1
|
Lee G, Nelson B, Koenig J, Plastaras JP, Metz JM, Yeap BY, Zhang Y, Drapek LC, Baglini C, Ryan DP, Parikh AR, Allen JN, Clark JW, Blaszkowsky LS, Ben-Josef E, Hong TS, Kharofa JR, Wo JY. Long-term Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiation With Proton Therapy for Treatment of Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: Combined Analysis of Two Prospective Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 122:52-62. [PMID: 39800328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) (5-FU/MMC) remains the standard of care for localized anal cancer, treatment is associated with significant acute and late toxicity. Proton radiation therapy (RT) may potentially reduce such toxicity. Here, we assess the long-term outcomes of patients with anal cancer treated with CRT using proton RT in 2 prospective pilot studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with stage I to III anal cancer treated with proton RT (pencil beam scanning or intensity modulated proton therapy) per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0529 dose schema with concurrent 5-FU/MMC (2 cycles) in 2 prospective, single-arm trials were followed. Locoregional failure, distant metastases, colostomy-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were assessed. Physician-graded late toxicity (>90 days from CRT) was assessed per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Late toxicities were compared with RTOG 0529 via Fisher exact test. Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2020, 39 patients were treated; 37 (95%) patients completed treatment per protocol. The median follow-up was 63 months. The 5-year locoregional failure, distant metastases, colostomy-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 21%, 19%, 72%, 69%, and 75%, respectively. The worst late treatment toxicities were grade 1 in 38%, grade 2 in 24%, grade 3 in 19%, grade 4 in 3%, and no grade 5. Compared to RTOG 0529, rates of overall grade 2+ late toxicities were significantly lower (46% vs 75%, P = .01), attributed to lower dermatologic toxicities (0% vs 25%, P < .01), but there was no significant difference in overall grade 3+ toxicities (22% vs 20%, P = 1.00). No statistically significant correlations between organ-at-risk dosimetry and late toxicities were noted. Available patient-reported outcomes demonstrated that significant proportion of patients had persistent gastrointestinal symptoms at long term. CONCLUSIONS Definitive CRT with proton RT with concurrent 5-FU/MMC for the treatment of anal cancer resulted in comparable long-term disease control and grade 3+ late toxicities compared to RTOG 0529. Future studies should evaluate additional measures to minimize treatment toxicity and subsets of patients who are most likely to benefit from proton RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bailey Nelson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Julie Koenig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yongbin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lorraine C Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christian Baglini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P Ryan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jill N Allen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jordan R Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tagliaferri L, Manfrida S, Fionda B, Dinapoli N, Barbaro B, De Luca V, Placidi E, Bertolini R, Marazzi F, Lancellotta V, Frascino V, Morganti AG, Gambacorta MA. High-Tailored Anal canal Radiotherapy (HIT-ART): Long term results of MR image-guided interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) boost. Brachytherapy 2025; 24:439-449. [PMID: 40118708 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes in terms of survival, treatment compliance and toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with personalized chemoradiation (RCT) followed by image guided Interventional Radiotherapy (IG-IRT), stratified by clinical baseline stage and treatment response. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed patients with histologically proven squamous anal carcinoma treated using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with curative intent, and IRT boost. External beam radiation was delivered using personalized IMRT technique with a simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) to deliver 45 to 55 Gy in 25 fractions according to clinical stage. After the end of the RCT patients underwent clinical and imaging re-evaluation, and according to initial stage of disease and tumor response, a radiotherapy boost was administered through IG-IRT, performing MRI with IRT applicator on site (trans-anal position) and defining GTV on MRI imaging. All patients' treatments and outcomes data were collected by an internal database. The endpoints were in terms of overall treatment time (OTT), toxicity, clinical complete response (cCR), locoregional failure (LRF), colostomy free survival, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate survival analysis with Kaplan- Meier curves was performed to allow between-group comparison. RESULTS 73 patients treated between February 2012 and January 2023 were included in the analysis. 72.6 % were female, with a median age of 65.4 years (range 39.1-89). 62 were staged T2-T4 (T2 42.5.5%, T3 19.2%, T4 27.4%) and 50 (68.5%) had positive nodes. Combined RCT was administered mainly using mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. The mean dose received by patients was 50 Gy; after a median time of 43 days (range 9-128) a sequential boost dose was delivered in 1-2 fractions (median dose of 4 Gy). OTT median was 85 days (range 44-225). The median follow-up period was 50.6 months. LRF was 17.8%, and at 3 and 5 years LC was 80.1% and 77.2%, CFS was 80.5 and 77.8%, DFS was 79.3% and 75.9% and OS 95.1%, 84.3% and 61.4% at 10 years. Moreover, we verified that OS was higher in patients who had an OTT lower than 93 days. Toxicity was acceptable: 45.2% of patients experienced a G1-G2 abdominal discomfort (only 5.5% had G3). CONCLUSIONS Our experience confirms that MR Image Guided Interventional Radiotherapy boost is a feasible treatment option with a significant impact on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- UOC Servizi di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.
| | - Nicola Dinapoli
- UOC Servizi di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Brunella Barbaro
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Viola De Luca
- UOC Servizi di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Elisa Placidi
- UOC Fisica per le Scienze della Vita, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Bertolini
- UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC Servizi di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italia; Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italia
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia; UOC Servizi di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu S, Ma SJ, Farag A, Huerta T, Gamez ME, Blakaj DM. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Big Data in Radiation Oncology. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2025; 39:453-469. [PMID: 39779423 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
This review explores the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in radiation oncology, focusing on computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques. We examined CV-based AI/ML in digital pathology and radiomics, highlighting the prospective clinical studies demonstrating their utility. We also reviewed NLP-based AI/ML applications in clinical documentation analysis, knowledge assessment, and quality assurance. While acknowledging the challenges for clinical adoption, this review underscores the transformative potential of AI/ML in enhancing precision, efficiency, and quality of care in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simeng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Alexander Farag
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Jacksonville Sinus and Nasal Institute, 836 Prudential Drive Suite 1601, Jacksonville, FL 32207, USA
| | - Timothy Huerta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Division of Head and Neck/Skull Base, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roth O'Brien DA, Hristidis VC, Chakrani Z, McCann P, Damato A, Williams V, Cote N, Reyngold M, Rosen R, Connell L, Pappou E, Hajj C, Paty PB, Horvat N, Pernicka JSG, Fiasconaro M, Shia J, Lisanti J, Wu AJ, Gollub MJ, Zhang Z, Yaeger R, Zinovoy M, Weiser MR, Saltz L, Cuaron J, Boe L, Cercek A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Smith JJ, Crane CH, Romesser PB. Clinical Outcomes, Patterns of Failure, and Salvage Therapies of a Large Modern Cohort of Patients With Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Definitive-Intent Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:951-962. [PMID: 39536799 PMCID: PMC12067387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patterns of failure and salvage therapy options for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) who recur after definitive-intent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy are not well described. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified consecutive patients with ASCC treated with definitive-intent IMRT between July 2005 and December 2019. Relevant patient and tumor parameters, disease outcomes (locoregional failure [LRF], distant failure, progression-free survival, colostomy-free survival, and overall survival [OS]), patterns of failure, and salvage therapies were collected. Failures were analyzed using competing risk methods, whereas survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Landmark analyses were conducted by considering whether patients had LRF within 12 months of completing IMRT. RESULTS A total of 375 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 6 years. Stage breakdown was 15%, 23%, and 62% for the American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0 to I, II, and III, respectively. Six-year rates of LRF, distant failure, progression-free survival, colostomy-free survival, and OS were 12%, 13%, 73%, 76%, and 80%, respectively. Disease recurred in 74 patients. Among the 45 patients with LRF, 39 (87%) failed within the anorectum, with 25 anal canal, 6 anal margin, and 8 rectal recurrences. Only 4 (9%) patients had isolated nodal failure. Patients experiencing LRF had worse 6-year OS than patients without LRF (44% vs 86%, P < .0001). Approximately 30% of patients who underwent salvage therapy were alive to 10 years after recurrence, compared with none of the patients who were managed with chemotherapy alone or the best supportive care. CONCLUSIONS This large ASCC cohort managed with definitive-intent IMRT demonstrated excellent rates of locoregional control and survival. Isolated regional nodal failures were uncommon, whereas the majority of LRFs occurred within the anorectum, despite dose escalation by tumor stage. We observed poor outcomes for patients experiencing locoregional disease recurrence, even after aggressive salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Roth O'Brien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vasilis C Hristidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zakaria Chakrani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Patrick McCann
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Antonio Damato
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicolas Cote
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roni Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Louise Connell
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emmanouil Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeanine Lisanti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa Zinovoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Len Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lillian Boe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Early Drug Development Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng M, Hallemeier CL, Almada C, Aranha O, Dorth J, Felder S, Goodman KA, Holliday EB, Jethwa KR, Kachnic LA, Miller ED, Murphy JD, Pollom E, Sio TT, Thomas H, Lindsay P, Bradfield L, Helms AR, Czito BG. Radiation Therapy for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2025:S1879-8500(25)00020-7. [PMID: 40023252 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2025.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for definitive treatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on (1) indications for radiation therapy (RT), concurrent systemic therapy and local excision/surgery, (2) appropriate RT techniques, (3) appropriate RT dose-fractionation regimens, target volumes, and dose constraints, and (4) appropriate surveillance strategies after definitive treatment. Recommendations are based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-based methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision-making are recommended for all patients. Definitive treatment with combined modality therapy is recommended for most patients using concurrent 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine plus mitomycin, with cisplatin as a conditional alternative to mitomycin with RT. Select patients with early-stage disease may be considered for local excision alone. RT target volumes should include the primary tumor/anal canal and rectum, and mesorectal, presacral, internal and external iliac, obturator, and inguinal lymph nodes. Intensity modulated RT-based treatment approaches are recommended. The primary tumor should receive doses of 4500 to 5940 cGy in 25 to 33 fractions, and clinically involved lymph nodes should receive 5040 to 5400 cGy in 28 to 30 fractions, depending on disease stage and RT approach. Elective nodal volumes should receive 3600 to 4500 cGy in 20 to 30 fractions, depending on disease stage and RT approach. Dose guidance for normal tissues and measures to minimize acute and chronic treatment-related toxicity are provided. Treatment breaks should be minimized. Posttreatment surveillance strategies, including timing of clinical/digital exam, anoscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography, are discussed. CONCLUSIONS These evidence-based recommendations guide clinical practice on the use of definitive therapy for localized anal squamous cell carcinoma. Future studies will further refine the optimal RT dose for early- and advanced-stage disease, use of alternative systemic agents, including immunotherapy, the role of adaptive RT, and other strategies to minimize long-term treatment-related toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | | | - Camille Almada
- Patient representative, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Olivia Aranha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Seth Felder
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Horatio Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patricia Lindsay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Amanda R Helms
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu H, Zhuang J, Zhang C, Huang W, Chen B, Zheng B, Song T. Prognostic Value of External Iliac Lymph Node (N1b) Metastasis in Anal Carcinoma and Validation of a New Stage Grouping System. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2025:S1533-0028(25)00015-5. [PMID: 39986979 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2025.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of external iliac lymph node (N1b) metastasis on anal carcinoma (AC) staging and refine the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) system without modifying existing criteria. METHODS This retrospective study was performed utilizing the data of 3,815 patients with AC included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2018 to 2021. We compared the TNM8th and 9th editions with our proposed system, focusing on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and time-dependent C-index measures were employed to evaluate the 3 staging systems. RESULTS The SEER registry identified only 42 patients with solitary N1b metastasis, with lymph node (LN) metastasis rates rising with higher T stages. No significant survival differences were found among N1a to N1c subgroups, yet N1a showed better OS and CSS than N1b+c (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.306, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.011-1.687, P = .041 for OS; HR = 1.432, 95% CI: 1.088-1.886, P = .011 for CSS). The proposed TNM system, reclassifying T 1N1M0 as stage I and defining T3-T4 with LN status as stages IIIA and IIIB, showed marginally improved predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.684 vs. 0.683 for OS; 0.635 vs. 0.634 for CSS). CONCLUSIONS N1b metastasis minimally affects AC staging. We introduce a simplified TNM system for clinical use: M Staging: Distant metastasis presence as M1. T Staging: T1 as stage I, T2 as stage II, T3-T4 as stage III. N Staging: N status noncontributory for stage I; N negative as stage A (IIA or IIIA), N positive as stage B (IIB or IIIB).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong'en Xu
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Zhuang
- Department of Information Technology, Hunan Els Publishing Company Limited, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenyu Zhang
- School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Weixuan Huang
- School of Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Bingchen Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo'an Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| | - Tao Song
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zheng A, Xu H, Tao Y, Chen B, Ding J, Song T, Lu Y. Comparative evaluation of TNM staging systems (eighth vs. ninth edition) for the non-surgical treatment of localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma: Prognostic significance of T classification and lymph node status. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0317598. [PMID: 39820172 PMCID: PMC11737782 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/01/2025] [Indexed: 01/19/2025] Open
Abstract
This study aims to compare the survival discrimination of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) eighth and ninth editions for patients with localized and locally advanced (LLA) anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated non-surgically and to evaluate the prognostic impact of T classification and lymph node (LN) status with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We retrospectively included 6,876 patients in the comparison. We observed the inversion of survival outcomes for stages IIB and IIIA diseases in the TNM eighth edition [median overall survival (OS): 112 months for stage IIB vs. not reached for stage IIIA]. By contrast, it demonstrated improvement in the TNM ninth edition (median OS: not reached for IIB disease vs. 120 months for IIIA disease, P<0.001). In the correlation analysis, we observed an increased correlation between T classification and TNM staging systems (r value increased from 0.78 to 0.93) and a decreased correlation for the LN status (r value decreased from 0.83 to 0.59). For OS, variable importance analysis demonstrated more weight of importance for the T classification than the LN status (0.0871 vs. 0.0048). Additionally, decision curve analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed the prognostic accuracy of T classification rather than the LN status. In conclusion, TNM ninth edition is a better prognostic indicator than the eighth edition for patients with LLA ASCC treated non-surgically. T classification plays a more important prognostic role than the LN status and warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aihong Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong’en Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital BiJie Hospital, BiJie First People’s Hospital, Bijie, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yiming Tao
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Tongxiang First People’s Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bingchen Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jieni Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanwei Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jirkovská M, Stankušová H, Kindlová A, Jirkovský D, Lohynská R. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy for anal cancer-results and quality of life. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02316-5. [PMID: 39542884 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02316-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE While anal cancer is a very rare oncological diagnosis representing less than 2% of lower gastrointestinal tract cancers, the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Radical radiochemotherapy with sequential or simultaneous boost is now the standard treatment modality. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy is one of the boost application options. Implementation of new radiotherapy techniques has resulted in improved therapeutic outcomes; however, it is still associated with acute and especially late toxicity. Gastrointestinal disorders and sexual dysfunction are the most frequent factors affecting the long-term quality of cured patients' lives. METHODS A total of 96 patients consecutively treated between 2000 and 2022 with external beam radio-/chemotherapy and an interstitial brachytherapy boost for histologically verified nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma were evaluated. The median follow-up time was 15.4 years (range 13.4-17.3 years). The primary objective of the study was to assess local control (LC) and quality of life (QoL). The Czech versions of internationally validated EORTC questionnaires were used to evaluate life quality-the basic EORTC QOL-C30 v.3 and the specific QOL-ANL 27 questionnaire. RESULTS Local control was 85.5% at 5 years, 83.4% at 10 years, 83.4% at 15 years, and 83.4% at 20 years, and there was no dependence on clinical stage. The most common forms of acute toxicity were cutaneous and hematological but were gastrointestinal for late toxicities. In the evaluation of quality of life, 80.5% of patients alive at the time participated. In the EORTC quality of life questionnaire C30 v.3, patients rated the functional scale score as 86.2 points (standard deviation [SD] = 12.6) and the symptom score as 15.5 points (SD = 12.5). The global health score achieved 68.4 points (SD = 23.6). The most common symptoms were fatigue with 25.6 points (SD = 20.2) and diarrhea with 19.0 points (SD = 27.8). In the QOL-ANL 27 questionnaire, symptom scales assessing bowel symptoms were scored 27.5 points (SD = 19) in non-stoma patients and 11.9 points (SD = 17.2) in stoma patients. In the single-item symptom scales, the highest scores were rated for frequency of urination with 26.4 points (SD = 30.8), need to be close to a toilet with 22.4 points (SD = 27.3), and self-cleaning more often with 25.3 points (SD = 31.8). In the functional scales assessing sex life and interest, men and women reported scores of 45.2 (SD = 23) and 45.5 points (SD = 19), respectively. CONCLUSION Boost with interstitial HDR brachytherapy is an established safe method of anal cancer treatment, with excellent results and limited late toxicity. Functioning scales were rated relatively highly in QoL questionnaires, and the overall global health score was comparable to published data. Gastrointestinal difficulties, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction dominated the symptom scales in our cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Jirkovská
- Department of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Hana Stankušová
- Department of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Kindlová
- Department of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel Jirkovský
- Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radka Lohynská
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital in Prague, Vídeňská 800, 140 59, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng A, Wang Y, Li S, Wang Y, Xu H, Ding J, Chen B, Song T, Lai L. Comparison of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma treated nonsurgically and proposal of a new stage grouping system. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70119. [PMID: 39158000 PMCID: PMC11331335 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the survival discrimination of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated nonsurgically and suggest a simple revised staging system with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Survival comparisons between the T and N stages and the different staging systems were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, followed by correlation analysis and variable importance analysis (VIA). Additionally, multivariate analysis was employed to identify significant predictors, which were further visualized using a nomogram. Finally, calibration curve, C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the performance of the different staging systems. RESULTS A total of 5384 patients with ASCC were analyzed, revealing superior discrimination OS by the TNM9th edition compared to that by the TNM8th edition. Multivariate analysis identified the T and N stages as significant OS predictors (all p < 0.001). However, ambiguity persisted in stage III subgroups within the TNM9th edition, showing OS times of 102 months for stage IIIA disease, 88 months for stage IIIB disease, and 128 months for stage IIIC disease (all p > 0.05). Correlation analysis demonstrated an increased correlation for the T stage between the TNM8th and 9th editions (ρ value from 0.7 to 0.89), while the N stage correlation decreased (ρ value from 0.84 to 0.56). VIA and the prognostic nomogram highlighted the greater importance of the T stage over the N stage. Based on these findings, a new staging system was developed, and its clinical utility was confirmed through calibration curves, C-index values (from 0.598 to 0.604), and DCAs. CONCLUSIONS Our new staging system exhibited slightly better prognostic value compared to the TNM9th staging systems for nonmetastatic ASCC and warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aihong Zheng
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yiwen Wang
- Department of Clinical Medical EngineeringThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Shuang Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Jinzhou Medical UniversityJinzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yingjie Wang
- Department of OncologyTongxiang First People's HospitalJiaxingPeople's Republic of China
| | - Hong'en Xu
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Jieni Ding
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Bingchen Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Division of Colorectal SurgeryZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Tao Song
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation OncologyZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical CollegeHangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Department of OncologyTongxiang First People's HospitalJiaxingPeople's Republic of China
| | - Lei Lai
- Department of OncologyTongxiang First People's HospitalJiaxingPeople's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivkin AC, Khan AH, Mellgren AF, Perez-Tamayo AM, Chaudhry V, Bianchi EM, Abdulhai MA. Pelvic Necrosis with Formation of a Pelvic "Cloaca" and Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection After Radiation for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2024; 25:e943599. [PMID: 39078802 PMCID: PMC11299884 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.943599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare cancer commonly treated with the Nigro protocol, which combines chemotherapy and radiation. Patients who received radiation therapy prior to modern advances, such as computer-based tumor targeting, volumetric planning, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, experience more acute and chronic adverse effects. Though exceedingly rare, radiation necrosis is of particular concern, as it can result in significant morbidity and mortality, including complex pelvic fistula formation and predisposition to potentially life-threatening necrotizing soft-tissue infections. CASE REPORT Here, we present a case of a 66-year-old woman with a prior history of anal SCC stage T3N×M0 who was treated with the Nigro protocol. Her treatment course was complicated by radiation proctitis, necessitating fecal diversion and ureteral strictures, requiring frequent stent exchanges. She presented 18 years after her cancer treatment, with widespread necrosis of her pelvic organs and surrounding soft tissue, resulting in formation of a large pelvic "cloaca", with a superimposed necrotizing soft-tissue infection. She was successfully treated by expedited resuscitation, septic source control, using multiple extensive debridements, and complete urinary diversion, utilizing a multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the importance of monitoring patients for signs of radiation toxicity, particularly in patients who received radiation prior to the latest technological advancements, as they are at increased risk of developing severe, late adverse effects decades after treatment. When these complications are recognized, early and aggressive intervention is required to spare the patient significant morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adil H. Khan
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| | - Anders F. Mellgren
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| | - Alejandra M. Perez-Tamayo
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| | - Vivek Chaudhry
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| | - Elisa M. Bianchi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| | - Mohamad A. Abdulhai
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shin JY, Chino F, Cuaron JJ, Washington C, Jablonowski M, McBride S, Gomez DR. Insurance Denials and Patient Treatment in a Large Academic Radiation Oncology Center. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2416359. [PMID: 38865128 PMCID: PMC11170304 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Insurance barriers to cancer care can cause significant patient and clinician burden. Objective To investigate the association of insurance denial with changes in technique, dose, and time to delivery of radiation oncology treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants In this single-institution cohort analysis, data were collected from patients with payer-denied authorization for radiation therapy (RT) from November 1, 2021, to December 8, 2022. Data were analyzed from December 15, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Exposure Insurance denial for RT. Main Outcomes and Measures Association of these denials with changes in RT technique, dose, and time to treatment delivery was assessed using χ2 tests. Results A total of 206 cases (118 women [57.3%]; median age, 58 [range, 26-91] years) were identified. Most insurers (199 [96.6%]) were commercial payers, while 7 (3.4%) were Medicare or Medicare Advantage. One hundred sixty-one patients (78.2%) were younger than 65 years. Of 206 cases, 127 (61.7%) were ultimately authorized without any change to the requested RT technique or prescription dose; 56 (27.2%) were authorized after modification to RT technique and/or prescription dose required by the payer. Of 21 cases with required prescription dose change, the median decrease in dose was 24.0 (range, 2.3-51.0) Gy. Of 202 cases (98.1%) with RT delivered, 72 (34.9%) were delayed for a mean (SD) of 7.8 (9.1) days and median of 5 (range, 1-49) days. Four cases (1.9%) ultimately did not receive any authorization, with 3 (1.5%) not undergoing RT, and 1 (0.5%) seeking treatment at another institution. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with payer-denied cases, most insurance denials in radiation oncology were ultimately approved on appeal; however, RT technique and/or effectiveness may be compromised by payer-mandated changes. Further investigation and action to recognize the time and financial burdens on clinicians and clinical effects on patients caused by insurance denials of RT is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Y. Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles Washington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Margaret Jablonowski
- Physician Billing Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Manfrida S, Fionda B, Mariani S, Luca VDE, Bertolini R, Barbaro B, Chiloiro G, Frascino V, Tagliaferri L, Gambacorta MA. High-tailored Anal Canal Radiotherapy (HIT-ART): Outcomes of a 10-Year Single Center Clinical Experience. In Vivo 2024; 38:1306-1315. [PMID: 38688632 PMCID: PMC11059920 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The current standard for anal cancer treatment is essentially a 'one size fits all' approach where the dose of radiotherapy is similar whether the tumor is very small or very large. Trials are ongoing to evaluate dose de-escalation or escalation in localized disease depending on tumor size. The aim of the study was to assess results of a personalized approach involving dose stratification by stage and boost dose adjusted according to tumor early response. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed squamous cell anal cancer (SCAC) patients treated between 2011 and 2021 by long-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CT); a sequential boost could be administered by IMRT or interventional radiotherapy (IRT) to obtain a total equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) of 54-60 Gy. RESULTS We analyzed 110 patients (61% T3-4 stage, 71% node-positive). A total of 68.2% of patients received a sequential boost, mainly by IRT; median total EQD2 to primary site was 59.3 Gy. Acute ≥G3 toxicity rate was 36.4%. Median follow-up (FUP) was 35.4 months. A total of 83% of patients achieved clinical complete response (cCR); locoregional recurrence (LRR) occurred in 20.9% and distant metastases in 6.4% of cases. A total of 12.7% patients underwent salvage surgery. A total of 25.5% of patients reported ≥G2 and 4.5% ≥G3 late toxicity. The estimated 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival and colostomy-free survival were 92%, 72% and 84% respectively; 3-year-LRR was 22%. Nodal stage was associated with poorer cCR probability and higher LRR (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Our results on a large cohort of patients with locally advanced SCAC and long FUP time confirmed the efficacy of IMRT; high local control and manageable toxicity also suggest IRT as a promising method in treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Manfrida
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Mariani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy;
| | - Viola DE Luca
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Bertolini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Brunella Barbaro
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hsieh MT, Shakespeare TP, Winkley L, Goonetilleke D, Yap SZL, Tahir ARM. Long-term outcomes of definitive radiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in a regional Australian cancer centre. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:325-332. [PMID: 38450897 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in the curative intent treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus. Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) is a highly conformal radiation therapy technique that has been implemented to reduce toxicity for these patients. However, there are few reports evaluating the long-term outcomes of VMAT. Thus, we evaluated the survival and toxicity outcomes of anal cancer patients treated in our regional cancer centre undergoing curative intent chemoradiotherapy using VMAT and following the Australian EviQ guidelines. METHODS All consecutive patients treated with the VMAT technique for curative-intent definitive chemoradiotherapy for anal SCC at our institution from 2013 until 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for survival and toxicity outcomes. Kaplan-Meier estimates of locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, anal cancer-specific survival and overall survival were obtained. RESULTS In total, 44 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 48.9 months (Range 7.8-107). 97.7% of patients completed the prescribed radiation therapy and 88.6% chemotherapy. Five patients (11.4%) recurred. Four (9.1%) had isolated local failures, and one (2.3%) had an isolated distant failure. There were no regional nodal failures. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, anal cancer-specific survival and overall survival were 90.3%, 97.7%, 88.1%, 97.1% and 87% at 3 years, and 90.3%, 97.7%, 88.1%, 93.0% and 72.3% at 5 years, respectively. Acute grade 3 genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI) and skin toxicities occurred in 2.2%, 6.8% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. There were no acute grade 4 toxicities. Late grade 2 GU and GI toxicities occurred in 6.8% and 11.3% of patients, respectively. There were no late grade 3 or 4 toxicities or treatment-related deaths. The 5 -year colostomy-free survival rate was 86.4%. CONCLUSION Outcomes for anal SCC after definitive chemoradiotherapy using VMAT in our regional cancer centre results in low rates of grade 3/4 toxicity, high rates of organ preservation and excellent survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ti Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- RCS Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Philip Shakespeare
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- RCS Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lauren Winkley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Goonetilleke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shaun Zheng Liang Yap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abdul Rahim Mohd Tahir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arzola A, Chang E, Rooney MK, Corrigan K, Das P, Ludmir EB, Koay EJ, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Messick C, Morris VK, Nebgen D, Crane CH, Holliday EB. Daily Vaginal Dilator Use During Radiation for Women With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Vaginal Wall Dosimetry and Patient-Reported Sexual Function. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e105-e116. [PMID: 37898354 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE At our institution, we treat patients with a daily vaginal dilator (VD) during chemoradiation (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). We evaluated compliance with daily VD use, radiation dose to the vaginal wall (VW), and anterior vaginal wall (AVW), and patient-reported long-term sexual function. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included women with SCCA who received definitive, intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based CRT. Women who were alive without evidence of disease received a patient-reported outcome survey, which included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). We identified factors associated with FSFI, such as radiation dose to the VW and AVW using linear regression models and used Youden index analysis to estimate a dose cutoff to predict sexual dysfunction. RESULTS Three hundred thirty-nine consecutively treated women were included in the analysis; 285 (84.1%) were treated with a daily VD. Of 184 women alive without disease, 90 patients (49%) completed the FSFI, and 51 (56.7%) were sexually active with valid FSFI scores. All received therapy with a daily VD. Forty-one women (80%) had sexual dysfunction. Univariate analysis showed higher dose to 50% (D50%) of the AVW correlated with worse FSFI (β -.262; P = .043), worse desire FSFI subscore (β -.056; P = .003), and worse pain FSFI subscore (β -.084; P = .009). Younger age correlated with worse pain FSFI subscale (β .067; P = .026). Age (β .070; P = .013) and AVW D50% (β -.087; P = .009) were significant on multivariable analysis. AVW D50% >48 Gy predicted increased risk of sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Daily VD use is safe and well tolerated during CRT for SCCA. Using a VD during treatment to displace the AVW may reduce the risk for sexual dysfunction. Limiting the AVW D50% <48 Gy may further reduce the risk but additional data are needed to validate this constraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enoch Chang
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology
| | | | | | - Prajnan Das
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Denise Nebgen
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Razavian NB, Shenker RF, Farris MK, Hughes RT. In Reply to Takiar and Beadle. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1299-1301. [PMID: 37980147 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Niema B Razavian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Rachel F Shenker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael K Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ryan T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smart AC, Liu KX, Domogauer JD, Rodriguez-Russo C, Jones B, Dickstein DR, Mancias JD, Shiloh RY, Wintner A, Zietman AL, Marshall DC, Dyer MA, Russo AL. Gender-Affirming Surgery and Cancer: Considerations for Radiation Oncologists for Pelvic Radiation in Transfeminine Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:301-311. [PMID: 37230432 PMCID: PMC10527783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Access to gender-affirming surgery is increasing for many transgender and nonbinary people in the United States, and radiation oncologists must be equipped to care for patients who have undergone such surgery in the region of their planned radiation treatment field. There are no guidelines for radiation treatment planning after gender-affirming surgery, and most oncologists do not receive training in the unique needs of transgender people with cancer. We review common gender-affirming genitopelvic surgeries for transfeminine people, including vaginoplasty, labiaplasty, and orchiectomy, and summarize the existing literature on the treatment of cancers of the neovagina, anus, rectum, prostate, and bladder in these patients. We also describe our systematic treatment approach and rationale for pelvic radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia C Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason D Domogauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Carlos Rodriguez-Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Brianna Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Joseph D Mancias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ron Y Shiloh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anton Wintner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony L Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah C Marshall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - M Aiven Dyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea L Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Joseph K, Balushi MA, Ghosh S, Stenson T, Abraham A, Elangovan A, Warkentin H, Paulson K, Tankel K, Usmani N, Severin D, Schiller D, Wong C, Mulder K, Doll C, King K, Nijjar T. Long-Term Patient-Reported Quality of Life of Anal Cancer Survivors Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy: Results From a Prospective Phase II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:434-445. [PMID: 37148982 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has confirmed its superiority in improving acute treatment-related toxicities in anal cancer, without compromising tumor control. However, the effect of IMRT on long-term quality of life (QOL) is poorly documented. The study prospectively evaluated the long-term patient-reported QOL after IMRT-based chemoradiation in anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-eight patients treated with IMRT and concurrent 5 fluorouracil/mitomycin-C were enrolled in the study. A prespecified secondary endpoint was prospective evaluation of long-term QOL. Fifty-four patients underwent QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment, and during follow-up until 60 months, with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales and the Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) scales. The QOL scores at baseline and posttreatment periods were compared. RESULTS For QLQ-C30, at 60 months, the mean scores of global health status, all functional scales, and all symptoms except diarrhea had improved, indicating normalization of QOL. Clinically and statistically significant improvements in the global health status (15.4; P = .003), role functioning (19.3; P = .0017), emotional functioning (18.9; P = .008), and social functioning (29.8; P ≤ .001) were observed. Diarrhea persisted as a concern over the years (P = .172). For European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CR29, rectal pain (-38.6; P = .001), mucous or blood discharge per rectum (-22.8; P = .005), and perianal soreness (-37.3; P ≤ .001) were improved both clinically and statistically. Clinically significant fecal leakage was reported by 16% of patients (5.6; P = .421). Volumes receiving 45 and 54 Gy were independent predictors for fecal incontinence. Clinically and statistically significant urinary incontinence occurred in 21% of patients (17.5; P = .014). Deterioration of dyspareunia was clinically significant (26.7; P = .099) at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS Compared with historical data, IMRT is associated with reduced long-term effects on QOL. The majority of patients treated with IMRT experienced clinically significant recovery of function and improvement in QOL over 5 years after completion of treatment. Specific toxicities such as chronic diarrhea, fecal incontinence, and urinary and sexual dysfunction were primarily responsible for deterioration of the long-term QOL. Future research aimed at reducing such toxicities is needed to further improve long-term QOL in anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurian Joseph
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Mustafa Al Balushi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Trevor Stenson
- Alberta Cancer Clinical Trials, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aswin Abraham
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Arun Elangovan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather Warkentin
- Alberta Cancer Clinical Trials, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kim Paulson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Keith Tankel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane Severin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dan Schiller
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Clarence Wong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Karen Mulder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Corinne Doll
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary & Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen King
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tirath Nijjar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nilsson MP, Undseth C, Albertsson P, Eidem M, Havelund BM, Johannsson J, Johnsson A, Radu C, Serup-Hansen E, Spindler KL, Zakrisson B, Guren MG, Kronborg C. Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:897-906. [PMID: 37504978 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2240490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: To date, anal cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy to similar volumes despite a marked difference in risk profile based on tumor location and stage. A more individualized approach to delineation of the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) could potentially provide better oncological outcomes as well as improved quality of life. The aim of the present work was to establish Nordic Anal Cancer (NOAC) group guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer.Methods: First, 12 radiation oncologists reviewed the literature in one of the following four areas: (1) previous delineation guidelines; (2) patterns of recurrence; (3) anatomical studies; (4) common iliac and para-aortic recurrences and delineation guidelines. Second, areas of controversy were identified and discussed with the aim of reaching consensus.Results: We present consensus-based recommendations for CTVe delineation in anal cancer regarding (a) which regions to include, and (b) how the regions should be delineated. Some of our recommendations deviate from current international guidelines. For instance, the posterolateral part of the inguinal region is excluded, decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue. For the external iliac region and the cranial border of the CTVe, we agreed on specifying two different recommendations, both considered acceptable. One of these recommendations is novel and risk-adapted; the external iliac region is omitted for low-risk patients, and several different cranial borders are used depending on the individual level of risk.Conclusion: We present NOAC consensus guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer, including a risk-adapted strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Per Albertsson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, and Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Monika Eidem
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - Birgitte Mayland Havelund
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jakob Johannsson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Björn Zakrisson
- Department of radiation sciences - oncology, Umeå University
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish, Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lu Y, Pan W, Deng S, Dou Q, Wang X, An Q, Wang X, Ji H, Hei Y, Chen Y, Yang J, Zhang HM. Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16040510. [PMID: 37111268 PMCID: PMC10146083 DOI: 10.3390/ph16040510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajie Lu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- The State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Biotechnology Center, School of Pharmacy, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- Correspondence: (Y.L.); (H.-M.Z.)
| | - Wei Pan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Shizhou Deng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Qiongyi Dou
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Xiangxu Wang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Qiang An
- The Department of Biomedical Engineering, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Xiaowen Wang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Hongchen Ji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Yue Hei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Jingyue Yang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Hong-Mei Zhang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- Correspondence: (Y.L.); (H.-M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anal Cancer: The Past, Present and Future. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3232-3250. [PMID: 36975459 PMCID: PMC10047250 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Anal cancer is a rare cancer that accounts for about 2% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Among anal cancer, squamous cell cancer is the most common malignancy. The incidence of all stages of anal squamous cell cancer has been increasing. Human papillomavirus infection and immunosuppression are major risk factors for anal cancer. The management of anal cancer has evolved over the past several decades and continues to do so. Chemoradiation therapy remains the mainstay for treatment for most patients with early-stage disease, whereas systemic therapy is the primary treatment for patients with metastatic disease. Patients with persistent disease or recurrence following chemoradiation therapy are treated with salvage surgery. Access to novel cytotoxic combinations and immunotherapy has improved the outcomes of patients with advanced disease. This review provides an overview of advances in the management of anal cancer over the past two decades. This paper reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, pathology, diagnosis, and management of localized and advanced anal squamous cell cancer, highlights current knowledge gaps in the management of anal cancer, and discusses future directions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lycke Wind K, Garm Spindler KL, Maria Lutz C, Nyvang L, Kronborg C. Estimated dose to site of loco-regional recurrence after radiotherapy in anal cancer using point of origin methods. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100424. [PMID: 36817982 PMCID: PMC9929855 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) dominates the failure pattern after curative radiotherapy in anal cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate dose of LRRs in anal cancer using a point of origin-based method. Method and materials Of 321 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, 31 patients with LRR (29 local recurrences and 5 regional lymph node recurrences) were available for analysis. The recurrence volumes were delineated on recurrence magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI). Rigid and subsequent deformable co-registration of planning computerised tomography scans and rMRI were performed. Point of origin was estimated as the centre of mass (COM) and an observer-based point of origin (obs-PO). Doses to COM and obs-PO, as well as the full recurrence volume, were estimated and the relation to target volumes was extracted. Results The median minimum dose to COM was 63.8 Gy (range 32.5-65.1 Gy) and 63.7 Gy (range 35.5-65.2 Gy) to obs-PO of local recurrences. COM was included in the high dose volume (64 Gy) in 86 % of cases, and obs-PO was included in 75 % of cases. There was no difference in minimum dose to COM and obs-PO, and the median distance between the two points was 3.3 mm (range 0.6-19.8 mm). No recurrences occurred in primarily boosted lymph nodes. Conclusion The majority of LLRs were located within the high dose volume indicating radioresistance as the primary cause of recurrence in anal cancer. No difference between the use of COM and obs-PO was evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lycke Wind
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Corresponding author.
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Christina Maria Lutz
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lars Nyvang
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark,Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murofushi KN, Itasaka S, Shimokawa M, Murakami Y, Yamamoto T, Nishimura Y, Kudo S, Sakamoto T, Ariga T, Ogo E, Taguchi K, Jingu K, Ogawa K. A phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (the JROSG 10-2 trial). JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023; 64:154-161. [PMID: 36280895 PMCID: PMC9855315 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This study assessed the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC). Patients with T1-4N0-3M0 SCCAC received chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 800 mg/m2/day, 96-h infusion) and mitomycin-C (MMC, 10 mg/m2 bolus). Patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were administered 36.0 Gy in 20 fractions or 49.5 Gy in 33 fractions for elective nodal irradiation and 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions for primary tumor and metastatic nodal irradiation. The sample size was considered sufficient to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the true 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) within a width of +15% when the expected true 2-year DFS was 70%. The primary endpoint was 2-year DFS. The secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LC), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and adverse events. Thirty-one patients were enrolled between January 2014 and July 2019. The median follow-up was 33.3 months (range, 16.2-65.8 months). Among the 31 patients, 13%, 32%, 16% and 39% had stage I, II, IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. Thirty patients were treated with IMRT. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 27 patients. The 2-year DFS, OS, LC and CFS rates were 77.4% (95% CI, 58.4-88.5%), 93.5% (95% CI, 76.6-98.3%), 83.9% (95% CI, 65.5-92.9%) and 80.6% (95% CI, 61.9-90.8%), respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 late adverse events; however, no grade ≥ 4 late adverse events occurred. Good DFS with a low rate of late adverse events was observed. Chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and MMC was effective for SCCAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Nemoto Murofushi
- Corresponding author. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan. Tel: +81-3-3823-2101. Fax: +81-3-4463-7591.
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama 710-8602, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Shimokawa
- Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Yuji Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kudo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan
| | - Takashi Sakamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto 615-8256, Japan
| | - Takuro Ariga
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
- Health Information Management Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Kurume University Radiation Oncology Center, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan
| | - Kentaro Taguchi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mejia-Gomez J, Petrovic I, Doherty M, Kennedy E, Wolfman W, Jacobson M, Brezden C, Philippopoulos E, Lukovic J. Sexual dysfunction in female patients with anal cancer treated with curative intent: A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2023; 178:109437. [PMID: 36481383 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are treated with sphincter-preserving radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, achieving excellent oncologic outcomes. Patients, however, may experience treatment-related morbidity including sexual dysfunction. The objective of this systematic review was to review the literature on sexual dysfunction in female patients treated for anal cancer and to identify knowledge gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO prior to initiation. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. There were no restrictions on the study time period. Studies were limited to English. All study designs were included except review articles, letters to the editor, and case reports with less than ten patients. RESULTS In total, 1801 studies were retrieved and 19 met the inclusion criteria, including: 13 cross-sectional surveys, 3 prospective studies, 1 longitudinal intervention study, 1 retrospective chart review, 1 case control study. Sexual function was assessed using the female sexual functioning index (FSFI), EORTC-QLQ-CR30 and -CR38; response rates were low (<50 % in most studies). Sexual dysfunction was reported by up to 85 % of women; the most common symptoms being dyspareunia (17-65 %), vaginal dryness (22-88 %), and loss of libido (38-95 %). Gastrointestinal issues, such as bowel problems, and body image concerns additionally affected sexual function and quality of life. CONCLUSION Sexual dysfunction is a common issue affecting most female patients treated for anal cancer and there is a paucity of evidence on the management of this important survivorship issue. There is additionally a lack of ethnic, economic, and educational diversity and there are no studies addressing the unique needs of LGBTQ individuals - future studies should make a concerted effort to include a diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irina Petrovic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Doherty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy Wolfman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Menopause and Premature Ovarian Failure, Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle Jacobson
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Brezden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jelena Lukovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bonù ML, La Mattina S, Singh N, Toraci C, Spiazzi L, Terraneo F, Barbera F, Vitali P, Frassine F, Guerini A, Triggiani L, Tomasini D, Morelli V, Imbrescia J, Andreuccetti J, Frittoli B, Pittiani F, Grazioli L, Portolani N, Nicosia L, Albano D, Bertagna F, Magrini SM, Buglione M. Anal squamous cell carcinoma: Impact of radiochemotherapy evolution over years and an explorative analysis of MRI prediction of tumor response in a mono-institutional series of 131 patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:973223. [PMID: 36353538 PMCID: PMC9639749 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiochemotherapy (RCHT) for the treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has evolved dramatically, also thanks to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and 3D image guidance (3D IGRT). Despite most patients presenting fair outcomes, unmet needs still exist. Predictors of poor tumor response are lacking; acute toxicity remains challenging; and local relapse remains the main pattern of failure. Patients and methods Between 2010 and 2020, ASCC stages I–III treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy or IMRT and CDDP-5FU or Mytomicine-5FU CHT were identified. Image guidance accepted included 2D IGRT or 3D IGRT. The study endpoints included freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLR), colostomy free survival (CFS), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), overall survival (OS), and acute and late toxicity as measured by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify possible radiomic predictors of tumor response. Feature extraction and data analysis were performed in Python™, while other statistics were performed using SPSS® v.26.0 software (IBM®). Results A total of 131 patients were identified. After a median FU of 52 months, 83 patients (63.4%) were alive. A total of 35 patients (26.7%) experienced locoregional failure, while 31 patients (23.7%) relapsed with distant metastasis. Five year FFLR, CFS, DMFS and PS resulted 72.3%, 80.1%, 74.5% and 64.6%. In multivariate analysis, 2D IGRT was associated with poorer FFLR, OS, and CFS (HR 4.5, 4.1, and 5.6, respectively); 3DcRT was associated with poorer OS and CFS (HR 3.1 and 6.6, respectively). IMRT reduced severe acute gastro-intestinal (GI) and severe skin acute toxicity in comparison with 3DcRT. In the exploratory analysis, the risk of relapse depended on a combination of three parameters: Total Energy, Gray Level Size Zone Matrix’s Large Area High Gray Level Emphasis (GLSZM’s LAHGLE), and GTV volume. Conclusions Advances in radiotherapy have independently improved the prognosis of ASCC patients over years while decreasing acute GI and skin toxicity. IMRT and daily 3D image guidance may be considered standard of care in the management of ASCC. A combination of three pre-treatment MRI parameters such as low signal intensity (SI), high GLSZM’s LAHGLE, and GTV volume could be integrated in risk stratification to identify candidates for RT dose-escalation to be enrolled in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Lorenzo Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore La Mattina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Navdeep Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristian Toraci
- Department of Medical Physics, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Department of Medical Physics, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fabrizia Terraneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fernando Barbera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Vitali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Frassine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Guerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Morelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jessica Imbrescia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Frida Pittiani
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Grazioli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of General Surgery, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Centre, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Bertagna
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McCall NS, Eng TY, Shelton JW, Hanasoge S, Patel PR, Patel Jr. AB, McCook-Veal AA, Switchenko JM, Cole TE, Khanna N, Han CH, Gordon AN, Starbuck KD, Remick JS. Incidence and predictors of toxicity in the management of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 44:101086. [PMID: 36281250 PMCID: PMC9587278 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective Given the rarity of vulvar cancer, data on the incidence of acute and late severe toxicity and patients' symptom burden from radiotherapy (RT) are lacking. Materials/Methods This multi-center, single-institution study included patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative intent RT between 2009 and 2020. Treatment-related acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities and late patient subjective symptoms (PSS) were recorded. Results Forty-two patients with predominantly stage III/IV disease (n = 25, 59.5 %) were treated with either definitive (n = 25, 59.5 %) or adjuvant (n = 17, 40.5 %) external beam RT to a median dose of 64 Gy and 59.4 Gy, respectively. Five patients received a brachytherapy boost with a median total dose of 84.3 Gy in 2 Gy-equivalent dose (EQD2). Intensity-modulated RT was used in 37 (88.1 %) of patients, and 25 patients (59.5 %) received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 27 months. Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 17 patients (40.5 %), including 13 (31.0 %) acute grade 3 skin events. No factors, including total RT dose (p = 0.951), were associated with acute skin toxicity. Eleven (27.5 %) patients developed late grade ≥ 3 toxicity events, including 10 (23.8 %) late grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity events. Patients with late grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity had a higher mean body-mass index (33.0 vs 28.2 kg/m2; p = 0.009). Common late PSS included vaginal pain (n = 15, 35.7 %), skin fibrosis (n = 10, 23.8 %), and requirement of long-term opiates (n = 12, 28.6 %). Conclusion RT for vulvar cancer is associated with considerable rates of severe acute and late toxicity and PSS burden. Larger studies are needed to identify risk factors, explore toxicity mitigation strategies, and assess patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal S. McCall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Tony Y. Eng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Joseph W. Shelton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Sheela Hanasoge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Pretesh R. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Ashish B. Patel Jr.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Ashley A. McCook-Veal
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Tonya E. Cole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States
| | - Namita Khanna
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, United States
| | - Chanhee H. Han
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, United States
| | - Alan N. Gordon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, United States
| | - Kristen D. Starbuck
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, United States
| | - Jill S. Remick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, United States,Corresponding author at: 1365 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mohamed AA, Risse K, Stock J, Heinzel A, Mottaghy FM, Bruners P, Eble MJ. Body Composition as a Predictor of the Survival in Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4521. [PMID: 36139681 PMCID: PMC9496941 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim: Sarcopenia and body composition parameters such as visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio have been shown to be relevant biomarkers for prognosis in patients with different types of cancer. However, these findings have not been well studied in anal cancer to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of different body composition parameters in patients undergoing radiation therapy for the treatment of anal cancer with curative intent. Material and Methods: After approval by the institutional ethical committee, we retrospectively identified 81 patients in our local registry, who received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the management of anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC). Clinical information, including body mass index (BMI), survival, and toxicities outcome, were retrieved from the local hospital registry. Based on the pre-therapeutic computer tomography (CT), we measured the total psoas muscle area, visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT), and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR). In addition to the classical prognostic factors as T-stage, N-stage, gender, and treatment duration, we analyzed the impact of body composition on the prognosis in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Sarcopenia was not associated with increased mortality in anal cancer patients, whereas increased BMI (≥27 kg/m2) and VSR (≥0.45) were significantly associated with worsened overall survival and cancer-specific survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. VSR-not BMI-was statistically higher in males. Sarcopenia and VSR ≥ 0.45 were associated with advanced T-stages. None of the body composition parameters resulted in a significant increase in treatment-related toxicities. Conclusion: BMI and visceral adiposity are independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with anal cancer. Measurements to treat adiposity at the time of diagnosis may be needed to improve the survival outcomes for the affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Allam Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Risse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Jennifer Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Felix M. Mottaghy
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Bruners
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael J. Eble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
De B, Corrigan KL, Rooney MK, Ludmir EB, Das P, Smith GL, Taniguchi CM, Minsky BD, Koay EJ, Koong A, Morris VK, Messick CA, You YN, Chang GJ, Westney OL, Nogueras Gonzalez GM, Holliday EB. Patient-Reported Bowel and Urinary Function in Long-Term Survivors of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Treated With Definitive Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy And Concurrent Chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:78-88. [PMID: 35589011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is curative for nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). However, the true effect of chemoradiation on long-term functional outcomes is poorly understood owing to limited follow-up and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 248 patients with SCCA treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. PRO measures were collected, including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ). Models were used to determine the association between demographic, tumor, treatment, and dosimetric data with PROs. RESULTS One hundred twelve (45%) patients completed PROs. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] time from radiation completion to survey was 51 [37-85] months. The median scores [IQR] for FACT-G7, FIQoL, and LARS were 21 [15-24], 14 [11-16], and 32 [25-37], respectively. For men, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding and incontinence subscores were 5 [2-6] and 1 [1-3], respectively. For women, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding, incontinence, and filling were 1 [1-3], 5 [3-8], and 4 [2-5], respectively. Higher (better) FIQoL scores were associated with higher (better) FACT-G7 scores (β = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.09; P < .001), and higher (worse) LARS scores were associated with lower (worse) FACT-G7 scores (β = -0.22; 95% confidence interval, -0.31 to -0.13; P < .001). A separate multivariable analysis revealed higher bowel bag D1% was associated with lower (worse) FIQoL (P = .001) and higher (worse) LARS (P = .003) scores. Higher bladder V40 Gy was associated with increased (worse) ICIQ voiding subscore (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with modern chemoradiation for SCCA experience significant long-term bowel toxic effects with considerable effect on quality of life. Minimizing bowel hotspots and bladder V40 Gy may improve bowel and urinary function. Other interventions to reduce long-term toxic effects and improve quality of life are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Kelsey L Corrigan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Michael K Rooney
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology; Department of Biostatistics
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology; Department of Health Services Research
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Albert Koong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine
| | | | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Health Services Research; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | - O Lenaine Westney
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
ECOG-ACRIN Guideline for Contouring and Treatment of Early Stage Anal Cancer Using IMRT/IGRT. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:335-347. [PMID: 35717050 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous anal cancer guidelines delineate target volumes similarly for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and/or perianal skin (SCCA), regardless of disease stage. The purpose of this guideline is to provide customized radiation treatment recommendations for early stage (T1-2 N0 M0) anal cancer treated with intensity modulated and image guided radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS A contouring atlas and radiation treatment recommendations for the ongoing, randomized phase II trial of deintensified chemoradiation for early stage SCCA (EA2182) was created by an expert panel of radiation oncologists. A literature search was conducted to update and expand these recommendations into a guideline for routine clinical use. RESULTS For the majority of cases, we recommend treatment in the supine, frog leg position with the use of a customized immobilization device and daily image guided RT to ensure optimal bone and soft tissue alignment. Vaginal dilators can be used daily during RT to maximize genitalia sparing. We recommend use of a 10-mm margin on the gross tumor plus including the anal complex to create the primary clinical target volume. To define the elective lymph node clinical target volume, we recommend starting with a 7-mm expansion on blood vessels, but then further refining these volumes based on the anatomic location. A 5- to 10-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin is suggested based on institutional setup and patient-specific factors. When using a simultaneous integrated boost technique, a dose of 50.4 Gy to primary PTV and 42 Gy to lymph node PTV, both delivered over 28 fractions, with chemotherapy is appropriate for early stage anal cancer. CONCLUSIONS This guideline provides anatomic, clinical, and technical instructions to guide radiation oncologists in the planning and delivery of intensity modulated and image guided RT for early stage SCCA.
Collapse
|
29
|
Overview of Radiation Treatment Volume Variations in Anal Cancer Contouring Guidelines. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e522-e530. [PMID: 35718076 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Recently, the XXX guideline was published to describe recommended treatment volumes in patients with diagnosis of early-stage anal cancer. There are notable differences in descriptions for the both the primary target and elective nodal volumes when comparing this guideline with established guidelines from the United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute, Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Support for these volume differences is based on retrospective data, but ultimately, prospective data from ongoing clinical trials are needed to validate these approaches.
Collapse
|
30
|
Eng C, Ciombor KK, Cho M, Dorth JA, Rajdev LN, Horowitz DP, Gollub MJ, Jácome AA, Lockney NA, Muldoon RL, Washington MK, O'Brian BA, Benny A, Lebeck Lee CM, Benson AB, Goodman KA, Morris VK. Anal Cancer: Emerging Standards in a Rare Rare Disease. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2774-2788. [PMID: 35649196 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The social stigma surrounding an anal cancer diagnosis has traditionally prevented open discussions about this disease. However, as recent treatment options and an increasing rate of diagnoses are made worldwide, awareness is growing. In the United States alone, 9,090 individuals were expected to be diagnosed with anal cancer in 2021. The US annual incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus continues to increase by 2.7% yearly, whereas the mortality rate increases by 3.1%. The main risk factor for anal cancer is a human papillomavirus infection; those with chronic immunosuppression are also at risk. Patients with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop anal cancer compared with the general population. In this review, we have provided an overview of the carcinoma of the anal canal, the role of screening, advancements in radiation therapy, and current trials investigating acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities. This article is a comprehensive approach to presenting the existing data in an effort to encourage continuous international interest in anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kristen K Ciombor
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California- Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA
| | - Jennifer A Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lakshmi N Rajdev
- Division for Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health/Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexandre A Jácome
- OncoBio Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Nova Lima, Brazil
| | - Natalie A Lockney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Roberta L Muldoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Mary Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brittany A O'Brian
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Amala Benny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Cody M Lebeck Lee
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Department of Internal Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Corrigan KL, De B, Rooney MK, Ludmir EB, Das P, Smith GL, Taniguchi CM, Minsky BD, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Holliday EB. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Chemoradiation in Patients with Anal Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100986. [PMID: 35662810 PMCID: PMC9157211 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
32
|
Tchelebi LT, Eng C, Messick CA, Hong TS, Ludmir EB, Kachnic LA, Zaorsky NG. Current treatment and future directions in the management of anal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:183-195. [PMID: 34847242 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Although rare, the rate of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is rising globally. Most patients present with nonmetastatic disease and are curable with appropriate treatment, which has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Before the 1970s, SCCA was managed with radical surgery, resulting in a permanent colostomy. Researchers found that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation could achieve a pathologic complete response. After this observation, definitive therapy shifted from radical surgery to sphincter-preserving chemoradiation. Investigations into the necessity of chemotherapy and the optimal regimen found that chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil is required for cure. Further studies evaluating the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or higher radiation doses have demonstrated no significant benefit to disease control. Advanced radiation delivery with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques is now considered the standard of care because of its prospectively determined, favorable acute toxicity profile compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiation. It is important to note that chemoradiation treatment response may be slow (up to 26 weeks) and should be assessed through serial clinical examinations. Today, surgical management of SCCA is reserved only for the lowest risk, early stage tumors or for recurrent/persistent disease. Current studies are evaluating radiation dose de-escalation in early stage disease and radiation dose escalation and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced cancers. In reviewing how and why modern-day treatment of SCCA was established, the objective of this report is to reenforce adherence to current treatment paradigms to assure the best possible outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Mount Kisco, New York
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Craig A Messick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sia J, Mou W, Agas RA, Xie J, Burns M, Varghayee N, Chu J, Heriot A, Leong T, Ngan SY. Long-term Patterns of Failure and the Value of Blood Prognostic Markers in Anal Cancers Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:e102-e112. [PMID: 34799240 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze the long-term outcomes and prognostic value of hematological parameters in anal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS Hospital records of consecutive patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma who received curative-intent IMRT according to a standardized contouring protocol between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Coverage of locoregional recurrences by the initial IMRT volumes were assessed. The prognostic value of pretreatment blood counts for PFS and OS were determined using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 166 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Forty-six percent and 54% of patients had Stage I-II and IIIA-B cancers, respectively. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS were 81%, 89%, 65% and 76% respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 5% of patients. Of all patients who relapsed, 70% had only locoregional recurrence as first site of failure. Ninety percent of locoregional recurrences were in-field. Hemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts were associated with PFS on univariable analysis, but only cancer stage and p16 status remained prognostic on multivariable analysis. Patients with more advanced cancer stages also had higher baseline neutrophil counts. Performance status and neutrophil counts were prognostic for OS on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION This study affirms the long-term efficacy and safety of IMRT. Treatment resistance, rather than radiation geographic miss, is a major issue underpinning locoregional recurrences. Pretreatment blood counts were not validated to be independently prognostic for disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Wei Mou
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ryan Anthony Agas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jing Xie
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Burns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nahal Varghayee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Trevor Leong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Samuel Y Ngan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|