Atezolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and history of asymptomatic, treated brain metastases: Exploratory analyses of the phase III OAK study

Construction of a nomogram to guide prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive‑stage small cell lung cancer

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have a high risk of brain metastasis (BM). However, to the best of our knowledge, the risk factors for BM remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors and establish a prediction model for BM in patients with ES-SCLC. A total of 156 patients with ES-SCLC who had no BM and achieved a partial or complete response between January 2020 and March 2023 were included. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=109) and validation (n=47) cohorts. Factors associated with BM were assessed in the training cohort. Univariate and Cox multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate patients with ES-SCLC. Cox multivariate analysis identified oligometastasis [hazard ratio (HR), 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85; P=0.021], sex (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.05-5.85; P=0.038) and baseline adrenal metastasis (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.54-5.21; P<0.001) as independent risk factors for BM. A nomogram model was constructed to predict intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the 9-, 12- and 18-month iPFS in the training cohort were 0.77, 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. The nomogram prediction and actual validation cohorts demonstrated good agreement. Among the high-risk factors for BM, the overall survival analysis demonstrated that non-oligometastasis and baseline adrenal metastasis were unfavorable prognostic factors. The present nomogram may aid risk assessment for BM in patients with ES-SCLC and guide prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve prognosis in lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10 ICIs recommended by the 2024 Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver genes, focusing on NSCLC patients presenting with BMs.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through June 2024 to identify eligible controlled trials and head-to-head randomized controlled trials investigating 10 ICIs in NSCLC patients with BMs. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed using hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Treatment efficacy was ranked hierarchically through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results

Sixteen trials from 11 studies, encompassing 1,274 NSCLC patients with BMs, were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ICIs significantly improved overall survival (OS: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P = 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.84; P < 0.001). SUCRA ranking identified pembrolizumab as the most effective agent for OS improvement (SUCRA 71%), while camrelizumab showed superior PFS benefits (SUCRA 92%). ICIs were associated with increased objective response rates (RR: 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06; P = 0.006), but elevated risks of immune-mediated adverse events (RR: 2.50; 95% CI, 1.46-4.30; P = 0.001) and grade 3-5 immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reaction (RR: 6.39; 95% CI, 1.53-26.69; P = 0.011).

Conclusion

ICIs demonstrate superior survival benefits compared to chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with BMs, with pembrolizumab and camrelizumab emerging as optimal choices for OS and PFS improvement, respectively. However, vigilant monitoring of immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions remains critical in clinical practice.

Immunotherapy and the Tumor Microenvironment in Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges and Future Directions

Brain metastases (BMs) are a relatively common and severe complication in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly affecting patient prognosis. Metastatic tumor cells can alter the brain tumor microenvironment (TME) to promote an immunosuppressive state, characterized by reduced infiltration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), diminished expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and changes in other proinflammatory factors and immune cell populations. Microglia, the resident macrophages of the brain, play a pivotal role in modulating the central nervous system (CNS) microenvironment through interactions with metastatic cancer cells, astrocytes, and infiltrating T cells. The M2 phenotype of microglia contributes to immunosuppression in BM via the activation of signaling pathways such as STAT3 and PI3K-AKT-mTOR. Recent advances have enhanced our understanding of the immune landscape of BMs in NSCLC, particularly regarding immune evasion within the CNS. Current immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promise for NSCLC patients with BM, demonstrating intracranial activity and manageable safety profiles. Future research is warranted to further explore the molecular and immune mechanisms underlying BM, aiming to develop more effective treatments.

Case Report: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for intramedullary spinal cord metastases of lung adenocarcinoma

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCMs) are rare in clinical practice and their presentation is usually an unfavorable sign with a median overall survival (mOS) of 3-4 months after diagnosis. Due to their rarity, heterogeneity and rapid progression, clinicians have few satisfactory guidelines or optimal management for ISCMs. Herein, we share a clinical experience of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with immunotherapy (IO) for ISCMs from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) that achieved a relatively high quality of life for 10 months, which has not been previously reported.

A retrospective study of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients with baseline brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

This multi-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). The study included 138 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with brain radiotherapy (BRT), from 2020 to October 2023. Intracranial overall response rate (iORR), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated. Although patients receiving ICIs plus BRT showed a trend toward longer OS compared with ICI alone, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.201). Among 82 patients with available data, the iORR was 49.1% (35-63) in the ICIs alone group, and 75.9% (56-90) in the ICIs + BRT group. Notably, in patients requiring corticosteroids or mannitol, combination therapy was associated with a better prognosis (P = 0.05). We found that the iORR of patients treated with ICIs + BRT was improved and did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Besides, the combination of ICIs and BRT improved the survival rate of subgroups of patients using corticosteroids.

The safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies for lung cancer brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on brain metastasis

Individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop brain metastases face a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have emerged as a promising immunotherapy for treating lung cancer with brain metastases. This systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in treating lung cancer patients with brain metastases. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies up to 27 August 2023. Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, radiological response rates, and adverse events were extracted. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA v.17. Our literature search yielded 39 eligible studies involving 15,428 patients. The overall response rate for PD-1 inhibitors was substantial, with pooled rates of 39% for overall response, 7% for complete response (CR), 27% for partial response (PR), and 31% for stable disease (SD). The pooled 6-month OS rate was 77%, and the 1-year OS rate was 61%. Subgroup analyses revealed higher PD-L1 expression levels and the use of platinum-based chemotherapy alongside immunotherapy were associated with improved outcomes. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in treating lung cancer patients with brain metastases, as evidenced by significant improvements in OS, PFS, and response rates. Incorporating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors into the treatment regimen, particularly for patients with high PD-L1 expression, has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Roles of SPOCK1 in the Formation Mechanisms and Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality in China and worldwide. Once it metastasizes to the brain, its prognosis is very poor. Brain metastases are found in about 20% of newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. About 30% of NSCLC patients develop brain metastases during treatment. NSCLC that is positive for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 variations is especially likely to metastasize to the brain. SPOCK1 is a proteoglycan with systemic physiological functions. It regulates the self-renewal of brain metastasis-initiating cells, regulates invasion and metastasis from the lung to the brain, plays an important role in tumor progression and treatment resistance, and has higher expression in metastatic tumor tissues than other tissues. Current treatments for NSCLC brain metastases include surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy. SPOCK1 is involved in many signaling pathways, by which it influences a variety of NSCLC treatment methods. In this paper, the progress of research on the treatment of NSCLC brain metastases is reviewed to guide decisions on treatment options in clinical practice.

TIMP1 Mediates Astrocyte-Dependent Local Immunosuppression in Brain Metastasis Acting on Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells

Immunotherapies against brain metastases have shown clinical benefits when applied to asymptomatic patients, but they are largely ineffective in symptomatic cases for unknown reasons. Here, we dissect the heterogeneity in metastasis-associated astrocytes using single-cell RNA sequencing and report a population that blocks the antitumoral activity of infiltrating T cells. This protumoral activity is mediated by the secretion of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP1) from a cluster of pSTAT3+ astrocytes that acts on CD63+ CD8+ T cells to modulate their function. Using genetic and pharmacologic approaches in mouse and human brain metastasis models, we demonstrate that combining immune checkpoint blockade antibodies with the inhibition of astrocyte-mediated local immunosuppression may benefit patients with symptomatic brain metastases. We further reveal that the presence of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in liquid biopsies provides a biomarker to select patients for this combined immunotherapy. Overall, our findings demonstrate an unexpected immunomodulatory role for astrocytes in brain metastases with clinical implications. Significance: This study presents a significant advancement in understanding immune modulation in brain tumors and offers new insights into the potential therapeutic interventions for brain metastases. See related commentary by Lorger and James, p. 11.

Genomic and Immune Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Metastatic spread of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the brain is a commonly occurring and challenging clinical problem, often resulting in patient mortality. Systemic therapies including immunotherapy have modest efficacy in treating brain metastases. Moreover, the local immune environment of brain metastases remains poorly described. This study aims to understand the genomic and immune landscape of NSCLC brain metastases.

METHODS

A total of 3,060 patients with NSCLC sequenced with the Strata Select assay on the Strata Oncology Platform were analyzed. Genomic alterations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and immune gene expression were compared across different tissue sites and histologies and within brain metastases.

RESULTS

A significant increase in TMB was observed in the brain metastasis samples compared with nonbrain metastasis samples. Mutations in TP53, KRAS, and CDKNA2A were more prevalent within the brain metastasis cohort compared with other tissue locations. In addition, PD-L1 expression was significantly decreased within brain metastasis samples compared with other sites. The overall immune landscape within the brain metastasis samples was largely reduced compared with primary lung samples. However, an immune-enriched brain metastasis cohort was identified with higher expressions of PD-L1 and other immune-related genes.

CONCLUSION

The overall TMB is increased within brain metastases compared with primary lung and other metastasis sites and is associated with a markedly diminished overall immune landscape. The identification of an immune-enriched brain metastasis subgroup suggests potential heterogeneity within the brain metastasis patient cohort, which might have implications for the development of targeted therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors +/- Chemotherapy for Patients With NSCLC and Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have demonstrated the intracranial efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) +/- chemotherapy. The efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy compared to ICI alone in patients with metastatic NSCLC and brain metastases (BM) remains unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to evaluate ICI efficacy and the influence of additional chemotherapy on survival outcomes in treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC with BM. Randomized phase II/III studies with at least one treatment arm with an ICI were eligible. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with and without BM were assessed.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, totaling 6560 patients, 770 with BM. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that patients with BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy had improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.60) and OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.68) versus chemotherapy alone. Patients without BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy also had improved PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. In the network meta-analysis of patients with BM, chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved PFS compared to ICI alone (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.96; p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed in OS. In the population of patients without BM, no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between chemoimmunotherapy versus ICI alone.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that ICIs with or without chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone for the first-line management of metastatic NSCLC with and without BM. This network meta-analysis suggests combination chemoimmunotherapy offers PFS benefit over ICI monotherapy in BM patients, warranting direct comparisons in clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42024501345.

Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis-Treatment Strategies and Molecular Characteristics

Lung cancer is a leading cause of brain metastases (BMs), with 10-20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with BMs at diagnosis and 25-50% developing them over the course of their disease. Historically, BMs have posed significant therapeutic challenges, partly due to the blood brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug penetration to the central nervous system. Consequently, BMs were initially managed with local treatments, including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy. In recent years, however, systemic treatments for BMs have advanced significantly, particularly with the development of molecularly-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The discovery of driver mutations and the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have yielded encouraging intracranial responses in NSCLC patients with actionable genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Genomic profiling has also suggested genetic heterogeneity between BMs and primary sites. Immunotherapies, alone or in combination with other treatments, have demonstrated promising results in NSCLC with BMs, although most clinical trials have included only selected patients with asymptomatic or previously treated BMs. In this review, we discuss the molecular and immune characteristics of NSCLC with BMs, analyze intracranial efficacy findings from clinical trials, and explore treatment strategies for lung cancer patients with BMs.

Efficacy and safety of combining anti-angiogenic therapy, radiotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in patients with driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic combination therapy in patients with driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) are uncertain.

METHODS

Eighty-eight records of driver gene-negative patients with NSCLC treated with craniocerebral radiotherapy (RT) and programmed death factor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors between May 2021 and May 2023 were collected. Based on whether anti-angiogenic therapy (AT) is combined or not, patients are categorized into the AT group and the non anti-angiogenic therapy (NAT) group. The NAT group patients received craniocerebral RT and PD-1 inhibitor and those in the AT group received craniocerebral RT and PD-1 inhibitor with ≥ 4 cycles of AT. Comparing the clinical efficacy and safety in these two patient cohorts was the main goal of the study.

RESULTS

By May 1, 2024, the iORR was 94.0% and 63.2% for AT and NAT group, respectively. The 1- and 2-year iLPFS for AT and NAT group were 93.6%, 80.9% and 69.7%, 36.4%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year iDPFS were 86.7%, 56.3% and 59.1%, 48.3%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS were 82.0%, 36.6% and 68.4%, 34.6%, respectively. Compared to the standard treatment (RT and PD-1 inhibitors), the addition of AT prolonged the median iLPFS (NR vs. 22.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 11.004, P < 0.001) and the median iDPFS (NR vs. 20.0 months, HR = 8.732, P = 0.003), but was not significant in the extension of the OS (21.0 vs. 19.0 months, HR = 1.601, P = 0.206). Multivariable analysis showed that combination therapy with AT is significantly associated with prolonged iLPFS (HR = 4.233, P = 0.002) and iDPFS (HR = 2.824, P = 0.007), whereas only GPA score is significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.589, P = 0.019). The incidence of hypertension in the AT group showed an increasing trend, and no significant increased risk of radiation-induced brain necrosis was found. No drug-related intracranial hemorrhage events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Combining AT, RT, and PD-1 inhibitors can substantially improve iLPFS and iDPFS for patients with driver gene-negative NSCLC with BM; however, it is not significantly associated with better OS.

Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Strategies for Managing Brain Metastases from Common Cancer Origins: A State-of-the-Art Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines contemporary strategies for managing brain metastases (BM) from common cancers such as lung, breast, and melanoma. We evaluate the efficacy and applicability of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, exploring their potential to cross the blood-brain barrier and improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and ADCs effectively treat BM. These treatments can overcome the challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier and improve therapeutic outcomes. ADCs are promising because they can deliver cytotoxic agents directly to tumor cells, which reduces systemic toxicity and increases drug delivery efficiency to the brain. Personalized medicine is becoming increasingly significant in treatment decisions, with biomarkers playing an essential role. Advances in molecular genetics and drug development have led to more refined treatments, emphasizing the precision medicine framework. The management of BM is evolving, driven by drug efficacy, resistance mechanisms, and the need for personalized medicine. Integrating ADCs into treatment regimens represents a significant advancement in targeting metastatic brain tumors. Despite these advances, BM management still presents considerable challenges, requiring ongoing research and multi-institutional trials to optimize therapeutic strategies. This review outlines the current state and future directions in treating BM, highlighting the critical need for continued innovation and comprehensive clinical evaluations to improve survival rates and quality of life for affected patients.

The effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevalent form of cancer, often leading to brain metastases (BM) and a significant decline in patient prognosis. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with brain radiotherapy is superior to conventional chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy in those patients remains to be explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study enrolled 161 NSCLC patients with BM who underwent either ICIs combined with brain radiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy. End points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (IPFS), and extracranial PFS (EPFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were employed to identify prognostic risk variables.

RESULTS

Patients receiving ICIs combined with brain radiotherapy exhibited significantly longer OS compared to those receiving chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy (34.80 months vs. 17.17 months, P = 0.005). In the Cox regression analysis, chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.09-3.05; P = 0.023), smoking (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-2.99; P = 0.043) and squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.31-5.13; P = 0.006) were associated with a worse prognosis. After propensity score matching (PSM), this finding remained consistent with before PSM (43.73 months vs. 17.17 months, P = 0.018). Squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.15-5.26; P = 0.021) and CT + RT (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.88; P = 0.016) were associated with a less favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that the combination of ICIs and brain radiotherapy provides superior OS for NSCLC patients with BM, compared to the chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trials, Guidelines and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are a common, severe complication in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are difficult to treat due to their complex tumor biology and the intricate microenvironment of the brain.

OBJECTIVES

This review examines the current role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating NSCLC with BM, focusing on the latest clinical trials, emerging strategies, current guidelines, and future directions. We highlight the efficacy of ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments such as radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and anti-VEGF agents.

RESULTS

While no single treatment sequence is universally accepted, combining ICIs with traditional therapies forms the core of the current treatment protocols. ICIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have significantly advanced NSCLC treatment, demonstrated by improved overall and progression-free survival in various settings. However, optimizing these benefits requires careful consideration of potential side effects, including cognitive decline and radiation necrosis, and the impact of steroid use on ICI efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The review underscores the necessity for a personalized, integrated multidisciplinary treatment approach. Future research should focus on refining combination therapies and understanding the optimal sequence and timing of treatment.

Modern era systemic therapies: Expanding concepts of cure in early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cure of cancer is a sensitive and multidimensional concept that is challenging to define, difficult to assert at the individual patient level, and often surrounded by controversy. The notion of cure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed and continues to evolve with improvements in diagnosis and treatment. Targeted and immune therapies have recently entered the treatment landscape of stage I-III NSCLC. While some initial pivotal trials of such agents failed to improve survival, recently approved epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (in EGFR-mutated NSCLC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown delays in disease recurrence or progression and unprecedented survival gains compared to previous standards of care. Additional data is now emerging supporting the benefit of treatment strategies based on alternation-matched targeting (anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] inhibition in ALK-altered disease) and immune checkpoint inhibition in stage I-III NSCLC. Similar to previous developments in the treatment of early and locally advanced NSCLC, it is expected that statistically significant and clinically meaningful trial-level benefits will translate into real-world benefits, including improvements in cure measures. Parallel advances in molecular testing (e.g., circulating tumor DNA analyses) are also allowing for a deeper and more comprehensive characterization of disease status and treatment response. Given the impact that curative-intent treatments have on survival, it is critical that various stakeholders, including clinicians and patients, are aware of new opportunities to pursue cure in stage I-III NSCLC.

The Emerging Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer has the highest incidence of brain metastases (BM) among solid organ cancers. Traditionally whole brain radiation therapy has been utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM treatment, although stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as the superior treatment modality for most patients. Highly penetrant central nervous system (CNS) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown significant CNS activity in patients harboring select oncogenic drivers. There is emerging evidence that patients without oncogene-driven tumors derive benefit from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The CNS activity of ICIs have not been well studied given exclusion of patients with active BM from landmark trials, due to concerns of inadequate CNS penetration and activity. However, studies have challenged the idea of an immune-privileged CNS, given the presence of functional lymphatic drainage within the CNS and destruction of the blood brain barrier by BM. An emerging understanding of the interactions between tumor and CNS immune cells in the BM tumor microenvironment also support a role for immunotherapy in BM treatment. In addition, posthoc analyses of major trials have shown improved intracranial response and survival benefit of regimens with ICIs over chemotherapy (CT) alone for patients with BM. Two prospective phase 2 trials evaluating pembrolizumab monotherapy and atezolizumab plus CT in patients with untreated NSCLC BM also demonstrated significant intracranial responses. This review describes the interplay between CNS immune cells and tumor cells, discusses current evidence for ICI CNS activity from retrospective and prospective studies, and speculates on future directions of investigation.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors of brain metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without baseline brain metastasis: Pooled analysis of individualized patient data from IMpower130, IMpower131, and IMpower150

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to explore the abilities of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in preventing brain metastases (BMs) among metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without initial BMs, as well as the risk factors of BMs.

METHODS

Individual patient data from three trials involving first-line atezolizumab for metastatic NSCLC (IMpower130, IMpower131, and IMpower150) were pooled. Among patients without baseline BMs and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, those receiving atezolizumab + chemotherapy ± bevacizumab were classified as the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and those receiving placebo + chemotherapy ± bevacizumab were classified as the chemotherapy group. The cumulative incidences of BM (CI-BMs) between the two groups were compared. Other factors associated with the CI-BM were analyzed by Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range, 0.03-33.64 months), 74 (3.1%) of the 2380 enrolled patients developed BMs, including 50 (3.1%) and 24 (3.0%) in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group (n = 1589) and the chemotherapy group (n = 791), respectively. The CI-BMs at 6, 12, and 24 months were 1.7%, 2.8%, and 3.3%, respectively. After taking competing risk events into account, there was no significant difference in the CI-BMs between the two groups (p = .888). Nevertheless, the use of bevacizumab and the histology of nonsquamous NSCLC were found to be independently associated with the risk of BMs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC without baseline BMs, adding atezolizumab in the first-line treatment might not reduce the CI-BM. However, the administration of bevacizumab may reduce the risk of BMs.

Immunotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Is it really a no-brainer?

There is still much progress to be made in understanding the underlying mechanisms of brain metastasis development and its optimal therapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); it is very important to expand research in this area because brain metastasis strongly affects patients' quality of life and overall survival. This editorial reviews the available data in the context of a recent meta‐analysis of the pivotal IMpower130, IMpower131, and IMpower150 studies, which explores metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase wild‐type NSCLC to determine potential preventative factors and risk factors for the development of brain metastasis, specifically the question of whether immunotherapy (the anti–programmed death ligand 1 antibody, atezolizumab in particular) plays a role in preventing brain metastasis.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

The role of immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases: a narrative review of the literature

Worldwide, approximately half of the patients diagnosed with lung cancer (LC) will develop, simultaneously or asynchronously, brain metastases (BMs). The existence of BMs negatively affects the quality of life and constitutes a poor prognostic factor, linked with high mortality. Locoregional therapy with surgery or radiation is, until now, the treatment of choice, especially for symptomatic patients; however, both options are linked to a high complication rate. The question arising here is whether, in asymptomatic patients, the benefit outweighs the risk and whether an alternative method can be used to treat this special category of patients. Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have represented a major breakthrough in the field of oncology, and several molecules have been approved as a treatment option for LC. This review tried to analyze the tumor microenvironment of both the primary lung tumor and the BMs in order to evaluate the intracranial activity of ICIs, outline the main challenges of including these agents in the treatment of LC with BMs, highlight the available information from the main clinical trials, and mark the potential positive effect of choosing a combination therapy. In conclusion, it appears that immunotherapy has a positive effect, inhibiting the progression of BMs, but more data should be published specifically for this category of patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease Following Receipt of EGFR-Targeted Therapy, Immune-Checkpoint Blockade, Intrathecal Chemotherapy, or Radiation Therapy Alone

BACKGROUND

EGFR-targeted therapy (ETT) and immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown promising results in treating NSCLC brain metastases (BM). However, little is known of their effect in treating leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 80 patients diagnosed with NSCLC LMD from January 2014 to March 2021. Patients were grouped based on initial LMD treatment: radiotherapy (RT) alone, ETT, ICB, and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC).

RESULTS

EGFR mutation was present in 22 patients (28%). Twenty patients had positive cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, while 60 patients were diagnosed based on MRI with clinical correlation. The RT alone group consisted primarily of whole brain radiation (n = 20; 77%), stereotactic radiation (n = 3; 12%), and palliative spine radiation (n = 2; 7%). There were no significant differences amongst the treatment groups in age, performance status, or neurologic symptoms. Overall, the 6-month overall survival (OS) and craniospinal progression free survival (CS-PFS) were 35% and 24%, respectively. The 6-month OS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 64%, 33%, 57%, and 29% respectively (log-rank P = .026). The 6-month CS-PFS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 43%, 33%, 29%, and 19% respectively (log-rank P = .049). Upon univariate analysis, receipt of ETT compared to RT alone reached significance for OS (HR 0.35, P = .006) and CS-PFS (HR 0.39, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with NSCLC LMD remains poor overall. However, the receipt of ETT for patients with EGFR-positive disease was associated with improved outcomes.

Navigating practical challenges in immunotherapy for metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy and now represents a standard of care for many tumor types, including triple-negative breast cancer. Despite the positive results that have led to the approval of immunotherapy in both early- and advanced-stage triple-negative breast cancer, pivotal clinical trials cannot address the myriad questions arising in everyday clinical practice, often falling short in delivering all the information that clinicians require. In this manuscript, we aim to address some of these practical questions, with the purpose of providing clinicians with a guide for optimizing the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of breast cancer patients and identifying opportunities for future research to clarify unresolved questions.

Evolutionary Trend Analysis of Research on Immunotherapy for Brain Metastasis Based on Machine-Learning Scientometrics

Brain metastases challenge cancer treatments with poor prognoses, despite ongoing advancements. Immunotherapy effectively alleviates advanced cancer, exhibiting immense potential to revolutionize brain metastasis management. To identify research priorities that optimize immunotherapies for brain metastases, 2164 related publications were analyzed. Scientometric visualization via R software, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace showed the interrelationships among literature, institutions, authors, and topic areas of focus. The publication rate and citations have grown exponentially over the past decade, with the US, China, and Germany as the major contributors. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center ranked highest in publications, while Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was most cited. Clusters of keywords revealed six hotspots: 'Immunology', 'Check Point Inhibitors', 'Lung Cancer', 'Immunotherapy', 'Melanoma', 'Breast Cancer', and 'Microenvironment'. Melanoma, the most studied primary tumor with brain metastases offers promising immunotherapy advancements with generalizability and adaptability to other cancers. Our results outline the holistic overview of immunotherapy research for brain metastases, which pinpoints the forefront in the field, and directs researchers toward critical inquiries for enhanced mechanistic insight and improved clinical outcomes. Moreover, governmental and funding agencies will benefit from assigning financial resources to entities and regions with the greatest potential for combating brain metastases through immunotherapy.

A Review of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a dramatic increase in the survival of patients with lung cancer across all stages. Over the past decade, the field has experienced rapid maturation; however, several challenges continue to complicate patient management. This review aims to highlight the data that led to this dramatic shift in practice as well as to focus on key challenges. These include determining the optimal therapy duration, managing frail patients or those with brain metastases, addressing the challenges posed by immune-related adverse events, and defining the various patterns of clinical and radiological responses to immunotherapy.

The efficiency and safety of temozolomide and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in pretreated NSCLC with brain metastasis: a retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has shown that both temozolomide (TMZ) and PD-1/L1 inhibitors (PD-1/L1) alone exhibit certain potential in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM), in this study, we will explore combining the two in order to seek new effective treatment options for NSCLC with BM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 2021.1 to 2023.12, we collected the date of these pretreated-NSCLC with BM who accept the treatment of TMZ and PD-1/L1, the objective response ratio (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as the primary endpoint, meanwhile, the toxicity of such regimen was also recorded.

RESULTS

About 42 patients are enrolled, our primary analysis demonstrated that the ORR of such regimen toward NSCLC with BM was 26.19%, with Approximate intracranial and extracranial lesion ORR was 6% and 20% respectively, the DCR was about 64.29%, the mean PFS and OS was about 4 m and 8.5 m. Further analysis indicated that the efficiency correlated with the diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) score. Moreover, the toxicity can also be tolerated, indicating the application potential of such regimen against NSCLC with BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results exhibited that with tolerated toxicity, the combination of TMZ and PD-1/L1 shows promising efficiency against NSCLC with BM, this would be of great significance for the treatment of NSCLC with brain metastasis. However, due to the limitation of sample and retrospective property, the real value of such regimen needed to be further confirmed in the future.

Case report: Long-term intracranial effect of zimberelimab monotherapy following surgical resection of high PD-L1-expressing brain metastases from NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide. Brain metastases (BM) frequently complicate NSCLC and portend a dismal prognosis. To control neurological symptoms, surgical resection is commonly followed by brain radiotherapy (RT). However, RT is often complicated by neurotoxicity. For patients with tumors that harbor positive driver genes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, treatment options for those without driver gene mutations are still debated. Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, as well as for those with asymptomatic BM. However, the effect of anti-PD-1 antibodies on active BM within such specific populations is undetermined. Herein we present a case of a 65-year-old patient with NSCLC and high PD-L1-expressing BM. The patient underwent surgical resection of BM followed by first-line monotherapy with 31 cycles of zimberelimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, and has already achieved 24 months of progression-free survival and intracranial recurrence-free survival. To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the intracranial effect of zimberelimab on BM from primary lung cancer. This case report might facilitate an understanding of the intracranial effects of different anti-PD-1 antibodies for such populations.

Immunotherapy combined with cranial radiotherapy for driver-negative non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective study

Background: This study assesses immune checkpoint inhibitors' efficacy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) and explores the role of cranial radiation therapy (CRT) in the immunotherapy era. Methods: The retrospective analysis screened NSCLC patients with BMs from July 2018 to December 2021. Treatment involved chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line, with patients divided into CRT and non-CRT groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and intracranial progression-free survival were calculated and compared. Results: Among 113 patients, 74 who received CRT had significantly better median OS (not reached vs 15.31 months), particularly among those with one to three BMs. Factors correlating with better OS included CRT, PD-L1 expression and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment scores. Conclusion: Integrating CRT with anti-PD-1 therapy notably enhanced long-term survival in NSCLC patients with BMs.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy on brain metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and treatment-related adverse events: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Records were searched electronically on MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS. Hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for overall survival and progression free survival, and treatment-related adverse events data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed in included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials.

RESULTS

PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy increased overall survival by 33% and progression free survival by 47% compared with chemotherapy. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 95%, 89% and 65% of patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy,chemotherapy and single agent immunotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in addition to chemotherapy increase overall and progression free survival when compared with chemotherapy alone. Chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy patients experienced the most treatment-related adverse events.

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy failed to reduce the risk of developing brain metastases in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IO) has demonstrated promising results in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and the management of ES-SCLC brain metastases (BMs) is now receiving significant clinical attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of IO in the clinical management of BMs.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, the study included the records of 250 patients who were diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and the cumulative incidence of BMs were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. In addition, the Cox regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the entire group, 85 patients had baseline BMs (IO plus chemotherapy [IO + ChT], n = 38; ChT alone, n = 47), and 165 patients (IO + ChT, n = 86; ChT alone, n = 79) did not have BMs at the time of initial diagnosis. The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The OS benefit with first-line antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy was maintained regardless of whether patients had BMs (with BMs, 17.97 vs. 13.14 months [p = .03]; without BMs, 18.46 vs. 15.05 months [p = .047]). However, in patients without BMs, IO did not delay the median time to developing brain progression (10.84 vs. 10.74 months; p = .84), and it did not significantly reduce the risk of developing intracranial metastases (the 2-year actuarial risk of developing BMs was 57.0% vs. 50.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy improved OS regardless of the presence of BMs. However, IO did not delay the median time to brain progression or reduce the risk of intracranial metastasis in patients without baseline BMs. The findings of this study have important clinical implications for the future management of BMs from ES-SCLC.

Harnessing immunotherapy for brain metastases: insights into tumor-brain microenvironment interactions and emerging treatment modalities

Brain metastases signify a deleterious milestone in the progression of several advanced cancers, predominantly originating from lung, breast and melanoma malignancies, with a median survival timeframe nearing six months. Existing therapeutic regimens yield suboptimal outcomes; however, burgeoning insights into the tumor microenvironment, particularly the immunosuppressive milieu engendered by tumor-brain interplay, posit immunotherapy as a promising avenue for ameliorating brain metastases. In this review, we meticulously delineate the research advancements concerning the microenvironment of brain metastases, striving to elucidate the panorama of their onset and evolution. We encapsulate three emergent immunotherapeutic strategies, namely immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell transplantation and glial cell-targeted immunoenhancement. We underscore the imperative of aligning immunotherapy development with in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment and engendering innovative delivery platforms. Moreover, the integration with established or avant-garde physical methodologies and localized applications warrants consideration in the prevailing therapeutic schema.

Management of Brain Metastases: A Review of Novel Therapies

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and most commonly originate from lung, followed by breast, melanoma, kidney, and colorectal cancer. Management of BM is individualized based on the size and number of brain metastases, the extent of extracranial disease, the primary tumor subtype, neurological symptoms, and prior lines of therapy. Until recently, treatment strategies were limited to local therapies, like surgical resection and radiotherapy, the latter in the form of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. The next generation of local strategies includes laser interstitial thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermic therapy, post-resection brachytherapy, and focused ultrasound. New targeted therapies and immunotherapies with documented intracranial activity have transformed clinical outcomes. Novel systemic therapies with intracranial utility include new anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors like brigatinib and ensartinib; selective "rearranged during transfection" inhibitors like selpercatinib and pralsetinib; B-raf proto-oncogene inhibitors like encorafenib and vemurafenib; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene inhibitors like sotorasib and adagrasib; ROS1 gene rearrangement (ROS1) inhibitors, anti-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase agents like larotrectinib and entrectinib; anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 agent like poziotinib; and antibody-drug conjugates like trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. This review highlights the modern multidisciplinary management of BM, emphasizing the integration of systemic and local therapies.

Efficacy of First-Line Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Different Brain Metastases Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with differing brain metastasis statuses.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search in public databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, to identify randomized controlled trials involving ES-SCLC patients, with or without brain metastases, who underwent first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measure was overall survival (OS).

Results

Our analysis incorporated seven high-quality randomized controlled trials, encompassing 398 patients with brain metastases and 3,533 without. Among patients without brain metastases, the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy led to significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 - 0.84, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67 - 0.88, P < 0.001) in comparison to chemotherapy alone. Conversely, for patients with brain metastases, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy did not result in a significant improvement in PFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.66 - 1.61, P = 0.887) or OS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.31, P = 0.776) when compared to chemotherapy alone.

Conclusions

In ES-SCLC patients without brain metastases, first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy demonstrated improved PFS and OS in contrast to chemotherapy alone. However, patients with brain metastases did not experience similar benefits.

Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.

Immunotherapy and brain metastasis in lung cancer: connecting bench side science to the clinic

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common form of intracranial malignant neoplasms in adults, with a profound impact on quality of life and traditionally associated with a dismal prognosis. Lung cancer accounts for approximately 40%-50% of BM across different tumors. The process leading to BMs is complex and includes local invasion, intravasation, tumor cells circulation into the bloodstream, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, extravasation of tumor cells into the brain parenchyma, and interaction with cells of the brain microenvironment, among others. Once the tumor cells have seeded in the brain parenchyma, they encounter different glial cells of the brain, as well as immune cells. The interaction between these cells and tumor cells is complex and is associated with both antitumoral and protumoral effects. To overcome the lethal prognosis associated with BMs, different treatment strategies have been developed, such as immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which have demonstrated to be an effective treatment in both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. These antibodies have shown to be effective in the treatment of BM, alone or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, many unsolved questions remain to be answered, such as the sequencing of immunotherapy and radiotherapy, the optimal management in symptomatic BMs, the role of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and so forth. The complexity in the management of BMs in the era of immunotherapy requires a multidisciplinary approach to adequately treat this devastating event. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence regarding epidemiology of BM, its pathophysiology, current approach to treatment strategies, as well as future perspectives.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BMs) throughout the disease, and the occurrence of BMs is considered to have a fairly high mortality rate. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in NSCLC patients is a clinical challenge. Currently, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment methods are often used to achieve effective control of intracranial disease and prolong survival. Immunotherapy (IT) is one of the core therapies for NSCLC. Single or combined IT represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) of programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.ICIs has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BMs, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we summarized the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of BMs, and the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with BMs s from NSCLC.

Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials

Background

Cancer immunotherapy shows unique efficacy kinetics that differs from conventional treatment. These characteristics may lead to the prolongation of trial duration, hence reliable surrogate endpoints are urgently needed. We aimed to systematically evaluate the study-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

We searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, between database inception and October 18, 2022, for phase 3 randomised trials investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. An updated search was done on July, 15, 2023. No language restrictions were used. Eligible trials had to set overall survival (OS) as the primary or co-primary endpoint and report at least one intermediate clinical endpoint including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria included: (1) adult patients (>18 years old) with advanced solid tumour; (2) no immunotherapy conducted in the control arms; (3) follow-up is long enough to achieve OS; (4) data should be public available. A two-stage meta-analytic approach was conducted to evaluate the magnitude of the association between these intermediate endpoints and OS. A surrogate was identified if the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.7 or greater. Leave-one-out cross-validation and pre-defined subgroup analysis were conducted to examine the heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was evaluated using the Egger's and Begg's tests. This trial was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022381648.

Findings

52,342 patients with 15 types of tumours from 77 phase 3 studies were included. ORR (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-0.24), DCR (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), and PFS (R2 = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56) showed weak associations with OS. However, a strong correlation was observed between 1-year survival and clinical outcome (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83). These associations remained relatively consistent across pre-defined subgroups stratified based on tumour types, masking methods, line of treatments, drug targets, treatment strategies, and follow-up durations. No significant heterogeneities or publication bias were identified.

Interpretation

1-year milestone survival was the only identified surrogacy endpoint for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy. Ongoing investigations and development of new endpoints and incorporation of biomarkers are needed to identify potential surrogate markers that can be more robust than 1-year survival. This work may provide important references in assisting the design and interpretation of future clinical trials, and constitute complementary information in drafting clinical practice guidelines.

Funding

None.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in "Special" NSCLC Populations: A Viable Approach?

Over the last decade, the therapeutic scenario for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major paradigm shift. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a meaningful clinical and survival improvement in different settings of the disease. However, the real benefit of this therapeutic approach remains controversial in selected NSCLC subsets, such as those of the elderly with active brain metastases or oncogene-addicted mutations. This is mainly due to the exclusion or underrepresentation of these patient subpopulations in most pivotal phase III studies; this precludes the generalization of ICI efficacy in this context. Moreover, no predictive biomarkers of ICI response exist that can help with patient selection for this therapeutic approach. Here, we critically summarize the current state of ICI efficacy in the most common "special" NSCLC subpopulations.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab with concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the safety cohort for non-randomized, open-label, phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastasis (BM), for which the current standard of care is radiation therapy with or without surgery. There are no prospective data on the safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) concurrent with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for BM. This is the safety cohort of the phase I/II investigator-initiated trial of SRS with nivolumab and ipilimumab for patients with BM from NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-institution study included patients with NSCLC with active BM amenable to SRS. Brain SRS and systemic therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab were delivered concurrently (within 7 days). The endpoints were safety and 4-month intracranial progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled in the safety cohort, 10 of whom were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 9.7-24.3 months). The median interval between systemic therapy and radiation therapy was 3 days. Only one patient had a DLT; hence, predefined stopping criteria were not met. In addition to the patient with DLT, three patients had treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events, including elevated liver function tests, fatigue, nausea, adrenal insufficiency, and myocarditis. One patient had a confirmed influenza infection 7 months after initiation of protocol treatment (outside the DLT assessment window), leading to pneumonia and subsequent death from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The estimated 4-month intracranial PFS rate was 70.7%.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent brain SRS with nivolumab/ipilimumab was safe for patients with active NSCLC BM. Preliminary analyses of treatment efficacy were encouraging for intracranial treatment response.

Organ-specific immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Based on the acknowledged organ-specific immune microenvironment, little is known regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer according to metastatic sites. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer with liver metastases (LM) or brain metastases (BM).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis and systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched in electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science), up to 31 January 2022. We also reviewed the abstracts from major international conferences. Eligibility criteria were randomised controlled phase II or III trials reporting the overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of LM or BM subsets.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for OS and PFS were extracted and aggregated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four randomised controlled trials with available outcomes for patients with BMs or LMs were identified. A total of 1124 patients with BM and 2077 patients with LM were included in the analysis. The pooled OS HR of patients with LMs was 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.95), and that of patients without LM 0.73 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.79). LM was associated with less benefits from ICIs. In patients with BM treated with ICIs, the pooled OS HR compared with the control arms was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses by histology suggested that only patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BM could gain benefit from ICIs (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68). BM negatively influenced efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed immunotherapy demonstrated efficacy in patients with lung cancer with LM and BM, survival benefits dominantly favoured patients with NSCLC. Patients with lung cancer with LM obtained less benefits from ICIs than those without. Therefore, organ-specific immunotherapeutic approaches should be considered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020212797.

Adverse reactions and efficacy of camrelizumab in patients with lung adenocarcinoma with high PD-L1 expression: A case report

RATIONALE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been rapidly developed for lung cancer therapy and major clinical guidelines have recommended them as the optimal first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive advanced lung cancer. Unfortunately, there is a lack of efficient prediction tools for the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immunotherapy, and there is a lack of real-world data on the processing of irAEs, particularly those occurring in multiple systems simultaneously.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report a 62-year-old male with expectoration who was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with brain and bone metastases.

DIAGNOSES

The results of the lung cancer tissue biopsy showed lung adenocarcinoma. Gene detection results of lung cancer tissue biopsy showed that the KRAS gene G12D was mutated and PD-L1 was positive, with a tumor proportion score of 95% (Dako 22C3 IHC platform).

INTERVENTIONS

The patient initially received 1 cycle of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After the results of PD-L1 testing were reported, he received 1 cycle of camrelizumab immunotherapy in combination with pemetrexed plus cisplatin based chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

Seventeen days after treatment, the patient presented with symptoms such as yellow staining of the sclera and skin, itching throughout the body, dry mouth, and ecchymosis of the skin of the right lower extremity, which continued to worsen. Following treatment with 2 mg/kg methylprednisolone, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate. IrAEs were controlled after dose escalation to 8 mg/kg in combination with plasma exchange therapy and treatment with multiple doses of mycophenolate ester. The patient then received no treatment for almost 2 months, but examination revealed that the tumor still had a persistent shrinkage reaction.

LESSONS

Camrelizumab has been well tolerated in several studies, but in patients with high PD-L1 expression and a G12D mutation in KRAS, one should be alert to the development of serious or even multisystem immune-related adverse effects. Timely and individualized selection of the hormone dosage is essential for the treatment of immunotherapy-induced multisystem irAEs.

Treatments for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC: A network meta-analysis

More clinical evidence is needed regarding the relative priority of treatments for brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Overall survival (OS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were selected for Bayesian network meta-analyses. We included 25 eligible randomized control trials (RCTs) involving 3,054 patients, investigating nine kinds of treatments for newly diagnosed BMs and seven kinds of treatments for previously treated BMs. For newly diagnosed BMs, adding chemotherapy, EGFR-TKIs, and other innovative systemic agents (temozolomide, nitroglycerin, endostar, enzastaurin, and veliparib) to radiotherapy did not significantly prolong OS than radiotherapy alone; whereas radiotherapy + nitroglycerin showed significantly better CNS-PFS and ORR. Surgery could significantly prolong OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.52, 95% credible intervals: 0.41-0.67) and CNS-PFS (HR: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.59) compared with radiotherapy alone. For previously treated BMs, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, nivolumab + ipilimumab, and cemiplimab significantly prolonged OS than chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy also showed better CNS-PFS and ORR than chemotherapy. In summary, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, especially ICI-combined therapies, showed promising efficacies for previously treated BMs from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC. The value of surgery should also be emphasized. The result should be further confirmed by RCTs.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, including patients with ECOG performance status 2 and other special populations: CheckMate 817

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 817, a phase 3B study, evaluated flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, in this research, we report on first-line treatment in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1 (cohort A) and special populations (cohort A1: ECOG PS 2; or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases, renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or controlled HIV infection).

METHODS

Cohorts A and A1 received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 and grade 5 immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs; adverse events (AEs) deemed potentially immune-related, occurring <100 days of last dose, and treated with immune-modulating medication (except endocrine events)) and treatment-related select AEs (treatment-related AEs with potential immunological etiology requiring frequent monitoring/intervention, reported between first dose and 30 days after the last dose) in cohort A; efficacy endpoints were secondary/exploratory. In cohort A1, safety/efficacy assessment was exploratory.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3-4 IMAEs were pneumonitis (5.1%), diarrhea/colitis (4.9%), and hepatitis (4.6%) in cohort A (N=391) and diarrhea/colitis (3.5%), hepatitis (3.5%), and rash (3.0%) in cohort A1 (N=198). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related select AEs were hepatic (5.9%), gastrointestinal (4.9%), and pulmonary (4.6%) events in cohort A and gastrointestinal (4.0%), skin (3.5%), and endocrine (3.0%) events in cohort A1. No grade 5 IMAEs or treatment-related select AEs occurred. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 (1.0%) and 3 (1.5%) patients in cohorts A and A1, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.7% and 20.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab was associated with manageable safety and durable efficacy in cohort A, consistent with data from phase 3 metastatic NSCLC studies. Special populations of cohort A1 including patients with ECOG PS 2 or ECOG PS 0-1 with untreated brain metastases had manageable treatment-related toxicity and clinically meaningful 3-year OS rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02869789.

Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the presence of brain metastases has historically portended poor prognosis, recent advances in local and systemic therapies have greatly improved outcomes for NSCLC patients with CNS involvement. Stereotactic radiology surgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective radiotherapy technique with fewer toxicities compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Furthermore, multi-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with CNS overall response rates (ORR) of up to 70-80% are now an accepted first-line approach for a subset of advanced NSCLC patients with targetable molecular alterations. In addition, while the CNS was once considered an immunologic sanctuary site, growing evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in brain metastases as well. Ongoing efforts to optimize CNS metastases management are necessary to refine multimodal treatment approaches and develop new therapeutics with better CNS penetrance.

Predictors of survival to immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT.

RESULTS

A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of  ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.

Neuro-oncology at the American Society for Clinical Oncology 2022 Annual Meeting

In the following brief report, we highlight the advances in the neuro-oncology space from the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting. We put into context the phase 2 and 3 trials and how these may alter the standard of care going forward. In addition, we highlight some other earlier work that will lead to future and potentially practice-changing trials.

The spatial transcriptomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis

Brain metastases (BrMs) are a common occurrence in lung cancer with a dismal outcome. To understand the mechanism of metastasis to inform prognosis and treatment, here we analyze primary and metastasized tumor specimens from 44 non-small cell lung cancer patients by spatial RNA sequencing, affording a whole transcriptome map of metastasis resolved with morphological markers for the tumor core, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and tumor brain microenvironment (TBME). Our data indicate that the tumor microenvironment (TME) in the brain, including the TIME and TBME, undergoes extensive remodeling to create an immunosuppressive and fibrogenic niche for the BrMs. Specifically, the brain TME is characterized with reduced antigen presentation and B/T cell function, increased neutrophils and M2-type macrophages, immature microglia, and reactive astrocytes. Differential gene expression and network analysis identify fibrosis and immune regulation as the major functional modules disrupted in both the lung and brain TME. Besides providing systems-level insights into the mechanism of lung cancer brain metastasis, our study uncovers potential prognostic biomarkers and suggests that therapeutic strategies should be tailored to the immune and fibrosis status of the BrMs.

Lung cancer with brain metastases remaining in continuous complete remission due to pembrolizumab and temozolomide: a case report

Background

Immunotherapy has been shown to improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver gene mutations. However, monotherapy with immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases (BM) is still under debate. Data regarding treatment of BM with immunotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with NSCLC is rare.

Case Presentation

A 60-year-old male due to cough and expectoration presented in our hospital. Chest computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and immunohistochemistry of a mediastinal lymph node biopsy were administered, he was diagnosed with stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma. Without driver gene mutations, he was treated with platinum-based chemotherapy because he refused to accept concurrent radiation therapy (RT). Heavy cough companied with hemoptysis and chest CT scan both revealed progressive disease (PD) after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Immunotherapy was consequently considered, while two metastatic lesions in the brain were confirmed after combined treatment of pembrolizumab with docetaxel. TMZ was administered in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg, day 1). A new metastasis in the right occipital lobe was detected on a scan 1 month later, though the other 2 lesions continued to shrink. The treatment was continued, MRI and CT scans suggested complete response (CR) was achieved for both the BM and lung lesions after 3 cycles. Consolidation therapy with TMZ and pembrolizumab (100 mg) per month was considered for another 7 months. Maintenance monotherapy with pembrolizumab (100 mg) was selected because of his stable CR status. At 59 months since diagnosis, the patient remains alive, with CR for both the primary lesions and BM. The patient experienced slight numbness on each side of his feet. There was no occurrence of adverse effects greater than grade 3.

Conclusions

The data indicates that immunotherapy combined with TMZ for untreated BM in NSCLC patients maybe an efficient and safe decision making therapeutic choice. Despite the encouraging efficacy of the combination, it is an isolated case and the speculation of synergism need to be proved in further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies even in large randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a minority of NSCLC patients benefit from ICIs, and whether the magnitude of benefit is specific factor-dependent remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to improve our understanding of clinicopathologic and biomolecular features associated with improved survival upon treatment with ICIs for NSCLC.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to August 31, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing overall survival (OS) in NSCLC treated with ICIs vs control therapies. We calculated the pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI in subgroups using a random-effects model, and assessed the heterogeneity between the paired estimates using an interaction test.

Results

A total of 23 RCTs involving 15,829 patients were included. We found that wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB were associated with a significant OS benefit from ICIs, but not mutant EGFR, low PD-L1 expression, and low bTMB. The differences of OS benefit between wild-type and mutant EGFR (HR=1.53, 95%CI 1.13-2.08), high and low PD-L1 (HR=1.35; 95%CI 1.14-1.61), high and low bTMB (HR=1.71; 95%CI 1.17-2.52) were statistically significant. OS benefit was found in all subgroups regardless of sex, age, ECOG PS, histology, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis, race, and region, and the interaction test demonstrated no significant difference of the OS benefit between these opposed subgroups (e.g. male vs female).

Conclusions

Wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB are associated with a greater magnitude of efficacy from ICIs vs control therapies in NSCLC. However, the administration of ICIs should not be restricted to other clinicopathological factors (sex, smoking history, race, etc.).