Prolonged urticaria with purpura: the spectrum of clinical and histopathologic features in a prospective series of 22 patients exhibiting the clinical features of urticarial vasculitis

Histopathologic Features in Urticaria and Urticarial Variants: Plasma Cells Should Be Rare

INTRODUCTION

Urticaria is a common cutaneous reaction pattern characterized by clinically transient edematous papules and wheals. Microscopically, intensity and predominant inflammatory cell type can vary, including lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, and mast cells. Plasma cells are rarely described within the infiltrate of urticaria, but systematic study to evaluate the frequency of this finding is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional dermatopathology archive was searched for 2018-2023 to identify cases diagnosed as urticaria and urticarial variants; 58 consecutive cases were included. Study authors, including one board-certified dermatopathologist, evaluated H&E slides for variation in inflammatory cells present, inflammation density/distribution, and predominant cell types.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight cases (female: 39, male: 19) were reviewed. Eleven cases (19%) showed rare, scattered plasma cells (0.02-0.09/mm2). Other inflammatory cell types predominated and, like other studies, fell into lymphocytic and neutrophilic predominant categories. Inflammation density predominantly ranged from sparse to moderate, with only two cases having brisk inflammation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that rare plasma cells may be present in urticaria biopsies but should not be abundant or clustered.

[Spectrum of morphological changes in chronic spontaneous urticaria and urticarial vasculitis]

The prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in the population is 0.5%-1%. According to modern guidelines for the management of patients with urticaria, the diagnosis of CSU does not require histological examination. However, in controversial clinical setting requiring differential diagnosis with urticarial vasculitis (UV), pathologists discover a wide range of pathomorphological changes in skin preparations in the absence of generally accepted differential diagnostic criteria. In this connection, it is of interest to study the spectrum of morphological changes in chronic spontaneous urticaria and urticarial vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze morphological changes in CSU and UV to improve differential diagnosis in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material of 15 patients with urticarial rashes was analyzed. Comparative analysis of the number of neutrophils and mast cells in skin samples from patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and urticarial vasculitis was performed.

RESULTS

The material of 15 patients with urticarial rashes was analyzed. The group of patients with CSU (n=5) was characterized by the absence of signs of leukocytoclastic vasculitis; endothelial cells and mild of moderate swelling were visualized in all samples, the perivascular infiltrate was located in the upper layer of the dermis and was sparse. And when stained with toluidine blue, a large number of mast cells were noted. In the group of patients with UV (n=10), signs of leukocytoclastic vasculitis of varying severity, dense and deep perivascular neutrophilic infiltrates with a small number of mast cells were visualized.

CONCLUSION

Considering the wide range of morphological changes in the skin in CSU and UV, for the differential diagnosis of diseases, a comprehensive histological examination of preparations in combination with an assessment of the number of mast cells in the dermis and an assessment of the composition of the cellular infiltrate for the number of neutrophils can be recommended.

Urticarial Vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent edematous papules and plaques on the skin that last longer than 24 hours, often accompanied by systemic symptoms such as joint pain and fever. Unlike common urticaria, this condition involves inflammation of small blood vessels, leading to more severe and long-lasting skin lesions with a tendency to leave a bruiselike appearance. Diagnosis is challenging and may require a skin biopsy. Associated with underlying autoimmune diseases, treatment involves managing symptoms with medications such as antihistamines and corticosteroids, addressing the immune system's dysfunction, and treating any concurrent autoimmune conditions.

In Urticarial Vasculitis, Long Disease Duration, High Symptom Burden, and High Need for Therapy Are Linked to Low Patient-Reported Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare and difficult-to-treat chronic skin disease defined by long-lasting urticarial lesions and the histopathologic finding of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As of yet, little is known about UV patients' perspective on the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess UV patients' perspective on the clinical course, treatment response, greatest challenges, and quality-of-life (QOL) impairment.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire was disseminated in a Facebook group of patients with UV. Patients with UV confirmed by skin biopsy were included.

RESULTS

Patients with UV had a mean age of 47.3 ± 12.3 years and were mostly female (94.3%; n = 82 of 87). The median delay in diagnosis was 8.1 months (interquartile range, 2.0-46.3). Normocomplementemia and hypocomplementemia were present in 54.0% (n = 27) and 46.0% (n = 23) of 50 patients, respectively. Most patients with UV (51.8%; n = 43 of 83) reported severely decreased QOL due to their disease. Low QOL was also the most frequently reported greatest challenge for patients with UV (40.7%), followed by the long-standing course of UV with frequent relapses (14.8%). Low QOL correlated with long disease duration (r = 0.298; P = .02) and high numbers of clinical symptoms (r = 0.294; P = .007). Patients with UV with allergies, lung diseases, and chronic infections reported lower QOL. Patients with UV with low QOL were treated with analgesics, dapsone, montelukast, omalizumab, and colchicine more often than patients with UV with higher QOL (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a considerable impairment in QOL in patients with UV associated with long disease duration, high symptom burden, and a high need for therapy. Improvement of the management of UV by further research is necessary.

Urticarial vasculitis: Clinical and laboratory findings with a particular emphasis on differential diagnosis

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare cutaneous vasculitis of small vessels characterized by recurrent episodes of wheal-like lesions that tend to last more than 24 hours, healing with a residual ecchymotic postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. The histopathologic pattern of UV is that of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, consisting of fibrinoid necrosis of dermal vessels' walls and neutrophil-rich perivascular inflammatory infiltrates. Although its etiopahogenesis remains still undefined, UV is now regarded as an immune complex-driven disease with activation of the complement cascade, leading to exaggerated production of anaphylatoxins that are responsible for neutrophil recruitment and activation. This condition can be categorized into 2 main entities according to serum complement levels: normocomplementemic UV and hypocomplementemic UV, the latter being associated with circulating anti-C1q autoantibodies and possible extracutaneous manifestations. Systemic multiorgan involvement may be seen particularly in syndromic hypocomplementemic UV, also known as McDuffie syndrome. This review summarizes the clinicopathological and laboratory features as well as the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of UV. A focus on its main differential diagnoses is provided, that is, chronic spontaneous urticaria, bullous pemphigoid, IgA (Henoch-Schönlein purpura) and IgM/IgG immune complex vasculitis, lupus erythematous tumidus, Wells syndrome, erythema multiforme, cutaneous mastocytosis, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, and coronavirus disease 2019-associated and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-vaccine-associated urticarial eruptions.

Urticarial vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare clinicopathologic entity that is characterized by chronic or recurrent episodes of urticarial lesions. Skin findings of this disease can be difficult to distinguish visually from those of chronic idiopathic urticaria but are unique in that individual lesions persist for ≥24 hours and can leave behind dusky hyperpigmentation. This disease is most often idiopathic but has been linked to certain drugs, infections, autoimmune connective disease, myelodysplastic disorders, and malignancies. More recently, some authors have reported associations between urticarial vasculitis and COVID-19, as well as influenza A/H1N1 infection. Urticarial vasculitis can extend systemically as well, most often affecting the musculoskeletal, renal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and ocular systems. Features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis seen on histopathologic examination are diagnostic of this disease, but not always seen. In practice, antibiotics, dapsone, colchicine, and hydroxychloroquine are popular first-line therapies, especially for mild cutaneous disease. In more severe cases, immunosuppressives, including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclosporine, as well as corticosteroids, may be necessary for control. More recently, select biologic therapies, including rituximab, omalizumab, and interleukin-1 inhibitors have shown promise for the treatment of recalcitrant or refractory cases.

A novel histopathological scoring system to distinguish urticarial vasculitis from chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is defined by long‐lasting urticarial lesions combined with the histopathologic findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As one of the major unmet needs in UV, diagnostic criteria are rather vague and not standardized. Moreover, there seems to be considerable overlap with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), particularly for the normocomplementemic variant of UV. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a diagnostic scoring system that improves the histopathologic discrimination between UV and CSU.

Methods

Lesional skin sections of patients with clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of UV (n = 46) and CSU (n = 51) were analyzed (blinded to the diagnosis) for the following pre‐defined criteria: presence of leukocytoclasia, erythrocyte extravasation, fibrin deposits, endothelial cell swelling, ectatic vessels, blurred vessel borders, dermal edema, intravascular neutrophil, and eosinophil numbers and numbers of dermal neutrophils, macrophages and mast cells.

Results

The greatest differences between UV and CSU samples were observed for leukocytoclasia (present in 76% of UV vs. 3.9% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), erythrocyte extravasation (present in 41.3% of UV vs. 2.0% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), and fibrin deposits (present in 27.9% of UV vessels vs. 9.7% of CSU vessels; p < 0.0001). Based on these findings, we developed a diagnostic score, the urticarial vasculitis score (UVS), which correctly assigned 37 of 46 cases of UV and 49 of 51 cases of CSU to the previously established diagnosis.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the UVS, a combined quantitative assessment of the three criteria leukocytoclasia, fibrin deposits and extravasated erythrocytes, distinguishes UV from CSU in skin histopathology. The UVS, if validated in larger patient samples, may help to improve the diagnostic approach to UV.

Real-World Experience on Omalizumab Treatment for Patients with Normocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis

BACKGROUND

Urticarial vasculitis is a small vessel vasculitis characterized by long-lasting wheals. It was suggested omalizumab is well tolerated and effective in patients with hypocomplementaemic urticarial vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical response and safety of omalizumab for treating patients with normocomplementaemic urticarial vasculitis (NUV) in real-world setting.

METHODS

We collected data from a single-center. This study included patients with NUV who was received omalizumab therapy. During a 24-week study period, the clinical efficacy was evaluated by patient's self-assessment instrument urticarial vasculitis activity score and Dermatology Life Quality Index.

RESULTS

Five patients with NUV were enrolled. Three patients received 6 doses of 150 or 300 mg omalizumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks. At 24-week follow-up, it was revealed improvement of clinical manifestations and reduction of urticarial vasculitis activity score and Dermatology Life Quality Index. At 24-week visit, mild wheals recurred in one patient who was only administrated with omalizumab for 4 times. One patient did not response to omalizumab therapy. No adverse events were recorded in the 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab may be a potential choice in the treatment of patients with NUV in the real-world life.

Histopathology of chronic spontaneous urticaria with occasional bruising lesions is not significantly different from urticaria with typical wheals

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) may occasionally exhibit long-lasting lesions with bruising, usually considered a hallmark of urticarial vasculitis (UV). Histopathology of these chronic urticarial lesions has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

Skin biopsies from patients with anti-H1 resistant CSU were evaluated for several parameters (edema, location, intensity, and cell composition of the inflammatory infiltrate, and abnormalities in the blood vessels).

RESULTS

We studied 45 patients (37 female/8 male, mean age 49.3 years) with CSU, 60% of whom with occasional bruising lesions and 3 patients with hypocomplementemic UV. Histopathology in CSU showed mainly perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrate (91.1%), including eosinophils (80%), neutrophils (77.8%), and lymphocytes (71.1%), vasodilatation (88.9%), intravascular neutrophils (95.6%), dermal edema (51.1%), swelling of endothelial cells (51.1%), and minor and rare fibrinoid necrosis and karyorrhexis (6.7%). Significant karyorrhexis and frank fibrinoid necrosis were observed, respectively, in two and three cases of UV. In patients with occasional bruising, mast cells occurred in fewer cases whereas eosinophils were more frequent, but no statistically significant difference was found for other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological findings were not significantly different between CSU with or without bruising lesions. Bruising may be associated with more severe forms of CSU with no histopathological signature, although UV cannot be completely excluded based on histopathology.

Skin Biopsy in Chronic Urticaria: When and Where and What to Look for?

Chronic urticaria is a relatively common condition in dermatology and is usually diagnosed on clinical grounds. Skin biopsy, however, may be indicated in certain cases to confirm diagnosis and rule out other conditions that can cause hive-like rashes. We review histopathologic findings seen in both chronic urticaria and other entities in the differential diagnosis. We then propose an algorithm of indications for skin biopsy in patients with hive-like rashes and suggest possible diagnoses based on the histopathologic findings.

Normocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Associated with A/H1N1 in a Child. Case Report

Urticarial vasculitis is an entity characterized by urticarial rashes that are typically pruritic and painful, associated with angioedema and purpura. Influenza viruses are common respiratory pathogens that can cause seasonal infections and global human morbidity/mortality. A 4.5-year-old girl presented with fever and painful urticarial skin lesions leaving post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The nasal specimens showed a positive for influenza A/H1N1. On the basis of these findings, a diagnosis of urticarial vasculitis associated with A/H1N1 was concluded. Taking the results together, we suggest that urticarial vasculitic lesions can be considered to the list of cutaneous manifestations during the seasonal flu.

A case report of hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis presenting with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome is an infrequent condition characterized by ocular, renal, gastrointestinal and pulmonary involvement with low serum complement levels and autoantibodies. Renal manifestations vary from microscopic hematuria to nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney injury. Accordingly differing histologic patterns have been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 65 years old woman with a history of chronic uveitis who presented with arthralgias, urticarial rush, nephrotic syndrome, glomerular hematuria and low serum complement. Kidney biopsy revealed an immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. The patient received induction therapy with steroids, cyclophosphamide and hydroxychloroquine followed by rapid clinical improvement and remission of proteinuria. Maintenance treatment consisted of rituximab pulses.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome cases is idiopathic, although an association to drugs, infections or other autoimmune disorders has been recorded. Given the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease, no standard treatment is established.

Development of a clinical-dermoscopic model for the diagnosis of urticarial vasculitis

The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of urticarial vasculitis lack accuracy, according to previous studies. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of a clinical and a clinical-dermoscopic model for the differential diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV). Dermoscopic images of lesions with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of CSU and UV were evaluated for the presence of selected criteria (purpuric patches/globules (PG) and red linear vessels). Clinical criteria of CSU and UV were also registered. Univariate and adjusted odds ratios were calculated. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted separately for clinical variables (clinical diagnostic model) and for both clinical and dermoscopic variables (clinical-dermoscopic diagnostic model). 108 patients with CSU and 27 patients with UV were included in the study. The clinical-dermoscopic model notably showed higher diagnostic sensitivity than the clinical approach (63% vs. 44%). Dermoscopic purpuric patches/globules (PG) was the variable that better discriminated UV, increasing by 19-fold the odds for this diagnosis. In conclusion, dermoscopy helps the clinical discrimination between CSU and UV. The visualization of dermoscopic PG may contribute to optimize decisions regarding biopsy in patients with urticarial rashes.

Dermal C4d Deposition and Neutrophil Alignment Along the Dermal-Epidermal Junction as a Diagnostic Adjunct for Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis (Anti-C1q Vasculitis) and Underlying Systemic Disease

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a clinicopathologic entity characterized by persistent urticarial lesions with biopsy features of vasculitis. Currently, only certain clinical features such as arthralgia and serum complement concentrations are used to identify UV patients at risk for an underlying systemic disease. Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (HUV) is in contrast to normocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (NUV), strongly associated with underlying systemic disease, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of this study was to find specific histopathological features associated with HUV and underlying systemic disease in UV. In addition, the use of complement C4d deposition in skin biopsies was evaluated as a diagnostic adjunct for HUV- and UV-associated systemic disease. In this retrospective study, the clinical, histopathological, and immunohistological (C4d) features of 43 patients with UV were compared between HUV and NUV and analyzed for association with UV-associated systemic disease. Eight of 43 patients with UV (19%) had hypocomplementemia. Patients with HUV showed a significantly higher number of perivascular neutrophils and lower number of eosinophils compared to NUV. Of all histopathological features, alignment of neutrophils along the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) and dermal granular C4d deposition were found to be strongly associated with HUV and underlying SLE. This study shows that both the alignment of neutrophils along the DEJ and dermal C4d deposition are strongly associated with HUV and SLE. Therefore, these (immuno)histopathological features can be used as an easy diagnostic adjunct for early detection of underlying systemic disease in UV.

Dermatologic Aspects of Systemic Vasculitis

Systemic and localized vasculitis affects the skin and subcutis, due to large vascular beds and hemodynamic factors, such as stasis in lower extremities, and environmental influences, as occur in cold exposure. Initial cutaneous manifestations of vasculitides include diverse and dynamic patterns of discoloration, swelling, hemorrhage, and necrosis. One-half of affected patients present with localized, self-limited disease to the skin without any known trigger or associated systemic disease, known as idiopathic cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Skin biopsy and dermatopathology contribute relevant information; however, they require correlation with clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory findings to reach an accurate diagnosis.

Treatment of urticarial vasculitis: A systematic review

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a difficult-to-treat condition characterized by long-lasting urticarial rashes and histopathologic findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Treatment is dictated by the severity of skin and systemic involvement and the underlying systemic disease. This is a comprehensive systematic review of the efficacy of current UV treatment options. We searched for relevant studies in 7 databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. In total, 261 eligible studies and 789 unique patients with UV were included in the systematic review. Most patients with UV are adult women with chronic (≥6 weeks) and systemic disease. UV is mostly idiopathic but can be associated with drugs, malignancy, autoimmunity, and infections. It usually resolves with their withdrawal or cure. Corticosteroids are effective for the treatment of skin symptoms in more than 80% of patients with UV. However, their long-term administration can lead to potentially serious adverse effects. The addition of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents often allows corticosteroid tapering and improves the efficacy of therapy. Biologicals, including omalizumab, as well as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, plasmapheresis, colchicine, hydroxychloroquine, intravenous immunoglobulin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and cyclosporine, can be effective for both skin and systemic symptoms in patients with UV. H₁-antihistamines, montelukast, danazol, H₂-antihistamines, pentoxifylline, doxepin, and tranexamic acid are not effective in most patients with UV. As of yet, no drugs have been approved for UV, and management recommendations are based mostly on case reports and retrospective studies. Prospective studies investigating the effects of treatment on the signs and symptoms of UV are needed.

The Histopathology of Urticaria Revisited-Clinical Pathological Study

BACKGROUND

The classic histopathological findings of urticaria include dermal edema and a sparse perivascular infiltrate of neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes. However, this pattern is inconsistently described.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the histological and immunofluorescence characteristics of urticaria and to identify distinctive patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in which the medical files and biopsy specimens of 58 patients with acute and chronic classical urticaria were reviewed. Pathological parameters were quantified.

RESULTS

We recognized 2 distinctive patterns of urticaria: lymphocyte and neutrophil predominant; the former was characterized by a perivascular location, whereas the latter was associated with an interstitial location and a denser infiltrate. Mast cells were relatively sparse, better demonstrated with special stains. Tryptase stain demonstrated more mast cells than Giemsa stain. Extravasated erythrocytes were present in 50% of the cases, but vasculitis was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological findings in classical urticaria show a spectrum of findings from a sparse superficial perivascular to a deep perivascular and interstitial infiltrate. Distinctive groups based on the dominant cell type can be identified, accounting for the similarity to neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis. Lesions may have a purpuric appearance, but leukocytoclastic vasculitis is never present.

Urticarial Dermatitis: Clinical Characteristics of Itch and Therapeutic Response to Cyclosporine

Background

Urticarial dermatitis, which is characterised by persistent wheals with eczematous papules and plaques, is frequently misdiagnosed and difficult to treat. Patients commonly experience intolerable pruritus which may greatly affect their quality of life.

Objective

The objective of this study is to characterize the clinical patterns of pruritus in patients with urticarial dermatitis and to determine the effectiveness of cyclosporine treatment.

Methods

This prospective study included 50 histopathologically confirmed patients with urticarial dermatitis. A face-to-face structured questionnaire was given to all patients, and they were treated with low-dose cyclosporine (1~3 mg/kg/d) for at least 2 weeks.

Results

The majority of patients (80.0%) had moderate to severe pruritus. Most patients experienced exacerbation of the itch in the evening (74.0%), with the extremities (upper, 86.0%; lower, 94.0%) being the most commonly involved sites. Due to severe pruritus, patients complained about reduced social contact, quality of life and difficulties in falling asleep et al. Cyclosporine significantly reduced the mean itch score and extent of erythema, and improved interference with daily activities and sleep.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the detailed description and characteristics of pruritus in patients with urticarial dermatitis. And we recommend alternative and effective therapeutic option of low-dose cyclosporine.

Urticarial vasculitis in northern Spain: clinical study of 21 cases

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a subset of cutaneous vasculitis (CV), characterized clinically by urticarial skin lesions of more than 24 hours' duration and histologically by leukocytoclastic vasculitis. We assessed the frequency, clinical features, treatment, and outcome of a series of patients with UV. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with UV included in a large series of unselected patients with CV from a university hospital. Of 766 patients with CV, UV was diagnosed in 21 (2.7%; 9 male and 12 female patients; median age, 35 yr; range, 1-78 yr; interquartile range, 5-54 yr). Eight of the 21 cases were aged younger than 20 years old. Potential precipitating factors were upper respiratory tract infections and drugs (penicillin) (n = 4; in all cases in patients aged <20 yr), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (n = 1), and malignancy (n = 1). Besides urticarial lesions, other features such as palpable purpura (n = 7), arthralgia and/or arthritis (n = 13), abdominal pain (n = 2), nephropathy (n = 2), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1) were observed. Hypocomplementemia (low C4) with low C1q was disclosed in 2 patients. Other abnormal laboratory findings were leukocytosis (n = 7), increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (n = 6), anemia (n = 4), and antinuclear antibody positivity (n = 2). Treatment included corticosteroids (n = 12), antihistaminic drugs (n = 6), chloroquine (n = 4), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (n = 3), colchicine (n = 2), and azathioprine (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 10 months (interquartile range, 2-38 mo) recurrences were observed in 4 patients. Apart from 1 patient who died because of an underlying malignancy, the outcome was good with full recovery in the remaining patients. In conclusion, our results indicate that UV is rare but not exceptional. In children UV is often preceded by an upper respiratory tract infection. Urticarial lesions and joint manifestations are the most frequent clinical manifestation. Low complement serum levels are observed in a minority of cases. The prognosis is generally good, but depends on the underlying disease.

Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis and its receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 are expressed in urticarial vasculitis

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), a member of the TNF family, has been implicated as a pro-inflammatory cytokine in many types of autoimmune and infectious diseases. However, information about TWEAK in dermatological diseases is limited. To date, no studies have investigated the roles of TWEAK in patients with urticarial vasculitis (UV). This study aimed to assess serum TWEAK levels, together with TWEAK and fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) expressions of skin lesions in patients with UV. Serum TWEAK levels in patients with UV, together with patients with cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis (CLA) and healthy controls were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TWEAK and Fn14 expressions of skin lesions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Results showed that TWEAK and Fn14 were abundantly expressed in the dermal vessel wall of lesional skin in patients with UV but not healthy controls. Serum TWEAK levels in the acute stage in patients with UV were significantly higher than those in the convalescent stage and healthy controls. Serum TWEAK levels were elevated significantly in patients with CLA compared with those in healthy controls. Our previous study indicated that TWEAK may be an important mediator for the development of vascular inflammation in skin. In addition, we also found that TWEAK blockade substantially reduced vascular damage and perivascular leukocyte infiltrates in lipopolysaccharide-induced cutaneous vasculitis. Our study shows that TWEAK may be associated with the pathogenesis of UV; it is therefore suggested that TWEAK may be a potential therapeutic target for UV and other types of cutaneous vasculitis.

Urticarial vasculitis: a retrospective study of 15 cases

INTRODUCTION

Urticarial vasculitis is a subtype of vasculitis characterized clinically by urticarial lesions and histologically by necrotizing vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical and histologic features of urticarial vasculitis in patients seen in the dermatology department of Hospital Universitario Virgen de Rocío in Seville, Spain, and to examine the association between hypocomplementemia and systemic disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a chart review of histologically confirmed cases of urticarial vasculitis in the database of our department covering a period of 10 years.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (9 women and 6 men with a median age of 51 years) were included. In 14 patients (93%), the lesions persisted for more than 24hours, and in 9 cases (60%) the lesions resolved leaving residual purpura or hyperpigmentation. Seven patients (47%) had low complement levels in the blood, 12 (80%) had extracutaneous symptoms, and 8 (53%) had associated systemic disease, the most common of which was systemic lupus erythematosus.

CONCLUSIONS

Urticarial vasculitis may be underdiagnosed. Response to treatment is variable, and hypocomplementemia and extracutaneous symptoms may indicate the presence of associated systemic disease.

Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema: a worldwide perspective

: Urticaria and angioedema are common clinical conditions representing a major concern for physicians and patients alike. The World Allergy Organization (WAO), recognizing the importance of these diseases, has contributed to previous guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urticaria. The Scientific and Clinical Issues Council of WAO proposed the development of this global Position Paper to further enhance the clinical management of these disorders through the participation of renowned experts from all WAO regions of the world. Sections on definition and classification, prevalence, etiology and pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are based on the best scientific evidence presently available. Additional sections devoted to urticaria and angioedema in children and pregnant women, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes, and physical urticarias have been incorporated into this document. It is expected that this article will supplement recent international guidelines with the contribution of an expert panel designated by the WAO, increasing awareness of the importance of urticaria and angioedema in medical practice and will become a useful source of information for optimum patient management worldwide.

[Neutrophilic urticaria or urticaria with predominantly neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate: study of its clinical and histopathologic characteristics and its possible association with rheumatic disease]

INTRODUCTION

Neutrophilic urticaria, described by Winkelmann in 1985, has yet to be completely defined and its clinical significance is poorly understood. Nevertheless, recent publications suggest that it could be a marker for rheumatic disease. The primary objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of rheumatic disease in 2 groups of patients with urticaria: those with conventional urticaria (non-neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate) and those with neutrophilic urticaria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all biopsy samples taken from urticarial lesions in our hospital between January 1, 1999 and June 28, 2009. Urticaria was classified according to predefined morphologic and histopathologic patterns. We compared the clinical and histologic characteristics of neutrophilic urticaria with those of conventional urticarias in the 84 patients included.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients, 57.1% had neutrophilic urticaria. We did not find significant differences between the percentages of patients with rheumatic disease between the neutrophilic and nonneutrophilic urticaria groups. In patients with acute urticaria, we found a significantly higher proportion of samples with histopathologic signs of neutrophilic urticaria as opposed to conventional histopathology. Patients with neutrophilic urticaria also had higher white blood cell counts.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of samples with neutrophilic urticaria in this series (57.1%) is higher than the percentages reported in the literature, possibly because we tended to biopsy recent lesions. We highlight that the presence of neutrophils in the biopsies of urticaria is a common finding and does not appear to be associated with other diseases.

[Cutaneous vasculitis]

Vasculitis is a term that refers to damage and inflammation of the walls of blood vessels of any size. The classification of types of cutaneous vasculitis continues to be a challenge, probably because of our lack of understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of this condition. Changes in the vessel wall will be visible on microscopy and will enable the different clinical forms to be distinguished according to the caliber of affected vessels, the type of cell that predominates in the inflammatory infiltrate, or the presence of such key findings as extravascular granulomas. Skin manifestations (macules, papules, nodules, livedo reticularis, etc) correlate with the size of the vessel affected. The prognosis in cases of vasculitis with skin involvement will be determined by the presence or absence of extracutaneous disease. Systemic vasculitis shows a predilection for certain organs, such as the kidney or lung. The introduction of immunosuppressant drug treatments has led to evident improvement in survival rates for patients with vasculitis. This review covers practical aspects of the pathophysiology, histopathology, treatment, and differential diagnosis of the main clinical presentations of vasculitis with cutaneous involvement.

Urticarial lesions: if not urticaria, what else? The differential diagnosis of urticaria: part II. Systemic diseases

There are a number of systemic disorders that can manifest with urticarial skin lesions, including urticarial vasculitis, connective tissue diseases, hematologic diseases, and autoinflammatory syndromes. All of these conditions may enter into the differential diagnosis of ordinary urticaria. In contrast to urticaria, urticarial syndromes may manifest with skin lesions other than wheals, such as papules, necrosis, vesicles, and hemorrhages. Lesions may have a bilateral and symmetrical distribution; individual lesions have a long duration, and their resolution frequently leaves marks, such as hyperpigmentation or bruising. Moreover, systemic symptoms, such as fever, asthenia, and arthralgia, may be present. The most important differential diagnosis in this group is urticarial vasculitis, which is a small-vessel vasculitis with predominant cutaneous involvement. Systemic involvement in urticarial vasculitis affects multiple organs (mainly joints, the lungs, and the kidneys) and is more frequent and more severe in patients with hypocomplementemia. Clinicopathologic correlation is essential to establishing a correct diagnosis.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing the learning activity, participants should be able to distinguish urticarial lesions suggesting diagnoses other than common urticaria; assess patients with urticarial lesions, and suspect systemic diseases presenting with urticarial skin lesions.

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis associated with urticarial vasculitis syndrome: a unique presentation

To report a case of triple association of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), juvenile dermatomyositis and urticarial vasculitis as well as a review of the relevant literature. A 12-year-old male patient diagnosed with overlap syndrome between SLE and juvenile dermatomyositis since 2004 evolved with erythematous plaques, which were compatible with an urticarial rash. Clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings indicated a diagnosis of urticarial vasculitis. The patient previously had a C1q deficiency. Using the established treatment with methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 3 days), increasing doses of deflazacort and introduction of a dapsone, as well as mycophenolate mofetil regimen, with the suspension of azathioprine resulted in complete resolution of skin lesions. Urticarial vasculitis can present in various diseases. In SLE, presentation of urticarial vasculitis in children is rarely found. The triple association of juvenile-onset SLE, juvenile dermatomyositis and urticarial vasculitis is unusual, and this is the first case described in literature.

The histological assessment of cutaneous vasculitis

Vasculitis is defined as inflammation directed at vessels, which compromises or destroys the vessel wall leading to haemorrhagic and/or ischaemic events. Skin biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis, whose manifestations include urticaria, infiltrative erythema, petechiae, purpura, purpuric papules, haemorrhagic vesicles and bullae, nodules, livedo racemosa, deep (punched out) ulcers and digital gangrene. These varied morphologies are a direct reflection of size of the vessels and extent of the vascular bed affected, ranging from a vasculitis affecting few superficial, small vessels in petechial eruptions to extensive pan-dermal small vessel vasculitis in haemorrhagic bullae to muscular vessel vasculitis in lower extremity nodules with livedo racemosa. Skin biopsy, extending to subcutis and taken from the earliest, most symptomatic, reddish or purpuric lesion is crucial for obtaining a high-yielding diagnostic sample. Based on histology, vasculitis can be classified on the size of vessels affected and the dominant immune cell mediating the inflammation (e.g. neutrophilic, granulomatous, lymphocytic, or eosinophilic). Disruption of small vessels by inflammatory cells, deposition of fibrin within the lumen and/or vessel wall coupled with nuclear debris allows for the confident recognition of small vessel, mostly neutrophilic vasculitis (also known as leukocytoclastic vasculitis). In contrast, muscular vessel vasculitis can be identified solely by infiltration of its wall by inflammatory cells. Extravasation of red blood cells (purpura) and necrosis are supportive, but not diagnostic of vasculitis as they are also seen in haemorrhagic and/or vaso-occlusive disorders (pseudovasculitis). Vasculitic foci associated with extravascular granulomas (palisaded neutrophilic and granulomatous dermatitis), tissue eosinophilia, or tissue neutrophilia signal the risk for, or co-existence of systemic disease. This essential histological information coupled with direct immunofluorescence and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic data and clinical findings enables more precise and accurate diagnosis of localized and systemic vasculitis syndromes.

A reassessment of diagnostic criteria and treatment of idiopathic urticarial vasculitis: a retrospective study of 47 patients

BACKGROUND

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is an uncommon type of chronic urticaria (CU), which exhibits leucocytoclastic vasculitis. Painful and long-lasting (> 24 h) weals associated with purpura or bruising are considered indicative of UV. It is often responsive to oral corticosteroids and poorly to oral antihistamines. Hypocomplementaemia and systemic involvement are also commonly reported.

AIMS

To diagnose patients with UV histologically and then compare their clinical features and response to various treatment regimens.

METHODS

Biopsies were taken from 312 subjects with CU unresponsive to oral antihistamines; of these, 47 were histologically diagnosed as having UV. Biopsies were taken irrespective of the clinical features of weal eruption. Other diseases known to be associated with small-vessel vasculitis had previously been excluded. Results. Individual weals lasted < 24 h in 57.4% of patients, and pain or tenderness was reported only by 8.6%. Extracutaneous features were present in 81%, hypocomplementaemia in 11% and abnormalities of other laboratory parameters (i.e. raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate, microscopic haematuria) in 76.6%. Hydroxyzine was effective in only one patient. Both oral corticosteroids and cinnarizine were effective in a high percentage of the patients.

CONCLUSION

This diagnostic approach allowed us to identify a large group (47 patients) with UV. Most did not present the clinical (prolonged duration of weals and bruising) and laboratory features that have previously been described as characteristic of UV. Cinnarizine was found to be a valuable treatment option.

Therapeutic alternatives for chronic urticaria: an evidence-based review, part 1

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of alternative therapies for chronic urticaria refractory to first-line treatments in an evidence-based manner.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE searches were performed cross-referencing urticaria with the names of multiple therapies. Articles were then reviewed for additional citations. Articles published after 1950 were considered.

STUDY SELECTION

All articles, including case reports, were reviewed for soundness and relevance.

RESULTS

Experience has been reported for a wide variety of alternative therapies in the treatment of chronic idiopathic and physical urticarias. Evidence for most agents is limited to anecdotal reports. The second-line therapies reviewed are also categorized based on criteria of safety, efficacy, convenience, and cost, in relation to the first-line antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative agents should be considered in patients with chronic urticaria who are both severely affected and unresponsive to antihistamines. Although monitoring for toxicity is important in management with many alternative agents, safety is favorable compared with corticosteroids.