Global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services: A systematic review

Community Mental Health in the Time of COVID-19: A Qualitative Assessment of Rural Providers' Experiences

The experiences of social and community mental health (SCMH) workers serving in rural communities during the COVID-19 pandemic are understudied. Therefore, nine SCMH workers were interviewed about challenges and strategies for providing mental health services in rural communities in the wake of COVID-19. Through qualitative analyses three primary themes emerged; challenges, needed resources and strategies for addressing mental health needs. Challenges included lack of resources, stigma, and policy barriers, but collaborating with local organizations, providing individualized services, and improving communication were suggested strategies to overcome challenges. The resilience and flexibility of SCMH workers was advantageous in adapting to the changing mental health landscape post-COVID-19, yet advocacy for funding, resources, and training for practitioners in rural mental health is still needed. Findings suggest offering individualized services, forging community connections and maximizing use of existing resources through local collaborations. Moreover, utilizing online mental health services and peer community-building may improve effective services.

Back-to-Back Climate shocks and the mental health crisis: A Texas-sized surge in depression and anxiety ER visits

Climate change is intensifying the frequency and severity of climate-related disasters, posing significant challenges to public mental health. This study explores the relationship between successive climate events and emergency department (ED) visits for depression and anxiety in the Greater Houston area from 2019 to 2023. Combining monthly data from the Texas Syndromic Surveillance System, the National Weather Service, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we conducted a time-series analysis to assess the impact of successive weather events on ED visits for anxiety and depression. Our random forest models reveal significant associations between weather variables and mental health-related ED visits. Specifically, time series decomposition uncovered distinct seasonal patterns, with specific periods consistently showing higher demand for mental health services. Additionally, the analysis indicates that severe weather events that restrict mobility, such as hurricanes and tropical storms, initially lead to a decrease in ED visits, followed by a surge in the following months, whereas events that do not impede travel, such as heatwaves and droughts, correlate with immediate increases in visits. Feature importance analysis indicated social factors, such as the number of households and children ≤17, along with weather variables like average temperature and total precipitation, were significant predictors of ED visits for both anxiety and depression. Access to healthcare services, including proximity to healthcare clinics and treatment centers, also played a crucial role. These observed patterns underscore the significant influence of seasonal and weather-related factors on mental health and underscore the need for targeted public health interventions that consider the timing and nature of climate events, as well as strategies to enhance community resilience and strengthen mental health support systems.

More or less equal? Trends in horizontal equity in mental health care utilization in Stockholm county, Sweden (2006-2022). Repeated survey-registry linked studies

BACKGROUND

Horizontal equity is defined as equal care for equal needs, regardless of socioeconomic factors. This study investigated trends in horizontal equity in mental health care (MHC) utilization in Sweden from 2006 to 2022. Monitoring equity provides valuable information for healthcare system governance (e.g., planning and resource allocation) necessary for ensuring equitable provision of services.

METHODS

A total of 81,650 Stockholm residents aged 18-64, who participated in the Hälsa Stockholm surveys of 2006, 2010, 2014 or 2021, were analysed. Their subsequent use of MHC (primary, in- and outpatient specialized care, and psychotropic medication) within six months after survey response was collected from registries between 2006 and 2022. Concentration index (CI) and need-standardized CI (Horizontal inequity index, HI), summative measures of inequalities, were used in this study. HI was estimated using self-reported psychological distress (measured with the General health questionnaire 12 in 2006-2014 and Kessler 6 in 2021) as the primary need indicator, with general health status and long-term limiting illness as additional need indicators. Equivalized disposable household income was used as the ranking variable, while education status, migration status, age, and sex were included as non-need variables that we controlled for in the analyses.

RESULTS

Lower-income individuals used MHC services more than their higher-income counterparts with comparable levels of psychological distress. These "pro-poor" inequities in the probability of MHC use increased from HI = -0.057 [95% Confidence Limits, CL: -0.079, -0.034] in 2006/2007 to HI = -0.130 [95% CL: -0.159, -0.102] in 2014/2015. By 2021/2022, the "pro-poor" inequities had decreased (HI = -0.034 [95% CL: -0.06, -0.009]), partly due to an increase in MHC use among higher-income groups but a decrease in the lowest income group. Standardizing for additional need indicators reduced the "pro-poor" inequities but maintained the observed trends. Among non-Nordic migrants, "pro-rich" inequities fell between 2006/2007 and 2014/2015 but rose in 2021/2022, with significant "pro-rich" inequities among non-European migrants in 2021/2022 (HI = 0.100 [95% CL: 0.024, 0.176]). Among patients in outpatient services, "pro-poor" inequities in visit frequency decreased over time (2006-2022).

CONCLUSION

We observed increasingly higher probability of MHC use among lower-income individuals than their higher-income peers with similar (measured) needs from 2006 to 2015. However, during the pandemic (2021/2022), potential access problems led to diminishing of "pro-poor" inequities in the total sample, and to "pro-rich" inequities among non-Nordic migrants. The Covid-19 disruption to the healthcare system-such as restrictions on in-person visits and the rapid transition to digital healthcare services-along with its impact on care-seeking, may explain the trend shifts.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates

Introduction

Implicit association tests have been extensively applied to reveal socially unacceptable and concealed stigma. Studies have explored the implicit stigma toward mental illness in specific groups, with limited comparisons across different groups. To investigate the implicit stigma toward mental illness among different groups, along with the interaction between implicit and explicit measurements.

Methods

Based on PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 1998 to April 18, 2024. Searches were updated through February 12, 2025. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) served as the quality evaluation framework, and Stata 12.0 facilitated the conduct of a meta-analysis.

Results

The analysis included fifty studies in the systematic review and thirty in the meta-analysis. Most studies used "mental illness" or related physical illness terms as concept words, paired with emotionally contrasting attribute words. Twenty-eight studies calculated the implicit effect using an improved algorithm, while thirty-eight examined the correlations between implicit and explicit measures. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) revealed that the lowest D scores were observed in the general population (SMD = 0.79, P < 0.001), followed by healthcare providers (SMD = 1.09, P = 0.054), students (SMD = 1.17, P < 0.001) and people with mental illness (SMD = 1.20, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The findings indicated that the selection of concept and attribute words, as well as the processing of data measuring implicit stigma, was not standardized. No reliable correlation was found between implicit and explicit measures. Despite the heterogeneity of included studies, the general public demonstrated the most positive attitudes, while individuals with mental illness exhibited negative attitudes. Further research is required to develop personalized anti-stigma interventions for different groups and regions based on these results, particularly from the perspective of implicit stigma.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictive measures on overall mental and physical health and well-being, specific psychopathologies and emotional states in representative adult Greek population: Results from the largest multi-wave, online national survey in Greece (COH-FIT)

BACKGROUND

Greece faced particular COVID-19-pandemic-related challenges, due to specific socio-cultural-economic/public-health factors and drastic restrictive policies.

OBJECTIVES

To understand trajectories of overall mental and physical health, well-being, emotional states and individual psychopathology in response to pandemic-related restrictive measures within general adult Greek population across the first two pandemic waves.

METHODS

Using multiple time-point cross-sectional data from the "Collaborative Outcomes study on Health and Functioning during Infection Times" (COH-FIT), we examined changes in outcomes from retrospective pre-pandemic ratings (T0) to three distinct intra-pandemic time points (lockdown 1: T1, between lockdowns: T2, lockdown 2: T3). Primary outcomes included WHO-5 well-being scores and a composite overall psychopathology "P-score", followed by a wide range of secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

10,377 participant responses were evaluated, including 2737 representative-matched participants. Statistically significant differences in well-being and overall psychopathology before and after quarantine (T0 vs. T1-T3), as well as across the assessed time frames (T1, T2, and T3) emerged in both samples. Global mental and physical health, individual psychopathology scores (anxiety, depression, PTSD, OCD, panic, mania, mood swings, sleep and concentration problems), emotional states (anger, helplessness, fear of infection, boredom, frustration, loneliness and overall stress scores), BMI and pain scores also showed statistically significant time differences in both samples, with the exemption of self-injury and suicidal attempt scores, showing lower intra-pandemic scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest multi-wave report on well-being, mental and physical health across different pandemic restriction periods in Greece, suggesting a substantial negative effect of lockdowns on most outcomes at least during the acute pandemic waves.

Understanding the Lived Experience of Patients With Heart Failure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure face multifaceted challenges, including emotional, social, and psychological burdens, while managing their condition. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these difficulties, amplifying fear, uncertainty, and healthcare complexities, further complicating their experiences.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify and analyze the challenges faced by patients with heart failure during the pandemic.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted to analyze data from qualitative studies. Data were sourced from EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS, spanning from March 11, 2020, when the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, to May 5, 2023, marking the end of COVID-19 as a global public health emergency.

RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted, identifying 676 articles through database searches: CINAHL-Complete (n = 130), PubMed (n = 313), SCOPUS (n = 210), hand search (n = 22), and Thai journal online (ThaiJO) (n = 1). After screening and quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 17 full-text articles of sufficient quality involving 277 participants with heart failure from East Asia (Taiwan, Japan), Southeast Asia (Thailand, Indonesia), Europe (Denmark, UK, Spain, Italy, Sweden), North America (United States), and the Middle East (Iran) were included in the synthesis. Six primary themes emerged: (1) Emotional Impact-patients reported increased anxiety, fear of disease progression, and heightened feelings of isolation, (2) Limited Physical and Social Activities-restrictions during the pandemic significantly disrupted daily routines, (3) Cultivating Resilience and Meaningful Living-many adapted by finding new coping mechanisms and purpose, (4) Divergent Perspectives on Care Delivery Innovation-although telehealth offered convenience for some, others faced challenges because of the lack of in-person care, (5) Social Support from Family and Friends-family support was critical but often limited by quarantine measures, and (6) Trust in Healthcare Providers-trust emerged as a key factor in managing heart failure during the crisis. Using the GRADE-CERQual approach, the certainty of evidence was evaluated and ranged from moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions that address the emotional and practical needs of patients with heart failure during crises. By promoting well-being and enhancing healthcare delivery, these insights can inform healthcare providers and policymakers in developing tailored support strategies aimed at improving patient outcomes and quality of lifePROSPERO registration number: CRD42024526561.

When It's Not Tics: Functional Tic-Like Behaviors

Functional tic-like behaviors (FTLBs) are a manifestation of functional neurologic disorder that can be mistaken for neurodevelopmental tic disorders like Tourette syndrome. Much information was gained about FTLBs because of an outbreak of FTLBs spreading among adolescents and young adults via social media during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In comparison to neurodevelopmental tic disorders, FTLBs have an older age of onset, more abrupt symptom onset, and more complex tics as well as other features that would be atypical of Tourette syndrome. Although they do not respond well to standard treatment for neurodevelopmental tics, they are treatable with appropriate behavioral therapy.

Assessing the performance of Portuguese public hospitals before and during COVID-19 outbreak, with optimistic and pessimistic benchmarking approaches

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the tertiary sector, particularly in healthcare, which faced unprecedented demand despite the existence of limited resources, such as hospital beds, staffing resources, and funding. The magnitude and global scale of this crisis provide a compelling incentive to thoroughly analyse its effects. This study aims to identify best practices within the Portuguese national healthcare service, with the goal of improving preparedness for future crises and informing policy decisions. Using a Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD) approach, this research constructs composite indicators to assess the pandemic's impact on the Portuguese public hospitals. The study analyzes monthly data from 2017 to May 2022, highlighting critical trends and performance fluctuations during this period. The findings reveal that each COVID-19 wave led to a decline in hospital performance, with the first wave being the most severe due to a lack of preparedness. Furthermore, the pandemic worsened the disparities among examined hospitals. Pre-pandemic top performers in each group improved their performance and were more consistently recognized as benchmarks, with their average benchmark frequency increasing from 66.5% to 83.5%. These top entities demonstrated greater resilience and adaptability, further distancing themselves from underperforming hospitals, which saw declines in both performance scores and benchmark frequency, widening the performance gap. The superior performance of top entities can be attributed to pre-existing strategic tools and contextual factors that enabled them to withstand the pandemic's challenges more effectively. HIGHLIGHTS: • The pandemic aggravated the differences between the hospitals examined. • The top-performing entities further distanced themselves from the remaining entities after the pandemic • Entities considered benchmarks before the pandemic remained the same, and became even more consistent during the pandemic. • The top-performing entities achieved higher scores than their pre-pandemic performance levels. • Benchmarking models for composite indicators with diverse decision-making preferences, and treatment of imperfect knowledge of data.

Using Intervention Mapping to co-design a psychosocial service with youth experiencing mental illness

BACKGROUND

Descriptions of service development processes in the youth mental health sector are lacking. Further, youth with lived experience of mental illness are rarely involved in service design. Intervention Mapping (IM) is a well-established framework for program development, implementation and evaluation, yet its applicability in the youth mental health sector is unknown. This paper describes the use of IM methodology to co-design and develop a psychosocial service to support youth aged 10-25 years experiencing mental illness in Tasmania, Australia.

METHODS

The six steps of IM were followed: 1) needs assessment; 2) define program outcomes and objectives; 3) program design; 4) program production; 5) implementation planning; and 6) evaluation planning.

RESULTS

Key outputs of each IM step are described. The service was successfully co-designed with young people at the centre of each step. The service includes wrap-around psychosocial support from lived-experience peer-support workers; outreach; and flexible frequency/intensity/duration to achieve young people's psychosocial goals.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to document the use of IM in co-designing a psychosocial service with youth experiencing mental illness. IM may provide a valuable roadmap for the youth mental health sector in supporting collaborative service design, implementation and evaluation planning, and systematic documentation of service development.

Mental health and sociodemographic influences during COVID-19: Longitudinal findings from Iceland

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced numerous stressors and challenges that have had profound implications for mental health. This study examined the effects of the pandemic on mental health among Icelandic adults (n = 1766), using longitudinal survey data spanning three waves of data collection from 2019 to 2022. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress increased from the beginning of the pandemic to the second time point, approximately one year into the pandemic, coinciding with reductions in happiness and social support. By the third time point, mental health remained slightly poorer than pre-pandemic levels, even after all COVID-19-related restrictions had been lifted. Unlike some other countries, COVID-19 infections in Iceland did not rise significantly until after the summer of 2021. Overall, participants perceived that the pandemic most adversely affected their social relationships and mental health. Prolonged periods in quarantine were predictive of these perceptions, albeit effect sizes were small. During the pandemic, women and younger participants reported slightly poorer mental health, while social support predicted better mental health outcomes. These results show that large societal stressors can significantly impact the mental health of populations. While social support is a prominent predictor of better mental health, additional variables may be needed to explain these effects fully.

Digital Surveillance of Mental Health Care Services in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study of National e-Referral System Data

Background

Mental illness affects an estimated 25% of the global population, with treatment gaps persisting worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges, leading to a significant increase in mental health issues globally. In Saudi Arabia, the lifetime prevalence of mental disorders is estimated at 34.2%, yet 86.1% of those with a 12-month mental disorder report no service use. To address these challenges, digital health solutions, particularly electronic referral (e-referral) systems, have emerged as powerful tools to improve care coordination and access. Saudi Arabia has pioneered the nationwide Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre (SMARC), a centralized e-referral system using artificial intelligence and predictive analytics.

objectives

This study aims to analyze Saudi Arabia's novel nationwide e-referral system for mental health services, using SMARC platform data to examine referral patterns, and service accessibility. This study also aims to demonstrate how digital health technology can inform and improve mental health care delivery and policy making.

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study used secondary data from SMARC on 10,033 psychiatric e-referrals in Saudi Arabia during 2020-2021. Referrals were assessed by patient sociodemographic variables, geographic data, and e-referral characteristics including date, type, bed type, and reason for e-referral. Descriptive statistical analyses identified referral patterns, while regression modeling determined predictors of external referrals to other regions.

Results

Analysis of 10,033 psychiatric e-referrals revealed that 58.99% (n=5918) were for patients aged 18-44 years, 63.93% (n=6414) were for men, and 87.10% (n=8739) were for Saudi nationals. The Western Business Unit generated 45.17% (n=4532) of all e-referral requests. Emergency cases were the most common type of referral overall, followed by routine inpatient and routine outpatient department referrals. However, in the Northern Business Unit, routine inpatient referrals were most frequent. Two-thirds of requests were for ward beds, while critical beds were rarely requested. "Unavailable subspecialty" was the primary reason for referrals across all regions. The utilization of the mental health e-referral system varied across regions, with the Northern Border and Albaha regions showing the highest rates, while Madinah, Eastern, and Riyadh regions demonstrated lower use. Temporal analysis showed almost similar monthly patterns in 2020 and 2021. There was an overall increase in referrals in 2021 compared with 2020.

Conclusions

This pioneering study of mental health e-referrals in Saudi Arabia demonstrates how digital health transformation, particularly through an e-referral system, has significantly enhanced access to mental health services nationwide in Saudi Arabia. The success of this digital initiative demonstrates how digital health solutions can transform health care access, particularly in mental health services, offering a valuable model for other health care systems.

Unexpected effects of pandemic-related changes on mental health: Evidence from a nationwide survey in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Substantial evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected population mental health globally. However, most studies assumed a linear relationship where only negative pandemic-induced changes led to worse mental health outcomes, overlooking the complex relationship between COVID-19-related changes and mental health. This study examined how various types and magnitudes of pandemic-related changes relate to depression and suicidal thoughts in a large, nationwide adult population sample.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2021 Korean Community Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey of 229,213 adults. The study examined the association between mental health outcomes and three types of pandemic-related changes: daily life impact (scored 0-100), economic activities (employment and income changes), and health behaviors (physical activity, instant food consumption, alcohol consumption, and smoking). Complex sample multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess these associations, adjusting for sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

The relationship between pandemic-related changes and mental health showed non-linear patterns. Compared to those reporting moderate changes, individuals reporting either no change (depression: aOR 1.253, 95% CI 1.135-1.384; suicidal thoughts: aOR 1.355, 95% CI 1.236-1.486) or complete disruption (depression: aOR 1.895, 95% CI 1.667-2.155; suicidal thoughts: aOR 1.788, 95% CI 1.558-2.052) in daily life showed higher risks of poor mental health. Unexpectedly, positive changes such as improved working conditions (suicidal thoughts: aOR 1.419, 95% CI 1.200-1.677) and increased income (depression: aOR 1.304, 95% CI 1.139-1.493; suicidal thoughts: aOR 1.244, 95% CI 1.079-1.435) were also associated with adverse mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that both minimal and substantial changes in daily life, as well as both positive and negative changes in economic conditions and health behaviors, were associated with poor mental health outcomes during the pandemic. These findings suggest the need for comprehensive mental health interventions that consider various types and magnitudes of life changes during crisis situations.

Digitally transforming community mental healthcare: Real-world lessons from algorithmic workforce integration

Community-based high intensity services for people living with severe and enduring mental illnesses face critical workforce shortages and workflow efficiency challenges. The expectation to monitor complex, dynamic patient data from ever-expanding electronic health records leads to information overload, a significant factor contributing to worker burnout and attrition. An algorithmic workforce, defined as a suite of algorithm-driven processes, can work alongside health professionals assisting with oversight tasks and augmenting human expertise. This selective review summarises lessons learned from our five-year experience (2018-22) of algorithmic workforce implementation research in two community mental health services in Australia covering both rural and urban populations. We retrace our implementation journey to illustrate four foundational processes: (i) algorithm design (ii) proof-of-concept validation (iii) workflow integration and (iv) optimization. By examining our previous studies, we discuss insights gained regarding intended human-centricity of services, potential algorithm-human misalignments, and unintended workload and accountability consequences for clinicians and organizations.

Healthcare costs associated with receipt of effective mental healthcare coverage in individuals with moderate or severe symptoms of anxiety and depression

BACKGROUND

Effective mental healthcare coverage (EMHC) is an important health system performance indicator of a population's mental healthcare needs. This study aims to assess the factors and healthcare costs associated with the receipt of EMHC for anxiety and depression.

METHODS

This study draws on data from participants from Alberta's Tomorrow Project with moderate or severe symptoms of anxiety and depression during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) with available medico-administrative and complete data [n = 720]. EMHC was assessed during the eighteen months as of March 1, 2020, and defined as adequate pharmacotherapy (i.e., antidepressant dispensed, with ≥ 80% proportion of days covered and 4 follow-up medical visits) and/or adequate psychotherapy (≥ 8 physician consultations for psychotherapy) depending on the severity of symptoms. Logistic regression analysis was used to study EMHC as a function of study variables. Regressions with augmented inverse probability weighting were used to estimate the total healthcare costs attributable to receipt of EMHC during the first 18-month period of the pandemic, controlling for confounders. Mean adjusted differences with 95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.

RESULTS

The proportion receiving EMHC was 26.7%. Individuals with worse self-rated mental health after the pandemic than before were less likely to receive EMHC. Those with a lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety were more likely to receive EMHC. The overall mean adjusted total healthcare costs attributable to receipt of EMHC during the pandemic was $2601 [ - $247, $5694]. The mean adjusted outpatient costs attributable to EMHC was significantly higher and reached $1613 [$873, $2577].

CONCLUSION

The study's findings highlight the existence of health inequalities and potential unmet mental health needs in individuals with worsening mental health during the pandemic. The receipt of EMHC during the pandemic was not significantly associated with increased total healthcare costs. These findings underscore the need for mental health policies that are aimed at improving timely access to EMHC to address population unmet mental health service needs.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to mental health services and socioeconomic inequalities in Italy

Objective

Comprehensive evidence on the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the use of mental health services is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the access to mental health services in Italy and to assess the socioeconomic and citizenship inequalities for the same outcome.

Methods

A population-based longitudinal open cohort of residents aged ≥ 10 years was established in three large centers covering about 6 million beneficiaries (nearly 10% of the entire population) of the Italian National Health Service (NHS) from 01 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the first access to one of the following mental health care services (FAMHS): outpatient facilities, hospital discharges, psychiatric drug prescriptions, emergency room admissions, residential and day care facilities, co-pay exemptions. To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on FAMHS, the temporal trend of FAMHS rates was investigated through an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of their monthly rates. Crude incidence rates per 100,000 person days with 95%CI were calculated comparing the two time periods (pre- and post-COVID-19) by sex, age group, deprivation index (as a proxy of socioeconomic status), and citizenship. Finally, adjusted rates and rates ratios with 95%CI were estimated via ITS analysis using a step-change model.

Results

ITS analysis for the trend of FAMHS rates showed a significant drop at the outbreak of the pandemic in crude rates and after adjusting for age, sex, deprivation level, and citizenship (RR=0.83 p<0.001). After the outbreak of COVID-19, the trend increased, with rates returning to pre-pandemic levels. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) showed a higher probability of having a FAMHS for females, Italians, and for residents in the most deprived areas. A gradient of higher rates with the increase in age was observed. Greater COVID-19 impact was found on the most deprived areas of residence, with a reduction in IRRs from pre- to post-COVID-19 significantly stronger.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic increased socioeconomic inequalities in mental health in Italy. Population-based cohorts are the most powerful instrument to monitor inequalities in access to mental health services and to provide timely information to drive policy.

Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic).

Objective

To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social outcomes, and clinical outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This quasi-experimental, nonrandomized trial was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare both treatment models at the 12-month follow-up using standardized instruments and routine hospital data. All patients were screened until the target sample size was reached, based on these criteria: stable residence with privacy for sessions, no child welfare risk, primary diagnosis within International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes F0X to F6X, residence in the catchment area, no commitment order, no acute suicidality or severe aggression requiring hospitalization, capacity to consent, not participating in other interventional studies, sufficient German language skills, no substantial cognitive deficits or intellectual impairment, and no more than 7 days in IHT or IT before recruitment. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2023.

Intervention

IHT provided daily acute psychiatric treatment at home, while IT was psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual. The mean treatment duration of the index treatment was 37.2 days for IHT and 28.2 days for IT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The inpatient readmission rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were combined readmission rate, total inpatient days, job integration, quality of life, psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, and recovery.

Results

Of 1396 individuals, 200 patients receiving IHT and 200 patients receiving IT were included (264 female [65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.45 [15.83] years [range, 18-88 years]). Baseline sociodemographic and psychometric characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the IHT group had lower inpatient readmission rate (IHT vs IT: 31.12% vs 49.74% IT; mean difference, 18% [95% CI, 9%-28%; P < .001), combined readmission rate (mean difference, 13% [95% CI, 4%-24%; P < .001), and fewer inpatient days (mean difference, 6.82 days; P < .001) than the IT group.

Conclusions and Relevance

This nonrandomized clinical trial found that patients receiving IHT had a lower likelihood of utilizing hospital-based psychiatric services and spent fewer inpatient days, suggesting that IHT is a viable alternative to IT.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04745507.

An Overview of Health-Promoting Programs and Healthy Lifestyles for Adolescents and Young People: A Scoping Review

The health of children, adolescents, and young adults is a primary global concern. In 2021, there were 2.1 million deaths among children and adolescents. Injuries, violence, communicable diseases, nutritional deficiencies, substance use, non-communicable diseases, and mental health disorders are among the leading causes of death in this age group. Background/objectives: This scoping review aims to identify and describe health promotion and healthy lifestyle programs developed worldwide targeting adolescents and young adults. Methods: A total of 106 programs were included, of which 8 were selected through scientific databases and 98 through other research methods (e.g., government websites and other online sources). Results: The results show that Europe, North America, New Zealand, and the United States of America are the continents and countries with the highest number of programs. Most programs originated before 2020 and are aimed at children, adolescents, and young adults. Mental health, substance and non-substance dependencies, and sexual and reproductive health were the most frequent areas among the available youth programs. Most programs do not mention evaluating or monitoring the services provided. Conclusions: This work allows for a deeper understanding of the programs available for adolescents and young adults, providing an overview of their characteristics. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of increasing the number of available programs, especially in countries with higher morbidity and mortality rates among the young population. The programs must be based on population studies to better meet their needs. Lastly, programs should become sustainable and integrated into national public policies, accompanied by ongoing training, supervision, and intervision of professionals working in these contexts.

Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial neural networks trained on extensive datasets to accurately understand and generate natural language. While they have received much attention and demonstrated potential in digital health, their application in mental health, particularly in clinical settings, has generated considerable debate.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to critically assess the use of LLMs in mental health, specifically focusing on their applicability and efficacy in early screening, digital interventions, and clinical settings. By systematically collating and assessing the evidence from current studies, our work analyzes models, methodologies, data sources, and outcomes, thereby highlighting the potential of LLMs in mental health, the challenges they present, and the prospects for their clinical use.

METHODS

Adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, this review searched 5 open-access databases: MEDLINE (accessed by PubMed), IEEE Xplore, Scopus, JMIR, and ACM Digital Library. Keywords used were (mental health OR mental illness OR mental disorder OR psychiatry) AND (large language models). This study included articles published between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2024, and excluded articles published in languages other than English.

RESULTS

In total, 40 articles were evaluated, including 15 (38%) articles on mental health conditions and suicidal ideation detection through text analysis, 7 (18%) on the use of LLMs as mental health conversational agents, and 18 (45%) on other applications and evaluations of LLMs in mental health. LLMs show good effectiveness in detecting mental health issues and providing accessible, destigmatized eHealth services. However, assessments also indicate that the current risks associated with clinical use might surpass their benefits. These risks include inconsistencies in generated text; the production of hallucinations; and the absence of a comprehensive, benchmarked ethical framework.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review examines the clinical applications of LLMs in mental health, highlighting their potential and inherent risks. The study identifies several issues: the lack of multilingual datasets annotated by experts, concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of generated content, challenges in interpretability due to the "black box" nature of LLMs, and ongoing ethical dilemmas. These ethical concerns include the absence of a clear, benchmarked ethical framework; data privacy issues; and the potential for overreliance on LLMs by both physicians and patients, which could compromise traditional medical practices. As a result, LLMs should not be considered substitutes for professional mental health services. However, the rapid development of LLMs underscores their potential as valuable clinical aids, emphasizing the need for continued research and development in this area.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024508617; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=508617.

The impact of the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on referral patterns and therapeutic service provision for children and young people's psychosocial distress in a Low-or Middle-Income Country: A service evaluation of routinely collected data from a non-government organisation operating in schools in the Western Cape, South Africa

INTRODUCTION

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including South Africa, there is a paucity of psychosocial support services. Therefore, services are often provided in schools by non-government organisations like Community Keepers (CK). The COVID-19 pandemic and resultant restrictions meant that children and young people's (CYP) lives changed, negatively affecting their mental health. Further, organisations like CK had to change their working processes.

METHOD

This project compared routinely collected data from CK from 2019 (pre-pandemic) to 2020 (pandemic) to describe the changes that occurred in referral patterns to, and service provision by, CK.

RESULTS

Both pre-pandemic and during the pandemic, most referrals of CYP were for emotional/psychological support and behavioural difficulties. In 2020, referrals for general guidance increased, whilst referrals for peer group issues and sexuality decreased. Further, CK completed more brief check-ins, provided wellbeing workshops to increased numbers of teachers, parents and CYP, and had more consultation sessions with other service providers during the pandemic.

DISCUSSION

Routinely collected data from this community-based service in a LMIC context shows differences in the way that support was provided, and to whom, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical implications, including the importance of increasing access to psychosocial support via technology, are included.

Qualitative Evaluation of the Impact of a School Mental Health Literacy Curriculum on Student-Teacher Relationships

Mental health literacy (MHL) programs, which aim to improve knowledge, reduce stigma and promote help-seeking behavior, are a promising approach to meeting the growing mental and behavioral health needs of youth. This study aimed to understand the relational impacts of a MHL curriculum on students and teachers. A MHL curriculum was delivered in middle school classrooms across 11 schools in two diverse school districts in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions. Fifteen teachers and counselors who delivered the MHL curriculum participated in focus groups to describe their experiences using the curriculum and perceptions of its impact. Qualitative focus group data were analyzed via team-based inductive thematic analysis following a grounded theory approach. Findings indicate that educators perceived the universal school MHL program to have a positive impact on relationships amongst students and between students and teachers. Participants reported that the MHL curriculum helped to open conversations about mental health and related topics by developing common language and providing an opportunity to model vulnerability. Having these conversations improved classroom rapport and helped teachers develop deeper connections with students. As a result, teachers and students achieved greater empathy and students advocated more for themselves and their peers. Implications for integrating MHL programs into multi-tiered frameworks in schools to expand access to mental health supports are discussed.

Design of Digital Mental Health Platforms for Family Member Cocompletion: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic placed an additional mental health burden on individuals and families, resulting in widespread service access problems. Digital mental health interventions suggest promise for improved accessibility. Recent reviews have shown emerging evidence for individual use and early evidence for multiusers. However, attrition rates remain high for digital mental health interventions, and additional complexities exist when engaging multiple family members together.

OBJECTIVE

As such, this scoping review aims to detail the reported evidence for digital mental health interventions designed for family use with a focus on the build and design characteristics that promote accessibility and engagement and enable cocompletion by families.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was conducted for articles published in the English language from January 2002 to March 2024. Eligible records included empirical studies of digital platforms containing some elements designed for cocompletion by related people as well as some components intended to be completed without therapist engagement. Platforms were included in cases in which clinical evidence had been documented.

RESULTS

Of the 9527 papers reviewed, 85 (0.89%) met the eligibility criteria. A total of 24 unique platforms designed for co-use by related parties were identified. Relationships between participants included couples, parent-child dyads, family caregiver-care recipient dyads, and families. Common platform features included the delivery of content via structured interventions with no to minimal tailoring or personalization offered. Some interventions provided live contact with therapists. User engagement indicators and findings varied and included user experience, satisfaction, completion rates, and feasibility. Our findings are more remarkable for what was absent in the literature than what was present. Contrary to expectations, few studies reported any design and build characteristics that enabled coparticipation. No studies reported on platform features for enabling cocompletion or considerations for ensuring individual privacy and safety. None examined platform build or design characteristics as moderators of intervention effect, and none offered a formative evaluation of the platform itself.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early era of digital mental health platform design, this novel review demonstrates a striking absence of information about design elements associated with the successful engagement of multiple related users in any aspect of a therapeutic process. There remains a large gap in the literature detailing and evaluating platform design, highlighting a significant opportunity for future cross-disciplinary research. This review details the incentive for undertaking such research; suggests design considerations when building digital mental health platforms for use by families; and offers recommendations for future development, including platform co-design and formative evaluation.

Prevalence, Correlates, and Comorbidities Among Young Adults Who Screened Positive for ADHD in South Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the prevalence, associated factors, and psychiatric comorbidities of adult ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing nationally representative data.

METHODS

Among the 5,511 respondents of the 2021 National Mental Health Survey, South Korea, 2,764 (18-49 years) were selected. The Korean versions of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and Structured Clinical Interview for Internet Gaming Disorder were used as diagnostic assessments.

RESULTS

The 6-month prevalence of positive screens for adult ADHD was 3.1%. In individuals aged 18 to 29 years exhibiting adult ADHD symptoms, high prevalence rates of alcohol use, depression, and Internet gaming disorders were observed in the last 12 months. Adults who screened positive for ADHD reported significantly lower life satisfaction and resilience, and higher loneliness and social isolation (vs. non-ADHD group).

CONCLUSION

Adult ADHD symptoms significantly influenced mental well-being, highlighting the need for an appropriate treatment/prevention system, particularly for individuals aged 18 to 29 years.

Patient Satisfaction with Psychological Treatment on a Voluntary Inpatient Psychiatric Unit

Despite the empirical literature suggesting the benefits of providing patient support and psychotherapy, research examining patient satisfaction with psychological services integrated within inpatient psychiatric treatment settings remains scarce. A sample of 122 adults within a voluntary inpatient psychiatric unit, who were receiving psychological services completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Overall, participants reported high levels of satisfaction with psychological services and perceived them as helpful to their overall care. These results remained consistent when exploratorily examining satisfaction and helpfulness prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings suggest the importance of integrating psychologists within inpatient psychiatric treatment settings. Future research may investigate the influence of psychological services on patient outcomes and how psychologists are perceived by other treatment team members.

Digital and Hybrid Pediatric and Youth Mental Health Program Implementation Challenges During the Pandemic: Literature Review With a Knowledge Translation and Theoretical Lens Analysis

BACKGROUND

The pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for child and youth mental health. There was a rise in depression, anxiety, and symptoms of suicidal ideation.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this knowledge synthesis were to gain a deeper understanding of what types of mental health knowledge translation (KT) programs, mental health first aid training, and positive psychology interventions were developed and evaluated for youth mental health.

METHODS

We undertook a literature review of PubMed and MEDLINE for relevant studies on youth mental health including digital and hybrid programs undertaken during the pandemic (2020-2022).

RESULTS

A total of 60 studies were included in this review. A few KT programs were identified that engaged with a wide range of stakeholders during the pandemic, and a few were informed by KT theories. Key challenges during the implementation of mental health programs for youth included lack of access to technology and privacy concerns. Hybrid web-based and face-to-face KT and mental health care were recommended. Providers required adequate training in using telehealth and space.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an opportunity to reduce the barriers to implementing tele-mental health in youth by providing adequate technological access, Wi-Fi and stationary internet connectivity, and privacy protection. Staff gained new knowledge and training from the pandemic experience of using telehealth, which will serve as a useful foundation for the future. Future research should aim to maximize the benefits of hybrid models of tele-mental health and face-to-face sessions while working on minimizing the potential barriers that were identified. In addition, future programs could consider combining mental health first aid training with hybrid digital and face-to-face mental health program delivery along with mindfulness and resilience building in a unified model of care, knowledge dissemination, and implementation.

Telehealth in community mental health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru: A qualitative study with key stakeholders

Aim

To describe the perceptions and experiences of key stakeholders to understand the use of telehealth in community mental health centers (CMHCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lima and Callao, Peru.

Methods

A qualitative study was carried out in four CMHCs in Lima and Callao, Peru. Forty-nine individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2021 and March 2022, considering CMHCs' users and their relatives, health and administrative workers, directors, as well as local and national policymakers. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Regarding the transition from in-person care to telehealth, CMHCs' directors and workers identified some of the regulations issued by the Government during the pandemic, such as the continuity of care through telehealth, especially for pregnant women and for people with comorbidities related to COVID-19. Regarding benefits, workers and users indicated that it allowed better communication, such as constant follow-ups. Directors and workers recognized that Google Drive facilitated access to user information, since they did not have an electronic medical record. Additionally, workers said they used social media to share educational information on mental health, and explained that some new users began their treatment this way. Regarding difficulties, participants reported a lack of devices and poor internet connection in CMHCs. Users mentioned that scheduling an appointment was difficult because the phone lines were usually saturated, and they could not find available appointments.

Conclusion

Although the pandemic forced an immediate and disruptive change towards telehealth, CMHCs were able to adapt most of their services. This study reports the adaptations made by CMHCs to move from in-person to remote care, identifying the benefits and challenges faced, information that can be used for the nationwide implementation of telehealth in CMHCs. We recommend ensuring technological equipment and internet connection and adapt the telehealth system to make it responsive to the routine practices of CMHCs.

Adult psychiatric inpatient admissions and length of stay before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large urban hospital setting in Vancouver, British Columbia

Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic individuals with mental illnesses faced challenges accessing psychiatric care. Our study aimed to describe patient characteristics and compare admissions and length of stay (LOS) for psychiatric-related hospitalizations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using health administrative data comparing individuals with an acute psychiatric admission between two time periods: 1st March 2019 to 31st December 2019 (pre-COVID) and 1st March 2020 to 31st December 2020 (during-COVID). Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to model the association between most responsible diagnosis type and the two-time periods to hospital LOS, reporting the Rate Ratio (RR) as the measure of effect.

Results

The cohort comprised 939 individuals who were predominately male (60.3%) with a severe mental illness (schizophrenia or mood-affective disorder) (72.7%) and a median age of 38 (IQR: 28.0, 52.0) years. In the multivariable analysis, anxiety disorders (RR: 0.63, CI: 0.4, 0.99) and personality disorders (RR: 0.52, CI: 0.32, 0.85) were significantly associated with a shorter LOS when compared to individuals without those disorders. Additionally, when compared to hospital admissions for non-substance related disorders the LOS for patients with substance-related disorders were significantly shorter during the COVID period (RR: 0.45, CI: 0.30, 0.67) and pre-COVID period (RR: 0.31, CI: 0.21, 0.46).

Conclusions

We observed a significant difference in the type and length of admissions for various psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 period. These findings can support systems of care in adapting to utilization changes during pandemics or other global health events.

Attitudes towards seeking psychological help among community dwelling older adults enrolled in primary care in Chile

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are common mental disorders among older adults, but they are frequently underdiagnosed. Attitudes towards seeking professional mental health care is one of the barriers to access to treatment. This study was aimed at assessing the attitudes towards seeking psychological help among older adults who are enrolled in primary care in Chile, and to determine the associated factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 233 primary care users aged 65 or more years. The Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Psychological Help was used. Reliability and factor analysis of this scale were carried out. The average scores of the scale and factors were calculated and compared, by selected variables. Multivariate linear regression was estimated to determine factors associated with attitudes towards seeking psychological help.

RESULTS

Three factors were identified in the attitudes towards seeking psychological help: confidence in psychologists, coping alone with emotional problems, and predisposition to seek psychological help. On average, participants had a favorable attitude towards seeking psychological help, compared with previous research. Lower level of education, and risk of social isolation were inversely associated with these attitudes.

CONCLUSION

Strategies to improve mental health literacy and social connection among older adults, could have an impact on factors that mediate the access to mental health care, such as attitudes towards seeking psychological help, among people who have a lower level of education or are at risk of social isolation.

Changes in the Clinical Practice of Mental Health Service Providers Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Questionnaire Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the practices of most mental health providers and resulted in a rapid transition to providing telemental health services, changes that were likely related to stay-at-home policies as well as increased need for services.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether these changes to practice have been sustained over time throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and whether there are differences among mental health provider type and setting. We hypothesized that there would be an increase in the number of patients seen in person after the initial surge of the pandemic in spring 2020 and subsequent discontinuation of stay-at-home policies, though with continued implementation of telemental health services across settings.

METHODS

This study surveyed 235 of the 903 mental health providers who responded to a survey in spring 2020 (Time point 1) and at a 1-year follow-up in spring 2021 (Time point 2). Differences in practice adjustments, factors related to telemental health, and number of patients seen were examined across provider type (social worker, psychologist, neuropsychologist) and setting (academic medical center [AMC], community mental health, private practice, and Veterans Affairs hospital).

RESULTS

From Time point 1 to Time point 2, there was a small but significant increase in the overall number of providers who were implementing telehealth (191/235, 81% to 204/235, 87%, P=.01) and there was a significant decline in canceled or rescheduled appointments (25%-50% in 2020 to 3%-7% in 2021, P<.001). Psychologists and providers working at AMCs reported decreased difficulty with telehealth implementation (P<.001), and providers working at AMCs and in private practice settings indicated they were more likely to continue telehealth services beyond spring 2021 (P<.001). The percent of time working remotely decreased overall (78% to 59%, P<.001), which was most notable among neuropsychologists and providers working at an AMC. There was an overall increase in the average number of patients seen in person per week compared with earlier in the pandemic (mean 4.3 to 8.7, P<.001), with no change in the number of patients seen via telehealth (mean 9.7 to 9.9, P=.66).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the rapid transition to telemental health at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020 was sustained over the next year, despite an overall increase in the number of patients seen in person. Although more providers reported returning to working on-site, over 50% of providers continued to use a hybrid model, and many providers reported they would be more likely to continue telemental health beyond spring 2021. This suggests the continued importance and reliance on telemental health services beyond the acute pandemic phase and has implications for future policies regulating the availability of telemental health services to patients.

A longitudinal study of risk and protective factors for symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused multiple stressors that may lead to symptoms of adjustment disorder.Objective: We longitudinally examined relationships between risk and protective factors, pandemic-related stressors and symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether these relationships differed by the time of assessment.Method: The European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) ADJUST Study included N = 15,169 participants aged 18 years and above. Participants from 11 European countries were recruited and screened three times at 6-month intervals from June 2020 to January 2022. Associations between risk and protective factors (e.g. gender), stressors (e.g. fear of infection), and symptoms of adjustment disorder (AjD, ADNM-8) and their interaction with time of assessment were examined using mixed linear regression.Results: The following predictors were significantly associated with higher AjD symptom levels: female or diverse gender; older age; pandemic-related news consumption >30 min a day; a current or previous mental health disorder; trauma exposure before or during the pandemic; a good, satisfactory or poor health status (vs. very good); burden related to governmental crisis management and communication; fear of infection; restricted social contact; work-related problems; restricted activity; and difficult housing conditions. The following predictors were associated with lower AjD levels: self-employment or retirement; working in healthcare; and face-to-face contact ≥ once a week with loved ones or friends. The effects of the following predictors on AjD symptoms differed by the time of assessment in the course of the pandemic: a current or previous mental disorder; burden related to governmental crisis management; income reduction; and a current trauma exposure.Conclusions: We identified risk factors and stressors predicting AjD symptom levels at different stages of the pandemic. For some predictors, the effects on mental health may change at different stages of a pandemic.

Acceptability and experience of a smartphone symptom monitoring app for people with psychosis in China (YouXin): a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Access to high-quality mental healthcare remains challenging for people with psychosis globally, including China. Smartphone-based symptom monitoring has the potential to support scalable mental healthcare. However, no such tool, until now, has been developed and evaluated for people with psychosis in China. This study investigated the acceptability and the experience of using a symptom self-monitoring smartphone app (YouXin) specifically developed for people with psychosis in China.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants with psychosis to explore the acceptability of YouXin. Participants were recruited from the non-randomised feasibility study that tested the validity, feasibility, acceptability and safety of the YouXin app. Data analysis was guided by the theoretical framework of acceptability.

RESULTS

Most participants felt the app was acceptable and easy to use, and no unbearable burdens or opportunity costs were reported. Participants found completing the self-monitoring app rewarding and experienced a sense of achievement. Privacy and data security were not major concerns for participants, largely due to trust in their treating hospital around data protection. Participants found the app easy to use and attributed this to the training provided at the beginning of the study. A few participants said they had built some form of relationship with the app and would miss the app when the study finished.

CONCLUSIONS

The YouXin app is acceptable for symptom self-monitoring in people with experience of psychosis in China. Participants gained greater insights about their symptoms by using the YouXin app. As we only collected retrospective acceptability in this study, future studies are warranted to assess hypothetical acceptability before the commencement of study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of implementation.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health visits in primary care: an interrupted time series analysis from nine INTRePID countries

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted mental health disorders, affecting both individuals with pre-existing conditions and those with no prior history. However, there is limited evidence regarding the pandemic's impact on mental health visits to primary care physicians. The International Consortium of Primary Care Big Data Researchers (INTRePID) explored primary care visit trends related to mental health conditions in Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Norway, Peru, Singapore, Sweden, and the USA.

Methods

We conducted an interrupted time series analysis in nine countries to examine changes in rates of monthly mental health visits to primary care settings from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021. Sub-group analysis considered service type (in-person/virtual) and six categories of mental health conditions (anxiety/depression, bipolar/schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders, sleep disorders, dementia, ADHD/eating disorders, and substance use disorder).

Findings

Mental health visit rates increased after the onset of the pandemic in most countries. In Argentina, Canada, China, Norway, Peru, and Singapore, this increase was immediate ranged from an incidence rate ratio of 1·118 [95% CI 1.053-1.187] to 2.240 [95% CI 2.057-2.439] when comparing the first month of pandemic with the pre-pandemic trend. Increases in the following months varied across countries. Anxiety/depression was the leading reason for mental health visits in most countries. Virtual visits were reported in Australia, Canada, Norway, Peru, Sweden, and the USA, accounting for up to 40% of the total mental health visits.

Interpretation

Findings suggest an overall increase in mental health visits, driven largely by anxiety/depression. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the studied countries adopted virtual care in particular for mental health visits. Primary care plays a crucial role in addressing mental ill-health in times of crisis.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant #173094 and the Rathlyn Foundation Primary Care EMR Research and Discovery Fund.

Would've, could've, should've: a cross-sectional investigation of whether and how healthcare staff's working conditions and mental health symptoms have changed throughout 3 pandemic years

OBJECTIVES

Mental health and well-being of healthcare staff were majorly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Little attention has been devoted to the role employers could choose to play in mitigating long-term negative consequences and how effective organisational measures taken were perceived by the individual healthcare workers. This study aims to investigate (1) whether and how healthcare professionals' mental health has changed from the second to the third pandemic year, (2) whether differences between professional groups (physicians, nurses, paramedics) identified in previous studies persisted and (3) how job demands and resources, for example, work culture and employers' measures, impacted this situation.

DESIGN

The study employs an observational, cross-sectional design, using an online survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was conducted online from mid-June to mid-August 2022 among healthcare staff in state-run and private healthcare facilities, such as doctor's practices, hospitals and paramedic organisations, in Germany and Austria (n=421).

OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured psychological strain using an ICD-10-based symptom checklist, as well as subjective strain and importance of stressors using self-report questions. The ICD-10 was the 10th version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, a widely used standardized diagnostic manual.

RESULTS

Psychological strain stayed relatively consistent, with nursing staff suffering the most. While the job demands participants felt most affected by were structural issues (eg, staff shortages), employers were far more likely to be perceived as taking action against pandemic-specific job demands (eg, lack of protective gear). Psychological strain was lowest when staff perceived employers' actions as effective. Only 60% of those with severe enough symptoms to require psychological help had intentions of seeking such help, which is in line with past studies. This help-seeking hesitancy was also dependent on different facets of perceived work culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare staff and nursing staff in particular continue to suffer in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while employers were perceived as taking action against pandemic-specific job demands, pre-existing job demands causing stress and psychological strain for staff have remained uncombatted.

First-contact patients with a community mental health service in rural Greece: A 3-year prospective study of treatment attendance and its co-relations

BACKGROUND

Treatment continuation is essential for the optimal management of patients with mental disorders in the community, but treatment and outcome are often undermined by the high rates of service disengagement and treatment non-adherence across all psychiatric diagnoses. The phenomenon may be even more relevant in rural settings.

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to explore attendance to treatment in first-contact patients in a community-based treatment setting in rural Greece and to explore the associations of treatment attendance with demographic and clinical factors.

METHOD

Data were collected prospectively over a 3-year period, with 1-year follow-up interval. All first-contact cases with the Mobile Mental Health Unit of the prefectures of Ioannina and Thesprotia (MMHU I-T), Northwest Greece were considered, but only clinical cases were processed.

RESULTS

The sample size consisted of 446 patients, with a mean age 65.4 ± 18.8 years. The rate of 12-month attendance to mental health treatment was 13.5% (60 out of 446 patients). Treatment attendance was found to be correlated with younger age, the diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, and patients' referral by other psychiatric services. First examination over the year 2019 had been significantly inversely associated with treatment engagement.

CONCLUSION

Rates of subsequent attendance after initial assessment in a rural community mental healthcare setting were rather low in the present study. Several variables that have been previously associated with service engagement were found to be related in this study too, whereas other were not. Research on treatment engagement in rural treatment settings should be ongoing to reveal all associated factors.

Clinical Outcome in Persons with Severe Mental Disorders Attending a Mental Health Day Center during the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Studies assessing the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on populations highlight the emergence of mental health difficulties, especially if a mental health disorder is already present. Patients with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) may be even more vulnerable to the psychosocial effects of the pandemic. However, little is known regarding the possible impact of the pandemic on SMI patients supported by community-based mental health day centers.

METHODS

A two-year prospective study comprising 29 individuals with SMI was conducted by the Skitali Mental Health Day Center in Ioannina, Northwest Greece. The described group of examined patients consisted mainly of psychotic patients (65.5%). Patients were assessed using the Health of Nations Outcome Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning scale, and scores prior to and after the onset of the pandemic were compared.

RESULTS

The results indicated that participants did not present any significant decline in their overall clinical status during the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding is relevant because previous research has shown that the pandemic may negatively impact adherence to treatment and service attendance and that the symptomatology of patients with SMIs may further deteriorate. It is suggested that the operation of mental health day centers during collective stressful events should be preserved, but further research is needed to evaluate their role in maintaining continuity of care during such events.

Risk assessment of psychiatric complications in infectious diseases: CALCulation of prognostic indices on example of COVID-19

Introduction

Factors such as coronavirus neurotropism, which is associated with a massive increase in pro-inflammatory molecules and neuroglial reactivity, along with experiences of intensive therapy wards, fears of pandemic, and social restrictions, are pointed out to contribute to the occurrence of neuropsychiatric conditions.

Aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of COVID-19 inflammation-related indices as potential markers predicting psychiatric complications in COVID-19.

Methods

A total of 177 individuals were examined, with 117 patients from a temporary infectious disease ward hospitalized due to COVID-19 forming the experimental group and 60 patients from the outpatient department showing signs of acute respiratory viral infection comprising the validation group. The PLR index (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) and the CALC index (comorbidity + age + lymphocyte + C-reactive protein) were calculated. Present State Examination 10, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess psychopathology in the sample. Regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, establishment of cutoff values for the COVID-19 prognosis indices, contingency tables, and comparison of means were used.

Results

The presence of multiple concurrent groups of psychopathological symptoms in the experimental group was associated (R² = 0.28, F = 5.63, p < 0.001) with a decrease in the PLR index and a simultaneous increase in CALC. The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the cutoff value of PLR was 0.384 (unsatisfactory). For CALC, the cutoff value associated with an increased risk of more psychopathological domains was seven points (sensitivity = 79.0%, specificity = 69.4%, AUC = 0.719). Those with CALC > 7 were more likely to have disturbances in orientation (χ² = 13.6; p < 0.001), thinking (χ² = 7.07; p = 0.008), planning ability (χ² = 3.91; p = 0.048). In the validation group, an association (R²McF = 0.0775; p = 0.041) between CALC values exceeding seven points and the concurrent presence of pronounced anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairments was demonstrated (OR = 1.52; p = 0.038; AUC = 0.66).

Discussion

In patients with COVID-19, the CALC index may be used for the risk assessment of primary developed mental disturbances in the context of the underlying disease with a diagnostic threshold of seven points.

Factors associated with mental health service use during the pandemic: Initiation and barriers

BACKGROUND

Scarce are the studies focusing on initiation of new mental health service use (MHSU) and distinguishing individuals who have sought services but have been unsuccessful in accessing these.

AIMS

Assessing the factors associated with initiating new MHSU as compared to no MHSU due to self-reported no need, no MHSU due to health system and personal barriers and MHSU using resources already in place.

METHODS

The sample included participants (n = 16,435) in the five established regional cohorts of the Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow's Health (CanPath) who responded to the CanPath COVID-19 health surveys (May-December 2020 and January-June 2021). Multinomial regression analyses were carried out to study MHSU since the pandemic (March 2020) as a function of predisposing, enabling and need factors. Analyses were carried out in the overall sample and restricted to those with moderate and severe symptoms (MSS) of depression and/or anxiety (n = 2,237).

RESULTS

In individuals with MSS of depression and/or anxiety, 14.4% reported initiating new MHSU, 22.0% had no MHSU due to barriers and personal reasons and 36.7% had no MHSU due to self-reported no need. Age, living alone, lower income, a decrease in income during the pandemic and health professional status were associated with MHSU. Younger adults were more likely to initiate MHSU during the pandemic than older adults who reported not being comfortable to seek mental health care or self-reported no need. Individuals living alone and with lower income were more likely to report not being able to find an appointment for mental health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness campaigns focusing on older adults that explain the importance of seeking treatment is needed, as well as sensitising health professionals as to the importance of informing and aiding individuals at risk of social isolation and lower socio-economic status as to available mental health resources and facilitating access to care.

Exploring US Nursing Leadership During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Response: A Qualitative Descriptive Study to Guide Leadership Development for Future Emergent Situations

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the experiences of nurse leaders during the 1st wave of the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance understanding in preparation for future disasters.

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to the healthcare system globally. Nurse leaders play an essential part and have a significant impact on the efficacy of disaster management in future emergent situations.

METHODS

The parent study conducted interviews with 100 nurses in the United States across specialty areas. This article presents a subgroup analysis of interview data from 13 self-identified nurse leaders. The research team used qualitative descriptive methodology and thematic analysis to identify patterns within the data.

RESULTS

Five themes were identified for effective nurse leadership during an emerging pandemic: 1) responsiveness; 2) anticipating needs; 3) care innovations; 4) collaboration; and 5) adaptability.

CONCLUSION

Supporting nurse leaders to exhibit effective leadership during periods of crisis is imperative to increase preparedness for future health events, protect population health, and create a pipeline of future nursing leadership. Involving nursing in developing and reforming policy is integral.

How COVID-19 has changed the utilization of different health care services in Poland

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care systems in many ways, including access to and the use of non-COVID services. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the utilization of different public health care services in Poland.

METHODS

The aggregated data on health care users and provided services for the years 2015/2016-2021 were used to analyse the changes in health care utilization during the pandemic and deviations from pre-pandemic utilization trends. Quantitative analysis was complemented with qualitative descriptions of the changes in principles of health care provision during the pandemic.

RESULTS

The results show a considerable drop in the provision of most health care services in 2020 that in some cases disturbed pre-pandemic utilization trends and was not made up for in 2021. The most significant decrease has been observed in the field of preventive and public health services, as well as rehabilitation. The provision of these services was put on hold during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The accumulated COVID-19-related "health debt" urgently calls for government actions to strengthen disease prevention and health promotion in Poland.

Addressing mental health need after COVID-19: a systematic review of remote EMDR therapy studies as an emerging option

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a substantial rise in mental health challenges, prompting a need for accessible and effective therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on remote Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy delivered in response to the increased need.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including PsychINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies assessing the efficacy of EMDR therapy administered online.

Results

Sixteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected, involving 1,231 participants across various age groups. Studies covered remote individual and group EMDR sessions and self-administered computerized protocols. Findings indicate promising outcomes in reducing PTSD symptoms, anxiety, and depression.

Discussion

The analysis of the selected studies demonstrates the feasibility and potential efficacy of online EMDR as an accessible therapeutic option for addressing mental health difficulties, particularly during times of limited in-person interaction. However, the studies revealed limitations such as small sample sizes, absence of control groups, and reliance on self-reported measures.Systematic review registration: The present review was registered on "The International Database to Register Your Systematic Reviews" (INPLASY) with the registration number 2023120018 and DOI number 10.37766/inplasy2023.2.0068.

Provision of community mental health care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A time series analysis in Peru

BACKGROUND

A consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic was that the provision of mental health services was reduced in several countries around the world, while the demand for mental health services increased.

AIMS

Our study aims to determine any variation in the number of users served, health appointments, and care activities conducted at 58 Peruvian community mental health centers (CMHCs) between March 2019 and October 2021.

METHODS

Our study used an observational design and analyzed information from the care provided in CMHCs. We evaluate the number of users served, health appointments, and care activities performed per month. The main statistical analysis used segmented regression with Newey-West standard errors, taking into account each month of the evaluation.

RESULTS

We had 988,456 unique users during the period evaluated. Regarding diagnoses, 7.4% (n = 72,818) had a severe mental problem, 39.4% (n = 389,330) a common mental problem, and 53.2% (n = 526,308) others health problems. The study found a reduction in the number of users served and health care appointments at the 58 CMHCs in March 2020, the month in which the closure measures were declared to reduce COVID-19 infections in Peru. This reduction was followed by an upward trend in the three variables during the pandemic in the 58 CMHCs studied. In, November 2020, 9 months after the pandemic started, the deficit in the average number of users served per month was recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that CMHCs in the Peruvian system were able to regain care capacity approximately 1 year after the pandemic. In addition, we discuss the efforts made to respond to mental health needs in the context of a global health crisis.

The Mental Health Impacts of a Pandemic: A Multiaxial Conceptual Model for COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted the mental health of the general population and particularly vulnerable individuals and groups. A wealth of research allows for estimating this impact and identifying relevant factors contributing to or mitigating it. The current paper presents and synthesizes this evidence into a multiaxial model of COVID-19 mental health impacts. Based on existing research, we propose four axes: (1) Exposure to COVID-related events; (2) Personal and social vulnerability, such as previous mental health problems or belonging to a vulnerable group; (3) Time, which accounts for the differential impacts throughout the development of the pandemic; and (4) Context, including healthcare and public policies, and social representations of the illness influencing individual emotional reactions and relevant behaviors. These axes help acknowledge the complexity of communities' reactions and are pragmatic in identifying and prioritizing factors. The axes can provide individual information (i.e., more exposure is harmful) and account for interactions (e.g., exposure in an early phase of the pandemic differs from a later stage). This model contributes to the reflections of the evidence and informs the mental health response to the next pandemic.

Association between the COVID-19 pandemic and psychiatric symptoms in people with preexisting obsessive-compulsive, eating, anxiety, and mood disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of before-after studies

AIM

To determine whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with a change in psychiatric symptoms in people with preexisting obsessive-compulsive, eating, anxiety, and mood disorders compared to their prepandemic levels.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase from inception until February 16, 2022. Studies were included if they reported prepandemic and during-pandemic psychiatric symptoms, using validated scales, in people with preexisting mood, anxiety, eating, or obsessive-compulsive disorders. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence certainty. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Effect sizes were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies from 10 countries were included. Of the 4465 included participants, 68% were female and the average age was 43 years. Mood and obsessive-compulsive disorders were the most studied disorders. During-pandemic psychiatric measurements were usually collected during nationwide lockdown. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms worsened among people with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, with a moderate effect size (N = 474 [six studies], SMD = -0.45 [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.08], I2  = 83%; very low certainty). We found a small association between the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced anxiety symptoms in people with mood, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and eating disorders (N = 3738 [six studies], SMD = 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02-0.19], I2  = 63%; very low certainty). No change in loneliness, depressive, or problematic eating symptoms was found.

CONCLUSION

People with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders may benefit from additional monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic and possibly future pandemics. Other psychiatric symptoms were stable in people with the specific disorders studied. Overall, evidence certainty was very low.

The Responsiveness of Mental Health Service Professionals to Two Years of Pandemic Emergency in Italy

This multicenter cross-sectional study explored the responsiveness of Mental Health Services (MHS) to two years of COVID-19 emergency in Italy. Specifically, the study explored the ability of staff to: acknowledge users' capabilities and value teamwork; reinvent the service and maintain/introduce good practices; and, acknowledge the positive aspects of the pandemic experience. These aspects were investigated in relation to socio-demographic and professional variables. Professionals from 17 MHS of 15 Italian Regions completed an online questionnaire on the MHS transformation during COVID-19. Data were collected at the end of the national health emergency (March 1-April 30, 2022). Most of the 1077 participants said they: paid more attention to users' physical health; revised treatment plans; mediated between user needs and safe work procedures; revalued the importance of gestures and habits; discovered unexpected personal resources in users; and, found positive aspects in the COVID-19 experience. The multivariate analyses showed significant differences in staff opinions related to gender, workplace, professional role, and geographic area of the MHS, covarying with staff work experience. Compared to male staff, female staff perceived MHS as more flexible and capable to maintain best practices, and female staff acknowledged more capabilities to the users. Compared to central and northern Italy staff, southern Italy staff gave more values to teamwork, perceived MHS as more capable to maintain best practices and acknowledged higher positive transformations. These findings may be useful for planning community-oriented MHS in the post-pandemic period, taking into account both the experience gained by staff and the MHS process of adaptation.

Impact of COVID-19 on mental health in the US with generative AI

This paper investigates the impact of COVID-19 on mental health in the US using a large CDC dataset and a new method with generative AI for automatically generating Python code. The generated code was used to investigate and visualize the time-series impact of COVID-19 on mental health by eight categories over time. The paper aims to activate research on mental health during COVID-19 and demonstrates the use of generative AI in psychiatry research for novice or non-programmer researchers.

Effect of the pandemic on prehospital management of patients with mental and behavioral disorders: a retrospective cohort study

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the accompanying coronavirus disease (Covid-19) have shifted the priority of human and technical resources toward their handling, thus affecting the usual standards of care for populations diagnosed with other clinical entities. The phenomenon becomes even more apparent in patients with presenting symptoms of mental and behavioral disorders, a category already vulnerable and underrepresented in regard to its prehospital approach and management. For the purposes of the current retrospective cohort study, we used records of the Polish National Emergency Medical Service Command Support System for the time period between April 1, 2019 and April 30, 2021, the official register of medical interventions delivered in Poland by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). We aimed to examine the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across the Masovian Voivodeship on individuals seeking medical care for mental and behavioral disorders pertaining in the "F" category of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). We examined the individuals' baseline characteristics, prehospital vital parameters and EMS processing times in a population of 59,651 adult patients (04/2019-03/2020, 28,089 patients, 04/2020-03/2021, 31,562 patients) handled by EMS teams. Compared to pre-COVID-19, EMS personnel handled fewer patients, but more patients required mental and behavioral care. Throughout the duration of the pandemic, all prehospital time periods were significantly delayed due to the increased time needed to prepare crew, vehicles, and technical equipment to ensure COVID-19 prevention and overcrowding in Emergency Departments (EDs).

Screening for postpartum depression and risk of suicidality with obstetrical patients: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is a vulnerable time where the physical and social stress of the COVID-19 pandemic affects psychological health, including postpartum depression (PPD). This study is designed to estimate the prevalence and correlates of PPD and risk of suicidality among individuals who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We surveyed individuals who gave birth at The Ottawa Hospital and were ≥ 20 days postpartum, between March 17 and June 16, 2020. A PPD screen consisted of a score ≥ 13 using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A score of 1, 2, or 3 on item 10 ("The thought of harming myself has occurred to me") indicates risk of suicidality. If a participant scores greater than ≥ 13 or ≥ 1 on item 10 they were flagged for PPD, the Principal Investigator (DEC) was notified within 24 h of survey completion for a chart review and to assure follow-up. Modified Poisson multivariable regression models were used to identify factors associated with PPD and risk of suicidality using adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of the 216 respondents, 64 (30%) screened positive for PPD and 17 (8%) screened positive for risk of suicidality. The maternal median age of the total sample was 33 years (IQR: 30-36) and the infant median age at the time of the survey was 76 days (IQR: 66-90). Most participants reported some form of positive coping strategies during the pandemic (97%) (e.g. connecting with friends and family, exercising, getting professional help) and 139 (64%) reported negative coping patterns (e.g. over/under eating, sleep problems). In total, 47 (22%) had pre-pregnancy anxiety and/or depression. Negative coping (aRR:2.90, 95% CI: 1.56-5.37) and pre-existing anxiety/depression (aRR:2.03, 95% CI:1.32-3.11) were associated with PPD. Pre-existing anxiety/depression (aRR:3.16, 95% CI:1.28-7.81) was associated with risk of suicidality.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a third of participants in this study screened positive for PPD and 8% for risk of suicidality. Mental health screening and techniques to foster positive coping skills/strategies are important areas to optimize postpartum mental health.

Publishing on a Shoestring: Understanding Barriers, Challenges, and Unique Opportunities to Academic Productivity in Psychiatry

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical track faculty within psychiatry may struggle to meet goals for academic scholarship, particularly publishing. In this review, we explore potential barriers to publication and solutions to support early career psychiatrists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence highlights challenges for faculty throughout academic practice, including barriers at the individual and systems levels. Within psychiatry, publication has favored biological studies with significant gaps in the literature serving as both an opportunity and challenge. Interventions underscore the importance of mentorship and propose incentivization to facilitate academic scholarship among clinical track faculty. Barriers to publication within psychiatry exist at the level of the individual, system, and field itself. This review shares potential solutions from across the medical literature and an example of an intervention from our own department. More studies are needed within the field of psychiatry to understand how to best support early career faculty members in their academic productivity, growth, and development.