1
|
Miniere HJM, Lima EABF, Lorenzo G, Hormuth II DA, Ty S, Brock A, Yankeelov TE. A mathematical model for predicting the spatiotemporal response of breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin. Cancer Biol Ther 2024; 25:2321769. [PMID: 38411436 PMCID: PMC11057790 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2321769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity contributes significantly to chemoresistance, a leading cause of treatment failure. To better personalize therapies, it is essential to develop tools capable of identifying and predicting intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneities. Biology-inspired mathematical models are capable of attacking this problem, but tumor heterogeneity is often overlooked in in-vivo modeling studies, while phenotypic considerations capturing spatial dynamics are not typically included in in-vitro modeling studies. We present a data assimilation-prediction pipeline with a two-phenotype model that includes a spatiotemporal component to characterize and predict the evolution of in-vitro breast cancer cells and their heterogeneous response to chemotherapy. Our model assumes that the cells can be divided into two subpopulations: surviving cells unaffected by the treatment, and irreversibly damaged cells undergoing treatment-induced death. MCF7 breast cancer cells were previously cultivated in wells for up to 1000 hours, treated with various concentrations of doxorubicin and imaged with time-resolved microscopy to record spatiotemporally-resolved cell count data. Images were used to generate cell density maps. Treatment response predictions were initialized by a training set and updated by weekly measurements. Our mathematical model successfully calibrated the spatiotemporal cell growth dynamics, achieving median [range] concordance correlation coefficients of > .99 [.88, >.99] and .73 [.58, .85] across the whole well and individual pixels, respectively. Our proposed data assimilation-prediction approach achieved values of .97 [.44, >.99] and .69 [.35, .79] for the whole well and individual pixels, respectively. Thus, our model can capture and predict the spatiotemporal dynamics of MCF7 cells treated with doxorubicin in an in-vitro setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo J. M. Miniere
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Ernesto A. B. F. Lima
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Guillermo Lorenzo
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
| | - David A. Hormuth II
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Sophia Ty
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Amy Brock
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gricourt G, Duigou T, Dérozier S, Faulon JL. neo4jsbml: import systems biology markup language data into the graph database Neo4j. PeerJ 2024; 12:e16726. [PMID: 38250720 PMCID: PMC10798154 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) has emerged as a standard for representing biological models, facilitating model sharing and interoperability. It stores many types of data and complex relationships, complicating data management and analysis. Traditional database management systems struggle to effectively capture these complex networks of interactions within biological systems. Graph-oriented databases perform well in managing interactions between different entities. We present neo4jsbml, a new solution that bridges the gap between the Systems Biology Markup Language data and the Neo4j database, for storing, querying and analyzing data. The Systems Biology Markup Language organizes biological entities in a hierarchical structure, reflecting their interdependencies. The inherent graphical structure represents these hierarchical relationships, offering a natural and efficient means of navigating and exploring the model's components. Neo4j is an excellent solution for handling this type of data. By representing entities as nodes and their relationships as edges, Cypher, Neo4j's query language, efficiently traverses this type of graph representing complex biological networks. We have developed neo4jsbml, a Python library for importing Systems Biology Markup Language data into a Neo4j database using a user-defined schema. By leveraging Neo4j's graphical database technology, exploration of complex biological networks becomes intuitive and information retrieval efficient. Neo4jsbml is a tool designed to import Systems Biology Markup Language data into a Neo4j database. Only the desired data is loaded into the Neo4j database. neo4jsbml is user-friendly and can become a useful new companion for visualizing and analyzing metabolic models through the Neo4j graphical database. neo4jsbml is open source software and available at https://github.com/brsynth/neo4jsbml.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Gricourt
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Thomas Duigou
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Sandra Dérozier
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Jean-Loup Faulon
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang S, Deshpande A, Verma BK, Wang H, Mi H, Yuan L, Ho WJ, Jaffee EM, Zhu Q, Anders RA, Yarchoan M, Kagohara LT, Fertig EJ, Popel AS. Informing virtual clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma with spatial multi-omics analysis of a human neoadjuvant immunotherapy clinical trial. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.11.553000. [PMID: 37645761 PMCID: PMC10462044 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.11.553000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Human clinical trials are important tools to advance novel systemic therapies improve treatment outcomes for cancer patients. The few durable treatment options have led to a critical need to advance new therapeutics in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent human clinical trials have shown that new combination immunotherapeutic regimens provide unprecedented clinical response in a subset of patients. Computational methods that can simulate tumors from mathematical equations describing cellular and molecular interactions are emerging as promising tools to simulate the impact of therapy entirely in silico. To facilitate designing dosing regimen and identifying potential biomarkers, we developed a new computational model to track tumor progression at organ scale while reflecting the spatial heterogeneity in the tumor at tissue scale in HCC. This computational model is called a spatial quantitative systems pharmacology (spQSP) platform and it is also designed to simulate the effects of combination immunotherapy. We then validate the results from the spQSP system by leveraging real-world spatial multi-omics data from a neoadjuvant HCC clinical trial combining anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib. The model output is compared with spatial data from Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC). Both IMC data and simulation results suggest closer proximity between CD8 T cell and macrophages among non-responders while the reverse trend was observed for responders. The analyses also imply wider dispersion of immune cells and less scattered cancer cells in responders' samples. We also compared the model output with Visium spatial transcriptomics analyses of samples from post-treatment tumor resections in the original clinical trial. Both spatial transcriptomic data and simulation results identify the role of spatial patterns of tumor vasculature and TGFβ in tumor and immune cell interactions. To our knowledge, this is the first spatial tumor model for virtual clinical trials at a molecular scale that is grounded in high-throughput spatial multi-omics data from a human clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuming Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atul Deshpande
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Babita K. Verma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hanwen Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haoyang Mi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Long Yuan
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Won Jin Ho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Jaffee
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Qingfeng Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert A. Anders
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Luciane T. Kagohara
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elana J. Fertig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Immunotherapy Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Jointly supervised research
| | - Aleksander S. Popel
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Jointly supervised research
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Phillips CM, Lima EABF, Gadde M, Jarrett AM, Rylander MN, Yankeelov TE. Towards integration of time-resolved confocal microscopy of a 3D in vitro microfluidic platform with a hybrid multiscale model of tumor angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1009499. [PMID: 36652468 PMCID: PMC9886306 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal of this study is to calibrate a multiscale model of tumor angiogenesis with time-resolved data to allow for systematic testing of mathematical predictions of vascular sprouting. The multi-scale model consists of an agent-based description of tumor and endothelial cell dynamics coupled to a continuum model of vascular endothelial growth factor concentration. First, we calibrate ordinary differential equation models to time-resolved protein concentration data to estimate the rates of secretion and consumption of vascular endothelial growth factor by endothelial and tumor cells, respectively. These parameters are then input into the multiscale tumor angiogenesis model, and the remaining model parameters are then calibrated to time resolved confocal microscopy images obtained within a 3D vascularized microfluidic platform. The microfluidic platform mimics a functional blood vessel with a surrounding collagen matrix seeded with inflammatory breast cancer cells, which induce tumor angiogenesis. Once the multi-scale model is fully parameterized, we forecast the spatiotemporal distribution of vascular sprouts at future time points and directly compare the predictions to experimentally measured data. We assess the ability of our model to globally recapitulate angiogenic vasculature density, resulting in an average relative calibration error of 17.7% ± 6.3% and an average prediction error of 20.2% ± 4% and 21.7% ± 3.6% using one and four calibrated parameters, respectively. We then assess the model's ability to predict local vessel morphology (individualized vessel structure as opposed to global vascular density), initialized with the first time point and calibrated with two intermediate time points. In this study, we have rigorously calibrated a mechanism-based, multiscale, mathematical model of angiogenic sprouting to multimodal experimental data to make specific, testable predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ernesto A. B. F. Lima
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Manasa Gadde
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Angela M. Jarrett
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Marissa Nichole Rylander
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gonçalves IG, Hormuth DA, Prabhakaran S, Phillips CM, García-Aznar JM. PhysiCOOL: A generalized framework for model Calibration and Optimization Of modeLing projects. GIGABYTE 2023; 2023:gigabyte77. [PMID: 36949818 PMCID: PMC10027115 DOI: 10.46471/gigabyte.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In silico models of biological systems are usually very complex and rely on a large number of parameters describing physical and biological properties that require validation. As such, parameter space exploration is an essential component of computational model development to fully characterize and validate simulation results. Experimental data may also be used to constrain parameter space (or enable model calibration) to enhance the biological relevance of model parameters. One widely used computational platform in the mathematical biology community is PhysiCell, which provides a standardized approach to agent-based models of biological phenomena at different time and spatial scales. Nonetheless, one limitation of PhysiCell is the lack of a generalized approach for parameter space exploration and calibration that can be run without high-performance computing access. Here, we present PhysiCOOL, an open-source Python library tailored to create standardized calibration and optimization routines for PhysiCell models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês G. Gonçalves
- Multiscale in Mechanical and Biological Engineering (M2BE), Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Spain
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - David A. Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - Sandhya Prabhakaran
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, USA
| | - Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - José Manuel García-Aznar
- Multiscale in Mechanical and Biological Engineering (M2BE), Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tunç B, Rodin GJ, Yankeelov TE. Implementing multiphysics models in FEniCS: Viscoelastic flows, poroelasticity, and tumor growth. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ADVANCES 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bea.2023.100074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
|
7
|
Lima EA, Wyde RA, Sorace AG, Yankeelov TE. Optimizing combination therapy in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING 2022; 402:115484. [PMID: 37800167 PMCID: PMC10552906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer is frequently treated with drugs that target the HER2 receptor, such as trastuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin. However, an open problem in treatment design is to determine the therapeutic regimen that optimally combines these two treatments to yield optimal tumor control. Working with data quantifying temporal changes in tumor volume due to different trastuzumab and doxorubicin treatment protocols in a murine model of human HER2+ breast cancer, we propose a complete framework for model development, calibration, selection, and treatment optimization to find the optimal treatment protocol. Through different assumptions for the drug-tumor interactions, we propose ten different models to characterize the dynamic relationship between tumor volume and drug availability, as well as the drug-drug interaction. Using a Bayesian framework, each of these models are calibrated to the dataset and the model with the highest Bayesian information criterion weight is selected to represent the biological system. The selected model captures the inhibition of trastuzumab due to pre-treatment with doxorubicin, as well as the increase in doxorubicin efficacy due to pre-treatment with trastuzumab. We then apply optimal control theory (OCT) to this model to identify two optimal treatment protocols. In the first optimized protocol, we fix the maximum dosage for doxorubicin and trastuzumab to be the same as the maximum dose delivered experimentally, while trying to minimize tumor burden. Within this constraint, optimal control theory indicates the optimal regimen is to first deliver two doses of trastuzumab on days 35 and 36, followed by two doses of doxorubicin on days 37 and 38. This protocol predicts an additional 45% reduction in tumor burden compared to that achieved with the experimentally delivered regimen. In the second optimized protocol we fix the tumor control to be the same as that obtained experimentally, and attempt to reduce the doxorubicin dose. Within this constraint, the optimal regimen is the same as the first optimized protocol but uses only 43% of the doxorubicin dose used experimentally. This protocol predicts tumor control equivalent to that achieved experimentally. These results strongly suggest the utility of mathematical modeling and optimal control theory for identifying therapeutic regimens maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto A.B.F. Lima
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
| | - Reid A.F. Wyde
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorenzo G, di Muzio N, Deantoni CL, Cozzarini C, Fodor A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Pérez-García VM, Gomez H, Reali A. Patient-specific forecasting of postradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics enables early prediction of biochemical relapse. iScience 2022; 25:105430. [DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
9
|
Yang EY, Howard GR, Brock A, Yankeelov TE, Lorenzo G. Mathematical characterization of population dynamics in breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin. Front Mol Biosci 2022; 9:972146. [PMID: 36172049 PMCID: PMC9510895 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.972146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of chemoresistance remains a significant cause of treatment failure in breast cancer. We posit that a mathematical understanding of chemoresistance could assist in developing successful treatment strategies. Towards that end, we have developed a model that describes the cytotoxic effects of the standard chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin on the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. We assume that treatment with doxorubicin induces a compartmentalization of the breast cancer cell population into surviving cells, which continue proliferating after treatment, and irreversibly damaged cells, which gradually transition from proliferating to treatment-induced death. The model is fit to experimental data including variations in drug concentration, inter-treatment interval, and number of doses. Our model recapitulates tumor cell dynamics in all these scenarios (as quantified by the concordance correlation coefficient, CCC > 0.95). In particular, superior tumor control is observed with higher doxorubicin concentrations, shorter inter-treatment intervals, and a higher number of doses (p < 0.05). Longer inter-treatment intervals require adapting the model parameterization after each doxorubicin dose, suggesting the promotion of chemoresistance. Additionally, we propose promising empirical formulas to describe the variation of model parameters as functions of doxorubicin concentration (CCC > 0.78). Thus, we conclude that our mathematical model could deepen our understanding of the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin and could be used to explore practical drug regimens achieving optimal tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Y. Yang
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Grant R. Howard
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Amy Brock
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Program, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Guillermo Lorenzo
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Guillermo Lorenzo, ,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hormuth DA, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Chad Quarles C, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 187:114367. [PMID: 35654212 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a fourth pillar in the treatment of brain tumors and, when combined with radiation therapy, may improve patient outcomes and reduce the neurotoxicity. As with other combination therapies, the identification of a treatment schedule that maximizes the synergistic effect of radiation- and immune-therapy is a fundamental challenge. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling is one promising approach to systematically investigate therapeutic combinations to maximize positive outcomes within a rigorous framework. However, successful clinical translation of model-generated combinations of treatment requires patient-specific data to allow the models to be meaningfully initialized and parameterized. Quantitative imaging techniques have emerged as a promising source of high quality, spatially and temporally resolved data for the development and validation of mathematical models. In this review, we will present approaches to personalize mechanism-based modeling frameworks with patient data, and then discuss how these techniques could be leveraged to improve brain cancer outcomes through patient-specific modeling and optimization of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Chase Christenson
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Brandon Curl
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Viguerie A, Grave M, Barros GF, Lorenzo G, Reali A, Coutinho A. Data-Driven Simulation of Fisher-Kolmogorov Tumor Growth Models Using Dynamic Mode Decomposition. J Biomech Eng 2022; 144:1141945. [PMID: 35771166 DOI: 10.1115/1.4054925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The computer simulation of organ-scale biomechanistic models of cancer personalized via routinely collected clinical and imaging data enables to obtain patient-specific predictions of tumor growth and treatment response over the anatomy of the patient's affected organ. However, the simulation of the underlying spatiotemporal models can entail a prohibitive computational cost, which constitutes a barrier to the successful development of clinically-actionable computational technologies for personalized tumor forecasting. Here we propose to utilize Dynamic-Mode Decomposition (DMD), an unsupervised machine learning method, to construct a low-dimensional representation of cancer models and accelerate their simulation. We show that DMD may be applied to Fisher-Kolmogorov models, which constitute an established formulation to represent untreated solid tumor growth that can further accommodate other relevant cancer phenomena. Our results show that a DMD implementation of this model over a clinically-relevant parameter space can yield impressive predictions, with short to medium-term errors remaining under 1% and long-term errors remaining under 20%, despite very short training periods. In particular, we have found that, for moderate to high tumor cell diffusivity and low to moderate tumor cell proliferation rate, DMD reconstructions provide accurate, bounded-error reconstructions for all tested training periods. We posit that this data-driven approach has the potential to greatly reduce the computational overhead of personalized simulations of cancer models, thereby facilitating tumor forecasting, parameter identification, uncertainty quantification, and treatment optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Viguerie
- Department of Mathematics, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Viale Francesco Crispi 7, L'Aquila, AQ 67100, Italy
| | - Malú Grave
- Dept. of Civil Engineering, COPPE/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68506, RJ 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Rua Waldemar Falcão 121, BA 40296-710, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Gabriel F Barros
- Dept. of Civil Engineering, COPPE/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68506, RJ 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Guillermo Lorenzo
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, Austin, TX, 78712-1229, USA; Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Architettura, Università di Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia, PV 27100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Reali
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Architettura, Università di Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia, PV 27100, Italy
| | - Alvaro Coutinho
- Dept. of Civil Engineering, COPPE/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68506, RJ 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu C, Lorenzo G, Hormuth DA, Lima EABF, Slavkova KP, DiCarlo JC, Virostko J, Phillips CM, Patt D, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology. BIOPHYSICS REVIEWS 2022; 3:021304. [PMID: 35602761 PMCID: PMC9119003 DOI: 10.1063/5.0086789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Digital twins employ mathematical and computational models to virtually represent a physical object (e.g., planes and human organs), predict the behavior of the object, and enable decision-making to optimize the future behavior of the object. While digital twins have been widely used in engineering for decades, their applications to oncology are only just emerging. Due to advances in experimental techniques quantitatively characterizing cancer, as well as advances in the mathematical and computational sciences, the notion of building and applying digital twins to understand tumor dynamics and personalize the care of cancer patients has been increasingly appreciated. In this review, we present the opportunities and challenges of applying digital twins in clinical oncology, with a particular focus on integrating medical imaging with mechanism-based, tissue-scale mathematical modeling. Specifically, we first introduce the general digital twin framework and then illustrate existing applications of image-guided digital twins in healthcare. Next, we detail both the imaging and modeling techniques that provide practical opportunities to build patient-specific digital twins for oncology. We then describe the current challenges and limitations in developing image-guided, mechanism-based digital twins for oncology along with potential solutions. We conclude by outlining five fundamental questions that can serve as a roadmap when designing and building a practical digital twin for oncology and attempt to provide answers for a specific application to brain cancer. We hope that this contribution provides motivation for the imaging science, oncology, and computational communities to develop practical digital twin technologies to improve the care of patients battling cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyue Wu
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kalina P. Slavkova
- Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | - Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - Debra Patt
- Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas 78731, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forward to a methodological proposal to support cancer patients: the dialogics' contribution for the precision care. Med Oncol 2022; 39:75. [PMID: 35195776 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01644-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In scientific context, the first step for scientific theoretical and methodological production is the epistemological analysis. What are assumptions for interaction between oncology and psychology? What are the conditions for psycho-oncological contribution in treating cancer? Furthermore, what are epistemological observations about the current developments in cancer field? And what are implications for sciences treating patients with neoplasms? Due to advances in oncology and in sciences supporting oncology, epistemological questions focus on the object of study of the integration between oncology and psychology. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to describe a proposal of theoretical and methodological frame suitable for current clinical and research needs in cancer patients asking for psychological support. Epistemological analysis lets the health professionals and researchers observe there are sciences using formal languages and sciences using ordinary language. Currently, personalized approach is pursued by oncology, identifying specific patients' characteristics to define the proper treatment process: not only tumor characteristics but also behavioral and psychological features. Cancer patients features can be found in patients' narrations about neoplasms: narration represents the core of clinical and research in psychoncology. Therefore when formalized, language provides the connection between oncology and psychology. Language used by patients and all the roles involved in the care of cancer patients can become a measure of these patients' features. Dialogics science measuring the ordinary language allows the ordinary language formalization, pursuing a personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu J, Hormuth DA, Yang J, Yankeelov TE. A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy Parameterized via Time-Resolved Microscopy Data. Front Oncol 2022; 12:811415. [PMID: 35186747 PMCID: PMC8855115 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.811415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Conventional radiobiology models, including the linear-quadratic model, do not explicitly account for the temporal effects of radiation, thereby making it difficult to make time-resolved predictions of tumor response to fractionated radiation. To overcome this limitation, we propose and validate an experimental-computational approach that predicts the changes in cell number over time in response to fractionated radiation. Methods We irradiated 9L and C6 glioma cells with six different fractionation schemes yielding a total dose of either 16 Gy or 20 Gy, and then observed their response via time-resolved microscopy. Phase-contrast images and Cytotox Red images (to label dead cells) were collected every 4 to 6 hours up to 330 hours post-radiation. Using 75% of the total data (i.e., 262 9L curves and 211 C6 curves), we calibrated a two-species model describing proliferative and senescent cells. We then applied the calibrated parameters to a validation dataset (the remaining 25% of the data, i.e., 91 9L curves and 74 C6 curves) to predict radiation response. Model predictions were compared to the microscopy measurements using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results For the 9L cells, we observed PCCs and CCCs between the model predictions and validation data of (mean ± standard error) 0.96 ± 0.007 and 0.88 ± 0.013, respectively, across all fractionation schemes. For the C6 cells, we observed PCCs and CCCs between model predictions and the validation data were 0.89 ± 0.008 and 0.75 ± 0.017, respectively, across all fractionation schemes. Conclusion By proposing a time-resolved mathematical model of fractionated radiation response that can be experimentally verified in vitro, this study is the first to establish a framework for quantitative characterization and prediction of the dynamic radiobiological response of 9L and C6 gliomas to fractionated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyan Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - David A. Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Jianchen Yang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Thomas E. Yankeelov,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bayesian calibration of a stochastic, multiscale agent-based model for predicting in vitro tumor growth. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008845. [PMID: 34843457 PMCID: PMC8659698 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Hybrid multiscale agent-based models (ABMs) are unique in their ability to simulate individual cell interactions and microenvironmental dynamics. Unfortunately, the high computational cost of modeling individual cells, the inherent stochasticity of cell dynamics, and numerous model parameters are fundamental limitations of applying such models to predict tumor dynamics. To overcome these challenges, we have developed a coarse-grained two-scale ABM (cgABM) with a reduced parameter space that allows for an accurate and efficient calibration using a set of time-resolved microscopy measurements of cancer cells grown with different initial conditions. The multiscale model consists of a reaction-diffusion type model capturing the spatio-temporal evolution of glucose and growth factors in the tumor microenvironment (at tissue scale), coupled with a lattice-free ABM to simulate individual cell dynamics (at cellular scale). The experimental data consists of BT474 human breast carcinoma cells initialized with different glucose concentrations and tumor cell confluences. The confluence of live and dead cells was measured every three hours over four days. Given this model, we perform a time-dependent global sensitivity analysis to identify the relative importance of the model parameters. The subsequent cgABM is calibrated within a Bayesian framework to the experimental data to estimate model parameters, which are then used to predict the temporal evolution of the living and dead cell populations. To this end, a moment-based Bayesian inference is proposed to account for the stochasticity of the cgABM while quantifying uncertainties due to limited temporal observational data. The cgABM reduces the computational time of ABM simulations by 93% to 97% while staying within a 3% difference in prediction compared to ABM. Additionally, the cgABM can reliably predict the temporal evolution of breast cancer cells observed by the microscopy data with an average error and standard deviation for live and dead cells being 7.61±2.01 and 5.78±1.13, respectively. The calibration of agent-based models of tumor cell growth to experimental data remains a challenge in computational oncology. Besides the computational cost of modeling thousands of agents, the model’s intrinsic stochasticity demands numerous realizations of the simulations to accurately represent the statistical features of the model predictions. We developed a hybrid, multiscale, coarse-grain, agent-based model that captures the growth and decline of human breast carcinoma cells under different initial conditions. We determined the effects of coarse-graining the ABM on the multiscale model output and the number of repetitions necessary to capture the stochastic transitions present in the model. We identified the most influential parameters on the model prediction through a sensitivity analysis and selected which parameters can be fixed and which ones should be calibrated. Using Bayesian calibration, we show that the model can accurately represent the experimental data. The validation step indicates that our model can reliably predict the in vitro temporal data, depending on the choice of the training (calibration data) sets.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hormuth DA, Phillips CM, Wu C, Lima EABF, Lorenzo G, Jha PK, Jarrett AM, Oden JT, Yankeelov TE. Biologically-Based Mathematical Modeling of Tumor Vasculature and Angiogenesis via Time-Resolved Imaging Data. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3008. [PMID: 34208448 PMCID: PMC8234316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-associated vasculature is responsible for the delivery of nutrients, removal of waste, and allowing growth beyond 2-3 mm3. Additionally, the vascular network, which is changing in both space and time, fundamentally influences tumor response to both systemic and radiation therapy. Thus, a robust understanding of vascular dynamics is necessary to accurately predict tumor growth, as well as establish optimal treatment protocols to achieve optimal tumor control. Such a goal requires the intimate integration of both theory and experiment. Quantitative and time-resolved imaging methods have emerged as technologies able to visualize and characterize tumor vascular properties before and during therapy at the tissue and cell scale. Parallel to, but separate from those developments, mathematical modeling techniques have been developed to enable in silico investigations into theoretical tumor and vascular dynamics. In particular, recent efforts have sought to integrate both theory and experiment to enable data-driven mathematical modeling. Such mathematical models are calibrated by data obtained from individual tumor-vascular systems to predict future vascular growth, delivery of systemic agents, and response to radiotherapy. In this review, we discuss experimental techniques for visualizing and quantifying vascular dynamics including magnetic resonance imaging, microfluidic devices, and confocal microscopy. We then focus on the integration of these experimental measures with biologically based mathematical models to generate testable predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
| | - Chengyue Wu
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
| | - Ernesto A. B. F. Lima
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
- Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78758, USA
| | - Guillermo Lorenzo
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
- Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Prashant K. Jha
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
| | - Angela M. Jarrett
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA;
| | - J. Tinsley Oden
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
- Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; (C.M.P.); (C.W.); (E.A.B.F.L.); (G.L.); (P.K.J.); (J.T.O.); (T.E.Y.)
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA;
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|