Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of the current and evolving therapeutic landscape for clinicians

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Contemporary advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in peer-reviewed guidelines regarding systemic therapy as well as the possibility of downstaging disease that may enable some patients with advanced disease to ultimately undergo partial hepatectomy or transplantation with curative intent. This review focuses on all modalities of therapy for HCC, guided by modern-day practice-changing randomized data where available. The surgical management of HCC, including resection and transplantation, both of which have evolving criteria for what is considered biologically resectable and transplantable, as well as locoregional therapy (i.e., therapeutic embolization, ablation, radiation, and hepatic arterial infusion), are discussed. Historical and modern-day practice-changing trials evaluating immunotherapy with targeted therapies for advanced disease, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy, are also summarized. In addition, this article examines the critical dimension of toxicities and patient-oriented considerations to ensure a comprehensive and balanced discourse on treatment implications.

Comparison of liver injury and inflammatory response following conventional and drug-eluting bead transcatheter chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the extent of liver injury and the inflammatory response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).

METHODS

Clinical data from October 2018 to October 2019 were prospectively collected to establish a database. The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in the two groups were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). Serum levels of hepatic function indicators and inflammatory cytokines were evaluated before treatment and five days post-treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 134 participants were included in the analysis. Following 1:1 PSM, 43 patients remained in each group, with no significant differences observed in baseline characteristics. The median absolute concentration of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was significantly lower in the DEB-TACE group five days after treatment. Among 18 patients who experienced idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, the DEB-TACE group exhibited a significantly lower proportion of cases. The alanine aminotransferase/alkaline phosphatase (ALT/ALP) ratio was notably higher in the cTACE group, while cholestatic-type liver injuries were predominant in the DEB-TACE group. Levels of MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-1β were lower in the DEB-TACE group five days post-treatment. Additionally, MCP-1 levels were significantly correlated with ALT levels and the type of liver injury. Similarly, IL-6 levels showed significant correlations with ALT, AST, and the type of liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE was associated with reduced acute liver injury, characterized primarily by cholestatic injury, and a milder inflammatory response compared to cTACE. Post-treatment levels of MCP-1 and IL-6 levels were correlated with aminotransferase levels and the type of liver injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-1800017781. Register URL link: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=30041 . Register date: 2018-8-14.

Effective Utilization of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization and Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Guide to Proper Usage

Transarterial chemoembolization is still an effective treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide and is categorized into conventional transarterial chemoembolization with ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization. Several randomized controlled trials conducted in Europe have shown the equivalent efficacy of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization and drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization. However, a recent randomized controlled trials in Japan established the superiority of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization in terms of complete response rates although higher liver toxicity for ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization. Nevertheless, the survival advantage of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization is yet to be substantiated. The adverse effects of drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization are milder than those of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization, rendering drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization an advantageous option for patients with bilobar tumors and impaired liver function/performance status. This article aims to provide an overview of these embolization techniques and a review of recent literature.

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization vs conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in adult patients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis of observational studies

Study design

Systematic review and update meta-analysis.

Purpose

The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the two approaches for HCC in adult patients (DEB-TACE vs cTACE).

Overview of literature

The TACE procedure is indicated for the treatment of HCC with intermediate (BCLC B) and early (BCLC A). Conflicting data obtained from earlier meta-analyses comparing DEB-TACE with cTACE prompted the updated meta-analysis.

Methods

The study included adult patients over the age of 18 with HCC. MEDLINE conducted a literature search using Pubmed and Google Scholar up to May 2024. The following parameters were evaluated: the effectiveness of the tumor response to treatment according to the mRECIST criteria (CR, PR, SD, PD), overall survival, progression-free survival, and complication rate. 32 retro- and prospective studies were analyzed.

Results

The study included 4,367 patients. The radiological response of the tumor in all four CR, PR, SD, and PD parameters in the DEB-TACE group showed the best response. The overall survival rate during the DEB-TACE procedure was higher by 3.54 months (p <0.00001), and progression-free survival (PFS) by 3.07 months (p <0.0001), respectively. The incidence of complications was comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

The results of the meta-analysis revealed clinically significant advantages of DEB-TACE in comparison with cTACE. Being comparable in terms of the frequency of complications, DEB-TACE demonstrated the best result in the radiological response of the tumor to the therapy, in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.

Efficacy and safety of transhepatic arterial chemoembolization with drug-loaded microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE), as a local treatment, has been widely used in the treatment of unresectable liver cancer. The introduction of drug carrier microspheres has brought new hope for the therapeutic effect of TACE. Microspheres can realize the slow release and directional delivery of drugs, reduce systemic toxicity and improve local curative effect.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of traditional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization against microsphere-assisted transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma that is incurable.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases for clinical trials of drug-luting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) vs conventional TACE (cTACE) for the treatment of unresectable liver cancer. We screened references based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and then selected valid data for meta-analysis using RevMan 53 software. The complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, postoperative stable disease (SD) rate, and 6-month and 12-month survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles were included, including 1177 patients, 519 of whom received DEB-TACE and 658 of whom received cTACE. The CR rate in the DEB-TACE group was much greater than that in the cTACE group [relative risk (RR) = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.18-1.72, P = 0.0002]. The 12-month survival rate significantly increased (RR = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.01- 1.17, P = 0.03); the PR rate (RR = 1.13; 95%CI: 0.97-1.30, P = 0.12); the SD rate (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.64-1.05, P = 0.12); and the 6-month survival rate (RR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00-1.10, P = 0.07). There was no significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with those of iodized oil TACE, the drug-loaded microspheres tended to have therapeutic advantages.

Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has achieved promising results. However, there are few studies comparing whether drug-eluting beads TACE (D-TACE) can bring more survival benefits to patients with large HCC compared to conventional TACE (C-TACE) in this triplet therapy.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of triple therapy comprising D-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (D-TACE-P-L) and C-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (C-TACE-P-L) in patients with large HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm), and analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Following a comprehensive review of our hospital's medical records, this retrospective study included 104 patients: 50 received D-TACE-P-L, and 54 received C-TACE-P-L. We employed Kaplan-Meier estimation to assess the median progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups, utilized Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors, and applied the χ 2 test to evaluate AEs.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) and median PFS were significantly higher in the D-TACE-P-L group compared to the C-TACE-P-L group (ORR: 66.0% vs 44.4%, P = 0.027; median PFS: 6.8 months vs 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Cox regression analysis identified treatment option, portal vein tumor thrombus, and hepatic vein invasion as protective factors for PFS. AEs were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-P-L may have significantly better PFS and ORR for large HCC, while exhibiting similar AEs to C-TACE-P-L.

Hypoxia as a Target for Combination with Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hypoxia has proven to be involved in multiple tumor biological processes and associated with malignant progression and resistance to therapy. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a well-established locoregional therapy for patients with unresectable HCC. However, TACE-induced hypoxia regulates tumor angiogenesis, energy metabolism, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and immune processes through hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), which may have adverse effects on the therapeutic efficacy of TACE. Hypoxia has emerged as a promising target for combination with TACE in the treatment of HCC. This review summarizes the impact of hypoxia on HCC tumor biology and the adverse effects of TACE-induced hypoxia on its therapeutic efficacy, highlighting the therapeutic potential of hypoxia-targeted therapy in combination with TACE for HCC.

Is ALPPS still appropriate for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in an era of targeted agents and immunotherapy?

Therapeutic options for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have limited efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads trans-arterial chemo-embolization (dTACE), portal vein embolization (PVE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for large or locally advanced HCC.Data regarding clinicopathological details, safety, and oncological outcomes were reviewed for the quadruple therapy (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI) and compared with ALPPS.From 2019 to 2020, 10 patients with large or locally advanced HCC underwent future remnant liver (FRL) modulation (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI: 5; ALPPS: 5). All five dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI cases responded well, with patients #4 and #5 achieving complete tumor necrosis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 5/5. Patients #1-4 underwent hepatectomy, while #5 declined surgery due to complete tumor necrosis. Mean FRL volume increased by 75.3% (range 60.0%-89.4%) in 2-4 months, compared to 104.6% (range 51.3%-160.8%) in 21-37 days for ALPPS (P = 0.032). Major postoperative complications occurred in 1/5 ALPPS patients. Resection rates were 4/4 for quadruple therapy and 5/5 for ALPPS. 2-year progression free survival for dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI and ALPPS were 5/5 and 3/5, respectively.Quadruple therapy is a feasible, effective strategy for enhancing resectability by downsizing tumors and inducing FRL hypertrophy, with manageable complications and improved long-term prognosis. In addition, it provokes the re-examination of the application of ALPPS in an era of molecular and immune treatments.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Effectiveness of Different Particle Sizes in Downstaging and Bridging in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with different particle sizes in bridging and downstaging in pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Assess the recurrent and survival rates after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 580 patients who underwent TACE using DEB from August 2012 to June 2020 at Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Pre- and post-TACE computed tomography scan images of the liver were reviewed, and treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Patients were divided by who met the criteria (n = 342) or beyond (n = 238) the University of California San Francisco criteria for successful bridging and downstaging rate evaluation. Each group was divided into subgroups according to DEB particle sizes (group A: <100μm, group B: 100-300 μm, group C: 300-500 μm, and group D: 500-700 μm) to compare objective response rate and post-LDLT survival rate.

RESULTS

Overall successful bridging and downstaging rate is 97.1% and 58.4%, respectively, in the group of patients who meet the criteria (n = 332) and are beyond (n = 139) the University of California San Francisco criteria. Group B (100-300 μm) had a higher successful bridging rate (99.5%, P = .003) and downstaging rate (63.8%, P = .443). This subgroup also demonstrated a higher objective response rate in single (93.2%, P = .038) tumors, multiple (83.3%, P = .001) tumors, and tumors with size less than 5 cm (93.9%, P = .005). There are no significant differences in post-LDLT overall survival rate between different particle sizes.

CONCLUSION

TACE with 100 to 300 μm DEB particles is associated with a better chance of bridging and downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma patients to LDLT.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres beads loaded with arsenic trioxide for unresectable large or huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) in the first-line treatment of patients with large (5 cm ≤ maximum diameter < 10 cm) or huge (maximum diameter ≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to the CBATO-TACE group and the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS), treatment response, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The extrahepatic collateral arteries, liver function, and liver fibrosis after the first TACE were also evaluated.

RESULTS

From September 2018 to September 2020, a total of 207 patients who underwent TACE were consecutively enrolled in this study. The median PFS was 9.5 months (range: 8.0 - 11.0) in the CBATO group, which was significantly longer than that in the cTACE group (6.0 months, range: 4.0-6.0) (p < 0.0001). Patients in the CBATO group had a median OS of 22 months (range: 20.0 - 27.0) compared with 16 months (range: 15.0 - 20.0) in the cTACE group (p = 0.0084). The most common TRAEs were fever (p = 0.043), and nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002), which were more observed in the cTACE group. In addition, the progressive disease time, pulmonary metastasis rate (p = 0.01), the mean number of extrahepatic collateral arteries (p = 0.01), and average number of TACE sessions (p = 0.025) were significantly decreased in the CBATO group.

CONCLUSIONS

CBATO-TACE achieved better therapeutic outcomes and similar safety profile compared to cTACE in large or huge HCC patients. Furthermore, CBATO-TACE was able to reduce extrahepatic collateral arteries production and extrahepatic lung metastasis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our study showed that CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) were effective and safe for the treatment of large and giant HCC. In addition, CBATO-TACE can reduce lateral hepatic branch artery formation and extrahepatic pulmonary metastasis, which provides a new treatment approach for unresectable HCC.

KEY POINTS

• We compare long-term efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) and conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in patients with large (5 cm ≤ maximum diameter < 10 cm) or huge HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 10 cm). • Compared with cTACE, CBATO-TACE significantly improved therapeutic outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with large or huge HCC. The safety assessment suggested that CBATO-TACE is a safe treatment that improves the quality of life and has good treatment adherence.

Prediction of postembolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma and its impact on prognosis

BACKGROUND

Postembolization syndrome (PES) represents the most frequent complication after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with HCC. Given the vague definition as a symptom complex comprising abdominal pain, fever, and nausea, PES is diagnosed in heterogeneous patient cohorts with symptoms ranging from mild pain to severe deterioration of their general condition. This study aimed to evaluate predictive factors and the prognostic impact of PES with regard to different severity grades.

METHODS

A total of 954 patients treated with TACE for HCC at the University Medical Centres Mainz and Freiburg were included in this study. PES disease severity was graded as mild, moderate, or severe according to a predefined combination of symptoms. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of PES. The prognostic impact of PES was evaluated by competing risk analyses considering liver transplantation as a competing risk.

RESULTS

PES occurred in 616 patients (64.5%), but only 56 patients (5.9%) had severe PES, defined as moderate to severe abdominal pain requiring opioids in combination with fever and nausea. The largest tumor diameter was the strongest independent predictor of PES (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13-1.28), and severe PES (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.14-1.33, p < 0.0001). Presence of liver cirrhosis was protective against PES (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.27-0.84, p = 0.01). Furthermore, PES was independently associated with an impaired disease control rate (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.16-0.69, p = 0.003) and severe PES with poor overall survival (subdistribution HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.99-2.36, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size and absence of liver cirrhosis are predictors of severe PES and associated with impaired prognosis in HCC patients after TACE.

Drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) consists of conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE). The benefits of the 2 treatments remain controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the 2 methods for the patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

In order to get a sound conclusion, we did thorough search all relevant studies with clear and stringent keyword criteria on the main databases. Objective tumor response rate, overall survival (OS) rate and adverse events were calculated and analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software. The random-effects or fixed-effects model was applied to pool the estimates according to Cochran Q test and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 2987 patients were eligible. DEB-TACE significantly improved objective tumor response rate (OR) (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.08, 1.48]; P = .003). While as for 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year OS rates, there were no evidences to indicate that DEB-TACE was significantly better than cTACE (RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.99, 1.11]; P = .08), (RR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.93, 1.11]; P = .68), (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.77, 1.10]; P = .37), (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.47, 1.80]; P = .81), respectively. Adverse events rate (AE) was also similar in both groups (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.99,1.26]; P = .08).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that DEB-TACE is not superior than cTACE regarding to OS and AE. However, DEB-TACE still be considered to provide a better objective tumor response rate for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib and Anti-PD-1 Antibodies for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has good efficacy in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), with a relatively high objective response rate (ORR) compared to conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and medium-term clinical efficacy of DEB-TACE combined with lenvatinib (LEN) plus PD-1 inhibitors as a triple therapy for the treatment of uHCC.

Methods

Data of patients with uHCC who received triple therapy of DEB-TACE combined with LEN plus PD-1 inhibitors from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The study endpoints were ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).

Results

Thirty-five patients were included in this study, with a median follow-up period of 15 months. The median cycle of DEB-TACE was 1, while that of all forms of TACE procedures per patient was 2. The median administration time of LEN was 7 months, and the median number of PD-1 inhibitor treatment was 4 cycles. The ORR based on mRECIST was 82.9%, disease control rate was 91.4%, and the median time to response was 7 weeks. Among these, the ORR of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A reached 100%, while that of BCLC stages B and C reached 84.6% and 78.9%, respectively. The median PFS was 9 months; the mOS was not reached. Fourteen patients (40%) successfully underwent downstaging conversion and surgical resection, 32 patients (91.4%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, and no grade 5-related adverse reactions occurred.

Conclusion

DEB-TACE combined with LEN and PD-1 inhibitors has a high ORR and surgical conversion rate in the treatment of uHCC tumors, and the toxicity and side effects were tolerable.

Preoperative sintilimab plus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria: A phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients with HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A exceeding the Milan criteria, or of BCLC stage B, can undergo resection after successful preoperative therapy, but an optimal approach has not been identified. We investigated preoperative drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) plus sintilimab, in this setting.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this prospective, phase II study (NCT04174781), adults with HCC of BCLC stage A exceeding the Milan criteria, or BCLC stage B, and ineligible for surgical resection, received sintilimab 200 mg and DEB-TACE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, pathologic response rate, and safety. At the data cutoff (July 2022), among 60 patients, the objective response rate was 62% (37/60) and 51 patients had undergone surgery. After a median follow-up of 26.0 months (range, 3.4-31.8), the median progression-free survival was 30.5 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). Among patients undergoing surgery, median progression-free survival was not reached and the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 76% (95% CI: 67-91). A pathologic complete response was achieved in 14% (7/51) of these patients. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, but these were generally manageable. Exploratory analyses showed an association between cytokeratin, V-domain Ig-containing Suppressor of T-cell Activation, CD68, CD169, and cluster 13 fibroblasts and recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Sintilimab plus DEB-TACE before surgery showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HCC of BCLC stage A exceeding the Milan criteria or BCLC stage B.

Comparison of CalliSpheres® microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This trial aimed to compare the outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres^® microspheres (CSM) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization cTACE in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients were divided into DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and cTACE group (n = 45). The treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) in the DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up (P = 0.031, P = 0.003, P = 0.002). The complete response (CR) in DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 3 months (P = 0.036). Survival analysis revealed that, DEB-TACE group had better survival benefits than cTACE group (median OS: 534 days vs. 367 days, P = 0.027; median PFS: 352 days vs. 278 days P = 0.004). The degree of liver function injury was more serious in DEB-TACE group at 1 week, but was similar between the two groups at 1 month. DEB-TACE with CSM caused a high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain (P = 0.031, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE with CSM showed better treatment response and survival benefits than cTACE group. Although a transient more severe liver damage, high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain occurred in the DEB-TACE group, it could be resolved through symptomatic treatment.

Idarubicin-loaded biodegradable microspheres enhance sensitivity to anti-PD1 immunotherapy in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an image-guided locoregional therapy used for the treatment of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, conventional TACE formulations such as epirubicin-lipiodol emulsion are rapidly dissociated due to the instability of the emulsion, resulting in insufficient local drug concentrations in the target tumor. To overcome these limitations, we used biodegradable Idarubicin loaded microspheres (BILMs), which were prepared from gelatin and carrageenan and could be loaded with Idarubicin (IDA-MS). The morphology and the ability to load and release IDA of BILMs were characterized in vitro. We evaluated tumor changes and side effects after TACE treatment with IDA-MS in VX2 rabbit and C57BL/6 mice HCC models. In addition, the effect of IDA-MS on the tumor immune microenvironment of HCC tumors was elucidated via mass spectrometry and immunohistochemistry. Result showed that IDA-MS was developed as a new TACE formulation to overcome the poor delivery of drugs due to rapid elimination of the anticancer drug into the systemic circulation. We demonstrated in rabbits and mice HCC models that TACE with IDA-MS resulted in significant tumor shrinkage and no more severe adverse events than those observed in the IDA group. TACE with IDA-MS could also significantly enhance the sensitivity of anti-PD1 immunotherapy, improve the expression of CD8⁺ T cells, and activate the tumor immune microenvironment in HCC. This study provides a new approach for TACE therapy and immunotherapy and illuminates the future of HCC treatment. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) formulations are rapidly dissociated due to the instability of the emulsion, resulting in insufficient local drug concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To overcome these limitations, we used biodegradable microspheres called BILMs, which could be loaded with Idarubicin (IDA-MS). We demonstrated in rabbits and mice HCC models that TACE with IDA-MS resulted in significant tumor shrinkage and no more severe adverse events than those observed in the IDA group. TACE with IDA-MS could also significantly enhance the sensitivity of anti-PD1 immunotherapy, improve the expression of CD8⁺ T cells, and activate the tumor immune microenvironment in HCC. This study provides a new approach for TACE therapy and immunotherapy and illuminates the future of HCC treatment.

Conventional vs. Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Propensity Score Weighted Comparison of Efficacy and Safety

This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective analysis included 370 patients with HCC treated with cTACE (n = 248) or DEB-TACE (n = 122) (January 2000-July 2014). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, baseline imaging was assessed, and clinical and laboratory toxicities were recorded. Propensity score weighting via a generalized boosted model was applied to account for group heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in OS between cTACE (20 months) and DEB-TACE patients (24.3 months, ratio 1.271, 95% confidence interval 0.876-1.69; p = 0.392). However, in patients with infiltrative disease, cTACE achieved longer OS (25.1 months) compared to DEB-TACE (9.2 months, ratio 0.366, 0.191-0.702; p = 0.003), whereas DEB-TACE proved more effective in nodular disease (39.4 months) than cTACE (18 months, ratio 0.458, 0.308-0681; p = 0.007). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency, except for abdominal pain, which was observed more frequently after DEB-TACE (101/116; 87.1%) than cTACE (119/157; 75.8%; p = 0.02). In conclusion, these findings suggest that tumor morphology and distribution should be used as parameters to inform decisions on the selection of embolic materials for TACE for a more personalized treatment planning in patients with unresectable HCC.

Addition of Camrelizumab to Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Untreatable Progression

Purpose: The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab addition to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with TACE-related untreatable progression (UP). Methods: Patients with HCC who received addition of camrelizumab due to UP after initial TACE treatment were enrolled at our institution between May 2019 and January 2021. Patients were assessed for tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Risk factors for PFS were evaluated with logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 41 patients were included. The objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 24.4% and 61.0% at 2 to 3 months, and 12.2% and 58.5% at 6 months, respectively. The median PFS of the patients were 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8 months, 8.2 months). Of the 41 patients, 23 received camrelizumab combined with TACE (hereafter, camrelizumab-TACE) on whom 52 combined TACE procedures were performed, with a median of 2 procedures (range: 1-6) per patient. The remaining 18 patients received camrelizumab alone due to TACE contraindications. Multivariable analysis indicated that camrelizumab-TACE was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Subgroup analysis showed a median PFS of 8 months in the camrelizumab-TACE group and 3 months in the camrelizumab monotherapy group (P < .001). No treatment-related mortalities occurred. Seventeen patients (41.5%) developed at least 1 type of AE after treatment with camrelizumab, with reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (n = 14, 34.1%) being the most common AE. Conclusion: Addition of camrelizumab to TACE offered an effective and safe treatment for HCC with UP.

Recent Trends and In-Hospital Mortality of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Germany: A Systematic Analysis of Hospital Discharge Data between 2010 and 2019

(1) Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure, characterized by the selective occlusion of tumor-feeding hepatic arteries, via injection of an embolizing agent and an anticancer drug. It represents a standard of care for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is also increasingly performed in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), as well as in liver metastases. Apart from the original method, based on intra-arterial infusion of a liquid drug followed by embolization, newer particle-based TACE procedures have been introduced recently. As yet, comprehensive data on current trends of TACE, as well as its in-hospital mortality in Germany, which could help to further improve outcome following TACE, are missing. (2) Methods: Based on standardized hospital discharge data, provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2010 to 2019, we aimed at systematically evaluating current clinical developments and in-hospital mortality related to TACE in Germany. (3) Results: A total of 49,595 individual cases undergoing TACE were identified within the observation period. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.00% and significantly higher in females compared to males (1.12 vs. 0.93%; p < 0.001). We identified several post-interventional complications, such as liver failure (51.49%), sepsis (33.87%), renal failure (23.9%), and liver abscess (15.87%), which were associated with a significantly increased in-hospital mortality. Moreover, in-hospital mortality significantly differed between the underlying indications for TACE (HCC: 0.83%, liver metastases: 1.22%, and CCA: 1.40%), as well as between different embolization agents (liquid embolization: 0.80%, loaded microspheres: 0.92%, spherical particles: 1.54%, and non-spherical particles: 2.84%), for which we observed large geographic differences in their frequency of use. Finally, in-hospital mortality was significantly increased in centers with a low annual TACE case volume (<15 TACE/year: 2.08% vs. >275 TACE/year: 0.45%). (4) Conclusion: Our data provide a systematic overview of indications and embolization methods for TACE in Germany. We identified a variety of factors, such as post-interventional complications, the embolization method used, and the hospitals’ annual case volume, which are associated with an increased in-hospital mortality following TACE. These data might help to further reduce the mortality of this routinely performed local-ablative procedure in the future.

The efficacy of drug-eluting bead or conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib has been used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the efficacy is good. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) in the treatment of HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). A total of 130 continuous patients who received D-TACE-A or C-TACE-A were included in the study from January 2017 to June 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential selection bias. Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) (14 months) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (7 months) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than the mOS (9 months; P = 0.001) and mPFS (4 months; P = 0.001) in the D-TACE-A group. After PSM, the mOS (14 months vs 9 months; P = 0.039) and mPFS (7 months vs 5 months; P = 0.009) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than those in the D-TACE-A group. In the multivariate regression analysis, C-TACE-A reduced the mortality rate and tumor progression rate compared with D-TACE-A. For the subgroup analysis, patients with VP1-2, without extrahepatic metastases, and with multiple TACE sessions who received C-TACE-A had a lower death risk and tumor progression risk than patients who received D-TACE-A. Before PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in any grade or grade III/IV adverse events (all P > 0.05). C-TACE-A could prolong mOS and mPFS in patients with PVTT, especially for patients with VP1-2 stage PVTT, no extrahepatic tumor metastases, and multiple TACE sessions.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Noninvasive Biomarker for the Early Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization using Drug-Eluting Beads

BACKGROUND

Prognostic evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using drug-eluting beads (DEBs) is essential for guiding the personalized treatment and follow-up strategy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been reported as a biomarker in conventional TACE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of ADCbaseline, ADC change, and ADCratio in predicting the early objective response for HCC after DEB-TACE.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included 32 consecutive patients undergoing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging before and 1 month after DEB-TACE. After DEB-TACE, patients were grouped based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria into responders (complete response [CR], partial response [PR] ) and nonresponders (stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD]). The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to assess the statistical differences in ADCbaseline, ADC change, and ADCratio between responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

At post-DEB-TACE follow-up MRI, 62.5% (n = 20, 11 CRs, and 9 PRs) of patients showed objective response, and 37.5% (n = 12, 7 SDs, and 5 PDs) did not respond to chemoembolization. Nonresponders had a significantly higher ADCbaseline value than responders (p < 0.001). The ROC for identifying the response to chemoembolization demonstrated that the threshold ADCbaseline value of 0.920 × 10-3 mm2/s had 100% sensitivity and 70% specificity. The ADC change and ADCratio of responders were higher than that of nonresponders (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ADCbaseline, ADC change, and ADCratio may be utilized as a noninvasive biomarker for predicting the early response of HCC to DEB-TACE.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history

OBJECTIVE

Multiple conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) procedures would cause treatment resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, whether drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) would resolve this issue is a necessary topic. Thus, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between DEB-TACE and cTACE in HCC patients with cTACE treatment history.

METHODS

Totally, 134 HCC patients with cTACE treatment history were retrospectively reviewed. They were categorized into DEB-TACE group (N = 70) and cTACE group (N = 64) based on the current treatment they received.

RESULTS

After 1-month treatment, DEB-TACE group exhibited an elevated objective response rate (ORR) (71.9% vs. 47.3%, P = 0.008) while similar disease control rate (DCR) (93.0% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.074) compared to cTACE group. Besides, after 3-month treatment, DEB-TACE group also displayed higher ORR (68.4% vs. 44.1%, P = 0.038) and DCR (81.6% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.034) compared to cTACE group. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 months vs. 6.5 months P = 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (18.5 months vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.025) were longer in DEB-TACE group compared to cTACE group. Moreover, DEB-TACE (vs. cTACE) independently correlated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.017) after adjustment by multivariate Cox's regression. Besides, most of liver function indexes were similar before and after treatment between these two groups. Also, the commonly observed adverse events were pain, fever, nausea/vomiting and blood pressure elevation with similar incidence between these two groups (all P > 0.050).

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE exhibits superiority over cTACE in HCC patients with cTACE treatment history.

[Transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma]

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is used as palliative and neoadjuvant treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TACE should be offered as palliative treatment to patients with intermediate stage large or multinodular HCC if no curative treatment option is available by resection or thermoablation and if extrahepatic metastases and tumor infiltration of main portal and systemic veins has been excluded. TACE is possible only in patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A-B, best up to 7 points) and with good performance status (ECOG 0). TACE can be used for bridging and for downstaging prior to liver transplantation with the intention to maintain or reach limited intrahepatic tumor load defined by Milan criteria. TACE should be adapted to the vascularization pattern of the HCC nodules and performed as selective as possible and repetetively if necessary with the goal of complete devascularization of the tumor tissue. Conventional TACE (cytotoxic drugs, iodized oil and embolic particles) and drug-eluting TACE (anthracycline preloaded in microspheres) can be used in a comparable way. During drug-eluting TACE, peripheral concentration of cytotoxic drugs is lower. Using conventional TACE in a palliative setting, survival benefit for patients was 8-11 months compared to best supportive care; however, this requires that all known contraindications and other criteria in terms of tumor and liver disease, respectively, associated with negative prognosis be taken into consideration. Better local response is achieved by drug-eluting TACE; however, no related survival benefit was shown compared to conventional TACE so far. Response to neoadjuvant local treatment is associated with improved prognosis after liver transplantation.

Use of chemotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic malignancies remain a global challenge. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for around 90% of patients with liver cancer and is the sixth most common neoplasm worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. However, the long-term prognosis for HCC remains far from satisfactory, with a late diagnosis and limited treatment. DOX has served as conventional chemotherapy with the longest history of use. Although conventional chemotherapy is being challenged by molecular therapy and immune therapy, there is renewed optimism and interest in both systematic and locoregional therapy. Combined chemotherapy is widely used in clinical practice. In specific terms, FOLFOX can serve as a first-line (category 2B) option as recommended by the 2021 NCCN guidelines, while the efficacy of LTLD plus RFA has been confirmed in the phase III HEAT study. These approaches have challenged the dominant status of molecular therapy in terms of health economics and they have potential benefits in Asia, where HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma is prevalent. Moreover, locoregional chemotherapy can be achieved with TACE and HAIC (possibly involving FOLFOX, DOX, mitomycin C, cisplatin, epirubicin, etc.). TACE was officially recommended by the 2021 NCCN guidelines for patients with Child-Pugh class B liver disease. In addition, HAIC has demonstrated a potential advantage in preliminary clinical practice, although it hasn't been included in any guidelines. Hence, this review summarizes large-scale trials and studies examining the development and innovative use of chemotherapeutic agents. Mounting clinical evidence warrants an exploration of the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Transarterial Radioembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-Life Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Korean Patients

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has become widely used in the treatment of HCC, one of the most common causes of cancer mortality worldwide. Here we investigated the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with TARE in a multi-medical center in Korea. A total of 149 patients treated with TARE from 2008-2014 were recruited. The pre-treatment HCC stage was classified according to the BCLC stage, of which C and D were defined as advanced HCC. Advanced HCC stage and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score A were identified in 62 (42%) and 134 (90%) patients, respectively. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) was identified in 58 patients (38.9%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 14 months, and the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 18.6 and 8.9 months, respectively. The overall tumor response was 47%, and the disease control rate was 78%. OS and PFS differed significantly according to the presence of liver cirrhosis, extrahepatic metastasis, tumor response and curative treatment after TARE (all, p < 0.05). Multiple tumors and major PVT were other independent factors related to OS, while the des-gamma carboxy protein level predicted PFS (all, p < 0.05). Tumor size was an independent predictor of tumor response. TTP, OS and PFS all differed among BCLC stages. The serious adverse effect after TARE was clinically not significant. Therefore, TARE is safe and effective in treating early to advanced HCCs.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab Compared With Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (D-TACE-C) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (C-TACE-C) in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study that evaluated the consecutive medical records of patients with unresectable HCC who had undergone D-TACE-C or C-TACE-C from April 2020 to August 2021. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated using tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival rates. The adverse events were recorded.

Results

A total of 54 patients were included in this study, including 27 patients who had received D-TACE-C treatment, and 27 patients who had received C-TACE-C treatment. The median PFS and DCR in the D-TACE-C group were significantly longer than those for the C-TACE-C group (PFS: 10 vs. 3 months, P=.017; DCR: 70.4% vs. 40.7%, P = .028). Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-C was the only protective factor for PFS. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates in D-TACE-C group and C-TACE-C group were 85.2% versus 79.4% (P = .646) and 65.2% versus 65.1% (P = .903), respectively. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was the most common adverse event associated with the treatment. There was no significant difference in the adverse events related to TACE and camrelizumab between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study.

Conclusions

D-TACE-C is a safe and well-tolerated treatment, and may produce better PFS and tumor response in patients with unresectable HCC than C-TACE-C.

Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in nearly three-quarters of all primary liver cancers, with the majority not amenable to curative therapies. We therefore aimed to re-evaluate the safety, efficacy, and survival benefits of treating patients with drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared to the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE). Several databases were searched with a strict eligibility criterion for studies reporting on adult patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC. The pooled analysis included 34 studies involving 4841 HCC patients with a median follow-up of 1.5 to 18 months. There were no significant differences between DEB-TACE and C-TACE with regard to complete response, partial response and disease stability. However, disease control (OR: 1.42 (95% CI (1.03,1.96) and objective response (OR: 1.33 (95% CI (0.99, 1.79) were significantly more effective for DEB-TACE treatment with fewer severe complications and all-cause mortality. The pooled-analysis did not find superiority of DEB-TACE in complete or partial response, disease stability, controlling disease progression, and 30 day or end-mortality. However, results showed that DEB-TACE is associated with a better objective response, disease control, and lower all-cause mortality with severe complications compared to C-TACE treatment. Given that the safety outcomes are based on limited studies with a potential for bias, there was no clear improvement of DEB-TACE over C-TACE treatment.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with FOLFOX-Based Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Large or Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) for unresectable large (5.1-10 cm) or huge (>10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with unresectable large or huge HCC who underwent D-TACE-HAIC (D-TACE-HAIC group) or DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) from January 2017 to December 2020. At imaging, tumor infiltrating appearance was classified into smooth tumor margin, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (mean age, 53 years ± 12; 117 men) were included: 69 underwent D-TACE-HAIC and 64 underwent DEB-TACE. The patients who underwent D-TACE-HAIC had higher ORR (71.0% vs 53.1%; P = 0.033), longer PFS (median, 9.3 vs 6.3 months; P = 0.005), and better OS (median, 19.0 vs 14.0 months; P = 0.008) than those who underwent DEB-TACE. In subgroup analysis, patients with non-smooth tumor margin (median, 20.8 vs 13.0 months; P = 0.031) or macrovascular invasion (median, 15.0 vs 11.0 months; P = 0.015) had significantly longer OS in D-TACE-HAIC group than in DEB-TACE group; but in patients with smooth tumor margin, OS between the two groups was similar (median, 37.0 vs 35.0 months; P = 0.458). DEB-TACE, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for poor OS in uni- and multivariable analyses. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (37.7% vs 28.1%; P = 0.242).

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-HAIC was tolerable and led to better OS than DEB-TACE in patients with large or huge HCC, especially in those with non-smooth tumor margin or macrovascular invasion.

Survival and Outcome in Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma (>5 cm)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to study the outcome and survival of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving drug-eluting beads (DEBs) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In addition, tumor morphologies were correlated with the response and survival to analyze the association of morphology with the outcome.

METHODS

Patients with large HCC (>5 cm) who underwent DEB-TACE for palliation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were assessed for objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS), which was calculated from the first session of DEB-TACE to the last follow-up/death. OR and OS were calculated for the entire study group and were compared among the subgroups consisting of solitary versus multifocal HCC, unilobar versus bilobar disease, well-defined versus ill-defined HCC, and HCC with homogeneous enhancement versus HCC with heterogeneous enhancement.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven DEB-TACE procedures were performed in 25 patients (average: 2.7 ± 1.4 sessions per patient). The mean lesion size was 9.9 ± 4.5 cm. Of 25 patients, 13 (52%) had multifocal HCC. Unilobar disease was seen in 15 patients (60%). The mean duration of follow-up was 24.4 months. OR at 6 and 12 months were 56% and 48%, respectively, with well-defined lesions showing better OR. The median OS was 28 months (95% confidence interval, 12.3-43.6). OS rate at 12 and 24 months was 92% and 57%, respectively. OS was seen to be superior in well-defined HCC and unilobar disease.

CONCLUSION

In this study, DEB-TACE has shown to have a good response in patients having large/multifocal HCC with preserved liver functions. Well-defined HCC and unilobar disease have a better response and survival.

Peritumoral portal enhancement during transarterial chemoembolization: a potential prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor response and survival varies in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and may be associated with several factors.

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of TACE in patients with intermediate stage HCC and to identify factors related to tumor response and survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with HCC treated with TACE between September 2008 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In 87 patients (71 men; mean age = 68 ± 9 years), 327 TACE treatments were performed (mean = 3/patient; range = 1-12). Mean and median overall survival were 32 and 19 months, respectively. Survival rates at 30 days, one, three, and five years were 99%, 71%, 19%, and 8%, respectively. Objective response (OR) was seen in 84% and disease control (DC) was seen in 92% of the patients. Patients in whom peritumoral portal lipiodol enhancement (PPLE) was seen during TACE had better OR (97 vs. 73%; P = 0.007) and DC (100 vs. 85%; P = 0.024), and a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.86) compared to those without PPLE. Severe adverse events were rare (15%) and occurred more often in patients with a larger tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE was effective and safe in patients with intermediate stage HCC. Patients with PPLE during TACE had better tumor response and longer survival than those without PPLE. Severe adverse events occurred more often in patients with larger tumors.

In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?

Conventional transarterial embolization (cTACE) has been proven to be effective for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a recent systematic review showing an overall survival (OS) of 19.4 months. Nevertheless, due to the rapid development of the systemic therapeutic landscape, the place of TACE is becoming questionable. Is there still a niche for TACE in the era of immunotherapy and combination treatments such as atezolizumab-bevacizumab, which has shown an OS of 19.2 months with excellent tolerance? The development of drug-eluting microspheres (DEMs) has led to the standardization of the technique, and along with adequate selection, it showed an OS of 48 months in a retrospective study. In order to increase treatment selectivity, new catheters have also been added to the TACE arsenal as well as the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), which provides three-dimensional volumetric images and guidance during procedures. Moreover, the TACE indications have also widened. It may serve as a "bridging therapy" for liver transplantation candidates while they are on the waiting list, and it represents a valuable downstaging tool to transplantation criteria. The aim of this review is to explore the current data on the advancements of TACE and its future place amongst the growing panel of treatments.

Prospective Multi-Center Korean Registry of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting Embolics for Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Two-Year Outcome Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the two-year treatment outcomes of chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolics (DEE) for nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective, multicenter, registry-based, single-arm trial conducted at five university hospitals in Korea. Patients were recruited between May 2011 and April 2013, with a target population of 200. A DC Bead loaded with doxorubicin was used as the DEE agent. Patients were followed up for two years. Per-patient and per-lesion tumor response analysis, per-patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) analysis, and per-lesion tumor control analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The final study population included 152 patients, with 207 target lesions for the per-lesion analysis. At one-month, six-month, one-year, and two-year per-patient assessments, complete response (CR) rates were 40.1%, 43.0%, 33.3%, and 19.6%, respectively. The objective response (OR) rates were 91.4%, 55.4%, 35.1%, and 19.6%, respectively. The cumulative two-year OS rate was 79.7%. The cumulative two-year PFS rate was 22.4% and the median survival was 9.3 months. In multivariable analysis, the Child-Pugh score (p = 0.019) was an independent predictor of OS, and tumor multiplicity (p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.020), and Child-Pugh score (p = 0.006) were independent predictors of PFS. In per-lesion analysis, one-month, six-month, one-year and two-year CR rates were 57.5%, 58.5%, 45.2%, and 33.3%, respectively, and the OR rates were 84.1%, 65.2%, 46.6%, and 33.3%, respectively. The cumulative two-year per-lesion tumor control rate was 36.2%, and the median time was 14.1 months. The Child-Pugh score (p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of tumor control. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 patients (7.2%).

CONCLUSION

DEE chemoembolization for nodular HCCs in the Korean population showed acceptable survival, tumor response, and safety profiles after a two-year follow-up. Good liver function (Child-Pugh score A5) was a key predictor of per-patient OS, PFS, and per-lesion tumor control.

Biocompatible copper sulfide-based nanocomposites for artery interventional chemo-photothermal therapy of orthotropic hepatocellular carcinoma

Transcatheter arterial embolization has been considered as a promising targeted delivery approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, chemoembolization was the main treatment for unresectable HCC. However, the traditional chemoembolization treatment suffers from undesirable therapeutic effects and serious side-effects. In this study, the doxorubicin (DOX)-encapsulated and near-infrared (NIR)-responsible copper sulfide (CuS)-based nanotherapeutics was developed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided chemo-photothermal therapy of HCC tumor in rats. The DOX-loaded CuS nanocomposites (DOX@BSA-CuS) demonstrated distinct NIR-triggered drug release behavior and high photothermal effect. In an orthotopic HCC rat model, DOX@BSA-CuS nanocomposites were selectively delivered to the tumor site via the intra-arterial transcatheter. The proposed DOX@BSA-CuS nanocomposites plus NIR laser irradiation exhibited significant tumor growth suppression performance. Moreover, the treatment progress can be monitored by MRI images. Finally, the preliminary toxicity estimate suggested the negligible side-effect of DOX@BSA-CuS nanocomposites during the therapeutic process. These results suggest the clinical translational potential possibility for imaging-guided arterial embolization with DOX@BSA-CuS nanocomposites for the treatment of HCC.

Magnetic mesoporous embolic microspheres in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment for liver cancer. Although many embolic agents have been exploited in TACE, embolic agents combining embolization, drug loading, and imaging properties have not yet been constructed. Herein, we report a new magnetic mesoporous embolic microsphere that can simultaneously be loaded with doxorubicin (Dox), block vessels, and be observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The microspheres were prepared by decorating magnetic polystyrene/Fe₃O₄ particles with mesoporous organosilica microparticles (denoted as PS/Fe₃O₄@MONs). The PS/Fe₃O₄@MONs were uniformly spherical and large (50 µm), with a high specific surface area, uniform mesopores, and a Dox loading capacity of 460.8 µg mg^-1. Dox-loaded PS/Fe₃O₄@MONs (PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox) effectively inhibited liver cancer cell growth. A VX2 rabbit liver tumor model was constructed to study the efficacy of TACE with PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox. In vivo, PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox could be smoothly delivered through an arterial catheter to achieve chemoembolization. Moreover, PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox and residual tumor parenchyma could be distinguished on MRI, which is of great significance for evaluating the efficacy of TACE. Histopathology showed that PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox could be deposited in the tumor vessels, completely blocking the blood supply. Overall, PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox showed good drug loading, embolization and imaging performance as well as potential for use in TACE. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment for liver cancer. Although many embolic agents have been exploited in TACE, embolic agents combining embolization, drug-loading, and imaging properties have not yet been constructed. In this work, we prepared magnetic mesoporous microspheres as a new embolic agent that can simultaneously load doxorubicin (Dox), block blood vessels and enable magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, this new embolic microsphere-mediated TACE strategy for liver cancer showed good therapeutic effects, and the PS/Fe₃O₄@MON@Dox embolic microspheres provide a new avenue for improving the efficacy of TACE for liver cancer and postoperative evaluation.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias.

Results

Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A.

The short-term safety and efficacy of TANDEM microspheres of various sizes and doxorubicin loading concentrations for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is the most common treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effect of drug loading concentration and microsphere size on treatment outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective study compares the outcomes of 87 HCC patients who underwent DEB-TACE with half-loaded or full-loaded doxorubicin (maximum capacity 50 mg/mL) in 75-µm or 100-µm microspheres. Treatment with 100-μm microspheres resulted in significantly lower rates of procedure-related complications (6.6% vs. 26.9%; P < 0.05), post-embolization syndrome (32.8% vs. 61.5%, P < 0.05), SIR complications (32.8% vs. 61.5%; P < 0.01) and adverse events involving abdominal pain (19.7% vs. 42.3%; P < 0.05). Half-load doxorubicin microspheres resulted in greater treatment response (OR, 4.00; 95% CI 1.06–15.13; P, 0.041) and shorter hospital stays (OR, − 1.72; 95% CI − 2.77–0.68; P, 0.001) than did microspheres loaded to full capacity. Stratified analysis further showed that patients treated with 100-μm half-load doxorubicin microspheres had a higher CR (63.6% vs 18.0%) and ORR (90.9 vs 54.0%) and a shorter hospital stay (1.6 ± 1.3 vs 4.2 ± 2.3 days) than did those treated with full-load microspheres (P < 0.05). Thus, the drug-loading concentration of microspheres in DEB-TACE should be carefully considered.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios as Predictors of Outcomes in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib

Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for outcomes following the combination treatment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib.

Materials and Methods: A total of 314 (270 male and 44 female) treatment-naïve patients with unresectable HCC treated by TACE plus sorafenib between January 2011 and December 2018 were enrolled in the retrospective study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were obtained within 3–7 days before the initial TACE and the median value of the NLR and PLR was considered as the cut-off value.

Results: The median value of NLR and PLR was 2.42 and 100, respectively. The median OS and PFS of the entire cohort were 18.7 months (95% CI: 16.8–20.6) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 8.5–9.8), respectively. The low NLR and PLR group showed improved OS and PFS compared with the high NLR and PLR group [21.8 months (95% CI: 15.2–28.5) vs. 15.4 months (95% CI: 12.4–18.3), p < 0.0001; 21.6 months (95% CI: 15.8–27.5) vs. 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.9–17.8), p = 0.00027, respectively]. In addition, the low NLR and PLR group also provided a longer PFS than the high NLR and PLR group [10.4 months (95% CI: 8.9–12.0) vs. 8.1 months (95% CI: 7.1–9.2), p = 0.00022; 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.6–11.9) vs. 8.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–9.2), p < 0.0001, respectively]. High NLR and PLR at baseline were predictive factors of poor OS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.004) and PFS (p = 0.045 and p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This study showed the prognostic value of quantitative inflammatory biomarkers in correlation with OS and PFS in unresectable HCC patients undergoing TACE plus sorafenib treatment.

Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Using HepaSpheres 20-40 µm and Subsequent Lipiodol TACE in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma > 5 cm

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using HepaSpheres 20-40 µm in diameter and subsequent cisplatin-based lipiodol TACE (Cis-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) > 5 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 39 consecutive patients (34 men, 5 women; mean age, 63.5 years; range, 39-80 years) who underwent DEB-TACE using HepaSpheres 20-40 µm as first-line treatment for HCC > 5 cm (mean diameter, 8.2 cm; range, 5.1-13 cm) between September 2018 and August 2019. Patients with new tumors, residual tumors, or tumor growth after initial DEB-TACE underwent subsequent Cis-TACE.

RESULTS

All 39 patients underwent initial DEB-TACE successfully, with 35 (89.7%) and three (7.7%) patients experiencing minor and major complications, respectively. After initial DEB-TACE, one patient (2.6%) achieved complete response (CR), 35 (89.7%) achieved partial response (PR), and three (7.7%) experienced progressive disease (PD). During a median follow-up period of 14.4 months (range, 0.6-23 months), 23 patients underwent Cis-TACE, with 11, three, and nine achieving CR, PR, and PD, respectively. The median overall survival time was 20.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 18.6-23.2 months), the median time to progression was 8.8 months (95% CI, 6.5-11.1 months), and the median time to local tumor recurrence was 16 months (95% CI, 7.4-24.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE using HepaSpheres 20-40 µm in diameter can be a safe and effective initial treatment method in patients with HCC > 5 cm. Subsequent Cis-TACE constitutes a good adjuvant method to enhance tumor response after initial DEB-TACE.