Slump stretching in the management of non-radicular low back pain: a pilot clinical trial

Efficacy of localized muscle vibration on lower extremity functional ability in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Lower extremity impairments are commonly affected in patients with stroke. Localized muscle vibration (LMV) incorporates sensory signals to alter cortical excitability. The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of LMV along with conventional physiotherapy (CPT) on lower extremities and activities of daily living (ADL) poststroke.

METHODS

In total, 37 participants with stroke (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.3) were randomly assigned to either the CPT plus LMV (n = 19) or the CPT group (n = 18). All participants underwent 30-min CPT, three sessions a week, for eight weeks. The participants in the experimental group underwent a 10-min LMV after each CPT session. The primary measure used was the Barthel Index (BI). The secondary measures used were the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), and the Range of Motion (ROM) evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty-four participants completed the treatment protocol. At the end of the treatment, between-group analysis showed significant differences in knee flexion (MAS) scores, indicating spasticity reduction (P = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.906) and knee flexion (P = 0.045, Cohen's d = 0.73) and extension (P = 0.013, Cohen's d = 1.013) ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT can improve the functional outcomes of the hemiplegic lower extremity poststroke. However, using localized muscle vibration may have a superior effect on improving ROM and spasticity. The progress in daily living activities is associated with reductions in spasticity, emphasizing the need for therapists to consider integrating LMV into their rehabilitation protocols to optimize stroke patient outcomes.

Determinants of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Food Delivery Riders in Eastern Peninsular Malaysia: An Ergonomic Risk Assessment

Background/Objectives: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) have been found to be the leading factor in disabilities and absenteeism among workers. Despite their growing numbers, WMSD prevalence and risk factors among food delivery riders remain underexplored. Given the high WMSD prevalence among motorcyclists and the rising road traffic accidents (RTAs) among delivery riders in Malaysia, a cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the determinants of WMSDs among this neglected group. Methods: A self-reported questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic factors, work-related factors, and a validated Malay-translated Standardised Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (M-SNMQ) was used to evaluate the WMSD symptoms and related factors among 191 food delivery riders in Eastern Peninsular Malaysia. An ergonomic risk assessment using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method and whole-body vibration (WBV) measurement was also conducted to elicit the WMSD risk and vibration exposure among the riders. The determinants of WMSDs were analysed using multiple logistic regression using SPSS 20.4. Results: This study revealed a high prevalence of WMSDs (74.9%) among food delivery riders in Eastern Peninsular Malaysia. Furthermore, three factors were found to be significantly associated with WMSDs among riders, namely the increasing average working days (aOR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.34, 2.98; p = 0.001), whole-body vibration (WBV) above the exposure action value (EAV) limit (aOR = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.13, 6.53; p = 0.026), and not exercising before work (aOR = 21.63; 95% CI = 7.45, 62.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Targeted interventions are essential to mitigate ergonomic risks and enhance rider safety. Occupational health policies should prioritise pre-work exercise and WBV exposure reduction to minimise musculoskeletal strain. Future longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of these risks on riders' health.

Comparison of different treatment positions of nerve slider technique for patients with low back pain: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) accompanied by sciatica is a widespread musculoskeletal issue with multifactorial etiology, impacting individuals across various demographics. Conservative treatments, notably physiotherapy, are key in managing LBP with sciatica, with neural mobilization techniques emerging as beneficial adjuncts.

AIM

This research aims to assess the effectiveness of utilizing the sciatic slider technique (SST) in both supine and slump positions, compared to conventional physiotherapy alone, in alleviating pain severity, improving lumbar flexibility, lumbar lordosis, lower limb muscle strength, and functional ability in patients with LBP associated with sciatica.

DESIGN

randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Department of Physiotherapy at Alia Hospital.

POPULATION

Sixty participants with LBP associated with sciatica.

METHODS

The participants were randomly allocated into three groups: Group (A) N.=20 received the SST in a slump position alongside conventional physiotherapy, Group (B) N.=20 received the same technique in a supine position with conventional physiotherapy, and Group (C) or (control) N.=20 underwent only conventional physiotherapy. Each group underwent three sessions per week for four weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index), lumbar flexibility (Modified Schober test), lower limb muscle strength (Hand-held dynamometry), and lumbar lordosis (Flexible ruler).

RESULTS

Analysis revealed significant differences between treatment groups. The slump position exhibited superior effectiveness in reducing pain intensity (P<0.001), and improving disability (P<0.001), with greater improvements in pain scores and disability index percentages. Additionally, slump position therapy led to significantly greater enhancements in range of motion (P<0.001), and hip abductor (P=0.007) when compared to the supine position. However, both techniques showed similar effects on lumbar lordosis angle and various lower limb muscle strength.

CONCLUSIONS

The sciatic nerve slider technique, whether applied in the slump or supine position, demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional physiotherapy alone in managing LBP with sciatica. Nevertheless, the slump position showed greater efficacy in reducing pain, improving disability, and enhancing certain functional parameters.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

These findings advocate for the inclusion of neural mobilization techniques, particularly in the slump position, in the management of LBP with sciatica.

Effects of Neurodynamics Along With Conventional Exercises on Sciatica Patients: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction Sciatica refers to a pain that travels along the course of the sciatic nerve. Patients also often experience paresthesia along with the pain in thighs, which may further radiate to the legs. Most commonly, compression of the lumbosacral nerve root is the cause of this syndrome. Neurodynamics and conventional exercises are considered effective treatment procedures for sciatica. This study aims to find out the efficacy of neurodynamics along with conventional exercises and conventional exercises alone. Methods A total of 58 patients with sciatica aged between 30 and 60 years of both genders were included in the study and randomly divided into a neurodynamic group (n=29) and a conventional group (n=29). Pre-test data were collected before the interventions, and post-test data were collected on the 14th day. The 101 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to measure data of sciatic pain, the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) was used to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQL), and a surface electromyography (EMG) biofeedback instrument was used to measure the peak and average muscle activation of the biceps femoris muscle. Results The pre-post data analysis of the neurodynamics and conventional group showed significant (p<0.05) improvement in 101 NPRS, PSFS, and peak EMG values. Insignificant (p>0.05) improvements were seen in average EMG values in the conventional group, and significant (p<0.05) improvement were seen in the neurodynamic group. Between-group analysis showed insignificant (p>0.05) differences in 101 NPRS as well as peak and average EMG values and showed significant (p<0.05) differences in PSFS values. Conclusion Neurodynamics with conventional exercises can help in reducing pain, improving muscle activation of the biceps femoris, and elevating the HRQL of the patient.

Effects of the Three-Direction Movement Control Focus Complex Pain Program and Neurodynamic Focus Complex Pain Program on Pain, Mechanosensitivity, and Body Function in Taekwondo Athletes with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study

We aimed to determine the effects of three-direction movement control focus complex pain program (3D-MCE) and neurodynamic focus complex pain program (NDT) on pain, mechanosensitivity, and body function in Taekwondo athletes with non-specific low back pain. This study used a two-group pretest-posttest design and was conducted at a university physiotherapy lab and training center. It included 21 Taekwondo athletes with non-specific low back pain from a Taekwondo studio and a University in Busan. Participants were divided into a 3D-MCE group (n = 10) and an NDT group (n = 10). The numerical rating pain scale (NRPS), pain pressure threshold (PPT), movement analysis, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured before and after the intervention. The intervention was performed for 45 min twice a week for 4 weeks. Each group performed movement control exercises and neurodynamic techniques. The NRPS, motion analysis, and ODI were significantly changed after the intervention in the 3-DMCE group. The NRPS, PPT, and ODI changed significantly after the intervention in the NDT group. Moreover, the PPT and motion analysis showed significant differences between the two groups. For Taekwondo athletes with non-specific low back pain, 3D-MCE improved the stability control ability of the lumbar spine. It was confirmed that neurodynamic techniques reduce muscle and nerve mechanosensitivity.

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilisation on Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and Physical Performance in Adults with Musculoskeletal Pain - A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate up-to-date evidence of the effectiveness of neural mobilisation techniques compared with any type of comparator in improving pain, function, and physical performance in people with musculoskeletal pain.

DATA SOURCES

The following sources were consulted: PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and PEDro databases; scientific repositories; and clinical trial registers. The last search was performed on 01/06/2023.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion. We included randomised, quasi-randomised, and crossover trials on musculoskeletal pain in which at least one group received neural mobilisation (alone or as part of multimodal interventions). Meta-analyses were performed where possible. The RoB 2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tools were used to assess risk of bias and to rate the certainty of evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine trials were identified. There was a significant effect favouring neural mobilisation for pain and function in people with low back pain, but not for flexibility. For neck pain, there was a significant effect favouring neural mobilisation as part of multimodal interventions for pain, but not for function and range of motion. Regarding other musculoskeletal conditions, it was not possible to conclude whether neural mobilisation is effective in improving pain and function. There was very low confidence for all effect estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Neural mobilisation as part of multimodal interventions appears to have a positive effect on pain for patients with low back pain and neck pain and on function in people with low back pain. For the other musculoskeletal conditions, results are inconclusive.

Manual Therapy with Neural Mobilization: Immediate Effect on the Vocal Quality of Women with Dysphonia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immediate effect of neural mobilization on the voice quality, self-perceived phonatory effort, and laryngeal muscles of women with behavioral dysphonia.

METHOD

This is an intrasubject comparative study. The research included 21 women aged 18 to 59 years with vocal complaints. Therefore, the selection of this sample excluded the lower limit of the voice change period and the upper limit of presbyphonia. The participants were assessed by voice acoustic and auditory-perceptual analysis, self-reported vocal effort, and laryngeal palpation performed at three moments: at baseline, after 10 minutes of vocal resting, and after manual therapy. The participants were divided into two groups: the group with 10 minutes of vocal resting (G1) and the group with intervention (G2). The patients in the intervention group underwent manual therapy using neural mobilization in the laryngeal region. For the statistical analysis, a descriptive analysis of the data was performed first with measures of central tendency and dispersion. Subsequently, the Anderson-Darling test was used to verify sample normality. To analyze the difference between three groups were used the parametric One-Way ANOVA or the non-parametric Friedman's test. The McNemar's or chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables and to compare an ordinal variable a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used. The Gwet's AC1 test was used to assess intra-rater agreement in the auditory-perceptual analysis response.

RESULTS

Neural mobilization in the laryngeal region showed no positive effects on the acoustic voice parameters and voice quality of women with dysphonia. Phonatory effort improved after neural mobilization in the laryngeal region (p = 0.004). There was no significant change in supralaryngeal resistance, lateral laryngeal resistance, and laryngeal position after neural mobilization in the laryngeal region.

CONCLUSION

Neural mobilization improved phonatory comfort but did have any effect on the voice quality and laryngeal musculature of women with dysphonia.

Effect of tibial nerve mobilization on balance & gait functions in subjects with subclinical diabetic neuropathy: A randomized clinical trial

Introduction

With advancing age, balance control diminishes as a result of cognitive impairment, decreased muscle strength, and impairment in visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems. Besides aforesaid factors, the addition of diabetes to all these leads to balance and gait-related issues such as falls and fall-related injuries. Impaired balance and gait performance in diabetics are primarily attributed to the diminished sensory function of the foot and ankle region owing to diabetic neuropathy. The purpose of this study was to explicitly examine the impact of neural mobilization on the balance & gait functions of subjects having subclinical diabetic neuropathy.

Methods

40 individuals with subclinical diabetic neuropathy, ranging in age from 50 to 75 years, were assigned to two groups at random: Group 1 received the concurrent application of Tibial nerve mobilization and Balance-Gait training whereas Group 2 received only Balance-Gait training. The therapy was administered five times each week, for four weeks. On the first and last day of treatment, measurements of VPT, BBS, TUG, and DGI were taken from each subject.

Results

The results of the study found that post neural mobilization and Balance-Gait training, scores of VPT, BBS, DGI, and TUG showed improvement but it was not significant. As it is evident that diabetic neuropathy is progressive in nature, even small changes can be helpful.

Conclusion

Neural mobilization integrated with balance-gait training of subclinical diabetic neuropathic individuals resulted in improved sensory functions along with enhanced balance-gait functions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01246-w.

Effects of Complex Pain Control Programs on Taekwondo Athletes with Recurrent Low Back Pain: A Case Study

Background and Objectives: Practitioners of martial arts such as Taekwondo are likelier to experience back pain during training or competition. As the back pain of taekwondo athletes shows various symptoms depending on the athlete's characteristics, such as technique and movement, a case study was conducted to verify the intervention effect suitable for individual traits. We examined the effects of a complex pain control program on pain, mechanosensitivity, and physical function in a Taekwondo athlete with recurrent low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: A Taekwondo athlete with LBP was recruited from D University, Busan. The intervention program was performed for 45 min twice a week for 3 weeks, and the patient was followed up with after 2 weeks. The numerical rating pain scale (NRPS), pain pressure threshold, mechanosensitivity, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were measured before and after the intervention. Therapeutic massage and nerve stimulation therapy were performed. Lumbar flexion, extension, and rotation were performed in the movement control exercise group, whereas the sliding technique, a neurodynamic technique of the tibial nerve, was applied in the neurodynamic technique group. This effect was verified by comparing the average measured values before and after the intervention. Results: Pain (NRPS) and mechanosensitivity reduced, range of motion and tactile discrimination abilities improved, and physical function (ODI) improved. The effect of the improved intervention lasted 2 weeks. Conclusions: These results indicate that application of complex pain control programs considering the four aspects of pain mechanisms for 3 weeks can be an effective intervention in Taekwondo athletes with recurrent LBP.

Neural mobilization in low back and radicular pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain can present with radicular pain caused by lumbosacral nerve root pathology. Neural mobilization (NM) is a treatment technique used to treat low back and radicular pain (LBRP).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of NM interventions in improving pain, disability, and function in adults with LBRP.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE (Ovid), Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cochrane databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of NM on pain, disability, and/or function in adults with LBRP.

DATA EXTRACTION

Authors reviewed studies and used the PEDro scale and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess methodological quality and risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eight studies were included. Six of the eight studies found the addition of NM to conservative treatment improved all measured outcomes. One study found improvements in some but not all functional measures, and delayed improvements in pain. One study found improvements in measures of neural sensitivity, but not overall pain and disability.

CONCLUSIONS

NM may be an effective tool for short-term improvements in pain, function, and disability associated with LBRP. Additional high quality research is needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

: This systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020192338).

Effect of Physiotherapeutic Interventions on Biomarkers of Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Literature

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of physiotherapeutic interventions on biomarkers of neuropathic pain in preclinical models of peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP). The search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane, Cinhal, Psycinfo, Scopus, Medline, and Science Direct. Studies evaluating any type of physiotherapy intervention for PNP (systemic or traumatic) were included. Eighty-one articles were included in this review. The most common PNP model was chronic constriction injury, and the most frequently studied biomarkers were related to neuro-immune processes. Exercise therapy and Electro-acupuncture were the 2 most frequently studied physiotherapy interventions while acupuncture and joint mobilization were less frequently examined. Most physiotherapeutic interventions modulated the expression of biomarkers related to neuropathic pain. Whereas the results seem promising; they have to be considered with caution due to the high risk of bias of included studies and high heterogeneity of the type and anatomical localization of biomarkers reported. The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019142878). PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the current evidence about physiotherapeutic interventions on biomarkers of neuropathic pain in preclinical models of peripheral neuropathic pain. Existing findings are reviewed, and relevant data are provided on the effectiveness of each physiotherapeutic modality, as well as its certainty of evidence and clinical applicability.

Effects of adding neural mobilization to traditional physical therapy on pain, functional disability, and H-reflex in patients after lumbar laminectomy: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether adding neural mobilization to a standard postoperative physical therapy program could improve the outcomes of patients after lumbar laminectomy.

DESIGN

A single blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Outpatient setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty participants of both sexes who had undergone lumbar laminectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were allocated randomly to two groups; study and control groups. All patients received a standard postoperative physical therapy program. Those in the study group received additional neural mobilization in the form of straight leg raising and dorsiflexion with two-ended slider. Treatment was administered three times/week for six successive weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and H-reflex latency were measured pre and post-treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 44.23 ± 4.64 and 45.3 ± 5.3 in study and control groups respectively (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS, ODI, and H-reflex latency in favor of the study group (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD for VAS, ODI, and H-reflex latency pre vs post treatment was 6.13 ± 1.22 vs 1.40 ± 0.77, 64.46 ± 4.05 vs 16.86 ± 2.55, and 32.07 ± 2.76 vs 27.46 ±1.79 in study group and 5.86 ± 1.07 vs 2.46 ± 0.73, 63.93 ± 3.91 vs 23.40 ± 2.93, and 31.76 ± 2.69 vs 29.4 ± 1.94 in control group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neural mobilization combined with traditional physical therapy program achieved better improvement in pain, functional disability and H-reflex in patients who underwent decompressive laminectomy than traditional physical therapy program only.

Validation of a sham novel neural mobilization technique in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is no validated sham neural mobilization (NM) intervention for lower quadrant conditions. A suitable sham NM comparator will allow to blind patients with low back pain (LBP) and reduce bias by limiting the confounding effects of expectations.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to develop a sham NM technique in patients with non-specific LBP and assess its validity in supplying a suitable blinding. Secondly, we compared the short-term effects of NM and the sham comparator on pain and the straight leg raise.

DESIGN

A randomized placebo-controlled trial in which participants and assessors were blinded.

METHOD

Fifty one patients (20 men,31 women), aged 22-65 years (43 ± 12y) were allocated randomly to a NM group (n = 26) or a sham NM group (n = 25). The primary outcome of believability of the sham technique was measured one week after the intervention. Secondary outcomes of pain intensity and the straight leg raise range-of-motion were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention and one week after.

RESULTS

The believability of the sham technique in terms of the frequencies of perceived group assignment showed no differences between groups. Eighteen participants believed they had received the experimental NM technique in the experimental group (69.2%) and 14 in the placebo NM group (56%). Pain and the straight leg raise changes did not show differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel sham NM demonstrated to be a believable intervention, capable of supplying a suitable blinding. Both groups showed similar short term perceived effects on pain and the straight leg raise.

Comparison of conservative treatment with and without neural mobilization for patients with low back pain: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem that causes pain, disability, and gait and balance problems. Neurodynamic techniques are used in the treatment of LBP.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of electrotherapy and neural mobilization on pain, functionality, gait, and balance in patients with LBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients were randomly assigned to either the neural mobilization group (NMG, n= 20) or electrotherapy group (ETG, n= 21). Assessment tools used were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functionality, straight leg raise test (SLRT) for neural involvement, and baropedographic platform (Zebris FDM-2TM) for gait and static balance measurements.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant decrease in pain and functional disability, while only the NMG group showed a significant increase in SLRT scores (p< 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant pre- to post-treatment changes in gait or static balance parameters in either group (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Neural mobilization was effective in reducing pain and improving functionality and SLRT performance in patients with LBP, but induced no change in gait and static balance parameters. Neural mobilization may be used as self-practice to supplement standard treatment programs.

Effects of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis on Mechanosensitivity, Disability, and Nerve Conduction Studies in Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

People diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have fibrosis between the soft, connective, and neural tissues that could worsen the compression of the median nerve. The diacutaneous fibrolysis (DF) technique may release tissue adhesions and increase the mobility of connective tissues. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of DF in people with mild to moderate CTS on mechanosensitivity, disability, and nerve conduction studies.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were recruited between April and September 2016 from the Department of Neurophysiology at the Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain. Thirty-nine people (52 wrists) diagnosed with mild to moderate CTS were included. Participants were randomly assigned to either the DF group (n = 26) or the sham group (n = 26). Both groups received 5 therapy sessions, 2 sessions per week. Mechanosensitivity with the Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1, symptom severity and functional status with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and median nerve sensory conduction velocity with nerve conduction studies were the outcomes measured. Assessments were recorded at baseline and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The DF group showed significant improvements in the following: mechanosensitivity, with 28.46 degrees of elbow extension range of motion (95% CI = 19.2-37.7); an increase of 1.0 point (95% CI = 0.7-1.4) for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity and functional status score; and sensory conduction velocity of median nerve, which improved to 5.8 m/s (95% CI = 2.5-9.2).

CONCLUSION

Participants with mild to moderate CTS experienced improvements in symptom severity, functional status, mechanosensitivity, and nerve conduction studies after 5 sessions of DF.

IMPACT

This study provides evidence of an approach based on soft and connective tissues around the median nerve in patients with CTS.

The immediate effect of neurodynamic techniques on jumping performance: A randomised double-blind study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neurodynamic techniques are used to restore neural functions. However, there are few studies about the effects on performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects on vertical jumping (VJ) and horizontal jumping (HJ) of 2 different tension loading techniques applied to young adults.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In this randomised double-blind study, a total of 68 participants with a mean age of 21.31 ± 1.21 years were separated into 2 groups using the closed envelope system: the femoral nerve mobilization (FNM) group and the sciatic nerve mobilization (SNM) group. The FNM and SNM techniques were applied as 2 seconds stretching with 2 seconds resting for 10 repetitions. The VJ and HJ performance of the participants was evaluated before and after the interventions by a researcher blinded to the groups.

RESULTS

The mean VJ performance before and after interventions was measured as 34.56 ± 7.80 cm and 35.89 ± 8.15 cm in the FNM group (p< 0.05) and 31.74 ± 8.31 cm and 32.76 ± 8.45 cm in the SNM group (p< 0.05). The effects of the techniques on HJ performance were not statistically significant (p> 0.05). There was no superiority between the techniques (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The neurodynamic techniques were found to provide an immediate increase in VJ performance. Neurodynamic techniques are generally used in patient populations to improve treatment outcomes. According to these study results, neurodynamic techniques can be safely used to provide an immediate increase in performances of individuals with no lower extremity problems.

Effect of ankle dorsiflexion on displacement and strain in the tibial nerve and biceps femoris muscle at the posterior knee during the straight leg raise: Investigation of specificity of nerve movement

BACKGROUND

A structural differentiation maneuver has been proposed to differentiate between muscle and nerve involvement during the straight leg raise test. However, to date, the mechanical specificity of this maneuver for the tibial nerve at the posterior knee has not been tested. The aim of this study was to investigate the specificity of ankle dorsiflexion as a differentiation maneuver between the tibial nerve and the biceps femoris muscle at the posterior knee during the straight leg raise in cadavers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out. In fresh frozen cadavers, with microstrain devices and Vernier calipers, strain and excursion in the tibial nerve and distal biceps femoris muscle were measured during ankle dorsiflexion at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of hip flexion of the straight leg raise.

FINDINGS

Ankle dorsiflexion resulted in significant distal excursion and increased strain in the tibial nerve (p < 0.05) whilst the muscle was not affected by the dorsiflexion (p > 0.05) at all hip flexion angles.

INTERPRETATION

Ankle dorsiflexion was mechanically specific between the tibial nerve and biceps femoris during the straight leg raise. This study adds to evidence that, in certain circumstances, dorsiflexion may be used in differentiation of nerve and muscle disorders in the posterior knee.

Shear Wave Elastographic Investigation of the Immediate Effects of Slump Neurodynamics in People With Sciatica

OBJECTIVES

Neurodynamic techniques are often used to treat people with sciatica pain, but their mechanical effects on the sciatic nerve are unknown. Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been shown to effectively estimate the stiffness of peripheral nerves in real time. The aim of this study was to use SWE to assess the effects of slump neurodynamics in the sciatic stiffness of people with sciatica.

METHODS

Sixteen participants volunteered for this study. The sciatic stiffness of 8 patients with unilateral chronic sciatica and 8 healthy control participants was measured by SWE, with the participants in a prone position and during a dynamic condition (ie, ankle dorsiflexion). These measurements were performed before and immediately after the neurodynamic intervention, which consisted of a static slump position applied to the symptomatic limb of the patients with sciatica and in a randomly chosen limb of the healthy participants.

RESULTS

The 8 patients with sciatica included 6 male and 2 female patients, and the 8 healthy control participants included 5 male and 3 female volunteers. Slump neurodynamics resulted in an immediate decrease in the sciatic nerve stiffness of the symptomatic limb in people with sciatica by 16.1% (effect size = 0.65; P = .019). The intervention showed no significant changes in the sciatic nerve stiffness of the healthy participants (effect size = 0.05; P = .754).

CONCLUSIONS

Slump neurodynamics have the potential of decreasing the sciatic nerve stiffness in people with sciatica, and this effect can be quantified by SWE, which may provide valuable information for health professionals.

Differential movement of the sciatic nerve and hamstrings during the straight leg raise with ankle dorsiflexion: Implications for diagnosis of neural aspect to hamstring disorders

INTRODUCTION

In hamstrings injuries, sciatic nerve and muscle disorders can coexist. Therefore, differential diagnosis to include or exclude nerve involvement is an important aspect of evaluation. The objective of this paper is to investigate the mechanical behaviour of the sciatic nerve and biceps femoris muscle in the proximal thigh with the ankle dorsiflexion manoeuvre at different degrees of hip flexion during the straight leg raise in cadavers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out. Linear displacement transducers were inserted into the sciatic nerve and the biceps femoris muscle of 11 lower extremities from 6 fresh cadavers to measure potential strain of both structures during ankle dorsiflexion at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of hip flexion during the straight leg raise. Excursion was also measured with a digital calliper.

RESULTS

Ankle dorsiflexion resulted in significant strain and distal excursion of the sciatic nerve at all ranges of hip flexion during the straight leg raise (p < 0.05). In contrast, the ankle movement did not affect the strain in biceps femoris at any position of the hip (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ankle dorsiflexion at different degrees of hip flexion during the straight leg raise produces changes in the strain and excursion of the sciatic nerve in the upper thigh. In contrast, the biceps femoris muscle at the same location was not affected by ankle movement. These findings show differential behaviour between the nerve and muscle with ankle dorsiflexion at this location that could be used as differential diagnosis in posterior hip pain.

Mobilization of the contralateral limb in Slump position: effects on knee extension in healthy adult subjects

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In the acute phase of neuropathic pain due to nerve root disorders, the neurodynamic approach proposes the mobilization of the contralateral limb to decrease the pain and increase the range of motion in the affected limb. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the contralateral knee mobilization on the ipsilateral knee extension range of motion in Slump position in healthy adult subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy subjects underwent a placebo, control and experimental manoeuvres that included a passive contralateral knee mobilization into extension. The knee, hip and cervical angles and distance between glabella and femoral condyle achieved in Slump test position were measured with an optoelectronic motion analysis system before and after each manoeuvre.

RESULTS

Experimental manoeuvre produced a statistically significant increase of the knee extension ROM when compared to the control (p=.017) and placebo (p=.007) manoeuvres. A significant increase of the hip angle and distance between glabella and femoral condyle was detected after the experimental manoeuvres (p<.001), but not after the placebo and control manoeuvres.

CONCLUSIONS

The contralateral mobilization in Slump position increases the ipsilateral knee extension ROM. Further research is required to confirm that the knee increment ROM was due to the neural component.

The addition of neurodynamic exercises to extension-oriented exercises among patients with chronic back-related leg pain: A study protocol

BACKGROUND

Patients with back-related leg pain exhibit nociceptive and neuropathic characteristics. Few studies have investigated the combination of interventions considering these characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if the addition of neurodynamic exercises (EEN) to extension-oriented exercises (EE) promotes additional benefits in individuals with back-related leg pain and a directional preference.

METHODS

Patients will be randomized to either EE or EEN. Patients from both groups will receive 7 sessions over 3 weeks. Low back and leg pain, function, quality of life, disability, and global perceived effect will be evaluated at baseline, 3 weeks after randomization and 1-month follow-up. A linear mixed model will be used for outcomes analysis.

The effects of dry needling and neurodynamic exercise on idiopathic peripheral neuropathy: A case report

A single patient (male, 67) with a medical diagnosis of idiopathic peripheral neuropathy (G60.9) was referred to physical therapy. The patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with peripheral neuropathy, including bilateral single leg balance deficits, sensation impairments, and antalgic gait. Treatment consisted of dry needling (DN) with electrical stimulation and a home exercise program involving a neurodynamic exercise to be performed daily. Dry needling included the use of thin filiform needles to stimulate the underlying structures directed at eliciting a change within the tissues. The needles were left in situ and connected to an electrical stimulation unit. The neurodynamic exercise used in this case study was designed to target the distal branches of the sciatic nerve. The patient was directed to complete 3 sets of 10 repetitions in the slumped position and moving between ankle plantar flexion and dorsiflexion. The patient was treated for a total of 4 visits over a 5-week period. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Romberg Test, and sensation testing were collected at baseline and then again after the 4th treatment. A Global Rating of Change (GROC) score was obtained at the end of treatment. After the 4th visit, functional self-report scores were not improved (93.75%-86.9% at completion), while NPRS decreased to 2 from a baseline rating of 4. The eyes closed portion of the Rhomberg balance test improved from 5 s on the right limb to 15 s and from 8 s to 20 s on the left limb. Sharp/dull sensation testing of the L4 dermatome also improved from 2 out of 5 correctly selected on the left lower limb to 5 out of 5. At the S1 level, sensation improved on the left lower limb from 2 out of 5 to 4 out of 5 and from 2 out of 5 on the right lower limb to 5 out of 5. The patient's GROC score was rated as quite a bit better (+5). The outcomes of this case study suggest that clinicians may consider the addition of DN with electrical stimulation and neurodynamic exercises to the treatment of this patient population given the sizeable and rapid improvements in pain, balance, and sensation testing following only 4 treatments.

Sciatic nerve stiffness is not changed immediately after a slump neurodynamics technique

Background

Neurodynamics techniques aim to assess and improve neural mechanosensitivity. However, there is no in vivo evidence regarding the mechanical effects of these techniques in the nerve stiffness. This study examined the immediate effects of a slump neurodynamics technique in the sciatic nerve shear wave velocity (SWV. i.e. an index of stiffness) using ultrasound-based elastography.

Methods

Fourteen healthy participants were included in this experiment. Sciatic SWV and ankle passive torque were measured during a passive ankle dorsiflexion motion (2°/s), before and immediately after 3 minutes of slump neurodynamics technique, randomly applied to one lower limb. The contralateral limb served as control.

Results

The slump intervention did not change the sciatic SWV (P=0.78), nor the dorsiflexion passive torque (P=0.14), throughout the ankle dorsiflexion motion. Excellent values of intra-rater repeatability (ICC=0.88, 0.68-0.96), and low values of standard error of measurement (0.59 m/s, 0.35-1.15m/s), were observed for the SWV measurements.

Conclusions

The sciatic nerve stiffness of healthy participants did not change immediately after a slump neurodynamics technique, suggesting a compliance of the neural tissue to tensile loads. However, these results ought to be confirmed using other neurodynamics techniques and in other populations (e.g. peripheral neuropathies).

Level of evidence

III.

In vivo effects of limb movement on nerve stretch, strain, and tension: A systematic review

BACKROUND

The mechanical behavior of the peripheral nervous system under elongation and tension has not been adequately established in vivo.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to investigate the mechanical behavior of the peripheral nervous system in vivo.

METHODS

In vivo studies which evaluated the effects of limb movement and neurodynamic tests on peripheral nerve biomechanics were systematically searched in PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Database, CINAHL, PEDro, Embase and Web of Science. Studies fulfilling the search criteria were assessed for methodological quality with a modified version of the Down & Blacks scale by two reviewers.

RESULTS

This review includes the results of 22 studies, of which 15 examined limb movement influencing the median nerve, four the sciatic nerve, two the tibial nerve; and one each the ulnar and peroneal nerves respectively. Substantial nerve longitudinal and transverse excursion and changes in diameter were reported. Despite this, increased nerve strain was not a major finding.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of included studies, including wide variety of nerves tested, measurement location and joint position prevented comparisons between studies and also amalgamation of data. Limb movement induces complex biomechanical effects of which nerve elongation plays only a minor role.

The treatment effect of hamstring stretching and nerve mobilization for patients with radicular lower back pain

[Purpose] In this paper, hamstring stretching and nerve mobilization are conducted on patients with radicular lower back pain, and changes to pain levels, pressure thresholds, angles of knee joint extension, and disorder levels of lower back pain were studied. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were divided into two groups: one group conducted hamstring stretches and was comprised of 6 male and 5 female subjects, and the other group received nerve mobilization treatment and was comprised of 5 male and 6 female subjects. [Results] Pain level and the disorder index of lower back pain were significantly alleviated after the intervention in both groups. Pressure threshold and angles of knee extension were significantly increased after the intervention in both groups. Comparing the two groups, the alleviation of pain was more significant in the nerve mobilization group. [Conclusion] Patients with radicular lower back pain showed significant differences in pain level, pressure threshold, knee extension angle, and disorder index of lower back pain for both the hamstring stretching group and nerve mobilization group after the treatment. Hamstring stretching and nerve mobilization can be usefully applied for the therapy of patients with radicular lower back pain.

The Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization for Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Study Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Objectives To determine the efficacy of neural mobilization (NM) for musculoskeletal conditions with a neuropathic component. Background Neural mobilization, or neurodynamics, is a movement-based intervention aimed at restoring the homeostasis in and around the nervous system. The current level of evidence for NM is largely unknown. Methods A database search for randomized trials investigating the effect of NM on neuromusculoskeletal conditions was conducted, using standard methods for article identification, selection, and quality appraisal. Where possible, studies were pooled for meta-analysis, with pain, disability, and function as the primary outcomes. Results Forty studies were included in this review, of which 17 had a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses could only be performed on self-reported outcomes. For chronic low back pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Questionnaire [0-50]: mean difference, -9.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14.50, -4.01; P<.001) and pain (intensity [0-10]: mean difference, -1.78; 95% CI: -2.55, -1.01; P<.001) improved following NM. For chronic neck-arm pain, pain improved (intensity: mean difference, -1.89; 95% CI: -3.14, -0.64; P<.001) following NM. For most of the clinical outcomes in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome, NM was not effective (P>.11) but showed some positive neurophysiological effects (eg, reduced intraneural edema). Due to a scarcity of studies or conflicting results, the effect of NM remains uncertain for various conditions, such as postoperative low back pain, cubital tunnel syndrome, and lateral epicondylalgia. Conclusion This review reveals benefits of NM for back and neck pain, but the effect of NM on other conditions remains unclear. Due to the limited evidence and varying methodological quality, conclusions may change over time. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(9):593-615. Epub 13 Jul 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7117.

Immediate effects of Graston Technique on hamstring muscle extensibility and pain intensity in patients with nonspecific low back pain

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of Graston Technique on hamstring extensibility and pain intensity in patients with nonspecific low back pain. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-four patients with nonspecific low back pain (27–46 years of age) enrolled in the study. All participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Graston technique group (n=12) and a static stretching group (n=12). The Graston Technique was used on the hamstring muscles of the experimental group, while the static stretching group performed static stretching. Hamstring extensibility was recorded using the sit and reach test, and a visual analog scale was used to measure pain intensity. [Results] Both groups showed a significant improvement after intervention. In comparison to the static stretching group, the Graston technique group had significantly more improvement in hamstring extensibility. [Conclusion] The Graston Technique is a simple and effective intervention in nonspecific low back pain patients to improve hamstring extensibility and lower pain intensity, and it would be beneficial in clinical practice.

Safety of lower extremity neurodynamic exercises in adults with diabetes mellitus: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Neurodynamic exercises aim to improve neural mechanosensitivity in order to promote pain-free movement and function. People with diabetes mellitus (DM) may be candidates for neurodynamic exercises to address common DM-related impairments such as reduced lower extremity range of motion (ROM) and altered neural mechanosensitivity. However, no studies have examined the safety and immediate effects of neurodynamic exercise in people with DM. This study aims to determine the feasibility of applying neurodynamic exercises in adults with DM by evaluating the rate of adverse events and quantifying immediate changes in straight leg raise (SLR) ROM.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study included 20 people with DM who performed a series of neurodynamic exercises on their right leg. Their left leg was used as an internal control. SLR testing was performed before and immediately after these exercises. Adverse events were monitored, including provocation of their neuropathy symptoms or discomfort or pain.

RESULTS

All participants completed the neurodynamic exercises without provocation of their neuropathy symptoms. No pain was reported and only one participant had minor discomfort with one exercise; a <30-s calf cramp. The right SLR ROM increased by an average of 5.2°-5.3° (p < 0.01) with no change on the left.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that lower extremity neurodynamic exercises are safe in adults with DM and may create small immediate improvements in SLR testing. Further research is indicated to investigate the safety and efficacy of neurodynamic exercises performed over multiple sessions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b.

Effects of lower body quadrant neural mobilization in healthy and low back pain populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neural mobilization (NM) is widely used to assess and treat several neuromuscular disorders. However, information regarding the NM effects targeting the lower body quadrant is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of NM techniques targeting the lower body quadrant in healthy and low back pain (LBP) populations.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials were included if any form of NM was applied to the lower body quadrant. Pain, disability, and lower limb flexibility were the main outcomes. PEDro scale was used to assess methodological quality.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were selected for full-text analysis, and ten were included in the meta-analysis, involving 502 participants. Overall, studies presented fair to good quality, with a mean PEDro score of 6.3 (from 4 to 8). Five studies used healthy participants, and five targeted people with LBP. A moderate effect size (g = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.48-0.98) was determined, favoring the use of NM to increase flexibility in healthy adults. Larger effect sizes were found for the effect of NM in pain reduction (g = 0.82, 95% CI 0.56-1.08) and disability improvement (g = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.14-2.03), in people with LBP.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that there are positive effects from the application of NM to the lower body quadrant. Specifically, NM shows moderate effects on flexibility in healthy participants, and large effects on pain and disability in people with LBP. Nevertheless, more studies with high methodological quality are necessary to support these conclusions.

Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial

QUESTION

In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms?

DESIGN

Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty participants with nerve-related leg pain recruited from the community.

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental group received four sessions of neurodynamic treatment. Both groups received advice to remain active.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Leg pain and low back pain (0, none, to 10, worst), Oswestry Disability Index (0, none, to 100, worst), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (0, unable to perform, to 30, able to perform), global perceived effect (-5 to 5) and location of symptoms were measured at 2 and 4 weeks after randomisation. Continuous outcomes were analysed by linear mixed models. Location of symptoms was assessed by relative risk (95% CI).

RESULTS

At 2 weeks, the experimental group did not have significantly greater improvement than the control group in leg pain (MD -1.1, 95% CI -2.3 to 0.1) or disability (MD -3.3, 95% CI -9.6 to 2.9). At 4 weeks, the experimental group experienced a significantly greater reduction in leg pain (MD -2.4, 95% CI -3.6 to -1.2) and low back pain (MD -1.5, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.2). The experimental group also improved significantly more in function at 2 weeks (MD 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.2) and 4 weeks (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.8), as well as global perceived effect at 2 weeks (MD 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) and 4 weeks (MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). No significant between-group differences occurred in disability at 4 weeks and location of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active did not improve leg pain and disability at 2 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01954199. [Ferreira G, Stieven F, Araujo F, Wiebusch M, Rosa C, Plentz R, et al. (2016) Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial.Journal of Physiotherapy62: 197-202].

The effects of neurodynamic straight leg raise treatment duration on range of hip flexion and protective muscle activity at P1

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, single blind, same subject crossover trial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of two neurodynamic treatment doses on range of hip flexion (ROM HF) and electromyographic (EMG) activity of semitendinosus, at first onset of pain (P1).

METHODS

A total of 26 healthy participants without low back or leg pain received each treatment in a random order with at least 48 hours between sessions. Baseline ROM HF and EMG magnitude of semitendinosus at P1 were collected. Subjects then received either 361 or 362 minutes of oscillating end of range (grade IVz) straight leg raise (SLR) neurodynamic treatment and were re-assessed for baseline measures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in EMG magnitude (P50.190) and ROM HF (P50.739) at P1. There was also no significant difference within groups in EMG magnitude at P1 (P50.182); however, there was a significant improvement in ROM HF at P1 in both groups compared to baseline readings (P50.000), with increases of 6.7u and 5.1u for the 361- and 362-minute groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that 362 minutes of oscillating grade IVz SLR neurodynamic treatment has no additional benefit over 361 minute, on ROM HF or EMG magnitude of semitendinosus at P1. Using an oscillating SLR treatment may, however, help to increase pain-free ROM HF, although further studies are necessary to confirm this.

The short term effects of straight leg raise neurodynamic treatment on pressure pain and vibration thresholds in individuals with spinally referred leg pain

BACKGROUND

Limited research exists for the effects of neurodynamic treatment techniques. Understanding short term physiological outcomes could help to better understand immediate benefits or harm of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the short-term effects of a straight leg raise (SLR) tensioner 'intervention' on pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and vibration thresholds (VT), and establish if additional factors influence outcome in individuals with spinally referred leg pain.

DESIGN

Experimental, repeated measures.

METHODS

Sixty seven participants (mean age (SD) 52.9 (13.3), 33 female) with spinally referred leg pain were divided into 3 sub-groups: somatic referred pain, radicular pain and radiculopathy. Individuals were assessed for central sensitisation (CS) and completed 5 disability and psychosocial questionnaires. PPT and VT were measured pre and post a 3 × 1 min SLR tensioner intervention.

RESULTS

No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between the 3 groups for either outcome measure, or after treatment. Slight improvements in VT were seen in the radiculopathy group after treatment, but were not significant. Only 2 participants were identified with CS. Disability and psychological factors were not significantly different at baseline between the 3 sub-groups, and did not correlate with the outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

No beneficial effects of treatment were found, but the trend for a decrease in VT indicated that even in individuals with radiculopathy, no detrimental changes to nerve function occurred. Psychosocial factors and levels of disability did not influence short term outcome of SLR treatment.

The effect of spinal position on sciatic nerve excursion during seated neural mobilisation exercises: an in vivo study using ultrasound imaging

Objectives

Research has established that the amount of inherent tension a peripheral nerve tract is exposed to influences nerve excursion and joint range of movement (ROM). The effect that spinal posture has on sciatic nerve excursion during neural mobilisation exercises has yet to be determined. The purpose of this research was to examine the influence of different sitting positions (slump-sitting versus upright-sitting) on the amount of longitudinal sciatic nerve movement during different neural mobilisation exercises commonly used in clinical practice.

Methods

High-resolution ultrasound imaging followed by frame-by-frame cross-correlation analysis was used to assess sciatic nerve excursion. Thirty-four healthy participants each performed three different neural mobilisation exercises in slump-sitting and upright-sitting. Means comparisons were used to examine the influence of sitting position on sciatic nerve excursion for the three mobilisation exercises. Linear regression analysis was used to determine whether any of the demographic data represented predictive variables for longitudinal sciatic nerve excursion.

Results

There was no significant difference in sciatic nerve excursion (across all neural mobilisation exercises) observed between upright-sitting and slump-sitting positions (P = 0.26). Although greater body mass index, greater knee ROM and younger age were associated with higher levels of sciatic nerve excursion, this model of variables offered weak predictability (R² = 0.22).

Discussion

Following this study, there is no evidence that, in healthy people, longitudinal sciatic nerve excursion differs significantly with regards to the spinal posture (slump-sitting and upright-sitting). Furthermore, although some demographic variables are weak predictors, the high variance suggests that there are other unknown variables that may predict sciatic nerve excursion. It can be inferred from this research that clinicians can individualise the design of seated neural mobilisation exercises, using different seated positions, based upon patient comfort and minimisation of neural mechanosensitivity with the knowledge that sciatic nerve excursion will not be significantly influenced.

Effects of lower limb neurodynamic mobilization on intraneural fluid dispersion of the fourth lumbar nerve root: an unembalmed cadaveric investigation

OBJECTIVES

Manual and physical therapists incorporate neurodynamic mobilisation (NDM) to improve function and decrease pain. Little is known about the mechanisms by which these interventions affect neural tissue. The objective of this research was to assess the effects of repetitive straight leg raise (SLR) NDM on the fluid dynamics within the fourth lumbar nerve root in unembalmed cadavers.

METHODS

A biomimetic solution (Toluidine Blue Stock 1% and Plasma) was injected intraneurally, deep to the epineurium, into the L4 nerve roots of seven unembalmed cadavers. The initial dye spread was allowed to stabilise and measured with a digital calliper. Once the initial longitudinal dye spread stabilised, an intervention strategy (repetitive SLR) was applied incorporating NDMs (stretch/relax cycles) at a rate of 30 repetitions per minute for 5 minutes. Post-intervention calliper measurements of the longitudinal dye spread were measured.

RESULTS

The mean experimental posttest longitudinal dye spread measurement (1.1 ± 0.9 mm) was significantly greater (P = 0.02) than the initial stabilised pretest longitudinal dye spread measurement. Increases ranged from 0.0 to 2.6 mm and represented an average of 7.9% and up to an 18.1% increase in longitudinal dye spread.

DISCUSSION

Passive NDM in the form of repetitive SLR induced a significant increase in longitudinal fluid dispersion in the L4 nerve root of human cadaveric specimen. Lower limb NDM may be beneficial in promoting nerve function by limiting or altering intraneural fluid accumulation within the nerve root, thus preventing the adverse effects of intraneural oedema.

Effects of simulated neural mobilization on fluid movement in cadaveric peripheral nerve sections: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neural mobilization techniques are used clinically to treat neuropathic pain and dysfunction. While selected studies report efficacy of these techniques, the mechanisms of benefit are speculative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of in vitro simulated stretch/relax neural mobilization cycles on fluid dispersion within sections of unembalmed cadaveric peripheral nerve tissue.

METHODS

Bilateral sciatic nerve sections were harvested from six cadavers. Matched pairs of nerve sections were secured in a tissue tester and injected with a plasma/Toluidine Blue dye solution. Once the initial dye spread stabilized, the experimental nerve sections underwent 25 stretch/relaxation cycles (e.g. simulated neural mobilization) produced by a mechanical tissue tester. Post-test dye spread measurements were compared to pre-test measurements as well as control findings (no simulated mobilization). Data were analyzed using paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Individual dye spread measurements were reliable [ICC(3,1) = 0·99]. The post-test intraneural fluid movement (dye spread) in the experimental section increased significantly with simulated neural mobilization compared to pre-test measurements (3·2±2·1 mm; P = 0·015) and control measurements (3·3±2·7 mm; P = 0·013).

CONCLUSION

Repetitive simulated neural mobilization, incorporating stretch/relax cycles, of excised cadaveric peripheral nerve tissue produced an increase in intraneural fluid dispersion. Neural mobilization may alter nerve tissue environment, promoting improved function and nerve health, by dispersing tissue fluid and diminishing intraneural swelling and/or pressure.

The effects of self-mobilization techniques for the sciatic nerves on physical functions and health of low back pain patients with lower limb radiating pain

[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the effects of self-mobilization techniques for the sciatic nerves on the quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain in the lower limbs accompanied by radiating pain. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were divided into two groups: a group receiving of lumbar segmental stabilization exercise training including sciatic nerve mobilization techniques, which included 8 males and 7 females, and a group receiving lumbar segmental stabilization exercise training, which included 8 males and 7 females. [Results] There were statistically significant differences in comparison of measurement results between the groups before and after the intervention. [Conclusion] Application of mobilization techniques for the sciatic nerves may promote healing of the soft tissues by stimulating the functions of the nervous system to improve nervous system adaptability and decrease sensitivity, helping to alleviate the symptoms.

The effectiveness of neural mobilizations in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to identify the effectiveness of neural mobilization techniques in various neuro-musculoskeletal conditions. Outcomes will be analyzed in terms of subgroups such as low back pain, cervico-brachial pain and carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders were ranked as the second largest contributor to disability worldwide in a study on the global burden of disease. Low back pain and neck pain contributed to 70% of disability in this comprehensive population-based study. Low back pain and neck pain are multifactorial, with heterogeneous populations. It has been proposed that targeting subgroups of patients may result in better treatment outcomes. Neck pain associated with upper limb pain is prevalent. These patients are more disabled than patients with neck pain alone. Similarly, low back pain with leg pain is a common phenomenon and is acknowledged as a predictor for chronicity.Neuropathic pain is often associated with musculoskeletal complaints including low back pain, whiplash associated disorders (WAD) and acute or chronic radiculopathy, and can be a feature of syndromes such as cervico-brachial pain syndrome. According to the International Association for the Study of Pain, neuropathic pain can be described as "pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system." Leg pain associated with back pain can be caused by central sensitization, denervation, nerve sensitization or somatically referred pain. In patients with WAD, neck pain is the most common symptom, but upper limb pain, weakness, paraesthesia and anesthesia are often present. Other conditions in which neural tissue is thought to contribute to the clinical picture are, for instance, lateral epicondalalgia and carpal tunnel syndrome.Management strategies for back pain and neck pain are often multimodal. However, the evidence for effective treatment of nerve related pain is lacking. Neural mobilizations are often used to affect the neural structures in conditions with signs of neural involvement or neural mechano-sensitivity. Neural mobilizations are defined as interventions aimed at affecting the neural structures or surrounding tissue (interface) directly or indirectly through manual techniques or exercise. Neural mobilizations have been studied in various populations such as low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, lateral epicondalalgia and cervico-brachial pain. Neural mobilization techniques studied include cervical lateral glides for cervico-brachial pain, nerve gliding exercises for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical lateral glides for lateral epicondalalgia and the slump as a neural mobilization technique in the treatment of low back pain. No specialized equipment is needed in the performance of neural mobilization techniques, which contributes to its popularity.Neural mobilization is said to affect the axoplasmic flow, movement of the nerve and its connective tissue and the circulation of the nerve by alteration of the pressure in the nervous system and dispersion of intraneural oedema. Neural mobilization decreases the excitability of dorsal horn cells. Neural mobilizations can be performed in various ways using passive movement, manual mobilization of the nerve or interface, and exercise. The aim of neural mobilization is to restore the mechanical and neurophysiological function of the nerve.Only one systematic review on the effectiveness of neural mobilizations could be identified in the literature. Since this review, several more studies have been published on this subject. The authors hypothesize that a review of the more recent literature (2008-2014) may confirm positive support for the use of neural mobilizations for neuro-musculoskeletal complaints as previously seen by Ellis and Hing. This review aims to include a meta-analysis and subgrouping of conditions which will be an extension of the previous review by Ellis and Hing. The outcomes of this systematic review may be used to inform clinical practice and the development of best practice guidelines.

Results of an Active Neurodynamic Mobilization Program in Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of an active neurodynamic mobilization program on pain, neurodynamics, perceived health state, and fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Local fibromyalgia association.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with FMS (N=48).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to an active neurodynamic mobilization program or a control group. The intervention was performed twice a week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain was assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory and Pain Catastrophizing Scale; neurodynamics were evaluated using neurodynamic tests for upper and lower limbs. The functional state was evaluated with the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, and perceived fatigue was evaluated with the Fatigue Severity Scale.

RESULTS

Significant (P<.05) between-groups differences were found in the values of pain, upper and lower limb neurodynamics, functional state, and fatigue. Also, significant pre- to postintervention within-group differences were found in the intervention group, whereas no significant changes were found in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A neurodynamic mobilization program is effective in improving pain, neurodynamics, functional status, and fatigue in patients with FMS.

The immediate and 24-hour follow-up effect of unilateral lumbar Z-joint mobilisation on posterior chain neurodynamics

Few studies have reported the effects of lumbar spine mobilization on neurodynamics. In a recent study, Szlezak et al. (2011) reported immediate improvement of posterior chain neurodynamics [range of passive straight leg raise (SLR)] following ipsilateral lumbar spine zygopophyseal (Z) joint mobilization. We re-duplicated the study with a 24 h follow-up measurement. Sixty healthy college students were assigned to two groups, mobilization and control. The mobilization group received ipsilateral grade 3 Maitland mobilizations to Z joint at a frequency of 2 MHz for 3 min and the control group received no treatment. The SLR was measured before and after the intervention for both the groups on the day of testing and 24-h later. Repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant pre to post improvement in SLR range after mobilization. The improvement was retained at 24-h. The results of the study are consistent with Szlezak et al. (2011).

The effect of neural mobilisation on cervico-brachial pain: design of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is often associated with shoulder or arm pain. There is a paucity of information on effective treatment for neck and arm pain, such as radiculopathy or cervico-brachial pain. Guidelines recommend neck mobilisation/ manipulation, exercises and advice as the treatment for neck pain, and neck and arm pain. There are a few studies that have used neural mobilisation as the treatment for cervico-brachial pain. Although results seem promising the studies have small sample sizes that make it difficult to draw definite conclusions.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial will be used to establish the effect of neural mobilisation on the pain, function and quality of life of patients with cervico-brachial pain. Patients will be recruited in four physiotherapy private practices and randomly assigned to usual care or usual care plus neural mobilisation.

DISCUSSION

In clinical practice neural mobilisations is commonly used for cervico-brachial pain. Although study outcomes seem promising, most studies have small participant numbers. Targeting the neural structures as part of the management plan for a subgroup of patients with nerve mechano-sensitivity seems feasible. Patients with neuropathic pain and psychosocial risk factors such as catastrophising, respond poorly to treatment. Although a recent study found these patients less likely to respond to neural mobilisation, the current study will be able to assess whether neural mobilisation has any added benefit compared to usual care. The study will contribute to the knowledge base of treatment of patients with cervico-brachial pain. The findings of the study will be published in an appropriate journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PACTR201303000500157.