Cardiac Toxicity of Alectinib in Patients With ALK+ Lung Cancer: Outcomes of Cardio-Oncology Follow-Up

Alectinib causes sinus bradycardia by suppressing L-type calcium current in sinus node

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged non-small cell lung cancer globally. Sinus bradycardia, as the major adverse cardiac events of alectinib, still widely impact patient's quality of life. However, its underlying mechanism remains elusive. The aim of this study was to reveal the pathogenesis of the alectinib induced sinus bradycardia (AISB) in a rat model, including the electrophysiology alterations and the molecular mechanism. SD rats were administered alectinib (10 mg/kg/day) by gavage for 7-10 days to mimic the clinical AISB. 3-days alectinib treatment did not change heart rate and sinus node recovery time (SNRT) as assessed through in vivo electrophysiology study. Also, alectinib didn't influence automaticity in isolated heart or single sinus node cardiomyocytes, indicating alectinib cannot decrease sinus node function rapidly. The decreased heart rate and prolonged SNRT was found after 7-days alectinib treatment. The inducibility of atrial fibrillation was not affected under the same condition. The RNA-seq assay revealed the transcriptomic alterations in sinus node of alectinib treated rats, and the dysregulation of genes in cardiac function were observed. The decreased expression of L-type calcium channel Cacna1d was confirmed among the channel candidates identified from RNA-seq assay. Subsequently, the patch-clamp test revealed the reduction in the corresponding L-type calcium current density in 7-days alectinib treated rats. These findings revealed that the AISB was caused by the reduction in Cacna1d expression which resulted in the electro-dysfunction mediated by the suppressed ICaL.

Cardiotoxicity of small-molecule kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recent advances in precision oncology have enabled many specific cancer patient populations to respond well and achieve longer survival with small-molecule kinase inhibitors, which have become a new therapeutic strategy for tumors. Since 2001, the Food and Drug Administration has approved 108 and 63 new anticancer drugs for treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies, respectively, 89 of which belong to the large group of small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). Compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-FU, SMKIs offer better efficacy with fewer toxic side effects. Nevertheless, with the development of more novel SMKIs and their wider clinical application to a larger population of cancer patients, variable degrees of cardiotoxic adverse events have emerged for some SMKIs during cancer therapy. This review comprehensively summarizes the most updated progress in the cardiotoxicity of SMKIs in cancer therapy and discusses the new findings and mechanisms, which will provide emerging strategies for the prevention of cardiotoxicity caused by small molecule targeted drugs and the design of the next generation of low cardiotoxicity targeted drugs.

Sex and Common Germline Variants Affect the Toxicity Profile and Pharmacokinetics of Alectinib: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib, a small-molecule kinase inhibitor, is used as first-line treatment for ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Albeit generally well-tolerated, a considerable subset of patients requires dose adjustments due to drug-related toxicity. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes related to the metabolism of alectinib may upfront identify patients at risk for toxicity.

METHODS

In this multicenter observational cohort study in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC receiving alectinib treatment, we investigated the association between toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and key genetic variants in ABCB1, CYP3A4, PPAR-α, POR, and CYP3A5. Data on demographics, adverse events, and alectinib trough levels were collected from five hospitals.

RESULTS

Among 215 patients, 47% experienced severe toxicity. Women experienced more severe toxicity (female versus male: 56% versus 34%; p = 0.001) and had +35% higher alectinib trough levels (p < 0.001). Homozygous carriers of the PPAR-α 209G>A variant exhibited a higher incidence of grade greater than or equal to 3 toxicity (38%) compared with patients who carried at least one wild-type allele (11%) (p = 0.004). This remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Patients who experienced severe toxicity had +18.5% (95% confidence interval: 2.9%-36.6%; p = 0.019) higher trough levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients encounter more severe toxicity due to higher alectinib exposure, which warrants further exploration. PPAR-α 209G>A significantly increased relevant alectinib-induced toxicity, most likely due to an increase in alectinib exposure. Pretreatment testing for genetic variants with a subsequent dose reduction could provide a viable approach to reduce alectinib-related toxicity.

Arrhythmia Challenges in Cardio-Oncology: High-Risk Therapies, Management, and Anticoagulation

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading cause of mortality in the United States. In 2021, there were 695,547 and 605,213 deaths due to heart disease and cancer, respectively. With novel oncologic and cardiac therapies, survival has improved leading to increased life-expectancy albeit with chronic illness burden. Arrhythmia management in patients with cancer, whether active or in remission, can be quite challenging. In this review, we will discuss high-risk oncological therapies, prevention, and management of Atrial fibrillation, Ventricular Arrhythmias, and Bradyarrhythmias.

Targeted therapy‑associated cardiotoxicity in patients with stage‑IV lung cancer with or without cardiac comorbidities

Targeted drugs have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the understanding of how cardiac comorbidity and toxicity affect the clinical outcomes of patients following targeted therapy remains limited. In a 14‑year cohort, cardiac comorbidities and toxicities among patients with stage‑IV NSCLC treated with targeted therapy were identified. The cardiotoxicities were compared in three patient groups: Cardiac, other and no comorbidities. Survival analysis employed Cox Proportional Hazard Models. In the prospectively followed 3,767 patients with stage‑IV NSCLC, 701 received targeted therapy; of which 133 (19.0%) had cardiac comorbidity, 504 (71.9%) had other comorbidities and 64 (9.1%) had none. In total, 15 patients (2.1%) developed cardiotoxicity after taking drugs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c‑ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) or vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor (VEGF)/VEGFR, and all 15 had comorbidities: 10 cardiac and 5 other comorbidities. Cardiac comorbidity was associated with a 7.5‑fold higher risk of targeted therapy‑related cardiotoxicity than other comorbidities (7.5 vs. 1.0%; P<0.001). Patients with or without cardiotoxicity had a median survival time of 4.7 or 1.9 years, respectively, and patients with cardiotoxicity had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.25‑0.81) than those without (P=0.003), when adjusting for comorbidities. In the 164 patients that received osimertinib, 32 (19.5%) had cardiac comorbidity and a 1.7‑fold higher risk of death than the 121 (73.8%) patients with other comorbidities. In the 74 patients treated with ALK/ROS1 inhibitors, cardiotoxicity was 14 times more common in patients with heart disease (30.0%) than those without (2.1%) (P=0.001). Cardiotoxicity was uncommon in patients with targeted drug‑treated stage‑IV NSCLC but was more prevalent in those with cardiac comorbidity and appeared to be a protector for longer survival. However, in osimertinib‑treated patients, cardiac comorbidity increased mortality.

Matters of the Heart: Cardiotoxicity Related to Target Therapy in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of each one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies, every drug has its own specific safety profile. In addition, this safety profile could not fully emerge from clinical trials data, as patients in clinical practice usually have more comorbidities and frailties. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known and established adverse event of anti-cancer therapies. However, only recently it has become a central topic for targeted therapies in NSCLC, due to the unknown real range and frequency. Management of this toxicity begins with prevention, and must balance the need of continuing an effective anticancer treatment versus low risk of even fatal events and the preservation of long-term quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge focusing on currently used targeted therapies in NSCLC.

What do we know about the role of neoadjuvant targeted therapy in early-stage EGFR-mutant and ALK-fused non-small cell lung cancer?-a narrative review of the current literature

Background and Objective

The standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions is targeted therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, data are still lacking on the use of TKIs as a neoadjuvant or induction approach. Therefore, this narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge on resectable EGFR-mutant and ALK-fused NSCLC regarding available perioperative treatment regimens and off-label neoadjuvant use of targeted therapy.

Methods

The relevant literature was identified by using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov (last search phase June 2024) and was restricted to English language. Peer-reviewed manuscripts but also conference abstracts that did not undergo peer-review were included.

Key Content and Findings

Patients with EGFR-mutations and ALK-fusions have typically been excluded from available phase III perioperative immunotherapy trials due to lower efficacy and higher toxicity of immunotherapy in those patients. In the adjuvant setting, recent evidence from the phase III ALINA and ADAURA trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of targeted therapy in resected ALK-fused and EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, to date there is no approval for the use of TKIs as neoadjuvant or induction therapy in those patients. We have therefore identified a number of case series and phase II trials using targeted therapy in resectable EGFR-mutant and ALK-fused NSCLC.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests that targeted therapies might be effective in patients with resectable EGFR-mutant and ALK-positive NSCLC, but ongoing trials will need to provide further evidence on the safety and efficacy of perioperative TKI therapy.

Endothelium as a Source of Cardiovascular Toxicity From Antitumor Kinase Inhibitors

Kinase inhibitors (KIs) targeting oncogenic molecular pathways have revolutionized cancer therapy. By directly targeting specific tumor-driving kinases, targeted therapies have fewer side effects compared with chemotherapy. Despite the enhanced specificity, cardiovascular side effects have emerged with many targeted cancer therapies that limit long-term outcomes in patients with cancer. Endothelial cells lining all blood vessels are critical to cardiovascular health and are also exposed to circulating levels of systemic anticancer therapies. Both on- and off-target perturbation of signaling pathways from KIs can cause endothelial dysfunction, resulting in cardiovascular toxicity. As such, the endothelium is a potential source, and also a therapeutic target for prevention, of cardiovascular toxicity. In this review, we examine the evidence for KI-induced endothelial cell dysfunction as a mechanism for the cardiovascular toxicities of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, BCR-Abl (breakpoint cluster region-Abelson proto-oncogene) KIs, Bruton tyrosine inhibitors, and emerging information regarding endothelial toxicity of newer classes of KIs.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer: A Review

Cardio-oncology currently faces one of the greatest challenges in the field of health care. The main goal of this discipline is to ensure that patients treated for cancer do not suffer or die from cardiovascular disease. The number of studies on the mechanisms of heart injury during cancer treatment is constantly increasing. However, there is insufficient data on heart rhythm disorders that may result from this treatment. This issue seems to be particularly important in patients with lung cancer, in whom anticancer therapy, especially radiotherapy, may contribute to the onset of cardiac arrhythmias. The observed relationship between cardiac dosimetry and radiotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in lung cancer treatment may explain the increased mortality from cardiovascular causes in patients after chest irradiation. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cardiac arrhythmias in this context. Conversely, recent reports have highlighted the application of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. This review of available studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of arrhythmias in patients treated for lung cancer aims to draw attention to the need for regular cardiological monitoring in this group of patients. Improving cardiac care for patients with lung cancer has the potential to enhance their overall therapeutic outcomes.

Analysis of Serious Weight Gain in Patients Using Alectinib for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is a standard-of-care treatment for metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Weight gain is an unexplored side effect reported in approximately 10%. To prevent or intervene alectinib-induced weight gain, more insight in its extent and etiology is needed.

METHODS

Change in body composition was analyzed in a prospective series of 46 patients with ALK+ NSCLC, treated with alectinib. Waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and skeletal muscle were quantified using sliceOmatic software on computed tomography images at baseline, 3 months (3M), and 1 year (1Y). To investigate an exposure-toxicity relationship, alectinib plasma concentrations were quantified. Four patients with more than 10 kg weight gain were referred to Erasmus MC Obesity Center CGG for in-depth analysis (e.g., assessments of appetite, dietary habits, other lifestyle, medical and psychosocial factors, and extensive metabolic and endocrine assessments, including resting energy expenditure).

RESULTS

Mean increase in waist circumference was 9 cm (9.7%, p < 0.001) in 1Y with a 40% increase in abdominal obesity (p = 0.014). VAT increased to 10.8 cm2 (15.0%, p = 0.003) in 3M and 35.7 cm2 (39.0%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. SAT increased to 18.8 cm2 (12.4%, p < 0.001) in 3M and 45.4 cm2 (33.3%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. The incidence of sarcopenic obesity increased from 23.7% to 47.4% during 1Y of treatment. Baseline waist circumference was a positive predictor of increase in VAT (p = 0.037). No exposure-toxicity relationship was found. In-depth analysis (n = 4) revealed increased appetite in two patients and metabolic syndrome in all four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Alectinib may cause relevant increased sarcopenic abdominal obesity, with increases of both VAT and SAT, quickly after initiation. This may lead to many serious metabolic, physical, and mental disturbances in long-surviving patients.

An update on Alectinib: a first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.