The frail fail: Increased mortality and post-operative complications in orthopaedic trauma patients

Intensive care unit readmission in injured older adults: Modifiable risk factors and implications

BACKGROUND

Prior evaluations of intensive care unit (ICU) readmission among injured older adults have inconsistently identified risk factors, with findings limited by use of subanalyses and small sample sizes. This study aimed to identify risk factors for and implications of ICU readmission in injured older adults.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted at a high-volume Level 1 trauma center and included injured older adult patients (65 years or older) requiring at least one ICU admission during hospitalization between 2013 and 2018. Patients who died <48 hours of admission were excluded. Exposures included patient demographics and clinical factors. The primary outcome was ICU readmission. Multivariable regression was used to identify risk factors for ICU readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 6,691 injured adult trauma patients were admitted from 2013 to 2018, 55.4% (n = 3,709) of whom were admitted to the ICU after excluding early deaths. Of this cohort, 9.1% (n = 339) were readmitted to the ICU during hospitalization. Readmitted ICU patients had a higher median Injury Severity Score (21 [interquartile range, 14-26] vs. 16 [interquartile range, 10-24]), with similar mechanisms of injury between the two groups. Readmitted ICU patients had a significantly higher mortality (19.5%) compared with single ICU admission patients (9.9%) ( p < 0.001) and higher rates of developing any complication, including delirium (61% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with the highest risk of readmission were delirium (Relative Risk, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-3.26) and aspiration (Relative Risk, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-5.54). More patients in the single ICU admission cohort received comfort-focused care at the time of their death as compared with the ICU readmission cohort (93% vs. 85%, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Readmission to the ICU is strongly associated with higher mortality for injured older adults. Efforts targeted at preventing respiratory complications and delirium in the geriatric trauma population may decrease the rates of ICU readmission and related mortality risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Effective Risk Assessment for Distal Radius Fractures: A Rigorous Multivariable Regression Analysis, Using a Novel 8-Item Modified Frailty Index

Introduction  Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common orthopaedic injuries. The prevalence of DRFs is increasing across all age groups but remains the second most common fracture in the elderly. The modified frailty index (MFI) often predicts morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic injuries. This study aims to determine the predictive value of MFI on complication rates following DRF and the patient length of stay and discharge outcomes. Methods  We utilized our MFI to perform a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Results  In a total of 22,313 patients, the average age was 46 ± 16. An increase in MFI led to an increase in the odds ratio of readmission and reoperation ( p  < 0.001). MFI predicted complications, doubling the rate as the score increased from 1 to 2 ( p  < 0.001). An MFI of 2 also led to a delayed hospital stay of 5 days ( p  < 0.001), as well as an increase in the odds of patients not being sent home at discharge ( p  < 0.001). Finally, life-threatening complications were also predicted with an increased MFI, the odds of a life-threatening complication increasing 488.20 times at an MFI of 3 ( p  < 0.001). Discussion and Conclusion  While surgical decision-making for frail patients with DRFs remains contentious, this novel 8-item MFI score was significantly associated with the probability of hospital readmission/reoperation, postoperative complications, and delayed hospital length of stay. Three new parameters were incorporated into our 8-item score compared with the conventional 5; hypoalbuminemia status (< 3.5 mg/dL), previous diagnosis of osteoporosis, and severe obesity (body mass index > 35) enhancing its sensitivity. Future studies are warranted for its prospective utility in ruling out postsurgical comorbidity.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom

Introduction The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and a major reorganization of healthcare services in the United Kingdom. The center where the study was done was one of the worst affected hospitals in the United Kingdom at the outset of the pandemic. Our study evaluates the impact of the pandemic and national lockdown on the outcomes for patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery. Methods We prospectively identified all patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery in the unit from 1st March 2020 to 31st May 2020. We recorded demographics, diagnoses, COVID-19 infection status, length of stay, and mortality. This was compared with a comparative group in the same period in 2018 and 2019. Results There was a significant reduction in the number of orthopedic trauma surgery cases (318) performed in 2020 compared to 2019 (423 cases, p<0.001) and 2018 (444 cases, p<0.001). The mean time from injury to presentation was 3.6 days, with 40 patients (12.6%) presenting more than one week after injury. The 30-day mortality was 8.2%, and the six-month mortality was 15.1%, with both significantly higher than in 2018 (p<0.001) and 2019 (p<0.001). COVID-19 testing was positive in 39% of patients, with 30-day mortality in this group at 37%, rising to a 53% six-month mortality. No patients under the age of 50 years old died. The majority of admissions (51%) were due to falls at home. The second most common mechanism was Do-It-Yourself (DIY) injuries. Road traffic accidents accounted for 2%. Conclusion There were significantly fewer cases of orthopedic trauma surgery during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period in previous years. The type of trauma also showed low numbers of high-energy and sporting injuries as a result of the national lockdown. Patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery who tested positive for COVID-19 had significantly higher 30-day mortality than those without COVID-19, and this increased mortality persisted to six months post-operatively. However, patients under 50 years old appear to be at low risk of death.

A simplified frailty index and nomogram to predict the postoperative complications and survival in older patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the clinical value of a simplified five-item frailty index (sFI) for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in older patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Method

This retrospective study included 333 patients (aged ≥65 years) with UTUC. Patients were classified into five groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 3+, according to sFI score. The variable importance and minimum depth methods were used to screen for significant variables, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression models applied to investigated the relationships between significant variables and postoperative complications. Survival differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Further, we developed a nomogram based on clinicopathological features and the sFI. The area under the curve (AUC), Harrel's concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram.

Result

Of 333 cases identified, 31.2% experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade of 2 or greater complication. Random forest-logistic regression modeling showed that sFI significantly influenced the incidence of postoperative complications in older patients (AUC= 0.756). Compared with patients with low sFI score, those with high sFI scores had significantly lower OS and CSS (p < 0.001). Across all patients, the random survival forest-Cox regression model revealed that sFI score was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS, with AUC values of 0.815 and 0.823 for predicting 3-year OS and CSS, respectively. The nomogram developed was clinically valuable and had good ability to discriminate abilities for high-risk patients. Further, we developed a survival risk classification system that divided all patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups based on total nomogram points for each patient.

Conclusion

A simple five-item frailty index may be considered a prognostic factor for the prognosis and postoperative complications of UTUC following RNU. By using this predictive model, clinicians may increase their accuracy in predicting complications and prognosis and improve preoperative decision-making.

The unexpected paradox of geriatric traumatic brain injury outcomes: Uncovering racial and ethnic disparities

BACKGROUND

Healthcare disparities have always challenged surgical care in the US. We aimed to assess the influence of disparities on cerebral monitor placement and outcomes of geriatric TBI patients.

METHODS

Analysis of 2017-2019 ACS-TQIP. Included severe TBI patients ≥65 years. Patients who died within 24 h were excluded. Outcomes included mortality, cerebral monitors use, complications, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

We included 208,495 patients (White = 175,941; Black = 12,194) (Hispanic = 195,769; Non-Hispanic = 12,258). On multivariable regression, White race was associated with higher mortality (aOR = 1.26; p < 0.001) and SNF/rehab discharge (aOR = 1.11; p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (aOR = 0.90; p < 0.001) or to undergo cerebral monitoring (aOR = 0.77; p < 0.001) compared to Black. Non-Hispanics had higher mortality (aOR = 1.15; p = 0.013), complications (aOR = 1.26; p < 0.001), and SNF/Rehab discharge (aOR = 1.43; p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (aOR = 0.69; p < 0.001) or to undergo cerebral monitoring (aOR = 0.84; p = 0.018) compared to Hispanics. Uninsured Hispanics had the lowest odds of SNF/rehab discharge (aOR = 0.18; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the significant racial and ethnic disparities in the outcomes of geriatric TBI patients. Further studies are needed to address the reason behind these disparities and identify potentially modifiable risk factors in the geriatric trauma population.

The Impact of Frailty Is Age Dependent in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Age-Adjusted Modified Frailty Index

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a well-established risk factor in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). How age modifies the impact of frailty on outcomes in these patients, however, remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to describe and evaluate the applicability of a novel risk stratification tool-the age-adjusted modified Frailty Index (aamFI)-in patients undergoing TKA.

METHODS

A national database was queried for all patients undergoing primary TKA from 2015 to 2019. There were 271,271 patients who met inclusion criteria for this study. First, outcomes were compared between chronologically young and old frail patients. In accordance with previous studies, the 75th percentile of age of all included patients (73 years) was used as a binary cutoff. Then, frailty was classified using the novel aamFI, which constitutes the 5-item mFI with the addition of 1 point for patients ≥73 years. Multivariable logistic regressions were then used to investigate the relationship between aamFI and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Frail patients ≥73 years had a higher incidence of complications compared to frail patients <73 years. There was a strong association between aamFI and complications. An aamFI of ≥3 (reference aamFI of 0) was associated with an increased odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 8.6, 95% CI 5.0-14.8), any complication (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.9-3.3), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8), and nonhome discharge (OR 6.1, 95% CI 5.8-6.4; all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although frailty negatively influences outcomes following TKA in patients of all ages, chronologically old, frail patients are particularly vulnerable. The aamFI accounts for this and represents a simple, but powerful tool for stratifying risk in patients undergoing primary TKA.

Use of a Six-Item Modified Frailty Index to Predict 30-day Adverse Events, Readmission, and Mortality in Older Patients Undergoing Surgical Fixation of Lower Extremity, Pelvic, and Acetabular Fractures

INTRODUCTION

This is a retrospective study evaluating the use of a new six-item modified frailty index (MF-6) to predict short-term outcomes of patients receiving surgery for lower extremity fractures.

METHODS

Patients older than 65 years undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for lower extremity, pelvic, and acetabulum fractures were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The MF-6 was calculated by assigning one point for each of six common conditions. Multivariable analysis was used to compare patients with an MF-6 of <3 and ≥3. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, readmission, revision surgery, and length of stay. An area under the curve receiver operator analysis was conducted to compare the MF-6 with MF-5, an existing five-item frailty index.

RESULTS

Nine thousand four hundred sixty-three patients were included. Patients with an MF-6 of ≥3 were at markedly higher risk of discharge destination other than home (Exp[B] = 2.09), mortality (Exp[B] = 2.48), major adverse events (Exp[B] = 2.16), and readmission (Exp[B] = 1.82). Receiver-operating curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.65 for mortality, 0.62 for major adverse events, and 0.62 for discharge destination other than home, all of which outperformed the MF-5.

DISCUSSION

The MF-6 was correlated with a 30-day postoperative incidence of infectious complications, readmission, and discharge destination. MF-6 scores can be used to risk-stratify patient populations as shifts to value-based care continue to develop.

The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality

Background

Pelvic fractures in older patients are associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Both might be determined by fracture morphology and/or patient characteristics. The aim of this project is to investigate the prognostic value of specific fracture characteristics with respect to overall survival and to compare it with an established classification system.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 60 years, treated conservatively for a CT-scan verified, low-energy pelvic ring fracture between August 2006 and December 2018. Survival data was available from patients’ charts and cantonal or national registries.

The prognostic value of fracture characteristic describing the anterior and posterior involvement of the pelvic ring was investigated. This analysis was repeated after patients were stratified into a high-risk vs a low-risk group according to patient characteristic (age, gender, comorbidities, mobility, living situation). This allowed to assess the impact of the different fracture morphologies on mortality in fit vs. frail senior patients separately.

Results

Overall, 428 patients (83.4% female) with a mean age of 83.7 years were included. Two thirds of patients were still living in their home and mobile without walking aid at baseline. In-hospital mortality was 0.7%, overall, one-year mortality 16.9%. An independent and significant association of age, gender and comorbidities to overall survival was found. Further, the occurrence of a horizontal sacral fracture as well as a ventral comminution or dislocation was associated with an increased mortality. The effect of a horizontal sacral fracture was more accentuated in low-risk patients while the ventral fracture components showed a larger effect on survival in high-risk patients.

Conclusion

Specific fracture characteristics may indicate a higher risk of mortality in conservatively treated patients with a low-energy pelvic ring fracture. Hence, they should be taken into account in future treatment algorithms and decisions on patient management.

The Age-Adjusted Modified Frailty Index: An Improved Risk Stratification Tool for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Frailty and increasing age are well-established risk factors in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, these variables have only been considered independently. This study assesses the interplay between age and frailty and introduces a novel age-adjusted modified frailty index (aamFI) for more refined risk stratification of THA patients.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2015 to 2019 for patients undergoing primary THA. First, outcomes were compared between chronologically younger and older frail patients. Then, to establish the aamFI, one additional point was added to the previously described mFI-5 for patients aged ≥73 years (the 75th percentile for age in our study population). The association of aamFI with postoperative complications and resource utilization was then analyzed categorically.

RESULTS

A total of 165,957 THA patients were evaluated. Older frail patients had a higher incidence of complications than younger frail patients. Regression analysis demonstrated a strong association between aamFI and complications. For instance, an aamFI of ≥3 (compared to aamFI of 0) was associated with an increased odds of mortality (OR: 22.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.62-41.68), any complication (OR: 3.50, 95% CI 3.23-3.80), deep vein thrombosis (OR: 2.85, 95% CI 2.03-4.01), and nonhome discharge (OR 9.61, 95% CI 9.04-10.21; all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Chronologically, older patients are impacted more by frailty than younger patients. The aamFI accounts for this and outperforms the mFI-5 in prediction of postoperative complications and resource utilization in patients undergoing primary THA.

Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

Preventing postoperative complications is crucial for patients, surgeons, and health care facilities. We developed a risk stratification scoring system to optimize postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. A total of 35,580 patients who underwent foot and ankle procedures from 2005 to 2017 were identified as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). To assess the risk of a postoperative complication, we identified several independent risk factors associated with 30-day postoperative complications, then proceeded to develop a point-based risk scoring system. To validate our scoring system, we used it on a cohort of patients from the database who underwent foot and ankle surgery. Risk factors that correlated with postoperative complications included tobacco abuse, age (≥65 years), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, elevated creatinine level (≥1.3 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hyponatremia (<135 mEq/L), and anemia (hematocrit value, men <42%; women <38%). Point scores for each factor were: anemia, +10; hypoalbuminemia, +9; elevated creatinine level, +6; CHF, +4; diabetes mellitus, +3; hyponatremia, +3; COPD, +2; hypertension, +2; age, +1; and tobacco abuse, +1. For the validation cohort, we stratified patients according to risk as low (0-20 points), medium (21-30 points), and high (≥31 points) risk. In terms of having a postoperative complication, compared with low-risk patients, patients who were at medium risk had an odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI, 2.8-7.9) and those at high risk had an odds ratio of 8.3 (95% CI, 4.8-14.5). [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):139-144.].

Is Frailty Associated with Adverse Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Definitions

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence supporting the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after surgery. There is, however, no consensus on how frailty should be assessed and used to inform treatment. In this review, we aimed to synthesize the current literature on the use of frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes following orthopaedic surgery by (1) identifying the frailty instruments used and (2) evaluating the strength of the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify articles that reported on outcomes after orthopaedic surgery within frail populations. Only studies that defined frail patients using a frailty instrument were included. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Study demographic information, frailty instrument information (e.g., number of items, domains included), and clinical outcome measures (including mortality, readmissions, and length of stay) were collected and reported.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 630 articles. Of these, 177 articles underwent full-text review; 82 articles were ultimately included and analyzed. The modified frailty index (mFI) was the most commonly used frailty instrument (38% of the studies used the mFI-11 [11-item mFI], and 24% of the studies used the mFI-5 [5-item mFI]), although a large variety of instruments were used (24 different instruments identified). Total joint arthroplasty (22%), hip fracture management (17%), and adult spinal deformity management (15%) were the most frequently studied procedures. Complications (71%) and mortality (51%) were the most frequently reported outcomes; 17% of studies reported on a functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the best approach to defining frailty among orthopaedic surgery patients, although instruments based on the accumulation-of-deficits model (such as the mFI) were the most common. Frailty was highly associated with adverse outcomes, but the majority of the studies were retrospective and did not identify frailty prospectively in a prediction model. Although many outcomes were described (complications and mortality being the most common), there was a considerable amount of heterogeneity in measurement strategy and subsequent strength of association. Future investigations evaluating the association between frailty and orthopaedic surgical outcomes should focus on prospective study designs, long-term outcomes, and assessments of patient-reported outcomes and/or functional recovery scores.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preoperatively identifying high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients through frailty instruments has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Frailty screenings can create opportunities for targeted intervention efforts and guide patient-provider decision-making.

Modified-frailty index does not independently predict complications, hospital length of stay or 30-day readmission rates following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty has been associated with inferior surgical outcomes in various fields of spinal surgery. With increasing healthcare costs, hospital length of stay (LOS) and unplanned readmissions have emerged as clinical proxies reflecting overall value of care. However, there is a paucity of data assessing the impact that baseline frailty has on quality of care in patients with spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact that frailty has on LOS, complication rate, and unplanned readmission after posterior lumbar spinal fusion for spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2010 through 2016.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent lumbar spinal decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedural coding systems. We calculated the modified frailty index (mFI) for each patient using 5 dichotomous comorbidities - diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, hypertension requiring medication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependent functional status. Each comorbidity is assigned 1 point and the points are summed to give a score between 0 and 5. As in previous literature, we defined a score of 0 as "not frail", 1 as "mild" frailty, and 2 or greater as "moderate to severe" frailty.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, LOS, readmission, and reoperation were assessed.

METHODS

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of adverse events (AEs), extended LOS, complications, and unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

There were a total of 5,296 patients identified, of which 2,030 (38.3%) were mFI=0, 2,319 (43.8%) patients mFI=1, and 947 (17.9%) were mFI ≥2. The mFI≥2 cohort was older (p≤.001) and had a greater average BMI (p≤.001). The mFI≥2 cohort had a slightly longer hospital stay (3.7 ± 2.3 days vs. mFI=1: 3.5 ± 2.8 days and mFI=0: 3.2 ± 2.1 days,p≤.001). Both surgical AEs and medical AEs were significantly greater in the mFI≥2 cohort than the other cohorts, (2.6% vs. mFI=1: 1.8% and mFI=0: 1.2%,p=.022) and (6.3% vs. mFI=1: 4.8% and mFI=0: 2.6%,p≤.001), respectively. While there was no significant difference in reoperation rates, the mFI≥2 cohort had greater unplanned 30-day readmission rates (8;4% vs. mFI=5.6: 4.8% and mFI=0: 3.4%,p≤.001). However, on multivariate regression analysis, mFI≥2 was not a significant independent predictor of LOS (p=.285), complications (p=.667), or 30-day unplanned readmission (p=.378).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that frailty, as measured by the mFI, does not significantly predict LOS, 30-day adverse events, or 30-day unplanned readmission in patients undergoing lumbar spinal decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis. Further work is needed to better define variable inputs that make up frailty to optimize surgical outcome prediction tools that impact the value of care.

Septic Arthritis of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Single-Center, 11-Year Retrospective Review

Septic arthritis of the smaller acromioclavicular joint is uncommon, with only a few reports and case series available in the literature. The aim of this outcomes analysis was to determine the prevalence of shoulder girdle septic arthritis within the authors' institution, with a particular focus on describing the authors' experience with acromioclavicular joint septic arthritis. A retrospective outcomes analysis was conducted of patients admitted to a single tertiary referral center from 2008 to 2018 with acromioclavicular joint septic arthritis. Demographic and clinical data were recorded for each patient; the modified Frailty Index score was calculated for each patient. Nine patients were identified as having acromioclavicular joint septic arthritis, making up 12% of shoulder girdle septic arthritis. Diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity, present in 4 (44.4%) patients. Staphylococcus aureus was responsible in 55.6% and Streptococcus species in 44.4%. Seven patients were treated surgically. Mean (SD) length of antibiotic therapy was 6.2 (2.7) weeks. Mean (SD) length of stay was 6 (2.83) days (range, 4-8 days) for patients who received antibiotic therapy only and 12.7 (7.52) days for those who proceeded for operative management. Mean modified Frailty Index score was 1.1. Septic arthritis of the acromioclavicular joint is an uncommon infection that occurs both in patients with impaired immunity and in those with intact immune systems. Tailored antimicrobial therapy in conjunction with surgical intervention, when indicated, appears to result in successful suppression or eradication of infection in the majority of cases. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e493-e497.].

National trends in extremity fracture hospitalizations among older adults between 2003 and 2017

BACKGROUND

Fractures in late life are highly consequential for health, services use, and spending. Little is known about trends in extremity fracture hospitalizations among older adults in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

The 2003-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), a representative sample of U.S. community hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalized adults aged 65 and older with a diagnosis of upper or lower extremity fracture.

MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of extremity fracture hospitalization and mortality, using NIS discharge and trend weights, and population denominators derived from the U.S. Census Bureau. Incidence was reported separately for men and women by age, fracture diagnosis, and injury mechanism. Weighted linear regression was used to test for significant trends over time.

RESULTS

Incidence of extremity fracture hospitalizations declined in both women (15.7%, p trend < 0.001) and men (3.2%, p trend < 0.001) between 2003 and 2017. This trend was primarily attributed to a decline in low energy femur fractures which accounted for 65% of all fracture hospitalizations. Among older adults with an extremity fracture hospitalization, mortality declined from 5.1% in 2003 to 3.3% in 2017 in men, and from 2.6% to 1.9% in women (p trend < 0.001). High energy fractures were due to falls (53%), motor vehicle accidents (34%), and other high impact injuries (13%). Overall, 12% of extremity fracture hospitalizations were attributed to high-energy injuries: increases were observed among men ages 65-74 (20%; p trend < 0.001) and 75-84 (10%; p trend = 0.013), but not among women of any age.

CONCLUSION

Observed declines in the incidence of extremity fracture hospitalizations and related mortality are encouraging. However, increasing incidence of fracture hospitalization from high energy injuries among men suggests that older adults with complex injuries will be seen with more prevalence in the future.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Frailty Instruments Derived From Electronic Health Data

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in the perioperative period. Given the increasing availability of electronic medical data, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with primary objectives of describing available frailty instruments applied to electronic data and synthesizing their prognostic value. Our secondary objectives were to assess the construct validity of frailty instruments that have been applied to perioperative electronic data and the feasibility of electronic frailty assessment.

METHODS

Following protocol registration, a peer-reviewed search strategy was applied to Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane databases, and the Comprehensive Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature from inception to December 31, 2019. All stages of the review were completed in duplicate. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes included nonhome discharge, health care costs, and length of stay. Effect estimates adjusted for baseline illness, sex, age, procedure, and urgency were of primary interest; unadjusted and adjusted estimates were pooled using random-effects models where appropriate or narratively synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety studies were included; 83 contributed to the meta-analysis. Frailty was defined using 22 different instruments. In adjusted data, frailty identified from electronic data using any instrument was associated with a 3.57-fold increase in the odds of mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68-4.75), increased odds of institutional discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.99-2.89), and increased costs (ratio of means, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.46-1.63). Most instruments were not multidimensional, head-to-head comparisons were lacking, and no feasibility data were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty status derived from electronic data provides prognostic value as it is associated with adverse outcomes, even after adjustment for typical risk factors. However, future research is required to evaluate multidimensional instruments and their head-to-head performance and to assess their feasibility and clinical impact.

Impact of Frailty and Malnutrition on Outcomes After Surgical Fixation of Lower Extremity Fractures in Young Patients

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the relationship of nutrition parameters and the modified frailty index (mFI) on postsurgical complications within a young patient population sustaining lower extremity orthopaedic trauma.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Urban, American College of Surgeons-Verified, Level-1, Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen-thousand one hundred nine adult patients under the age of 65 sustaining lower extremity fractures undergoing operative intervention from 2006 to 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

On admission, mFI and albumin levels were obtained, as well as complication data. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the association between frailty, malnutrition, and postoperative complications. Patients were stratified, healthy (mFI ≤1, albumin ≥3.5 g/dL), malnourished (mFI ≤1, albumin <3.5 g/dL), frail (mFI ≥2, albumin ≥3.5 g/dL), and frail and malnourished (mFI ≥2, albumin <3.5 g/dL).

RESULTS

60.4% of patients were healthy, 18.8% were malnourished, 11.7% were frail, and 9.0% were frail and malnourished. Frailty and/or malnourishment on admission predicted significantly higher odds of postoperative complications and mortality when compared with healthy patients. Frailty and malnourishment in conjunction predicted a significantly higher odds ratio of 1.46 (1.22-1.75) for developing postoperative complications when compared with the only malnourished. This was also observed when compared with the only frail (odd ratio: 1.61, P < 0.001); however, there was also a 2.72 (P < 0.001) increased odds of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty and malnutrition in conjunction predicts a subset of patients with a higher risk of postoperative complications beyond that of frailty or malnutrition in isolation. Identification of these physiological states on admission allows for interventional opportunities during hospitalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Frail Geriatric Trauma Patients

Background

Frailty in geriatric trauma patients is commonly associated with adverse outcomes. Racial disparities in geriatric trauma patients are previously described in the literature. We aimed to assess whether race and ethnicity influence outcomes in frail geriatric trauma patients.

Methods

We performed a 1-year (2017) analysis of TQIP including all geriatric (age ≥ 65 years) trauma patients. The frailty index was calculated using 11-variables and a cutoff limit of 0.27 was defined for frail status. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for demographics, insurance status, injury parameters, vital signs, and ICU and hospital length of stay.

Results

We included 41,111 frail geriatric trauma patients. In terms of race, among frail geriatric trauma patients, 35,376 were Whites and 2916 were African Americans; in terms of ethnicity, 37,122 were Non-Hispanics and 2184 were Hispanics. On regression analysis, the White race was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2–2.0; p < 0.01) and in-hospital complications (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9; p < 0.01). White patients were more likely to be discharged to SNF (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.4; p = 0.03) and less likely to be discharged home (p = 0.04) compared to African Americans. Non-Hispanics were more likely to be discharged to SNF (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.5; p < 0.01) and less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.01) as compared to Hispanics. No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was seen between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics.

Conclusion

Race and ethnicity influence outcomes in frail geriatric trauma patients. These disparities exist regardless of age, gender, injury severity, and insurance status. Further studies are needed to highlight disparities by race and ethnicity and to identify potentially modifiable risk factors in the geriatric trauma population.

Effect of Age on Complication Rates and Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis for Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is one of the most common toe pathologies in patients greater than 50 years old. Although metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is used to improve pain and function, older patients are often considered to be higher-risk operative candidates. There are minimal data on outcomes of MTP fusion and no studies comparing outcomes between geriatric and younger patients.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective study of all patients who underwent MTP fusion between August 1, 2015, and July 1, 2018. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Life-Space Assessment survey (LSA), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain administered preoperatively as well as 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Baseline characteristics and operative outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were compared between patients <65 years old and ≥65 years old. Of 143 included patients, 79 were in the younger group (mean of 56.5 years) and 64 were in the older group (mean of 72.0 years).

RESULTS

Compared with the younger group, the older group was more predominantly female (95.3% older group, 77.2% younger group, P = .002). More patients in the older group had hypertension (73.4% older group, 50.6% younger group, P = .005) and coronary artery disease (9.4% older group, 0.0% younger group, P = .005). Both age groups had similar rates of postoperative wound complications requiring operative irrigation and debridement, deep vein thrombosis, deformity recurrence, and revision surgery. No differences were detected in SF-36, LSA, and VAS surveys administered at baseline, 6 months postoperation, or 1 year postoperation between younger and older patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite more comorbidities, older patients had similar rates of postoperative complications and reported similar outcomes for pain, function, and mobility following MTP fusion. These findings support increased implementation of MTP fusion surgery for older patients with hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort.

Concomitant Malnutrition and Frailty Are Uncommon, but Significant Risk Factors for Mortality and Complication Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) demand continues to rise, but we are also gaining greater insight into patient risk factors for postoperative complications and excess resource utilization. There has been growing interest in frailty and malnutrition as risk factors, although they are often mistakenly used interchangeably. We aimed at identifying the incidence of their coexistence, and the magnitude of risk they confer to TKA patients.

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database to identify 4 patient cohorts: healthy/normal serum albumin, healthy/hypoalbuminemic patients, normoalbuminemic/medically frail patients (defined by modified frailty index), and hypoalbuminemic/frail patients. We performed both univariate and multivariate analyses to quantify the risk conferred by each condition in isolation, and in coexistence.

RESULTS

Of 179,702 elective TKA cases from 2006 to 2018, 18.6% of patients were frail only, 3.0% were hypoalbuminemic -only, and just 1.2% were both frail and hypoalbuminemic. The raw rate of any complication was highest in frail/hypoalbuminemic patients (8.7%), 5.2% in hypoalbuminemic patients, 4.8% in frail patients, and just 3.4% in healthy patients (P < .001); the multivariate model revealed odds ratio of a complication in frail/hypoalbuminemic group of 2.40 (95% confidence interval = 1.27-1.63; P < .001). Mortality within 30 days was highest in the frail/hypoalbuminemic cohort (1.0%), and just 0.1% in healthy patients, and the multivariate model noted an odds ratio of 9.43 for these patients (95% confidence interval = 5.92-14.93; P < .001). The odds of all studied complications were highest in the frail/hypoalbuminemic group.

CONCLUSION

Frailty and hypoalbuminemia represent distinct conditions and are independent risk factors for a complication after TKA. Their coexistence imparts a synergistic association with the risk of post-TKA complications.

Combined Malnutrition and Frailty Significantly Increases Complications and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to rise. While prior work has examined frailty and malnutrition independently, the additive effects of these conditions are unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined influence of malnutrition and frailty in the elective THA patient.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing elective, primary THA were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with hip fracture were excluded. Preoperative serum albumin levels (malnutrition = albumin <3.5 g/dL) and 5-item modified frailty index scores (≥2 = frail) were collected. Four cohorts were created: (1) Healthy (N), (2) Frail-only (F), (3) Hypoalbuminemia-only (H), and (4) Hypoalbuminemia and frail (HF). Demographic and complication data were collected, and statistical analysis was performed comparing complications between cohorts.

RESULTS

105,997 patients undergoing THA were identified for inclusion. The majority (82%) of patients were healthy (14% F, 3% H, and 1% HF). The HF group was found to have higher odds of complication compared with all other groups (HF vs N; odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07-4.46, P < .001). Notably, patients in the HF cohort had a 1.9% 30-day mortality rate (HF vs N; OR 12.66, 95% CI 7.81-20.83, P < .001). Additionally, HF patients had higher odds of increased resource utilization when compared with all other groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty and malnutrition both represent physiologically compromised states but are only weakly correlated. The concurrent presence of frailty and malnutrition in the THA patient has significant detrimental impacts. Further research will be needed to delineate to what degree these risk factors are modifiable.

Frailty in major trauma study (FRAIL-T): a study protocol to determine the feasibility of nurse-led frailty assessment in elderly trauma and the impact on outcome in patients with major trauma

INTRODUCTION

The burden of frailty on older people is easily recognisable by increasing mortality and morbidity, longer hospital stays and adverse discharge locations. In the UK, frailty screening has recently become part of the best practice commissioning tariff within National Health Service England, yet there is no evidence or consensus as to who should carry out this assessment or within which time frame. As major trauma is an increasing burden for older people, there is a need to focus clinician's attention on early identification of frailty in the emergency department (ED) in patients with major trauma as a way to underpin frailty specific major trauma pathways, to optimise recovery and improve patient experience. Throughout the patient with major trauma pathway, nurses are perhaps best placed to conduct timely clinical assessments working with the patient, family and multidisciplinary team to influence ongoing care. This study aims to determine the feasibility of nurse-led assessment of frailty in patients aged 65 years or more admitted to major trauma centres (MTCs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective observational study conducted across five UK MTCs, enrolling 370 participants over 9 months. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility of nurse-led frailty assessment in MTC EDs in patients aged 65 years or more following traumatic injury. The prevalence of frailty and the best assessment tool for use in the ED will be determined. Other outcome measures include quality of life and frailty assessment 6 months after injury, mortality and discharge outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was given ethical approval by the Social Care Research Ethics Committee (REC no 19/IEC08/0006). Findings will be published in scientific journals and presented to national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN10671514.

Peri-operative management of frailty in the orthopedic patient

The purpose of this investigation was to summarize current research on diagnosis, outcomes, and management of frail patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Because frail patients are at increased risk of negative post-operative outcomes including increased 30-day mortality and post-operative complications including infections and delirium, such a review is timely. Strategies including supervised exercise training programs before surgery, early identification of frailty, prophylactic antibiotics, regular drug chart review, regular monitoring of electrolytes, and other strategies to prevent post-operative delirium are helpful in the management of frail orthopedic patients. It is important for surgeons and anesthesiologists to take action in attempt to alleviate adverse post-operative outcomes in frail patients. Ultimately, more research is needed to identify new strategies and to evaluate whether pre-operative optimization can effectively mitigate post-operative outcomes in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Trauma

BACKGROUND

The 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been shown to predict adverse outcomes in surgery; yet, its role in trauma patients is unclear. We hypothesized that increasing frailty, as indicated by increasing mFI-5 scores, would correlate with worse outcomes and greater mortality in trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients captured by our 2018 Spring and Fall Trauma Quality Improvement Program registry. The mFI-5 was calculated by assigning one point for each comorbidity present: diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functionally dependent health status. Outcomes included complications, length of stay, mortality, and discharge location.

RESULTS

A total of 3364 patients were included; 68.0% (n = 2288) were not frail, 16.5% (n = 555) were moderately frail, and 15.5% (n = 521) were severely frail. Higher frailty scores were associated with greater rates of unplanned intubations (P < 0.01) and unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit (P < 0.01). Rates of nonhome discharge (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the severe frailty group compared with the moderate and no frailty groups. On multivariable regression adjusting for demographics and injury details, severe frailty was predictive of any complication (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.12-2.11; P < 0.01), failure to rescue (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.47-5.66; P = 0.002), nonhome discharge (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.47-2.40; P < 0.0001), and mortality (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.07-3.15; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is not only associated with longer hospitalizations but also with more complications, adverse discharge locations, and increased odds of mortality. The mFI-5 is a quick and intuitive tool that can be used to determine an individual's frailty at the time of admission.

Prophylactic postoperative measures to minimize surgical site infections in spine surgery: systematic review and evidence summary

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are three phases in prophylaxis of surgical site infections (SSI): preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. There is lack of consensus and paucity of evidence with SSI prophylaxis in the postoperative period.

PURPOSE

To systematically evaluate the literature, and provide evidence-based summaries on postoperative measures for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis.

METHODS

A systematic review conforming to PRIMSA guidelines was performed utilizing PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database from inception to January 2019. The GRADE approach was used for quality appraisal and synthesis of evidence. Six postoperative care domains with associated key questions were identified. Included studies were extracted into evidence tables, data synthesized quantitatively and qualitatively, and evidence appraised per GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies (nine RCT, 32 cohort studies) were included. In the setting of preincisional antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) administration, use of postoperative AMP for SSI reduction has not been found to reduce rate of SSI in lumbosacral spine surgery. Prolonged administration of AMP for more than 48 hours postoperatively does not seem to reduce the rate of SSI in decompression-only or lumbar spine fusion surgery. Utilization of wound drainage systems in lumbosacral spine and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis corrective surgery does not seem to alter the overall rate of SSI in spine surgery. Concomitant administration of AMP in the presence of a wound drain does not seem to reduce the overall rate of SSI, deep SSI, or superficial SSI in thoracolumbar fusion performed for degenerative and deformity spine pathologies, and in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis corrective surgery. Enhanced-recovery after surgery clinical pathways and infection-specific protocols do not seem to reduce rate of SSI in spine surgery. Insufficient evidence exists for other types of spine surgery not mentioned above, and also for non-AMP pharmacological measures, dressing type and duration, suture and staple management, and postoperative nutrition for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the postoperative period being key in SSI prophylaxis, the literature is sparse and without consensus on optimum postoperative care for SSI prevention in spine surgery. The current best evidence is presented with its limitations. High quality studies addressing high risk cohorts such as the elderly, obese, and diabetic populations, and for traumatic and oncological indications are urgently required.

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis suffering from AO Type B3 traumatic thoracolumbar fractures are associated with increased frailty and morbidity when compared with patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

Background

AO Type B3 hyperextension thoracolumbar fractures are the commonest fracture subtype in ankylosing spinal disorders. Although often considered together in spinal fractures, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are distinct spondyloarthropathies with different pathophysiology. Few studies have compared the two entities in the setting of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The authors compare demographic metrics, injury profile, clinical and radiographical outcomes between patients with AS and DISH in patients suffering from AO Type B3 traumatic thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2018, a retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically-managed patients with AO Type B3 fractures was performed. Demographic metrics, co-morbidity [Charlson-comorbidity index, modified frailty index (mFI), etc.], injury profile (level of injury, mechanism of injury, etc.), clinical (postoperative complication, etc.) and radiographical variables were collected. Differences between patients with AS and DISH were compared.

Results

Fourteen patients were identified. All patients had AS (n=6) or DISH (n=8). The mean age was 72.8±10.2 years and 78.6% of patients were neurologically intact at presentation. Medical and/or surgical complications occurred in 10 of 14 (71.4%) patients. As compared to patients with DISH, patients with AS were more likely to have low falls as the injury mechanism [odds ratio (OR): 35.0, P=0.026], have higher mFI (OR: 30.6, P=0.015), and experience a higher number of postoperative complications per patient (AS: 1.8/patient vs. DISH: 0.5/patient, P=0.024).

Conclusions

In the setting of AO Type B3 fractures, patients with AS are more frail and have higher in-hospital morbidity compared to patients with DISH. Despite both pathologies being ankylosing in nature, further studies are required to fully understand the clinical differences between the two entities to enable clinicians to apply a more targeted and nuanced approach in managing fractures in ankylosing spinal disorders.

Impact of Frailty on 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between frailty and 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures. Furthermore, the authors sought to identify a specific frailty index score that would help identify high-risk patients. This retrospective study evaluated 229 consecutive patients 50 years or older who presented to a single level I trauma center for surgical fixation of an intertrochanteric femur fracture. Frailty was determined using a previously validated 11-point modified frailty index (mFI) scale. Primary outcome variables included 30-day morbidity and mortality. Of the 229 patients included in this study, 82 (36%) had a postoperative complication and there were 10 (4%) mortalities. The most common complications were delirium (n=40; 17%) and acute kidney injury (n=25; 11%). Mean mFI score for those who developed a postoperative complication was 0.24 compared with 0.14 for those who did not (P<.001). The mortality rate increased from 0% for mFI of 0 to 11% for mFI of 0.27 or more. Patients with an mFI of 0.27 or more were more than 9 times as likely to have a mortality compared with patients with an mFI of less than 0.27 (P=.006). This study demonstrates that the mFI is associated with 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients aged 50 years or older with intertrochanteric femur fractures. The authors identified an mFI score of 0.27 or more as the most robust predictor of increased 30-day morbidity and mortality following surgical fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):344-348.].

Hypoalbuminemia Is an Independent Risk Factor for 30-Day Mortality, Postoperative Complications, Readmission, and Reoperation in the Operative Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma Patient

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition, as indicated by hypoalbuminemia, is known to have detrimental effects on outcomes after arthroplasty, geriatric hip fractures, and multiple general surgeries. Hypoalbuminemia has been examined in the critically ill but has largely been ignored in the orthopaedic trauma literature. We hypothesized that admission albumin levels would correlate with postoperative course in the nongeriatric lower extremity trauma patient.

METHODS

Patients with lower extremity (including pelvis and acetabulum) fracture who underwent operative intervention were collected from the ACS-NSQIP database. Patients younger than 65 years were included. Patient demographic data, complications, length of stay, reoperation rate, and readmission rate were collected, and patient modified frailty index scores were calculated. Poisson regression with robust error variance was then conducted, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Five thousand six hundred seventy-three patients with albumin available were identified, and 29.6% had hypoalbuminemia. Hypoalbuminemic patients had higher rates of postoperative complications [9.3% vs. 2.6%; relative risk (RR) 1.63] including increased rates of: mortality (3.2% vs. 0.4%; RR 4.86, 95% confidence interval 2.66-8.87), sepsis (1.5% vs. 0.5%, RR 2.35), and reintubation (2.3% vs. 0.4%; RR 3.84). Reoperation (5.5% vs. 2.6%, RR 1.74) and readmission (11.4% vs. 4.1%; RR 2.53) rates were also higher in patients with low albumin.

CONCLUSION

Hypoalbuminemia is a powerful predictor of acute postoperative course and mortality after surgical fixation in nongeriatric, lower extremity orthopaedic trauma patients. Admission albumin should be a routine part of the orthopaedic trauma workup. Further study into the utility of supplementation is warranted, as this may represent a modifiable risk factor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index: A Concise and Useful Tool for Assessing the Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Morbidity Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusions

BACKGROUND

The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a concise comorbidity-based risk stratification tool that has been shown to predict the occurrence of adverse outcomes following various orthopedic surgeries.

METHODS

The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to identify patients undergoing an elective 1- to 2-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar pathology. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the presence of the 5 co-morbidities: congestive heart failure within 30 days prior to surgery, insulin-dependent or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, partially dependent or totally dependent functional health status at time of surgery, and hypertension requiring medication. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent impact of increasing mFI-5 score on postoperative morbidity while controlling for baseline clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Increasing mFI-5 score versus mFI-5 = 0 was associated with higher odds of any complication (mFI-5 ≥2: odds ratio [OR] 1.45; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.22), 30-day readmissions (mFI-5 ≥2: OR 1.46; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.18), and nonhome discharge (mFI-5 ≥2: OR 1.80; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.16). Higher mFI-5 score was significantly associated with increased risks of superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, unplanned reoperation, any medical complication, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, postoperative ventilator use, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, sepsis, and septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher mFI-5 scores were associated with increased postoperative morbidity following elective 1- to 2-level posterior lumbar fusions.

Frailty and Malnutrition Are Associated With Inpatient Postoperative Complications and Mortality in Hip Fracture Patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship of nutrition parameters with the modified frailty index (mFI) and postoperative complications in hip fracture patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Urban, American College of Surgeons-Verified, Level-1, Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients with isolated hip fractures.

INTERVENTION

N/A.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

On admission, albumin and total lymphocyte count (TLC) levels and complication data were collected. Additionally, mFI scores were calculated. Statistical analysis was then used to analyze the association between frailty, malnutrition, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 62.6% and 17.5% of patients were malnourished as defined by TLC of <1500 cells per cubic millimeter and albumin of <3.5 g/dL, respectively. Both TLC (P = 0.024; r = -0.12) and albumin (P < 0.001; r = -0.23) weakly correlated with frailty. Combining malnutrition and frailty revealed predictive synergy. Albumin of <3.5 g/dL and mFI of ≥0.18 in the same patient resulted in a positive predictive value of 69% and a likelihood ratio of 4 (2.15-7.43) for postoperative complications. Similarly, the combination of hypoalbuminemia and frailty resulted in a positive predictive value of 23.3% and likelihood ratio of 8.52 (P < 0.001) for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

When patients are frail and malnourished, there is a risk elevation beyond that of frailty or malnutrition in isolation. This high-risk cohort can be easily identified at admission with routine laboratory values and clinical history. There is an opportunity to improve outcomes in frail hip fracture patients because malnutrition represents a potentially modifiable risk factor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outpatient and Inpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Comparison of 30-day Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient single-level cervical total disc replacement (TDR) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical TDR is a motion-sparing treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. It is an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a similar complication rate. Like ACDF, it may be performed in the inpatient or outpatient setting. Efforts to reduce health care costs are driving spine surgery to be performed in the outpatient setting. As cervical TDR surgery continues to gain popularity, the safety of treating patients on an outpatient basis needs to be validated.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent single-level cervical disc replacement surgery between 2006 and 2015. Complication data including 30-day complications, reoperation rate, readmission rate, and length of stay data were compared between the inpatient and outpatient cohort using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 531 (34.2%) patients treated as outpatients and 1022 (65.8%) were treated on an inpatient basis. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The overall 30-day complication rate was 1.4% for inpatients and 0.6% for outpatients. Reoperation rate was 0.6% for inpatient and 0.4% for outpatients. Readmission rate was 0.9% and 0.8% for inpatient and outpatient, respectively. There were no statistical differences identified in rates of readmission, reoperation, or complication between the inpatient and outpatient cohorts.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between 30-day complications, readmission, and reoperation rates between inpatients and outpatients who underwent a single-level cervical TDR. Furthermore, the overall 30-day complication rates were low. This study supports that single-level cervical TDR can be performed safely in an outpatient setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Frailty predicts mortality and complications in chronologically young patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries

BACKGROUND

As morbidity and mortality from traumatic orthopaedic injuries continues to rise, increased research is being conducted on how to best predict complications in at risk patients. Recently, frailty indices have been validated in a variety of surgical subspecialties as predictors of morbidity and mortality. However, the vast majority of research has been conducted on geriatric patient populations, with little evidence on patients who are chronologically young. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of a modified frailty index (mFI) in predicting mortality and complications after pelvis, acetabulum, and lower extremity trauma in patients of all ages.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2005 to 2014 for all patients who underwent surgery for pelvis, acetabulum, and lower extremity trauma. The sample size was divided into geriatric (age ≥ 60) and young (age < 60) cohorts. The mFI score was calculated for each patient. Bivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and a chi-square test to determine the relationship between mFI and both primary and secondary outcomes while adjusting for age. Univariate analysis and multivariate analyses were performed. All analyses were done using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) and a p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

56,241 patients were identified to have undergone surgery for pelvis, acetabulum, or lower extremity trauma. 28% of patients were identified under the age of 60. In the young cohort, mFI was a strong predictor of thirty-day mortality (OR 11.02, 95% CI 6.26-19.39, p < 0.001). With regards to Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications, MFI is also a strong predictor in the young cohort (OR 28.82, 95% CI 16.05-51.77, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The mFI score was a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality in chronologically young orthopaedic trauma patients. The use of the mFI score can provide an individualized risk assessment to interdisciplinary teams for perioperative counseling and to improve outcomes.

Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications in Hand Surgery Patients

PURPOSE

Avoidance of postoperative complications is important to both patients and surgeons. In an attempt to optimize postoperative outcomes, a risk stratification scoring system has been created to aid in optimizing risk factors for general surgical complications in hand surgery patients.

METHODS

Patients were identified who underwent hand procedures as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Independent risk factors associated with postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery were identified and used to develop a point-scoring system to estimate the relative risk for sustaining complications. For validation, the system was tested on a subset of patients from the database who had undergone hand surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 49,272 patients were identified as having undergone hand surgery from 2005 to 2015. The incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days of hand surgery was 2.3%. Risk factors associated with postoperative complications were male sex, tobacco abuse, congestive heart failure, anemia (male hematocrit less than 42; female less than 38), elevated creatinine (greater than 1.3 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (less than 3.5 g/dL), and hyponatremia (less than 135 mEq/L). Point scores derived for each of these factors were: hypoalbuminemia, +5; congestive heart failure, +2; anemia, +2; elevated creatinine, +2; male sex, +1; tobacco abuse, +1; and hyponatremia, +1. In the validation cohort, patients categorized as low-risk (0-3) using the point-scoring system had a 2.4% rate of 30-day complications; patients categorized as medium risk (4-7) had a 10.4% complication rate (relative risk = 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-5.9 compared with low risk) and high risk (≥8), 28.9% (relative risk = 11.9; 95% confidence interval, 9.0-15.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This point-scoring system predicts risk for general postoperative complications after hand surgery. These data may help surgeons identify areas of clinical concern with patients to reduce the risk for sustaining postoperative complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.