Prospective Cohort Study to Compare Long-Term Lung Cancer-Specific and All-Cause Survival of Clinical Early Stage (T1a-b; ≤20 mm) NSCLC Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Surgery

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of lung neoplasms: is it ready for prime time?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in radiation delivery have expanded the scope of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung cancer treatment, as it offers better local control, shorter treatments, and enhanced immunostimulation. This review summarizes recent literature regarding SBRT's role in nonoperable and operable early-stage, locally advanced, central, and oligometastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its mixed results with immunotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies demonstrate SBRT achieves excellent local control in inoperable early-stage NSCLC and is being explored as an alternative to surgery for operable cases. Additionally, SBRT can be done safely in central tumors if strict dose limits to normal structures are observed. SBRT shows promise in locally advanced disease, as consolidative local therapy for oligoprogressive and oligometastatic disease and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Advances in adaptive radiation therapy and novel fractionation schedules, including ultra-hypofractionation and personalized approaches, further refine SBRT's role in lung cancer management, with more practice changing clinical trials on the horizon.

SUMMARY

SBRT provides durable and well tolerated treatment for patients with localized and metastatic lung cancer. With ongoing trials exploring its synergy with immunotherapy and its applicability in operable patients and large tumors, SBRT is poised to play an even greater role in personalized lung cancer treatment.

Comparison of surgical and radiotherapy outcomes in octogenarians with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER database retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of death worldwide, yet optimal treatment strategies for octogenarians with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear.

AIMS

To investigate treatment patterns and survival outcomes in octogenarians and older with early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage I-IIA NSCLC diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 were included. Primary treatments included surgery, radiation, and no treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by treatment and year. Propensity score matching balanced clinical characteristics between surgery and radiation groups, followed by Cox regression analysis. Survival outcomes were further compared within matched subgroups stratified by tumor size.

RESULTS

Among 7,372 patients, median survival was 67 months for surgery and 33 months for radiotherapy. Radiotherapy use increased from 31.2% in 2011 to 49.4% in 2020, while surgery rates declined. Multivariate analysis (N = 2,434) showed radiotherapy was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.78-2.15, P < 0.001) compared to surgery.

DISCUSSION

Radiotherapy is increasingly used to treat early-stage NSCLC in octogenarians, yet surgery provides superior long-term survival. Limitations of lack of detailed comorbidity data and differentiation between conventional radiotherapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) may have expanded the advantages of surgery. Meanwhile, patient performance status and preferences must be considered in treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery remains the preferred treatment option for eligible octogenarians with early-stage NSCLC.

Surgery Versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients over 75 Years Treated for Stage IA-IIA NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Lobectomy with lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for stage IA-IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Surgery is responsible for higher early mortality but offers better overall long-term survival. The patient population concerned is often elderly and combines the comorbidities of smoking and age. Several trials have shown good results of stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) in terms of local control and tolerance in elderly subjects. Our objective is to study the survival and regional control of patients over 75 years treated by surgery or SABR for localized NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We conducted a single-center retrospective study between January 2012 and December 2022 including elderly patients who received surgery or SABR for NSCLC less than 5 cm in size, N0, M0. A cumulative comorbidity index was calculated for each patient, considering severity and impact of treatment. We performed subgroup analyses using CART method to identify factors impacting survival and early death.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 127 operated patients were matched to 85 patients treated with SABR. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years for the operated patients was 83.87% and 47.30% compared with 88.8% and 31.5% in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.068). We have identified four factors influencing the incidence of early mortality: gender, World Health Organization Performance status (WHO status), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), and treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery seems to remain the standard of treatment in terms of overall survival and locoregional recurrence, in a context where SABR nevertheless provides excellent local control and tolerance in the short and long term. In order to improve patient selection, we are proposing for the first time a tool to aid therapeutic decision-making.

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis on Image-Guided Biopsy Samples in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Feasibility Study and Comparison With Surgical Samples

Introduction

Limited information exists on next-generation sequencing (NGS) success for lung tumors of 30 mm or less. We aimed to compare NGS success rates across biopsy techniques for these tumors, assess DNA sequencing quality, and verify reliability against surgical resection results.

Methods

We used data from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment study, including patients with lung tumors measuring 30 mm or less who had surgery and NGS on biopsies since 2016. We collected data on biopsy type, nodule characteristics, complications, sequencing feasibility, clinical actionable variants, surgery type, and TNM classification. We compared NGS feasibility and quality between biopsy methods and, for those with NGS on surgical samples, compared feasibility, quality, and detection of actionable variants.

Results

Among the 654 participants with lung tumors of 30 mm or less who underwent surgery, 70 had NGS on prior biopsies. The median age was 68.5; 51.4% were male individuals, and 75.7% were smokers. The mean diameter of biopsied nodules was 17.7 mm, with 67.1% fine-needle aspiration, 17.1% computed tomography-guided transthoracic core needle biopsies, and 17.1% endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. DNA sequencing was feasible in 97.1% of biopsy samples; 2.9% had low tumor cellularity. Coverage depth was achieved in 89.7% of biopsies. RNA sequencing was successful in 66.2% of biopsies, especially in core needle biopsies. Actionable alterations were found in 41.4% of patients. Among the participants, 30% had NGS on surgical samples. RNA sequencing was more feasible on surgical samples (95.2% versus 42.9% for biopsies). NGS on surgical samples matched biopsy results in 90% of patients, with 10% showing additional alterations.

Conclusion

DNA sequencing succeeded in 97.1% of biopsies of nodules 30 mm or less, whereas RNA sequencing feasibility was lower. NGS on biopsy samples is generally reliable but requires careful review.

High barriers to treatment are associated with stereotactic radiation instead of surgery for patients with operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer†

OBJECTIVES

Although surgery is considered the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer, there has been increased use of stereotactic radiotherapy for operable patients in recent years. Given that this modality may be perceived as a more practical treatment, we hypothesized that it might be more often delivered to patients who experience barriers to care.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2018-2020) was queried for patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy (48-60 Gy, 3-5 fractions), excluding patients with contraindications to surgery. Patients who had all the following characteristics were categorized as experiencing 'high barriers' to treatment: income below median national levels, lack of private insurance, treatment at a community facility and residence in non-metropolitan areas. Using multivariable logistic regression, the association between high barriers to treatment and stereotactic radiotherapy use was estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 60 829 patients were included, of whom 3382 (5.6%) experienced high barriers to treatment. Among them, 13 535 (22.3%) underwent stereotactic radiotherapy and 47 294 (77.7%) underwent surgery. Overall, more patients undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy faced high barriers to treatment compared to those who received surgery (8.6% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Geographic region was associated with the delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy (P < 0.001). The magnitude of such association was stronger among those who faced high barriers. In multivariable analysis, experiencing high barriers to treatment remained associated with receiving stereotactic radiotherapy (OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.35-1.58).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stereotactic radiotherapy is more prevalent among patients facing barriers to care. Further research is needed to clarify the role of this treatment modality in early-stage lung cancer.

Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent SBRT. They were categorized into two groups based on the presence of GGO-component: 65 patients in the subsolid group with a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 1 and 174 patients in the solid group with a CTR of 1. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression models for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed for adjusting confounding factors. Recurrence incidence was assessed using competing risk analysis and compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, female, peripheral location, and subsolid nodules were favorable prognostic factors for LCSS; peripheral location, subsolid nodules, and adjuvant therapy were favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Between the subsolid (n = 65) and solid groups (n = 174), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.003), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.7% versus 80.3%, 90.9% versus 64.1%, 82.7% versus 53.5%, respectively. The median PFS were 72.5 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.030), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 75.4% versus 61.2%, 56.6% versus 44.9%, 48.6% versus 23.3%, respectively. After stabilized IPTW (n = 240), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.024), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.0% versus 82.4%, 92.2% versus 67.7%, 85.3% versus 58.2%, respectively. The median PFS were 60.2 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.096), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 73.8% versus 61.0%, 53.5% versus 46.2%, 46.8% versus 22.4%, respectively. The subsolid group had lower rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) (10.4% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.035) and distant metastasis (DM) (17.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.064) compared to the solid group.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of GGO-component in the lesion is an independent prognostic factor for LCSS and PFS. Subsolid nodules treated with SBRT demonstrated better prognosis, with significantly lower rates of local-regional recurrence. We should highlight GGO-component as a practical indicator for risk stratification of SBRT patients to guide treatment decisions.

Patients With Surgically Resectable Lung Cancer Who Opt for Radiation Have Worse Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgery has been the standard procedure for resectable primary LC. Survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy, another treatment, is significantly biased due to preponderance of data from patients deemed unsuitable for surgery. We examined survival of patients refusing surgery in favor of radiation therapy.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify patients with primary Stage I NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Patients were excluded if it was unknown if they were recommended for surgery or if surgery was contraindicated. Multiple predictors were assessed: radiation versus surgery, age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, marital status, tumor size, and histology. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate hazard ratios and generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

When adjusted for confounding variables, survival was greater for patients undergoing surgical resection than those refusing surgery in favor of radiation (HRadj 2.66; 95% CI: 2.27-3.11, p < 0.001) or for those receiving no standardized treatment (HRadj 4.43; 95% CI: 3.57-5.50, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is an effective treatment for inoperable early LC but there is limited data comparing outcomes against surgical resection. When eligible for both, patients refusing surgery and choosing radiation had worse survival when adjusting for variables including age, tumor size, and histology, and suggests that surgical resection is a superior treatment modality.

Perspective on Management of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Findings on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Examinations for Lung Cancer Screening. From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee

Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) carefully implemented has been found to reduce deaths from lung cancer. Optimal management starts with selection of eligibility criteria, counseling of screenees, smoking cessation, selection of the regimen of screening which specifies the imaging protocol, and workup of LDCT findings. Coordination of clinical, radiologic, and interventional teams and ultimately treatment of diagnosed lung cancers under screening determine the benefit of LDCT screening. Ethical considerations of who should be eligible for LDCT screening programs are important to provide the benefit to as many people at risk of lung cancer as possible. Unanticipated diseases identified on LDCT may offer important benefits through early detection of leading global causes of death, such as cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as the latter may result from conditions such as emphysema and bronchiectasis, which can be identified early on LDCT. This report identifies the key components of the regimen of LDCT screening for lung cancer which include the need for a management system to provide data for continuous updating of the regimen and provides quality assurance assessment of actual screenings. Multidisciplinary clinical management is needed to maximize the benefit of early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Different regimens have been evolving throughout the world as the resources and needs may be different, for countries with limited resources. Sharing of results, further knowledge, and incorporation of technologic advances will continue to accelerate worldwide improvements in the diagnostic and treatment approaches.