Impact of Bridging Chemotherapy on Clinical Outcomes of CD19-Specific CAR T Cell Therapy in Children/Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Comparison of infectious complications with BCMA-directed therapies in multiple myeloma

B-cell-maturation-antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies are highly active for multiple myeloma, but infections are emerging as a major challenge. In this retrospective, single-center analysis we evaluated infectious complications after BCMA-targeted chimeric-antigen-receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), bispecific-antibodies (BsAb) and antibody-drug-conjugates (ADC). The primary endpoint was severe (grade ≥3) infection incidence. Amongst 256 patients, 92 received CAR-T, 55 BsAb and 109 ADC. The incidence of severe infections was higher with BsAb (40%) than CAR-T (26%) or ADC (8%), including grade 5 infections (7% vs 0% vs 0%, respectively). Comparing T-cell redirecting therapies, the incidence rate of severe infections was significantly lower with CAR-T compared to BsAb at 1-year (incidence-rate-ratio [IRR] = 0.43, 95%CI 0.25-0.76, P = 0.004). During periods of treatment-emergent hypogammaglobulinemia, BsAb recipients had higher infection rates (IRR:2.27, 1.31-3.98, P = 0.004) and time to severe infection (HR 2.04, 1.05-3.96, P = 0.036) than their CAR-T counterparts. During periods of non-neutropenia, CAR-T recipients had a lower risk (HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.21-0.93, P = 0.032) and incidence rate (IRR:0.32, 95% 0.17-0.59, P < 0.001) of severe infections than BsAb. In conclusion, we observed an overall higher and more persistent risk of severe infections with BsAb. Our results also suggest a higher infection risk during periods of hypogammaglobulinemia with BsAb, and with neutropenia in CAR-T recipients.

Practice guideline: Preparation for CAR T-cell therapy in children and young adults with B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

The objective of this guideline, prepared by the ALL subgroup of the Advanced Cell Therapy Sub-Committee of BSBMTCT (British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation), is to provide healthcare professionals with practical guidance on the preparation of children and young adults with B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from the point of referral to that of admission for CAR T-cell treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate the levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.

The new era of immunological treatment, last updated and future consideration of CAR T cell-based drugs

Cancer treatment is one of the fundamental challenges in clinical setting, especially in relapsed/refractory malignancies. The novel immunotherapy-based treatments bring new hope in cancer therapy and achieve various treatment successes. One of the distinguished ways of cancer immunotherapy is adoptive cell therapy, which utilizes genetically modified immune cells against cancer cells. Between different methods in ACT, the chimeric antigen receptor T cells have more investigation and introduced a promising way to treat cancer patients. This technology progressed until it introduced six US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR T cell-based drugs. These drugs act against hematological malignancies appropriately and achieve exciting results, so they have been utilized widely in cell therapy clinics. In this review, we introduce all CAR T cells-approved drugs based on their last data and investigate them from all aspects of pharmacology, side effects, and compressional. Also, the efficacy of drugs, pre- and post-treatment steps, and expected side effects are introduced, and the challenges and new solutions in CAR T cell therapy are in the last speech.

Discrete Event Simulation to Incorporate Infusion Wait-Time When Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of a Chimeric-Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to use discrete event simulation to model the impact of wait-time, defined as the time between leukapheresis and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) infusion, when assessing the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel in young patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

METHODS

The movement of patients through the model was determined by parametric time-to-event distributions, with the competing risk of an event determining the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) assigned. Cost-effectiveness was expressed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for tisagenlecleucel compared with chemotherapy over the lifetime.

RESULTS

The base case generated a total of 5.79 QALYs and $622 872 for tisagenlecleucel and 1.19 QALYs and $181 219 for blinatumomab, resulting in an ICER of $96 074 per QALY. An increase in mean CAR-T wait-time to 6.20 months reduced the benefit and costs of tisagenlecleucel to 2.78 QALYs and $294 478 because of fewer patients proceeding to infusion, reducing the ICER to $71 112 per QALY. Alternatively, when the cost of tisagenlecleucel was assigned pre-infusion in sensitivity analysis, the ICER increased with increasing wait-time.

CONCLUSIONS

Under a payment arrangement where CAR-T cost is incurred post-infusion, the loss of benefit to patients is not reflected in the ICER. This may be misguiding to decision makers, where cost-effectiveness ratios are used to guide resource allocation. discrete event simulation is an important tool for economic modeling of CAR-T as it is amenable to capturing the impact of wait-time, facilitating better understanding of factors affecting service delivery and consequently informed decision making to deliver faster access to CAR-T for patients.

Comparative efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel among adults with r/r follicular lymphoma

Regulatory approvals of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) have established the feasibility of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL). This study used individual patient data from ELARA (tisa-cel) and aggregate published patient data from ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) to compare efficacy and safety outcomes in r/r FL using matching-adjusted indirect comparison methods. After adjustment for baseline differences in the trial populations, the results suggested that tisa-cel (n = 52), compared with axi-cel (n = 86), had similar effects on overall response rate (91.2% vs. 94.2%; p = .58), complete response rate (74.0% vs. 79.1%; p = .60), progression-free survival (HR [95% CI]: 0.8 [0.4, 1.9]; p = .67), and overall survival (HR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.2, 1.5]; p = .21). Tisa-cel (n = 53) was associated with better safety outcomes than axi-cel (n = 124), reflected by lower rates of any grade and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events.

Bridging therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium

ABSTRACT

During the manufacturing period of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, patients may experience a decline in their condition due to cancer progression. In this study, we investigated the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received antilymphoma treatment between leukapheresis and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion. We conducted our analysis using data from the multicenter US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, with a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4.3-42.1). Out of the 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 patients received axi-cel. A total 52% of patients (n = 143) who received BT had a higher baseline risk profile than patients who did not receive BT, and these patients, as a group, had inferior outcomes compared with those who did not receive BT. However, after propensity score matching between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in overall response rate (77% vs 87%; P = .13), complete response rate (58% vs 70%; P = .1), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; P = .23), and overall survival (HR, 1.39; P=.09) between the BT group and the no-BT group, respectively. Analyzing the effects of BT in the whole cohort that underwent leukapheresis regardless of receiving axi-cel (intention-to-treat analysis) showed similar results. Radiation BT resulted in outcomes similar to those observed with nonradiation BT. Our findings suggest that BT may be safe without a significant impact on long-term survival for patients who require disease stabilization during the manufacturing period. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no clear advantage to using radiation-based BT over nonradiation-based BT.

CAR-T cell manufacturing: Major process parameters and next-generation strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have demonstrated strong curative potential and become a critical component in the array of B-cell malignancy treatments. Successful deployment of CAR-T cell therapies to treat hematologic and solid cancers, as well as other indications such as autoimmune diseases, is dependent on effective CAR-T cell manufacturing that impacts not only product safety and efficacy but also overall accessibility to patients in need. In this review, we discuss the major process parameters of autologous CAR-T cell manufacturing, as well as regulatory considerations and ongoing developments that will enable the next generation of CAR-T cell therapies.

Impact of disease burden and late loss of B cell aplasia on the risk of relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T Cell (Tisagenlecleucel) infusion in pediatric and young adult patients with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of B-cell monitoring

Introduction

Loss of B-cell aplasia (BCA) is a well-known marker of functional loss of CD19 CAR-T. Most relapses and loss of BCA occur in the first months after CD19 CAR-T infusion. In addition, high tumor burden (HTB) has shown to have a strong impact on relapse, especially in CD19-negative. However, little is known about the impact of late loss of BCA or the relationship between BCA and pre-infusion tumor burden in patients infused with tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Therefore, the optimal management of patients with loss of BCA is yet to be defined.

Methods

We conducted a Spanish, multicentre, retrospective study in patients infused with tisagenlecleucel after marketing authorization. A total of 73 consecutively treated patients were evaluated.

Results

Prior to infusion, 39 patients had HTB (≥ 5% bone marrow blasts) whereas 34 had a low tumor burden (LTB) (<5% blasts). Complete remission was achieved in 90.4% of patients, of whom 59% relapsed. HTB was associated with inferior outcomes, with a 12-month EFS of 19.3% compared to 67.2% in patients with LTB (p<0.001) with a median follow-up of 13.5 months (95% CI 12.4 - 16.2). In the HTB subgroup relapses were mainly CD19-negative (72%) whereas in the LTB subgroup they were mainly CD19-positive (71%) (p=0.017). In the LTB group, all CD19-positive relapses were preceded by loss of BCA whereas only 57% (4/7) of HTB patients experienced CD19-positive relapse. We found a positive correlation between loss of BCA and CD19-positive relapse (R-squared: 74) which persisted beyond six months post-infusion. We also explored B-cell recovery over time using two different definitions of loss of BCA and found a few discrepancies. Interestingly, transient immature B-cell recovery followed by BCA was observed in two pediatric patients. In conclusion, HTB has an unfavorable impact on EFS and allo-SCT might be considered in all patients with HTB, regardless of BCA. In patients with LTB, loss of BCA preceded all CD19-positive relapses. CD19-positive relapse was also frequent in patients who lost BCA beyond six months post-infusion. Therefore, these patients are still at significant risk for relapse and close MRD monitoring and/or therapeutic interventions should be considered.

CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies: Where are we now and where are we heading for?

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a revolutionary new pillar in cancer care, particularly in relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies. Following impressive clinical outcomes in hematological malignancies, the FDA-approved six CAR-T cell products for indications such as lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma. Despite the numerous advantages of CAR-T cell treatment, several challenges exist that interfere with its therapeutic efficacy. Serious adverse effects connected with the treatment continue to be a major concern. In addition, poor persistence of therapeutics and antigen escape frequently result in tumor relapse. Exorbitant treatment cost further remains a significant barrier to its effective implementation, limiting its accessibility. This review presents progress of CAR-T research, the key obstacles that hamper promising outcomes for patients with hematological malignancies, and a few strategies to overcome them.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 2: Prevention and Management of Relapse Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been transformative in inducing and sustaining remission, relapse rates remain unacceptably high, with approximately 50% of children and young adults experiencing relapse within the first year postinfusion. Emerging strategies to extend the durability of remission involve the use of prognostic biomarkers to identify those at high risk of relapse or incorporate strategies aimed to enhancing functional CAR T cell persistence. Nonetheless, with antigen loss/down-regulation or evolution to lineage switch as major mechanisms of relapse, optimizing single antigen targeting alone is insufficient. Here, with a focus on relapse prevention strategies, including postinfusion surveillance and treatment approaches being explored to optimize post-CAR-T management (eg, combinatorial antigen targeting strategies, preemptive hematopoietic cell transplantation), we review the current state of the art in the prevention and management of post CAR-T relapse. We highlight the advancements in the field and identify gaps in the literature to guide future research in optimizing the prevention and management of post-CAR-T relapse in children and young adults with B-ALL.

CAR T-Cells for the Treatment of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common subtype of acute leukemia in the pediatric population. The prognosis and treatment of B-ALL have dramatically improved over the past decade with the adoption of intensive and prolonged combination chemotherapy regimens. The advent of novel immunologic agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab has changed the treatment landscape of B-ALL. However, patients have continued to relapse, raising the need for novel therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have achieved a milestone in the treatment of B-ALL. Two CD19-targeting CAR T-cells were approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory B-ALL. In this review, we review the available data regarding CD19-targeting CAR T-cells with their safety profile as well as the mechanism of resistance to these agents and the way to overcome this resistance.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 1: Clinical Variables Associated with Improved Outcomes for Children and Young Adults treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells for B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CAR-T) targeting the CD19 antigen on B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has transitioned from a highly investigational therapy with limited access to a commercial therapy with established toxicities, response and survival rates, and access in numerous countries. With more than a decade of clinical study and 5 years of commercial access, data showing associations with success and failure have emerged. To address functional limitations of CAR-T and overcome constrained sample sizes when studying single-trial or single-center data, collaborative groups, including the Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium, the CAR-Multicenter Analysis, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the International BFM Study Group, among others, have been retrospectively interrogating the amassed clinical experience. The high patient numbers and varied clinical experiences compiled by these groups have defined clinical variables impacting CAR-T outcomes. Here we review published CAR-T trials and consortium/collaborative outcomes to establish variables associated with optimal response to CAR-T in children and young adults with B-ALL. We focus on findings with clinical relevance that have emerged, including data implicating pretreatment disease burden, presence of extramedullary disease, nonresponse to prior CD19 antigen targeting (blinatumomab therapy), CAR T cell dose, and fludarabine pharmacokinetics as factors impacting post-CAR-T survival. Additionally, we address the role of collaborative efforts going forward in guiding clinical practice evolution and further optimizing post-CAR-T outcomes.

Nivolumab combined with brentuximab vedotin for R/R primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a 3-year follow-up

Patients with relapsed/refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (R/R PMBL) have poor responses to salvage therapy. Nivolumab and brentuximab vedotin (BV) showed promising early efficacy in patients with R/R PMBL in the phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter CheckMate 436 study; we report safety and efficacy findings from the 3-year follow-up. Patients who were eligible were aged ≥15 years with R/R PMBL previously treated with either high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or ≥2 prior multiagent chemotherapies, and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0 to 1 and CD30 expression of ≥1%. Patients were treated with nivolumab 240 mg and BV 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included complete response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety was monitored throughout. At final database lock (30 March 2022), 29 patients had received nivolumab plus BV; median follow-up was 39.6 months. Investigator-assessed ORR was 73.3%; median time to response was 1.3 months (range, 1.1-4.8). Median PFS was 26.0 months; median OS was not reached. PFS and OS rates at 24 months were 55.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0-73.8) and 75.5% (95% CI, 55.4-87.5), respectively. The most frequently occurring grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia. Consolidative HCT was received by 12 patients, with a 100-day complete response rate of 100.0%. This 3-year follow-up showed long-term efficacy for nivolumab plus BV in R/R PMBL, with no new safety signals. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02581631.

How I use risk factors for success or failure of CD19 CAR T cells to guide management of children and AYA with B-cell ALL

By overcoming chemotherapeutic resistance, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells facilitate deep, complete remissions and offer the potential for long-term cure in a substantial fraction of patients with chemotherapy refractory disease. However, that success is tempered with 10% to 30% of patients not achieving remission and over half of patients treated eventually experiencing relapse. With over a decade of experience using CAR T cells in children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) to treat relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 5 years since the first US Food and Drug Administration approval, data defining the nuances of patient-specific risk factors are emerging. With the commercial availability of 2 unique CD19 CAR T-cell constructs for B-ALL, in this article, we review the current literature, outline our approach to patients, and discuss how individual factors inform strategies to optimize outcomes in children and AYA receiving CD19 CAR T cells. We include data from both prospective and recent large retrospective studies that offer insight into understanding when the risks of CAR T-cell therapy failure are high and offer perspectives suggesting when consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation or experimental CAR T-cell and/or alternative immunotherapy should be considered. We also propose areas where prospective trials addressing the optimal use of CAR T-cell therapy are needed.

Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment approach for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, identifying the factors that influence long-term response to this therapy is necessary to optimize patient selection and treatment allocation. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the use of autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with R/R B-ALL, using several databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Journals@Ovid, Embase, and clinicaltrial.gov. A total of 38 reports were analyzed, which enrolled 2134 patients. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using reconstructed patient survival data. The study explored key modulators of response, including costimulatory domains, disease status, age, and lymphodepletion. The median overall survival and event-free survival were 36.2 months [95% CI 28.9, NR] and 13.3 months [95% CI 12.2, 17], respectively. The overall response rate was 76% [95% CI 71, 81]. The use of 4-1BB costimulatory domain in the CAR construct, administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion, and pretreatment morphologic remission were associated with better overall survival, with hazard ratios of 0.72, 0.56, and 0.66, respectively. Morphologic remission and 4-1BB domain were associated with better event-free survival, with hazard ratios of 0.66 and 0.72, respectively. These findings suggest that CAR T cell therapy may offer long-term benefits to patients with R/R B-ALL. However, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and better understand the impact of various factors on the outcome of CAR T cell therapy.

Combination strategies to optimize the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of haematological malignancies. However, resistance and relapse remain prominent limitations, and they are related to the limited persistence and efficacy of CAR T cells, downregulation or loss of tumour antigens, intrinsic resistance of tumours to death signalling, and immune suppressive microenvironment. Rational combined modality treatments are regarded as a promising strategy to further unlock the antitumor potential of CAR T cell therapy, which can be applied before CAR T cell infusion as a conditioning regimen or in ex vivo culture settings as well as concomitant with or after CAR T cell infusion. In this review, we summarize the combinatorial strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted therapies and other immunotherapies, in an effort to further enhance the effectiveness of this impressive therapy and benefit more patients.

Infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and infection prophylaxis after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell becomes a breakthrough therapy providing excellent remission rates and durable disease control for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T-cells have several potential side effects including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicities, cytopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Infection has been increasingly recognized as a complication of CAR T-cell therapy. Several factors predispose CAR T-cell recipients to infection. Fortunately, although studies show a high incidence of infection post-CAR T-cells, most infections are manageable. In contrast to patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant, less is known about post-CAR T-cell immune reconstitution. Therefore, evidence regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies in these patients is more limited. As CAR T-cell therapy becomes the standard treatment for R/R B lymphoid malignancies, we should expect a larger impact of infections in these patients and the need for increased clinical attention. Studies exploring infection and immune reconstitution after CAR T-cell therapy are clinically relevant and will provide us with a better understanding of the dynamics of immune function after CAR T-cell therapy including insights into appropriate strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of infections in these patients. In this review, we describe infections in recipients of CAR T-cells, and discuss risk factors and potential mitigation strategies.

Clinical efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention in acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention in acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eighty acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy admitted to our hospital from April 2018 to December 2021 were selected and divided, according to the nursing mode, as the conventional group (n=40) with routine nursing mode and the comprehensive group (n=40) with the comprehensive nursing mode. Patients' anxiety (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS) scores, depression (Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS) scores, occurrence of complications, nursing satisfaction, nursing experience, complaint rate, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were compared between the two groups so as to analyze the efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention. The improvement of quality of life in the two groups was observed and analyzed using the short form of quality of life measurement (WHOQOL-BREF). Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients with comprehensive nursing intervention.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups were found prior nursing (P>0.05), while after nursing, scores in the two groups both decreased, with those in the comprehensive group significantly lower than in the conventional group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications after nursing in the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Nursing satisfaction of patients in the comprehensive group were significantly higher than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After nursing, the nursing experience of the comprehensive group was significantly better than that of the conventional group (P<0.05); the complaint rate of the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05); before nursing, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); after nursing, the VAS score of the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in WHOQOL-BREF scores between the two groups (P>0.05); after nursing, the comprehensive group was higher than the conventional group. Among the 40 patients in the comprehensive nursing group, 15 patients developed infection. The number of neutrophils, age above 40, white blood cell count, hemoglobin content, high-intensity chemotherapy and glucocorticoid therapy were independent risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients with comprehensive nursing intervention (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy for acute leukemia can effectively improve the patient's nursing experience, reduce the patient's complaint rate, alleviate the patient's physical pain, relieve the patient's anxiety, depression and other negative emotions, and reduce the patient's complications, suggesting that comprehensive nursing intervention exerts better clinical efficacy and has high safety, which merits promotion clinically.

Preparing for CAR T cell therapy: patient selection, bridging therapies and lymphodepletion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have emerged as a potent therapeutic approach for patients with certain haematological cancers, with multiple CAR T cell products currently approved by the FDA for those with relapsed and/or refractory B cell malignancies. However, in order to derive the desired level of effectiveness, patients need to successfully receive the CAR T cell infusion in a timely fashion. This process entails apheresis of the patient's T cells, followed by CAR T cell manufacture. While awaiting infusion at an authorized treatment centre, patients may receive interim disease-directed therapy. Most patients will also receive a course of pre-CAR T cell lymphodepletion, which has emerged as an important factor in enabling durable responses. The time between apheresis and CAR T cell infusion is often not a simple journey, with each milestone being a critical step that can have important downstream consequences for the ability to receive the infusion and the strength of clinical responses. In this Review, we provide a summary of the many considerations for preparing patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia for CAR T cell therapy, and outline current limitations and areas for future research.