Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection

A randomized study of cryoablation of intercostal nerves in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery can cause significant pain, and optimizing pain control after surgery is highly desirable. We examined pain control after intercostal nerve block with or without cryoablation of the intercostal nerves.

METHODS

This was a randomized study (NCT05348447) of adults scheduled for a minimally invasive thoracic procedure. Each intercostal space near the incision site was injected with lidocaine and bupivacaine with epinephrine (standard of care). The cryoanalgesia group also had 5 to 6 intercostal nerves ablated. The primary outcome was the amount of narcotics (in morphine milligram equivalents taken during the postoperative hospital stay and the first 2 weeks postdischarge. Secondary outcomes were incentive spirometry volume and pain scores in the hospital and pain and neuropathy scores at 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Our final cohort contained 103 patients (52 standard of care and 51 cryoanalgesia). There were no differences between the treatment groups in morphine milligram equivalents administered during the hospital stay (44.9 vs 38.4 mg), total morphine milligram equivalents at 2 weeks (108.8 vs 95.2 mg), or pain assessed by visual analog scale on postoperative day 1 (3.8 and 3.3), postoperative day 2 (2 and 3.5), or 2 weeks (2 and 3.5) for standard of care and cryoanalgesia group patients, respectively. The decrease in incentive spirometry during the postoperative period was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Patients in the cryoanalgesia group had higher neuropathy scores (8 vs 13; P = .019) 2 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized study, cryoanalgesia did not decrease postoperative pain or narcotic requirements. Cryoanalgesia increased neuropathic pain 2 weeks after surgery.

Improvement in postoperative pain control by combined use of intravenous dexamethasone with dexmedetomidine after erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acute pain after thoracoscopic surgery is very noticeable and often requires additional techniques or adjunctive medications to reduce it. We investigated whether intravenous dexamethasone with dexmedetomidine after erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block could further decrease the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to group C (20 mL normal saline), group S (10 mg dexamethasone + normal saline to 20 mL), or group SM (10 mg dexamethasone + 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine + normal saline to 20 mL). All patients underwent erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block 30 min before anesthesia induction and all drugs were infused intravenously 30 min after general anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was incidence of moderate-to-severe pain at 24 h on movement postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement and at rest throughout the first two postoperative days, pain score, opioid consumption, quality of recovery and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Group SM lowered the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement at 24 h postoperatively than group C (11.1% vs. 48.0%; RR 0.231; 95% CI, 0.074 to 0.725) and group S (11.1% vs. 38.5%; RR 0.289; 95% CI, 0.089 to 0.933). Group SM reduced NRS score on movement (3.0 [3.0] vs. 3.0 [2.0] vs. 3.0[1.0]; P < 0.001) and total opioid consumption (26.0 [6.0] vs. 32.0 [9.0] vs. 28.0 [2.5]; P = 0.004) within 24 h after surgery, fewer patients required rescue analgesia (11.1% vs. 48.0% vs. 38.5%; P = 0.009). Group SM also lowered incidence of nausea and vomiting (7.4% vs. 32.0% vs. 30.8%; P = 0.047) and had a higher QoR-15 score at postoperative 24 h (132.0 [10.0] vs. 123.0 [8.0] vs. 127.5 [10.8]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of dexamethasone with dexmedetomidine after erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block further decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain. It also reduced NRS scores and opioid consumption, making the postoperative pain control better for thoracoscopic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2400084435 on 05/16/2024.

Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain management: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain remains a major problem across a wide range of surgical procedures. The efficacy and clinical utility of the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in reducing postoperative pain remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ESPB compared with placebo or sham block in perioperative pain management.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB to placebo or sham block in surgical patients. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain at 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h, intraoperative and cumulative postoperative opioid consumption (24 h), and postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and block-related adverse events. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, as well as meta-regressions, were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess the quantitative robustness of the available data. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42024583633.

FINDINGS

Forty-three RCTs were included, with 1361 patients randomized to the Erector Spinae Plane Block group. ESPB reduced postoperative pain at 2 h (MD -1.46;95 % CI -1.98 to -0.94;p < 0.001;I2 = 91 %), 6 h (MD -1.23;95 % CI -1.64 to -0.83;p < 0.001;I2 = 89 %), 24 h (MD -0.47;95 % CI -0.67 to -0.28;p < 0.001;I2 = 78 %), and 48 h (MD -0.24;95 % CI -0.39 to -0.09;p = 0.002;I2 = 10 %). Also, intraoperative opioid consumption (MD -137.43 μg;95 % CI -208.73 to -66.13;p < 0.001;I2 = 100 %), 24 h cumulative opioid consumption (MD -25.62 mg;95 % CI -31.31 to -19.93;p < 0.001;I2 = 99 %), and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.56;95 % CI 0.44 to 0.72;p < 0.001;I2 = 16 %) were significantly lower in patients submitted to ESPB. No significant differences were found in postoperative pruritus (RR 0.62;95 % CI 0.35 to 1.10;p = 0.105;I2 = 27 %). Notably, no block-related adverse events were reported in any study. Certainty of evidence was rated as low to moderate for most outcomes. TSA suggested that no further trials are needed to assess ESPB efficacy in the analyzed outcomes, except for postoperative pruritus.

CONCLUSION

ESPB is a safe and effective regional anesthesia technique that significantly reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption across various surgical procedures.

Outside the Cage (OTC) Non-Intercostal Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy

We describe a case of outside the cage nonintercostal robotic esophagectomy, a feasible approach for minimally invasive esophageal resection with potential benefits of reducing postoperative pain and related complications.

Comparison of postoperative pain between robotic and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomic lung resection in patients with stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are widely used, minimally invasive procedures. The present study aimed to compare postoperative pain following U-VATS and RATS anatomical lung resection in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data from 133 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent U-VATS (n = 63), four-arm RATS (n = 70) lobectomy, or segmentectomy between August 2020 and August 2023. Early postoperative outcomes, pain scores through postoperative day 7, and duration of postoperative analgesic use 60 days after surgery were compared using propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

In the propensity score-matched analysis, the U-VATS group had a shorter operative time than the RATS group (160 vs. 202 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in blood loss, chest tube duration, complications, post operative stay length, or number of dissected lymph nodes and stations. The U-VATS group exhibited significantly lower pain scores than the RATS group throughout the entire postoperative period, particularly on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7(P = 0.006, 0.044, 0.032, 0.041, 0.007, and 0.024, respectively). The number of patients who used analgesics for at least 2 months was lower in the U-VATS group than in the RATS group (4 [8.2%] vs. 17 [34.0%], respectively; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

U-VATS anatomical lung resection in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer has less postoperative pain than RATS.

Predictors of Opioid Prescription Refill After Lung Cancer Resection

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic surgery patients are among the least likely to be on opioids before surgery but have the highest rate of new persistent opioid use after surgery compared to other surgical cohorts. Nearly 27% of opioid-naïve lung cancer resection patients become new persistent opioid users. We aimed to identify risk factors for postdischarge opioid prescription refill within 90 ds of surgery for lung cancer resection patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all opioid-naïve patients undergoing lung cancer resection from July 2018 to May 2021 at an academic medical center. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for opioid prescription refill between discharge and 90 ds after surgery.

RESULTS

The cohort included 152 patients, 100 (65.8%) women with a median (IQR) age of 71 (65 - 75) and 115 (75.7%) of whom lived with family or friends (versus. alone). Twenty-nine (19.1%) patients had an opioid prescription refill after discharge. Risk factors for opioid prescription refill included living with others (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.31, 95% CI 1.06-26.64), thoracotomy (4.31, 1.37-13.52), chest tube duration (days) (1.14, 1.02-1.27), age (1.08, 1.01-1.16), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) on the day before discharge (1.07, 1.02-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified risk factors for opioid prescription refill after lung cancer resection: living with family or friend (versus alone), thoracotomy, chest tube duration, increasing age, and MME on the day before discharge. Some of these, namely thoracotomy, chest tube duration, and MME on the day before discharge, may aid patient-centered opioid prescribing.

Prospective Study of Preoperative Negative Affect and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: The Moderating Role of Sex

Objective: Preoperative negative affect is a risk factor for worse postoperative pain, but research investigating this association among patients undergoing thoracic surgery is inconsistent. Additionally, female patients often report greater negative affect and postoperative pain than males. This prospective observational study investigated the association between preoperative negative affect and postoperative pain after thoracic surgery and whether this association differed by sex. Methods: Patients (n = 105) undergoing thoracic surgery completed preoperative assessments of pain and negative affect (PROMIS anxiety and depression short forms). Patients reported their daily worst pain over the first 7 postoperative days, and an index score of acute postoperative pain was created. Six months after surgery, a subsample of patients (n = 60) reported their worst pain. Results: Higher levels of preoperative anxiety (r = 0.25, p = 0.011) and depression (r = 0.20, p = 0.042) were associated with greater acute postoperative pain, but preoperative negative affect was not related to chronic postsurgical pain (anxiety: r = 0.19, p = 0.16; depression: r = -0.01, p = 0.94). Moderation analyses revealed that the associations between both preoperative anxiety (b = 0.12, 95% CI [0.04, 0.21], p = 0.004) and depression (b = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.26], p = 0.008) with acute postoperative pain were stronger among females than males. Similarly, the association between preoperative anxiety and chronic postsurgical pain was stronger among females (b = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.20], p = 0.022), but the association between preoperative depression and chronic pain did not differ based on sex (b = 0.13, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.34], p = 0.201]). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that negative affect may be especially important to the experience of pain following thoracic surgery among female patients, whose degree of preoperative anxiety may indicate vulnerability to progress to a chronic pain state. Preoperative interventions aimed at reducing negative affect and pain may be particularly useful among females with high negative affect before thoracic surgery.

The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has advanced the treatment of lung cancer since its introduction in the 1990s. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offer the advantage of smaller incisions without compromising patient outcomes. These techniques have been shown to be safe and effective in standard pulmonary resections (lobectomy and sub-lobar resection) and in complex pulmonary resections (sleeve resection and pneumonectomy). Furthermore, several studies show these techniques enhance patient outcomes from early recovery to improved quality of life (QoL) and excellent oncologic results. The rise of RATS has yielded further operative benefits compared to thoracoscopic surgery. The wristed instruments, neutralization of tremor, dexterity, and magnification allow for more precise and delicate dissection of tissues and vessels. This review summarizes of the advancements in minimally invasive thoracic surgery and the positive impact on patient outcomes.

Comparison of early postoperative patient-reported outcomes after multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare early postoperative patient-reported outcomes between multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (M-RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Symptom severity and functional status were measured using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery at pre-surgery, during postoperative hospitalisation, and within 4 weeks of discharge. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis of patients with NSCLC who were treated with M-RATS and U-VATS was performed. The symptom severity and daily functional status presented as proportion of moderate-to-severe scores on a 0-10-point scale, were compared using a generalised estimation equation model.

RESULTS

We enrolled 762 patients with NSCLC from a prospective cohort (CN-PRO-Lung 3), including 151 and 611 who underwent M-RATS and U-VATS, respectively, before PSM analysis. After 1:1 PSM, two groups of 148 patients each were created. Pain severity (P = 0.019) and activity limitation (P = 0.001) during hospitalisation were higher in the M-RATS group. However, no significant differences existed post-discharge in pain (P = 0.383), cough (P = 0.677), shortness of breath (P = 0.526), disturbed sleep (P = 0.525), drowsiness (P = 0.304), fatigue (P = 0.153), distress (P = 0.893), walking difficulty (P = 0.242), or activity limitation (P = 0.513). M-RATS caused less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.013), more stations of dissected lymph nodes (P = 0.001), more numbers of dissected lymph nodes (P = 0.001), and less tube drainage on the first postoperative day (P = 0.003) than U-VATS.

CONCLUSION

M-RATS and U-VATS achieved comparable symptom burden and functional impairment after discharge. However, compared to U-VATS, M-RATS was associated with more severe pain and activity limitation in the short postoperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000033016.

Effect of age on postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain after radical resection of lung cancer-specific pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the relationship between age and postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain after radical resection of lung cancer and the specific effect of moderate-to-severe pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) on this relationship.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single medical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ≥18 years having radical resection of lung cancer between 2018 and 2020.

MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain.

RESULTS

A total of 3764 patients were included in the analysis. The incidence of postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain was 28.3%. Age had a significant effect on the prediction model of postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain. Among the whole population and those without moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU, those who were younger than 58.5 years were prone to experience moderate-to-severe pain 24 hours after surgery, and in patients with moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU, the age threshold was 62.5 years.

CONCLUSION

For patients who underwent elective radical resection for lung cancer, age was related to postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain, and moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU had a specific effect on this relationship. Patients among the whole population and those patients without moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU were more likely to experience postoperative 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain when they were younger than 58.5 years old, and in patients with moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU, the age threshold was 62.5 years old.

Early adoption of robotic lung resection in an established video assisted thoracic surgery practice

Background

Reported advantages to robotic thoracic surgery include shorter length of stay (LOS), improved lymphadenectomy, and decreased complications. It is uncertain if these benefits occur when introducing robotics into a well-established video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) practice. We compared the two approaches to investigate these advantages.

Materials and methods

IRB approval was obtained for this project. Patients who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy from May 2016-December 2018 were propensity-matched 2: 1 (VATS: robotic) and compared using weighted logistic regression with age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery type, stage, Exparel, and epidural as covariates. Complication rates, operation times, number of sampled lymph nodes, pain level, disposition, and LOS were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and with Rao-Scott Chi-squared tests.

Results

213 patients (142 VATS and 71 robot) were matched. Duration of robotic cases was longer than VATS (median 186 min (IQR 78) vs. 164 min (IQR 78.75); p < 0.001). Significantly more lymph nodes (median 11 (IQR 7.50) vs. 8 (IQR 7.00); p = 0.004) and stations were sampled (median 4 (IQR 2.00) vs. 3 (IQR 1.00); p < 0.001) with the robot. Interestingly, robotic resections had higher 72-hour pain scores (median 3 (IQR 3.25) vs. 2 (IQR 3.50); p = 0.04) and 48-hour opioid usage (median 37.50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (IQR 45.50) vs. 22.50 MME (IQR 37.50); p = 0.01). Morbidity, LOS, and disposition were similar (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The robotic approach facilitates better lymph node sampling, even in an established VATS practice.

Healthcare sustainability in cardiothoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Climate change is the greatest threat to human health. Cardiothoracic patients suffer direct consequences from poor environmental health and we have a vested interest to address this in our practice. As leaders of complex high-end surgery, we are uniquely positioned to effect practical and immediate changes to significantly pare down emissions within the operating theatre, outside the operating theatre and beyond the confines of the hospital.

METHODS

We aim to spotlight this pressing issue, take stock of our current efforts, and encourage fellow specialists to drive this agenda.

RESULTS

Sustainability in healthcare needs to be formalized as part of the core curriculum in surgical training and awareness generated via carbon audits and life cycle analyses. Practical actions such as reducing unnecessary equipment usage, choosing reusable equipment over single use disposables, judicious use of investigations rooted in clinical reasoning and sharing of resources across services and health systems help reduce the carbon output of our specialty.

CONCLUSION

The 'Triple Bottom Line' serves as a good template to calibrate efforts that balance quality against environmental costs. More can be done to advocate for and find solutions for sustainable healthcare with cardiothoracic surgery.

Factors related to post-thoracotomy pain following robotic-assisted thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a minimally invasive procedure; however, some patients experience persistent postoperative pain. This study aimed to investigate factors related to postoperative pain following RATS.

METHODS

The data of 145 patients with lung cancer, who underwent RATS with a four-port (one in the sixth intercostal space [ICS] and three in the eighth ICS) lobectomy or segmentectomy between May 2019 and December 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Factors associated with analgesic use for at least 2 months following postoperative pain (PTP group) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent preoperative pain control for any condition or chest wall resection were excluded. Among the 138 patients, 45 (32.6%) received analgesics for at least 2 months after surgery. Patient height and transverse length of the thorax correlated with PTP in the univariate analysis (non-PTP vs. PTP; height, 166 vs. 160 cm; p < .001; transverse length of the thorax, 270 vs. 260 mm, p = .016). In the multivariate analysis, height was correlated with PTP (p = .009; odds ratio, 0.907; 95% confidence interval, 0.843-0.976). Height correlated with the transverse length of the thorax (r = .407), anteroposterior length of the thorax (r = .294), and width of the eighth ICS in the middle axillary line (r = .210) using Pearson's correlation coefficients. When utilizing a 165-cm cutoff value for height to predict PTP using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.601-0.779).

CONCLUSION

Short stature is associated with a high risk of postoperative pain following RATS.

Timing of recovery of quality of life after robotic anatomic lung resection

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an underreported aspect of surgical recovery. The purpose of our study was to track PROs after robotic anatomic lung to determine the timing to recovery of baseline patient baseline quality of life. This was a prospective cohort study at an academic medical center (4/2021-12/2022). Patients who underwent robotic anatomic lung resection were asked to complete PROMIS-29 surveys at the preoperative clinic visit, postoperative clinic visit, 30 days and 90 days postoperatively via in-person and email-based electronic surveys. The PROPr score, a summary of health-related quality of life, and mental and physical health z-scores were estimated for each patient using published methods and compared by postoperative timing. 75 patients completed the preoperative survey and at least one postoperative survey; 56 completed postoperative clinic surveys, 54 completed 30-day postoperative surveys, and 40 completed 90-day postoperative surveys. All three PROMIS scores decreased between the preoperative and first postoperative visit (all p < 0.05). PROPr scores increased over time but remained significantly worse than baseline by 90 days (-0.08 difference between 90 days and preoperative, p = 0.02). While PROMIS summary z-scores for physical health remained - 0.29 lower at 90 days postoperatively, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). Mental health scores returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively (p = 0.41). While some PROs returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively, overall quality-of-life scores remained significantly below preoperative baselines. These findings are important to share with patients during the informed consent process to achieve patient centered care more effectively.

Surgical Approach and Persistent Opioid Use in Medicare Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

Robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for lung resection are associated with decreased inpatient opioid use compared with open surgery. Whether these approaches affect outpatient persistent opioid use remains unknown.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 66 years or more who underwent lung resection between 2008 and 2017 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Persistent opioid use was defined as filling an opioid prescription 3 to 6 months after lung resection. Adjusted analyses were performed to evaluate surgical approach and persistent opioid use.

RESULTS

We identified 19,673 patients: 7479 (38%) underwent open surgery, 10,388 (52.8%) VATS, and 1806 (9.2%) robotic surgery. Persistent opioid use was 38% in the entire cohort, including 27% of opioid naïve patients, and highest after open surgery (42.5%), followed by VATS (35.3%) and robotic (33.1%, P < .001). In multivariable analyses, robotic (odds ratio 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .028) and VATS (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95; P = .003) approaches were both associated with decreased persistent opioid use compared with open surgery in opioid naïve patients. At 12 months, patients resected using a robotic approach had the lowest oral morphine equivalent per month compared with VATS (133 vs 160, P < .001) and open surgery (133 vs 200, P < .001). Among chronic opioid patients, surgical approach was not associated with postoperative opioid use.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent opioid use after lung resection is common. Both robotic and VATS approaches were associated with decreased persistent opioid use compared with open surgery among opioid naïve patients. Whether a robotic approach yields additional long-term advantages over VATS warrants further investigation.

Chronic pain after posterolateral and axillary approaches to lung surgery: a monocentric observational study

PURPOSE

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) and chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain (CPNP) were evaluated 4 months after thoracic surgery whether the approach was a posterolateral (PL) incision or the less invasive axillary (AX) one.

METHODS

Patients, 79 in each group, undergoing a thoracotomy between July 2014 and November 2015 were analyzed 4 months after surgery in this prospective monocentric cohort study.

RESULTS

More PL patients suffered PTPS (60.8% vs. 40.5%; p = 0.017) but CPNP was equally present (45.8% and 46.9% in the PL and AX groups). Patients with PTPS have more limited daily activities (p < 0.001) but a similar psychological disability (i.e., catastrophism). Patients with CPNP have an even greater limitation of daily activities (p = 0.007) and more catastrophism (p = 0.0002). Intensity of pain during mobilization of the homolateral shoulder at postoperative day 6 (OR = 1.40, CI 95% [1.13-1.75], p = 0.002); age (OR = 0.97 [0.94-1.00], p = 0.022), and presence of pain before surgery (OR = 2.22 [1.00-4.92], p = 0.049) are related to the occurrence of PTPS; while, height of hypoesthesia area on the breast line measured 6 days after surgery is the only factor related to that of CPNP (OR = 1.14 [1.01-1.30], p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery was associated with less frequent PTPS, but with equal risk of CPNP. Pain before surgery and its postoperative intensity are associated with PTPS. This must lead to a more aggressive care of pain patients before surgery and of a better management of postoperative pain. CPNP can be forecasted according to the early postoperative height of hypoesthesia area on the breast line.

Multimodal evaluation of locoregional anaesthesia efficacy on postoperative pain after robotic pulmonary lobectomy for NSCLC: a pilot study

The primary objectives of the study were to analyse the robotic approach and ultrasound-guided paravertebral block compared to thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block after robotic pulmonary lobectomy on postoperative pain and opioids use. The secondary objectives were to analyse and compare patients' necessity of additional antalgic drugs and patients' performance during respiratory therapy, following robotic surgery and in the two groups. Consecutively, 52 patients undergoing robotic pulmonary lobectomies were treated either with ropivacaine-based intercostal nerve block or paravertebral block from February 2022 to October 2022. When necessary, morphine was administered at day 1. Acetaminophen was administered as an additional antalgic drug on demand up to 3 g per day. Pain was measured 1 h after the end of the surgical procedure and daily through the pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Morphine administration rate and per day and total additional administrations of acetaminophen were recorded. Pain and opioids administration was measured 1 month after the procedure. Data were analysed in the overall population and in the intercostal nerve block group VS paravertebral block group. Overall, 34.6% of the patients required morphine administration and 51.7% of the patients required at least daily acetaminophen administration up to discharge. At 1 month postoperatively, four patients presented with chronic pain and one still was under opioid medication. At intergroup analysis, the paravertebral block group demonstrated lower NRS at fixed time points (p < 0.0001) and lower morphine consumption (45.7%VS11.8%; p = 0.02). Acetaminophen rescue administration at fixed time points was lower in the paravertebral block group (p < 0.0001) and mobility and dynamic pain resulted in better results (p = 0.03; p = 0.04). At 1 month, no differences were found between study groups. Similarly to other minimally invasive techniques, postoperative pain may arise after robotic pulmonary lobectomy. Paravertebral bloc can help to reduce postoperative pain as well as morphine and antalgic drugs administration and improve early mobilization.

Identifying risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain and preventive measures: a comprehensive update

INTRODUCTION

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a prevalent condition that can diminish health-related quality of life, cause functional deficits, and lead to patient distress. Rates of CPSP are higher for certain types of surgeries than others (thoracic, breast, or lower extremity amputations) but can occur after even uncomplicated minimally invasive procedures. CPSP has multiple mechanisms, but always starts as acute postsurgical pain, which involves inflammatory processes and may encompass direct or indirect neural injury. Risk factors for CPSP are largely known but many, such as female sex, younger age, or type of surgery, are not modifiable. The best strategy against CPSP is to quickly and effectively treat acute postoperative pain using a multimodal analgesic regimen that is safe, effective, and spares opioids.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review of the literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Every surgical patient is at some risk for CPSP. Control of acute postoperative pain appears to be the most effective approach, but principles of good opioid stewardship should apply. The role of regional anesthetics as analgesics is gaining interest and may be appropriate for certain patients. Finally, patients should be better informed about their relative risk for CPSP.

Lung cancer patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 expression endure graver postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is common in lung cancer patients, and it is unclear whether cancer itself participates in pain regulation. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expressed by tumours may be analgesic. Our study aimed to detect the association between PD-L1 and acute postoperative pain.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent VATS for lung cancer with tumour PD-L1 expression analysed in our centre from Jan 2017 to Jul 2020. They were divided into PD-L1 (-) group and PD-L1 (+) group and were further divided into four subgroups according to opioids for postoperative analgesia: sufentanil PD-L1 (-), sufentanil PD-L1 (+), oxycodone PD-L1 (-), and oxycodone PD-L1 (+). We compared the numeric rating scale (NRS) for the first three postoperative days at rest or cough between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 369 patients (167 in PD-L1 (-) vs. 202 in PD-L1 (+)) were included. On the first postoperative day, NRS at cough in the PD-L1 (+) patients were higher than those in the PD-L1 (-) patients (2.91 ± 1.07 vs. 2.66 ± 1.01, p = 0.018). On the third day, NRS at cough in PD-L1 (+) patients was higher (2.50 ± 1.02 vs. 2.26 ± 1.09, p = 0.043). For patients with oxycodone, NRS was higher in PD-L1 (+) than in PD-L1 (-) (p = 0.041) at cough after surgery. In contrast, those with sufentanil did not significantly differ in NRS between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PD-L1 (+) suffered graver pain in the early postoperative period after VATS for lung cancer compared with PD-L1 (-) on tumours. Analgesia with sufentanil seemed to overcome this effect better than oxycodone.

SIGNIFICANCE

We demonstrated that patients with positive programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumours suffered graver pain in the early postoperative period after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer and reacted differently with opioids. It might be beneficial to adjust analgesic protocols according to tumour PD-L1 expression for individualized postoperative pain management.

Continuous Relationship of Operative Duration with Risk of Adverse Perioperative Outcomes and Early Discharge Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery

Background: For thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, the continuous relationship and the trigger point of operative duration with a risk of adverse perioperative outcomes (APOs) and early discharge remain unknown. Methods: This study enrolled 12,392 patients who underwent this surgical treatment. Five groups were stratified by operative duration: <60 min, 60−120 min, 120−180 min, 180−240 min, and ≥240 min. APOs included intraoperative hypoxemia, delayed extubation, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), prolonged air leakage (PAL), postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), and transfusion. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot was used to characterize the continuous relationship of operative duration with the risk of APOs and early discharge. Results: The risks of the aforementioned APOs increased with each additional hour after the first hour. A J-shaped association with APOs was observed, with a higher risk in those with prolonged operative duration compared with those with shorter values. However, the probability of early discharge decreased from 0.465 to 0.350, 0.217, and 0.227 for each additional hour of operative duration compared with counterparts (<60 min), showing an inverse J-shaped association. The 90 min procedure appears to be a tipping point for a sharp increase in APOs and a significant reduction in early discharge. Conclusions: Our findings have important and meaningful implications for risk predictions and clinical interventions, and early rehabilitation, for APOs.

Robotic Belsey Mark IV Repair of the Paraesophageal Hernia

OBJECTIVE

Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias in patients with hostile abdomen is challenging. Despite its utility as an open procedure, the adoption of the minimally invasive Belsey Mark IV procedure has been limited because of the complexity of using traditional video-assisted thoracoscopic instrumentation. The robotic platform offers additional degrees of freedom, which enables minimally invasive transthoracic approach despite challenging anatomy. The purpose of this article is to describe a technique of robotic approach for the Belsey Mark IV operation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 5 cases of the robotic Belsey Mark IV procedure completed at a single institution between June 2018 and November 2021. Data were collected from a review of the medical records, including operative reports, anesthesia records, imaging, and clinical notes. The operative technique is described in the present article. There were 4 men and 1 woman. The average age of the patients was 64.4 ± 13.6 years, with an average body mass index of 24.5 kg/m². Three patients had undergone previous transabdominal hiatal hernia repair, and 2 of them had 2 prior repairs. One patient underwent simultaneous pulmonary left lower lobectomy for cancer with the Belsey Mark IV procedure.

RESULTS

The average operative time was 209 ± 95 min (110 to 360 min). The average postoperative length of stay was 4.2 days, and 2 patients experienced complications including bleeding and persistent air leak (after lobectomy). The average blood loss was 67 ± 25 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The robotic platform enables a transthoracic minimally invasive approach to the Belsey Mark IV operation.

Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database.

METHODS

Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P <.01). Multivariate analyses showed comparable RATS and VATS complications with no independent association between the minimally invasive surgery approach used and adverse surgical outcomes, except for a decreased risk of pneumonia with RATS, relative to VATS sublobar resection (P <.01). Thoracic complication rates and LOS decreased after RATS lobectomy in 2018, compared with previous years (P <.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of robotic-assisted lung resection for cancer has increased in the United States between 2015 and 2018 for sublobar resection and lobectomy. In adjusted regression analysis, compared with VATS, patients who underwent RATS had similar complication rates and LOS. The robotic approach was associated with increased total hospital cost. LOS and thoracic complication rates trended down after RATS lobectomy.

Comparison of the effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) on postoperative acute and chronic pain. Material and Method: Patients aged range of 18 to 80 years and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were included in a single-blinded randomized trial. All patients were informed about the study and their written consent was obtained. The primary outcome was determined as acute postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and secondary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and the incidence of chronic pain. US-guided ESPB and TPVB were performed to all patients and they were assigned randomly to ESPB (Group 1) and TPVB (Group 2) groups according to the analgesia protocol. Results: Visual analog scale (VAS) resting and VAS cough scores at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 16th hours were found to be statistically significantly higher in the TPVB group than in the ESPB group (p&lt;0.05) Morphine consumption (p:0.042) and additional analgesic (p:0.037) use were found to be statistically significantly higher in the TPVB group compared to the ESPB group. As complications, only nausea and vomiting were observed with no significant difference between the groups (p&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative 30th and 90th day pain characteristics between the groups (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: ESPB was superior to TPVB in terms of acute postoperative pain management, morphine consumption, and side effects, but the incidence of chronic pain in the first and third months after surgery was similar in both groups.

Early Postoperative Pain Trajectories after Posterolateral and Axillary Approaches to Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Monocentric Observational Study

Less-invasive thoracotomies may reduce early postoperative pain. The aims of this study were to identify pain trajectories from postoperative days 0–5 after posterolateral and axillary thoracotomies and to identify potential factors related to the worst trajectory. Patients undergoing a posterolateral (92 patients) or axillary (89 patients) thoracotomy between July 2014 and November 2015 were analyzed in this prospective monocentric cohort study. The best-fitting model resulted in four pain trajectory groups: trajectory 1, the “worst”, with 29.8% of the patients with permanent significant pain; trajectory 2 with patients with low pain (32.6%); trajectory 3 with patients with a steep decrease in pain (22.7%); and trajectory 4 with patients with a steep increase (14.9%). According to a multinomial logistic model multivariable analysis, some predictive factors allow for differentiation between trajectory groups 1 and 2. Risk factors for permanent pain are the existence of preoperative pain (OR = 6.94, CI 95% (1.54–31.27)) and scar length (OR = 1.20 (1.05–1.38)). In contrast, ASA class III is a protective factor in group 1 (OR = 0.02 (0.001–0.52)). In conclusion, early postoperative pain can be characterized by four trajectories and preoperative pain is a major factor for the worst trajectory of early postoperative pain.

Complications of Robotic Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Compared to Open Thoracotomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

(1) Background: Conventional open thoracotomy has been the accepted surgical treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. However, newer, minimally invasive approaches, such as robotic surgery, have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy with potentially superior peri-operative outcomes. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess these outcomes through a meta-analysis. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases to identify all of the relevant studies that compared robotic surgery with open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Pooled data on the peri-operative outcomes were then meta-analyzed. (3) Results: Twenty-two studies involving 12,061 patients who underwent robotic lung resection and 92,411 patients who underwent open thoracotomy were included for analysis. Mortality rates and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in patients who underwent robotic resection. Compared to open thoracotomy, robotic surgery was also associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications, including atrial arrhythmia, post-operative blood transfusions, pneumonia and atelectasis. However, the operative times were significantly longer with robotic lung resection. (4) Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrated superior post-operative morbidity and mortality outcomes with robotic lung resection compared to open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy for Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) offers a minimally invasive option for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, of which interstitial lung diseases comprise the most common diagnoses. It has a high diagnostic yield with prognostic and therapeutic implications. TBLC has a favorable safety profile compared with surgical lung biopsy, but associated complications include pneumothorax and bleeding. However, TBLC techniques remain variable. Here we review the latest techniques described to maximize diagnostic yield and mitigate complications of TBLC as well as how this modality has been incorporated into guidelines.

The safety profile of a protocolized transbronchial cryobiopsy program utilizing a 2.4 mm cryoprobe for interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has emerged as a promising alternative to surgical lung biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. However, uncertainty remains regarding its overall complications due to a lack of procedural standardization including the size of cryoprobe utilized.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of a protocolized transbronchial cryobiopsy program utilizing a 2.4 mm cryoprobe. 201 consecutive subjects were enrolled at a single academic center.

RESULTS

The average biopsy size was 106.2 ± 39.3 mm². Complications included a total pneumothorax rate of 4.9% with 3.5% undergoing chest tube placement. Severe bleeding defined by the Nashville Working Group occurred in 0.5% of cases. There were no deaths at 30-days.

DISCUSSION

A protocolized transbronchial cryobiopsy program utilizing a 2.4 mm cryoprobe in can achieve a high diagnostic yield with a favorable safety profile.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

Comparison of the perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different body mass index ranges

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common malignancy and one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has gradually become a prevalent surgical method for patients with NSCLC. Previous studies have found that body mass index (BMI) is associated with postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RATS compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of NSCLC with different BMI, in terms of perioperative outcomes.

Methods

The baseline and perioperative data, including BMI, of 849 NSCLC patients who underwent minimally invasive anatomic lung resections from August 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was applied to minimize potential bias between the two groups (VATS and RATS), and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Subgroup analysis was subsequently performed.

Results

Compared to VATS, RATS had more lymph nodes dissected {9 [inter-quartile range (IQR), 6–12] vs. 7 (IQR, 6–10), P<0.001}, a lower estimated bleeding volume [40 (IQR, 30–50) vs. 50 (IQR, 40–60) mL, P<0.001], and other better postoperative outcomes, but a higher cost of hospitalization [¥83,626 (IQR, 77,211–92,686) vs. ¥75,804 (IQR, 66,184–83,693), P<0.001]. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that RATS (P=0.027) and increasing BMI (P=0.030) were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis indicated that the advantages of RATS may be more obvious in patients with a BMI of 24–28 kg/m², in which the RATS group had more lymph nodes dissected [9 (IQR, 6–12) vs. 7 (IQR, 5–10), P<0.001] and a decreased risk of total postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.443; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.212–0.924; P=0.030] compared to the VATS group.

Conclusions

Both, RATS and VATS can be safely applied for patients with NSCLC. Perioperative outcome parameters indicate advantages for RATS, however at a higher cost of hospitalization. The advantages of RATS might be more obvious in patients with a BMI of 24–28 kg/m².

Robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer

Background

The major advantages of robot-assisted surgery are the fine field of view provided by the high-precision three-dimensional (3D) images and the good operability provided by the robotic arms that enables precise movements. A growing number of retrospective studies have compared robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the number of cases is limited and the results are contradictory.

Methods

We studied the medical records of primary lung cancer patients who underwent lobectomy with lymph node dissection between 2017 and 2020. Four hundred and eleven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria in this study (RATS: 103; VATS: 308). We compared the perioperative factors and postoperative results of the VATS and RATS groups. Further, we adjusted background factors using propensity score matching (PSM) then compared the results of 200 patients (100 patients in each group). In this study, we matched interlobar fissure completeness, which affects operative difficulty and operative time; however, this has been superficially compared in previous studies.

Results

After PSM, a significant difference was observed in the intraoperative blood loss (RATS: 53.3 mL, VATS: 120.3 mL, P=0.04). The rates of surgical complications were comparable between the groups (10.0% vs. 13.0%, P=0.66) with similar mean operation times (RATS: 215.0 min, VATS: 210.1 min, P=0.57). The mean postoperative stay in the RATS group was shorter than that in the VATS group (10.0 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Initial experience of RATS had no obvious drawbacks when compared with that of VATS on propensity-matched analysis.

The effects of paravertebral blockade usage on pulmonary complications, atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Although combined thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB)-general anesthesia (GA) could improve pain control compared to GA alone after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, it has not been established whether this improvement in pain control could reduce associated adverse outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association between TPVB usage and adverse outcomes after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from a prospective database.

SETTING

A high-volume thoracic center in China.

PATIENTS

13966 consecutive patients who received thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS

With a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, adverse outcomes between GA alone and GA-TPVB were investigated. Multivariate and multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify factors and calculate odds radio (OR) for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

The rate of TPVB usage was 14.8% (2070 out of 13,966). TPVB combined with GA was associated with lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (30.4% vs 33.5%, P = 0.005) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (2.1% vs 2.9%, P = 0.041), and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (Median [IQR]; 5[4-5] vs 5[4-6]) days, P < 0.001) compared to GA alone. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, we investigated adverse outcomes in 2640 (1320 pairs) patients with or without TPVB usage, and this association remained existed, namely, the rates of PPCs (29.8% vs 34.2%, P = 0.014) and POAF (2.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.028) were lower and LOS was shorter (5[4-5] vs 5[4-6] days, P < 0.001) in the GA-TPVB group. In multivariate analysis, the combination of GA plus TPVB was independent predictor for PPCs (OR = 0.879, 95%CI, 0.793-0.974, P = 0.014) and POAF (OR = 0.714, 95%CI, 0.516-0.988, P = 0.042), respectively. However, in multiple linear analysis, lower rates of PPCs and POAF associated with TPVB usage, rather than TPVB usage, were responsible for the reduced LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

The usage of TPVB may be a feasible and adjustable approach to reduce the rates of PPCs and POAF and associated LOS in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Robotic and video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer have similar perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

At present, the clinical conclusion that robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), which is better for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not clear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between RATS and VATS for NSCLC.

Methods

The Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) framework was employed to develop the search strategy, and the findings was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched EMbase, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wan Fang Data to collect clinical studies about RATS vs. VATS for patients with NSCLC from inception to October 2019. The following outcomes were measured: rate of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital mortality, lymph node dissection, hospitalization time, operating time, and postoperative drainage days. Estimation of potential publication bias was conducted by Begg’s test and Egger’s test. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using Stata 15.0 software.

Results

A total of 18 studies involving 60,349 patients were included. Among them, 8,726 cases were in the RATS group, and 51,623 were in the VATS group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the operation time of RATS group was longer than that of VATS group (SMD=0.532, 95% CI: 0.391–0.674, P=0.000). And the further meta-analysis suggested that the incidence of postoperative complications was lower in patients who underwent RATS after 2015 (OR=0.848, 95% CI: 0.748–0.962, P=0.010). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between both groups in postoperative hospitalization time (SMD=0.003, 95% CI: −0.104–0.110, P=0.957). In addition, more lymph nodes were retrieved in RATS group than VATS (SMD=0.308, 95% CI: 0.131–0.486, P=0.001). However, the conversion rate, retrieved lymph node station, days to tube removal and in-hospital mortality rate have no significant differences between both groups.

Discussion

The current meta-analysis indicates that the perioperative outcomes of RATS and VATS for NSCLC are equivalence. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions still need to be verified by more high-quality studies.

Randomized controlled trial of an alternative drainage strategy vs routine chest tube insertion for postoperative pain after thoracoscopic wedge resection

Background

Thoracoscopic surgery has greatly alleviated the postoperative pain of patients, but postsurgical acute and chronic pain still exists and needs to be addressed. Indwelling drainage tubes are one of the leading causes of postoperative pain after thoracic surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effects of alternative drainage on acute and chronic pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Methods

Ninety-two patients undergoing lung wedge resection were selected and randomly assigned to the conventional chest tube (CT) group and the 7-Fr central venous catheter (VC) group. Next, the numeric rating scale (NRS) and pain DETECT questionnaire were applied to evaluate the level and characteristics of postoperative pain.

Results

NRS scores of the VC group during hospitalization were significantly lower than those of the CT group 6 h after surgery, at postoperative day 1, at postoperative day 2, and at the moment of drainage tube removal. Moreover, the number of postoperative salvage analgesics (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [(NSAIDs]) and postoperative hospitalization days were notably reduced in the VC group compared with the CT group. However, no significant difference was observed in terms of NRS pain scores between the two groups of patients during the follow-up for chronic pain at 3 months and 6 months.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a drainage strategy using a 7-Fr central VC can effectively relieve perioperative pain in selected patients undergoing VATS wedge resection, and this may promote the rapid recovery of such patients after surgery.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03230019. Registered July 23, 2017.

Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Intercostal Block with Incision Infiltration in Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (rVATS) report significant postoperative pain. Both the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and the surgical intercostal block (IB) (performed by a surgeon from within the thorax), along with incision infiltration (II), are distinct modalities that target the lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves and are acceptable analgesic modalities in an enhanced recovery after rVATS surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled pilot trial with 65 patients to assess the difference in analgesia quality between the SAPB and IB+II in rVATS.

SETTING

Major academic teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The inclusion criteria included ASA physical status I-IV, ages 18-to-75 undergoing an elective, unilateral rVATS procedure.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided SAPB at the end of their surgery, using a 20-mL mixture consisting of 10 mL of liposomal bupivacaine (133 mg) and 10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, or IB+II, using a 20-mL mixture consisting of 10 mL of liposomal bupivacaine (133 mg) and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine prior to skin closure by the surgeon.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was the amount of postoperative opioid consumption in morphine milliequivalents [MME] during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes were time to first analgesic request, VAS scores at zero, two, six, 18, or 24 hours at rest, and PACU, ICU, or hospital lengths of stay (LOS). There were no differences in any outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SAPB and IB+II are comparable analgesic modalities for rVATS procedures.

The impact of social determinants of health on management of stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) can be important contributors in health care outcomes. We hypothesized that certain SDOH independently impact the management and outcomes of stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC were identified from the National Cancer Database. The impact of SDOH factors on utilization of surgery, perioperative outcomes and overall survival were examined, both in bivariate and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 236,140 patients were identified. In multivariate analysis, SDOH marginalization were associated with less frequent use of surgery, lower 5-year survival and, in surgical patients, more frequent use of open surgery and lower 90-day postoperative survival.

CONCLUSION

SDOH disparities have a significant impact in the management and outcomes of stage I NSCLC. We identified SDOH patient groups particularly impacted by such disparities, in which higher utilization of surgery and minimally invasive approaches may lead to improved outcomes.

AAAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Thoracic Surgery Pain

Patients undergoing thoracic surgery experience particular challenges for acute pain management. Availability of standardized diagnostic criteria for identification of acute pain after thoracotomy and video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) would provide a foundation for evidence-based management and facilitate future research. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the United States Food and Drug Administration, the American Pain Society (APS), and the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) formed the ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) initiative to address absence of acute pain diagnostic criteria. A multidisciplinary working group of pain experts was invited to develop diagnostic criteria for acute thoracotomy and VATS pain. The working group used available studies and expert opinion to characterize acute pain after thoracotomy and VATS using the 5-dimension taxonomical structure proposed by AAAPT (i.e., core diagnostic criteria, common features, modulating factors, impact/functional consequences, and putative mechanisms). The resulting diagnostic criteria will serve as the starting point for subsequent empirically validated criteria. PERSPECTIVE ITEM: This article characterizes acute pain after thoracotomy and VATS using the 5-dimension taxonomical structure proposed by AAAPT (ie, core diagnostic criteria, common features, modulating factors, impact and/or functional consequences, and putative mechanisms).

Comparison of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy bronchial sleeve lobectomy with pulmonary arterioplasty for centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of bronchial sleeve lobectomy with pulmonary arterioplasty by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) in centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and two thoracotomy and 31 UniVATS cases were included in this retrospective, single-centre study. Baseline characteristics, perioperative performance and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the thoracotomy group, the UniVATS group was associated with lower postoperative blood transfusion rate (P = 0.043), decreased postoperative hospital stays (P = 0.008), shorter drainage duration (P = 0.003) and less drainage volume during the first postoperative 24 h (P = 0.005). Besides, the 3-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank, P = 0.81 and P = 0.78, respectively). In addition, squamous cell carcinoma was proved to be the independent favourable predictor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.80; P = 0.008], and advanced pathological stage was found to be independently associated with worse overall survival (IIIB stage: HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.13-9.12; P = 0.028) and recurrence-free survival (IIIB stage: HR 3.54, 95% CI 1.32-9.51; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

With appropriate patient selection, UniVATS sleeve lobectomy with pulmonary arterioplasty is feasible and safe for centrally located lung cancer in the hands of thoracic surgeons with extensive thoracoscopy experience.

Uniportal video-assisted versus open pneumonectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis with short-term outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Uniportal (U-VATS) pneumonectomy in lung cancer patients remains disputed in terms of oncological outcomes, and has not been compared to open approaches previously. We evaluated U-VATS versus open pneumonectomy at a high-volume centre.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups based on surgical approach. Propensity-score matching was performed (1:1), and intention-to-treat analysis applied. Overall survival, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital-stay and readmission, pain, time to adjuvant therapy, morbidity and mortality were tested. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. NC) RESULTS: 341 patients underwent pneumonectomy; 23 patients with small-cell lung cancer were excluded, thus 318 patients were submitted to surgery by either U-VATS (n = 54) or open (n = 264). After matching, 52 patients were selected from each group. Five patients (9.2%) in the uniportal group required conversion. There was no significant difference in intraoperative outcomes, complication rates, readmission rates or mortality. The U-VATS group experienced significantly shorter hospital stay (mean ± SD; 6.7 ± 2.7 vs 9.1 ± 2.3 days, p < 0.001) and reported less pain postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated sooner after U-VATS (38.1 ± 8.4 vs 50.8 ± 11.5 days, p < 0.0001). Overall survival appeared to be superior in U-VATS when pathology stage was aligned (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Uniportal VATS is a safe and effective alternative approach to open surgery for pneumonectomy in lung cancer. Complications and oncologic outcomes were comparatively similar. U-VATS showed lower postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and superior overall survival. The study is a preliminary analysis.

Quality of Life, Postoperative Pain, and Lymph Node Dissection in a Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and OPEN for Early Stage Lung Cancer

We compare the perioperative course, postoperative pain, and quality-of-life (QOL) in patients undergoing anatomic resections of early-stage lung cancer by means of robotic surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), or muscle-sparing thoracotomy (OPEN); 169 consecutive patients with known/suspected lung cancer, candidates to anatomic resection, were enrolled in a single-center prospective study from April 2016 to December 2018. EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 scores were obtained preoperatively and, at three time points, postoperatively. RATS and VATS groups were matched for ASA scores, while RATS and open surgery were matched for gender, ASA score, cancer stage, and tumor size; 58 patients underwent open surgery, 58 had VATS, and 53 had RATS. Hospital stay was shorter after RATS than OPEN (median 4.5 versus 5; p = 0.047). Comparing matched RATS and VATS groups, the number of hilar lymph nodes and nodal stations removed was significantly higher in the former approach (p = 0.01 vs. p < 0.0001); conversely, pain at 2 weeks was slightly lower after VATS (p = 0.004). No significant difference was observed in conversions, complications, duration of surgery, and postoperative hospitalization. The robotic approach was superior to OPEN in terms of QOL, pain, and length of postoperative stay and showed improved lymph node dissection compared to VATS.

Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique and safety of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with uniportal and three-port VATS.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 146 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS lobectomy between January 2018 and May 2018. The general clinical date, perioperative data and life quality were individually compared and analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the uniportal than in the three-port group (p = 0.035), and significantly shorter chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay durations were found in the uniportal than in the three-port group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.008). The postoperative 24 and 72 h numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower in the uniportal group than in the three-port group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number or stations of total lymph node dissected (p = 0.222 and p = 0.159). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative total or respiratory complications (p = 0.917 and p = 0.930).

CONCLUSIONS

Uniportal VATS is a safe and effective alternative for patients with NSCLC. It is a preferable option for appropriate cases as it is conducive to patients' postoperative recovery and quality of life.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after pulmonary lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To establish recommendations for optimisation of the management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy, particularly Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 13 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Soci,t, franOaise d'anesth,sie et de r,animation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Soci,t, franOaise de chirurgie thoracique et cardiovasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence.

METHODS

Five domains were defined: 1) patient pathway and patient information; 2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; 3) anaesthesia and analgesia for lobectomy; 4) surgical strategy for lobectomy; and 5) enhanced recovery after surgery. For each domain, the objective of the recommendations was to address a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). An extensive literature search on these questions was carried out and analysed using the GRADE® methodology. Recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology, and were then voted by all experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 32 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. After two voting rounds and several amendments, a strong consensus was reached for 31 of the 32 recommendations and a moderate consensus was reached for the last recommendation. Seven of these recommendations present a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+), 23 have a moderate level of evidence (18 GRADE 2+ and 5 GRADE 2-), and 2 correspond to expert opinions. Finally, no recommendation was provided for 2 of the questions.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong consensus was expressed by the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the whole perioperative management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine (Lipo-B) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (B-HCl), in the presence of multimodal analgesia, on postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) lobectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care cancer center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 60 patients who underwent MITS lobectomy and received intercostal nerve blockade (ICNB) with either 0.66% Lipo-B (n = 29) or 0.5% B-HCl (n = 31).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the first 12 hours postoperatively, followed by opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative opioid and nonopioid consumption and pain scores were compared between groups at 12-hour intervals for the first 72 hours. Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics, intraoperative (p = 0.46) and postoperative opioid consumption, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores and pain scores upon postanesthesia care unit arrival and after four hours, length of postanesthesia care unit stay (p = 0.84), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.55). Both groups received intra- and postoperative multimodal analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, no differences in opioid consumption or pain scores were observed in the immediate postoperative period following MITS lobectomy between patients given ICNB with Lipo-B and those given ICNB with B-HCl in the presence of multimodal analgesia.

[Thoracic Surgery: The Era of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy]

The contingent of VATS (video assistend thoracic surgery) lobectomies will continue to increase in the time to come. Thoracic surgery departments that do not integrate this procedure into their routine spectrum will have to justify themselves to referrers and clinic administrations and will have problems with the recruitment of training assistants as well. The advantages of minimally invasive lobectomy are impressive and the long-term oncological results are equivalent to open lobectomy. VATS lobectomies in non-intubated patients will increase significantly in the next few years and further reduce the invasiveness of the operation. The number of clinics that offer RATS (roboter assistend thoracic surgery) lobectomies will also increase as more companies bring robot systems onto the market, making them significantly cheaper. Better screening programs for risk patients for lung cancer, rapid advances in thoracic oncology and further minimization of surgical trauma in lung resections will significantly improve the overall therapy and prognosis for lung cancer patients in the years to come.