Clinical Improvement Through Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: What Can Be Expected and Who Is Likely to Benefit Most?

Unsupervised Clustering of Adult Spinal Deformity Patterns Predicts Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether different radiographic clusters of adult spinal deformity identified using artificial intelligence-based clustering are associated with distinct surgical outcomes.MethodsPatients were classified based on the results of a previously conducted analysis that examined clusters of deformity, including Moderate Sagittal (Mod Sag), Severe Sagittal (Sev Sag), Coronal, and Hyper-Thoracic Kyphosis (Hyper-TK). The surgical data, HRQOL, and complication outcomes of these clusters were then compared.ResultsThe final analysis included 1062 patients. Similar to published results on a different patient sample, Mod Sag and Sev Sag patients were older, more likely to have a history of previous spine surgery, and more disabled. By 2-year, all clusters improved in HRQOL and reached a similar rate of minimal clinically important difference (MCID).The Sev Sag cluster had the highest rate major complications (53% vs 34-40%), and complications leading to reoperation (29% vs 17-23%), implant failures (20% vs 8-11%), and operative complications (27% vs 10-17%). Coronal patients had the highest rate of pulmonary complications (9% vs 3-6%) but the lowest rate of X-ray imbalance (10% vs 19-21%). No significant differences were found in neurological complications, infection rate, gastrointestinal, or cardiac events (all P > .1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a lower time to first complications for the Sev Sag cluster.ConclusionsAll clusters of adult spinal deformity benefit similarly from surgery as they all achieved similar rates of MCID. Although the rates of complications varied among the clusters, the types of complications were not significantly different.

Weak trunk extensors in adult spinal deformity patients are related to sagittal malalignment and kinematic limitations

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is associated with muscles' degeneration that affects postural control and outcomes of an eventual corrective surgery. Evaluation of ASD is usually based on static radiographs and more recently on functional assessment. However, there has been limited exploration of muscle strength weakness in ASD. The aim was to investigate the relationship between trunk muscles' strength in ASD and its relationship with radiographic and kinematic alterations and quality-of-life decline.

METHODS

28 ASD and 18 asymptomatic subjects underwent biplanar radiographs with 3D calculation of spino-pelvic and global postural parameters. 3D movement analysis of gait, sitting to standing and stair ascent, was studied allowing the calculation of head, trunk and lower limbs 3D kinematics. Participants filled out health related quality of life questionnaires. A single operator measured 4 times the strength of the trunk muscles, using a hand-held dynamometer, to assess measurements' reliability. ASD population was divided into two groups based on the strength of trunk extensors: ASD-weak extensors (N = 11 patients having trunk extensors strength

RESULTS

Measurements of muscle strengths using the hand-held dynamometer were reliable (ICC>0.94). On standing radiographs, the ASD-weak extensors group showed an increased positive sagittal malalignment compared to the other groups (SVA=61 mm vs ASD-normal extensors: 18 mm, controls: -4 mm, p < 0.001). This sagittal malalignment remained during movement (kinematic-SVA=223 mm vs ASD-normal extensors:178 mm, controls:138 mm, p < 0.001). Muscle strength weakness was correlated to the decline of quality-of-life scores (PCS-SF36: r = 0.48, VAS for pain: ρ=-0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that weak trunk extensors are associated with sagittal malalignment in static position, kinematic limitations during daily life activities and reduced quality of life scores. Future studies will investigate the effect of muscle strengthening on both static and dynamic alignment in ASD and their quality of life.

Collapse

Key Words

• 3D movement analysis
• Adult spinal deformity
• Functional assessment
• Muscle strength
• Trunk extensors

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Male
• Female
• Biomechanical Phenomena
• Adult
• Quality of Life
• Torso/physiopathology
• Middle Aged
• Muscle Strength/physiology
• Case-Control Studies
• Radiography
• Spinal Curvatures/physiopathology
• Spinal Curvatures/diagnostic imaging
• Muscle Weakness/physiopathology
• Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology
• Gait/physiology
• Young Adult

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Maria Saadé Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Rami Rachkidi Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Ali Rteil Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Elma Ayoub Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Elena Jaber Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Celine Chaaya Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Nabil Nassim Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Elio Mekhael Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Rami Rehayem Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Julien Abi Nahed Technology Innovation Unit, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Bilal Ramadan Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Mohamad Karam Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Ismat Ghanem Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Abir Massaad Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Ayman Assi Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Impact of preoperative clinical state on 2-year clinical outcomes following degenerative lumbar scoliosis surgery

To assess the preoperative clinical state's impact on clinical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Preoperative and follow-up (FU) scores in each Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) domain were compared with age- and sex-matched normative references. At baseline, patients were classified by differences from normative values in four groups: Worst, Severe, Poor, and Moderate. At 2 years postoperative FU, patients were divided into four groups (Worst Severe Poor Asymptomatic) based on the difference in MCID between postoperative and normal values. The changes in MCID were considered as the criterion for surgical efficacy. In addition, we calculated the classification of preoperative and FU clinical symptom severity in each domain in same patient. The distinction among curve types was also performed based on the SRS-Schwab classification. A total of 123 patients were included. During FU, patients with more severe preoperative clinical symptoms were more likely to achieve clinical changes (>1 MCID, p < 0.05), but the rate of reaching "asymptomatic" was lower (p < 0.05). Kendall's tau-b correlation analysis found that preoperative clinical severity was correlated with clinical changes category in Activity (Tau-b = 0.252; p = 0.002), Pain (Tau-b = 0.230; p = 0.005), Appearance (Tau-b = 0.307; p < 0.001), and Mental (Tau-b = 0.199; p = 0.016), and it also was correlated with FU clinical severity in Activity (Tau-b = 0.173; p = 0.023), Pain (Tau-b = 0.280; p < 0.001), and Mental (Tau-b = 0.349; p < 0.001). There was a correlation between preoperative clinical severity and FU SRS-22 score outcomes. Patients with severe preoperative clinical symptoms can experience better treatment outcomes during FU, but it is also more difficult to recover to the normal reference.

Machine learning clustering of adult spinal deformity patients identifies four prognostic phenotypes: a multicenter prospective cohort analysis with single surgeon external validation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, heterogeneity in patient pathology, surgical expectations, baseline impairments, and frailty complicates comparisons in clinical outcomes and research. This study aims to qualitatively segment ASD patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort.

PURPOSE

To qualitatively segment adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered cohort.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Machine learning algorithm using patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort from a retrospective single center, single surgeon cohort with complete 2-year follow up.

PATIENT SAMPLE

About 805 ASD patients; 563 patients from a prospective multicenter study and 242 from a single center to be used as a validation cohort.

OUTCOME MEASURES

To validate and extend the Ames-ISSG/ESSG classification using machine learning-based clustering analysis on a large, complex, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed a training cohort of 563 ASD patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort of 242 ASD patients from a retrospective single center/surgeon cohort with complete two-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/radiographic follow-up. Using k-means clustering, a machine learning algorithm, we clustered patients based on baseline PROs, Edmonton frailty, age, surgical history, and overall health. Baseline differences in clusters identified using the training cohort were assessed using Chi-Squared and ANOVA with pairwise comparisons. To evaluate the classification system's ability to discern postoperative trajectories, a second machine learning algorithm assigned the single-center/surgeon patients to the same 4 clusters, and we compared the clusters' two-year PROs and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

K-means clustering revealed four distinct phenotypes from the multicenter training cohort based on age, frailty, and mental health: Old/Frail/Content (OFC, 27.7%), Old/Frail/Distressed (OFD, 33.2%), Old/Resilient/Content (ORC, 27.2%), and Young/Resilient/Content (YRC, 11.9%). OFC and OFD clusters had the highest frailty scores (OFC: 3.76, OFD: 4.72) and a higher proportion of patients with prior thoracolumbar fusion (OFC: 47.4%, OFD: 49.2%). ORC and YRC clusters exhibited lower frailty scores and fewest patients with prior thoracolumbar procedures (ORC: 2.10, 36.6%; YRC: 0.84, 19.4%). OFC had 69.9% of patients with global sagittal deformity and the highest T1PA (29.0), while YRC had 70.2% exhibiting coronal deformity, the highest mean coronal Cobb Angle (54.0), and the lowest T1PA (11.9). OFD and ORC had similar alignment phenotypes with intermediate values for Coronal Cobb Angle (OFD: 33.7; ORC: 40.0) and T1PA (OFD: 24.9; ORC: 24.6) between OFC (worst sagittal alignment) and YRC (worst coronal alignment). In the single surgeon validation cohort, the OFC cluster experienced the greatest increase in SRS Function scores (1.34 points, 95%CI 1.01-1.67) compared to OFD (0.5 points, 95%CI 0.245-0.755), ORC (0.7 points, 95%CI 0.415-0.985), and YRC (0.24 points, 95%CI -0.024-0.504) clusters. OFD cluster patients improved the least over 2 years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the OFD cohort had significantly worse reoperation outcomes compared to other clusters (HR: 3.303, 95%CI: 1.085-8.390).

CONCLUSION

Machine-learning clustering found four different ASD patient qualitative phenotypes, defined by their age, frailty, physical functioning, and mental health upon presentation, which primarily determines their ability to improve their PROs following surgery. This reaffirms that these qualitative measures must be assessed in addition to the radiographic variables when counseling ASD patients regarding their expected surgical outcomes.

Worse Preoperative Disability is Predictive of Improvement in Disability After Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

Few previous studies have examined the relationship between preoperative disability and patient outcomes after complex adult spinal deformity surgery. In this study, we hypothesized that patients with worse preoperative disability would be more likely achieve a clinically significant improvement in their symptoms after surgery.

METHODS

Demographics, comorbidities, surgical data, and health related survey results were analyzed from a consecutive series of adults (≥18 years old) who underwent spinal deformity correction, instrumentation, and fusion. Patients included had 6 or more levels fused and their surgery performed at single institution between 2015 and 2018 with minimum 2 year follow up.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria. Bivariate analysis demonstrated the following as having a greater probability of reaching minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at 2 years postoperatively: >50th percentile Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (ODI >36), cardiac comorbidities, and use of pelvic fixation, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Conversely, baseline Scoliosis research society score (SRS) >50th percentile (SRS ≥62) and use of vertebral column resection (VCR) were significant predictors of not reaching MCID at 2 years. On logistic regression analysis, >50th percentile ODI score (ODI >36) was identified as the only independent predictor of achieving MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with greater disability, independent of other preoperative or surgical factors, are more likely to have clinically significant improvement in their daily functioning after complex deformity surgery. For patients who undergo surgical intervention for severe or progressive deformity, including VCR, MCID might be an ineffective outcome measure.

Characteristics and standards of severe sagittal imbalance in adult patients with spinal deformities: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics of "severe" dynamic sagittal imbalance (DSI) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and establish criteria for them.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with ASD presenting four cardinal signs of lumbar degenerative kyphosis. All patients underwent deformity corrective surgery and were divided into three groups according to the diagnostic criteria based on the Oswestry disability index and dynamic features (△Timewalk: time until C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] reaches ≥ 20 cm after the start of walking) of sagittal imbalance. The paravertebral back muscles were analyzed and compared using T2-weighted axial imaging. We performed a statistically time-dependent spinopelvic sagittal parameter analysis of full standing lateral lumbar radiographs. Lumbar flexibility was analyzed using dynamic lateral lumbar radiography.

RESULTS

The patients were classified into the mild (△Timewalk ≥ 180 s, 35 patients), moderate (180 s > △Timewalk ≥ 30 s, 38 patients), and severe (△Timewalk < 30 s, 29 patients) groups. The back muscles in the severe group exhibited a significantly higher signal intensity (533.4 ± 237.5, p < 0.05) and larger area of fat infiltration (35.2 ± 5.4, p < 0.05) than those in the mild (223.8 ± 67.6/22.9 ± 11.9) and moderate groups (294.4 ± 214.7/21.6 ± 10.6). The analysis of lumbar flexibility revealed significantly lower values in the severe group (5.8° ± 2.5°, p < 0.05) than in the mild and moderate groups (14.2° ± 12.4° and 11.4° ± 8.7°, respectively). The severe group had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (LL, 25.1° ± 22.7°, p < 0.05) and Pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL, 81.5° ± 26.6°, p < 0.001) than those of the mild (8.2° ± 16.3°/58.7° ± 18.8°) and moderate (14.3° ± 28.6°/66.8° ± 13.4°) groups. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, PI-LL was statistically significant, with an area under the curve of 0.810 (95% confidence interval) when the baseline was set at 75.3°. The severe group had more postoperative complications than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the following criteria for severe DSI: C7SVA > 20 cm within 30 s of walking or standing, a rigid lumbar curve < 10° on dynamic lateral radiographs, and a PI-LL mismatch > 75.3°.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery: A Review

»

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) are both metrics at interpreting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

»

MCID values tend to vary significantly depending on the baseline pain and function in both acute and chronic symptom states while PASS thresholds are more stable.

»

MCID values are more easily attainable than PASS thresholds.

»

Although PASS is more relevant to the patient, it should continue to be used in tandem with MCID when interpreting PROM data.

Validation of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgical Outcome Prediction Tools in Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Advances in machine learning (ML) have led to tools offering individualized outcome predictions for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Our objective is to examine the properties of these ASD models in a cohort of adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ML algorithms produce patient-specific probabilities of outcomes, including major complication (MC), reoperation (RO), and readmission (RA) in ASD. External validation of these models is needed.

METHODS

Thirty-nine predictive factors (12 demographic, 9 radiographic, 4 health-related quality of life, 14 surgical) were retrieved and entered into web-based prediction models for MC, unplanned RO, and hospital RA. Calculated probabilities were compared with actual event rates. Discrimination and calibration were analyzed using receiver operative characteristic area under the curve (where 0.5=chance, 1=perfect) and calibration curves (Brier scores, where 0.25=chance, 0=perfect). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 169 of 187 (90%) surgical patients completed 2-year follow up. The observed rate of MCs was 41.4% with model predictions ranging from 13% to 68% (mean: 38.7%). RO was 20.7% with model predictions ranging from 9% to 54% (mean: 30.1%). Hospital RA was 17.2% with model predictions ranging from 13% to 50% (mean: 28.5%). Model classification for all three outcome measures was better than chance for all [area under the curve=MC 0.6 (0.5-0.7), RA 0.6 (0.5-0.7), RO 0.6 (0.5-0.7)]. Calibration was better than chance for all, though best for RA and RO (Brier Score=MC 0.22, RA 0.16, RO 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

ASD prediction models for MC, RA, and RO performed better than chance in a cohort of adult lumbar scoliosis patients, though the homogeneity of ASLS affected calibration and accuracy. Optimization of models require samples with the breadth of outcomes (0%-100%), supporting the need for continued data collection as personalized prediction models may improve decision-making for the patient and surgeon alike.

Changes in health-related quality of life measures associated with degree of proximal junctional kyphosis

PURPOSE

To explore the changes in health-related quality of life parameters observed in patients experiencing varying degrees of proximal junctional kyphosis following corrective adult spinal deformity fusions.

METHODS

Inclusion: adult spinal deformity patients > 18 y/o, undergoing spinal fusion. PJK: ≥ 10° measure of the sagittal Cobb angle between the inferior endplate of the UIV and the superior endplate of the UIV + 2. Severe PJK: > 28° PJK. Mild PJK: ≥ 10^oand ≤ 28°. ANOVA, followed by ANCOVA, compared the change in HRQoLs between time points (BL, 1Y, 2Y) among PJK groups. Correlation-related change in PJK and change in HRQoL for mild and severe groups.

RESULTS

969 patients (age: 64.5 y/o,75% F, posterior levels fused:12.3) were studied. 59% no PJK, 32% mild PJK, 9% severe PJK. No differences in HRQoLs were seen between no PJK and PJK groups at baseline, one year, and 2 years. Adjusted analysis revealed Severe PJK patients improved less in SRS-22 Satisfaction (NoPJK: 1.6, MildPJK: 1.6, SeverePJK: 1.0; p = 0.022) scores at 2 years. Linear regression analysis only found clinical improvement in SRS-22 Satisfaction to correlate with the change of the PJK angle by 2 years (R = 0.176, P = 0.008). No other HRQoL metric correlated with either the incidence of PJK or the change in the PJK angle by one or 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

These results maintain that patients presenting with and without proximal junctional kyphosis report similar health-related qualities of life following corrective adult spinal deformity surgery, and SRS-22 Satisfaction may be a clinical correlate to the degree of PJK. Rather than proving proximal junctional kyphosis to have a minimal clinical impact overall on HRQoL metrics, these data suggest that future analysis of this phenomenon requires different assessments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence: III.

Patient-reported outcome measure clustering after surgery for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

Adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) is a widespread and debilitating subset of adult spinal deformity. Although many patients benefit from operative treatment, surgery entails substantial cost and risk for adverse events. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are patient-centered tools used to evaluate the appropriateness of surgery and to assist in the shared decision-making process. Framing realistic patient expectations should include the possible functional limitation to improvement inherent in surgical intervention, such as multilevel fusion to the sacrum. The authors' objective was to predict postoperative ASLS PROMs by using clustering analysis, generalized longitudinal regression models, percentile analysis, and clinical improvement analysis of preoperative health-related quality-of-life scores for use in surgical counseling.

METHODS

Operative results from the combined ASLS cohorts were examined. PROM score clustering after surgery investigated limits of surgical improvement. Patients were categorized by baseline disability (mild, moderate, moderate to severe, or severe) according to preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Responder analysis for patients achieving improvement meeting the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) standards was performed using both fixed-threshold and patient-specific values (MCID = 30% of remaining scale, SCB = 50%). Best (top 5%), worst (bottom 5%), and median scores were calculated across disability categories.

RESULTS

A total of 171/187 (91%) of patients with ASLS achieved 2-year follow-up. Patients rarely achieved a PROM ceiling for any measure, with 33%-43% of individuals clustering near 4.0 for SRS domains. Patients with severe baseline disability (< 2.0) SRS-pain and SRS-function scores were often left with moderate to severe disability (2.0-2.9), unlike patients with higher (≥ 3.0) initial PROM values. Patients with mild disability according to baseline SRS-function score were unlikely to improve. Crippling baseline ODI disability (> 60) commonly left patients with moderate disability (median ODI = 32). As baseline ODI disability increased, patients were more likely to achieve MCID and SCB (p < 0.001). Compared to fixed threshold values for MCID and SCB, patient-specific values were more sensitive to change for patients with minimal ODI baseline disability (p = 0.008) and less sensitive to change for patients with moderate to severe SRS subscore disability (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ASLS surgeries have a limit to possible improvement, probably due to both baseline disability and the effects of surgery. The most disabled patients often had moderate to severe disability (SRS < 3, ODI > 30) at 2 years, emphasizing the importance of patient counseling and expectation management.

Description of spine motion during gait in normal adolescents and young adults

INTRODUCTION

Standing radiographs allow analysis of spinal segments and their relative positioning. However, it requires a specific positioning influencing spinal alignment. Knowledge of trunk movements when walking is therefore an essential step to evaluate dynamic sagittal balance. Our objective was to define spinal junction kinematics and their correlations during gait in a healthy population.

METHOD

This is a prospective, single-center study. Between 2015 and 2017, 25 healthy volunteers were included. The measurements were taken in a motion analysis laboratory. Several kinematic parameters were studied, including spinal junction movements in the three planes and dynamic sagittal vertical axis (Dyn-SVA). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the interactions between the spinal junctions.

RESULTS

In the sagittal plane, the average amplitude of variation of the dyn-SVA was 25.5 cm (SD = 8.9). The average range of motion of the lumbosacral and thoracolumbar junction was approximately 3°, they operated in anti-phase during the gait cycle and were strongly correlated (r = -0.5069, p = 0.01). In the transverse plane, the anti-rotation of the upper body relative to the pelvis was mainly ensured by the opposite movements of the lumbosacral and thoracolumbar junction (r = 0.5689, p = 0.003). In the frontal plane, the lateral inclination in the lumbar region was made in the opposite direction from the pelvis toward the carrying member.

CONCLUSION

Although there is substantial inter-subject variability, our study characterized the angular movements in the three planes of the different spinal junctions, of the pelvis and the lower limbs during a gait cycle in a healthy population.

Comparing Thoracic Extensive Laminoplasty (TELP) and Laminectomy in Treating Severe Thoracic Ligamentum Flavum Ossification: A Proposed Novel Technique and Case-Control Study

Objective

(1) To propose a novel technique named thoracic extensive laminoplasty (TELP) in curing severe thoracic ligamentum flavum ossification (STOLF) and (2) to compare outcomes between TELP and laminectomy in curing STOLF.

Methods

Cases with fused or tuberous STOLF (Sato classification) treated from Jan 2015 to Jan 2017 were reviewed and divided into the TELP group (G1) and laminectomy group (G2) according to their surgical management. Data on demographics, complications, pre- and postoperative symptoms, residual spinal canal area (RSCA-1), residual spinal cord area (RSCA-2), modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL, based on the SF-36) were collected.

Results

Fifty-nine G1 and sixty-two G2 patients were enrolled. No significant differences in demographic data or preoperative data of RSCA-1, RSCA-2, mJOA, or HRQOL were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). Patients in G1 and G2 showed similar postoperative improvements in RSCA-1 and RSCA-2 at the final follow-up (p > 0.05). However, patients in G1 showed higher postoperative improvements in mJOA (OR = 2.706, 95% CI: 1.279~5.727, p = 0.008) at the final follow-up. Patients in G1 also showed higher postoperative improvements in HRQOL than patients in G2 (p < 0.05) at the final follow-up, and patients with more severe STOLF presented with better improvements in HRQOL in G1 (p < 0.05). Dural laceration and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were observed in seven G2 patients, and no complications were found in G1 patients after surgery.

Conclusion

TELP is a novel, effective, and safer surgical technique in treating STOLF and could be a substitute for traditional laminectomy.

Preoperative patient-reported outcome score thresholds predict the likelihood of reaching MCID with surgical correction of adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative (pre-op) identification of patients likely to achieve a clinically meaningful improvement following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is critical, especially given the substantial cost and comorbidity associated with surgery. Even though pain is a known indication for surgical ASD correction, we are not aware of established thresholds for baseline pain and function to guide which patients have a higher likelihood of improvement with corrective surgery.

PURPOSE

We aimed to establish pre-op patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds to identify patients likely to improve by at least one minimum clinically important difference (MCID) with surgery for ASD.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We reviewed 172 adult patients' charts who underwent corrective surgery for spinal deformity.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Included measures were the Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22). Our primary outcome of interest was improvement by at least one MCID on the ODI and SRS-22 at 2 years after surgery.

METHODS

As part of usual care, the VAS, ODI, and SRS-22 were collected pre-op and re-administered at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. MCIDs were calculated using a distribution-based method. Determining significant predictors of MCID at two years was accomplished by Firth bias corrected logistic regression models. Significance of predictors was determined by Profile Likelihood Chi-square. We performed a Youden analysis to determine thresholds for the strongest pre-op predictors.

RESULTS

At year two, 118 patients (83%) reached MCID for the SRS and 127 (75%) for the ODI. Lower pre-op SRS overall, lower pre-op SRS pain, and higher pre-op SRS function predicted a higher likelihood of reaching MCID on the overall SRS (p < 0.05). Higher pre-op ODI, lower SRS pain and self-image, and higher SRS overall predicted a higher likelihood of reaching MCID on the ODI (p < 0.05). An ODI threshold of 29 predicted reaching MCID with a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.64 (AUC = 0.7813). An SRS threshold of 3.89 predicted reaching MCID with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.68 (AUC = 0.8024).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified useful thresholds for ODI and SRS-22 with acceptable predictive ability for improvement with surgery for ASD. Pre-op ODI, SRS, and multiple SRS subscores are predictive of meaningful improvement on the ODI and/or SRS at 2 years following corrective surgery for spinal deformity. These results highlight the usefulness of PROMs in pre-op shared decision-making.

Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Correction Surgery in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCID has been introduced in the adult spinal deformity to quantify the absolute minimum change that can be considered a success. There are limited data available to identify factors affecting reaching MCID after DLS surgery.

METHODS

This study reviewed a cohort of 123 DLS patients after correction surgery and with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Inclusion criteria included age ≥40 and minimum five vertebrae fused and the availability of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores and radiographic data at baseline (BL) and FU. Using a multivariate analysis, two groups were compared to identify possible risk factors: those who reached MCID in the all four SRS domains (N = 65) at the last FU and those who missed MCID (N = 58).

RESULTS

At baseline, patients differed significantly from matched normative data in all SRS-22 domains. The baseline HRQOL was comparable in reached MCID and missed MCID group patients (P > 0.05). The HRQOL scores at FU were significantly higher than those at baseline. Of 123 included patients, 77.2% (N = 95), 72.4% (N = 89), 76.4% (N = 94), and 89.4% (N = 110) reached MCID in SRS pain, activity, appearance, and mental domain, respectively. Pelvic incidence (PI) >55°, lumbar lordosis (LL) loss >4.65°, coronal imbalance at FU, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) at FU >80 mm, and presence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and distal junctional problem (DJP) had negative effects on the recovery process.

CONCLUSION

Factors affecting reaching MCID after surgery for DLS were higher PI, LL loss, coronal imbalance, severe sagittal imbalance, and the occurrence of PJK and DJP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Characteristics and treatment of dynamic sagittal imbalance in adult spinal deformity

OBJECTIVE

To raise the diagnostic criteria, classification and treatment strategy of dynamic sagittal imbalance (DSI).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with stooping and back pain after walking were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the radiographic parameters and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, the diagnostic criteria of DSI were raised. DSI patients received nonoperative treatment and (or) surgery. Radiographic parameters and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes would be measured and compared between prewalk and postwalk and among each subgroup.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three ASD patients with stooping and back pain after walking were enrolled in our study. The quantitative diagnostic criteria was prewalk SVA < 40 mm and postwalk SVA-prewalk SVA ≥ 20 mm after 10-min walk. Based on the quantitative diagnostic criteria of DSI raised by our team, DSI patients could be classified into three groups: 20 mm ≤ ΔSVA < 60 mm (mild, 31.0%), 60 mm ≤ ΔSVA < 100 mm (moderate, 42.1%) and ΔSVA ≥ 100 mm (severe, 27.0%). After nonoperative treatment, the ΔSVA in mild and moderate group was prominently decreased (P < 0.001) with the significant improvement of HRQOL outcomes (P < 0.001), while there was no significant change in ΔSVA and clinical outcomes in group C (P > 0.05). Patients who received the operative treatment showed prominent improvement in ΔSVA and clinical outcomes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study proposed a quantitative diagnostic criteria and novel classification of DSI. Nonoperative treatment is effective for most DSI patients with ΔSVA < 100 mm, while the majority of DSI patients with ΔSVA ≥ 100 mm need operative intervention.

Development and validation of risk stratification models for adult spinal deformity surgery

OBJECTIVE

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has a high rate of major complications (MCs). Public information about adverse outcomes is currently limited to registry average estimates. The object of this study was to assess the incidence of adverse events after ASD surgery, and to develop and validate a prognostic tool for the time-to-event risk of MC, hospital readmission (RA), and unplanned reoperation (RO).

METHODS

Two models per outcome, created with a random survival forest algorithm, were trained in an 80% random split and tested in the remaining 20%. Two independent prospective multicenter ASD databases, originating from the European continent and the United States, were queried, merged, and analyzed. ASD patients surgically treated by 57 surgeons at 23 sites in 5 countries in the period from 2008 to 2016 were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 1612 ASD patients: mean (standard deviation) age 56.7 (17.4) years, 76.6% women, 10.4 (4.3) fused vertebral levels, 55.1% of patients with pelvic fixation, 2047.9 observation-years. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 12.1% of patients had at least one MC at 10 days after surgery; 21.5%, at 90 days; and 36%, at 2 years. Discrimination, measured as the concordance statistic, was up to 71.7% (95% CI 68%-75%) in the development sample for the postoperative complications model. Surgical invasiveness, age, magnitude of deformity, and frailty were the strongest predictors of MCs. Individual cumulative risk estimates at 2 years ranged from 3.9% to 74.1% for MCs, from 3.17% to 44.2% for RAs, and from 2.67% to 51.9% for ROs.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of accurate prognostic models for the occurrence and timing of MCs, RAs, and ROs following ASD surgery is possible. The presented variability in patient risk profiles alongside the discrimination and calibration of the models highlights the potential benefits of obtaining time-to-event risk estimates for patients and clinicians.

Recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The postoperative recovery patterns of cervical deformity patients, thoracolumbar deformity patients, and patients with combined cervical and thoracolumbar deformities, all relative to one another, is not well understood. Clear objective benchmarks are needed to quantitatively define a "good" versus a "bad" postoperative recovery across multiple follow-up visits, varying deformity types, and guide expectations.

PURPOSE

To objectively define and compare the complete 2-year postoperative recovery process among operative cervical only, thoracolumbar only, and combined deformity patients using area-under-the-curve (AUC) methodology.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of 2 prospective, multicenter adult cervical and spinal deformity databases.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred seventy spinal deformity patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Common health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments across both databases included the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) back pain assessment. In order to compare disability improvements, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were merged into one outcome variable, the ODI-NDI. Both assessments are gauged on the same scale, with minimal question deviation. Sagittal Radiographic Alignment was also assessed at pre- and all postoperative time points.

METHODS

Operative deformity patients >18 years old with baseline (BL) to 2-year HRQOLs were included. Patients were stratified by cervical only (C), thoracolumbar only (T), and combined deformities (CT). HRQOL and radiographic outcomes were compared within and between deformity groups. AUC normalization generated normalized HRQOL scores at BL and all follow-up intervals (6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 year). Normalized scores were plotted against follow-up time interval. AUC was calculated for each follow-up interval, and total area was divided by cumulative follow-up length, determining overall, time-adjusted HRQOL recovery (Integrated Health State, IHS). Multiple linear regression models determined significant predictors of HRQOL discrepancies among deformity groups.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy patients were included (27 C, 27 T, and 116 CT). Age, BMI, sex, smoking status, osteoporosis, depression, and BL HRQOL scores were similar among groups (p >. 05). T and CT patients had higher comorbidity severities (CCI: C 0.696, T 1.815, CT 1.699, p = .020). Posterior surgical approaches were most common (62.9%) followed by combined (28.8%) and anterior (6.5%). Standard HRQOL analysis found no significant differences among groups until 1-year follow-up, where C patients exhibited comparatively greater NRS back pain (4.88 vs. 3.65 vs. 3.28, p = .028). NRS Back pain differences between groups subsided by 2-years (p>.05). Despite C patients exhibiting significantly faster ODI-NDI minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement (33.3% vs. 0% vs. 23.0%, p < .001), all deformity groups exhibited similar ODI-NDI MCID achievement by 2-years (51.9% vs. 59.3% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.563). After HRQOL normalization, similar results were observed relative to the standard analysis (1-year NRS Back: C 1.17 vs. T 0.50 vs. CT 0.51, p < .001; 2-year NRS Back: 1.20 vs. 0.51 vs. 0.69, p = .060). C patients exhibited a worse NRS back normalized IHS (C 1.18 vs. T 0.58 vs. CT 0.63, p = .004), indicating C patients were in a greater state of postoperative back pain for a longer amount of time. Linear regression models determined postoperative distal junctional kyphosis (adjusted beta: 0.207, p = .039) and osteoporosis (adjusted beta: 0.269, p = .007) as the strongest predictors of a poor NRS back IHS (model summary: R² = 0.177, p = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite C patients exhibiting a quicker rate of MCID disability (ODI-NDI) improvement, they exhibited a poorer overall recovery of back pain with worse NRS back scores compared with BL status and other deformity groups. Postoperative distal junctional kyphosis and osteoporosis were identified as primary drivers of a poor postoperative NRS back IHS. Utilization of the IHS, a single number adjusting for all postoperative HRQOL visits, in conjunction with predictive modelling may pose as an improved method of gauging the effect of surgical details and complications on a patient's entire recovery process.

Determinants of Patient Satisfaction 2 Years After Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Latent Class Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the determinants of patient satisfaction with respect to changes in functional limitations 2 years after spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

For operatively treated adult spine deformity (ASD), patient satisfaction has become an important component of evaluating quality of care.

METHODS

A total of 430 operative patients with ASD with 2-year follow-up were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society 22-item. Latent class analysis was performed to assign individuals to classes based on the changes in pre- and 2-year postoperative functions, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). An ordered logistic regression was conducted to assess the association of class membership and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Latent class analysis identified four classes. The worsened-condition class (WC: 1.4%) consisted of patients who were likely to experience worsened function, particularly in lifting and pain intensity. The remained-same class (RS: 13.0%) included patients who remained the same, because the majority reported approximately no change in walking, standing, and sitting. The mild-improved class (mild-I: 40.2%) included patients with mildly enhanced conditions, specifically, in standing, social life, and employment. The most-improved class (most-I: 45.3%) included patients with great improvement after surgery mainly in standing, followed by social life and employment. The odds of being satisfied were significantly increased by 3.91- (P < 0.001) and 16.99-fold (P < 0.001), comparing patients in mild-I and most-I to the RS/WC class, respectively, after controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSION

Improvement in standing, social life, and employment are the most important determinants of patient satisfaction postsurgery. Reduced pain intensity and enhanced walking ability also help to elevate patient satisfaction. However, lifting, personal care, sitting, sleeping, and travelling may be of less importance. Examining the heterogeneity of patient-reported outcome in patients with ASD allows the identification of classes with different patient characteristics and satisfaction, and thus, help to guide tailored provision of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Are the sagittal cervical radiographic modifiers of the Ames-ISSG classification specific to adult cervical deformity?

OBJECTIVEThe Ames-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) classification has recently been proposed as a tool for adult cervical deformity evaluation. This classification includes three radiographic cervical sagittal modifiers that have not been evaluated in asymptomatic adults. The aim of this study was to determine whether the sagittal radiographic modifiers described in the Ames-ISSG cervical classification are encountered in asymptomatic adults without alteration of health-related quality of life (HRQOL).METHODSThe authors conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects with an age ≥ 18 years and no cervical or back-related complaints or history of orthopedic surgery. All subjects underwent full-body biplanar radiographs with the measurement of cervical, segmental, and global alignment and completed the SF-36 HRQOL questionnaire. Subjects were classified according to the sagittal radiographic modifiers (chin-brow vertical angle [CBVA], mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis [TS-CL], and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]) of the Ames-ISSG classification for cervical deformity, which also includes a qualitative descriptor of cervical deformity, the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) myelopathy score, and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification for spinal deformity assessment. Characteristics of the subjects classified by the different modifier grades were compared.RESULTSOne hundred forty-one asymptomatic subjects (ages 18-59 years, 71 females) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-seven (19.1%) and 61 (43.3%) subjects were classified as grade 1 in terms of the TS-CL and CBVA modifiers, respectively. Ninety-eight (69.5%) and 4 (2.8%) were grade 2 for these same respective modifiers. One hundred thirty-six (96.5%) subjects had at least one modifier at grade 1 or 2. There was a significant relationship between patient age and grades of TS-CL (p < 0.001, Cramer's V [CV] = 0.32) and CBVA (p = 0.04, CV = 0.22) modifiers. The HRQOL, global alignment, and segmental alignment parameters were similar among the subjects with different modifier grades (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSThe CBVA and TS-CL radiographic modifiers of the Ames-ISSG classification do not seem to be specific to subjects with cervical deformities and can occur in asymptomatic subjects without alteration in HRQOL.

Effect of the upper instrumented vertebral level (upper vs. lower thoracic spine) on gait ability after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The relationship between gait pattern and the level of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) has not been fully documented.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the effect of UIV level for the gait pattern in ASD.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A prospective case series was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Thirty surgically treated consecutive female ASD with lumbosacral fusion (age 67.0±8.4 years; body mass index 22.7±2.4 kg/m²; Cobb angle 49.9°±21.3°; coronal vertical axis 1.5±3.6 cm; C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] 9.3±5.3 cm; pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis 35.4°±25.8°; and lean volume of the lower leg 5.5±0.9 kg) were categorized into upper thoracic [UT] group or lower thoracic [LT] group based on the level of UIV (UT; UIV T2-T5, LT; UIV T9-T11), and the gait pattern were compared before and after corrective spine surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and force plate analysis were the outcome measures.

METHODS

All subjects underwent gait analysis on a custom-built force plate. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Subjects were followed-up for at least 2 years postoperation.

RESULTS

The UT group had larger baseline Cobb angle, whereas the LT group had larger C7SVA (UT vs. LT; Cobb angle: 59.2±22.9 vs. 44.6±17.4°, p=.03, C7SVA: 10.9±8.7 vs. 12.0±7.1 cm, p=.03). Preoperatively, no difference was found in gait velocity and stride between UT and LT group, whereas the right and left difference of step length was significantly large in UT group (velocity: 55.0±12.5 vs. 53.6±9.0 m/min, stride: 99.7±13.0 vs. 97.8±13.6 cm, step length; 10.4±4.9 vs. 5.6%±3.3%). Coronal and sagittal alignments were significantly improved in both groups (total; Cobb angle: 19.4°±10.6°, C7SVA: 5.3±2.9 cm, PI-LL: 12.1°±5.1°). Gait pattern, stride, and velocity all improved significantly after surgery (total; velocity: 62.3±8.9m/min, stride: 106.8±12.3 cm, p=.01). The knee angle at the heel contact phase and hip range of motion (ROM) were also significantly improved at postoperation (total; hip ROM: preoperation: 29.2°±9.1°, postoperation: 36.2°±4.8°, knee angle; preoperation: 10.6°±6.6°, postoperation: 4.4°±2.8°). No difference was observed for the pelvis and shoulder rotation on the horizontal plane at postoperation in both groups (total; pelvis rotation; preoperation: 7.4°±3.4°, postoperation: 7.9°±2.4°, shoulder rotation; preoperation: 7.4°±2.9°, postoperation: 8.7°±3.6°). The head vertical deviation was also not changed postoperatively in both groups (preoperation: 3.1±0.9 cm, postoperation: 3.1±0.8 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Both UT and LT groups achieved similar improvement of gait ability and pattern after surgery. Additional studies will be needed to further define the effect of UIV for the activity of daily living such as fast walking, stepping the stairs, or standing from the chair in ASDs.

Predictors of Postoperative Recovery Based on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients after Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors associated with the recovery process of elderly patients after degenerative lumbar scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

A total of 213 elderly patients who had undergone surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis from 2011 to 2015 were included retrospectively in this study. Clinical data and demographics were collected for logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 213 eligible patients, 77 (38.5%) were classified as being in the excellent group, 70 (35%) as showing improvement, 24 (12%) as showing no change, and 29 (14.5%) as having deteriorated. At baseline, patients differed significantly from matched normative data in all Scoliosis Research Society domains. Larger differences from normative values were found for pain and activity domains. After surgery, each domain improved significantly. In the multivariate logistic regression, age 60-70 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.431; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.143-5.174), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade <3 (OR, 2.987; 95% CI, 1.519-5.874) may be predictive factors for a satisfying recovery, whereas presence of complications (OR, 0.342; 95% CI, 0.153-0.765), fusion to the sacrum (OR, 0.200; 95% CI, 0.076-0.523), and more osteotomies (OR, 0.360; 95% CI, 0.132-0.985) have negative effects on the recovery process.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors that affect postoperative recovery in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis are age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, distal fusion level, presence of complications, and number of osteotomies.

Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions

PURPOSE

Medical and health policy providers should be aware of the impact of adult spinal deformity (ASD) on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The purpose of this study was to compare the relative burden of four chronic conditions with that of ASD.

METHODS

The International Quality of Life Assessment project gathered data from 24,936 people and published the SF-36 scores of patients with self-reported arthritis, chronic lung disease, diabetes and congestive heart failure from 8 industrialized countries (3 continents) Alonso et al. (Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 13:283-298, 2004). We compared these with the SF-36 baseline data of consecutive patients with ASD enrolled in a prospective multicentre international database with the following inclusion criteria: age >18 years and scoliosis >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >25° or thoracic kyphosis >60°. Four ASD groups were considered: all ASD patients, surgical candidates (preop HRQL scores), and non-surgical candidates with and without previous surgery. Adjusted estimates of the impact of chronic disease were calculated using separate multivariate linear regression models. Individuals without chronic conditions were used as the reference group. Coefficients for each chronic condition and ASD represent the difference compared with this healthy group.

RESULTS

766 patients (mean age 45.8 years) met the inclusion criteria for ASD. The scores on all SF-36 domains were lower in ASD patients than in any other chronic condition. Differences between ASD and the other chronic conditions were always greater than the reported minimal clinically important differences. When compared with individuals reporting no medical conditions, SF-36 scores from the population with self-reported chronic conditions ranged from -2.5 to -14.1. Comparable scores for patients with ASD ranged from -10.9 to -45.0. Physical function, role physical and pain domains showed the worst scores. Surgical candidates with ASD displayed the worst HRQL scores (-17.4 to -45.0) and patients previously operated the best (-10.9 to -33.3); however, even the latter remained worse than any scores for the other self-reported chronic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The global burden of ASD was huge compared with other self-reported chronic conditions in the general population of eight industrialized countries. The impact of ASD on HRQL warrants the same research and health policy attention as other important chronic diseases.