1
|
Mizumoto M, Terashima K, Makishima H, Suzuki M, Ogino T, Waki T, Iwata H, Tamamura H, Uchinami Y, Akimoto T, Okimoto T, Iizumi T, Murakami M, Katoh N, Maruo K, Shibuya K, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan. Liver Cancer 2024; 13:161-168. [PMID: 38751552 PMCID: PMC11095592 DOI: 10.1159/000531376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be treated with chemotherapy in unresectable cases, but outcomes are poor. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an alternative treatment and has good dose concentration that may improve local control. Methods Fifty-nine patients who received initial PBT for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 at nine centers were included in the study. The treatment protocol was based on the policy of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Forty patients received 72.6-76 Gy (RBE) in 20-22 fr, 13 received 74.0-76.0 Gy (RBE) in 37-38 fr, and 6 received 60-70.2 Gy (RBE) in 20-30 fr. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The 59 patients (35 men, 24 women; median age: 71 years; range: 41-91 years) had PS of 0 (n = 47), 1 (n = 10), and 2 (n = 2). Nine patients had hepatitis and all 59 cases were considered inoperable. The Child-Pugh class was A (n = 46), B (n = 7), and unknown (n = 6); the median maximum tumor diameter was 5.0 cm (range 2.0-15.2 cm); and the clinical stage was I (n = 12), II (n = 19), III (n = 10), and IV (n = 18). At the last follow-up, 17 patients were alive (median follow-up: 36.7 months; range: 24.1-49.9 months) and 42 had died. The median OS was 21.7 months (95% CI: 14.8-34.4 months). At the last follow-up, 37 cases had recurrence, including 10 with local recurrence. The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-11.3 months). In multivariable analyses, Child-Pugh class was significantly associated with OS and PFS, and Child-Pugh class and hepatitis were significantly associated with local recurrence. Four patients (6.8%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher. Conclusion PBT gives favorable treatment outcomes for unresectable ICC without distant metastasis and may be particularly effective in cases with large tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | | | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsieh RCE, Lee CH, Huang HC, Wu SW, Chou CY, Hung SP, Lee CW, Krishnan S, Venkatesulu BP, Lee JC, Chou YC, Chan KM, Lin PT, Lee WC, Lin CC, Lin SY, Hong JH. Clinical and Dosimetric Results of Proton or Photon Radiation Therapy for Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:712-724. [PMID: 37778426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to report the clinical and dosimetric attributes of patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton or photon radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and dosimetric indices of 159 patients with >5 cm nonmetastatic HCC who underwent definitive radiation therapy using either protons (N = 105) or photons (N = 54) between 2014 and 2018. Additional photon plans were performed in the 105 proton-treated patients using the same dose prescription criteria for intragroup dosimetric comparison. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 75 Gy exhibited significantly better local control (LC; 2-year: 85.6% vs 20.5%; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS; median, 7.4 vs 3.2 months; P < .001), and overall survival (OS; median, 18.1 vs 7.3 months; P < .001) compared with those with BED10 < 75 Gy. Notably, proton-treated patients had a significantly higher BED10 (96 vs 67 Gy; P < .001) and improved LC (2-year: 88.5% vs 33.8%; P < .001), PFS (median, 7.4 vs 3.3 months; P = .001), and OS (median, 18.9 vs 8.3 months; P < .001) than those undergoing photon radiation therapy. Furthermore, patients treated with protons had significantly lower V1 of the liver (P < .001), mean upper gastrointestinal tract dose (P < .001), and mean splenic dose (P < .001), with significantly decreased incidences of radiation-induced liver disease (P = .007), grade ≥3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .001), and grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, proton radiation therapy consistently correlated with superior LC (P < .001), PFS (P < .001), and OS (P < .001). In intragroup dosimetric comparison, photon plans demonstrated significantly higher mean liver dose (P < .001) compared with actually delivered proton treatments, and 72 (69%) of them had mean liver dose exceeding 28 Gy, which necessitated target dose de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS In the context of large HCC radiation therapy, a higher target BED10 was associated with improved outcomes. Notably, proton therapy has demonstrated the capability to deliver ablative doses while also being accompanied by fewer instances of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Cancer Genome Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
| | - Ching-Hsin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Wei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yu Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Ping Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Wei Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois; Edward Hines Veteran Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jin-Chiao Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chih Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ting Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Chun Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shen-Yen Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Hong Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mizumoto M, Ogino H, Okumura T, Terashima K, Murakami M, Ogino T, Tamamura H, Akimoto T, Waki T, Katoh N, Araya M, Onoe T, Takagi M, Iwata H, Numajiri H, Okimoto T, Uchinami Y, Maruo K, Shibuya K, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:725-733. [PMID: 37778422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective multicenter registry study was started May 2016 in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients who received PBT for HCC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered in the database of the Particle Beam Therapy Committee and Subcommittee of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 755 registered patients, 576 with initial PBT and no duplicate cancer were evaluated. At final follow-up, 322 patients were alive and 254 had died. The median follow-up period for survivors was 39 months (0-58 months). The median OS time of the 576 patients was 48.8 months (95% CI, 42.0-55.6 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 80.5%-86.6%), 68.5% (64.5%-72.2%), 58.2% (53.9%-62.2%), and 50.1% (44.9%-55.0%), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 332 patients, including local recurrence in 45 patients. The median PFS time was 14.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-17.0 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year PFS rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-59.2%), 37.5% (33.5%-41.5%), 30.2% (26.3%-34.2%), and 22.8% (18.5%-27.4%), respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were significantly higher for tumor size <5 versus 5 to 10 cm (P < .001) and <5 versus ≥10 cm (P < .001); Child-Pugh score A/B versus C (P < .001); and distance of the tumor from the gastrointestinal tract <1 versus 1 to 2 cm (P < .008) and <1 versus >2 cm (P < .001). At final follow-up, 27 patients (4.7%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher, with liver failure (n = 7), and dermatitis (n = 7) being most common. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter prospective data registry indicated that PBT for HCC gives good therapeutic effects (3-year local control rate of 90%) with a low risk of severe late adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, 4423 Higashikata, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, 891-0304, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Tamamura
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, 910-8526, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8510, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntou-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 065-0033, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Howard TP, McClelland S, Jimenez RB. Evolving Role of Proton Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300674. [PMID: 38377440 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
With the expansion of proton radiation therapy centers across the United States and a gradually expanding body of academic evidence supporting its use, more patients are receiving-and asking about-proton therapy than ever before. Here, we outline, for nonradiation oncologists, the theoretical benefits of proton therapy, the clinical evidence to date, the controversies affecting utilization, and the numerous randomized trials currently in progress. We also discuss the challenges of researching and delivering proton therapy, including the cost of constructing and maintaining centers, barriers with insurance approval, clinical situations in which proton therapy may be approached with caution, and the issue of equitable access for all patients. The purpose of this review is to assist practicing oncologists in understanding the evolving role of proton therapy and to help nonradiation oncologists guide patients regarding this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones-Pauley M, Victor DW, Kodali S. Pushing the limits of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:3-9. [PMID: 38032256 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review existing and newer strategies for treatment and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both pre and postliver transplantation. SUMMARY HCC is rising in incidence and patients are often diagnosed at later stages. Consequently, there is a need for treatment strategies which include collaboration of multiple specialties. Combinations of locoregional, systemic, and surgical therapies are yielding better postliver transplantation (post-LT) outcomes for patients with HCC than previously seen. Tumor biology (tumor size, number, location, serum markers, response to therapy) can help identify patients who are at high risk for HCC recurrence posttransplantation and may expand transplant eligibility for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David W Victor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sudha Kodali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gutman MJ, Serra LM, Koshy M, Katipally RR. SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:1-10. [PMID: 38495259 PMCID: PMC10940045 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Gutman
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lucas M. Serra
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew Koshy
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rohan R. Katipally
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abualnil AY, Kumar R, George MA, Lalos A, Shah MM, Deek MP, Jabbour SK. Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:173-195. [PMID: 37945142 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)is a common type of liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with advanced stages or underlying liver disease. While surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, radiation therapy has become increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for those who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a highly precise form of radiation therapy that delivers very high doses of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Several studies have reported favorable outcomes with SBRT in HCC treatment. Moreover, SBRT can be used to treat recurrent HCC after prior treatment, offering a potentially curative approach in select cases. While SBRT has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating HCC, future studies are needed to further investigate the potential role of SBRT in combination with other treatments for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aseel Y Abualnil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Mridula A George
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Alexander Lalos
- Division of Gasteroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Mihir M Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chami P, Diab Y, Khalil DN, Azhari H, Jarnagin WR, Abou-Alfa GK, Harding JJ, Hajj J, Ma J, El Homsi M, Reyngold M, Crane C, Hajj C. Radiation and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Combination Therapy for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16773. [PMID: 38069095 PMCID: PMC10706661 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver tumor immune microenvironment has been thought to possess a critical role in the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, for several types of cancers, including HCC, liver metastases have shown evidence of resistance or poor response to immunotherapies. Radiation therapy (RT) has displayed evidence of immunosuppressive effects through the upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules post-treatment. However, it was revealed that the limitations of ICIs can be overcome through the use of RT, as it can reshape the liver immune microenvironment. Moreover, ICIs are able to overcome the RT-induced inhibitory signals, effectively restoring anti-tumor activity. Owing to the synergetic effect believed to arise from the combination of ICIs with RT, several clinical trials are currently ongoing to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perla Chami
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107, Lebanon;
| | - Youssef Diab
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Balamand, Beirut 1100, Lebanon; (Y.D.)
| | - Danny N. Khalil
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Hassan Azhari
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James J. Harding
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Joseph Hajj
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Balamand, Beirut 1100, Lebanon; (Y.D.)
| | - Jennifer Ma
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | | | - Carla Hajj
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bush DA, Volk M, Smith JC, Reeves ME, Sanghvi S, Slater JD, deVera M. Proton beam radiotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer 2023; 129:3554-3563. [PMID: 37503907 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares survival rates, recurrence patterns, toxicity, and treatment cost in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with either transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or proton beam radiotherapy (PBT). METHODS Subjects with untreated HCC meeting Milan or San Francisco transplant criteria were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive PBT (n = 36) or TACE (n = 40). Proton therapy was administered in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to a total dose of 70.2 Gy. TACE was repeated until complete or maximal response. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), toxicity, and cost. RESULTS Of the 76 randomized patients, 74 were assessed for outcome measures. The 2-year OS for PBT versus TACE was similar at 68%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-0.86, and 65%, 95% CI, 0.52-0.83 (p = .80), however, median PFS was improved for PBT versus TACE (not reached vs. 12 months, p = .002). LC was improved with PBT versus TACE (hazard ratio, 5.64; 95% CI, 1.78-17.9, p = .003). Days of posttreatment hospitalization were 24 for PBT and 166 for TACE (p < .001). Total mean cost per patient for treatment and posttreatment care revealed a 28% cost savings for PBT. CONCLUSIONS PBT and TACE yielded similar OS for treatment of HCC, but PFS and LC were improved with PBT compared to TACE. Patients treated with PBT required fewer courses of treatment, fewer posttreatment hospitalization days, and reduced cost of treatment compared to TACE. These data support the use of PBT as a viable treatment alternative to TACE for patients with HCC within transplant criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Bush
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Michael Volk
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Transplant Institute and Liver Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Jason C Smith
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Interventional Radiology, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Mark E Reeves
- Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Samrat Sanghvi
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Jerry D Slater
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Michael deVera
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Transplant Institute and Liver Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gharzai LA, Wang C, Tang M, Jackson WC, Maurino C, Cousins MM, Mendiratta-Lala M, Parikh ND, Mayo CS, Haken RKT, Owen D, Cuneo KC, Schipper MJ, Lawrence TS. Efficacy of a Second Course of Radiation for Patients With Metachronous Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e504-e514. [PMID: 37295727 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Liver-directed radiation therapy is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but metachronous lesions develop outside the irradiated field in >50% of patients. We hypothesized that irradiation of these new lesions would produce an outcome like that of patients receiving a first course (C1) of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included patients with HCC who received a second course (C2) of radiation therapy >1 month after C1. Toxicity was defined as Child-Pugh score increase ≥2 within 6 months posttreatment (binary model) and as the change in albumin-bilirubin during the year after treatment (longitudinal model). Overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF) were captured at the patient and lesion level, respectively; both were summarized with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Predictors of toxicity and OS were assessed using generalized linear mixed and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS Of 340 patients with HCC, 47 underwent irradiation for metachronous HCC, receiving similar prescription dose in C1/C2. Median follow-up was 17 months after C1 and 15 months after C2. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced toxicity after C1, and 25% experienced toxicity after C2. Worse baseline albumin-bilirubin predicted toxicity in both binary (odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.46-3.94; P = .0005) and longitudinal models (P < .005). Two-year LF rate was 11.2% after C1 and 8.3% after C2; tumor dose (hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; 95% CI, 0.969-0.995; P = .007) and tumor size (HR, 1.135; 95% CI, 1.068-1.206; P < .005) predicted LF. Two-year OS was 46.0% after C1 and 42.6% after C2; tumor dose (HR, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.979-0.992; P < .005) and tumor size (HR, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.010-1.088; P = .0124) predicted OS. Reirradiation was not associated with toxicity (P > .7), LF (P = .79), or OS (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS In this largest series in the Western hemisphere, we demonstrate that irradiation for metachronous HCC offers low rates of LF with acceptable toxicity and OS like that of patients receiving a C1. These findings support judicious selection of patients for reirradiation in metachronous HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ming Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Christopher Maurino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew M Cousins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Charles S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Randall K Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew J Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herr DJ, Wang C, Mendiratta-Lala M, Matuszak M, Mayo CS, Cao Y, Parikh ND, Haken RT, Owen D, Evans JR, Stanescu T, Yan M, Dawson LA, Schipper M, Lawrence TS, Cuneo KC. A Phase II Study of Optimized Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3852-3858. [PMID: 37471457 PMCID: PMC10592290 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that optimizing the utility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) based on the individual patient's probability for tumor control and risk of liver injury would decrease toxicity without sacrificing local control in patients with impaired liver function or tumors not amenable to thermal ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with Child-Pugh (CP) A to B7 liver function with aggregate tumor size >3.5 cm, or CP ≥ B8 with any size tumor were prospectively enrolled on an Institutional Review Board-approved phase II clinical trial to undergo SBRT with baseline and midtreatment dose optimization using a quantitative, individualized utility-based analysis. Primary endpoints were change in CP score of ≥2 points within 6 months and local control. Protocol-treated patients were compared with patients receiving conventional SBRT at another cancer center using overlap weighting. RESULTS A total of 56 patients with 80 treated tumors were analyzed with a median follow-up of 11.2 months. Two-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 6.4% [95% confidence interval (CI, 2.4-13.4)]. Twenty-one percent of patients experienced treatment-related toxicity within 6 months, which is similar to the rate for SBRT in patients with CP A liver function. An analysis using overlap weighting revealed similar local control [HR, 0.69; 95% CI (0.25-1.91); P = 0.48] and decreased toxicity [OR, 0.26; 95% CI (0.07-0.99); P = 0.048] compared with conventional SBRT. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of individuals with impaired liver function or tumors not amenable to thermal ablation with a treatment paradigm designed to optimize utility may decrease treatment-related toxicity while maintaining tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Herr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Martha Matuszak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Charles S. Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Randy Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Current Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph R. Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A. Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Kyle C. Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Choi JI, Simone CB, Lozano A, Frank SJ. Advances and Challenges in Conducting Clinical Trials With Proton Beam Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:407-415. [PMID: 37684070 PMCID: PMC10503212 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Advances in proton therapy have garnered much attention and speculation in recent years as the indications for proton therapy have grown beyond pediatric, prostate, spine, and ocular tumors. To achieve and maintain consistent access to this cancer treatment and to ensure the future viability and availability of proton centers in the United States, a call for evidence has been heard and answered by proton radiation oncologists. Answers provided in this review include the evolution of proton therapy research, rationale for proton clinical trial design, challenges in and barriers to the conduct of proton therapy research, and other unique considerations for the study of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.; New York Proton Center, New York, NY..
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.; New York Proton Center, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Non-Surgical Locoregional Therapies Alone or in Combination with Systemic Therapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061748. [PMID: 36980634 PMCID: PMC10046599 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, representing the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Curative intent treatment options for patients with HCC include liver transplantation, resection and ablation of small lesions. Other potentially curative therapies include cryoablation, microwave ablation and percutaneous alcohol injection. For locally advanced disease, different arterially directed therapies including transarterial chemoembolization and selective internal radiation therapy, plus external beam radiation including three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy, are available or studied. Systemic therapies based on checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available for the management of metastatic HCC and sometimes for locally advanced disease. Combinations of locoregional therapies with systemic drugs are currently the subject of several clinical trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chuang YC, Wu PH, Shen YA, Kuo CC, Wang WJ, Chen YC, Lee HL, Chiou JF. Recent Advances in Metal-Based NanoEnhancers for Particle Therapy. NANOMATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 13:1011. [PMID: 36985905 PMCID: PMC10056155 DOI: 10.3390/nano13061011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the most common therapeutic regimens for cancer treatment. Over the past decade, proton therapy (PT) has emerged as an advanced type of radiotherapy (RT) that uses proton beams instead of conventional photon RT. Both PT and carbon-ion beam therapy (CIBT) exhibit excellent therapeutic results because of the physical characteristics of the resulting Bragg peaks, which has been exploited for cancer treatment in medical centers worldwide. Although particle therapies show significant advantages to photon RT by minimizing the radiation damage to normal tissue after the tumors, they still cause damage to normal tissue before the tumor. Since the physical mechanisms are different from particle therapy and photon RT, efforts have been made to ameliorate these effects by combining nanomaterials and particle therapies to improve tumor targeting by concentrating the radiation effects. Metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) exhibit many unique properties, such as strong X-ray absorption cross-sections and catalytic activity, and they are considered nano-radioenhancers (NREs) for RT. In this review, we systematically summarize the putative mechanisms involved in NRE-induced radioenhancement in particle therapy and the experimental results in in vitro and in vivo models. We also discuss the potential of translating preclinical metal-based NP-enhanced particle therapy studies into clinical practice using examples of several metal-based NREs, such as SPION, Abraxane, AGuIX, and NBTXR3. Furthermore, the future challenges and development of NREs for PT are presented for clinical translation. Finally, we propose a roadmap to pursue future studies to strengthen the interplay of particle therapy and nanomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Chen Chuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
| | - Ping-Hsiu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Yao-An Shen
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- International Master/Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chen Chen
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Lun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (Y.-C.C.)
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Canters R, Vaassen F, Lubken I, Cobben M, Murrer L, Peeters S, Berbee M, Ta B. Radiotherapy for mediastinal lymphoma in breath hold using surface monitoring and nasal high flow oxygen: Clinical experiences and breath hold stability. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109594. [PMID: 36870610 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study we describe the clinical introduction and evaluation of radiotherapy in mediastinal lymphoma in breath hold using surface monitoring combined with nasal high flow therapy (NHFT) to prolong breath hold duration. MATERIALS AND METHODS 11 Patients with mediastinal lymphoma were evaluated. 6 Patients received NHFT, 5 patients were treated in breath hold without NHFT. Breath hold stability as measured by a surface scanning system was evaluated, as well as internal movement based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) before and after treatment. Based on internal movement, margins were determined. In a parallel planning study we compared free breathing plans with breath hold plans using the determined margins. RESULTS Average inter breath hold stability was 0.6 mm for NHFT treatments, and 0.5 mm for non-NHFT treatments (p > 0.1). Intra breath hold stability was 0.8 vs. 0.6 mm (p > 0.1) on average. Using NHFT, average breath hold duration increased from 34 s to 60 s (p < 0.01). Residual CTV motion derived from CBCTs before and after each fraction was 2.0 mm for NHFT vs 2.2 mm for non-NHFT (p > 0.1). Combined with inter-fraction motion, a uniform mediastinal margin of 5 mm appears to be sufficient. In breath hold, mean lung dose is reduced by 2.6 Gy (p < 0.001), while mean heart dose is reduced by 2.0 Gy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Treatment of mediastinal lymphoma in breath hold is feasible and safe. The addition of NHFT approximately increases breath hold durations with a factor two while stability is maintained. By reducing breathing motion, margins can be decreased to 5 mm. A considerable dose reduction in heart, lungs, esophagus, and breasts can be achieved with this method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Canters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - Femke Vaassen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Indra Lubken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Maud Cobben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Lars Murrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Peeters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Ta
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang M, Jiang M, Li P, Yuan M, Zhao C, Lai W, Li J, Hong C, Qi Y. Construction of a competitive electrochemical immunosensor based on sacrifice of Prussian blue and its ultrasensitive detection of alpha-fetoprotein. Anal Chim Acta 2023; 1257:341143. [PMID: 37062562 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Effective signal amplification is a prerequisite for ultrasensitive detection by electrochemical immunosensors. For quantitative and ultrasensitive detection of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), we designed a competitive electrochemical immunosensor and transferred the immunoreactivity from the electrode surface to the cuvette. AFP antigen was captured using AFP primary antibody (Ab1) immobilized on magnetic nanobeads (MBs), and ZIF-8 nanomaterials attached to secondary antibody (Ab2) were used as probes. MBs helped retain the sandwich structure in the test tube through incubation and washing steps. Then, an appropriately fixed excess of sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution was added to the cuvettes, resulting in etching of Zn ions from ZIF-8 and formation of Zn-EDTA complexes. After magnetic separation, a certain amount of supernatant is added dropwise to the Prussian blue (PB)-modified electrode (GCE), and Fe ions (from PB) complex with the remaining EDTA in the supernatant, thus reducing the signal response value of PB. The higher the AFP concentration, the lower the amount of free EDTA in the supernatant, the less the destruction of PB, and therefore the higher the current. Under optimal conditions, the immunosensor achieved ultra-sensitive detection of AFP in the range of 10-4 ng/mL-100 ng/mL with a limit of detection (LOD) as low as 0.032 pg/mL (S/N = 3). The excellent performance provides an important tool for the early screening and detection of AFP.
Collapse
|
17
|
Uchinami Y, Katoh N, Abo D, Morita R, Taguchi H, Fujita Y, Kanehira T, Suzuki R, Miyamoto N, Takao S, Matsuura T, Sho T, Ogawa K, Orimo T, Kakisaka T, Kobashi K, Aoyama H. Study of hepatic toxicity in small liver tumors after photon or proton therapy based on factors predicting the benefits of proton. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220720. [PMID: 36633335 PMCID: PMC10078862 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In a previous study of hepatic toxicity, the following three factors were identified to predict the benefits of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with a maximum diameter of ≤5 cm and Child-pugh grade A (CP-A): number of tumors (1 vs ≥2), the location of tumors (hepatic hilum or others), and the sum of the diameters of lesions. The aim of this study is to analyze the association between these three factors and hepatic toxicity. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients of CP-A treated with PBT or photon stereotactic body radiotherapy (X-ray radiotherapy, XRT) for HCC ≤5 cm. For normal liver dose, the V5, V10, V20 (volumes receiving 5, 10, and 20 Gy at least), and the mean dose was evaluated. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and CP score changes from the baseline were evaluated at 3 and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS In 89 patients (XRT: 48, PBT: 41), those with two or three (2-3) predictive factors were higher normal liver doses than with zero or one (0-1) factor. In the PBT group, the ALBI score worsened more in patients with 2-3 factors than those with 0-1 factor, at 3 months (median: 0.26 vs 0.02, p = 0.032) and at 6 months (median: 0.35 vs 0.10, p = 0.009). The ALBI score change in the XRT group and CP score change in either modality were not significantly different in the number of predictive factors. CONCLUSION The predictive factor numbers predicted the ALBI score change in PBT but not in XRT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study suggest that the number of predictive factors previously identified (0-1 vs 2-3) were significantly associated with dosimetric parameters of the normal liver in both modalities. In the proton group, the number of predictive factors was associated with a worsening ALBI score at 3 and 6 months, but these associations were not found in the photon SBRT group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Daisuke Abo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryo Morita
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Fujita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Suzuki
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takuya Sho
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koji Ogawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Orimo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Kakisaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chamseddine I, Kim Y, De B, Naqa IE, Duda DG, Wolfgang JA, Pursley J, Wo JY, Hong TS, Paganetti H, Koay EJ, Grassberger C. Predictive Model of Liver Toxicity to Aid the Personalized Selection of Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00104-9. [PMID: 36739920 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to develop an externally validated model for predicting liver toxicity after radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that can integrate both photon and proton dose distributions with patient-specific characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS Training data consisted of all patients with HCC treated between 2008 and 2019 at our institution (n = 117, 60%/40% photon/proton). We developed a shallow convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict posttreatment liver dysfunction from the differential dose-volume histogram (DVH) and baseline liver metrics. To reduce bias and improve robustness, we used ensemble learning (CNNE). After a preregistered study analysis plan, we evaluated stability using internal bootstrap resampling and generalizability using a data set from a different institution (n = 88). Finally, we implemented a class activation map method to characterize the critical DVH subregions and benchmarked the model against logistic regression and XGBoost. The models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision-recall curve. RESULTS The CNNE model showed similar internal performance and robustness compared with the benchmarks. CNNE exceeded the benchmark models in external validation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 versus 0.55 to 0.70, and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.6 versus 0.43 to 0.52. The model showed improved predictive power in the photon group, excellent specificity in both modalities, and high sensitivity in the photon high-risk group. Models built solely on DVHs confirm outperformance of the CNNE and indicate that the proposed structure efficiently abstracts features from both proton and photon dose distributions. The activation map method demonstrates the importance of the low-dose bath and its interaction with low liver function at baseline. CONCLUSIONS We developed and externally validated a patient-specific prediction model for hepatic toxicity based on the entire DVH and clinical factors that can integrate both photon and proton therapy cohorts. This model complements the new American Society for Radiation Oncology clinical practice guidelines and could support value-driven integration of proton therapy into the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Chamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Yejin Kim
- Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Dan G Duda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John A Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Changes in Nutritional Status of Cancer Patients Undergoing Proton Radiation Therapy Based on Real-World Data. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2023; 2023:9260747. [PMID: 36824406 PMCID: PMC9943601 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9260747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Methods Observational study on 47 adult hospitalized cancer patients including 27 males and 20 females who received proton beam radiotherapy during December 2021 and August 2022. Nutritional assessments, 24 h dietary survey, handgrip strength (HGS) test, anthropometrical measurements, and hematological parameters were conducted or collected at the beginning and the completion of treatment. Results The rate of nutritional risk and malnutrition among the total of 47 enrolled patients was 4.3% and 12.8% at the onset of proton radiation and raised up to 6.4% and 27.7% at the end of the treatment. 42.6% of patients experienced weight loss during the proton radiotherapy, and 1 of them had weight loss over 5%, and in general, the average body weight was stable over radiotherapy. The changes in patients' 24 h dietary intakes, HGS, and anthropometrical parameters, including triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), midupper arm circumference (MUAC), and midupper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), were statistically insignificant over the treatment (all p values > 0.05). The changes in patients' hematological parameters, including total protein (TP) and serum albumin (ALB), were not statistically significant over the treatment (all p values >0.05), and the level of hemoglobin (HGB) at the end of treatment was higher than that at the onset (p < 0.05). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that proton radiotherapy might have a lighter effect on the nutritional status of cancer patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zaki P, Chuong MD, Schaub SK, Lo SS, Ibrahim M, Apisarnthanarax S. Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231206335. [PMID: 37908130 PMCID: PMC10621304 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231206335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has increasingly been utilized in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to technological advances with positive clinical outcomes. Innovations in EBRT include improved image guidance, motion management, treatment planning, and highly conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Moreover, proton beam therapy (PBT) and magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have expanded the capabilities of EBRT. PBT offers the advantage of minimizing low- and moderate-dose radiation to the surrounding normal tissue, thereby preserving uninvolved liver and allowing for dose escalation. MRgRT provides the advantage of improved soft tissue delineation compared to computerized tomography (CT) guidance. Additionally, MRgRT with online adaptive therapy is particularly useful for addressing motion not otherwise managed and reducing high-dose radiation to the normal tissue such as the stomach and bowel. PBT and online adaptive MRgRT are emerging technological advancements in EBRT that may provide a significant clinical benefit for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Zaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam Ibrahim
- School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kiseleva V, Gordon K, Vishnyakova P, Gantsova E, Elchaninov A, Fatkhudinov T. Particle Therapy: Clinical Applications and Biological Effects. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:2071. [PMID: 36556436 PMCID: PMC9785772 DOI: 10.3390/life12122071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy is a developing area of radiotherapy, mostly involving the use of protons, neutrons and carbon ions for cancer treatment. The reduction of side effects on healthy tissues in the peritumoral area is an important advantage of particle therapy. In this review, we analyze state-of-the-art particle therapy, as compared to conventional photon therapy, to identify clinical benefits and specify the mechanisms of action on tumor cells. Systematization of published data on particle therapy confirms its successful application in a wide range of cancers and reveals a variety of biological effects which manifest at the molecular level and produce the particle therapy-specific molecular signatures. Given the rapid progress in the field, the use of particle therapy holds great promise for the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoriia Kiseleva
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Konstantin Gordon
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, 249031 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Polina Vishnyakova
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Gantsova
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Elchaninov
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery”, 117418 Moscow, Russia
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery”, 117418 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Radiotherapy Side Effects: Comprehensive Proteomic Study Unraveled Neural Stem Cell Degenerative Differentiation upon Ionizing Radiation. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12121759. [PMID: 36551187 PMCID: PMC9775306 DOI: 10.3390/biom12121759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cranial radiation therapy is one of the most effective treatments for childhood brain cancers. Despite the ameliorated survival rate of juvenile patients, radiation exposure-induced brain neurogenic region injury could markedly impair patients' cognitive functions and even their quality of life. Determining the mechanism underlying neural stem cells (NSCs) response to irradiation stress is a crucial therapeutic strategy for cognitive impairment. The present study demonstrated that X-ray irradiation arrested NSCs' cell cycle and impacted cell differentiation. To further characterize irradiation-induced molecular alterations in NSCs, two-dimensional high-resolution mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics analyses were conducted to explore the mechanism underlying ionizing radiation's influence on stem cell differentiation. We observed that ionizing radiation suppressed intracellular protein transport, neuron projection development, etc., particularly in differentiated cells. Redox proteomics was performed for the quantification of cysteine thiol modifications in order to profile the oxidation-reduction status of proteins in stem cells that underwent ionizing radiation treatment. Via conjoint screening of protein expression abundance and redox status datasets, several significantly expressed and oxidized proteins were identified in differentiating NSCs subjected to X-ray irradiation. Among these proteins, succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial (sdha) and the acyl carrier protein, mitochondrial (Ndufab1) were highly related to neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and Huntington's disease, illustrating the dual-character of NSCs in cell differentiation: following exposure to ionizing radiation, the normal differentiation of NSCs was compromised, and the upregulated oxidized proteins implied a degenerative differentiation trajectory. These findings could be integrated into research on neurodegenerative diseases and future preventive strategies.
Collapse
|
23
|
Choi JI, Prabhu K, Hartsell WF, DeWees T, Sinesi C, Vargas C, Benda RK, Cahlon O, Chang AL. Outcomes and toxicities after proton partial breast radiotherapy for early stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer: 3-Year results of a phase II multi-center trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:71-77. [PMID: 36093343 PMCID: PMC9450061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a good treatment option for partial breast irradiation. Proton PBI results in excellent local tumor control and OAR sparing. Cosmesis and quality of life with PBT are comparable to other PBI modalities.
Purpose Proton therapy (PT) for partial breast irradiation (PBI) in early-stage breast cancer can decrease morbidity versus photon PBI with superior organs-at-risk sparing. We report 3-year outcomes of the first prospective, multicenter, phase II trial of proton PBI. Methods and Materials This Proton Collaborative Group phase II trial (PCG BRE007-12) recruited women ≥ 50 years with node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ≤3cm, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing breast conserving surgery followed by proton PBI (40 Gy(RBE), 10 daily fractions). Primary endpoint was freedom from ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence. Adverse events were prospectively graded using CTCAEv4.0. Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) assessed patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL). Results Thirty-eight evaluable patients enrolled between 2/2013–11/2016. Median age was 67 years (range 50–79); 55 % had left-sided disease, and median tumor size was 0.9 cm. Treatment was delivered in ≥ 2 fields predominantly with uniform scanning PT (n = 37). At 35-month median follow-up (12–62), all patients were alive, and none had local, regional or distant disease progression. One patient developed an ER-negative contralateral IDC. Seven grade 2 adverse events occurred; no radiotherapy-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred. Changes in BCTOS subdomain mean scores were maximum 0.36, indicating no meaningful change in PRQOL. Median heart volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy), lung V20Gy, and lung V10Gy were 0 %, 0 % and 0.19 %, respectively. Conclusion At 3 years, proton PBI provided 100 % cancer control for early-stage, ER-positive breast cancer. Toxicities are minimal, and PRQOL remains acceptable with continued follow-up. These findings support PT as a safe and effective PBI delivery option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 East 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Corresponding author at: 225 East 126 Street, New York, NY 10035, USA.
| | - Kiran Prabhu
- Integris Health, 5911 W. Memorial, Oklahoma City, OK 73142, USA
| | - William F. Hartsell
- Northwestern Medicine, Chicago Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA
| | - Todd DeWees
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Christopher Sinesi
- Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute, 40 Enterprise Pkwy, Hampton, VA 23666, USA
| | - Carlos Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Rashmi K. Benda
- Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, 701 NW 13 St, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- New York Proton Center, 225 East 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Andrew L. Chang
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, 9730 Summers Ridge Rd, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Navin PJ, Olson MC, Mendiratta-Lala M, Hallemeier CL, Torbenson MS, Venkatesh SK. Imaging Features in the Liver after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Radiographics 2022; 42:2131-2148. [PMID: 36240077 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Historically, radiation therapy was not considered in treatment of liver tumors owing to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, development of highly conformed radiation treatments such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased use of radiation therapy in the liver. SBRT is indicated in treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors with outcomes comparable to those of other local therapies, especially in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After SBRT, imaging features of the tumor and surrounding background hepatic parenchyma demonstrate a predictable pattern immediately after treatment and during follow-up. The goals of SBRT are to deliver a lethal radiation dose to the targeted liver tumor and to minimize radiation dose to normal liver parenchyma and other adjacent organs. Evaluation of tumor response after SBRT centers on changes in size and enhancement; however, these changes are often delayed secondary to the underlying physiologic effects of radiation. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SBRT should allow better understanding of the typical imaging features in detection of tumor response and avoid misinterpretation from common pitfalls and atypical imaging findings. Imaging features of radiation-induced change in the surrounding liver parenchyma are characterized by a focal liver reaction that can potentially be mistaken for no response or recurrence of tumor. Knowledge of the pattern and chronology of this phenomenon may allay any uncertainty in assessment of tumor response. Other pitfalls related to fiducial marker placement or combination therapies are important to recognize. The authors review the basic principles of SBRT and illustrate post-SBRT imaging features of treated liver tumors and adjacent liver parenchyma with a focus on avoiding pitfalls in imaging evaluation of response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Navin
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Michael C Olson
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Christopher L Hallemeier
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Michael S Torbenson
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dionisi F, Scartoni D, Fracchiolla F, Giacomelli I, Siniscalchi B, Goanta L, Cianchetti M, Sanguineti G, Brolese A. Proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:959552. [PMID: 36003769 PMCID: PMC9393743 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.959552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver cancer represents one of the most common causes of death from cancer worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Among local therapies, evidence regarding the use of radiation therapy is growing. Proton therapy currently represents the most advanced radiation therapy technique with unique physical properties which fit well with liver irradiation. Here, in this review, we aim to 1) illustrate the rationale for the use of proton therapy (PT) in the treatment of HCC, 2) discuss the technical challenges of advanced PT in this disease, 3) review the major clinical studies regarding the use of PT for HCC, and 4) analyze the potential developments and future directions of PT in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Francesco Dionisi,
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Irene Giacomelli
- Proton Therapy Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Goanta
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Napoli, Italy
| | - Marco Cianchetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Brolese
- General Surgery & Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uchinami Y, Katoh N, Suzuki R, Kanehira T, Tamura M, Takao S, Matsuura T, Miyamoto N, Fujita Y, Koizumi F, Taguchi H, Yasuda K, Nishioka K, Yokota I, Kobashi K, Aoyama H. A study on predicting cases that would benefit from proton beam therapy in primary liver tumors of less than or equal to 5 cm based on the estimated incidence of hepatic toxicity. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:70-75. [PMID: 35633653 PMCID: PMC9130086 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
An advantage of PBT is reducing the liver receiving low doses of radiation. The factors predicting the benefit in PBT are different among NTCP models. The tumor size, number, and location are useful in estimating the benefits of PBT.
Background Materials and methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
28
|
Proton Therapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122900. [PMID: 35740567 PMCID: PMC9220794 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy is among the locoregional therapy modalities used to treat unresectable or medically inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton radiation therapy plays a major role in the treatment of HCC, especially when liver toxicity is a concern. The aim of this review is to provide a concise and comprehensive summary on the use of proton therapy in the management of HCC. Abstract Proton radiation therapy plays a central role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the near-zero exit dose and improved sparing of normal liver parenchyma, protons are being used even in challenging scenarios, including larger or multifocal liver tumors, and those associated with vascular tumor thrombus. There is a mounting level of evidence that suggests that protons are superior to photons in terms of survival and toxicity outcomes, specifically the progression to liver failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing protons to photons is currently underway to verify this hypothesis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lewis S, Barry A, Hawkins MA. Hypofractionation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma - The Effect of Fractionation Size. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e195-e209. [PMID: 35314091 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased over the years. Several prospective studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy, and randomised trials are underway. The advancement in technology has enabled the transition from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to highly focused SBRT. Liver damage is the primary limiting toxicity with radiation, with the incidence of grade 3 varying from 0 to 30%. The reported radiotherapy fractionation schedule for HCC, and in practice use, ranges from one to 10 fractions, based on clinician preference and technology available, tumour location and tumour size. This review summarises the safety and efficacy of various SBRT fractionation schedules for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lewis
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M A Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lewis S, Dawson L, Barry A, Stanescu T, Mohamad I, Hosni A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: from infancy to ongoing maturity. JHEP Rep 2022; 4:100498. [PMID: 35860434 PMCID: PMC9289870 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Lewis
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Jordan
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
- Corresponding author. Address: Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chow R, Simone CB, Jairam MP, Swaminath A, Boldt G, Lock M. Radiofrequency ablation vs radiation therapy vs transarterial chemoembolization vs yttrium 90 for local treatment of liver cancer - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival data. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:484-494. [PMID: 34846988 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.2009563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), radiation therapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 (Y90) relative to one another for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare RFA to RT to TACE to Y90 in the treatment of HCC. METHODS Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up until April 19, 2021. Observational analyses with propensity score matched (PSM) cohort analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on two or more treatments relative to one another with respect to overall survival (OS) and/or progression free survival (PFS) were included. Survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and meta-analyzed using a multivariate network meta-analysis. RESULTS After exclusions, 24 RCTs or PSM observational studies reporting on 5549 patients were included. While 1-year OS was greater for Y90 than TACE (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-0.99), all other 1-year OS comparisons across the 4 modalities yielded similar OS, and there were no differences across any modalities in 2-year and 3-year OS. TACE had a modest PFS advantage relative to RFA (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.95) and RT (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83) at 2 years. CONCLUSION All modalities assessed resulted in similar OS, which explains the current heterogenous practice patterns. This conclusion may assist in decision making based on administrative and patient costs, and implementation of these modalities. Other factors such as toxicity rate specific to individual patients could not be assessed using network meta-analysis and may also play a role in selection of modality. Further studies, ideally using PSM cohort analyses or RCT study design, reporting on OS, PFS, local control, complete response and toxicity are needed prior to drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Pooja Jairam
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Proton Beam Therapy in Managing Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Invasion. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071616. [PMID: 35406392 PMCID: PMC8997051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion is a rare and notorious subtype of HCC. This study included patients that had unresectable HCC with bile duct invasion and proton beam therapy between November 2015 and February 2021. Twenty patients fit the inclusion criteria. The median tumor size was 6.3 cm. Nine patients (45.0%) had major vascular invasions. All included patients received the radiation dose of 72.6 gray relative biological effectiveness due to the proximity of porta hepatis and tumor. The median follow-up time was 19.9 months. The median overall survival was 19.9 months among deceased patients. The 1-year cumulative local recurrence rates were 5.3%, with only two patients developing in-field failure. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 79.4% and 53.3%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 58.9%. Four patients developed radiation-induced liver disease. The 1-year cholangitis-free survival was 55.0%. Skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity and rarely severe. Eight patients developed ≤ grade 3 gastrointestinal ulcers. Proton beam therapy offers desirable survival outcomes for unresectable HCC patients with bile duct invasion. Optimal local tumor control could also be obtained within acceptable toxicities.
Collapse
|
33
|
Sung W, Hong TS, Poznansky MC, Paganetti H, Grassberger C. Mathematical Modeling to Simulate the Effect of Adding Radiation Therapy to Immunotherapy and Application to Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:1055-1062. [PMID: 34774999 PMCID: PMC9059476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a comprehensive framework to simulate the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with radiation therapy (RT) and to apply the framework for investigating ICI-RT combination regimen in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS The mechanistic mathematical model is based on dynamic biological interactions between the immune system and the tumor using input data from patient blood samples and outcomes of clinical trials. The cell compartments are described by ordinary differential equations and represent irradiated and nonirradiated tumor cells and lymphocytes. The effect of ICI is modeled using an immune activation term that is based on tumor size changes observed in a phase 1/2 clinical trial for HCC. Simulated combination regimen are based on ongoing ICI-RT trials. RESULTS The proposed framework successfully describes tumor volume trajectories observed in early-stage clinical trials of durvalumab monotherapy in patients with HCC. For ICI-RT treatment regimen the irradiated tumor fraction is the most important parameter for the efficacy. For 90% of the tumor cells being irradiated, adding RT to ICI yields an increase in clinical benefit from 33% to 71% in nonirradiated tumor sites. The model agrees with clinical data showing an association of outcome with initial tumor volume and lymphocyte counts. We demonstrate model application in clinical trial design to predict progression-free survival curves, showing that the cohort size to show significant improvement heavily depends on the irradiated tumor fraction. CONCLUSIONS We present a framework extending radiation cell kill models to include circulating lymphocytes and the effect of ICIs and enable simulation of combination strategies. The simulations predict that a significant amount of the benefit from RT in combination with ICI stems from the reduction in irradiated tumor burden and associated immune suppression. This aspect needs to be included in the interpretation of outcomes and the design of novel combination trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonmo Sung
- Division of Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark C Poznansky
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Division of Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Division of Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Franses JW, Zhu AX. Neoadjuvant approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma: There's no time like the present. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2738-2743. [PMID: 35266995 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a lethal malignancy and is an increasingly common cause of cancer death worldwide. Curative-intent surgical resection remains the standard of care for eligible patients, yet outcomes remain poor for many patients, with most patients experiencing recurrence in the five years after resection. There is currently significant interest in utilizing locoregional and systemic therapies - in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings - to increase the chance of cure. This review article appraises the existing literature and current clinical trial landscape of neoadjuvant therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
|
35
|
Wu YY, Fan KH. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210670. [PMID: 34558308 PMCID: PMC8978248 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localized prostate cancer can be treated with several radiotherapeutic approaches. Proton therapy (PT) can precisely target tumors, thus sparing normal tissues and reducing side-effects without sacrificing cancer control. However, PT is a costly treatment compared with conventional photon radiotherapy, which may undermine its overall efficacy. In this review, we summarize current data on the dosimetric rationale, clinical benefits, and cost of PT for prostate cancer. METHODS An extensive literature review of PT for prostate cancer was performed with emphasis on studies investigating dosimetric advantage, clinical outcomes, cost-effective strategies, and novel technology trends. RESULTS PT is safe, and its efficacy is comparable to that of standard photon-based therapy or brachytherapy. Data on gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and sexual function toxicity profiles are conflicting; however, PT is associated with a low risk of second cancer and has no effects on testosterone levels. Regarding cost-effectiveness, PT is suboptimal, although evolving trends in radiation delivery and construction of PT centers may help reduce the cost. CONCLUSION PT has several advantages over conventional photon radiotherapy, and novel approaches may increase its efficacy and safety. Large prospective randomized trials comparing photon therapy with proton-based treatments are ongoing and may provide data on the differences in efficacy, toxicity profile, and quality of life between proton- and photon-based treatments for prostate cancer in the modern era. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE PT provides excellent physical advantages and has a superior dose profile compared with X-ray radiotherapy. Further evidence from clinical trials and research studies will clarify the role of PT in the treatment of prostate cancer, and facilitate the implementation of PT in a more accessible, affordable, efficient, and safe way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Yu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choe JW, Lee HY, Rim CH. Will the collaboration of surgery and external radiotherapy open new avenues for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis? World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:704-714. [PMID: 35317274 PMCID: PMC8891726 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i7.704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Portal invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in 12.5%-40% of patients diagnosed with cancer and yields poor clinical outcomes. Since it is a common cause of inoperability, sorafenib was regarded as the standard treatment for HCC in the Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer guidelines. However, the median survival of the Asian population was only approximately 6 mo, and the tumor response rate was less than moderate (< 5%). Various locoregional modalities were performed, including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and surgery, alone or in combination. Among them, EBRT is a noninvasive method and can safely treat tumors involving the major vessels. Palliative EBRT has been commonly performed, especially in East Asian countries, where locally invasive HCC is highly prevalent. Although surgery is not commonly indicated, pioneering studies have demonstrated encouraging results in recent decades. Furthermore, the combination of neo- or adjuvant EBRT and surgery has been recently used and has significantly improved the outcomes of HCC patients, as reported in a few randomized studies. Regarding systemic modality, a combination of novel immunotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor showed results superior to that of sorafenib as a first-line agent. Future clinical trials investigating the combined use of these novel agents, surgery, and EBRT are expected to improve the prognosis of HCC with portal invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Wan Choe
- Department ofInternal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, South Korea
| | - Hye Yoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, South Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen CL, Ong AD, Cheng JY, Yong CC, Lin CC, Chen CY, Cheng YF. Proton beam therapy to bridge or downstage locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma to living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:103-111. [PMID: 35284524 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Aldwin D Ong
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Jen-Yu Cheng
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Chih-Che Lin
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Chih-Yi Chen
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Yu-Fan Cheng
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chamseddine I, Kim Y, De B, El Naqa I, Duda DG, Wolfgang J, Pursley J, Paganetti H, Wo J, Hong T, Koay EJ, Grassberger C. Predictive Modeling of Survival and Toxicity in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiotherapy. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100169. [PMID: 35192402 PMCID: PMC8863122 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To stratify patients and aid clinical decision making, we developed machine learning models to predict treatment failure and radiation-induced toxicities after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The models were developed using linear and nonlinear algorithms, predicting survival, nonlocal failure, radiation-induced liver disease, and lymphopenia from baseline patient and treatment parameters. The models were trained on 207 patients from Massachusetts General Hospital. Performance was quantified using Harrell's c-index, area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy in high-risk populations. Models' structures were optimized in a nested cross-validation approach to prevent overfitting. A study analysis plan was registered before external validation using 143 patients from MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical utility was assessed using net-benefit analysis. RESULTS The survival model stratified high-risk versus low-risk patients well in the external validation cohort (c-index = 0.75), better than existing risk scores. Predictions of 1-year survival and nonlocal failure were excellent (external AUC = 0.74 and 0.80, respectively), especially in the high-risk group (accuracy > 90%). Cause-of-death analysis showed differential modes of treatment failure in these cohorts and indicated that these models could be used to stratify RT patients for liver-sparing treatment regimen or combination approaches with systemic agents. Predictions of liver disease and lymphopenia were good but less robust (external AUC = 0.68 and 0.7, respectively), suggesting the need for more comprehensive consideration of dosimetry and better predictive biomarkers. The liver disease model showed excellent accuracy in the high-risk group (92%) and revealed possible interactions of platelet count with initial liver function. CONCLUSION Machine learning approaches can provide reliable outcome predictions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after RT in diverse cohorts across institutions. The excellent performance, particularly in high-risk patients, suggests novel strategies for patient stratification and treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Chamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yejin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Dan G. Duda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Theodore Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chilukuri S, Panda PK, Jalali R. Proton Therapy in LMICs: Is the Need Justified? JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2100268. [PMID: 35025690 PMCID: PMC8769152 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
|
40
|
Apisarnthanarax S, Barry A, Cao M, Czito B, DeMatteo R, Drinane M, Hallemeier CL, Koay EJ, Lasley F, Meyer J, Owen D, Pursley J, Schaub SK, Smith G, Venepalli NK, Zibari G, Cardenes H. External Beam Radiation Therapy for Primary Liver Cancers: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:28-51. [PMID: 34688956 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications and technique-dose of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of EBRT in HCC and IHC. This guideline is intended to cover the definitive, consolidative, salvage, preoperative (including bridge to transplant), and adjuvant settings as well as palliative EBRT for symptomatic primary lesions. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Strong recommendations are made for using EBRT as a potential first-line treatment in patients with liver-confined HCC who are not candidates for curative therapy, as consolidative therapy after incomplete response to liver-directed therapies, and as a salvage option for local recurrences. The guideline conditionally recommends EBRT for patients with liver-confined multifocal or unresectable HCC or those with macrovascular invasion, sequenced with systemic or catheter-based therapies. Palliative EBRT is conditionally recommended for symptomatic primary HCC and/or macrovascular tumor thrombi. EBRT is conditionally recommended as a bridge to transplant or before surgery in carefully selected patients. For patients with unresectable IHC, consolidative EBRT with or without chemotherapy should be considered, typically after systemic therapy. Adjuvant EBRT is conditionally recommended for resected IHC with high-risk features. Selection of dose-fractionation regimen and technique should be based on disease extent, disease location, underlying liver function, and available technologies. CONCLUSIONS The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of EBRT for HCC and IHC with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care. Future studies should focus on further defining the role of EBRT in the context of liver-directed and systemic therapies and refining optimal regimens and techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aisling Barry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ronald DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary Drinane
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Foster Lasley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Rogers, Arkansas
| | - Jeffrey Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie K Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Grace Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeta K Venepalli
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gazi Zibari
- Department of Transplantation Services, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Higinia Cardenes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tong VJW, Shelat VG, Chao YK. Clinical application of advances and innovation in radiation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Transl Res 2021; 7:811-833. [PMID: 34988334 PMCID: PMC8715712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved over the past two decades, with the development of newer treatment modalities. While various options are available, unmet needs are reflected through the mixed treatment outcome for intermediate-stage HCC. As HCC is radiosensitive, radiation therapies have a significant role in management. Radiation therapies offer local control for unresectable lesions and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Radiotherapy also provides palliation in metastatic disease, and acts as a bridge to resection and transplantation in selected patients. Advancements in radiotherapy modalities offer improved dose planning and targeted delivery, allowing for better tumor response and safer dose escalations while minimizing the risks of radiation-induced liver damage. Radiotherapy modalities are broadly classified into external beam radiation therapy and selective internal radiation therapy. With emerging modalities, radiotherapy plays a complementary role in the multidisciplinary care of HCC patients. Aim: We aim to provide an overview of the role and clinical application of radiation therapies in HCC management. Relevance for Patients: The continuous evolution of radiotherapy techniques allows for improved therapeutic outcomes while mitigating unwanted adverse effects, making it an attractive modality in HCC management. Rigorous clinical studies, quality research and comprehensive datasets will further its application in the present era of evidence-based practice in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie J W Tong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vishal G Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore
| | - Yew Kuo Chao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roberts HJ, Wo JY. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors: An effective liver-directed therapy in the toolbox. Cancer 2021; 128:956-965. [PMID: 34847255 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of radiation for primary liver cancers has historically been limited because of the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Treatment fields have become more conformal because of several technical advances, and this has allowed for dose escalation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, is now able to safely treat liver tumors to ablative doses while sparing functional liver parenchyma by using highly conformal therapy. Several retrospective and small prospective studies have examined the use of SBRT for liver cancers; however, there is a lack of well-powered randomized studies to definitively guide management in these settings. Recent advances in systemic therapy for primary liver cancers have improved outcomes; however, the optimal selection criteria for SBRT as a local therapy remain unclear among other liver-directed options such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah J Roberts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abousaida B, Seneviratne D, Hoppe BS, Ko SJ, Asaithamby A, Cucinotta FA, Kirwan JM, Mody K, Toskich B, Ashman JB, Hallemeier CL, Krishnan S. Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:1169-1179. [PMID: 34595139 PMCID: PMC8478421 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s292516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is unresectable and non-transplantable can be treated by several liver-directed therapies. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is an increasingly accepted and widely utilized treatment modality in this setting. Accelerated charged particles such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) offer technological advancements over conventional photon radiotherapy. In this review, we summarize the distinct advantages of CIRT use for HCC treatment, focusing on physical and biological attributes, and outline dosimetric and treatment planning caveats. Based on these considerations, we posit that HCC may be among the best indications for use of CIRT, as it allows for maximizing tumoricidal doses to the target volume while minimizing the dose to the organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belal Abousaida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stephen J Ko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Aroumougame Asaithamby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Francis A Cucinotta
- School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Jessica M Kirwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kabir Mody
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Beau Toskich
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bhangoo RS, Mullikin TC, Ashman JB, Cheng TW, Golafshar MA, DeWees TA, Johnson JE, Shiraishi S, Liu W, Hu Y, Merrell KW, Haddock MG, Krishnan S, Rule WG, Sio TT, Hallemeier CL. Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Clinical Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100675. [PMID: 34409199 PMCID: PMC8361033 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods and Materials A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who were treated with IMPT for HCC with curative intent from June 2015 to December 2018. All patients had fiducials placed before treatment. Inverse treatment planning used robust optimization with 2 to 3 beams. The majority of patients were treated in 15 fractions (n = 30, 81%, 52.5-67.5 Gy, relative biological effectiveness), whereas the remainder were treated in 5 fractions (n = 7, 19%, 37.5-50 Gy, relative biological effectiveness). Daily image guidance consisted of orthogonal kilovoltage x-rays and use of a 6° of freedom robotic couch. Outcomes (local control, progression free survival, and overall survival) were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Thirty-seven patients were included. The median follow-up for living patients was 21 months (Q1-Q3, 17-30 months). Pretreatment Child-Pugh score was A5-6 in 70% of patients and B7-9 in 30% of patients. Nineteen patients had prior liver directed therapy for HCC before IMPT. Eight patients (22%) required a replan during treatment, most commonly due to inadequate clinical target volume coverage. One patient (3%) experienced a grade 3 acute toxicity (pain) with no recorded grade 4 or 5 toxicities. An increase in Child-Pugh score by ≥ 2 within 3 months of treatment was observed in 6 patients (16%). At 1 year, local control was 94%, intrahepatic control was 54%, progression free survival was 35%, and overall survival was 78%. Conclusions IMPT is safe and feasible for treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Tiffany W Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yanle Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Heller M, Parikh ND, Fidelman N, Owen D. Frontiers of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3648-3659. [PMID: 33837453 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03065-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma continues to increase worldwide. Fortunately, there have been notable recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapy. In this current review, we will highlight these new developments and future directions of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and address the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.
Collapse
|
46
|
Shampain KL, Hackett CE, Towfighi S, Aslam A, Masch WR, Harris AC, Chang SD, Khanna K, Mendiratta V, Gabr AM, Owen D, Mendiratta-Lala M. SBRT for HCC: Overview of technique and treatment response assessment. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3615-3624. [PMID: 33963419 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03107-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging locoregional treatment (LRT) modality used in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The decision to treat HCC with LRT is evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting, and the specific LRT chosen depends on the treatment intent, such as bridge-to-transplant, down-staging to transplant, definitive/curative treatment, and/or palliation, as well as underlying patient clinical factors. Accurate assessment of treatment response is necessary in order to guide clinical management in these patients. Patients who undergo LRT need continuous imaging evaluation to assess treatment response and to evaluate for recurrence. Thus, an accurate understanding of expected post-SBRT imaging findings is critical to avoid misinterpreting normal post-treatment changes as local progression or viable tumor. SBRT-treated HCC demonstrates unique imaging findings that differ from HCC treated with other forms of LRT. In particular, SBRT-treated HCC can demonstrate persistent APHE and washout on short-term follow-up imaging. This brief review summarizes current evidence for the use of SBRT for HCC, including patient population, SBRT technique and procedure, tumor response assessment on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging with expected findings, and pitfalls in treatment response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sohrab Towfighi
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anum Aslam
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William R Masch
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alison C Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Silvia D Chang
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kanika Khanna
- Department of Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Ahmed M Gabr
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reduce Patient Treatment wait time in a Proton Beam Facility - A Gatekeeper Approach. J Med Syst 2021; 45:80. [PMID: 34258667 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01756-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Patient wait time can negatively impact treatment quality in a proton therapy center, where multiple treatment rooms share one proton beam. Wait time increases patient discomfort that can lead to patient motion, dissatisfaction, and longer treatment delay. This study was to develop a patient call-back model that reduced patient wait while efficiently utilizing the proton beam. A "Gatekeeper" logic allowing therapists to adjust the time of a patient's call-back to the treatment room was developed. It uses a two-pronged approach to minimize overlap of long treatment and the possibility of excessive wait in the queue to receive the proton beam. The goal was to reduce the maximum wait time to less than eight minutes per field for a four-room facility. The effectiveness of this logic was evaluated through simulation, and five scenarios were compared. Four scenarios implementing various levels of gatekeeper logic were compared with the original scenario without the logic. The best performing model provided a reduction of the maximum field wait by 26% and met the predefined goal. Adjusting call-back extended the treatment day length by an average of 6 min and a maximum of 12 min in total. The use of this gatekeeper logic significantly reduces patient field wait with minimal impact on treatment day length for a four-room proton facility. A sample interface that adopts this logic for therapists to make informed decision on patient call-back time is demonstrated.
Collapse
|
48
|
Iizumi T, Okumura T, Sekino Y, Takahashi H, Tsai YL, Takizawa D, Ishida T, Hiroshima Y, Nakamura M, Shimizu S, Saito T, Numajiri H, Mizumoto M, Nakai K, Sakurai H. Long-term clinical outcomes of patients receiving proton beam therapy for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:682-687. [PMID: 34036362 PMCID: PMC8273797 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located in the caudate lobe (caudate HCC) is rare; however, patients with this type of tumour have poorer prognoses than those with HCC in other segments. Despite many published reports on the clinical usefulness of proton beam therapy (PBT) for HCC, data on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PBT for caudate HCC remain scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the outcomes of this group of patients. Thirty patients with caudate HCC who underwent definitive PBT between February 2002 and February 2014 were retrospectively analysed. The total irradiation doses ranged from 55 to 77 (median 72.6) Gy relative biological dose. The median follow-up period was 37.5 (range, 3.0-152.0) months. The overall survival (OS) rates at one, three and five years were 86.6%, 62.8% and 46.1%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, Child-Pugh A (P < 0.01), having a single tumour (P = 0.02) and a low serum alpha-fetoprotein level (AFP; P < 0.01) were significant factors predicting longer survival. The local control (LC) rates at one, three and five years were 100%, 85.9% and 85.9%, respectively, while the corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 65%, 27.5% and 22%, respectively. No grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed. PBT is effective and safe for the treatment of caudate HCC, and should therefore be considered a feasible option for intervention in patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Iizumi
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan. TEL: +81-29-853-7100; FAX: +81-29-853-7102; E-mail:
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Takahashi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Yu-Lun Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
| | - Daichi Takizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hitachi General Hospital, Ibaraki, 317-0077, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki Cancer Center, Ibaraki, 309-1793, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hiroshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chandra RA, Keane FK, Voncken FEM, Thomas CR. Contemporary radiotherapy: present and future. Lancet 2021; 398:171-184. [PMID: 34166607 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Oncology care is increasingly a multidisciplinary endeavour, and radiation therapy continues to have a key role across the disease spectrum in nearly every cancer. However, the field of radiation oncology is still one of the most poorly understood of the cancer disciplines. In this Review, we attempt to summarise and contextualise developments within the field of radiation oncology for the non-radiation oncologist. We discuss advancements in treatment technologies and imaging, followed by an overview of the interplay with advancements in systemic therapy and surgical techniques. Finally, we review new frontiers in radiation oncology, including advances within the metastatic disease continuum, reirradiation, and emerging types of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi A Chandra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Florence K Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|