Periprocedural Management of Oral Anticoagulation

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding deep vein thrombosis and the nursing management

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a significant challenge in healthcare settings, with proper nursing management playing a crucial role in patient outcomes. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a significant challenge in healthcare settings, with proper nursing management playing a crucial role in patient outcomes. To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of nurses regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and its nursing management. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Zhejiang Province between August and September 2024. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire that was validated through expert consensus and pilot testing (Cronbach's α = 0.949). A total of 568 valid questionnaires were analyzed. Among the participants, 272 (47.9%) reported having experience in caring for DVT patients. The mean scores showed that 75.9% of participants achieved adequate knowledge levels, 82.5% demonstrated positive attitudes, and 83.9% exhibited proactive practices. All indicating satisfactory levels within their respective ranges. Multivariate logistic regression showed that involving in the care of DVT patients, with relative have a history of DVT, and participation in the training of DVT care were independently associated with knowledge. Concurrently, knowledge was independently associated with attitude. Moreover, knowledge and attitude were independently associated with proactive practice (All P < 0.05). Nurses demonstrated adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices regarding DVT and its nursing management. Targeted training programs and experiential opportunities, particularly for nurses with limited exposure to DVT care, should be prioritized to further enhance their knowledge and practices, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Exploring extracellular vesicles as novel therapeutic agents for intervertebral disc degeneration: delivery, applications, and mechanisms

Intervertebral disc degeneration is a multifactorial degenerative disease that poses a significant threat to the health of the elderly population. Current treatments primarily focus on physical therapy, medication, and surgery to alleviate symptoms associated with disc compression but do not address the progression of degeneration. Therefore, this review aimed to explore the potential of extracellular vesicle therapy as a novel preventive strategy to delay degeneration and enhance tissue repair in intervertebral discs. We cover the pathogenic mechanisms underlying intervertebral disc degeneration, including inflammation, apoptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy dysregulation, and the roles of non-coding RNAs. Subsequently, we discussed the therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles and their molecular components, such as proteins, RNAs, and lipids, in modulating these pathways to counter intervertebral disc degeneration. We provides a comprehensive review of the significant role of extracellular vesicle cargo in mediating repair mechanisms. It discusses the functional enhancement advantages exhibited by extracellular vesicles under current bioengineering modifications and drug loading. The challenges and future prospects of utilizing extracellular vesicle therapy to treat this degenerative condition are also summarized.

Rapid Determination of Xa Inhibitor Activity in Blood Using a Microfluidic Device that Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Generation Under Flow

Background

Patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) often present complicated scenarios following major bleeding, stroke, or emergency surgery. Rapid whole blood assays of DOAC levels would aid clinical decisions such as the need for DOAC reversal.

Methods

We developed a single-use, storage-stable, eight-channel microfluidic device to estimate factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban) levels in venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation patients. The assay simultaneously measured whole blood clotting dynamics on collagen/tissue factor (TF; wall shear rate, 200 -1 ) under four ex vivo conditions: no-treatment control, high dose Factor Xa inhibition, low dose or high dose FXa reversal agent (andexanet alfa). Fibrin and platelet deposition dynamics were monitored via two-color epifluorescence microscopy. Plasma samples were also evaluated by LC-MS/MS for DOAC concentrations.

Results

Experiments with healthy volunteer blood spiked with DOAC verified device performance (DOAC IC 50 ∼120 nM) and confirmed that andexanet alfa added to healthy donor blood had no off-target effect on platelet or fibrin signal. Patient whole blood monitored for 15 to 25 minutes (17 minutes mean runtime) allowed calculation of functional DOAC concentrations ranging from 2 to 500 nM that correlated well with LC-MS/MS determination of apixaban or rivaroxaban (R 2  = 0.7 or 0.9, respectively). Platelet dysfunction was not observed in any patient on DOAC. For a threshold of 100 nM DOAC, the area under the curve (AUC) was found to be 0.881 for apixaban and 0.933 for rivaroxaban.

Conclusion

Microfluidic testing of whole blood can provide a rapid estimate of DOAC levels over the on-therapy range.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers: 2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

The rate of postoperative hematoma following risk-adapted cessation of oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

This study describes the management of patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) and analyzes the risk of postoperative hematoma and epistaxis following treatment of pituitary adenoma (PA).

METHODS

Patients with OAC prior to EETS for PA were analyzed in a single center retrospective case series of consecutive patients with PA, who were treated between December 2008 and July 2022. Patient data (age, sex, clinical, endocrinology, tumor histology) were entered into a SPSS® database. The rate of postoperative hemorrhage (intracranial and epistaxis) and other perioperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 305 patients, 20 patients were on OAC prior to EETS for PA. Indications included non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in 10 patients and previous venous thromboembolic event (VTE) in 8 patients, in 2 patients had overlapping indications. Twelve patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) paused medication 1-3 days (43.6 ± 23.6 h) before surgery, while phenprocoumon was paused 234 ± 123.55 h (min 6, max 22 days) before surgery. Baseline characteristics such as age, sex, tumor growth direction, tumor volume, and largest diameter showed no significant differences. No significant increase in postoperative hemorrhage was observed in patients with OAC compared to those without. One patient on apixaban paused 48 h before surgery experienced postoperative epistaxis. Among patients without OAC, one experienced intracranial hemorrhage and seven experienced epistaxis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OAC prior to EETS for PA have no increased risk for postoperative hematoma when OAC is paused based on individual risk assessment and recent general recommendations.

Medical Clinics of North America-Periprocedural Antithrombotics: Prophylaxis and Interruption

Anticoagulation management in the surgical patient requires clinical expertise and careful attention. For patients already receiving anticoagulation for a defined indication (ie, stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation, treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), or presence of a mechanical heart valve), understanding how to manage these agents by weighing the risks of thromboembolic events and bleeding is paramount. Additionally, prevention of VTE in the surgical patient involves the identification of patient-specific and procedure-specific risk factors for both VTE and bleeding. With this information, as well as familiarity with the several antithrombotic options available, an appropriate prophylaxis strategy can be employed.

Apixaban anti-Xa levels in clinical practice: A case report

Apixaban is a widely used direct oral anticoagulant that is recommended over warfarin therapy for many clinical indications. In patients with atrial fibrillation, dose reductions are recommended for patients with advanced age (≥80 years), low weight (≤60 kg) or elevated serum creatinine (≥1.5 mg/dL), but there is no routine laboratory monitoring necessary for long term-use. Furthermore, apixaban dose reductions due to renal dysfunction are not recommended when treating acute venous thromboembolism. Apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa assays are readily available at some medical centres, and they may be of clinical utility in certain circumstances such as in patients with renal insufficiency, medication adherence assessment, periprocedural planning, extremes in body weight and advanced age. Here, we describe the case of an elderly patient with chronic kidney disease taking apixaban for acute pulmonary embolism. The patient had an unanticipated prolonged apixaban half-life, with detectable apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa levels for >10 days after the last administered dose, which delayed a necessary surgical intervention by >1 week. This case is an example of appropriately using apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa levels to guide therapeutic decision making in perioperative planning.

Brazilian Consensus on the Application of Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Thyroid Nodules: A Task Force Statement by the Brazilian Society of Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery (SOBRICE), Brazilian Society of Head and Neck Surgery (SBCCP), and Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM)

There is increasing interest in ultrasound-guided ablation treatments for thyroid diseases, including benign and malignant ones. Surgeons, radiologists, and endocrinologists carry out these treatments, and various organizations within these specialties have recently released multiple international consensus statements and clinical practice standards. The aim of the present consensus statement is to provide guidance, cohesion, and standardization of best practices for thermal ablation procedures of thyroid nodules. The statement includes the indications for these procedures, preprocedural evaluations, technical aspects of the procedures, posttreatment care, follow-up, complications, and training recommendations. This document was written by a panel of specialists from the Brazilian Society of Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery (SOBRICE), the Brazilian Society of Head and Neck Surgery (SBCCP), and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM). The statement does not aim to provide criteria for assessing the capability of specialists to perform the procedure. Instead, it aims to promote the standardization of best practices to reduce potential adverse outcomes. Additionally, it strives to enhance the delivery of high-quality care and the widespread adoption of these technologies on a national level. The recommendations collectively serve as a guidebook for applying best practices in thyroid ablation.

Perioperative Management of Traditional and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Hip Fracture Patients

Hip fractures are an increasingly common injury in the senior population and almost always require surgical fixation or prosthetic replacement. These surgeries, according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, are considered high-risk for bleeding, especially in a population fraught with comorbidities and often presenting on anticoagulation medications. Direct oral anticoagulants represent a class of drugs that have been becoming more popular in use in this population, with many benefits over the historically used Warfarin. There are recommendations for preoperative discontinuation and postoperative resumption of these medications, which can be more readily managed for elective surgeries. However, there is a paucity of literature detailing best practice guidelines for the perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulants when a patient presents with a hip fracture. This review article summary of the periprocedural management of DOACs for hip surgery was developed by examining the American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, Perioperative Guidelines on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Agents written by anesthesiologists, various retrospective studies, and drug labels for pharmacokinetic data. These recommendations should be used as a guideline, along with the collaboration of multidisciplinary hospital teams during inpatient admission, to manage these complex patients.

Intraoperative Catastrophic Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report

This case report describes a 75-year-old female with a medical history including recurrent bowel obstruction due to sigmoid stricture, atrial fibrillation managed with rivaroxaban, a 50-year one pack-per-day smoking history, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease with bilateral iliac stents (2015), stage III chronic kidney disease, and renal artery stenosis with bilateral stenting. She was transferred from outside hospital for an elective sigmoidectomy with ileorectal anastomosis following several recent admissions due to bowel obstruction that had been managed non-operatively. She was deemed optimized for surgery by the primary care team; however, during induction, she developed pulseless ventricular tachycardia requiring extensive resuscitative efforts. Intraoperative findings revealed biventricular failure and a clot in the right pulmonary artery. Despite aggressive treatment, including veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), the patient's condition deteriorated, and life support was ultimately withdrawn. This case highlights the challenges of managing complex surgical patients and underscores the importance of multidisciplinary care in such cases.

How Would I Treat My Own Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in the Perioperative Period?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) results from an incomplete resolution of acute pulmonary embolism, leading to occlusive organized thrombi, vascular remodeling, and associated microvasculopathy with pulmonary hypertension (PH). A definitive CTEPH diagnosis requires PH confirmation by right-heart catheterization and evidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease on imaging studies. Surgical removal of the organized fibrotic material by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest represents the treatment of choice. One-third of patients with CTEPH are not deemed suitable for surgical treatment, and medical therapy or interventional balloon pulmonary angioplasty presents alternative treatment options. Pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with technically operable disease significantly improves symptoms, functional capacity, hemodynamics, and quality of life. Perioperative mortality is <2.5% in expert centers where a CTEPH multidisciplinary team optimizes patient selection and ensures the best preoperative optimization according to individualized risk assessment. Despite adequate pulmonary artery clearance, patients might be prone to perioperative complications, such as right ventricular maladaptation, airway bleeding, or pulmonary reperfusion injury. These complications can be treated conventionally, but extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been included in their management recently. Patients with residual PH post-PEA should be considered for medical or percutaneous interventional therapy.

An Evaluation of the Duration of Oral Anticoagulant Use Among Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes associated with the duration of postoperative direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) therapy in patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 176 consecutive patients who underwent stenting for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions between March 2018 and December 2021. In total, 99 and 77 patients were discharged on a 3-month and >3-month regimen of DOAC therapy, respectively. The primary cumulative endpoint was a composite of thrombotic complications, bleeding complications, primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency within 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing 3-month and >3-month DOAC therapy were similar in age, sex, lesion site, symptoms, and average stent diameter and length. Upon multivariate analysis, the primary cumulative endpoint did not differ between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-3.30; P = 0.76). Moreover, the primary patency at 1 year did not differ between the groups (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.14-16.54; P = 0.74). Furthermore, there were no discernible differences in the secondary endpoints of bleeding complications (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.22-1.96; P = 0.45) or thrombotic complications (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.55-5.80; P = 0.34) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month regimen of DOAC therapy showed a similar risk of postoperative thrombosis and bleeding when compared to longer DOAC therapy durations over the course of 1 year following endovascular intervention. This could be a preferred option for patients with a higher estimated bleeding risk after venous stenting.

Short- and long-term risks of photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate: a population-based comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard surgical treatment for benign prostate enlargement (BPE). Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is an alternative, but there is limited real-life evidence of PVP risks.

OBJECTIVE

To compare short- and long-term risks of PVP to those of TURP in the treatment of BPE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent elective PVP or TURP between 2006 and 2018 in 20 hospitals in Finland were retrospectively studied using a combination of national registries (n = 27,408; mean age 71 years). Short-term risks were postoperative mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and reoperations for bleeding. Long-term risks were reoperations for BPE or any urethral operations within 12 years. Differences between treatment groups were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Risks were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

There were no differences in postoperative mortality or MACE between the study groups. Reoperations for bleeding were less frequent after PVP (0.9%, HR: 0.72, p = 0.042). Bleeding was more likely in patients with atrial fibrillation (number needed to treat [NNT] for PVP vs TURP: 61). Cumulative incidence for reoperation was higher after PVP (23.5%) than after TURP in long-term follow-up (17.8%; HR: 1.20, p < 0.0001, NNT: -31.7).

CONCLUSIONS

PVP is associated with lower postoperative bleeding risk but higher long-term reoperation risk than TURP. Patients with high bleeding risk and a low likelihood of needing reoperation appear most suitable for laser vaporization.KEY MESSAGEPVP is associated with lower postoperative bleeding risk but higher long-term reoperation risk than TURP. PVP appears an attractive treatment option, especially for patients with high bleeding risk and a low likelihood of needing a reoperation.

Reducing bleeding risk in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) significantly mitigates thromboembolism risks in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients yet concern about major bleeding events persist. In fact, clinically relevant hemorrhages can be life-threatening. Bleeding risk is dynamic and influenced by factors such as age, new comorbidities, and drug therapies, and should not be assessed solely based on static baseline factors.

AREAS COVERED

We comprehensively review the bleeding risk associated with OAC therapy. Emphasizing the importance of assessing both thromboembolic and bleeding risks, we present clinical tools for estimating stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and bleeding risk in AF and VTE patients. We also address overlapping risk factors and the dynamic nature of bleeding risk.

EXPERT OPINION

The OAC management is undergoing constant transformation, motivated by the primary objective of mitigating thromboembolism and bleeding hazards, thereby amplifying patient safety throughout the course of treatment. The future of OAC embraces personalized approaches and innovative therapies, driven by advanced pathophysiological insights and technological progress. This holds promise for improving patient outcomes and revolutionizing anticoagulation practices.

Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review

Background  With a trend toward greater virtual care in selected clinical settings, perioperative anticoagulant management appears well suited for this care delivery model. We explored the potential for virtual care among patients who are receiving anticoagulant therapy and require perioperative management around the time of an elective surgery/procedure. Methods  We undertook a retrospective review of patients who were receiving anticoagulant therapy, either a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or warfarin, assessed in a perioperative anticoagulation-bridging clinic over a 5-year period from 2016 to 2020. Using prespecified criteria, we determined the proportion of patients who likely would be suitable for virtual care (receiving a DOAC or warfarin and having a minimal- or low-/moderate-bleed-risk surgery/procedure), those who likely would be suitable for in-person care (receiving warfarin and requiring heparin bridging for a mechanical heart valve), and patients who would be suitable for either care delivery model (receiving a DOAC or warfarin, but not with a mechanical heart valve, and requiring a high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure). Results  During the 5-year study period, there were 4,609 patients assessed for perioperative anticoagulant management in whom the most widely used anticoagulants were warfarin (37%), apixaban (30%), and rivaroxaban (24%). Within each year assessed, 4 to 20% of all patients were undergoing a minimal-bleed-risk procedure, 76 to 82% were undergoing a low-/moderate-bleed-risk surgery/procedure, and 10 to 39% were undergoing a high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure. The proportion of patients considered suitable for virtual, in-person, or either virtual or in-person management was 79.6, 7.1, and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusion  In patients who were assessed in a perioperative anticoagulation clinic, there was a high proportion of patients in whom a virtual care model might be suitable.

Managing Anticoagulation and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Active Bleed or Upcoming Procedure: A Scoping Review

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to provide primary care providers and hospitalists with up-to-date guidance surrounding the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents in periprocedural settings and when unexpected bleeding complications arise.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science using applicable MeSH terms and keywords. No date limits or filters were applied. Articles cited by recent cardiovascular guidelines were also utilized.

Results

For direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K agonists (VKAs), a patient's risk for clot and procedural risk of bleeding should be assessed. Generally, patients considered at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) should be bridged, patients at low risk should forgo bridging therapy, and patients in the intermediate range should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Emergent anticoagulation reversal treatment is available for both warfarin (i.e., prothrombin complex concentrate, phytonadione) and DOACs (i.e., idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal; andexanet alfa for apixaban and rivaroxaban reversal). DAPT does not need to be held for paracentesis or thoracentesis and is low risk for those needing urgent lumbar punctures. In patients with clinically significant bleeding, those with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in the last three months should resume DAPT as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable, while patients greater than three months out from PCI at high risk of bleed can be de-escalated to single antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusions

Appropriate management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents in the periprocedural setting and patients with active bleed remains critical in inpatient management.

Anticoagulation decision-making before non-cardiac surgery in patients with mechanical heart valve: A retrospective study

Objective

To clarify the timing of warfarin discontinuation at different ranges of INR. Improve anticoagulation management in non-cardiac surgical patients with MHV.

Design

This is a single-center retrospective observational study.

Setting

and participants This study used data from the Hospital Information System, and the Surgery and Anesthesia Information System of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University. Participants included 121 adult patients with MHV who underwent non-cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2021.

Results

Overall, 121 patients with MHV (15 aortic valve only, 56 mitral valve only, and 50 with multiple valves) underwent non-cardiac surgery. When the duration of warfarin discontinuation was ≤ 3 days, 3-5 days, and≥5 days, the INR was 1.45, 1.15, and 1.09, respectively. Bleeding between INR ≤1.2 and INR >1.2 groups was not statistically significant using Student's t-test (95% CI -0.57, 0.14 P = 0.24). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that Intraoperative bleeding volume correlated with preoperative albumin levels (OR = 0.68，95% CI 0.49, 0.89).

Conclusions

When need preoperative INR is less than 1.5 in patients with MHV undergoing non-cardiac surgery, preoperative warfarin discontinuation for 3 days is sufficient. If INR less than 1.2, preoperative warfarin discontinuation for 3-5 days is appropriate. And in patients with MHV underwent abdominal surgery, intraoperative bleeding is not significant reduced by lower INR after preoperative warfarin discontinuation. Furthermore, the effect of albumin levels on coagulation function cannot be ignored in patients with MHV.

Strengths and limitations

This study was derived from real-world clinical data. It's a retrospectively study to describe the INR changed according to the duration of warfarin discontinuation in patients with MHV and compared intraoperation of bleeding volume between INR>1.2 and INR ≤ 1.2after warfarin discontinuation. To clarify the timing of warfarin discontinuation at different ranges of INR. Improve anticoagulation management in non-cardiac surgical patients with MHV, while providing clinicians with a reference for preoperative warfarin adjustment. This study does have a few limitations. The number of cases is small because patients undergoing repeat noncardiac surgery after heart valve surgery are a special case population. And the patients were not followed up after non-cardiac surgery. The impact of changes in INR on postoperative complications could not be assessed in patients with MHV.

Can additional variables be used to predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery? Anticoagulants and parenchyma thickness: a detailed examination

The purpose of this article is to identify the factors that predict the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with a focus on the effect of renal parenchymal thickness and anticoagulant use on stone-free rates. From February 2014 to April 2022, cases of kidney stones treated with RIRS at our clinic were retrospectively screened. The study included 642 cases meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients who were observed to be stone free after a single session of RIRS were assigned to Group F, while those with residual fragments were assigned to Group R. Group F comprised 472 patients, while Group R included 170 patients. The two groups have compared certain preoperative and postoperative laboratory and radiological parameters. The infundibulopelvic angle was significantly more acute in Group R (45.63 ± 16.25 vs. 49.28 ± 15.36, p = 0.011) while patients in Group F tended to have thicker parenchyma (27.39 ± 8.38 vs. 22.88 ± 5.56, p < 0.001). In our analysis of multivariate logistic regression, stone size (OR: 1.074, 1.037-1.113; p < 0.001), lower calyceal location (OR: 0.550, 95% CI 0.364-0.831; p = 0.005), multiple numbers of stones (OR 0.254, 95% CI 0.166-0.389; p =  < 0.001), the value of parenchymal thickness (OR 0.911, 95% CI 0.882-0.941; p =  < 0.001) and more importantly use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.333-0.933; p = 0.026) appeared to be independent predictors of stone-free status after RIRS. Further evaluation of the data revealed that the cut-off value of the renal parenchymal thickness for an effective stone-free status in a ROC curve analysis was 24.5 with 62.9% sensitivity and 56.8% specificity (area under curve value: 0.654 [95% CI 0.608-0.699, p < 0.001]). The endourologist may be able to make more informed decisions by evaluating renal parenchymal thickness in addition to patient-related factors like anticoagulant use, which we find significantly affects outcomes, along with the stone and renal anatomy-related factors.

Protocols for perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulants in hospitals: opportunities for improvement

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and describe the protocolized perioperative management in patient using Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

Between August and December 2020, a nationwide survey in 70 hospitals in the Netherlands was conducted. We asked hospital pharmacists to submit their protocols for perioperative management of DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) users. The protocols were assessed for a number of parameters divided into categories: interruption and restart timetables DOACs for elective procedures, criteria for the start of an urgent procedure without antidotes, criteria for the use of antidotes and advised antidotes for urgent procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 49 hospitals (70%) sent a protocol for perioperative management of DOACs. Two pairs of protocols were identical because hospitals cooperated closely, leaving 47 individual protocols for analysis. Thirty-five of these protocols contained a policy for both elective and urgent procedure; five protocols contained only a policy for elective and seven only for urgent procedures. In protocols for elective procedure, we found great variation in interruption and restart timetables intended for patients with renal impairment (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratio < 80 ml/min). In case of urgent procedures, there is variation in choice of antidote, criteria for administration of an antidote and antidote dosing.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of the current state of the perioperative protocols in the Netherlands in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Protocols are often not complete and show important and unwanted variation. We have found that national guidelines do not provide unambiguous advice on all points (urgent procedures) and are therefore often elaborated at a local level. The results of this research can help in improving and harmonizing the perioperative protocols on a national level.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): From the laboratory point of view

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a new generation of drugs that have been increasingly used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic states. According to the mechanism of anticoagulant action, DOACs are divided into two groups: direct inhibitors of thrombin (dabigatran) and direct inhibitors of activated factor X (FXa) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban). Compared to the vitamin K antagonists, DOACs are superior in terms of onset of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties and fixed daily dose without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Despite these advantages, there are clinical conditions in which laboratory measurement of DOACs should be performed. Although DOACs have an impact on screening haemostasis assays (prothrombin time, PT; activated partial thromboplastin time, aPTT; and thrombin time, TT), these tests are not appropriate for quantifying drug levels. Therefore, specific quantitative methods (LC-MS/MS as a gold standard method for all DOACs, coagulometric and chromogenic assays for dabigatran, and chromogenic anti-Xa assays with drug-specific calibrators for inhibitors of FXa) should only be used for determination of DOACs concentration. The aim of this review is to present all aspects of laboratory assessment of DOACs, including pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors in the overall testing process with a special accent on the available specific quantitative methods for measurement of DOACs in circulation.

Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND

The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug.

METHODS

Strong or conditional practice recommendations are generated based on high, moderate, low, and very low certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary panel generated 44 guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of VKAs, heparin bridging, DOACs, and antiplatelet drugs, of which two are strong recommendations: (1) against the use of heparin bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation; and (2) continuation of VKA therapy in patients having a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation. There are separate recommendations on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing minor procedures, comprising dental, dermatologic, ophthalmologic, pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator implantation, and GI (endoscopic) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial new evidence has emerged since the 2012 iteration of these guidelines, especially to inform best practices for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a VKA and may require heparin bridging, for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a DOAC, and for patients who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs. Despite this new knowledge, uncertainty remains as to best practices for the majority of perioperative management questions.

Vitamin-K Antagonists vs. Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Severity of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Analysis of Italian and UK Data

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is one of most frequent and significant challenges for emergency physicians and gastroenterologists. Mortality for upper (U) GIB is high, especially in the elderly and comorbid patients. However, there is scant evidence in the literature concerning an assessment of warfarin (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in terms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) severity. Aims: Using data from two different settings (Italy and the UK), we aimed to compare the impact of VKA and DOACs on the severity of UGIB. Methods: Retrospective bicentric study on adult patients under VKA or DOACs admitted either to the emergency department at the Gemelli Hospital in Rome, Italy or University College Hospital in London, UK, with suspected UGIB from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018. Univariate analysis with Fisher’s exact test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used. Results: 106 patients (62 M/44 F; mean age 71.2 ± 16.9 yrs) were enrolled and divided into the VKA group (N = 57; M: 56%, mean age: 64.9 ± 21.3 yrs) and the DOAC group (N = 49; M: 61%; mean age: 77.6 ± 12.5 yrs). At univariate analysis, the VKA group presented two endoscopic diagnoses more frequently than the DOAC group (26% vs. 8%, p < 0.05), were more frequently endoscopically treated (44% vs. 22%, p < 0.05), rescoped (12% vs. 2%, p = 0.048) and hospitalized (79% vs. 53%, p = 0.01) with a longer length of stay, LOS (VKA: 58% > 5 days vs. DOAC: 68% < 5 days, p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of hemoglobin level on admission, however the requirement of blood transfusions was higher in the VKA group (60% vs. 41%, p = 0.041). One third of the VKA group showed a lower platelet count than the DOAC group (33% vs. 8%, p = 0.01). No statistically significant differences for in-hospital mortality were observed. For the ANOVA, the type of anticoagulant used was the only significant predictor of need to rescope (p = 0.041) and a significant co-predictor for a LOS > 5 days (p = 0.009; as well as cirrhosis, p = 0.013 and age, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our outcomes revealed a more severe UGIB in patients on VKA, but the impact of comorbidities (i.e., more cirrhotic patients in the VKA group) cannot be disregarded. DOAC subgroup descriptive analysis, even though on a little cohort, showed higher bleeding severity for rivaroxaban.

Bleeding disorders in implant dentistry: a narrative review and a treatment guide

Purpose

Considering a high prevalence of congenital and especially acquired bleeding disorders, their heterogeneity and the multitude of possible treatments strategies, a review of the scientific data on this topic is needed to implement a treatment guide for healthcare professionals.

Methods

A selective literature review was performed via PubMed for articles describing oral surgery / dental implant procedures in patients with congenital and acquired bleeding disorders. Out of the existing literature, potential treatment algorithms were extrapolated.

Results

In order to assess the susceptibility to bleeding, risk stratification can be used for both congenital and acquired coagulation disorders. This risk stratification, together with an appropriate therapeutic pathway, allows for an adequate and individualized therapy for each patient. A central point is the close interdisciplinary cooperation with specialists. In addition to the discontinuation or replacement of existing treatment modalities, local hemostyptic measures are of primary importance. If local measures are not sufficient, systemically administered substances such as desmopressin and blood products have to be used.

Conclusions

Despite the limited evidence, a treatment guide could be developed by means of this narrative review to improve safety for patients and practitioners. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to allow the implementation of official evidence-based guidelines.

Radiofrequency ablation and related ultrasound-guided ablation technologies for treatment of benign and malignant thyroid disease: An international multidisciplinary consensus statement of the American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section with the Asia Pacific Society of Thyroid Surgery, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons, European Thyroid Association, Italian Society of Endocrine Surgery Units, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, Latin American Thyroid Society, and Thyroid Nodules Therapies Association

BACKGROUND

The use of ultrasound-guided ablation procedures to treat both benign and malignant thyroid conditions is gaining increasing interest. This document has been developed as an international interdisciplinary evidence-based statement with a primary focus on radiofrequency ablation and is intended to serve as a manual for best practice application of ablation technologies.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to guide statement development and generation of best practice recommendations. Modified Delphi method was applied to assess whether statements met consensus among the entire author panel.

RESULTS

A review of the current state of ultrasound-guided ablation procedures for the treatment of benign and malignant thyroid conditions is presented. Eighteen best practice recommendations in topic areas of preprocedural evaluation, technique, postprocedural management, efficacy, potential complications, and implementation are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

As ultrasound-guided ablation procedures are increasingly utilized in benign and malignant thyroid disease, evidence-based and thoughtful application of best practices is warranted.

Perioperative consultative hematology: can you clear my patient for a procedure?

Periprocedural management of antithrombotics is a common but challenging clinical scenario that renders patients vulnerable to potential adverse events such as bleeding and thrombosis. Over the past decade, periprocedural antithrombotic approaches have changed considerably with the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), as well as a paradigm shift away from bridging in many warfarin patients. Successfully navigating this high-risk period relies on a number of individualized patient assessments conducted within a framework of standardized, systematic approaches. It also requires a thorough understanding of antithrombotic pharmacokinetics, multidisciplinary coordination of care, and comprehensive patient education and empowerment. In this article, we provide clinicians with a practical, stepwise approach to periprocedural management of antithrombotic agents through case-based examples of relevant clinical scenarios.