Total arch repair with open triple-branched stent graft placement for acute type A aortic dissection: experience with 122 patients

Clinical predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score in patients in acute type A aortic dissection after total arch replacement

The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score has been accepted as a predictor of poor outcome in elective operations. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of ACEF score in acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) patients after total arch replacement. A total of 227 AAAD patients from July 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled and divided into Tertiles 1 (ACEF ≤ 0.73), Tertiles 2 (0.73 < ACEF ≤ 0.95), and Tertiles 3 (ACEF > 0.95). Using inverse probability processing weighting (IPTW) to balance the baseline characteristics and compare the outcomes. Cox logistic regression was used to further evaluate the survival prediction ability of ACEF score. The in-hospital mortality was 9.8%. After IPTW, in the baseline characteristics reached an equilibrium, a higher ACEF score before operation still associated with higher in-hospital mortality. After 1 year follow-up, 184 patients (90.6%) survival. Multivariable analysis revealed that ACEF score (adjusted hazard ratio  1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.34-4.91; p = 0.036) and binary ACEF score (adjusted HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.82-6.20; p < 0.001) was independently associated with 1-year survival. In addition, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated differentiation improvement (IDI) verified that the ACEF score and binary ACEF score is an accurate predictive tool in clinical settings. In conclusions, ACEF score could be considered as a useful tool to risk stratification in patients with AAAD before operation in daily clinical work.

Double-branched stent graft and four-stage deployment in total arch repair: safety and feasibility evaluation in porcine models

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this research was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of an innovative double-branched stent graft system employing four-stage deployment technology for aortic arch repair in porcine models.

METHODS

The double-branched stent graft system consisted of a proximal polyester artificial blood vessel, the main and double-branched stent grafts and a delivery system. We utilized 12 healthy pigs as experimental animals (6 per group). Postimplantation, samples were collected at 90 and 180 days after the operations. Preoperative and postoperative imaging and intraoperative arterial blood gas analyses were performed. After the pigs were euthanized, the implanted product, surrounding tissue and major organs were collected for pathological analysis.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of the stent graft implants was 100% (12/12). All animals survived to the experimental end point. Perioperative assessments showed intact stent grafts, and imaging features at the end of the follow-up period revealed neither endoleak nor device migration. No major adverse cardiovascular events were observed during the postoperative follow-up period. Pathological examinations confirmed the satisfactory biocompatibility of the stent graft.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative double-branched stent graft system with four-stage deployment technology was affirmed as a safe and feasible option for aortic arch repair in accordance with our preclinical evaluation with porcine models.

Mid-term outcomes of total neointima implantation in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection

Total neointima implantation (patch neointima technique + triple-branched stent graft placement) has been performed in proximal aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) for more than 10 years at a center. However, there is no report on the mid-term outcomes with a control group of the surgical procedure. Consequently, the authors aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in this study. Patients who underwent the total neointima implantation were classified as Group A, and those who underwent the conventional aortic root reconstruction with the "sandwich" technique and the total aortic arch replacement were classified as Group B. Furthermore, the authors described the preoperative characteristics, operative data, and patient outcomes. Group A patients experienced a shorter surgery duration, lower volumes of perioperative bleeding, and fewer red blood cell transfusions. The incidence of neurological complications was significantly reduced in Group A. All patients maintained a normal range of proximal aortic sizes after surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences between the patients in the two groups regarding cumulative mortality and the incidence of moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency. In well-selected patients, total neointima implantation is an alternative procedure for the surgical repair of ATAAD.

Improving outcomes of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Background. It remains equivocal if acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgical outcomes are improving. We analyzed current outcome trends to evaluate improvements and to identify predicting variables. Methods. From 2015 to 2020, 204 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD and were divided into recent (n = 102) and earlier (n = 102) groups. Uni- and multivariable statistical analysis was performed to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. Results. Thirty-day mortality decreased significantly in the recent group (3.9% vs 14.6%, p = .014). Prevalence of neurological insult also decreased significantly (13% vs 25%, p = .028). Other major complications remained unchanged. There was no statistically significant difference in overall 30-day mortality between low-volume vs high-volume surgeons (12.3% vs 7.3%, p = .21). The number of surgeons performing ATAAD procedures decreased from nine in 2015 to five in 2020. Preoperative lactate (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.03-1.51), dissection of any arch vessel (OR 14.2, 95%CI 1.79-113), non-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 12.5, 95%CI 2.54-61.6), biological composite graft (OR 19.1, 95%CI 2.75-133), concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 38.8, 95%CI 2.91-517) and intraoperative adverse event (OR 9.5, 95%CI 2.22-40.9) were statistically significant independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions. Early outcomes after ATAAD improved in the most recent experience. Part of the explanation may be fewer surgeons performing more procedures annually, a relatively conservative approach to the extent of aortic resection and ensuring adequate cerebral protection. Major complications remain prevalent and require attention to be further reduced.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Early outcomes of a triple-branched stent graft implantation in elderly patients with acute type a aortic dissection

PURPOSE

Older patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) have higher risk of mortality than that of younger patients when a total arch reconstruction (TAR) is required. Triple-branched stent graft (TBSG) implantation is a novel technique for TAR. However, early outcomes of a TBSG implantation in older patients have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of the TBSG technique in older patients with ATAAD.

METHODS

From February 2015 to December 2020, 640 patients who simultaneously underwent an emergent open aortic surgery and TBSG implantation for ATAAD were enrolled in this study. They were categorized into the younger (age ≤ 70 years old, n = 573) and older groups (age > 70 years, n = 67). Clinical data of all patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULT

The mean ages of the patients in the younger and older groups were 45.3 ± 9.6 years old and 73.5 ± 3.0 years old, respectively. Preoperative characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for weight and incidence of moderate or greater aortic regurgitation, which were lower in the older group than those in the younger group. Surgical procedure and duration (i.e., duration for cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp, selected cerebral perfusion, and total circulation arrest) were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). Patients in the older group had higher incidence of dialysis for acute kidney injury and longer ICU stay compared with those in the younger group. However, the incidences of 30-day mortality (5.1% in younger group vs. 7.5% in older group, p = 0.407) and other major complications (i.e., neurological adverse events) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TBSG implantation for ATAAD resulted in an acceptable mortality rate in patients above 70 years old, thus, it could be a feasible surgical procedure to perform in older patients with ATAAD when a TAR is required.

Triple-Branched Stent Graft Implantation for Acute Non-A-non-B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for acute non-A-non-B aortic dissection remains controversial. Triple-branched stent graft (TBSG) implantation has been used to treat acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TBSG as a treatment for acute non-A-non-B aortic dissection.

METHODS

Fifty patients with non-A-non-B dissection received TBSG implantation in our center between January 2014 and December 2019. Early mortality, morbidity, and dissected aorta remodeling during follow-up were calculated.

RESULTS

There were no deaths in-hospital or within 30 days. Postoperative complications included pneumonia (n = 12), acute kidney injury (n = 6; preoperative renal malperfusion, n = 4), transient cerebral injury (n = 6; preoperative cerebral malperfusion, n = 4), pleural effusion (n = 4), and pericardial effusion (n = 2). During follow-up, 1 patient experienced a stroke, and 2 patients required secondary interventional therapy for residual dissection below the level of the TBSG. All implanted TBSGs had good positioning, and all sidearm stent graft grafts were fully patent. No retrograde aortic dissection or type I endoleak was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

TBSG implantation for acute non-A-non-B aortic dissection had a low incidence of mortality and morbidity, featuring good remodeling of the dissected aortic wall during follow-up. The early outcomes of this technique were satisfactory.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical intervention for Stanford type A aortic dissection is controversial. The aim of this trial sequential meta-analysis was to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft and stent elephant trunk implantation for total aortic arch reconstruction in Sandford type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for retrieving relevant studies from inception to February 28, 2022. We evaluated 30-day mortality, procedure-related time including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross-clamp (ACC), and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP), the incidence of postoperative complications including paralysis, cerebral embolism, and acute renal failure, intensive care unit (ICU) time, and medical expenditure. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) software.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 260 dissection cases were included eventually. Total aortic arch reconstruction with open triple-branched stent graft was comparable to the stented elephant trunk implantation in 30-day mortality, incidence of postoperative complications, ICU time, and medical expenditure, but open triple-branched stent graft was related to shorter procedure-related time including CPB (mean difference [MD] = -46.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -67.24 to -24.98, p < .001), ACC (MD = -42.82, 95% CI = -66.74 to -18.90, p < .001), and SCP (MD = -17.88, 95% CI = -33.36 to -2.39, p = .02). TSA confirmed robustness of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggested that total aortic arch reconstruction with open triple-branched stent graft may be an effective and simplified procedure than the stented elephant trunk implantation.

Type 1A Endoleak after TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: A Review of the Literature

Aortic arch repair is a challenging intervention. Open surgical repair is still considered the gold standard, but in high-risk patients, it is not always a reasonable option, making endovascular approaches an enticing, when not the only available, alternative for treatment. The strategies more commonly adopted are surgical supra-aortic trunk (SAT) rerouting followed by deployment of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis, chimney techniques, custom-made scalloped, fenestrated, and branched devices, and in situ or physician-modified fenestrations. If we excluded techniques involving SAT rerouting where the arch anatomy is surgically modified in order to make deployment in the aortic arch of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis possible, in the other techniques, one or more SATs are incorporated in the thoracic endoprosthesis. In these cases, no matter what solution is adopted, because of the morphology of the aorta at this level, achieving an ideal sealing is extremely difficult, and endovascular treatments of the arch are burdened by an increased risk of type IA endoleaks. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. We identified 1277 records. After reading titles, abstracts, and full texts, we excluded 1231 records. Exclusion criteria were low-quality evidence, abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, reviews, editorials, and expert opinions. A total of 48 studies were included, for a total of 3114 patients. A type IA endoleak occurred in 248 patients (7.7%) with a mean incidence of 18.8% in chimney procedures, 4.8% and 3%, respectively, in fenestrated and branched devices, and 2.2% in in situ fenestration. We excluded from our analysis scalloped technology that is used when the target vessel originates from a healthy landing zone and represents a different anatomical setting. Type IA endoleaks are a concern with all types of endovascular aortic arch repair, and they can compromise the outcomes of the procedure. The rate of type IA endoleaks appears to be significantly higher in chimney procedures. In order to maximize sealing, whenever possible, endovascular repair of the arch should be achieved with custom-made fenestrated devices. However, chimney configurations are still a valuable solution particularly in the emergency setting, although in such a procedure, to guarantee accurate postoperative management and follow-up, an imaging protocol could be useful.

Zone proximalization in frozen elephant trunk: what is the optimal zone for open intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of complex aortic lesions involving the ascending, arch, and proximal descending aorta, remains challenging for surgeons despite the evolution of surgical techniques and aortic prostheses over decades. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) approach offers a one-stage repair of this entity of aortic pathologies. The main scope of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of FET.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In a systematic review, multiple electronic databases including EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed/MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 2021 to identify relevant studies reporting on outcomes of total arch replacement (TAR) with FET.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eighty-five studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 10960 patients. Meta-analysis was conducted using the R-studio (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA) and STATA software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). The pooled in-hospital mortality rate was 7% (95% CI 0.05-0.09; I²=76%) and 12% for renal failure (95% CI 0.09-0.15; I²=88%), while the rates for paraplegia and cerebrovascular accidents were 3% (95% CI 0.02-0.04; I²=0%) and 6% (95% CI 0.05-0.08; I²=73%), respectively. Lower heterogeneity was attained after the stratification by the aortic pathologies, except for the renal failure. The distal anastomosis of the stent in zone 2 was significantly correlated with a lower renal failure development compared to zone 3 (odds ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.82; P=0.069; I²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the morbidities and mortality following TAR with FET were acceptable. We also associated the distal anastomosis in zone 2 with fewer renal failure development compared to that in zone 3.

Partial upper sternotomy for extensive arch repair in older acute type A aortic dissection patients

OBJECTIVES

The partial upper sternotomy (PUS) approach is acceptable for aortic valve replacement, and even aortic root operation. However, the efficiency of PUS for extensive arch repair of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) in older adult patients has not been well investigated.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2019, 222 older adult patients (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with AAAD went through extensive arch repair, among which 127 received PUS, and 95 underwent full sternotomy (FS). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for early death, and negative binomial regression analysis was applied to explore risk factors related to post-operative ventilator-supporting time and intensive care unit stay time.

RESULTS

Total early mortality was 8.1% (18/222 patients). The PUS group had shorter Cardiopulmonary bypass time (133.0 vs.155.0 min, P < 0.001), cross-clamp time (44.0 vs. 61.0 min, P < 0.001) and shorter selective cerebral perfusion time (11.0 vs. 21.0 min, P < 0.001) than the FS group. Left ventricle ejection fraction  < 50% (odds ratio [OR] 17.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87-155.63; P = 0.012) and malperfusion syndromes (OR 65.83; 95% CI 11.53-375.86; P < 0.001) were related to early death. In the multivariate model, the PUS approach contributed to shorter ventilator-supporting time (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.91; P = 0.003), when compared with the FS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results of emergency extensive arch repair of AAAD via PUS in older adult patients were satisfactory. However, the long-term results remain to be investigated.

Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk

Background

The introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for total arch replacement (TAR) has revolutionized the field of aortivascular surgery by allowing hybrid repair of complex aortic pathologies in a single step through combining an open surgical approach with an endovascular one. FET has been associated with favorable aortic remodeling, however, its is also associated with development of distal stent graft induced new entry (dSINE) tears postoperatively. The rate of aortic remodeling and the incidence of dSINE have been linked together, in addition, there seems to be a relationship between these two variables and FET insetion length as well as graft size.

Aims

The scope of this review is to highlight the rate of aortic remodeling as well the incidence of dSINE associated with different FET devices available commercially. This review also aimed to investigate the relationship between aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and FET graft size.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase in order to collate all research evidence on the above mentioned variables.

Results

Thoraflex™ Hybrid Plexus seems to yield optimum aortic remodeling by promoting maximum false thrombosis as well true lumen expansion. Thoraflex Hybrid™ is also associated with the lowest incidence of dSINE post-FET relative to the other FET devices on the market. Aortic remodeling and dSINE do influence each other and are both linked with FET graft length and size.

Conclusion

The FET technique for TAR shows excellent aortic remodeling but is associated with a considerable risk of dSINE development. However, Thoraflex™ Hybrid has demonstrated itself to be the superior FET device on the aortic arch prostheses market. Since aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and stent graft size are all interconnect, the choice of FET device length and size must be made with great care for optimum results.

Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex thoracic aorta pathologies remains a challenge for cardiovascular surgeons. After introducing Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET), a significant evolution of surgical techniques has been achieved. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of FET in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and the effect of circulatory arrest time on post-operative neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

A standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted for all observational studies of patients diagnosed with ATAAD undergoing total arch replacement with FET reporting in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and neurological outcomes. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (StataCorp, TX, USA).

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were eligible for the present meta-analysis, including 3211 patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement with FET. The pooled estimate for in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and spinal cord injury were 7% (95% CI 5 - 9; I²  = 68.65%), 5% (95% CI 4 - 7; I²  = 63.93%), and 3% (95% CI 2 - 4; I²  = 19.56%), respectively. Univariate meta-regression revealed that with increasing the duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest time, the effect sizes for postoperative stroke and SCI enhances.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that employing the FET procedure for acute type A dissection is associated with acceptable neurologic outcomes and a similar mortality rate comparing with other aorta pathologies. Besides, increasing hypothermic circulation arrest time appears to be a significant predictor of adverse neurologic outcomes after FET.

Mid-term outcomes of modified valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus the Bentall procedure for middle-aged Chinese patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study

Background

The mid-term and long-term efficacies of valve preservation in acute DeBakey I aortic dissection (AD) are controversial. Thus, it is unclear whether middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD should undergo modified valve-sparing procedures or the Bentall procedure in an emergency setting.

Methods

This study included 213 middle-aged Chinese patients (under 60 years old) who were treated for acute DeBakey I AD between January 2009 and June 2015. The treatments involved modified valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) (117 patients) or the Bentall procedure (96 patients). Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Echocardiography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings were reviewed at 3 months, 1 year, and then annually after surgery.

Results

No significant differences were observed in terms of the preoperative, intraoperative, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative parameters. There were also no significant differences in aortic regurgitation (AR). However, follow-up examinations using CTA revealed that 6 patients had endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent (0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 6/90 patients [6.7%], P = 0.022). The anticoagulation-related thromboembolism/bleeding events was significantly lower in group A than in group B (0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 11/90 patients [11.1%], P = 0.001). And postoperative aortic valve re-operation rate was significantly lower in group A (1/110 patients [0.9%] vs. 8/90 patients [8.9%], P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in survival during the follow-up period (log-rank P > 0.05).

Conclusion

For middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD, VSARR were associated with a lower rate of endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent, thromboembolism/bleeding events and aortic valve re-operation (vs. the Bentall procedure).

Frozen elephant trunk in total arch replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and aortic proximalization

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure became a popular entity for utilization in aortic arch aneurysm disease. However, its proper mortality and morbidities as well as the predictors of outcomes are poorly identified. This systematic review and meta-analysis explore FET outcomes and its predictors with a focus on zone aortic proximalization.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from their beginning to June 2020 to find studies reporting the outcomes of the FET procedure for the total arch replacement (TAR).

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies including 7967 patients were evaluated. The pooled estimates of cerebrovascular accidents, paraplegia, renal failure, and in-hospital mortality were 7.104 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.691-8.661; I²  = 78.53%), 3.465 (95% CI, 2.852-4.136; I²  = 15.96), 14.969 (95% CI, 11.361-18.977; I²  = 91.26%), and 8.933 (95% CI, 7.128-10.919; I²  = 78.51%), respectively. Stratification by the geographical locations and by the aortic pathologies led to lower heterogeneity, but not for renal failure. The distal anastomosis in Zone 2 was associated with a lower rate of renal failure compared with Zone 3 (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81; p = .003; I²  = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The FET procedure for TAR can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidities among patients with complex aortic pathologies. Moreover, the distal anastomosis in Zone 2 was associated with lower renal failure compared to Zone 3.

Combined femoral and axillary perfusion strategy for Stanford type a aortic dissection repair

Background

The optimal cannulation strategy in surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection is critical to patient survival but remains controversial. Different cannulation strategies have their own advantages and drawbacks during cardiopulmonary bypass. Our centre used a combined femoral and axillary perfusion strategy for the surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. The purpose of this study was to review and clarify the clinical outcome of femoral artery cannulation combined with axillary artery cannulation for the treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study that included 327 patients who were surgically treated for type A aortic dissection in our institution from January 2017 to June 2019. Femoral and axillary artery cannulation was used to establish cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type A aortic dissection. The demographic data, surgical data, and clinical results of the patients were calculated.

Results

Femoral artery combined with axillary artery cannulation was technically successful in 327 patients. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 141.60 ± 34.89 min, and the selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 14.94 ± 2.76 min. The early mortality rate was 3.06%. The incidence of permanent neurologic dysfunction was 0.92%. Sixteen patients had postoperative renal insufficiency, and five patients had liver failure.

Conclusion

Femoral artery combined with axillary artery cannulation for type A aortic dissection can significantly improve the prognosis of patients, especially in terms of cerebral protection, and can reduce the occurrence of adverse malperfusion syndrome and neurological complications.

Long-term outcomes of treatment with different stent grafts in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We developed an integrated triple-branched stent to treat acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (AD) and modified it to enhance its adaptability. However, whether the patients treated by the modified stent would achieve better long-term prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

This study enrolled 147 patients with acute DeBakey type I AD. The original integrated triple-branched stents were used in 57 patients (Group A) between July 2012 and August 2013, and the modified stents in 90 patients (Group B) between September 2013 and March 2015. Clinical characteristics, surgical data, postoperative complications, mortality, and follow-up data of the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The two groups presented comparable early death rates (Group A = 7.0%, Group B = 5.9%; p = .719). The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was lower in Group B (10.0%) versus Group A (24.6%) (p = .018). Compared with the original integrated triple-branched stent graft, the modified stent could reduce the risk of early postoperative AKI (OR [95% CI] = 0.36 [0.14, 0.94]). Early endoleak rates were significantly lower in Group B (1.0%) compared to Group A (9.4%) (p = .004). During follow-up, there were five deaths in Group A (9.4%) and six deaths in Group B (7.2%) (p = .646). Chronic kidney injury (7.5% vs. 3.6%; p = .311), delayed endoleak (11.3% vs. 4.8%; p = .157), and late reinterventions (7.5% vs. 2.4%; p = .155) in the two groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute DeBakey type I AD, the modified stent showed feasible and safe treatment outcomes and reduced early endoleak rates. However, the long-term effects were similar to the original treatment.

Efficacy of interleukin-6 in combination with D-dimer in predicting early poor postoperative prognosis after acute stanford type a aortic dissection

Background

We studied early poor postoperative prognosis in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients and investigated the predictive effect of interleukin-6 (IL-6) combined with D-dimer in the early poor postoperative prognosis after ATAAD.

Methods

Data on 141 ATAAD patients, who underwent emergency surgery between January 2018 and December 2018 at our hospital, were studied. We analyzed early postoperative prognosis using two patient groups. Patients with good prognosis were included in group A and those with poor prognosis were in group B. Univariate logistic and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed for poor early postoperative prognosis.

Results

Preoperative IL-6 level was lower (57.8 ± 39.0 vs 211.0 ± 153.7 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and the D-dimer was also lower (7.3 ± 6.1 vs. 16.7 ± 5.8 μg/mL, p < 0.001) in group A than in B. The cut-off points, determined by the ROC curve, were preoperative IL-6 > 108 pg/mL (area under the curve: AUC = 0.901) and D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL (AUC = 0.817). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6 > 108 pg/mL, D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL, prothrombin time > 15 s, creatinine > 135 mmol/mL, and operation time > 306 min for ATAAD appeared to be early postoperative risk factors of poor prognosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6 > 108 pg/mL and D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL were early postoperative risk factors for poor prognosis after ATAAD, and the odds ratios (ORs) of IL-6 > 108 pg/mL and D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL were 24.937 (6.837, 90.931) and 18.757 (5.094, 69.075), respectively. When IL-6 was > 108 pg/mL (AUC = 0.901), the sensitivity and specificity of predicting early postoperative prognosis after ATAAD were 79.4 and 89.7%, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.839 to 0.963). When D-dimer was > 14.0 g/mL (AUC = 0.817), the sensitivity and specificity were 82.4 and 84.1%, respectively (95% CI 0.731 to 0.903). When combined with D-dimer (AUC = 0.936) (95% CI 0.793 to 0.979), the AUC values were more predictive than those for the individual marker.

Conclusion

IL-6 > 108 pg/mL and D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL is of high predictive value for the assessment of early poor postoperative prognosis after ATAAD. And IL-6 > 108 pg/mL in combination with D-dimer > 14.0 μg/mL is of higher predictive value.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients with triple-branched stent graft implantation

Background

Neurological complications is a common complication following novel triple-branched stent graft implantation in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD). But the incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium (POD) are not completely clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of POD after novel triple-branched stent graft implantation.

Methods

An observational study of AAD patients who underwent novel triple-branched stent graft implantation between January 2017 and July 2019 were followed up after surgery. Patients’ delirium was screened by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit from the first day after the operation, lasted 5 days. The risk factors of POD were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

A total of 280 AAD patients were enrolled in this research, the incidence of POD was 37.86%. Adjusting for age, body mass index, and mechanical ventilation duration, multivariate Cox regression analysis model revealed that non-manual work (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = .554; 95% CI: 0.335–0.915; P = .021), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores > 20 (AHR = 3.359, 95% CI: 1.707–6.609, P < .001), hypoxemia (AHR = 1.846, 95% CI: 1.118–3.048, P = .017), and more than two types of analgesics and sedatives were independently associated with POD.

Conclusions

This study showed that risk factors independently associated with POD were APACHE-II score > 20, hypoxemia, and more types of analgesics and sedatives, and non-manual work was the protective factor.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR1900022408; Date: 2019/4/10).

A modified axillo-femoral perfusion for acute type a aortic dissection accompanied with lower limb malperfusion

Background

Lower limb malperfusion accompanied with acute type A dissection (AAD) is reported to be an independent predictor for mortality. Timely treatment is required. However, staged approach to restore the perfusion of the ischemic leg before aortic repair has a continuously increase risk of aortic rupture. Aortic repair under isolated axillary artery perfusion also has the risk of prolonging leg ischemia. Here we introduce our experience in performing axillo-femoral perfusion, which is supposed to bring benefits for treating lower limb malperfuison.

Methods

Thirty patients who suffered AAD accompanied by lower limb ischemia enrolled in our study. All patients received aortic repair as soon as possible using the modified axillo-femoral perfusion approach. The cardiopulmonary bypass and cooling started with the right axillary artery perfusion. Then the femoral artery of the ischemic side was exposed and sewn to a graft connected with another inflow cannula. The rectal temperature was about 31 °C when the femoral perfusion started. The perfusion of the ischemic legs preoperative was estimated after the surgery by the clinical signs, the saturation of the distal-limb, and computed tomography scan.

Results

Twenty-eight patients got good perfusion of the lower body after the surgery. Two patients received femoral-femoral artery bypass immediately after surgery because of the thrombosis in the right common iliac artery, without further injury. No peripheral vessels damage occurred, and no compartment fasciotomy or amputation needed. One patient died for the sepsis and the subsequent multi organ failure 28 days postoperative.

Conclusions

The modified axllio-femoral perfusion could restore the lower limbs’ perfusion simultaneously during the aortic surgery without neither delaying dissection repair nor prolonging the ischemic time. It is a simple, but safe and effective technique.

Midterm cerebral outcomes of Stanford type A aortic dissection in patients who underwent novel triple-branched stent graft implantation combined with intraoperative monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cerebral outcomes of patients underwent novel triple‐branched stent graft implantation combined with the intraoperative monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation.

Methods

One hundred thirty‐seven consecutive patients who underwent the surgery of triple‐branched stent graft implantation in our department were enrolled in this retrospective case‐control study. The patients in group A received brain protection based on the intraoperative monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation and the patients in group B received conventional brain protection. The general clinical data, the types of corrective surgeries, the intraoperative situations, the postoperative complications, and the midterm outcomes of the patients were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of postoperative cerebral dysfunction in the patients of group A was significantly lower than that in the patients in group B (3.2% vs 14.9%, P = .020). We found significant differences in the incubation times (30.3 ± 22.1 vs 42.3 ± 27.9 hours, P = .014), the lengths of intensive care unit stay (58.0 ± 54.3 vs 79.7 ± 55.5 hours, P = .004), and the hospital stays (19.3 ± 6.7 vs 24.9 ± 17.3 days, P = .045). A descending trend in the mortality rates was observed between the patients in the two groups based on the 20 months of observation; however, this trend was not statistically significant (1.6% vs 6.8%, P = .218).

Conclusions

The novel triple‐branched stent graft implantation procedure combined with intraoperative monitoring of the regional cerebral oxygen saturation was an effective treatment for Stanford type A aortic dissection, with a relatively low incidence of postoperative cerebral dysfunction.

Surgical repair and reconstruction of aortic arch in debakey type I aortic dissection: recent advances and single-center experience in the application of branched stent graft

Background

Aortic dissection (AD) represents a clinically uncommon aortic pathology which predicts a dismal prognosis if not promptly treated. In acute Debakey type I AD (ADIAD), aortic lesion extends from aortic root to even distal abdominal aorta among which aortic arch and its three main branches still remain a great surgical challenge for repair and reconstruction. Several decades have witnessed the painstaking efforts of cardiovascular surgeons across the globe for optimizing the surgical procedures, from total or hemi-arch replacement, “elephant trunk” technique to branched stent graft. However, operative mortality and morbidity still remain to be reduced and surgical strategy is to be advanced and simplified, particularly the repair and reconstruction of aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels.

Methods

In this paper, we reviewed the relevant literature concerning recent advances in surgical intervention of aortic arch and summarized our opinions in the application of branched stent graft in ADIAD.

Results

The operative strategy for acute Debakey type I aortic dissection still remain to be advanced and simplified, especially the repair and reconstruction of aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. For selection of branched stent grafts, the anatomic features and pathological changes of diseased arch are the crucial factors for clinical decision making.

Conclusions

Branched stent graft is potentially an effective alternative for the treatment of type I AD with diseased aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. The selection of branched stent grafts still remains to be further discussed in large-scale studies in the future.

Classification and outcomes of extended arch repair for acute Type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Distal extent of repair in patients undergoing surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is controversial. Emerging hybrid techniques involving open and endovascular surgery have been reported in small numbers by select individual centres. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcomes following extended arch repair for ATAAD. A classification system is proposed of the different techniques to facilitate discussion and further investigation.

Methods

Using Ovid MEDLINE, 38 studies were identified reporting outcomes for 2140 patients. Studies were categorized into four groups on the basis of extent of surgical aortic resection and the method of descending thoracic aortic stent graft deployment; during circulatory arrest (frozen stented elephant trunk) or with normothermic perfusion and use of fluoroscopy (warm stent graft): (I) surgical total arch replacement, (II) total arch and frozen stented elephant trunk, (III) hemiarch and frozen stented elephant trunk and (IV) total arch and warm stent graft. Perioperative event rates were obtained for each of the four groups and the entire cohort using pooled summary estimates. Linearized rates of late mortality and reoperation were calculated.

Results

Overall pooled hospital mortality for extended arch techniques was 8.6% (95% CI 7.2-10.0). Pooled data categorized by surgical technique resulted in hospital mortality of 11.9% for total arch, 8.6% total arch and frozen stented elephant trunk, 6.3% hemiarch and frozen stented elephant trunk and 5.5% total arch and 'warm stent graft'. Overall incidence of stroke for the entire cohort was 5.7% (95% CI 3.6-8.2). Rate of spinal cord ischaemia was 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-3.0). Pooled linearized rate of late mortality was 1.66%/pt-yr (95% CI 1.34-2.07) with linearized rate of re-operation of 1.62%/pt-yr (95% CI 1.24-2.05).

Conclusions

Perioperative results of extended arch procedures are encouraging. Further follow-up is required to see if long-term complications are reduced with these emerging techniques. The proposed classification system will facilitate future comparison of short- and long-term results of different techniques of extended arch repair for ATAAD.

Ascending Aorta and Hemiarch Replacement Combined With Modified Triple-Branched Stent Graft Implantation for Repair of Acute DeBakey Type I Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

To simplify extensive repair of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection, ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement combined with modified triple-branched stent graft implantation was developed. The descriptions and early results of this technique are reported.

METHODS

From August 2014 to September 2015, 116 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection underwent ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement combined with modified triple-branched stent graft implantation. Clinical data of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Survivors were followed up prospectively by computed tomography angiography.

RESULTS

The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 131.5 ± 10.7 minutes, the aortic cross-clamp time was 50.0 ± 9.9 minutes, and the selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time was 17.2 ± 2.2 minutes. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.4%. Two patients were lost during follow-up. One patient died of a cerebrovascular accident 2 months after discharge, and another died of chronic renal failure 5 months after discharge. At the 3-month postoperative scans, complete thrombus formation of the false lumen around the implanted modified triple-branched stent graft occurred in all survivors, at the diaphragmatic level in 69.7% patients, and at the superior mesenteric arterial level in 8.3% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive thoracic aorta repair of acute type I aortic dissection can be performed simply by combining ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement with modified triple-branched stent graft implantation. This technique can reduce the risk and technical difficulty of extensive thoracic aorta repair to levels close to those seen with ascending aorta and hemiarch graft replacement with open distal anastomosis.

Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Ascending Aorta Replacement Combined With Open Fenestrated Stent Graft Placement

BACKGROUND

In the conventional ascending replacement for acute type A aortic dissection, the distal aortic anastomosis is frequently performed at the dissected site, and postoperative residual dissection in the arch and downstream aorta still occurs in most patients. We used open placement of a fenestrated stent graft during this operation.

METHODS

During the conventional ascending replacement in 41 patients with acute type A aortic dissection, a fenestrated stent graft was inserted into the arch and the proximal descending aorta through the distal ascending transection. The distal ascending transection incorporating the proximal end of the fenestrated stent graft was directly anastomosed to the Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) tube graft. Survivors were examined by computed tomography angiography.

RESULTS

The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 134.46 ± 19.03 minutes, aortic cross-clamp time was 46.38 ± 8.57 minutes, and selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time was 12.50 ± 2.19 minutes. There was 1 in-hospital death but no difficult bleeding from the distal aortic anastomosis. On postoperative computed tomography, the false lumen closed, with complete thrombus formation around the inserted fenestrated stent graft found in all survivors (100%), at the diaphragmatic level in 28 patients (70%), and at the superior mesenteric arterial level in 3 (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

An open fenestrated stent graft placement provided extensive primary repair of the thoracic aorta and a strong distal aortic stump during the conventional ascending aorta replacement for acute type A aortic dissection but did not increase the risk or technical difficulty of the operation.

Total Aortic Arch Reconstruction With Triple-Branched Stent Graft or Hemiarch Replacement for Acute Debakey Type I Aortic Dissection: Five-Years Experience With 93 Patients

OBJECTIVE

We compared the outcomes of a new triple-branched stent graft reconstruction technique of total aortic arch with those of the conventional strategy of replacing the hemiarch during the surgical treatment of acute Debakey type I aortic dissection over five years.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with acute Debakey type I aortic dissection underwent ascending aorta replacement combined with triple-branched stent graft reconstruction of the aortic arch from June 2008 to February 2010. Concurrently, 41 cases of Debakey type I aortic dissection underwent ascending aorta replacement combined with hemiarch replacement. Both groups received hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and selective cerebral perfusion.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality of the two groups were similar. Postoperative data were not different between the groups. During the five years after surgery, there were no deaths in the stent graft group and three deaths in the hemiarch group. The late reinterventions/events during follow-up in the stent graft group were significantly less than those in the hemiarch group. On postoperative computed tomography, the aortic diameter of both groups was significantly reduced compared to the postoperative aortic diameter. There was no difference in diameter between one month and five years postoperatively in the stent graft group, although in the hemiarch group the diameter was significantly greater at five years than at one month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The triple-branched stent graft reconstruction of the aortic arch is an effective and simplified procedure for the treatment of acute Debakey type I aortic dissection.

Open Stented Grafts for Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique: Technical Aspects and Current Outcomes

With growing experience in patients with aneurysms and dissections in the arch and proximal descending aorta, the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has been shown to be safe and effective, and has achieved favorable short to mid-term outcomes. As the FET technique is gaining wider acceptance, there is a growing need for versatile, technically simple, and highly durable open stented grafts involving less complicated deployment mechanisms enabling use in various indications. This paper gives a brief review on the technical aspects and clinical outcomes of currently available open stented grafts used in the FET technique, including the E-vita Open Plus, Thoraflex Hybrid, Cronus, and J Graft. While none of these grafts can claim to be an ideal device, technology continues to improve towards this goal. As newer devices and systems are developed, more widespread use of the FET technique can be expected; such progress promises to improve the clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with complex aortic diseases.

A self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft for arch repair during open type A dissection surgery

OBJECTIVE

To make the open placement of the triple-branched stent graft technique suitable for most patients with acute type A aortic dissection to achieve effective individual total arch repair, we developed a self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft and arch open technique. In this study, we report the clinical experience and outcomes of total arch repair using implantation of this self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft with the aid of the arch open technique.

METHODS

Between December 2012 and July 2014, 105 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection with indications of total arch repair underwent total arch repair using implantation of a self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft with the aid of the arch open technique under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and selective cerebral perfusion. Survivors were followed up prospectively by means of computed tomography angiography.

RESULTS

The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 169.37 ± 27.17 minutes, aortic crossclamp time was 60.48 ± 16.72 minutes, and selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time was 28.95 ± 7.23 minutes. The in-hospital mortality was 4.76%. One patient was lost to follow-up. One sudden death of unknown cause occurred 10 months after surgery. On the 3-month postoperative scans, the false lumen closed with complete thrombus formation around the self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft was found in all survivors and at the diaphragmatic level in 71.72% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple implantation of a self-adaptive triple-branched stent graft with the aid of the arch open technique can be used safely in most patients with acute type A aortic dissection for effective individual total arch repair.