Comparison of Surgeon Assessment to Frailty Measurement in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Association of Frailty Index and Postoperative Outcomes of Open Bypass Lower Extremity Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia Using the Vascular Quality Initiative

BackgroundFrailty in patients undergoing surgery is strongly associated with postoperative complications. The risk analysis index (RAI) is a validated model for frailty that has been shown to predict short and long-term outcomes. Through utilization of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), this study examined the application of the VQI-derived RAI in acute limb ischemia (ALI) patients undergoing open bypass lower extremity revascularization.MethodsThis is a longitudinal retrospective cohort study conducted on patients undergoing revascularization for ALI from the VQI. Using preoperative variables, an RAI score was calculated for each patient, and they were stratified into six cohorts: ≤20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 35-40, and ≥41. A binary forward multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk in each cohort on postoperative outcomes (mortality, amputation, surgical site infection, bypass revision, and discharge destination).ResultsThe VQI dataset included 3,620 patients (72.1% male) with an average age of 65 ± 12 years. After conducting a binary forward multivariate logistic regression, frailty was not associated with amputation, surgical site infection, or bypass revision. However, frailty at the highest vs lowest RAI score was significantly associated with 3.26 higher times the odds of mortality and 0.32 lower times the odds of being discharged home.ConclusionFrailty, modeled by the RAI, was demonstrated to be associated with postoperative outcomes in a linear manner in ALI patients undergoing open bypass lower extremity revascularization. Since this is one of the first times a long-term outcomes national database such as the VQI was utilized to study this topic, our research supports the incorporation of the RAI as a screening tool for ALI patients to help guide postoperative care and prognosis and guide shared decision-making in whether to pursue limb salvage or primary amputation.

Frailty Screening Using the Risk Analysis Index: A User Guide

The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has emerged as the most thoroughly validated and flexible assessment of surgical frailty, proven feasible for at-scale bedside screening and available in a suite of tools, that effectively risk stratifies patients across a wide variety of clinical contexts and data sources. This user guide provides a definitive summary of the RAI's theoretical model, historical development, validation, statistical performance, and clinical interpretation, placing the RAI in context with other frailty assessments and emphasizing some of its advantages. Detailed instructions are provided for each RAI variant, along with a systematic review of existing RAI-related literature.

Expanding the EVAR Pool with Non-IFU Patients: How Important is Subjective Physician Assessment?

Objectives: In order to reduce the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related complication rate in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, manufacturers recommend following the instructions for use (IFU). However, IFU is considered too conservative in many centers. In this context, we present our experience and patient follow-up data with 248 consecutive patients with or without IFU eligibility. Methods: A total of 248 patients who underwent elective EVAR for AAA between 2014 and 2019 were included. In total, 190 patients were in the IFU group and 58 in the non-IFU group. Patients were evaluated for baseline demographic and anatomic data; unexpected periprocedural intervention; and postoperative data such as development of endoleaks during follow-up, need for re-intervention, development of complications, EVAR patency, and mean 5-year survival rate. Results: The patients did not differ in terms of basic demographic data. The basic anatomical data were suitable for the IFU standard. Intraoperative endoleak development was significantly higher in the non-IFU group. In addition, the development of endoleaks at any time, the need for re-intervention, and the development of complications were higher in the non-IFU group at postoperative follow-up. Survival analysis showed no difference in the mean 5-year follow-up. The EVAR patency rate was higher in the IFU group. Conclusions: We believe that the decision for a non-IFU EVAR should be patient-specific and that the results of the subjective medical assessment should definitely be taken into account. However, we should not forget that EVAR patients, especially non-IFU patients, are susceptible to future changes in the aorta and prone to the development of endoleaks and re-interventions.

Decision making in the frail vascular surgery patient: A scoping review

Increasing evidence highlights the adverse impact of frailty and reduced physiologic reserve on surgical outcomes. Therefore, identification of frailty is essential for older adults being evaluated for vascular surgery procedures. Numerous frailty assessment tools are available to quantify the level of frailty and assist in preoperative decision making for these older patients. This review evaluates traditional and novel frailty metrics for their scientific validation, limitations, and clinical utility in vascular surgery decision-making.

Differences in preoperative frailty assessment of surgical candidates by sex, age, and race

Introduction

Surgical decision-making often relies on a surgeon's subjective assessment of a patient's frailty status to undergo surgery. Certain patient demographics can influence subjective judgment when compared to validated objective assessments. In this study, we explore the relationship between subjective and objective frailty assessments according to patient age, sex, and race.

Methods

Patients were prospectively enrolled in urology, general surgery, and surgical oncology clinics. Using a visual analog scale (0-100), operating surgeons independently rated the patient's frailty status. Objective frailty was classified using the Fried Frailty Criteria ranging from 0 to 5. Multivariable proportional odds models were conducted to examine the potential association of factors with objective frailty, according to surgeon frailty rating. Subgroup analysis according to patient sex, race, and age was also performed.

Results

Seven male surgeons assessed 203 patients preoperatively with a median age of 65. A majority of patients were male (61 %), white (67 %), and 60 % and 40 % underwent urologic and general surgery/surgical oncology procedures respectively. Increased subjective surgeon rating (OR 1.69; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with the presence of objective frailty. On subgroup analysis, a higher magnitude of such association was observed more in females (OR 1.86; p = 0.0007), non-white (OR 1.84; p = 0.0019), and older (>60, OR 1.75; p = 0.0001) patients, compared to male (OR 1.45; p = 0.0243), non-white (OR 1.48; p = 0.0109) and patients under 60 (OR 1.47; p = 0.0823).

Conclusion

The surgeon's subjective assessment of frailty demonstrated tendencies to rate older, female, and non-white patients as frail; however, differences in patient sex, age, and race were not statistically significant.

Impact of frailty on adverse outcomes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic role of frailty in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS: We conducted an extensive literature search on PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase databases to identify studies that reported the association of frailty with postoperative complications, reintervention, or all-cause mortality in patients with AAA after surgery. Short-term mortality was defined by a combination of in-hospital and 30-day death.

RESULTS

Seven cohort studies reporting on 9 articles with 323,788 AAA patients were included. The reported prevalence of frailty in AAA patients ranged between 2.3% and 34.6%. Pooling the results revealed that frailty was significantly associated with a higher risk of short-term all-cause mortality (adjusted risk ratios [RR] 3.20; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.95-5.26), long-term all-cause mortality (adjusted RR 2.86; 95% CI 2.57-3.17), and postoperative complications (adjusted RR 2.19; 95% CI 1.50-3.20) compared to non-frail individuals. However, there was no clear association between frailty and reintervention (HR 1.44; 95% CI 0.97-2.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty independently predicts the short and long-term survival as well as postoperative complications in patients with AAA undergoing surgery. Assessing frail status may potentially enhance surgical decision-making for these patients.

A systematic review of frailty assessment tools used in vascular surgery research

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is common in vascular patients and is recognized for its prognostic value. In the absence of consensus, a multitude of frailty assessment tools exist. This systematic review aimed to quantify the variety in these tools and describe their content and application to inform future research and clinical practice.

METHODS

Multiple cross-disciplinary electronic literature databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Studies describing frailty assessment in a vascular surgical population were eligible. Data extraction to a validated template included patient demographics, tool content, and analysis methods. A secondary systematic search for papers describing the psychometric properties of commonly used frailty tools was then performed.

RESULTS

Screening 5358 records identified 111 eligible studies, with an aggregate population of 5,418,236 patients. Forty-three differing frailty assessment tools were identified. One-third of these failed to assess frailty as a multidomain deficit and there was a reliance on assessing function and presence of comorbidity. Substantial methodological variability in data analysis and lack of methodological description was also identified. Published psychometric assessment was available for only 4 of the 10 most commonly used frailty tools. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most studied and demonstrates good psychometric properties within a surgical population.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment is demonstrated, precluding meaningful comparisons of services and data pooling. A uniform approach to assessment is required to guide future frailty research. Based on the literature, we make the following recommendations: frailty should be considered a continuous construct and the reporting of frailty tools' application needs standardized. In the absence of consensus, the Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated tool with good psychometric properties that demonstrates usefulness in vascular surgery.

Simplifying Hospital Quality Comparisons for Vascular Surgery Using Center-Level Frailty Burden Rather Than Comorbidities

BACKGROUND

Failure to rescue (FtR), or inpatient death following complication, is a publicly reported hospital quality measure. Previous work has demonstrated significant variation in the proportion of frail patients across hospitals. However, frailty is not incorporated into risk-adjustment algorithms for hospital quality comparisons and risk adjustment is made by comorbidity scores. Our aim was to assess the impact of frailty on FtR quality measurement and as a means of risk adjustment.

METHODS

Patients undergoing open or endovascular aneurysm repair or lower extremity bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) at centers performing ≥ 25 vascular procedures annually (2003-2019) were included. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated in-hospital death using scaled hierarchical modeling clustering at the center level. Center FtR observed/expected ratios were compared with expected values adjusted for either standard comorbidity profiles or frailty as measured by the VQI Risk Analysis Index. Centers were divided into quartiles using VQI-linked American Hospital Association data to describe the hospital characteristics of centers whose ranks changed.

RESULTS

A total of 63,143 patients (213 centers) were included; 1,630 patients (2.58%) were classified as FtR. After accounting for center-level variability, frailty was associated with FtR [scaled odds ratio 1.9 (1.8-2.0), P < 0.001]. The comorbidity-centric and frailty-based models performed similarly in predicting FtR with C-statistics of 0.85 (0.84-0.86) and 0.82 (0.82-0.84), respectively. Overall changes in ranking based on observed/expected ratios were not statistically significant (P = 0.48). High and low performing centers had similar ranking using comorbidity-centric and frailty-based methods; however, centers in the middle of the performance spectrum saw more variability in ranking alterations. Forty nine (23%) of hospitals improved their ranking by five or more positions when using frailty versus comorbidity risk adjustment. The centers in Quartile 4, those who performed the highest number of vascular procedures annually, experience on average a significant improvement in hospital ranking when frailty was used for risk adjustment, whereas centers performing the fewest number of vascular procedures and the lowest proportion of vascular surgery cases annually (Quartile 1) saw a significant worsening of ranking position (all P < 0.05). However, total number of surgical procedures annually, total hospital beds, for-profit status, and teaching hospital status were not significantly associated with changes in rank.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple frailty-adjusted model has similar predictive abilities as a comorbidity-focused model for predicting a common quality metric that influences reimbursement. In addition to distilling the risk-adjustment algorithm to a few variables, frailty can be assessed preoperatively to develop quality improvement efforts for rescuing frail patients. Centers treating a greater proportion of frail patients and those who perform higher volumes of vascular surgery benefit from a risk adjustment strategy based on frailty.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis and Pre-existing Sarcopenia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Critically ill patients with sepsis account for significant disease morbidity and healthcare costs. Sarcopenia has been proposed as an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes, although its effect on long-term outcomes remains unclear.

Methods

Retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated at a tertiary care medical center over 6 years (09/2014 - 12/2020). Critically ill patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were included, with sarcopenia defined by skeletal muscle index at the L3 lumbar area on abdominal Computed-Tomography scan. The prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with clinical outcomes was analyzed.

Results

Sarcopenia was present in 34 (23%) of 150 patients, with median skeletal muscle indices of 28.1 cm 2 /m 2 and 37.3 cm 2 /m 2 in sarcopenic females and males, respectively. In-hospital mortality was not associated with sarcopenia when adjusted for age and illness severity. One year mortality was increased in sarcopenic patients, after adjustment for illness severity (HR 1.9, p = 0.02) and age (HR 2.4, p = 0.001). However, it was not associated with increased likelihood for discharge to long-term rehabilitation or hospice care in adjusted analyses.

Conclusion

Sarcopenia independently predicts one year mortality but is not associated with unfavorable hospital discharge disposition in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Early Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

This study compares the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), based on their weight status as defined by their body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Patients with primary EVAR for ruptured and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2019). Patients were categorized by weight status (underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m², normal weight: 18.5-24.9 kg/m², overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m², Obese I: 30-34.9 kg/m², Obese II: 35-39.9 kg/m², Obese III: > 40 kg/m²). Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of 3,941 patients, 4.8% were underweight, 24.1% normal weight, 37.6% overweight, and 22.5% with Obese I, 7.8% Obese II, and 3.3% Obese III status. Underweight patients presented with larger (6.0 [5.4-7.2] cm) and more frequently ruptured (25.0%) aneurysms than normal weight patients (5.5 [5.1-6.2] cm and 4.3%, P < 0.001 for both). Pooled 30-day mortality was worse for underweight (8.5%) compared to all other weight status (1.1-3.0%, P < 0.001), but risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated that aneurysm rupture (odds ratio [OR] 15.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.98-28.0) and not underweight status (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.73-4.18) accounted for increased mortality in this population. Obese III status was associated with prolonged operative time and respiratory complications after ruptured AAA, but not 30-day mortality (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.25-2.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at either extreme of the BMI range had the worst outcomes after EVAR. Underweight patients represented only 4.8% of all EVARs, but 21% of mortalities, largely attributed to higher incidence of ruptured AAA at presentation. Severe obesity, on the other hand, was associated with prolonged operative time and respiratory complications after EVAR for ruptured AAA. BMI, as an independent factor, was however not predictive of mortality for EVAR.

Sex difference in early mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Although female patients have a lower prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), they seem to have a worse treatment outcome compared with male patients. Both maximum aneurysm diameter and aortic size index (ASI) are important indicators of the risk of AAA rupture, among which ASI has been shown capable of equalizing sex-related anatomical differences. Our study aimed to investigate whether sex is an independent risk factor for early postoperative mortality and how the diameter or ASI affects the association between sex and mortality.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who enrolled in the AAA registry of the German Society of Vascular Surgery from 2013 to 2019. The patients were treated by either open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The association between sex and 30-day mortality was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The interaction and mediating effects of maximum aneurysm diameter and ASI were investigated to verify their roles in the effect of sex on mortality. The relationships between the diameter (or ASI) and the risk of 30-day mortality in different sexes were demonstrated by the restricted cubic spline.

RESULTS

Overall, 23,275 cases were included in our analysis, with 20,130 male (86.5%) and 3139 female (13.5%) patients. Female patients had a smaller maximum aneurysm diameter (OSR, 55.23 ± 10.29 mm vs 58.05 ± 11.28 mm [P < .001]; EVAR, 54.06 ± 9.08 mm vs 56.11 ± 9.38 mm [P < .001]), but a higher ASI (OSR, 3.16 ± 0.71 vs 2.92 ± 0.69 [P < .001]; EVAR, 3.05 ± 0.66 vs 2.80 ± 0.59 [P < .001]) compared with male patients. The 30-day mortality rate was higher for female patients in both OSR (6.6% vs 4.2%; P = .002) and EVAR groups (1.8% vs 0.8%; P < .001). Logistic regression confirmed a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality for female patients compared with male patients (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.99; P = .001). No interaction was found between sex and diameter or ASI, but there were mediating effects for diameter and ASI in the effect of sex on 30-day mortality. For female patients, the risk of 30-day mortality linearly increased with the increase of diameter (P_Nonlinear = .089) or ASI (P_Nonlinear = .888), whereas the risk for male patients was U-shaped (for diameter, P_Nonlinear < .001; for ASI, P_Nonlinear = .020).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality after AAA repair. Both diameter and ASI are mediating factors for the effect of sex on 30-day mortality. The relationship between diameter or ASI and the risk of 30-day mortality is different for male and female patients.

Preoperative frailty measured by risk analysis index predicts complications and poor discharge outcomes after Brain Tumor Resection in a large multi-center analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the independent effect of frailty, as measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Administrative (RAI-A) for postoperative complications and discharge outcomes following brain tumor resection (BTR) in a large multi-center analysis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing BTR were queried from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSIQP) for the years 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the independent associations between frailty tools (age, 5-factor modified frailty score [mFI-5], and RAI-A) on postoperative complications and discharge outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 30,951 patients who underwent craniotomy for BTR; the median age of our study sample was 59 (IQR 47-68) years old and 47.8% of patients were male. Overall, increasing RAI-A score, in an overall stepwise fashion, was associated with increasing risk of adverse outcomes including in-hospital mortality, non-routine discharge, major complications, Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complication, and extended length of stay. Multivariable regression analysis (adjusting for age, sex, BMI, non-elective surgery status, race, and ethnicity) demonstrated that RAI-A was an independent predictor for worse BTR outcomes. The RAI-A tiers 41-45 (1.2% cohort) and > 45 (0.3% cohort) were ~ 4 (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% CI: 2.1-8.9) and ~ 9 (OR: 9.5, 95% CI: 3.9-22.9) times more likely to have in-hospital mortality compared to RAI-A 0-20 (34% cohort).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Increasing preoperative frailty as measured by the RAI-A score is independently associated with increased risk of complications and adverse discharge outcomes after BTR. The RAI-A may help providers present better preoperative risk assessment for patients and families weighing the risks and benefits of potential BTR.

Perioperative care in open aortic vascular surgery: A Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society and Society for Vascular Surgery

The Society for Vascular Surgery and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society formally collaborated and elected an international, multi-disciplinary panel of experts to review the literature and provide evidence-based recommendations related to all of the health care received in the perioperative period for patients undergoing open abdominal aortic operations (both transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches, including supraceliac, suprarenal, and infrarenal clamp sites, for aortic aneurysm and aortoiliac occlusive disease). Structured around the ERAS® core elements, 36 recommendations were made and organized into preadmission, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative recommendations.

Prevalence and Prognosis Impact of Frailty Among Older Adults in Cardiac Intensive Care Units

Background

Whether frailty, defined as a biological syndrome that reflects a state of decreased physiological reserve and vulnerability to stressors, may impact the outcomes of elderly patients admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality in patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted to a CICU.

Methods

This prospective single-centre observational study was conducted among patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted to a CICU in a tertiary centre. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), which provides a score ranging from 0 (not frail) to 17 (very frail). The population was divided into 3 classes: EFS-score of 0-3, EFS-score of 4-6, and EFS-score > 7.

Results

A total of 199 patients were included, and median follow-up duration was 365 days. The mean age was 84.8 years, and 50 patients (25.1%) died during the follow-up period. In all, 45 (22.6%), 60 (30.2%), and 94 patients (47.2%) had an EFS-score of 0-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7, respectively. The all-cause mortality rate was 4.4%, 27.1%, and 37.2% in the 0-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7 EFS-score groups, respectively (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, frailty status remained associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratio was 2.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54-12.45) within the 4-6 EFS-score group, and 5.46 (95% confidence interval 1.23-24.08) within the ≥ 7 EFS-score group.

Conclusions

Frailty is highly prevalent in older adults admitted to the population hospitalized in a CICU and represents a strong prognostic factor for 1-year all-cause mortality.

Successful Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with High-risk Comorbidities or Lesion Characteristics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Certain comorbidities and lesion characteristics are associated with increased risk for procedural complications, limb events, and cardiovascular events following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of high-risk modifiable and unmodifiable patient characteristics and its relative impact on clinical outcomes such as amputation risk and mortality. Furthermore, general approaches to potentially mitigating these risks through pre-intervention planning and use of modern devices and techniques are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetes, tobacco use, and older age remain strong risk factors for the development of peripheral arterial disease. Recent data highlight the significant risk of polyvascular disease on major limb and cardiac events in advanced PAD, and ongoing studies are assessing this risk specifically after PVI. Challenging lesion characteristics such as calcified disease and chronic total occlusions can be successfully treated with PVI by utilizing novel devices (e.g., intravascular lithotripsy, re-entry devices) and techniques (e.g., subintimal arterial "flossing" with antegrade-retrograde intervention). Understanding high-risk patient comorbidities and lesion characteristics will improve our ability to counsel and manage patients with advanced PAD. Continued device innovation and novel techniques will aid in procedural planning for successful interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

Association Between Patient Frailty and Postoperative Mortality Across Multiple Noncardiac Surgical Specialties

Importance

Frailty is an important risk factor for postoperative mortality. Whether the association between frailty and mortality is consistent across all surgical specialties, especially those predominantly performing lower stress procedures, remains unknown.

Objective

To examine the association between frailty and postoperative mortality across surgical specialties.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cohort study was conducted across 9 noncardiac specialties in hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014, using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between frailty and postoperative mortality. Data analysis was conducted from September 15, 2019, to April 30, 2020. Patients 18 years or older undergoing noncardiac procedures were included.

Exposures

Risk Analysis Index measuring preoperative frailty categorized patients as robust (Risk Analysis Index ≤20), normal (21-29), frail (30-39), or very frail (≥40). Operative Stress Score (OSS) categorized procedures as low (1-2), moderate (3), and high (4-5) stress. Specialties were categorized by case-mix as predominantly low intensity (>75% OSS 1-2), moderate intensity (50%-75%), or high intensity (<50%).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Thirty-day (both measures) and 180-day (VASQIP only) postoperative mortality.

Results

Of the patients evaluated in NSQIP (n = 2 339 031), 1 309 795 were women (56.0%) and mean (SD) age was 56.49 (16.4) years. Of the patients evaluated in VASQIP (n = 426 578), 395 761 (92.78%) were men and mean (SD) age was 61.1 (12.9) years. Overall, 30-day mortality was 1.2% in NSQIP and 1.0% in VASQIP, and 180-day mortality in VASQIP was 3.4%. Frailty and OSS distributions differed substantially across the 9 specialties. Patterns of 30-day mortality for frail and very frail patients were similar in NSQIP and VASQIP for low-, moderate-, and high-intensity specialties. Frailty was a consistent, independent risk factor for 30- and 180-day mortality across all specialties. For example, in NSQIP, for plastic surgery, a low-intensity specialty, the odds of 30-day mortality in very frail (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 27.99; 95% CI, 14.67-53.39) and frail (aOR, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.03-8.58) patients were statistically significantly higher than for normal patients. This was also true in neurosurgery, a moderate-intensity specialty, for very frail (aOR, 9.8; 95% CI, 7.68-12.50) and frail (aOR, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.58-4.89) patients and in vascular surgery, a high-intensity specialty, for very frail (aOR, 10.85; 95% CI, 9.83-11.96) and frail (aOR, 3.42; 95% CI, 3.19-3.67) patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, frailty was associated with postoperative mortality across all noncardiac surgical specialties regardless of case-mix. Preoperative frailty assessment could be implemented across all specialties to facilitate risk stratification and shared decision-making.