Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Lung Cancer

Checkpoint Inhibitors, CAR T Cells, and the Hemostatic System: What Do We Know So Far?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are novel therapeutic strategies that enhance anticancer immunity by activating or engineering cancer-targeting T cells. The resulting hyperinflammation carries several side effects, ranging from autoimmune-like symptoms to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with potentially severe consequences. Recent findings indicate that ICIs increase the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic adverse events. Patients with prior VTE might be at higher risk of developing new events under ICI while other risk factors vary across studies. So far, data on CAR T-linked coagulopathies are limited. Hypofibrinogenemia in the presence of CRS is the most commonly observed dysregulation of hemostatic parameters. A rare but particularly severe adverse event is the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation activation, which can occur in the setting of CRS and may be linked to immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. While the increasing number of studies on thromboembolic complications and coagulation alterations under ICIs and CAR T therapies are concerning, these results might be influenced by the retrospective study design and the heterogeneous patient populations. Importantly, numerous promising new T cell-based immunotherapies are currently under investigation for various cancers and are expected to become very prominent therapy options in the near future. Therefore, coagulopathies and thrombosis under T cell-directed immuno- and anti-cancer therapies is important. Our review provides an overview of the current understanding of ICI- and CAR T-associated thromboembolism. We discuss pathogenic mechanisms of inflammation-associated coagulation activation and explore potential biomarkers for VTE.

Myocarditis prediction in locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer patients with cardiac parameters abnormalities undergoing immunotherapy: development and validation of a risk assessment model

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for advanced lung cancer, yet their cardiotoxicity, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis, poses significant clinical challenges. This study aims to create a predictive model using cardiac biomarkers to identify patients prone to myocarditis during treatment, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 1,838 patients with locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer and abnormal baseline cardiac parameters receiving immunotherapy from June 2018 to August 2024 were analyzed, with a follow-up date cutoff of September 20, 2024. Patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatments, and cardiac parameters of these patients prior to immunotherapy. A nomogram was constructed via multivariable logistic regression, and AUC and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were performed to verify the accuracy of the model.

RESULTS

Among 1,838 patients, 89 (4.84%) developed myocarditis. Independent predictors included α-HBDH > 910 U/L (OR = 10.57, 95%CI: 2.47-45.22, P = 0.001), CK-MB > 15 ng/mL (OR = 3.87, 95%CI: 1.06-14.11, P = 0.040), hs-cTnT elevation (14-28 pg/mL: OR = 4.19; 28-42 pg/mL: OR = 13.10; >42 pg/mL: OR = 25.43, P < 0.001), NT-proBNP > 3× age-adjusted upper limit (OR = 9.72, 95%CI: 1.09-86.73, P = 0.042), and Caprini score ≥ 4 (OR = 4.49, 95%CI: 2.26-8.90, P < 0.001). The nomogram demonstrated strong discrimination ability, with an AUC of 0.831 in the training cohort (sensitivity: 0.842, specificity: 0.717) and an AUC of 0.844 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes a validated risk assessment model integrating cardiac biomarkers (α-HBDH, CK-MB, hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP) and Caprini risk score to predict ICI-related myocarditis in lung cancer patients with cardiac abnormalities. The tool facilitates early identification of high-risk patients, enabling tailored monitoring and preemptive management. These findings underscore the critical role of baseline cardiac profiling in optimizing immunotherapy safety.

Long-term and short-term cardiovascular disease mortality among patients of 21 non-metastatic cancers

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies on cardiovascular disease (CVD) death risk in cancer patients mostly focused on overall cancer, age subgroups and single cancers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the CVD death risk in non-metastatic cancer patients at 21 cancer sites.

METHODS

A total of 1,672,561 non-metastatic cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) datebase (1975-2018) were included in this population-based study, with a median follow-up of 12·7 years. The risk of CVD deaths was assessed using proportions, competing-risk regression, absolute excess risks (AERs), and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs).

RESULTS

In patients with localized cancers, the proportion of CVD death and cumulative mortality from CVD in the high-competing risk group (14 of 21 unique cancers) surpassed that of primary neoplasm after cancer diagnosis. The SMRs and AERs of CVD were found higher in patients with non-metastatic cancer than the general US population (SMR 1·96 [95 %CI, 1·95-1·97]-19·85[95 %CI, 16·69-23·44]; AER 5·77-210·48), heart disease (SMR 1·94[95 %CI, 1·93-1·95]-19·25[95 %CI, 15·76-23·29]; AER 4·36-159·10) and cerebrovascular disease (SMR 2·05[95 %CI, 2·02-2·08]-24·71[95 %CI, 16·28-35·96]; AER 1·01-37·44) deaths. In the high-competing risk group, CVD-related SMR in patients with localized stage cancer increased with survival time but followed a reverse-dipper pattern in the low-competing risk group (7 of 21 cancers). The high-competing risk group had higher CVD-related death risks than the low-competing risk group.

CONCLUSION

The CVD death risk in patients with non-metastatic cancer varied by cancer stage, site and survival time. The risk of CVD mortality is higher in 14 out of 21 localized cancers (high-competing cancers). Targeted strategies for CVD management in non-metastatic cancer patients are needed.

Characteristics, Incidence, and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Real-World Practice-A Retrospective Study in Chinese Han Population

Purpose

This study aimed to elaborate on the incidence, clinical features, and management of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in real-world practice.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review study on patients receiving at least one dose of ICI therapy at a Chinese tertiary hospital from March 2020 to March 2021. CVAEs were identified through clinical assessment and the Naranjo algorithm. The management and outcomes of CVAEs were monitored over a median follow-up duration of 8 months.

Results

Among the included 203 patients, 4.4% (9/203) developed CVAEs, including heart failure (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2), myocarditis (n = 2), and pericardial disease (n = 2), with a proportion (6/9) tending to be severe (grade 3 or grade 4). CVAEs were more common in older patients (mean age: 73.6 ± 9.2 years) and those with hypertension (p = 0.02) or heart failure (p = 0.01). Adherence to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for managing CVAEs was low (44%), with most cases showing partial resolution by the last follow-up.

Conclusion

We reported that the incidence of ICI-related CVAEs in the Chinese institution was higher than that in some prior studies. Adherence to guidelines for managing ICI-related CVAEs is found to be suboptimal in real-world practice and highlighted as a needed improvement.

Accelerated Coronary Artery Disease in a Patient With Advanced Lung Cancer: Interplay of Cancer, Inflammation, and Treatment Effects

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and lung cancer are among the most prevalent causes of death worldwide, representing substantial public health challenges. The relationship between coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer is potentially multifaceted, influenced by common risk factors and the adverse cardiac effects of cancer treatments. However, cases of accelerated CAD occurring within a year of cancer treatment initiation are rarely reported. We present a case of a Black American male undergoing combination therapy (chemotherapy/radiotherapy/immunotherapy) for small-cell lung cancer, who developed ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) seven months after beginning treatment. Although we do not have the official records, the patient reported that he had previously undergone a cardiac workup (including an echo/stress test) at an outside facility a year prior, due to persistent dyspnea, which was unremarkable. The patient underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention and was discharged on apixaban and prasugrel. This study underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients receiving lung cancer treatments, emphasizes the need for early recognition of warning signs, and highlights the critical role of risk factor management and enhanced surveillance in this vulnerable population.

Association among major adverse cardiovascular events with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence and overall risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

We systematically searched all cohort studies, including the available MACE data in cancer patients receiving ICIs, in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from their inception to September 5, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of MACEs associated with ICI exposure, and the secondary outcome was the overall risk of MACEs associated with ICI exposure versus non-ICI exposure controls. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used in the random- or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 109,883 cancer patients. In the median follow-up period ranging from 3.3 to 55.2 months, the incidence of MACEs associated with ICI exposure was 8.22%, ranging from 0.55% to 3.98%, among the nine MACEs, including myocarditis, tachyarrhythmia, pericarditis, pericardial effusions, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and conduction disorder. The incidence of MACE associated with non-ICI exposure was 3.84%, ranging from 0.81% to 4.72%. The risks of all-grade MACEs and pericardial effusions were significantly higher in the ICI group than in the non-ICI controls. ICI treatment, age, male sex, and prior radiation therapy were significantly associated with MACEs.

CONCLUSION

The risk of MACEs during ICI treatment in patients with cancer is more common than is currently recognized. ICI use is closely associated with an increased risk of MACEs. Patients at risk were older, male, and had a history of radiation therapy.

Adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac imaging findings in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need to better understand the diverse presentations, risk factors, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated cardiovascular toxicity. There remains a lack of consensus surrounding cardiovascular screening, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making in patients receiving ICIs.

METHODS

We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study including 2165 cancer patients treated with ICIs between 2013 and 2020. The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events (ACE): a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, arrhythmias, heart failure, valvular disease, pericardial disease, and myocarditis. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the individual components of ACE. We additionally conducted an imaging substudy examining imaging characteristics from echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 44% (n = 962/2165) of patients experienced ACE. In a multivariable analysis, dual ICI therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.45), age (HR 1.01, CI 1.00-1.01), male sex (HR 1.18, CI 1.02-1.36), prior arrhythmia (HR 1.22, CI 1.03-1.43), lung cancer (HR 1.17, CI 1.01-1.37), and central nervous system (CNS) malignancy (HR 1.23, CI 1.02-1.47), were independently associated with increased ACE. ACE was independently associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk of mortality (P<0.001). Dual ICI therapy was also associated with a 2.0-fold increased risk of myo/pericarditis (P = 0.045), with myo/pericarditis being associated with a 2.9-fold increased risk of mortality (P<0.001). However, the cardiovascular risks of dual ICI therapy were offset by its mortality benefit, with dual ICI therapy being associated with a ~25% or 1.3-fold decrease in mortality. Of those with echo prior to ICI initiation, 26% (n = 115/442) had abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction or global longitudinal strain, and of those with echo after ICI initiation, 28% (n = 207/740) had abnormalities. Of those who had CMR imaging prior to ICI initiation, 43% (n = 9/21) already had left ventricular dysfunction, 50% (n = 10/20) had right ventricular dysfunction, 32% (n = 6/19) had left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement, and 9% (n = 1/11) had abnormal T2 imaging.

CONCLUSION

Dual ICI therapy, prior arrhythmia, older age, lung and CNS malignancies were independently associated with an increased risk of ACE, and dual ICI therapy was also independently associated with an increased risk of myo/pericarditis, highlighting the utmost importance of cardiovascular risk factor optimization in this particularly high-risk population. Fortunately, the occurrence of myo/pericarditis was relatively uncommon, and the overall cardiovascular risks of dual ICI therapy appeared to be offset by a significant mortality benefit. The use of multimodal cardiac imaging can be helpful in stratifying risk and guiding preventative cardiovascular management in patients receiving ICIs.

Arterial inflammation on [18F]FDG PET/CT in melanoma patients treated with and without immune checkpoint inhibitors: CHECK-FLAME I

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized cancer treatment. However, ICIs may increase the immune response to non-tumor cells, possibly resulting in increased arterial inflammation, raising the risk of atherosclerotic events. Nevertheless, malignancies may induce a pro-inflammatory state and the association between ICIs and arterial inflammation remains to be clarified. This study aims to assess differences in increase in arterial inflammation between patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs compared to a control group without ICIs.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scans at baseline, 6 months (T1) and 18 months (T2) were included in this retrospective observational study. Arterial inflammation was evaluated in eight segments by calculating the target-to-background ratio (TBR). The primary study outcome was the difference in increase in mean TBRmax between patients treated with and without ICIs.

RESULTS

We included 132 patients of whom 72.7 % were treated with ICIs. After exclusion for the use of anti-inflammatory medication, patients treated with ICIs showed a significant increase in mean TBRmax between baseline and T1 from 1.29 ± 0.12 to 1.33 ± 0.13 (p = 0.017), while in the control group, no change in mean TBRmax (1.30 ± 0.12 to 1.28 ± 0.10, p = 0.22) was observed (p = 0.027). During longer follow-up, mean TBRmax remained stable in both groups. Arterial inflammation increased significantly after ICI therapy in patients without active inflammation (p < 0.001) and in patients without calcifications (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant increase in arterial inflammation as measured on [18F]FDG PET/CT was observed in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs only in the first six months after initiation of therapy, whereas no changes were observed in the control group. Moreover, arterial inflammation was mainly increased in patients without pre-existing inflammatory activity and with non-calcified lesions.

Cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer - a scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC and the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology

The advent of immunological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of solid and haematological cancers over the last decade. Licensed therapies which activate the immune system to target cancer cells can be broadly divided into two classes. The first class are antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoint signalling, known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The second class are cell-based immune therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocyte (CAR-T) cell therapies, natural killer (NK) cell therapies, and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The clinical efficacy of all these treatments generally outweighs the risks, but there is a high rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are often unpredictable in timing with clinical sequalae ranging from mild (e.g. rash) to severe or even fatal (e.g. myocarditis, cytokine release syndrome) and reversible to permanent (e.g. endocrinopathies).The mechanisms underpinning irAE pathology vary across different irAE complications and syndromes, reflecting the broad clinical phenotypes observed and the variability of different individual immune responses, and are poorly understood overall. Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities have emerged, and our understanding has evolved from focussing initially on rare but fatal ICI-related myocarditis with cardiogenic shock to more common complications including less severe ICI-related myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, including conduction system disease and heart block, non-inflammatory heart failure, takotsubo syndrome and coronary artery disease. In this scientific statement on the cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer, we summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of ICI, CAR-T, NK, and TIL therapies. We also highlight gaps in the literature and where future research should focus.

Immune checkpoints in cardiac physiology and pathology: therapeutic targets for heart failure

Immune checkpoint molecules are physiological regulators of the adaptive immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, have revolutionized cancer treatment and their clinical use is increasing. However, ICIs can cause various immune-related adverse events, including acute and chronic cardiotoxicity. Of these cardiovascular complications, ICI-induced acute fulminant myocarditis is the most studied, although emerging clinical and preclinical data are uncovering the importance of other ICI-related chronic cardiovascular complications, such as accelerated atherosclerosis and non-myocarditis-related heart failure. These complications could be more difficult to diagnose, given that they might only be present alongside other comorbidities. The occurrence of these complications suggests a potential role of immune checkpoint molecules in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis, and disruption of physiological immune checkpoint signalling might thus lead to cardiac pathologies, including heart failure. Although inflammation is a long-known contributor to the development of heart failure, the therapeutic targeting of pro-inflammatory pathways has not been successful thus far. The increasingly recognized role of immune checkpoint molecules in the failing heart highlights their potential use as immunotherapeutic targets for heart failure. In this Review, we summarize the available data on ICI-induced cardiac dysfunction and heart failure, and discuss how immune checkpoint signalling is altered in the failing heart. Furthermore, we describe how pharmacological targeting of immune checkpoints could be used to treat heart failure.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have uncommon associations with cardiotoxicity, yet these cardiotoxic effects are associated with high mortality. An accurate assessment of risk for cardiotoxicity is essential for clinical decision-making, but data from randomized controlled trials often differ from real-world observational studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed, including phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) reporting myocarditis or pericardial disease, myocardial infarction, or stroke with an immunotherapy. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to pool results between ICIs and other cancer therapy in RCTs and OSs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. In total, 54 RCTs (N=38 264) and 24 OSs (N=12 561 455) were included. In RCTs, ICI use resulted in higher risk of myocarditis (OR, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.10-5.98]), pericardial disease (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.57-4.77]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.03-3.25]), compared with non-ICI (placebo or chemotherapy). In OSs, ICI use was not associated with myocarditis, pericardial disease, or myocardial infarction compared with controls; however, combination ICIs demonstrated higher risk of myocarditis compared with single ICI use (OR, 3.07 [95% CI, 1.28-7.39]). Stroke risk was not increased with use of ICIs in RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated increased risk of ICI myocarditis, pericardial disease, and myocardial infarction in RCTs but not OSs. Results of this study suggest there are differences between ICI cardiotoxicity risk, possibly suggesting differences in diagnoses and management, in clinical trials versus the OSs.

Immunotherapy-associated cardiovascular toxicities: insights from preclinical and clinical studies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely accepted and effective treatment for various types of solid tumors. Recent studies suggest that cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) specifically have an incidence rate ranging from 1.14% to more than 5%. Myocarditis is the most common observed cardiovascular irAE. Others include arrhythmias, pericardial diseases, vasculitis, and a condition resembling takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) pathway, and the recently discovered lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) pathway, play a critical role in boosting the body's natural immune response against cancer cells. While ICIs offer significant benefits in terms of augmenting immune function, they can also give rise to unwanted inflammatory side effects known as irAEs. The occurrence of irAEs can vary in severity, ranging from mild to severe, and can impact the overall clinical efficacy of these agents. This review aims to summarize the underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular irAE from both preclinical and clinical studies for a better understanding of cardiovascular irAE in clinical application.

Cardiovascular disease and lung cancer

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death. While survival rates have improved with advancements in cancer therapeutics, additional health challenges have surfaced. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with lung cancer. CVD and lung cancer share many risk factors, such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes, advanced age, and obesity. Optimal management of this patient population requires a full understanding of the potential cardiovascular (CV) complications of lung cancer treatment. This review outlines the common shared risk factors, the spectrum of cardiotoxicities associated with lung cancer therapeutics, and prevention and management of short- and long-term CVD in patients with non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell (SCLC) lung cancer. Due to the medical complexity of these patients, multidisciplinary collaborative care among oncologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, and other providers is essential.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicity with combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) have been investigated for the treatment of several tumor types. Both ICIs and AIs may lead to cardiovascular adverse events, and their combination may potentially increase the risk for cardiovascular toxicity. In the present meta-analysis, we aim to assess the cardiovascular toxicity of ICIs plus AIs vs. AIs alone. Secondary objectives are non-cardiovascular adverse events and efficacy.

Methods

Systematic review was performed according to PRISMA statement. Phase II and III randomized clinical trials were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts, from inception to June 2022. The pooled risks for overall response rate (ORR), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), immune-related AEs, (irAEs), hypertension, and vascular events defined as stroke, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolisms, were calculated.

Results

In terms of cardiovascular toxicity, we found higher risk for severe hypertension among patients treated with ICIs plus AIs as compared with those receiving AIs (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53), but no significant difference was found for any-grade hypertension, and for vascular events. There was also no difference in terms of overall AEs, whereas the incidence of irAEs was increased in the ICIs plus AIs arm, as expected. In terms of efficacy, ICIs plus AIs achieved better ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.70-2.97) and PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.63) as compared to AIs alone.

Conclusion

The addition of ICIs to AIs significantly increased the risk of high-grade hypertension, but not that of acute vascular events.

Impact of a Cancer History on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction Who Received Revascularization

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether a cancer history increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo revascularization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who were confirmed as type 1 acute MI (AMI) by coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who died in hospital or those not undergoing revascularization were excluded. Patients with a cancer history were compared with those without it. A cancer history was examined in the in-hospital cancer registry. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, recurrent type 1 MI, post-discharge coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Among 551 AMI patients, 55 had a cancer history (cancer group) and 496 did not (non-cancer group). Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-2.82). Among the cancer group, patients who were diagnosed as AMI within 6 months after the cancer diagnosis had a higher risk of the composite endpoint than those who were diagnosed as AMI 6 months or later after the cancer diagnosis (adjusted HR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.55-19.07).

CONCLUSIONS

A cancer history increased the risk of CV events after discharge among AMI patients after revascularization.

Major adverse cardiovascular events in advanced-stage lung cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Background

Lung cancers are common worldwide. First-line targeted therapy and chemotherapy are both standard treatments in the current guidelines. With the development of new anticancer therapy, the lifespan of patients with late-stage lung cancer has increased. Cardiovascular events can occur during cancer treatment. This observational study aimed to report the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after cancer treatment using real-world data.

Objectives

Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage lung cancer between January 2011 and December 2017 were enrolled. Data were collected from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD).

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Baseline characteristics, clinical stages, pathologies, and outcomes were retrieved from the CGRD.

Results

We identified 4406 patients with advanced lung cancer, of whom 2197 received first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy and 2209 received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Most patients in the first-line EGFR-TKI group were never-smokers (74.9%), whereas those in the first-line chemotherapy group were ever-smokers (66.0%). The incidence of MACE was not significantly different between the two groups (12.0% versus 11.9%, p = 0.910). However, the incidence of ischemic stroke was higher in the first-line EGFR-TKI group than in the first-line chemotherapy group (3.9% versus 1.9%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

MACEs are common in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer during treatment. The incidence of MACE was similar between the first-line EGFR-TKI therapy and first-line chemotherapy groups. Although more patients in the EGFR-TKI group were female and never-smokers, the risk of ischemic stroke was higher in patients who received first-line EGFR-TKI therapy than in those who received first-line chemotherapy.

Immunotherapy-Associated Atherosclerosis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Findings and Implications for Future Research

Purpose of the Review

Even as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the lifespan of many patients, they may also trigger acceleration of long-term cardiovascular disease. Our review aims to examine the current landscape of research on ICI-mediated atherosclerosis and address key questions regarding its pathogenesis and impact on patient management.

Recent Findings

Preclinical mouse models suggest that T cell dysregulation and proatherogenic cytokine production are key contributors to plaque development after checkpoint inhibition. Clinical data also highlight the significant burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients on immunotherapy, although the value of proactively preventing and treating ASCVD in this population remains an open area of inquiry. Current treatment options include dietary/lifestyle modification and traditional medications to manage hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes risk factors; no current targeted therapies exist.

Summary

Early identification of high-risk patients is crucial for effective preventive strategies and timely intervention. Future research should focus on refining screening tools, elucidating targetable mechanisms driving ICI atherosclerosis, and evaluating long-term cardiovascular outcomes in cancer survivors who received immunotherapy. Moreover, close collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is essential to optimize patient outcomes.

Cardiovascular toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors: review of associated toxicity and design of the Spanish Immunotherapy Registry of Cardiovascular Toxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed the prognosis of many tumors. However, concerning associated cardiotoxicity has been reported. Little is known about the real-life incidence-specific surveillance protocols or the translational correlation between the underlying mechanisms and the clinical presentation of ICI-induced cardiotoxicity. The lack of data from prospective studies led us to review the current knowledge and to present the creation of the Spanish Immunotherapy Registry of Cardiovascular Toxicity (SIR-CVT), a prospective registry of patients receiving ICI that aims to examine the role of hsa-miR-Chr8:96, (a specific serum biomarker of myocarditis) in the early diagnosis of ICI-induced myocarditis. An exhaustive prospective cardiac imaging study will be performed before and during the first 12 months of treatment. The correlation between clinical, imaging, and immunologic parameters may improve our understanding of ICI-induced cardiotoxicity and enable simpler surveillance protocols. We assess ICI-induced cardiovascular toxicity and describe the rationale of the SIR-CVT.

Update on Immunotherapy Cardiotoxicity: Checkpoint Inhibitors, CAR T, and Beyond

OPINION STATEMENT

Immunotherapy is an innovative approach to cancer treatment that involves using the body's immune system to fight cancer. The landscape of immunotherapy is constantly evolving, as new therapies are developed and refined. Some of the most promising approaches in immunotherapy include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): these drugs target proteins on the surface of T-cells that inhibit their ability to attack cancer cells. By blocking these proteins, checkpoint inhibitors allow T-cells to recognize and destroy cancer cells more effectively. CAR T-cell therapy: this therapy involves genetically modifying a patient's own T-cells to recognize and attack cancer cells. CAR T-cell therapy exhibits favorable response in many patients with refractory hematological cancers with growing clinical trials in solid tumors. Immune system modulators: these drugs enhance the immune system's ability to fight cancer by stimulating the production of immune cells or inhibiting the activity of immune-suppressing cells. While immunotherapy has shown great promise in the treatment of cancer, it can also pose significant cardiac side effects. Some immunotherapy drugs like ICIs can cause myocarditis, which can lead to chest pain, shortness of breath, and heart failure. Other cardiac side effects of ICIs include arrhythmias, pericarditis, vasculitis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. It is important for patients receiving immunotherapy to be monitored closely for these side effects, as prompt treatment can help prevent serious complications. Patients should also report any symptoms to their healthcare providers right away, so that appropriate action can be taken. CAR T-cell therapy can also illicit an exaggerated immune response creating cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that may precipitate cardiovascular events: arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Overall, while immune modulating therapy is a promising and expanding approach to cancer treatment, it is important to weigh the potential benefits against the risks and side effects, especially in patients with high risk for cardiovascular complications.

Cancer survivorship at heart: a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology roadmap for healthcare professionals

In cancer, a patient is considered a survivor from the time of initial diagnosis until the end of life. With improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors (CS) has grown considerably and includes: (1) Patients cured and free from cancer who may be at risk of late-onset cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT); (2) Patients with long-term control of not-curable cancers in whom CTR-CVT may need to be addressed. This paper highlights the importance of the cancer care continuum, of a patient-centered approach and of a prevention-oriented policy. The ultimate goal is a personalized care of CS, achievable only through a multidisciplinary-guided survivorship care plan, one that replaces the fragmented management of current healthcare systems. Collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is the pillar of a framework in which primary care providers and other specialists must be engaged and in which familial, social and environmental factors are also taken into account.

Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain to Assess Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Myocarditis

Longitudinal strain (LS) measured by echocardiography has been reported to be useful not only for the diagnosis and risk stratification of various cardiac diseases, but also in cardio-oncology. Most previous studies have been conducted on patients undergoing treatment with anthracyclines and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies. Existing guidelines recommend that global LS (GLS) should be measured before and after the administration of cancer drugs. This recommendation is based on many reports showing that a decline in GLS is indicative of early or mild cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction. The main purpose of this article is to provide insight into the importance of LS in patients undergoing cancer treatment and highlight the role of LS evaluation in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, which is being used with increasing frequency. Among cancer drug therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an important place in cancer treatment and are used for the treatment of many types of cancer. Although the efficacy of ICIs in cancer treatment has been reported, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have also been reported. Among these irAEs, cardiovascular complications, although rare, are recognized as important adverse events that may result in ICI treatment discontinuation. Myocarditis is one severe adverse event associated with ICIs, and it is important to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to it. Several studies have reported a relationship between LS and cardiac complications associated with ICIs which may contribute to the early diagnosis of ICI-induced cardiac complications.

An Increased Understanding of the Association Between Atherosclerosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy activates the host immune system to promote tumor cell death. This activation of the immune system can lead to off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is an established link between inflammation and atherosclerosis. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the existing body of literature discussing the potential association between ICI treatment and atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pre-clinical studies suggest that ICI therapy may lead to T-cell-mediated progression of atherosclerosis. Recent retrospective clinical studies have shown higher rates of myocardial infarction and stroke with ICI therapy, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, small observational cohort studies have used imaging modalities to demonstrate higher rates of atherosclerotic progression with ICI treatment. Early pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests an association between ICI treatment and the progression of atherosclerosis. However, these findings are preliminary, and adequately powered prospective studies are needed to demonstrate a conclusive association. As ICI therapy is increasingly used to treat a variety of solid tumors, it is important to evaluate and mitigate the potential adverse atherosclerotic effects of ICI treatment.

Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without angiogenesis inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database from 2014 to 2022

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) have become increasingly available for multiple types of cancers, although the cardiovascular safety profiles of this combination therapy in real-world settings have not been elucidated to date. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the cardiovascular toxicity profiles of ICIs combined with AGIs in comparison with ICIs alone.

Methods

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the 1^st quarter of 2014 to the 1^st quarter of 2022 was retrospectively queried to extract reports of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with ICIs alone, AGIs alone and combination therapy. To perform disproportionality analysis, the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs) were calculated with statistical shrinkage transformation formulas and a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for ROR (ROR₀₂₅) > 1 or IC (IC₀₂₅) > 0 with at least 3 reports was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 18 854 cardiovascular AE cases/26 059 reports for ICIs alone, 47 168 cases/67 595 reports for AGIs alone, and 3 978 cases/5 263 reports for combination therapy were extracted. Compared to the entire database of patients without AGIs or ICIs, cardiovascular AEs were overreported in patients with combination therapy (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.559/1.478), showing stronger signal strength than those taking ICIs alone (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.118/1.086) or AGIs alone (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.323/1.252). Importantly, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy showed a decrease in signal strength for noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 1.142/2.216 vs. IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.673/1.614), while an increase in signal value for embolic and thrombotic events (IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.147/1.111 vs. IC₀₂₅/ROR₀₂₅ = 0.591/1.519). For outcomes of cardiovascular AEs, the frequency of death and life-threatening AEs was lower for combination therapy than ICIs alone in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis (37.7% vs. 49.2%) as well as in embolic and thrombotic events (29.9% vs. 39.6%). Analysis among indications of cancer showed similar findings.

Conclusion

Overall, ICIs combined with AGIs showed a greater risk of cardiovascular AEs than ICIs alone, mainly due to an increase in embolic and thrombotic events while a decrease in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis. In addition, compared with ICIs alone, combination therapy presented a lower frequency of death and life-threatening in noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis and embolic and thrombotic events.

Part 1: The Clinical Applications of Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain

There is an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Indices of left ventricular (LV) systolic function such as LV ejection fraction used to identify those at risk of adverse cardiac events such as heart failure may not be truly representative of LV systolic function in certain cardiac diseases. Given that LV ejection fraction reduction may represent more advanced irreversible stages of disease, measures of myocardial strain have emerged as a feasible and robust instrument for the early identification of heart disease and subtle LV systolic dysfunction. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of myocardial strain concepts and emerging clinical applications of global longitudinal strain in cardio-oncology.

Extensive CArdioVAscular Characterization and Follow-Up of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of both advanced and early stages of various malignancies has resulted in a substantial increase in the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The current follow-up guidelines are based on anecdotal evidence and expert opinions, due to a lack of solid data and prospective studies. As many questions remain unanswered, cardiac monitoring, in patients receiving ICIs, is not always implemented by oncologists. Hence, an urgent need to investigate the possible short- and long-term CV effects of ICIs, as ICI approval is continuing to expand to the (neo)adjuvant setting.

METHODS

We have initiated a prospective, multicenter study, i.e., the CAVACI trial, in which a minimum of 276 patients with a solid tumor, eligible for ICI treatment, will be enrolled. The study consists of routine investigations of blood parameters (troponin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, in particular) and a thorough CV follow-up (electrocardiograms, transthoracic echocardiograms, and coronary calcium scoring) at fixed time points for a total period of two years. The primary endpoint is the cumulative incidence of troponin elevation in the first three months of ICI treatment, compared to baseline levels. Furthermore, secondary endpoints include incidence above the upper limit of normal of both troponin and NT-proBNP levels, evolution in troponin and NT-proBNP levels, the incidence of CV abnormalities/major adverse cardiac events, evaluation of associations between patient characteristics/biochemical parameters and CV events, transthoracic echocardiography parameters, electrocardiography parameters, and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Recruitment of patients started in January 2022. Enrolment is ongoing in AZ Maria Middelares, Antwerp University Hospital, AZ Sint-Vincentius Deinze, and AZ Sint-Elisabeth Zottegem.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05699915, registered 26 January 2023.

Comparative cardiotoxicity risk of pembrolizumab versus nivolumab in cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A meta-analysis

Objective

Recently, several researchers have reported the incidence of cardiac-related toxicities occurring with nivolumab (Opdivo) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda). There is still a need for balance between oncology treatment efficacy and reduction of cardiotoxicity burden in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients. Thus, the primary aim was to determine whether pembrolizumab or nivolumab would present with a greater risk for cardiotoxicity reports.

Materials and methods

This meta-analysis was performed with respect to the MOOSE reporting guidelines. Studies were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar; the search terms were Keytruda or Pembrolizumab, PD1 inhibitors, anti-PD1 drugs, Nivolumab or Opdivo, and cardiotoxicities or cardiac toxicity. The study was restricted to original articles investigating ICI-induced cardiac immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The targeted population was cancer patients treated with either pembrolizumab or nivolumab monotherapy, of which those with records of any cardiac events following the therapy were labeled as events. The measures used to achieve the comparison were descriptive proportions, probabilities, and meta-analysis pooled odds ratios (ORs).

Results

Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Nivolumab accounted for 55.7% cardiotoxicity and pembrolizumab, for 27.31% (P = 0.027). The meta-analysis was based on the Mantel–Haenszel method, and the random-effect model yielded a pooled OR = 0.73 (95% CI [0.43–1.23] P = 0.24), with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 99% P = 0). Hence, the difference in cardiotoxicity odds risk between pembrolizumab and nivolumab was not statistically significant. On subgroup analysis based on cardiotoxicity type, the “myocarditis” subgroup in which there was no statistical heterogeneity was associated with a significant cardiotoxicity risk increase with pembrolizumab (OR = 1.30 [1.07;1.59], P&lt; 0.05; I2 = 0%, Ph = 0.4).

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to compare the cardiotoxicity potentials of nivolumab and pembrolizumab. In contrast to previous reports, the overall findings here demonstrated that nivolumab-induced cardiotoxicity was more commonly reported in the literature than pembrolizumab; however, myocarditis seemed more likely to occur with pembrolizumab therapy.

The incidence and risk of cardiovascular events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Asian populations

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, there are no data characterizing cardiovascular events among Asians on immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aim to determine the incidence and risk of cardiac events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in an Asian population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study at two tertiary referral centers in Taiwan. Immune checkpoint inhibitor users were matched with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor users based on predetermined clinical variables. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute peripheral occlusive disease, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, heart failure, pericardial disease, myocarditis, cardiac arrhythmias and conduction block.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and November 2021, 868 immune checkpoint inhibitor users were matched 1:1 with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor users. Among immune checkpoint inhibitor users, 67 (7.7%) patients developed major adverse cardiovascular events. During a median follow-up period of 188 days, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events for immune checkpoint inhibitor and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor users was 94.8 and 46.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively, resulting in an incidence rate ratio of 2.1 [95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.9]. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, immune checkpoint inhibitor users had a 60% increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events [hazard ratio, 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.3)]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors use was independently associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke [hazard ratio, 3.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.0-9.0)] and pulmonary embolism [hazard ratio, 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.4-21.3)]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age > 65, metastatic disease, hypertension and baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio < 180 were risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Asians, immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, particularly ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related to Cardiotoxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have now emerged as a mainstay of treatment for various cancers. Along with development of ICIs, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have aroused wide attention. The cardiac irAE, one of the rare but potentially fatal effects, have been reported recently. However, the clinical comprehension of cardiac irAEs remains limited and guidelines are inadequate for cardio-oncologists to tackle the problem. In this review, we have summarized current classifications of, manifestations of, potential mechanisms of, and treatment for ICI-related myocardial injury in order to provide some clues for the understanding of cardiac irAEs in clinical work.

Imaging of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The normal immune system identifies and eliminates precancerous and cancerous cells. However, tumors can develop immune resistance mechanisms, one of which involves the exploitation of pathways, termed immune checkpoints, that normally suppress T-cell function. The goal of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy is to boost T-cell-mediated immunity to mount a more effective attack on cancer cells. ICIs have changed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and numerous ICIs have now been approved as first-line treatments for NSCLC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ICIs can cause atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression, whereby the tumor burden initially increases but then decreases. Therefore, response criteria have been developed specifically for patients receiving immunotherapy. Because ICIs activate the immune system, they can lead to inflammatory side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Usually occurring within weeks to months after the start of therapy, irAEs range from asymptomatic abnormal laboratory results to life-threatening conditions such as encephalitis, pneumonitis, myocarditis, hepatitis, and colitis. It is important to be aware of the imaging appearances of the various irAEs to avoid misinterpreting them as metastatic disease, progressive disease, or infection. The basic principles of ICI therapy; indications for ICI therapy in the setting of NSCLC; response assessment and atypical response patterns of ICI therapy, as compared with conventional chemotherapy; and the spectrum of irAEs seen at imaging are reviewed. An invited commentary by Nishino is available online. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Overcoming the cardiac toxicities of cancer therapy immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led recent advances in the field of cancer immunotherapy improving overall survival in multiple malignancies with abysmal prognoses prior to their introduction. The remarkable efficacy of ICIs is however limited by their potential for systemic and organ specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most of which present with mild to moderate symptoms that can resolve spontaneously, with discontinuation of therapy or glucocorticoid therapy. Cardiac irAEs however are potentially fatal. The understanding of autoimmune cardiotoxicity remains limited due to its rareness. In this paper, we provide an updated review of the literature on the pathologic mechanisms, diagnosis, and management of autoimmune cardiotoxicity resulting from ICIs and their combinations and provide perspective on potential strategies and ongoing research developments to prevent and mitigate their occurrence.

Cardiovascular adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A real world study from 2018 to 2022

Background

The reported rate of cardiovascular adverse events (CAE) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is low but potentially fatal. Assess the risk of CAE in cancer patients and compare the incidence of CAE between Chinese developed ICIs and imported ICIs.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on cancer patients treated with ICI for at least four cycles in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from January 2018 to March 2022. Baseline characteristics, physiological and biochemical values, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings were compared between patients with and without CAE.

Results

Among 495 patients treated with ICIs, CAEs occurred in 64 patients (12.93%). The median time to the event was 105 days (61–202). The patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (L-NLR) were significantly associated with the risk of developing CAE (hazard ratio HR 3.64, 95% confidence ratio CI 1.86–7.15, P = 0.000). Patients with higher comorbidity burden significantly increased the risk of developing CAE (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05–1.61, P = 0.014). Those who received a combination of ICI and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.37–4.84, P = 0.003) or thoracic radiation therapy (HR 32.93, 95% CI 8.81–123.14, P = 0.000) were at a significantly increased risk of developing CAE. Compared to baseline values, creatine kinase is -oenzymes (CK-MB) (95% CI -9.73 to -2.20, P = 0.003) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (95% CI -1.06 to -0.06, P = 0.028) were elevated, and the QTc interval prolonged (95% CI -27.07 to -6.49, P = 0.002). Using nivolumab as a control, there was no difference in CAE risk among the eight ICIs investigated. However, the results of the propensity matching showed that programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors had lower CAE occurrence compared with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (adjusted HR = 0.38, P = 0.045).

Conclusion

Patients who received concurrent VEGFR inhibitors and ICIs had a history of thoracic radiation therapy, L-NLR, and higher comorbidity burden had an increased risk of CAEs. Elevated cTnI, CK-MB, and QTc, can be used to monitor CAEs. There was no significant difference in CAE risks between Chinese domestic and imported ICIs. PD-L1 inhibitors had lower CAE occurrence than PD-1 inhibitors.

The Value of Troponin as a Biomarker of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity

In cancer survivors, cardiac dysfunction is the main cause of mortality. Cardiotoxicity represents a decline in cardiac function associated with cancer therapy, and the risk factors include smoking, dyslipidemia, an age of over 60 years, obesity, and a history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure. Troponin is a biomarker that is widely used in the detection of acute coronary syndromes. It has a high specificity, although it is not exclusively associated with myocardial ischemia. The aim of this paper is to summarize published studies and to establish the role of troponin assays in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity associated with various chemotherapeutic agents. Troponin has been shown to be a significant biomarker in the diagnosis of the cardiac dysfunction associated with several types of chemotherapeutic drugs: anthracyclines, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 treatment, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Based on the data available at this moment, troponin is useful for baseline risk assessment, the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity, and as a guide for the initiation of cardioprotective treatment. There are currently clear regulations regarding the timing of troponin surveillance depending on the patient’s risk of cardiotoxicity and the type of medication administered, but data on the cut-off values of this biomarker are still under investigation.

ICIs-Related Cardiotoxicity in Different Types of Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly developing immunotherapy cancer drugs that have prolonged patient survival. However, ICIs-related cardiotoxicity has been recognized as a rare, but fatal, consequence. Although there has been extensive research based on different types of ICIs, these studies have not indicated whether cardiotoxicity is specific to a type of cancer. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze a variety of ICIs-related cardiotoxicity, focusing on different types of cancer. We found that the incidence of ICIs-related cardiac adverse events (CAEs) and common cardiotoxic manifestations vary with cancer type. This inspired us to explore the underlying mechanisms to formulate targeted clinical strategies for maintaining the cardiovascular health of cancer patients.

Circulating biomarkers for management of cancer therapeutics related cardiac dysfunction

Cancer therapeutics related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Effective clinical management of CTRCD is impeded by a lack of sensitive diagnostic and prognostic strategies. Circulating molecular markers could potentially address this need as they are often indicative of cardiac stress before cardiac damage can be detected clinically. A growing understanding of the underlying physiological mechanisms for CTRCD has inspired research efforts to identify novel pathophysiologically-relevant biomarkers that may also guide development of cardio-protective therapeutic approaches. The purpose of this review is to evaluate current circulating biomarkers of cardiac stress and their potential role in diagnosis and management of CTRCD. We also discuss some emerging avenues for CTRCD-focused biomarker investigations.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Associated Cardiotoxicity

Large population-based studies examining differences in ICI-associated cardiotoxicity across cancer types and agents are limited. Data of 5518 cancer patients who received at least one cycle of ICIs were extracted from a large network of health care organizations. ICI treatment groups were classified by the first ICI agent(s) (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, avelumab, atezolizumab, or durvalumab) or its class (PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors, CTLA4-inhibitors, or their combination (ipilimumab + nivolumab)). Time to first cardiac adverse event (CAE) (arrhythmia, acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or pericarditis) developed within one year after ICI initiation was analyzed using a competing-risks regression model adjusting for ICI treatment groups, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and cancer sites. By month 12, 12.5% developed cardiotoxicity. The most common cardiotoxicity was arrhythmia (9.3%) and 2.1% developed myocarditis. After adjusting for patient characteristics and cancer sites, patients who initiated on monotherapy with ipilimumab (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 2.00; 95% CI: 1.49−2.70; p < 0.001) or pembrolizumab (aHR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01−1.46; p = 0.040) had a higher risk of developing CAEs within one year compared to nivolumab monotherapy. Ipilimumab and pembrolizumab use may increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared to other agents. Avelumab also estimated a highly elevated risk (aHR: 1.92; 95% CI: 0.85−4.34; p = 0.117) compared to nivolumab and other PD-L1 agents, although the estimate did not reach statistical significance, warranting future studies.

Cardiovascular Risks with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have changed the therapeutic landscape across a range of solid malignancies. However, there is little data regarding the cardiovascular (CV) impact of these agents. The purpose of this review is to discuss reported CV effects, pathophysiology, pre-treatment screening, diagnostic workup, and treatment recommendations in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is apparent that CV events are not class dependent, and while infrequently reported in clinical trials, unique CV toxicity may occur with EGFR inhibitors, including structural, electrical, and vascular events. There remains an unmet need to fully elucidate the spectrum of CV events associated with EGFR inhibitors. Early CV screening, close clinical monitoring, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach between medical and cardio-oncology is needed to minimize the potentially detrimental impact of cardiotoxicity in this patient population.

The Potential Cardiotoxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a mono- or adjuvant oncologic treatment is rapidly expanding to most fields of cancer. Alongside their efficacy, ICIs carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) arising from misguided immune-mediated response to normal tissues. In the cardiovascular system, the cardiac toxicity of ICIs has been primarily related to the development of an acute, immune-mediated myocarditis; beyond this potentially fatal complication, evidence of an increased risk of cardiovascular events and accelerated atherosclerosis is emerging, as well as reports of other cardiovascular adverse events such as arrythmias, Takotsubo-like syndrome and vascular events. The absence of identified risk factors for cardiotoxic complications, specific monitoring strategies or diagnostic tests, pose challenges to the timely recognition and optimal management of such events. The rising numbers of patients being treated with ICIs make this potential cardiotoxic effect one of paramount importance for further investigation and understanding. This review will discuss the most recent data on different cardiotoxic effects of ICIs treatment.

Myocardial PD-L1 Expression in Patients With Ischemic and Non-ischemic Heart Failure

Objective: Immune checkpoints inhibitors are promising and wide-spread agents in anti-cancer therapy. However, despite their efficacy, these agents could cause cardiotoxicity, a rare but life-threatening event. In addition, there are still no well-described predictive factors for the development of immune-related adverse events and information on high risk groups. According to known experimental studies we hypothesized that cardiovascular diseases may increase myocardial PD-L1 expression, which could be an extra target for Checkpoint inhibitors and a potential basis for complications development.

Methods: We studied patterns of myocardial PD-L1 expression in non-cancer-related cardiovascular diseases, particularly ischemic heart disease (n = 12) and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 7), compared to patients without known cardiovascular diseases (n = 10) using mouse monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody (clone 22C3, 1:50, Dako). Correlation between immunohistochemical data and echocardiographic parameters was assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software—R studio version 1.3.1093.

Results: In the myocardium of cardiac patients, we found membranous, cytoplasmic, and endothelial expression of PD-L1 compared to control group. In samples from patients with a history of myocardial infarction, PD-L1 membrane and endothelial expression was more prominent and frequent, and cytoplasmic and intercalated discs staining was more localized. In contrast, samples from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy displayed very faint endothelial staining, negative membrane staining, and more diffuse PD-L1 expression in the cytoplasm and intercalated discs. In samples from the non-cardiac patients, no convincing PD-L1 expression was observed. Moreover, we discovered a significant negative correlation between PD-L1 expression level and left ventricular ejection fraction and a positive correlation between PD-L1 expression level and left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

Conclusions: The present findings lay the groundwork for future experimental and clinical studies of the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cardiovascular diseases. Further studies are required to find patients at potentially high risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (CV–irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may have been underreported given that most previous reports were retrospective. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and predictors of CV–irAEs and determine the feasibility of serial cardiac monitoring using a combination of B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T, and electrocardiogram for the prediction of future symptomatic (grade ≥2) CV–irAEs.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study that included 129 consecutive patients with non–small-cell lung cancer who received ICI monotherapy at a single center. Serial cardiac monitoring was performed during ICI monotherapy.

Results

A total of 35 (27%) patients developed any grade ≥1 CV–irAEs with a median time of onset of 72 (interquartile range 44-216) days after ICI treatment initiation. Multivariate Fine–Gray regression analysis showed that prior acute coronary syndrome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.15 (95% [CI], 2.03-4.91), prior heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.33]), and achievement of disease control (adjusted HR 1.91, [95% CI, 1.16-3.14]) were significantly associated with grade ≥1 CV–irAEs. Serial cardiac monitoring revealed that patients with preceding grade 1 CV–irAEs were associated with a significantly higher risk of onset of grade ≥2 CV–irAEs compared with those without preceding grade 1 CV–irAEs (HR: 6.17 [95% CI, 2.97-12.83]).

Conclusion

CV–irAEs were more common than previously recognized and have several predictors. Moreover, serial cardiac monitoring may be feasible for the prediction of future grade ≥2 CV–irAEs.

Future Perspectives of Cardiovascular Biomarker Utilization in Cancer Survivors: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Improving cancer survival represents the most significant effect of precision medicine and personalized molecular and immunologic therapeutics. Cardiovascular health becomes henceforth a key determinant for the direction of overall outcomes after cancer. Comprehensive tissue diagnostic studies undoubtedly have been and continue to be at the core of the fight against cancer. Will a systemic approach integrating circulating blood-derived biomarkers, multimodality imaging technologies, strategic panomics, and real-time streams of digitized physiological data overcome the elusive cardiovascular tissue diagnosis in cardio-oncology? How can such a systemic approach be personalized for application in day-to-day clinical work, with diverse patient populations, cancer diagnoses, and therapies? To address such questions, this scientific statement approaches a broad definition of the biomarker concept. It summarizes the current literature on the utilization of a multitude of established cardiovascular biomarkers at the intersection with cancer. It identifies limitations and gaps of knowledge in the application of biomarkers to stratify the cardiovascular risk before cancer treatment, monitor cardiovascular health during cancer therapy, and detect latent cardiovascular damage in cancer survivors. Last, it highlights areas in biomarker discovery, validation, and clinical application for concerted efforts from funding agencies, scientists, and clinicians at the cardio-oncology nexus.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiotoxicity: possible mechanisms, manifestations, diagnosis and management

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of anticancer drugs that enhance the immune system function and activate T cells against cancerous cells. Although cardiac complications are not common, they could be accompanied with high morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

Regarding the importance of cardiac complications and their subsequent burden on individuals and the healthcare system, this review attempts to discuss the mechanism, diagnosis, and management of myocarditis, besides recapitulating the possible mechanism of other cardiac adverse events. Moreover, we briefly discuss the concurrent administration of other chemotherapeutic agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to insufficient knowledge concerning the physiopathology of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their potential further complications, cardiovascular complications in particular and in the context of this paper's focus, cooperation of oncologists, immunologists, and cardiologists is necessary for the management of patients. Experimental approaches such as using corticosteroids are becoming a part of guidelines for managing cardiac irAEs. However, a unique algorithm for diagnosis and management is necessary, especially in myocarditis cases. Furthermore, more studies are required to resolve current challenges, including prevention of myocarditis, concurrent administration of other chemotherapeutic agents, and re-introducing patients with ICIs.

Cardiovascular toxicity of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors: synergistic anti-tumour effects at the cost of increased cardiovascular risk?

In the past two decades, treatment outcomes for a wide range of malignancies have improved remarkably due to the development of novel anti-cancer therapies, including vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite their unprecedented anti-tumour effects, it is becoming increasingly clear that both types of agents are associated with specific cardiovascular toxicity, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocarditis and acceleration of atherosclerosis. Currently, VEGFI and ICI combination therapy is recommended for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and has shown promising treatment efficacy in other tumour types as well. Consequently, VEGFI and ICI combination therapy will most likely become an important therapeutic strategy for various malignancies. However, this combinatory approach is expected to be accompanied by a substantial increase in cardiovascular risk, as both types of agents could act synergistically to induce cardiovascular sequelae. Therefore, a comprehensive baseline assessment and adequate monitoring by specialised cardio-oncology teams is essential in case these agents are used in combination, particularly in high-risk patients. This review summarises the mechanisms of action and treatment indications for currently registered VEGFIs and ICIs, and discusses their main vascular and cardiac toxicity. Subsequently, we provide the biological rationales for the observed promising synergistic anti-tumour effects of combined VEGFI/ICI administration. Lastly, we speculate on the increased risk for cardiovascular toxicity in case these agents are used in combination and its implications and future directions for the clinical situation.

Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.

Cardiotoxicity Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study From 2014 to 2019 Based on FAERS

This study was to scientifically and systematically explore the association between cardiotoxicity and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and also to characterize the spectrum of ICI-related cardiac complications. From the first quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter of 2019, data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database were selected to conduct the disproportionality analysis. Reporting odds ratios and information components were used to evaluate the signal after statistical shrinkage transformation. In total, 7,443,137 cases and 36,326,611 drug-adverse event pairs were collected, among which 9,271 cases were identified to be related to ICI-induced cardiotoxicities. The number of male patients was much higher than that of females (5,579 vs. 3,031) and males presented a slightly higher reporting frequency than females in general, which was statistically significant (ROR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.99-1.09, p < 0.001). Simultaneously, the proportion of serious or life-threatening outcomes in males was significantly higher than in females (ROR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.96-1.15, p < 0.001). Importantly, ICIs were associated with over-reporting frequencies of cardiotoxicities in general (ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08). PD-1 and PD-L1 were found to be related to cardiac adverse events, corresponding to ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08, and ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08, respectively, while anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) was significantly associated with some specific adverse events rather than common adverse events. The spectrum of cardiotoxicities induced by ICIs mostly differed among individual agents, but also demonstrated some common features. Dyspnea (N = 2,527, 21.25%), myocarditis (N = 614, 5.16%), atrial fibrillation (N = 576, 4.84%), cardiac failure (N = 476, 4.00%), and pericardial effusion (N = 423, 3.56%) were the top five cardiac adverse events reported in the database. Among them, myocarditis was the only one caused by all ICIs with strong signal value and high risk, warranting further attention. Overall, this investigation mainly showed the profile of cardiotoxicities caused by ICIs, which varied between different ICI therapies, but also shared some similarities in specific symptoms such as myocarditis. Therefore, it is vital and urgent to recognize and manage ICI-related cardiotoxicities, known to frequently occur in clinical practice, at the earliest point.

Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Events and Atherosclerotic Plaque

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treat an expanding range of cancers. Consistent basic data suggest that these same checkpoints are critical negative regulators of atherosclerosis. Therefore, our objectives were to test whether ICIs were associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and a higher risk of atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular events.

METHODS

The study was situated in a single academic medical center. The primary analysis evaluated whether exposure to an ICI was associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in 2842 patients and 2842 controls matched by age, a history of cardiovascular events, and cancer type. In a second design, a case-crossover analysis was performed with an at-risk period defined as the 2-year period after and the control period as the 2-year period before treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke). Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome. In addition, in an imaging substudy (n=40), the rate of atherosclerotic plaque progression was compared from before to after the ICI was started. All study measures and outcomes were blindly adjudicated.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort study, there was a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular events after starting an ICI (hazard ratio, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.0-5.5]; P<0.001). There was a similar increase in each of the individual components of the primary outcome. In the case-crossover, there was also an increase in cardiovascular events from 1.37 to 6.55 per 100 person-years at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5]; P<0.001). In the imaging study, the rate of progression of total aortic plaque volume was >3-fold higher with ICIs (from 2.1%/y before 6.7%/y after). This association between ICI use and increased atherosclerotic plaque progression was attenuated with concomitant use of statins or corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular events were higher after initiation of ICIs, potentially mediated by accelerated progression of atherosclerosis. Optimization of cardiovascular risk factors and increased awareness of cardiovascular risk before, during, and after treatment should be considered among patients on an ICI.

Cardiac troponin I predicts clinical outcome of patients with cancer at emergency department

BACKGROUND

The prognostic ability of cardiac troponin I (TnI) has been demonstrated in general populations and among cardiovascular disease patients, but it has not been evaluated in cancer patients.

HYPOTHESIS

This study assumes to have the prognostic ability of cardiac troponin in cancer patients visiting the emergency department.

METHODS

Cancer patients visiting the emergency department were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patients with previously known coronary artery disease or clinically indicated coronary angiography were not included. The maximal value from Siemens ADVIA Centaur troponin I Ultra assay within 24 hours was assessed. The primary endpoint was 180-day all-cause death, including cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death.

RESULTS

A total of 9135 cancer patients (mean age: 63 years, male gender: 60%) were enrolled. Lowest (0.006 ng/mL), assay-specific <99th % (0.007-0.039 ng/mL), below median ≥ 99th % (0.040-0.129 ng/mL), and above median ≥ 99th % (≥0.130 ng/mL) TnI were found in 4487 (49.1%), 3158 (34.6%), 852 (9.3%), and 638 (7.0%) patients, respectively. There was 3192 (34.9%) all-cause deaths including 137 (1.5%) cardiovascular and 3047 (33.4%) noncardiovascular deaths in the 180-day follow-up period. The risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular death increased across higher TnI strata (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.3-2.9; 2.1-9.3; 1.3-1.8; P < .001, all). These findings were consistent within clinical subgroups including solid and hematologic cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients visiting the emergency department with elevated troponin I were at increased risk of 180-day death. Cancer patients with elevated TnI may need additional evaluation or careful follow-up even without cardiovascular disease diagnosis.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiac Toxicity in Patients Treated for Non-Small Lung Cancer: A Review

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, both in men and women. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 80-85% of lung cancer cases). Therapeutics named immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment in the last decade. They are monoclonal antibodies, and those directed against PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) or PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) have been used in the treatment of lung cancer and significantly improved the prognosis of NSCLC patients. However, during treatment with ICIs, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can occur in any organ and any tissue. At the same time, although cardiac irAEs are relatively rare compared to irAEs in other organs, they have a high mortality rate. The two most common clinical manifestations of immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity are myocarditis and pericarditis. Various types of arrhythmias have been reported in patients treated with ICIs, including the occurrence of life-threatening complete atrioventricular block or ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Here, we aim to summarize the incidence, clinical manifestations, underlying mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for ICI-associated cardiotoxicity as these issues become very important in view of the increasing use of ICI in the treatment of lung cancer.

Nivolumab increases pulmonary artery pressure in patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The widespread use of Nivolumab results in an increasing number of side effects and adverse events. Herein, we evaluated the impact of Nivolumab on crude and normalized pulmonary artery diameter (PAD).

METHODS

We analyzed clinical, morphometric, pathological and radiological data of lung cancer patients treated by Nivolumab in an 18-month period. Blinded radiological evaluation was performed, by three observers measuring axial PAD and Aorta diameter (AoD) in secondarily matched pre- and post-Nivolumab CT-scans. Correlation between ΔPAD and clinicopathological data was investigated.

RESULTS

59 patients receiving Nivolumab for treatment of advanced lung carcinoma were identified. Pre-and post-Nivolumab comparison of CT-scan measures revealed that mean PAD was 26.3 ± 2.8 mm versus 28.0 ± 3.0 mm (p < 0.001), and mean PAD/AoD ratio was 0.82 ± 0.09 versus 0.87 ± 0.11 (p <  0.001), respectively. Median ΔPAD was 0.05 [0.01-0.122] was significantly higher in hypometabolic patients exhibiting low Rest Energy Expenditure (p = 0.03). Patients exhibiting ΔPAD > 1% had significantly lower serum albumin level (p = 0.03), and higher nutritional risk (p = 0.02), compared to others. Unlike Nivolumab therapy, there was no increase of PAD after chemotherapy in the same cohort of patients with available scans (n = 45, 25.9 ± 2.9 mm pre-chemotherapy versus 25.7 ± 2.4 mm post-chemotherapy, p = 0.51). Anti-PD-1 treatment was associated with immune-related adverse events in 11 (18.6%) cases including 2 cases of life-threatening acute pulmonary hypertension, both exhibiting post-treatment PAD/AoD ratio > 1.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab is associated to PAD enlargement, a potential marker of pulmonary hypertension, sometimes leading to lethal adverse events. Careful CT-scan and echocardiographic evaluation of PAD should be part of the therapeutic work-up of patients receiving Nivolumab, especially those suffering cancer-associated malnutrition.

Coronary and aortic calcification are associated with cardiovascular events on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is low, the overall burden of CV events after ICI is unknown. Risk factors for CV events after ICI have yet to be identified.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the association between vascular calcification on routine baseline computed tomography (CT) imaging and CV events following ICI.

METHOD

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 76 patients referred to Cardio-Oncology with prior ICI treatment. Coronary and aortic calcification on non-gated chest and abdominal CT imaging were qualitatively assessed. The association of baseline clinical parameters and vascular calcification with symptomatic heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, symptomatic arrhythmia, or pericardial effusion after ICI was evaluated.

RESULTS

Over 11 months of follow-up, there were 80 CV events that occurred in 49 patients. Worse coronary and aortic calcification on pre-treatment CT imaging was seen in patients with a CV event (p = .018 and p = .014, respectively). There were no differences in traditional CV risk factors between those with and without a CV event. Eighteen patients (37%) were restarted on ICI therapy after a non- myocarditis or symptomatic systolic HF CV event without recurrent events or mortality over 13 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic HF was the most common CV event seen after ICI therapy. Worse coronary and aortic calcification on baseline CT imaging was associated with CV events following ICI. With careful clinical evaluation, selected patients may be re-treated with ICI following a non- myocarditis or symptomatic systolic HF CV event.