Safety and efficacy of sertraline for depression in patients with heart failure: results of the SADHART-CHF (Sertraline Against Depression and Heart Disease in Chronic Heart Failure) trial

Impact of antidepressant and antipsychotic use in the occurence of torsades de pointes arrhythmia: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

Psychotropic drugs may prolong the corrected QT interval (QTc), which has been associated with torsades de pointes (TdP). Our aim is to measure the relative impact of psychotropic drug use on TdP. A case-control study was conducted on 110 cases of confirmed TdP, and 330 matched controls. Hierarchical regression was performed by first including pre-identified risk factors (including demographic, medical conditions, and drugs such as antiarrhythmics) and then psychotropic drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics). Population attributable risks (PAR) were calculated.

RESULTS

At the time of admission, TdP was the primary, secondary, or complication diagnosis in 32.7 %, 30.9 %, and 36.4 % of cases, respectively. There were more patients with TdP who died during hospitalization compared to controls (7.3 % vs. 2.7 %, p < 0.05), but TdP was the cause of death in only two (1.8 %) of them. In our final regression model, age, hepatic and/or renal failure and antidepressant/antipsychotic drug monotherapy were not associated with TdP. On the other hand, the use of other QTc-prolonging drugs, female sex, left ventricular dysfunction, acute myocardial infarction, hypokalemia, and use of ≥ 2 antidepressants were all significantly associated with TdP, with PAR of 55.3 %, 41.8 %, 26.2 %, 13.0 %, 11.7 %, and 6.3 % respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In analyses adjusting for concomitant conditions/drugs, antidepressant or antipsychotic monotherapy was not associated with TdP while the use of ≥ 2 antidepressants was. However in terms of PAR, the use of other QTc-prolonging drug, including antiarrhythmics, sex, and left ventricular dysfunction carried a higher burden than the use of ≥2 antidepressants. These findings may inform and assist in balancing the risks and benefits of psychotropic drugs.

Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in individuals suffering from physical conditions and depressive disorders: network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are effective for depression, but most evidence excludes individuals with comorbid physical conditions.

AIMS

To assess antidepressants' efficacy and tolerability in individuals with depression and comorbid physical conditions.

METHODS

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Co-primary outcomes were efficacy on depressive symptoms and tolerability (participants dropping out because of adverse events). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool and certainty of estimates with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis approach. A study protocol was registered in advance (https://osf.io/9cjhe/).

RESULTS

Of the 115 included RCTs, 104 contributed to efficacy (7714 participants) and 82 to tolerability (6083 participants). The mean age was 55.7 years and 51.9% of participants were female. Neurological and cardiocirculatory conditions were the most represented (26.1% and 18.3% of RCTs, respectively). The following antidepressants were more effective than placebo: imipramine, nortriptyline, amitriptyline, desipramine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, fluoxetine, escitalopram, mianserin, mirtazapine and agomelatine, with standardised mean differences ranging from -1.01 (imipramine) to -0.34 (escitalopram). Sertraline and paroxetine were effective for the largest number of ICD-11 disease subgroups (four out of seven). In terms of tolerability, sertraline, imipramine and nortriptyline were less tolerated than placebo, with relative risks ranging from 1.47 (sertraline) to 3.41 (nortriptyline). For both outcomes, certainty of evidence was 'low' or 'very low' for most comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressants are effective in individuals with comorbid physical conditions, although tolerability is a relevant concern. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have the best benefit-risk profile, making them suitable as first-line treatments, while tricyclics are highly effective but less tolerated than SSRIs and placebo.

Heart and brain interactions in heart failure: pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical perspectives

Heart failure (HF) is a complex and debilitating syndrome that affects millions of people worldwide. In addition to the syndrome-related functional limitations, such as exercise intolerance and dyspnea, patients frequently suffer from various comorbidities. Neuropsychiatric conditions, including autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and depression, are important albeit underrecognized comorbidities in HF. Autonomic dysfunction, which is expressed as sympathetic predominance and decreased parasympathetic tone, is a key contributor to HF progression. Depression and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent in HF patients, affecting adherence to medical treatment and increasing morbidity and mortality risk. Stress cardiomyopathy, a usually reversible form of left ventricular dysfunction triggered by emotional or physical stress, is another clinical manifestation of the interplay between the heart and the brain. Early recognition and management of these comorbidities in HF patients are crucial for improving outcomes. This narrative review provides an overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms linking HF and brain disorders and discusses clinical perspectives of heart-brain interactions in the context of HF.

Exploring symptom clusters and core symptoms during the vulnerable phase in patients with chronic heart failure: a network-based analysis

AIMS

To construct a symptom network of chronic heart failure patients in the vulnerable period and identify core symptoms and bridge symptoms between different symptom clusters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A convenience sampling method was used to select 402 patients with chronic heart failure within 3 months after discharge from the cardiology departments of two tertiary-level A hospitals in Zhenjiang City, and symptom-related entries of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) were used to conduct the survey. Symptom networks were constructed using the R language. The constructed symptom network was structurally stable, and the correlation stability coefficient was 0.595. In the network, 'depression' (MLHFQ9), 'dyspnoea on exertion' (MLHFQ3), and 'worry' (MLHFQ7) are the core symptoms. 'Cognitive problems' (MLHFQ8), 'sleep difficulties' (MLHFQ4), and 'fatigue' (MLHFQ6) are bridge symptoms connecting the emotional-cognitive and somatic symptom clusters. In the network comparison test, there were no significant differences in symptom networks between patients of different genders and places of residence.

CONCLUSION

'Depression' and 'increased need to rest' are the core and most severe symptoms, respectively, in the vulnerable phase of chronic heart failure, and 'cognitive problems' is the most important bridge symptom. Clinical caregivers can build a precise intervention programme based on the core and bridge symptoms and focus on the emotional and cognitive symptom clusters, in order to improve the efficacy of symptom management during the vulnerable period in patients with chronic heart failure.

Beyond Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy: Nonpharmacologic Management for Patients With Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure. Guideline-directed medical therapy and device-based therapy in HF are well established. However, the role of nonpharmacologic modalities to improve HF care remains underappreciated, is underused, and requires multimodal approaches to care. Diet, exercise and cardiac rehabilitation, sleep-disordered breathing, mood disorders, and substance use disorders are potential targets to reduce morbidity and improve function of patients with HF. Addressing these factors may improve symptoms and quality of life, reduce hospitalizations, and improve mortality in heart failure. This state-of-the-art review discusses dietary interventions, exercise programs, and the management of sleep-disordered breathing, mood disorders, and substance use in individuals with heart failure. The authors review the latest data and provide optimal lifestyle recommendations and recommended prescriptions for nonpharmacologic therapies.

Palliative Care and Hospice for Heart Failure Patients: Position Statement From the Korean Society of Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in South Korea, imposing substantial physical, emotional, and financial burdens on patients and society. Despite the high burden of symptom and complex care needs of HF patients, palliative care and hospice services remain underutilized in South Korea due to cultural, institutional, and knowledge-related barriers. This position statement from the Korean Society of Heart Failure emphasizes the need for integrating palliative and hospice care into HF management to improve quality of life and support holistic care for patients and their families. By clarifying the role of palliative care in HF and proposing practical referral criteria, this position statement aims to bridge the gap between HF and palliative care services in South Korea, ultimately improving patient-centered outcomes and aligning treatment with the goals and values of HF patients.

The impact of shock therapy on depression development and remote prognosis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of depression in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D). The study was also to evaluate the impact of shock therapy on depression development and long-term prognosis.

METHODS

The prospective study encompassed 396 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients implanted with CRT-D. All patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and underwent a psychiatric examination at baseline. 221 patients free of depressive symptoms at baseline were included into the final analysis. The assessment of psychiatric status was routinely repeated every 6 months as well as after the shock delivery. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for HF.

RESULTS

During long-term observation (median 37.1 months) 52 (23.5%) patients suffered from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, whereas 48 (21.8%) subjects developed depression. The incidence of new-onset depression was significantly higher in patients after shock delivery (Shock Group), CRT non-responders and subjects with atrial fibrillation. The risk for a composite endpoint was higher in the Shock Group than subjects without an ICD intervention: 57.7% vs. 25.4% and in patients with new-onset depression compared to the population free of this disorder: 62.5% vs. 24.9% (all p < 0.001). New-onset depression (HR 1.7) and an ICD shock (HR 2.1) were strong independent predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is a common mental disorder in CRT-D recipients, that adversely affects long-term prognosis. Subjects suffering from ICD shocks and those with HF progression are at higher risk of experiencing depressive symptoms.

Sertraline in depressed patients with or at risk for coronary heart disese: a systemic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Depression is a prevalent comorbidity among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). While recent studies have hinted at a possible association between CHD and antidepressant medications like sertraline, the existing evidence remains inconclusive. To investigate this potential link, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for relevant articles published up to March 2023. After a thorough screening of titles and abstracts, 12 studies were included in our review.

RESULTS

The included studies, spanning from 1999 to 2021, comprised 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pilot study. A total of 2767 participants with major depressive disorder and a history of cardiovascular disease or at risk for such events were included. The majority of these studies demonstrated improvements in mood status among patients treated with serotonin-targeting antidepressants and a reduced risk of cardiovascular events, as measured by various outcomes. While some cardiac adverse effects were observed with serotonin treatment, these did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide evidence supporting the beneficial effects of serotonin-targeting antidepressants for both depressive symptoms and the prevention of coronary adverse outcomes. These results highlight the potential value of serotonin-based treatments for depression in high-risk populations.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About the Psychiatric Manifestations of Nonpsychiatric Serious Illness and Treatments

Mental health issues are widespread and significant among individuals with serious illness. Among patients receiving palliative care (PC), psychiatric comorbidities are common and impact patient quality of life. Despite their prevalence, PC clinicians face challenges in effectively addressing the intricate relationship between medical and psychiatric disorders due to their complex, intertwined and bidirectionally influential nature. This article, created collaboratively with a team of psychiatric-palliative care experts, is the second in a two-part series examining the bidirectional relationship between medical and psychiatric illness in PC. This article explores 10 prevalent psychiatric manifestations associated with severe illness and its treatment. Building upon the first article, which focused on 10 common physical manifestations of psychiatric illness among patients receiving PC, these two articles advocate for an integrated approach to PC that prioritizes mental and emotional wellbeing across the continuum of serious illness.

Patient With Chronic Heart Failure as a Participant in the Treatment Process: the Role of Structured Training And Outpatient Observation (on the Anniversary of the Study Chance)

Aim      The article presents the principal results and conclusions of the study "SCHool and outpAtient moNitoring of patients with Cardiac failurE (CHANCE)", organized by the Society of Experts in Heart Failure.Material and methods  CHANCE was a multicenter randomized study. Patients in the intervention group (IG) received the Structured Education and Flexible Outpatient Control Model, that included telephone contacts plus an additional visit if necessary. The planned visits for the IG and control group (CG) were scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months. 360 IG patients and 385 CG patients were included in the analysis. In the main analysis of the CHANCE study, the efficacy was assessed by the impact on the hard endpoints (mortality and rehospitalizations), clinical condition, functional capabilities, quality of life, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and cost-effectiveness. Also, a comprehensive assessment was performed of the prevalence, structure, and dynamics of anxiety and depressive symptoms depending on the changes in the clinical condition.Results Mortality significantly differed between the groups: 30 (8.3%) patients died in the IG and 50 (13.0%) in the CG. The relative risk of death was 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.99, p = 0.044. To prevent one death, it was necessary to educate and monitor 21 patients with clinically evident chronic heart failure (CHF) according to the principles of the CHANCE program. According to the dynamics of the Clinical Condition Assessment Scale (SCAS), the score difference between the groups was 1.7 (p<0.001) after 12 months of follow-up in favor of the IG group. In 12 months, the increase in the 6-minute walk test distance was 98.7 m in the IG and 42.9 m in the CG (p<0.001). The change from baseline in the Minnesota questionnaire total score was 15.3 ± 16.3 in the IG (p<0.001) and 6.2 ± 15.3 in the CG (p<0.001). The odds of developing depressive symptoms increased with each SCAS point by 19% (p = 0.0002). The odds of developing anxiety symptoms increased with each SCAS point by 12% (p = 0.02). The odds of developing the most unfavorable combination of anxiety and depressive symptoms increased with each SCAS point by 41% (p = 0.000002). The participation of patients in the study increased the odds of reducing the anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with CHF by 2.35 times (p<0.0001), to a greater extent in women.Conclusion      The CHANCE study that included 42 centers in 23 cities of Russia became the forerunner of the first initiatives in organizing the outpatient follow-up of patients in real clinical practice and serves as a vivid example of the importance of national research programs. Their implementation allows obtaining results that can be scaled up throughout the country to make an important contribution to the improvement of medical care for patients with CHF.

Incidence of depression in patients with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Estimating how type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects the rate of depression in cardiovascular disease (CVD) can help identify high-risk patients. The aim is to investigate how T2D affects the rate of depression according to specific subtypes of CVD.

METHODS

Incident CVD patients, free of psychiatric disease, with and without T2D, were included from nationwide registries between 2010 and 2020. We followed patients from CVD diagnosis until the first occurrence of depression, emigration, death, 5 years, or end of study (December 31, 2021). We used time-dependent Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) of depression following subtypes of CVD with and without T2D. The model included age, sex, comorbidities, calendar year, T2D duration, educational level, and living situation as covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 165,096 patients were included; 45,845 had a myocardial infarction (MI), 63,691 had a stroke, 19,959 had peripheral artery disease (PAD), 35,568 had heart failure (HF), and 979 were diagnosed with 2 or more CVD subtypes (= > 2 CVD's). Baseline T2D in each CVD subtype ranged from 11 to 17%. The crude incidence rate of depression per 1000 person-years (95% confidence intervals) was: MI + T2D: 131.1 (109.6;155.6), MI: 82.1 (65.3;101.9), stroke + T2D: 287.4 (255.1;322.6), stroke: 222.4(194.1;253.6), PAD + T2D: 173.6 (148.7;201.4), PAD:137.5 (115.5;162.5), HF + T2D: 244.3 (214.6;276.9), HF: 199.2 (172.5;228.9), =  > 2 CVD's + T2D: 427.7 (388.1;470.2), =  > 2 CVD's: 372.1 (335.2;411.9). The adjusted IRR of depression in MI, stroke, PAD, HF, and =  > 2 CVD's with T2D compared to those free of T2D was: 1.29 (1.23;1.35), 1.09 (1.06;1.12), 1.18 (1.13;1.24), 1.05 (1.02;1.09), and 1.04 (0.85;1.27) (p-value for interaction < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of T2D increased the rate of depression differently among CVD subtypes, most notable in patients with MI and PAD.

Depressive symptoms are associated with clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

The objective of this study was to examine associations between elevated depressive symptoms and increased risk of adverse clinical events patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), as well as the potential contribution of health behaviours.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred forty-two men and women with HFrEF were enrolled through heart failure (HF) clinics and followed over time. At baseline and 6 months, depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and HFrEF disease activity by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) was used to assess HF self-care behaviours. Proportional hazards regression models assessed the contribution of depressive symptoms and HFrEF disease biomarkers on death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Over a median follow-up period of 4 years, 42 patients (30%) died, and 84 (60%) had cardiovascular hospitalizations. A 10-point higher baseline BDI-II score was associated with a 35% greater risk of death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Higher baseline BDI-II scores were associated with poorer HF self-care maintenance behaviours (R = -0.30, P < 0.001) and fewer daily steps (R = -0.19, P = 0.04), suggesting that elevated depressive symptoms may diminish important health behaviours. Increases in plasma BNP over 6 months were associated with worse outcomes. Changes in BDI-II and plasma BNP over 6 months were positively related (R = 0.25, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that elevated depressive symptoms are associated with an increased likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Poor health behaviours may contribute to the adverse association of elevated depressive symptoms with the increased hazard of adverse clinical outcomes.

Psychokardiologie – aus praktischer und klinischer Sicht

In order to treat and research the development, progression, therapy and prevention of cardiological and psychosomatic disorders and their interactions, the field of psychocardiology has been established in recent years and now offers several treatment options.The well-known somatic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and acquired or congenital lipid metabolism disorders, lack of exercise, malnutrition and sleep-related disorders are often related to psychosocial risk factors. Conversely, mental illnesses such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder can also be viewed as independent risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.Somatic illnesses can, in turn, result in significant psychological reactions that have a severely negative impact on the course of the disease, participation and quality of life.In addition to the scientific research into these connections, psychocardiology offers a clinical specialty that questions, diagnoses and provides treatment for psychosocial connections in cardiovascular patients.The aim of this article is primarily to convey clinical and practical aspects of psychocardiology and the most important psychological comorbidities in connection with heart disease. In addition, it should be shown which therapeutic offers are available in the medical care structures and how therapy can be carried out. Psychotherapy and exercise therapy are preferred for the treatment of these comorbid disorders. The possibility of psychopharmacological therapy for cardiovascular patients is also presented, especially because of possible problematic medication interactions.

The Brain-Heart Axis: An Umbrella Review on Impact of Psychiatric Disease on Incidence, Management, and Outlook of Cardiovascular Disease

Psychiatric conditions, such as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, are increasingly recognized as significant risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review systematically analyzes evidence from various databases to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of psychiatric illnesses on the incidence, management, and prognosis of CVD. Key findings suggest a bidirectional relationship between psychiatric disorders and CVD, indicating that mental health conditions can predispose individuals to CVD, while CVD can exacerbate or trigger psychiatric symptoms. The review explores the underlying mechanisms of these associations, including behavioral factors, stress responses, and medication side effects. It also examines the challenges in managing CVD patients with comorbid psychiatric conditions, emphasizing the importance for integrated care approaches. This review underscores the necessity of considering mental health as an integral component of cardiovascular care and calls for further research to develop tailored management strategies for these complex conditions, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights for future investigations and guides clinicians in optimizing care for patients with both psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions.

Impact of Mental Health Treatment on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Ischemic Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence as to the impact of mental health treatment on outcomes in patients with heart disease. The aim of this study was to examine whether individuals who received mental health treatment for anxiety or depression after being hospitalized for ischemic disorders or heart failure had a reduced frequency of rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, or mortality compared with those who did not receive treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A population-based, retrospective, cohort design was used to examine the association between psychotherapy or antidepressant medication prescription and health service utilization and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure and comorbid anxiety or depression. Those receiving versus not receiving mental health treatment were compared based on the frequency of rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and mortality. The study sample included 1563 patients who had a mean age of 50.1 years. Individuals who received both forms of mental health treatment for anxiety or depression were 75% less likely to be rehospitalized, 74% less likely to have an emergency department visit, and 66% less likely to die from any cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health treatment for anxiety or depression has a significant impact on outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease consisting of reduced hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and in some conditions improved survival.

Comparative effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depression in 43,061 older adults with chronic somatic diseases: A Danish target trial emulation study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative effectiveness of commonly used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for comorbid depression in older adults with chronic somatic diseases by applying a target-trial-emulation framework.

METHODS

Danish target-trial-emulation study including 43,061 individuals aged ≥65 years (54.1% females, mean age 77.8 years) with a first redeemed prescription for depression with sertraline (n = 6673), escitalopram (n = 7104) or citalopram (n = 29,284) in 2006-2017. Individuals had cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD)/asthma, diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, or osteoporosis. Outcomes were treatment switching, combination/augmentation, psychiatric hospital contact for depression, and any psychiatric in-patient care. Follow-up was one year and adjusted Cox regression analyses calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR) within each somatic disease.

RESULTS

Across all six disease groups and four outcomes, we found that citalopram use, compared with sertraline, was associated with lower risks in several analyses, with statistically significant results in cancer, CVD, COPD/asthma, and diabetes (e.g., HRRs for psychiatric hospital contacts for depression/any psychiatric in-patient care ranging between 0.47 and 0.61). For escitalopram, compared with sertraline, some analyses indicated poorer outcomes with significantly higher risks for combination/augmentation treatment (HRRs ranging between 1.15 and 1.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Although observational studies are prone to confounding, these findings indicate clinically relevant differences between the SSRIs, with better outcomes in citalopram users and poorer outcomes in escitalopram users than sertraline, urging the need for clinical studies in this vulnerable patient population.

Smoking blunts sertraline response in depression: A prospective observational cohort study

Background

Smoking is common in patients of depression and is known to affect response to antidepressants. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of smoking on the antidepressant effect of sertraline.

Method

Patients with depression were divided into smoker and nonsmoker cohorts and followed up for 8 weeks. Serum sertraline levels were estimated using the high-performance liquid chromatography system. Response to treatment was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).

Results

Serum sertraline levels did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers at 4 and 8 weeks. Nonsmokers responded better to sertraline than smokers after 8 weeks. Adverse drug reaction profile did not vary between the two groups and was not impacted by serum sertraline levels. Nonsmokers showed a greater fall in the HAM-D score than smokers.

Conclusion

This study found depression among smokers to be less responsive to sertraline. This was not explained by serum sertraline levels. Treatment of depression in smokers with sertraline might require higher doses and duration, with more frequent reviews.

Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: An Overview of Reviews

Antidepressants are a commonly used, easily accessible, and overall safe treatment option for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in treating sleep disturbances in patients with PTSD. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched (July 2022) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the treatment of PTSD. Moreover, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for individual trials investigating the antidepressant treatment of PTSD (up to September 2022), and reference lists of all possibly relevant identified studies were screened. Sleep-related outcomes, i.e., total sleep time, sleep quality, dreams/ nightmares, insomnia, and somnolence, were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Metaanalytic evaluations were performed wherever possible. 39 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified; data from pooled analyses, reviews, and observational studies were used for antidepressants with a weak evidence base or when their findings were deemed important. Overall, scarce data exist on the effects of antidepressants on sleep outcomes among patients with PTSD. Some evidence may support the use of amitriptyline, nefazodone, paroxetine, and sertraline for improving sleep in patients with PTSD. Τhere was a meta-analytical trend indicating improvement of nightmares with fluoxetine, less insomnia with amitriptyline and more with brofaromine, as well as more somnolence with paroxetine vs. placebo, respectively. However, data from more than 1 RCT with a considerable number of patients were only available for paroxetine. Evidence is insufficient to draw safe conclusions. More and better-designed RCTs, with consistent reporting of sleep-related outcomes, are needed.

Low Rates of Psychotherapy Referrals in Patients With Heart Failure With Depression

BACKGROUND

Depression is common among patients with heart failure (HF) and can impact patients' outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the rates of psychotherapy referrals for patients with HF with depression.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2008 to 2018, we examined visits for patients with depression and concurrent HF or coronary artery disease. We estimated the likelihood of referral for psychotherapy using survey weights to provide nationally representative estimates. Among 1797 visits for patients with HF or coronary artery disease and depression, only 9.4% (95% confidence interval 7.2%-12.2%) were referred for psychotherapy, including mental health counseling and stress management. Rates of referral were lowest among patients with depression and HF at 7.5% (95% confidence interval 4.1%-13.2%). The odds of referral decreased over the years from 2008 to 2018 (odds ratio per additional year 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.98, P = .022), with referral rates in 2008 of 12.8% compared with 4.8% in 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative study of ambulatory visits, patients with HF and depression were referred for psychotherapy in only 7.5% of visits and referral rates have decreased over the years. Magnifying the value of psychotherapy and increasing referral rates are essential steps to improve care for patients with HF with depression.

[Palliative aspects in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as intensive care medicine : Consensus paper of the DGIIN, DGK, DGP, DGHO, DGfN, DGNI, DGG, DGAI, DGINA and DG Palliativmedizin]

The integration of palliative medicine is an important component in the treatment of various advanced diseases. While a German S3 guideline on palliative medicine exists for patients with incurable cancer, a recommendation for non-oncological patients and especially for palliative patients presenting in the emergency department or intensive care unit is missing to date. Based on the present consensus paper, the palliative care aspects of the respective medical disciplines are addressed. The timely integration of palliative care aims to improve quality of life and symptom control in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as intensive care.

Quality of life in heart failure: New data, new drugs and devices

Quality of life (QoL) is a therapeutic goal in heart failure. There are many EBM therapies for improving QoL. In this study, data is presented on new pharmacotherapies and devices that impact QoL in the heart failure population.

Screening for Emotional Distress in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we discuss the relationship between emotional distress and common cardiovascular disease condition, including coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant. We review screening measures that have been studied and used in clinical practice for each condition, as well as priorities for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies consistently demonstrate failing to identify and treat emotional distress in patients with cardiovascular disease is associated with adverse outcomes. However, routine emotional distress screening is not formally recommended for all cardiovascular disease conditions and is limited to depression screening in select patient populations. Future research should focus on evaluating the validity and reliability of standardized screening measures across the scope of emotional distress in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease. Other areas of future research include implementation of evidence-based pharmaceutical treatments and integrated behavioral health approaches and interventions.

Association of Depression Symptoms and Biomarkers of Risk on Clinical Outcomes in HFrEF

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have demonstrated an association of depression with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF, but the possible mechanisms responsible for the association are not unserstood.

METHODS

142 men and women with HFrEF were enrolled through HF clinics and followed over time. At baseline and 6-months, depression was assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and disease activity by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Proportional Hazards Regression Models assessed the contribution of depressive symptoms and HFrEF disease biomarkers on death or cardiovascular hospitalization.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up period of 4 years, 42 patients (30%) died, and 84 (60%) had cardiovascular hospitalizations. A 10-point higher baseline BDI-II score was associated with a 35% higher hazard of death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Greater baseline BDI-II scores were associated with poorer HF self-care maintenance (R=-0.30, p<0.001) and fewer daily steps (R=-0.19, p=0.04), suggesting that depression may adversely affect important health behaviors. Increases in plasma BNP over 6 months were associated with worse outcomes. Changes in BDI-II score and plasma BNP over 6 months were positively correlated (R=0.25, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of elevated depression symptoms and their association with an increased likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Health behaviors may play a greater role than direct biobehavioral pathways in the adverse effects of depression on the HF disease trajectory and resultant clinical outcomes.

Depression Subtypes in Systolic Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is associated with an elevated risk of morbidity, mortality, hospitalization, and impaired quality of life. One potential contributor to these poor outcomes is depression. Yet the effectiveness of treatments for depression in patients with HF is mixed, perhaps due to the heterogeneity of depression.

METHODS

This secondary analysis applied latent class analysis (LCA) to data from a clinical trial to classify patients with systolic HF and comorbid depression into LCA subtypes based on depression symptom severity, and then examined whether these subtypes predicted treatment response and mental and physical health outcomes at 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

In LCA of 629 participants (mean age 63.6 ± 12.9; 43% females), we identified 4 depression subtypes: mild (prevalence 53%), moderate (30%), moderately severe (12%), and severe (5%). The mild subtype was characterized primarily by somatic symptoms of depression (e.g., energy loss, sleep disturbance, poor appetite), while the remaining LCA subtypes additionally included nonsomatic symptoms of depression (e.g., depressed mood, anhedonia, worthlessness). At 12 months, LCA subtypes with more severe depressive symptoms reported significantly greater improvements in mental quality of life and depressive symptoms compared to the LCA mild subtype, but the incidence of cardiovascular- and noncardiovascular-related readmissions, and mortality was similar among all subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with depression and systolic heart failure those with the LCA mild depression subtype may not meet full criteria for major depressive disorder, given the overlap between HF and somatic symptoms of depression. We recommend requiring depressed mood or anhedonia as a necessary symptom for major depressive disorder in patients with HF.

Association of Depression and Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading worldwide cause of mortality. There has been increased awareness of the impact of psychological health on cardiovascular disease. In particular, major depression has been linked to increased all-cause mortality, development of cardiovascular disease, and worse outcomes in those with existing cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis assessing the incidence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular disease outcomes among those with major depressive disorder.

RESULTS

Among 26 studies of 1,957,621 individuals, depression was associated with increased risk of incident stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.28), myocardial infarction (HR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.45), congestive heart failure (HR 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09), or any cardiovascular disease (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30). Depression was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), cardiovascular disease mortality (HR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.27-1.63), and congestive heart failure mortality (HR 3.20; 95% CI, 1.29-7.94).

CONCLUSION

Depression has a significant negative impact on development of cardiovascular disease and on cardiovascular disease outcomes. Further efforts to understand and mitigate these impacts are prudent.

Depression and incident cardiovascular disease among patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Depression is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to identify the association of depression with incident CVD.

Methods

We studied patients with CKD stages 2-4 enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) and excluded participants with preexisting CVD. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between baseline depression [Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score ≥11] and incidence of CVD (cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or peripheral artery disease). Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and 10-year estimated CVD risk.

Results

Among 2585 CRIC study participants, 640 (25%) patients had depression at study baseline. Compared to patients without depression, patients with depression were more likely to be women (56% vs. 46%), non-White (68% vs. 53%), with household income <$20,000 (53% vs. 26%), without a high school degree (31% vs. 15%), uninsured (13% vs. 7%), with lower eGFR (42 vs. 46 ml/min/1.73 m (Palmer et al., 2013 Jul)22), and with higher UACR (90 vs. 33 mg/g). In multivariate analyses, depression was associated with a 29% increased risk of developing CVD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.62, p = 0.03). BDI (as a continuous variable) was associated with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.017, 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.030, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Among patients with CKD stages 2-4 enrolled in CRIC without preexisting CVD, depression was associated with a 29% increased risk of incident CVD.

Selection of the optimal dose of sertraline for depression: A dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sertraline has been shown to be effective in the treatment of depression. However, the relationship between the dosage of sertraline and its efficacy and safety are unclear. We identified RCTs that compared sertraline with placebo for the treatment of depression, conducted conventional meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of sertraline, and assessed the nonlinear dose-response relationship between sertraline dosage and the changes in HAM-D and CGI-S scores, dropout from care for any reason or due to adverse effects, and the rate of adverse effects, using a 1-stage restricted cubic spline regression model. Twenty-one RCTs involving 4,235 patients were included. The pooled mean differences (MD) in the change in HAM-D total score [MD=-2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.93, -1.76], CGI-S score and MADRS score, but also the dropout rate for adverse effects, and rate of adverse effects were higher in sertraline group. The therapeutic response of sertraline for treating depression increased with the dosage. Meanwhile, the risk of total adverse reactions slightly decreased between 50 and 150 mg, and increased at doses above 150 mg. The dose-dependence of both efficacy and safety need to be considered when choosing the optimal dosage of sertraline.

The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for heart failure patients: a narrative review

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, despite available treatments. Psychological issues such as depression, anxiety and poor self-care are prevalent in HF patients. Such issues adversely affect patients' daily lives and increase hospitalization and mortality rates; therefore, effective approaches to address these are needed. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been proposed as potentially useful for psychological comorbidities in HF patients, but its efficacy is not well-established. This narrative review aimed to summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of CBT for HF patients. A search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CBT for HF patients. Ten studies (nine RCTs and one case study) were included in the review. CBT was found to be an effective intervention for managing depression, anxiety, low quality of life, and impaired social and physical functioning in HF patients. The results suggest that CBT can improve psychological well-being and enhance the benefits of rehabilitation programs. Face-to-face CBT appears to be superior to conventional therapy and can be implemented in cardiac rehabilitation settings. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of internet-based CBT for cardiac patients and identify factors that promote treatment adherence.

Treatment of depression and inadequate self-care in patients with heart failure: One-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Both depression and inadequate self-care are common in patients with heart failure. This secondary analysis examines the one-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a sequential approach to treating these problems.

METHODS

Patients with heart failure and major depression were randomly assigned to usual care (n = 70) or to cognitive behavior therapy (n = 69). All patients received a heart failure self-care intervention starting 8 weeks after randomization. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at Weeks 8, 16, 32, and 52. Data on hospital admissions and deaths were also obtained.

RESULTS

One year after randomization, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) scores were - 4.9 (95% C.I., -8.9 to -0.9; p < .05) points lower in the cognitive therapy than the usual care arm, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy scores were 8.3 (95% C.I., 1.9 to 14.7; p < .05) points higher. There were no differences on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index or in hospitalizations or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of cognitive behavior therapy relative to usual care for major depression in patients with heart failure persisted for at least one year. Cognitive behavior therapy did not increase patients' ability to benefit from a heart failure self-care intervention, but it did improve HF-related quality of life during the follow-up period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02997865.

ACLP Best Practice Guidance: Evaluation and Treatment of Depression in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We present Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry best practice guidance on depression in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, which resulted from the collaboration of Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry's transplant psychiatry special interest group and Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee. Depression (which in the transplant setting may designate depressive symptoms or depressive disorders) is a frequent problem among SOT recipients. Following a structured literature review and consensus process, the Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry transplant psychiatry special interest group proposes recommendations for practice: all organ transplant recipients should be screened routinely for depression. When applicable, positive screening should prompt communication with the mental health treating provider or a clinical evaluation. If the evaluation leads to a diagnosis of depressive disorder, treatment should be recommended and offered. The recommendation for psychotherapy should consider the physical and cognitive ability of the patient to maximize benefit. The first-line antidepressants of choice are escitalopram, sertraline, and mirtazapine. Treating depressive disorders prior to transplantation is recommended to prevent posttransplant depression. Future research should address the mechanism by which transplant patients develop depressive disorders, the efficacy and feasibility of treatment interventions (both pharmacological and psychotherapeutic, in person and via telemedicine), and the resources available to transplant patients for mental health care.

Managing depression in frail older people; too little too late or pathologising loss?

It is testament to the advances of modern medicine that we have a population with more older people than ever before. While we are increasingly adept at managing their physical comorbidities, we have made relatively little progress in addressing the psychological impact of ageing. In this article we consider the prevalence and complex aetiology of depression in older people who often have to deal with profound loss, while simultaneously managing multiple comorbidities. We consider the challenges of diagnosing depression faced by healthcare professionals including access to resources and training, and what differentiates depression from socially appropriate low mood. Finally, we discuss treatment options and the difficulties that clinicians face when they have only limited resources and skills available, but a desire to help. We consider the role for antidepressants, and when not to prescribe, before addressing the challenges of providing talking therapies and social interventions.

Depression in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction, an Undervalued Comorbidity: An Up-To-Date Review

Introduction: Depression is a common and severe comorbidity among individuals with heart failure (HF). Up to a third of all HF patients are depressed, and an even higher proportion have symptoms of depression. Aim: In this review, we evaluate the relationship between HF and depression, explain the pathophysiology and epidemiology of both diseases and their relationship, and highlight novel diagnostic and therapeutic options for HF patients with depression. Materials and Methods: This narrative review involved keyword searches of PubMed and Web of Science. Review search terms included ["Depression" OR "Depres*" OR "major depr*"] AND ["Heart Failure" OR "HF" OR "HFrEF" OR "HFmrEF" OR "HFpEF" OR "HFimpEF"] in all fields. Studies included in the review met the following criteria: (A) published in a peer-reviewed journal; (B) described the impact of depression on HF and vice versa; and (C) were opinion papers, guidelines, case studies, descriptive studies, randomized control trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews. Results: Depression is an emergent HF risk factor and strongly relates with worse clinical outcomes. HF and depression share multiple pathways, including platelet dis-reactivity, neuroendocrine malfunction, inappropriate inflammation, tachi-arrhythmias, and frailty in the social and community setting. Existing HF guidelines urge evaluation of depression in all HF patients, and numerous screening tools are available. Depression is ultimately diagnosed based on DSM-5 criteria. There are both non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical treatments for depression. Regarding depressed symptoms, non-pharmaceutical treatments, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and physical exercise, have shown therapeutic results, under medical supervision and with an effort level adapted to the patient's physical resources, together with optimal HF treatment. In randomized clinical studies, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the backbone of antidepressant treatment, did not demonstrate advantage over the placebo in patients with HF. New antidepressant medications are currently being studied and could provide a chance to enhance management, treatment, and control of depression in patients with HF. Conclusions: Despite the substantial link between depression and HF, their combination is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Considering the hopeful yet unclear findings of antidepressant trials, further research is required to identify people who may benefit from antidepressant medication. The goal of future research should be a complete approach to the care of these patients, who are anticipated to become a significant medical burden in the future.

Impact of antidepressant use on the autonomic nervous system: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Changes in cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation observed in psychiatric disorders may be mitigated by antidepressants. We meta-analyzed and systematically reviewed studies examining antidepressants' effects on ANS outcomes, including heart rate variability (HRV). We conducted a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant search of PubMed and Scopus until March 28th, 2022. We included randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) and pre-post studies, regardless of diagnosis. We pooled results in random-effects meta-analyses, pooling homogeneous study designs and outcomes. We conducted sensitivity analyses and assessed quality of included studies. Thirty studies could be meta-analyzed. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were significantly associated with a reduction in the square root of the mean-squared difference between successive R-R intervals (RMSSD) (SMD= -0.48) and skin conductance response (SMD= -0.55) in RCTs and with a significant increase in RMSSD in pre-post studies (SMD=0.27). In pre-post studies, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were associated with a significant decrease in several HRV outcomes while agomelatine was associated with a significant increase in high frequency power (SMD= 0.14). In conclusion, SSRIs reduce skin conductance response but have no or inconclusive effects on other ANS outcomes, depending on study design. TCAs reduce markers of parasympathetic function while agomelatine might have the opposite effect. Studies are needed to investigate the impact of SSRIs on the recovery of cardiac ANS regulation after acute myocardial infarction, and the effects of newer antidepressants.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized control trials

Major depression (MD) is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF) and contributes to increased risk of hospitalization and mortality. The implementation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has become a key strategy for treating HF patients' depression. We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive CBT compared to the standard of care (SOC) in HF patients with MD. The primary outcome was the depression scale (post-intervention and by the end of follow-up). The secondary outcomes were the quality of life (QoL), self-care scores, and 6-min walk test distance(6-MW). The standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. A total of 6 RCTs with 489 patients (244 in the CBT group and 245 in the SOC group) were included. As compared to the SOC, CBT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the post-interventional depression scale (SMD: -0.45, 95%CI: -0.69, -0.21; P < 0.01) and by the end of follow-up (SMD: -0.68, 95%CI: -0.87, -0.49; P < 0.01). Furthermore, CBT significantly improved the QoL (SMD: -0.45, 95%CI: -0.65, -0.24; P < 0.01). However, there were no differences in the self-care scores (SMD: 0.17, 95%CI: -0.08, 0.42; P = 0.18) or in 6-MW (SMD: 0.45, 95%CI: -0.39, 1.28; P = 0.29) between the two groups. According to our meta-analysis of published clinical studies, CBT may be more effective than standard therapy at enhancing depression scores and quality of life. To assess the long-term clinical effects of CBT in heart failure patients, larger and more powerful RCTs are required.

A Pilot Study of Neurobiological Mechanisms of Stress and Cardiovascular Risk

Objective

Coronary heart disease is a leading cause of death and disability. Although psychological stress has been identified as an important potential contributor, mechanisms by which stress increases risk of heart disease and mortality are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to assess mechanisms by which stress acts through the brain and heart to confer increased CHD risk.

Methods

Coronary Heart Disease patients (N=10) underwent cardiac imaging with [Tc-99m] sestamibi single photon emission tomography at rest and during a public speaking mental stress task. Patients returned for a second day and underwent positron emission tomography imaging of the brain, heart, bone marrow, aorta (indicating inflammation) and subcutaneous adipose tissue, after injection of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for assessment of glucose uptake followed mental stress. Patients with (N=4) and without (N=6) mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia were compared for glucose uptake in brain, heart, adipose tissue and aorta with mental stress.

Results

Patients with mental stress-induced ischemia showed a pattern of increased uptake in the heart, medial prefrontal cortex, and adipose tissue with stress. In the heart disease group as a whole, activity increase with stress in the medial prefrontal brain and amygdala correlated with stress-induced increases in spleen (r=0.69, p=0.038; and r=0.69, p=0.04 respectfully). Stress-induced frontal lobe increased uptake correlated with stress-induced aorta uptake (r=0.71, p=0.016). Activity in insula and medial prefrontal cortex was correlated with post-stress activity in bone marrow and adipose tissue. Activity in other brain areas not implicated in stress did not show similar correlations. Increases in medial prefrontal activity with stress correlated with increased cardiac glucose uptake with stress, suggestive of myocardial ischemia (r=0.85, p=0.004).

Conclusions

These findings suggest a link between brain response to stress in key areas mediating emotion and peripheral organs involved in inflammation and hematopoietic activity, as well as myocardial ischemia, in Coronary Heart Disease patients.

First results from post-COVID inpatient rehabilitation

Background

COVID-19 is associated with various symptoms and psychological involvement in the long term. In view of the multifactorial triggering and maintenance of the post-COVID syndrome, a multimodal therapy with somatomedical and psychotherapeutic content is expedient. This paper compares the psychological stress of post-COVID patients and their course in rehabilitation to psychosomatic and psychocardiological patients.

Method

Observational study with control-groups and clinical, standardized examination: psychological testing (BDI-II, HELATH-49), 6-MWT as somatic parameter, two measurement points (admission, discharge). Sample characteristics, including work related parameters, the general symptom-load and the course of symptoms during rehabilitation are evaluated.

Results

At admission in all measures post-COVID patients were significantly affected, but less pronounced than psychosomatic or psychocardiological patients (BDI-II post-COVID = 19.29 ± 9.03, BDI-II psychosomatic = 28.93 ± 12.66, BDI-II psychocardiology = 24.47 ± 10.02). During rehabilitation, in all complaint domains and sub-groups, symptom severity was significantly reduced (effect sizes ranging from d = .34 to d = 1.22). Medium positive effects were seen on self-efficacy (d = .69) and large effects on activity and participation (d = 1.06) in post-COVID patients. In the 6-MWT, the walking distance improved by an average of 76.43 ± 63.58 meters (d = 1.22). Not a single patient deteriorated in walking distance, which would have been a possible sign of post exercise malaise (PEM).

Conclusion

Post-COVID patients have a slighter psychological burden as psychocardiological or psychosomatic patients. Although rehabilitation is not curative, post-COVID patients benefit significantly from the interventions and there were no signs of PEM.

Sigma-1 Receptor Signaling: In Search of New Therapeutic Alternatives for Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases

Cardiovascular and renal diseases are among the leading causes of death worldwide, and regardless of current efforts, there is a demanding need for therapeutic alternatives to reduce their progression to advanced stages. The stress caused by diseases leads to the activation of protective mechanisms in the cell, including chaperone proteins. The Sigma-1 receptor (Sig-1R) is a ligand-operated chaperone protein that modulates signal transduction during cellular stress processes. Sig-1R interacts with various ligands and proteins to elicit distinct cellular responses, thus, making it a potential target for pharmacological modulation. Furthermore, Sig-1R ligands activate signaling pathways that promote cardioprotection, ameliorate ischemic injury, and drive myofibroblast activation and fibrosis. The role of Sig-1R in diseases has also made it a point of interest in developing clinical trials for pain, neurodegeneration, ischemic stroke, depression in patients with heart failure, and COVID-19. Sig-1R ligands in preclinical models have significantly beneficial effects associated with improved cardiac function, ventricular remodeling, hypertrophy reduction, and, in the kidney, reduced ischemic damage. These basic discoveries could inform clinical trials for heart failure (HF), myocardial hypertrophy, acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here, we review Sig-1R signaling pathways and the evidence of Sig-1R modulation in preclinical cardiac and renal injury models to support the potential therapeutic use of Sig-1R agonists and antagonists in these diseases.

A bibliometric analysis of research on heart failure comorbid with depression from 2002 to 2021

Heart failure (HF) with depression is a common comorbidity associated with worse clinical status and quality of life. Although there have been numerous high-quality studies and relevant reviews on HF comorbid with depression, few bibliometric analyses of this field have been reported. In order to understand the development process, research hotspots and future directions, this review analyzes the papers on HF comorbid with depression from January 2002 to December 2021 through CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Visual cooperative networks between countries, authors and institutions were conducted to understand the basic development status of HF comorbid with depression. Furthermore, we performed co-occurrence analysis, burst detection, and timeline analysis for keywords to understand this field's research directions and hotspots. Finally, a detailed review and analysis of the classical literature in this field were conducted based on co-citation analysis. This bibliometric analysis provides an overview of studies on HF comorbid with depression and emphasizes the research on comorbidity mechanisms and more effective interventions as a priority for future research.

Underestimated prognostic value of depression in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the different predictive values of depression among patients with different cardiac systolic function levels.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty-three consecutive patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were included the depressive state was assessed using the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Depression was defined as have depressive symptoms with a PHQ-9 score ≥5. The level of cardiac systolic function was classified as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50 and <50%.

RESULTS

Over a median of 26.2 months, 421 patients completed the follow-up and experienced 101 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), 45 non-cardiac rehospitalizations, and 17 deaths. Predictors for clinical outcomes in patients with different cardiac systolic function levels were not the same. For participants with preserved LVEF, depression was associated with increased risks for cardiovascular events and composite outcomes. However, when focusing the whole population, predictive values of depression for MACEs, non-cardiac rehospitalizations, and composite endpoints all dropped. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses further confirmed that depression was the one of the main predictors for all clinical outcomes. With the combination of other simple features, area under curve (AUC) could reach 0.64-0.67.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconsistent with the general impression, depression is found to have a closer linkage with clinical outcomes in CAD patients with preserved LVEF rather than in those with decreased LVEF. These findings appeal for more attention on CAD patients with depressive symptoms and comparatively normal LVEF. Including psychological factors may be a good attempt when constructing risk prediction models.

Statins and Antidepressants: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Outlook of the Risks and Benefits of Co-prescription (2022)

Antidepressants are the most prescribed medications in the United States, and the most frequently prescribed antidepressants are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) followed by serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitors (SARIs), and norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRI). On the other hand, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, also known as statins, are the most prescribed lipid-lowering medications, and because the majority of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have depressive symptoms, it is essential to understand the possible drug-drug interactions these two classes of medications can have, their potential synergistic mechanisms, and possible risks. In our research, we tried to understand the facts and uncover any missing links regarding the potential risks and benefits of statins and antidepressant co-prescription in the current clinical scenario. We reviewed all the relevant information from inception up to October 2022 regarding the antidepressant and statin polypharmacy. The databases we used were PubMed and PubMed Central, and the 11 keywords were "statins," "SSRI," "SNRI," "selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors," "serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors," "antidepressants," "HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors," "tricyclic antidepressants," "monoamine oxidase inhibitors," "serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitors," and "norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors." We carefully screened each of the relevant articles, including animal and human studies. In our study, we concluded that co-prescription of statins and SSRIs/SNRIs was generally safe and should be encouraged due to the potential synergistic nature of their effects in patients with CVD and major depression, and caution is advised with all other classes of antidepressants. We would like to encourage the undertaking of large-scale observational studies and proactive postmarketing surveillance to improve our knowledge regarding this topic considering the immense clinical importance it holds by directly and indirectly affecting half the population worldwide.

Geriatric Domains in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Because heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is closely linked to aging processes and disproportionately affects older adults, consideration of geriatric domains is paramount to ensure high-quality care to older adults with HFpEF. Multimorbidity, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms, frailty, falls, and social isolation each have important implications on quality of life and clinical events including hospitalization and mortality. There are multiple strategies to screen for these conditions. This narrative review underscores the importance of screening for multiple geriatric conditions, integrating these conditions into decision making, and addressing these conditions when caring for older adults with HFpEF.

Depression and cardiovascular diseases

Depression is a well-known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The prevalence of depression in patients with cardiovascular diseases has been reported to be approximately 20 %. A two-step depression screening protocol using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is recommended for patients with cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular diseases and depression share a common pathology, including increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, hyperactivity of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and inflammation. Psychosocial and environmental factors are also associated with depression and cardiovascular outcomes. Randomized controlled trials of antidepressant treatment for patients with depression and cardiovascular diseases have shown no advantage regarding cardiovascular outcomes. However, improvement in depressive symptoms, regardless of the method, may lead to a reduction in subsequent cardiovascular events. A collaborative approach between cardiologists and psychiatrists is recommended to manage depression in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Future research should identify more specific targets for treating patients with cardiovascular diseases, involve collaboration with professionals across fields, and establish community support systems.

Prognostic implications of a one-item health literacy screen on health status outcomes among heart failure patients with depression

Background

Health literacy (HL) is the degree to which individuals can obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services. Although low HL portends greater risk for clinical events, its association with heart failure (HF)-specific health status- patients' symptoms, function and quality of life- is poorly understood. We thus explored the association of low HL with health status outcomes in depressed patients with HF, for whom treatment regimens can be complex.

Methods

Participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction and depression, from the Hopeful Heart trial, were categorized as having low or adequate HL at baseline using a validated, 1-item HL screen. HF-specific health status was measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Using serial risk-adjusted linear regression models, we assessed the association of HL with baseline, 12-month and 12-month change in the KCCQ Overall Summary (OS) scores (range 0-100; lower scores = worse health status).

Results

Among 629 participants, 35 % had low HL. Those with low HL had lower health status at all time points, including at 12 months after discharge (-9.8 points, 95%CI [-14.3, -5.3], p < 0.001), with poorer improvements in KCCQ-OS scores after accounting for baseline health status (-6.4 points, 95%CI [-10.5, -2.3], p = 0.002).

Conclusions

In those with HF and depression, low HL was common and associated with worse HF-specific health status and poorer improvement over time. A brief HL screen can identify patients at risk for poorer health status outcomes and for whom additional interventions may be warranted.

The Risk of Fatal Arrhythmias Associated With Sertraline in Patients With Post-myocardial Infarction Depression

Sertraline is a first-line antidepressant and the most commonly used in the treatment of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in major depression. It is preferred due to its central and peripheral actions on the serotonergic system in patients with mental health issues as well as cardiovascular disease, particularly post-myocardial infarction depression. Some of the feared adverse effects include QT prolongation, arrhythmias including Torsades de pointed, and sudden cardiac death, which are associated with older antidepressants and are rarely seen with SSRIs, including sertraline. We tried to understand the risks associated with sertraline use in cardiac patients. We reviewed all the relevant information from inception up to July 2022 regarding the risks of sertraline use in cardiovascular diseases, particularly with a focus on post-myocardial infarction depression, and gathered around 500 articles in our research and narrowed it down to 37 relevant articles. The database used was PubMed and the keywords used are sertraline, arrhythmia, major depression, post-myocardial infarction, and ventricular tachycardia. We carefully screened all relevant articles and found articles supporting and refuting the effects of sertraline in increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We concluded that there is a significant variability due to confounding factors affecting individual cases. Overall, sertraline has no increased risk in comparison with other antidepressants and a comparatively preferable safety profile to other SSRIs like citalopram in general cases. Any patient with a high risk of arrhythmias due to any etiology should receive a screening ECG before sertraline prescription for baseline QT interval and genotyping for any serotonin transporter/receptor variations. Patients should also be periodically monitored for drug-drug interactions while on therapy. We encourage further research, including randomized clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance regarding the use of sertraline in high-risk cases.