JW, Esposito G, Aghdam N, Kumar D, Suy S, Leger P, Hankins RA, Dawson NA, Collins SP. Rationale for Involved Field Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy-Enhanced Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nodal Oligo-Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:606260. [PMID: 33537236 PMCID: PMC7848164 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is a common clinical scenario that is likely to increase significantly with the widespread adoption of novel positron emission tomography (PET) agents. Despite increasing evidence that localized therapy is disease modifying, most men with lymph node recurrent prostate cancer receive only systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For men who receive localized therapy the intent is often to delay receipt of systemic therapy. Little evidence exists on the optimal combination of local and systemic therapy in this patient population. In this hypothesis generating review, we will outline the rationale and propose a framework for combining involved field SBRT with risk adapted intermittent ADT for hormone sensitive nodal recurrent prostate cancer. In patients with a limited number of nodal metastases, involved field stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may have a role in eliminating castrate-resistant clones and possibly prolonging the response to intermittent ADT. We hypothesize that in a small percentage of patients, such a treatment approach may lead to long term remission or cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | - Abigail N. Pepin
- George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Edina Wang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mary McGunigal
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Bullock
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Giuseppe Esposito
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ryan A. Hankins
- Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, Radwan N, Lim SJ, Antonarakis ES, Rowe SP, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Deville C, Greco SC, Wang H, Denmeade SR, Paller CJ, Dipasquale S, DeWeese TL, Song DY, Wang H, Carducci MA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Dicker AP, Eisenberger MA, Alizadeh AA, Diehn M, Tran PT. Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:650-659. [PMID: 32215577 PMCID: PMC7225913 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 797] [Impact Index Per Article: 199.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Question How effectively does stereotactic ablative radiotherapy prevent progression of disease compared with observation in men with recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with 1 to 3 metastases? Findings In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 54 men, progression of disease at 6 months occurred in 7 of 36 participants (19%) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and in 11 of 18 participants (61%) undergoing observation, a statistically significant difference. Meaning Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is a promising treatment approach for men with recurrent hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer who wish to delay initiation of androgen deprivation therapy. Importance Complete metastatic ablation of oligometastatic prostate cancer may provide an alternative to early initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Objective To determine if stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) improves oncologic outcomes in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants The Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (ORIOLE) phase 2 randomized study accrued participants from 3 US radiation treatment facilities affiliated with a university hospital from May 2016 to March 2018 with a data cutoff date of May 20, 2019, for analysis. Of 80 men screened, 54 men with recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and 1 to 3 metastases detectable by conventional imaging who had not received ADT within 6 months of enrollment or 3 or more years total were randomized. Interventions Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive SABR or observation. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was progression at 6 months by prostate-specific antigen level increase, progression detected by conventional imaging, symptomatic progression, ADT initiation for any reason, or death. Predefined secondary outcomes were toxic effects of SABR, local control at 6 months with SABR, progression-free survival, Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)–measured quality of life, and concordance between conventional imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted positron emission tomography in the identification of metastatic disease. Results In the 54 men randomized, the median (range) age was 68 (61-70) years for patients allocated to SABR and 68 (64-76) years for those allocated to observation. Progression at 6 months occurred in 7 of 36 patients (19%) receiving SABR and 11 of 18 patients (61%) undergoing observation (P = .005). Treatment with SABR improved median progression-free survival (not reached vs 5.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.81; P = .002). Total consolidation of PSMA radiotracer-avid disease decreased the risk of new lesions at 6 months (16% vs 63%; P = .006). No toxic effects of grade 3 or greater were observed. T-cell receptor sequencing identified significant increased clonotypic expansion following SABR and correlation between baseline clonality and progression with SABR only (0.082085 vs 0.026051; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with SABR for oligometastatic prostate cancer improved outcomes and was enhanced by total consolidation of disease identified by PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography. SABR induced a systemic immune response, and baseline immune phenotype and tumor mutation status may predict the benefit from SABR. These results underline the importance of prospective randomized investigation of the oligometastatic state with integrated imaging and biological correlates. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02680587
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William Yue Shi
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Matthew Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Noura Radwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Su Jin Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven P Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E Ross
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Gorin
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen C Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hailun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samuel R Denmeade
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Channing J Paller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shirl Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theodore L DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Carducci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin G Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mario A Eisenberger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ash A Alizadeh
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ke Z, Xie A, Chen J, Zou Z, Shen L, Dai Y, Zou D. Naturally available hypericin undergoes electron transfer for type I photodynamic and photothermal synergistic therapy. Biomater Sci 2021; 8:2481-2487. [PMID: 32202278 DOI: 10.1039/d0bm00021c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Naturally available compounds with bioactivity are potential candidates for cancer treatment. In this paper, we isolated hypericin (HC) from Hypericum sinense L. and investigated its antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo. The nanoparticles (NPs) of HC were prepared by a nanoprecipitation process with 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-ethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (DSPE-PEG-2000). With light irradiation, HC NPs not only undergo efficient electron transfer to generate the superoxide radical (O2-˙) and the hydroxyl radical (OH˙) as well as energy transfer producing singlet oxygen (1O2) for photodynamic therapy (PDT), but also non-radiative decay to produce heat for photothermal therapy (PTT) with a photothermal conversion efficiency of 29.3%. This synergistic therapy, therefore, largely boosts the phototherapy efficacy of HC NPs on human cervical cancer cells (HeLa), guaranteeing a low half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of only 5.6 μg mL-1. Furthermore, in vivo studies suggest that HC NPs are capable of inhibiting tumor proliferation after laser irradiation, and the main organs remain healthy, including the heart, kidneys, liver, lungs and spleen. Our results indicate that HC NPs derived from nature with excellent phototherapy efficacies are biocompatible candidates for type I PDT/PTT synergistic cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Ke
- School of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, P.R. China.
| | - Aize Xie
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, P.R. China
| | - Jianjiao Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, P.R. China.
| | - Zhenyuan Zou
- School of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, P.R. China.
| | - Lei Shen
- Jiangsu Laboratory of Advanced Functional Materials, Department of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
| | - Yansong Dai
- Virginia University of Integrative Medicine, Fairfax, 22031, Virginia, USA.
| | - Dengfeng Zou
- School of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Achard V, Bottero M, Rouzaud M, Lancia A, Scorsetti M, Filippi AR, Franzese C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ingrosso G, Ost P, Zilli T. Radiotherapy treatment volumes for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1224-1234. [PMID: 32536241 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is an emerging treatment strategy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, large heterogeneities exist in the RT regimens used, with series reporting the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) strategies and others the delivery of focal treatments to the relapsing nodes with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). In this systematic review of the literature we compared the oncological outcomes and toxicity of the different RT regimens for nodal oligorecurrent PCa patients, with the aim of defining the optimal RT target volume in this setting. METHODS We performed a systemic search on the Pubmed database to identify articles reporting on the use of ENRT or SBRT for oligometastatic PCa with nodal recurrence. RESULTS Twenty-two articles were analyzed, including four prospective phase II trials (3 with SBRT and 1 with ENRT). Focal SBRT, delivered with an involved node, involved site, and involved field modality, was the most commonly used strategy with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 16 to 58% and a very low toxicity profile. Improved PFS rates were observed with ENRT strategies (52-80% at 3 years) compared to focal SBRT, despite a slightly higher toxicity rate. One ongoing randomized phase II trial is comparing both modalities in patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. CONCLUSIONS With a large variability in patterns of practice, the optimal RT strategy remains to be determined in the setting of nodal oligorecurrent PCa. Ongoing randomized trials and advances in translational research will help to shed light on the best management for these patients. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tor Vergata General Hospital, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Miura N, Pradere B, Mori K, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Misrai V, D'Andrea D, Albisinni S, Papalia R, Saika T, Scarpa RM, Shariat SF, Esperto F. Metastasis-directed therapy and prostate-targeted therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2020; 72:531-542. [PMID: 32550632 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The following keywords were used: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate carcinoma" OR "prostate neoplasm" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("oligometastatic" OR "oligometastasis" OR "PSMA") AND ("surgery" OR "prostatectomy" OR "radical prostatectomy" OR "cytoreductive" OR "local treatment" OR "radiotherapy" OR "stereotactic" OR "stereotaxic") AND ("survival" OR "mortality"). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After evaluating the selection criteria, 81 studies were evaluated for our endpoints. We included 22 studies for PTT of synchronous mPCa. There have been no randomized studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy (cRP). Four prospective studies showed that cRP was feasible but did not contribute to a positive effect on overall survival (OS). Regarding PTT-radiotherapy, two randomized controlled phase 3 trials showed that OS was improved in men with a low metastatic burden. Regarding MDT of metachronous lymph node recurrence, we included 29 retrospective studies. For MDT of oligometastases, we included 30 studies. One randomized phase 2 trial showed that androgen deprivation therapy-free survival improved with stereotactic body radiation therapy compared to that with surveillance; however, benefits on OS remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS We performed a comprehensive overview of the current literature on MDT and PTT. The feasibility of MDT and PTT is supported by several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of high-quality trials to prove its survival benefits. Results from ongoing prospective trials data are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria -
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan -
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Vincent Misrai
- Department of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Takashi Saika
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Esperto
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Patterns of Recurrence and Modes of Progression After Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:387-395. [PMID: 32798608 PMCID: PMC7856169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is increasingly used in castration-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer because it prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and androgen deprivation free survival. Here we describe patterns of recurrence and identify modes of progression after MDT using SABR. Methods and Materials: Two hundred fifty-eight patients with castration-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer (≤5 lesions at staging) were retrospectively identified from a multi-institutional database. Descriptive patterns of recurrence and modes of progression were reported. Other outcomes including median time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, time to next intervention, distant metastasis–free survival, overall survival, and biochemical PFS (bPFS) were reported. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis was performed. Results: Median follow-up was 25.2 months, and 50.4% of patients received concurrent androgen deprivation. Median time to PSA recurrence was 15.7 months, time to next intervention was 28.6 months, distant metastasis–free survival was 19.1 months, and bPFS was 16.1 months. Two-year overall survival was 96.8%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with bPFS included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .04), N1 disease at diagnosis (HR, 2.00; P = .02), M1 disease at diagnosis (HR, 0.44; P = .01), initial PSA at diagnosis (HR, 1.002; P = <.001), use of androgen deprivation therapy (HR, 0.41; P < .001), pre-SABR PSA (HR, 1.02; P = .01), and use of enhanced imaging for staging (HR, 2.81; P = .001). Patterns of progression favored an osseous component at recurrence; in patients initially treated to a bone lesion alone, the vast majority (86.5%) experienced a recurrence that included an osseous site. Patients treated initially to a nodal site alone tended to recur in a node only (64.5%); however, there was also a significant minority with an osseous component of recurrence at progression (32.3%). Modes of progressors were class I (patients with long term control [no recurrence ≥18 months after therapy]) occurring in 40.9%, class II (oligoprogressors [≤3 lesions at recurrence]) occurring in 36% (including 7.9% of patients with PSA recurrence but no metastatic disease), and class III (polyprogressors [>3 lesions]) occurring in 23.1% of patients. Conclusions: After MDT, the majority of patients have long-term control or oligoprogression (class I or II). Recurrence tended to occur in osseous sites. These findings, if validated, have implications for future integration of MDT and clinical trial design.
Collapse
|
39
|
A phase II randomized trial of RAdium-223 dichloride and SABR Versus SABR for oligomEtastatic prostate caNcerS (RAVENS). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:492. [PMID: 32487038 PMCID: PMC7268477 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07000-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis directed therapy (MDT) for patients with oligometastatic disease is associated with improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to systemic therapy alone. Additionally, within a prostate-cancer-specific cohort, MDT is able to forestall initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with hormone-sensitive, oligometastatic prostate cancer (HSOPCa) compared to observation. While MDT appears to be safe and effective in HSOPCa, a large percentage of men will eventually have disease recurrence. Patterns of failure in HSOPCa demonstrate patients tend to have recurrence in the bone following MDT, raising the question of sub-clinically-apparent osseous disease. Radium-223 dichloride is a radiopharmaceutical with structural similarity to calcium, allowing it to be taken up by bone where it emits alpha particles, and therefore might have utility in the treatment of micrometastatic osseous disease. Therefore, the primary goal of the phase II RAVENS trial is to evaluate the efficacy of MDT + radium-223 dichloride in prolonging progression free survival in men with HSOPCa. METHODS Patients with HSOPCa and 3 or less metastases with at least 1 bone metastasis will be randomized 1:1 to stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)) alone vs SABR + radium-223 dichloride with a minimization algorithm to balance assignment by institution, primary intervention, prior hormonal therapy, and PSA doubling time. SABR is delivered in one to five fractions and patients in the SABR + radium-223 dichloride arm will receive six infusions of radium-223 dichloride at four-week intervals. The primary end point is progression free survival. The secondary clinical endpoints include toxicity and quality of life assessments, local control at 12 months, locoregional progression, time to distant progression, time to new metastasis, and duration of response. DISCUSSION The RAVENS trial will be the first described phase II, non-blinded, randomized study to compare SABR +/- radium-223 dichloride in patients with HSOPCa and 3 or less metastases with at least one bone metastasis. The primary hypothesis is that SABR + radium-223 dichloride will increase median progression-free survival from 10 months in the SABR arm to 20 months in the SABR + radium-223 dichloride arm. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04037358. Date of Registration: July 30, 2019. Date of First Participant Enrolled: August 9, 2019. Date of Last Approved Amendment: October 16, 2019. Protocol Version: Version 5.
Collapse
|
40
|
Clinical outcome of PSMA-guided radiotherapy for patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:143-151. [PMID: 32405735 PMCID: PMC7835298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04777-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose First-line treatment of patients with recurrent, metastatic prostate cancer involves hormone therapy with or without additional systemic therapies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) allows the detection of oligometastatic disease that may be amenable to image-guided radiotherapy. The current study classifies the type and localization of metastases and the clinical outcome of PSMA-PET/CT-guided radiotherapy to selected metastases. Materials and methods Between 2011 and 2019, 86 patients with recurrent, oligometastatic prostate carcinoma were identified by PSMA-PET/CT and were treated with image-guided radiotherapy of their metastases. Sites of relapse were characterized, and the primary endpoint overall survival (OS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival were tabulated. Results In total, 37% of the metastases were bone metastases, 48% were pelvic nodal metastases, and 15% were nodal metastases outside of the pelvis. After PSMA-guided radiotherapy, a biochemical response was detected in 83% of the cohort. A statistically significant decrease in the standard uptake value (SUV) was seen in irradiated metastases. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the 3-year OS and bPFS were 84% and 55%, respectively. The median time of ADT-free survival was 13.5 months. A better clinical outcome was observed for patients receiving concomitant ADT or more than 24 fractions of radiation. Conclusion PSMA-guided radiotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach with excellent infield control for men with oligorecurrent prostate carcinoma. However, prospective, randomized trials are necessary to determine if this approach confers a survival advantage.
Collapse
|
41
|
Henkenberens C, Oehus AK, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Janssen S, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of repeated PSMA PET-directed radiotherapy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after initial curative therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:1006-1017. [PMID: 32399639 PMCID: PMC7581615 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01629-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients diagnosed with oligorecurrent disease and treated with a first and a second PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) PET(positron-emission tomography)-directed radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with oligorecurrent relapse after curative therapy received a first PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. After biochemical progression, all patients received a second PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (ADT-FS). The intervals of BPFS were analyzed separately as follows: the interval from the last day of PSMA PET-directed RT to the first biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_1 and the interval from second PSMA PET-directed RT to further biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_2. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 39.5 months (18-60). One out of 32 (3.1%) patients died after 47 months of progressive metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). All patients showed biochemical responses after the first PSMA PET-directed RT and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before RT was 1.70 ng/mL (0.2-3.8), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range <0.07-3.8; p = 0.004). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after the first PSMA PET-directed RT was 2.9 ng/mL (range 0.12-12.80; p = 0.24). Furthermore, the PSA level after the second PSMA PET-directed RT at the last follow-up (0.52 ng/mL, range <0.07-154.0) was not significantly different (p = 0.36) from the median PSA level (1.70 ng/mL, range 0.2-3.8) before the first PSMA PET-directed RT. The median bPFS_1 was 16.0 months after the first PSMA PET-directed RT (95% CI 11.9-19.2) and the median bPFS_2 was significantly shorter at 8.0 months (95% CI 6.3-17.7) after the second PSMA PET-directed RT (p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.9-8.3). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant parameter for bPFS_1, whereas extrapelvic disease was the only significant parameter (p = 0.02, OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.81-4.19) in multivariate analysis for bPFS_2. The median ADT-FS was 31.0 months (95% CI 20.1-41.8) and multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone metastases, compared to patients with only lymph node metastases at first PSMA PET-directed RT, had a significantly higher chance (p = 0.007, OR 4.51; 95% CI 1.8-13.47) of needing ADT at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION If patients are followed up closely, including PSMA PET scans, a second PSMA PET-directed RT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kathrin Oehus
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Medical practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Treibesstraße 11, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph A J von Klot
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Efficacy of PSMA ligand PET-based radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:362. [PMID: 32349700 PMCID: PMC7191762 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06883-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial number of patients will develop further biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Recently published data using prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA - PET) for re-staging suggest that those recurrences are often located outside the prostate fossa and most of the patients have a limited number of metastases, making them amenable to metastasis-directed treatment (MDT). METHODS We analyzed 78 patients with biochemical progression after RP and sRT from a retrospective European multicenter database and assessed the biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS; PSA < nadir + 0.2 ng/ml or no PSA decline) as well as the androgen deprivation therapy- free survival (ADT-FS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed to determine influencing factors. RESULTS A total of 185 PSMA - PET positive metastases were detected and all lesions were treated with radiotherapy (RT). Concurrent ADT was prescribed in 16.7% (13/78) of patients. The median PSA level before RT was 1.90 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) and decreased statistically significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.26 ng/mL (range, 0.0-12.25; p < 0.001). The median PSA level of 0.88 ng/mL (range, 0.0-25.8) at the last follow-up was also statistically significantly lower (p = 0.008) than the median PSA level of 1.9 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) before RT. The median bRFS was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.2-19.8). After 12 months, 55.3% of patients were free of biochemical progression. Multivariate analyses showed that concurrent ADT was the most important independent factor for bRFS (p = 0.01). The median ADT-FS was not reached and exploratory statistical analyses estimated a median ADT-FS of 34.0 months (95% CI, 16.3-51.7). Multivariate analyses revealed no significant parameters for ADT-FS. CONCLUSIONS RT as MDT based on PSMA - PET of all metastases of recurrent prostate cancer after RP and sRT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kroeze SGC, Henkenberens C, Vogel MME, Kirste S, Becker J, Burger IA, Derlin T, Bartenstein P, Eiber M, Mix M, la Fougère C, Müller AC, Grosu AL, Combs SE, Christiansen H, Guckenberger M, Belka C. Influence of localization of PSMA-positive oligo-metastases on efficacy of metastasis-directed external-beam radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:1852-1863. [PMID: 32002591 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately 40-70% of biochemically persistent or recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RPE) are oligo-metastatic in 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET). Those lesions are frequently located outside the prostate bed, and therefore not cured by the current standards of care like external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of the prostatic fossa. This retrospective study analyzes the influence of oligo-metastases' site on outcome after metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDR). METHODS Retrospectively, 359 patients with PET-positive PCa recurrences after RPE were analyzed. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < post-radiotherapy nadir + 0.2 ng/mL) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS All patients were initially clinically without distant metastases (cM0). Seventy-five patients had local recurrence within the prostatic fossa, 32 patients had pelvic nodal plus local recurrence, 117 patients had pelvic nodal recurrence, 51 patients had paraaortic lymph node metastases with/without locoregional recurrence, and 84 patients had bone or visceral metastases with/without locoregional recurrence. Median PSA before MDR was 1.2 ng/mL (range, 0.04-47.5). Additive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in 35% (125/359) of patients. Median PSA nadir after MDR was 0.23 ng/mL (range, < 0.03-18.30). After a median follow-up of 16 months (1-57), 239/351 (68%) patients had no biochemical recurrence. Patients with distant lymph node and/or distant metastases, the so-called oligo-body cohort, had an overall in-field control of 90/98 (91%) but at the same time, an ex-field progress of 44/96 (46%). In comparison, an ex-field progress was detected in 28/154 (18%) patients with local and/or pelvic nodal recurrence (oligo-pelvis group). Compared with the oligo-pelvis group, there was a significantly lower BRFS in oligo-body patients at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION Overall, BRFS was dependent on patterns of metastatic disease. Thus, MDR of PSMA PET-positive oligo-metastases can be offered considering that about one-third of the patients progressed within a median follow-up of 16 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N-S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - S G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - M M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Unterschleissheim, Munich, Germany
| | - S Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - J Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - I A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - T Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Ch la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Unterschleissheim, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Salaün PY, Abgral R, Malard O, Querellou-Lefranc S, Quere G, Wartski M, Coriat R, Hindie E, Taieb D, Tabarin A, Girard A, Grellier JF, Brenot-Rossi I, Groheux D, Rousseau C, Deandreis D, Alberini JL, Bodet-Milin C, Itti E, Casasnovas O, Kraeber-Bodere F, Moreau P, Philip A, Balleyguier C, Luciani A, Cachin F. Good clinical practice recommendations for the use of PET/CT in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:28-50. [PMID: 31637482 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04553-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a nuclear medicine functional imaging technique with proven clinical value in oncology. PET/CT indications are continually evolving with fresh advances made through research. French practice on the use of PET in oncology was framed in recommendations based on Standards-Options-Recommendations methodology and coordinated by the French federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNLCC). The recommendations were originally issued in 2002 followed by an update in 2003, but since then, a huge number of scientific papers have been published and new tracers have been licenced for market release. The aim of this work is to bring the 2003 version recommendations up to date. For this purpose, a focus group was set up in collaboration with the French Society for Nuclear Medicine (SFMN) to work on developing good clinical practice recommendations. These good clinical practice recommendations have been awarded joint French National Heath Authority (HAS) and French Cancer Institute (INCa) label status-the stamp of methodological approval. The present document is the outcome of comprehensive literature review and rigorous appraisal by a panel of experts, organ specialists, clinical oncologists, surgeons and imaging specialists. These data were also used for the EANM referral guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Yves Salaün
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
| | - Ronan Abgral
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France
| | - Olivier Malard
- Head and Neck, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Solène Querellou-Lefranc
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France
| | - Gilles Quere
- Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | | | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Elif Hindie
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Antoine Tabarin
- Endocrinology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - David Groheux
- Nuclear Medicine, Hopital Saint Louis AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Désirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Jean-Louis Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine, Georges-François Leclerc center - François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Itti
- Nuclear Medicine, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodere
- Nuclear Medicine, Ouest Cancer Institute, Nantes, France.,Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Arnaud Philip
- Centre du traitement de la douleur, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | | | - Alain Luciani
- Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Florent Cachin
- Nuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Cancer Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ong WL, Koh TL, Lim Joon D, Chao M, Farrugia B, Lau E, Khoo V, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, Foroudi F. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a single-institution experience and review of the published literature. BJU Int 2019; 124 Suppl 1:19-30. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Tze Lui Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Briana Farrugia
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Radiology; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Medicine; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Medicine; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Institute of Cancer Research; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre; Epworth Healthcare; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Radiation Therapy in the Definitive Management of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The Johns Hopkins Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:948-956. [PMID: 31419509 PMCID: PMC7050213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The use of radiation therapy (RT) in consolidating oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is a rapidly evolving treatment paradigm. We review our institutional experience using metastasis-directed therapy in the definitive management of men with OPCa. Methods and Materials: Patients with OPCa treated with definitive RT were included. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to assess biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and time to next intervention. Cumulative incidence functions were used to calculate rates of local failure. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4). Results: This study analyzed 156 patients with OPCa and 354 metastatic lesions with median follow-up of 24.6 months. Of 150 patients with toxicity data, 53 (35%) experienced acute grade 1 toxicity, 8 (5%) had grade 2, and none had grade 3 toxicity. Only 13 patients (9%) had late toxicities. At 24 months, the cumulative incidence of local failure was 7.4%. Median bPFS for the entire cohort was 12.9 months and 52% at 1 year. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with prolonged bPFS were periRT androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), lower gross tumor volume, and hormone-sensitive (HS) OPCa. Median time to next intervention, including repeat RT, was 21.6 months. Median bPFS for men with HS prostate cancer was 17.2 months compared with 7.2 months in men with castrate-resistant OPCa (P < .0001), and cumulative incidence of local failure at 24 months was lower with HS OPCa (4.8% vs 12.1%; P = .034). We analyzed 28 men with HS OPCa treated with a course of peri-RT ADT (median, 4.3 months) with recovery of testosterone. At a median follow-up of 33.5 months, 20 patients had not developed bPFS, median bPFS had not been reached, and 24-month bPFS was 77%. Conclusions: Metastasis-directed therapy can be effective across a wide range of OPCa subtypes, but with differential efficacy. Further study is warranted to investigate the use of RT across the wide range of patients with OPCa. Local consolidation of oligometastatic disease is a rapidly emerging treatment paradigm. This article reviews our institutional experience treating oligometastatic prostate cancer with definitive intent radiation therapy. We demonstrate that metastasis-directed therapy with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy to oligometastatic lesions can be effective across a wide range of oligometastatic prostate cancer subtypes, but with differential efficacy. Continued study is warranted to investigate the use of radiation therapy over the wide range of patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
47
|
De Bleser E, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Pasquier D, Zilli T, Van As N, Siva S, Fodor A, Dirix P, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Trippa F, Detti B, Ingrosso G, Triggiani L, Bruni A, Alongi F, Reynders D, De Meerleer G, Surgo A, Loukili K, Miralbell R, Silva P, Chander S, Di Muzio NG, Maranzano E, Francolini G, Lancia A, Tree A, Deantoni CL, Ponti E, Marvaso G, Goetghebeur E, Ost P. Metastasis-directed Therapy in Treating Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis Comparing the Outcome and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Elective Nodal Radiotherapy. Eur Urol 2019; 76:732-739. [PMID: 31331782 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are being investigated as metastasis-directed treatments in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC); however, comparative data are still lacking. OBJECTIVE To compare outcome and toxicity between both treatments. Primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, adjusted for selected variables (aMFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis of 506 (SBRT: 309, ENRT: 197) patients with hormone-sensitive nodal oligorecurrent PC (five or fewer lymph nodes (LNs; N1/M1a), treated between 2004 and 2017. Median follow-up was 36 mo (interquartile range 23-56). INTERVENTION SBRT was defined as a minimum of 5 Gy per fraction to each lesion with a maximum of 10 fractions. ENRT was defined as a minimum dose of 45 Gy in up to 25 fractions to the elective nodes, with or without a simultaneous boost to the suspicious node(s). The choice of radiotherapy (RT) was at the discretion of the treating physician, with treatments being unbalanced over the centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS In total, 506 patients from 15 different treatment centers were included. Primary treatment was radical prostatectomy, RT, or their combination. Nodal recurrences were detected by positron emission tomography/computer tomography (97%) or conventional imaging (3%). Descriptive statistics was used to summarize patient characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS ENRT was associated with fewer nodal recurrences compared with SBRT (p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients with one LN at recurrence had longer aMFS after ENRT (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.85, p = 0.009). Late toxicity was higher after ENRT compared with that after SBRT (16% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Limitations include higher use of hormone therapy in the ENRT cohort and nonstandardized follow-up. CONCLUSIONS ENRT reduces the number of nodal recurrences as compared with SBRT, however at higher toxicity. Our findings hypothesize that ENRT should be preferred to SBRT in the treatment of nodal oligorecurrences. This hypothesis needs to be evaluated in a randomized trial. PATIENT SUMMARY This study investigated the difference between stereotactic and elective nodal radiotherapy in treating limited nodal metastatic prostate cancer. Nodal relapse was less frequent following elective nodal radiotherapy than following stereotactic body radiotherapy, and thus elective nodal radiotherapy might be the preferred treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise De Bleser
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas Van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Shankar Siva
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Baracaldo, Spain
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy, Tor Vergata General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology and Hematology Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Verona, Italy
| | - Dries Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Kaoutar Loukili
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pedro Silva
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarat Chander
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Ernesto Maranzano
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Elisabetta Ponti
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy, Tor Vergata General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gallium-68-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 PET/CT of Prostate and Nonprostate Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:286-299. [PMID: 31166760 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to provide a concise summary of the current experience with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 imaging of prostate and nonprostate malignancies and benign conditions. CONCLUSION. PSMA is overexpressed in prostate cancer and in the neovasculature of many other malignancies. The relevance of PSMA as a biologic target, coupled with advances in the design, synthesis, and evaluation of PSMA-based radionuclides for imaging and therapy, is anticipated to play a major role in patient care.
Collapse
|
49
|
Pattern of metastatic deposit in recurrent prostate cancer: a whole-body MRI-based assessment of lesion distribution and effect of primary treatment. World J Urol 2019; 37:2585-2595. [PMID: 30826887 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02700-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE It is generally accepted that when metastases develop in a patient with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa), they follow a centrifuge pattern of seeding from the pelvis and that most patients enter the disease as oligometastatic. In this study, we used whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) to assess the anatomical distribution of oligo- and polymetastatic disease and the impact of the initial treatment on this distribution in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS WB-MRI examinations of patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical treatment by surgery or/and radiotherapy were analyzed for disease recurrence. The patients were separated into three groups, based on the primary treatment: patients treated by radical prostatectomy without radiotherapy and with/without lymph node dissection (RP), patients treated only by radiotherapy or hormono-radiotherapy (RT) and patients treated with radical prostatectomy and adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy (RP + RT). Patients with ≤ 5 bone or/and node metastases were considered oligometastatic. Regional distributions of bone and lymph nodes metastases were reported using anatomical diagrams. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify prognostic factors of relapse. RESULTS The primary treatment (RP, RT, RP + RT), Gleason score, PSA at relapse, time between first diagnosis and recurrence did not influence the metastatic status (oligo vs. polymetastatic). Oligometastatic patients showed different distribution of bone metastases compared to the polymetastatic ones and the distribution of the oligometastatic disease was not influenced by the primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS In this WB-MRI-based study, there was no evidence that the primary treatment influenced the metastatic status of the patient or the distribution of the oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|