Comparison of Doppler Flow Velocity and Thermodilution Derived Indexes of Coronary Physiology

Invasive coronary function testing in clinical practice: Implementing the 2024 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes

Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is increasingly recognized as a significant aspect of chronic coronary syndromes. These patients frequently experience recurrent angina, resulting in high healthcare costs and impaired quality of life. Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is able to identify ANOCA endotypes, which can guide treatment and improve quality of life. Despite Class II recommendations for invasive microvascular assessments in the previous 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines, ICFT has yet to translate into widespread clinical practice. Patients with ANOCA experience poor quality of life and reduced functional capacity, highlighting the need for earlier ICFT implementation. The 2024 ESC Guidelines now strongly recommend ICFT (Class I, level of evidence B) for patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries and persistent angina despite optimal medical therapy, and for confirming or excluding ANOCA in patients with uncertain diagnoses on non-invasive testing (Class I, level of evidence B). Consequently, a standardized approach to optimize the management of ANOCA patients is warranted. Therefore, this review aims to provide interventional cardiologists with a contemporary review of the literature and a practical guideline on implementation of ICFT. It will discuss the following subjects: the definitions of the different endotypes, an example of an ICFT protocol, discontinuation of medication prior to ICFT, use of radial cocktail, target vessel for testing, acetylcholine injection techniques and rechallenge, adenosine injection techniques, the order of testing, the interpretation of ICFT, safety and feasibility, and the pharmacological treatment.

A Novel Angiography-Derived Computational Coronary Flow Reserve to Evaluate Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a key parameter for risk stratification in coronary artery disease but is limited by high cost, prolonged procedure time, and suboptimal reproducibility. We proposed a novel angiography-based method (Angio-CFR) to overcome these challenges and assessed its diagnostic performance. 107 consecutive patients underwent invasive coronary angiography with thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRthermo) were prospectively enrolled. Flow velocity at hyperemia and rest was estimated from angiographic images, and Angio-CFR was calculated as their ratio. Angio-CFR correlated well with CFRthermo (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), and showed good discrimination of CFRthermo < 2.5 (AUC = 0.879, p < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of 2.5. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of Angio-CFR were 81.71%, 83.33%, and 81.25%, respectively. Angio-CFR provides a pressure-wire-free method for coronary function assessment, demonstrating promising diagnostic accuracy and offering a more accessible approach for CFR measurement in clinical practice.

Challenges in diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction and coronary vasospasm

Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) include 2 overlapping subgroups of patients - those with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), or ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). A diagnosis of ANOCA-INOCA, is common and should be considered where angina is present and/or ischaemia is found on functional imaging in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (Ford and Berry, 2019). This review aims to provide an overview of contemporary challenges in the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and vasospastic disease, with a focus on recent guideline changes and current controversies. CMD and vasospastic angina (VSA) are increasingly acknowledged as an important and frequently overlooked, under investigated, and undertreated entities that contribute to ANOCA-INOCA (Samuels et al., 2023; Kunadian et al., 2020; Ford and Berry, 2019; Burgess and Mamas, 2024).

Repeatability and Correlation of Coronary Physiology Indices Measured With Bolus and Continuous Thermodilution

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown weak agreement between coronary physiology indices derived from continuous and bolus thermodilution, and suggested greater variability with bolus thermodilution measurements. This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and correlation of continuous and bolus thermodilution-derived physiology indices in cardiac transplant recipients.

METHODS

Paired fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), absolute hyperemic resistance (RHyp), and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) using continuous and bolus thermodilution were performed in consecutive cardiac transplant recipients.

RESULTS

In 20 patients, IMR was more repeatable than CFR and MRR derived from either continuous thermodilution (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95 versus 0.70 and 0.59; P=0.004 and P=0.002, respectively) or bolus thermodilution (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95 versus 0.20 and 0.33; P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively), and similarly repeatable compared with RHyp (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95 versus 0.87; P=0.188). FFR by continuous thermodilution correlated with standard FFR measurements (R=0.89, P<0.001) but were significantly lower in value (0.87±0.05 versus 0.89±0.05; P=0.004). CFR and MRR measurements using continuous thermodilution did not correlate with measurements using bolus thermodilution (R=0.33, P=0.170; R=0.34, P=0.155, respectively) and were significantly lower in value (2.9±1.0 versus 3.7±0.8, P=0.003; 3.4±1.1 versus 4.8±1.3, P<0.001, respectively). IMR and RHyp did not correlate (R=0.28, P=0.226).

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiac transplant recipients, IMR had superior repeatability compared with CFR and MRR derived from either bolus or continuous thermodilution, and was equally repeatable compared with RHyp. FFR, CFR, and MRR values obtained from continuous thermodilution were systematically lower compared with their counterparts obtained from bolus thermodilution.

Safety, Feasibility, and Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Coronary Function Testing: Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing

Importance

Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease frequently have coronary vasomotor dysfunction as underlying pathophysiological mechanism, comprising epicardial spasm, microvascular spasm, and/or microcirculatory dysfunction. These endotypes can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing which has previously shown to be safe in tertiary and expert centers.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease who were clinically referred for a coronary function test (CFT); and assess safety and feasibility of a CFT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This quality improvement study was performed using the Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing (NL-CFT), a prospective, observational registry, in 15 participating hospitals (2 tertiary and 13 nontertiary). Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease who were referred for a clinically indicated CFT between December 2020 and January 2024 were included.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A complete CFT consisted of acetylcholine spasm provocation testing and assessment of microcirculatory function. Prevalence of different endotypes based on test results and overall safety were assessed.

Results

Among a total of 1207 patients included, 978 (81%) were female; and the mean (SD) age was 60 (10) years. The prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction was very high (78%). There were 11 (0.9%) major and 10 (0.8%) minor complications reported. Of them, 3 major and all minor were definitely related to the coronary function test. No procedural death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was observed. No differences were found in the occurrence of complications between tertiary and nontertiary centers.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that a CFT was feasible and safe to perform in both tertiary and nontertiary centers with a high diagnostic yield.

Microvascular resistance reserve: impact on health status and myocardial perfusion after revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel invasive index of the microcirculation, which is independent of epicardial stenoses, and has both diagnostic and prognostic implications. This study investigates whether MRR is associated with health status outcomes by revascularization in patients with moderate coronary stenoses.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stable chest pain and moderate (30%-90% diameter) stenoses on invasive coronary angiography (n = 222) underwent invasive physiology assessment. Revascularization was performed according to guideline recommendations. At baseline and follow-up, health status and myocardial perfusion were assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and positron emission tomography. The primary endpoint was freedom from angina at follow-up with secondary endpoints including changes in health status by SAQ domains and myocardial perfusion by MRR and revascularization status. Low MRR was defined as ≤3.0.

RESULTS

Freedom from angina occurred in 38/173 patients. In multivariate analyses, MRR was associated with freedom from angina at follow-up (odds ratio 0.860, 95% confidence interval 0.740-0.987). By MRR and revascularization groups, patients with normal MRR who did not undergo revascularization, and patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization, had improved health status of angina frequency [mean difference SAQ angina frequency score 8.5 (3.07-13.11) and 13.5 (2.82-23.16), respectively]. For both groups, health status of physical limitation [mean difference in SAQ physical limitation score 9.7 (4.79-11.93) and 8.7 (0.53-13.88), respectively] and general health status [mean difference in SAQ summary score 9.3 (5.18-12.50) and 10.8 (2.51-17.28), respectively] also improved. Only patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization had improved myocardial perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate coronary stenoses, MRR seems to predict the symptomatic and perfusion benefit of revascularization.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIERS

NCT03481712 and NCT04707859.

Clinical implications of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and role of the thermodilution method

More than 60% of patients undergoing coronary angiography present no coronary artery disease (CAD). Angina and myocardial ischemia are classically determined by epicardial vascular obstruction, but coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) may also represent a possible cause for these phenomena. Two endotypes of CMD have been recognized, with two different pathophysiological mechanisms: structural CMD, characterized by low coronary flow reserve (CFR) and high microvascular resistance (MVR) values; and functional CMD, characterized by low CFR and normal MVR values. According to the present data, almost half of patients with non-obstructive CAD have shown signs of CMD. For this reason, further investigations for microvascular function assessment should be considered when evaluating no-CAD patients complaining of angina or presenting signs of myocardial ischemia. The thermodilution method is currently becoming a widespread invasive technique due to its feasibility and high reproducibility for coronary physiology evaluation. Furthermore, a recently introduced technique - called continuous thermodilution - allows for direct measurement of absolute coronary flow and resistances. The role of this brand-new technique in the clinical scenario is however still to be fully investigated and its use is at present limited to research purposes only. Among no-CAD patients, both structural and functional CMD are related to a worse prognosis in term of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In this review, we will discuss the present evidence supporting the definition, prevalence and clinical implication of the different forms of CMD and the technical aspects of its invasive assessment.

Functional assessment in angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries: from microvascular resistance reserve to subtypes of coronary microvascular dysfunction

AIMS

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a heterogeneous condition defined by reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR). The new index 'microvascular resistance reserve' (MRR) has been developed, but its role is unclear. We investigate the relationships between functional indices in ANOCA (angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries) patients and evaluate the hemodynamic features of different CMD subtypes.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive ANOCA patients assessed by using the bolus thermodilution technique. CFR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and MRR were estimated and correlated with each other. Patients were divided into two groups based on CMD presence (CFR < 2.5). Subsequently, high-hyperaemic-resistance (HHR) and low-hyperaemic-resistance (LHR) CMD subtypes were defined according to IMR values (cut-off 25). Microvascular flow and resistance were estimated both at rest and during hyperaemia with Tmnrest/IMRrest and Tmnhyp/IMR, respectively. All functional indices were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients were enrolled: 66 patients in the normal group (CFR ≥ 2.5), 20 in the HHR-CMD group (CFR < 2.5 and IMR ≥ 25) and 22 in the LHR-CMD group (CFR < 2.5 and IMR < 25). MRR strongly correlated (r = 0.968, P < 0.01) with CFR, showing a good discriminatory power (area under the curve = 0.97) and accuracy (85%) for detecting CMD. LHR-CMD patients showed reduced microvascular resistance (IMRrest 34.3 ± 15.1, P < 0.01) and increased resting flow (Tmnrest 0.37 ± 0.17, P < 0.01), while HHR-CMD patients had impaired hyperaemic flow (Tmnhyp 0.45 ± 0.24 P < 0.01). MRR was reduced in CMD patients (P < 0.01), with no differences between CMD subtypes (P = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

In ANOCA patients, MRR and CFR are strongly correlated and could be considered as functionally interchangeable tools. IMR is crucial for differentiating CMD endotypes.

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Without Obstructive Epicardial Stenosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

What is the pathophysiology and clinical findings as well as management of patients presenting with INOCA/MINOCA (Ischemia/Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries).

RECENT FINDINGS

INOCA/MINOCA has a complex pathophysiology. In this review article, we aim to summarize the complex pathophysiology and clinical diagnosis, and review the current management options.

Aortic versus distal pressure for derivation of hyperaemic microvascular resistance: From the ILIAS registry

BACKGROUND

In patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), intracoronary function testing typically involves assessing the minimal microvascular resistance. This can be derived from the coronary flow and the distal pressure (Pd) during maximal hyperaemia. Theoretically, in ANOCA patients, resistance and pressure have minimal impact along the epicardial vessel, suggesting the possibility of deriving hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR) using aortic pressure (Pa) instead of Pd, but this has not been studied previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the ILIAS registry, a global multicentre registry pooling lesion-level coronary pressure and flow data, were used to compare HMR calculated with Pa versus Pd. A total of N = 1321 evaluated vessels were included. The study population consisted predominantly of men (68 %) with a mean age of 62 ± 10 years, and stable anginal symptoms (93 %). The overall correlation between HMR calculated with Pa and with Pd was good (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.84, p ≤0.005). The Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference between HMR based on Pa and Pd of 0.53 (limits of agreements ±1.35). An adjusted Bland-Altman showed that the difference between HMR based on Pa and Pd was significantly related to the functional severity of the epicardial lesion (R2 = 0.71, coef.: -4.5, p < 0.005). In patients with a FFR >0.80 there were no considerable outliers, and with a FFR <0.80 outliers increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In ANOCA patients, defined by a FFR above 0.80, HMR can be accurately measured with aortic pressure instead of distal pressure. However, in patients with a FFR below 0.80, there is a significant difference between HMR measured with Pa and Pd.

Discordant diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction by microvascular resistance reserve: Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography vs bolus thermodilution method

OBJECTIVE

Epicardial stenosis and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) may coexist in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) has been demonstrated to be a valid cross-modality metric using continuous saline infusion thermodilution and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity methods. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and diagnostic concordance of CMD defined by MRR using two methods-stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (S-TDE) and the invasive bolus thermodilution method (B-Thermo)-in patients with functionally significant epicardial stenosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 204 left anterior descending artery (LAD) territories in CCS. All patients underwent physiological assessment using a pressure-temperature wire and S-TDE before elective fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. The concordance rate was evaluated using κ values.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, the median age was 72 years, and 72.5% of patients were male. The median FFR value was 0.69. MRRS-TDE and MRRB-Thermo were similar (3.41 vs 3.48, P = 0.877), whereas only a weak, albeit significant relationship was observed between these two metrics (r = 0.167, P = 0.017). CMD was diagnosed in 20.6% and 32.8% of patients using S-TDE and B-Thermo, respectively, when a cutoff MRR value of 2.7 was applied. The concordance rate of CMD diagnosis between the two methods was low (κ = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

MRRS-TDE and MRRB-Thermo showed a very weak correlation in the LAD territory with functionally significant stenosis in patients with CCS. The prevalence of CMD diagnosed using MRRS-TDE and MRRB-Thermo was not comparable, and the diagnostic concordance of CMD using these two methods was very low.

Utilizing Invasive Coronary Functional Testing in a Coronary Microvascular and Vasomotor Dysfunction Program: Methods and Considerations

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular and vasomotor dysfunction (CMVD) is associated with a threefold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and is the primary mechanism responsible for angina/ischemia in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA/INOCA). Proper assessment for CMVD is vital to provide targeted treatment and improve patient outcomes. Invasive coronary functional testing (ICFT) is the "gold standard," for CMVD assessment and can be used to diagnose all endotypes. However, there is a lack of standardization for ICFT protocols and use in the treatment of CMVD.

AIMS

To provide a comprehensive overview of ICFT protocols utilized at the Christ Hospital Womens Heart Center (TCH-WHC).

METHODS

Here, we outline our standard operating procedures for ICFT utilized at TCH-WHC, including the procedures two main methods: Doppler and Thermodilution. We describe our structured approach for ICFT referral and postdiagnostic clinical management utilized at The Christ Hospital Women's Heart Center (TCH-WHC) CMVD program. We then quantified how ICFT has contributed to growth of the TCH-WHC.

RESULTS

From October of 2020 until July of 2024, a total of 422 patients have undergone ICFT at TCH-WCH, 64% were performed via the Doppler protocol and 36% were performed via the Thermodilution protocol. Based on exclusive endotype categories, 19% had an endothelial-independent CMD alone, 19% had endothelial-dependent CMD or microvascular VSA alone, 3% had epicardial VSA alone, 42% had mixed disease (any combination of the above categories), and 17% had a normal ICFT.

CONCLUSIONS

ICFT provides opportunity to provide diagnostic clarity and optimize medical treatment for CMVD. TCH-WHC's structured approach for ICFT referral and protocol for conducting comprehensive ICFT which has been vital for the growth of our specialized CMVD program.

The Belgian Registry on Coronary Function Testing (BELmicro Registry): Study Population, Prevalence of Coronary Vascular Dysfunction, and Procedural Safety

Coronary function testing (CFT) plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of coronary vascular dysfunction and providing patients with tailored therapy. The Belgian registry on CFT (BELmicro registry) is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry including 14 centers in Belgium. All patients who underwent clinically indicated CFT were included in the registry. Baseline characteristics, CFT data, and clinical outcomes were collected. This analysis aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of a real-world population of patients who underwent CFT, evaluate the prevalence of coronary vascular dysfunction, and assess the safety of CFT in daily clinical practice. Between October 2021 and September 2023, 449 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 65 ± 10 years, and 47.4% of patients were men. A total of 59% of patients had hypertension, 18.7% had diabetes, 69.5% had hypercholesterolemia, and 40.1% had a smoking habit. Angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCAs) were identified in 85.1% of the patients. Microvascular physiology assessment was performed in 95.5% of patients, vasoreactivity test in 28.5%, and both in 24.0%. coronary microvascular dysfunction was diagnosed in 23.4% of patients with ANOCA, epicardial vasospasm in 26.3%, and microvascular spasm in 14.9%. Rates of major complications were 0.7% for microvascular physiology assessment and 0% for vasoreactivity test. In conclusion, participants in the BELmicro registry represented a real-world population of patients, characterized by a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and coronary vasospasm were frequent in patients with ANOCA. Performing CFT in daily clinical practice was feasible, with a low rate of complications.

The association between trimethylamine N-oxide levels and coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), leading to adverse clinical outcomes. However, its diagnosis remains difficult, and mechanisms elusive. This study explores the role of Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbiota metabolite, as a potential biomarker for diagnosing CMD in STEMI patients.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study enrolled 210 STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). TMAO levels were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months post-PCI, whilst coronary physiology was assessed at 3 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CMD at 3 months, with the secondary endpoint being major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 12 months. An additional 59 consecutive patients were enrolled for validation.

RESULTS

TMAO levels varied from baseline to 3 months, then stabilised. The areas under the ROC curve for baseline TMAO and TMAO at 3-month were 0.55 (95 % CI 0.46-0.64; p = 0.426), and 0.80 (95 % CI 0.73-0.87; p < 0.001), respectively. The optimal cut-off for TMAO at 3-month to diagnose CMD was 3.91, with similar sensitivity and specificity in the derivation and validation cohort. The incidence of MACCE was higher in patients with TMAO≥3.91 (41.4 % vs 10.7 %; p < 0.001). The addition of 3-month TMAO improved the diagnostic performance of traditional risk factors.

CONCLUSION

TMAO is a robust biomarker for CMD and is significantly associated with the incidence of MACCE. TMAO has the potential in guiding clinical decision-making and suggests an interplay between gut microbiota and CMD.

The impact of the microvascular resistance on the measures of stenosis severity

The relationship between measures of stenosis and microvascular resistance is of importance due to medical decisions being based on these values. This research investigates the impact of varying microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and hyperaemic stenosis resistance (hSR). Microvascular resistance is classified using hyperaemic microvascular resistance (hMR). Additionally, hMR using the upstream pressure value (hMRPa) has also been calculated and is compared to hMR measured conventionally. Tests were conducted at three different degrees of stenosis (quantified by percent area) in a coronary flow circuit with varying downstream resistance to simulate the microvasculature. Pressure and flow values are recorded across the stenosed section, allowing for calculation of the diagnostic indexes. Results indicate that for a constant degree of stenosis, FFR would increase with increasing microvascular resistance while hSR would remain almost constant. hMRPa was found to approach hMR as the stenosis severity decreased, and the pressure gradient decreased. In the results shown here, with sufficiently high downstream resistance, an 84 % stenosis could produce an FFR value over 0.8. This result suggests that there is the potential for misdiagnosis of the severity of stenosis when combined with elevated microvascular resistance. Consequently, decisions on the clinical significance of a stenosis, classified by FFR, need to consider the effect of the microvascular resistance.

Coronary microvascular disease in women: epidemiology, mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) involves functional or structural abnormalities of the coronary microvasculature resulting in dysregulation of coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to myocardial oxygen demand. This perfusion mismatch causes myocardial ischemia, which manifests in patients as microvascular angina (MVA). CMD can be diagnosed non-invasively via multiple imaging techniques or invasively using coronary function testing (CFT), which assists in determining the specific mechanisms involving endothelium-independent and dependent epicardial and microcirculation domains. Unlike traditional coronary artery disease (CAD), CMD can often occur in patients without obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial disease, which can make the diagnosis of CMD difficult. Moreover, MVA due to CMD is more prevalent in women and carries increased risk of future cardiovascular events. Successful treatment of symptomatic CMD is often patient-specific risk factor and endotype targeted. This article aims to review newly identified mechanisms and novel treatment strategies for managing CMD, and outline sex-specific differences in the presentation and pathophysiology of the disease.

Novel diagnostic approaches and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction

The mechanism underlying ischaemic heart disease (IHD) has been primarily attributed to obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, non-obstructive coronary arteries are identified in >50% of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography, recently leading to growing interest in the investigation and management of angina/ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA). INOCA is an umbrella term encompassing a multiple spectrum of possible pathogenetic entities, including coronary vasomotor disorders which consist of two major endotypes: coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and vasospastic angina. Both conditions can coexist and be associated with concomitant obstructive CAD. Particularly, CMD refers to myocardial ischaemia due to reduced vasodilatory capacity of coronary microcirculation secondary to structural remodelling or impaired resting microvascular tone (functional) or a combination of both. CMD is not a benign condition and is more prevalent in women presenting with chronic coronary syndrome compared to men. In this setting, an impaired coronary flow reserve has been associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. ANOCA/INOCA patients also experience impaired quality of life and associated increased healthcare costs. Therefore, research in this scenario has led to better definition, classification, and prognostic stratification based on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The development and validation of non-invasive imaging modalities, invasive coronary vasomotor function testing and angiography-derived indices provide a comprehensive characterisation of CMD. The present narrative review aims to summarise current data relating to the diagnostic approach to CMD and provides details on the sequence that therapeutic management should follow.

Developments and Controversies in Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

Approximately half of all coronary angiograms performed for angina do not show obstructive coronary artery disease, and many of these patients have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Invasive testing for CMD has increased with the advent and wider availability of thermodilution systems. We review CMD pathophysiology and invasive diagnostic testing using the Doppler and thermodilution systems. We report the results of a PubMed search of invasive microvascular testing and discuss limitations of current diagnostic algorithms in the diagnosis of CMD, including controversies regarding the optimal cutoff value for abnormal coronary flow reserve, use of microvascular resistance indices, and options for increasing sensitivity of testing.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Murray's law in the coronary arterial circulation

Murray's law has been viewed as a fundamental law of physiology. Relating blood flow ([Formula: see text]) to vessel diameter (D) ([Formula: see text]·∝·D3), it dictates minimum lumen area (MLA) targets for coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The cubic exponent (3.0), however, has long been disputed, with alternative theoretical derivations, arguing this should be closer to 2.33 (7/3). The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the optimum flow-diameter exponent in human and mammalian coronary arteries. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles quantifying an optimum flow-diameter exponent for mammalian coronary arteries within the Cochrane library, PubMed Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases on 20 March 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine a pooled flow-diameter exponent. Risk of bias was assessed with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool, funnel plots, and Egger regression. From a total of 4,772 articles, 18 were suitable for meta-analysis. Studies included data from 1,070 unique coronary trees, taken from 372 humans and 112 animals. The pooled flow diameter exponent across both epicardial and transmural arteries was 2.39 (95% confidence interval: 2.24-2.54; I2 = 99%). The pooled exponent of 2.39 showed very close agreement with the theoretical exponent of 2.33 (7/3) reported by Kassab and colleagues. This exponent may provide a more accurate description of coronary morphometric scaling in human and mammalian coronary arteries, as compared with Murray's original law. This has important implications for the assessment, diagnosis, and interventional treatment of coronary artery disease.

A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation of the Coronary Microcirculation Using Bolus Thermodilution: CATH CMD

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) can cause myocardial ischemia in patients presenting with angina without obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Evaluating for CMD by using the thermodilution technique offers a widely accessible means of assessing microvascular resistance. Through this technique, 2 validated indices, namely coronary flow reserve and the index of microcirculatory resistance, can be computed, facilitating investigation of the coronary microcirculation. The index of microcirculatory resistance specifically estimates minimum achievable microvascular resistance within the coronary microcirculation. We aim to review the bolus thermodilution method, outlining the fundamental steps for conducting measurements and introducing an algorithmic approach (CATH CMD) to systematically evaluate the coronary microcirculation. Embracing a standardized approach, exemplified by the CATH CMD algorithm, will facilitate adoption of this technique and streamline the diagnosis of CMD.

The Impact of Microvascular Resistance Reserve on the Outcome of Patients With STEMI

BACKGROUND

Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) can characterize coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD); however, its prognostic impact in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients remains undefined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the prevalence of CMD in STEMI patients and to elucidate the prognostic performance of MRR.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 210 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent successful revascularization and returned at 3 months for coronary physiology assessments with bolus thermodilution. The prevalence of CMD (MRR <3) and the association between MRR and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 12 months were investigated.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 65 years, and 59.5% were men. At the 3-month follow-up, 56 patients (27%) had CMD (MRR <3.0). The number of MACCEs at 12 months was higher in patients with vs without CMD (48.2% vs 11.0%; P < 0.001). MRR was independently associated with 12-month MACCEs (HR: 0.45 per unit increase; 95% CI: 0.31-0.67; P < 0.001) and with stroke, heart failure, and poorer recovery in left ventricular systolic function. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting MACCEs at 12 months with fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), the index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and MRR were 0.609, 0.762, 0.781, and 0.743, respectively. The prognostic performance of CFR, IMR, and MRR were all comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel parameter MRR is a prognostic marker of MACCEs in STEMI patients with a comparable performance to CFR and IMR. (Impact of TMAO Serum Levels on Hyperemic IMR in STEMI Patients [TAMIR]; NCT05406297).

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and atrial reservoir function

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) refers to structural and functional abnormalities of the coronary microcirculation, which may be diagnosed using invasive coronary physiology. CMD is responsible for impaired diastolic cardiac function. It has recently been suggested that left atrial strain (LASr) represents a highly sensitive tool for detecting cardiac diastolic function abnormalities. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CMD and LASr.

METHODS

Consecutively enrolled patients with non-obstructed coronary arteries (NOCA) underwent CMD and LASr evaluation by invasive thermodilution and noninvasive echocardiography, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-two (42) patients were included, out of which 26 presented with CMD. There were no significant differences between CMD-positive and negative patients in terms of clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. LASr was significantly reduced in patients with CMD (24.6% ± 6.1 vs. 30.3 ± 7.8%, p = 0.01). A moderate correlation was observed between coronary flow reserve and LAsr (r = 0.47, p = 0.002). A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that CMD was independently associated with LASr (OR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.78-0.99.135, p = 0.04). A LASr cut-off of 25.5% enabled an optimal classification of patients with or without CMD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NOCA and CMD had a significantly reduced LASr compared with patients without CMD, suggesting the early impairment of diastolic function in these patients.

Multivessel Coronary Function Testing Increases Diagnostic Yield in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

Invasive CFT is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with ANOCA. Most institutions recommend only testing the left coronary circulation. Therefore, it is unknown whether testing multiple coronary territories would increase diagnostic yield.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of multivessel, compared with single-vessel, invasive coronary function testing (CFT) in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA).

METHODS

Multivessel CFT was systematically performed in patients with suspected ANOCA. Vasoreactivity testing was performed using acetylcholine provocation in the left (20 to 200 μg) and right (20 to 80μg) coronary arteries. A pressure-temperature sensor guidewire was used for coronary physiology assessment in all three epicardial vessels.

RESULTS

This multicenter study included a total of 228 vessels from 80 patients (57.8 ± 11.8 years of age, 60% women). Compared with single-vessel CFT, multivessel testing resulted in more patients diagnosed with coronary vasomotor dysfunction (86.3% vs 68.8%; P = 0.0005), coronary artery spasm (60.0% vs 47.5%; P = 0.004), and CMD (62.5% vs 36.3%; P < 0.001). Coronary artery spasm (n = 48) predominated in the left coronary system (n = 38), though isolated right coronary spasm was noted in 20.8% (n = 10). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined by abnormal index of microcirculatory resistance and/or coronary flow reserve, was present 62.5% of the cohort (n = 50). Among the cohort with CMD, 27 patients (33.8%) had 1-vessel CMD, 15 patients (18.8%) had 2-vessel CMD, and 8 patients (10%) had 3-vessel CMD. CMD was observed at a similar rate in the territories supplied by all 3 major coronary vessels (left anterior descending coronary artery = 36.3%, left circumflex coronary artery = 33.8%, right coronary artery = 31.3%; P = 0.486).

CONCLUSIONS

Multivessel CFT resulted in an increased diagnostic yield in patients with ANOCA compared with single-vessel testing. The results of this study suggest that multivessel CFT has a role in the management of patients with ANOCA.

Impact of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction on Functional Left Ventricular Remodeling and Diastolic Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common complication of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and can lead to adverse cardiovascular events. Whether CMD after STEMI is associated with functional left ventricular remodeling (FLVR) and diastolic dysfunction, has not been investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a nonrandomized, observational, prospective study of patients with STEMI with multivessel disease. Coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance of the culprit vessel were measured at 3 months post-STEMI. CMD was defined as index of microcirculatory resistance ≥25 or coronary flow reserve <2.0 with a normal fractional flow reserve. We examined the association between CMD, LV diastolic dysfunction, FLVR, and major adverse cardiac events at 12-month follow-up. A total of 210 patients were enrolled; 59.5% were men, with a median age of 65 (interquartile range, 58-76) years. At 3-month follow-up, 57 patients (27.14%) exhibited CMD. After 12 months, when compared with patients without CMD, patients with CMD had poorer LV systolic function recovery (-10.00% versus 8.00%; P<0.001), higher prevalence of grade 2 LV diastolic dysfunction (73.08% versus 1.32%; P<0.001), higher prevalence of group 3 or 4 FLVR (11.32% versus 7.28% and 22.64% versus 1.99%, respectively; P<0.001), and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (50.9% versus 9.8%; P<0.001). Index of microcirculatory resistance was independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction and adverse FLVR.

CONCLUSIONS

CMD is present in ≈1 of 4 patients with STEMI during follow-up. Patients with CMD have a higher prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction, adverse FLVR, and major adverse cardiac events at 12 months compared with those without CMD.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT05406297.

Correlation of Non-Invasive Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography with Invasive Doppler Wire-Derived Coronary Flow Reserve and Their Impact on Infarct Size in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with adverse prognosis after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to compare the invasive, Doppler wire-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) with the non-invasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE)-derived CFR, and their ability to predict infarct size. Methods: We included 36 patients with invasive Doppler wire assessment on days 3-7 after STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), of which TTDE-derived CFR was measured in 47 vessels (29 patients) within 6 h of the invasive Doppler. Infarct size was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at a median of 8 months. Results: The correlation between invasive and non-invasive CFR was modest in the overall cohort (rho 0.400, p = 0.005). It improved when only measurements in the LAD artery were considered (rho 0.554, p = 0.002), with no significant correlation in the RCA artery (rho -0.190, p = 0.435). Both invasive (AUC 0.888) and non-invasive (AUC 0.868) CFR, measured in the recanalized culprit artery, showed a good ability to predict infarct sizes ≥18% of the left ventricular mass, with the optimal cut off values of 1.85 and 1.80, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with STEMI, TTDE- and Doppler wire-derived CFR exhibit significant correlation, when measured in the LAD artery, and both have a similarly strong association with the final infarct size.

Angiographic Coronary Slow Flow Is Not a Valid Surrogate for Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries is frequently caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Consensus diagnostic criteria for CMD include baseline angiographic slow flow by corrected TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count (cTFC), but correlations between slow flow and CMD measured by invasive coronary function testing (CFT) are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between cTFC and invasive CFT for CMD.

METHODS

Adults with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries underwent invasive CFT with thermodilution-derived baseline coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). CMD was defined as abnormal CFR (<2.5) and/or abnormal IMR (≥25). cTFC was measured from baseline angiography; slow flow was defined as cTFC >25. Correlations between cTFC and baseline coronary flow and between CFR and IMR and associations between slow flow and invasive measures of CMD were evaluated, adjusted for covariates. All patients provided consent.

RESULTS

Among 508 adults, 49% had coronary slow flow. Patients with slow flow were more likely to have abnormal IMR (36% vs 26%; P = 0.019) but less likely to have abnormal CFR (28% vs 42%; P = 0.001), with no difference in CMD (46% vs 51%). cTFC was weakly correlated with baseline coronary blood flow (r = -0.35; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.27), CFR (r = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.28), and IMR (r = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07-0.24). In multivariable models, slow flow was associated with lower odds of abnormal CFR (adjusted OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary slow flow was weakly associated with results of invasive CFT and should not be used as a surrogate for the invasive diagnosis of CMD.

[Myocardial Infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries: Imaging plays a central role]

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary lesion (MINOCA) represents a non-negligible percentage of the proportion of myocardial infarctions (≈6%). Moreover, the long-term prognosis is poor, with an annual mortality rate of 2%. This high mortality rate may be explained by the fact that MINOCA represents a heterogeneous group, and the diagnosis of pathology is poorly understood. It is essential to be aware of this clinical presentation, and to follow the different diagnostic strategies, in order to identify the etiological mechanism, and thus set up a suitable treatment. Many tools are available to support diagnosis, notably in the fields of imaging, the principal contributors being coronary angiography, coronary physiology and pharmacological testing, as well as endo-coronary imaging and cardiac MRI. This review will provide an update on the definition, epidemiology, diagnostic strategies and treatment options for patients with MINOCA.

Comparison of bolus versus continuous thermodilution derived indices of microvascular dysfunction in revascularized coronary syndromes

Background

The assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) using invasive methods is a field of growing interest, however the preferred method remains debated. Bolus and continuous thermodilution are commonly used methods, but weak agreement has been observed in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). This study examined their agreement in revascularized acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) patients.

Objective

To compare bolus thermodilution and continuous thermodilution indices of CMD in revascularized ACS and CCS patients and assess their diagnostic agreement at pre-defined cut-off points.

Methods

Patients from two centers underwent paired bolus and continuous thermodilution assessments after revascularization. CMD indices were compared between the two methods and their agreements at binary cut-off points were assessed.

Results

Ninety-six patients and 116 vessels were included. The mean age was 64 ± 11 years, and 20 (21 %) were female. Overall, weak correlations were observed between the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) and continuous thermodilution microvascular resistance (Rµ) (rho = 0.30p = 0.001). The median coronary flow reserve (CFR) from continuous thermodilution (CFRcont) and bolus thermodilution (CFRbolus) were 2.19 (1.76-2.67) and 2.55 (1.50-3.58), respectively (p < 0.001). Weak correlation and agreement were observed between CFRcont and CFRbolus (rho = 0.37, p < 0.001, ICC 0.228 [0.055-0.389]). When assessed at CFR cut-off values of 2.0 and 2.5, the methods disagreed in 41 (35 %) and 45 (39 %) of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

There is a significant difference and weak agreement between bolus and continuous thermodilution-derived indices, which must be considered when diagnosing CMD in ACS and CCS patients.

In-vitro validation of coronary physiology assessment with 5 French guiding catheters

BACKGROUND

The trans-radial approach for cardiac catheterization led to an increasing adoption of 5 French (F) catheters. We aim to evaluate reliability and reproducibility of coronary physiology assessment performed with 5F guiding catheter (GC).

METHODS

Physiological measurements were performed in a coronary flow simulator, which provides two pulsatile flows, the baseline and hyperaemic flows. Two screws, positioned proximally and distally to the distal sensor of a pressure-temperature guidewire, were used to determine various combinations of stenoses and distal obstructions, simulating different pathophysiological conditions. For each setting, 5 measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were performed with 6F and 5F GCs.

RESULTS

A total amount of 190 measurements were performed, 95 with 6F GC and 95 with 5F GC. Minimal differences between 6F and 5F GCs were detected for FFR [0.91 (IQR: 0.87-0.94) and 0.87 (IQR: 0.82-0.92) respectively, p < 0.001] and IMR (16.5 ± 8.8 and 15.4 ± 8.3 respectively, p = 0.001). Mean CFR was comparable between 6F and 5F GCs (3.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 0.7 respectively, p = 0.38). Misclassification rates were 1.0 %, 1.0 % and 0 % for FFR, CFR and IMR, respectively. According to Passing-Bablok analysis, an excellent agreement between 6F and 5F GCs was demonstrated for FFR and IMR, and a modest agreement for CFR. All measurements with 5F GC showed high reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

In our in-vitro model, a complete physiological assessment including FFR, CFR and IMR resulted substantially comparable between 6F and 5F GCs. Further in-vivo analysis is required to support these findings.

Ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease: more than meets the eye

Symptomatic women with angina are more likely to have ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) compared to men. In both men and women, the finding of INOCA is not benign and is associated with adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and angina hospitalizations. Women with INOCA have more angina and a lower quality of life compared to men, but they are often falsely reassured because of a lack of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a perception of low risk. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a key pathophysiologic contributor to INOCA, and non-invasive imaging methods are used to detect impaired microvascular flow. Coronary vasospasm is another mechanism of INOCA, and can co-exist with CMD, but usually requires invasive coronary function testing (CFT) with provocation testing for a definitive diagnosis. In addition to traditional heart disease risk factors, inflammatory, hormonal and psychological risk factors that impact microvascular tone are implicated in INOCA. Treatment of risk factors and use of anti-atherosclerotic and anti-anginal medications offer benefit. Increasing awareness and early referral to specialized centers that focus on INOCA management can improve patient-oriented outcomes. However, large, randomized treatment trials to investigate the impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are needed. In this focused review, we discuss the prevalence, pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of INOCA.

Assessing the Impact of Prolonged Averaging of Coronary Continuous Thermodilution Traces

Continuous Thermodilution is a novel method of quantifying coronary flow (Q) in mL/min. To account for variability of Q within the cardiac cycle, the trace is smoothened with a 2 s moving average filter. This can sometimes be ineffective due to significant heart rate variability, ventricular extrasystoles, and deep inspiration, resulting in a fluctuating temperature trace and ambiguity in the location of the "steady state". This study aims to assess whether a longer moving average filter would smoothen any fluctuations within the continuous thermodilution traces resulting in improved interpretability and reproducibility on a test-retest basis. Patients with ANOCA underwent repeat continuous thermodilution measurements. Analysis of traces were performed at averages of 10, 15, and 20 s to determine the maximum acceptable average. The maximum acceptable average was subsequently applied as a moving average filter and the traces were re-analysed to assess the practical consequences of a longer moving average. Reproducibility was then assessed and compared to a 2 s moving average. Of the averages tested, only 10 s met the criteria for acceptance. When the data was reanalysed with a 10 s moving average filter, there was no significant improvement in reproducibility, however, it resulted in a 12% diagnostic mismatch. Applying a longer moving average filter to continuous thermodilution data does not improve reproducibility. Furthermore, it results in a loss of fidelity on the traces, and a 12% diagnostic mismatch. Overall, current practice should be maintained.

Noninvasive transthoracic doppler flow velocity and invasive thermodilution to assess coronary flow reserve

Background

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) provides prognostication and coronary physiological information, including epicardial coronary stenosis and microvascular function. The relationship between stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE)-derived coronary flow velocity reserve (CFRS-TDE) and thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) before and after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.

Methods

This single-center prospective registry study evaluated patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided elective PCI for left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions with wire-based invasive physiological measurements and pre- and post-PCI stress TDE examinations.

Results

A total of 174 LAD lesions from 174 patients were included in the final analysis. A modest correlation was detected between the pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and the pre-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.383, P<0.001). The frequently used CFRS-TDE threshold of 2.0 corresponded to a pre-PCI CFRthermo of 2.18. Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE underestimated pre-PCI CFRthermo [1.89 (1.44-2.31) vs. 2.05 (1.38-2.93), P<0.001]. Both CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo increased significantly post-PCI [pre-PCI CFRS-TDE 1.89 vs. post-PCI CFRS-TDE 2.33, P<0.001; pre-PCI CFRthermo 2.05 (1.38-2.93) vs. post-PCI CFRthermo 2.59 (1.63-3.55), P<0.001]. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between changes in CFRS-TDE and changes in CFRthermo after PCI (r=0.008, P=0.915) or between post-PCI CFRS-TDE and post-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.054, P=0.482).

Conclusions

Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are modestly correlated, but post-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo have no correlation. CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are not interchangeable, particularly post-PCI, suggesting that the two metrics represent different coronary physiologies after PCI.

Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microcirculation: A State-of-the-Art Review

A significant proportion of patients presenting with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia have no "significant" epicardial disease; thereby, the assessment of coronary microcirculation gained an important role in improving diagnosis and guiding therapy. In fact, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be found in a large proportion of these patients, supporting both symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia. However, CMD represents a diagnostic challenge for two main reasons: (1) the small dimension of the coronary microvasculature prevents direct angiographic visualization, and (2) despite the availability of specific diagnostic tools, they remain invasive and underused in the current clinical practice. For these reasons, CMD remains underdiagnosed, and most of the patients remain with no specific treatment and quality-of-life-limiting symptoms. Of note, recent evidence suggests that a "full physiology" approach for the assessment of the whole coronary vasculature may offer a significant benefit in terms of symptom improvement among patients presenting with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. We analyze the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction, providing the readers with a guide for the invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation, together with the available evidence supporting its use in clinical practice.

Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures

Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) as an alternative to wire-based coronary physiological indices for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction. We evaluated trajectories of TFC during IDP and the impact of ACh provocation on TFC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who underwent IDP to diagnose INOCA were included and divided into two groups according to the positive or negative ACh provocation test. Wire-based invasive physiological assessment was preceded by ACh provocation tests and intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). We evaluated TFC at three different time points during IDP; pre-ACh, post-ISDN, and post-hyperemia. Results: Of 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) had positive ACh provocation test. In the positive ACh group, resting mean transit time (Tmn) and baseline resistance index were significantly higher than in the negative ACh group. Post-ISDN TFC was significantly correlated with resting Tmn (r = 0.31, p = 0.002). Absolute TFC values were highest at pre-ACh, followed by post-ISDN and post-hyperemia in both groups. All between-time point differences in TFC were statistically significant in both groups, except for the change from pre-ACh to post-ISDN in the positive ACh group. Conclusions: In patients suspected of INOCA, TFC was modestly correlated with Tmn, a surrogate of coronary blood flow. The positive ACh provocation test influenced coronary blood flow assessment during IDP.

Functional Assessment of Long-Term Microvascular Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of death and retransplantation following heart transplantation (HTX). Surveillance angiography performed yearly is indicated for the early detection of the disease, but it remains of limited sensitivity.

METHODS

We performed bolus thermodilution-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in HTX patients undergoing yearly surveillance coronary angiography without overt CAV.

RESULTS

In total, 27 HTX patients were included who had 52 CFR, IMR, and FFR measurements at a mean of 43 months after HTX. Only five measurements were performed in the first year. CFR decreased significantly by 0.13 every year (p = 0.04) and IMR tended to increase by 0.98 every year (p = 0.051), whereas FFR did not change (p = 0.161) and remained well above 0.80 over time. After one year, CFR decreased significantly (p = 0.022) and IMR increased significantly (p = 0.015), whereas FFR remained unchanged (p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The functional status of the epicardial coronary arteries of transplanted hearts did not deteriorate over time. On the contrary, a significant decrease in CFR was noted. In view of the increasing IMR, this is caused by the deterioration of the function of microvasculature. CFR and IMR measurements may provide an early opportunity to diagnose CAV.

Continuous vs Bolus Thermodilution to Assess Microvascular Resistance Reserve

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) can, in principle, be derived by any method assessing coronary flow.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare CFR and MRR as derived by continuous (CFRcont and MRRcont) and bolus thermodilution (CFRbolus and MRRbolus).

METHODS

A total of 175 patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease were studied. Bolus and continuous thermodilution measurements were performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery. MRR was calculated as the ratio of CFR to fractional flow reserve and corrected for changes in systemic pressure. In 102 patients, bolus and continuous thermodilution measurements were performed in duplicate to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Mean CFRbolus was higher than CFRcont (3.47 ± 1.42 and 2.67 ± 0.81 [P < 0.001], mean difference 0.80, upper limit of agreement 3.92, lower limit of agreement -2.32). Mean MRRbolus was also higher than MRRcont (4.40 ± 1.99 and 3.22 ± 1.02 [P < 0.001], mean difference 1.2, upper limit of agreement 5.08, lower limit of agreement -2.71). The correlation between CFR and MRR values obtained using both methods was significant but weak (CFR, r = 0.28 [95% CI: 0.14-0.41]; MRR, r = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.16-0.39]; P < 0.001 for both). The precision of both CFR and MRR was higher when assessed using continuous thermodilution compared with bolus thermodilution (repeatability coefficients of 0.89 and 2.79 for CFRcont and CFRbolus, respectively, and 1.01 and 3.05 for MRRcont and MRRbolus, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution yields lower values of CFR and MRR accompanied by an almost 3-fold reduction of the variability in the measured results.

The impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategies during ST-elevation myocardial infarction on the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common complication of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and can lead to adverse cardiovascular events. This is a non-randomized, observational, prospective study of STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI, grouped based on whether they underwent balloon pre-dilatation stenting or direct stenting of the culprit lesion. Coronary physiology measurements were performed 3 months post-PCI including coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measurements at the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of CMD at 3 months, defined as IMR ≥ 25 or CFR < 2.0 with a normal fractional flow reserve. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months. Two hundred ten patients were enrolled; most were men, 125 (59.5%), with a median age of 65 years. One hundred twelve (53.2%) underwent balloon pre-dilatation before stenting, and 98 (46.7%) underwent direct stenting. The prevalence of CMD at 3 months was lower in the direct stenting group than in the balloon pre-dilatation stenting group (12.24% vs. 40.18%; p < 0.001). Aspiration thrombectomy and administration of intracoronary glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were associated with lower odds of CMD (OR = 0.175, p = 0.001 and OR = 0.113, p = 0.001, respectively). Notably, MACE in patients who underwent direct stenting was lower than in those who underwent balloon pre-dilatation before stenting (14.29% vs. 26.79%; p = 0.040). In STEMI patients with multivessel disease, direct stenting of the culprit lesion, aspiration thrombectomy and administration of intracoronary glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were associated with a lower prevalence of CMD at 3 months and lower incidence of MACE at 12 months compared with balloon pre-dilatation stenting.This trial is registered at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT05406297 .

Sex differences in prevalence and outcomes of the different endotypes of chronic coronary syndrome in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Insights from the global ILIAS invasive coronary physiology registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is informed by studies predominantly including men. This study investigated the relationship between patients sex and different endotypes of CCS, including sex-specific clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In patients with CCS undergoing coronary angiography, invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) were measured. Patients were stratified into groups: 1) obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) (FFR≤0.80, no revascularization), 2) undergoing revascularization, 3) non-obstructive coronary artery disease with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) (FFR>0.80, CFR≤2.5), and 4) non-obstructive coronary artery disease without CMD (FFR>0.80 and CFR>2.5).

RESULTS

1836 patients (2335 vessels) were included, comprising 1359 (74.0%) men and 477 (26.0%) women. oCAD was present in 14.1% and was significantly less prevalent in women than in men (10.3% vs 15.5%, respectively p < 0.01). Revascularization was present in 30.9% and was similarly prevalent in women and men (28.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively p = 0.13). CMD was present in 24.2% and was significantly more prevalent in women than men (28.6% vs 22.6%, respectively p < 0.01). Normal invasive measurements were found in 564 patients (33.0% women vs 30.0% men, p = 0.23). Male sex was associated with an increased risk of target vessel failure compared to women (HR.1.89, 95% CI 1.12-3.18, p = 0.018), regardless of CCS-endotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex differences exist in the prevalence and outcomes of different endotypes of CCS in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. In particular, oCAD (and subsequent revascularization) were more prevalent in men. Conversely, CMD was more prevalent in women. Overall, men experienced a worse cardiovascular outcome compared to women, independent of any specific CCS endotype.

Invasive Coronary Assessment in Myocardial Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is threefold: (i) to give an overview of well-established invasive methods for assessing patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; (ii) to describe the prognostic and treatment implications based on these findings, and (iii) to discuss current knowledge gaps and future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that invasive coronary function testing not only allows for risk stratification of patients with INOCA but also guides medical therapy with improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Based on these findings, invasive coronary function assessment is now a class 2a recommendation in the 2021 ACC/AHA chest pain guideline to improve the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and to enhance risk stratification. Invasive functional testing for patients with INOCA is well established and easily performed in the catheterization laboratory. Comprehensive invasive assessment is a key to differentiating INOCA endotypes and optimizing both medical therapy and preventive strategies including lifestyle modification.

Integrated Assessment of Computational Coronary Physiology From a Single Angiographic View in Patients Undergoing TAVI

BACKGROUND

Angiography-derived computational physiology is an appealing alternative to pressure-wire coronary physiology assessment. However, little is known about its reliability in the setting of severe aortic stenosis. This study sought to provide an integrated assessment of epicardial and microvascular coronary circulation by means of single-view angiography-derived physiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

Pre-TAVI angiographic projections of 198 stenotic coronary arteries (123 patients) were analyzed by means of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio and angiography microvascular resistance. Wire-based reference measurements were available for comparison: fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all cases, instantaneous wave-free ratio in 148, and index of microvascular resistance in 42 arteries.

RESULTS

No difference in terms of the number of ischemia-causing stenoses was detected between FFR ≤0.80 and Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 (19.7% versus 19.2%; P=0.899), while this was significantly higher when instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (44.6%; P=0.001) was used. The accuracy of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 in predicting pre-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 was significantly higher than the accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (93.4% versus 77.0%; P=0.001), driven by a higher positive predictive value (86.9% versus 50%). Similar findings were observed when considering post-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 as reference. In 82 cases with post-TAVI angiographic projections, Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio values remained stable, with a low rate of reclassification of stenosis significance (9.9%), similar to FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Angiography microvascular resistance demonstrated a significant correlation (Rho=0.458; P=0.002) with index of microvascular resistance, showing an area under the curve of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.752-0.964) in predicting index of microvascular resistance ≥25.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-derived physiology provides a valid, reliable, and systematic assessment of the coronary circulation in a complex scenario, such as severe aortic stenosis.

Comprehensive Management of ANOCA, Part 1-Definition, Patient Population, and Diagnosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is increasingly recognized and may affect nearly one-half of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for suspected ischemic heart disease. This working diagnosis encompasses coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular and epicardial spasm, myocardial bridging, and other occult coronary abnormalities. Patients with ANOCA often face a high burden of symptoms and may experience repeated presentations to multiple medical providers before receiving a diagnosis. Given the challenges of establishing a diagnosis, patients with ANOCA frequently experience invalidation and recidivism, possibly leading to anxiety and depression. Advances in scientific knowledge and diagnostic testing now allow for routine evaluation of ANOCA noninvasively and in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with coronary function testing (CFT). CFT includes diagnostic coronary angiography, assessment of coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance, provocative testing for endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasospasm, and intravascular imaging for identification of myocardial bridging, with hemodynamic assessment as needed.

Comprehensive Management of ANOCA, Part 2-Program Development, Treatment, and Research Initiatives: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Centers specializing in coronary function testing are critical to ensure a systematic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Management leveraging lifestyle, pharmacology, and device-based therapeutic options for ANOCA can improve angina burden and quality of life in affected patients. Multidisciplinary care teams that can tailor and titrate therapies based on individual patient needs are critical to the success of comprehensive programs. As coronary function testing for ANOCA is more widely adopted, collaborative research initiatives will be fundamental to improve ANOCA care. These efforts will require standardized symptom assessments and data collection, which will propel future large-scale clinical trials.

Continuous Versus Bolus Thermodilution-Derived Coronary Flow Reserve and Microvascular Resistance Reserve and Their Association With Angina and Quality of Life in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronaries: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Background Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) are physiological parameters to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction. CFR and MRR can be assessed using bolus or continuous thermodilution, and the correlation between these methods has not been clarified. Furthermore, their association with angina and quality of life is unknown. Methods and Results In total, 246 consecutive patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries from the multicenter Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing (NL-CFT) were investigated. The 36-item Short Form Health Survey Quality of Life and Seattle Angina questionnaires were completed by 153 patients before the invasive measurements. CFR and MRR were measured consecutively with bolus and continuous thermodilution. Mean continuous thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFRabs) was significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFRbolus) (2.6±1.0 versus 3.5±1.8; P<0.001), with a modest correlation (ρ=0.305; P<0.001). Mean continuous thermodilution-derived microvascular resistance reserve (MRRabs) was also significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution-derived MRR (MRRbolus) (3.1±1.1 versus 4.2±2.5; P<0.001), with a weak correlation (ρ=0.280; P<0.001). CFRbolus and MRRbolus showed no correlation with any of the angina and quality of life domains, whereas CFRabs and MRRabs showed a significant correlation with physical limitation (P=0.005, P=0.009, respectively) and health (P=0.026, P=0.012). In a subanalysis in patients in whom spasm was excluded, the correlation further improved (MRRabs versus physical limitation: ρ=0.363; P=0.041, MRRabs versus physical health: ρ=0.482; P=0.004). No association with angina frequency and stability was found. Conclusions Absolute flow measurements using continuous thermodilution to calculate CFRabs and MRRabs weakly correlate with, and are lower than, the surrogates CFRbolus and MRRbolus. Absolute flow parameters showed a relationship with physical complaints. No relationship with angina frequency and stability was found.

Microvascular resistance reserve: diagnostic and prognostic performance in the ILIAS registry

AIMS

The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was introduced as a means to characterize the vasodilator reserve capacity of the coronary microcirculation while accounting for the influence of concomitant epicardial disease and the impact of administration of potent vasodilators on aortic pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of MRR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1481 patients with stable symptoms and a clinical indication for coronary angiography were included from the global ILIAS Registry. MRR was derived as a function of the coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and corrected for driving pressure. The median MRR was 2.97 [Q1-Q3: 2.32-3.86] and the overall relationship between MRR and CFR was good [correlation coefficient (Rs) = 0.88, P < 0.005]. The difference between CFR and MRR increased with decreasing FFR [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.34; Coef.-2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.05--2.73; P < 0.005]. MRR was independently associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.95; P = 0.024] and with target vessel failure (TVF) at 5-year follow-up (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76-0.97; P = 0.047). The optimal cut-off value of MRR was 3.0. Based on this cut-off value, only abnormal MRR was significantly associated with MACE and TVF at 5-year follow-up in vessels with functionally significant epicardial disease (FFR <0.75).

CONCLUSION

MRR seems a robust indicator of the microvascular vasodilator reserve capacity. Moreover, in line with its theoretical background, this study suggests a diagnostic advantage of MRR over other indices of vasodilatory capacity in patients with hemodynamically significant epicardial coronary artery disease.

Practical Approach for Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A State-of-the-Art Review

Anginal symptoms are frequently encountered in patients without the presence of significant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). It is increasingly recognized that vasomotor disorders, such as an abnormal vasodilatory capacity of the coronary microcirculation or coronary vasospasm, are the dominant pathophysiological substrate in these patients. Although the evidence with respect to angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries is accumulating, the diagnosis and treatment of these patients remains challenging. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview regarding the pathophysiological origins of angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries disorders and its diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Hereby, we provide a practical approach for the management of patents with angina and non-obstructive CAD.

Coronary Vascular (DYS) Function and Invasive Physiology Assessment: Insights into Bolus and Continuous Thermodilution Methods

A considerable number of patients with angina or myocardial ischemia have no significant coronary artery disease on invasive angiography. In recent years, several steps towards a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of these conditions, angina or ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA), have been made. Nevertheless, several gaps in knowledge still remain. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of ANOCA and INOCA, with a particular focus on pathophysiology, recent diagnostic innovations, gaps in knowledge and treatment modalities.