The contribution of more sensitive hepatitis B surface antigen assays to detecting and monitoring hepatitis B infection

Longstanding, undiagnosed, highly replicative hepatitis B virus reactivation in the presence of high levels of anti-HBs antibodies

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant recipients are among the populations at risk for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation, and close monitoring is needed for its early detection.

METHODS

We describe a case of HBV reactivation in a patient who underwent kidney transplantation more than 30 years ago, with a known serological profile of past HBV infection.

RESULTS

Reactivation occurred as a highly replicative infection that went undiagnosed for 7 years due to negative results for HB surface antigen (HBsAg) and high levels of anti-HBs antibodies. Viral genome sequencing showed a high number of mutations in the major hydrophilic region of HBsAg that could explain such a profile.

DISCUSSION

This case highlights the usefulness of frequent and systematic HBV viral load testing in patients at risk of reactivation, with anti-hepatitis B core antibodies, regardless of HBsAg detection, aminotransferases, and anti-HBs antibody levels.

Misuse of the Lower Limit of Detection in HBV DNA Testing and Anti-HBe Positive Status Will Significantly Impact the Diagnosis of Occult HBV Infection

The diagnosis of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) is influenced by factors such as the lower limit of detection (LOD) of the HBV DNA test. However, in clinical practice and scientific research, the lower limit of quantification (LOQ) is often misused as the LOD. This study aims to investigate the impact of misuse of the LOD of the HBV DNA test on the detection rate of OBI, as well as the risk factors for OBI. Four hundred twelve patients who were HBsAg-negative and had undergone high-sensitivity HBV DNA testing were included in this study. HBV DNA was detected using the Cobas 6800 System with an LOD of 2.4 IU/mL and an LOQ of 10 IU/mL. The effect of using the LOQ as the LOD on the detection rate of OBI was compared, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the risk factors for OBI. (1) Of the 412 patients, 63.3% (n = 261) were male, with a median age of 47 (range 34-55) years. A total of 473 HBV DNA test results were obtained, with 366 individuals undergoing only one HBV DNA test and the remaining 46 patients undergoing 2 to 5 HBV DNA tests (resulting in a total of 107 test results). (2) Considering only the first HBV DNA test result, the detection rate of OBI was 4.1% (17/412). However, when the LOQ (10 IU/mL) was used as the LOD, the detection rate of OBI was only 1.5% (6/412) (p < 0.001). (3) Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in age, anti-HBe positivity rate and anti-HBc positivity rate between OBI and non-OBI individuals (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that anti-HBe positivity was an independent risk factor for OBI in this study (odds ratio [OR] = 3.807, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065-13.617, p = 0.040), while anti-HBs positivity was a protective factor against OBI (OR = 0.271, 95% CI: 0.093-0.787, p = 0.016). (4) Among the 46 patients who underwent repeated testing, a total of seven individuals were found to be HBV DNA-positive in the first test, and six individuals tested positive for HBV DNA one or more times in subsequent tests. When OBI was confirmed by ≥ 1 out of 1-5 tests with detectable HBV DNA, the detection rate of OBI in this study could increase from 4.1% to 5.6%. The detection rate of OBI among HBsAg-negative adult patients attending hepatology departments in this region is 4.1%. Misusing the LOQ as LOD can significantly decrease the detection rate of OBI. The presence of anti-HBe positivity and undergoing multiple HBV DNA tests can lead to a significant increase in the detection rate of OBI.

Performance evaluation of the MAGLUMI Hepatitis B virus surface antigen chemiluminescence immunoassay

A highly sensitive and reliable Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) measurement is essential to universal screening, timely diagnosis, and management of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of MAGLUMI HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). MAGLUMI HBsAg (CLIA) was compared against ARCHITECT HBsAg. 411 HBsAg positive samples, including different stages of infection, genotypes, subtypes, mutants, and 30 seroconversion panels were tested to evaluate diagnostic sensitivity. Diagnostic specificity was evaluated by testing 205 hospitalized samples and 5101 blood donor samples. Precision, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and linearity were also verified. The diagnostic sensitivity of the MAGLUMI HBsAg (CLIA) was 100% with better seroconversion sensitivity than ARCHITECT HBsAg. The MAGLUMI HBsAg (CLIA) has optimal detection efficacy for HBV subgenotypes samples. The analytical sensitivity is 0.039 IU/mL. The initial diagnostic specificity is 99.63% on blood donors and 96.59% on hospitalized samples. The verification data demonstrated high repeatability, a LoB of 0.02 IU/mL, LoD of 0.05 IU/mL and an excellent linearity of 0.050-250 IU/mL (R2 = 0.9946). The MAGLUMI HBsAg (CLIA) is proved a highly sensitive and reliable assay with optimal subgenotype detection efficacy.

Occult HBV Infection in Patients Infected by HIV or HCV: Comparison between HBV-DNA and Two Assays for HBsAg

We investigated the frequency and serological correlates of occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) and the potential impact of a highly sensitive assay for HBsAg in subjects infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), who are also at risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, often in an occult form. Samples from 499 patients with HIV, all HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive, and 137 patients with HCV were tested for HBV-DNA, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and HBsAg by a conventional and highly sensitive assay. HBV biomarkers were detected in 71.5% of HCV-RNA-positive, with a higher prevalence of cases positive only for anti-HBc in patients with HCV than in those with HIV. HBV-DNA was detectable in 0.6% of HIV-positive and 7.3% of HCV-RNA-positive patients. Among patients with HCV, four were positive for HBsAg and negative for HBV-DNA, bringing the rate of HBV-active infection in this group to 10.2%. Active HBV infection was not related to gender or specific patterns of HBV biomarkers but was higher in HCV patients coinfected by HIV compared to those infected only by HCV. Monitoring patients at high risk for HBV infection and reactivation may require testing for both HBV-DNA and HBsAg.

Contemporary and historical human migration patterns shape hepatitis B virus diversity

Infection by hepatitis B virus (HBV) is responsible for approximately 296 million chronic cases of hepatitis B, and roughly 880,000 deaths annually. The global burden of HBV is distributed unevenly, largely owing to the heterogeneous geographic distribution of its subtypes, each of which demonstrates different severity and responsiveness to antiviral therapy. It is therefore crucial to the global public health response to HBV that the spatiotemporal spread of each genotype is well characterized. In this study, we describe a collection of 133 newly sequenced HBV strains from recent African immigrants upon their arrival in Belgium. We incorporate these sequences-all of which we determine to come from genotypes A, D, and E-into a large-scale phylogeographic study with genomes sampled across the globe. We focus on investigating the spatio-temporal processes shaping the evolutionary history of the three genotypes we observe. We incorporate several recently published ancient HBV genomes for genotypes A and D to aid our analysis. We show that different spatio-temporal processes underlie the A, D, and E genotypes with the former two having originated in southeastern Asia, after which they spread across the world. The HBV E genotype is estimated to have originated in Africa, after which it spread to Europe and the Americas. Our results highlight the use of phylogeographic reconstruction as a tool to understand the recent spatiotemporal dynamics of HBV, and highlight the importance of supporting vulnerable populations in accordance with the needs presented by specific HBV genotypes.

Versatile performance edges of HBsAg Next assay in diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of HBV infection

BACKGROUND

HBsAg Next assay (HBsAgNx) claims improved detection of HBsAg. The aim was to investigate its performance in ascertaining HBsAg loss, ability to detect HBsAg in various phases of HBV infection, specificity and its amenability to in-house neutralization.

METHODS

Analytical sensitivity was investigated using NIBSC standard (3rd WHO-IS). For clinical performance, out of 91,962 samples tested for HBsAg (Qual-II), 512 samples consisting of 170 cases with evidence of HBsAg loss during treatment (n = 116) and without treatment (n = 54), acute-hepatitis B (n = 90) and acute exacerbation of chronic-hepatitis B (n = 41), acute-hepatitis A (n = 24) and acute-hepatitis E (n = 9) positive, HIV-1 positive (n = 20), non-HBV, HAV and HEV related acute-hepatitis (n = 81) and HBsAg prozone (n = 14) as well as in-house neutralization (n = 63) were included.

RESULTS

The calculated limit of detection (LOD) was 0.004 IU/mL. Of the 170 patients with apparent HBsAg loss, 18/116 (15.5%) among treated and 15/54 (27.7%) with spontaneous clearance were positive in HBsAgNx (p < 0.0001). Additionally, it detected HBsAg in 12/95 (12.6%) and 6/34 (17.6%) patients who were HBV DNA negative in treatment experienced and spontaneous clearance groups respectively (p < 0.001). The specificity of HBsAgNx was comparable to HBsAg Qual-II. The signal-intensity of HBsAgNx was significantly higher than HBsAg Qual-II across various phases of HBV infection and prozone samples.

CONCLUSION

HBsAgNx significantly enhanced the accuracy of HBsAg detection without compromising the specificity in ascertaining HBsAg loss. The performance was superior in various phases of HBV infection including samples that exhibited prozone effect. Furthermore, it is amenable to cost-effective in-house neutralization to confirm low HBsAg levels.

Virological Treatment Monitoring for Chronic Hepatitis B

More than 250 million people worldwide are currently infected with hepatitis B, despite the effectiveness of vaccination and other preventive measures. In terms of treatment, new therapeutic approaches are rapidly developing, promising to achieve the elimination of infected cells and the complete cure of infection. The on-treatment monitoring of these innovative antiviral treatments will require the implementation of new virological tools. Therefore, new biomarkers are being evaluated besides the traditional virological and serological assays in order to obtain information on different steps of the viral replication cycle and to monitor response to therapy more accurately. The purpose of this work is to describe both standard and innovative tools for chronic hepatitis B treatment monitoring, and to analyse their potential and feasibility.

Detection of the hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with occult hepatitis B using an assay with enhanced sensitivity

Patients with occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) have undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by conventional assays but detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in blood/liver. We evaluated the key performance characteristics of a sensitive HBsAg assay (ARCHITECT HBsAg Next Qualitative Assay, referred as NEXT) with respect to HBsAg detection. Assay precision, sample carryover and seroconversion sensitivity of NEXT were evaluated. HBsAg was measured by NEXT in 1,138 individuals, including 1,038 patients who attended liver clinics in a tertiary hospital (200 HBV DNA-positive blood donors whose HBsAg was undetectable by conventional assays, and 38 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, 800 chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg seroclearance) and 100 HBsAg-negative subjects recruited from a community project. The within-run and within-laboratory coefficients of variation were <6% for the positive sample pools. In 9 seroconversion panels tested, NEXT allowed an earlier HBsAg detection than conventional assays. NEXT detected HBsAg in 10/200 (5%) HBsAg-negative blood donors, 1/20 (5%) and 0/18 HBsAg-negative patients with and without HBV reactivation respectively, and 59/800 (7.3%) patients with HBsAg seroclearance. HBsAg was detectable by NEXT in 27.8%, 8.2%, 6.9%, 3.8% and 1.9% samples at <3, 3-5, >5-8, >8-11, and >11 years after HBsAg seroclearance, respectively. Seven out of 100 HBsAg-negative community identified subjects was tested positive by NEXT. Comparing with conventional HBsAg assays, NEXT demonstrated a higher sensitivity and conferred an increment of 5-7% detection rate in patients with OBI, thereby helping in identifying HBV carriers and prevention of OBI-associated HBV transmission and reactivation.

Molecular and Serological Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-Positive Samples with Very Low or Undetectable Levels of HBV Surface Antigen

BACKGROUND

Gaps remain in the detection of nucleic acid test (NAT) yield and occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) by current HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) assays. The lack of detection may be due to HBsAg levels below current assay detection limits, mutations affecting HBsAg assays or HBsAg levels, or the masking of HBsAg by antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). In this study, we evaluate the incremental detection of NAT yield and OBI from five diverse geographic areas by an improved sensitivity HBsAg assay and characterize the samples relative to the viral load, anti-HBs status, and PreS1-S2-S mutations. Included is a comparison population with HBV DNA levels comparable to OBI, but with readily detectable HBsAg (High Surface-Low DNA, HSLD).

METHODS

A total of 347 samples collected from the USA, South Africa, Spain, Cameroon, Vietnam, and Cote D'Ivoire representing NAT yield (HBsAg(-), antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc)(-), HBV DNA(+), N = 131), OBI (HBsAg(-), anti-HBc(+), HBV DNA(+), N = 188), and HSLD (HBsAg(+), anti-HBc(+), HBV DNA(+), N = 28) were tested with ARCHITECT HBsAg NEXT (HBsAgNx) (sensitivity 0.005 IU/mL). The sequencing of the PreS1-S2-S genes from a subset of 177 samples was performed to determine the genotype and assess amino acid variability, particularly in anti-HBs(+) samples.

RESULTS

HBsAgNx detected 44/131 (33.6%) NAT yield and 42/188 (22.3%) OBI samples. Mean HBV DNA levels for NAT yield and OBI samples were lower in HBsAgNx(-) (50.3 and 25.9 IU/mL) than in HBsAgNx(+) samples (384.1 and 139.5 IU/mL). Anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL was present in 28.6% HBsAgNx(+) and 45.2% HBsAgNx(-) OBI, and in 3.6% HSLD samples. The genotypes were A1, A2, B, C, D, E, F, and H. There was no significant difference between HBsAgNx(-) and HBsAgNx(+) in the proportion of samples harboring substitutions or in the mean number of substitutions per sample in PreS1, PreS2, or S for the NAT yield or OBI (p range: 0.1231 to >0.9999). A total of 21/27 (77.8%) of HBsAgNx(+) OBI carried S escape mutations, insertions, or stop codons. HSLD had more PreS1 and fewer S substitutions compared to both HBsAgNx(-) and HBsAgNx(+) OBI. Mutations/deletions associated with impaired HBsAg secretion were observed in the OBI group.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAgNx provides the improved detection of NAT yield and OBI samples. Samples that remain undetected by HBsAgNx have exceptionally low HBsAg levels below the assay detection limit, likely due to low viremia or the suppression of HBsAg expression by host and viral factors.

Challenges in transfusion-transmitted infection screening in Sub-Saharan Africa

In Sub-Saharan Africa, high clinical demand for transfusion faces endemic bloodborne infections and limited resources. Blood screening for transfusion-transmitted bloodborne pathogens is the cornerstone of blood safety. Although there have been substantial improvements over the years, challenges in transfusion-transmitted infection screening that have been identified repeatedly long ago still need to be addressed. Affordability and sustainability of state-of-the-art quality assessed serological and molecular assays, and associated confirmation strategies remain of real concern. In addition, limited resources and infrastructures hamper the development of adequate facilities, quality management, and staff qualification, and exacerbate shortage of reagents and equipment maintenance. It is also important to maintain effort in constituting pools of repeat voluntary non-remunerated donors. Alternative strategies for blood screening that take into account local circumstances might be desirable but they should rely on appropriate field evaluation and careful economic assessment rather than dogma established from high-resource settings.