An Immune Recovery-Based Revaccination Protocol for Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Revaccination Outcomes Following Pediatric HSCT

Vaccinations in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology: Biologic Basis, Clinical Applications, and Perspectives

Children with hemato-oncological diseases represent a heterogeneous population at heightened risk for vaccine-preventable diseases. Their immunosuppressed state reduces vaccine efficacy and raises safety concerns regarding live attenuated vaccines due to the risk of viral reactivation. The immunological and clinical implications of the single conditions are significantly different; therefore, specific vaccination strategies are needed. Despite the availability of vaccine guidelines for immunocompromised patients, clinical practice remains highly variable. It is generally recommended to avoid vaccinations during chemotherapy, with some exceptions for influenza, pneumococcal, and, in some countries, hepatitis B vaccines. The timing of immune recovery after chemotherapy depends on the specific treatment and most guidelines recommend administering vaccines 3-6 months after treatment cessation. Concerning HSCT, the timing of immune recovery is affected by several factors such as the HSCT platform, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and infections. Inactivated vaccines are typically administered 3-6 months post-HSCT, while live attenuated vaccines are delayed for at least two years. In children with asplenia or hyposplenism, recommendations focus on immunization against encapsulated bacteria, with tailored schedules based on the patient's age and underlying condition. This paper explores the biological factors influencing vaccination efficacy and safety in pediatric hematology and oncology patients. It also provides an updated overview of the available evidence and current vaccination guidelines. Finally, this paper highlights the main clinical and research areas for further improvement to provide tailored vaccination schedules for this vulnerable population.

Unrelated cord blood transplantation using minimal-intensity conditioning in a 1.5-month-old infant with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency

BACKGROUND

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a heterogenous disorder with profound deficiency of T/B-cell functions. The best SCID therapy requires hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) early in life. HSCT with conditioning is necessary to achieve a long-term reconstitution of B-cell functions. However, conditioning may aggravate pre-existing infection and cause transplant-related toxicity, especially in very young infants. Hence, the intensity of conditioning should be reduced to allow the reconstitution of immunity including B cells to the extent that prevents transplant-related toxicity and delayed complications.

METHODS

An infant with a family history of X-linked SCID (X-SCID) was diagnosed with X-SCID disorder soon after birth. The infant exhibited cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection despite being strictly isolated. At 1.5 months of age, we performed an unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) with a less intensity conditioning regimen: fludarabine (125 mg/m2) + melphalan (80 mg/m2). We evaluated the efficacy of reconstitution by assessing B-cell function and growth and psychomotor development at 5 years and 7 months after CBT.

RESULTS

The clinical course after CBT was uneventful after CBT. The CMV infection was fully controlled by ganciclovir or foscavir therapy, which was discontinued at day 55 after CBT. Furthermore, immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy was also discontinued at 6 months after CBT. A sufficient proportion of CD27+ memory B cells was developed, which was essential for an effective vaccination and prevention of infections. While the B-cell chimerism became recipient-dominant, the Ig replacement therapy was substituted by very successful post-vaccine immunity acquisition after CBT. The analysis of the general developmental parameters showed that chemotherapy did not cause any delay in growth and psychomotor development.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBT therapy with this conditioning regimen was well tolerated and induced an effective reconstitution of B-cell functions in an X-SCID infant under the 3 months of age.

Strategic infection prevention after genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies: recommendations from the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee

There is lack of guidance for immune monitoring and infection prevention after administration of ex vivo genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies (GMHSCT). We reviewed current infection prevention practices as reported by providers experienced with GMHSCTs across North America and Europe, and assessed potential immunologic compromise associated with the therapeutic process of GMHSCTs described to date. Based on these assessments, and with consensus from members of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT) Stem Cell Engineering Committee, we propose risk-adapted recommendations for immune monitoring, infection surveillance and prophylaxis, and revaccination after receipt of GMHSCTs. Disease-specific and GMHSCT-specific considerations should guide decision making for each therapy.

Vaccinations in children with hematologic malignancies and those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants or cellular therapies

Children who are immune compromised are uniquely threatened by a higher risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). Children who undergo chemotherapy or cellular therapies may not have preexisting immunity to VPDs at the time of their treatment including not yet receiving their primary vaccine series, and additionally they have higher risk of exposures (e.g., due to family structures, daycare and school setting) with decreased capacity to protect themselves using nonpharmaceutic measures (e.g., masking). In the past, efforts to revaccinate these children have often been delayed or incomplete. Treatment with chemotherapy, stem cell transplants, and/or cellular therapies impair the ability of the immune system to mount a robust vaccine response. Ideally, protection would be provided as soon as both safe and effective, which will vary by vaccine type (e.g., replicating versus nonreplicating; conjugated versus polysaccharide). While a single approach revaccination schedule following these therapies would be convenient for providers, it would not account for patient specific factors that influence the timing of immune reconstitution (IR). Evidence suggests that many of these children would mount a meaningful vaccine response as early as 3 months following completion of treatment. Here within, we provide updated guidance on how to approach vaccination both during and following completion of these therapies.

Updates in hematopoietic cell transplant and cellular therapies that enhance the risk for opportunistic infections

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease physicians may be asked to evaluate and manage a variety of infections in immunocompromised hosts undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and cellular therapies. Over the last decade, several advances in cellular therapy have occurred, with implications for the types of infectious complications that may be seen.

AIMS

The purpose of this review is to update the infectious disease physician on newer advances in HCT and cellular therapy, including haploidentical transplant, expanding indications for transplant in older individuals and children, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells. We will review how these advances might influence infectious disease complications following HCT. We will also provide a perspective that infectious disease physicians can use to evaluate the degree of immune suppression in an individual patient to help determine the type of infections that may be encountered.

High Rates of Seroprotection and Seroconversion to Vaccine-Preventable Infections in the Early Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Period

In patients early post-autologous stem cell transplant, seroprotection rates were high for Hemophilus influenzae type B and tetanus toxoid (70%-90%) but lower for Streptococcus pneumoniae (30%-50%) including after revaccination. There were high rates of seropositivity (67%-86%) to measles, mumps, and rubella and varicella zoster virus. Durability of protection requires assessment.

Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Time and Adherence to Revaccination after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Implementation of a Revaccination Clinic within the Transplantation Program

Revaccination after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is critical to prevent morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable illnesses. The global aim of our quality improvement initiative was to enhance timely, correct, and effective revaccination after pediatric HCT. The SMART aim of our project was to decrease median unvaccinated time by 4 months by decreasing the time to vaccine eligibility, time from eligibility to vaccine initiation, and time to completion of the vaccine series. A multidisciplinary group performed a cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative evaluation of revaccination practices at our institution. We identified factors associated with delayed, incorrect, or incomplete revaccination. Several plan-do-study-act interventions were implemented to address these drivers, including revising immune readiness criteria, increasing auditing of primary care administered immunizations, and, importantly, establishing a dedicated revaccination clinic within the HCT clinic at our center. The time to vaccine eligibility decreased from 12.6 months to 10 months (a 20% decrease), and the time to complete the vaccine series decreased from 19.3 months to 15.7 months (a 19% decrease). With a quality improvement initiative, we addressed the many causes of delayed or incomplete revaccination post-HCT and through a team-based approach successfully decreased the time to vaccine start and time to vaccine completion at our center.

Vaccine Adherence and Postvaccination Serological Status of Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience

Despite developing consensus guidelines addressing immunization after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), studies showed deviations from recommended immunization practices commonly occur. Difference between the ideal scenario presented in guidelines and real-life scenarios is one of the most recognized barriers to implementing recommended practices. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients' adherence to revaccination schedule and evaluate the serological status after immunization. Transplant and vaccination records of children who were followed up at least 2 years after HSCT, postvaccination antibody results of vaccine-preventable diseases were evaluated retrospectively. Total of 173 patients have enrolled in this study. Median revaccination onset time was post-transplant 15 months. Adherence to revaccination program was 30% for inactive and 11.4% for live vaccines. Oral polio vaccine was given to 22 patients, and Bacille-Calmette-Guerin vaccine was applied to 3. Seropositivity after revaccination was >90% for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis A, pertussis, and measles, and it was 88.5% for rubella, 80% for mumps and varicella. Measles seropositivity was low in children with hemoglobinopathy. In subgroup assessments of pertussis, patients vaccinated with low antigen-containing pertussis vaccine (Tdap) had higher seropositivity of adenylate cyclase toxin. Our findings revealed the importance of careful monitoring of current practices in pediatric HSCT recipients.

Adoptive immune transfer from donors offers Anti-HBV protection to HBsAb-negative patients after Allo-HSCT

Adoptive transfer of hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity may occur following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Here, we investigated the adoptive transfer of HBV immunity in 112 patients without HBV surface antibody (HBsAb) (HBsAb-) at the time of their first allo-HSCT. After allo-HSCT, HBV-DNA（87.5%） and HBsAg（11.1%%）cleared in HBsAg+ patients. All HBsAg- patients acquired HBsAb immediately. Nevertheless, HBsAb titers subsequently declined, and 39/67 (58.2%) patients lost HBsAb during follow-up. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was better in patients who lost HBsAb. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent risk factors for OS were lack of cytomegalovirus (CMV) clearance, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and no HBsAb loss. Overall, adoptive immune transfer offers anti-HBV protection to patients without HBsAb, as they acquire HBsAb and clear HBV-DNA and HBsAg, while HBsAb loss after allo-HSCT predicts better survival.

Antibody Response against Vaccine Antigens in Children after TCRαβ-Depleted Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: Is It Similar to That in Recipients with Fully Matched Donors?

Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with HLA-mismatched donors are more immune suppressed than those with fully matched donors. The immunologic response to vaccines also may differ in HLA-mismatched haploidentical HSCT recipients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the antibody response to vaccines in pediatric TCRαβ-depleted haploidentical HSCT recipients. This longitudinal study included a study group of 21 children who underwent haploidentical HSCT without CD19 depletion and with TCRαβ depletion and a control group of 38 children who underwent fully matched donor HSCT. Antibody levels were quantified by serologic tests before vaccination and after each dose against tetanus, diphtheria, pneumococcus, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella. The median recipient age was significantly lower (P = .037) and the median donor age was significantly higher (P = .000) in the haploidentical group compared with the fully matched group. At the months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplantation, the median CD4, CD8, and CD19 cell counts and lymphocyte counts were similar in the haploidentical and fully matched groups. The median natural killer cell count was higher in the haploidentical group at the months 1, 3, and 6 post-transplantation (P = .001, .006, and .004, respectively). The median time to first vaccination was similar in the 2 groups (12.5 [range, 11 to 14] months for the haploidentical group and 11 [range, 9 to 13] months for the fully matched group; P = .441). Seroprotection rates were 100% in both groups after the second and third doses of diphtheria vaccine, the third dose of tetanus vaccine, the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine, the second and third doses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13), and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PSPV23), although lower after the initial doses and before vaccination. Seroprotection for hepatitis A, rubella, and varicella was >90% in the fully matched group and 100% for the haploidentical group after the second doses. Measles and mumps seroprotection rates were >80% in the haploidentical group and approximately 70% for the fully matched group after the second dose. Antibody response and seroprotection rates against vaccine antigens were similar in the haploidentical group and the fully matched when revaccination was started at 12 months post-transplantation. These findings support the idea that TCRαβ-depleted haploidentical HSCT recipients can be revaccinated according to the same vaccination schedule as fully matched HSCT recipients. Revaccination earlier after transplantation and vaccine responses for recipients of different types of HSCT should be evaluated in future studies.

Rituximab Toxicity after Preemptive or Therapeutic Administration for Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Rituximab is commonly used as prevention, preemption, or therapeutically for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although it is generally assumed that rituximab toxicity (ie, infections resulting from hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia) is negligible in relation to mortality due to PTLD, limited evidence supports the validity of this assumption. We sought to determine the impact of rituximab on immunoglobulin levels, neutrophil count, infection density, and mortality outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed 349 HCT recipients, 289 of whom did not receive rituximab and 60 of whom received rituximab preemptively or therapeutically at a median of 55 days post-transplantation. IgM, IgG, and IgA levels at 6 months and 12 months post-transplantation were lower in patients who received rituximab compared with those who did not (significant at P < .05 for IgM and IgA at 6 months and for IgM and IgG at 12 months). Rituximab recipients also had a higher incidence of severe neutropenia (<.5/nl) between 3 and 24 months (subhazard ratio [SHR], 2.3; P = .020). Regarding non-Epstein-Barr viral infections/PTLD, the rituximab group had a higher infection density between 3 and 24 months compared with the no-rituximab group (3.8 versus 1.6 infections per 365 days at risk; incidence rate ratio, 2.2; P < .001). The rituximab group also had a higher incidence of fatal infections (SHR, 3.1; P = .026), higher nonrelapse mortality (SHR, 2.4; P = .006), and higher overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.7; P = .033). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of clinically significant graft-versus-host disease, graft failure, or relapse. Based on this study, rituximab given for PTLD is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether the benefit of preemptive rituximab outweighs the risk remains to be determined. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

An ISCT Stem Cell Engineering Committee Position Statement on Immune Reconstitution: the importance of predictable and modifiable milestones of immune reconstitution to transplant outcomes

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for some malignant and non-malignant disease. There have been substantial advances since the approaches first introduced in the 1970s, and the development of approaches to transplant with HLA incompatible or alternative donors has improved access to transplant for those without a fully matched donor. However, success is still limited by morbidity and mortality from toxicity and imperfect disease control. Here we review our emerging understanding of how reconstitution of effective immunity after allogeneic transplant can protect from these events and improve outcomes. We provide perspective on milestones of immune reconstitution that are easily measured and modifiable.