Validation of High-Risk Features for Stent-Related Ischemic Events as Endorsed by the 2017 DAPT Guidelines

Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation insight from the OPTION trial

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) preserves ischemic protection while limiting bleeding risk in patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of indobufen-based DAPT in patients with MVD.

METHODS

Patients in the OPTION trial were stratified based on the presence of MVD. We compared the ischemic and bleeding risks of indobufen-based DAPT (indobufen 100mg twice a day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) vs conventional DAPT (aspirin 100 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) in patients with and without MVD, using landmarks at 6 months and 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

RESULTS

Patients with MVD tended to be older and contained a higher prevalence of high-risk features. Compared with patients without MVD, those with MVD were at higher risk for net adverse clinical events and ischemic events. The risk of ischemic events between indobufen-based DAPT vs conventional DAPT was similar either in patients with MVD or without MVD during the first and second 6 months. During the first 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT decreased the risk of bleeding events consistently in patients with and without MVD. Of note, during the second 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT continually decreased the risk of bleeding events in patients with MVD but not in those without MVD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MVD, indobufen plus clopidogrel DAPT compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel DAPT could reduce the risk of bleeding events while preserving ischemic protection during both the first and second 6 months post-PCI. Indobufen presents an effective option for patients with MVD, especially those at high ischemic risk requiring DAPT beyond 6 months post-PCI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at www.chictr.org. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Indobufen vs Aspirin after Coronary Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: the OPTION Trial (ChiCTR-IIR-17013505).

Prognostic value of HELT-E2S2 score among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: sub-analysis of the SHINANO 5-year registry

The HELT-E2S2 score has recently been proposed as a new risk stratification tool for ischemic stroke in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of HELT-E2S2 score for cardiovascular events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Between August 2012 and July 2013, patients undergoing PCI enrolled in the SHINANO 5-year registry, a prospective, observational multicenter registry, were analyzed for the current study. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke at 5 years. Key secondary endpoint was bleeding events at 5 years. A total of 1608 patients were divided into the low HELT-E2S2 score group (< 2, n = 915) and high HELT-E2S2 score group (≥ 2, n = 693). Major criteria of the HELT-E2S2 score were hypertension (74.7%), elderly age 75-84 years (31.3%), and AF (11.1%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the high HELT-E2S2 score group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (33.4% vs. 14.8%, P < 0.001) and bleeding events (12.7% vs. 5.3%, P < 0.001) compared with the low HELT-E2S2 score group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the HELT-E2S2 score remained significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.69; P = 0.015). The HELT-E2S2 score appears a useful tool for predicting future cardiovascular events in CAD patients undergoing PCI.

Impact of Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with High Ischemic Risk

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for bifurcation coronary lesions.

METHODS

A total of 1000 patients who underwent PCI for coronary bifurcation lesions and had clinical follow-up were divided into two groups based on the duration of DAPT: DAPT > 12 months and DAPT ≤ 12 months). Patients who experienced a myocardial infarction, required repeat PCI, or died within 1 year after the initial procedure were excluded.

RESULTS

Among the 1000 eligible patients, 394 patients received DAPT for > 12 months (39.4%). Most patients in our study presented with chronic coronary disease (61%). The majority of patients in our study (62.8%) had a low bleeding risk. The median follow-up duration was 35 months (interquartile range 20.6-36.5). There were no significant differences in the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between groups of prolonged DAPT (> 12 month) and DAPT ≤ 12 months (18.8% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.11). Patients with clinical features of high ischemic risk (HIR) had a significantly increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-3.26, p = 0.015) when compared with patients without clinical features of HIR. Compared with DAPT ≤ 12 months, extended DAPT (> 12 months) did not improve outcomes in patients with clinical (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.90-1.72, p = 0.19) and technical features (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.67-1.63, p = 0.85) of HIR.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter real-world registry, administration of DAPT for more than 12 months in patients who have undergone PCI for bifurcation lesion is not associated with a reduced incidence of MACE in long-term follow-up.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03450577.

An Aspirin-Free Strategy for Immediate Treatment Following Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

There was no study evaluating the effects of an aspirin-free strategy in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an aspirin-free strategy in patients undergoing complex PCI.

METHODS

We conducted the prespecified subgroup analysis based on complex PCI in the STOPDAPT-3 (ShorT and OPtimal duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent-3), which randomly compared low-dose prasugrel (3.75 mg/d) monotherapy to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with low-dose prasugrel and aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome or high bleeding risk. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following 6 criteria: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, or a target of chronic total occlusion. The coprimary endpoints were major bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5) and cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke) at 1 month.

RESULTS

Of the 5,966 study patients, there were 1,230 patients (20.6%) with complex PCI. Regardless of complex PCI, the effects of no aspirin relative to DAPT were not significant for the coprimary bleeding (complex PCI: 5.30% vs 3.70%; HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.84-2.47; P = 0.18 and noncomplex PCI: 4.26% vs 4.97%; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65-1.11; P = 0.24; P for interaction = 0.08) and cardiovascular (complex PCI: 5.78% vs 5.93%; HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.62-1.55; P = 0.92 and noncomplex PCI: 3.70% vs 3.10%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.88-1.63; P = 0.25; P for interaction = 0.48) endpoints without significant interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of the aspirin-free strategy relative to standard DAPT for the cardiovascular and major bleeding events were not different regardless of complex PCI. (ShorT and OPtimal duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent-3 [STOPDAPT-3]; NCT04609111).

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease With Recent or Remote Events: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Ongoing debate remains regarding optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the following: (i) dual-pathway therapy (DPT; oral anticoagulant [OAC] plus antiplatelet) vs triple therapy (OAC and dual-antiplatelet therapy) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and (iii) OAC monotherapy vs DPT at least 1 year after PCI or ACS. Following a 2-stage process, we identified systematic reviews published between 2019 and 2022 on these 2 clinical questions, and we updated the most comprehensive search for additional RCTs published up to October 2022. Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.

Results

Based on 6 RCTs (n = 10,435), DPT reduced major bleeding (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73) and increased stent thrombosis (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.36), vs triple therapy after PCI or medically-managed ACS, with no significant differences in MACE and death. In 2 RCTs (n = 2905), OAC monotherapy reduced major bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.91) vs DPT in AF patients with remote PCI or ACS, with no significant differences in MACE or death.

Conclusions

In patients with AF and coronary artery disease, using less-aggressive antithrombotic treatment (DPT after PCI or ACS, and OAC alone after remote PCI or ACS) reduced major bleeding, with an increase in stent thrombosis with recent PCI. These results support a minimalist yet personalized antithrombotic strategy for these patients.

Periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy reduces the risk of spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization, and improves angina status; however, PCI is associated with an increased risk of periprocedural myocardial injury and MI. Numerous studies have investigated the mechanisms, predictors, and therapeutic strategies for periprocedural MI. Various definitions of periprocedural MI have been proposed by academic groups and professional societies requiring different cardiac biomarker thresholds and ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia. The frequency and clinical significance of periprocedural MI substantially varies according to the definitions applied. In daily practice, accurate diagnosis of clinically-relevant periprocedural MI is essential because it may have a substantial impact on subsequent patient management. In the clinical trial setting, only clinically relevant periprocedural MI definitions should be applied as a clinical endpoint in order to avoid obscuring meaningful outcomes. In this review, we aim to summarize the mechanisms, predictors, frequency, and prognostic impact of periprocedural MI in patients undergoing PCI and to provide the current perspective on this issue.

Complex primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut biodegradable versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) are superior to thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to determine the impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) complexity on long-term clinical outcomes with BP-SES versus DP-EES in STEMI patients.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI (NCT02579031) randomized trial, which included individual data from 407 STEMI patients enrolled in the BIOSCIENCE trial (NCT01443104). STEMI patients were randomly assigned to treatment with ultrathin-strut BP-SES or thin-strut DP-EES, and further categorized into those undergoing complex versus noncomplex pPCI. Complex pPCI was defined by the presence of ≥1 of the following criteria: 3 vessel treatment, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation lesion with ≥2 stents implanted, total stent length ≥60 mm, and/or chronic total occlusion treatment. The primary endpoint was TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial reinfarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization, within 2 years.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1707 STEMI patients, 421 (24.7%) underwent complex pPCI. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At 2 years, TLF occurred in 14 patients (7.1%) treated with BP-SES and 25 patients (11.6%) treated with DP-EES (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-1.19; p = 0.15) in the complex pPCI group, and in 28 patients (4.4%) treated with BP-SES and 49 patients (8.2%) treated with DP-EES (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34-0.86; p = 0.008; p for interaction = 0.74) in the noncomplex pPCI group. Individual TLF components and stent thrombosis rates did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

In a post hoc subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial, ultrathin-strut BP-SES were superior to thin-strut DP-EES with respect to TLF at 2 years among STEMI patients undergoing both complex and noncomplex pPCI.

Tailoring oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: from guidelines to clinical practice

The assessment of bleeding and ischemic risk is a crucial step in establishing appropriate composition and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Evidence from recent randomized clinical trials led to some paradigm shifts in current guidelines recommendations. Options alternative to the standard 12-month DAPT duration include shorter periods of DAPT followed by single antiplatelet treatment with either aspirin or P2Y12 monotherapy, guided or unguided de-escalation DAPT, prolonged DAPT beyond the 12-month treatment period. Although DAPT composition and duration should be selected for each ACS patient on an individual basis weighing clinical and procedural variables, data from latest trials and meta-analyses may permit suggesting the most appropriate DAPT strategy according to the ischemic and bleeding risk assessed using validated tools and scores.

Impact of one-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to clinical presentation: a post hoc analysis of the randomised One-Month DAPT trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by aspirin monotherapy according to clinical presentation has not been elucidated.

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the impact of 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after polymer-free drug-coated stent (PF-DCS) implantation (1-month DAPT after PF-DCS) vs 6-12-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) implantation (6-12-month DAPT after BP-DES) according to clinical presentation.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the One-Month DAPT trial. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularisation, and stroke) and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Among 1,828 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1-month DAPT after PF-DCS resulted in lower rates of the primary outcome than 6-12-month DAPT after BP-DES (3.9% vs 6.5%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.90; p=0.012). However, among 1,192 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the rates of the primary outcome were not significantly different between the two therapy groups (5.6% vs 3.6%; HR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.91-2.70; p=0.102) and a significant interaction was observed between therapy and clinical presentation regarding the primary outcome (Pint=0.005). A significant interaction was observed in MACCE (Pint=0.016), but not in major bleeding (Pint=0.276).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for non-complex lesions, the benefits of 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy for a composite of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes were found in patients with stable CAD, but not in those with ACS.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT02513810.

Prediction of risk for bleeding, myocardial infarction and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Whether bleeding and myocardial infarction (MI) improve the performance of risk prediction models for mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unknown.

METHODS

This study included 3377 patients with ACS who underwent PCI in the setting of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial. Patients with bleeding, MI or those dying at 1 year after PCI were characterized in terms of baseline characteristics, risk estimates and C-statistic of the risk prediction models for these outcomes.

RESULTS

Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3-5), MI and mortality occurred in 195 patients (5.8%), 143 patients (4.3%) and 143 patients (4.3%), respectively. After adjustment, bleeding [hazard ratio = 5.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.03-8.53; P < 0.001] and MI [hazard ratio = 5.90; 95% CI, (3.00-11.65); P < 0.001) remained independently associated with the risk for 1-year mortality. The C-statistic (with 95% CI) of the model for bleeding, MI and mortality was, 0.755 (0.722-0.786), 0.752 (0.717-0.789) and 0.868 (0.837-0.896), respectively. The inclusion of bleeding [C-statistic: 0.892 (0.867-0.913); delta C-statistic 0.024 (-0.014 to 0.065); P = 0.200] or MI [C-statistic: 0.878 (0.851-0.903); delta C-statistic 0.011 (-0.030 to 0.053); P = 0.635] in the risk prediction models for mortality alongside baseline demographical and clinical variables did not improve prediction for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS treated with PCI, mortality is the most accurately predicted outcome. Bleeding and MI did not improve risk discrimination for mortality when added in the risk prediction models for mortality suggesting that these outcomes do not provide incremental prognostic information on top of baseline demographical and clinical data.

Prognostic and Practical Validation of ESC/EACTS High Ischemic Risk Definition on Long-Term Thrombotic and Bleeding Events in Contemporary PCI Patients

AIMS

The ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines recently standardized the definition of patients at high ischemic risk (HIR). However, the ability of ESC/EACTS-HIR criteria to stratify ischemic and bleeding risk in a contemporary real-world East Asian cohort remains unexplored.

METHODS

A total of 10,167 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from prospective Fuwai PCI Registry (January 2013 to December 2013) were reviewed. ESC/EACTS-HIR features was defined as having at least one of the eight clinical and angiographic characteristics. The primary ischemic endpoint was target vessel failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]); bleeding outcome was assessed using the BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. Median follow-up was 29 months.

RESULTS

Compared with non-HIR patients, HIR patients (n=5,149, 50.6%) were associated with increased risk for target vessel failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadjust]: 1.48 [1.25-1.74]) and patient-oriented composite outcome (HRadjust: 1.44 [1.28-1.63]), as well as cardiac death, MI, and TVR. By contrast, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (HRadjust: 0.84 [0.66-1.06]). Greater than or equal to three implanted stents and diabetic patients with diffuse multivessel coronary disease emerged as independent predictors for long-term adverse outcomes. There was no significant interaction between high bleeding risk (HBR) status and clinical outcomes associated with ESC/EACTS-HIR criteria (all Pinteraction ＞0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ESC/EACTS-HIR features identified patients at increased risk of thrombotic events, including cardiac death, but not for clinically relevant bleeding. Importantly, HBR did not modify cardiovascular risk subsequent to patients with ESC/EACTS-HIR features, suggesting its potential clinical applicability in tailoring antithrombotic therapy.

Frequency and Outcomes of Periprocedural MI in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI

BACKGROUND

Definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) differ with respect to biomarker threshold as well as ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia and are limited in terms of validation.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the frequency and impact of periprocedural MI by using various MI definitions among patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, periprocedural MIs were assessed according to the third and fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria based on high-sensitivity troponin in patients with CCS undergoing PCI enrolled into the Bern PCI registry. The primary endpoint was cardiac death at 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 4,404 patients with CCS, periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI were observed in 18.0%, 14.9%, 2.0%, and 2.0% of patients, respectively. Among patients with periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI, cardiac mortality at 1 year was 2.9%, 3.0%, 5.8%, and 10.0%. The ARC-2 (HR: 3.90; 95% CI: 1.54-9.93) and SCAI (HR: 7.66; 95% CI: 3.64-16.11) were more relevant compared with the third UDMI (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and fourth UDMI (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.11-3.37) for cardiac death at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CCS undergoing PCI, periprocedural MI defined according to the ARC-2 and SCAI criteria was 7 to 9 times less frequent compared with the third and fourth UDMI. Periprocedural MI defined by using the ARC-2 and SCAI were more prognostic for cardiac death at 1 year compared with the third and fourth UDMI. (CARDIOBASE Bern PCI Registry; NCT02241291).

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

It remains inconclusive whether ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI in real-world practice.

METHODS

Based on an all-comers PCI registry, we compared the long-term effectiveness and safety between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI, defined as PCI procedures for complex lesions including bifurcation, chronic total occlusion, ostial, tortuous, calcific, diffused, thrombus-containing, and restenotic lesions. The primary ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The safety outcome comprised Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias.

RESULTS

Among ACS patients who underwent complex PCI, 4373 (35.2%) and 8065 (64.8%) received dual antiplatelet therapy based on ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. The incidences of composite ischemic events (before PSM: 1.74% vs. 2.84%; after PSM: 1.50% vs. 2.65%; p < 0.01 for both) and all-cause death (before PSM: 1.23% vs. 2.12%, p < 0.01; after PSM: 1.09% vs. 1.81%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower in the ticagrelor-treated than in the clopidogrel-treated group. There was no significant difference in BARC types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst the risk of major bleeding was comparable between the two drugs, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic events than clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI.

Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome by High Bleeding Risk: The Subanalysis From the TICO Trial

This study demonstrated that for acute coronary syndrome patients treated with drug eluting stents, high bleeding risk (HBR) was associated with higher rates of net adverse clinical events (NACEs), not only including bleeding but also ischemic events. Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with lower rates of NACEs and major bleeding than ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT regardless of HBR, with no significant interaction between therapy and HBR. These findings were consistent regardless of HBR definition by Academic Research Consortium for HBR criteria or by Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent DAPT score.

Background and Objectives

Identifying patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) is important when making decisions for antiplatelet therapy strategy. This study evaluated the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to HBR in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DESs).

Methods

In this post-hoc analysis of the TICO trial, HBR was defined by 2 approaches: meeting Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria or Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent DAPT (PRECISE-DAPT) score ≥25. The primary outcome was a 3–12 months net adverse clinical event (composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events).

Results

Of the 2,980 patients without adverse events during the first 3 months after DES implantation, 453 (15.2%) were HBR by ARC-HBR criteria and 504 (16.9%) were HBR by PRECISE-DAPT score. The primary outcome rate was higher in HBR versus non-HBR patients (by ARC-HBR criteria: hazard ratio [HR], 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76–4.69; p<0.001; by PRECISE-DAPT score: HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.92–4.98; p<0.001). Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower primary outcome rate than ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT regardless of HBR by ARC-HBR criteria, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect for HBR and non-HBR patients (p-interaction=0.400). Results were consistent by PRECISE-DAPT score (p-interaction=0.178).

Conclusions

In ACS patients treated with DESs, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes regardless of HBR, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect between HBR and non-HBR.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494895

Clinical Impact of Single and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 12 Months on Ischemic Risk in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal antiplatelet strategy beyond 12 months in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who undergo successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study therefore aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of single (SAPT) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 12 months in patients with stable AMI and second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods: Of 13,104 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health database, we selected 4,604 patients who underwent PCI with second-generation DES and exhibited no adverse clinical events within 12 months; they were classified into SAPT (aspirin or clopidogrel) or DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) groups. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke between 12 and 36 months. Results: The SAPT group (n = 1,862) was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACCE between 12 and 36 months [4.2 vs. 8.5%, hazard ratio (HR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.61; p < 0.001] than the DAPT group (n = 2,742). The results were consistent after adjusting for confounders through multivariable and propensity score matching analysis. Moreover, in patients with complex features (defined as an unprotected left main PCI, implanted stent length of ≥38 mm, multivessel PCI, or ≥3 stents per patients), the SAPT group (n = 678) also demonstrated a significantly lower risk of MACCE between 12 and 36 months (4.9 vs. 9.9%, HR: 0.46, CI: 0.31-0.68, p < 0.001) than the DAPT group (n = 1,167). Conclusions: In patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with second-generation DES and exhibited no adverse clinical events within 12 months, the use of SAPT was associated with a significantly lower MACCE between 12 and 36 months compared with the use of DAPT.

Clinical outcomes and cardiac rehabilitation in underrepresented groups after percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational study

AIMS

Underrepresentation of migrants, women, and older adults in cardiovascular disease (CVD) trials may contribute to disparate care and survival. Among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we aimed to investigate the associations of (i) underrepresented groups with major adverse cardiac events (MACE), CVD mortality, and non-CVD mortality, (ii) underrepresented groups with cardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake, and (iii) CR uptake with outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 15 211 consecutive patients from the CARDIOBASE Bern PCI registry (2009-18). In multi-state models comparing transition probabilities of events, sex was not associated with increased risk of any event. For each year increase in age, the increased risk of non-CVD and CVD mortality was 8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6-9%]. Being migrant was associated with a lower risk of non-CVD mortality [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) 0.49 (0.27-0.90)] but not with CVD mortality. In logistic regression analysis, CR uptake was lower among women [odds ratio (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.57-0.86)] and older adults [0.32 (0.27-0.38)], but not among migrants. In cox regression, CR was independently associated with lower all-cause [HR (95% CI) = 0.12 (0.03-0.37)] and CVD mortality [0.1 (0.02-0.7)], but not with MACE [1.08 (0.8-1.4)].

CONCLUSION

Among underrepresented groups undergoing PCI, age, but not migration status nor sex, contributed to disparities in mortality. Migrant status did not result in lower attendance of CR. Considering the protective associations of CR on CVD mortality independent of age, sex, and migration status, the lower uptake in women and older adults is noteworthy.

Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Whether potent antiplatelet therapy after complex PCI improves outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) remains unclear. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with SCAD undergoing complex PCI. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of SCAD and undergoing PCI during January 2016 to December 2018 were selected from an institutional registry. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 12 months after PCI. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Results: Among 15,459 patients with SCAD included in this analysis, complex PCI was performed in 6,335 (41.0%) patients. Of patients undergoing complex PCI, 1,123 patients (17.7%) were treated with ticagrelor. The primary efficacy outcome after complex PCI occurred in 8.6% of patients in the ticagrelor group and 11.2% in the clopidogrel group. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor decreased the risk of MACE in patients undergoing complex PCI [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.764; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.615 to 0.949; p = 0.015], but not in non-complex PCI (p for interaction = 0.001). There was no significant difference in incidence of major bleeding between patients treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel (p = 0.221), while ticagrelor was associated with an increased risk of minor bleeding (adjusted HR: 3.099; 95% CI: 2.049 to 4.687; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with SCAD and undergoing complex PCI, ticagrelor could substantially reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes without increasing the risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

Clinical outcomes according to lesion complexity in high bleeding risk patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI: Analysis from the Onyx ONE clear study

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with and without complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) after 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

BACKGROUND

PCI with 1-month DAPT has been demonstrated to be safe in HBR patients treated with Resolute Onyx ZES. Whether these outcomes are consistent in patients with complex lesions is uncertain.

METHODS

Among HBR patients who were event-free 1 month after PCI with ZES and treated thereafter with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), the clinical outcomes between 1 month and 1 year were compared after complex PCI (3 vessels treated, ≥ 3 lesions treated, total stent length > 60 mm, bifurcation with ≥ 2 stents implanted, atherectomy, or left main, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion PCI) versus noncomplex PCI. Propensity score adjustment was performed to adjust for baseline differences among complex and noncomplex patients.

RESULTS

Complex patients (N = 401, 26.6% of total) had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction (MI). Between 1 month and 1 year, rates of MI (7.1% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.02) and cardiac death/MI (9.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.04) were higher among complex versus noncomplex patients, although stent thrombosis rates were similar. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, differences in outcomes were no longer significant between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher rates of ischemic outcomes in complex PCI patients were largely explained by baseline clinical differences, rather than lesion complexity, among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT following PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES.

Constraints in Clinical Cardiology and Personalized Medicine: Interrelated Concepts in Clinical Cardiology

Systems biology is established as an integrative computational analysis methodology with practical and theoretical applications in clinical cardiology. The integration of genetic and molecular components of a disease produces interacting networks, modules and phenotypes with clinical applications in complex cardiovascular entities. With the holistic principle of systems biology, some of the features of complexity and natural progression of cardiac diseases are approached and explained. Two important interrelated holistic concepts of systems biology are described; the emerging field of personalized medicine and the constraint-based thinking with downward causation. Constraints in cardiovascular diseases embrace three scientific fields related to clinical cardiology: biological and medical constraints; constraints due to limitations of current technology; and constraints of general resources for better medical coverage. Systems healthcare and personalized medicine are connected to the related scientific fields of: ethics and legal status; data integration; taxonomic revisions; policy decisions; and organization of human genomic data.

Ischemic and bleeding risk after complex percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without high bleeding risk

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate utility of the complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) criteria in real-world practice.

BACKGROUND

Applicability of procedural complexity criteria for risk stratification has not been adequately evaluated in real-world practice.

METHODS

Among 13,087 patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2, the study population consisted of 7,871 patients after excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction and those without stent implantation. Complex PCI was defined as PCI, which fulfills at least one of the followings: three vessels treated, > = 3 stents implanted, > = 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with two stents, >60 mm total stent lengths, and target of chronic total occlusion.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of and adjusted risks for the primary ischemic (myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke), and bleeding (GUSTO moderate/severe) endpoints were significantly higher in patients with complex PCI (N = 2,777 [35%]) than in those with noncomplex PCI (N = 5,094 [65%]) (15.4% vs. 10.9%, log-rank p < .001; odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.79, p < .001, and 11.9% vs. 9.9%, log-rank p = .004; OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.46, p = .01). In the 30-day landmark analysis, the higher risks of patients with complex PCI for ischemic and major bleeding events were only seen within 30 days after PCI (ischemic; within 30 days: HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.79-2.69, p < .001; beyond 30 days: HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.92-1.34, p = .26, and bleeding; within 30 days: HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13-2.16, p = .007; beyond 30 days: HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.94-1.31, p = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with complex PCI as compared with patients with noncomplex PCI had a higher risk for both ischemic and bleeding events mainly within 30 days after PCI.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy De-escalation Strategies

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the combination of aspirin (ASA), and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, protects against stent thrombosis and new atherothrombotic events after a stent implantation or an acute coronary syndrome, but exposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding. In most current practices, the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor is stopped at 6 to 12 months and ASA is continued indefinitely. The advent of safer stents, with less risk of stent thrombosis, has challenged this standard of care, however. A number of alternative strategies involving earlier de-escalation of the antiplatelet therapy have therefore been proposed. In these approaches, standard DAPT is switched to a less potent antithrombotic combination at an earlier time-point than recommended by guidelines. Three different de-escalation variations have been tested to date. The first one maintains DAPT but switches from the potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors ticagrelor or prasugrel to either a lower dose or to clopidogrel, while maintaining ASA. The 2 other approaches involve changing DAPT to a single antiplatelet at some earlier time-point after the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure, by stopping either the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor or ASA. These strategies have all demonstrated some benefit in clinical trials so far, but especially the contribution of ASA in secondary prevention is clearly evolving as its role in increasing bleeding complications while not providing increased ischemic benefit is becoming more and more clear. In contemporary practice, the type and duration of DAPT should now be based on an individualized decision, and the de-escalation strategies, if used wisely, can be added to the existing options.

Accuracy of the PARIS score and PCI complexity to predict ischemic events in patients treated with very thin stents in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcations

BACKGROUND

The PARIS risk score (PARIS-rs) and percutaneous coronary intervention complexity (PCI-c) predict clinical and procedural residual ischemic risk following PCI. Their accuracy in patients undergoing unprotected left main (ULM) or bifurcation PCI has not been assessed.

METHODS

The predictive performances of the PARIS-rs (categorized as low, intermediate, and high) and PCI-c (according to guideline-endorsed criteria) were evaluated in 3,002 patients undergoing ULM/bifurcation PCI with very thin strut stents.

RESULTS

After 16 (12-22) months, increasing PARIS-rs (8.8% vs. 14.1% vs. 27.4%, p < .001) and PCI-c (15.2% vs. 11%, p = .025) were associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiac events ([MACE], a composite of death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization), driven by MI/death for PARIS-rs and target lesion revascularization/stent thrombosis for PCI-c (area under the curves for MACE: PARIS-rs 0.60 vs. PCI-c 0.52, p-for-difference < .001). PCI-c accuracy for MACE was higher in low-clinical-risk patients; while PARIS-rs was more accurate in low-procedural-risk patients. ≥12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with a lower MACE rate in high PARIS-rs patients, (adjusted-hazard ratio 0.42 [95% CI: 0.22-0.83], p = .012), with no benefit in low to intermediate PARIS-rs patients. No incremental benefit with longer DAPT was observed in complex PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of ULM/bifurcation PCI, the residual ischemic risk is better predicted by a clinical risk estimator than by PCI complexity, which rather appears to reflect stent/procedure-related events. Careful procedural risk estimation is warranted in patients at low clinical risk, where PCI complexity may substantially contribute to the overall residual ischemic risk.

The IMPact on Revascularization Outcomes of intraVascular ultrasound-guided treatment of complex lesions and Economic impact (IMPROVE) trial: Study design and rationale

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown in clinical trials, registries, and meta-analyses to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI. However, IVUS utilization remains low. An increasing number of high-risk or complex coronary artery lesions are treated with PCI, and we hypothesize that the impact of IVUS in guiding treatment of these complex lesions will be of increased importance in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events while remaining cost-effective. The "IMPact on Revascularization Outcomes of intraVascular ultrasound-guided treatment of complex lesions and Economic impact" trial (registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04221815) is a multicenter, international, clinical trial randomizing subjects to IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in a 1:1 ratio. Patients undergoing PCI involving a complex lesion are eligible for enrollment. Complex lesion is defined as involving at least 1 of the following characteristics: chronic total occlusion, in-stent restenosis, severe coronary artery calcification, long lesion (≥28 mm), or bifurcation lesion. The clinical investigation will be conducted at approximately 120 centers in North America and Europe, enrolling approximately 2,500 to 3,100 randomized subjects with an adaptive design. The primary clinical end point is the rate of target vessel failure at 12 months, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. The co-primary imaging end point is the final post-PCI minimum stent area assessed by IVUS. The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of IVUS guidance on the PCI treatment of complex lesions.

Validation of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and comparison with contemporary bleeding risk scores

AIMS

The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) defined consensus-based criteria for patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to validate the ARC-HBR criteria for the bleeding outcomes using a large cohort of patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2016, patients undergoing PCI were prospectively included in the Bern PCI Registry. Patients were considered to be at HBR if at least one major criterion or two minor criteria were met. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding at one year; ischaemic outcomes were assessed using the device-oriented composite endpoints (DOCE) of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation. Among 12,121 patients, those at HBR (n=4,781, 39.4%) had an increased risk of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (6.4% vs 1.9%; p<0.001) and DOCE (12.5% vs 6.1%; p<0.001) compared with those without HBR. The degree of risk and prognostic value were related to the risk factors composing the criteria. The ARC-HBR criteria had higher sensitivity than the PRECISE-DAPT score and the PARIS bleeding risk score (63.8%, 53.1%, 31.9%), but lower specificity (62.7%, 71.3%, 86.5%) for BARC 3 or 5 bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at HBR defined by the ARC-HBR criteria had a higher risk of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding as well as DOCE. The bleeding risk was related to its individual components. The ARC-HBR criteria were more sensitive for identifying patients with future bleedings than other contemporary risk scores at the cost of specificity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02241291

Contribution of ESC DAPT guideline-endorsed high thrombotic risk features to long-term clinical outcomes among patients with and without high bleeding risk after PCI

Background

Whether the underlying risk of high bleeding risk (HBR) influences the relationship of high thrombotic risk (HTR) features with adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate (1) the prognostic effect of ESC guideline-endorsed HTR features on long-term clinical outcomes and (2) whether the outcomes of HTR versus non-HTR features vary by HBR status.

Methods

Ten thousand one hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2013 and December 2013 were prospectively enrolled in Fuwai PCI Registry. Patients who are at HTR were defined as: diffuse multivessel disease in diabetic patients, chronic kidney disease, at least three stents implanted, at least three stents lesions treated, bifurcation with two stents implanted, total stent length > 60 mm, or treatment of chronic total occlusion. The definition of HBR was based on the Academic Research Consortium for HBR criteria. The primary ischemic outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis. The primary bleeding outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, defined according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding.

Results

With a 2.4-year median follow-up, 4430 patients (43.6%) having HTR experienced a significantly higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] _adjust: 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34–1.82; P < 0.001) and device-oriented composite endpoint (composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and target lesion revascularization) (HR_adjust: 1.52 [1.27–1.83]; P < 0.001), compared to those having non-HTR. The risk of clinically relevant bleeding did not differ between groups (HR_adjust: 0.85 [0.66–1.08]; P = 0.174). Associations between HTR and adverse events were similar in HBR and non-HBR groups, without evidence of interaction (all P_interaction > 0.05); however, adverse event rates were highest among subjects with both HTR and HBR.

Conclusions

ESC guideline-endorsed HTR was associated with significantly increased risk of MACE without any significant differences in clinically relevant bleeding. The presence of HBR does not emerge as a modifier of cardiovascular risk for patients at HTR, suggesting more potent and longer antiplatelet therapy may be beneficial for this patient population.

Efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor under NT-proBNP in hospitalized ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients on percutaneous coronary intervention: CCC-ACS Project Analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification with specific biomarkers is proposed for tailored P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

This nationwide registry and quality improvement study is from November 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. In total, 11,512 STEMI patients received aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) and underwent PCIs in hospitals. Of the patients, 2992 were prescribed ticagrelor and 8520 clopidogrel. The primary effectiveness outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, in-hospital ischemic stroke). The primary safety outcome was in-hospital major bleeding.

RESULTS

MACCE incidence was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (0.8% versus 1.2%; P=0.046), but under different NT-proBNP levels, cumulative hazards of MACCE were without statistical significance. Bleeding rates were higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (all bleeding: 9.9% versus 6.9%, P<0.001; major bleeding: 4.0% versus 2.7%, P<0.001). The higher cumulative hazard of bleeding could be identified in the Kaplan-Meier curves. In the multivariate analysis, ticagrelor increased bleeding events, compared with clopidogrel, at NT-proBNP >1800 ng/L patients (all bleeding: HR 1.46; 95%CI, 1.07-2.01; major bleeding: HR 1.68, 95%CI, 1.03-2.74), but a low effect was found in those with lower NT-proBNP level. Subgroup analyses show that ticagrelor increased major bleeding in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.50 (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.61-6.74) (interaction p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

We found that ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, increased bleeding complications in hospitalized patients with NT-proBNP>1800 ng/L, especially in patients with EF < 0.50.

Benefit-Risk Profile of DAPT Continuation Beyond 1 Year after PCI in Patients with High Thrombotic Risk Features as Endorsed by 2018 ESC/EACTS Myocardial Revascularization Guideline

PURPOSE

The ischemic/bleeding trade-off of continuing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year after PCI for patients with high thrombotic risk (HTR) as endorsed by 2018 ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines remain unknown.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary stenting between January 2013 and December 2013 from the prospective Fuwai registry were defined as HTR if they met at least 1 ESC/EACTS guideline-endorsed HTR criteria. A total of 4578 patients who were at HTR and were events free at 1 year after the index procedure were evaluated. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke).

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 2.4 years. > 1-year DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin significantly reduced the risk of MACCE compared with ≤ 1-year DAPT (1.9% vs. 4.6%; hazard ratio (HR): 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.54; P < 0.001), driven by a reduction in all-cause death (0.2% vs. 3.0%; HR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03-0.15). Cardiac death and definite/probable stent thrombosis also occurred less frequently in prolonged DAPT group. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding occurred similarly between both groups (1.1% vs. 0.9%; HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.58-2.13; P = 0.763). Similar results were found using multivariable Cox model, propensity score-matched, and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ESC-endorsed HTR who were free from major ischemic or bleeding events 1 year after coronary stenting, continued DAPT beyond 1 year might offer better effectiveness in terms of atherothrombotic events and comparable safety in terms of clinically relevant bleeding compared with ≤ 1-year DAPT. ESC-HTR criteria is an important parameter to take into account in tailoring DAPT prolongation.

Dual antiplatelet therapy prolongation in high-risk patients with prior myocardial infarction: insights from the post-PCI registry

BACKGROUND

Patients surviving a myocardial infarction (MI) are at a heightened risk for recurrent ischemic events that can be reduced with the long-term addition of a second antithrombotic drug to aspirin. However, data about real prescription of this therapy are lacking and sometimes controversial.

METHODS

We aimed to describe the incidence and the determinants of a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prolongation beyond 12 months in a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with prior MI undergoing PCI and features of high ischemic risk intended as age more than 65 years, second MI, type 2 diabetes mellitus, multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We analysed patients enrolled in the prospective 'Post-PCI' registry that included patients treated with PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or acute coronary syndromes. At 12 months' follow-up, we collected data about DAPT prolongation in patients with prior MI and at least one of the previous features of high risk who did not experience ischemic and bleeding events during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 1113 patients included in the registry, 778 (72%) presented the inclusion criteria for the present study: 434 (66%) were more than 65 years old, 245 (37%) had a second MI, 189 (29%) diabetes mellitus, 480 (73%) MVCAD and 216 (33%) CKD. Despite a DAPT being prescribed for 1 year in 86% of the patients, it was prolonged for over 12 months in 105 (16%) of them. At multivariable analysis, only second MI and MVCAD were independent predictors of DAPT prolongation in a model including age more than 65 years, diabetes mellitus, CKD and PCI on left main/left anterior descending coronary artery. We found no significant difference in DAPT prolongation according to a DAPT-score value at least 2 or based on the physician who actually performed the follow-up (clinical cardiologist, interventional cardiologist or other).

CONCLUSION

In patients with prior MI and features of high ischemic risk undergoing PCI, the rate of DAPT prolongation beyond 12 months was low; recurrent MI and MVCAD appeared as its main determinants.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk of Adverse Events in relation to High Bleeding Risk among Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights from a Large Single-Center Cohort Study

Background/Aim

The relation between complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), high bleeding risk (HBR), and adverse events after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents has been incompletely characterized. This study sought to investigate the ischemic and bleeding events after complex PCI including stratification according to HBR estimated by PARIS bleeding risk score.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2013, 10,167 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled in Fuwai PCI Registry. Complex PCI was defined when having at least one of the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, treatment of chronic total occlusion, unprotected left main PCI, in-stent restenosis target lesion, and severely calcified lesion. The primary ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization), and primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.

Results

The median duration of follow-up was 29 months. In adjusted Cox regression analysis, patients having complex PCI procedures experienced higher risks of MACE (hazard ratio (HR): 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–1.92; P < 0.001), compared with noncomplex PCI. In contrast, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was statistically similar between the 2 groups (HR: 0.86 [0.66–1.11]; P = 0.238). There was no statistical interaction between HBR (PARIS bleeding score ≥8 or <8) and complex PCI in regard to MACE (adjusted P_interaction = 0.388) and clinically relevant bleeding (adjusted P_interaction = 0.279).

Conclusions

Patients who had undergone complex PCI resulted in substantially more ischemic events, without an increase in clinically relevant bleeding risk, and these associations did not seem to be modified by HBR status. More intensified antiplatelet therapy may be beneficial for patients with complex percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.

Impact of long-term ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial

Aims 

To evaluate the impact of an experimental strategy [23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)] vs. a reference regimen (12-month aspirin monotherapy following 12-month DAPT) after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods and results

In the present post hoc analysis of the Global Leaders trial, the primary endpoint [composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI)] at 2 years was assessed in patients with complex PCI, which includes at least one of the following characteristics: multivessel PCI, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation PCI with ≥2 stents, or total stent length >60 mm. In addition, patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, or any revascularization) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) [composite of POCE or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 3 or 5 bleeding] were explored. Among 15 450 patients included in this analysis, 4570 who underwent complex PCI had a higher risk of ischaemic and bleeding events. In patients with complex PCI, the experimental strategy significantly reduced risks of the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.85] and POCE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.93), but not in those with non-complex PCI (Pinteraction = 0.015 and 0.017, respectively). The risk of BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding was comparable (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.67–1.40), resulting in a significant risk reduction in NACE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.92; Pinteraction = 0.011).

Conclusion 

Ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month DAPT could provide a net clinical benefit for patients with complex PCI. However, in view of the overall neutral results of the trial, these findings of a post hoc analysis should be considered as hypothesis generating.