Pregnancy and foetal outcomes following anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: A prospective multicentre study

Safety of biologics in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) face the dual challenge of controlling disease activity while ensuring fetal safety during pregnancy. Biologics are increasingly used to treat ARDs, but evidence regarding their safety during pregnancy remains uncertain. This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety of biologics during pregnancy by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in major databases to identify studies involving pregnant ARDs patients treated with biologics from inception to 30th September 2024. The outcomes assessed included small for gestational age (SGA), cesarean section, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, severe maternal infection, birth defects (BD), and a composite outcome of fetal miscarriage or death.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies involving 11,712 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in patients exposed to biologics was comparable to those observed in the general ARDs population. Compared to other biologics, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of cesarean section (26.93 % vs. 63.64 %, p = 0.01), early pregnancy loss (10.44 % vs. 18.77 %, p = 0.03), and termination of pregnancy (8.59 % vs. 16.11 %, p < 0.01). Compared to csDMARDs, biologic use during pregnancy did not significantly increase the risk of APOs.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to biologics during pregnancy in ARDs patients does not significantly increase the risk of APOs, with TNFis showing a well-supported safety profile, while non-TNFi biologics may carry higher risks, requiring cautious evaluation.

2024 Update of the Japan College of Rheumatology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Secondary publication

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to update the Japan College of Rheumatology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis (CPG for RA).

METHODS

The recommendations were developed based on the evidence published until the end of June 2022 using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. The steering committee, CPG panel, systematic review (SR) group, and SR support team were organised.

RESULTS

The treatment goal and drug treatment algorithm required no modifications; however, the footnotes of the drug treatment algorithm were modified. SR of 21 new or updated recommendations for subcutaneous methotrexate (n = 1), biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (n = 1), rituximab (n = 5), Janus kinase inhibitors (n = 6), biosimilars (n = 2), older patients (n = 4), and pregnancy and lactation (n = 2) was conducted. The recommendations for comorbidities and surgery and rehabilitation remained unchanged from the 2020 CPG for RA.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2024 CPG for RA, which provide recommendations that reflect the current healthcare environment for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan, can be used effectively as a tool for shared decision-making between rheumatologists and patients in the treatment of RA.

Real-world individual and comparative analysis of adverse event reporting for adalimumab and etanercept using public FDA adverse event reporting system data

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed adverse events (AEs) related to adalimumab and etanercept using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to detect unexpected AEs. Subsequently, we compared the discrepancy in serious outcomes involving the same injection site reactions (ISRs) between two different medications.

METHODS

Four algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were used to identify AE signals. These signals were standardized to preferred terms (PTs), and categorized at the system organ classification (SOC) level using the MedDRA system for further analysis. Serious outcomes were defined as death, disability, hospitalization, or life-threatening. The term "multiple serious outcomes" refers to instances that involve two or more of these serious consequences.

RESULTS

Adalimumab had 186,697 AE reports (736 PTs and 28 SOCs), while etanercept had 289,989 AE reports (294 PTs and 21 SOCs). At the PT level, we identified new unexpected AEs in adalimumab that related to multiple serious outcomes like intestinal obstruction, osteoarthritis, hernia, paternal drugs affecting the fetus, intestinal fistula, anal fistula, and postoperative adhesion. At the PT level of etanercept, we discerned unanticipated AEs related to multiple serious outcomes such as knee arthroplasty, joint destruction, finger deformity, and Felty's syndrome. At the SOC level, we paid special attention to the gastrointestinal disorders in adalimumab, with many unexpected PTs, as well as the vascular disorders and cardiac disorders in etanercept. For both drugs, the most common SOC is general disorders and administration site conditions, with ISRs being the most prevalent AEs within this category. The results indicate that etanercept has a greater variety of serious outcomes involving shared ISRs than adalimumab (p < 0.01) and also exhibits higher reported rates for these serious consequences (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Upon individual analysis, we identified unanticipated AEs in adalimumab and etanercept, respectively. Comparative analysis suggests that, despite similar ISRs, etanercept necessitates heightened vigilance due to its potential for more serious outcomes.

Certolizumab pegol in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic, immune-mediated systemic inflammatory disease encompassing ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. TNF inhibitors are the preferred second line therapy for patients with active axial spondyloarthritis. Certolizumab pegol is a TNF inhibitor approved for treatment of both. Three large phase III trials (RAPID-axSpA, C-axSpAnd and C-OPTIMISE) and one large phase IV trial (CIMAX) establish its clinical efficacy in treatment of active disease and maintenance of remission for both diseases. Real world evidence demonstrates clinical efficacy and benefits including reduced bone loss, reduced risk of uveitis, safety in pregnancy and lactation and index drug survival of 10 years. It is generally well tolerated, though can be associated with increased risk of serious infections.

Drug switching in axial spondyloarthritis patients in Germany - a social listening analysis

Background

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease which primarily affects the axial skeleton resulting in chronic back pain and stiffness. According to the guideline, the first-line treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and non-pharmacological treatment. Second line treatment involves biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) such as tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-17 inhibitors.

Objectives

The aim of this social media listening research project was to analyse switches of medication and the reasons thereof to gain valuable insights into real-life journeys of patients suffering from axSpA.

Methods

Publicly available posts in German-speaking disease-specific forums were scanned for disease-specific keywords and commonly used drugs by axSpA patients on the Permea platform. Posts containing at least two key words were selected and switches between medications were manually labelled. A total of 287 scraped posts between 01 July 2010 and 04 Feb 2022 were analysed.

Results

The largest group of described medication switches was initially using bDMARDs. Switches to a different bDMARD, termination of medication and switches to glucocorticoids were most frequently named. Patients on NSAIDs switched to glucocorticoids, a different NSAID or bDMARD, whereas patients on csDMARDs most frequently changed to bDMARDs. In all medication groups the main reason for switching was insufficient efficacy and side effects. Additionally, for the medication groups bDMARDs, csDMARDs and corticosteroids, pregnancy and lactation were given as a reason for switching, whereas patients in the NSAID group never mentioned pregnancy and breastfeeding as a reason for switching treatment.

Conclusion

Our analysis shows medication switches based on real-life patient experiences shared with peers in a social listening setting. We also show medication switches differing from advised guidelines. Gathering real-life insights into patients' journey dealing with chronic diseases allows us to understand, and thereby improve patient care and treatment.

TNF-α/anti-TNF-α drugs and its effect on pregnancy outcomes

Pregnancy is a complex biological process. The establishment and maintenance of foetal-maternal interface are pivotal events. Decidual immune cells and inflammatory cytokines play indispensable roles in the foetal-maternal interface. The disfunction of decidual immune cells leads to adverse pregnancy outcome. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, a common inflammatory cytokine, has critical roles in different stages of normal pregnancy process. However, the relationship between the disorder of TNF-α and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), spontaneous abortion (SA), preterm birth and so on, is still indefinite. In this review, we thoroughly reviewed the effect of TNF-α disorder on pathological conditions. Moreover, we summarized the reports about the adverse pregnancy outcomes (PE, IUGR, SA and preterm birth) of using anti-TNF-α drugs (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, certolizumab and golimumab) currently in the clinical studies. Overall, IUGR, SA and preterm birth are the most common adverse pregnancy outcomes of anti-TNF-α drugs. Our review may provide insight for the immunological treatment of pregnancy-related complication, and help practitioners make informed decisions based on the current evidences.

Therapy of psoriasis during pregnancy and breast-feeding

There have been multiple systemic drugs approved for the therapy of psoriasis vulgaris and psoriasis arthritis (PsA) in the last decade. However, treatment decisions are difficult to make in women planning a pregnancy and in pregnant and lactating women due to the paucity of data for such cases. The strongest evidence for psoriasis therapy during pregnancy exists for topical corticosteroids. Medically controlled use of UVB-therapy is also considered safe. The best evidence regarding systemic therapy during pregnancy and lactation is available for the group of TNF-alpha inhibitors, which is also reflected in the respective medical product information. This is especially important in cases of psoriatic arthritis. Among traditional systemic therapeutics, the largest clinical experience exists for ciclosporin, which, if medically necessary, may be continued during gestation. However, TNF-alpha inhibitors, especially the pegylated form, should be preferred in case of pregnancy. Furthermore, an elective pregnancy termination is not necessary due to systemic therapy of psoriasis with many further substances during the first pregnancy weeks. The current work provides a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on treatment of psoriasis during pregnancy and lactation. Based on the available scientific information, severity of psoriasis and patient's comorbidities, the best possible therapeutic approach can be found in consensus with the patient.

The use of biological agents in pregnant women affected by autoimmune disorders: Why we need more research of this neglected area

Women of childbearing age are largely affected by several autoimmune disorders (the estimates range between 1.5 and 10 per 10,000). The increasing number of effective biological agents has dramatically revolutionized the treatment of these clinical conditions, ameliorating the patient's quality of life. The use of these agents by women during pregnancy is growing to ensure the disease activity control and avoid adverse health outcomes. However, for many newer biological agents, the degree of information concerning their use in pregnancy is often incomplete to perform a conclusive risk assessment on fetal and maternal health given the exclusion of this specific population from pharmacological clinical trials. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed the unacceptable inequities of pharmacological research and medical treatment for pregnant and lactating women, exacerbating the need for filling the gaps of quantitative and qualitative pharmacology data in this sensitive population. ere we summarize (i) what is already known about safety and effectiveness of biological agents in this understudied population (with specific focus on pregnancy-related health outcomes), and what we are going to learn from the on-going studies among pregnant women treated with biological agents; (ii) the methodological and ethical considerations that characterize the pharmacological research in pregnancy, also discussing emerging evidence on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in this clinical setting.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with immune mediated inflammatory diseases exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α during pregnancy: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNFα is increasingly used as treatment for immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis (PS). However, the impact of anti-TNFα during pregnancy on mother and newborn is under debate. This requires a sound knowledge of the effects of this treatment on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after anti-TNFα therapy during pregnancy in women with IMID, specifically IBD, RA and PS.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 39 studies assessing pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of women with IMID exposed to anti-TNFα agents during pregnancy. We used a random-effects model to determine pooled outcome measures.

RESULTS

An increased risk of preterm births (OR 1.45, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.82, p = 0.001) and infections in newborns (OR 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.27, p = 0.05)) was seen for women in the combined group of IMID exposed to anti-TNFα compared to diseased controls. Specifically for IBD patients exposed to anti-TNFα, the risk was increased for preterm birth (OR 1.66, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.42, p = 0.009), and low birth weight (OR 1.49, 95% CI = 1.01 to 2.20, p = 0.047) compared to diseased controls. Combined data from studies of women with RA and PS, showed no increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcome after exposure to anti-TNFα. Most children of mothers with IMID received vaccination according to national vaccination schemes and only minor adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to anti-TNFα agents during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of preterm birth and infections in newborns of women with IMID compared to diseased controls. The risk of preterm birth and low birth weight was increased in women with IBD specifically. The increased risk of infections in newborns underlines the importance of vaccination, which seems to be safe in children exposed to anti-TNFα. Delay of vaccination is therefore unnecessary in these children. These data may aid in balancing the continuing anti-TNFα therapy versus the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

The effect of paternal exposure to immunosuppressive drugs on sexual function, reproductive hormones, fertility, pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the possible influence of immunosuppressive drugs on male sexual function and reproductive outcomes is scarce. Men diagnosed with immune-mediated diseases and a wish to become a father represent an important neglected population since they lack vital information to make balanced decisions about their treatment.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this research was to systematically review the literature for the influence of paternal immunosuppressive drug use on many aspects of male sexual health, such as sexual function, fertility, pregnancy outcomes and offspring health outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the bibliographic databases: Embase (via Elsevier embase.com), MEDLINE ALL via Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Trials (via Wiley) and Web of Science Core Collection. Additionally, Google Scholar and the Clinical trial registries of Europe and the USA were searched. The databases were searched from inception until 31 August 2019. The searches combined keywords regarding male sexual function and fertility, pregnancy outcomes and offspring health with a list of immunosuppressive drugs. Studies were included if they were published in English and if they included original data on male human exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. A meta-analysis was not possible to perform due to the heterogeneity of the data.

OUTCOMES

A total of 5867 references were identified, amongst which we identified 161 articles fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Amongst these articles, 50 included pregnancy and offspring outcomes and 130 included sexual health outcomes. Except for large Scandinavian cohorts, most of the identified articles included a small number of participants. While a clear negative effect on sperm quality was evident for sulfasalazine and cyclophosphamide, a dubious effect was identified for colchicine, methotrexate and sirolimus. In three articles, exposure to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis resulted in improved sperm quality. The information regarding pregnancy and offspring outcomes was scant but no large negative effect associated with paternal immunosuppressive drug exposure was reported.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Evidence regarding the safety of immunosuppressive drugs in men with a wish to become a father is inconclusive. The lack of standardisation on how to evaluate and report male sexual function, fertility and reproduction as study outcomes in men exposed to immunosuppressive drugs is an important contributor to this result. Future research on this topic is needed and should be preferably done using standardised methods.

Antirheumatic medications in pregnancy and breastfeeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As active rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease during pregnancy increases the risk for pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and maternal illness, ongoing management with pregnancy-compatible medications can improve these outcomes. Selecting and taking these medications can be challenging for rheumatologists and patients due to limited knowledge about potential risks and benefits.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fortunately, the American College of Rheumatology, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, British Rheumatology Society, and the European League Against Rheumatism have each published recommendations to guide the use of antirheumatic medications in pregnancy and lactation. Each of these groups endorsed the use of hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, sulfasalazine, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in pregnancy. They also agreed that methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and leflunomide should be avoided in pregnancy. New medications, including small-molecules and biologics, have limited data to support safety in pregnancy and are not currently recommended during this period. Most antirheumatic medications are compatible with lactation.

SUMMARY

Because many patients are hesitant to use antirheumatic medications during pregnancy, honest and accurate discussions about pregnancy planning and management are important to help women make decisions that are in their and their offspring's best interest.

Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications.

RESULTS

A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations.

Drug discontinuation in pregnant women with psoriasis: The PSO-MOTHER cohort study

PURPOSE

To analyse the drug use pattern in women with psoriasis before, during and after pregnancy.

METHODS

All children born (2009-2016) in a central Italian region (Lazio) to mothers with a diagnosis of psoriasis were identified. Drug use patterns (biologicals, systemic, and topical), and discontinuation and switching of drug therapies before, during, and after pregnancy were studied. Findings were compared with data from a population exposed to similar drug therapies (eg, antirheumatic drugs).

RESULTS

Among 3499 deliveries by women affected by psoriasis, 1876 (53.6%) were diagnosed with this condition before the Last Menstrual Period (LMP). Of these, 525 (27.9%) had at least one drug prescription for psoriasis therapy during 6 months before LMP. For each class of drugs considered, there was a general decrease in its use during pregnancy. Considering the two trimesters preceding LMP and the three trimesters of pregnancy, the following percentages of prescriptions were observed: from 10.5% to 0% for biologicals, 7.2% to 2.5% for the conventional systemic drugs, and 51.1% to 9.4% for the topical treatments. After delivery, previous treatments were resumed. Similar results were observed for rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of drugs come with warnings regarding potential embryo-fetotoxicity, which might play a role in the decision to continue treatments during pregnancy. According to our study pregnancy appears to have a significant influence on drug prescriptions of different pharmacological treatments for psoriasis.

Long-term safety of adalimumab for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory skin disorder that affects regions rich in apocrine glands. Although the etiology of HS is not clear, inflammatory cytokines, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, participate in pathogenesis. Adalimumab (ADA), a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets TNFα, is the only EMA/FDA-approved biologic agent available for the therapy of moderate-to-severe HS.Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to present existing studies with an emphasis on the safety profile of ADA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. ADA is prescribed for more than 15 years for varied indications and has improved the therapeutic outcomes of many diseases. Clinical trials and real-life safety data from ADA administration in HS were presented, with particular attention to special populations, such as children, elderly, and pregnant women.Expert opinion: Existing data advise for limited safety concerns with long-term ADA treatment provided that patients are thoroughly screened for infections, latent tuberculosis, and history of malignancy before the start of treatment.

Safety of systemic therapy for noninfectious uveitis

Introduction: The treatment strategies for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) aim to achieve disease remission, prevention of recurrences, and preserving vision, while minimizing the side effects associated with the therapies used.Areas covered: The index review aims to provide a detailed overview of the adverse events and safety parameters associated with the systemic therapies for the management of the NIU.Expert opinion: Despite being the cornerstone of management of acute cases of NIU, long-term corticosteroid use is associated with multi-system side effects, requiring the use of steroid-sparing agents. Adalimumab was recently approved by the FDA for the management of NIU based on the results of VISUAL studies. Similarly, newer drugs targeting various aspects of the inflammatory cascade are being developed. However, until we completely understand the molecular pathways of the inflammatory diseases, the therapeutic profile of these newer agents needs to be broad enough to suppress inflammatory cascade and narrow enough to spare normal cellular processes. Another strategy that has shown some potential in decreasing the systemic side effects is to provide local drug delivery. Therefore, the future of management of NIU is very bright with many novel therapeutic agents and strategies of drug delivery on the horizon.

Etanercept protects ovarian reserve against ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat model

INTRODUCTION

Etanercept has been widely used in autoimmune diseases for blocking tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), which is an inflammatory cytokine. The anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects of etanercept against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury have been shown for several tissues in rat studies, but to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on its protective effects following similar injury in ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether etanercept has beneficial effects on ovarian I/R injury, as well as on ovarian reserve.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-four rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6/group): sham (laparotomy only); sham + etanercept; I/R; and I/R + etanercept. Ischemia was induced for 3 h by twisting the ovary, and 24 h after detorsion the ovarian tissues were collected to evaluate histopathologic changes, glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) concentrations for oxidative stress, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) for DNA damage, caspase-3 activity for apoptosis and ovarian follicle counts. To measure anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), serum samples were drawn before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Tissue GSH and SOD levels were significantly higher, while MDA and MPO levels were significantly lower in the I/R + etanercept group than in the I/R group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). Tissue 8-OHdG and caspase-3 activity were significantly lower in the I/R+etanercept group than in the I/R group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). Preoperative and postoperative AMH levels were compared and there was a significant reduction in the I/R and I/R + etanercept groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The reduction of AMH in the I/R + etanercept group was significantly lower than in the I/R group. The primordial, preantral and small antral follicle numbers were also significantly higher in the I/R + etanercept group compared to the I/R group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Etanercept attenuated inflammation and related oxidative stress and also helped to preserve ovarian reserve following ovarian I/R damage.

Fetal Toxicity of Immunosuppressive Drugs in Pregnancy

Women affected by autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation, or neoplasia need to continue immunosuppressive treatment during pregnancy. In this setting, not only a careful planning of pregnancy, but also the choice of drugs is critical to preventing maternal complications and minimizing the fetal risks. Some immunosuppressive drugs are teratogenic and should be replaced even before the pregnancy, while other drugs need to be managed with caution to prevent fetal risks, including miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity, and low birth weight. In particular, the increasing use of biologic agents raises the question of their compatibility with reproduction. In this review we present data on the indication and safety in pregnancy of the most frequently used immunosuppressive drugs.

Tumour necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphisms in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis

Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) concentration is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Moreover, TNF-α promoter polymorphisms affect cellular TNF-α concentrations. Although several studies on TNF-α polymorphisms have been reported, these studies only define specific loci and result in conflicting conclusions. The meta-analysis in this study was performed to examine the relationship between various TNF-α polymorphisms and RPL. We searched for articles, using MEDLINE and Embase, and performed meta-analysis of 21 studies involving 3437 cases and 4016 controls. The results demonstrated that the -308G/A polymorphism is positively associated with RPL, particularly in cases involving three or more miscarriages. For -1031T/C, -863C/A, and -376G/A polymorphisms, recessive and homozygote models revealed significant associations with RPL. However, -857C/T, -238G/A, and +488G/A polymorphisms showed no association with RPL. A subgroup analysis with respect to ethnicity demonstrated that the -308G/A and -238G/A polymorphisms are associated with RPL in Asian and Middle Eastern populations, respectively. This meta-analysis showed the associations between TNF-α polymorphisms and RPL. However, further studies of genetic polymorphisms in TNF-α other than -308G/A and -238G/A are required.

Anti-TNF Exposure during Pregnancy in Crohn's Disease Patients

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects young people of reproductive age. Therefore, a broad discussion is needed about the possible disease effects in pregnancy, as well as the risks of fetal exposure to the medications used, especially biological therapy. This study aimed to describe the management of 4 Crohn's disease patients who received anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy and present a literature review. We reported 4 cases composed of young women who became pregnant while receiving anti-TNF agents. The patients presented a satisfactory response to the clinical treatment and the pregnancies progressed without complications. We did not observe maternal or embryonic toxicity, or unfavorable outcomes. The available data point to inflammatory activity as the main risk factor for unfavorable gestational evolution to date, and showed anti-TNF therapy to be safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. However, the benefits and risks must be discussed with the patient and management decisions should be taken on an individual basis.

The use of biologics and small molecules in pregnant patients with rheumatic diseases

INTRODUCTION

Biological agents have radically changed the prognosis of rheumatic patients. Current evidence demonstrates that tight disease control during pregnancy is mandatory to minimize adverse outcome risk. As the new therapeutic tools are pivotal to maintain appropriate disease activity, it is timely to review available evidence about the safety of biologics and small molecules in pregnancy. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature review has been performed, reporting available data about the passage into breast milk, rate of pregnancy loss and fetal malformations, and long-term complications due to in utero exposure to biological agents and small molecules. Expert commentary: Data about the safety of agents against tumor necrosis factor in pregnancy are reassuring. Even rituximab, tocilizumab, belimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and abatacept have not been associated with an increased rate of fetal abnormalities or adverse pregnancy outcome. Experience with small molecules is too small to draw any conclusion. Even if further data are warranted to define the possible long-term effects of in utero biologic exposure on the infant immune system development, it is reasonable to speculate that in the next future the use of biologics during pregnancy will continue to expand, at least when maternal benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Pregnancy Outcomes After Exposure to Certolizumab Pegol: Updated Results From a Pharmacovigilance Safety Database

Objective

Anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) medications are effective in controlling chronic inflammatory diseases, but information about their use and safety in pregnancy is limited. Consequently, anti‐TNF agents are often discontinued early in gestation. Certolizumab pegol (CZP), a PEGylated, Fc‐free anti‐TNF agent approved for the treatment of rheumatic diseases and/or Crohn's disease, has minimal to no active placental transfer. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in women receiving CZP, especially those exposed during early pregnancy.

Methods

Prospective and retrospective data on maternal CZP exposure were extracted from the UCB Pharma safety database through March 6, 2017. Analysis was limited to prospective reports to avoid potential bias associated with retrospective submissions. The numbers of live births, miscarriages, elective abortions, stillbirths, and major congenital malformations were ascertained.

Results

Of 1,137 prospectively reported pregnancies with maternal exposure to CZP, 528 (including 10 twin pregnancies) had 538 known outcomes: 459 live births (85.3%), 47 miscarriages (8.7%), 27 elective abortions (5.0%), and 5 stillbirths (0.9%). There were 8 major congenital malformations (1.7%) among the 459 infants. First trimester exposure occurred in 367 (81.2%) of 452 pregnancies resulting in 459 live births. Exposure during all 3 trimesters occurred in 201 (44.5%) of 452 pregnancies.

Conclusion

This analysis represents the largest cohort of pregnant women exposed to an anti‐TNF agent for management of chronic inflammatory diseases. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes does not indicate a teratogenic effect of CZP, compared to the general population, nor an increased risk of fetal death. The data are reassuring for women of childbearing age considering treatment with CZP.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients Exposed to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors throughout Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are increasingly used in pregnancy but are frequently withheld in the second or third trimesters. We evaluated the maternal and fetal outcomes of women who continued their TNFi throughout pregnancy compared to women who interrupted TNFi during pregnancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of women seen in clinic with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or ankylosing spondylitis, who were exposed to TNFi during pregnancy. We separated pregnancies into 2 groups based on the level of TNFi exposure and compared outcomes.

RESULTS

In Group 1 (TNFi exposure in first trimester only), 11 women had 14 pregnancies and 12 live births. There were 2 first-trimester losses (2/14, 14%), one in the setting of active RA. Five pregnancies (5/14, 35.7%) were complicated by a disease flare. Eight patients (8/12, 66%) flared postpartum. In Group 2 (TNFi exposure throughout pregnancy), 29 women had 32 pregnancies and 34 live births. Three (3/28, 10.7%) adverse pregnancy outcomes were reported in 2 patients. One patient had a twin pregnancy and delivered at 33 weeks after developing preterm premature rupture of membranes at 32 weeks in the setting of a JIA flare. Her second pregnancy was complicated by active JIA before and throughout gestation, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet levels (HELLP) syndrome at 39 weeks. Another patient with comorbid antiphospholipid syndrome underwent a cesarean birth at 36 weeks for suspicion of HELLP syndrome. Six (6/32, 18.7%) postpartum flares occurred.

CONCLUSION

Women who discontinued their TNFi during pregnancy had a higher risk of peri- or postpartum flare compared to those who continued their TNFi throughout pregnancy.

Safety and tolerability of adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a review summarizing 15 years of real-life experience

Biologic therapies like adalimumab are the gold standard for psoriasis treatment with efficacy and safety profiles allowing for long-term treatment. However, adalimumab cannot be used in all patients and may cause adverse drug reactions. This study reviews conditions that might limit the use of adalimumab under real-life conditions. Local injection site reactions affect 12-37% of patients but rarely require specific therapy. Dermatological adverse events (AEs) include the paradoxical psoriasis and tend to respond to adequate therapy without adalimumab discontinuation. Adalimumab increases the risk for infections; latent chronic infections like tuberculosis or hepatitis B/C impose the highest risk for serious AEs. However, administration of adalimumab may still be possible under appropriate monitoring or prophylactic therapy. Some studies indicate an increased risk of malignancies in patients with psoriasis exposed to adalimumab. Here, the causal relationship is unclear since both psoriasis and some first-line therapies increase the risk of malignancies. Depression frequently coincides with psoriasis and may respond to adalimumab as well. Cardiovascular diseases are contraindications for adalimumab, but evidence suggests that adalimumab may still be a treatment option. Overall AE rates range from 245 to 399 per 100 patient years (serious AEs: 6-23; death: 1-2). Thus, adalimumab is slightly less safe than ustekinumab and infliximab but exhibits superior effectiveness and drug survival. Adalimumab is safe for pregnant women during the first trimester, for children up to 4 years and for the elderly. Thus, in spite of several conditions that require specific attention, the favourable safety and tolerability of adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis is confirmed.

Common Adverse Effects of Anti-TNF Agents on Gestation

Autoimmune disease has affected up to 50 million Americans, according to the American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association (AARDA) and 75 percent of those affected are women. These inflammatory diseases have variable activity and a lot of women will have to undergo major therapies during and after pregnancy. Many of the women suffering from these disease will improve during gestation. However a lot of women will require continuation of disease-modifying therapies (i.e., biological therapies) throughout pregnancy and post-partum involving many risks. In the past decade all gaze turned to biological therapies, as an attempt, to obtain even more effective medications in order to suppress the exacerbation of autoimmune disease, even at the most unfit circumstances such as pregnancy. The results are both satisfying and promising since increasingly proven thoughts prevail on making anti-TNF agents first-line medications, clearing up the limited knowledge over human influence. The purpose of this review is to summarize the results of the reports with the highest and representative range of patients of the last decade involving the use of anti-TNF agents during pregnancy.