Feasibility of early postoperative mobilisation after colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study

Delayed ambulation in adult patients after major abdominal surgery in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicenter prospective follow up study

Abdominal surgery is associated with prolonged hospitalization, reduced physical activity levels, and prolonged bed rest. Delayed ambulation is a major problem after abdominal surgery which result in prolonged hospital stay. Ambulation was defined as delayed if the patient could not walk more than 10 m without assistance on postoperative day one within 24 h of surgery. Although abdominal surgery is performed for a variety of surgical procedures in a day to day practice the incidence and factors associated with delayed ambulation after major abdominal surgery have not been well investigated in the study area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the incidence and factors associated with delayed ambulation after major abdominal surgery. A multicenter, prospective follow up study was conducted from March 28, to June 5, 2023, on 422 participants. Patients were taken consecutively, and data were collected by using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were entered into Epi Data version 4.6 Software and exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Both descriptive and analytic statistics were used. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used. Variables with a p-value less than < 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were fitted into the multivariable analysis. Both the crude odds' ratio (COR) and Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval were calculated to show the strength of association. Variables with a p-value of < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The overall incidence of delayed ambulation after major abdominal surgery was 48.1% (95%CI:43.4-52.6). Having severe pain (AOR:3.23, 95%CI:1.09-9.55), dizziness (AOR:7.21, 95%CI:3.49-14.91), nasogastric tube (AOR:2.36, 95%CI:1.05-5.34), drain (AOR:3.27, 95%CI:1.52-7.04), fatigue (AOR:7.62, 95%CI:3.71-15.66), intraoperative fluid used > 2000 ml (AOR:2.54, 95%CI:1.03-6.24), duration of surgery > 2-hour (AOR:3.96, 95%CI:1.87-8.38) and blood loss > 500 ml (AOR:2.68, 95%CI:1.24-5.79) were significantly associated with delayed ambulation. Nearly half of the patients were unable to ambulate at postoperative day one after major abdominal surgery. Adopting a zero fluid balance approach, minimizing surgical duration and blood loss, timely removal of drains and catheters, and prioritizing postoperative pain management is recommended.

The Factors Influencing Early Ambulation in Patients With Gastrointestinal Neoplasms: A Mixed Study

BACKGROUND

Early ambulation helps improve postoperative recovery in gastrointestinal neoplasm patients. However, compliance with early ambulation remains low.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the influencing factors and experiences of early ambulation in gastrointestinal neoplasm patients and to provide suggestions for subsequent intervention programs.

METHODS

A convergent mixed-method design was used, which was based on the Health Belief Model. Gastrointestinal neoplasm patients were invited to participate in the quantitative and qualitative investigations. The demographic data, early activity awareness, self-efficacy, disease treatment data, and social psychological data of 405 gastrointestinal neoplasm patients were collected and analyzed in a nested case-control study. A semistructured interview on early ambulation was conducted for 16 patients. Finally, the results of the 2 studies were integrated.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis revealed that age, education level, exercise habits, nutritional status, pulmonary disease status, activity awareness, and social support were the influencing factors (P < .05). Five themes were extracted from the qualitative research results: insufficient recognition of perceived threat, perceived barriers and benefits, cues to action (internal/external factors), self-efficacy (success/failure), and needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' perceptions of early ambulation and social support influenced early ambulation. Perceptions of benefits/barriers, age, education level, and humanized nursing may affect early postoperative movement. Self-efficacy and behavioral cues, such as pulmonary disease status, nutritional status, and pain status, still need further exploration.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Reinforcing perceived severity, perceived benefits, and social support; removing possible barriers; and providing individualized health education according to the age and educational level of patients are recommended.

Early mobilization after pancreatic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic surgery has long been burdened with high postoperative morbidity. Early mobilization has been advocated to prevent complications and improve functional capacity. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence supporting how to implement early mobilization and its independent impact on postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of implementing early mobilization in reducing postoperative complications and enhancing recovery in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind, randomized trial in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery in a tertiary hospital in China. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either the control group or the intervention group. Patients in the control group received usual care, whereas those in the intervention group received the early enforced mobilization protocol. The protocol consisted of 2 key components: professional assistance with the first ambulation on postoperative day 1 and family-involved supervision to achieve daily walking goals. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days, measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index. Secondary outcomes were postoperative mobilization, time to recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative pulmonary complications, pancreatic surgery-specific complications, patient-reported outcome measures, and 30-day readmission and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were enrolled: 67 in the intervention group and 68 in the control group. The median Comprehensive Complication Index was not statistically significant between groups (mean difference -1.7; 95% confidence interval -8.7 to 0). Patients in the intervention group had earlier first ambulation postoperatively, walked greater distances on postoperative days 1-7, and had earlier time to first defecation. Trends for improvement in patient-reported outcomes showed that scores of Quality of Recovery 15 at postoperative day 3, physical function of Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 at postoperative day 7, and global quality of life at postoperative day 30 were significantly greater in the intervention group. There was no between-group difference in other domains of the Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 or other secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Early enforced mobilization intervention did not reduce postoperative complications of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, but it can enhance postoperative mobilization and improve the recovery of gastrointestinal function and patient-perceived quality of recovery.

Association Between Early Mobilization and Postoperative Pneumonia Following Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to confirm that early mobilization (EM) could reduce pneumonia in patients undergoing robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

METHODS

Postoperative pneumonia was defined as physician-diagnosed pneumonia using the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definition of pneumonia with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade II-V on postoperative day (POD) 3-5. EM was defined as achieving an ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) ≥7 by POD 2. Patients were divided into EM (n = 36) and non-EM (n = 35) groups. Barriers to EM included pain, orthostatic intolerance (OI), and orthostatic hypotension.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 12.7%, with a significant difference between the EM (2.8%) and non-EM (22.9%) groups (P = 0.014). The odds ratio was 0.098 in the EM group compared to the non-EM group. A significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the barriers to EM at POD 2 only for OI, with a higher incidence in the non-EM group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with OI were more likely to be unable to achieve EM than those without OI (odds ratio, 7.030; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

EM within POD 2 may reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing RAMIE for TESCC. Furthermore, it was suggested that OI can have a negative impact on the EM after RAMIE.

Feasibility and usefulness of postoperative mobilization goals in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) clinical pathway for elective colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Despite mobilization is highly recommended in the ERAS® colorectal guideline, studies suggest that more than half of patients don't reach the daily goal of 360 min out of bed. However, data used to quantify mobilization are predominantly based on self-assessments, for which the accuracy is uncertain. This study aims to accurately measure postoperative mobilization in ERAS®-patients by validated motion data from body sensors.

METHODS

ERAS®-patients with elective bowel resections were eligible. Self-assessments and motion sensors (movisens: ECG-Move 4 and Move 4; Garmin: Vivosmart4) were used to record mobilization parameter from surgery to postoperative day 3 (POD3): Time out of bed, time on feet and step count.

RESULTS

97 patients were screened and 60 included for study participation. Self-assessment showed a median out of bed duration of 215 min/day (POD1: 135 min, POD2: 225 min, POD3: 225 min). The goal of 360 min was achieved by 16.67% at POD1, 21.28% at POD2 and 20.45% at POD3. Median time on feet objectively measured by Move 4 was 109 min/day. During self-assessment, patients significantly underestimated their "time on feet"-duration with 85 min/day (p = 0.008). Median number of steps was 933/day (Move 4).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed with objectively supported data, that most patients don't reach the daily mobilization goal of 360 min despite being treated by an ERAS®-pathway with ERAS®-nurse. Even considering an empirically approximated underestimation, the ERAS®-target isn't achieved by more than 75% of patients. Therefore, we propose an adjustment of the general ERAS®-goals into more patient-centered, individualized and achievable goals.

REGISTRATION

This study is part of the MINT-ERAS-project and was registered prospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register on 25.02.2022. Trial registration number is "DRKS00027863".

Relation of Early Mobility With Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relation of mobility with abdominal symptoms and pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

The study has a prospective, correlational design.

METHODS

The study sample included 130 patients who underwent abdominal surgery. Data were gathered with a sociodemographic and clinical features form, the Patient and Observer Mobility Scale, a patient mobility checklist, the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Higher scores on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale show more severe symptoms (max scores: 21 on abdominal pain, 14 on reflux, 21 on diarrhea, 28 on distension, and 21 on constipation). The frequency of mobility and the severity of pain was evaluated from the postoperative first day until discharge. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated on the postoperative seventh day.

FINDINGS

The mean time elapsing till the first postoperative mobility was 22.13 ± 0.57 hours. The mean score was 7.61 ± 0.19 on abdominal pain, 11.94 ± 0.23 on distension, 2.04 ± 0.32 on reflux, 5.02 ± 0.32 on diarrhea, and 4.65 ± 0.24 on constipation. As the difficulty in mobility increased, the frequency of patient mobility decreased, and pain severity increased. As the difficulty in mobility increased, so did the duration of abdominal pain, diarrhea, indigestion, reflux, and time elapsing until the first intestinal gas passed after surgery. As the frequency of mobility increased, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and time elapsing till the first intestinal gas after surgery decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study showed that increased mobility had a positive relationship with the reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms and pain. Therefore, interventions directed toward increasing patient mobility should be performed.

Association between delayed ambulation and increased risk of adverse events after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients

PURPOSE

The relationship between delayed ambulation (DA) and postoperative adverse events (AEs) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in elderly patients remains elusive. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of DA on the postoperative AEs including complications, readmission and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively established database of elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) who underwent TLIF surgery. The early ambulation (EA) group was defined as patients ambulated within 48 h after surgery, whereas the delayed ambulation (DA) group was patients ambulated at a minimum of 48 h postoperatively. The DA patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched to the EA patients based on age, gender and the number of fused segments. Univariate analysis was used to compare postoperative outcomes between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for adverse events and DA.

RESULTS

After excluding 125 patients for various reasons, 1025 patients (≤ 48 h: N = 659 and > 48 h: N = 366) were included in the final analysis. After propensity score matching, there were 326 matched patients in each group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data and the surgery-related variables between the two groups (p > 0.05). The patients in the DA group had a significant higher incidence of postoperative AEs (46.0% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.002) and longer LOS (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified that age, operative time, diabetes, and DA were independently associated with postoperative AEs, whereas greater age, higher international normalized ratio, and intraoperative estimated blood loss were identified as independent risk factors for DA.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed ambulation was an independent risk factor for postoperative AEs after TLIF in elderly patients. Older age, increased intraoperative blood loss and worse coagulation function were associated with delayed ambulation.

PERIOPERATIVE CARE IN DIGESTIVE SURGERY: THE ERAS AND ACERTO PROTOCOLS - BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER

BACKGROUND

The concept introduced by protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery modifies perioperative traditional care in digestive surgery. The integration of these modern recommendations components during the perioperative period is of great importance to ensure fewer postoperative complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and decreased surgical costs.

AIMS

To emphasize the most important points of a multimodal perioperative care protocol.

METHODS

Careful analysis of each recommendation of both ERAS and ACERTO protocols, justifying their inclusion in the multimodal care recommended for digestive surgery patients.

RESULTS

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) such as ERAS and ACERTO protocols are a cornerstone in modern perioperative care. Nutritional therapy is fundamental in digestive surgery, and thus, both preoperative and postoperative nutrition care are key to ensuring fewer postoperative complications and reducing the length of hospital stay. The concept of prehabilitation is another key element in ERPs. The handling of crystalloid fluids in a perfect balance is vital. Fluid overload can delay the recovery of patients and increase postoperative complications. Abbreviation of preoperative fasting for two hours before anesthesia is now accepted by various guidelines of both surgical and anesthesiology societies. Combined with early postoperative refeeding, these prescriptions are not only safe but can also enhance the recovery of patients undergoing digestive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This position paper from the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery strongly emphasizes that the implementation of ERPs in digestive surgery represents a paradigm shift in perioperative care, transcending traditional practices and embracing an intelligent approach to patient well-being.

Safety and benefit of ambulation within 24 hours in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion: propensity score matching study of 882 patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Elderly patients are less likely to recover from lumbar spine fusion (LSF) as rapidly compared with younger patients. However, there is still a lack of research on the effect of early ambulation on elderly patients undergoing LSF surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and benefit of ambulation within 24 hours in elderly patients who underwent LSF.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive patients (aged 65 and older) who underwent elective transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for degenerative disorders from January 2019 to October 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included postoperative complications, postoperative drainage (mL), laboratory test data, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission and reoperation within 3 months.

METHODS

Early ambulation patients (ambulation within 24 hours after surgery) were propensity-score matched 1:1 to a delayed ambulation patients (ambulation at a minimum of 48 hours postoperatively) based on age, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fused segments. The incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs, including rates of complications, readmission, and prolonged LOS) and the average LOS were used to assess the safety and benefit of early ambulation, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the association between early ambulation and postoperative AEs. The risk factors for delayed ambulation were also determined using multivariable logistic analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 998 patients with LSF surgery were reviewed in this study. After excluding 116 patients for various reasons, 882 patients (<24 hours: N=350, 24-48 hours: N=230, and >48 hours: N= 302) were included in the final analysis. After matching, sex, BMI, preoperative comorbidities, laboratory test data and surgery-related variables were comparable between the groups. The incidence of postoperative AEs was significantly lower in the EA group (44.3% vs 64.0%, p<.001). The average postoperative LOS of the EA group was 2 days shorter than the DA group (6.5 days vs 8.5 days, p<.001). Patients in the EA group had a significantly lower rate of prolonged LOS compared with the DA group (35.1% vs 55.3%, p<.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volumes between the two groups. Multivariable analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, p<.001), increased intraoperative EBL (OR 1.002, p=.001), and higher international normalization ratio (OR 10.57, p=.032) as significant independent risk factors for delayed ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulation within 24 hours after LSF surgery is independently associated fewer AEs and shorter hospital stays in elderly patients. Implementing the goal of ambulation within 24 hours after LSF surgery into enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for elderly patients seems appropriate. Older age, increased intraoperative blood loss and worse coagulation function are associated with delayed ambulation.

Influence of motivational interviewing on postoperative mobilization in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) pathway in elective colorectal surgery - a randomized patient-blinded pilot study

PURPOSE

Early mobilization is an essential component of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®)-pathway. However, a large percentage of patients fail to achieve the ERAS® recommended goal (360 min out of bed from post-operative day 1/POD1). Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based type of patient-centered consultation to promote intrinsic motivation. This study aims to evaluate if MI can improve postoperative mobilization.

METHODS

This two-arm, patient-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial included ERAS®-patients undergoing elective bowel resections. Conversations were validated by MI Treatment Integrity. Two validated motion sensors (movisens) and self-assessments were used to measure mobilization (POD1-POD3: Time out of bed, time on feet and step count).

RESULTS

97 patients were screened, 60 finally included and randomized. Cumulatively across POD1-3, the intervention group (IG) was longer out of bed than the control group (CG) (median: 685 vs. 420 min; p=0.022). The IG achieved the ERAS®-goal of 360 min/day more frequently across POD1-3 (27.4% vs. 10.61%; p=0.013). Time on feet was 131.5 min/day (median per POD) in IG vs. 95.8 min/day in the CG (p=0.212), step count was 1347 in IG vs. 754 steps/day in CG (p=0.298).

CONCLUSION

MI could be conducted low threshold and was well accepted by patients. MI can improve mobilization in the context of ERAS®. Despite better performance, it should be noted that only 27.4% of the IG reached the ERAS®-compliance goal of 360 min/day. The findings of this pilot study stipulate to further test the promising perioperative effects of MI within a multicenter superiority trial.

REGISTRATION

This study was registered prospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register on 25.02.2022. Trial registration number is "DRKS00027863".

First mobilisation after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery: when is it actually performed? A national, multicentre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Knowledge of clinical practice regarding mobilisation after surgery is lacking. This study therefore aimed to reveal current mobilisation routines after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery and to identify factors associated with mobilisation within 6 hours postoperatively.

DESIGN

A prospective observational national multicentre study.

SETTING

18 different hospitals in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

1492 adult patients undergoing abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery with duration of anaesthesia>2 hours.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Primary outcome was time to first postoperative mobilisation. Secondary outcomes were the type and duration of the first mobilisation. Data were analysed using multivariate logistic regression and general structural equation modelling, and data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Among the included patients, 52% were mobilised to at least sitting on the edge of the bed within 6 hours, 70% within 12 hours and 96% within 24 hours. Besides sitting on the edge of the bed, 76% stood up by the bed and 22% were walking away from the bedside the first time they were mobilised. Patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery required the longest time before mobilisation with an average time of 11 hours post surgery. Factors associated with increased likelihood of mobilisation within 6 hours of surgery were daytime arrival at the postoperative recovery unit (OR: 5.13, 95% CI: 2.16 to 12.18), anaesthesia <4 hours (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.40) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-2, (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 96% if the patients were mobilised within 24 hours after surgery and 52% within 6 hours. Daytime arrival at the postoperative recovery unit, low ASA classification and shorter duration of anaesthesia were associated with a shorter time to mobilisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

FoU, Forskning och Utveckling in VGR, Vastra Gotaland Region (Id:275357) and Clinical Trials (NCT04729634).

Actual physical activity after major abdominal cancer surgery: Far from optimal

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols emphasize the importance of early postoperative mobilization. However, literature quantifying actual physical activity after major abdominal cancer surgery is scarce and inconclusive.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Center Groningen from 2019 to 2021. Patients' postoperative physical activity was measured using an accelerometer, with the primary aim of assessing daily physical activity. Secondary aims were identifying patient-related factors associated with low physical activity and studying the consequences of low physical activity in terms of complication rate and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

143 patients included (48 % male; mean age 65 years), 38.5 %, 24.5 %, 19.6 %, and 14 % underwent pancreatic, hepatic, colorectal, or cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, respectively. Median daily step count was low; from median 71 steps on the first to 918 steps on the seventh postoperative day. An association between physical activity and age (OR 3.597, p = 0.013), preoperative weight loss ≥10 % (OR 4.984, p = 0.004), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR 4.016, p = 0.001), midline laparotomy (OR 2.851, p = 0.025), and operation duration (OR 1.003, p = 0.044) was found. An association was observed between physical activity and the occurrence of complications (OR 3.197, p = 0.039) and prolonged hospital stay (β 4.068, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative physical activity is low in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery and is linked to postoperative outcomes. Although physical activity should be encouraged in all patients, patient-specific risk factors were identified that can aid early recognition of patients at risk of low physical activity.

The association between objectively measured preoperative light-intensity physical activity and postoperative ambulation in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

[Purpose] To clarify the association between preoperative physical activity and postoperative ambulation based on physical activity intensity, and independent of functional capacity and depression, in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. [Participants and Methods] Seventy patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal or gastric cancer were enrolled. Preoperative moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity, light-intensity physical activity, and sedentary behavior were assessed using an accelerometer. The primary outcome was the days to postoperative first ambulation (capable of independently and continuously walking 150 m). Functional capacity and depression, as confounders, were evaluated by measuring the 6-minute walk distance and using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. [Results] Of the 70 patients, 28 had insufficient accelerometer data, and 42 were included in the analysis. Preoperative light-intensity physical activity, but not moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity and sedentary behavior, was negatively associated with the days to postoperative first ambulation, after adjusting for age, preoperative functional capacity, and preoperative depression. [Conclusion] Preoperative light-intensity physical activity was associated with the days to postoperative ambulation independently of age, functional capacity, and depression. Hence, predicting delayed ambulation by preoperative light-intensity physical activity in patients with gastrointestinal cancer may be useful.

Early Ambulation Shortened the Length of Hospital Stay in ICU Patients after Abdominal Surgery

The optimal time to ambulation remains unclear for intensive care unit (ICU) patients following abdominal surgery. While previous studies have explored various mobilization techniques, a direct comparison between ambulation and other early mobilization methods is lacking. Additionally, the impact of time to ambulation on complications and disuse syndrome prevention requires further investigation. This study aimed to identify the optimal time to ambulation for ICU patients after abdominal surgery and considered its potential influence on complications and disuse syndrome. We examined the relationship between time to ambulation and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were categorized into the nondelayed (discharge within the protocol time) and delayed (discharge later than expected) groups. Data regarding preoperative functioning, postoperative complications, and time to discharge were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Of the 274 postsurgical patients managed in the ICU at our hospital between 2018 and 2020, 188 were included. Time to ambulation was a significant prognostic factor for both groups, even after adjusting for operative time and complications. The area under the curve was 0.72, and the cutoff value for time to ambulation was 22 h (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 77%). A correlation between time to ambulation and complications was observed, with both impacting the hospital LOS (model 1: p < 0.01, r = 0.22; model 2: p < 0.01, r = 0.29). Specific cutoff values for time to ambulation will contribute to better surgical protocols.

Factors influencing early mobilisation for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery from multiple perspectives: a qualitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVES

Despite early mobilisation as a key component of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for pancreatic surgery, the implementation of early mobilisation remains unsatisfactory. What factors influence the implementation of early mobilisation from the lens of all stakeholders is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the influencing factors of early mobilisation in pancreatic surgery from the perspective of patients, family members and health professionals.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design using individual interviews and focus groups.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, 10 family members and 10 healthcare professionals from a large university teaching hospital in China.

METHODS

We collected data on participants' views on factors influencing early mobilisation after pancreatic surgery. Two researchers independently reviewed the transcripts and emergent coding. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Three main categories that influenced the implementation of early mobilisation in pancreatic surgery were identified: (1) attitude towards early postoperative mobilisation (eg, perceived advantages or disadvantages of early mobilisation), (2) subjective norm (eg, impact from health professionals, family members and fellow patients) and (3) perceived behavioural control (eg, knowledge, abilities, resources and environment).

CONCLUSION

Factors influencing early mobilisation are diverse and multidimensional. The successful implementation of early mobilisation requires the dedication of both patients and healthcare professionals.

Immersive Virtual Reality Fitness Games to Improve Recovery After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Single Blind Controlled Pilot Trial

Introduction: Early mobilization after surgery is crucial for reducing postoperative complications and restoring patients' fitness and ability to care for themselves. Immersive, activity-promoting fitness games in virtual reality (VR) can be used as a low-cost motivational adjunct to standard physiotherapy to promote recovery after surgery. In addition, they have potentially positive effects on mood and well-being, which are often compromised after colorectal surgery. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a VR-based intervention that provides additional mobilization. Methods: Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group (VR group) received daily bedside fitness exercises using immersive, activity-promoting, virtual reality fitness games in addition to standard care during their postoperative hospital stay. Results: A total of 62 patients were randomized. The feasibility outcomes were in line with the predefined goals. In the VR group, an improvement in overall mood (+0.76 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.12; P < 0.001) and a shift toward positive feelings were observed. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days in the VR group compared with 9.0 days in the control group, but the difference (2.0 days) did not reach statistical significance (95% CI -0.0001 to 3.00; P = 0.076). Surgical outcomes, health status, and measures of distress did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the feasibility of a VR intervention that improved overall mood and showed a desirable effect on feelings and length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery. The results should stimulate further research investigating the potential of VR as an adjunct to physiotherapy to enhance mobilization after surgery.

Efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for thoracic and abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on lower limb muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after thoracic and abdominal surgery. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE via PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database via Elsevier, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via their dedicated search portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov on November 2021 and updated in April 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of NMES after thoracic and abdominal surgery. The primary outcomes were lower limb muscle strength, HR-QOL, and adverse events. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty of evidence. A total of 18 randomized control trials involving 915 participants, including 10 on cardiovascular surgery, two on pulmonary surgery, five on digestive system surgery, and one on other surgery, were included. NMES slightly increased lower limb muscle strength and adverse events in cardiovascular surgery. Adverse events (hypotension, pain, and muscle discomfort) occurred in seven patients. HR-QOL was measured in two studies on cardiovascular surgery, but these were not pooled due to concept heterogeneity. Overall, NMES slightly increases lower limb muscle strength after cardiovascular surgery without serious adverse events. However, higher-quality randomized control trials in thoracic and abdominal surgeries are needed.

Effects of early postoperative mobilization following gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early postoperative mobilization is considered a key element of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. The aim of this study was to summarize the effect of early postoperative mobilization following gastrointestinal operations on patient recovery, mobility, the morbidity rate and duration of hospital stay.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in December, 2022, using PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled trials reporting the effects of early postoperative mobilization after gastrointestinal surgery were included. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified Downs and Black tool and the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomized trials. The outcomes of interest were gastrointestinal recovery (defined passage of first flatus or bowel movements), mobility (step count on postoperative day 3), the morbidity rate and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

After elimination of duplicates, 3678 records were identified, and 71 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 15 studies (eight RCTs) reporting on 3538 patients were included. Most trials evaluated early postoperative mobilization after different gastrointestinal operations, including upper gastrointestinal (n = 8 studies), hepatopancreatobiliary (n = 10 studies) and colorectal resections (n = 10 studies). The investigated early postoperative mobilization protocols, operative techniques (minimally invasive or open) and outcome parameters were heterogeneous between the studies. Early postoperative mobilization seemed to significantly accelerate clinical gastrointestinal recovery (mean difference, hours: -11.53 (-22.08, -0.97), P = 0.03). However, early postoperative mobilization did not significantly improve the morbidity rate (risk ratio: 0.93 (0.70, 1.23), P = 0.59), postoperative mobility of patients (step count mean difference: 1009 (-803, 2821), P = 0.28) or shorten the duration of hospital stay (mean difference, days: -0.25 (-0.99,0.43), P = 0.47) in randomized trials.

CONCLUSION

There is a large heterogeneity among the study cohorts, operations and interventions. The available evidence currently does not support specific early postoperative mobilization protocols as an isolated element to further reduce the morbidity rate and duration of hospital stay. Further well-designed trials are required to identify effective early postoperative mobilization protocols.

Association between early mobilisation after abdominal cancer surgery and postoperative complications

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative complications and readmission to hospital after major cancer surgery are common. Early mobilisation in hospital is thought to reduce complications, and patients are recommended to mobilise for at least 2 h on the day of surgery, and thereafter at least 6 h per day. Evidence for early mobilisation is limited and therefore also how early mobilisation may influence the development of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between early mobilisation after abdominal cancer surgery and readmission to hospital due to postoperative complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult patients who had abdominal cancer surgery due to ovarian, colorectal, or urinary bladder cancer between January 2017 and May 2018 were included in the study. Exposure was set to the mean number of steps taken over the first three postoperative days, measured with an activity monitor. Primary outcome was readmission to hospital within 30 days after discharge, and secondary outcome was severity of complications. Data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between exposure and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 133 patients included in the study, 25 were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after discharge. The analysis showed no association between early mobilisation and readmission or severity of complications.

CONCLUSION

Early mobilisation does not seem to increase the odds of readmission, nor the severity of complications. This study contributes to the limited research on the association between early mobilisation and postoperative complications after abdominal cancer surgery.

Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023

OBJECTIVE

The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence.

METHODS

Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format.

RESULTS

The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.

Association Between Mobilization and Composite Postoperative Complications Following Major Elective Surgery

Importance

Mobilization after surgery is a key component of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways.

Objective

To evaluate the association between mobilization and a collapsed composite of postoperative complications in patients recovering from major elective surgery as well as hospital length of stay, cumulative pain scores, and 30-day readmission rates.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective observational study conducted at a single quaternary US referral center included patients who had elective surgery between February 2017 and October 2020. Mobilization was assessed over the first 48 postoperative hours with wearable accelerometers, and outcomes were assessed throughout hospitalization. Patients who had elective surgery lasting at least 2 hours followed by at least 48 hours of hospitalization were included. A minimum of 12 hours of continuous accelerometer monitoring was required without missing confounding variables or key data. Among 16 203 potential participants, 8653 who met inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Data were analyzed from February 2017 to October 2020.

Exposures

Amount of mobilization per hour for 48 postoperative hours.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial injury, ileus, stroke, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary complications, and all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, cumulative pain scores, and 30-day readmission.

Results

Of 8653 included patients (mean [SD] age, 57.6 [16.0] years; 4535 [52.4%] female), 633 (7.3%) experienced the primary outcome. Mobilization time was a median (IQR) of 3.9 (1.7-7.8) minutes per monitored hour overall, 3.2 (0.9-7.4) in patients who experienced the primary outcome, and 4.1 (1.8-7.9) in those who did not. There was a significant association between postoperative mobilization and the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84; P < .001) for each 4-minute increase in mobilization. Mobilization was associated with an estimated median reduction in the duration of hospitalization by 0.12 days (95% CI, 0.09-0.15; P < .001) for each 4-minute increase in mobilization. The were no associations between mobilization and pain score or 30-day readmission.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, mobilization measured by wearable accelerometers was associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital length of stay.

Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for reducing opioid requirement and facilitating early ambulation: a double-blind, randomized trial

Various techniques have been formulated to reduce pain and ensure early recovery after surgery, as these are major concerns among surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patients. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), the injection of local anesthetic into the fascial plane, is a simple and novel analgesia technique widely used due to its minimal risk of complications. ESPB has been tried in various surgeries; however, no study has reported its use in colorectal surgery. This study investigated whether ESPB could promote early recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) by reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity. After randomization into the ESPB or control groups, an ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed at the thoracic 10^th-11th level with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or normal saline. The ESPB group used less fentanyl during the initial 24 h after surgery (P = 0.004) and experienced less pain (P < 0.05 at all-time points) than the control group. The time to the first ambulation and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the ESPB group than in the control group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.008, respectively). In conclusion, ESPB could promote early recovery by reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity in patients receiving LCS.

Effects of a Mobilization Program Applied to Bariatric Surgery Patients on Preventing Gastrointestinal Complications: a Quasi-Experimental Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of a planned early targeted mobilization program applied to patients that underwent bariatric surgery with the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy method on gastrointestinal complications (nausea-vomiting, abdominal distention, delayed flatus-defecation, and intolerance of early oral intake).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, controlled group, quasi-experimental design study was conducted between July 2019 and March 2020 in the general surgery clinic of a training and research hospital with 70 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and met the inclusion criteria. The prepared mobilization program was applied to the patients on the 0th, 1st, and 2nd postoperative days, and the gastrointestinal functions of the patients were monitored.

RESULTS

The intervention group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus, defecation, and oral intake; higher frequency of defecation; lower pain, abdominal distention, and nausea; better tolerance of oral intake; and higher total oral intake compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Planned, early, and targeted mobilization was determined to be a feasible, safe, and cost-effective nursing intervention to prevent gastrointestinal complications in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways: current evidence and recent advancements

Early mobilization is a crucial component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways that counteract the adverse physiological consequences of surgical stress and immobilization. Early mobilization reduces the risk of postoperative complications, accelerates the recovery of functional walking capacity, positively impacts several patient-reported outcomes and reduces hospital length of stay, thereby reducing care costs. Modifiable barriers to early mobilization include a lack of education and a lack of resources. Education and clinical decision-making tools can improve compliance with ERAS mobilization recommendations and create a culture that prioritizes perioperative physical activity. Recent advances include real-time feedback of mobilization quantity using wearable technology and combining ERAS with exercise prehabilitation. ERAS guidelines should emphasize the benefits of structured postoperative mobilization.

Sustaining a Multidisciplinary, Single-Institution, Postoperative Mobilization Clinical Practice Improvement Program Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been recently extended to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery, with excellent outcomes reported. Early mobilization is an essential facet of the ERAS protocol, but compliance has been reported to be poor. We recently reported our success in a 6-month clinical practice improvement program (CPIP) for early postoperative mobilization. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced reduced staffing and resource availability, which can make CPIP sustainability difficult.

OBJECTIVE

We report outcomes at 1 year following the implementation of our CPIP to improve postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing major HPB surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We divided our study into 4 phases-phase 1: before CPIP implementation (January to April 2019); phase 2: CPIP implementation (May to September 2019); phase 3: post-CPIP implementation but prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (October 2019 to March 2020); and phase 4: post-CPIP implementation and during the pandemic (April 2020 to September 2020). Major HPB surgery was defined as any surgery on the liver, pancreas, and biliary system with a duration of >2 hours and with an anticipated blood loss of ≥500 ml. Study variables included length of hospital stay, distance ambulated on postoperative day (POD) 2, morbidity, balance measures (incidence of fall and accidental dislodgement of drains), and reasons for failure to achieve targets. Successful mobilization was defined as the ability to sit out of bed for >6 hours on POD 1 and ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2. The target mobilization rate was ≥75%.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients underwent major HPB surgery from phases 2 to 4 of our study, with 33 (29.0%), 45 (39.5%), and 36 (31.6%) patients in phases 2, 3, and 4, respectively. No baseline patient demographic data were collected for phase 1 (pre-CPIP implementation). The majority of the patients were male (n=79, 69.3%) and underwent hepatic surgery (n=92, 80.7%). A total of 76 (66.7%) patients underwent ON-Q PainBuster insertion intraoperatively. The median mobilization rate was 22% for phase 1, 78% for phases 2 and 3 combined, and 79% for phase 4. The mean pain score was 2.7 (SD 1.0) on POD 1 and 1.8 (SD 1.5) on POD 2. The median length of hospitalization was 6 days (IQR 5-11.8). There were no falls or accidental dislodgement of drains. Six patients (5.3%) had pneumonia, and 21 (18.4%) patients failed to ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2 from phases 2 to 4. The most common reason for failure to achieve the ambulation target was pain (6/21, 28.6%) and lethargy or giddiness (5/21, 23.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This follow-up study demonstrates the sustainability of our CPIP in improving early postoperative mobilization rates following major HPB surgery 1 year after implementation, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further large-scale, multi-institutional prospective studies should be conducted to assess compliance and determine its sustainability.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: History, Key Advancements and Developments in Transplant Surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims to improve patient outcomes by controlling specific aspects of perioperative care. The concept was introduced in 1997 by Henrik Kehlet, who suggested that while minor changes in perioperative practise have no significant impact alone, incorporating multiple changes could drastically improve outcomes. Since 1997, significant advancements have been made through the foundation of the ERAS Society, responsible for creating consensus guidelines on the implementation of enhanced recovery pathways. ERAS reduces length of stay by an average of 2.35 days and healthcare costs by $639.06 per patient, as identified in a 2020 meta-analysis of ERAS across multiple surgical subspecialties. Carbohydrate loading, bowel preparation and patient education in the pre-operative phase, goal-directed fluid therapy in the intra-operative phase, and early mobilisation and enteral nutrition in the post-operative phase are some of the interventions that are commonly implemented in ERAS protocols. While many specialties have been quick to incorporate ERAS, uptake has been slow in the transplantation field, leading to a scarcity of literature. Recent studies reported a 47% reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) in liver transplantation patients treated with ERAS, while progress in kidney transplantation focuses on pain management and its incorporation into enhanced recovery protocols.

Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the early postoperative period: a literature review

The early postoperative period is a crucial stage in a patient's recovery as they are susceptible to a range of complications, with detection and management the key to avoiding long term consequences. Wearable devices are an innovative way of monitoring patient's post-intervention and may translate into improved patient outcomes, and reduced strain on healthcare resources, as they may facilitate safer and earlier discharge from the hospital setting. Several recent studies have investigated the use of wearable devices in postoperative monitoring. This review outlines the current literature including the range of wearable devices used for postoperative monitoring, the variety of surgeries investigated, and the outcomes assessed. A search of five electronic databases was performed. Data on the range of wearable devices, outcomes and surgeries investigated were extracted and synoptically analysed. Twenty-four articles were retrieved. Data on several different types of surgery were available and discussed. Most studies used wrist-mounted wearable devices and accelerometers or pedometers to assess physical activity metrics, including step counts and physical activity intensity (PAI), as markers of recovery. Wearable devices can provide objective data capture in the early postoperative phase to remotely monitor patients using various metrics including temperature, cardiac monitoring and physical activity. The majority of current research is focussed on wrist-mounted accelerometers and pedometers used to assess physical activity as a marker of postoperative function. Further research is required to demonstrate improved safety and cost-effectiveness of this technology.

Early ambulation after general and digestive surgery: a retrospective single-center study

PURPOSE

Postoperative early ambulation contributes to the improvement of postoperative outcomes; however, the definition of "early" ambulation is unclear. In this study, we aimed to define desirable "early" ambulation after digestive surgery in terms of short-term outcomes and to identify the risk factors for delayed ambulation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 718 patients who underwent major digestive surgery between January 2016 and May 2019 in our hospital. The timing of first ambulation after surgery was reviewed and correlated with short-term postoperative outcomes and perioperative patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 718 patients, 55% underwent first ambulation at postoperative day (POD) 1, 31% at POD 2, and the remaining patients at POD 3 or later. Whereas short-term outcomes were equivalent among patients with first ambulation at POD 1 and those at POD 2, patients who delayed ambulation until POD 3 or after had an increased incidence of infectious complications (P = 0.004), longer hospitalization (P < 0.001), and a decreased home discharge rate (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that significant predictors of delayed ambulation (POD ≥ 3) were poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), low controlling nutritional status (CONUT), nonlaparoscopic surgery, and transvenous opioid use. Of these factors, the combination of ECOG-PS, CONUT, and nonlaparoscopic surgery clearly stratified patients into four-grade risk groups regarding delayed ambulation (P for trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that first ambulation before POD 2 could be desirable for better short-term outcomes. Active preoperative intervention, such as nutritional care and prehabilitation, in patients with multiple risk factors for delayed ambulation could improve the postoperative course.

Investigation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol outcome on post colectomy patients

BACKGROUND

An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was implemented to improve quality and cost effectiveness of surgical care in elective colorectal procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. The ERAS protocol was initiated on 9 July 2018 and retrospectively reviewed in July 2019 by chart review, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database and risk stratification using Clavien-Dindo classification for all elective colorectal procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients, 55 (pre-ERAS) and 54 (post-ERAS) are included in the final analysis. There were no differences in complications were recorded (p = 0.37) and 30-day readmissions (p = 0.785). The mean hospital stay was 5.89 ± 2.62 days in pre-ERAS and 4.94 ± 2.27 days in post-ERAS group which was statistically significant (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

An ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery harmonised perioperative care and decreased length of stay.

A retrospective study on efficacy of the ERAS protocol in patients undergoing surgery for Crohn disease: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) offers many benefits for patients with colorectal cancer. However, its application to patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is questioned.

AIM

The aim of this propensity-matched study was to validate the results of ERAS protocol on CD patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ileocolic resection for primary or relapsed CD from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and propensity-matched into two equal groups (ERAS vs standard of care). Demographic characteristics, length of stay, bowel function, oral intake, and perioperative morbidity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety four out of 299 patients were selected for analysis. No significant difference was observed for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, previous surgery and therapy, operative time and laparoscopy. The median length of stay in ERAS and non-ERAS groups was 6 and 8 days (p < 0.001). Median postoperative days of first bowel movement and solid oral intake were day 1 and day 2 p < 0,001, and day 2 and day 4.5 p < 0,001 in ERAS and non-ERAS group, respectively. No statistically differences in other postoperative outcomes were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS implementation showed decreased length of stay, faster bowel function restoration and earlier solid oral intake in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open ileocolic resection for primary or relapsing CD.

Challenges to accomplish stringent fluid management standards 7 years after enhanced recovery after surgery implementation-The surgeon's perspective

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze fluid management standards in 2 high-volume, enhanced recovery after surgery institutions 7 years after implementation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing elective, segmental colonic and extensive colorectal resections for benign and malignant pathology (2011-2017). Administration and composition of intravenous fluids, postoperative weight gain, and factors impeding compliance to preidentified fluid thresholds (3L fluid administration, 2.5 kg weight gain) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 5,155 patients were included. Among them, 2,320 patients (45.1%) received >3 L intravenous fluids at postoperative day 0. Fluid totals remained unchanged over the 7-year observation period. Fluid overload was independently associated with postoperative weight gain ≥2.5 kg at postoperative day 2 (odds ratio 1.34, P < .001). Patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (≥3) undergoing open and longer (≥180 minutes) procedures were more likely to exceed both thresholds according to multivariable analysis (all P < .001). Other than open surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, contamination class ≥3, and malignancy, both thresholds (≥3 L: odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.15, ≥ 2.5 kg: odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.33-1.97) were independent risk factors for postoperative adverse outcomes (occurring in 28.1% of patients).

CONCLUSION

Compliance with fluid thresholds appears to be challenging in patients with comorbidities undergoing open and long procedures. Efforts are encouraged because both thresholds are linked to adverse outcomes and appear to be potentially modifiable in selected patients.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a prospective single center study

BACKGROUND

It is still unknown whether ERAS program is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In addition, the definition of the "old patient" in terms of age varies across the studies and different age cut-off, such as 65, 70, and 75 years have been used worldwide.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing primary, elective colorectal laparoscopic surgery between January 2017 and December 2018 were considered eligible to follow the ERAS protocol according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guidelines. Elderly were defined according three different cut-off values: <65 and ≥65 years, <70 and ≥70 years, <75 and ≥75 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Adherence to protocol did not differ significantly between younger and older patients, for most of the items. Thirty-day mortality was absent. The frequency of postoperative complications globally considered and the frequency of the various single complications did not differ significantly between younger and older patients, independently of the cutoff considered to define the older age. Similarly, the frequency of re-intervention and readmission was similar in younger and older patients. Time to flatus and time to stool were similar in young and older patients, independently of the age cut-off used. Time to oral liquid diet was similar in patients with age <65 and ≥65 years while it was moderately longer in patients ≥70 years (1.5±1.1 days;) than in those <70 years (1.1±0.4 days; P=0.030) as well as in patients ≥75 years with respect to the younger ones (1.2±0.5 vs. 1.6±1.2 days; P=0.045). The time to oral solid feeding was similar in young and old patients, independently of the age cut-off used. Time to bladder catheter removal was significantly longer in older patients, independently of the age cut-off used, although the differences do not seem to be clinically relevant. The length of stay was significantly higher in older patients, when the cutoff of 70 years or 75 years was used, but did not differ significantly when the cut-off of 65 years was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the ERAS protocol is safe, feasible, and effective in elderly patients as in the young ones, undergoing laparoscopic elective colorectal surgery. This suggests that the ERAS program can be applied usefully to elderly patients in the routine clinical practice.

Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify patients eligible for a 48-h stay after colorectal resection, to provide guidance for early discharge planning.

METHODS

A bi-institutional retrospective cohort study was undertaken of consecutive patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection for benign or malignant pathology within a comprehensive enhanced recovery pathway between 2011 and 2017. Overall and severe (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or above) postoperative complication and readmission rates were compared between patients who were discharged within 48 h and those who had hospital stay of 48 h or more. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain significant factors associated with a short hospital stay (less than 48 h).

RESULTS

In total, 686 of 5122 patients (13·4 per cent) were discharged within 48 h. Independent factors favouring a short hospital stay were age below 60 years (odds ratio (OR) 1·34; P = 0·002), ASA grade less than III (OR 1·42; P = 0·003), restrictive fluid management (less than 3000 ml on day of surgery: OR 1·46; P < 0·001), duration of surgery less than 180 min (OR 1·89; P < 0·001), minimally invasive approach (OR 1·92; P < 0·001) and wound contamination grade below III (OR 4·50; P < 0·001), whereas cancer diagnosis (OR 0·55; P < 0·001) and malnutrition (BMI below 18 kg/m² : OR 0·42; P = 0·008) decreased the likelihood of early discharge. Patients with a 48-h stay had fewer overall (10·8 per cent versus 30·6 per cent in those with a longer stay; P < 0·001) and fewer severe (2·6 versus 10·2 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) complications, and a lower readmission rate (9·0 versus 11·8 per cent; P = 0·035).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge of selected patients is safe and does not increase postoperative morbidity or readmission rates. In these patients, outpatient colorectal surgery should be feasible on a large scale with logistical optimization.

Physical Activity and Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Mobilization after surgery is recommended to reduce the risk of adverse effects and to improve recovery. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between perioperative physical activity and postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The daily number of footsteps was recorded from preoperative day 5 to postoperative day 3 in a prospective cohort of patients using wrist accelerometers. Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), 6 Min Walking Test (6MWT), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were assessed preoperatively. ROC curves were used to assess the performance of physical activity as a diagnostic test of complications and prolonged length of stay (LOS) of more than 5 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 50 patients were included. Patients with complications were significantly older (67 years) than those without complications (53 years, <i>p</i> = 0.020). PEF was significantly lower in the group with complications (mean flow 294.3 vs. 363.6 L/min, <i>p</i> = 0.038) while there was no difference between groups for the other two tests (TUGT and 6MWT). The tests had no capacity to discriminate the occurrence of complications and prolonged LOS, except the 6MWT for LOS (AUC = 0.746, <i>p</i> = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.604–0.889). There was no difference in the mean number of preoperative footsteps, but patients with complications walked significantly less postoperatively (mean daily footsteps 1,101 vs. 1,243, <i>p</i> = 0.018). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b><i></i>Colorectal surgery patients with complications were elderly, had decreased PEF, and walked less postoperatively. The 6MWT could be used preoperatively to discriminate patients with potentially increased LOS and foster mobilisation strategies.

Understanding the benefits and implications of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes are an innovative approach to optimising patient outcomes in the perioperative period and have been implemented in various surgical departments across a range of specialties, with varying degrees of success. ERAS is an evidence-based, multimodal programme that has repeatedly demonstrated a reduction in post-operative complications and reduced the length of hospital stays following elective surgery. However, despite extensive evidence to support these benefits, several barriers to ERAS implementation have been identified. This article outlines the components of ERAS, focusing on the barriers to its implementation and how these could be overcome. It also discusses the implications of ERAS for patients, nurses and healthcare organisations.