2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi

The effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes and complications of pediatric ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Small ureteral caliber may prohibit safe primary ureteroscopy (URS), particularly in children. Pre-stenting was proposed to passively dilate the ureter for later safer ureteral access. This meta-analysis aims to analyze outcomes of both primary and deferred ureteroscopy after a period of pre-stenting.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing outcomes of primary and deferred ureteroscopy in children younger than 18 years with ureteral and/or renal stones. Outcomes of interest were stone free rate (SFR), complication rates, ureteral injury, urinary tract infection (UTI), operative time, stone migration, postoperative stenting use and ureteral access sheath use.

RESULTS

Four studies encompassing 826 patients were included. When attempted, primary ureteroscopic access was successful in 69-83 % of patients. SFR was higher in the pre-stenting group (OR 0.87, 95 % CI [0.81-0.94], P = 0.0005). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the overall complications rate (RR 1.66, 95 % CI [0.93-2.96], P = 0.09), ureteral injury (RR 3.67, 95 % CI [0.43-31.66], P = 0.24) febrile UTI (RR 0.62 (95 % CI [0.15 to 2.5], P = 0.5), use of postoperative stent (OR 0.86, 95 % CI [0.52-1.44], P = 0.58), use of ureteral access sheath (RR 0.94 (95 % CI [0.73 to 1.22], P = 0.65), or stone migration (RR 2.28 (95 % CI [0.48 to 10.80], P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Although pre-stenting is associated with a relatively higher SFR, primary URS is successful in most pediatric patients without increased complication risk. We advocate primary URS whenever possible to allow stone treatment under a single anesthetic and minimize healthcare costs.

Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy: a retrospective comparative study in high-risk patients with positive preoperative urine cultures

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy (VADL), employing a flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS), with traditional flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURL) for upper urinary tract stones in patients with positive urine cultures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 421 patients treated with fURL between January 2022 and August 2024. Patients were divided into a traditional fURL group and a VADL group. Propensity score matching adjusted for baseline differences, with a 1:1 ratio applied to compare stone-free rates, operative durations, postoperative hospital stay durations, and postoperative infectious complications.

RESULTS

Among 114 well-matched patients in each group, no mortalities occurred. The VADL group demonstrated significantly lower incidences of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (7.0% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.037) and shorter hospital stays (2.0 [1.0, 2.0] vs. 1.0 [1.0, 2.0], p = 0.014). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the VADL group (87.7% vs. 72.8%, p = 0.005). However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative fever incidence or operative duration (7.0% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.472; 55.5 [40.0, 75.0] vs. 60.0 [45.0, 75.0], p = 0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

VADL significantly reduces postoperative infectious complications and enhances stone-free rates in patients with upper urinary tract stones and positive preoperative urine cultures undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Knowledge‑map Analysis of Ureteroscopy for Urolithiasis

The utilization of ureteroscopy (URS) for managing urolithiasis has garnered substantial global recognition. Nonetheless, bibliometric analyses focusing on URS in the context of urolithiasis treatment remain sparse. Therefore, we used bibliometrics to summarize the relevant literature in this field in recent years, in order to grasp the core research directions, capture the developmental frontiers, and provide valuable information for urologists to understand the research hotspots. In this study, we compiled the literature on URS and urinary stones from the Web of Science core database over the past two decades. In this study, we compiled literature about URS and urolithiasis from the Web of Science Core Collection spanning the past two decades. The assembled data were subsequently visualized and analyzed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. The findings revealed a total of 1,461 publications, with a consistent annual increase and a notable surge post-2010. The most frequently occurring keywords identified were "ureteroscopy" and "calculi". Olivier Traxer, a prominent figure from France, is recognized as a leading expert in the domain, particularly emphasizing the practical application of diverse techniques for the treatment and management of urinary stones. The Journal of Urology has disseminated the most pertinent literature in this area, with Turkey emerging as the most prolific contributor. Keyword analysis within this field has identified four primary research hotspots: the investigation of complications to mitigate treatment risks, the standardization of treatment protocols, the determination of treatment indications based on stone types, and the implementation of novel techniques in ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Emergency treatment of obstructive pyelonephritis: A single center series

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare two different drainage methods, percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and retrograde ureteral double-J (DJ) stent insertion, in patients with obstructive pyelonephritis (OP).

METHODS

The study included 77 patients who presented to the emergency department due to stones. Type of decompression treatment (PCN or DJ stent), fever, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, urine culture, blood culture, presence of additional diseases, and antibiotic treatment were evaluated for these patients. Emergency decompressive treatment was not randomly assigned. The clinician chose the appropriate treatment method based on the patient's condition after obtaining an informed consent. Patients under the age of 18 were categorized into three subgroups: infants, children under 10 years, and adolescents.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients, 31 were in the DJ stent group and 46 were in the PCN group. Patients in the PCN group exhibited significantly higher fever levels before the procedure (37.6 ± 1.0°C). Additionally, the positivity rate of urine and blood cultures was higher in the PCN group. The average time to stone treatment after infection and medical treatment, as well as fever control, was shorter in the PCN group (9 ± 2.3 days). Empiric treatment with Ceftriaxone (1 g IV) was confirmed by sensitivity results of urine or blood culture in 45% of cases. None of the patients developed advanced urosepsis after the procedure, but the resolution of infection parameters was faster in the PCN group (7 ± 3.3 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PCN and DJ stent insertion are effective and safe methods for managing obstructive pyelonephritis. It was observed that the PCN method under local anesthesia was useful in quickly controlling fever and allowing early surgical treatment. Finally, third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics are beneficial for empiric initial treatment.

Ureteral Wall Thickness as an Independent Predictor of Stone Impaction - A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Urologists can encounter difficulties when dealing with ureteral stone impaction. However, reliable preoperative indicators of stone impaction are scarce.

AIMS

We aimed to determine ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as an independent predictor of intraoperative stone impaction, to detect if any patient or stone-related factors predict impaction and to ascertain whether impaction affected intraoperative/postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 83 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones between October 2023 and March 2024. UWT measurement was done preoperatively on non-contrast computed tomography. Clinical predictors of stone impaction were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for independently predicting impaction. We also analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with respect to impaction.

RESULTS

Out of 83 patients, 46 (55.42%) had impacted stones. Gender, stone laterality, stone size, area, Hounsfield unit, degree of hydronephrosis, duration of symptoms, and UWT had significant association with stone impaction on univariate analysis. When these factors were subjected to multivariate analysis, only UWT and stone area had significant association with impaction. We determined a UWT cutoff of 3.45 mm and a stone area cutoff of 28.62 mm2 for predicting impaction based on ROC analysis. Our study showed that impaction increased the overall duration of the procedure and affected stone clearance rates.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study, high UWT is associated with a higher risk of stone impaction, prolonged duration of procedure, and lower stone clearance rates.

Role of inflammatory markers in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones less than 10 mm

INTRODUCTION

In ureterolithiasis, the prediction of spontaneous passage poses a challenge for urologists. Moreover, there is controversy surrounding the preferred management approach, whether medical or surgical, as each approach has its disadvantages. Procalcitonin and other inflammatory markers were studied for predicting stone passage spontaneously, but their significance remains controversial. This study aims to assess the association between these markers, especially procalcitonin, and spontaneous ureteral stone passage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter prospective cohort study from March 2022 to October 2023, consecutive patients with a single unilateral distal ureteric stone less than 10 mm were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were specified. Patients underwent medical expulsive therapy (MET) and were monitored for stone passage. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Out of 94 patients enrolled, 72.3% were male and 27.7% were female, with a mean age of 38.84± 10.41 years. Stone sizes varied, with the most common range being 4 mm- 5.9 mm. Participants were categorized based on spontaneous stone passage as spontaneous stone passage (SSP) and non-SSP. No significant differences were observed in most demographic and laboratory variables. However, serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein showed significant differences between the SSP and non-SSP groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several inflammatory markers were studied to predict the spontaneous passage of the ureteral stone, the current study concluded that only elevated procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and large stone diameter decrease the chance of spontaneous ureteral stone passage.

Ureteroscopy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stone: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) for large proximal ureteric stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective randomised trial was conducted from January 2018 through December 2022 including patients with impacted proximal ureteric stones of 15-25 mm. Patients underwent fURS or RLU. Primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Demographic data, stone features, and complications rates were also compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were enrolled, 32 in each group. The mean impacted stone time was similar between groups, as well as stone size (17 mm) and stone density (>1000 Hounsfield Units). The ureteric stone-free rates between the two groups (93.7% in fURS vs 96.8% in RLU; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.72 to 3.17; P = 0.554), and overall success rates, which take into account residual fragments in the kidney (84.3% in fURS vs 93.7% in RLU; OR 1.02, 95% CI -0.69 to 2.74; P = 0.23), were similar. Operative time was also not statistically significantly different between groups (median 80 vs 82 min; P = 0.101). There was no difference in hospital length of stay. Retropulsion rate was higher with fURS (65.6% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Residual hydronephrosis (34.3% each group) and complication rates did no differ according to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Flexible URS and RLU are both highly efficient and present low morbidity for large impacted proximal ureteric stone treatment. RLU is not superior to fURS.

Micropercutaneous nephrostomy for intervention in acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction with hydronephrosis and infection

To compare the efficacy and advantages of mini percutaneous nephrostomy (MPCN), micropercutaneous nephrostomy (MicroPCN), and retrograde ureteric stenting (RUS) in the treatment of acute upper urinary tract calculi (UUTC) obstruction with hydronephrosis and infection, and verify the safety and indications of clinical application of micropercutaneous nephrostomy. Clinical-epidemiological data of patients with acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction and infection treated in Ningbo No.2 hospital were retrospectively collected from May 2019 to May 2023. 64 patients (20 patients in MPCN group, 13 patients in MicroPCN group, and 31 patients in RUS group) were eligible for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no significant differences in peri-intervention temperature, multiple infection indicators and complications among the three groups. The nutritional status and peri-intervention coagulation function of patients in MicroPCN and RUS groups were poor, the CRP and proportion of using carbapenem advanced antibiotics were higher. The length of hospital stay and the length of hospital stay after the intervention in MPCN and MicroPCN groups were longer, the length and width of calculi were larger, and the degree of hydronephrosis was heavier. Patients in the MicroPCN group had the worst general condition, the lowest hemoglobin before intervention, the longest withdrawal time of vasoactive drugs. MPCN, MicroPCN, and RUS are safe and effective in relieving acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction complicated with infection. MicroPCN has more advantages for patients with critical illness or complex obstruction urinary lithiasis.

Analysis of postoperative infection factors of retrograde intrarenal surgery combined with negative pressure equipment for renal stones

Our study aimed to retrospectively analyze the patients who underwent the combination of negative pressure equipment and RIRS(NP-RIRS) for renal stones, and identified new high-risk factors related to infection. 456 patients with renal stones ≤ 3 cm underwent NP-RIRS in our department, from January 2022 to October 2023. All patients were divided into non-infection group(NIRIRS group) and infection group(IRIRS group) based on infection complications during the perioperative period. Establish a receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)based on variables with statistical differences, and use the Jordan index to find the optimal cutoff value. Classify the data into two categories based on the best truncation value, and perform binary logistic regression analysis on the classified data. In the IRIRS group, there were 10 cases of fever (2.92%), 2 cases of sepsis (0.58%), and no cases of septic shock or death. The length and the CT value of the stone were 16 (13,21) vs. 22 (19,24) (p < 0.001), 764 (570,1012) vs. 1372 (841,1527) (p < 0.001), respectively, and there was a statistical difference. The surgical time of NIRIRS group and IRIRS group were 57 (50,65) vs. 75 (60,98), respectively (p < 0.001), with statistical differences. On the contrary, the stone-free rate(SFR) at 3 months after surgery was 97.60% vs. 91.70% (p = 0.209), and there was no difference. The length of stones, surgical time, and CT values of stones between the two groups were further used to establish ROC, with ROC areas of 0.791, 0.791, and 0.816, respectively(Fig. 2). Based on the Jordan index, the optimal cutoff values were 17.5 mm (stone size), 64.5 min (surgery time), and 732.5 HU (stone CT value), respectively. Three continuous variables were transformed into binary data using the best truncation criterion, and the classified results were subjected to binary logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the three variables remained independent risk factors for postoperative infection complications. The incidence of infection after NPRIRS was lower than TRIRS for kidney stones. Length of stones, surgical time, and CT value of stones were independent risk factors for postoperative infection in NPRIRS treatment of kidney stones. Due to the small sample size, the credibility and generalizability of the conclusions were limited.

Ultrathin semirigid retrograde ureteroscopy versus antegrade flexible ureteroscopy in treating proximal ureteric stones 1-2 cm, a prospective randomized multicenter study

To compare the outcomes of using Ultrathin semirigid retrograde ureteroscopy and antegrade flexible ureteroscopy to treat proximal ureteric stones of sizes 1-2 cm. A prospective randomized multicenter study included patients who had proximal ureteric stones 1-2 cm, amenable for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy between August 2023 and February 2024. Two hundred thirty patients were divided evenly into two treatment groups. Group I included patients treated with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser stone fragmentation, and Group II included patients treated with retrograde ultrathin semirigid ureteroscopy. The study groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, stone access success, operation time, reoperation rates, peri-operative complications, and stone-free status. Group I included 114 patients, while Group II included 111. The mean age of the patients was 33.92 ± 10.37 years, and the size of the stones was 15.88 ± 3 mm. The study groups had comparable demographics and stone characteristics. The mean operative time was significantly longer in group I than in group II (102.55 ± 72.46 min vs. 60.98 ± 14.84 min, respectively, P < 0.001). Most reported complications were MCCS grades I and II, with no significant difference between the study groups. The stone-free rate after four weeks was 92.1% and 81.1% for groups I and II, respectively, which increased to 94.7% and 85.6% after eight weeks (P > 0.05). Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy is equivalent to retrograde ultrathin semirigid ureteroscopy in treating proximal ureteric stones regarding stone-free status and procedure-related morbidity. However, the antegrade approach has a longer operative time, greater fluoroscopy exposure, and longer hospital stays.

3D dynamic diuretic renal scintigraphy using a hybrid whole body CZT SPECT/CT camera protocol in the evaluation of acute ureteric obstruction caused by ureteric stone

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of dynamic 3D diuretic renal scintigraphy using a hybrid whole body CZT SPECT/CT for the evaluation of acute ureteric obstruction in patients with urinary stone disease.

METHODS

20 patients who presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic due to urinary stone disease confirmed by means of CT were prospectively included. Three observers evaluated and graded hydronephrosis, hydroureter, perirenal stranding, and thickening of the renal fascia from the CT as well as the renal scintigraphy curves from the dynamic SPECT study. The normalized residual activity from dynamic SPECT was analysed at 16 min in all patients and at 20 min in suspected obstruction.

RESULTS

Renal scintigraphy curves showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, PPV 83% and a NPV 100% for obstruction, while normalized residual activity showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 73%, PPV 56% and a NPV 100%. All patients presented at least 2 secondary signs of obstruction on the CT, showing a PPV of only 25% for obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic 3D diuretic renal scintigraphy CZT SPECT/CT provides valuable functional and anatomical information from one single examination. The combination of pathological renogram curves and high normalized residual activity values provide the most valuable imaging information to determine the presence of acute ureteric obstruction. The secondary signs of obstruction observed on CT are not specific and should not be used to confirm or discard obstruction in patients with urinary stone disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN15338358. Registration date 03/01/2024. Retrospectively registered. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15338358?q=miguel%20ochoa%20figueroa&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=2&page=1&pageSize=10.

Using ensemble learning and hierarchical strategy to predict the outcomes of ESWL for upper ureteral stone treatment

Urinary tract stones are a common and frequently recurring medical issue. Accurately predicting the success rate after surgery can help avoid ineffective medical procedures and reduce unnecessary healthcare costs. This study collected data from patients with upper ureter stones who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, including cases of successful as well as unsuccessful stone removal after the first and second lithotripsy procedures, and constructed prediction systems for the outcomes of the first and second lithotripsy procedures. Features were extracted from three categories of information: patient characteristics, stone characteristics, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy machine data, and additional features were created using Feature Creation. Finally, the impact of features on the models was analyzed using six methods to calculate feature importance. Our prediction model for the first lithotripsy, selected from among 43 methods and seven ensemble learning techniques, achieves an AUC of 0.91. For the second lithotripsy, the AUC reaches 0.76. The results indicate that the detailed and binary information provided by patients regarding their history of stone experiences contributes differently to the predictive accuracy of the first and second lithotripsy procedures. The prediction tool is available at https://predictor.isu.edu.tw/ks.

Comparison of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy, and mini-percutaneous antegrade flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large (≥ 15 mm) impacted proximal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (TPLU), retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (R-fURS), and mini-percutaneous antegrade flexible ureteroscopy (A-fURS) for treating large (≥ 15 mm) impacted proximal ureteral stones. A total of 105 adult patients were randomized into 3 equal groups: group A (35) patients underwent TPLU, group B (35) patients underwent R-fURS, and group C (35) patients underwent A-fURS. The initial stone-free rate was 100%, 68.6%, and 80% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean operative time (OT) was (85.0 ± 7.57 min) in group A, (61.0 ± 8.21 min) in group B, and (89.57 ± 15.12 min) in group C. The three groups were comparable concerning the overall complications. R-fURS is a less invasive modality for treating such stones; however, it is associated with a lower SFR and a higher rate of auxiliary procedures. Both TPLU and miniperc A-fURS are effective and valuable alternatives for treating large impacted proximal ureteric stones.

Using fosfomycin to prevent infection following ureterorenoscopy in response to shortage of cephalosporins: a retrospective preliminary study

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the shortage of cefazolin led to the demand for cefotiam and cefmetazole exceeding the supply. The Department of Nephro-urology at Nagoya City University Hospital used fosfomycin as a substitute for perioperative prophylaxis. This retrospective preliminary study evaluated the efficacy of fosfomycin and cefotiam for preventing infections following ureterorenoscopy.

METHODS

The study included 182 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy between January 2018 and March 2021). Perioperative antibacterial treatment with fosfomycin (n = 108) or cefotiam (n = 74) was administered. We performed propensity score matching in both groups for age, sex, preoperative urinary catheter use, and preoperative antibiotic treatment.

RESULTS

The fosfomycin and cefotiam groups (n = 69 per group) exhibited no significant differences in terms of patients' median age, operative duration, preoperative urine white blood cell count, preoperative urine bacterial count, and the rate of preoperative antibiotic treatment. In the fosfomycin and cefotiam groups, the median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3 and 4 days, respectively; the median maximum postoperative temperature was 37.3 °C and 37.2 °C, respectively. The fosfomycin group had lower postoperative C-reactive protein levels and white blood cell count than the cefotiam group. However, the frequency of fever > 38 °C requiring additional antibiotic administration was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

During cefotiam shortage, fosfomycin administration enabled surgeons to continue performing ureterorenoscopies without increasing the complication rate.

Recent developments in ureteral stent: Substrate material, coating polymer and technology, therapeutic function

The ureteral stent is an effective treatment for clinical ureteral stricture following urological surgery, and the functional coating of the stent could effectively inhibit bacterial colonization and other complications. The present review provides an analysis and description of the materials used in ureteral stents and their coatings. Emphasis is placed on the technological advancements of functional coatings, taking into consideration the characteristics of these materials and the properties of their active substances. Furthermore, recent advances in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of functional coatings are also reviewed. It is anticipated that this article will serve as a valuable reference providing insights for future research development on new drug-loaded ureteral stents.

Percutaneous Nephrostomy as a Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Obstruction - Experiences in the University Clinic of Urology in Skopje

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive uropathy encompasses various urinary tract obstructions, leading to changes in urine flow, kidney pressure, and impaired kidney function. Predicting renal recovery from obstructive uropathy, can be challenging and necessitates treatment, as in percutaneous nephrostomy (PNS) drainage. The choice of drainage method depends on patient-specific factors and local expertise. According to the data for the Republic of North Macedonia, in the register of the European Renal Association, in the last few years, there has been an increase in the percentage of patients with obstructive nephropathy from 7.6% to 8.9% who end up on a chronic hemodialysis program. Prompt relief from urinary tract obstruction is essential to preserve renal function and prevent complications. The aim of this study is to present our initial data analysis of recent experience in the use of nephrostomies as a method for temporary or long-term resolution of obstructive nephropathy, in terms of safety and success in preserving kidney function and reducing the number of patients on hemodialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study analyzed the medical records of 24 patients with obstructive uropathy who underwent PNS placement. Data were collected for the type and degree of obstruction from the ultrasonographic examination. A pig tail nephrostomy was used, with a dilator, guided under ultrasound and controlled with contrast and fluoroscope. Obstructive nephropathy was defined as an elevation of the serum creatinine > 109 µmol/L, before the intervention. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated according to the formula CKD epi in ml/min. Each placement of the PNS was considered as an individual procedure and the data of 38 placed nephrostomies were analyzed. We compared the laboratory analyses from the day before (D0) PNS placement and on the seventh day (D7) after PNS placement. The reduction of values for red blood cells (RBC) and hemoglobin (Hb) baseline values from D0 to D7 and the need for transfusion after the procedure were defined as a complication-bleeding. The increase in total counts of the white blood cells (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from the baseline values from D0 to D7 were defined as a complication-infection. Standard statistical methods were used for data processing.

RESULTS

Most patients, 17 (70%), had malignant disease as the cause of obstruction. Unilateral obstruction was more common, detected in 24 (63%) of procedures, with a high degree of hydronephrosis. Obstructive nephropathy, marked by elevated serum creatinine, was observed in 23 (60%) cases before PNS placement. Complications included bleeding and infection but did not result in any fatalities. When comparing the laboratory analysis before PNS placement (D0) and seven days later (D7), a statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine (225±161 vs. 162±145, p=0.005) and an increase in GFR (47±39 vs.59±34, p= 0.005) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous nephrostomy is a safe and effective treatment option for urinary tract obstruction, especially in patients with malignancies. Continuous monitoring is essential to assess long-term complications and the longevity of PNS functionality. This procedure offers a significant benefit in preserving renal function and minimizing the need for hemodialysis in these patients.

Ureteral stricture formation after endoscopic removal of obstructing stones: could it be predicted with well-assessed radiological parameters?

The possible role of well-assessed radiological parameters in the prediction of ureteral stricture formation in cases with impacted obstructive ureteral calculi has been evaluated. 46 adult patients with or without ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscopic stone management were included. In addition to stone size and some certain radiological parameters including ureteral wall thickness (UWT) of the involved ureter at the impacted stone site was also measured and noted on computed tomography (CT) images. Parameters were evaluated in two subgroups of cases, namely: Group 1: patients in whom a ureteral stricture formed after endoscopic stone removal and Group 2: patients normal ureteral anatomy without any stricture formation. The possible relationship between the UWT values and degree of hydronephrosis (HN) with subsequent stricture formation was comparatively evaluated. All of the stones were proximal ureteral calculi in both groups. Both the degree of HN and proximal ureteral diameter (PUD) parenchymal was higher in cases with stricture formation. In addition, mean parenchymal thickness was lower and mean values of UWT measurements at the stone site were 3.70 ± 0.97 mm and 2.17 ± 0.26 mm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. A cutoff value 2.49 mm for UWT was found to be highly predictive for stricture formation. UWT value calculated at the obstructing stone site was found to be predictive enough for the likelihood of ureteral stricture formation with high sensitivity and specificity . This evaluation along with some other radiological parameters may enable the urologists to follow such cases on this aspect with necessary measures taken.

Confirmation of negative urine culture status after appropriate antibiotic treatment prior to endourological stone procedures: Is it really necessary?

To evaluate the necessity of confirmation for a negative urine culture test outcome after an appropriate antibiotic regimen for urinary tract infection (UTI) prior to endoscopic stone removal procedures. 170 cases receiving an appropriate antibiotic treatment for culture proven UTI based on test outcomes before endoscopic stone removal were evaluated in two groups: Group 1 (n = 85) Patients in whom a second urine culture test was performed to ensure "negative urine culture" status prior to the procedures after receiving antibiotic therapy and Group 2 (n = 85). Patients receiving the same antibiotic therapy without any additional urine culture test before the procedures. Cases were comparatively evaluated with respect to the statistical significance of post-operative infective complications (fever, sepsis), duration of hospital stay and readmission rates during early post-operative period. Our findings demonstrated no significant difference regarding the rate of infective complications (presence of fever, incidence of septic findings), hospitalization period and readmission rates between the two groups. Although the presence of a negative urine status has been confirmed by urine culture test in group 1 cases, no additional urine culture test was performed with this aim in group 2 cases (negative urine culture was confirmed only with urinalysis) and the outcomes regarding the infective problems were found to be similiar. Our current findings indicate that a second urine culture test may not be a "must" if the patients receive an appropriate antibiotic regimen based on the sensitivity test outcomes for a reasonable time period.

Standardization of the management of pediatric urolithiasis in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of urolithiasis in the pediatric population is rising and medical expulsive therapy (MET) using alpha-adrenergic antagonists has been found to be effective in aiding in the passage of ureteral stones in children. A prior review of patients presenting to our quaternary children's hospital with urolithiasis found only 54 % were prescribed MET and these patients had increased rates of spontaneous stone passage. Thus, an ED urolithiasis management protocol was created to standardize evaluation and care of children with suspected urolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare management of children with urolithiasis presenting to the ED before and after urolithiasis management protocol implementation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients with urolithiasis who presented to our children's ED from 2011 to 2022. The primary outcome was rate of MET prescribing before and after pathway implementation in July 2017, thus the pre-implementation group comprises patients who presented to the ED from July 2011 to July 2017, and the post-protocol group includes those who presented from August 2017 to April 2022. Secondary outcomes included CT utilization in the ED, surgical intervention rate, proportion with spontaneous stone passage, and frequency of urology consultation. Two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the outcomes of interest before and after protocol implementation.

RESULTS

Of 337 patients who presented to the ED after protocol implementation, 120 met inclusion criteria. When comparing outcomes before and after implementation of the protocol, there was significantly decreased use of CT scans (79 % vs 50 %, p < 0.0001) and increased prescribing of MET (54 % vs 82 %, p < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in opioids prescribed (44 % vs 26.7 %, p = 0.0040), and an increased rate of spontaneous stone passage (34 % vs 46 %, p = 0.0483). Lastly, there was a significant reduction in the rate of surgery for stone management after the implementation of protocol (35 % vs 17 %, p = 0.0020) DISCUSSION: As the ED is the primary site of presentation for many children with urolithiasis, standardization of evaluation and management provides an opportunity to improve outcomes in this population. We found that implementation of an ED urolithiasis management protocol was associated with decreased use of CT scans, decreased opioid prescribing, increased spontaneous stone passage, and decreased rate of surgical management for children with ureteral stones.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the positive impact of standardizing care for children presenting to the ED with urolithiasis.

The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis

Aims

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia.

Panel

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Methods

The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.

A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones

BACKGROUND

The proper surgical modality for large non-obstructing proximal ureteral stones is disputed. We compare effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPNL) in treatment of upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who performed FURL or TPNL for upper ureteral stones between June 2016 and November 2018. Comparative analysis was conducted regarding demographic parameters, stone free rate, postoperative pain and complications.

RESULTS

This study included 58 patients treated with FURL and 60 patients treated with TPNL owing to upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. Stone size was similar in the FURL and TPNL groups (17.6 ± 2.6 vs. 18.0 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.194). The overall 3-month stone clearance rate was 95.8% for FURL versus 96.0% for TPNL (p = 0.575). There was no difference between the FURL and TPNL groups for hospital stay (p = 0.280) and postoperative complications. On the other hand, patients treated with FURL had longer operative time (p = 0.012) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical techniques were considered feasible and effective surgical procedures in the treatment of large upper ureteral stones.

Comparison of immediate versus post-stenting ureteroscopy for ureteral stones treatment

Ureteroscopy is a highly effective treatment for ureteral stones, characterized by a high stone-free rate and a low need for re-treatment. Ureteral stent placement can improve the insertion of the ureteral access sheath and ureteroscope but may be associated with higher morbidity prior to and after ureteroscopy. The study aimed to compare immediate versus post-stenting ureteroscopy for ureteral stone treatment in terms of operative time, intra- and post-operative complications, length of hospital stay, and stone-free rate. This prospective study involved 126 patients with ureteral stones divided into two groups: the post-stenting ureteroscopy group (PS-URS), who underwent primary ureteral stenting by double J followed by delayed ureteroscopy, and the immediate ureteroscopy group (I-URS), who underwent immediate ureteroscopy without previous stenting. Sixty-six patients were included in the PS-URS group and 60 patients in the I-URS group. Results were comparable, with no significant differences between both groups. The mean operative time was 33.77±3.51 minutes for the PS-URS group and 34.60±2.01 minutes for the I-URS group. The average length of hospital stay was 0.84±2.55 days for PS-URS and 0.92±1.96 days for I-URS patients. The stone-free rate was 97% in the PS-URS group and 95% in the I-URS group. The overall complication rate was 4.5% versus 5% in the PS-URS and I-URS groups, respectively, with all complications being minor and managed effectively. Immediate ureteroscopy is a safe and relevant operative approach for ureteral stones, with comparative results for post-stenting delayed ureteroscopy.

Clinical application of novel integrated suctioning semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy

INTRODUCTION

Urinary calculi are frequently encountered in urology. Traditionally, the lack of a perfect water injection and drainage system means the observation field is affected during ureteroscopy. Here, we explored the effect and clinical value of a new integrated suctioning semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for treating ureteral calculi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 180 patients were successfully enrolled in this study (60 in each group). Group A included patients who underwent a traditional semi-rigid URSL, group B included patients who underwent a suctioning semi-rigid URSL with a sheath being connected to a vacuum device, and group C included patients who underwent a new type of suctioning integrated rigid URSL with a novel designed ureteroscope.

RESULTS

In total, 164 cases of URSL were completed in one stage. Compared with group A, group C had a higher stone-clearance rate at 30 days postoperatively, shorter operation time, and fewer hospitalization days (p < .05); compared with group B, group C had a higher one-stage operation success rate, shorter operation time, and fewer hospitalization days (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparatively, the new suctioning integrated semi-rigid URSL is advantageous for treating upper urinary calculi, considering the reduced operation time, length of hospital stay, and low invasiveness.

To Evaluate the Impact of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Removal of Proximal and Distal Ureter Calculi

Background Urinary calculus illness is a prevalent clinical issue encountered by the medical community, particularly urologists, in contemporary society. Laser technologies have been widely accepted as standard modalities for lithotripsy applications. Using the Ho:YAG laser has expanded the range of applications for ureteroscopic stone management (URS), enabling the treatment of bigger stones in all regions of the upper urinary tract. It is noteworthy that ureteroscopy (URS) demonstrates superior rates of stone clearance for distal stones, regardless of their size, with a success rate of 94.5% compared to 74% for other treatment modalities. Significant variation exists in the reported results and problems associated with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy across different trials, as documented in the literature. The procedure's outcome might vary based on factors such as the size of the stone, the length of impaction, the presence of ureteral damage and granulation, the kind and size of endoscopes used, and the specific energy settings employed by various operators. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteroscopic removal of proximal and distal ureter calculi. Methods This prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Urology at DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune, from March 2021 to March 2023. Patients diagnosed with a case of ureteric stone who opted for URSL during the study period were included. A total of 50 patients who underwent URSL in the urology department were included in this study. These were then grouped into those with proximal ureteral stones and distal ureteral stones. (25 each) Results The study observed that patients diagnosed with proximal ureteral stones had bigger calculi, with a mean stone size of 15mm, in comparison to patients with distal ureteral stones, with a mean stone size of 10mm (P=0.010). The stone burden was significantly higher for proximal ureteral stone patients than those with distal ureteric stones (P=0.010). The average duration of the operating procedure for upper ureter stones was 70 minutes, but for lower stones, the mean operative time was 45 minutes (P<0.001). No statistical significance was seen in the median age of patients between the two groups (P=0.89). The maximum number of cases in the upper stone group were in the age group of 16-30 years, and in the lower stone group was in the age group of 31-45 years. The prevalence of DJ stents at the time of presentation was higher among patients diagnosed with proximal ureteric stones than those with distal ureteric stones, with rates of 28% and 20%, respectively (P=0.508). Full fragmentation was successfully accomplished in all patients within the distal calculus group, accounting for 100% of the cases. At the same time, for proximal ureteric stones, a single laser lithotripsy session resulted in 92% (23 patients) achieving a stone-free status after two weeks.  Conclusion The study observed that stone size, burden, and procedure duration were statistically significant among other criteria. Mean age, stone HU, prior DJ stent, and stone-free rate were statistically insignificant. The procedure indicated that Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy has efficacy in treating both proximal and distal ureteral stones, with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications. None of the complications were due to laser energy.

The Degree of Hydronephrosis as an Indicator of the Necessity for Ureteric Dilatation during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

During rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, it is often encountered that the ureter is difficult to access. Attempts to advance the ureteroscope make the surgery more difficult. This study evaluated the preoperative predictive factors associated with difficult ureteral access (difficult ureter (DU)) during URS and assessed if clinical outcomes differed according to the degree of DU. This study identified 217 patients who underwent rigid ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy for the management of ureter stones between June 2017 and July 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Korea. In this group, preoperative factors were identified using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses that could predict the degree of DU. Additionally, we also evaluated differences in treatment outcomes depending on the degree of DU. In 50 URS cases (22.0%), ureteral access using a ureteroscope was difficult. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the degree of hydronephrosis was associated with the degree of DU. Treatment outcomes, extended operation times, low stone-free rate, postoperative pain, and secondary treatment were also significantly associated with the degree of DU. Clinicians can counsel patients with a lesser degree of hydronephrosis and approach their management accordingly.

Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) recommendation on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urolithiasis

This article provides evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions to aid urologists in making optimal decisions regarding managing urolithiasis in various clinical scenarios. The most frequently asked questions by urologists in their clinical practice have been collected and answered in the form of FAQs; based on the latest evidence and expert opinions. The natural history of urolithiasis is divided into active treatment and silent phases, with the active treatment stage divided into typical and special situations and peri-treatment management. The authors address 28 key questions, offering practical guidance for the proper diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urolithiasis in clinical practice. This article is expected to be served as a valuable resource for urologists.

A Rare Case of Obstructive Uropathy in an Elderly Male From Rural India - A Case Report

Ureterocele is a rare congenital anomaly often believed to be caused due to incomplete dissolution of the Chwalla membrane. In this pathology, the distal end of the ureter is invaginated in the bladder and is dilated. We present a case of an 81-year-old male from rural India who came with complaints of hematuria and was diagnosed with ureterocele.

Double-J stent versus percutaneous nephrostomy for emergency upper urinary tract decompression

Urinary tract obstruction is a serious condition that can cause significant morbidity in patients with acute obstructive uropathy. Prompt urinary diversion is necessary to prevent further damage to the kidneys. Retrograde ureteral stenting (RUS) and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) are the two main treatment options for this condition in many hospitals. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PCN and RUS for treating acute obstructive uropathy. We conducted a retrospective study of 1500 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency room between January 2017 and December 2021 and underwent either double-J stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy. Patient characteristics and anatomic data were evaluated using abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, blood tests, and/or KUB radiography. Out of the 1500 patients, 1172 patients underwent double-J stenting, while 328 patients received percutaneous nephrostomy initially. In 54 cases where double-J stenting was inefficient, subsequent percutaneous nephrostomy was performed. The majority of cases were efficiently treated with double-J stenting. Double-J stenting was an effective method of urinary drainage in most cases of acute obstructive uropathy.

Ambulatory Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Management of Large Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi: A Feasibility Study at a Tertiary Referral Center

Aim: To conduct a comparative, nonrandomized study to assess the feasibility of mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) using supine Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) access (16F) in Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia position for managing proximal large-volume impacted ureteral calculi as ambulatory day-care surgery vis-a-vis standalone ureteroscopy (URS) with push-back PCNL, if needed. The primary aim was to study the outcomes and stone-free rates (SFRs). Secondary aim was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: Data of 60 patients undergoing ECIRS (Group 1) from January 2016 to December 2019 were collected prospectively in a nonrandomized fashion from a single center after Ethics Committee approval. A matched-paired analysis was performed with retrospectively collated data of 60 patients undergoing standard URS/pushback PCNL (Group 2) using analysis of variance, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Outcomes and Results: Group 1 patients had a significantly shorter procedure time vs Group 2 (42.1 ± 11.2 minutes vs 52.1 ± 13.7 minutes; p < 0.001). Group 1 (59/60) patients had an overall single stage SFR of 98.3%, which was significantly higher than single-stage SFR of 83% in Group 2 (50/60) (p < 0.002). Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of fever (10 vs 4, p = 0.01). However, there were no cases of sepsis in either group. Rest of the complications were comparable for both, as the need for ancillary procedures was significantly higher in Group 2 (10% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001). Patients were discharged on the same day in both groups. Conclusions: The findings of our study suggest that, in large and impacted proximal ureteric stones, combined minimally invasive endoscopic approach offers the best option to render the patient stone free by a single intervention. With better intra- and postoperative outcomes and safety profile, Mini-ECIRS may be considered as an ambulatory procedure in this setting.

Assessment of the efficacy of reduced-radiation noncontrast computed tomography scan compared with the standard noncontrast computed tomography scan for detecting urolithiasis: A prospective single-center study

Background

Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scan of the kidneys, ureter and bladder is the standard investigative modality for diagnosing and following up patients with urolithiasis. With each scan, a patient receives radiation of 18-34 mGy. Dose considerations become pertinent because of a 10% lifetime incidence rate and higher than 50% risk of recurrence, necessitating repeated imaging in the lifetime of a stone former. Hence, this study aimed to assess the sensitivity of "reduced-radiation" CT imaging by altering scan settings to lower than the "standard" norms.

Materials and methods

Altogether, 222 patients (255 "kidney-ureter" stone-bearing units or "renal units") with urolithiasis and patients undergoing CT for other reasons with incidental findings of renal/ureteric calculi between 2017 and 2019 were included. All patients were subjected to 3 sequential scans at tube current settings of 250 mA (CT-N/Standard), 100 mA (CT-100), and 50 mA (CT-50) at a constant voltage of 120 kV. Their clinicodemographic and radiological findings were recorded and assessed for significance.

Results

Of the 255 renal units, 117 were between 30 and 44 years of age, 75% were men. Of the 255 patients, 178 (70.1%) reported a first stone episode and 77 had recurrence. Lower ureteric calculi were predominant (40.4%). All calculi were identified on CT-N; CT-100 failed to detect calculi in 1 patient, and CT-50 failed in 3 patients, where all calculi were <3 mm in size. Meanwhile, none were undetected among patients with obesity. The sensitivity was 99.61% for the CT-100 and 98.82% for the CT-50, which indicated a 2.5 and 5 times lower radiation and dose/length, respectively, than CT-N.

Conclusions

The reduced-radiation CT scan is safe, sensitive, and accurate for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis with significantly lower radiation exposures. Our study lays the foundation to accept low-dose CT in general and CT-50 in particular, as the new "standard of care," and attempt further dose reduction without loss of diagnostic efficacy.

Comparative study between Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for treatment of distal ureteral calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a period of 6 months (January 2022 to June 2022) this prospective randomized study was conducted on 170 patients with distal ureteric stone ≤ 10 mm. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in group A received Tamsulosin 0.4mg, in group B received Silodosin, and in group C receive Tadalafil 5 mg. Therapy was given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The rate and time of stone expulsion, the analgesic use, attacks of colic and hospital visits for pain, and adverse effects of drugs were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 170 patients who were enrolled in study, 20 were lost to follow-up (7, 8, 5 in group A, B, And C respective-ly). There was a significant higher stone passage rate in group C than group A and B (90% vs. 70% and 76% respectively; p-value = 0.043) and shorter expulsion time in group C (8.7 ± 3.3 days) vs. group A (12.5 ± 5.2 days) and group B (11.3 ± 4.2 days) with (p-value = 0.001)(highly statistically significant with p-value < 0.001) and increased amount of analgesics required in group A (225 ± 115.7 mg) and group B (163 ± 77.5 mg) when compared with group C (120 ± 55.3 mg).

CONCLUSION

Tadalafil is more effective than Tamsulosin and Silodosin in treatment of patients with distal ureteric stones ≤ 10 mm as regard stone expulsion rate, expulsion time with decreased number of colicky episodes and side effects.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and adverse drug reactions of adrenergic alpha-antagonists in treating children with ureteral calculi

This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of three different adrenergic alpha-antagonists during the treatment of pediatric ureteral stones. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry until January 2022. We identified 7 articles, including six RCTs and one cohort study. 610 children received either adrenergic alpha-antagonists or placebo. The results confirmed that the three different adrenergic alpha-antagonists could significantly increase the ureteral calculi expulsive rate and shorten the ureteral calculi expulsive time, regardless of the size of the stone "<5 mm" or "5-10 mm". Subgroup analysis suggested that all three adrenergic alpha-antagonists increased the ureteral calculi expulsive rate. Tamsulosin and silodosin also have the effect of shortening ureteral calculi expulsive time, while doxazosin has an insignificant effect on ureteral calculi expulsive time. Besides, tamsulosin and silodosin obviously reduced the number of pain episodes caused by ureteral calculi in children. We analyzed the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) caused by the treatment of three different adrenergic alpha-antagonists to explore their ADRs. The probability of ADRs was increased after treatment with adrenergic alpha-antagonists. Further subgroup analysis revealed the application of tamsulosin was positively correlated with ADRs in children with ureteral calculi, while the application of doxazosin and silodosin had no statistically significant effect on the probability of TEAEs. In a conclusion, this article systematically analyzed the efficacy and ADRs of three different adrenergic alpha-antagonists, and provided reference and guidance for the application of adrenergic alpha-antagonists to treat children ureteral calculi.

Software-Estimated Stone Volume Is Better Predictor of Spontaneous Passage for Acute Nephrolithiasis

Purpose: To evaluate whether computer program-estimated urolith stone volume (SV) was a better predictor of spontaneous passage (SP) compared with program-estimated stone diameter (PD) or manually measured stone diameter (MD), and whether utilizing SV and MD together provided additional value in SP prediction compared with MD alone. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with acute renal colic and single renal/ureteral stone on CT from July 2017 to April 2020. Diameter obtained from radiology reports or manually measured when report not available. Semiautomated stone analysis software (qSAS) was used to estimate SV and PD. ROC analysis was performed to compare accuracy of SV vs MD vs PD in predicting SP by 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Subgroup analysis was performed by stone size ( Collapse

Key Words

• CT
• nephrolithiasis
• renal colic
• stone passage
• stone volume

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Retrospective Studies
• Prospective Studies
• Remission, Spontaneous
• Ureteral Calculi/diagnostic imaging
• Kidney Calculi
• Software

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Tommy Chiou Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Margaret F. Meagher Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Jonathan H. Berger Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Tony T. Chen Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Roger L. Sur Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Seth K. Bechis Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for the management of obstructive anuria secondary to ureteric urolithiasis in children: a prospective randomized study

To compare the role of primary and deferred ureteroscopy (URS) in the management of obstructive anuria secondary to ureteric urolithiasis in pediatric patients. This prospective randomized study included 120 children aged ≤ 12 years who presented with obstructive anuria secondary to ureteric urolithiasis between March 2019 and January 2021. The children were subdivided into group A, which included children who had undergone primary URS without pre-stenting, and group B, which included children who had undergone URS after ureteric stenting. All children were clinically compensated and sepsis-free. Patients with underlying urological structural abnormalities were excluded. The operative time, improvement of renal functions, stone-free rate, and complications were compared between the two groups. At the 1-month follow-up, urine analysis; kidney, ureter, and bladder radiography; and ultrasonography were performed. The patient characteristics of both groups did not show any significant difference. Primary URS had failed in ten children (16.6%) in group A. Moreover, failure of stenting was noted in six patients (11%) in group B. The mean operative time for group B was significantly lower than that for group A (p ≤ 0.001). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in group B (p ≤ 0.001). The rate of overall complications was higher in group A. Deferred URS is preferable over primary URS in the management of obstructive anuria secondary to ureteric urolithiasis". In children because of the lower need for ureteric dilatation, higher stone- free rate, shorter procedure time, and lower complication rate.

Management of pediatric ureterolithiasis in the emergency room: A single institution review and new management pathway

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Urolithiasis is an increasingly common condition seen in children with an annual incidence of 2-3% in children under 18, and up to 10% in adolescents. Treatment of stones varies including observation, IV hydration, pain management, medical expulsive therapy (MET), or surgery. Though well-studied and often used in adults, MET (alpha-adrenergic antagonists to facilitate passage of ureteral stones), is not routinely prescribed in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to review a quaternary children's hospital's emergency room frequency of MET utilization for ureterolithiasis as well as evaluate the clinical outcomes of children who were prescribed MET compared to those treated with pain control alone.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review was performed of children 2 months to 18 years with ureterolithiasis who presented to a quaternary children's hospital ED from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was the frequency of MET prescribed. Secondary outcomes included the following comparisons in patients who received MET and analgesics with those who received analgesics alone: hospital admission rate, length of hospitalization, emergency room re-presentation rate, surgical intervention, spontaneous stone passage, urology consultation, how the urology consult affected MET utilization, referral to outpatient urology and nephrology clinics, and CT utilization in the ED. Comparisons were performed utilizing Fischer's exact and t-tests.

RESULTS

139 patients were included with a mean age of 14 years (SD 4.14), 42% male. There was no difference between age, gender, stone size, return to the ED, serum creatinine, or length of hospitalization (if admitted) between patients who were and were not placed on MET. The rate of stone passage was significantly higher for those placed on MET (45%) versus not (20%) (p = 0.0022). Urology was consulted for 93% of the cases where children were prescribed MET, compared with only 52% of cases where MET was not prescribed (p = <0.0001).

DISCUSSION

In our experience MET was significantly underutilized in patients where urology was not involved. This is similar to a study by Itano et al. which found urology consultation in the ED significantly increased use of tamsulosin for ureterolithiasis in adults. Children with ureterolithiasis placed on MET had a significantly higher rate of stone passage compared to children managed by pain control alone.

CONCLUSION

Given the benefits of MET to increase the rate of spontaneous stone passage it may be considered first line therapy for treatment of children with ureterolithiasis.

Multiple pyonephrotic compartments with different microorganisms and an infected "calcium milk" in a patient with bilateral obstructive uropathy: A challenging case

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

If the surgeon encounters frank pus, he is advised to limit the procedure to efficient drainage of the infected compartment of the urinary tract either by double J stent insertion or percutaneous nephrostomy and abort and postpone the definitive stone treatment until the infection is treated.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a highly complex case of an elderly female with multiple obstructing stones in the left kidney and ureter, with complete staghorn stones in the right kidney. While this scenario was already complex by virtue of the stone burden alone, which demands the combination of multiple stone treatment techniques, it was further complicated by compartmental infections in various parts of the kidneys with different microbes necessitating repeated abortion of procedures. As often in elderly patients, there was no rise of inflammatory markers, and bladder urine cultures were repeatedly negative. Moreover, a rare form of infection was encountered, namely "calcium milk" in the form of a radio-opaque lower pole abscess on the right.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

We discuss the etiology, treatment, and management of pyonephrosis and remind the need to always take it into account and react accurately when encountering infected space behind obstruction during minimally invasive surgeries in urolithiasis.

CONCLUSION

Hidden microorganisms with different entities should be considered during surgical management of urinary stones. Complete drainage and appropriate antibiotic therapy are the cornerstones of treating this condition.

Primary versus delayed ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Ureteric colic is a major clinical and economic burden on the National Health Service. There has been a recent paradigm shift to consider definitive surgery as the primary intervention at the time of initial presentation.

Objective:

To systematically evaluate the outcomes of primary/emergency ureteroscopy versus delayed/elective ureteroscopy.

Methods:

We performed a critical review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials–CENTRAL, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and individual urological journals in April 2020. A robust database search was performed using a combination of the terms ‘primary ureteroscopy’, ‘immediate ureteroscopy’, ‘delayed ureteroscopy’ and ‘emergency ureteroscopy’. Adult patients (> 16 years) with ureteric stones presenting as an emergency were included.

Results:

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, with 4 studies directly comparing primary/emergency to delayed/elective ureteroscopy for an acute presentation of ureteric colic. Across the studies, 1708 patients underwent primary/emergency ureteroscopy for ureteric calculi and 990 underwent delayed ureteroscopy. No significant differences in stone-free rates were found between both groups with primary/emergency achieving 85% and delayed/elective 91% ( p = 0.68). The majority of stones treated were located in the distal ureter in both groups. Overall, there were no differences in complications between the groups ( p = 0.42) or major complications (0.17). However, there were fewer minor complications in the primary URS group ( p = 0.02). Ureteral catheter or double-J stent insertion was used in 71% of delayed/elective ureteroscopy cases, compared to 46.8% of primary/emergency cases (p = 0.001). For patients undergoing primary/emergency ureteroscopy, 6.4% patients required auxiliary procedures. In the delayed/elective group, 7.6% required further definitive treatment (NS).

Conclusion:

Primary ureteroscopy is a safe and feasible procedure, when performed in suitable patients in the acute setting. It is associated with significantly lower stent usage, equivalent stone clearance, no increase in overall or major complications including sepsis, and fewer minor complications when compared to delayed/elective ureteroscopy. Prospective studies will do well to explore this area further but on current evidence, primary ureteroscopy is the safe procedure.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable

Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders – A Narrative Review

Use of α-androgenic receptor blockers remains a mainstay therapeutic approach for the treatment of urological diseases. Silodosin is recommended over other α-blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), due to its high α_1A uroselectivity. Current research data suggest that silodosin is efficacious in the management of various urological diseases. Thus, we herein review the current evidence of silodosin related to its efficacy and tolerability and appraise the available literature that might ultimately aid in management of various urological conditions at routine clinical practice. Literature reveals that silodosin is beneficial in improving nocturia events related to LUTS/BPH. Silodosin exerts effect on relaxing muscles involved in detrusor obstruction, therefore prolonging the need for patients undergoing invasive surgery. Silodosin treatment, either as a monotherapy or combination, significantly improves International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) including both storage and voiding symptoms in patients with BPH/LUTS. Patients on other treatment therapies such as phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or other α-blockers are well managed with this drug. Steadily, silodosin has proved beneficial in the treatment of other urological disorders such as chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), overactive bladder/acute urinary retention (AUR), premature ejaculation (PE), and prostate cancer post brachytherapy-induced progression. In patients with distal ureteral stones, silodosin treatment is beneficial in decreasing stone expulsion time without affecting stone expulsion rate or analgesic need. Moreover, there were significant improvements in intravaginal ejaculation latency time, quality of life scores, and decrease in PE profile among patients with PE. Silodosin has also demonstrated promising results in increasing the likelihood of successful trial without catheter in patients with AUR and those taking antihypertensive drugs. Reports from Phase II studies have shown promising role of silodosin in the treatment of CP/CPPS as well as facilitating ureteral stone passage. From the robust data in this review, further silodosin treatment strategies in the management of different urological conditions need to be focused on.

Comparison of Fragmentation and Dusting Modality Using Holmium YAG Laser during Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stone: A Single-Center's Experience

Laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an efficacious treatment for ureteral stones. There have been few previous studies comparing the different energy and frequency settings for URSL in a single center. We compared these two laser modalities, which were simultaneously used in our medical center for the treatment of ureteral stones. Patients who underwent fragmentation or dusting laser URSL between September 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared patients who underwent fragmentation and dusting laser and assessed the enhancing factors for stone free rate. There were a total of 421 patients with ureteral stones who met the study criteria. There was no significant difference between the characteristics of both groups. The fragmentation group had a better stone free rate and a lower retropulsion rate compared with the dusting group. Multivariate analysis revealed that stone basket use, no upper ureteral stone or pyuria significantly improved the stone free rate. Both laser modes were effective and safe for ureteral lithotripsy although the fragmentation system showed slightly higher effectiveness and lower complication rate.

Shedding light on pharmacists' knowledge of kidney stones' etiology and treatment

Background

The recurring nature of kidney stones (KS) makes it difficult to control and treat. Patients' education plays a part in reducing disease recurrence. Pharmacists participate in the healthcare services through educating patients with kidney stones about KS preventive measures and medications that greatly reduce the disease frequency and the treatment cost. Insufficient pharmacists' knowledge may affect the services' quality and result in misuse of KS medications.

Objectives

To evaluate the pharmacists' level of knowledge to provide adequate information about KS preventive measures, medications, and treatments for patients with kidney stones in Jordan.

Methods

An online descriptive survey was distributed to pharmacists to assess their knowledge about KS causes, prevention, and treatment. The results were analyzed using the SPSS software.

Results

There were 393 pharmacists participated in this study. Pharmacists demonstrated an overall intermediate level of knowledge about KS. They showed an excellent level of knowledge regarding KS types and etiology, an intermediate level of knowledge about KS preventive measures and treatment, and poor knowledge about home remedies and drugs that promote KS formation.

Conclusion

Pharmacists knowledge about KS management through diet and medications need to be improved. This could be through focusing on pharmacists' training for the effective implementation of knowledge in the clinical practice. Adopting guidelines by pharmacists may reduce the risk of KS recurrence and provide pharmacist-led patient education about KS management in hospitals and community pharmacies.

Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis: Recommendations for CT Imaging Techniques and Practical Issues

A vast disparity exists between science and practice for CT radiation dose. Despite high-level evidence supporting the use of low-dose CT (LDCT) in diagnosing appendicitis, a recent survey showed that many care providers were still concerned that the low image quality of LDCT may lead to incorrect diagnoses. For successful implementation of LDCT practice, it is important to inform and educate the care providers not only of the scientific discoveries but also of concrete guidelines on how to overcome more practical matters. Here, we discuss CT imaging techniques and other practical issues for implementing LDCT practice.

Acute extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones - 7-years' experience from a busy district general hospital

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of acute extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteric stones we present our experience of ESWL in 530 ureteric stone cases, in the largest UK series we are aware of to date. ESWL is underutilised in ureteric stone management. The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) report showed just four units nationally treated >10% of acute ureteric stones with ESWL. Despite guideline recommendations as a first-line treatment option, few large volume studies have been published.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data between December 2012 and February 2020 was performed. Data relating to patient demographics, stone characteristics, skin-to-stone distance, and treatment failure were collected. Cost analysis was conducted by the Trust's surgical financial manager. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess for predictors of ESWL success.

RESULTS

A success rate of 68% (95% confidence interval 64%-72%) at 6 weeks was observed (n = 530). The median (interquartile range) number of treatment sessions was 2 (1, 2). Stone diameter was observed to be a predictor of ESWL success. The small number of stones treated of >13 mm or >1250 HU had an ~50% chance of successful treatment. Acute ureteric ESWL was less costly than acute ureterorenoscopy, consistent with findings from previous NHS studies.

CONCLUSION

Acute ESWL is a safe, reliable, and financially viable treatment option for a wider spectrum of patients than reflected in international guidelines based on our large, heterogenous series. In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, with theatre access reduced and concerns over aerosol generating procedures, acute ESWL remains an attractive first-line treatment option.