Antioxidant reserve of the lungs and ventilator-associated pneumonia: A clinical trial of high dose selenium in critically ill patients

Selenium as an Antioxidant: Roles and Clinical Applications in Critically Ill and Trauma Patients: A Narrative Review

Selenium plays an indispensable role in antioxidant defense through its incorporation into selenoproteins, including glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and thioredoxin reductase. In the context of trauma and critical illness, systemic inflammation and oxidative stress frequently deplete selenium reserves, compromising the body's antioxidant defenses. This deficiency exacerbates immune dysfunction, elevates the risk of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome, and increases susceptibility to infections and mortality. Observational studies have consistently shown that lower selenium levels correlate with poorer clinical outcomes, such as extended stays in intensive care units and higher mortality rates. Supplementation of selenium has demonstrated promise in restoring GPx activity, reducing oxidative stress markers, and supporting recovery, particularly in patients with pre-existing selenium deficiency. While the impact on mortality remains variable across clinical trials, early and targeted supplementation appears to be beneficial, especially when combined with other micronutrients like vitamins C and E or zinc. These combinations enhance the antioxidant response and tackle the complex oxidative pathways in critically ill and trauma patients. Importantly, the clinical benefits of selenium supplementation appear to be influenced by baseline selenium status, with patients exhibiting severe deficiency deriving the most pronounced improvements in oxidative stress markers, immune function, and recovery. This review highlights the critical importance of addressing selenium deficiency, advocating for personalized therapeutic strategies. However, further large-scale studies are essential to optimize dosing regimens, refine combination therapies, and validate selenium's therapeutic potential in trauma and critical care settings.

Association of Serum Selenium and Selenoprotein P with Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age which is characterized by various reproductive and metabolic disorders. Oxidative stress (OS) is now recognized to be involved in the pathogenesis of PCOS which could be targeted in the management of PCOS-related complications. Selenium (Se), as an antioxidant trace element, has been shown to decrease in PCOS patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the Se and selenoprotein P (SELENOP) levels with OS markers in women with PCOS. In this cross-sectional study, 125 females aged 18-45 years diagnosed with PCOS were included. Demographic, clinical, and lifestyle information of participants were obtained using the relevant questionnaires. Fasting blood samples were collected to measure biochemical parameters. Serum levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), erythrocyte superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase activities as well as anthropometric measurements were assessed across tertiles of serum concentrations of Se and SELENOP. Higher serum levels of Se were associated with higher serum TAC levels (β=0.42, P<0.001) and erythrocytes GPx activity (β=0.28, P=0.002) as well as with lower serum TBARS levels (β= -0.26, P=0.003). Similarly, higher serum levels of SELENOP were associated with higher TAC (β=0.32, P<0.001) and erythrocyte GPx activity (β=0.30, P=0.001). SELENOP also showed an inverse association with serum levels of TBARS (β= -0.40, P<0.001). Nevertheless, erythrocytes SOD and CAT activities showed no significant relationships with serum Se and SELENOP concentrations (all P>0.05). The present study found that serum Se and SELENOP levels were inversely associated with TBARS levels and positively associated with TAC levels and erythrocytes GPx activity.

Efficacy and safety of selenium or vitamin E administration alone or in combination in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Micronutrient administration that contributes to antioxidant defense has been extensively studied in critically ill patients, but consensus remains elusive. Selenium and vitamin E are two important micronutrients that have synergistic antioxidant effects. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of selenium or vitamin E administration alone and the combination of both on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized in the ICU.

METHODS

After electronic searches on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, VIP database and Wanfang data, initially 1767 papers were found, and 30 interventional studies were included in this analysis. We assessed the risk-difference between treatment and control (standard treatment) groups by pooling available data on length of stay (ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay), mortality (ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, 6-month mortality and all-cause mortality), duration of mechanical ventilation, adverse events and new infections.

RESULTS

By analyzing the included studies, we found no significant effect of selenium administration alone on mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, or adverse events in ICU patients. However, after excluding studies with high heterogeneity, the meta-analysis showed that selenium alone reduced the length of hospital stay (MD: -1.38; 95% CI: -2.52, -0.23; I-square: 0%). Vitamin E administration alone had no significant effect on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or adverse events in ICU patients. However, after excluding studies with high heterogeneity, the meta-analysis showed that vitamin E alone could reduce the length of ICU stay (MD: -1.27; 95% CI: -1.86, -0.67; I-square: 16%). Combined administration of selenium and vitamin E had no significant effect on primary outcomes in ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Selenium administration alone may shorten the length of hospital stay, while vitamin E alone may reduce the length of ICU stay. The putative synergistic beneficial effect of combined administration of selenium and vitamin E in ICU patients has not been observed, but more clinical studies are pending to confirm it further.

The effect of selenium therapy in critically ill patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Selenium is an essential nutrient with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immuno-regulatory properties. Studies have displayed that in critically ill patients, selenium supplementation may be a potentially promising adjunctive therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to present an overview of the effects of selenium supplementation in adult critically ill patients based on published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A literature search in three electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was performed to find eligible SRMAs until July 2022. For each outcome, the risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were recalculated using either random or fixed effect models. The methodological quality and quality of evidence of the SRMAs were assessed by applying "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(GRADE) tools, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 17 meta-analyses containing 24 RCTs based on inclusion criteria. Selenium supplementation can reduce the incidence of mortality (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.98, P = 0.024) and incidence of acute renal failure (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.46, 0.98, P: 0.038) significantly; however, the certainty of evidence was low. Moreover, with moderate to very low certainty of evidence, no significant effects were found for risk of infection (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.80, 1.05, P: 0.207), pneumonia (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.72, 1.72, P: 0.675), as well as the length of ICU (MD: 0.15, 95% CI - 1.75, 2.05, P: 0.876) and hospital stay (MD: - 0.51, 95% CI - 3.74, 2.72, P: 0.757) and days on ventilation (MD: - 0.98, 95% CI - 2.93, 0.98, P: 0.329).

CONCLUSIONS

With low quality of evidence, the use of selenium supplementation could improve the risk of mortality and acute renal failure, but not other outcomes in critically ill patients.

Taurine in Septic Critically Ill Patients: Plasma versus Blood

Purpose: Sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) encompass various problems throughout the body, and two of its major problems are the creation of oxidative substances in the body and decrease of the body's antioxidant capacity to deal with the stress and organ damage. Optimal enteral nutrition fortified with antioxidant or immunomodulator amino acid is a hot topic concerning sepsis in the critical care setting. Taurine plays a protective role as an antioxidant in cells that is likely to have a protective role in inflammation and cytotoxicity. Methods: In the present study, 20 septic patients and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The blood and plasma taurine levels of the patients on days 1, 3 and 7 were measured. Blood and plasma taurine level and the correlation between them, organ failure, and severity of the disease were assessed. Results: Taurine concentrations in the plasma of the septic patients were significantly lower than control group, and the whole blood concentrations were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.001). There was not a significant correlation between the blood and plasma taurine levels in control and septic patients. In addition, there was not any correlation between the severity of the disease, organ failure, mortality, and plasma as well as the blood concentration of taurine. Conclusion: In septic patients, taurine concentration in plasma and blood are low and high, respectively. These concentrations are not linked to each other and not associated with the patients' outcome, and the disease severity, and organ failure.

The effects of selenium supplementation on inflammatory markers in critically ill patients

Abstract

Low serum selenium (Se) levels have been shown in critical illness, which is associated with poor clinical outcomes and a higher mortality rate. Se plays an important role in inflammation and oxidative stress. Since the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines and increased oxidative stress is a major component of critical illnesses, its supplementation has been demonstrated to have promising effects on critically ill patients. This study aims to review the evidence regarding the effects of Se supplementation on inflammatory and oxidative markers in critically ill patients. The literature review highlights alterations of inflammatory markers, including procalcitonin, leukocyte count, albumin, prealbumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), inflammatory cytokines, and cholesterol following Se supplementation in critically ill patients. Besides, the antioxidant properties of Se due to its presence in the structure of several selenoenzymes have been reported.

Article highlights

Low serum Se level have been shown in critical illness, which is associated with poor clinical outcome and higher mortality rate.

Se plays an important role in inflammation and oxidative stress.

Se supplementation can have promising effects by alterations of inflammatory markers and its antioxidant properties for critically ill patients.

Prevention and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common acquired infection in the intensive care unit. Recent studies showed that the critical COVID-19 patients with invasive mechanical ventilation have a high risk of developing VAP, which result in a worse outcome and an increasing economic burden. With the development of critical care medicine, the morbidity and mortality of VAP remains high. Especially since the outbreak of COVID-19, the healthcare system is facing unprecedented challenges. Therefore, many efforts have been made in effective prevention, early diagnosis, and early treatment of VAP. This review focuses on the treatment and prevention drugs of VAP in COVID-19 patients. In general, prevention is more important than treatment for VAP. Prevention of VAP is based on minimizing exposure to mechanical ventilation and encouraging early release. There is little difference in drug prophylaxis from non-COVID-19. In term of treatment of VAP, empirical antibiotics is the main treatment, special attention should be paid to the antimicrobial spectrum and duration of antibiotics because of the existence of drug-resistant bacteria. Further studies with well-designed and large sample size were needed to demonstrate the prevention and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 based on the specificity of COVID-19.

Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, and Immunomodulatory Roles of Nonvitamin Antioxidants in Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Therapy

Viral pathologies encompass activation of pro-oxidative pathways and inflammatory burst. Alleviating overproduction of reactive oxygen species and cytokine storm in COVID-19 is essential to counteract the immunogenic damage in endothelium and alveolar membranes. Antioxidants alleviate oxidative stress, cytokine storm, hyperinflammation, and diminish the risk of organ failure. Direct antiviral roles imply: impact on viral spike protein, interference with the ACE2 receptor, inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase 4, transmembrane protease serine 2 or furin, and impact on of helicase, papain-like protease, 3-chyomotrypsin like protease, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Prooxidative environment favors conformational changes in the receptor binding domain, promoting the affinity of the spike protein for the host receptor. Viral pathologies imply a vicious cycle, oxidative stress promoting inflammatory responses, and vice versa. The same was noticed with respect to the relationship antioxidant impairment-viral replication. Timing, dosage, pro-oxidative activities, mutual influences, and interference with other antioxidants should be carefully regarded. Deficiency is linked to illness severity.

Selenium and mercury concentrations in biological samples from patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic disease affecting multiple organs. Furthermore, viral infection depletes several trace elements and promotes complex biochemical reactions in the body. Smoking has been linked to the incidence of COVID-19 and associated mortality, and it may impact clinical effects, viral and bacterial conversion, and treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 and the elemental concentrations of selenium (Se) and mercury (Hg) in biological samples from smokers and nonsmokers infected with the virus and in healthy individuals.

METHOD

We evaluated changes in the concentrations of essential (Se) and toxic (Hg) elements in biological samples (blood, nasal fluid, saliva, sputum, serum, and scalp hair) collected from male smokers and nonsmokers (aged 29-59 years) infected with COVID-19 and from healthy men in the same age group. The patients lived in different cities in Sindh Province, Pakistan. The Se and Hg concentrations were determined using atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

Se concentrations in all types of biological samples from smokers and nonsmokers with COVID-19 were lower than those of healthy smokers and nonsmokers. Hg concentrations were elevated in both smokers and nonsmokers with COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, persons infected with COVID-19 had higher concentrations of toxic Hg, which could cause physiological disorders, and low concentrations of essential Se, which can also cause weakness. COVID-19 infection showed positive correlations with levels of mercury and selenium. Thus, additional clinical and experimental investigations are essential.

Antioxidant micronutrient supplements for adult critically ill patients: A bayesian multiple treatment comparisons meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antioxidant micronutrients (AxMs) have been administered to critically ill adults attempting to counteract the oxidative stress imposed during critical illness. However, results are conflicting and relative effectiveness of AxMs regimens is unknown. We conducted a Bayesian multi-treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis to identify the best AxM treatment regimen that will improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of databases through August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing AxMs supplementations with placebo among critically ill adults were included. Two authors assessed trial quality using Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed certainty of evidence (CoE). A random effect model, non-informative priors Bayesian MTC meta-analysis using gemtc package in R version 3.6.2 was performed. AxMs treatment effect on clinical outcomes (mortality, infection rates, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays and ventilator days) were represented by absolute risk differences (ARD) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Prior to final analysis, we repeated the search through January 2021.

RESULTS

37 RCT (4905 patients) were included with 16 direct comparisons. With respect to mortality, the ARD for "vitamin E" compared with placebo was centred at -0.19 [95%CrI: -0.54,0.16; very low CoE] and was ranked the best treatment for mortality reduction as per surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA 0.71, 95%CrI: 0.07,1.00). A combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" was ranked the best for lowest ICU stay [-9.40, 95% CrI: -20.0,1.50; low CoE]. A combination of "selenium, zinc, copper and vitamin E" was ranked the best treatment for infection risk reduction [-0.22, 95% CrI: -0.61,0.17; very low CoE]. Ventilator days were least with a combination of "selenium, zinc and manganese" [2.80, 95% CrI: -6.30,0.89; low CoE]. Hospital stay was the lowest using a combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" [-13.00, 95% CrI: -38.00,13.00; very low CoE]. There is substantial uncertainty present in the rankings due to wide and overlapping 95% CrIs of SUCRA scores for the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on critically ill adult patients have suggested a possible beneficial effects of certain AxM supplementations over and above the recommended dietary allowance. However, evidence does not support their use in clinical practice due to the low confidence in the estimates. Current studies evaluating specific AxMs or their combinations are limited with small sample sizes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020210199.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Evidence suggesting a potential benefit of AxMs use more than recommended doses in critically ill adults is weak, indicating that there is no justification for this practice.

Metabolic and nutritional triggers associated with increased risk of liver complications in SARS-CoV-2

Obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, cancer and smoking are risk factors for negative outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which can quickly induce severe respiratory failure in 5% of cases. Coronavirus disease-associated liver injury may occur during progression of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with or without pre-existing liver disease, and damage to the liver parenchyma can be caused by infection of hepatocytes. Cirrhosis patients may be particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 if suffering with cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction. Furthermore, pharmacotherapies including macrolide or quinolone antibiotics and steroids can also induce liver damage. In this review we addressed nutritional status and nutritional interventions in severe SARS-CoV-2 liver patients. As guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 in intensive care (IC) specifically are not yet available, strategies for management of sepsis and SARS are suggested in SARS-CoV-2. Early enteral nutrition (EN) should be started soon after IC admission, preferably employing iso-osmolar polymeric formula with initial protein content at 0.8 g/kg per day progressively increasing up to 1.3 g/kg per day and enriched with fish oil at 0.1 g/kg per day to 0.2 g/kg per day. Monitoring is necessary to identify signs of intolerance, hemodynamic instability and metabolic disorders, and transition to parenteral nutrition should not be delayed when energy and protein targets cannot be met via EN. Nutrients including vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, folic acid, zinc, selenium and ω-3 fatty acids have in isolation or in combination shown beneficial effects upon immune function and inflammation modulation. Cautious and monitored supplementation up to upper limits may be beneficial in management strategies for SARS-CoV-2 liver patients.

A Mechanistic Link Between Selenium and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly emerging disease caused by a highly contagious virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and this disease has affected millions of people across the world and led to hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide. Nutrition is a key factor related to this disease, and nutritional status may determine the risk and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Selenium is one of the major trace elements required for redox functions and has significant roles in viral infections. The purpose of this review was to examine the current evidence on the role of selenium in COVID-19. We reviewed studies on selenium and COVID-19, and other relevant studies to understand how selenium status can modify the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and how selenium status might affect a person post-infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found that oxidative stress is a characteristic feature of COVID-19 disease, which is linked with the immunopathological disorder observed in individuals with severe COVID-19. Selenium plays a key role in strengthening immunity, reducing oxidative stress, preventing viral infections and supporting critical illness. Moreover, selenium deficiency is related to oxidative stress and hyperinflammation seen in critical illness, and selenium deficiency is found to be associated with the severity of COVID-19 disease. Selenium supplementation at an appropriate dose may act as supportive therapy in COVID-19. Future studies in large cohorts of COVID-19 are warranted to verify the benefits of selenium supplementation for reducing risk and severity of COVID-19.

Daily parenteral selenium therapy in critically ill patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients hospitalized at the intensive care unit (ICU) are more prone to oxidative stress. Antioxidants such as selenium (Se) may have beneficial effects on outcomes in these patients. Studies and systematic reviews in this field have inconclusive results.

METHODS

An updated systematic search was done to find clinical trials published in PubMed, Cochrane's library, ISI web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases from January 1980 up to April 2020, to assess the effects of daily Se supplementation on patient's survival, hospital and ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, infection, acute renal failure (ARF) occurrence and serum creatinine levels.

RESULTS

From 1394 papers found in the first step of the search, after deleting duplicate findings, 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results of the pooled random-effect size analysis of 24 trials showed no remarkable effect of daily parenteral Se administration on patient's hospital and ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, infectious complications, ARF, survival and serum creatinine levels (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed that daily parenteral Se administration (in doses higher than 1000 μg/d) increased the length of ICU stay by 4.48-folds (95%CI: -0.5, 9.46, p = 0.07). Parenteral Se supplementation at the first and following dose of ≤1000 μg reduced the number of ARF at the hospitalized patients by 76% and 45%, respectively (p = 0.02, and p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of Se increases days of ICU stay, but low doses decreases the number of ARF occurrence in ICU patients. More trials are needed to assess its effect on ARF occurrence.

Antioxidant micronutrient supplementation in critically ill adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of antioxidant micronutrient (AxM) supplementation in the critically ill patients has been controversial, and recent trials have suggested a tendency to harm. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to examine the effect of AxM supplementation on clinical outcomes among critically ill adults.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, LILACS, DARE, SCOPUS, and Web of sciences databases were searched from inception to March 2019. RCTs that compared AxM supplements with placebo in adult critically ill patients and reporting mortality as an outcomes were included. Trial quality was assessed using updated cochrane risk of bias (RoB-II) tool. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days and infection between the two groups. Outcomes were summarised using random-effects estimators. Quality of evidence (QOE) was rated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Prior to final analysis, we repeated the search through September 2019. R version 3.6.2 and STATA version 13 were used for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 34 trials with 4678 patients revealed that AxM supplementation was associated with possible reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.89 [95%CI 0.79 to 0.99], TSA adjusted CI 0.77 to 1.03; Low QOE). Fragility index and number needed to treat were 1 and 41, respectively. Eight studies with low RoB (RR, 1.08; 95%CI 0.95 to 1.23; TSA CI, 0.64 to 1.82; moderate QOE) did not show mortality reduction with AxM supplementation.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

ICU LOS (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.84; 95%CI -1.50 to -0.18; moderate QOE), hospitalization days (WMD, -2.83; 95%CI -3.91to -1.75; low QOE) and ventilator days (WMD, -1.87; 95%CI -3.60 to -0.14; very low QOE) showed a statistically significant benefit with AxM supplementation. In meta-regression analysis, neither the duration of AxM therapy nor the dosage of selenium, which was the most widely studied AxM, reported an association with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although AxM supplementation was associated with possible reduction in all-cause mortality, results from the TSA and studies with low RoB showing null effect suggest that the evidence of benefit is questionable. Secondary outcomes attained statistically significant benefit with AxM supplements, but the certainity of evidence was low. To summarize, current evidence does not justify administration of AxM in critically ill patients.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019125898.

Effect of selenium supplementation on antioxidant markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

The aim of this study is the systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trial studies to assess the antioxidant effects of selenium (Se) supplementation.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the previously published protocol. The PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases were meticulously searched for relevant data, without time or language restriction, up to June 1, 2017. All clinical trials which assessed the effect of Se supplementation on antioxidant markers, including oxidative stress index (OSI), antioxidant potency composite (APC) index, plasma malonaldehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT)), and total antioxidant plasma (TAP), were included. The effect of Se supplementation on antioxidant markers was assessed using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The random-effect meta-analysis method was used to estimate the pooled SMD.

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies which assessed the effect of Se supplementation on antioxidant markers were included. The random-effect meta-analysis method showed that Se supplementation significantly increased GPX (SMD = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.21-0.87) and TAC (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.66) levels and decreased MDA levels (SMD = - 0.54, 95% CI = - 0.78, - 0.30). The effect of Se supplementation on other antioxidant markers was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that Se supplementation might reduce oxidative stress by increasing TAC and GPX levels and decreasing serum MDA, both of which are crucial factors for reduction of oxidative stress.

The Effect of Intravenous Selenium on Oxidative Stress in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To modulate the inflammatory response in respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with selenium.

BACKGROUND

Selenium replenishes the glutathione peroxidase proteins that are the first line of defense for an oxidative injury to the lungs.

METHODS

Forty patients with ARDS were randomized into two groups: the SEL⁺ group being administered sodium selenite and the SEL^- group receiving normal saline for 10 days. Blood samples were taken on Day-0, DAY-7, and Day-14 for assessment of IL-1 beta, IL-6, C-reactive protein, GPx-3, and selenium. Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) was measured in the bronchial wash fluids. Pearson correlation and repeated measure analysis were performed to examine the effects of selenium on the inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Sodium selenite replenished selenium levels in the SEL⁺ group. Selenium concentrations were linearly correlated to serum concentrations of GPx3 (R value: 0.631; P < 0.001), and FRAP (R value: -0.785; P < 0.001). Serum concentrations of both IL 1-beta (R value: -0.624; P < 0.001) and IL-6 (R value: -0.642; P < 0.001) were inversely correlated to the serum concentrations of selenium. There was a meaningful difference between two groups in airway resistance and pulmonary compliance changes (P values 0.008 and 0.028, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Selenium restored the antioxidant capacity of the lungs, moderated the inflammatory responses, and meaningfully improved the respiratory mechanics. Despite these changes, it had no effect on the overall survival, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay. Selenium can be used safely; however, more trials are essential to examine its clinical effectiveness.