Participants at three months post-operative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) demonstrate differences in lower extremity energy absorption contribution and quadriceps strength compared to healthy controls

Early Measures of Torque Development are Related to Peak Torque at Six Months Following ACL Reconstruction

Background and Purpose

Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at increased risk for subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, with quadriceps strength deficits being a risk factor. While early measures of quadriceps strength can predict strength in the later stages of rehabilitation, it remains unclear whether isometric rate of torque development (RTD) is related to later outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between quadriceps RTD values at four months post-ACLR and quadriceps isokinetic peak torque values at six months post-ACLR. It was hypothesized that isometric RTD at four months would be significantly correlated with isokinetic peak torque at six months post-ACLR. A secondary hypothesis was that the involved limb RT would be significantly slower than the uninvolved limb at four months post-operative.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

Forty-seven patients (22 males and 25 females) who had undergone ACLR performed isometric testing at four months and isokinetic testing at six months post-operatively. Isometric testing was utilized to measure torque from 0-100ms (RTD100) and from 100-200ms (RTD200), and isometric peak torque. Isokinetic testing was utilized to measure peak torque at 60°/sec and 180°/sec. Correlations between isometric and isokinetic measures were evaluated using Spearman's rho. RTD was compared between the involved and uninvolved limbs.

Results

The four-month measures of RTD100 (r=.55, r=.45), RTD200 (r=.63, r=.52), and peak isometric torque (r=.77, r=.64) were all significantly correlated with 60°/sec and 180°/sec isokinetic peak torque (p≤0.001), respectively. The involved limb rate of torque development was slower, and strength was lower than the uninvolved limb (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The hypotheses were supported as four-month isometric measures were moderately to strongly correlated to six-month isokinetic peak torque measures and the involved limb RTD was slower than the uninvolved limb. Incorporation of interventions focusing on development of force quickly is encouraged during rehabilitation.

Level of Evidence

3b.

Comparison of knee loading in subjects 12 weeks post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus repair when performing a double-limb squat

BACKGROUND

Despite postoperative complications, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard treatment after a tear. Recent advancements in anterior cruciate ligament repair techniques have led to improved outcomes and renewed interest in repair as a less invasive alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare knee biomechanics and quadriceps strength during double-leg squat at 12 weeks between individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or repair.

METHODS

A total of 43 participants (21 repair, 23 reconstruction) were included. A 10-camera Motion Capture System was used to capture joint motions during double-leg squat, and two force plates collected ground reaction forces. Peak knee extension moment, knee flexion angle, knee flexion angle displacement, and quadriceps strength were measured. Independent t-tests were performed for participant demographics (age, height, mass), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form scores, and isokinetic quadriceps strength. A univariate ANCOVA was performed on each dependent variable and Cohen's d effect size was calculated.

FINDINGS

The repair group demonstrated significantly greater knee extension moment compared to the reconstruction group after accounting for age (P = .033, effect size = 1.00). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for quadriceps strength (P = .138), peak knee flexion angle (P = .330), or knee flexion angle displacement (P = .372).

INTERPRETATION

This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating favorable outcomes of repair compared to reconstruction. In addition to previously identified advantages of repair, there appears to be some biomechanical advantage of repair compared to reconstruction at 12 weeks.

Strength of the Uninvolved Limb Following Return to Activity After ACL Injury: Implications for Symmetry as a Marker of Sufficient Strength

Background

Muscular strength deficits are common after ACL injury. While the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), using the uninvolved limb as a reference, is widely used, negative strength adaptations may affect both limbs post-injury. It is uncertain how the strength of the uninvolved limb in those with an ACL injury compares to uninjured individuals, making it unclear whether it is appropriate as a benchmark for determining sufficient strength.

Purpose

To compare the strength of key lower extremity muscles of the uninvolved limb in those with history of ACL injury (ACL-I) to the dominant limb in individuals with no history of ACL injury (control).

Study Design

Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 5,727 military cadets were examined, with 82 females and 126 males in the ACL-I group and 2,146 females and 3,373 males in the control group. Maximum isometric strength was assessed for six muscle groups measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Separate two-way ANOVAs with limb and sex were performed for each muscle group.

Results

Significant main effects for limb were observed with the uninvolved limb in the ACL-I group displaying greater strength compared to the dominant limb in the control group for the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus medius, but effect sizes were small (Cohen's d <0.25). Significant main effects for sex were observed with greater male muscular strength in all six muscle groups with small to large effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.49-1.46). No limb-by-sex interactions were observed.

Conclusions

There was no evidence of reduced strength in the uninvolved limb in those with a history of ACL injury compared to the dominant limb in those with no prior ACL injury. This finding suggests that, after clearance to return to activities, the uninvolved limb can be used as a standard for comparison of sufficient strength, including when using the LSI. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction

Background

ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft.

Study type

Case Control Study.

Methods

The ACL-r group [n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group [n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups.

Results

The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206).

Conclusions

Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R.

Level of Evidence

3.

Ambulatory support moment contribution patterns and MRI-detected tibiofemoral and patellofemoral disease worsening in adults with knee osteoarthritis: A preliminary study

We investigated whether baseline sagittal-plane ankle, knee, and hip contribution to the total support moment (TSM) are each associated with baseline-to-2-year tibiofemoral and patellofemoral tissue damage worsening in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Ambulatory lower-limb kinetics were captured and computed. TSM is the sum of ankle, knee, and hip extensor moments at each instant during gait. Ankle, knee, and hip contributions to TSM were computed as joint moments divided by TSM, expressed as percentages. Participants underwent MRI of both knees at baseline and 2 years later. Logistic regression models assessed associations of baseline ankle contribution to TSM with baseline-to-2-year cartilage damage and bone marrow lesion worsening, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, gait speed, disease severity, and pain. We used similar analytic approaches for knee and hip contributions to TSM. Sample included 391 knees from 204 persons (age[SD]: 64[10] years; 76.5% women). Greater ankle contribution may be associated with increased odds of tibiofemoral cartilage damage worsening (OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.02-5.57) and decreased odds of patellofemoral bone marrow lesion worsening (OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.73). The ORs for greater knee contribution were in the protective range for tibiofemoral compartment and in the deleterious range for patellofemoral. Greater hip contribution may be associated with increased odds of tibiofemoral worsening (OR = 2.71; 95% CI: 1.17-6.30). Greater ankle contribution to TSM may be associated with baseline-to-2-year tibiofemoral worsening, but patellofemoral tissue preservation. Conversely, greater knee contribution may be associated with patellofemoral worsening, but tibiofemoral preservation. Preliminary findings illustrate potential challenges in developing biomechanical interventions beneficial to both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments.

Pelvic Rotation Is Associated With Asymmetry in the Knee Extensor Moment During Double-Leg Squatting After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Asymmetry in knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting was observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, even after the completion of the rehabilitation program for return to sports. The purpose of this study was to clarify the association between asymmetry in the knee extensor moment and pelvic rotation angle during double-leg squatting after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Twenty-four participants performed double-leg squatting. Kinetics and kinematics during squatting were analyzed using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system with 2 force plates. The limb symmetry index of knee extensor moment was predicted by the pelvic rotation angle (R2 = .376, P = .001). In addition, the pelvic rotation and the limb symmetry index of the vertical ground reaction force independently explained the limb symmetry index of the knee extensor moment (R2 = .635, P < .001, β of pelvic rotation = -0.489, β of vertical ground reaction force = 0.524). Pelvic rotation toward the involved limb was associated with a smaller knee extensor moment in the involved limb than in the uninvolved limb. The assessment of pelvic rotation would be useful for partially predicting asymmetry in the knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting. Minimizing pelvic rotation may improve the asymmetry in the knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Harvesting a second graft from the extensor mechanism for revision ACL reconstruction does not delay return of quadriceps function

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether harvesting a second graft from the ipsilateral extensor mechanism adversely affects clinical outcomes in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 34 patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft or bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft was conducted. Patients with two grafts (BTB+QT) from the extensor mechanism were matched based on age, laterality, and sex to patients who had primary reconstruction with hamstring (HS) autograft followed by revision with either BTB or QT autograft (HS+QT/BTB). Return of quadriceps function was assessed with time to return to jogging in a standardized rehab protocol or time to regain 80% quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Marx scores at 12-month follow-up and return to sport.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in return to jogging or 80% quadriceps strength (HS 149.5 ± 38.2 days, BTB+QT 131.7 ± 40.1 days, n.s.), number able to return to sport (HS 62%, BTB+QT 93%, n.s.), months to return to sport (HS 10.6 ± 1.4, BTB+QT 10.5 ± 2.3, n.s.), return to pre-injury level of competition (HS 62%, BTB+QT 73%, n.s.), or IKDC (HS 77.2 ± 16.4, BTB+QT 74.8 ± 23.9, n.s.) and Marx scores (HS 9.2 ± 5.3, BTB+QT 8.0 ± 3.7, n.s.) at one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The main finding of the present study was that outcomes for patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with a second extensor mechanism autograft were comparable to those seen for patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with extensor mechanism autograft after primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. By better understanding the consequences of harvesting a second graft from the extensor mechanism, surgeons can better decide what graft to use in revision ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effects of Limb Dominance on Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Gait at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Patellofemoral joint complications have commonly been reported in long-term outcome studies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the biomechanics in the early phases of rehabilitation that could be associated with the development of these abnormalities is unclear. Limb dominance may affect the biomechanics of the knee joint in patients after ACLR.

Purpose:

To compare knee joint loading between surgical and nonsurgical limbs at 12 weeks postoperatively in patients who underwent ACLR on either their dominant limb (ACL-D) or nondominant limb (ACL-ND).

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Included were 54 patients (32 ACL-D and 22 ACL-ND). Peak and integrated patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), peak patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), and peak knee extension moment (KEM) were assessed during the stance phase of gait while participants walked on a 10-m runway at a self-selected speed.

Results:

The surgical limb of the ACL-D group had significantly decreased peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P < .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. The surgical limb of the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly increased peak PFJS (P = .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P = .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. For the surgical limb, the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly greater peak PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001) , (PFJRF [P<.001]) and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-D group. For the nonsurgical limb, the ACL-D group demonstrated greater peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P = .003), and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-ND group.

Conclusion:

Significantly larger knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-ND group and smaller knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-D group were observed compared to the contralateral nonsurgical limb, which suggests that limb dominance has a key role in loading at the knee joint during gait.

Clinical Relevance:

Altered knee joint loading during gait at 12 weeks after ACLR may lead to the development of patellofemoral joint abnormalities.

Adolescent Athletes Demonstrate Inferior Objective Profiles at the Time of Return to Sport After ACLR Compared With Healthy Controls

Background:

Athletes display persistent muscle deficits and altered limb-loading mechanics at the time of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

To compare an objective profile of adolescent athletes at RTS after ACLR to matched healthy controls.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 124 participants; 62 patients who underwent ACLR (15.4 ± 1.7 years) and 62 healthy controls (15.3 ± 1.7 years). Motion capture and force plates were used to capture joint motions during jump landing (JL) and single-limb squat (SLS) tasks. Energy absorption contribution (EAC) was calculated, and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess for EAC differences between groups. Participants completed an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength testing was performed on each limb. Independent t tests were run to examine age, height, weight, and IKDC scores as well as compare differences between groups for quadriceps and hamstring strength.

Results:

A significant group × joint interaction was found for JL (P < .001) and SLS (P < .001). For JL, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. During SLS, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. The ACLR cohort demonstrated lower IKDC scores (P < .001) and significantly lower quadriceps strength on the surgical limb (P < .001) than controls. There were no differences in surgical limb hamstring strength between the ACLR cohort and healthy controls (P = .701).

Conclusion:

Compared with matched healthy controls, the participants who underwent ACLR in this study demonstrated an inferior objective profile at RTS, consisting of deficits in surgical limb loading, self-reported outcomes, and strength.

Energy Absorption Contribution Deficits in Participants Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Context: Lower-extremity loading patterns change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, there is limited research regarding energy absorption contribution (EAC) of athletes following ACLR who reinjure their ACL and those who do not. EAC can be utilized as a measure of joint loading during tasks. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Three groups of individuals (13 in each group) with matched age, sex, height, weight, and sports were enrolled. Data were collected at time of return-to-sport testing for the 2 ACLR groups. An 8-camera 3D motion capture system with a sampling rate of 120 Hz and 2 force plates capturing at 1200 Hz were used to capture joint motions in all 3 planes during a double-limb jump landing. Results: Participants in the ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly greater hip EAC (55.8 [21.5] and 56.7 [21.2]) compared with healthy controls (19.5 [11.1]), P < .001 and P < .001, respectively. The ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly lower knee EAC (24.6 [22.7] and 27.4 [20.8]) compared with healthy controls (57.0 [12.2]), P < .001 and P < .001, respectively. However, the ACLR reinjury group had significantly lower ankle EAC (15.9 [4.6]) than healthy controls (23.5 [6.6]), whereas there was no statistical difference between the ACLR no reinjury group (19.7 [7.8]) and healthy controls. Conclusions: Athletes who had a second ACL injury after ACLR, and those without second ACL injury, appear to have similar hip, knee, and ankle joint loading of the surgical limb at return-to-sport testing. Nevertheless, joint loading patterns were significantly different from healthy controls. The study suggests that EAC as a measure of joint loading during a double-limb jump landing at time of return to sport may not be a strong predictor for second injury following ACLR.

Twelve-Week Quadriceps Strength as A Predictor of Quadriceps Strength At Time Of Return To Sport Testing Following Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Restoration of quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) continues to challenge both patients and clinicians. Failure to adequately restore quadriceps strength has been linked to decreased patients' self-reported outcomes and an increased risk for re-injury. Early identification of quadriceps strength deficits may assist in tailoring early interventions to better address impairments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between early (12 weeks following ACL-R) isokinetic peak torque and isokinetic peak torque at time of return to sport (RTS) testing.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort Study.

METHODS

A total of 120 participants (males = 55; females =65) were enrolled in the study (age = 16.1±1.4 yrs; height = 1.72±10.5 m; mass = 70.7±16.3 kg). All participants were level 1 or 2 cutting and pivoting sport athletes who underwent a primary bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACL-R. Participants were tested at two time points: 12 weeks following surgery and again at time of RTS testing. A linear regression model was carried out to investigate the relationship between age, sex, and isokinetic peak torque at 12 weeks following ACL-R and isokinetic peak torque at time of RTS testing.

RESULTS

When 12-week isokinetic peak torque was entered first for the hierarchy regression analysis, this factor was predictive of the peak torque at the time of RTS testing, F(1, 118) = 105.6, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.472, indicating that the 12-week quadriceps strength accounted for 47% of the variance in the quadriceps strength at the time of RTS testing. When age and sex were added in the regression analysis, both factors only added 0.8% of variance for the quadriceps strength at the time of RTS testing.

CONCLUSION

Isokinetic peak torque at 12 weeks following surgery was shown to be a significantly strong predictor (47%) for isokinetic quadriceps strength recovery at time of RTS. This finding underscores the importance of early restoration of quadriceps strength and that while non-modifiable factors such as sex and age are important, early restoration of quadriceps strength most strongly influences late stage quadriceps strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With Uninjured Matched Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

The limb symmetry index may overestimate the recovery of quadriceps muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison of individuals who have had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with age-, sex-, and activity-matched individuals might be more appropriate to guide rehabilitation interventions.

Purpose:

To compare the quadriceps strength between the injured limb of people with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the limb of an age-, sex-, and activity-matched control group.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and SPORTDiscus were searched between inception and April 2019. Studies were included if they reported the peak quadriceps strength for persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and age-, sex-, and activity-matched control groups measured using isometric or isokinetic dynamometry. Risk of bias was assessed, and meta-analyses and metaregression (for effect of time since surgery) were performed.

Results:

A total of 2759 studies were identified and 21 were included for analyses. Quadriceps strength was lower in the limbs with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with the limb from matched controls within 6 months of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (standardized mean difference [SMD], –1.42; 95% CI, –1.62 to –1.23), 6 to 18 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SMD, –0.92; 95% CI, –1.18 to –0.66), and >18 to 48 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SMD, –0.38; 95% CI, –0.79 to 0.03). Results of the metaregression were significant, with the difference between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and matched controls decreasing with time since surgery (P < .001).

Conclusion:

In people with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the injured limb had lower quadriceps strength compared with the limb of age-, sex-, and activity-matched controls up to 4 years after surgery. Clinicians should consider comparison with matched cohorts for return to sports decision making.

Limb dominance influences energy absorption contribution (EAC) during landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of limb dominance on energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a jump landing (JL) task at return to sport (RTS) after ACL-R.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical Research Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eight participants (age = 16.19 ± 1.74, Height = 172.25 ± 9.96 cm, Weight = 72.61 ± 15.48 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants were grouped into two groups: those who injured their dominant limb ACL (D-ACL) and those who injured their non-dominant limb ACL (ND-ACL). A multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess for between group differences in EAC across the three joints.

RESULTS

In the surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated smaller hip (D-ACL = 32.23 ± 10.44%, ND-ACL = 69.68 ± 8.51%, p < 0.008) and greater knee (D-ACL = 45.86 ± 10.36%, ND-ACL = 9.41 ± 5.68%, p < 0.008) EAC than ND-ACL. In the non-surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated greater hip (D-ACL = 62.59 ± 9.03%, ND-ACL = 25.95 ± 7.15%, p < 0.008), and smaller knee (D-ACL = 13.79 ± 5.57%, ND-ACL = 58.01 ± 7.86%, p < 0.008), EAC than ND-ACL.

CONCLUSION

After ACL-R, eccentric loading strategies during a JL task at RTS are different depending upon limb dominance. D-ACL demonstrated a greater knee loading strategy on the surgical side compared to ND-ACL.

Neuromuscular Function of the Knee Joint Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular deficits are common following knee injuries and may contribute to early-onset post-traumatic osteoarthritis, likely mediated through quadriceps dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To identify how peri-articular neuromuscular function changes over time after knee injury and surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Trials).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Moderate and high-quality studies comparing neuromuscular function of muscles crossing the knee joint between a knee-injured population (ligamentous, meniscal, osteochondral lesions) and healthy controls. Outcomes included normalized isokinetic strength, muscle size, voluntary activation, cortical and spinal-reflex excitability, and other torque related outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and five of meniscal injury were included. For ACL injury, strength and voluntary activation deficits were evident (moderate to strong evidence). Cortical excitability was not affected at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but decreased at 24+ months (moderate evidence). Spinal-reflex excitability did not change at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but increased at 24+ months (strong evidence). We also found deficits in torque variability, rate of torque development, and electromechanical delay (very limited to moderate evidence). For meniscus injury, strength deficits were evident only in the short-term. No studies reported gastrocnemius, soleus or popliteus muscle outcomes for either injury. No studies were found for other ligamentous or chondral injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuromuscular deficits persist for years post-injury/surgery, though the majority of evidence is from ACL injured populations. Muscle strength deficits are accompanied by neural alterations and changes in control and timing of muscle force, but more studies are needed to fill the evidence gaps we have identified. Better characterisation and therapeutic strategies addressing these deficits could improve rehabilitation outcomes, and potentially prevent PTOA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42019141850.

Effect of Meniscal Repair on Joint Loading in Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 3 Months Following Surgery

Context: Joint loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is thought to influence long-term outcomes. However, our understanding of the role of meniscus repair at the time of ACL-R on early joint loading is limited. Objective: To assess if differences in total energy absorption and energy absorption contribution of the hip, knee, and ankle exist in the early stages of rehabilitation between patients who received an isolated ACL-R and those with concomitant meniscal repairs. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Fifty-nine human subjects, including 27 who underwent ACL-R and 32 who underwent ACL-R with concomitant meniscal repairs. Main Outcome Measure: The total energy absorption and the energy absorption contribution of each joint of both the involved and uninvolved limbs during a double-limb squat task. Results: There were significant differences in energy absorption contribution between groups at the knee joint (P = .01) and the hip joint (P = .04), but not at the ankle joint (P = .48) of the involved limb. Post hoc analysis indicates that preoperative hip and knee loading differences exist and when you control for preoperative loading (analysis of covariance), the postsurgery difference was not significant. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the additional surgical procedure of MR may not have had negative effects on joint loading during squatting at 12 weeks.

The single-leg vertical hop provides unique asymmetry information in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Traditional testing to identify asymmetries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction include four similar horizontal hopping tests. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a single-leg vertical hopping test can identify performance and biomechanical asymmetries, and whether performance asymmetries provide unique information compared to traditional tests.

METHODS

Twelve women with history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [age: 21.1 years (SD 3.2), height: 165.8 cm (SD 6.0), mass: 68.3 kg (SD 8.8)] completed traditional horizontal hop testing. Participants also performed a single-leg vertical hop for maximal height while instrumented for three-dimensional motion analysis. Paired t-tests were performed to identify side-to-side differences in performance variables and Spearman's rank correlations were performed of limb symmetry indices to identify whether the single-leg vertical hop test provides unique information. Repeated measures MANOVAs were performed to identify single-leg vertical hop biomechanical asymmetries.

FINDINGS

Participants exhibited significant side-to-side performance differences during the single-leg vertical hop [mean difference = 0.02 m (SD 0.03), P = .04]. Only weak to moderate relationships were identified between limb symmetry indices of the single-leg vertical hop and other horizontal hopping tests. The vertical hop elicited significant asymmetries of joint kinematics (P = .04) and angular impulse (P = .04). Specifically, the involved limb showed lower peak ankle dorsiflexion (P = .004) and knee abduction (P = .02) angles, lower sagittal plane impulse at the knee (P = .02) and greater sagittal plane impulse at the hip (P = .03).

INTERPRETATION

The single-leg vertical hop can identify performance and biomechanical asymmetries in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, potentially providing complementary information to standard horizontal hopping tests.

Knee Loading After ACL-R Is Related to Quadriceps Strength and Knee Extension Differences Across the Continuum of Care

Background:

Quadriceps strength and knee extension are believed to be important in the ability to effectively load the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R).

Purpose:

To compare quadriceps strength (QUADS), side-to-side knee extension difference (ExtDiff), and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) in patients preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at return to sport (RTS). A secondary aim was to determine how the factors of QUADS and ExtDiff contributed to the ability to load the knee (knee EAC) at each of the 3 time points.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Overall, 41 individuals (mean ± SD age, 15.95 ± 1.63 years) were enrolled in this study. QUADS, ExtDiff, and knee EAC during a double-limb squat were collected preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at RTS. Isokinetic QUADS was collected at 60 deg/s, normalized to body mass, and averaged across 5 trials. Knee extension was measured with a goniometer, and ExtDiff was calculated for analyses. Knee EAC was measured during double-limb squat descent and was calculated as a percentage of total energy absorption for the limb. Observations were obtained from both the surgical and nonsurgical limbs at the 3 time points. A mixed regression model with random intercept to compare change over the 3 time points was used, and a model selection was conducted with Akaike information criteria. Significance was set at P < .05.

Results:

Surgical limb QUADS was significantly lower preoperatively (mean ± SD, 1.37 ± 0.49 N·m/kg; P = .0023) and at 12 weeks (1.11 ± 0.38 N·m/kg; P < .0001) than at RTS (1.58 ± 0.47 N·m/kg). Nonsurgical limb QUADS was also significantly lower preoperatively (2.01 ± 0.54 N·m/kg; P < .0256) and at 12 weeks (2.03 ± 0.48 N·m/kg; P < .0233) than at RTS (2.18 ± 0.54 N·m/kg). Knee EAC for the surgical limb was significantly lower at 12 weeks than at RTS (40.98% ± 13.73% vs 47.50% ± 12.04%; P < .0032), and ExtDiff was significantly greater preoperatively than at RTS (–2.68° ± 3.19° vs –0.63° ± 1.43°; P < .0001). Preoperatively, QUADS for both the surgical (P < .0003) and nonsurgical (P = .0023) limbs was a significant predictor of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 33.99% of the variance. At 12 weeks, surgical limb QUADS was a significant predictor (P < .0051) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 18.83% of the variance. At RTS, ExtDiff was a significant predictor (P = .0201) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 12.92% of the variance.

Conclusion:

The ability to load the knee after ACL injury changes across the continuum of care and is related to QUADS and ExtDiff. These results provide clinicians with insight into potential contributing factors that may limit knee loading during the rehabilitation process.