Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score is a risk factor for acute kidney injury after surgical aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) increases after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study aimed to characterize the risk factors of AKI after SAVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective registry study based on data from 299 consecutive patients undergoing SAVR. At 48 h after SAVR, 41 patients developed AKI. There was a significantly higher prevalence of older age, higher body mass index (BMI), and diabetes mellitus in the AKI group. Previous use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) and β-blocker, intake and output volumes within 24 h, mechanical ventilation time, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, baseline creatinine, baseline, 24 h, and 48 h estimated glomerular filtration rate were strongly associated with the incidence of AKI. BMI >24, history of hypertension, use of ACEI/ARB and β-blocker, and mechanical ventilation time were associated with AKI. Univariate logistic regression indicated that overweight, hypertension, use of ACEI/ARB and β-blocker, and mechanical ventilation time were associated with AKI. Notably, the ACEF score was an independent predictor of AKI. The receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to assess the ACEF score for predicting AKI and the best cutoff was 1.1. After dividing ACEF into quartiles, each one-unit increment in ACEF led to a 2.27-fold risk in the incidence of AKI among patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is a generalizable phenomenon occurring frequently after SAVR. The ACEF score is an independent predictor of AKI among patients undergoing SAVR.

Calcium channel blocker use and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve intervention for aortic stenosis

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat coronary artery disease (CAD). The effects of the use of CCBs on the prognosis of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) after transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) has not been explored. This study elucidated the effects of the use of CCBs on clinical outcomes of patients who underwent TAVI for severe AS. This retrospective observational study included 993 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for severe AS between January 2017 and July 2023. All patients were followed up for all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure. Composite endpoints between patients with and without CCBs at discharge were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). CCBs were administered to 590 (59.4%) patients following TAVI. Over a median follow-up period of 719 (335-1,120) days, the composite endpoint occurred in 269 patients. After PSM, there was no significant difference in the composite endpoint between the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.879; p = 0.409). Subgroup analysis revealed that the use of CCBs was associated with a better prognosis in the CAD subgroup (p for interaction = 0.002). This study does not suggest that the use of CCBs is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients after TAVI for severe AS. Additionally, the use of CCBs may lead to a better prognosis in patients with CAD.

Association between blood pressure traits, hypertension, antihypertensive drugs and calcific aortic valve stenosis: a mendelian randomization study

Background

Hypertension is associated with an increased risk of calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). However, the directionality of causation between blood pressure traits and aortic stenosis is unclear, as is the benefit of antihypertensive drugs for CAVS.

Methods

Using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics, we performed bidirectional two-sample univariable mendelian randomization (UVMR) to assess the causal associations of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) with CAVS. Multivariable mendelian randomization (MVMR) was conducted to evaluate the direct effect of hypertension on CAVS, adjusting for confounders. Drug target mendelian randomization (MR) and summary-level MR (SMR) were used to estimate the effects of 12 classes of antihypertensive drugs and their target genes on CAVS risk. Inverse variance weighting was the primary MR method, with sensitivity analyses to validate results.

Results

UVMR showed SBP, DBP, and PP have causal effects on CAVS, with no significant reverse causality. MVMR confirmed the causality between hypertension and CAVS after adjusting for confounders. Drug-target MR analyses indicated that calcium channel blockers (CCBs), loop diuretics, and thiazide diuretics via SBP lowering exerted protective effects on CAVS risk. SMR analysis showed that the CCBs target gene CACNA2D2 and ARBs target gene AGTR1 were positively associated with CAVS risk, while diuretics target genes SLC12A5 and SLC12A1 were negatively associated with aortic stenosis risk.

Conclusions

Hypertension has a causal relationship with CAVS. Managing SBP in hypertensive patients with CCBs may prevent CAVS. ARBs might exert protective effects on CAVS independent of blood pressure reduction. The relationship between diuretics and CAVS is complex, with opposite effects through different mechanisms.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Beyond Severe Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment option in appropriate patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). A number of advancements have since expanded the eligible population to bicuspid aortic valve with feasible anatomy; small aortic annuli; low-flow, low-gradient AS; and younger patients. Focus has also shifted beyond the symptomatic severe patients to asymptomatic severe and moderate AS, as early valve replacement may prevent irreversible cardiac remodeling. Dedicated devices to treat native aortic regurgitation have shown encouraging short-term outcomes. While the expansion of TAVR to younger patients has raised questions about valve durability and feasibility of reintervention, valve-in-valve TAVR has thus far shown encouraging midterm results. In this review, we summarize the evidence in these contemporary TAVR populations, exploring both the promise and challenge of broadening the patient pool for this minimally invasive procedure.

Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition and Cardiac Damage in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The optimal medical treatment strategy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been established, and might be affected by the extent of extravalvular cardiac damage. We aimed to investigate the prognostic association of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in TAVR patients stratified according to the extent of extravalvular cardiac damage.

METHODS

In a prospective TAVR registry, patients were retrospectively evaluated for baseline cardiac damage and classified into 5 stages of cardiac damage (0-4) according to established criteria. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were compared according to RAS inhibitor prescription at discharge.

RESULTS

Among 2247 eligible patients who underwent TAVR between August 2007 and June 2021, 1634 (72.7%) were prescribed RAS inhibitors at discharge. Eighty-three patients (3.7%) were classified as stage 0, 276 (12.3%) as stage 1, 889 (39.6%) as stage 2, 489 (21.8%) as stage 3, and 510 (22.7%) as stage 4. RAS inhibitor prescription after TAVR was associated with a reduced risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadjusted], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.77). The protective association was accentuated among patients with cardiac stages 3 and 4 (HRadjusted, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.32-0.92]; and HRadjusted, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.92], respectively), but not statistically significant in for those with stage 2 (HRadjusted, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent TAVR, we found a strong association of RAS inhibitor prescription and improved clinical outcome in the overall population, and there were no signs of heterogeneity across stages of cardiac damage.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01368250.

Ramipril After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Without Reduced Ejection Fraction: The RASTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with aortic stenosis may continue to have an increased risk of heart failure, arrhythmias, and death after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors may be beneficial in this setting. We aimed to explore whether ramipril improves the outcomes of patients with aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint) was a multicenter trial comparing ramipril with standard care (control) following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40%. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac mortality, heart failure readmission, and stroke at 1-year follow-up. Secondary end points included left ventricular remodeling and fibrosis. A total of 186 patients with median age 83 years (range 79-86), 58.1% women, and EuroSCORE-II 3.75% (range 3.08-4.97) were randomized to receive either ramipril (n=94) or standard treatment (n=92). There were no significant baseline, procedural, or in-hospital differences. The primary end point occurred in 10.6% in the ramipril group versus 12% in the control group (P=0.776), with no differences in cardiac mortality (ramipril 1.1% versus control group 2.2%, P=0.619) but lower rate of heart failure readmissions in the ramipril group (3.2% versus 10.9%, P=0.040). Cardiac magnetic resonance analysis demonstrated better remodeling in the ramipril compared with the control group, with greater reduction in end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular volumes, but nonsignificant differences were found in the percentage of myocardial fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramipril administration after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with preserved left ventricular function did not meet the primary end point but was associated with a reduction in heart failure re-admissions at 1-year follow-up.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT03201185.

Management of Fluid Overload in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (EASE-TAVR): A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).

OBJECTIVES

The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).

Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition in Patients With Myocardial Injury Complicating Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background

Periprocedural myocardial injury impacts clinical outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The optimal medical management strategy for TAVR-related periprocedural myocardial injury has not been established.

Objectives

The authors aimed to investigate the prognostic association of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in patients with periprocedural myocardial injury after TAVR.

Methods

In a prospective TAVR registry, patients were retrospectively stratified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 periprocedural myocardial injury and RAS inhibitor prescription after TAVR. The main outcomes of interest were prevalence of myocardial injury and cardiovascular death. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze outcomes of interest.

Results

Among 2,083 eligible patients undergoing TAVR between August 2007 and June 2023, 283 patients (13.8%) developed VARC-3 periprocedural myocardial injury. RAS inhibitors were prescribed in 197 patients (70%) with periprocedural myocardial injury and in 1,251 patients (71.2%) without injury. Compared with patients without periprocedural myocardial injury, patients with myocardial injury had an increased risk of cardiovascular death at 1 year (HRadjusted: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.39-3.11). The use of RAS inhibitors after TAVR was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death in patients with and without periprocedural myocardial injury (HRadjusted: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.22-0.95, and HRadjusted: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30-0.65, respectively).

Conclusions

One out of 7 patients undergoing TAVR experienced periprocedural myocardial injury. VARC-3 periprocedural myocardial injury was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death at 1 year after TAVR. The favorable association of RAS inhibitor prescription was consistent in patients with and without periprocedural myocardial injury. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Are Associated With Reduced Valvular Fibrosis in Women With Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may slow down the progression of aortic stenosis (AS) through their antifibrotic effect. Women present more valvular fibrosis than men, so ARBs may have more effect in females. Our aim was to assess the impact of ARBs on the remodelling of the aortic valve in men and women.

METHODS

We included patients who had an aortic valve replacement with or without coronary bypass grafting from 2006 to 2013. Patients with missing echocardiographic or histologic data were excluded. Warren-Yong and fibrosis scores of the explanted valves were performed. Patients were divided into 4 phenotypes according to their Warren-Yong and fibrosis scores: mild calcification/fibrosis, severe calcification/fibrosis group, predominant fibrosis group, predominant calcification group.

RESULTS

Among the 1321 included patients, the vast majority (89%) has severe AS. Patients in the predominant fibrosis group, compared with the predominant calcium group, were more often female (39% vs 31%; P = 0.008) with bicuspid valves (44% vs 34%; P = 0.002), and less often used ARBs (25% vs 30%; P = 0.046). Female sex was independently associated with being in the predominant fibrosis group (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.95; P = 0.01), with a significant interaction between female sex and ARBs. Women taking ARBs compared with women not taking ARBs had significantly lower fibrosis scores (P < 0.001). This difference was not seen in men.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of patients with moderate-severe AS, among the women there was a negative association between intake of ARBs and valvular fibrosis. Thus, the possible effects of ARBs may be sex specific, with a larger therapeutic role in women.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with poor outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), due to their favorable effects on ventricular remodeling, have been hypothesized to improve outcomes post-TAVR, yet there are no recommendations regarding their use.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs with those not receiving ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR.

Methods

We performed a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Library until June 14, 2023, and included all studies comparing clinical outcomes between patients given ACEIs/ARBs and those not given ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. We used a random effects model with appropriate corrections to calculate relative risk (RR) and CIs, with all analyses carried out using R v4.0.3.

Results

We included ten studies on the use of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR. Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86, I2 = 62%, chi-square P < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.88, I2 = 0%, chi-square P = 0.54), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, I2 = 0%, chi-square P = 0.59). Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had a similar risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, vascular complications, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation.

Conclusions

We found that patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs had a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Risk of other outcomes was similar to patients not receiving ACEIs/ARBs. Randomized clinical trials are needed to explore the benefits of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR, so that definitive guidelines can be developed.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in heart failure

Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may develop heart failure (HF), the presence of which has traditionally been deemed as a final stage in AS progression with poor outcomes. The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred therapy for most patients with AS and concomitant HF. With its instant afterload reduction, TAVR offers patients with HF significant haemodynamic benefits, with corresponding changes in left ventricular structure and improved mortality and quality of life. The prognostic covariates and optimal timing of TAVR in patients with less than severe AS remain unclear. The purpose of this review is to describe the association between TAVR and outcomes in patients with HF, particularly in the setting of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, acute HF, and right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to highlight areas for future research.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibition after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The optimal medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic stenosis remains unknown. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors could potentially improve cardiac remodelling and clinical outcomes after SAVR.

METHODS

All patients undergoing SAVR due to aortic stenosis in Sweden 2006-2020 and surviving 6 months after surgery were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; all-cause mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction). Secondary endpoints included the individual components of MACE and cardiovascular mortality. Time-updated adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare patients with and without RAS inhibitors. Subgroup analyses were performed, as well as a comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).

RESULTS

A total of 11 894 patients (mean age, 69.5 years, 40.4% women) were included. Median follow-up time was 5.4 (2.7-8.5) years. At baseline, 53.6% of patients were dispensed RAS inhibitors, this proportion remained stable during follow-up. RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93), p<0.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of all-cause death (aHR 0.79 (0.73 to 0.86), p<0.001). The lower MACE risk was consistent in all subgroups except for those with mechanical prostheses (aHR 1.07 (0.84 to 1.37), p for interaction=0.040). Both treatment with ACE inhibitors (aHR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97)) and ARBs (0.87 (0.81 to 0.93)) were associated with lower risk of MACE.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that medical therapy with an RAS inhibitor after SAVR is associated with a 13% lower risk of MACE and a 21% lower risk of all-cause death.

Aortic Valve Disease, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, and the Heart Failure Patient: A State-of-the-Art Review

Concomitant aortic stenosis (AS) in heart failure (HF) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic AS and asymptomatic AS with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% and during other cardiac surgeries. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has now allowed for the treatment of severe AS in previously inoperable or high-surgical-risk patients. Leveraging multimodality imaging techniques is increasingly recognized for reinforcing the rationale for intervening early, thus mitigating the risk of ongoing progression to advanced HF. There are increasing data in favor of TAVR in diverse clinical scenarios, particularly asymptomatic AS and moderate AS. Limited information is, however, available regarding the advantages of HF medical therapy before and after intervention. This review aims to comprehensively examine the phenotypes of AS in the context of HF progression, while exploring the evolving role of TAVR in specific populations.

Acute advanced aortic stenosis

Acute decompensation often represents the onset of symptoms associated with severe degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) and usually complicates the clinical course of the disease with a dismal impact on survival and quality of life. Several factors may derange the faint balance between left ventricular preload and afterload and precipitate the occurrence of symptoms and signs of acute heart failure (HF). A standardized approach for the management of this condition is currently lacking. Medical therapy finds very limited application in this setting, as drugs usually indicated for the control of acute HF might worsen hemodynamics in the presence of AS. Urgent aortic valve replacement is usually performed by transcatheter than surgical approach whereas, over the last decades, percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty gained renewed space as bridge to definitive therapy. This review focuses on the pathophysiological aspects of acute advanced AS and summarizes current evidence on its management.

Association of ACEI/ARB and statin prescribing patterns with mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Findings from real-world claims data

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for most patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), but the impact of medical therapy prescribing patterns on post-TAVR patients has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed Optum claims data from 9,012 adults who received TAVR for AS (January 2014-December 2018). Pharmacy claims data were used to identify patients who filled ACEI/ARB and/or statin prescriptions during the study's 90-day landmark period post-TAVR. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate the association of prescribing patterns with mortality during the 3-year follow-up period. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the impact of 11 potential confounders on the observed associations.

RESULTS

A significantly lower adjusted 3-year mortality was observed for patients with post-TAVR prescription for ACEI/ARBs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.91, P = .0003) and statins (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94, P = .0018) compared to patients who did not fill prescriptions for these medications post-TAVR. Subgroup analyses revealed that the survival benefit associated with ACEI/ARB prescription was not affected by any of the potential confounding variables, except preoperative ACEI/ARB prescription was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality vs postoperative prescription only. No other subgroup variables had significant interactions associated with survival benefits, including preoperative use of statins.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale, real-world analysis of patients undergoing TAVR, the prescription of ACEI/ARB and statins was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality at 3-years, especially in those where the medications were initiated preoperatively.

Contemporary issues and lifetime management in patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Latest clinical trials have indicated favorable outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, there are unanswered questions particularly in younger patients with longer life expectancy. While current evidence are limited to short duration of clinical follow-up, there are certain factors which may impair patients clinical outcomes and quality-of-life at long-term. Contemporary issues in the current TAVR era include prosthesis-patient mismatch, heart failure hospitalization, subclinical thrombosis, future coronary access, and valve durability. In this review, the authors review available evidence and discuss each remaining issues and theoretical treatment strategies in lifetime management of TAVR patients.

Association of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors use with short- and long-term mortality in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The present study aimed to investigate the association of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) with short- and long-term mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for relevant studies published before March 2022. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included to assess the effect of RASi on short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (≥1 year) mortality in patients with AS.

Results

A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our results demonstrated that RASi reduced short-term mortality (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, p = 0.008) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Subgroup analysis revealed that RASi was still associated with lower short-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, the association was relatively weak in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). For long-term mortality, the pooled OR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.88-1.24, p = 0.63) after sensitivity analysis in patients who did not undergo AVR. In addition, our study confirmed that RASi significantly reduced long-term mortality (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.74, p < 0.0001) in patients who underwent AVR. Subgroup analysis showed that both TAVR and SAVR groups treated with RASi had lower long-term mortality.

Conclusion

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors did not change long-term mortality in AS patients who did not undergo AVR. However, RASi reduced short- and long-term mortality in patients who underwent AVR.

A new integrative approach to assess aortic stenosis burden and predict objective functional improvement after TAVR

Background

A non-negligible rate of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) do not report symptomatic improvement or even die in the short-midterm. We sought to assess the degree of objective functional recovery after TAVR and its prognostic implications and to develop a predictive model.

Methods

In a cohort of patients undergoing TAVR, a prospective evaluation of clinical, anatomical, and physiological parameters was conducted before and after the procedure. These parameters were derived from echocardiography, non-invasive analysis of arterial pulse waves, and cardiac tomography. Objective functional improvement 6 months after TAVR was assessed using a 6-min walk test and nitro-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. The derived predictive model was prospectively validated in a different cohort. A clinical follow-up was conducted at 2 years.

Results

Among the 212 patients included, objective functional improvement was observed in 169 patients (80%) and subjective improvement in 187 (88%). Patients with objective functional improvement showed a much lower death rate at 2 years (9% vs. 31% p = 0.0002). Independent predictors of improvement were as follows: mean aortic gradient of ≥40 mmHg, augmentation index₇₅ of ≥45%, the posterior wall thickness of ≤12 mm, and absence of atrial fibrillation. A simple integer-based point score was developed (GAPA score), which showed an area under the curve of 0.81 for the overall cohort and 0.78 for the low-gradient subgroup. In a validation cohort of 216 patients, these values were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively.

Conclusion

A total of 80% of patients experienced objective functional improvement after TAVR, showing a significantly lower 2-year mortality rate. A predictive score was built that showed a good discriminative performance in overall and low-gradient populations.

Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor type and dosage on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

The objective of the study was to determine the effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) on the survival of subgroups of patients with aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess the impact of types and dosages of RASI on outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This single-centre, retrospective analysis included 2862 patients (n = 2227 with RASI and n = 635 without RASI) after successful TAVI. Propensity score matching established comparable patient populations (n = 625 per group). Survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression and was corrected for baseline, procedural, and medical parameters. Self-reported adherence to RASI therapy 3 months after hospital discharge was 94%. Three-year all-cause mortality rates were 12.3% and 20.2% for patients with or without RASI, respectively (log-rank <0.001). In the matched study populations, mortality rates were 14.2% vs. 20.0% (log-rank <0.03). RASI was particularly beneficial in patients with ejection fraction <40% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval 0.50 (0.29-0.87)], EuroScore II ≥4% [HR 0.47 (0.35-0.65)], or low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis [HR 0.53 (0.31-0.93)] who were also on beta-blockers and statins. An association between discharge dosage and survival was observed, with HR 0.75 (0.58-0.96) and 0.57 (0.44-0.72) for patients on <50% and ≥50% target dose, respectively. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) reduced mortality rates similarly (13.9% vs. 9.8%, log-rank 0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

The beneficial association between RASI after TAVI and improved survival during follow-up is particularly evident in high-risk patients and may be dose dependent. No superiority was noted in the effectiveness of ACEI or ARB.

Systemic blood pressure in severe aortic stenosis: Haemodynamic correlates and long-term prognostic impact

AIMS

Blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) are controversial. This study sought to describe the haemodynamic profile and the clinical outcome of severe AS patients with low versus high central meaarterial pressure (MAP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with severe AS (n = 477) underwent right and left heart catheterization prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). The population was divided into MAP quartiles. The mean systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MAP in the entire population were 149 ± 25, 68 ± 11, and 98 ± 14 mmHg. Patients in the lowest MAP quartile had the lowest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systemic vascular resistance, and valvulo-arterial impedance, whereas there were no significant differences in mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and stroke volume index across MAP quartiles. However, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) was lowest in patients in the lowest and highest in those in the highest MAP quartile. After a median (interquartile range) post-AVR follow-up of 3.7 (2.6-5.2) years, mortality was highest in patients in the lowest MAP quartile [hazard ratio 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.21-7.83); P = 0.02 for lowest versus highest quartile]. In the multivariate analysis, lower MAP [hazard ratio 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99) per 10 mmHg increase; P = 0.04], higher mean right atrial pressure and lower LVEF were independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

In severe AS patients, lower MAP reflects lower systemic vascular resistance and valvulo-arterial impedance, which may help to preserve stroke volume and filling pressures despite reduced left ventricular performance, and lower MAP is a predictor of higher long-term post-AVR mortality.

Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions

Degenerative calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease and often co-exists with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction at the time of diagnosis. Impaired LV systolic function has been associated with worse outcomes in the setting of AS, even after successful aortic valve replacement (AVR). Myocyte apoptosis and myocardial fibrosis are the 2 key mechanisms responsible for the transition from the initial adaptation phase of LV hypertrophy to the phase of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Novel advanced imaging methods, based on echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, can detect LV dysfunction and remodeling at an early and reversible stage, with important implications for the optimal timing of AVR especially in patients with asymptomatic severe AS. Furthermore, the advent of transcatheter AVR as a first-line treatment for AS with excellent procedural outcomes, and evidence that even moderate AS portends worse prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients, has raised the question of early valve intervention in this patient population. With this review, we describe the pathophysiology and outcomes of LV systolic dysfunction in the setting of AS, present imaging predictors of LV recovery after AVR, and discuss future directions in the treatment of AS extending beyond the traditional indications defined in the current guidelines.

The clinical outcomes of reni-angiotensin system inhibitors for patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The objective of our systematic reviews and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of RAS inhibitors for patients after TAVR.

Methods and results

We performed a comprehensive search for Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane databases from inception to May 1, 2022. The analysis of all outcomes was performed using the random-effects model. In total, 7 articles with a total of 32,585 patients (RAS inhibitor, N = 14,871; Controls, N = 17,714) were included in our study. There was a significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.76, 95%Cl = 0.68 to 0.86, P < 0.01), cardiovascular death (RR = 0.66, 95%Cl = 0.59-0.74, P < 0.01) and HF readmission (RR = 0.87, 95%Cl = 0.80-0.94, P < 0.01) in patients with RAS inhibitors compared with controls. Patients with RAS inhibitors also had lower rates of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95%Cl = 0.76-0.89, P < 0.01) and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.73, 95%Cl, 0.62-0.85, P < 0.01) after propensity matching.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our systematic reviews and meta-analysis demonstrated that RAS inhibitors could improve the clinical outcomes for patients after TAVR. Further large and high-quality trials should be conducted to support the use of RAS inhibitors for patients after TAVR.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries

Background

The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of systemic inflammation has been associated with worse prognosis in several chronic disease states, including heart failure. However, few data exist on the prognostic impact of elevated baseline NLR or change in NLR levels during follow‐up in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) for aortic stenosis.

Methods and Results

NLR was available in 5881 patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR or SAVR in PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) I, II, and S3 trials/registries (median [Q1, Q3] NLR, 3.30 [2.40, 4.90]); mean NLR, 4.10; range, 0.5–24.9) and was evaluated as continuous variable and categorical tertiles (low: NLR ≤2.70, n=1963; intermediate: NLR 2.70–4.20, n=1958; high: NLR ≥4.20, n=1960). No patients had known baseline infection. High baseline NLR was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 3 years (58.4% versus 41.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18–1.63; P<0.0001) compared with those with low NLR, irrespective of treatment modality. In both patients treated with TAVR and patients treated with SAVR, NLR decreased between baseline and 2 years. A 1‐unit observed decrease in NLR between baseline and 1 year was associated with lower risk of death or rehospitalization between 1 year and 3 years (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82–0.89; P<0.0001).

Conclusions

Elevated baseline NLR was independently associated with increased subsequent mortality and rehospitalization after TAVR or SAVR. The observed decrease in NLR after TAVR or SAVR was associated with improved outcomes.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00530894, NCT0134313, NCT02184442, NCT03225001, NCT0322141.

Associations between medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and long-term mortality: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry

AIMS

The association between the use of statins, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and/or β-blockers and long-term mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients with AS who underwent isolated first-time SAVR in Sweden from 2006 to 2017 and survived 6 months after discharge were included. Individual patient data from four mandatory nationwide registries were merged. Cox proportional hazards models, with time-updated data on medication status and adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, type of prosthesis, and year of surgery, were used to investigate associations between dispensed statins, RAS inhibitors, and β-blockers and all-cause mortality. In total, 9553 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 4.9 years (range 0-11); 1738 patients (18.2%) died during follow-up. Statins were dispensed to 49.1% and 49.0% of the patients within 6 months of discharge from the hospital and after 10 years, respectively. Corresponding figures were 51.4% and 53.9% for RAS inhibitors and 79.3% and 60.7% for β-blockers. Ongoing treatment was associated with lower mortality risk for statins {adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.67 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.60-0.74]; P < 0.001} and RAS inhibitors [aHR 0.84 (0.76-0.93); P < 0.001] but not for β-blockers [aHR 1.17 (1.05-1.30); P = 0.004]. The associations were robust in subgroups based on age, sex, and comorbidities (P for interactions >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large population-based real-world study support the use of statins and RAS inhibitors for patients who underwent SAVR due to AS.

Changes in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during cardiac remodeling after mitral valvuloplasty in dogs

BACKGROUND

Information regarding changes in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) during cardiac remodeling after mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) in dogs remains lacking.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To assess the longitudinal effects of MVP on circulating RAAS activity.

ANIMALS

Eight client-owned dogs receiving MVP for myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD).

METHODS

This is a cohort study. Plasma renin activity (PRA), angiotensin II (AT2), aldosterone (PAC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine concentrations, were measured in these dogs before (baseline) and at 3 consecutive monthly follow-ups (Post-1M, Post-2M, Post-3M). Echocardiography was concomitantly used to assess the process of cardiac recovery after MVP.

RESULTS

The echocardiography revealed a significant decrease in LVIDDN, LA/Ao, FS, E velocity, E/A, E' sep, S' lat, E' lat, and A' lat after MVP compared with baseline (P < .05). There was a significant reduction in the PRA (2.45, 3.05, 2.74 vs 8.8 ng/mL/h; P = .002), AT2 (466, 315, 235 vs 1200 pg/mL; P = .009), and PAC (39.88, 47, 54.62 vs 179.5 pg/mL; P = .01), respectively at Post-1M, Post-2M, Post-3M compared to the baseline. Additionally, BUN and creatinine concentrations decreased from Post-1M. The RAAS variables showed significant, weak to moderate, relationship with selected echocardiographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Mitral valvuloplasty contributes to decreased RAAS activity in MMVD dogs, which paralleled the process of cardiac reverse remodeling up to Post-3M. This information facilitates formulating strategies to optimize clinical outcomes for dogs after MVP.

Arterial Hypertension in Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Critical Update

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a very common valve disease and is associated with high mortality once it becomes symptomatic. Arterial hypertension (HT) has a high prevalence among patients with AS leading to worse left ventricle remodeling and faster degeneration of the valve. HT also interferes with the assessment of the severity of AS, leading to an underestimation of the real degree of stenosis. Treatment of HT in AS has not historically been pursued due to the fear of excess reduction in afterload without a possibility of increasing stroke volume due to the fixed aortic valve, but most recent evidence shows that several drugs are safe and effective in reducing BP in patients with HT and AS. RAAS inhibitors and beta-blockers provide benefit in selected populations based on their profile of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Different drugs, on the other hand, have proved to be unsafe, such as calcium channel blockers, or simply not easy enough to handle to be recommended in clinical practice, such as PDE5i, MRA or sodium nitroprusside. The present review highlights all available studies on HT and AS to guide antihypertensive treatment.

Rationale and design of the Dapagliflozin after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (DapaTAVI) randomized trial

AIMS

Despite aortic stenosis (AS) relief, patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at increased risk of developing heart failure (HF) within first months of intervention. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization in individuals with diabetes mellitus, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease. However, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on outcomes after TAVI is unknown. The Dapagliflozin after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (DapaTAVI) trial is designed to assess the clinical benefit and safety of the SGLT-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

DapaTAVI is an independent pragmatic, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label blinded endpoint, multicentre trial conducted in Spain, evaluating the effect of dapagliflozin 10 mg/day on the risk of death and worsening HF in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. Candidate patients should have prior history of HF admission plus ≥1 of the following criteria: (i) diabetes mellitus, (ii) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, or (iii) estimated glomerular filtration rate between 25 and 75 ml/min/1.73 m² . A total of 1020 patients will be randomized (1:1) to dapagliflozin vs. no dapagliflozin. Key secondary outcomes include: (i) incidence rate of individual components of the primary outcome; (ii) cardiovascular mortality; (iii) the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death; and (iv) total number of HF rehospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

DapaTAVI will determine the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in a broad spectrum of frail patients after AS relief by TAVI.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized, open-label blinded endpoint control trial

Background

With the expanded utilization of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to younger and lower surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), optimal medical therapy after TAVI procedure has become the main concern. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) are widely utilized in the area of cardiovascular disease including heart failure and myocardial infarction and revealed the ability to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Interests have, thus, been drawn in investigating whether the prescription of RASi after the TAVI procedure can prevent or reverse cardiac remodeling and improve long-term clinical outcomes. No recommendation regarding the prescription of RASi after TAVI is proposed yet due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials, especially in the Chinese population. We, therefore, designed this randomized controlled trial to explore the effect of adding fosinopril to standard care in patients who underwent a successful TAVI procedure on the LV remodeling.

Methods

A total of 200 post-TAVI patients from seven academic hospitals across China will be recruited and randomized with a ratio of 1:1 to receive standard care or standard care plus fosinopril. Follow-up visits will take place at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months from randomization to assess the clinical symptoms, any adverse events, cardiac function, and quality of life. Cardiac magnetic resonance will be performed at baseline and repeated at the 24-month follow-up visit to assess LV remodeling.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence regarding medical therapy for AS patients who underwent TAVI and filling the gap in the Chinese population.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100042266. Registered on 17 January 2021

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05411-5.

Comparison of long-term mortality in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with or without anti-atherosclerotic therapy

Atherosclerosis is a risk factor for both aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease. This study aimed to investigate whether anti-atherosclerotic therapy (AT), defined as the simultaneous use of antiplatelet agents, statins, and renin aldosterone system inhibitors, had long-term clinical benefits for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Between October 2013 and May 2017, 2518 patients (31% men; median age, 85 years) who underwent TAVR in 14 Japanese centers were divided into two groups: patients who were prescribed anti-atherosclerotic therapy (AT, n = 567) and patients who were not (no AT, n = 1951). The median follow-up period for this cohort was 693 days (interquartile range, 389-870 days). Compared to no AT group, AT group was associated with significantly lower 2-year all-cause mortality (11.7% vs. 16.5%; log-rank p = 0.002) and 2-year cardiovascular mortality rates (3.5% vs. 6.0%; log-rank p = 0.017). In a propensity-matched cohort (n = 495 each; median follow-up, 710 days [IQR, 394 - 896 days]), patients in AT group had a lower prevalence of 2-year cardiovascular mortality (3.8% vs. 6.2%, log-rank p = 0.024) than that in the no AT group. In the multivariate stepwise regression analysis, AT was a significant predictor of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.80; p = 0.007). AT may improve survival in post-TAVR patients. Future studies are necessary to identify an optimal treatment regimen to improve long-term outcomes after TAVR.

Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

Over the last half century, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has evolved to offer a durable and efficient valve haemodynamically, with low procedural complications that allows favourable remodelling of left ventricular (LV) structure and function. The latter has become more challenging among elderly patients, particularly following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Precise understanding of myocardial adaptation to pressure and volume overloading and its responses to valve surgery requires comprehensive assessments from aortic valve energy loss, valvular-vascular impedance to myocardial activation, force-velocity relationship, and myocardial strain. LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis remains as the structural and morphological focus in this endeavour. Early intervention in asymptomatic aortic stenosis or regurgitation along with individualised management of hypertension and atrial fibrillation is likely to improve patient outcome. Physiological pacing via the His-Purkinje system for conduction abnormalities, further reduction in para-valvular aortic regurgitation along with therapy of angiotensin receptor blockade will improve patient outcome by facilitating hypertrophy regression, LV coordinate contraction, and global vascular function. TAVI leaflet thromboses require anticoagulation while impaired access to coronary ostia risks future TAVI-in-TAVI or coronary interventions. Until comparable long-term durability and the resolution of TAVI related complications become available, SAVR remains the first choice for lower risk younger patients.

Hypertension in aortic stenosis: a focused review and recommendations for clinical practice

: In patients with aortic stenosis, the presence of hypertension negatively affects the hemodynamic severity of the stenosis, and worsens adverse left ventricular remodeling. It accelerates the progression of the stenosis and is associated with worse prognosis. Proper management of hypertension is thus crucial but there are concerns about the safety and efficacy of antihypertensive medications as well as uncertainty about optimal blood pressure (BP) targets and their impact on left ventricular mass regression and survival benefits. In the present review, we discuss these issues based on the evidence available in the current literature. Focus is first directed on the consequences of a persistently elevated BP before and after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter valve implantation, and the clinical significance of an abnormal BP response during exercise in patients with significant aortic stenosis. Available data on use of antihypertensive drugs are then critically addressed, the conclusion being that calcium channel blockers may be associated with lower survival, and that diuretics may have disadvantages in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and smaller left ventricular cavity dimensions, β-blockers may be well tolerated and a better choice for patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and arrhythmias. Renin--angiotensin system blockers improve survival given either before or after valve intervention. Emphasis is placed on the fact that evidence is not derived from randomized trials but only from observational studies. Finally, we discuss the optimal SBP level to reach in patients with aortic stenosis. Again, randomized trials are not available but observational evidence suggests that values between 130 and 139 mmHg systolic and 70-90 mmHg diastolic might represent the best option, and lower BP targets should probably be avoided.

The year in cardiology: valvular heart disease

Collapse

Meta-analysis of impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

INTRODUCTION

To determine whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) prescription is associated with better survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we performed the first meta-analysis of currently available studies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

To identify all studies reporting impact of RASI prescription on survival after TAVI, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, etc. through October 2019. We extracted adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard ratios (HRs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) of midterm (up to ≥6-month) all-cause mortality for RASI prescription from each study and combined study-specific estimates using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic HRs in the random-effects model.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 13 eligible studies with a total of 26,132 TAVI patients and included them in the present meta-analysis. None was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were observational studies comparing patients with versus without RASI prescription (including 3 propensity score matched studies), and 8 were observational studies investigating RASI prescription as one of covariates. The primary meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated that RASI prescription was associated with significantly lower midterm mortality (HR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.92; P=0.0002). Although we identified significant funnel plot asymmetry (P=0.036 by the rank correlation test) suggesting publication bias, correcting for it using the trim-and-fill method did not substantially alter the result favoring RASI prescription (corrected HR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

RASI prescription may be associated with better midterm survival after TAVI.

Optimal Medical Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Limited data exist on optimal medical therapy post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for late cardiovascular events prevention. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of beta-blocker (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi), and their combination on outcomes following successful TAVI. In a consecutive cohort of 1,684 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, the status of BB and RASi treatment at discharge was collected, and patients were classified into 4 groups: no-treatment, BB alone, RASi alone, and combination groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF) at 2-year. There were 415 (25%), 462 (27%), 349 (21%), and 458 (27%) patients in no-treatment, BB alone, RASi alone, and combination groups, respectively. The primary outcome was lower in RASi alone (21%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]_adj: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.81) and combination (22%; HR_adj: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.72) groups than in no-treatment group (34%) but no significant difference between RASi alone and combination groups (HR_adj: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.62). The primary outcome results were maintained in a sensitivity analysis of patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, RASi treatment was an independent predictor of 2-year all-cause mortality (HR_adj: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.90), while that was not observed in BB therapy (HR_adj: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.25). In conclusion, post-TAVI treatment with RASi, but not with BB, was associated with lower all-cause mortality and HHF at 2-year. The combination of RASi and BB did not add an incremental reduction in the primary outcome over RASi alone.

Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the impact of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

The impact of RAS inhibitors on outcomes after TAVR was unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review of articles comparing outcomes of patients using and not using RAS inhibitors after TAVR was performed through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Primary outcome was midterm all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with the corresponding 95% confidence interval using random effect models.

RESULTS

Five studies with 23,319 patients were included. Patients treated with RAS inhibitors had lower midterm all-cause mortality after TAVR than those without RAS inhibitors in both the unmatched (13.3 vs. 17.2%, RR 0.77, p = .005) and propensity score matched cohorts (13.5 vs 16.2%, RR 0.83, p < .001). Cardiovascular mortality (10.4 vs. 15.6%, RR 0.68, p < .001), rate of heart failure readmission (12.2 vs. 14.5%, RR 0.80, p = .006), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (14.0 vs. 23.7%, RR 0.73, p = .003) were also lower with RAS inhibitors. No difference was found between two groups regarding cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, and moderate/severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

RAS inhibitors were associated with lower midterm all-cause mortality after TAVR.

Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on Pharmacological Treatment of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), the most common heart valve disease, is characterized by the slow progressive fibro-calcific remodeling of the valve leaflets, leading to progressive obstruction to the blood flow. CAVS is an increasing health care burden and the development of an effective medical treatment is a major medical need. To date, no effective pharmacological therapies have proven to halt or delay its progression to the severe symptomatic stage and aortic valve replacement represents the only available option to improve clinical outcomes and to increase survival. In the present report, the current knowledge and latest advances in the medical management of patients with CAVS are summarized, placing emphasis on lipid-lowering agents, vasoactive drugs, and anti-calcific treatments. In addition, novel potential therapeutic targets recently identified and currently under investigation are reported.

Pre- and Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Serum Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels and All-Cause Mortality

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited to and is based on clinical judgment and surgical scoring systems. Serum natriuretic peptides are used for general risk stratification in patients with aortic stenosis, reflecting the increase in their afterload and thereby stressing the need for valve intervention. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of pre- and post-procedural serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) on 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent TAVR.

METHODS

In this population-based study, we included 148 TAVR patients treated at the Poriya Medical Center between June 1, 2015, and May 31, 2018. Routine blood samples for serum BNP levels (pg/mL) were taken just before the TAVR and 24 h post-TAVR. Our primary clinical outcome was defined as 1-year all-cause mortality. We used backward regression models and included all variables that had a p value <0.1 in the univariable analysis. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was calculated for the prediction of all-cause mortality by serum BNP levels using the median as the cut-off point.

RESULTS

In this study cohort, BNP levels 24 h post-TAVR higher than the cohort median versus lower than the cohort median (387.5 pg/mL; IQR 195-817.6) were the strongest predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 9; 95% CI 2.72-30.16; p < 0.001). The statistically significant relationship was seen in the unadjusted regression model as well as after the adjustment for clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum BNP levels 24 h post-procedure were found to be a meaningful marker in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in patients after TAVR procedure.

Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension confers a poor prognosis in moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS), however, antihypertensive therapy (AHT) is often not prescribed due to the perceived deleterious effects of vasodilation and negative inotropes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and grey literature were searched without language restrictions up to 9 September 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments from a systematic search of observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing AHT with a placebo or no AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS for any parameter of efficacy and safety outcomes. Conflicts were resolved by the third reviewer. Meta-analysis with pooled effect sizes using random-effects model, were estimated in R.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, Left Ventricular (LV) Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and LV ejection fraction RESULTS: From 3025 publications, 31 studies (26 500 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 24 studies in the meta-analysis. AHT was not associated with mortality when all studies were pooled, but heterogeneity was substantial across studies. The effect size of AHT differed according to drug class. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) were associated with reduced risk of mortality (Pooled HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80, p=0.006), The differences in changes of haemodynamic or echocardiographic parameters from baseline with and without AHT did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

AHT appears safe, is well tolerated. RAASi were associated with clinical benefit in patients with moderate or severe AS.

Protection of Sacubitril/Valsartan against Pathological Cardiac Remodeling by Inhibiting the NLRP3 Inflammasome after Relief of Pressure Overload in Mice

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The persistent existence of pathological cardiac remodeling, resulting from aortic stenosis, is related to poor clinical prognosis after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val), comprising an angiotensin receptor blocker and a neprilysin inhibitor, has been demonstrated to have a beneficial effect against pathological cardiac remodeling, including cardiac fibrosis and inflammation in heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine whether Sac/Val exerts a cardioprotective effect after pressure unloading in mice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Male C57BL/6 J mice were subjected to debanding (DB) surgery after 8 weeks (wk) of aortic banding (AB). Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography, which indicated a protective effect of Sac/Val after DB. After treatment with Sac/Val post DB, decreased heart weight and myocardial cell size were observed in mouse hearts. In addition, histological analysis, immunofluorescence, and western blot results showed that Sac/Val attenuated cardiac fibrosis and inflammation after DB. Finally, our data indicated that Sac/Val treatment could significantly suppress NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in mice after relief of pressure overload.

CONCLUSION

Sac/Val exerted its beneficial effects to prevent maladaptive cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction in mice following pressure unloading, which was at least partly due to the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation.

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Aortic Stenosis: Implications Before and After Aortic Valve Replacement

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular heart disease in the aging population that is characterized by a variable period of asymptomatic phase before development of symptoms and severe AS. Mortality and morbidity is substantial even after aortic valve replacement, in part related to persistent left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and heart failure. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade therapy is associated with modulation of adverse left ventricular remodeling, reduction in myocardial hypertrophy, and fibrosis, resulting in clinical improvements in patients with congestive heart failure There are emerging data to suggest benefit of RAS blockade in patients with AS before and after AVR with regard to potentially slower progression of aortic valve calcification, left ventricular mass and survival benefit in favor of RAS blockade group before AVR, and also survival benefit in patients after AVR. We review the available data to understand the role of RAS blockade before AVR and in patients undergoing surgical AVR and transcatheter AVR. There are significant survival advantages of RAS inhibition in patients with AS undergoing surgical AVR or transcatheter AVR. On the basis of existing literature, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to evaluate the role of RAS inhibition in patients with AS.

Dose-Dependent Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

There is growing body of evidence from retrospective studies that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade is associated with improved outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, it remains unknown whether the effect of RAS blockade is dose dependent. The current study sought to assess the dose-dependent effect of RAS blockade on survival and left-ventricular (LV) remodelling after TAVR.

METHODS

Patients who were enrolled into our observational TAVR study at our institution were retrospectively assessed according to different doses of RAS blockade: group 1 (no RAS blockade), group 2 (25% of maximum daily dose), group 3 (50% of maximum daily dose), and group 4 (full daily dose).

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients between January 2015 and September 2019 were included. Patients with higher doses of RAS blockade showed a trend toward higher overall survival at 3-year follow-up (56% with no RAS blockade vs 66% with the 25% dose vs 79% with the 50% dose vs 78% with the full dose; P = 0.063). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the difference in survival was significant (P = 0.042). Besides New York Heart Association class and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), RAS blockade dose was identified as independent predictor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.97; P = 0.03). With respect to LV remodelling, a significantly larger reduction of LV mass index was observed during the follow-up with higher doses of RAS blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the impact of RAS blockade treatment on clinical outcome and LV remodelling after TAVR is dose dependent.

Determinants and Impact of Heart Failure Readmission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background:

Heart failure (HF) readmission is common post–transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Nonetheless, limited data are available regarding its predictors and clinical impact. This study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and impact of HF readmission within 1-year post-TAVR, and assessed the effects of the prescription of HF therapies at discharge on the risk of HF readmission and death.

Methods:

Patients included in the TAVR registry of a single expert center from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed. Competing-risk and Cox regressions were performed to identify predictors of HF readmission and death.

Results:

Among 750 patients, 102 (13.6%) were readmitted for HF within 1-year post-TAVR. Overall, 53 patients (7.1%) experienced late readmissions (>30 days post-TAVR), and 17 (2.3%) had multiple readmissions. In ≈30% of readmissions, no trigger could be identified. Predominant causes of readmissions were changes in medication/nonadherence and supraventricular arrhythmia. Independent predictors of HF readmission included diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, previous acute HF, grade III or IV aortic regurgitation, and pulmonary hypertension both at discharge from the index hospitalization but not HF therapies. Overall, HF readmission did not significantly impact all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% CI, 0.99–1.85]). However, late (HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.30–2.78]) and multiple HF readmissions (HR, 2.10 [95% CI,1.17–3.76]) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors at discharge was associated with a lower rate of all-cause mortality, especially among patients receiving doses of 25% to <50% (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]) and 75% to 100% (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37–0.98]) of the optimal daily dose.

Conclusions:

HF readmission is common within 1-year of TAVR. Late and multiple HF readmissions associate with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality. Baseline comorbidities (diabetes, chronic lung disease, previous acute HF) and echocardiographic findings at discharge (grade III or IV aortic regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension) identified patients at high risk of HF readmission.