International survey among orthopaedic trauma surgeons: Lack of a definition of fracture-related infection

Management of Fracture-Related Infection in Conflict Zones: Lessons Learned from Medical Missions to Gaza

Background/Objectives: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) are a significant complication in conflict zones, where limited resources and damaged infrastructure complicate orthopedic care. Methods: This study retrospectively reviews the management of FRIs during medical missions to Gaza from April to July 2024. Results: Among 135 patients treated for war-related fractures, 30% were identified with suspected FRIs, which were primarily following explosive injuries. Contributing factors to the high incidence of infection included malnutrition, poor sanitation, and the scarcity of sterile surgical supplies. The absence of standard infection control measures further complicated treatment. Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical need for a comprehensive approach that incorporates infection prevention, sustainable healthcare planning, and quality assurance tailored to the realities of conflict zones. The study underscores the importance of international support to ensure the availability of essential medical supplies and to develop effective, context-specific strategies for infection management. By applying these insights, healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of FRIs in resource-limited settings affected by conflict.

The Concept of Treatment for Surgical Infection in the Hindfoot

Background

Chronic osteomyelitis of the calcaneus (OC) and open infected calcaneal fractures, especially when complicated by infected soft tissue defects, present significant surgical challenges. Accepted recommendations for the surgical treatment of this pathology are yet to be established.

Methods

Drawing from our experience and the consensus among experts, we have developed a concept for selecting optimal, well-known surgical approaches based on the specific pathologic presentation. This concept distinguishes 4 main forms of hindfoot infection: infected wounds, open infected fractures, OC, and their mixed forms. Patients with conditions that could confound the treatment outcomes, such as diabetes mellitus and neurotrophic diseases, were excluded from this analysis. We present a retrospective analysis of the treatment outcomes for 44 patients (4 women and 40 men) treated between 2009 and 2022 using some refined surgical techniques. Treatment success was evaluated based on the absence of disease recurrence within a 2-year follow-up, the avoidance of below-knee amputations, and the restoration of weightbearing function.

Results

The treatment results were considered through the prism of our proposed concept and according to the Cierny-Mader classification. There were 4 instances of disease recurrence, necessitating 6 additional surgeries, 2 of which (4.5% of the patient cohort) resulted in amputations. In the remaining cases, we were able to restore weightbearing function and eliminate the infection through reconstructive surgeries, employing skin grafts when necessary.

Conclusion

Surgical infections of the hindfoot area remain a significant challenge. The strategic concept we propose for surgical decision making, tailored to the specific pathology, represents a potential advancement in addressing this challenge. This framework could provide valuable guidance for orthopaedic surgeons in their clinical decision-making process.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Surgical debridement and continuous irrigation for early surgical site infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus with a closed patella fracture surgery: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Management of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is a huge challenge to orthopedic surgeons, and significantly impacts patients and their families due to long treatment cycles and associated discomfort experiences.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 68-year-old woman without a medical history of any comorbidities, diabetes, hypertension, allergies, or tuberculosis, was admitted to our hospital complaining of right knee pain following a fall. X-ray and CT scans revealed a closed right patella fracture. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation with tension band wiring and circle wire. Preoperative assessment showed normal nutritional status. Prophylactic cefazolin sodium pentahydrate was administered 30 min preoperatively and maintained for 24 h post-operation to prevent infection. The patient was discharged 3 days after the operation. However, the wound exhibited signs of infection: redness, swelling, and the presence of secretions. Outpatient dressings and oral antibiotics were prescribed but failed to control the infection, leading to rehospitalization. Surgical debridement and continuous articular irrigation were implemented to address the infection. Secretion cultures were taken to identify the causative bacteria. Levofloxacin and Rifampicin were used according to drug sensitivity tests. However, the patient experienced severe knee swelling and an iodine irritative reaction subsequently. Anti-allergic treatment and normal saline dressings were applied to alleviate swelling, pain, and skin irritation. MRI results indicated arthroedema and possible infection necessitating further surgical debridement, the patient rejected additional surgery and requested discharge. Levofloxacin and Rifampicin were used for a month to control the infection after discharge, accompanied by regular rehabilitation exercises. Fortunately, the infection was successfully managed, and knee function was satisfactorily restored.

DISCUSSION

SSI after patella fracture surgery can lead to a worse quality of life, serious economic burden, and psychological distress. Therefore, effective treatment methods for managing postoperative SSIs are very important.

CONCLUSION

Sufficient surgical debridement is vital to remove infection tissue of early SSI caused by Staphylococcus aureus with a closed patella fracture surgery. Continuous articular irrigation and sensitive antibiotics help control infection, and active rehabilitation training improves knee function recovery.

Wound alpha defensin levels are significantly higher in patients with fracture related infection: A pilot, prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In absence of frank purulence, wound cultures represent 'gold-standard' for diagnosis of fracture related infection (FRI). However, these are time-intensive, and may be falsely negative, necessitating the need for accurate and rapid biomarker-based diagnosis. We conducted this study to determine the accuracy of 3 wound-based biomarkers for the diagnosis of FRI.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study on adult patients who underwent an operative procedure for an upper or lower limb fracture. Wound fluid levels of alpha-defensin (AD), neutrophil elastase (NE) and IL-6 were evaluated on post-operative day 2, and patients were followed up for one month. Patients were categorized as cases (FRI) or controls (no FRI), on the basis of the consensus definition of FRI. Univariate analysis, along with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

48 patients were included. AD levels showed a 2.6-fold elevation in cases (n = 26, Median = 23.74 µg/ml) as compared to controls (n = 22, Median = 8.78 µg/ml). The area under the curve for this variable was 0.71 (95% Confidence Intervals = 0.56 - 0.86). The levels of NE and IL-6 were not significantly different between cases and controls.

CONCLUSION

Wound AD levels are significantly elevated in patients with FRI. However, these results need to be validated in a larger cohort of patients before it can be used as a biomarker of FRI.

Current Concepts of Fracture-Related Infection

Currently, fracture-related infection (FRI) still represents great challenges in front of orthopaedic surgeons, despite great advances that have been achieved regarding its diagnosis and treatment. Although both FRI and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) belong to osteoarticular infections and share similarities, FRI displays unique characteristics. Diagnosis of FRI is sometimes difficult owing to the nonspecific symptoms, and treatment is usually tricky, with a high risk of infection recurrence. In addition, the long disease course is associated with a significantly elevated risk of disability, both physically and psychologically. Moreover, such a disorder still poses heavy economic burdens to the patients, both personally and socially. Therefore, early diagnosis and reasonable treatment are the key issues for increasing the cure rate, decreasing the risks of infection relapse and disability, and improving the life quality and prognosis of the patients. In this review, we summarized the present concepts regarding the definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of FRI.

The management of fracture related infections: What practices can be supported by high-level evidence?

Fracture related infections (FRIs) are a disabling condition causing significant concern within the orthopaedic community. FRIs have a huge societal and economic burden leading to prolonged recovery times and the potential for becoming chronic conditions or being life-threatening. Despite its importance in our field, the surgical community has just recently agreed on a definition which, added to the lack of surgical trials assessing preventive and treatment interventions have limited our understanding and precipitated wide variations in surgeons' practice. This article aims to review the current practices that can be supported with high-quality evidence. Currently, we have a limited body of high-quality evidence on FRI prevention and treatment. A handful of measures have proven effective, such as the use of prophylactic antibiotics, the use of saline and low pressure as the preferred irrigation solution and the safety of delaying initial surgical débridement more than 6 hours without impacting infection rates for open fracture wounds débridement. Future multicentre trials, properly powered, will shed light on current areas of controversy regarding the benefit of different preoperative and perioperative factors for the prevention and treatment of FRIs. Higher quality evidence is needed to guide surgeons to offer an evidence-based approach to prevent FRI occurrence and to treat patients suffering from them.

Isothermal Microcalorimetry Improves the Time to Diagnosis of Fracture-related Infection Compared With Conventional Tissue Cultures

BACKGROUND

A consensus definition recently was formulated for fracture-related infection, which centered on confirmatory criteria including conventional cultures that take time to finalize and have a 10% to 20% false-negative rate. During this time, patients are often on broad-spectrum antibiotics and may remain hospitalized until cultures are finalized to adjust antibiotic regimens.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the diagnostic accuracy of isothermal microcalorimetry, and how does its accuracy compare with that of conventional cultures? (2) Does isothermal microcalorimetry decrease time to detection (or diagnosis) of fracture-related infection compared with conventional cultures? (3) Does isothermal microcalorimetry have a diagnostic accuracy or time advantage over conventional cultures in patients on chronic suppressive antibiotics?

METHODS

Between July 2020 and August 2021, we treated 310 patients with concerns for infection after prior fracture repair surgery. Of those, we considered all patients older than 18 years of age with fixation hardware in place at the time of presentation as potentially eligible. All included patients returned to the operating room with cultures obtained and assessed by both isothermal microcalorimetry and conventional cultures, and all were diagnosed using the consensus criteria for fracture-related infection. Based on that, 81% (250 of 310) of patients were eligible; a further 51% (157 of 310) were excluded because of the following reasons: the capacity of the isothermal microcalorimetry instrument limited the throughput on that day (34% [106 of 310]), they had only swab cultures obtained in surgery (15% [46 of 310]), or they had less than 3 months follow-up after surgery for infectious concerns (2% [5 of 310]), leaving 30% (93 of 310) of the originally identified patients for analysis. We obtained two to five cultures from each patient during surgery, which were sent to our clinical microbiology laboratory for standard processing (conventional cultures). This included homogenization of each tissue sample individually and culturing for aerobic, anaerobic, acid-fast bacilli, and fungal culturing. The remaining homogenate from each sample was then taken to our orthopaedic research laboratory, resuspended in growth media, and analyzed by isothermal microcalorimetry for a minimum of 24 hours. Aerobic and anaerobic cultures were maintained for 5 days and 14 days, respectively. Overall, there were 93 patients (59 males), with a mean age of 43 ± 14 years and a mean BMI of 28 ± 8 kg/m 2 , and 305 tissue samples (mean 3 ± 1 samples per patient) were obtained and assessed by conventional culturing and isothermal microcalorimetry. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of isothermal microcalorimetry to diagnose fracture-related infection were compared with conventional cultures using a McNemar test based on the consensus definition of fracture-related infection. This consensus criteria is comprised of two levels of certainty for the diagnostic variables. The first is confirmatory criteria, where infection is considered definitely present and includes the presence of fistula/sinus tract/wound breakdown, purulent drainage or the presence of pus, presence of microorganisms in deep tissue specimens on histopathologic examination, presence of more than five neutrophils/high-powered field by histopathologic examination (only for chronic/late onset cases), and identification of phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens by conventional culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens. The second is suggestive criteria in which further investigation is required to achieve confirmatory status. Fracture-related infection was diagnosed for this study to minimize subjectivity based on the presence of at least one of the confirmatory criteria as documented by the managing surgeon. When suggestive criteria were present without confirmatory criteria, patients were considered negative for fracture-related infection and followed further in clinic after surgical exploration (n = 25 patients). All 25 patients deemed not to have fracture-related infection were considered infection-free at latest follow-up (range 3 to 12 months). The time to detection or diagnosis was recorded and compared via the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Using the consensus criteria for fracture-related infection, there were no differences with the numbers available between isothermal microcalorimetry and conventional cultures in terms of sensitivity (87% [95% confidence interval 77% to 94%] versus 81% [95% CI 69% to 89%]), specificity (100% [95% CI 87% to 100%] versus 96% [95% CI 79% to 99%]), PPV (100% [95% CI 90% to 100%] versus 98% [95% CI 89% to 99%]), NPV (74% [95% CI 60% to 84%] versus 65% [95% CI 52% to 75%]), or accuracy (90% [95% CI 83% to 96%] versus 85% [95% CI 76% to 91%]; p = 0.13). The concordance by sample between conventional cultures and isothermal microcalorimetry was 85%. Isothermal microcalorimetry had a shorter median (range) time to detection or diagnosis compared with conventional cultures (2 hours [0.5 to 66] versus 51 hours [18 to 147], difference of medians 49 hours; p < 0.001). Additionally, 32 patients used antibiotics for a median (range) duration of 28 days (7 to 1095) before presentation. In these unique patients, there were no differences with the numbers available between isothermal microcalorimetry and conventional cultures in terms of sensitivity (89% [95% CI 71% to 98%] versus 74% [95% CI 53% to 88%]), specificity (100% [95% CI 48% to 100%] versus 83% [95% CI 36% to 99%]), PPV (100% [95% CI 85% to 100%] versus 95% [95% CI 77% to 99%]), NPV (63% [95% CI 37% to 83%] versus 42% [95% CI 26% to 60%]), or accuracy (91% [95% CI 75% to 98%] versus 78% [95% CI 57% to 89%]; p = 0.17). Isothermal microcalorimetry again had a shorter median (range) time to detection or diagnosis compared with conventional cultures (1.5 hours [0.5 to 48] versus 51.5 hours [18 to 125], difference of medians 50 hours; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Given that isothermal microcalorimetry considerably decreases the time to the diagnosis of a fracture-related infection without compromising the accuracy of the diagnosis, managing teams may eventually use isothermal microcalorimetry-pending developmental improvements and regulatory approval-to rapidly detect infection and begin antibiotic management while awaiting speciation and susceptibility testing to modify the antibiotic regimen. Given the unique thermograms generated, further studies are already underway focusing on speciation based on heat curves alone. Additionally, increased study sizes are necessary for both overall fracture-related infection diagnostic accuracy and test performance on patients using long-term antibiotics given the promising results with regard to time to detection for this groups as well.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Epidemiology and Drug Resistance of Fracture-Related Infection of the Long Bones of the Extremities: A Retrospective Study at the Largest Trauma Center in Southwest China

Objective

To describe the demographic characteristics, risk factors, and bacterial resistance of fracture-related infection (FRI) of the long bones of the extremities.

Materials and Methods

This single-center study retrospectively evaluated patients with FRI of the long bones of the extremities at West China Hospital between January 2012 and December 2017, and analyzed the demographic characteristics, risk factors, distribution of pathogenic bacteria, and bacterial drug resistance.

Results

Among 9,900 patients, 535 patients (5.4%) were diagnosed with FRI. The most common site of FRI was tibiofibular (298, 55.7%), with 424 cases (79.2%) of open fractures, and 282 cases (52.7%) due to traffic injuries. The 41–50 years age group had the highest incidence of FRI with 157 (29.3%) cases. Overall, 546 strains of 52 types of bacteria were detected in FRI patients, with 105 strains of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (48, 8.8%) and extended-spectrum-β-lactamase Escherichia coli (32, 5.8%) accounted for the largest proportion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.813; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.071∼3.070; P = 0.027) and fracture type (OR 3.128; 95% CI, 1.683∼5.815; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for monomicrobial infection (MI). Female sex (OR 4.190; 95% CI, 1.212∼14.486; P = 0.024) was an independent risk factor for polymicrobial infection (PI).

Conclusion

This study clarified the infection rates, changes in the bacterial spectrum, and drug resistance characteristics, and risk factors of FRI of the long bones of the extremities in the largest trauma center in southwest China.

What Are the Risk Factors for Infection After Operative Treatment of Peritalar Fracture Dislocations?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk factors associated with deep infection after operative treatment of peritalar fracture dislocations.

DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed to identify patients who had operative treatment of a peritalar fracture dislocation over an 11-year period (2008-2019).

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were identified by review of all surgical billing that included open reduction of peritalar dislocation. Minimum follow-up for inclusion was 3 months or the outcome of interest. A total of 178 patients were identified, and 154 patients met inclusion criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcome was deep infection, defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures.

RESULTS

A total of 19 (12.3%) patients developed a postoperative deep infection. The most common associated fractures were talus (47%), calcaneus (33%), and fibula (9%) fractures. The infected group was significantly older (47.2 vs. 39.5 years, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing operative management for peritalar fracture dislocations with current smoking were found to have significantly higher odds of postoperative deep infection (74 vs. 34%, adjusted odds ratio = 7.4, 95% confidence interval, 2.3-24.1, P = 0.001). There was a significantly higher risk of infection in patients with a Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture (32 vs. 12%, adjusted odds ratio = 5.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-20.3, P = 0.007). The infected group had high rates of below knee amputation when compared with the group without infection (47 vs. 1%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective study, risk factors for infection after peritalar fracture dislocation included older age, smoking, and Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Economic outcomes associated with deep surgical site infection from lower limb fractures following major trauma

AIMS

This study aims to estimate economic outcomes associated with 30-day deep surgical site infection (SSI) from closed surgical wounds in patients with lower limb fractures following major trauma.

METHODS

Data from the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHiST) trial, which collected outcomes from 1,547 adult participants using self-completed questionnaires over a six-month period following major trauma, was used as the basis of this empirical investigation. Associations between deep SSI and NHS and personal social services (PSS) costs (£, 2017 to 2018 prices), and between deep SSI and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), were estimated using descriptive and multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of uncertainty surrounding components of the economic analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to participants without deep SSI, those with deep SSI had higher mean adjusted total NHS and PSS costs (adjusted mean difference £1,577 (95% confidence interval (CI) -951 to 4,105); p = 0.222), and lower mean adjusted QALYs (adjusted mean difference -0.015 (95% CI -0.032 to 0.002); p = 0.092) over six months post-injury, but this difference was not statistically significant. The results were robust to the sensitivity analyses performed.

CONCLUSION

This study found worse economic outcomes during the first six months post-injury in participants who experience deep SSI following orthopaedic surgery for major trauma to the lower limb. However, the increase in cost associated with deep SSI was less than previously reported in the orthopaedic trauma literature. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):398-403.

Diagnostic value of platelet indices in infected nonunion: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of platelet indices has been evaluated in various infectious diseases but not in infected nonunion. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of platelet indices for diagnosis of infected nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent primary fracture nonunion revision surgeries from January 2016 to December 2021. A total of 297 patients were included in the study: 96 with infected nonunion (group A) and 201 with aseptic nonunion (group B). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic value of each index. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. White blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), plasma fibrinogen, plasma D-dimer, platelet count (PC), plateletcrit, and ratio of platelet count to mean platelet volume (PC/MPV) were significantly higher, and MPV and platelet distribution width (PDW) significantly lower, in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed PC/MPV and plasma fibrinogen to have better diagnostic value than the other coagulation indicators (AUC of 0.801 and 0.807, respectively). The combination of ESR, plasma fibrinogen, and PC/MPV had good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of infected nonunion. PC/MPV had better diagnostic value than ESR and plasma fibrinogen in the subgroup of patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma fibrinogen and PC/MPV ratio might be useful parameters for early diagnosis of infected nonunion.

Guidelines for Treatment of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias From the European and Americas Hernia Societies-A Web-Based Survey on Surgeons' Opinion

Background and aims: The European and Americas Hernia Society's (EHS and AHS) Guidelines on the treatment of primary midline ventral hernias were launched to guide surgeons. As a part of a dissemination plan of the guideline, this study aimed to evaluate the level of consensus between recommendations and the current surgical practices of EHS and AHS members before implementation. Material and methods: A questionnaire was constructed including questions on the current practice of the members and nine selected key recommendations from the guidelines. An on-stage consensus voting was performed at the EHS Congress in Hamburg 2019 followed by a SurveyMonkey sent to all EHS and AHS members. Consensus with a recommendation was defined as an agreement of ≥70%. Results: A total of 178 votes were collected in Hamburg. A further 499/1,754 (28.4%) of EHS and 150/1,100 (13.6%) of AHS members participated in the SurveyMonkey. A consensus was reached for 7/9 (78%) of the recommendations. The two recommendations that did not reach consensus were on indication and the technique used for laparoscopic repair. In current practice, more AHS participants used a preformed patch; 50.7% (76/150) compared with EHS participants 32.1% (160/499), p < 0.001. Conclusion: A consensus was achieved for most recommendations given by the new guideline for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Recommendations that did not reach consensus were on indication and technique for laparoscopic repair, which may reflect the lack of evidence on these topics.

Analysis of Risk Factors and Association of Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Markers With Conventional Markers in Delayed Fracture Related Infection for Closed Fracture

Background: Fracture-related infections (FRI) remain a difficult consequence for orthopedic trauma patients, their relatives, the treating physicians, and the healthcare systems. Delayed fracture-related infection is an important step in the infection process that can be controlled by diagnosing and preventing it from moving to the next level. Neutrophils CD64 and CD66b were identified as sensitive indicators in the event of infection. Normal sequential changes, on the other hand, occur after surgery and are extremely high. They are back to normal on the 10^th day after the operation. The aim of this study was, therefore, to examine the risk factors associated with fracture-related infection by comparing cluster of differentiation (CD) indicators with conventional markers and comparing them with gold standards culture reports. As a result, it could be an early sign of a closed fracture infection.

Material & Methods: Between February 2020 and March 2021, 510 patients from the Department of Orthopedics at King George Medical University in Lucknow agreed to participate in the study. The study included patients who had a closed fracture and had undergone elective or emergency surgery. Blood was withdrawn before the surgery (baseline) on day one and again on the third, seventh, and 10^th day after the operation to measure the quantitative measurements of the biomarkers (total leucocyte count [TLC], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C reactive protein [CRP], CD64, and CD66b) in all follow-up examinations. Patients were monitored for delayed signs of the infection for 2 to 10 weeks. The biomarkers were evaluated and linked to the culture reports.

Results: Of the 510 patients included, 272 were men (53.3%) and 238 women (46.7%), the mean age was 40 (20-78), the mean age for fracture related infection with positive culture (FRI POS) was 48.0 (SD: 19.47), for fracture related infection with negative culture (FRI NEG) was 46.20 (SD: 17.18), and for patient with no signs of infections (NON-FRI) was 45.13 (SD: 17.62) (p <0.001), the mean duration of the fracture to admission (in hours) was 4.90 (SD: 1.92), 4.91 (SD: 2.65), and 5.14 (SD: 2.66) (p <0.001), respectively. The mean duration of admission to surgery (in hours) was 31.54 (SD: 85.14), 43.14 (SD: 105.64), and 61.84 (134.14), respectively (p <0.001). The mean duration of surgery was 4.63 (SD: 1.85), 5.14 (SD: 2.16), and 5.05 (SD: 2.16) (p <0.001). The risk factors such as bone type (p = 0.04) and addiction (p = 0.01) were identified as statistically significant. There was no correlation between the CD66b markers on the third, seventh, and 10^th days. CD64 was significantly correlated with ESR, TLC, and CRP on the 10^th day in the FRI-positive group (r = 0.638; p = 0.03) (r = 0.744; p = 0.009) (r = 0.817; p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The risk factors for infection in fracture patients are significantly influenced by the type of bone and addiction the patient is using. Elevated CD64 levels could be used as a diagnostic marker for infection early on the 10^th day after surgery before the appearance of clinical signs.

What is the diagnostic value of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for surgical site infection in fracture-related infection?

BACKGROUND

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains one of the most challenging complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery. An early diagnosis is of paramount importance to guide treatment. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for the diagnosis of organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) to the recently developed diagnostic criteria of the FRI consensus definition in operatively treated fracture patients.

METHODS

This international multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated 257 patients with 261 infections after operative fracture treatment. All patients included in this study were considered to have an FRI and treated accordingly ('intention to treat'). The minimum follow-up was one year. Infections were scored according to the CDC criteria for organ/space SSI and the diagnostic criteria of the FRI consensus definition.

RESULTS

Overall, 130 (49.8%) FRIs were captured when applying the CDC criteria for organ/space SSI, whereas 258 (98.9%) FRIs were captured when applying the FRI consensus criteria. Patients could not be classified as having an infection according to the CDC criteria mainly due to a lack of symptoms within 90 days after the surgical procedure (n = 96; 36.8%) and due to the fact that the surgery was performed at an anatomical localization not listed in the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) operative procedure code mapping (n = 37; 14.2%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the importance of standardization with respect to the diagnosis of FRI. The results endorse the recently developed FRI consensus definition. When applying these diagnostic criteria, 98.9% of the infections that occured after operative fracture treatment could be captured. The CDC criteria for organ/space SSI captured less than half of the patients with an FRI requiring treatment, and seemed to have less diagnostic value in this patient population.

Current concepts in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI)

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most challenging complications following operative management of fractures. It can have profound implications for the patient, can be associated with considerable morbidity and often lead to impaired outcomes. There are significant healthcare-related costs. In recent years, there has been significant progress towards developing preventative strategies. Furthermore, diagnostic algorithms and management protocols have recently been reported. Lack of a strong evidence base has previously hindered efforts to implement these and develop established standards of care. There are multiple aspects of care that need to be considered and a multi-disciplinary approach is recommended. In this narrative review, we present the most up-to-date recommendations in the prevention, diagnosis and management of FRI.

[Management of suspected early infection after osteosynthesis]

The infection rate after fracture osteosynthesis depends on many factors. The postoperative infection rate after osteosynthesis (inpatient treatment) was between 1.15% and 2.04% for the years 2017-2019. The total number of postoperative wound infections was estimated at around 225,000 annually in 2018. Essential factors for reducing the infection rate after osteosynthesis are the favorable choice of the timing of the operation and the surgical procedure as well as the treatment of relevant secondary diseases. If a postoperative wound infection is suspected critical assessment of the wounds in the postoperative course is essential in order to be able to identify and treat this complication at an early stage. After osteosynthesis, early diagnosis of a peri-implant infection and differentiated surgical and antibiotic treatment are the prerequisites for the best possible treatment success.

Surgical site infections after distal radius fracture surgery: a nation-wide cohort study of 31,807 adult patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) after distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery have not previously been studied as the primary outcome in a large population with comparative data for different surgical methods. The aims of this study were 1) to compare SSI rates between plate fixation, percutaneous pinning and external fixation, and 2) to study factors associated with SSI.

METHODS

We performed a nation-wide cohort study linking data from the Swedish national patient register (NPR) with the Swedish prescribed drug register (SPDR). We included all patients ≥18 years with a registration of a surgically treated DRF in the NPR between 2006 and 2013. The primary outcome was a registration in the SPDR of a dispensed prescription of peroral Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin within the first 8 weeks following surgery, which was used as a proxy for an SSI. The SSI rates for the three main surgical methods were calculated. Logistic regression was used to study the association between surgical method and the primary outcome, adjusted for potential confounders including age, sex, fracture type (closed/open), and a dispensed prescription of Flucloxacillin and/or Clindamycin 0-8 weeks prior to DRF surgery. A classification tree analysis was performed to study which factors were associated with SSI.

RESULTS

A total of 31,807 patients with a surgically treated DRF were included. The proportion of patients with an SSI was 5% (n = 1110/21,348) among patients treated with plate fixation, 12% (n = 754/6198) among patients treated with percutaneous pinning, and 28% (n = 1180/4261) among patients treated with external fixation. After adjustment for potential confounders, the surgical method most strongly associated with SSI was external fixation (aOR 6.9 (95% CI 6.2-7.5, p < 0.001)), followed by percutaneous pinning (aOR 2.7 (95% CI 2.4-3.0, p < 0.001)) (reference: plate fixation). The classification tree analysis showed that surgical method, fracture type (closed/open), age and sex were factors associated with SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSI rate was highest after external fixation and lowest after plate fixation. The results may be useful for estimation of SSI burdens after DRF surgery on a population basis. For the physician, they may be useful for  estimating the likelihood of SSI in individual patients.

How Successful Is Antibiotic Treatment for Superficial Surgical Site Infections After Open Fracture? A Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) Cohort Secondary Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although many studies report the incidence and prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) after open fractures, there is limited information on the treatment and subsequent outcomes of superficial SSIs in patients with open fractures. Additionally, clinical studies describing the factors that are associated with persistent infection after nonoperative treatment with antibiotics for patients with superficial SSIs are lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Therefore, we asked: (1) What proportion of patients with superficial SSIs after open fracture treatment developed persistent infection after nonoperative treatment (that is, treatment with antibiotics alone)? (2) What risk factors are associated with SSIs that do not resolve with nonoperative (antibiotic) treatment? As a secondary objective, we planned to analyze the microbiological information about participants wound cultures, when these were available, and the proportion of positive cultures for patients whose SSIs were not resolved by antibiotics alone.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) trial dataset. The FLOW trial included 2445 patients with operatively managed open fractures. FLOW participants who had a nonoperatively managed superficial SSI diagnosed in the 12 months post-fracture were included in this analysis. Superficial SSIs were diagnosed in 168 participants within 12 months of their fracture. Of these, 83% (139) had their superficial SSI treated with antibiotics alone. Participants were grouped into two categories: (1) 97 participants whose treatment with antibiotics alone resolved the superficial SSI and (2) 42 participants whose treatment with antibiotics alone did not resolve the SSI (defined as undergoing surgical management or the SSI being unresolved at latest follow-up [12-months post-fracture for the FLOW trial]). Of the participants whose treatment with antibiotics alone resolved the SSI, 92% (89 of 97) had complete follow-up, 6% (6 of 97) were lost to follow-up before 12 months, 1% (1 of 97) withdrew consent from the study before 12 months, and 1% (1 of 97) experienced mortality before 12 months. Of the participants whose treatment with antibiotics alone did not resolve the SSI, 90% (38 of 42) had complete follow-up, 7% (3 of 42) were lost to follow-up before 12 months, and 2% (1 of 42) withdrew consent from the study before 12 months. A logistic binary regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with persistent infection despite superficial SSI antibiotic treatment. Based on biologic rationale and previous evidence, we identified a priori 13 potential factors (corresponding to 14 levels) to be included in the regression model.

RESULTS

The antibiotic treatment resolved the superficial SSI in 70% (97 of 139) of patients and did not resolve the SSI in 30% (42 of 139). After controlling for potential confounding variables, such as age, fracture severity, and time from injury to initial surgical irrigation and débridement, superficial SSIs diagnosed later in follow-up were associated with antibiotics not resolving the SSI (odds ratio 1.05 [95% CI 1.004 to 1.009] for every week of follow-up; p = 0.03). Sex, fracture pattern, and wound size were not associated with antibiotics not resolving the SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our secondary analysis of prospectively collected FLOW data suggests that antibiotics alone can be an appropriate treatment option when treating superficial SSIs after an open fracture wound, especially when promptly diagnosed. Further research with longer follow-up time is needed to better identify the natural history of superficial SSIs and possibly some dormant or subclinical infections to help clinicians in the treatment decision-making process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

A new sequential animal model for infection-related non-unions with segmental bone defect

BACKGROUND

The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) is still a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The prevalence of FRI is particularly high in open fractures with extensive soft-tissue damage. This study aimed to develop a new two-step animal model for non-unions with segmental bone defects, which could be used to evaluate new innovative bone substitutes to improve the therapeutic options in humans with FRI and bone defects.

METHODS

After randomization to infected or non-infected groups, 30 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent a transverse osteotomy of the mid-shaft femur with a 5 mm defect. Additionally, the periosteum at the fracture zone was cauterized at both sides. After intramedullary inoculation with 10³ CFU Staphylococcus aureus (infected group) or PBS (non-infected group), a fracture stabilization was done by intramedullary K-wires. After 5 weeks, the bone healing process was evaluated, and revision surgery was performed in order to obtain increased bone healing. The initial K-wires were removed, and debridement of the osteotomy-gap was done followed by a more stable re-osteosynthesis with an angle-stable plate. After further 8 weeks all rats were euthanized and the bone consolidation was tested biomechanically and the callus formation quantitatively by micro-CT analysis.

RESULTS

We developed and presented a new two-stage non-union animal model through a targeted S. aureus infection. After 5 weeks, all animals showed a non-union irrespective of assignment to the infected and non-infected group. Lane and Sandhu score showed a higher callus formation in the infected group. In all infected animals, the inoculated S. aureus strain was detected in the revision surgery. The second surgery did not improve bone healing, as shown by the Lane Sandhu score and in the μ-CT analysis. Similarly, biomechanical testing showed in both groups a significantly lower maximum torque as compared to the contralateral side (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to successfully develop a new two-stage non-union animal model, which reflects a genuine clinical situation of an infection-related non-union model with segmental bone defects. This model could be used to evaluate various therapeutic anti-infectious and osteoinductive strategies in FRIs.

The infected fracture: can we agree on standard definitions?

A precise definition of infection after fracture fixation is essential for the evaluation of published research data and for the future establishment of uniform treatment concepts. Recently, a multidisciplinary expert panel has developed a consensus definition that includes 4 confirmatory criteria for infection following fracture fixation. These criteria are: Fistula, sinus, or wound breakdown; purulent drainage or deep purulence at surgery; positive cultures from at least 2 separate deep tissue/implant specimens taken during an operative intervention; and microorganisms in deep tissue specimens confirmed by histopathological staining. The consensus panel also identified 6 categories of suggestive criteria which are features associated with infection that requires further investigation.

(FLiP) fracture-table vs. lateral positioning for femoral intramedullary nailing: A survey of orthopaedic surgeon preferences

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fractures are common and severe injuries that often occur alongside other complex, high-energy injuries. Definitive internal fixation using reamed, locked intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become the standard of care in adequately resuscitated patients, commonly performed in the supine position with utilization of a fracture table. The lateral position, without the use of traction, offers an alternative that may be associated with lower complication rates. Given the lack of high-quality evidence in the area, this study was designed to assess the attitudes, knowledge base and preferences of Orthopaedic surgeons regarding patient positioning during antegrade IMN of femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

Orthopedic surgeon members of the AO North America, Canadian Orthopaedic Association and the Ontario Orthopaedic Association were invited to participate in a web-based survey addressing the management of femoral shaft fractures and the need for further research in this area.

RESULTS

Most surgeons (56%) favored treating mid-shaft femur fractures in the supine position using a fracture table compared to supine/sloppy lateral (29%) or direct lateral (12%) with the leg free draped. Canadian surgeons showed a significantly higher preference for supine positioning with a fracture table when compared to their American colleagues. Academic and higher-level trauma center surgeons were more likely to prefer the sloppy lateral or direct lateral positioning with manual traction compared to community surgeons. The most commonly cited perceived barrier for utilizing the lateral position was expertise and lack of available assistants. Forty-five percent of respondents expressed interest in being involved in a randomized control trial comparing lateral positioning vs. supine with traction.

CONCLUSION

Consensus surrounding the positioning and utilization of traction in femoral shaft fractures is lacking. Given the perceived possible benefits and reduced complications using the lateral position and free-leg draping, further research is warranted to determine the optimal positioning for these injuries during femoral IMN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional Survey.

Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of infection after fracture fixation

Currently, accurate diagnosis and successful treatment of infection after fracture fixation (IAFF) still impose great challenges. According to the onset of infection symptoms after implantation, IAFF is classified as early infection (<2 weeks), delayed infection (2∼10 weeks) and late infection (>10 weeks). Confirmation of IAFF should be supported by histopathological tests of intraoperative specimens which confirm infection, cultures from at least two suspected infection sites which reveal the same pathogen, a definite sinus or fistula which connects directly the bone or the implant, and purulent drainage from the wound or presence of pus during surgery. Diagnosis of IAFF is built on comprehensive assessment of medical history, clinical signs and symptoms of the patient, and imaging and laboratory tests. The gold standard of diagnosis is histopathological tests. Treatment of IAFF consists of radical debridement, adequate irrigation, implant handling, systematic and local antibiotics, reconstruction of osseous and/or soft tissue defects, and functional rehabilitation of an affected limb. Early accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of IAFF play a key role in increasing the cure rate, reducing infection recurrence and disability risk, restoring limb function and improving quality of life of the patient.

Titanium alloys: in vitro biological analyzes on biofilm formation, biocompatibility, cell differentiation to induce bone formation, and immunological response

Biological effects of titanium (Ti) alloys were analyzed on biofilms of Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, and Streptococcus sanguinis, as well as on osteoblast-like cells (MG63) and murine macrophages (RAW 264.7). Standard samples composed of aluminum and vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V), and sample containing niobium (Ti-35Nb) and zirconium (Ti-13Nb-13Zr) were analyzed. Monomicrobial biofilms were formed on the Ti alloys. MG63 cells were grown with the alloys and the biocompatibility (MTT), total protein (TP) level, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and mineralization nodules (MN) formation were verified. Levels of interleukins (IL-1β and IL-17), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and oxide nitric (NO) were checked, from RAW 264.7 cells supernatants. Data were statically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test, or T-test (P ≤ 0.05). Concerning the biofilm formation, Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy showed the best inhibitory effect on E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus. And, it also acted similarly to the Ti-6Al-4V alloy on C. albicans and Streptococcus spp. Both alloys were biocompatible and similar to the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Additionally, Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy was more effective for cell differentiation, as observed in the assays of ALP and MN. Regarding the stimulation for release of IL-1β and TNF-α, Ti-35Nb and Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloys inhibited similarly the synthesis of these molecules. However, both alloys stimulated the production of IL-17. Additionally, all Ti alloys showed the same effect for NO generation. Thus, Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy was the most effective for inhibition of biofilm formation, cell differentiation, and stimulation for release of immune mediators.

Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered locking nails for the treatment of fracture-related infections - A retrospective case analysis of 10 cases

Introduction: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) are a devastating complication. FRIs are challenging and should be addressed with a multidisciplinary approach. An FRI should be addressed surgically by non-viable bone debridement, local antibiotic deposition, minimization of dead space and fracture stabilization. Antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails are a viable option to face these complications. To demonstrate the safety and utility of commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails, we performed a review of the cases operated in our institution and a cost analysis to compare the cost of a commercial nail to other available alternatives.

Material and methods: We designed a retrospective study of consecutive cases to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered commercial nails and designed a cost analysis of commercial coated nails compared to other custom-made alternatives.

Results: We treated seven tibias and three femurs. Nine patients fully fit the criteria for FRI. There was one case of reintervention because of persistent drainage. All fractures healed, and in the first year post-intervention, there were no signs or symptoms of infection. There were no complications related to the commercially available nail that was used. There is a small increase in the direct quantifiable cost in commercially available nails, but non-quantifiable cost should be assessed individually.

Conclusions: Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails are a safe and useful treatment option for complicated cases of lower limb long bone reconstruction. The low complication rate and the straightforward technique compensate for the direct cost increase in most situations.

Clinical practice in prevention of fracture-related infection: An international survey among 1197 orthopaedic trauma surgeons

INTRODUCTION

Open fractures are still a challenge in orthopaedic trauma surgery, and compared to closed fractures, the rate of complications including fracture-related infection (FRI) remains significantly higher. Although different guidelines on prevention of FRI have been published in past decades, the current recommendations vary significantly. The objectives of this international questionnaire were to evaluate clinical practice procedures for the prevention of FRI in open fractures and to evaluate adherence to available guidelines.

METHODS

A 17-item questionnaire regarding prophylaxis against infection in fracture care was administered by SurveyMonkey® and was sent via blast e-mail to all users of AOTrauma (Davos, Switzerland).

RESULTS

Overall, 1197 orthopaedic trauma surgeons answered the survey. Although cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed agents for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in open fractures, a total of 13 different antibiotics were mentioned in the survey. Furthermore, the duration of PAP was extremely variable with a tendency towards longer treatment periods with increasing open fracture severity. The majority of surgeons (71%) agreed that the optimal duration of PAP was not well defined in the literature. The use of local anti-infective agents varied significantly, although all options received additional votes with increasing injury severity. Some of the other surgical aspects addressed in this review were associated with debridement and irrigation. A delay of six hours from injury to the first debridement was acceptable to 47% of surgeons, but delays were tolerable. Normal saline was the solution used most often for wound irrigation in open fractures (89%), with low-pressure irrigation being applied most commonly (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

This international survey provided an overview of clinical practice in FRI prevention, particularly in open fracture cases. The treatment of these serious injuries remains heterogeneous. A major issue is the lack of consensus concerning type and duration of PAP. Furthermore, there seems to be no agreement on the indication for the use of local anti-infective agents. Overall, it is unknown what the repercussions are of this lack of internationally accepted guidelines on daily clinical practice, but it is clear that standardised treatment protocols are preferable in the current medical landscape.

Perioperative Contamination of Orthopaedic Polyethylene Implants, Targeting Devices and Arthroscopes. Experts' Decision Tree and Literature Review

Introduction Sterility errors during orthopaedic procedures can be stressful for the surgeon or scrub nurse and lead to devastating infectious complications and liability issues. This paper aims to review orthopaedic surgeon practices and propose possible attitudes to adopt.

Methods Out of 1023 questionnaires sent, 170 orthopaedic surgeons answered a Volunteer Feedback Template (multiple-choice test) by SurveyMonkey® (San Mateo, CA, USA) anonymously. The survey questioned surgeon's response to a sterility mistake during a standard total knee joint replacement, trauma surgery and arthroscopic procedure. Those “sterility mistake” situations occurred when there was contamination of 1) a sterile polyethylene (PE) 2) a sterile targeting device, and 3) an arthroscope.

Results When the definitive PE is contaminated, and if a new definitive PE will only be available 2 hours later, 52% of surgeons would wait for the new definitive PE (p<0.001). In the same situation, if a new PE will only be available in 4 hours, the results showed a significant difference favoring two other options: ”putting a definitive PE one size smaller or bigger with balance adjustment” (31%); and “leaving the provisional PE in the joint, closing the wound and re-operating the patient in the coming days when the definitive PE arrives” (29%) (p<0.001). When the new PE is only available 24 hours later results were 34% and 31%, respectively (p<0.001). In the case of a surgical procedure for a classic intertrochanteric fracture, if the carbon fiber targeting device is contaminated, most surgeons (50%) chose to put the nail without the targeting device and finish the surgery (p<0.001). When the arthroscope is desterilized, 39% of participants would wait until the arthroscope has been sterilized again (approximately 2 hours), while 24% would use another procedure (p<0.001). Sixty-two percent of surgeons would adapt their strategy. No clear trend could be identified in terms of antibiotic treatment following a sterility error.

Conclusions There are no established guidelines on how to deal with sterility breaches during surgery and on the antibiotic strategy following the prolonged surgical time resulting from the delay for a new implant. The most common course of action chosen by participating surgeons is detailed in our expert decision tree - if another sterile component is not available within 2 hours - : insertion of another PE size, rescheduling the operation, adapting the surgical technique (for trauma procedures), or soaking the arthroscope in disinfectant solution. As instances of contamination cannot be avoided, it is recommended to have a minimum of two copies of sterile PE implants, arthroscopes or targeting devices readily available before surgery begins-.

Insights into treatment and outcome of fracture-related infection: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Standardized guidelines for treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI) are lacking. Worldwide many treatment protocols are used with variable success rates. Awareness on the need of standardized, evidence-based guidelines has increased in recent years. This systematic literature review gives an overview of available diagnostic criteria, classifications, treatment protocols, and related outcome measurements for surgically treated FRI patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in all scientific literature since 1990. Studies in English that described surgical patient series for treatment of FRI were included. Data were collected on diagnostic criteria for FRI, classifications used, surgical treatments, follow-up protocols, and overall outcome. A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Proportions and weighted means were calculated.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2051 studies. Ninety-three studies were suitable for inclusion, describing 3701 patients (3711 fractures) with complex FRI. The population consisted predominantly of male patients (77%), with the tibia being the most commonly affected bone (64%), and a mean of three previous operations per patient. Forty-three (46%) studies described FRI at one specific location. Only one study (1%) used a standardized definition for infection. A total of nine different classifications were used to guide treatment protocols, of which Cierny and Mader was used most often (36%). Eighteen (19%) studies used a one-stage, 50 (54%) a two-stage, and seven (8%) a three-stage surgical treatment protocol. Ten studies (11%) used mixed protocols. Antibiotic protocols varied widely between studies. A multidisciplinary approach was mentioned in only 12 (13%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive literature review shows a lack of standardized guidelines with respect to diagnosis and treatment of FRI, which mimics the situation for prosthetic joint infection identified many years ago. Internationally accepted guidelines are urgently required to improve the quality of care for patients suffering from this significant complication.

The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis when treating open limb fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

As well as debridement and irrigation, soft-tissue coverage, and osseous stabilization, systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is considered the benchmark in the management of open fractures and considerably reduces the risk of subsequent fracture-related infections (FRI). The direct application of antibiotics in the surgical field (local antibiotics) has been used for decades as additional prophylaxis in open fractures, although definitive evidence confirming a beneficial effect is scarce. The purpose of the present study was to review the clinical evidence regarding the effect of prophylactic application of local antibiotics in open limb fractures.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Cohort studies investigating the effect of additional local antibiotic prophylaxis compared with systemic prophylaxis alone in the management of open fractures were included and the data were pooled in a meta-analysis.

Results

In total, eight studies which included 2738 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The effect of antibiotic-loaded poly(methyl methacrylate) beads was investigated by six of these studies, and two studies evaluated the effect of local antibiotics applied without a carrier. Meta-analysis showed a significantly lower infection rate when local antibiotics were applied (4.6%; 91/1986) than in the control group receiving standard systemic prophylaxis alone (16.5%; 124/752) (p < 0.001) (odds ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.40).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests a risk reduction in FRI of 11.9% if additional local antibiotics are given prophylactically for open limb fractures. However, due to limited quality, heterogeneity, and considerable risk of bias, the pooling of data from primary studies has to be interpreted with caution.

Cite this article: M. Morgenstern, A. Vallejo, M. A. McNally, T. F. Moriarty, J. Y. Ferguson, S. Nijs, WJ. Metsemakers. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:447–456. The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis when treating open limb fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.77.BJR-2018-0043.R1