A randomized clinical trial indicates that levamisole increases the time to relapse in children with steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Short-term outcome of levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: a single-center prospective cohort study

Introduction

This study aims to describe the outcome of levamisole (LEVA) treatment in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS).

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Children aged 1-18 years diagnosed with FRNS were included. LEVA was started with a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg every other day for 2 years along with low-dose prednisolone in the first year.

Results

A total of 70 children with FRNS were enrolled in the study. The median age was 7.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 5.0-9.6 years] with a slight predominance of boys (42, 60%). The mean number of relapses and cumulative dose of steroids significantly decreased after 2 years of LEVA therapy and during the 1-year follow-up. LEVA non-response was observed in half of the studied participants (28, 46%). The responders and non-responders were comparable in terms of cumulative dose of steroids and number of relapses in the year prior to starting LEVA [5,242 ± 1,738 versus 4,910 ± 1,469 (p-value = 0.52) and 5.4 ± 2.4 versus 5.2 ± 2.1 (p-value = 0.85)].

Conclusion

LEVA therapy resulted in a substantial reduction in the frequency of relapses and cumulative dosage, indicating its potential as an alternative option for children with relapsing disease.

Timing of relapse as a key indicator of steroid-sparing requirements in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Managing children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome poses challenges due to recurrent relapses necessitating prolonged steroid exposure, thus increasing susceptibility to long-term complications. Identifying those at risk of poor response to steroid therapy may be helpful to guide timely intervention with steroid-sparing agents. This study aimed to identify factors associated with steroid-sparing agent needs in children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome treated between 2006 and 2023. Cox proportional regression analyzed prognostic factors for steroid-sparing agent requirements in children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. The time-to-event analysis utilizing the Kaplan-Meier estimate examined the proportion of children needing steroid-sparing agents after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Medical records of 121 children (85 males) diagnosed with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at a median age of 4.5 years (range 1.3-12.8) were reviewed over a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range 1.0-15.0). Time to subsequent relapse post-frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome diagnosis (at 3-month threshold) emerged as the sole significant predictor of steroid-sparing agent requirement, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-4.05. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that an earlier first relapse (< 3 months) led to earlier steroid-sparing agent requirement (log-rank p = 0.005). Children who relapsed within 3 months post-frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome diagnosis exhibited a higher frequency of relapses, a greater incidence of steroid-related adverse events, and were more likely to develop steroid dependency.

CONCLUSIONS

Early subsequent relapse following diagnosis of frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome was linked to earlier requirement of steroid-sparing agent therapy. Further prospective research is necessary to confirm this observation.

Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

About 80% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, half will relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. While non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications prolong periods of remission, they have significant potential adverse effects. Currently, there is no consensus about the most appropriate second-line agent in children with frequently relapsing SSNS. In addition, these medications could be used with corticosteroids in the initial episode of SSNS to prolong the period of remission. This is the fifth update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2005, 2008, 2013 and 2020.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications in SSNS in children with a relapsing course of SSNS and in children with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to October 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were included if they involved children with SSNS and compared non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications with placebo, corticosteroids or no treatment; different non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications, or different doses, durations or routes of administration of the same non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 58 studies (122 reports) randomising 3720 children. Half were multicentre studies, and most studies were undertaken in South and East Asia (28 studies) and Europe (20 studies). The numbers of children randomised ranged from 14 to 211. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 32 and 33 studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment, respectively. Eleven studies were at low risk of performance bias and 13 were at low risk of detection bias. Forty-eight and 36 studies were at low risk of incomplete and selective reporting, respectively. Rituximab with or without prednisone compared with placebo with or without prednisone probably reduces the number of children experiencing relapse at six months (5 studies, 182 children: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.43) and 12 months (3 studies, 108 children: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09) (moderate certainty), may increase the number with severe infusion reactions (4 studies, 162 children: RR 5.21, 95% CI 1.19 to 22.89; low certainty), but not severe infection or arthropathy (low certainty). Rituximab compared with tacrolimus probably reduces the risk of relapse at 12 months (4 studies, 238 children: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96) and may reduce the risk of relapse when compared with low dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1 study, 30 children: RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62). Rituximab followed by MMF for 500 days reduces the risk of relapse compared with rituximab followed by placebo for 500 days (1 study, 78 children: RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.63; high certainty). Rituximab probably does not differ from ofatumumab in the riisk of relapse and 12 months (1 study, 140 children: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41; moderate certainty) or in adverse events. MMF and levamisole (1 study, 149 children: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16) may have similar effects on the number of children who relapse at 12 months (low certainty). Cyclosporin compared with MMF may reduce the risk of relapse at 12 months (3 studies, 114 children: RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.30) (low certainty). Levamisole compared with steroids or placebo may reduce the number of children with relapse during treatment (8 studies, 474 children: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82) (low certainty). Preliminary data from single studies indicate that levamisole and prednisone compared with prednisone alone may delay the onset of relapse after the initial episode of SSNS and that levamisole compared with increasing prednisone administration from alternate day to daily at the onset of infection may reduce the risk of relapse with infection (low certainty). Cyclosporin compared with prednisone may reduce the number of children who relapse (1 study, 104 children: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83) (low certainty). Alkylating agents compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the risk of relapse during cyclosporin treatment (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.48) (low certainty evidence) but may reduce the risk of relapse at 12 to 24 months (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74) (low certainty). Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil) compared with prednisone probably reduce the number of children who experience relapse at six to 12 months (6 studies, 202 children: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.60) and at 12 to 24 months (4 studies, 59 children: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.46) (moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

New studies incorporated in this review update indicate that rituximab compared with prednisone, tacrolimus, or MMF is a valuable additional agent for managing children with relapsing SSNS. Comparative studies of CNIs, MMF, and levamisole suggest that CNIs may be more effective than MMF and that levamisole may be similar in efficacy to MMF. Important new studies suggest that MMF prolongs remission following rituximab, that levamisole may prevent infection-related relapse more effectively than changing from alternate-day to daily prednisone and that levamisole and prednisone compared with prednisone alone may prolong the time to first relapse. There are currently 23 ongoing studies which should improve our understanding of how to treat children with frequently relapsing SSNS.

Daily compared with alternate-day levamisole in pediatric nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Levamisole is less expensive and has a better toxicity profile compared to other steroid sparing agents used in nephrotic syndrome. It has a plasma half-life of 2.0 to 5.6 hours, but is conventionally administered on alternate days. We aimed to assess whether daily levamisole is safe and more effective than standard alternate-day therapy in maintaining remission in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FR/SDNS).

METHODS

An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in children with FR/SDNS. Group A received daily while Group B received alternate-day levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/dose) for 12 months. Prednisolone was tapered off by 3 months. Patients were monitored for relapses, further steroid requirement, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

A total of 190 children with FR/SDNS (94 in Group A and 96 in Group B) were analyzed. Sustained remission for 12 months was observed in 36% of Group A and 27% of Group B patients (p = 0.18). Numbers completing 12 months in the study were 67% in Group A and 56% in Group B (p = 0.13). Time to first relapse, persistent FR/SDNS, and withdrawal due to poor compliance were statistically similar in both groups, while relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable in both groups, with reversible leucopenia and hepatic transaminitis being the commonest.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily levamisole therapy was not superior to alternate-day therapy in maintaining sustained remission over 12 months. Nevertheless, relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower without increased adverse effects.

Chronic levamisole exposure in male rats alters sexual behavior and induces apoptosis in the testis

Levamisole is an anti-helminthic drug developed and introduced in veterinary medicine, and it has been used more frequently after the inclusion of its usage in human medicine regarding disorders with immunomodulatory properties. In recent years, it has started to attract attention since it has beneficial effects on the treatment of COVID-19 due to its immunomodulatory properties. To investigate the effects of levamisole on sexual behavior and the reproductive system in male rats, two groups were formed the vehicle (n = 10) and levamisole (n = 10) groups. The vehicle group was given purified water whereas the levamisole group was administered with levamisole (2 mg/kg) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks. Levamisole treatment significantly increased the mount latency (ML, P < 0.001) as well as the intromission latency (IL, P < 0.01). It also significantly prolonged postejaculatory interval (PEI, P < 0.01), decreased copulatory rate (CR, P < 0.05), and sexual activity index (SAI, P < 0.05). It significantly decreased serum monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) levels (P < 0.05). Additionally, levamisole induced disorganizations of germinal epithelial cells of seminiferous tubules, congestion, edema in the interstitial area, and metaphase arrest in some spermatocytes (P < 0.001), and it significantly increased the immunohistochemical expressions of apoptotic Bax and cytochrome c, which is crucial proapoptotic protein, in the testis (P < 0.001). Also, levamisole significantly upregulated the mRNA levels of the apoptosis-related key regulatory genes, including Bax (Bcl-2-associated X protein, P = 0.05) and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (P < 0.01) in testis. The current research is the first to show that levamisole may decrease sexual performance, potency, sexual motivation, and libido and induce apoptosis in the testis.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody in children with nephrotic syndrome treated with levamisole: a cross-sectional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Levamisole is a commonly used steroid-sparing agent (SSA), but the reported incidence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity has been concerning.

METHODS

Observational cross-sectional study wherein children aged 2 to 18 years with frequently relapsing/steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS) on levamisole for ≥ 12 months were tested for ANCA.

RESULTS

A total of 210 children (33% female), median age of 7.3 (IQR: 5.6-9.6) years, and a median duration of levamisole exposure of 21 (IQR: 15-30) months were tested. ANCA was positive in 18% (n = 37): 89% (n = 33) perinuclear ANCA (pANCA), 3% (n = 1) cytoplasmic ANCA (cANCA), and 8% (n = 3) both. Of ANCA-positive children, none had reduced eGFR or abnormal urinalysis. The majority of these children were asymptomatic (81%, n = 30). Rash was more common among ANCA-positive children [6/37 (16%) vs. 3/173 (2%), p = 0.0001]. On multivariate analysis, higher age (OR = 1.02, [95th CI: 1.01 to 1.03], p = 0.007) and longer duration of levamisole exposure (OR = 1.05, [95th CI: 1.02 to 1.08], p = 0.0007) were associated with ANCA positivity. Levamisole was stopped in ANCA-positive children with the resolution of any clinical manifestations if present. Repeat ANCA testing was performed in 54% (20/37), and all were ANCA negative by 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with FRNS/SDNS on longer duration of levamisole were associated with increasing prevalence of ANCA positivity, but most of these children were clinically asymptomatic. Prospective studies are required to determine the chronology of ANCA positivity and its clinical implication.

Levamisole Induced Agranulocytosis in a Child with Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

Levamisole has been used as an effective immunomodulator. Levamisole has been used for nephrotic syndrome due to its immunostimulant, immunomodulating, and steroid-sparing effects. Common adverse effects of levamisole are gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, abdominal cramps), and pyrexia. However, agranulocytosis or pancytopenia is also a rare but life-threatening complication of levamisole. This is a case report of a 5-year-old girl who had steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome for which she was started on levamisole as per her weight, following which she had falling total leukocyte count levels on every visit. Thus, this case report emphasizes identifying this rare side effect and its management.

Saliva monitoring of prednisolone in children with first onset steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: Is it possible?

AIMS

Prednisolone is the cornerstone of treatment for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, but is associated with marked side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring using saliva would be a patient-friendly option to monitor prednisolone treatment. To assess the feasibility of saliva monitoring, we described the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unbound prednisolone in plasma and saliva of children with first onset steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS).

METHODS

Children (age 2-16 years) with SSNS participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with levamisole were treated with an 18-week tapering schedule of prednisolone. Five serial samples were collected at 4 (saliva) and 8 weeks (saliva and plasma) after first onset. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the PK parameters of unbound prednisolone and the saliva-to-plasma ratio. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the predictive performance of saliva monitoring.

RESULTS

From 39 children, 109 plasma and 275 saliva samples were available. Estimates (relative squared error) of unbound plasma clearance and volume of distribution were 93 (5%) L h-1 70 kg-1 and 158 (7%) L 70 kg-1, respectively. Typical saliva-to-plasma ratio was 1.30 (8%). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that on basis of 4 saliva samples and a single plasma sample unbound plasma area-under-the-concentration-time curve can be predicted within 20% imprecision in 79% of the patients compared to 87% based on 4 plasma samples.

CONCLUSION

Saliva proved to be a reliable and patient-friendly option to determine prednisolone plasma exposure in children with SSNS. This opens opportunities for further PK and pharmacodynamics studies of prednisolone in a variety of paediatric conditions.

Levamisole in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: new promises, and advocacy for global access

In the current issue of Kidney International, Sinha et al. present data from an open-label, noninferior, randomized controlled trial comparing 12-months of alternate-day prednisolone, given daily during infection, versus levamisole, in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. This study suggests that both of these strategies are efficacious and safe. Results of this study should redefine the role of levamisole in future guidelines, and a call for global availability of levamisole should be advocated.

An open label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial evaluated alternate day prednisolone given daily during infections vs. levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Initial therapies for children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome include alternate-day prednisolone that is given daily during infections, or levamisole. In this open label, non-inferiority trial, 160 patients, 2 to 18-years-old with frequent relapses, were randomly assigned to receive either prednisolone (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/alternate-day, given daily during infections), or levamisole (2-2.5 mg/kg/alternate-days) for one-year. Patients with relapses on alternate day prednisolone at over 1 mg/kg, prior use of potent steroid-sparing therapies, eGFR under 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and significant steroid toxicity were excluded. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with frequent relapses, defined as three-relapses in one-year, or two-relapses within six-months if associated with significant steroid toxicity or loss to follow up. Eighty patients each were randomized to receive prednisolone and levamisole. Baseline features showed preponderance of young patients presenting within two-years of disease onset. On intention-to-treat analysis, frequent relapses were more common in patients administered prednisolone (40% versus 22.5%; risk difference 17.5%; 95% confidence interval 3.4-31.6%). Prednisolone was not non-inferior to levamisole in preventing frequent relapses. However, the two groups showed similar proportions of patients in sustained remission, comparable frequency of relapses, and low frequency of adverse events. The decline in steroid requirement from baseline was higher in the levamisole group. Per-protocol analysis showed similar results. These results have implications for choice of therapy for frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Although therapy with alternate-day prednisolone was not non-inferior to levamisole in preventing frequent relapses, both therapies were effective in other outcome measures. Thus, levamisole was relatively steroid-sparing and may be preferred in patients at risk of steroid toxicity.

Levamisole suppresses activation and proliferation of human T cells by the induction of a p53-dependent DNA damage response

Levamisole (LMS) is a small molecule used in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). The pathogenesis of INS remains unknown, but evidence points toward an immunological basis of the disease. Recently, LMS has been shown to increase the relapse-free survival in INS patients. While LMS has been hypothesized to exert an immunomodulatory effect, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Here, we show that LMS decreased activation and proliferation of human T cells. T-cell activation-associated cytokines such as IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were reduced upon LMS treatment, whereas IL-4 and IL-13 were increased. Gene expression profiling confirmed that the suppressive effects of LMS as genes involved in cell cycle progression were downregulated. Furthermore, genes associated with p53 activation were upregulated by LMS. In agreement, LMS treatment resulted in p53 phosphorylation and increased expression of the p53 target gene FAS. Accordingly, LMS sensitized activated T cells for Fas-mediated apoptosis. LMS treatment resulted in a mid-S phase cell cycle arrest accompanied by γH2AX-foci formation and phosphorylation of CHK1. Our findings indicate that LMS acts as an immunosuppressive drug that directly affects the activation and proliferation of human T cells by induction of DNA damage and the activation of a p53-dependent DNA damage response.

Childhood nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common glomerular disease in children. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of its treatment, and steroid response is the main prognostic factor. Most children respond to a cycle of oral steroids, and are defined as having steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Among the children who do not respond, defined as having steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, most respond to second-line immunosuppression, mainly with calcineurin inhibitors, and children in whom a response is not observed are described as multidrug resistant. The pathophysiology of nephrotic syndrome remains elusive. In cases of immune-mediated origin, dysregulation of immune cells and production of circulating factors that damage the glomerular filtration barrier have been described. Conversely, up to a third of cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome have a monogenic origin. Multidrug resistant nephrotic syndrome often leads to kidney failure and can cause relapse after kidney transplant. Although steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome does not affect renal function, most children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome have a relapsing course that requires repeated steroid cycles with significant side-effects. To minimise morbidity, some patients require steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, including levamisole, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and cyclophosphamide. Close monitoring and preventive measures are warranted at onset and during relapse to prevent acute complications (eg, hypovolaemia, acute kidney injury, infections, and thrombosis), whereas long-term management requires minimising treatment-related side-effects. A subset of patients have active disease into adulthood.

Long-term complications in patients with childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Reports on long-term complications of childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome (NS), such as obesity, osteoporosis, growth failure, and hypertension, are mostly from developed countries not representing South Asian ethnicities. Furthermore, data on cardiovascular health among patients with childhood-onset NS are limited.

METHODS

This was an observational study involving patients attending a tertiary care center. Patients aged 15 years and older were examined for long-term complications and remission of NS at their visit in December 2021. Childhood-onset NS meant onset of NS before 10 years of age. Long-term complications included obesity, growth failure, low bone mineral density (BMD) Z score, hypertension, and increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Long-term remission was defined as no relapse for the last [Formula: see text] 3 consecutive years without immunosuppressive medication to maintain remission.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients studied (~ 80% with frequent relapsing (FR)/steroid-dependent (SD) NS), the mean age was 17.6 (± 2.4) years at the time of study. Long-term complications were noted in 89.1% of patients which included one or more of the following: obesity (22.7%), growth failure (31.7%), low BMD Z score (53.5%), hypertension (31.7%), and high cIMT (50.5%). Thirty-nine patients (38.6%) were in long-term remission at the time of the study. Growth failure and low BMD Z scores were less frequent in patients with long-term remission compared to those without long-term remission.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with childhood-onset NS (predominantly FR/SDNS) who were studied at [Formula: see text] 15 years of age, ~ 90% had long-term complications which included high cIMT in 50%. Only ~ 40% were in long-term remission. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome in Africa: Epidemiology, Treatment Trends, and Outcomes

Nephrotic syndrome is a common childhood glomerular disease that is associated with massive proteinuria and edema. Children with nephrotic syndrome are at risk of chronic kidney disease, disease-related complications, and treatment-related complications. Patients with frequently relapsing disease or steroid toxicity may require newer immunosuppressive medications. However, access to these medications is limited in many African countries owing to prohibitive cost, the need for frequent therapeutic drug monitoring, and a lack of appropriate facilities. This narrative review examines the epidemiology of childhood nephrotic syndrome in Africa, including trends in treatment and patient outcomes. In most of North Africa, as well as among White and Indian populations in South Africa, the epidemiology and treatment of childhood nephrotic syndrome closely resembles that of European and North American populations. Historically, secondary causes of nephrotic syndrome (eg, quartan malaria nephropathy and hepatitis B-associated nephropathy) were predominant among Blacks in Africa. Over time, the proportion of secondary cases has decreased, along with rates of steroid resistance. However, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis increasingly has been reported among patients with steroid resistance. There is a need for consensus guidelines for the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome in Africa. Furthermore, establishing an African nephrotic syndrome registry could facilitate monitoring of disease and treatment trends, and provide opportunities for advocacy and research to improve patient outcomes.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent pediatric glomerular disease, affecting from 1.15 to 16.9 per 100,000 children per year globally. It is characterized by massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and/or concomitant edema. Approximately 85-90% of patients attain complete remission of proteinuria within 4-6 weeks of treatment with glucocorticoids, and therefore, have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). Among those patients who are steroid sensitive, 70-80% will have at least one relapse during follow-up, and up to 50% of these patients will experience frequent relapses or become dependent on glucocorticoids to maintain remission. The dose and duration of steroid treatment to prolong time between relapses remains a subject of much debate, and patients continue to experience a high prevalence of steroid-related morbidity. Various steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs have been used in clinical practice; however, there is marked practice variation in the selection of these drugs and timing of their introduction during the course of the disease. Therefore, international evidence-based clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) are needed to guide clinical practice and reduce practice variation. The International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) convened a team of experts including pediatric nephrologists, an adult nephrologist, and a patient representative to develop comprehensive CPRs on the diagnosis and management of SSNS in children. After performing a systematic literature review on 12 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, recommendations were formulated and formally graded at several virtual consensus meetings. New definitions for treatment outcomes to help guide change of therapy and recommendations for important research questions are given.

Therapeutic trials in difficult to treat steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: challenges and future directions

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is a common condition in pediatric nephrology, and most children have excellent outcomes. Yet, 50% of children will require steroid-sparing agents due to frequently relapsing disease and may suffer consequences from steroid dependence or use of steroid-sparing agents. Several steroid-sparing therapeutic agents are available with few high quality randomized controlled trials to compare efficacy leading to reliance on observational data for clinical guidance. Reported trials focus on short-term outcomes such as time to first relapse, relapse rates up to 1-2 years of follow-up, and few have studied long-term remission. Trial designs often do not consider inter-individual variability, and differing response to treatments may occur due to heterogeneity in pathogenic mechanisms, and genetic and environmental influences. Strategies are proposed to improve the quantity and quality of trials in steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome with integration of biomarkers, novel trial designs, and standardized outcomes, especially for long-term remission. Collaborative efforts among international trial networks will help move us toward a shared goal of finding a cure for children with nephrotic syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of levamisole in childhood nephrotic syndrome: A meta-analysis

Present evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of levamisole in childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS), particularly the steroid-sensitive NS (SSNS), is limited. We searched relevant databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane CENTRAL till June 30, 2020. We included 12 studies for evidence synthesis (5 were clinical trials that included 326 children). The proportion of children without relapses at 6-12 months was higher in the levamisole group as compared to steroids (relative risk [RR]: 5.9 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.13-264.8], I2 = 85%). Levamisole as compared to the control increased the proportion of children without relapses at 6-12 months (RR: 3.55 [95% CI: 2.19-5.75], I2 = 0%). The GRADE evidence was of "very-low certainty" except for the comparison of levamisole with control, the latter being of "moderate certainty." To conclude, levamisole given to children with SSNS is beneficial in preventing relapses and achieving remission as compared to placebo or low-dose steroids. Good-quality trials are needed to provide a robust evidence in this regard. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42018086247.

Long-term obesity prevalence and linear growth in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: is normal growth and weight control possible with steroid-sparing drugs and low-dose steroids for relapses?

BACKGROUND

Long-term steroid treatment in children is known to cause obesity and negatively affect growth. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of obesity and overweight and analyze linear growth in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

The study involved 265 children treated with glucocorticoids for nephrotic syndrome for a mean duration of 43 months (range: 6-167, IQR: 17, 63.3). Height, weight, and BMI SDS were recorded at each visit. Rate of change between the final and initial height, weight, and BMI was calculated (Δ score). The cumulative steroid dose (mg/kg/day) during follow-up was calculated. Relapses without significant edema were treated with low-dose steroids and steroid-sparing drugs were used in children with steroid dependency/frequent relapses.

RESULTS

Mean first BMI SDS was + 1.40 ± 1.30 and final + 0.79 ± 1.30. At initial assessment, 41.4% of the patients were obese (BMI ≥ 95^th percentile) and 19.5% were overweight (BMI 85^th-95^th percentile). At the last clinical visit, 24% were obese and 17% overweight. The children had lower BMI SDS at last clinical visit compared to initial assessment. Mean first height SDS of the cohort was - 0.11 ± 1.22 and final score 0.078 ± 1.14 (p < 0.0001). Almost 85% of patients were treated with steroid-sparing drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that children with nephrotic syndrome, despite a need for steroid treatment for active disease, can improve their obesity and overweight and also improve their linear growth from their first to last visit with us.

"Clinical Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Levamisole Therapy in Frequently Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome" - A retrospective comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Children with Frequently relapsing (FR) or Steroid dependent (SD) Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) often develop side effects of corticosteroids. Various steroid-sparing agents are in practice, but only a few studies exist so far which have compared the safety and efficacy of these two commonly used agents.

METHODS

We did a retrospective medical records review of children with FRNS or SDNS who had Levamisole or MMF as a steroid-sparing agent with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The aim was to compare the course of our patients on MMF and Levamisole. Our primary objective was to determine the number of children in sustained remission and those with the infrequently relapsing course on Levamisole and MMF and, the median time to relapse in months in the two groups. The secondary objective was to compare time to first relapse and number of relapses in FRNS and SDNS group children on MMF and Levamisole.

RESULTS

A total of 88 children (34% female) with diagnosis FR/SDNS (44 each) were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients took Levamisole, while forty-nine received MMF therapy. The median age of presentation at the relapsing course was 4.2 years. The proportion of children with sustained remission or infrequent relapsing (IFR) course on MMF was 73.6%, compared to 48.71% on Levamisole (p-value 0.015). Also, the median time to first relapse was 12 months (24, 1.5) and 4.5 months (24, 1) on respective medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome was superior in the MMF group than Levamisole, especially in SDNS patients, and also MMF was more efficacious in maintaining sustained remission. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Association between HLA alleles and sub-phenotype of childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed the effects of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles on different clinical sub-phenotypes in childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS), including SSNS without recurrence (SSNSWR) and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome/frequently relapse nephrotic syndrome (SDNS/FRNS). In this study, we investigated the relationship between HLA system and children with SSNSWR and SDNS/FRNS and clarified the value of HLA allele detection for precise typing of childhood SSNS.

METHODS

A total of 241 Chinese Han individuals with SSNS were genotyped using GenCap-WES Capture Kit, and four-digit resolution HLA alleles were imputed from available Genome Wide Association data. The distribution and carrying frequency of HLA alleles in SSNSWR and SDNS/FRNS were investigated. Additionally, logistic regression and mediating effects were used to examine the relationship between risk factors for disease process and HLA system.

RESULTS

Compared with SSNSWR, significantly decreased serum levels of complement 3 (C3) and complement 4 (C4) at onset were detected in SDNS/FRNS (C3, P < 0.001; C4, P = 0.018). The average time to remission after sufficient initial steroid treatment in SDNS/FRNS was significantly longer than that in SSNSWR (P = 0.0001). Low level of C4 was further identified as an independent risk factor for SDNS/FRNS (P = 0.008, odds ratio = 0.174, 95% confidence interval 0.048-0.630). The HLA-A*11:01 allele was independently associated with SSNSWR and SDNS/FRNS (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.0006, respectively). No significant HLA alleles were detected between SSNSWR and SDNS/FRNS. In addition, a mediating effect among HLA-I alleles (HLA-B*15:11, HLA-B*44:03 and HLA-C*07:06), C4 level and SDNS/FRNS was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-I alleles provide novel genetic markers for SSNSWR and SDNS/FRNS. HLA-I antigens may be involved in steroid dependent or frequent relapse in children with SSNS as mediators of immunoregulation.

Levamisole causes a transient increase in plasma creatinine levels but does not affect kidney function based on cystatin C

BACKGROUND

In pediatric patients treated with levamisole to prevent relapses of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), a transient and non-progressive rise in creatinine levels has been observed. It has been suggested that levamisole affects tubular secretion of creatinine. However, other potential mechanisms - nephrotoxicity and interference with the analytical assay for creatinine - have never been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

In three steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) patients with elevated plasma creatinine levels, treated with levamisole 2.5 mg/kg every other day, serum cystatin C was determined. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the full age spectrum for creatinine and the full age spectrum for cystatin C equations. Interference of levamisole with the enzymatic creatinine assay was tested using spare human plasma of different creatinine concentrations spiked with levamisole (4, 20, and 100 µM).

RESULTS

Three patients who received levamisole with elevated plasma creatinine levels had normal serum cystatin C levels and corresponding estimated GFR. There was no assay interference.

CONCLUSION

Levamisole increases plasma creatinine levels, which is most probably due to impaired tubular secretion of creatinine since there was no assay interference and patients had normal eGFR based on serum cystatin C. However, interference of metabolites of levamisole could not be excluded. To monitor GFR, cystatin C in addition to creatinine should be used and be measured before and during levamisole use.

Assessment of FDA-approved drugs against Strongyloides ratti in vitro and in vivo to identify potentially active drugs against strongyloidiasis

BACKGROUND

Infections with Strongyloides stercoralis belong to the most neglected helminth diseases, and research and development (R&D) efforts on novel drugs are inadequate.

METHODS

A commercially available library containing 1600 FDA-approved drugs was tested in vitro against Strongyloides ratti larvae (L3) at 100 µM. Hits (activity > 70%) were then evaluated against S. ratti adult worms at 10 µM. Morantel, prasterone, and levamisole were tested in the S. ratti rat model using dosages of 1-100 mg/kg.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of the 1600 compounds tested against S. ratti L3 revealed activity above 70%. Of 64 compounds which progressed into the adult screen, seven compounds achieved death of all worms (benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, Gentian violet, methylbenzethonium chloride, morantel citrate, ivermectin, coumaphos), and another eight compounds had activity > 70%. Excluding topical and toxic compounds, three drugs progressed into in vivo studies. Prasterone lacked activity in vivo, while treatment with 100 mg/kg morantel and levamisole cured all rats. The highest in vivo activity was observed with levamisole, yielding a median effective dose (ED50) of 1.1 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a drug repurposing approach, our study identified levamisole as a potential backup drug for strongyloidiasis. Levamisole should be evaluated in exploratory clinical trials.

Levamisole and ANCA positivity in childhood nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ANCA positivity in children managed with levamisole as a steroid-sparing agent for nephrotic syndrome (NS).

METHODS

Medical records of children with steroid-sensitive NS managed with levamisole therapy at Sydney Children's Hospital between 1/1/2000 and 31/12/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Main outcome measure was side effects of levamisole therapy including ANCA positivity.

RESULTS

Seventy-one children, median age 3 years and 1 month (IQR 29-68 months) at first presentation, were subsequently managed with levamisole. 60.6% were male and 65% Caucasian. 47.9% had frequently relapsing (FR)NS and 52.1% steroid-dependent (SD)NS. Overall, there was a median reduction in relapses from 3 (IQR 1-5) to 0.4 relapses (IQR 0-1) per year after levamisole was commenced. Levamisole was successful in preventing relapse in 19 (29%) patients and was used for median 24 (22 to 25) months. Levamisole was discontinued due to relapse in 25 patients (38%) after median 12 (5-28) months. Side effects occurred in 28 patients (42.4%); the most common side effect was ANCA positivity in 12 patients. In eleven of these patients, levamisole was discontinued; in one patient, low-level titres were documented and spontaneously resolved without cessation of levamisole. Two patients developed ANCA-associated vasculitis.

CONCLUSION

ANCA positivity is a common side effect of levamisole and was seen in 18.2% of our patients. Monitoring is required to determine side effects including ANCA positivity and treatment modified accordingly.

Practice variations in the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands

Nephrotic syndrome in childhood is a common entity in the field of pediatric nephrology. The optimal treatment of children with nephrotic syndrome is often debated. Previously conducted studies have shown significant variability in nephrotic syndrome management, especially in the choice of steroid-sparing drugs. In the Netherlands, a practice guideline on the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome has been available since 2010. The aim of this study was to identify practice variations and opportunities to improve clinical practice of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands. A digital structured survey among Dutch pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists was performed, including questions regarding the initial treatment, relapse treatment, kidney biopsy, additional immunosuppressive treatment, and supportive care. Among the 51 responses, uniformity was seen in the management of a first presentation and first relapse. Wide variation was found in the tapering of steroids after alternate day dosing. Most pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists (83%) would perform a kidney biopsy in case of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, whereas for frequent relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome this was 22% and 41%, respectively. Variation was reported in the steroid-sparing treatment. Finally, significant differences were present in the supportive treatment of nephrotic syndrome.Conclusion: Substantial variation was present in the management of nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands. Differences were identified in steroid tapering, use of steroid coverage during stress, choice of steroid-sparing agents, and biopsy practice. To promote guideline adherence and reduce practice variation, factors driving this variation should be assessed and resolved. What is Known: • National and international guidelines are available to guide the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome. • Several aspects of the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome, including the choice of steroid-sparing drugs and biopsy practice, are controversial and often debated among physicians. What is New: • Significant practice variation is present in the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands, especially in the treatment of FRNS, SDNS, and SRNS. • The recommendation on the steroid treatment of a first episode of nephrotic syndrome in the KDIGO guideline leaves room for interpretation and is likely the cause of substantial differences in steroid-tapering practices among Dutch pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

JUSTIFICATION

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

OBJECTIVE

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

PROCESS

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Development and Validation of a Highly Sensitive Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Technique to Determine Levamisole in Plasma and Saliva

BACKGROUND

Levamisole is used as a steroid-sparing drug for the treatment of frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. As part of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial with levamisole, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of levamisole in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were investigated, as well as the feasibility of using saliva as an alternative and patient-friendly matrix for determining levamisole concentrations. In this study, the authors presented the development and validation of a highly sensitive method for determining levamisole in plasma and saliva using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

METHODS

In 100 μL samples, proteins were precipitated with 750 μL acetonitrile/methanol 420:80 (v/v) with levamisole-D5 as an internal standard. Calibration standards were prepared over a range of 0.1 ng/mL-50 ng/mL. To determine ultrafiltration efficiency, the ultrafiltrate was obtained by centrifuging blank plasma samples over the filter. Both filtered and nonfiltered samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

For plasma, accuracy and within-run and between-run imprecision were between 95.0% and 100% and <14.5%, respectively, and for saliva, between 100.9% and 107.5%, and <13.3%. No significant matrix effects were observed. Samples were stable at benchtop for 24 hours and -80°C, for at least 14 months (stability experiments ongoing). The ultrafiltration efficiency of unbound concentrations in plasma was lower than 85% (58.9%) but stable, and, therefore, the observed concentration should be corrected.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on observations, the developed measure can determine levamisole concentrations in participant saliva samples.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

Justification

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

Objective

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

Process

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

Recommendations

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

CD80 Insights as Therapeutic Target in the Current and Future Treatment Options of Frequent-Relapse Minimal Change Disease

Minimal change disease (MCD) is the most common cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, and it is well known for its multifactorial causes which are the manifestation of the disease. Proteinuria is an early consequence of podocyte injury and a typical sign of kidney disease. Steroid-sensitive patients react well with glucocorticoids, but there is a high chance of multiple relapses. CD80, also known as B7-1, is generally expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in steroid-sensitive MCD patients. Various glomerular disease models associated with proteinuria demonstrated that the detection of CD80 with the increase of urinary CD80 was strongly associated closely with frequent-relapse MCD patients. The role of CD80 in MCD became controversial because one contradicts finding. This review covers the treatment alternatives for MCD with the insight of CD80 as a potential therapeutic target. The promising effectiveness of CD20 (rituximab) antibody and CD80 inhibitor (abatacept) encourages further investigation of CD80 as a therapeutic target in frequent-relapse MCD patients. Therapeutic-based antibody towards CD80 (galiximab) had never been investigated in MCD or any kidney-related disease; hence, the role of CD80 is still undetermined. A new therapeutic approach towards MCD is essential to provide broader effective treatment options besides the general immunosuppressive agents with gruesome adverse effects.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

The effect of levamisole on kidney function in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Levamisole is frequently used as a steroid-sparing agent in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Side effects, such as neutropenia, gastro-intestinal upset and skin rash, have been reported. We noted an increase in creatinine in some of our patients, but literature on the effect of levamisole on kidney function is lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients 1-18 years of age, treated for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome with levamisole at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children between January 2010 and January 2020. Data was collected on clinical observations and serum creatinine values before, during and after treatment. eGFR was calculated using the Schwartz equation.

RESULTS

In total, 75 children were included in the analysis. The median duration of treatment was 19 (IQR 12-27) months. The median estimated GFR was 134 (IQR 119-160), 101 (IQR 91-113) and 116 (IQR 106-153) ml/min/1.73 m², respectively, before, during and after treatment with levamisole. The difference between eGFR before and after treatment compared with during treatment was statically significant (P < 0.0001). During the treatment period, the eGFR decrease was not progressive. The median levamisole dose was 2.5 (IQR 2.3-2.6) mg/kg on alternate days, and the dose was not correlated with the decrease in eGFR (r = 0.07, 95% CI - 0.22 to 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Levamisole significantly decreases eGFR. However, this decrease is not progressive or irreversible and would not be an indication to discontinue the treatment.

Pediatric idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: diagnosis and therapy -short version of the updated German best practice guideline (S2e) - AWMF register no. 166-001, 6/2020

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent glomerular disease in children in most parts of the world. Children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) generally have a good prognosis regarding the maintenance of normal kidney function even in the case of frequent relapses. The course of SSNS is often complicated by a high rate of relapses and the associated side effects of repeated glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy. The following recommendations for the treatment of SSNS are based on the comprehensive consideration of published evidence by a working group of the German Society for Pediatric Nephrology (GPN) based on the systematic Cochrane reviews on SSNS and the guidelines of the KDIGO working group (Kidney Disease - Improving Global Outcomes).

Rituximab for very low dose steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) carries a high risk of toxicity from steroids or steroid-sparing agents. This open-label, randomized controlled trial was designed to test whether the monoclonal antibody rituximab is non-inferior to steroids in maintaining remission in juvenile forms of SDNS and how long remission may last (EudraCT:2008-004486-26).

METHODS

We enrolled 30 children 4-15 years who had developed SDNS 6-12 months before and were maintained in remission with low prednisone doses (0.1-0.4 mg/Kg/day). Participants were randomized following a non-inferiority design to continue prednisone alone (n 15, controls) or to add a single intravenous infusion of rituximab (375 mg/m², n 15 intervention). Prednisone was tapered in both arms after 1 month. Children assigned to the control arm were allowed to receive rituximab to treat disease relapse.

RESULTS

Proteinuria increased at 3 months in the prednisone group (from 0.14 to 1.5 g/day) (p < 0.001) and remained unchanged in the rituximab group (0.14 g/day). Fourteen children in the control arm relapsed within 6 months. Thirteen children assigned to rituximab (87%) were still in remission at 1 year and 8 (53%) at 4 years. Responses were similar in children of the control group who received rituximab to treat disease relapse. We did not record significant adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab was non-inferior to steroids for the treatment of juvenile SDNS. One in two children remains in remission at 4 years following a single infusion of rituximab, without significant adverse events. Further studies are needed to clarify the superiority of rituximab over low-dose corticosteroid as a treatment of SDNS.

Efficacy of Levamisole in children with Frequent Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome at Tertiary Care Center-Karachi

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of levamisole in maintaining remission of proteinuria in children with frequent relapsing and steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (FR/SDNS).

Methods:

This observational study on 81 children with FR /SDNS was carried out from June 2007 - June 2017 at The Kidney Center-Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi-Pakistan. Levamisole (leva) along with low dose prednisolone on alternate day (AD) was used after induction of remission with daily oral prednisolone in children with FR/ SDNS for 6-36 months. Patients with steroid resistance were excluded. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results:

Eighty-one patients with FR (66) or SD (15) received levamisole treatment. Mean age at diagnosis was 3.72 ±2.33 years. Levamisole was used on AD in 59.25% and daily in 40.74% of cases. Twenty-four could not complete six months and were excluded, 57 patients completed treatment duration of 15.68±9.93 months and 51 post-leva follow-up of 11.70±11.23 months. Mean leva-dose was 1.73±0.67 mg/kg/ patient. Mean cumulative prednisolone dose per patient before, on-leva and post-leva was 3389.81±2785.22, 2471.97±2024.98 and 661.37± 905.37 mg respectively. Mean relapse rate per year before leva, on -leva and post -leva was 3.30 ±0.50,0.98± 1.1and 0.79±1.27 respectively. Levamisole was effective in 90% of patients. During post-leva follow up, 76.4% patients, maintained remission, whereas 23.5% behaved as FR/SD and require further immunosuppressive therapy.

Conclusions:

Levamisole was effective in maintaining remission in 90% while on treatment, whereas it maintained remission after discontinuation in 76.4% cases. Levamisole may be used as first steroid sparing agent before other immunosuppressive therapies in children with FR/SDNS. Further studies are required for optimal duration and dosage schedule.

Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

About 80% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, half relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. While non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications prolong periods of remission, they have significant potential adverse effects. Currently, there is no consensus about the most appropriate second-line agent in children who are steroid sensitive, but who continue to relapse. In addition, these medications could be used with corticosteroids in the initial episode of SSNS to prolong the period of remission. This is the fourth update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2005, 2008 and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications in SSNS in children with a relapsing course of SSNS and in children with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 10 March 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were included if they involved children with SSNS and compared non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications with placebo, corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone) or no treatment; compared different non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications or different doses, durations or routes of administration of the same non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias of the included studies and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 studies (91 reports) and included data from 2428 children. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 and 24 studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment respectively. Nine studies were at low risk of performance bias and 10 were at low risk of detection bias. Thirty-seven and 27 studies were at low risk of incomplete and selective reporting respectively. Rituximab (in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and prednisolone) versus CNI and prednisolone probably reduces the number of children who relapse at six months (5 studies, 269 children: RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.43) and 12 months (3 studies, 198 children: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.93) (moderate certainty evidence). At six months, rituximab resulted in 126 children/1000 relapsing compared with 548 children/1000 treated with conservative treatments. Rituximab may result in infusion reactions (4 studies, 252 children: RR 5.83, 95% CI 1.34 to 25.29). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and levamisole may have similar effects on the number of children who relapse at 12 months (1 study, 149 children: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16). MMF may have a similar effect on the number of children relapsing compared to cyclosporin (2 studies, 82 children: RR 1.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 5.46) (low certainty evidence). MMF compared to cyclosporin is probably less likely to result in hypertrichosis (3 studies, 140 children: RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.50) and gum hypertrophy (3 studies, 144 children: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.42) (low certainty evidence). Levamisole compared with steroids or placebo may reduce the number of children with relapse during treatment (8 studies, 474 children: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82) (low certainty evidence). Levamisole compared to cyclophosphamide may make little or no difference to the risk for relapse after 6 to 9 months (2 studies, 97 children: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.81) (low certainty evidence). Cyclosporin compared with prednisolone may reduce the number of children who relapse (1 study, 104 children: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83) (low certainty evidence). Alkylating agents compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the risk of relapse during cyclosporin treatment (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.48) (low certainty evidence) but may reduce the risk of relapse at 12 to 24 months (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74), suggesting that the benefit of the alkylating agents may be sustained beyond the on-treatment period (low certainty evidence). Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil) compared with prednisone probably reduce the number of children, who experience relapse at six to 12 months (6 studies, 202 children: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.60) and at 12 to 24 months (4 studies, 59 children: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.46) (moderate certainty evidence). IV cyclophosphamide may reduce the number of children with relapse compared with oral cyclophosphamide at 6 months (2 studies, 83 children: RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88), but not at 12 to 24 months (2 studies, 83 children: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.29) and may result in fewer infections (2 studies, 83 children: RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.72) (low certainty evidence). Cyclophosphamide compared to chlorambucil may make little or no difference in the risk of relapse after 12 months (1 study, 50 children: RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.13) (low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

New studies incorporated in this review indicate that rituximab is a valuable additional agent for managing children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, the treatment effect is temporary, and many children will require additional courses of rituximab. The long-term adverse effects of this treatment are not known. Comparative studies of CNIs, MMF, levamisole and alkylating agents have demonstrated little or no differences in efficacy but, because of insufficient power; clinically important differences in treatment effects have not been completely excluded.

Relationships between the clinical phenotypes and genetic variants associated with the immunological mechanism in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: protocol for a prospective observational single-centre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is the most common glomerulopathy that results in childhood chronic kidney disease in China, but the relationships between different clinical phenotypes and immunological genetic variants observed in patients with INS are ambiguous and have not been well studied. A cohort study combined with whole exome sequencing might further identify the effects of immunological genetic variants on clinical phenotypes and treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We describe a 3 year prospective observational single-centre cohort study to be conducted in the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University in China. This study will recruit and investigate 336 patients with childhood-onset INS presenting with different clinical phenotypes. Whole exome sequencing will be conducted when patients progress to a confirmed clinical phenotype during follow-up. Relevant clinical and epidemiological data, as well as conventional specimens, will be collected at study entry and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after disease onset. After this cohort is generated, the immunological genetic variants of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome without frequent relapse, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent/frequent relapse nephrotic syndrome will be evaluated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol is approved by Ethics Committee of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (reference number 2018-140). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800019795.

Prevention of relapses with levamisole as adjuvant therapy in children with a first episode of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol for a double blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial (the LEARNS study)

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is characterised by a high relapse rate up to 80% after initial response to standard therapy with corticosteroids. Steroid toxicity is common and causes a great burden of disease that negatively influences the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recently, studies have shown that levamisole, an anthelminthic drug, significantly improves relapse-free survival in children with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Compared with other steroid-sparing drugs, levamisole has relatively few side effects. We hypothesise that adding levamisole to standard therapy with corticosteroids in children with a first episode of INS will prevent relapses, decrease cumulative dosage of steroids used and improve HRQoL. This paper presents the study protocol for the LEARNS study (LEvamisole as Adjuvant therapy to Reduce relapses of Nephrotic Syndrome).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial will be conducted in 20 participating hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Participants (n=92) with a first episode of INS, aged 2-16 years, who achieve remission after 4 weeks of oral prednisolone will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either levamisole 2.5 mg/kg alternate day or placebo added to prednisolone (18-week tapering schedule) for a total of 24 weeks. Follow-up will be until 2 years after first presentation. Additionally, parents and/or children will fill out five HRQoL questionnaires. Primary outcome of the LEARNS study is occurrence of relapses within 12 months after first presentation. Secondary outcomes include time to first relapse, cumulative steroid dose after 2 years, safety parameters and quality of life scores.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee. Results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL6826, 2017-001025-41.

Immunosuppressive therapy in children with primary nephrotic syndrome: single center experience, Karachi, Pakistan

Background

Majority of children with nephrotic syndrome are steroid sensitive, but treatment of difficult to treat nephrotic (frequent relapsing, steroid dependent and steroid resistant) syndrome is challenging. Low dose steroid, levamisole, cyclophosphamide (CPM), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the common options of treatment.

Objective of the study was to determine the response to steroid and alternative immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) in children with difficult nephrotic syndrome (DNS).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 176 children with DNS, managed over 12 years at The Kidney Center-Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi- Pakistan from 2005 to 2017.

Initial episode was treated with daily oral prednisolone (OP) for 4–8 weeks followed by alternate day OP for 12–24 weeks. Subsequently low dose OP, levamisole (Leva)and cyclophosphamide was used for frequent relapsing (FR)/ steroid dependent (SD). All with initial steroid resistance and non- responders to leva and or cyclophosphamide were biopsied and treated with CNIs and MMF. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

There were 130(73.86%) children with FR/SD and 46(26.13%) with SRNS. All children with SR (46) and 86 with FR/SD were biopsied. Minimal change disease (60.60%) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS 23%) were the two common lesions. Majority (73.86%) received single OP whereas divided doses were administered in 26.13% cases. Daily OP was used for 4, 6 and 8 weeks in 61.36,28.4 and10.22% respectively. Steroids were tapered over 3 (31.81%),4 (52.27%) and 6 months (15.90%). Levamisole, CPM, cyclosporin (CS) and MMF were used sequentially in 45, 54.23, 50 and 20% respectively. Combination of MMF and CS was used in 11.29% of cases.

Levamisole was effective in 80%, CPM induced complete remission (CR, 57.77%) or partial remission (PR, 22.22%), CS induced CR 46.59% and PR 39.77%. MMF showed PR and CR 69 and 12.82% respectively. At last follow up, 46% were maintaining remission while off treatment, whereas 35% are maintaining remission on therapy,10.23% lost- to-follow, 5.68% progressed to chronic kidney disease. Mortality was 2.84% and it was due to infection and uremia.

Conclusion

Majority had steroid sensitive MCD. Levamisole and cyclophosphamide were effective in maintaining remission in FR/ SD. FSGS was responsible for resistance to steroid and alternative ISAs. Cyclosporin was effective in inducing remission in SRNS. Mortality was less than 3%.

Levamisole in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Clinical Efficacy and Pathophysiological Aspects

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is one of the most common pediatric glomerular diseases. Unfortunately, it follows a relapsing and remitting course in the majority of cases, with 50% of all cases relapsing once or even more often. Most children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond initially to steroid therapy, nevertheless repeated courses for patients with relapses induce significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, such as cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, levamisole, or rituximab. To reduce the relapse rate, several drugs have been used. Among these, levamisole has been considered the least toxic and least expensive therapy. Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) showed that levamisole is effective in reducing the relapse risk in steroid sensitive forms of nephrotic syndrome with a low frequency of side effects. Levamisole is a synthetic imidazothiazole derivative with immune-modulatory properties. In this article, we review recent data from randomized trials and observational studies to assess the efficacy of levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Properties and Applications of Marine-Derived Proteins and Peptides

Marine organisms provide an abundant source of potential medicines. Many of the marine-derived biomaterials have been shown to act as different mechanisms in immune responses, and in each case they can significantly control the immune system to produce effective reactions. Marine-derived proteins, peptides, and protein hydrolysates exhibit various physiologic functions, such as antimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant, antihypertensive, and anti-inflammatory activities. Recently, the immunomodulatory properties of several antimicrobial peptides have been demonstrated. Some of these peptides directly kill bacteria and exhibit a variety of immunomodulatory activities that improve the host innate immune response and effectively eliminate infection. The properties of immunomodulatory proteins and peptides correlate with their amino acid composition, sequence, and length. Proteins and peptides with immunomodulatory properties have been tested in vitro and in vivo, and some of them have undergone different clinical and preclinical trials. This review provides a comprehensive overview of marine immunomodulatory proteins, peptides, and protein hydrolysates as well as their production, mechanisms of action, and applications in human therapy.

Efficacy and acceptability of immunosuppressive agents for pediatric frequently-relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

A network meta-analysis was conducted to regard the effects of available immunosuppressive medications in pediatric frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS).

METHODS

We reviewed systematically 26 randomized controlled trials (1311 patients) that compared any of the following immunosuppressive agents to placebo/nontreatment (P/NT) or another drug for FRNS/SDNS treatment in children.

RESULTS

The main outcomes were efficacy and acceptability. At the 6-month, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, levamisole, and rituximab had better efficacy than P/NT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.09, 0.03, 0.28, and 0.07, respectively); cyclophosphamide was significantly more effective than azathioprine and chlorambucil. At 12 months, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, cyclosporine, levamisole, and rituximab had better efficacy than P/NT (0.10, 0.03, 0.10, 0.23, and 0.07, respectively); Chlorambucil were found to be more efficacious than levamisole and MMF (0.12 and 0.09, respectively). At 24 months, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, and levamisole had better efficacy than P/NT (0.09, 0.04, and 0.03, respectively); cyclophosphamide had better efficacy than cyclosporine and vincristine (0.17 and 0.39, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in acceptability were found. Our results suggest that cyclophosphamide may be preferred initially in children with FRSN/SDNS, chlorambucil, and rituximab may be acceptable medications for patients with FRSN/SDNS. Long-term follow-up trials focused on gonadal toxicity and limitation of maximum dosage of cyclophosphamide should been carried out.

Treating the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: are steroids the answer?

The use of steroids in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the major discovery of the twentieth century in the field of pediatric nephrology. At onset of the twenty-first century, steroids remain the first line of treatment at first flare. All the protocols to treat the first flare are similar by a common sequence including a first phase of daily prednisolone/prednisone at a dose of 60 mg/m²/day for at least 4 weeks followed by an alternate-day regimen for several weeks. It appears that a cumulated dose of 2240 mg/m² given in 8 weeks at the first flare without tapering sequence is not inferior to increased dose and duration in terms of prevalence of frequent relapsers and the subsequent cumulated dose of steroids at 24 months of follow-up. A higher cumulated dose might only be interesting in patients aged below 4 years although a formal demonstration is still missing. Several retrospective studies are concordant to suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone pulses are useful to reach a full urinary remission in case of oral resistance to 4 weeks of oral prednisone/prednisolone. A majority of patients have multiple relapses after the treatment of the first flare and half meet the definition of steroid dependency. In those patients, long-lasting alternate-day prednisone/prednisolone therapy does not lead to long-lasting remission, opening the question of the best strategy of immunosuppression.

Multiple cutaneous and mucosal lesions in a patient with cocaine-levamisole-induced vasculopathy syndrome

Levamisole is an adulterant found in nearly 70% of cocaine in the United States. The concomitant use of levamisole and cocaine leads to a distinct clinical syndrome that typically manifests as agranulocytosis, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and elevated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) levels. Systemic involvement has also been rarely reported with this syndrome. This is a case of a 51-year-old woman with chronic cocaine use who initially presented with multiple cutaneous ulcerations and was later found to have pulmonary and renal involvement. Infectious workup was unrevealing and autoimmune workup revealed highly elevated levels of perinuclear ANCA. Due to continuous cocaine use despite counseling, the patient was readmitted with worsening pulmonary and renal manifestations requiring initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.