Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by real-time PCR in fecal samples for the non-invasive diagnosis of CMV intestinal disease

Performance evaluation of the Alinity m system for quantifying cytomegalovirus DNA in samples of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tract

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load in specimens other than blood such as bronchoalveolar lavages, intestinal biopsies, or urine has become a common practice as an ancillary tool for the diagnosis of CMV pneumonitis, intestinal disease, or congenital infection, respectively. Nevertheless, most commercially available CMV PCR platforms have not been validated for CMV DNA detection in these specimen types. In this study, a laboratory-developed test based on Alinity m CMV ("Alinity LDT") was evaluated. Reproducibility assessment using spiked bronchial aspirate (BAS) or urine samples showed low standard deviations of 0.08 and 0.27 Log IU/mL, respectively. Evaluating the clinical performance of Alinity LDT in comparison to a laboratory-developed test based on RealTime CMV ("RealTime LDT") showed good concordance across 200 clinical specimens including respiratory specimens, intestinal biopsies, urine, and stool. A high Pearson's correlation coefficient of r = 0.92, a low mean bias of -0.12 Log IU/mL, a good qualitative agreement of 90%, and a Cohen's kappa value of 0.76 (substantial agreement) were observed. In separate analyses of the sample types BAS, tracheal aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, biopsies, and urine, the assay results correlated well between the two platforms with r values between 0.88 and 0.99 and a bias <0.5 Log IU/mL. Overall, the fully automated, continuous, random access Alinity LDT yielded good reproducibility, high concordance, and good correlation to RealTime LDT in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urine samples and may enhance patient management with rapid result reporting.IMPORTANCEIn transplant recipients, a major cause for morbidity and mortality is end-organ disease by primary or secondary CMV infection of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. In addition, sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental abnormalities are frequent sequelae of congenital CMV infections in newborns. Standard of care for highly sensitive detection and quantitation of the CMV DNA load in plasma and whole blood specimens is real-time PCR testing. Beyond that, there is a need for quantitative determination of CMV DNA levels in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tract specimens using a highly automated, random access CMV PCR assay with a short turnaround time to enable early diagnosis and treatment. In the present study, clinical performance of the fully automated Alinity m analyzer in comparison to the current RealTime LDT assay was evaluated in eight different off-label sample types.

Cytomegalovirus Infection: An Underrated Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment

CMV infection is still a matter of concern in IBD patients, especially regarding the disease's relapse management. Why IBD patients, particularly those affected by ulcerative colitis, are more susceptible to CMV reactivation is not totally explained, although a weakened immune system could be the reason. Various techniques, ranging from serology to histology, can be employed to detect intestinal CMV infection; however, there is currently disagreement in the literature regarding the most effective diagnostic test. Furthermore, CMV involvement in steroid resistance has been broadly discussed, but whether CMV infection is a cause or consequence of the disease severity and, consequently, steroid refractoriness is still debated. Its potential contribution to the lack of response to advanced therapy and small molecules must be more valued and wholly explored. In this review, we look at the actual literature on CMV in IBD patients, and we suggest a pragmatic algorithm for clinical practice management of CMV infection.

Performance of Cytomegalovirus Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays of Fecal and Plasma Specimens for Diagnosing Cytomegalovirus Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in plasma or stool may facilitate detection of CMV colitis.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 117 patients with clinically suspected CMV colitis. Patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms and having increased risk of CMV infection were eligible. All participants underwent colonoscopy with tissue biopsy. Five patients underwent colonoscopy twice because of clinical recurrence, resulting in a total of 122 colonoscopies. Stool CMV-PCR and plasma CMV-PCR were performed within 7 days before/after colonoscopy. Twenty asymptomatic volunteers also underwent the same protocol.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (23.1%) of 122 colonoscopies yielded positive for CMV colitis. The sensitivity and specificity was 70.4% and 91.6% for stool CMV-PCR and 66.7% and 94.7% for plasma CMV-PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of either positive plasma or positive stool CMV-PCR was 81.5%, which is significantly higher than that of plasma CMV-PCR alone ( P = 0.045). However, positive results from both tests yielded a specificity of 95.8%, which is significantly higher than that of stool CMV-PCR alone ( P = 0.045). There was a good and significant correlation between stool CMV-PCR and plasma CMV-PCR ( r = 0.71, P < 0.01), and both tests significantly correlated with the cytomegalic cell count ( r = 0.62, P < 0.01 for stool and r = 0.64, P < 0.01 for plasma). There were no positive stool or plasma CMV-PCR assays among volunteers.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study strongly suggest that the combination of stool CMV-PCR and plasma CMV-PCR can be used to confidently rule in (both positive) or rule out (both negative) a diagnosis of CMV colitis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), original wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and cytomegalovirus co-infection in a young adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, case report, and review of the possible cytomegalovirus reactivation mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Like other viral infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection could affect different human body systems, including host immune responses. Three years after its pandemic, we learn more about this novel coronavirus. As we expected, different co-infections with various organisms, such as viruses, bacteria, and even fungi, have been reported. However, concurrent infection with two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus is extremely unusual. We have only a rudimentary understanding of such co-infections and their long-term consequences for patients with cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old young Iranian adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented with abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting following a recent history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. The patient never experienced respiratory symptoms, and the chest imaging study was normal on admission. His primary laboratory investigation revealed prerenal azotemia and severe abnormal liver function tests (blood urea nitrogen 32 mg/dL, creatinine 1.75 mg/dL, prothrombin time 66 s, partial thromboplastin time 44.5 s, international normalized ratio 5.14, total bilirubin 2.9 mg/dL, and direct bilirubin 2.59 mg/dL). Cytomegalovirus disease was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction in his blood and stool samples. The patient's gastrointestinal signs and symptoms improved shortly after receiving intravenous ganciclovir treatment. His gastrointestinal symptoms continued intermittently for weeks despite maintenance valganciclovir prescription, necessitating frequent hospitalizations. The patient was complicated by the recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms during the sixth hospitalization, even though he had no respiratory symptoms, and the nasopharyngeal test revealed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 Wuhan strain for the first time. Remdesivir and valganciclovir were administrated due to persistent enteritis and evidence of intestinal tissue invasion by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and cytomegalovirus on multiple intestinal biopsies, which led to partial clinical responses. Cytomegalovirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 fecal shedding continued for more than 6 months despite repeated antiviral therapy, and the Wuhan and Alpha strains were also detected in his nasopharyngeal samples through repeated sampling (confirmed by four nasopharyngeal sampling and multiple stool specimens and several intestinal biopsies). Finally, during the Delta-variant (B.1.617.2) outbreak in Iran, the patient was admitted again with febrile neutropenia and decreased level of consciousness, necessitating respiratory support and mechanical ventilation. During the Delta-variant peak, the patient's nasopharyngeal sample once more tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The patient died a few days later from cardiopulmonary arrest.

CONCLUSION

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has encountered patients with cancer with critical diagnostic and treatment challenges. Patients who are immunocompromised may co-infect with multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus, and even with timely diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis may be poor.

Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by digital PCR in stool samples for the non-invasive diagnosis of CMV gastroenteritis

Background

CMV gastroenteritis is common in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and it is difficult to distinguish from acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), which has very similar symptoms but needs quite different treatment. CMV gastroenteritis is caused by local infection or reactivation of CMV in the gastrointestinal tract while aGvHD is due to immune rejection. The gold standard of diagnosis of CMV gastroenteritis and aGvHD is gastrointestinal biopsy under endoscopy, which is invasive and can potentially lead to severe side effects. Stool samples testing with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) may be an alternative, while the application in trace level measurements and precision are not all satisfactory enough in reported research.

Methods

In this study, we designed a novel method that extracted the cell free DNA (cfDNA) from the fecal supernatant to perform digital PCR (dPCR) for the detection of CMV, analyzed the performance and compared it with the total DNA extracted by the current procedure.

Results

Twenty-two paired stool samples using two DNA extraction methods proved that the cfDNA extraction method had markedly higher DNA concentrations and control gene copy number, suggesting that cfDNA may be more informative and more useful for the detection of CMV DNA segment. The dPCR approach in detecting CMV DNA segment also exhibit good linearity (R2 = 0.997) and higher sensitivity (limit of detection at 50% was 3.534 copies/μL). Eighty-two stool samples from 44 immunocompromised patients were analyzed, CMV-positive rate was 28%, indicating that more than one-quarter of the gastrointestinal symptoms within these patients may be caused by CMV infection or reactivation.

Conclusion

The combined results suggest that detection of CMV by dPCR in cfDNA of stool supernatant is a powerful method to identify CMV gastroenteritis and helps in clinical treatment decision making.

Human cytomegalovirus: a survey of end-organ diseases and diagnostic challenges in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most important infectious complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, early detection and prompt treatment are imperative to improve transplant outcomes. This article highlights the clinical characteristics of the most common CMV end-organ diseases in SOT recipients and their diagnostic modalities and challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

CMV can cause a variety of end-organ diseases in SOT recipients. Although CMV nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is frequently employed to detect CMV reactivation or infection, its predictive value for various CMV end-organ diseases remains uncertain. Given the limitation of PCR or other noninvasive tests, confirmation of CMV end-organ disease may require tissue biopsy, which may not be feasible or available, or may cause untoward complications.

SUMMARY

The utility of PCR to diagnose CMV end-organ disease is limited. As CMV can infect any organ system(s), clinicians caring for SOT recipients need to maintain vigilance for any signs and symptoms of end-organ disease to allow early recognition and prompt treatment. Invasive procedures might be needed to confirm the diagnosis and minimize the empirical use of antiviral therapy that may have substantial drug toxicities.

Viral Enteritis in Solid-Organ Transplantation

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for infections due to chronic immunosuppression. Diarrhea is a commonly encountered problem post transplantation, with infectious causes of diarrhea being a frequent complication. Viral infections/enteritides in solid organ transplant recipients often result from frequently encountered pathogens in this population such as cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and norovirus. However, several emerging viral pathogens are increasingly being recognized as more sensitive diagnostic techniques become available. Treatment is often limited to supportive care and reduction in immunosuppression, though antiviral therapies mayplay a role in the treatment in certain diseases. Viral enteritis is an important entity that contributes to morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Cytomegalovirus and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) with a Special Focus on the Link with Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects approximately 40% of adults in France and persists lifelong as a latent agent in different organs, including gut. A close relationship is observed between inflammation that favors viral expression and viral replication that exacerbates inflammation. In this context, CMV colitis may impact the prognosis of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), and notably those with ulcerative colitis (UC). In UC, the mucosal inflammation and T helper cell (TH) 2 cytokines, together with immunomodulatory drugs used for controlling flare-ups, favor viral reactivation within the gut, which, in turn, increases mucosal inflammation, impairs corticoid and immunosuppressor efficacy (the probability of steroid resistance is multiplied by more than 20 in the case of CMV colitis), and enhances the risk for colectomy. This review emphasizes the virological tools that are recommended for exploring CMV colitis during inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and underlines the interest of using ganciclovir for treating flare-ups associated to CMV colitis in UC patients.

Increasing Cytomegalovirus Detection Rate from Respiratory Tract Specimens by a New Laboratory-Developed Automated Molecular Diagnostic Test

Lots of automated molecular methods for detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in the blood are available, but seldom for various clinical specimens. This study was designed to establish a highly sensitive automated assay to detect CMV DNA in non-blood specimens. We designed a new QMT assay using QIAGEN artus CMV RG polymerase chain reaction (Q-CMV PCR) kit applied on the BD MAX system and compared with the other assays, including an RGQ assay (LabTurbo auto-extraction combined Q-CMV PCR kit on Rotor-Gene-Q instrument), and in-house PCR assay. A total of 1067 various clinical samples, including 426 plasma, 293 respiratory tract specimens (RTS), 127 stool, 101 cerebral spinal fluid, 90 vitreous humours were analysed. Examining CMV DNA in simultaneous specimens of the same immunocompromised patient with respiratory symptoms, the detection rate of RTS (93.6%, 88/94) was significant higher than plasma (65.9%, 62/94). The positive rates for plasma samples with a low CMV viral load (<137 IU/mL) and diagnostic sensitivity of QMT, RGQ, and in-house assays were 65% and 99.1%, 45% and 100%, 5% and 65.5%, respectively. The QMT assay performs better, with shorter operational and turnaround time than the other assays, enabling the effective and early detection of CMV infection in various clinical specimens, particularly for RTS.

A stool test in patients with active ulcerative colitis helps exclude cytomegalovirus disease

Objectives: In severe ulcerative colitis (UC) bowel biopsy is recommended to detect the cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection capable of complicating the course of the disease. Histopathology with immunohistochemistry (IHC) is time-consuming, and a blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CMV DNA is used as an alternative, notwithstanding nothing more than a moderate correlation between the two. We aimed to detect CMV DNA in the stools of patients with active UC, and to compare the results with CMV IHC in bowel biopsies.Materials and methods: Measurement of CMV DNA in stools (copies/ml) entailed PCR, while biopsies assessed inflammation activity (Geboes scale), as well as counts of numbers of CMV IHC-positive cells/biopsy. The severity of UC was assessed using the Mayo score, stool calprotectin and concentrations of C-reactive protein in the blood.Results: 89 of the above pairs of tests for CMV were performed among 75 patients. CMV was detected in 36/89 stool specimens and 19/89 bowel biopsies. The sensitivity of the stool-CMV PCR was thus 84.7%, while specificity was of 71.4%. The negative predictive value was 94.3% and the positive predictive value 44.4%. No difference in the severity of UC was noted between the stool CMV DNA positive and negative groups. Similarly, there was no difference in the severity of UC between the CMV IHC positive and negative groups, except for the Geboes score, more often found to be higher in CMV IHC-positive patients (p = .002).Conclusions: CMV DNA was detected in the stools of 40.4% of patients with active UC. A negative test result may help to exclude bowel CMV disease.

A Practical Review of Cytomegalovirus in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous Herpesviridae virus with a wide spectrum of pathology in humans. Host immunity is a major determinant of the clinical manifestation of CMV and can vary widely in the gastroenterology and hepatology practice setting. Immunocompetent patients generally develop a benign, self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome whereas gastrointestinal tissue-invasive disease is more frequently seen in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Additionally, liver allograft dysfunction is a significant consequence of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. While polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques allow for the reliable and accurate detection of CMV in the human host, the diagnostic value of different serologic, endoscopic, and histologic tests depends on a variety of factors. Similarly, latent CMV, CMV infection, and CMV disease carry different significance depending on the patient population, and the decision to initiate antiviral therapy can be complex and patient-specific. This review will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CMV in patient populations relevant to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology-liver transplant recipients, inflammatory bowel disease patients, and otherwise immunocompetent patients.

Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in fecal samples in the diagnosis of enterocolitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus enterocolitis is a rare but potentially life threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Its early diagnosis and treatment are essential for a successful outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential benefit of fecal CMV DNA detection in the diagnosis of CMV colitis among stem cell transplant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Biopsies from the lower gastrointestinal tract, taken during 69 episodes of diarrhea, were compared with fecal samples previously examined for CMV DNA in 45 patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Six confirmed cases of CMV colitis were observed, with 16 out of 69 (23%) fecal samples proving positive for CMV DNA. Only one positive sample correlated with histologically confirmed CMV colitis, and 15 samples were evaluated as false positive. These results provide a 16.7% sensitivity and 76.2% specificity in the diagnosis of CMV enterocolitis.

CONCLUSION

The examination of fecal samples for the presence of CMV DNA has very low potential in the diagnosis of CMV enterocolitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation; therefore, a biopsy of the gastrointestinal mucosa is still warranted for correct diagnosis.

Short article: Stool cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus-related gastrointestinal disease

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of cytomegalovirus-related gastrointestinal disease (CMV-GI disease) still requires histopathology, but biopsy is considered invasive. Stool CMV PCR has been reported in adults as an alternative method to diagnose this condition; hence, the results between studies are discrepant. Moreover, no pediatric studies on stool CMV real-time PCR in CMV-GI disease have been carried out. Here, we evaluate the value of stool CMV real-time PCR in detecting CMV-GI disease among immunocompromised children.

METHODS

We enrolled immunocompromised patients aged younger than 20 years who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms at a teaching hospital during January 2015-March 2016. Stool samples were analyzed for CMV real-time PCR. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy with mucosal biopsy.

RESULTS

We performed stool CMV real-time PCR in 31 patients, but two could not undergo endoscopy. Therefore, 29 patients were analyzed. Two additional stool samples showed inhibitors that interfere with the PCR testing and were precluded from the final analysis. Among 27 patients, we found CMV-GI disease in seven (26%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of stool CMV real-time PCR were 71, 85, and 82%, respectively. We also found that all patients with CMV-GI disease had positive plasma CMV real-time PCR (>150 copies/ml). A significant association between stool and plasma CMV real-time PCR was also noted (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stool CMV real-time PCR may be used as a noninvasive tool in the diagnosis of CMV-GI disease. Plasma CMV real-time PCR shows a significant correlation with stool CMV real-time PCR and also represents high diagnostic values.

Active cytomegalovirus infection diagnosed by real-time PCR in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, controlled observational study (.)

OBJECTIVE

It is assumed that cytomegaloviral (CMV) infection in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is caused by reactivation due to the immunosuppressive therapy, but the role of CMV as a pathophysiological factor and prognostic marker in IBD is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate CMV infection in IBD, with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry, with emphasis on newly diagnosed disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective, controlled study, 67 patients with IBD and 34 control patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or rectal bleeding were included. Serology for CMV was analysed along with CMV DNA in plasma, mucosal biopsies, and faeces. Mucosal biopsies were further analysed with histopathology and CMV immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Detection of CMV IgM was more common in patients with IBD, compared to controls, 21% versus 3%. CMV DNA was found in 16% of patients with newly diagnosed, untreated IBD and in 38% of steroid-treated patients. Four of the five patients that needed urgent surgery were CMV-DNA positive in at least one of three sample types. None of the controls had detectable CMV DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Active CMV infection was found in high proportions of newly diagnosed untreated patients with IBD, in patients on immunosuppression and in patients in the need of surgery. Low CMV-DNA levels in non-immunosuppressed patients were not a risk factor for the development of more severe IBD, while the detection of CMV DNA in patients on immunosuppressive therapy may foresee disease progression.

Clinical value of PCR detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in stool samples of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in stool samples of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

METHODS: Clinical data of all hospitalized IBD patients at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2013 to March 2015 were reviewed. Blood and stool samples were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed for CMV DNA using real-time PCR in 116 patients who were included in the study.

RESULTS: Of 116 patients who underwent both serum and stool CMV DNA detection, 16 had detectable CMV DNA in stool samples, four had detectable CMV DNA in serum, and 100 had negative findings for CMV DNA in both serum and stool samples. The average number of CMV DNA copies in four stool samples in the serum positive group was 1.23 × 10⁵ (6.05 × 10⁴ - 2.58 × 10⁵), which was much higher than that of patients who were only stool positive (5.66 × 10⁴ copies, 2.59 × 10³ - 2.82 × 10⁵ copies).

CONCLUSION: Detection of CMV in stool samples is a highly sensitive, non-invasive testing method as compared to blood CMV DNA PCR.

Cytomegalovirus and ulcerative colitis: Place of antiviral therapy

The link between cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and inflammatory bowel diseases remains an important subject of debate. CMV infection is frequent in ulcerative colitis (UC) and has been shown to be potentially harmful. CMV reactivation needs to be diagnosed using methods that include in situ detection of viral markers by immunohistochemistry or by nucleic acid amplification techniques. Determination of the density of infection using quantitative tools (numbers of infected cells or copies of the genome) is particularly important. Although CMV reactivation can be considered as an innocent bystander in active flare-ups of refractory UC, an increasing number of studies suggest a deleterious role of CMV in this situation. The presence of colonic CMV infection is possibly linked to a decreased response to steroids and other immunosuppressive agents. Some treatments, notably steroids and cyclosporine A, have been shown to favor CMV reactivation, which seems not to be the case for therapies using anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. According to these findings, in flare-ups of refractory UC, it is now recommended to look for the presence of CMV reactivation by using quantitative tools in colonic biopsies and to treat them with ganciclovir in cases of high viral load or severe disease.

Coexisting cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent patients with Clostridium difficile colitis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis usually occurs in immunocompromised patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplantation, and malignancy receiving chemotherapy or ulcerative colitis receiving immunosuppressive agents. However, CMV colitis is increasingly recognized in immunocompetent hosts. Notably, CMV colitis coexisting with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in apparently healthy individuals has been published in recent years, which could result in high morbidity and mortality. CMV colitis is a rare but possible differential diagnosis in immunocompetent patients with abdominal pain, watery, or especially bloody diarrhea, which could be refractory to standard treatment for CDI. As a characteristic of CDI, however, pseudomembranous colitis may be only caused by CMV infection. Real-time CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for blood and stool samples may be a useful and noninvasive diagnostic strategy to identify CMV infection when treatment of CDI eventually fails to show significant benefits. Quantitative CMV-PCR in mucosal biopsies may increase the diagnostic yield of traditional histopathology. CMV colitis is potentially life-threatening if severe complications occur, such as sepsis secondary to colitis, massive colorectal bleeding, toxic megacolon, and colonic perforation, so that may necessitate pre-emptive antiviral treatment for those who are positive for CMV-PCR in blood and/or stool samples while pending histological diagnosis.

Cytomegalovirus Colitis in a Critically Ill Patient Following Severe Legionella Pneumonia with Multiple Organ Failure

A 68-year-old man visited an emergency department complaining of dyspnea. He was diagnosed to have Legionella pneumonia with multiple organ failure. Although his multiple organ failure improved, he suffered from persistent abdominal pain and diarrhea with continuous minor bleeding. Colonoscopy revealed a longitudinal ulcer of the rectum, below the peritoneal reflection. He was diagnosed with cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis. Antiviral therapy with ganciclovir was initiated. He finally underwent a colostomy after a bowel stricture caused an intestinal outlet obstruction, which made oral intake impossible. Based on the present case, we believe that CMV colitis must be considered as one of the differential diagnoses when critically ill patients develop continuous diarrhea and abdominal pain.

Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay for detection of cytomegalovirus in stool samples from patients with ulcerative colitis

AIM: To evaluate a multiplex PCR assay for the detection of bacterial and viral enteropathogens in stool samples from patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 300 individuals, including immunocompetent patients, immunocompromised patients, and patients with UC. Stool samples were collected from the recto-sigmoid region of the colon by endoscopy. The samples were qualitatively analyzed for bacterial and viral enteropathogens with a multiplex PCR assay using a Seeplex^® Kit. Additional clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical records.

RESULTS: A multiplex PCR assay detected 397 pathogens (191 bacteria and 206 viruses) in 215 samples (71.7%). The most frequently detected bacteria were Escherichia coli H7, 85 (28.3%); followed by Aeromonas spp., 43 (14.3%); and Clostridium perfringens, 36 (12.0%) samples. The most prevalent viruses were Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 90 (30.0%); followed by human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), 53 (17.7%); and cytomegalovirus (CMV), 37 (12.3%) samples. The prevalence rate of CMV infection was significantly higher in the immunocompromised group than in the immunocompetent group (P < 0.01). CMV infection was more common in patients with UC (26/71; 36.6%) than in the immunocompetent patients excluding UC (6/188; 3.2%) (P < 0.01). CMV infection was more prevalent in UC active patients (25/58; 43.1%) than in UC inactive patients (1/13; 7.7%) (P < 0.05). Among 4 groups which defined by the UC activity and immunosuppressive drugs, the prevalence rate of CMV infection was highest in the UC active patients with immunosuppressive drugs (19/34; 55.8%). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection was more common in the immunocompromised patients excluding UC (18/41; 43.9%) than in the immunocompetent patients excluding UC (47/188; 25.0%) (P < 0.05). The simultaneous presence of CMV and EBV and/or HHV6 in UC active patients (14/58; 24.1%) was greater than in immunocompromised patients excluding UC (5/41; 12.2%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The multiplex PCR assay that was used to analyze the stool samples in this study may serve as a non-invasive approach that can be used to exclude the possibility of CMV infection in patients with active UC who are treated with immunosuppressive therapy.

Detection of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in feces has limited value in predicting CMV enteritis in patients with intestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is difficult to diagnose. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of CMV DNA in feces for predicting CMV enteritis.

METHODS

HSCT patients with intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were enrolled if they met the following criteria: (i) underwent a colonoscopy and (ii) peripheral blood and feces specimens were available for CMV DNA detection within 24 h of colonoscopy. The colonoscopy histology was used as the gold standard for diagnosing CMV enteritis.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients underwent 58 colonoscopy examinations, and 7 were diagnosed as having CMV enteritis. Within 24 h of colonoscopy, 9 patients had detectable CMV in the feces and 19 patients had detectable CMV in the plasma, respectively. In the 7 patients with CMV enteritis, only 2 had detectable CMV in the stool, resulting in a sensitivity of 28.6%. In the 51 patients without CMV enteritis, 44 had no detectable CMV in the stool, with a specificity of 86.3%.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that CMV detection in the feces was not a good predictor of CMV enteritis in patients with intestinal GVHD after allo-HSCT.