IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to cephalosporins: Cross-reactivity and tolerability of alternative cephalosporins

Development and validation of a cephalosporin allergy clinical decision rule

BACKGROUND

Like penicillin allergy labels, cephalosporin allergy labels go largely unverified and drive inappropriate antibiotic use. Clinical decision rules (CDR) have been validated to identify low-risk penicillin allergy labelled patients suitable for direct oral challenge (DOC); however, the generalisability to cephalosporin allergy remains uncertain.

METHODS

Cephalosporin allergy tested cohorts from three hospitals in Australia were used for validation of a cephalosporin allergy CDR based on clinical variables utilised in the published penicillin allergy decision rule (PEN-FAST). Patients with a cephalosporin allergy label underwent allergy testing. North American tested cohorts were used for external validation.

FINDINGS

From an Australian validation cohort of 228 patients and an external cohort of 167 patients, the four clinical features associated with a positive penicillin allergy from PEN-FAST showed similar associations to a positive cephalosporin test, with minor adjustments to scoring. Validation showed an AUROC of 0.921. A cut-off of less than three points for the newly directed CEPH-FAST was chosen to classify a low risk of cephalosporin allergy, for which six of 105 patients (5.7%) had positive allergy testing results.

INTERPRETATION

Utilising the previously published and internationally validated tool PEN-FAST, we validated the same criteria with minor modifications for low-risk cephalosporin allergies. The results suggest that a CEPH-FAST score of less than three is associated with a high negative predictive value and could be used by clinicians and antimicrobial stewardship programmes to identify patients with low-risk cephalosporin allergies at the point of care, following local validation, who could proceed to DOC or use non-cross-reactive cephalosporins.

Assessing the safety of increased outpatient cephalosporin use following the modification of penicillin allergy cross-reactivity alerts

BACKGROUND

Concerns about penicillin-cephalosporin cross-reactivity have historically led to conservative prescribing and avoidance of cephalosporins in patients with penicillin allergy labels, potentially causing suboptimal outcomes. Recent evidence suggests a lower risk of cross-reactivity, prompting a reassessment of alert systems.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of limited penicillin cross-reactivity alerts on outpatient cephalosporin use and the incidence of adverse reactions in a healthcare setting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared cephalosporin prescribing and adverse reactions in patients labeled as penicillin-allergic before and after limiting penicillin cross-reactivity alerts in the electronic medical record at a large academic medical center.

RESULTS

Among 17,174 patients (8,131 pre- and 9,043 post-implementation), there was a statistically significant increase in outpatient cephalosporin prescribing by 8% (P < .001). The use of alternative antibiotic classes decreased. There was no statistically significant increase in adverse events pre- and post-implementation (0.036%-0.058%, P = .547), and no severe events were attributable to cross-reactivity. The alert modification reduced alerts by 92% (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The reduction of penicillin-cephalosporin cross-reactivity alerts was associated with increased cephalosporin use, without a significant increase in adverse reactions. This demonstrates that the practice is safe and decreases alert burden.

Development of a drug allergy alert tiering algorithm for penicillins and cephalosporins

INTRODUCTION

Limited research is available regarding recommendations about which drug allergy alerts (DAAs) in clinical decision support (CDS) systems should interrupt provider workflow. The objective was to evaluate the frequency of penicillin and cephalosporin DAA overrides at two institutions. A secondary objective was to redesign DAAs using a new tiered alerting system based on patient factors.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study evaluated CDS DAA overrides for penicillins and cephalosporins at two large academic medical centers. Included patients were at least 18 years of age and had a penicillin or cephalosporin DAA fired at the time of medication ordering. We developed a rule-based algorithm to classify DAAs into three groups: no alerts presented to user, non-interruptive (informational) alerts, and interruptive alerts requiring a coded response. The rule-based algorithm includes drug class or cross-sensitivity matches and reaction types with designated severities (high, medium, or low).

RESULTS

DAAs for penicillin and cephalosporins were overridden 55% of the time at each institution. Of the DAAs overrides, 85% were cross sensitivity matches and 15% were drug class matches. Reactions were classified as 22% high severity, 29% medium, and 48% low. Most low severity reactions were rash (25%), unspecified reactions with no comments (13%), nausea/vomiting (4%), and GI upset (3%). High severity reactions were mostly other reactions with comments (19%) and anaphylaxis (4%). Approximately 30% of the penicillin and cephalosporin alert overrides could have been non-interruptive alerts based on the penicillin or cephalosporin allergic reaction documented in the EHR at each institution.

CONCLUSION

The majority of penicillin and cephalosporin DAAs were overridden, largely for cross sensitivity in lower severity reactions. The data can be used to inform DAA redesign, reduce override rates, and improve patient safety.

Stability of diluted chlorhexidine for skin testing in drug allergy evaluations

Background

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), a common cause of perioperative anaphylaxis, is frequently used for skin testing in allergy evaluations. Although CHX's maximal nonirritating concentrations are known, the stability of its dilutions for skin testing remains unexplored, particularly when sterile water for injection (SWFI) or normal saline (NS) are used as diluents.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the stability and precipitation of CHX when diluted with SWFI or NS for drug allergy skin testing.

Methods

CHX dilutions (5-0.002 mg/mL) were prepared using SWFI and NS. HPLC and UV-visible spectrophotometry were used to assess stability and precipitation over 48 hours. Turbidity was measured at various time points to monitor precipitation.

Results

HPLC analysis showed no significant differences in peak heights between CHX-SWFI and CHX-NS dilutions. However, visible precipitation and increased turbidity (>100 NTU) were observed in CHX-NS at higher concentrations (5 mg/mL) after 60 minutes. No precipitation occurred in CHX-SWFI at any concentration for 48 hours.

Conclusion

For CHX skin testing, SWFI is the preferred diluent at concentrations higher than 0.02 mg/mL to avoid precipitation. Using NS for the final dilution from 0.02 to 0.002 mg/mL is feasible and reduces injection pain. Except for CHX-NS at 5 mg/mL, reagents can be prepared up to 24 hours before testing.

Effects of Sex and Gender in Immediate β-Lactam Antibiotic Allergy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

β-Lactams are the most common antibiotic class reported to cause allergic drug reactions. Previous literature suggests an increased prevalence of penicillin drug allergy in female patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings. However, the effects of sex and gender have not been well characterized regarding the entire class of β-lactam antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify sex- and gender-based differences in the prevalence of immediate β-lactam allergy.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search of Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library between 2013 and 2023. Patients with a documented β-lactam allergy who underwent allergy testing with skin testing, oral drug challenge, or serum-specific IgE were included. We quantitatively assessed sex- and gender-based differences in β-lactam allergy with meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 69 primary studies assessing 53,989 participants from outpatient and inpatient cohorts. A total of 7,558 patients had a confirmed β-lactam allergy. There was no difference in the prevalence of positive β-lactam allergy test between males and females. Subgroup analysis of studies that performed oral challenges showed a higher risk of β-lactam allergy in females compared with males (relative risk = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.66; P < .001; I2 = 77.8%). Finally, there was a higher proportion of females (64.8%) than males enrolled in β-lactam allergy studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest both sex-based and gender-based differences in the prevalence of immediate β-lactam allergy. Biological factors such as sex hormones and gender-based behaviors including increased health care use may contribute to higher rates of β-lactam allergy diagnosis in females.

Is the Anamnesis Enough to De-Label Patients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy?

Background: The decision whether to de-label patient with suspected BL hypersensitivity is based on risk stratification. The aim of this study was to prepare a characteristic of diagnostic risk groups and to create a model enabling the identification of the low-risk diagnostic group. Methods: We analyzed the medical records of patients hospitalized due to suspected hypersensitivity to BL antibiotics. Based on their medical-history data, patients were divided into three diagnostic risk groups, using the criteria proposed by Shenoy et al. Univariate and multivariate analysis models were used to create a diagnostic tool. Results: Among 263 patients referred for BL hypersensitivity diagnosis, 88 (33.5%) were allocated to group I, 129 (49%) to group II, and 46 (17.5%) to group III. There were significant differences between diagnostic risk groups regarding history of hypersensitivity to penicillins (p < 0.001), cephalosporins (p < 0.001), >1 BL (p < 0.05), several episodes of BL hypersensitivity (p < 0.001), medical intervention (p < 0.001), documented hypersensitivity (p < 0.001), time from drug intake to symptoms (p < 0.001), and time from hypersensitivity to diagnosis (p < 0.001). In total, 81 patients (30.8%) were de-labeled: 52 (59.8%) in group I, 27 (20.9%) in group II, and 2 (4.3%) in group III. The univariate analysis model of the low-diagnostic-risk group applied to the de-labeled part showed 90% specificity and 21.93% sensitivity. NPV and PPV were estimated at 72.04% and 49.53%, respectively. The multivariate model had high specificity but low sensitivity; its NPV was 76%, with 68% PPV. Conclusions: The tool enabling the identification of low-diagnostic-risk patients based on anamnesis is not sensitive enough to de-label patients on its basis.

Cefazolin as the mainstay for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy in obstetrics and gynecology

Cefazolin is the most common antibiotic used for prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology. Among those with a penicillin allergy, alternative antibiotics are often chosen for prophylaxis, given fears of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin. Alternative antibiotics in this setting are associated with adverse sequelae, including surgical site infection, induction of bacterial resistance, higher costs to the healthcare system, and possible Clostridium difficile infection. Given the difference in R1 side chains between penicillin and cefazolin, cefazolin use is safe and should be recommended for patients with a penicillin allergy, including those who experience Immunoglobulin E-mediated reactions such as anaphylaxis. Cefazolin should only be avoided in those who experience a history of a severe, life-threatening delayed hypersensitivity reaction manifested as severe cutaneous adverse reactions (Steven-Johnson Syndrome), hepatitis, nephritis, serum sickness, and hemolytic anemia in response to penicillin administration. In addition, >90% of those with a documented penicillin allergy do not have true allergies on skin testing. Increased referral for penicillin allergy testing should be incorporated into routine obstetric care and preoperative assessment to reduce suboptimal antibiotic prophylaxis use. More education is needed among providers surrounding penicillin allergy assessment and cross-reactivity among penicillins and cephalosporins to optimize antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology.

Are changes in antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations responsible for an increased risk of cefazolin allergy?

BACKGROUND

The first line of prevention of surgical site infection relies on the timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are the most recommended antibiotics in elective surgery. The incidence of cefazolin allergy has increased worldwide over the years. The sensitization mechanism of cefazolin is currently unknown, and data supporting cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins are lacking. Sensitization could occur through previous exposure either to cefazolin or to structurally related chemical agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitization agents towards cefazolin.

METHODS

The OpenBabel chemoinformatics toolbox was used to search for similarities between cefazolin and other molecules in an extensive drug database. Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold, we selected drugs with the most similar structure to that of cefazolin. Exposure to those drugs and cefazolin was assessed in a cohort of patients with skin test-proven cefazolin allergy at a specialized allergy centre via a self-administered anonymous questionnaire.

RESULTS

Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold (score≥0.7), 42 molecules were found to be similar to cefazolin (all cephalosporins). Only 8 were marketed in France. None of the 14 cefazolin-allergic patients who answered the questionnaire (65% female, median age 56 years) reported exposure to any identified antibiotics. In contrast, 11 (78%) had at least one previous surgery requiring cefazolin before the index case.

CONCLUSION

Direct previous cefazolin exposure was identified in 78% of cefazolin-allergic patients. Cefazolin started to take a central place in antibiotic prophylaxis after 2010, when cefamandole usage decreased drastically. Changes in antibiotic prophylaxis over the past 14 years in France could have been the turning point for the increased incidence of cefazolin allergy.

Changing patterns in the epidemiology of drug allergy

Drug allergy (DA) remains a complex and unaddressed problem worldwide that often deprives patients of optimal medication choices and places them at risk for life-threatening reactions. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis are common and due to the lack of standardized definitions and biomarkers. The true burden of DA is unknown, and recent efforts in data gathering through electronic medical records are starting to provide emerging patterns around the world. Ten percent of the general population engaged in health care claim to have a DA, and the most common label is penicillin allergy. Up to 20% of emergency room visits for anaphylaxis are due to DA and 15%-20% of hospitalized patients report DA. It is estimated that DA will increase based on the availability and use of new and targeted antibiotics, vaccines, chemotherapies, biologicals, and small molecules, which are aimed at improving patient's options and quality of life. Global and regional variations in the prevalence of diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus and mycobacterial diseases, and the drugs used to treat these infections have an impact on DA. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the global impact of DA by presenting emerging data on drug epidemiology in adult and pediatric populations.

Management of Penicillin Allergy in the Perioperative Setting

The selection of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is challenging in patients with a history of penicillin allergy; as such, we present a literature review exploring current best practices and the associated supporting evidence, as well as areas for future research. Guidelines recommend the use of alternative agents in patients with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, but those alternative agents are associated with worse outcomes, including an increased risk of surgical site infection, and higher cost. More recent data suggest that the risk of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin, is extremely low, and that cefazolin can be used safely in most penicillin-allergic patients. Studies have therefore explored how best to implement first-line cefazolin use in patients with a penicillin allergy label. A variety of interventions, including preoperative allergy de-labeling with incorporation of penicillin skin testing, use of patient risk-stratification questionnaires, and utilization of clinician algorithms to guide antibiotic selection intraoperatively, have all been shown to significantly increase cefazolin utilization without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Further studies are needed to clarify the most effective interventions and implementation strategies, as well as to evaluate whether patients with severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin should continue to be excluded from receipt of other beta-lactams.

Assessing Pediatric Cephalosporin Allergic Reactions Through Direct Graded Oral Challenges

BACKGROUND

Cephalosporins, β-lactam antibiotics, commonly cause allergic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical characteristics and management of pediatric patients with suspected cephalosporin allergy using direct graded oral challenges (GOCs).

METHODS

Children referred for suspected cephalosporin allergy at 4 Canadian clinics were recruited over 10 years. Data on demographics, clinical reaction characteristics, and management were collected through a questionnaire. Patients underwent a direct GOC (initially 10% of the treatment dose, then 90% after 20 min), and reactions were monitored 1 week postchallenge. Families were contacted annually for up to 5 years to detect subsequent antibiotic reactions. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with positive GOC reactions.

RESULTS

Among the 136 patients reporting cephalosporin allergy, 75 (55.1%) were males with a median age of 3.9 years (interquartile range 2.3-8.7). Cefprozil represented the most common cephalosporin linked to the index reaction (67.6% of cases). Of the 136 direct GOCs, 5.1% had an immediate and 4.4% a nonimmediate reaction, respectively. Positive GOCs conducted in children with a history of skin-limited nonsevere rashes were classified as mild, benign skin rashes. Positive GOCs were more likely in children with food allergies (adjusted odds ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct GOCs are safe and effective for diagnosing pediatric cases that report nonvesicular skin-limited symptoms while being treated with cephalosporins.

[Practicability of the German guidelines on skin and soft tissue infections]

The guidelines on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections in adults from 2018 were the first German language S2k guidelines for these infections. This article summarizes the experiences with respect to their practicality in the clinical routine and the resulting supplementations and comments. In view of the many different terms for soft tissue infections, the guidelines had to first establish some definitions and diagnostic criteria. Among others, the guidelines introduced the provisional term limited phlegmons (phlegmons are usually termed cellulitis in Angloamerican literature) for the frequent initially superficial soft tissue infections with Staphylococcus aureus, which do not always extend to the fascia, in order to differentiate them from erysipelas caused by Streptoccocus, which in contrast to phlegmons always respond to penicillin. The general symptoms present in erysipela are a practical differential criterion. Somewhat more complex are the definitions and recommendations for the severe forms of phlegmon, which involve the fascia and are accompanied by necrosis, so that here the practicality of the guidelines needs to prove its worth over time. The guidelines also give recommendations how to proceed in case of alleged or confirmed hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics. Currently, relevant guidelines recommend, and it is correspondingly here elaborated, that in acute cases a beta-lactam antibiotic with side chains other than those in the suspected drug may present an alternative without prior testing. Therefore, cefazolin, that does not share any side chains with other beta-lactam antibiotics, could be administered under appropriate precautionary measures. The term cellulitis is avoided in the guidelines. Since it is used frequently, and also for non-infectious dermatoses, the various meanings are discussed and distinguished from each other.

Beta-lactam comprehensive allergy management program in a community medical center

Objective

The Beta-lactam Comprehensive Allergy Management Program (CAMP) was implemented to facilitate complete beta-lactam allergy history documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) and increase beta-lactam utilization. The study objective was to assess the rate of complete allergy histories and days of antimicrobial therapy (DOT) before versus after CAMP implementation.

Design

Quasi-experimental study with interrupted time-series analysis.

Setting

Non-teaching, urban, and community medical center within a multi-hospital health system.

Patients

Adult inpatients with a beta-lactam allergy receiving antimicrobial therapy.

Methods

The multidisciplinary CAMP team screened, interviewed, and collected allergy history details of adult inpatients with a beta-lactam allergy receiving antimicrobial therapy starting January 4, 2021. Patients were stratified as high, moderate, or low risk of IgE-mediated allergy and referred to an allergist for skin testing or drug challenge. The EMR was updated with interview details and drug challenge or skin test results. The primary endpoint was rate of complete allergy history documentation before (12/1/18-4/1/19) compared to after (1/4/21-5/1/21) program implementation. The secondary endpoint was days of inpatient beta-lactam therapy. Implementation logistics, de-labeling rate, and antimicrobial therapy changes were evaluated.

Results

The program evaluated 392 individuals, with 184 and 208 patients comprising the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. The post-intervention period was associated with an increase of 19.8% in complete allergy histories (0.359 PPc; R 2 0.26; p = 0.002) and 9.34 beta-lactam DOT per 1,000-days-present (1.106 PPc; R 2 0.194; p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Implementation of a comprehensive beta-lactam allergy management program was associated with higher rates of complete beta-lactam allergy history and beta-lactam use.

Direct challenges are the gold standard for most antibiotic allergy evaluations

Antibiotic allergies are frequently encountered in clinical practice, and delabeling of these allergies has individual and public health benefits. This review focuses on the evidence supporting graded challenges without preceding skin testing in adult and pediatric patients to the major groups of antibiotics including penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, metronidazole, carbapenems, and aztreonam. The cost savings, time savings, and evidence for performing graded challenges outside of an allergy/immunology office are also reviewed for graded challenges to penicillins.

The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergy

OBJECTIVES

Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergy is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy.

METHODS

The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) questions relevant for both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergy. For each question a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Quality of evidence was graded from very low to high and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak.

RESULTS

Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) and non-beta-lactam antibiotics (NBLA). Due to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data supports that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule are severe delayed type reactions, in which reexposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation of a multidisciplinary team.

CONCLUSIONS

Accumulated scientific data now supports a more liberal approach that better balances benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In the Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach towards suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used NBLA, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.

Potential Factors of Primary Hospital Healthcare Professionals in Hindering the Abolition of Routine Skin Test for Cephalosporin: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

In 2021, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of Chinese issued a document that no longer recommended the routine skin test for cephalosporin (RSTC). However, there is still resistance to the cancellation of RSTC in a primary hospital. The study aimed to explore the potential factors for hindering the abolition of the RSTC in a county-level hospital based on the PRECEDE model.

Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted on healthcare workers in the Pidu District People's Hospital, Chengdu, by online questionnaire from September 10 to September 25 in the 2021.The PRECEDE model was used to divide the potential factors of healthcare professionals in hindering the abolition of the RSTC into predisposing factors, enabling factors and reinforcing factors. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square test, multiple linear and multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

We collected 605 respondents' valid questionnaires. 254 healthcare professionals were against cancellation of the RSTC, accounting for 41.98%. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that working for 6~10 years (β = 1.953, P = 0.024), medium (β = 1.995, P = 0.030) or senior (β = 4.003, P = 0.007) professional qualification, pharmacists (β = 3.830, P = 0.013) and working in surgical department (β= 4.462, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher score of predisposing factors, enabling factors, and reinforcing factors on abolition of RSTC. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pharmacists (OR=3.113, 95% CI: 1.341-7.223, P=0.030), medium professional qualification (OR=1.272, 95% CI: 0.702-2.302, P=0.008), scores of predisposing factors (OR=1.335, 95% CI: 1.033-1.726, P=0.009), and scores of enabling factors (OR=1.208, 95% CI: 1.109-1.315, P<0.001) were independently associated with the positive anticipated behavior on the abolition of RSTC. While nurses (OR=0.516, 95% CI: 0.284-0.938, P<0.001) were independently associated with anticipated negative behavior.

Conclusion

Pharmacists, medium professional qualification, and healthcare professionals with higher scores of predisposing and enabling factors were more likely to have a positive anticipated behavior on the abolition of RSTC, while nurses did not.

Drug Allergy Practice Parameter Updates to Incorporate Into Your Clinical Practice

The drug allergy practice parameter was developed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions. It was last updated in 2010. With the growth of research and evidence-based data since then, experts came together to update the practice parameter with a focus on sections that the work group deemed to have significant changes (or were not addressed) in the previous practice parameter. This review is a focused update on aspects of the practice parameter deemed to have the greatest impact on clinical practice and includes significant updates on diagnosis of antibiotic allergy including penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfonamide, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide allergies. Other topics include the evolution in our management approach to patients with aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy, diagnostic testing for delayed drug hypersensitivity and allergy to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and the key consensus-based statements for clinical practice. Specifically, the updated practice parameter helps allergists understand the place of 1- or 2-step drug challenges that are valuable tools often without the need for skin testing in many clinical situations. A proactive approach to delabeling penicillin allergy as well as unnecessary avoidance of safe antibiotic alternatives for patients with proven penicillin allergy is emphasized. New guidance is provided on management of patients with different phenotypes of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions. Approaches to delayed drug hypersensitivity and use of delayed intradermal and patch testing for specific phenotypes are reviewed. Lastly, practical approaches to management of patients with reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics are discussed.

The Combined Use of Chronological and Morphological Criteria in the Evaluation of Immediate Penicillin Reactions: Evidence From a Large Study

BACKGROUND

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins are often labeled on the basis of a similar set of symptoms, but a key feature of these reactions that can be reproduced in diagnostic testing may be the timing of a reaction in relation to the dose administration.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the timing of a reaction in response to the last dose of a penicillin would predict the results of diagnostic testing.

METHODS

We evaluated 1074 patients by performing skin tests, serum specific IgE assays (ImmunoCAP), and challenges. Patients who were evaluated by us more than 6 months after their reactions and found negative were reevaluated within 2 to 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients who had reacted within 1 hour after the first dose, within 1 hour after subsequent doses, more than 1 hour to within 6 hours after the first dose, or more than 1 hour to within 6 hours after subsequent doses were classified as group A (758 individuals), B (92), C (67), or D (157), respectively. Penicillin hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 707 patients (65.8%) by skin tests (407 patients, 57.6%), ImmunoCAP (47, 6.6%), both tests (232, 32.8%), or challenges (21, 3%). A conversion to allergy-test positivity occurred in 7 of 10 patients with anaphylactic reactions and in 1 of 28 patients with other reactions who were reevaluated after negative challenges. The rate of penicillin-allergic patients in groups A, B, C, and D was 85%, 35.9%, 35.8%, and 3.8%, respectively. Only 1 of 107 patients reporting cutaneous reactions lasting more than 1 day had positive results to allergy tests.

CONCLUSIONS

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity can be diagnosed by skin tests in about 70% of subjects who react within 1 hour (eg, patients from groups A and B). This hypersensitivity can be lost over time, as demonstrated by the negativization of allergy tests in follow-up studies. In subjects with anaphylactic reactions, however, it is advisable to not consider this phenomenon definitive. In fact, a conversion to allergy test positivity can be observed in up to 20% of such subjects retested after negative challenges.

Adherence and outcomes of a surgical prophylaxis guideline promoting cephalosporin use among patients with penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND

The study purpose was to assess adherence to a local surgical prophylaxis guideline in patients with reported penicillin allergies, which recommends cephalosporins as first-line prophylaxis.

METHODS

Adult patients with penicillin allergies admitted for a surgical procedure from July 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively screened, and the first surgery per admission was included. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeries using β-lactam prophylaxis. Additional outcomes included prophylaxis timing, hypersensitivity reactions, acute kidney injury, infectious complications, duration of stay, and 30-day mortality or readmission.

RESULTS

Among 597 procedures, 504 patients (84.4%) received a β-lactam for surgical prophylaxis, including 494 (82.3%) who received a cephalosporin. Patients in the non-β-lactam group were more likely to have a type I IgE-mediated penicillin allergy (48.4% vs 31.7%, P = .002); however, the majority with type I reactions still received β-lactams (78.0%), including in the setting of anaphylaxis or angioedema to penicillin (67.7%). Zero allergic reactions to prophylaxis antibiotics were reported in either group, and there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients receiving drugs associated with the management of allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactams was associated with inappropriate prophylaxis timing (9.7% vs 3.2%, P = .005) and postprocedural acute kidney injury (7.5% vs 0.6%, P < .001). All other outcomes were nonsignificant between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Among surgical patients with a documented penicillin allergy, most received cephalosporin prophylaxis as recommended by institutional guidelines, with zero allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactam prophylaxis was associated with worsened outcomes. Cephalosporin prophylaxis should be preferred for surgical patients, including in the setting of true penicillin allergy.

Antibiotic allergy in children with cystic fibrosis: A retrospective case-control study

Antibiotic allergy is a big problem that may affect the treatment and life quality of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

AIM

To evaluate predictive factors for confirmed antibiotic hypersensitivity in children with CF.

METHODS

In this case-controlled study, we examined 15 patients with CF who had been confirmed with antibiotic allergy. Additionally, we included a control group of age- and gender-matched 45 CF patients with no antibiotic allergy. The diagnosis of antibiotic allergy was confirmed in the presence of a compatible history and a positive response in the drug skin test or provocation test. Multiple drug hypersensitivity was classified according to the temporal relationship of antibiotics: (i) distant, (ii) simultaneous, and (iii) sequential. The data were analyzed by conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

β-lactam allergy was confirmed in eight patients (ceftazidime n = 5, piperacillin-tazobactam n = 3) and non-β-lactam allergy was confirmed in two patients (ciprofloxacin n = 1, azithromycin n = 1). Additionally, multiple drug hypersensitivity in five patients (distant n = 4, sequential n = 1), among whom two patients showed hypersensitivity against ceftazidime/piperacillin-tazobactam+ ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin, two patients showed hypersensitivity against ceftazidime+ ciprofloxacin n = 2, and one patient showed hypersensitivity against piperacillin-tazobactam+ amikacin+ trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All patients (n = 13) with confirmed β-lactam allergy were meropenem tolerant. Multivariate analysis indicated that immediate reactions (, p &lt; 0.001) and allergic evaluation in the first six months after the reaction (p = 0.036) were significant risk factors for the prediction of antibiotic hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Beta-lactam antibiotic allergy is the most commonly confirmed drug allergy in children with CF. However, unlike normal children, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam account for the majority.

CROSS-REACTIVITY TO ANTIBIOTICS: PROPOSITIONS FOR SELECTING ALTERNATIVES

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To analyze CR among antibacterials of different classes and to overcome some widespread misconceptions regarding CR between different classes of antibiotics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The narrative review represents an assessment of the most pertinent literary sources published in English language, which dealt with the issues of cross-reactivity between individual antibiotics and different classes of these ones.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: With a high probability of type I AR in a patient in the past, it is better to plan the treatment of patients together with an allergist / immunologist. If this probability is estimated to be low, the choice of a particular antibiotic may be based to some extent on CR data.

Management of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Allergy: A Real-Life Study

Beta-lactam allergy is a common problem in everyday medical practice and is recognized as a major public health issue. Carrying this label frequently leads to the avoidance of all beta-lactam antibiotics, favoring the use of other less preferred classes of antibiotics, that are more expensive and associated with more side effects and increased antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, delabeling a beta-lactam allergy is part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Herein, we retrospectively examined the clinical records of 576 patients who were referred to our center for a label of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics and were systematically investigated following a standardized algorithm. Our main aim was to evaluate the frequency of confirmed immediate- and delayed-type allergy to commonly prescribed subclasses of beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin and cephalosporin), as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) and the sensitivity of skin tests. Our secondary aims were to examine the safety of beta-lactam skin testing and drug challenge. We identified that 260 patients reported a history of immediate reactions, 131 of delayed reactions, and 114 of unknown timing or mechanism of reactions. Following assessment and testing, 86 (18.3%) patients had a confirmed allergy to any beta-lactam antibiotics; 63 (13.4%) with an immediate- and 23 (4.9%) with a delayed-type reaction. Most frequently identified confirmed allergy was to penicillins (65 patients), followed by cephalosporins (21 patients). When immediate-type reactions were examined, NPV of skin tests were 96.3% and 100% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. When delayed reactions were considered, NPV were 91.9 and 87.5% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. Evaluation of the safety of skin tests according to the standardized procedure showed that systemic allergic reactions occurred in only 0.7% of skin tests and in 3.1% of drug challenges. Overall, our data indicate that only 18.3% of patients with a beta-lactam allergy label have a confirmed allergy and non-allergic patients can be safely delabeled through allergic workup based on skin tests and drug challenge. This approach supports the policy of saving second-line antibiotics through a standardized allergy workup.

Promoting β-lactam utilization through suppression of electronic medical record cross-allergy alerts

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

Current literature surrounding management of patients with reported β-lactam allergies focuses on allergy delabeling. Standard clinical decision support tools have not been optimized to be compatible with the currently accepted cross-reaction rate of 1% to 2%. This potentially promotes use of non-β-lactam antibiotics, which are often not first-line therapy and may carry increased risks. The impact of electronic medical record (EMR) clinical decision support tool optimization on utilization of β-lactam antibiotics in β-lactam-allergic patients was evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective pre-post β-lactam cross-allergy EMR alert suppression quality improvement intervention cohort study of β-lactam-allergic adult inpatients prescribed antibiotics was conducted. Preintervention baseline data were collected for an initial cohort admitted during September 2018. The intervention, in which clinical decision support rules were updated to display β-lactam cross-sensitivity allergy alerts only for β-lactam-allergic patients with documentation of organization-defined high-severity reactions of anaphylaxis, hives, and shortness of breath, was implemented August 20, 2019. The postintervention cohort included patients admitted during September 2019.

RESULTS

A 91% increase in the percentage of β-lactam-allergic patients who received a β-lactam agent at any time during their admission was noted after the intervention (26.6% vs 51%, P < 0.001). Statistically significant decreases in prescribing of alternative antibiotic classes were seen for fluoroquinolones (decrease from 45.3% to 26%, P < 0.001), aminoglycosides (decrease from 9.4% to 2.9%, P = 0.002), and aztreonam (decrease from 30% to 16.7%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EMR β-lactam cross-allergy alert optimization consistent with current literature significantly improved the utilization of alternative β-lactam subclasses, mostly through β-lactam prescribing as initial therapy in β-lactam-allergic patients.

Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics

Beta-lactam antibiotics are the most commonly reported drug allergy in adults and children. More than 95% of those with reported allergy labels to beta lactams are not confirmed when subjected to allergy testing. Beta lactam antibiotics are associated with a wide spectrum of immediate and delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latency period to symptoms and clinical presentation aids in the causality assessment. Risk stratification based on diagnosis and timing then allows for appropriate management and evaluation. Skin prick testing, intradermal testing and oral challenge are well established for evaluation of immediate reactions. Delayed intradermal testing, patch testing and oral challenge can also be considered for evaluation of mild to moderate delayed reactions. Cross-reactivity between beta-lactams appears to be driven most commonly by a shared R1 side-chain. Standardized algorithms, protocols and pathways are needed for widespread implementation of a pragmatic and effective approach to patients reporting beta lactam allergy.

Population-Based Incidence of New Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Cefaclor, and Sulfonamide Antibiotic "Allergies" in Exposed Individuals with and without Preexisting Ampicillin, Cephalexin, or Cefaclor "Allergies"

BACKGROUND

There is a theoretical concern, unconfirmed by population-based challenge data, that clinically significant, immunologically mediated hypersensitivity occurs among β-lactams sharing side chains.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the population-based allergy incidence associated with the use of β-lactams sharing exact R1 side chains (ampicillin, cephalexin, and cefaclor [ACC]), with or without a current ACC allergy or a sulfonamide antibiotic allergy for comparison.

METHODS

All courses of ACC and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole used by any Kaiser Permanente California members in 2017 and 2018, with follow-up through January 2019, were identified along with their preexisting antibiotic allergy status and all new antibiotic-specific allergies reported within 30 days of course initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 1,167,713 courses of ACC were administered to individuals. No sulfonamide antibiotic or ACC allergy and 4771 new ACC allergies (0.41%) were reported. Moreover, 130,032 courses of ACC were administered to individuals with a sulfonamide antibiotic allergy; no ACC allergy and 904 new ACC allergies (0.70%) were reported. There were 5,958 courses of ACC administered to individuals with an ACC allergy; 2,341 who also had sulfonamide antibiotic allergy, as well as 52 new ACC allergies (0.87%) were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of new ACC allergy reports is minimally and no-specifically increased when a preexisting ACC or sulfonamide antibiotic allergy exists greater than the baseline incidence in the population. This argues against clinically significant, immunologically mediated cross-reactivity among β-lactams sharing exact side chains in individuals with preexisting but unconfirmed β-lactam allergy. Any previously reported, even unrelated antibiotic allergy appears to be a risk factor for reporting a new antibiotic allergy.

Economic Burden of Patient-Reported Penicillin Allergy on Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Self-reported penicillin allergies in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty often results in the use of second-line prophylactic antibiotics. A higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with suboptimal antibiotics vs first generation cephalosporins, which have historically been grouped with other beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin for potential allergic reactions. This study evaluates the economic burden of self-reported penicillin allergies in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Data from studies reporting true incidence of IgE-mediated penicillin allergies, infection-free survivorship of TJA, and cost of PJI attributed to use of second-line antibiotics were obtained. Projected cost of preoperative penicillin allergy testing and potentially avoidable PJI associated with second-line antibiotic usage were calculated. This was compared with projected cost of PJI in the current state to estimate cost savings.

RESULTS

Implementation of preoperative penicillin allergy testing leads to a potential savings of nearly $37 million to payors in the first year based on 1-year survivorship. This savings increases to $411.6 million over a 10-year span and $1.18 billion over a 20-year span.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative penicillin allergy testing or risk stratification via thorough history should be implemented as standard of care for patients with self-reported penicillin allergies before TJA and would result in decreased cost of PJI.

Diagnostic Approach of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Cefazolin in a Large Prospective Cohort

BACKGROUND

Cefazolin is a common trigger of perioperative anaphylaxis. The diagnostic approach is controversial because the optimal concentration for skin testing is uncertain, drug provocation tests (DPTs) are contraindicated in severe reactions, and in vitro tests are not thoroughly validated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize a large number of patients reporting cefazolin allergic reactions and to analyze the diagnostic role of in vivo and in vitro tests.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients with suspicion for allergic reactions to cefazolin by clinical history, skin tests (STs), and, if negative, DPT. In a subgroup of patients, basophil activation test (BAT) and radioallergosorbent test were done before allergologic workup was performed and the final diagnosis was achieved.

RESULTS

We evaluated 184 patients, 76 of whom were confirmed as allergic (41.3%), 90 were nonallergic (48.9%), and 18 were nonconfirmed (9.8%). All patients reporting anaphylactic shock and most reporting anaphylaxis were confirmed to be allergic (P < .001). Forty allergic patients (52.6%) were confirmed by STs, 22 by DPT (28.9%), and 14 by clinical history (18.4%). All subjects manifesting exanthemas and pruritus were nonallergic. The BAT sensitivity was 66.7% when CD63 and CD203c were combined as activation markers. Six of 8 patients with negative STs and positive DPT had a positive BAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients allergic to cefazolin often reported severe immediate-type reactions. Skin tests enabled a diagnosis in half of patients when using cefazolin at 20 mg/mL. Unfortunately, DPT could not be performed in all patients owing to reaction severity, which makes BAT a promising diagnostic tool. Further research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms, especially in severe reactions.

Classifying cephalosporins: from generation to cross-reactivity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most recent literature studying the classifications, immunochemistry, and crossreactivity of allergy reactions to cephalosporins.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last five years, research interest has focused on three areas related to cephalosporin allergy: cross-reactivity among cephalosporins and with other beta-lactams; the incidence of adverse reactions in penicillin allergy patients or in reported penicillin allergy labels; and new cephalosporins structures involved in the immunological recognition.

SUMMARY

Meta-analysis of a substantial number of studies shows that cephalosporins are safer than previously thought. Evidence supports two main conclusions in that regard. First, there is a relatively low percentage of cross-reactivity between cephalosporins and other beta-lactams with penicillins in penicillin allergy patients. Second, there is a very low incidence of allergy reactions in nonselected as well as in selected penicillin allergy patients when cephalosporins are used prior to surgical intervention.On the other hand, few structures have been discovered related to the immune mechanism of cephalosporin allergy reactions, and these are far from being ready to use in clinical practice.

Urticaria: The 1-1-1 Criterion for Optimized Risk Atratification in β-Lactam Allergy Delabeling

BACKGROUND

A spurious label of β-lactam allergy compromises antibiotic stewardship. Delabeling protocols based on direct challenges (ie, not preceded by allergy tests) can be applied in low-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims at determining the significance of the characteristics of urticaria in the risk stratification for delabeling.

METHODS

The characteristics of urticarial eruptions that had occurred during therapeutic courses with a β-lactam, namely the time interval between the exposure and onset, the dose (first or subsequent) after which urticaria appeared, and the duration of the eruption, were correlated to the results of a systematic allergy workup (skin tests, specific IgE measurements, and challenges). Data from 410 patients enrolled in 3 allergy centers (Rome and Troina, Italy, and Antwerp, Belgium) were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression was performed, which included appearance within 1 hour after the first dose and regression within 1 day: a model that can be summarized as the "1-1-1" urticaria criterion.

RESULTS

An urticarial eruption that had appeared within 1 hour after the first dose and had regressed within 1 day was more frequently reported in the group with a positive allergy workup, with odds ratios of 17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-31), 11 (95% CI: 6-20), and 48 (95% CI: 14-157), respectively (P < .005). The 1-1-1 criterion displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 85%, and a negative predictive value and a positive predictive value of 80% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with urticaria meeting the 1-1-1 criterion should be considered at high risk and referred for an allergy workup with skin testing and specific IgE measurement before challenging.

Safety of administering cefazolin versus other antibiotics in penicillin-allergic patients for surgical prophylaxis at a major Canadian teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Cefazolin surgical prophylaxis is associated with better patient outcomes; however, its use in penicillin-allergic patients is controversial. We evaluated the safety of cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic patients, including those with anaphylaxis histories.

METHODS

We conducted a pre and postintervention quality improvement evaluation of an institution-wide policy change at a tertiary-care hospital, before (October 2017-January 2018), during (February 2018-September 2018), and after (October 2018-October 2019) transition to routine cefazolin prophylaxis for penicillin-allergic patients, including those with anaphylaxis histories but excluding severe delayed reactions (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome). Retrospective data was collected on all surgical prophylaxis patients with penicillin-anaphylactic histories between October 2017 and September 2018. From October 2018, we prospectively reviewed adverse events with cefazolin. Primary outcome was adverse events in penicillin-allergic patients receiving cefazolin perioperatively.

RESULTS

From October 2017 to October 2019, 27,467 operations were performed. Of 220 patients with penicillin-anaphylactic histories reviewed prior to the full policy change, no statistically significant differences were reported in allergic reactions (P = .70), surgical site infections (P = 1.00), or adverse events (P = .32) with cefazolin compared to other antibiotics. Postpolicy implementation, cefazolin usage increased 18.2%, while vancomycin and clindamycin decreased by 11.4% and 62.0%, respectively. No anaphylaxis was documented in penicillin-allergic patients receiving cefazolin in either the review or quality assurance follow-up after the change. Of 3 patients developing reactions to cefazolin, none had histories of penicillin allergy. Surgical site infection rates were similar between pre and postpolicy time periods (P = .842).

CONCLUSION

Administration of cefazolin in penicillin-anaphylactic patients for surgical prophylaxis appears to be safe.

Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Cefazolin is the preoperative antibiotic of choice because it is safer and more efficacious than second-line alternatives. Surgical patients labeled as having penicillin allergy are less likely to prophylactically receive cefazolin and more likely to receive clindamycin or vancomycin, which results in higher rates of surgical site infections.

Objective

To examine the incidence of dual allergy to cefazolin and natural penicillins.

Data Sources

MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without language restrictions for relevant articles published from database inception until July 31, 2020.

Study Selection

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was performed for articles published from database inception to July 31, 2020, for studies that included patients who had index allergies to a natural penicillin and were tested for tolerability to cefazolin or that included patients who had index allergies to cefazolin and were tested for tolerability to a natural penicillin. A total of 3228 studies were identified and 2911 were screened for inclusion.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were independently extracted by 2 authors. Bayesian meta-analysis was used to estimate the frequency of allergic reactions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Dual allergy to cefazolin and a natural penicillin.

Results

Seventy-seven unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding 6147 patients. Cefazolin allergy was identified in 44 participants with a history of penicillin allergy, resulting in a dual allergy meta-analytical frequency of 0.7% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.1%-1.7%; I2 = 74.9%). Such frequency was lower for participants with unconfirmed (0.6%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-1.3%; I2 = 54.3%) than for those with confirmed penicillin allergy (3.0%; 95% CrI, 0.01%-17.0%; I2 = 88.2%). Thirteen studies exclusively assessed surgical patients (n = 3884), among whom 0.7% (95% CrI, 0%-3.3%; I2 = 85.5%) had confirmed allergy to cefazolin. Low heterogeneity was observed for studies of patients with unconfirmed penicillin allergy who had been exposed to perioperative cefazolin (0.1%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-0.3%; I2 = 13.1%). Penicillin allergy was confirmed in 16 participants with a history of cefazolin allergy, resulting in a meta-analytical frequency of 3.7% (95% CrI, 0.03%-13.3%; I2 = 64.4%). The frequency of penicillin allergy was 4.4% (95% CrI, 0%-23.0%; I2 = 75%) for the 8 studies that exclusively assessed surgical patients allergic to cefazolin.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that most patients with a penicillin allergy history may safely receive cefazolin. The exception is patients with confirmed penicillin allergy in whom additional care is warranted.

β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-Reactivity: A Clinician's Guide to Selecting an Alternative Antibiotic

β-Lactams which include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams are the most common antibiotic classes reported to cause allergic reactions to drugs. This review is mainly about published studies assessing the cross-reactivity among β-lactams in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic subjects by carrying out diagnostic tests with alternative β-lactams and, if appropriate, graded challenges. Several studies demonstrated that cross-reactivity connected with the β-lactam ring, causing positive responses to allergy tests with all β-lactams, is infrequent in subjects with an IgE-mediated allergy and anecdotal in those with a T-cell-mediated allergy. Identities or similarities of β-lactam side-chain structures are mainly responsible for cross-reactivity among these antibiotics. For example, in aminopenicillin-allergic subjects, cross-reactivity with aminocephalosporins could possibly be over 30%. On the other hand, in a few prospective studies of penicillin-allergic individuals, less than 1% of cases show a cross-reactivity between penicillins and both aztreonam and carbapenems. Particular patterns of allergy-test positivity observed in some studies that assessed cross-reactivity among β-lactams seem to indicate that prior exposures may be responsible for coexisting sensitivities. Therefore, pre-treatment skin tests with the related β-lactams are suggested before administering them via graded challenges to β-lactam-allergic patients who need alternative β-lactams.

Emerging Causes of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: A Review of Anaphylaxis-Associated Reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced anaphylaxis is a well-known adverse drug reaction for some drug classes, but emerging drug causes of anaphylaxis and novel mechanisms may contribute in unrecognized ways.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the top drugs reported in association with anaphylaxis and anaphylaxis followed by death in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

We reviewed the publicly available FAERS database from 1999 to 2019. Using search terms "anaphylactic shock" or "anaphylactic reaction" and sorting cases by generic drug names, we counted and trended reports to FAERS in which a drug was associated with anaphylaxis or anaphylaxis followed by death.

RESULTS

From 1999 to 2019, there were 17,506,002 adverse drug events reported in FAERS, of which 47,496 (0.27%) were reported as anaphylaxis. Excluding patients without age, sex, or country data, respectively, the median age of patients in reports of anaphylaxis was 52 (interquartile range: 28), 62.71% were female, and 13,899 of 34,381 (40.43%) reports were from the United States. There were 2984 of 47,496 (6.28%) reports of anaphylaxis followed by death. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis in FAERS were antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis deaths were antibiotics, radiocontrast agents, and intraoperative agents. Linear regression demonstrated reports of anaphylaxis to mAbs increasing at an average rate of 0.77% of total anaphylaxis reports per year (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.88) from 2.00% in 1999 to 17.37% in 2019, faster than any other drug class.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics were highly reported for anaphylaxis overall and anaphylaxis followed by death. Increasing reports were noted for anaphylaxis to mAb therapies.

Testing Strategies and Predictors for Evaluating Immediate and Delayed Reactions to Cephalosporins

BACKGROUND

Although 1% to 2% of the general population carries a cephalosporin allergy label (CAL), we lack validated testing strategies and predictors of true allergy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify cross-reactivity patterns and predictors of skin test positive (STP) in geographically disparate patients with a CAL.

METHODS

A total of 780 adult patients labeled with a CAL or penicillin allergy label (PAL) with unknown tolerance of cephalosporins identified from the Austin Hospital (Melbourne, Australia) (n = 410) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) (n = 370) between 2014 and 2018 underwent a standardized skin testing.

RESULTS

Of 328 patients with a CAL, 29 (8.8%) tested STP to ≥1 cephalosporin(s). There were no cefazolin or ceftriaxone STP, 0 of 452 (0%), in patients with a PAL only. Of 328 patients with a CAL, 16 (4.8%) were ampicillin STP. Eleven of 16 of these patients had an initial allergy label to cephalexin. Twenty of 29 cephalosporin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to a cephalosporin with a different R1 side chain, and 8 of 14 ampicillin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to ≥1 non-amino R1 group cephalosporin. Eleven of 13 patients STP to cefazolin were skin and ingestion challenge negative to all other penicillins and cephalosporins predicted by its distinct R1/R2 groups. Seven of 15 ceftriaxone STP patients demonstrated cross-reactivity with R1-similar cephalosporins. Time since the original reaction predicted STP testing to both penicillins, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per year 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90, 0.97), and cephalosporins, aOR per year 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalosporin cross-reactivity is based on shared R1 groupings. Increasing time since the original reaction and the presence of a PAL with unknown cephalosporin tolerance predict a lower likelihood of cephalosporin STP.

Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper

A recent survey of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) on how European allergy specialists deal with beta-lactam (BL) hypersensitivity demonstrated a significant heterogeneity in current practice, suggesting the need to review and update existing EAACI guidelines in order to make the diagnostic procedures as safe and accurate, but also as cost-effective, as possible. For this purpose, a bibliographic search on large studies regarding BL hypersensitivity diagnosis was performed by an EAACI task force, which reviewed and evaluated the literature data using the GRADE system for quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. The updated guidelines provide a risk stratification in BL hypersensitivity according to index reaction(s), as well as an algorithmic approach, based on cross-reactivity studies, in patients with a suspicion of BL hypersensitivity and an immediate need for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible. Furthermore, the update addresses availability and concentrations of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, and diagnostic algorithms and administration of alternative BL in allergic subjects. Specifically, distinct diagnostic algorithms are suggested depending on risk stratification of the patient into high and low risk based on the morphology and chronology of the reaction, immediate (ie, occurring within 1-6 hours after the last administered dose) or nonimmediate (ie, occurring more than 1 hour after the initial drug administration), and the reaction severity. Regarding the allergy workup, the main novelty of this document is the fact that in some low-risk nonimmediate reactions ST are not mandatory, especially in children. For DPT, further studies are necessary to provide data supporting the standardization of protocols, especially of those regarding nonimmediate reactions, for which there is currently no consensus.

Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG)

This guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) hypersensitivity was written by the German and Austrian professional associations for allergology, and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy in a consensus procedure according to the criteria of the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. BLA such as penicillins and cephalosporins represent the drug group that most frequently triggers drug allergies. However, the frequency of reports of suspected allergy in patient histories clearly exceeds the number of confirmed cases. The large number of suspected BLA allergies has a significant impact on, e.g., the quality of treatment received by the individual patient and the costs to society as a whole. Allergies to BLA are based on different immunological mechanisms and often manifest as maculopapular exanthema, as well as anaphylaxis; and there are also a number of less frequent special clinical manifestations of drug allergic reactions. All BLA have a beta-lactam ring. BLA are categorized into different classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, and beta-lactamase inhibitors with different chemical structures. Knowledge of possible cross-reactivity is of considerable clinical significance. Whereas allergy to the common beta-lactam ring occurs in only a small percentage of all BLA allergic patients, cross-reactivity due to side chain similarities, such as aminopenicillins and aminocephalosporins, and even methoxyimino cephalosporins, are more common. However, the overall picture is complex and its elucidation may require further research. Diagnostic procedures used in BLA allergy are usually made up of four components: patient history, laboratory diagnostics, skin testing (which is particularly important), and drug provocation testing. The diagnostic approach - even in cases where the need to administer a BLA is acute - is guided by patient history and risk - benefit ratio in the individual case. Here again, further studies are required to extend the present state of knowledge. Performing allergy testing for suspected BLA hypersensitivity is urgently recommended not only in the interests of providing the patient with good medical care, but also due to the immense impact of putative BLA allergies on society as a whole.

Cephalosporins' Cross-Reactivity and the High Degree of Required Knowledge. Case Report and Review of the Literature

Antibiotic cross-reactivity represents a phenomenon of considerable interest as well as antibiotic resistance. Immediate reactions to cephalosporins are reported in the literature with a prevalence of only 1%-3% of the population, while anaphylactic reactions are rarely described (approximately 0.0001%-0.1%) as well as fatalities. Allergic reaction to cephalosporins may occur because of sensitization to unique cephalosporin haptens or to determinants shared with penicillins. Cross-reactivity between cephalosporins represents, in fact, a well-known threatening event involving cephalosporins with similar or identical R1- or R2-side chains. The present report describes the case of a 79-year-old man who suddenly died after intramuscular administration of ceftriaxone. Serum dosage of mast cell tryptase from a femoral blood sample at 3 and 24 hours detected values of 87.7μg/L and 93.5μg/L, respectively (cut-off value 44.3 μg/L); the serum-specific IgE for penicillins, amoxicillin, cephaclor and also for the most common allergens were also determined. A complete post-mortem examination was performed, including gross, histological and immunohistochemical examination, with an anti-tryptase antibody. The cause of death was identified as anaphylactic shock: past administrations of cefepime sensitized the subject to cephalosporins and a fatal cross-reactivity of ceftriaxone with cefepime occurred due to the identical seven-position side chain structure in both molecules. The reported case offers food for thought regarding the study of cross-reactivity and the need to clarify the predictability and preventability of the phenomenon in fatal events.

Immediate cephalosporin allergy

BACKGROUND

Patients who suffer from acute IgE-mediated allergy to a cephalosporin antibiotic are frequently assumed to be at high risk of allergy to other cephalosporins and penicillins.

AIM

To define cross-reactivity patterns in patients with confirmed allergy to a cephalosporin.

METHODS

Subjects presenting with a history of immediate allergy to a cephalosporin-family antibiotic between March 2009 and July 2017 were investigated with specific IgE testing to penicillin, amoxycillin and cefaclor, followed by skin prick testing, intradermal testing and drug provocation testing with a panel of penicillins and cephalosporins.

RESULTS

Out of 564 subjects with a reported beta-lactam allergy, 90 identified a cephalosporin as their index drug. Fifty-five (61.1%) of the 90 subjects tested had a history consistent with an IgE-mediated reaction, of whom 24 (43.6%) were proven to be allergic to their index cephalosporin. Twenty (83.3%) of the 24 were allergic only to their index cephalosporin. Of the four remaining subjects, two were co-sensitised to another beta-lactam with a similar side chain, while the other two had no specific cross-reactivity pattern. Major and minor penicillin determinants were negative for all cephalosporin-allergic individuals.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, cephalosporin allergy does not appear to be a class effect, with most cases found allergic only to their index cephalosporin. Co-sensitisation to other cephalosporins or penicillins was uncommon, and when it occurred, was usually consistent with side chain cross-reactivity.

Tolerability of Cefazolin and Ceftibuten in Patients with IgE-Mediated Aminopenicillin Allergy

BACKGROUND

Side-chain similarities or identities constitute the predominant factor for cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, whereas differences in the side-chain structure seem to account for the absence of such cross-reactivity.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the cross-reactivity between penicillins and 2 cephalosporins (ie, cefazolin and ceftibuten) that have side chains different from those of penicillins, as well as to evaluate the possibility of using these cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic subjects.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of 131 consecutive subjects who had suffered 170 immediate reactions (mostly anaphylaxis) to penicillins and had positive skin test results to at least 1 penicillin reagent. All patients underwent skin tests with cefazolin and ceftibuten. Patients with negative results were challenged with them.

RESULTS

One participant had positive skin test results to cefazolin and ceftibuten, as well as to all other reagents tested, including aztreonam and carbapenems. All 129 subjects who underwent challenges with cefazolin and ceftibuten tolerated them. One subject refused cephalosporin challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins could be treated with cephalosporins such as cefazolin and ceftibuten, which are among the cephalosporins that have side-chain determinants different from those of penicillins. Nevertheless, in patients with such hypersensitivity who need these alternative β-lactams, pretreatment skin tests are advisable because of the possibility of coexisting sensitivities or, much less frequently, of a sensitivity to an antigenic determinant of the common β-lactam ring.