Determining Planning Priorities for SABR for Oligometastatic Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the SABR-COMET Phase II Randomized Trial

Evaluating Toxicity and Interaction Outcomes of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial

PURPOSE

Although stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is known for low toxicity and safety, its combined use with specific systemic therapies requires further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the toxicity of SABR in combination with various systemic therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A secondary analysis of the SABR-5 trial evaluated grade 2+ and 3+ toxicities post-SABR in patients who had received high-risk or non-high-risk systemic therapies before SABR at 4 predefined intervals: concurrent with SABR, 1 day to 1 week prior, 1 to 2 weeks prior, or 2 to 12 weeks prior. High-risk systemic therapy was a priori defined as drugs that may increase treatment toxicity when delivered in close proximity to SABR. This category encompasses cytotoxic chemotherapy, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-CTLA-4 agents.

RESULTS

Among 380 patients, grade 2+ toxicity rates were 17.3% (35/202) off systemic therapy, 19.2% (19/99) on non-high-risk therapy, and 42.9% (3/7) on high-risk therapy concurrent with SABR. Grade 3+ rates were 3.5% (7/202), 4.0% (4/99), and 28.6% (2/7), respectively. On multivariable analysis, concurrent use of high-risk systemic therapy was associated with a higher risk of grade 3+ toxic effects (OR, 14.88; P = .009). No significant risk was noted when high-risk drugs were used within 1 week, 2 weeks, or 2 to 12 weeks of SABR or with any non-high-risk drugs. Grade 2+ toxic effects associated with concurrent high-risk systemic therapy were primarily bone/pain related. Increased tumor diameter also elevated grade 2+ toxicity risk (per 1 cm increment; G2+ OR, 1.19; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent use of high-risk drugs has demonstrated a potential of increased SABR-related toxicity, warranting caution in their concurrent use with SABR. In contrast, combining non-high-risk drugs (eg, hormonal therapy) with SABR did not increase risk. Further research is essential to identify risks associated with this therapeutic combination.

The Impact of Ultracentral Tumor Location on Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Secondary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

There are limited data on outcomes in patients with ultracentral pulmonary oligometastases treated with SABR. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultracentral location was prognostic for toxicity and survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Oligometastatic lung lesions treated on the single-arm phase 2 SABR-5 trial were retrospectively stratified into 2 cohorts: ultracentral tumors (UC), defined as planning target volume overlap or direct tumor abutment to the proximal bronchial tree, esophagus, great vessels, or heart, and nonultracentral tumors. Cohorts were compared with respect to grade ≥ 2 toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients with 45 ultracentral metastases and 93 patients with 172 nonultracentral metastases underwent SABR. The most common primary histologies were colorectal (30%), lung (13%), and renal (13%), and these did not differ between groups. Patients with UC had a lower median PFS of 5.8 months compared with 15.8 months in patients with non ultracentral tumors (P < .001). OS was also worse in the UC cohort: median 29.0 months versus not yet reached (P < .001). On multivariable regression, UC remained prognostic for worse PFS (hazard ratio 2.18, P = .004) and OS (hazard ratio 3.45, P < .001). Groups had similar rates of local tumor control. Patients with UC had higher 2-year cumulative incidence of polymetastatic progression: 69.2% versus 31.4% (P < .001). The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 14.6% for patients with UC and 9.8% for patients with nonultracentral tumors (P = .74). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective patient cohort, SABR for ultracentral tumor had low toxicity rates and good local control. However, ultracentral location was an adverse prognostic feature for survival. This finding should be validated with larger studies and may be a factor when weighing the benefit versus risk of SABR in patients with pulmonary oligometastases.

Local control and recurrence patterns after stereotactic irradiation delivered in more than 4 fractions for hepatocellular carcinomas and liver metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective treatment for liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a dose-response relationship for local control (LC). Proximity to organs at risk (OAR) often requires dose de-escalation. This study evaluated LC and recurrence patterns in patients administered hepatic SBRT in more than 4 fractions due to dosimetric constraints.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 33 patients treated with SBRT (Cyberknife®) in more than 4 fractions for HCC or liver metastases, between January 2011 and December 2019. Patients were ineligible for treatment in 3 or 4 fractions due to OAR proximity. Recurrence patterns were analysed according to the volume shared between recurrence and initial target or treatment isodose volumes.

RESULTS

The primary dose ranged from 35 to 50 Gy delivered in 5 to 7 fractions for the treatment of HCC (39%) or liver metastases (61%) mainly secondary to colorectal cancer (40%). LC rate was 64%, with 12 patients showing recurrence volume overlap with the initial target volume or treatment isodose. In-field recurrence occurred in only 12.5% of patients with most relapses being out-of-field. No grade ≥ 3 events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Despite dose reductions to spare OAR, SBRT showed satisfactory LC with low toxicity. Out-of-field recurrence remains the most common pattern identified and likely related to underlying disease. Prospective data are necessary to determine whether preserving dose while reducing planning target volume (PTV) coverage could enhance LC. Trial registration All patients were retrospectively registered, and this study is registered at the Health Data Hub site (number HDH414).

Effects of maximum dose on local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic tumors of colorectal cancer

This study aimed to identify radiotherapy dosimetric parameters related to local failure (LF)-free survival (LFFS) in patients with lung and liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We analyzed 75 oligometastatic lesions in 55 patients treated with SBRT between January 2014 and December 2021. There was no constraint or intentional increase in maximum dose. LF was defined as the progression of the treated lesion until the last follow-up or death. The dose distributions were recalculated using Monte Carlo-based algorithms. The significance of the planning target volume (PTV) biologically effective dose (BED) 10s (D2, D95, D98, Dmean) in LFFS was evaluated using Cox regression, considering sex, age, primary cancer, tumor site, oligometastatic status, multiplicity, and either tumor size or one of the volume parameters. LF occurred in 23.4% of the lesions. Lesions showing LF received significantly lower PTV D2 (146 ± 21 vs. 164 ± 23, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that PTV D2 (< 159 Gy10 vs. ≥ 159 Gy10) was the sole dosimetric parameter associated with LFFS. Tumors equal to or larger than the median size/volume yet receiving < 159 Gy10 of PTV D2 showed the lowest LFFS following stratification by median PTV D2 combined with tumor size or volume parameters. The maximum dose (PTV D2) was significantly associated with LFFS after SBRT for lung and liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer. Increasing the maximum dose may be beneficial for managing larger tumors.

OligoM-Cancer: A multidimensional information platform for deep phenotyping of heterogenous oligometastatic cancer

Patients with oligometastatic cancer (OMC) exhibit better response to local therapeutic interventions and a more treatable tendency than those with polymetastatic cancers. However, studies on OMC are limited and lack effective integration for systematic comparison and personalized application, and the diagnosis and precise treatment of OMC remain controversial. The application of large language models in medicine remains challenging because of the requirement of high-quality medical data. Moreover, these models must be enhanced using precise domain-specific knowledge. Therefore, we developed the OligoM-Cancer platform (http://oligo.sysbio.org.cn), pioneering knowledge curation that depicts various aspects of oligometastases spectrum, including markers, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy choices. A user-friendly website was developed using HTML, FLASK, MySQL, Bootstrap, Echarts, and JavaScript. This platform encompasses comprehensive knowledge and evidence of phenotypes and their associated factors. With 4059 items of literature retrieved, OligoM-Cancer includes 1345 valid publications and 393 OMC-associated factors. Additionally, the included clinical assistance tools enhance the interpretability and credibility of clinical translational practice. OligoM-Cancer facilitates knowledge-guided modeling for deep phenotyping of OMC and potentially assists large language models in supporting specialised oligometastasis applications, thereby enhancing their generalization and reliability.

Acute toxicity in patients with oligometastatic cancer following metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy: An interim analysis of the E2-RADIatE OligoCare cohort

AIM

To evaluate acute toxicity at 6 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic cancer within the OligoCare cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

OligoCare is a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational study that aims to report prospective real-world data of patients with oligometastases from solid cancer treated with SBRT (NCT03818503). Primary tumor included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and prostate cancer (PC). This analysis addresses a secondary endpoint of the trial, acute toxicity within 6 months after SBRT.

RESULTS

Out of 1,597registered patients, 1'468 patients were evaluated for acute toxicity. Globally, 290 (20 %) had NSCLC primary disease, 227 (16 %) had BC, 293 (20 %) had CRC, and 658 (45 %) had PC. Concomitant systemic treatment was administered in 527 (35.9 %) patients. According to the EORTC/ESTRO oligometastatic disease (OMD) classification, 828 (56 %) patients had de novo OMD, 464 (32 %) repeat OMD, and 176 (12 %) induced OMD. Acute grade ≥ 3 SBRT related adverse events were reported in 8 (0.5 %) patients, including 2 (0.1 %) fatal AEs. In particular, 6 (0.4 %) grade 3 events were: 1 empyema, 1 pneumonia, 1 radiation pneumonitis, 1 radiation skin injury, 1 decreased appetite, and 1 bone pain. Among those 2 occurred in NSCLC patients, 2 in BC patients, and 1 in CRC and PC patients each. The two (0.1 %) grade 5 toxicity were represented by: pneumonitis and cerebral hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

OligoCare is the largest prospective registry cohort on oligometastatic disease. Acute toxicity within 6 months was low, confirming the safety of SBRT in the treatment of oligometastases.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Pericolonic Soft Tissue Metastases Using Daily Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy

A 74-year-old woman with pathologic T4a N1 M0 adenocarcinoma of the cecum, initially treated with right hemicolectomy, developed rising serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels while receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Re-staging investigations demonstrated two soft tissue metastases in the right abdomen comprised of a retrocolic lesion immediately posterior to the colon and a retroperitoneal lesion with no other sites of metastases. The patient was treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a dose of 40 Gy in five daily fractions to both pericolonic soft tissue metastases simultaneously. A standard volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan had suboptimal dose coverage of the retrocolic metastasis adjacent to the colon, so cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was employed to maximize radiation dose to the tumors due to the radioresistant histology. An intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan was created using artificial intelligence tools integrated with the treatment unit. Median contouring and plan creation for each fraction was 21.5 minutes (range 14.9-28.1). For the retrocolic metastasis, compared to the standard VMAT plan, the CBCT-guided online ART plan improved coverage of the gross target volume by the prescription dose from 80.0% to 99.7%. SABR to pericolonic soft tissue metastases was feasible using CBCT-guided online ART and can significantly improve target volume coverage when targets are adjacent to mobile normal organs, which may be particularly important for radioresistant histologies for local control.

Prospective phase II trial on ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases

BACKGROUND

Oligometastases in mediastinal nodes are increasingly prevalent, posing challenges for treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to proximity to organs at risk (OARs). We report the results of a single prospective observational phase II trial on ablative SBRT for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases (NCT02970955).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2017, patients with < 3 nodal metastases were evaluated by the tumor board and included if deemed inoperable. SBRT was delivered using risk adaptive approach based on number, site and size of metastatic nodes (50 Gy/5fractions, 60 Gy/8fractions, 70 Gy/10 fractions). Planning target volume (PTV) partial underdosage was allowed. The primary end point was local control (LC) at 12 months. Secondary end points were: acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to next systemic therapy (TTNS).

RESULTS

Between 03/2017-11/2021, 32 patients (41 nodal metastases) were included. NSCLC (13pts), breast (5pts) and colorectal cancer (4pts) were the most represented primary tumour. In 66 % cases, partial PTV undercoverage was necessary. LC at 1 and 2 years was 93.5 % and 82.3 %, respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated with no acute or late toxicity ≥ G3. Median OS was 59.7 months. OS at 1 and 2 years was 96.9 % and 83.8 % respectively. Median PFS was 12.2 months. PFS at 1 and 2 years was 53.1 % and 31.3 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This trial supported the feasibility and safety of ablative SBRT for thoracic nodes metastases thanks to risk adaptive approach allowing to delay of new systemic therapies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Factors influencing local control after MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) for adrenal metastases

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for adrenal gland metastases, but it is technically challenging and there are concerns about toxicity. We performed a multi-institutional pooled retrospective analysis to study clinical outcomes and toxicities after MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) using for adrenal gland metastases.

Methods and Materials

Clinical and dosimetric data of patients treated with MRgSBRT on a 0.35 T MR-Linac at 11 institutions between 2016 and 2022 were analyzed. Local control (LC), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

A total of 255 patients (269 adrenal metastases) were included. Metastatic pattern was solitary in 25.9 % and oligometastatic in 58.0 % of patients. Median total dose was 45 Gy (range, 16-60 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions, and the median BED10 was 100 Gy (range, 37.5-132.0 Gy). Adaptation was done in 87.4 % of delivered fractions based on the individual clinicians' judgement. The 1- and 2- year LPFS rates were 94.0 % (95 % CI: 90.7-97.3 %) and 88.3 % (95 % CI: 82.4-94.2 %), respectively and only 2 patients (0.8 %) experienced grade 3 + toxicity. No local recurrences were observed after treatment to a total dose of BED10 > 100 Gy, with single fraction or fractional dose of > 10 Gy.

Conclusions

This is a large retrospective multi-institutional study to evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicities with MRgSBRT in over 250 patients, demonstrating the need for frequent adaptation in 87.4 % of delivered fractions to achieve a 1- year LPFS rate of 94 % and less than 1 % rate of grade 3 + toxicity. Outcomes analysis in 269 adrenal lesions revealed improved outcomes with delivery of a BED10 > 100 Gy, use of single fraction SBRT and with fraction doses > 10 Gy, providing benchmarks for future clinical trials.

Stereotactic reirradiation with CyberknifeR for locally recurrent prostate cancer, long-term toxicity and clinical outcomes from a monocentric cohort

PURPOSE

Up to 47% of patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiotherapy (EBRT) eventually develop local recurrence. To date, no clear consensus exists on optimal management. A growing body of interest supports the use of stereotaxic re-irradiation (rSBRT), with promising oncological outcomes and low toxicity profile. We collected a single-center case series of locally recurrent PCa who underwent re-irradiation after a previous course of postoperative or definitive radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 101 patients treated at our institution for locally recurrent PCa from June 2012 to June 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients underwent rSBRT with CyberKnife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), delivered to intraprostatic or macroscopic recurrences within the prostate bed, for a total dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions.

RESULTS

All patients received prior EBRT. The median EQD2 total dose was 75.0 Gy (range, 60-80 Gy). Thirty-two (32%) patients were receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after prior biochemical recurrence. After a median follow-up of 57.8 months, BR occurred in 55 patients (54.5%), with a median BR-free survival (BRFS) of 40.4 months (95% C.I. 34.3-58.3). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) developed metastatic disease, with a median metastasis-free survival (MFS) not reached. PSA ≥ 2.5 ng/ml and ADT were associated with worst BRFS (26.06 vs. 39.3 months, p = 0.03 and 22.7 vs. 27 months, p = 0.01, respectively). Castration-resistant status and ADT were found to be predictive of worst MFS (34.1 vs. 50.5 months, p = 0.02 and 33.5 vs. 53.1 months, p = 0.002, respectively). Concomitant ADT was confirmed as an independent factor for MFS (HR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5-10.6, p = 0.007). No grade > /2 adverse were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

After almost 5 years of follow-up, with a median BRFS of 40.4 months and no grade ≥ 2 AEs, CyberknifeR rSBRT proved effective and safe in a cohort of 101 patients affected by locally recurrent PCa.

Clinical outcomes of MR-guided adrenal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with preferential sparing of organs at risk

Background and purpose

The optimal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) doses for adrenal tumors are unknown. Some trials have specified that organ at risk (OAR) dose constraints should take priority over target coverage. We performed a retrospective review of the outcomes of MR-guided adrenal SABR (MRgRT) delivered with OAR sparing.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent adrenal MRgRT between 2016 and 2023 were identified from our Ethics-approved institutional database. Dose ranged between 8 and 24 Gy per fraction, delivered in 1-5 fractions. A 3 mm margin was added to the breath-hold gross tumor volume (GTV) to derive a PTV. Plan were delivered to an 'optimized' PTV that was generated by excluding any overlap with OARs.

Results

Adrenal SABR was performed in 107 patients (114 metastases). The commonest scheme used 5 fractions of 10 Gy (53.5 %); 82 % of plans delivered a BED10 ≧ 80 Gy. Systemic therapy was administered within 3 months preceding or following SABR in 53.5 % of patients. Grade 3 acute toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) occurred in 0.9 % of patients, and 4.4 % reported late toxicity, consisting of adrenal insufficiency and a vertebral collapse. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range, 0.0-73.4 months). Local progression occurred in 7.4 % of evaluable patients. PTV underdosage was frequent, with a coverage compromise index (D99/prescription dose) of < 0.90 in 52 % of all plans. Recurrences were independent of the prescription doses.

Conclusion

MRgRT for adrenal metastases is well tolerated with high local control rates despite prioritizing OAR sparing over PTV coverage. Studies using deformable dose accumulation may lead to a better understanding of dose-response relationship with adaptive SABR.

Tumor volume changes during stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases under MRI guidance

PURPOSE

Gross tumor volume (GTV) changes during stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for adrenal tumors are not well characterized. We studied treatment-induced GTV changes during, and after, 5-fraction MR-guided SABR on a 0.35 T unit.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Details of patients treated for adrenal metastases using 5-fraction adaptive MR-SABR were accessed. GTV changes between simulation and first fraction (ΔSF1) and all fractions were recorded. Wilcoxon paired tests were used for intrapatient comparisons. Logistic and linear regression models were used for features associated with dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Once-daily fractions of 8 Gy or 10 Gy were delivered to 70 adrenal metastases. Median simulation-F1 interval was 13 days; F1-F5 interval was 13 days. Median baseline GTVs at simulation and F1 were 26.6 and 27.2 cc, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean ΔSF1 was + 9.1% (2.9 cc) relative to simulation; 47% of GTVs decreased in volume at F5 versus F1. GTV variations of ≥ 20% occurred in 59% treatments at some point between simulation to end SABR, and these did not correlate with baseline tumor characteristics. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months, a radiological complete response (CR) was seen in 23% of 64 evaluable patients. CR was associated with baseline GTV (p = 0.03) and ΔF1F5 (p = 0.03). Local relapses were seen in 6%.

CONCLUSION

Frequent changes in adrenal GTVs during 5-fraction SABR delivery support the use of on-couch adaptive replanning. The likelihood of a radiological CR correlates with the baseline GTV and intra-treatment GTV decline.

Should organs at risk (OARs) be prioritized over target volume coverage in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases? a secondary analysis of the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS.

CONCLUSION

PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.

Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Adrenal Gland Metastases: First Clinical Results

Stereotactic MR-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an interesting treatment option for adrenal gland metastases (AGM). We reviewed data from 12 consecutive patients treated with MRgRT for an AGM in our center between 14 November 2019 and 17 August 2021. Endpoints were tolerance assessment, the impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). The majority of patients were oligometastatic (58.3%), with 6 right AGM, 5 left AGM and 1 left and right AGM. The prescribed dose was 35 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. The median PTV V95% on the initial plan was 95.74%. The median V95% of the PTVoptimized (PTVopt) on the initial plan was 95.26%. Thirty-eight (69%) fractions were adapted. The PTV coverage was significantly improved for adapted plans compared to predicted plans (median PTV V95% increased from 89.85% to 91.17%, p = 0.0478). The plan adaptation also significantly reduced Dmax for the stomach and small intestine. The treatment was well tolerated with no grade > 2 toxicities. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the 1−year LC and OS rate were 100% and 91.7%. Six patients (50%) presented a metastatic progression, and one patient (8.3%) died of metastatic evolution during the follow-up. Adaptation of the treatment plan improved the overall dosimetric quality of MRI-guided radiotherapy. A longer follow-up is required to assess late toxicities and clinical results.

Progression-free survival and local control following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for up to 5 oligometastases: an analysis from the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial

PURPOSE

Despite increasing utilization of stereotactic ablative therapy (SABR) for oligometastatic cancer, prospective outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and prognostic factors from the population-based phase II XXX trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The XXX trial was a single arm phase II study with the primary endpoint of toxicity, conducted at the 6 regional cancer centres across XXX, during which time SABR for oligometastases was only offered on trial. Patients with up to 5 oligometastases (total or not controlled by prior treatment, and including induced oligometastatic disease) underwent SABR to all lesions. Patients were 18 years of age or older, ECOG 0-2 and had life expectancy ≥ 6 months. The secondary outcomes of PFS and LC are presented here.

RESULTS

Between November 2016 and July 2020, 381 patients underwent SABR on trial. Median follow-up was 27 months (IQR 18-36). Median PFS was 15 months (95% CI 12-18). LC at 1 and 3 years were 93% (95% CI 91 - 95) and 87% (95% CI 84 - 90), respectively. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor diameter (HR=1.09, p<0.001), declining performance status (HR=2.13, p<0.001), disease-free interval < 18 months (HR=1.52, p=0.003), four or more metastases at SABR (HR=1.48, p=0.048), initiation or change in systemic treatment (HR=0.50, p<0.001) and oligoprogression (HR=1.56, p=0.008) were significant independent predictors of PFS. Tumor diameter (SHR=1.28, p<0.001), colorectal histology (SHR=4.33, p=0.002) and "other" histology (SHR=3.90, p<0.001) were associated with worse local control.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort including patients with genuine oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, and induced oligometastatic disease, the median PFS was 15 months and LC at 3 years was 87%. This supports ongoing efforts to randomize patients on phase III trials, even outside the original 1-5 metachronous oligometastatic paradigm.