1
|
Moris D, Martinino A, Schiltz S, Allen PJ, Barbas A, Sudan D, King L, Berg C, Kim C, Bashir M, Palta M, Morse MA, Lidsky ME. Advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of the current and evolving therapeutic landscape for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2025. [PMID: 40392748 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2025] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Contemporary advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in peer-reviewed guidelines regarding systemic therapy as well as the possibility of downstaging disease that may enable some patients with advanced disease to ultimately undergo partial hepatectomy or transplantation with curative intent. This review focuses on all modalities of therapy for HCC, guided by modern-day practice-changing randomized data where available. The surgical management of HCC, including resection and transplantation, both of which have evolving criteria for what is considered biologically resectable and transplantable, as well as locoregional therapy (i.e., therapeutic embolization, ablation, radiation, and hepatic arterial infusion), are discussed. Historical and modern-day practice-changing trials evaluating immunotherapy with targeted therapies for advanced disease, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy, are also summarized. In addition, this article examines the critical dimension of toxicities and patient-oriented considerations to ensure a comprehensive and balanced discourse on treatment implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alessandro Martinino
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Schiltz
- Patient Advocate Steering Committee, National Cancer Institute Hepatobiliary Task Force, Los Gatos, California, USA
- Blue Faery, Simi Valley, California, USA
- Cancer CAREpoint, Los Gatos, California, USA
| | - Peter J Allen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Barbas
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Debra Sudan
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lindsay King
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carl Berg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles Kim
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mustafa Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael A Morse
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singal AG, Salem R, Pinato DJ, Pillai A. Advances in Locoregional and Systemic Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2025:S0016-5085(25)00660-2. [PMID: 40320088 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2025] [Revised: 03/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025]
Abstract
Significant advances have occurred in the locoregional and systemic therapy landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with the most notable being the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations. ICI combinations have significantly improved the overall survival of patients with unresectable HCC, affording median survival over 2 years and long-term survival exceeding 5 years in a subset of patients. Accordingly, there has been increased interest in the earlier application of systemic therapies, including (neo)adjuvant therapy in the perioperative setting or in combination with intra-arterial therapies. However, recent data failed to demonstrate improved recurrence-free survival with use of adjuvant ICI therapy. Conversely, 2 trials showed improved progression-free survival when ICI therapies were combined with transarterial chemoembolization, although data regarding the impact on overall survival are still immature. These improved outcomes raise several new questions, including which patients with liver-localized HCC should receive systemic therapy, how should this be sequenced or combined with other available therapies, and how to manage those patients with marked responses, including consideration of liver transplantation. These questions are often determined on a case-by-case basis and best made in a multidisciplinary manner considering several factors, including tumor burden, degree of liver dysfunction, performance status, and patient's long-term goals of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Texas.
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lam M, Salem R, Toskich B, Kappadath SC, Chiesa C, Fowers K, Haste P, Herman JM, Kim E, Leung T, Padia SA, Sangro B, Sze DY, Garin E. Clinical and dosimetric considerations for yttrium-90 glass microspheres radioembolization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic colorectal carcinoma, and metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07229-8. [PMID: 40148510 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07229-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The TheraSphere Global Steering Committee reconvened to review clinical data and address knowledge gaps related to treatment and dosimetry in non-HCC indications using Yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres. METHODS A PubMed search was performed. References were reviewed and adjudicated by the Delphi method. Recommendations were graded according to the degree of recommendation and strength of consensus. Dosimetry focused on a mean dose approach, i.e., aiming for an average dose over either single or multicompartment volumes of interests. Committee discussion and consensus focused on optimal patient selection, disease presentation, liver function, tumour type, tumour vascularity, and curative/palliative treatment intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and colorectal and neuroendocrine carcinoma liver metastases (mCRC, mNET). RESULTS For all indications, single compartment average perfused volume absorbed dose ≥ 400 Gy is recommended for radiation segmentectomy and 150 Gy for radiation lobectomy. Single compartment 120 Gy for uni- and bilobar treatment reflects current clinical practice, which results in variable tumour and normal tissue absorbed doses. Therefore, multicompartment dosimetry is recommended for uni- and bilobar treatment, aiming for maximum 75 Gy to normal tissue and 150-200 Gy (mCRC, mNET), ≥ 205 (iCCA) tumour absorbed doses. These dose thresholds are preliminary and should be used with caution accounting for patient specific characteristics. CONCLUSION Consensus recommendations are provided to guide clinical and dosimetry approaches for 90Y glass microsphere radioembolization in iCCA, mCRC and mNET. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer E01.132, Postbus 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Univ Rennes, INSERM, INRA, Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer), 35000, Rennes, France.
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Beau Toskich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Kirk Fowers
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - Paul Haste
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Leung
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Department of Radiology, University of California-los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Etienne Garin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuhn TN, Engelhardt WD, Kahl VH, Alkukhun A, Gross M, Iseke S, Onofrey J, Covey A, Camacho JC, Kawaguchi Y, Hasegawa K, Odisio BC, Vauthey JN, Antoch G, Chapiro J, Madoff DC. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Patient Selection for Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2025; 36:477-488. [PMID: 39638087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a machine learning algorithm to improve hepatic resection selection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) by predicting post-portal vein embolization (PVE) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter retrospective study (2000-2020) included 200 consecutive patients with CRC liver metastases planned for PVE before surgery. Data on radiomic features and laboratory values were collected. Patient-specific eigenvalues for each liver shape were calculated using a statistical shape model approach. After semiautomatic segmentation and review by a board-certified radiologist, the data were split 70%/30% for training and testing. Three machine learning algorithms predicting the total liver volume (TLV) after PVE, sufficient future liver remnant (FLR%), and kinetic growth rate (KGR%) were trained, with performance assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), or root mean squared error. Significance between the internal and external test sets was assessed by the Student t-test. One institution was kept separate as an external testing set. RESULTS A total of 114 (76 men; mean age, 56 years [SD± 12]) and 37 (19 men; mean age, 50 years ± [SD± 11]) patients met the inclusion criteria for the internal validation and external validation, respectively. Prediction accuracy and AUC for sufficient FLR% or liver growth potential (KGR%> 0%) were high in the internal testing set-85.81% (SD ± 1.01) and 0.91 (SD ± 0.01) or 87.44% (SD ± 0.10) and 0.66 (SD ± 0.03), respectively. Similar results occurred in the external testing set-79.66% (SD ± 0.60) and 0.88 (SD ± 0.00) or 72.06% (SD ± 0.30) and 0.69 (SD ± 0.01), respectively. TLV prediction showed discrepancy rates of 12.56% (SD ±4.20%; P = .86) internally and 13.57% (SD ± 3.76%; P = .91) externally. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning-based models incorporating radiomics and laboratory test results may help predict the FLR%, KGR%, and TLV as metrics for successful PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom N Kuhn
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - William D Engelhardt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, James McKlevey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vinzent H Kahl
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Abedalrazaq Alkukhun
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Moritz Gross
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Iseke
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - John Onofrey
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anne Covey
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sangro B, Argemi J, Ronot M, Paradis V, Meyer T, Mazzaferro V, Jepsen P, Golfieri R, Galle P, Dawson L, Reig M. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2025; 82:315-374. [PMID: 39690085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.
Collapse
|
6
|
Finessi M, Cioffi M, Grimaldi S, Fronda M, Rovera G, Passera R, Carucci P, Gaia S, Rolle E, Rizza G, Colli F, Saracco GM, Romagnoli R, Calandri M, Fonio P, Morbelli SD, Doriguzzi Breatta A. Albi score predicts overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2025; 130:271-279. [PMID: 39681817 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01943-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of baseline clinical features and treatment procedure, including liver function measured with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) formula and dosing methods in HCC patients treated with SIRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study includes 82 consecutive patients with liver-dominant HCC treated with SIRT (90Y glass microspheres, TheraSphereTM) between October 2014 and September 2023. Twenty-five patients were treated with standard dosimetry, while for remaining patients, multi-compartment dosimetry was performed using Simplicit90YTM software. Impact of baseline patient's characteristics including presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), Child-Pugh score (CP), ALBI score, bilirubin levels, tumor size and prior locoregional liver-directed or systemic treatments was assessed through multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Median follow-up after treatment was 40.0 months (15.2-67.9). At univariable analysis, ALBI score and bilirubin levels were found to be independent prognostic factors for survival after SIRT (p = 0.001, respectively); furthermore, at Cox proportional hazards analysis, HR for death of ALBI 2 versus ALBI 1 was 10.54 (95% CI, 1.42-78.19, p = 0.021), while despite not significant, HR in patients with bilirubin levels over 1.1 mg/dl was 2.67 (0.75-9.44, p = 0.118). Conversely, no significant association was found between OS and cirrhosis, tumor size and PVT. CONCLUSION ALBI score demonstrated to impact OS in HCC patients treated with SIRT thus going beyond a simple prediction of treatment-related toxicity. The present results are relevant for the selection of HCC patients for SIRT in a real-world clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Finessi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Martina Cioffi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Fronda
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Guido Rovera
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Patrizia Carucci
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Gaia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Emanuela Rolle
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgia Rizza
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Colli
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Maria Saracco
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Calandri
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Fonio
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Daniela Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Doriguzzi Breatta
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tabrizian P, Pero A, Schwartz M. Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 2025; 29:59-72. [PMID: 39608958 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2024.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
Hepatic resection has long been considered the preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when feasible, but its role, as well as the outcomes is evolving rapidly. This article explores the impact of the changing demographics of HCC, reviews current criteria for resection, considers the roles of liver transplantation and nonsurgical locoregional therapies vis-a-vis resection, highlights the potential of new systemic therapies (particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors) to improve outcomes, details the common complications associated with resection, and discusses recurrence of HCC after resection and its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parissa Tabrizian
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Adriana Pero
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi M, Han DH, Kim KS, Choi JS, Kim BK, Kim SU, Seong J, Kim DY, Choi GH. Is liver resection still required for patients who have predictive factors for complete pathologic necrosis after downstaging treatments of locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109349. [PMID: 39504595 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 09/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection can induce complete remission after tumor downstaging in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, additional benefits of liver resection have not been investigated in patients expected to have complete pathological necrosis (CPN) following HCC downstaging. METHODS Between 2002 and 2019, 999 patients with locally advanced HCC underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (n = 800) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE) (n = 199). Among these patients, excluding those who underwent liver transplantation, 94 who underwent liver resection (OP group) and 867 who did not undergo surgical treatment (non-OP group) were included in this study. CPN predictive factors in the OP group were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Long-term outcomes were compared between patients with CPN (op-CPN) and those with CPN predictive factors in the non-OP group (nop-CPNPF). RESULTS Of the 94 patients in the OP group, 38 (40.4 %) had CPN (CCRT, n = 72; TARE, n = 22). In the multivariate analysis, CPN predictive factors were complete radiologic response and tumor marker responders (odds ratio [OR] 18.468, p = 0.006; OR 3.698, p = 0.045). Among the non-OP group, 21 patients were in the nop-CPNPF group. There was no difference in DFS between the nop-CPNPF and op-CPN groups (40.0 ± 18.3 vs. 60.0 ± 14.0 months, p = 0.838). The OS of the op-CPN group was not higher than that of the nop-CPNPF group (5-year OS: 39.4 % vs. 33.3 %, p = 0.328). CONCLUSIONS The nop-CPNPF group showed long-term outcomes similar to those of the op-CPN group, suggesting that liver resection may not provide additional benefits for long-term outcomes in patients with CPN-PF after HCC downstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munseok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin-si, South Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung Up Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vigneron P, Franzè MS, Chalaye J, Tacher V, Sessa A, Luciani A, Kobeiter H, Regnault H, Bejan A, Calderaro J, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Raimondo G, Leroy V, Brustia R, Amaddeo G. Selective internal radiation therapy across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma: literature review. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:974-990. [PMID: 39669087 PMCID: PMC11634413 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) represents an endovascular treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its use is widely recognized in the intermediate and advanced HCC, but it has become more prevalent in recent years in different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of SIRT and its clinical implications through different stages of HCC. Methods A literature review of papers on this topic was performed using PubMed MEDLINE, focusing exclusively on the role of yttrium-90 SIRT across all BCLC stages and comparing it with other treatments. Only English-language papers currently available until September 2023 were considered. Key Content and Findings Many studies have shown that SIRT is a promising tool with multiple uses, such as tumour control in the context of bridge-to-liver transplantation or resection, tumour downstaging, and curative therapy in selected patients. Therefore, according to the recent update of BCLC staging system criteria, SIRT now emerges as a potential curative treatment for early-stage HCC patients, serving as an alternative when ablation or resection is not feasible. It is also a promising treatment compared to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as well as in combination with immunotherapies. Conclusions SIRT is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients at all BCLC stages of HCC. Therefore, due to its numerous advantages, SIRT may prove useful in many complex HCC treatment situations in the near future. Keywords Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); radioembolization; yttrium-90 (90Y); selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT); transarterial radioembolization (TARE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Vigneron
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
| | - Maria Stella Franzè
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Julia Chalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Anna Sessa
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Hicham Kobeiter
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Hélène Regnault
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
| | - Ancuta Bejan
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Julien Calderaro
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Pathology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
- University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Vincent Leroy
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France
- INSERM, Unit U955, Team 18, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kalra A, Rowcroft A, Trinder M, Ballal M, Bhandari M. Use of selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 as a bridge to liver resection: a 5-year single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:1970-1975. [PMID: 39265776 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (Y-90) has been historically reserved for unresectable liver malignancy. Evidence is emerging for the use of SIRT to increase future liver remnant (FLR), allowing for the resection of previously inoperable disease. METHODS This was a 5-year retrospective review of all patients undergoing SIRT with Y-90 at a tertiary institute. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic data, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome, safety of liver resection after SIRT, was evaluated with 90-day morbidity and mortality. RESULTS A total of 134 SIRT procedures were performed on 113 patients. Post-SIRT complications occurred in 18 patients (15.9%), with a single 30-day mortality. In addition, 17 patients underwent SIRT with the intent to augment FLR for liver resection. After SIRT, mean hepatic mebrofenin extraction and FLR increased from 2.5%/min/m2 and 30.5% to 4.2%/min/m2 and 52.5% (P = .01 and P < .0001, respectively). Ten patients underwent resection, and there were 2 intraoperative complications. The median time from SIRT to resection was 5.2 months. The 90-day postoperative morbidity was 20% (n = 2), and complications were analyzed according to the Clavien-Dindo II classification scale. There was no 30-day or 90-day postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION Post-SIRT liver resection is a challenging procedure with low postoperative mortality and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryan Kalra
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Alistair Rowcroft
- Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew Trinder
- Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mohammed Ballal
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mayank Bhandari
- Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arar A, Heglin A, Veluri S, Alnablsi MW, Benjamin JL, Choudhary M, Pillai A. Radioembolization of HCC and secondary hepatic tumors: a comprehensive review. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2024; 68:270-287. [PMID: 39088238 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.24.03572-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE), also called Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), has emerged as an effective locoregional therapy for primary and secondary hepatic tumors, utilizing yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres and other agents such as holmium-166 and rhenium-188. TARE has various applications in the management of HCC across different BCLC stages. Radiation segmentectomy, which involves administering high doses of Y90 (>190 Gy), can be both curative and ablative, achieving complete necrosis of the tumor. In contrast, radiation lobectomy involves administering a lower dose of Y90 (80-120 Gy) as a neoadjuvant treatment modality to improve local control and induce future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients who are planned to undergo surgery but have insufficient FLR. Modified radiation lobectomy combines both techniques and offers several advantages over portal vein embolization (PVE). Y90 is also used in downstaging HCC patients outside liver transplantation criteria, as well as bridging those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Multiple studies and combined analyses were described to highlight the outcomes of TARE and compare it with other treatment modalities, including TACE and sorafenib. Additionally, the review delves into the efficacy and safety of radioembolization in managing metastatic colorectal cancer and other metastatic tumors to the liver. Recent studies have emphasized the role of personalized dosimetry for improved outcomes, and thus we described the different methods used for this purpose. Pretherapy imaging, estimating lung shunt, selection of therapeutic radionuclides, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness were all discussed as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Arar
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA -
| | - Alex Heglin
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shriya Veluri
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Mhd Wisam Alnablsi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jamaal L Benjamin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Moaz Choudhary
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anil Pillai
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mansur A, Habibollahi P, Fang A, Mahvash A, Etezadi V, Liddell RP, Camacho JC, Cohen EI, Kokabi N, Arepally A, Georgiades C, Nezami N. New frontiers in radioembolization. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241280692. [PMID: 39371617 PMCID: PMC11456171 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241280692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization is a locoregional transarterial therapy that combines radionuclide and micron-sized beads to deliver radiation internally to the target tumors based on the arterial blood flow. While initially developed as a palliative treatment option, radioembolization is now used for curative intent treatment, neoadjuvant therapy, and method to downstage or bridge for liver transplant. Radioembolization has become increasingly utilized and is an important therapeutic option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. This article provides an overview of the techniques, challenges, and novel developments in radioembolization, including new dosimetry techniques, radionuclides, and new target tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam Fang
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Armeen Mahvash
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vahid Etezadi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert P. Liddell
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Juan C. Camacho
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Associates of Florida, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Emil I. Cohen
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Aravind Arepally
- Radiology Associates of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- ABK Biomedical Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christos Georgiades
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, CCC Bldg., Room CG225, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Franzè MS, Vigneron P, Sessa A, Saitta C, Chalaye J, Tacher V, Luciani A, Regnault H, Bejan A, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Leroy V, Brustia R, Raimondo G, Amaddeo G. Prognostic factors influencing outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy. Ann Hepatol 2024; 30:101539. [PMID: 39179159 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has emerged as a viable endovascular treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, SIRT is currently recommended for early- and intermediate-stage HCC that is unsuitable for alternative locoregional therapies. Additionally, SIRT remains a recommended treatment for patients with advanced-stage HCC and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) without extrahepatic metastasis. Several studies have shown that SIRT is a versatile and promising treatment with a wide range of applications. Consequently, given its favourable characteristics in various scenarios, SIRT could be an encouraging treatment option for patients with HCC across different BCLC stages. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have focused on better understanding the prognostic factors associated with SIRT to identify patients who derive the most benefit from this treatment or to refine the optimal technical procedures of SIRT. Several variables can influence treatment decisions, with a growing emphasis on a personalised approach. This review, based on the literature, will focus on the prognostic factors associated with the effectiveness of radioembolization and related complications. By comprehensively analysing these factors, we aimed to provide a clearer understanding of how to optimise the use of SIRT in managing HCC patients, thereby enhancing outcomes across various clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Franzè
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paul Vigneron
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Anna Sessa
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Carlo Saitta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Julia Chalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Hélène Regnault
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Ancuta Bejan
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Leroy
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chan SM, Cornman-Homonoff J, Lucatelli P, Madoff DC. Image-guided percutaneous strategies to improve the resectability of HCC: Portal vein embolization, liver venous deprivation, or radiation lobectomy? Clin Imaging 2024; 111:110185. [PMID: 38781614 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Despite considerable advances in surgical technique, many patients with hepatic malignancies are not operative candidates due to projected inadequate hepatic function following resection. Consequently, the size of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration when predicting a patient's likelihood of liver insufficiency following hepatectomy. Since its initial description 30 years ago, portal vein embolization has become the standard of care for augmenting the size and function of the FLR preoperatively. However, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed to improve surgical candidacy, chief among them liver venous deprivation and radiation lobectomy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the status of preoperative liver augmentation prior to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with a focus on these three techniques, highlighting the distinctions between them and suggesting directions for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Mei Chan
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua Cornman-Homonoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological, and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yu Q, Wang Y, Ungchusri E, Pillai A, Liao CY, Fung J, DiSabato D, Baker T, Patel M, Van Ha T, Ahmed O. Modified Radiation Lobectomy Strategy of Radioembolization for Right-Sided Unresectable Primary Liver Tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:989-997.e2. [PMID: 38490364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety and effectiveness of using modified radiation lobectomy (mRL) to treat primary hepatic tumors located in the right hepatic lobe (Segments V-VIII) and to determine future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to include 19 consecutive patients (7 females, 12 males) who underwent single-session mRL for right-sided primary hepatic tumors: 15 received segmentectomy plus lobectomy (segmental dose of >190 Gy and lobar dose of >80 Gy); 4 were treated with the double-segmental approach (dominant segments of >190 Gy and nondominant segments of >80 Gy). Treated tumors included 13 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and 2 mixed-type HCC-CCA with a median dominant tumor size of 5.3 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7-7.3 cm). FLR of the left hepatic lobe was measured at baseline, T1 (4-8 weeks), T2 (2-4 months), T3 (4-6 months), and T4 (9-12 months). RESULTS Objective tumor response and tumor control were achieved in 17 of the 19 (89.5%) and 18 of the 19 (94.7%) patients, respectively. FLR hypertrophy was observed at T1 (median, 47.8%; P = .025), T2 (median, 48.4%; P = .012), T3 (median, 50.4%; P = .015), and T4 (median, 59.1%; P < .001). Patients without cirrhosis demonstrated greater hypertrophy by 6 months (median, 55.8% vs 47.2%; P = .031). One patient developed a Grade 3 adverse event (ascites requiring paracentesis) at 1-month follow-up. Grade ≥2 serum toxicities were associated with worse baseline Child-Pugh Score, serum albumin, and total bilirubin (P < .05). Among 7 patients who underwent neoadjuvant mRL, 2 underwent resection and 1 received liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS mRL appears safe and effective for treatment of right-sided primary hepatic tumors with the benefit of promoting FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Yating Wang
- Hematology and Oncology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Ethan Ungchusri
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine; Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John Fung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Diego DiSabato
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Talia Baker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and Advanced Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mikin Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Regnault H, Chalaye J, Galetto-Pregliasco A, Perrin C, Derbel H, Amaddeo G, Mulé S, Lequoy M, Kobeiter H, Reizine E, Itti E, Duvoux C, Laurent A, Leroy V, Sommacale D, Rasolonirina D, Luciani A, Calderaro J, Tacher V, Brustia R. Selective internal radiation therapy for unresectable HCC: The SIRT downstaging study. Hepatol Commun 2024; 8:e0475. [PMID: 38934702 PMCID: PMC11213600 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is recommended as a downstaging (DS) strategy for solitary unresectable HCC <8 cm. The aim of this study was to report the results of acquired experience in a tertiary center for all unresectable HCCs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational study using data collected from consecutive patients undergoing SIRT between October 2013 and June 2020. DS was considered achieved when a curative treatment could be proposed 6 months after SIRT. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients were included (male = 90%, 64 ± 11 y), of whom 112 (n = 88%) had cirrhosis. HCC was classified as BCLC stage C in 64 patients (50%), with a median diameter of 61 mm, an infiltrative pattern in 51 patients (40%), and portal vein invasion in 62 (49%) patients. Fifty patients (39%) achieved DS 6 months following SIRT, with 29 of them (23%) undergoing curative treatment in a median time of 4.3 months: 17 (13%) were transplanted, 11 (85%) had liver resection, and 1 patient had a radiofrequency ablation. The median overall survival of patients with or without DS was 51 versus 10 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients who achieved DS, progression-free survival was higher in patients who underwent surgery: 47 versus 11 months (p < 0.001). Four variables were independently associated with DS: age (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]; p = 0.032), baseline α-fetoprotein (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.00]; p = 0.034), HCC distribution (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: [0.11, 0.75]; p = 0.012), and ALBI grade (OR: 0.34. 95% CI: [0.14, 0.80]; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that SIRT in patients with unresectable HCC could be an effective treatment: DS was achieved for around 39% of the patients and more than half of these then underwent curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Regnault
- Hepatology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Julia Chalaye
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | | | - Clara Perrin
- Hepatology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Haytham Derbel
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Hepatology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Sébastien Mulé
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Marie Lequoy
- Hepatology Department, Saint Antoine Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Hicham Kobeiter
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Edouard Reizine
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Emmanuel Itti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Hepatology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Leroy
- Hepatology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Diana Rasolonirina
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Julien Calderaro
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- Radiology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Team “Viruses, Hepatology, Cancer”, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Salem R, Greten TF. Interventional radiology meets immuno-oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2024; 80:967-976. [PMID: 35988688 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional and systemic therapies are the most used treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Interventional radiologists have improved and developed novel protocols and devices for both intratumoural ablative approaches with curative intent and various transarterial intrahepatic treatment options, which have continuously improved patient outcomes. Two large phase III randomised clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of different immune checkpoint inhibitors either as single agents or in combination in the first-line setting and immunotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment option for patients with advanced HCC. Herein, we discuss advances and perspectives in the area of interventional radiology (IR) and immune-oncology (IO). We summarise results from recent studies and provide an overview of ongoing studies in IR and IO. Based on the significant advances in both areas, we propose that IR and IO need to cover the emerging "discipline" of IR-IO, in which we develop and test novel approaches to combine locoregional therapies with immunotherapy, in order to develop sufficient evidence for them to be considered standard of care for patients with HCC in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Tim F Greten
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda MD, USA; NCI CCR Liver Cancer Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hadjivassiliou A, Hou X, Cardarelli-Leite L, Klyuzhin IS, Bénard F, Klass D, Ho SGF, Rahmim A, Liu D. Contralateral Hypertrophy Post Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus. Cureus 2024; 16:e59260. [PMID: 38813339 PMCID: PMC11135002 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Contralateral hypertrophy of non-irradiated liver following Yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly recognized as an option to facilitate curative surgical resection in patients that would otherwise not be surgical candidates due to a small future liver remnant (FLR). This study aimed to investigate the correlation between patient features and liver hypertrophy and identify potential predictors for liver growth in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) undergoing TARE. Methodology Twenty-three patients with HCC and PVTT were included. Contralateral liver hypertrophy was assessed at six months posttreatment based on CT or MRI imaging. Thirteen patient features were selected for statistical and prediction analysis. Univariate Spearman correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed. Subsequently, four feature-selection methods based on multivariate analysis were used to improve model generalization performance. The selected features were applied to train linear regression models, with fivefold cross-validation to assess the performance of the predicted models. Results The ratio of disease-free target liver volume to spared liver volume and total liver volume showed the highest correlations with contralateral hypertrophy (P-values = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). In three out of four feature-selection methods, the feature of disease-free target liver volume to total liver volume ratio was selected, having positive correlations with the outcome and suggesting that more hypertrophy may be expected when more volume of disease-free liver is irradiated. Conclusions Contralateral hypertrophy post-90Y TARE can be an option for facilitating surgical resection in patients with otherwise small FLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xinchi Hou
- Department of Functional Imaging, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, CAN
| | | | - Ivan S Klyuzhin
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, CAN
| | - François Bénard
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, CAN
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
- Department of Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Darren Klass
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Stephen G F Ho
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, CAN
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen QF, Chen S, Chen M, Lyu N, Zhao M. Improving the Conversion Success Rate of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focus on the Use of Combination Therapy with a High Objective Response Rate. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024; 12:298-304. [PMID: 38426191 PMCID: PMC10899866 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2023.00403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The high mortality rate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is partially due to the fact that a significant number of patients are diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage, with surgical treatment options unavailable. Conversion therapy, which involves both locoregional and systemic treatments, has the potential to downstage tumors in selected patients with initially unresectable HCC, thereby making surgical treatment a possibility and potentially increasing long-term survival. To optimize the conversion rate, it is necessary to maximize successful conversions and clearly define the target population for conversion treatment through a collaborative effort. In this review article, we summarize the clinical experience and evidence for conversion therapy in patients with 'potentially resectable' HCC from four perspectives: 1) defining the target population for conversion therapy, 2) selecting the appropriate conversion strategy, placing emphasis on the utilization of combination therapy that exhibits a significant objective response rate, 3) determining the timing and urgency of surgical resection, 4) promoting the adoption of a multidisciplinary team model. The authors are optimistic that with the continuous progress in treatment and a deeper understanding of HCC, the success rate of HCC conversion therapy will increase, and the overall survival of HCC patients will be prolonged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Feng Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Song Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Badar W, Yu Q, Patel M, Ahmed O. Transarterial Radioembolization for Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist 2024; 29:117-122. [PMID: 38128565 PMCID: PMC10836303 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) is a growing area of study due to its benefits in early-, intermediate-, and late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment intent, including curative therapy, bridging to transplant, and downstaging disease, informs treatment approach and dosimetry goals. Radiation lobectomy (RL) and radiation segmentectomy (RS) are the 2 main forms of Y90 administration which have shown improved survival outcomes with the development of personalized dosimetry. RS aims to achieve complete pathological necrosis with dose escalation and RL aims for local disease control as well as induction of contralateral lobe hypertrophy to improve hepatic reserve. Furthermore, TARE has been validated in head-to-head comparison to other locoregional and systemic therapies. Lastly, early potential exists for combination therapy between TARE and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wali Badar
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Qian Yu
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mikin Patel
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Andel D, van den Bent L, Ernest Hendrik Lam MG, Johannes Smits ML, Molenaar IQ, de Bruijne J, Laclé MM, Kranenburg O, Max Borel Rinkes IH, Hagendoorn J. 90Y-/ 166Ho- 'Radiation lobectomy' for liver tumors induces abnormal morphology and impaired drainage of peritumor lymphatics. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:100981. [PMID: 38298739 PMCID: PMC10827593 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims High-dose unilobar radioembolization, or 'radiation lobectomy' (RL), is an induction therapy that achieves contralateral future liver remnant hypertrophy while simultaneously irradiating the tumor. As such, it may prevent further growth, but it is unknown whether RL affects intrahepatic lymphatics, a major route via which liver tumors disseminate. Methods This was a case-control study conducted at University Medical Center Utrecht. The study compared lymph vessels in livers that had undergone RL (cases) with those in livers that had not undergone RL (controls). Histological samples were acquired from patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between 2017 and 2022. Lymph vessel morphology was analyzed by two researchers using podoplanin, a protein that is expressed in lymphatic endothelium. In vivo liver lymph drainage of radioembolized livers was assessed using intraoperative liver lymphangiography (ILL): during liver surgery, patent blue dye was injected into the liver parenchyma, followed by inspection for staining of perihepatic lymph structures. ILL results were compared to a previously published cohort. Results Immunohistochemical analysis on post-RL tumor tissues from ten patients with CRLM and nine patients with HCC revealed aberrant morphology of irradiated liver lymphatics when compared to controls (n = 3 per group). Irradiated lymphatics were tortuous (p <0.05), thickened (p <0.05) and discontinuous (p <0.05). Moreover, post-RL lymphatics had larger lumens (1.5-1.7x, p <0.0001), indicating lymph stasis. ILL revealed diminished lymphatic drainage to perihepatic lymph nodes and vessels in irradiated livers when compared to non-radioembolized controls (p = 1.0x10-4). Conclusions Radioembolization impairs peritumoral lymph vessel function. Further research is needed to evaluate if radioembolization impairs tumor dissemination via this route. Impact and implications Unilobar radioembolization can serve as an alternative to portal venous embolization for patients who are considered unresectable due to an insufficient future liver remnant. This research suggests that radioembolization impairs the function of peritumoral liver lymph vessels, potentially hindering dissemination via this route. These findings provide support for considering unilobar radioembolization over standard portal venous embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte van den Bent
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Leonard Johannes Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joep de Bruijne
- Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela Marie Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inne Hildbrand Max Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ziogas IA, Gleisner AL. Resection Versus Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How to Offer the Best Modality. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:113-127. [PMID: 37953031 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Liver resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patient comorbidities, tumor resectability, and perioperative morbidity and mortality risk, specifically of post-hepatectomy liver failure, are determining factors when deciding between liver resection and liver transplantation in patients who do not have an obvious contraindication to either treatment. Liver resection is preferred in patients without cirrhosis, and it may be a reasonable choice in patient with cirrhosis but preserved liver function and no portal hypertension if the size and function of the future liver remnant are appropriate, especially if organ availability is scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. https://twitter.com/IA_Ziogas
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Girardet R, Knebel JF, Dromain C, Vietti Violi N, Tsoumakidou G, Villard N, Denys A, Halkic N, Demartines N, Kobayashi K, Digklia A, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Boughdad S, Duran R. Anatomical Quantitative Volumetric Evaluation of Liver Segments in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy: Key Parameters Influencing Untreated Liver Hypertrophy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:586. [PMID: 38339337 PMCID: PMC10854872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Factors affecting morphological changes in the liver following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are unclear, and the available literature focuses on non-anatomical volumetric assessment techniques in a lobar treatment setting. This study aimed to investigate quantitative changes in the liver post-SIRT using an anatomical volumetric approach in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different levels of treatment selectivity and evaluate the parameters affecting those changes. This retrospective, single-institution, IRB-approved study included 88 HCC patients. Whole liver, liver segments, tumor burden, and spleen volumes were quantified on MRI at baseline and 3/6/12 months post-SIRT using a segmentation-based 3D software relying on liver vascular anatomy. Treatment characteristics, longitudinal clinical/laboratory, and imaging data were analyzed. The Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test evaluated volumetric parameters evolution. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between variables. Uni/multivariate analyses investigated factors influencing untreated liver volume (uLV) increase. Results: Most patients were cirrhotic (92%) men (86%) with Child-Pugh A (84%). Absolute and relative uLV kept increasing at 3/6/12 months post-SIRT vs. baseline (all, p ≤ 0.005) and was maximal during the first 6 months. Absolute uLV increase was greater in Child-Pugh A5/A6 vs. ≥B7 at 3 months (A5, p = 0.004; A6, p = 0.007) and 6 months (A5, p = 0.072; A6, p = 0.031) vs. baseline. When the Child-Pugh class worsened at 3 or 6 months post-SIRT, uLV did not change significantly, whereas it increased at 3/6/12 months vs. baseline (all p ≤ 0.015) when liver function remained stable. The Child-Pugh score was inversely correlated with absolute and relative uLV increase at 3 months (rho = -0.21, p = 0.047; rho = -0.229, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, uLV increase was influenced at 3 months by younger age (p = 0.013), administered 90Y activity (p = 0.003), and baseline spleen volume (p = 0.023). At 6 months, uLV increase was impacted by younger age (p = 0.006), whereas treatment with glass microspheres (vs. resin) demonstrated a clear trend towards better hypertrophy (f = 3.833, p = 0.058). The amount (percentage) of treated liver strongly impacted the relative uLV increase at 3/6/12 months (all f ≥ 8.407, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Liver function (preserved baseline and stable post-SIRT) favored uLV hypertrophy. Younger patients, smaller baseline spleen volume, higher administered 90Y activity, and a larger amount of treated liver were associated with a higher degree of untreated liver hypertrophy. These factors should be considered in surgical candidates undergoing neoadjuvant SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Girardet
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Jean-François Knebel
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Naik Vietti Violi
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Georgia Tsoumakidou
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nicolas Villard
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nermin Halkic
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Kosuke Kobayashi
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Antonia Digklia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Serhal M, Riaz A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies. Cancer Treat Res 2024; 192:207-232. [PMID: 39212923 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Management of hepatic malignancies is a multidisciplinary task with the involvement of hepatologists, medical/surgical/radiation oncologists, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. Patients should be selected for a specific targeted therapy after multidisciplinary consensus. Interventional oncology, with image-guided locoregional cancer therapies, can decrease systemic toxicity without compromising tumoricidal effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhamad Serhal
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tzedakis S, Sebai A, Jeddou H, Garin E, Rolland Y, Bourien H, Uguen T, Sulpice L, Robin F, Edeline J, Boudjema K. Resection Postradioembolization in Patients With Single Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 278:756-762. [PMID: 37539588 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) to convert to resection initially unresectable, single, large (≥5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND TARE can downsize cholangiocarcinoma to resection but its role in HCC resectability remains debatable. METHODS All consecutive patients with a single large HCC treated between 2015 and 2020 in a single tertiary center were reviewed. When indicated, patients were either readily resected (upfront surgery) or underwent TARE. TARE patients were converted to resection (TARE surgery) or not (TARE-only). To further assess the effect of TARE on the long-term and short-term outcomes, a propensity score matching analysis was performed. RESULTS Among 216 patients, 144 (66.7%) underwent upfront surgery. Among 72 TARE patients, 20 (27.7%) were converted to resection. TARE-surgery patients received a higher mean yttrium-90 dose that the 52 remaining TARE-only patients (211.89±107.98 vs 128.7±36.52 Gy, P <0.001). Postoperative outcomes between upfront-surgery and TARE-surgery patients were similar. In the unmatched population, overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was similar between upfront-surgery and TARE-surgery patients (83.0%, 60.0%, 47% vs 94.0%, 86.0%, 55.0%, P =0.43) and compared favorably with TARE-only patients (61.0%, 16.0% and 9.0%, P <0.0001). After propensity score matching, TARE-surgery patients had significantly better overall survival than upfront-surgery patients ( P =0.021), while disease-free survival was similar ( P =0.29). CONCLUSION TARE may be a useful downstaging treatment for unresectable localized single large HCC providing comparable short-term and long-term outcomes with readily resectable tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Amine Sebai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Heithem Jeddou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Etienne Garin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Yan Rolland
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Heloise Bourien
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Thomas Uguen
- Department of Hepatology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Laurent Sulpice
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Fabien Robin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Julien Edeline
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Andel D, Hagendoorn J, Alsultan AA, Lacle MM, Smits MLJ, Braat AJAT, Kranenburg O, Lam MGEH, Borel Rinkes IHM. Colorectal liver metastases that survive radioembolization display features of aggressive tumor behavior. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1345-1353. [PMID: 37442645 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation lobectomy is a therapeutic approach that involves targeted radiation delivery to induce future liver remnant hypertrophy and tumor control. In patients with colorectal liver metastases, only 30-40% have complete tumor regression. The importance of tumor biology in treatment response remains elusive. METHODS Patients with colorectal liver metastases who received radiation lobectomy were selected from surgical pathology files. Using a machine learning scoring protocol, pathological response was correlated to tumor absorbed dose and expression of markers of radioresistance Ki-67 (proliferation), CAIX (hypoxia), Olfm4 (cancer stem cells) and CD45 (leukocytes). RESULTS No linear association was found between tumor dose and response (ρ < 0.1, P = 0.73 (90Y), P = 0.92 (166Ho)). Response did correlate with proliferation (ρ = 0.56, P = 0.012), and non-responsive lesions had large pools (>15%) of Olfm4 positive cancer stem cells (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0037). Responding lesions (regression grade ≤2) were highly hypoxic compared to moderate and non-responding lesions (P = 0.011). Non-responsive lesions had more tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (3240 cells/mm2 versus 650 cells/mm2), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION The aggressive phenotype of a subset of surviving cancer cells emphasizes the importance of prompt resection after radiation lobectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Aziz Alsultan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela Marie Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Leonard Johannes Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yoon JH, Choi SK. Management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and strategies for optimal outcomes. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:300-315. [PMID: 37734717 PMCID: PMC10565545 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2023.08.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis, management of early-stage HCC is often successful with highly efficacious treatment modalities such as liver transplantation, surgical resection, and radiofrequency ablation. However, unfavorable clinical outcomes have been observed under certain circumstances, even after efficient treatment. Factors that predict unsuitable results after treatment include tumor markers, inflammatory markers, imaging findings reflecting tumor biology, specific outcome indicators for each treatment modality, liver functional reserve, and the technical feasibility of the treatment modalities. Various strategies may overcome these challenges, including the application of reinforced treatment indication criteria with predictive markers reflecting tumor biology, compensation for technical issues with up-to-date technologies, modification of treatment modalities, downstaging with locoregional therapies (such as transarterial chemotherapy or radiotherapy), and recently introduced combination immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in the management of early-stage HCC and suggest strategies to overcome these obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyun Yoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aliseda D, Rotellar F, Sancho L, Batidas JF, Martínez de la Cuesta A, Rodríguez-Fraile M. Surgery and radioembolization of liver tumors. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2023:S2253-8089(23)00056-3. [PMID: 37321348 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection is considered the curative treatment par excellence for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors. However, less than 40% of them are candidates for surgery, either due to non-modifiable factors (comorbidities, age, liver dysfunction…), or to the invasion or proximity of the tumor to the main vascular requirements, the lack of a future liver remnant (FLR) adequate to maintain postoperative liver function, or criteria of tumor size and number. In these last factors, hepatic radioembolization has been shown to play a role as a presurgical tool, either by hypertrophy of the FLR or by reducing tumor size that manages to reduce tumor staging (term known as "downstaging"). To these is added a third factor, which is its ability to apply the test of time, which makes it possible to identify those patients who present progression of the disease in a short period of time (both locally and at distance), avoiding a unnecessary surgery. This paper aims to review RE as a tool to facilitate liver surgery, both through the experience of our center and the available scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- Departamento de Cirugía General, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Departamento de Cirugía General, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Lidia Sancho
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Fernando Batidas
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vulasala SSR, Sutphin PD, Kethu S, Onteddu NK, Kalva SP. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:963966. [PMID: 37324012 PMCID: PMC10266282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Patrick D. Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samira Kethu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | - Nirmal K. Onteddu
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Flowers Hospital, Dothan, AL, United States
| | - Sanjeeva P. Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kauffman N, Morrison J, O’Brien K, Fan J, Zinn KR. Intra-Arterial Delivery of Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: Current Trends and the Future of Alpha-Particle Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041138. [PMID: 37111624 PMCID: PMC10144492 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A paradigm shift is underway in cancer diagnosis and therapy using radioactivity-based agents called radiopharmaceuticals. In the new strategy, diagnostic imaging measures the tumor uptake of radioactive agent “X” in a patient’s specific cancer, and if uptake metrics are realized, the patient can be selected for therapy with radioactive agent “Y”. The X and Y represent different radioisotopes that are optimized for each application. X–Y pairs are known as radiotheranostics, with the currently approved route of therapy being intravenous administration. The field is now evaluating the potential of intra-arterial dosing of radiotheranostics. In this manner, a higher initial concentration can be achieved at the cancer site, which could potentially enhance tumor-to-background targeting and lead to improved imaging and therapy. Numerous clinical trials are underway to evaluate these new therapeutic approaches that can be performed via interventional radiology. Of further interest is changing the therapeutic radioisotope that provides radiation therapy by β- emission to radioisotopes that also decay by α-particle emissions. Alpha (α)-particle emissions provide high energy transfer to the tumors and have distinct advantages. This review discusses the current landscape of intra-arterially delivered radiopharmaceuticals and the future of α-particle therapy with short-lived radioisotopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Kauffman
- Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - James Morrison
- Advanced Radiology Services, 3264 N Evergreen Dr, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, USA
| | - Kevin O’Brien
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Jinda Fan
- Departments of Radiology and Chemistry, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Kurt R. Zinn
- Departments of Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Villalabeitia Ateca I, Prieto Calvo M, Martínez de la Cuesta A, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Gastaca Mateo M. Radioembolization with yttrium as neoadjuvant therapy in initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cir Esp 2023; 101:143-145. [PMID: 36064166 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mikel Prieto Calvo
- Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
| | | | | | - Mikel Gastaca Mateo
- Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Salem R, Padia SA, Lam M, Chiesa C, Haste P, Sangro B, Toskich B, Fowers K, Herman JM, Kappadath SC, Leung T, Sze DY, Kim E, Garin E. Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:328-343. [PMID: 36114872 PMCID: PMC9816298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05956-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In light of recently published clinical reports and trials, the TheraSphere Global Dosimetry Steering Committee (DSC) reconvened to review new data and to update previously published clinical and dosimetric recommendations for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS The TheraSphere Global DSC is comprised of health care providers across multiple disciplines involved in the treatment of HCC with yttrium-90 (Y-90) glass microsphere-based transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Literature published between January 2019 and September 2021 was reviewed, discussed, and adjudicated by the Delphi method. Recommendations included in this updated document incorporate both the results of the literature review and the expert opinion and experience of members of the committee. RESULTS Committee discussion and consensus led to the expansion of recommendations to apply to five common clinical scenarios in patients with HCC to support more individualized efficacious treatment with Y-90 glass microspheres. Existing clinical scenarios were updated to reflect recent developments in dosimetry approaches and broader treatment paradigms evolving for patients presenting with HCC. CONCLUSION Updated consensus recommendations are provided to guide clinical and dosimetric approaches for the use of Y-90 glass microsphere TARE in HCC, accounting for disease presentation, tumor biology, and treatment intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Department of Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Haste
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Beau Toskich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kirk Fowers
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Leung
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Etienne Garin
- INSERM, INRA, Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer), Univ Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Santhakumar C, Ormiston W, McCall JL, Bartlett A, Duncan D, Holden A. Portal vein embolization with absolute ethanol to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. CVIR Endovasc 2022; 5:36. [PMID: 35869399 PMCID: PMC9307697 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-022-00312-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is widely used prior to major liver resection to reduce the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PVE using absolute ethanol. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing preoperative PVE between February 2003 and February 2020 at a high-volume tertiary institution were retrospectively reviewed. Hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) was determined by comparing volumetric data using semi-automated software on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging before and after PVE. Efficacy of absolute ethanol was evaluated by the percentage increase in the FLR volume and the ratio of the FLR to the total liver volume (TLV). Technical success and complications following PVE were evaluated. Feasibility of hepatectomy following PVE and the incidence of PHLF were determined. Results Sixty-two patients underwent preoperative PVE using absolute ethanol. The technical success rate was 95.2%. Median time interval between PVE and follow-up imaging was 34 days (range 6–144 days). The mean increase in FLR volume and ratio of the FLR to TLV were 43.6 ± 34.4% and 12.3 ± 7.7% respectively. Major adverse events occurred in 3 cases (4.8%) and did not preclude consideration of surgery. Forty-two patients (67.8%) proceeded to surgery for intended hepatectomy of which 36 patients (58.1%) underwent liver resection. Major post-operative complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) and there were no cases of PHLF. Conclusion Preoperative PVE with absolute ethanol is effective and safe in inducing hypertrophy of the FLR before partial hepatectomy to prevent PHLF.
Collapse
|
34
|
Prediction of left lobe hypertrophy after right lobe radioembolization of the liver using a clinical data model with external validation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20718. [PMID: 36456637 PMCID: PMC9715713 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25077-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), right-sided radioembolization (RE) with Yttrium-90-loaded microspheres is an established palliative therapy and can be considered a "curative intention" treatment when aiming for sequential tumor resection. To become surgical candidate, hypertrophy of the left liver lobe to > 40% (future liver remnant, FLR) is mandatory, which can develop after RE. The amount of radiation-induced shrinkage of the right lobe and compensatory hypertrophy of the left lobe is difficult for clinicians to predict. This study aimed to utilize machine learning to predict left lobe liver hypertrophy in patients with HCC and cirrhosis scheduled for right lobe RE, with external validation. The results revealed that machine learning can accurately predict relative and absolute volume changes of the left liver lobe after right lobe RE. This prediction algorithm could help to estimate the chances of conversion from palliative RE to curative major hepatectomy following significant FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Predictors of Liver Failure in Non-Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy. World J Surg 2022; 46:3081-3089. [PMID: 36209339 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06742-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is associated with high mortality following liver resection. There have been limited studies evaluating predictors of PHLF and clinically significant PHLF in non-cirrhotic patients. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP) to evaluate 8,093 non-cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy from 2014 to 2018. Primary endpoints were PHLF and clinically significant PHLF (PHLF grade B or C). RESULTS Among all patients, 4.74% (n = 383) developed PHLF and 2.5% clinically significant PHLF (n = 203). The overall 30-day mortality was 1.35% (n = 109), 11.5% (n = 44) in patients with PHLF, and 19.2% in those with clinically significant PHLF. Factors associated with PHLF were: metastatic liver disease (OR = 1.84, CI = 1.14-2.98), trisectionectomy (OR = 3.71, CI = 2.59-5.32), right total lobectomy (OR = 4.17, CI = 3.06-5.68), transfusions (OR = 1.99, CI = 1.52-2.62), organ/space SSI (OR = 2.84, CI = 2.02-3.98), post-operative pneumonia (OR = 2.43, CI = 1.57-3.76), sepsis (OR = 2.27, CI = 1.47-3.51), and septic shock (OR = 5.67, CI = 3.43-9.36). Patients who developed PHLF or clinically significant PHLF had 2-threefold increased risk of perioperative mortality. Post-hepatectomy renal failure (OR = 8.47, CI = 3.96-18.1), older age (OR = 1.04, CI = 1.014-1.063), male sex (OR = 1.83, CI = 1.07-3.14), sepsis (OR = 2.96, CI = 1.22-7.2), and septic shock (OR = 3.92, CI = 1.61-9.58) were independently associated with 30-mortality in patients with clinically significant PHLF. CONCLUSION PHLF in non-cirrhotic patients increased the risk of perioperative mortality and is associated with the extent of hepatectomy and infectious complications. Careful evaluation of the liver remnant, antibiotic prophylaxis, nutritional assessment, and timely management of post-operative infections could decrease major morbidity and mortality following hepatectomy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Radiological and pathological assessment with EOB-MRI after Y90 radiation lobectomy prior to liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2185-2192. [PMID: 36085263 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation lobectomy (RL) utilizes Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization for achieving tumor control and inducing contralateral lobe hypertrophy. Our objective was to evaluate the chronological changes occurring radiologically and histopathologically after Y90 RL. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent Y90 RL prior to planned liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was performed every 3 months. RESULTS Future liver remnant volume (FLRV) significantly increased up to 9 months after Y90 RL. Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in the treated lobe experienced a 40% reduction in enhancement ratio (ER) during ensuing first 3 months, and never recovered. The reduced ER in the non-tumoral parenchyma was significantly correlated with increased FLRV and FLR (r = 0.41 and r = 0.35, respectively; both p < 0.01). Histopathological evaluation of non-tumor liver tissue found features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome as an early change after Y90 RL (median 5.7 months) and parenchymal collapse as a late change (mean 11 months). DISCUSSION The reduced uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA at 3 months post Y90 RL correlates with a significant increase in FLRV prior to liver resection. EOB-MRI evaluation at 3 months can guide future plan of action after Y90 RL.
Collapse
|
37
|
Vilgrain V. Techniques interventionnelles de modulation hépatique. BULLETIN DE L'ACADÉMIE NATIONALE DE MÉDECINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.banm.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Entezari P, Toskich BB, Kim E, Padia S, Christopher D, Sher A, Thornburg B, Hohlastos ES, Salem R, Collins JD, Lewandowski RJ. Promoting Surgical Resection through Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy. Radiographics 2022; 42:2166-2183. [PMID: 36206182 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
An inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) can preclude curative-intent surgical resection for patients with primary or secondary hepatic malignancies. For patients with normal baseline liver function and without risk factors, an FLR of 20% is needed to maintain postsurgical hepatic function. However, the FLR requirement is higher for patients who are exposed to systemic chemotherapy (FLR, >30%) or have cirrhosis (FLR, >40%). Interventional radiologic and surgical methods to achieve FLR hypertrophy are evolving, including portal vein ligation, portal vein embolization, radiation lobectomy, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Each technique offers particular advantages and disadvantages. Knowledge of these procedures can help clinicians to choose the suitable technique for each patient. The authors review the techniques used to develop FLR hypertrophy, focusing on technical considerations, outcomes, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Entezari
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Beau B Toskich
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Edward Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Siddharth Padia
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Derrick Christopher
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Alex Sher
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Bartley Thornburg
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Elias S Hohlastos
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Riad Salem
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Jeremy D Collins
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sidali S, Trépo E, Sutter O, Nault J. New concepts in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:765-774. [PMID: 35975347 PMCID: PMC9486494 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death and occurs mainly in the context of chronic liver disease at cirrhosis stage. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, first established in 1999, is the most commonly used staging system for HCC in Western countries that link tumor burden, liver function and performance status with prognosis and therapeutic management. Since the first publication of this classification, it has been implemented in several clinical guidelines and recent major therapeutic advances in the management of HCC have modified the therapeutic landscape of HCC. Accordingly, an updated version was recently published in 2022, incorporating an expert clinical decision-making component and the concept of treatment stage migration. This update also introduces the positive results of recent randomized clinical trials, and introduces atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) as a first-line combination regimen for patients with advanced HCC. Finally, the complexity of the management of patients with HCC highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach including input from hepatology, surgery, radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Sidali
- Université de ParisHôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital BeaujonService D’HépatologieDMU DIGESTClichyFrance
- Centre de Recherche des CordeliersSorbonne UniversitéInsermUniversité de ParisFunctional Genomics of Solid TumorsEquipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le CancerLabex OncoImmunologyParisFrance
| | - Eric Trépo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive OncologyCUB Hôpital ErasmeUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
- Laboratory of Experimental GastroenterologyUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Olivier Sutter
- Interventional Radiology UnitHôpital AvicenneHôpitaux Universitaires Paris‐Seine‐Saint‐DenisAssistance‐Publique Hôpitaux de ParisBobignyFrance
| | - Jean‐Charles Nault
- Centre de Recherche des CordeliersSorbonne UniversitéInsermUniversité de ParisFunctional Genomics of Solid TumorsEquipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le CancerLabex OncoImmunologyParisFrance
- Liver UnitHôpital AvicenneHôpitaux Universitaires Paris‐Seine‐Saint‐DenisAssistance‐Publique Hôpitaux de ParisBobignyFrance
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie HumaineUniversité Paris 13Communauté D’Universités et Etablissements Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Transarterial Radioembolization to Impact Liver Volumetry: When and How. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1646-1650. [PMID: 35859212 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03218-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Inadequate volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) renders many patients with liver malignancies not amenable to surgical resection. Depending on the health of the liver and the patient in general, an FLR of 25-40% is required to avoid acute post-hepatectomy liver failure. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of a diseased liver lobe leads to atrophy of the embolized lobe and compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral lobe. Although the absolute degree of FLR hypertrophy seems to be comparable to portal vein embolization, the kinetic of hypertrophy is much slower after radioembolization. However, TARE has the unique advantages of simultaneously offering local tumor control, possibly downstaging disease, and providing biological test of time. Progressions in technique and personalized dosimetry allow for more predictable ablative treatment of liver malignancies and preparation for major liver surgery. This article provides an overview of the existing literature, discusses the evidence, and considers possible criteria for patient selection.
Collapse
|
41
|
Baker T, Tabrizian P, Zendejas I, Gamblin TC, Kazimi M, Boudjema K, Geller D, Salem R. Conversion to resection post radioembolization in patients with HCC: recommendations from a multidisciplinary working group. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1007-1018. [PMID: 35012876 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres is an efficacious option for converting appropriately selected patients with borderline-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to surgical candidacy. METHODS In 2018 and 2019, a diverse multidisciplinary group of surgical and interventional experts with experience using 90Y for downstaging and bridging to liver transplant convened to review peer-reviewed literature and personal experience in the use of 90Y to convert borderline resectable liver cancer patients to surgical candidacy. The working group included surgical oncologists specializing in liver cancer, liver transplant surgeons with experience in complex hepatobiliary surgery, and interventional radiologists with experience using 90Y. RESULTS This document presents expert recommendations based upon the group's experience and consensus. CONCLUSIONS By combining related evidence from the literature with expert experiences with TARE in surgical candidates, these recommendations aim to demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of TARE in converting borderline-resectable patients to surgical options. The document also addresses the concerns about potential complications associated with TARE during the surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Baker
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David Geller
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ytrrium-90 transarterial radioembolization in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:796-808. [PMID: 35013882 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02745-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is a promising alternative strategy to treat liver tumors and liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), as it selectively delivers radioactive isotopes to the tumor via the hepatic artery, sparring surrounding liver tissue. The landscape of TARE indications is constantly evolving. This strategy is considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver-confined disease and preserved liver function in whom neither TACE nor systemic therapy is possible. In patients with liver metastases from CRC, TARE is advised when other chemotherapeutic options have failed. Recent phase III trials have not succeeded to prove benefit in overall survival; however, it has helped to better understand the patients that may benefit from TARE based on subgroup analysis. New strategies and treatment combinations are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical applications of TARE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.
Collapse
|
43
|
Vietti Violi N, Gnerre J, Law A, Hectors S, Bane O, Doucette J, Abboud G, Kim E, Schwartz M, Fiel MI, Taouli B. Assessment of HCC response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization with gadoxetate disodium MRI: correlation with histopathology. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6493-6503. [PMID: 35380226 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08732-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transarterial 90Y radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly being used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. However, tumor response assessment after TARE may be challenging. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of gadoxetate disodium MRI for predicting complete pathologic necrosis (CPN) of HCC treated with TARE, using histopathology as the reference standard. METHODS This retrospective study included 48 patients (M/F: 36/12, mean age: 62 years) with HCC treated by TARE followed by surgery with gadoxetate disodium MRI within 90 days of surgery. Two radiologists evaluated tumor response using RECIST1.1, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR criteria and evaluated the percentage of necrosis on subtraction during late arterial, portal venous, and hepatobiliary phases (AP/PVP/HBP). Statistical analysis included inter-reader agreement, correlation between radiologic and pathologic percentage of necrosis, and prediction of CPN using logistic regression and ROC analyses. RESULTS Histopathology demonstrated 71 HCCs (2.8 ± 1.7 cm, range: 0.5-7.5 cm) including 42 with CPN, 22 with partial necrosis, and 7 without necrosis. EASL and percentage of tumor necrosis on subtraction at the AP/PVP were independent predictors of CPN (p = 0.02-0.03). Percentage of necrosis, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR had fair to good performance for diagnosing CPN (AUCs: 0.78 - 0.83), with a significant difference between subtraction and LI-RADS-TR for reader 2, and in specificity between subtraction and other criteria for both readers (p-range: 0.01-0.04). Radiologic percentage of necrosis was significantly correlated to histopathologic degree of tumor necrosis (r = 0.66 - 0.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Percentage of tumor necrosis on subtraction and EASL criteria were significant independent predictors of CPN in HCC treated with TARE. Image subtraction should be considered for assessing HCC response to TARE when using MRI. KEY POINTS • Percentage of tumor necrosis on image subtraction and EASL criteria are significant independent predictors of complete pathologic necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with90Y radioembolization. • Subtraction, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR have fair to good performance for diagnosing complete pathologic necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with90Y radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naik Vietti Violi
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Gnerre
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Amy Law
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Stefanie Hectors
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Doucette
- Department of Environmental Medicine & Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghadi Abboud
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- The Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton ND, M P, M P, Nd H. Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:113-133. [PMID: 34961675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). DATA SOURCES This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS. RESULTS Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS. CONCLUSIONS With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papamichail
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Papamichail M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Pizanias M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Heaton Nd
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Park J, Oh D, Paeng JC, Lee M, Chung JW, Kim HC. Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Effects of Arterioportal Shunts on Nontargeted Liver Hypertrophy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 33:787-796.e4. [PMID: 35346860 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether arterioportal shunting to the contralateral lobe attenuates the liver function and the hypertrophy of the nontargeted liver after radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients who received radioembolization for HCC contained within the right lobe between 2012 and 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups based on the presence and extent of arterioportal shunt : patients with retrograde arterioportal shunting to the left lobe (contralateral group) and patients with arterioportal shunt limited to the right lobe or no arterioportal shunt (control group). Safety profiles including adverse events, tumor response and overall survival were compared. With the volume of left lateral segment used as a surrogate marker for nontarget liver, degree of hypertrophy was compared between two groups at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Liver function significantly deteriorated in contralateral group in a month (p=<0.05). Tumor response and overall survival did not significantly differ between two groups. Degree of hypertrophy was significantly higher in the control group compared with the contralateral group at 3 months [10.6% vs 3.5% (p = 0.008)] and at 6 months [20.7% vs 2.4% (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION In patients with arterioportal shunting to the contralateral lobe, hypertrophy of the nontarget liver may not occur and the liver function may be worsened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juil Park
- Departments of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongkyu Oh
- Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Chul Paeng
- Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myungsu Lee
- Departments of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Wook Chung
- Departments of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Cheol Kim
- Departments of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022; 76:681-693. [PMID: 34801630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018hxqeanni] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Reig
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| | - Alejandro Forner
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
| | - Jordi Rimola
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
- BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- BCLC Group, Vascular Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona University, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángeles Garcia-Criado
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robin K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Josep Fuster
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Choi JW, Kim HC. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: what clinicians need to know. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2022; 22:4-13. [PMID: 37383534 PMCID: PMC10035707 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 (90Y) has been used in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for more than 10 years in Korea. There are two types of 90Y radioactive microspheres available, namely, glass and resin microspheres, with comparable clinical outcomes. In general, TARE outperforms transarterial chemoembolization regarding post-embolization syndrome, time to progression, tumor downsizing for liver transplantation, and hospitalization stay. Although TARE is commonly recommended for patients with unresectable large HCCs, it can be an alternative to or performed in combination with ablation, surgical resection, and systemic treatment. This review aimed to address 90Y radioactive microspheres, patient selection, clinical outcomes, simulation tests, radioembolization procedures, follow-up imaging, and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Woo Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Cheol Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022; 76:681-693. [PMID: 34801630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018'||'] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Reig
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| | - Alejandro Forner
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
| | - Jordi Rimola
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
- BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- BCLC Group, Vascular Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona University, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángeles Garcia-Criado
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robin K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Josep Fuster
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022; 76:681-693. [PMID: 34801630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018%' and 2*3*8=6*8 and 'nh7h'!='nh7h%] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Reig
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| | - Alejandro Forner
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
| | - Jordi Rimola
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
- BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- BCLC Group, Vascular Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona University, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángeles Garcia-Criado
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robin K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Josep Fuster
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022; 76:681-693. [PMID: 34801630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018' and 2*3*8=6*8 and 'b5hw'='b5hw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Reig
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| | - Alejandro Forner
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain
| | - Jordi Rimola
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
- BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- BCLC Group, Vascular Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona University, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángeles Garcia-Criado
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robin K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Josep Fuster
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Surgery Department, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain; BCLC Group, Radiology Department, CDI, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|