Pediatric trauma patients with isolated airway compromise or Glasgow Coma Scale less than 8: does immediate attending surgeon's presence upon arrival make a difference?

A management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma cases

BACKGROUND

Pediatric trauma, particularly major trauma cases, are often treated in less than optimal facilities by providers who lack training and experience in treating severely injured children. We aimed to develop a management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma using the Theory of Constraints (TOC).

METHODS

We conducted interviews with 17 highly experienced policy makers, senior nursing managers and medical managers in pediatrics and trauma. The interviews were analyzed by qualitative methods. The TOC was utilized to identify undesirable effects (UDEs) and core challenges, and to design a focused current reality tree (CRT). Subsequently, a management model for optimal admission and treatment of pediatric trauma was constructed.

RESULTS

The CRT was illustrated according to 4 identified UDEs focusing on lack of: (1) clear definitions of case manager in pediatric trauma; (2) uniform criteria regarding the appropriate site for admitting pediatric trauma, (3) standard guidelines and protocols for treatment of trauma cases and for training of trauma medical teams; and (4) standard guidelines for evacuating pediatric trauma patients. The management model for treatment and admission of pediatric trauma is based on 3 major elements: human resources, hospital policy concerning the appropriate emergency department (ED) for pediatric trauma patients and clear definitions regarding children and trauma levels. Each of the elements contains components that should be clearly defined in order for a medical center to be designated for admitting and treating pediatric trauma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that the optimal ED for pediatric trauma cases is one with available operating rooms, intensive care beds, an imaging unit, laboratories and equipment suitable for treating children as well as with staff trained to treat children with trauma. To achieve optimal outcomes, medical centers in Israel should be classified according to their trauma treatment capabilities and their ability to treat varied severities of pediatric trauma cases.

Variability in the structure and care processes for critically injured children: A multicenter survey of trauma bay and intensive care units

PURPOSE

Evaluate national variation in structure and care processes for critically injured children.

METHODS

Institutions with pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) that treat trauma patients were identified through the Virtual Pediatric Systems (n=72). Prospective survey data were obtained from PICU and Trauma Directors (n=69, 96% response). Inquiries related to structure and care processes in the PICU and emergency department included infrastructure, physician staffing, team composition, decision making, and protocol/checklist use.

RESULTS

About one-third of the 69 institutions were ACS-verified Level-1 Pediatric Trauma Centers (32%); 36 (52%) were state-designated Level 1. The surgeon was the primary decision maker in the trauma bay at 88% of sites, and in the PICU at 44%. The intensivist was primary in the PICU at 30% of sites and intensivist consultation was elective at 11%. Free-standing pediatric centers used checklists more often than adult/pediatric centers for DVT prophylaxis (75% vs. 50%, p=0.039), cervical spine clearance (75% vs. 44%, p=0.011), and pain control (63% vs. 34%, p=0.024). Otherwise, protocols/checklists were infrequently utilized by either center type.

CONCLUSION

Variability exists in structure and care processes for critically injured children. Further investigation of variation and its causal relationship to outcomes is warranted to provide optimal care.

Validation of rules to predict emergent surgical intervention in pediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Trauma centers use guidelines to determine when a trauma surgeon is needed in the emergency department (ED) on patient arrival. A decision rule from Loma Linda University identified patients with penetrating injury and tachycardia as requiring emergent surgical intervention. Our goal was to validate this rule and to compare it with the American College of Surgeons' Major Resuscitation Criteria (MRC).

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from 1993 through 2010 from 2 level 1 trauma centers in Denver, CO. Patient demographics, injury severity, times of ED arrival and surgical intervention, and all variables of the Loma Linda Rule and the MRC were obtained. The outcome, emergent intervention (defined as requiring operative intervention by a trauma surgeon within 1 hour of arrival to the ED or performance of cricothyroidotomy or thoracotomy in the ED), was confirmed using standardized abstraction. Sensitivities, specificities, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 8,078 patients included, and 47 (0.6%) required emergent intervention. Of the 47 patients, the median age was 11 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7 to 14 years), 70% were male, 30% had penetrating mechanisms, and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 25 (IQR 9 to 41). At the 2 institutions, the Loma Linda Rule had a sensitivity and specificity of 69% (95% CI 45% to 94%) and 76% (95% CI 69% to 83%), respectively, and the MRC had a sensitivity and specificity of 80% (95% CI 70% to 92%) and 81% (95% CI 77% to 85%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent surgical intervention is rare in the pediatric trauma population. Although precision of predictive accuracies of the Loma Linda Rule and MRC were limited by small numbers of outcomes, neither set of criteria appears to be sufficiently accurate to recommend their routine use.

Validation and refinement of a rule to predict emergency intervention in adult trauma patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Trauma centers use "secondary triage" to determine the necessity of trauma surgeon involvement. A clinical decision rule, which includes penetrating injury, an initial systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg, or an initial pulse rate greater than 100 beats/min, was developed to predict which trauma patients require emergency operative intervention or emergency procedural intervention (cricothyroidotomy or thoracotomy) in the emergency department. Our goal was to validate this rule in an adult trauma population and to compare it with the American College of Surgeons' major resuscitation criteria.

METHODS

We used Level I trauma center registry data from September 1, 1995, through November 30, 2008. Outcomes were confirmed with blinded abstractors. Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Our patient sample included 20,872 individuals. The median Injury Severity Score was 9 (interquartile range 4 to 16), 15.3% of patients had penetrating injuries, 13.5% had a systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg, and 32.5% had a pulse rate greater than 100 beats/min. Emergency operative intervention or procedural intervention was required in 1,099 patients (5.3%; 95% CI 5.0% to 5.6%). The sensitivities and specificities of the rule and the major resuscitation criteria for predicting emergency operative intervention or emergency procedural intervention were 95.6% (95% CI 94.3% to 96.8%) and 56.1% (95% CI 55.4% to 56.8%) and 85.5% (95% CI 83.3% to 87.5%) and 80.9% (95% CI 80.3% to 81.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This new rule was more sensitive for predicting the need for emergency operative intervention or emergency procedural intervention directly compared with the American College of Surgeons' major resuscitation criteria, which may improve the effectiveness and efficiency of trauma triage.

Trauma Attending Physician Continuity: Does it Make a Difference?

Continuity of care is important in achieving optimal outcomes in trauma patients, but the optimal length of the trauma attending (TA) rotation is unknown. We hypothesize that longer TA rotations provide greater continuity, and therefore improve outcomes. We did a retrospective comparison of trauma patient outcomes from two consecutive 6-month periods during which we transitioned from a 1-month TA rotation to a 1-week TA rotation. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the χ2 were used for statistical analysis. Over the 12-month study period 1924 patients were admitted to the Trauma Service. The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and Abbreviated Injury Scores for the chest, abdomen, and extremities. Although mortality, patient charges, and violations of the standard of care were similar between the two groups, overall morbidity was lower (18.6% vs 23.2%), and hospital length of stay higher (9.07 days vs 8.41 days) in the 1-week TA group compared with the 1-month TA group. A one-week TA rotation was associated with a longer hospital length of stay, but improved morbidity. Longer TA rotations do not necessarily provide improved continuity or improved outcomes.

Financial impact of in-house attending surgeon: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Current work hour restrictions have required some programs to have staff surgeons cover in-house call. Other programs have considered in-house staff coverage at night for the billable tasks performed during these hours. However, there have been no data published describing the load or value of work that an in-house team performs at night. Therefore, we prospectively recorded tasks performed in a pediatric surgery training center after staff had left for the night.

METHODS

Between April 2005 and March 2006, all services rendered from 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM that would require staff presence were prospectively recorded by a pediatric surgical fellow on-call. Tasks performed while staff was in the hospital were excluded. Time of service was recorded and assigned to an hour of the night. Billing codes were identified for each task, and relative value units were assigned. The collectable amount for services was calculated using 2006 Medicare reimbursement. Data were analyzed in functional blocks (6:00-10:00 PM, 10:00 PM-4:00 AM, and 4:00-6:00 AM).

RESULTS

Data from 111 call nights were collected over the year. Attending staff was in-house 10 of those nights. Of the remaining 101 nights, peak hour of activity was from 12:00 AM to 1:00 AM (35 nights). In the 10:00 PM to 4:00 AM time block, service was rendered 80 nights considering all activity, 68 nights if trauma/burns were excluded, and 45 nights excluding trauma/burns and nonoperative admissions. The sum collectable for all overnight services for the year was $25,855.

CONCLUSION

The in-house resident team performs tasks through the middle of the night on most nights. However, billable revenue generated by these tasks is very small compared with revenue generated from the normal operative schedule.

Pediatric Blunt Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis in a Level I Trauma Center

This study consisted of an 8-year retrospective trauma registry analysis of blunt trauma and comprised of 2458 children (<18 years of age) and 4568 adults (18–64 years of age). Falls and motor vehicular crashes were seen in 30.4 per cent (749) and 23 per cent (566) of children, and 25.4 per cent (1158) and 41.9 per cent (1914) of adults. Children had a higher mean revised trauma score (7.69 vs 7.66) and Glasgow Coma Score (14.5 vs 14.3), and a lower Injury Severity Score (ISS; 6.68 vs 7.83 and hospital length of stay (2.8 vs 3.8 days) with P < 0.05. Overall mortality was 1.3 per cent in children and 1.9 per cent in adults (P = 0.05). Pedestrian accidents resulted in a 3.8 per cent (6/161) mortality rate. Pediatric nonsurvivors had a 6.4-fold higher ISS than survivors compared with a 5.2-fold increase in adults. Mortality progressively increased with higher ISS; 0.09 per cent in <15, 1.3 per cent, in 15 to 24, and 17 per cent in children with ≥25 ISS. Mortality in multiple chest injuries was 19 per cent. The presence of chest trauma resulted in a 46-fold higher mortality in children. Most lethal injuries were combined head, chest, and abdomen trauma with a 25 per cent mortality in children and 28 per cent in adults. Admission Glasgow Coma Score <9 and systolic blood pressure below 100 mm Hg carried high mortality: 39 and 6 per cent in children vs 31 and 24 per cent in adults. Ninety-seven per cent of children and 89 per cent of adults were discharged home.