Adherence to interferon-beta treatment and results of therapy switching

Real-world effectiveness of cladribine as an escalation strategy for MS: Insights from the Czech nationwide ReMuS registry

Background

Cladribine, a selective immune reconstitution therapy, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives

Provide experience with cladribine therapy in a real-world setting.

Methods

This is a registry-based retrospective observational cohort study. First, using data from the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS, we analysed patients who initiated cladribine from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Second, we analysed a subgroup of patients who initiated cladribine between September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, thus possessing a follow-up period of at least 2 years. We evaluated demographic and MS characteristics including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before and after cladribine administration, relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adherence.

Results

In total, 617 patients (335 with follow-up of at least 2 years) started cladribine therapy in the study period (mean age 37.0, mean disease duration 8.4 years, 74.1% females). In most cases, cladribine was administered as a second-line drug, a total of 80.7% had been escalated from a platform DMT. During 2 years before cladribine initiation, the average annualised relapse rate (ARR) was .67. Following cladribine initiation, the ARR decreased to .28 in the first year and .22 in the second year. Overall, across the entire two-year treatment period, 69.0% of patients were relapse-free and the average ARR was .25. As for EDSS development, the median baseline EDSS was 2.5 and remained stable even after 24 months. The adherence to treatment ranged of around 90%.

Conclusion

This nationwide study confirms the efficacy of cladribine in real-world settings, especially in patients who are not treatment-naïve. In addition, the study shows an exceptionally high adherence rate, a finding that underscores the invaluable role of cladribine, but also the value of registry-based studies in capturing real-world clinical practice.

[Adherence to treatment in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis]

Adherence to therapy largely determines the success of treatment interventions: low levels of adherence are associated with reduced treatment effectiveness. For many chronic diseases, the level of adherence to treatment is about 50% or less, which confirms the relevance of this topic and requires its research. The high costs of treatment, the need for long-term continuous use of drugs and the special socio-economic significance of a disease such as multiple sclerosis (MS) determine the importance of maintaining a high level of adherence to its treatment. An analysis of literature data on the concept of treatment adherence, methods of its definition and influencing factors was carried out, the values of the level of adherence in the treatment of MS, as well as measures to maintain it during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered. Increasing awareness of healthcare professionals about the problem of treatment adherence and ways to improve it helps to improve the efficiency of managing patients with MS. The paper considers the primary stage of the strategy to improve treatment adherence among patients with MS, namely the formation of expanded knowledge of the problem by specialists of a multidisciplinary team involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with MS.

Effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on improving medication adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with injectable disease-modifying drugs: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to prescribed treatment in chronic diseases, as occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS), is a critical factor for a successful therapeutic response. This study aimed to investigate the effect of educational program based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) on treatment adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving injectable immunomodulatory drugs.

METHODS

The present study is an educational randomized controlled trial research that was conducted on 100 patients with MS who had gone to MS clinic in Tehran city (Iran). The samples were randomly assigned to the intervention (N = 50) and control groups (N = 50). Data collection instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire based on TPB. Then, educational program was performed for the intervention group through four educational sessions. After three months, data collection was repeated for the two groups and data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The knowledge and performance of the intervention group on treatment adherence drugs increased from 56.25 ± 20.3 to 78.31 ± 15.57 and 56.22 ± 5.76 to 71.62 ± 12.01 after the education respectively (p < 0.001). The mean of construct of TPB in the intervention group also increased after the intervention (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Applying the TPB model proved is very effective in developing an educational program for patients with MS, to enhance treatment adherence drugs. Besides such programs, follow-up education for controlling and monitoring are highly recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20210808052109N1. Prospectively registered at 12-Aug-2021, (12/8/2021) available at: URL: https://en.irct.ir/trial/57994.

Adherence to Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS is an incurable disease. The goal of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) is to slow the progression of the disease, prevent relapses and increase the patient’s overall quality of life. According to the World Health Organisation definition, adherence means the extent to which a person’s medication-taking behaviour corresponds with the agreed upon treatment recommendations from a healthcare provider. Accurate adherence is necessary for efficient treatment. Non-adherence is related to unsuccessful treatments, the risk of relapses and increased healthcare costs. The aim of this study is to present the main factors relating to non-adherence in MS patients.

Therapeutic adherence and coping strategies in patients with multiple sclerosis: An observational study

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating autoimmune disorder affecting the central nervous system and targets the myelin sheaths around nerves. Local problem: Medical advances have enabled patients to lead a better quality of life (QoL) than before. However, because of its chronicity and unpredictability, it remains a very challenging disease for both patients and their families, as it involves the continued use of medication to slow down progression. The aim of this study is to assess drug adherence in patients with MS. In particular, we will examine how the way drugs are administered (oral or injective) affects compliance with therapy, including the correlation with coping strategies and the QoL of each patient.We enrolled 88 patients with MS, divided into 2 groups according to therapy (injective or oral). The Morisky Medication Adherence scale was administered to evaluate adherence to treatment, the MS QoL 54 to estimate mental and physical health, and Brief coping orientation to problems experienced Inventory for coping strategies.The results showed that in both groups the patients showed a good therapeutic alliance and trust in treatment. In particular, a correlation has been found between therapeutic adherence, adaptive coping strategies, and mental health when drug therapy is administered by injection. In conclusion, this result suggests that for patients receiving injection treatment to have greater adherence to therapy, appropriate coping strategies and good mental health must be developed in order for patients receiving injection therapy to have greater adherence to therapy; they need to develop appropriate coping strategies and good mental health to address this mode of administration successfully.

Understanding treatment decisions from the perspective of people with relapsing remitting multiple Sclerosis: A critical interpretive synthesis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system that mainly affects young adults. While there is no cure for MS, disease modifying treatments (DMTs) reduce the relapse rate and partial accrual of disability. More effective DMTs may have higher risks including life-threatening infections or secondary autoimmunity. The complexity and novelty of available treatments cause challenges for clinicians when prescribing treatments and for people with MS (PwMS) when deciding what trade-offs they are willing and ready to make.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experience of people with relapsing remitting MS (PwRRMS) and their perspectives in choosing treatments.

METHODS

Critical interpretive synthesis was employed to review and synthesis the published literature. Eighty-three publications were selected in a multi-step systematic process.

RESULTS

Findings are presented in four interrelated areas: the influence of the clinical evidence-base in decision making; the meaning of DMT efficacy for PwRRMS; the influence of models of decision-making and information acquisition practices in PwRRMS; and the importance of psychosocial dimensions in DMT decision making. Synthesis of the findings revealed that alongside medical and individual reasoning, contextual circumstances play an important role in making treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

This review identifies and explains the importance of diverse contextual circumstances (clinical, social, psychological) that are important for PwRRMS when making treatment decisions. The findings demonstrate the importance of eliciting, understanding and addressing such contextual factors.

Understanding the positive benefit:risk profile of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: perspectives from the Alemtuzumab Clinical Development Program

The introduction of high-efficacy therapies for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis has driven re-evaluation of treatment goals and benefit:risk considerations in treatment choice. In the alemtuzumab Phase II and III clinical trials, patients treated with alemtuzumab 12 mg versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a demonstrated significantly reduced annualized relapse rates and improved magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, and were significantly more likely to achieve no evidence of disease activity and reduction in brain volume loss. In two of the studies, alemtuzumab-treated patients had a significantly reduced risk of 6-month confirmed disease worsening, compared with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a. Benefits were maintained throughout 5 years, with a majority of patients receiving no alemtuzumab retreatment or other disease-modifying therapy. Trial results support alemtuzumab’s manageable, consistent safety profile in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Infusion-associated reactions, the most frequent adverse events (AEs), can be minimized by corticosteroid pretreatment, monitoring, and symptomatic management. Other AEs include infections and autoimmune events. Oral anti-herpes prophylaxis should be initiated on the first day of each alemtuzumab treatment course and continued according to local guidelines. Overall cancer risk was lower in the alemtuzumab clinical trials than in a reference population; however, continuing surveillance will determine if alemtuzumab may be associated with certain malignancies such as thyroid papillary carcinoma and melanoma, which are currently identified as potential risks. The post-approval risk management strategy includes a safety monitoring program. Autoimmune AEs (thyroid events, immune thrombocytopenia, nephropathies) can be detected in a timely manner with the monitoring program, which includes physician and patient education about the signs and symptoms, monthly renal and hematologic monitoring, and quarterly thyroid function monitoring for 48 months after the last alemtuzumab course. Education, vigilance by physicians and patients, and monthly laboratory monitoring are recommended to maintain alemtuzumab’s positive benefit:risk profile.

Alemtuzumab in the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an update on the clinical trial evidence and data from the real world

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), given as two annual courses on five consecutive days at baseline and on three consecutive days 12 months later. Here we provide an update on the long-term efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in RRMS, including real-world experience, and advances in our understanding of its mechanism of action. Recent data from the phase II/III extension study have demonstrated that alemtuzumab reduces relapse rates, disability worsening, and the rate of brain volume loss over the long term, with many patients achieving no evidence of disease activity. In high proportions of patients, preexisting disability remained stable or improved. Alemtuzumab is associated with a consistent safety profile over the long term, with no new safety signals emerging and the overall annual incidence of reported adverse events decreasing after the first year on treatment. Acyclovir prophylaxis reduces herpetic infections, and monitoring has been shown to mitigate the risk of autoimmune adverse events, allowing early detection and overall effective management. Data from clinical practice and ongoing observational studies are providing additional information on the real-world use of alemtuzumab. Recent evidence on the mechanism of action of alemtuzumab indicates that in addition to its previously known effects of inducing depletion and repopulation of T and B lymphocytes, it also results in a relative increase of cells with memory and regulatory phenotypes and a decrease in cells with a proinflammatory signature, and may further promote an immunoregulatory environment through an impact on other innate immune cells (e.g. dendritic cells) that play a role in MS. These effects may allow preservation of innate immunity and immunosurveillance. Together, these lines of evidence help explain the durable clinical efficacy of alemtuzumab, in the absence of continuous treatment, in patients with RRMS.

Persistence to disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in a Canadian cohort

PURPOSE

To examine the long-term persistence to the first-line injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) and to identify the factors associated with nonpersistence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used population-based administrative data from Manitoba, Canada. All adult subjects who were diagnosed with MS and dispensed a first-line injectable DMT (beta-interferon-1b, beta-interferon-1a, and glatiramer acetate) between 1996 and 2011 and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary outcome was the median time to discontinuation of any DMT. The associations between potential predictors and persistence were estimated using multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Overall, 721 subjects were followed for a median of 7.8 years (interquartile range 6.1). The median time to discontinuation of all first-line DMTs was 4.2 years (25th and 75th percentile: 1.7, 10.6 years). Of the 451 (62.6%) subjects who discontinued their DMT during the study period, 259 (57.4%) eventually resumed or restarted a DMT. Subjects who were younger when starting a DMT, had prior MS-related hospitalizations, were more recently diagnosed with MS, or had a greater lag time between their MS diagnosis and DMT initiation were more likely to discontinue therapy.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the individuals receiving a DMT for MS in Manitoba remained on therapy for at least 4 years. DMT discontinuation occurred in 60% of the cohort, but most restarted a DMT within 1 year. While not all of the factors identified with discontinuing DMT are modifiable, they may help practitioners enhance MS care by identifying individuals who may be at particular risk for DMT discontinuation.

Dimethyl fumarate in the management of multiple sclerosis: appropriate patient selection and special considerations

Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), also known as gastroresistant DMF, is the most recently approved oral disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Two randomized clinical trials (Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting MS [DEFINE] and Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [CONFIRM]) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing relapse rate and radiological signs of disease activity, as seen on magnetic resonance imaging. The DEFINE study also indicated a significant effect of DMF on disability worsening, while the low incidence of confirmed disability worsening in the CONFIRM trial rendered an insignificant reduction among the DMF-treated groups when compared to placebo. DMF also demonstrated a good safety profile and acceptable tolerability, since the most common side effects (gastrointestinal events and flushing reactions) are usually transient and mild to moderate in severity. Here, we discuss the place in therapy of DMF for individuals with relapsing multiple sclerosis, providing a tentative therapeutic algorithm to manage newly diagnosed patients and those who do not adequately respond to self-injectable DMTs. Literature data supporting the potential role of DMF as a first-line therapy are presented. The possibility of using DMF as switching treatment or even as an add-on strategy in patients with breakthrough disease despite self-injectable DMTs will also be discussed. Lastly, we argue about the role of DMF as an exit strategy from natalizumab-treated patients who are considered at risk for developing multifocal progressive leukoencephalopathy.

New opportunities of real-world data from clinical routine settings in life-cycle management of drugs: example of an integrative approach in multiple sclerosis

The assessment and demonstration of a positive benefit-risk balance of a drug is a life-long process and includes specific data from preclinical, clinical development and post-launch experience. However, new integrative approaches are needed to enrich evidence from clinical trials and sponsor-initiated observational studies with information from multiple additional sources, including registry information and other existing observational data and, more recently, health-related administrative claims and medical records databases. To illustrate the value of this approach, this paper exemplifies such a cross-package approach to the area of multiple sclerosis, exploring also possible analytic strategies when using these multiple sources of information.

Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis

OBJECTIVE

Achieving therapeutic goals in multiple sclerosis (MS) requires strict adherence to treatment schedules. This retrospective study analyzed persistence with, and adherence to, fingolimod compared with injectable/infusible disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with MS.

METHODS

Patients in the PharMetrics Plus™ US administrative claims database with at least one prescription for, or administration of, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon (IFN), or natalizumab (index DMT) between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011 were included. Patients were naïve to index DMT (no claim in the previous 360 days) and had an MS diagnosis code within 360 days of the first index DMT prescription. Outcomes were persistence, risk of discontinuing index DMT (evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model), adherence (measured using the medication possession ratio [MPR] and proportion of days covered [PDC] in patients with at least two index DMT prescriptions), and the risk of being non-adherent (MPR <80% and PDC <80%, assessed using a logistic regression model).

RESULTS

The study included 3750 patients (fingolimod, n = 889; GA, n = 1233; any IFN, n = 1341; natalizumab, n = 287). Discontinuation rates (fingolimod, 27.9%; GA, 39.5%; IFN, 43.7%; natalizumab, 39.5%; all p < 0.001) and risk of discontinuation were significantly higher (hazard ratios vs fingolimod [95% confidence interval]: GA, 1.75 [1.49-2.07]; IFN, 2.01 [1.71-2.37]; natalizumab, 1.53 [1.22-1.91]) for patients receiving other DMTs compared with fingolimod. The risk of being non-adherent was also lower for patients in the fingolimod cohort than the other treatment cohorts, irrespective of whether non-adherence was defined as MPR <80% (p < 0.05 for all) or PDC <80% (p < 0.05 for GA and IFN).

LIMITATIONS

As with all studies assessing real-world treatment patterns it is unclear if medications were used as prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, persistence with, and adherence to, oral fingolimod was higher than for injectable and infusible DMTs.

The Combined Effect of Nursing Support and Adverse Event Mitigation on Adherence to Interferon Beta-1b Therapy in Early Multiple Sclerosis: The START Study

There is limited clinical evidence on the impact of nurse support and adverse event (AE) mitigation techniques on adherence to interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real-world setting. The aim of the Success of Titration, analgesics, and BETA nurse support on Acceptance Rates in MS Treatment (START) trial was to assess the combined effect of titration, analgesics, and BETA (Betaseron Education, Training, Assistance) nurse support on adherence to IFNβ-1b therapy in patients with early-onset MS and to evaluate safety. Participants were instructed to titrate IFNβ-1b and use analgesics to minimize flu-like symptoms. All received BETA nurse follow-up at frequent intervals: live training, two telephone calls during the first month of therapy, and monthly calls thereafter. Participants were considered adherent if they took at least 75% of the total prescribed doses over 12 months (≥75% compliance). Safety was monitored via reported AEs and laboratory test results. Participants who took at least one IFNβ-1b dose over 12 months were analyzed (N = 104); 73.8% of participants completed the study. The mean age of participants was 37.2 years; 72.1% were women and 78.8% were white. Ninety participants had relapsing-remitting MS and 14 had clinically isolated syndrome. The mean compliance rate, reported for 96 participants with complete dose interruption records, was 84.4%. At 12 months, 78.1% of participants were considered adherent. The serious adverse event rate was 9.6%; most events were unrelated to therapy. Thus in the START study, in which participants received nursing support combined with dose titration and use of analgesics, the majority of participants were adherent to therapy.

Comparative effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferons or glatiramer acetate for relapse rates in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis

OBJECTIVE

Disease-modifying therapies, such as fingolimod, interferon (IFN) and glatiramer acetate (GA), have differing effects on relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but little is known about the real-world differences in relapse rates with these treatments. This retrospective study assessed relapse rates in patients with active MS initiating fingolimod, IFN or GA therapy in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Using administrative claims data from the US PharMetrics Plus database, we identified previously treated and untreated patients with MS who initiated fingolimod, IFN or GA treatment between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 and had experienced a relapse in the previous year. A claims-based algorithm was used to identify relapses over the persistence period in patients with 540 days of post-index continuous enrolment. A logistic regression model assessed the probability of having at least one relapse and a generalized linear model estimated differences in annualized relapse rates (ARRs).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 525 patients (fingolimod, n = 128; combined IFN/GA cohort, n = 397) of the 31,041 initially identified. Similar findings for fingolimod and IFN/GA were observed for the unadjusted proportion of patients experiencing relapses (31.3% vs. 34.0%, respectively; p = 0.5653) and ARRs (0.50 vs. 0.55, respectively) while persistent to treatment. After adjusting for baseline differences, fingolimod was associated with a 52% reduction in the probability of having a relapse (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.84; p = 0.0097) and a 50% reduction in ARR (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75; p = 0.0006) compared with IFN/GA.

LIMITATIONS

Identification of relapses is based on the claims in the database rather than on a clinical assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, fingolimod was shown to be associated with significantly lower relapse rates than IFN/GA in patients with MS who had a history of relapses.

Adherence to interferon β-1b treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis in Spain

BACKGROUND

Adherence to interferon β-1b (INFβ-1b) therapy is essential to maximize the beneficial effects of treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS). For that reason, the main objectives of this study are to assess adherence to INFβ-1b in patients suffering from MS in Spain, and to identify the factors responsible for adherence in routine clinical practice.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study including 120 Spanish patients with MS under INFβ-1b treatment. Therapeutic adherence was assessed with Morisky-Green test and with the percentage of doses received. The proportion of adherent patients assessed by Morisky-Green test was 68.3%, being indicative of poor adherence. Nevertheless, the percentage of doses received, which was based on the number of injected medication, was 94.3%. The main reason for missing INFβ-1b injections was forgetting some of the administrations (64%). Therefore, interventions that diminish forgetfulness might have a positive effect in the proportion of adherent patients and in the percentage of doses received. In addition, age and comorbidities had a significant effect in the number of doses injected per month, and should be considered in the management of adherence in MS patients.

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE

Among all the available methods for assessing adherence, the overall consumption of the intended dose has to be considered when addressing adherence.

[Discontinuation and long-term adherence to beta interferon therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis]

OBJECTIVE

To determine discontinuation rate and degree of adherence to first-line treatment with interferon-beta (INFβ) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), identifying causes and associated factors.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective observational study that included patients with MS treated with INFβ during 2001. The patients were followed-up from the beginning of treatment until the end of 2006. The data sources used were a computer database compiled in the outpatients' area, medical records and application protocols for beginning and monitoring treatment for MS. Patient characteristics at baseline, treatment and continuity were included in the information collected.

RESULTS

The study included 131 patients. Mean follow-up was 74 ± 26 years. 641% of the patients were treated with only one drug during the study. At 2 years follow-up 99% of patients had discontinued INFβ therapy and at 5 years 412% had done so. Men, patients with relapsing-remitting MS and those treated with INFβ1a i.m. continued treatment for a longer period, but this was statistically significant only in patients with 10 years or less of disease progression at the beginning of therapy. Main causes of discontinuation were lack of efficacy (388%) and adverse effects (328%). Compliant patients presented lower discontinuation rates (558% vs. 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

treatment of MS patients with IFNβ is discontinued mainly due to lack of efficacy and adverse effects. Greater understanding of patients' views can help to identify those at greatest risk of lack of adherence, thereby helping to improve treatment.

Exacerbation history is associated with medication and appointment adherence in MS

Disease-modifying treatments are designed to prevent exacerbations in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, few studies have examined the relationship between disease activity and treatment adherence in MS. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between disease activity (e.g., annualized relapse rates), medication adherence, and appointment adherence in relapsing-remitting MS. Retrospective exacerbation and appointment data were collected and used to predict prospective medication adherence. Results indicated that patients with higher annualized relapse rates missed fewer doses of medication and were less likely to miss appointments. Conversely, patients with relatively stable disease were more likely to demonstrate poor medication adherence and poor appointment adherence. Patients who missed more appointments also missed more doses of their disease modifying medication. Future studies may wish to examine clinical methods designed to improve immunotherapy adherence among patients who are in relatively symptom-free stages of relapsing-remitting MS.

Comparison of adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective administrative claims analysis

PURPOSE

To compare adherence and persistence among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) initiated on disease-modifying therapy (DMTs), including intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a), subcutaneous (SC) IFNβ-1a, IFNβ-1b, or glatiramer acetate (GA).

METHODS

MS patients initiated on IM-IFNβ-1a, SC-IFNβ-1a, IFNβ-1b, or GA between January 1, 2000 and January 2, 2008 were identified from a retrospective claims database study associated with a large US health plan. The date of DMT initiation was the index date; patients were observed for 6 months before and 12-36 months after the index date. Adherence to the index DMT was measured with a medication possession ratio (MPR), the proportion of days patients possessed their index DMTs; MPR ≥ 0.80 was considered adherent. Persistence was time in days from index date until the earlier of a minimum 60-day gap in DMT therapy or the last DMT claim during follow-up. Adherence and persistence were modeled with logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions, respectively.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 6,680 patients in the DMT cohorts: IM-IFNβ-1a (N = 2,305, 34.5%); IFNβ-1b (N = 894, 13.4%); GA (N = 2,270, 34.0%); and SC-IFNβ-1a (N = 1,211, 18.1%). The IM-IFNβ-1a cohort had significantly higher regression-adjusted odds of adherence relative to the other cohorts: 52.4% higher odds versus the IFNβ-1b cohort (OR = 0.656, CI = 0.561-0.768); 33.5% higher odds versus the GA cohort (OR = 0.749, CI = 0.665-0.844); and 20.6% higher odds versus the SC-IFNβ-1a cohort (OR = 0.829, CI = 0.719-0.957). There were no consistent differences in persistence between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

IM-IFNβ-1a patients had significantly higher odds of adherence compared with other DMT cohorts, possibly attributable to IM-IFNβ-1a's less frequent dosing schedule. The benefits of adherence may include better quality of life, lower risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and emergency visits, making adherence a critical component of MS management.

The relationship between alternative medication possession ratio thresholds and outcomes: evidence from the use of glatiramer acetate

OBJECTIVE

To examine how changes in the medication possession ratio (MPR) affect the probability of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses and total and MS-related charges among patients treated with glatiramer acetate (GA).

METHODS

Data were obtained from i3 InVision™ Data Mart for January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2010. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with MS, initiated therapy with GA, and had continuous insurance coverage from 6 months prior through 24 months after initial use of GA (n=839). Multivariate regressions which controlled for patient characteristics examined the association between achievement of alternative MPR goals and patient relapses and charges.

RESULTS

Patients who achieved an MPR of at least 0.7 had significantly lower odds of relapse than those with MPR thresholds below 0.7, with achievement of a threshold of 0.7, 0.8, or 0.9, associated with an odds ratio of relapse of 0.545 (95% CI=0.351-0.824), 0.568 (95% CI=0.371-0.870), and 0.421 (95% CI=0.260-0.679), respectively. Attaining higher MPR thresholds resulted in larger reductions in direct medical charges, excluding GA and other MS-related drugs. MPR of 0.25 was associated with $1699 lower 2-year total direct medical charges (p=0.009) while a threshold of 0.95 was associated with $2136 lower total charges (p<0.001), compared to patients not reaching these respective thresholds. MPR of 0.90 was associated with $986 lower MS-related charges than for those with MPR<0.90 (p=0.050). Results also revealed an association between patient adherence to GA and statistically significant reductions in charges for specific components of care.

LIMITATIONS

Results are generalizable only to patients with medical and prescription benefit coverage without regard for functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

As adherence improved the odds of relapse decreased and charge offsets generally increased. Results suggest that, despite higher costs associated with increased usage of GA, patient outcomes are improved and there are cost-offsets associated with adherent use of GA.

Fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

Fingolimod is the first oral agent approved in the USA for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator that binds to sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors on lymphocytes, resulting in a downregulation of the receptor and a reversible sequestration of lymphocytes in lymphoid tissue. Effector memory T cells are not sequestered so that immune surveillance may be minimally affected. Two large-scale Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of fingolimod compared with placebo and intramuscular interferon β-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Due to its mechanism of action, fingolimod administration may be associated with first-dose bradycardia and macular edema. Therefore, patients should be observed for 6 h at the time of their first dose and undergo ophthalmologic evaluation prior to treatment initiation and at 3-4 months after initiation.

Management of multiple sclerosis in adolescents - current treatment options and related adherence issues

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system that is increasingly recognized in children and adolescents. This realization comes with additional concerns about existing therapeutic options and the impact of the disease on health-related outcomes of adolescents with MS. This five-part review provides an update on management strategies relevant to the pediatric MS population. The first section gives an overview on the epidemiology and natural history of early onset MS. The second section outlines currently available MS treatments, including medications during acute relapses and long-term immunomodulatory therapies. The third section highlights adherence issues pertaining to MS, including the challenges uniquely faced by adolescents. The fourth section provides a summary of research into quality of life and psychosocial consequences of pediatric onset MS. Attention is drawn to the grief experience of affected adolescents and the importance of peer relationships. Finally, the family resilience framework is presented as a conceptual model to facilitate optimal adaptation of adolescents with MS. Healthcare professionals can promote resilience and treatment adherence by ensuring that these individuals and their families are sufficiently informed about available MS treatments, providing instrumental support for managing potential medication side effects, and addressing age-appropriate developmental needs.

Persistence and adherence to disease modifying drugs among patients with multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective database study aimed to evaluate the adherence of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on immunomodulatory treatments using claims data, and to identify differences between compliance and persistency measurements in the context of this disease.

METHODS

Continuously enrolled MS patients treated with subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron * ), subcutaneous IFNbeta-1a (Rebif dagger ), intramuscular IFNbeta-1a (Avonex double dagger ), and subcutaneous glatiramer acetate (Copaxone section sign ).) were identified from the PharMetrics patient-centric database, and all information related to patient demographics and pharmacy claims for the drugs of interest were extracted.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were treatment switches and discontinuations for patients initiated on the drugs of interest. Various compliance and persistency metrics including the proportion of days covered, treatment prevalence at 6-monthly time points after initiation, and the continuous time on drug were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 6134 MS patients were started on one of the four drugs of interest. The number of patients switching or discontinuing therapy rose over the study period. The proportion of patients switching was similar between study drugs, by the different metrics, with the highest switch rates for subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b and the lowest for subcutaneous glatiramer acetate. Discontinuation rates were highest for subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b and lowest for intramuscular IFNbeta-1a. Regression models showed that intramuscular IFNbeta-1a and subcutaneous IFNbeta-1a had similar and higher persistency compared to subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b and subcutaneous glatiramer acetate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment switching and discontinuation is common in MS patients, there is some noticeable variability between drugs and across measures of persistency and adherence. Also, claims data do not allow distinguishing between clinical patterns of MS, direct estimation of disease severity and observation of care that occurs outside of insurance coverage, and results need to be cautiously interpreted. The compliance to the various MS drugs was 80% or higher at all times for all four drugs. The highest rate of treatment persistency existed in the intramuscular IFNbeta-1a initiator group, while subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b was associated with a significantly lower persistence (p < 0.0001).

Healthcare resource utilization following switch or discontinuation in multiple sclerosis patients on disease modifying drugs

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore the cost and utilization in the period following discontinuations or switches of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Secondary objectives included an assessment of the time to switch or discontinuation from index DMD treatment.

METHODS

Cases were defined as a billed MS diagnosis in continuously enrolled patients initiated with interferon-beta1a IM, interferon-beta1b SC, glatiramer acetate, and interferon-beta1a SC found in the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database. Information on patient demographics, diagnoses, procedures, pharmacy-dispensed drugs, and costs was extracted; reasons for discontinuation and expenses outside of the healthcare system were not available. Treatment discontinuations and switches between study drugs were defined using pharmacy prescription patterns and analyzed by descriptive and regression methods. The non-pharmacy medical costs in the 18 months following switching or discontinuation were compared to the costs in a randomly selected similar period for those patients who did not switch or discontinue these agents.

RESULTS

A total of 5,772 MS patients were continuously enrolled and were treated with one or more of the four drugs of interest, and about half of these patients switched drugs or discontinued treatment for at least 90 days. Patients initiated with interferon-beta1b SC were more likely to discontinue treatment compared to interferon-beta1a IM users. Non-pharmaceutical medical costs were highest for those switching treatments followed by those discontinuing DMDs in the 18 months following a switch or discontinuation, compared to persistent users of these drugs. Interferon beta1b SC initiators had higher costs following changes or discontinuations, while glatiramer acetate and interferon-beta1a SC users had lower subsequent costs compared to interferon-beta1a IM users.

LIMITATIONS

Unfortunately, the reasons for stopping the initial treatment cannot be determined from analysis of an administrative claims database. Also, the MS cases followed in this analysis are billing diagnostic events unconfirmed through a review of medical records or other data sources. The results are unstratified in terms of severity and thus while treatment patterns may vary for patients with different types of MS (e.g., progressive vs. relapsing-remitting), this cannot be examined in this analysis.

CONCLUSION

Changing or discontinuing DMDs is common among MS patients and is associated with higher non-pharmaceutical medical costs that vary based on the initiating drug and other demographics characteristics.

Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence

Poor treatment adherence is problematic in many therapy areas, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Several immunomodulatory drugs are available for the treatment of MS, all of which require frequent parenteral administration. Current first-line therapies are two formulations of interferon (IFN) beta-1a, one of IFN beta-1b, and one of glatiramer acetate. Discontinuation of treatment is common, particularly in the first few months after initiation. Although the true effect of poor adherence to MS therapy is not known, it is likely to lead to a fall in treatment efficacy. Many factors influence a patient's adherence to treatment, including the patient's MS subtype and disability level, cognitive impairment resulting from MS, perceived lack of efficacy of the prescribed medication, and adverse events associated with MS therapy. This article summarizes the barriers to adherence to MS therapies, and discusses patient management strategies that can be employed to encourage adherence. Future advances in the field of MS treatment will be explored, including the development of orally administered drugs, which may enhance adherence.

Adherence of adolescents to multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy

In this mixed-methods study, utilization data for disease-modifying therapies were reviewed to determine the adherence rate among our pediatric multiple sclerosis cohort. Adolescents were interviewed to explore their experiences with multiple sclerosis and the impact of peer relationships on adherence to treatment. Seventeen adolescents (6 male, 11 female) started interferon beta or glatiramer acetate before age 18. The mean age at first drug start date was 15.8 years. Eight of the adolescents (47%) discontinued treatment after a median duration of 20 months. Many of the adolescents struggled to integrate the injections into their daily lives, with peers either facilitating or impeding this transition. In conclusion, adolescents in this cohort had difficulty adhering to disease-modifying therapies, and peers played an important role in mediating their adjustment to multiple sclerosis. Specific strategies are required to improve adolescents' adherence to treatment, including less intrusive options and enhancing peer support.