SRA880, in vitro characterization of the first non-peptide somatostatin sst(1) receptor antagonist

Structural simplification: an efficient strategy in lead optimization

The trend toward designing large hydrophobic molecules for lead optimization is often associated with poor drug-likeness and high attrition rates in drug discovery and development. Structural simplification is a powerful strategy for improving the efficiency and success rate of drug design by avoiding “molecular obesity”. The structural simplification of large or complex lead compounds by truncating unnecessary groups can not only improve their synthetic accessibility but also improve their pharmacokinetic profiles, reduce side effects and so on. This review will summarize the application of structural simplification in lead optimization. Numerous case studies, particularly those involving successful examples leading to marketed drugs or drug-like candidates, will be introduced and analyzed to illustrate the design strategies and guidelines for structural simplification.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets. It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.

Reduced brain somatostatin in mood disorders: a common pathophysiological substrate and drug target?

Our knowledge of the pathophysiology of affect dysregulation has progressively increased, but the pharmacological treatments remain inadequate. Here, we summarize the current literature on deficits in somatostatin, an inhibitory modulatory neuropeptide, in major depression and other neurological disorders that also include mood disturbances. We focus on direct evidence in the human postmortem brain, and review rodent genetic and pharmacological studies probing the role of the somatostatin system in relation to mood. We also briefly go over pharmacological developments targeting the somatostatin system in peripheral organs and discuss the challenges of targeting the brain somatostatin system. Finally, the fact that somatostatin deficits are frequently observed across neurological disorders suggests a selective cellular vulnerability of somatostatin-expressing neurons. Potential cell intrinsic factors mediating those changes are discussed, including nitric oxide induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, high inflammatory response, high demand for neurotrophic environment, and overall aging processes. Together, based on the co-localization of somatostatin with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), its presence in dendritic-targeting GABA neuron subtypes, and its temporal-specific function, we discuss the possibility that deficits in somatostatin play a central role in cortical local inhibitory circuit deficits leading to abnormal corticolimbic network activity and clinical mood symptoms across neurological disorders.

Antiangiogenic role of miR-361 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: functional interaction with the peptide somatostatin

Somatostatin (SRIF) acts as antiangiogenic factor, but its role in the regulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) targeting proangiogenic factors is unknown. We used human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) to investigate whether (1) miRNAs targeting proangiogenic factors are influenced by hypoxia, (2) their expression is regulated by SRIF, and (3) SRIF-regulated miRNAs affect HUVEC angiogenic phenotype. The involvement of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 and hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1 in miRNA effects was studied. Quantitative real-time PCR, Western blot, cell proliferation assays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used. Using specific algorithms, three miRNAs (miR-17, miR-18b, and miR-361) were predicted to bind angiogenesis-associated factors including STAT3, HIF-1α, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Hypoxia downregulates miR-17 and miR-361 without affecting miR-18b. SRIF restored decreased levels of miR-361 acting at the SRIF receptor sst(1). Downregulated miR-361 was also restored by HIF-1α inhibition with YC-1. Combined application of SRIF did not influence YC-1-induced miR-361 downregulation, suggesting that YC-1 and SRIF modulate miR-361 through a common mechanism involving HIF-1α. This possibility was confirmed by the result that HIF-1α activation in normoxia-downregulated miR-361 and that this downregulation was prevented by SRIF. miR-361 overexpression reduced hypoxia-induced cell proliferation and VEGF release indicating miR-361 involvement in the acquisition of an angiogenic phenotype by HUVEC. miR-361 effects on VEGF were enhanced by the coadministration of SRIF. Our results suggest that (1) SRIF regulates miR-361 expression through a control on HIF-1, (2) miR-361 affects HUVEC angiogenic phenotype, and (3) SRIF and miR-361 act cooperatively in limiting hypoxia-induced VEGF release.

Neuropeptidomics of mouse hypothalamus after imipramine treatment reveal somatostatin as a potential mediator of antidepressant effects

Excessive activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been associated with numerous diseases, including depression, and the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine has been shown to suppress activity of the HPA axis. Central hypothalamic control of the HPA axis is complex and involves a number of neuropeptides released from multiple hypothalamic subnuclei. The present study was therefore designed to determine the effects of imipramine administration on the mouse hypothalamus using a peptidomics approach. Among the factors found to be downregulated after acute (one day) or chronic (21 days) imipramine administration were peptides derived from secretogranin 1 (chromogranin B) as well as peptides derived from cerebellin precursors. In contrast, peptides SRIF-14 and SRIF-28 (1-11) derived from somatostatin (SRIF, somatotropin release inhibiting factor) were significantly upregulated by imipramine in the hypothalamus. Because diminished SRIF levels have long been known to occur in depression, a second part of the study investigated the roles of individual SRIF receptors in mediating potential antidepressant effects. SRA880, an antagonist of the somatostatin-1 autoreceptor (sst1) which positively modulates release of endogenous SRIF, was found to synergize with imipramine in causing antidepressant-like effects in the tail suspension test. Furthermore, chronic co-administration of SRA880 and imipramine synergistically increased BDNF mRNA expression in the cerebral cortex. Application of SRIF or L054264, an sst2 receptor agonist, but not L803807, an sst4 receptor agonist, increased phosphorylation of CaMKII and GluR1 in cerebrocortical slices. Our present experiments thus provide evidence for antidepressant-induced upregulation of SRIF in the brain, and strengthen the notion that augmented SRIF expression and signaling may counter depressive-like symptoms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

Somatostatin-28 modulates prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response, reward processes and spontaneous locomotor activity in rats

Somatostatins have been shown to be involved in the pathophysiology of motor and affective disorders, as well as psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. We hypothesized that in addition to motor function, somatostatin may be involved in somatosensory gating and reward processes that have been shown to be dysregulated in schizophrenia. Accordingly, we evaluated the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of somatostatin-28 on spontaneous locomotor and exploratory behavior measured in a behavioral pattern monitor, sensorimotor gating, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex, and brain reward function (measured in a discrete trial intracranial self-stimulation procedure) in rats. Somatostatin-28 decreased spontaneous locomotor activity during the first 10 min of a 60 min testing session with no apparent changes in the exploratory activity of rats. The highest somatostatin-28 dose (10 microg/5 microl/side) induced PPI deficits with no effect on the acoustic startle response or startle response habituation. The somatostatin-induced PPI deficit was partially reversed by administration of SRA-880, a selective somatostatin 1 (sst(1)) receptor antagonist. Somatostatin-28 also induced elevations in brain reward thresholds, reflecting an anhedonic-like state. The non-peptide sst(1) receptor antagonist SRA-880 had no effect on brain reward function under baseline conditions. Altogether these findings suggest that somatostatin-28 modulates PPI and brain reward function but does not have a robust effect on spontaneous exploratory activity. Thus, increases in somatostatin transmission may represent one of the neurochemical mechanisms underlying anhedonia, one of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and sensorimotor gating deficits associated with cognitive impairments in schizophrenia patients.

Hippocampal sst(1) receptors are autoreceptors and do not affect seizures in rats

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14) exerts anticonvulsive effects in several rat seizure models, generally attributed to sst(2) receptor activation. Whereas sst(1) immunoreactivity has been localized to both polymorphic interneurons and principal cells in the rat hippocampus, its potential role as an inhibitory autoreceptor or as a receptor involved in mediating anticonvulsive actions remains unknown. We showed that intrahippocampal administration of the sst(1) antagonist SRA880 (1 microM) induced a robust increase in hippocampal SST-14 levels without affecting gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in conscious rats, indicating that the sst(1) receptor acts as an inhibitory autoreceptor. SRA880 did not affect seizure severity and did not reverse the anticonvulsive action of SRIF-14 (1 microM) against pilocarpine-induced seizures, suggesting that hippocampal sst(1) receptors are not involved in the anticonvulsive effects of SRIF-14.

Functional effects of somatostatin receptor 1 activation on synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF) co-localizes with GABA in the hippocampus and regulates neuronal excitability. A role of SRIF in the control of hippocampal activity has been proposed, although the exact contribution of each SRIF receptor (sst(1)-sst(5)) in mediating SRIF action requires some clarification. We used hippocampal slices of wild-type and sst(1) knockout (KO) mice and selective pharmacological tools to provide conclusive evidence for a role of sst(1) in mediating SRIF inhibition of synaptic transmission. With single- and double-label immunohistochemistry, we determined the distribution of sst(1) in hippocampal slices and we quantified sst(1) colocalization with SRIF. With electrophysiology, we found that sst(1) activation with CH-275 inhibited both the NMDA- and the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-mediated responses. Results from sst(1) KO slices confirmed the specificity of CH-275 effects; sst(1) activation did not affect the inhibitory transmission which was in contrast increased by sst(4) activation with L-803,087 in both wild-type and sst(1) KO slices. The AMPA-mediated responses were increased by L-803,087. Functional interaction between sst(1) and sst(4) is suggested by the finding that their combined activation prevented the CH-275-induced inhibition of AMPA transmission. The involvement of pre-synaptic mechanisms in mediating inhibitory effects of sst(1) on excitatory transmission was demonstrated by the finding that CH-275 (i) increased the paired-pulse facilitation ratio, (ii) did not influence the AMPA depolarization in the presence of tetrodotoxin, and (iii) inhibited glutamate release induced by epileptiform treatment. We conclude that SRIF control of excitatory transmission through an action at sst(1) may represent an important contribution to the regulation of hippocampal activity.

Novel, potent, and radio-iodinatable somatostatin receptor 1 (sst1) selective analogues

The proposed sst(1) pharmacophore (J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 523-533) derived from the NMR structures of a family of mono- and dicyclic undecamers was used to design octa-, hepta-, and hexamers with high affinity and selectivity for the somatostatin sst(1) receptor. These compounds were tested for their in vitro binding properties to all five somatostatin (SRIF) receptors using receptor autoradiography; those with high SRIF receptor subtype 1 (sst(1)) affinity and selectivity were shown to be agonists when tested functionally in a luciferase reporter gene assay. Des-AA(1,4-6,10,12,13)-[DTyr(2),DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (25) was radio-iodinated ((125)I-25) and specifically labeled sst(1)-expressing cells and tissues. 3D NMR structures were calculated for des-AA(1,4-6,10,12,13)-[DPhe(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (16), des-AA(1,2,4-6,10,12,13)-[DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (23), and des-AA(1,2,4-6,10,12,13)-[DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-SRIF-NH(2) (27) in DMSO. Though the analogues have the sst(1) pharmacophore residues at the previously determined distances from each other, the positioning of the aromatic residues in 16, 23, and 27 is different from that described earlier, suggesting an induced fit mechanism for sst(1) binding of these novel, less constrained sst(1)-selective family members.

Activation of somatostatin receptors in the globus pallidus increases rat locomotor activity and dopamine release in the striatum

RATIONALE

Somatostatin and its receptors have been localized in brain nuclei implicated in motor control, such as the striatum, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, and globus pallidus (GP).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of somatostatin receptors (sst(1,2,4)) in the GP on dopamine (DA)-mediated behaviors, such as locomotor activity, and to examine the GP-striatum circuitry by correlating the effect of somatostatin in the GP with the release of DA in the striatum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals received saline, somatostatin (60, 120, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side) or the following selective ligands: L-797,591 (sst(1) analog, 60, 120, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-779,976 (sst(2) analog, 120, 240, 480 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-803,087 (sst(4) analog; 120, 240, 480 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-796,778 (sst(3) analog, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side), SRA-880 (sst(1) selective antagonist + somatostatin, 120 ng/0.5 microl per side), CYN154806 (sst(2) selective antagonist + somatostatin, 120 ng/0.5 microl per side) bilaterally in the GP of the rat. Locomotor activity was measured for 60 min. The effect of somatostatin, administered intrapallidally, on the extracellular concentrations of DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and homovanillic acid in the striatum was also studied in the behaving rat using in vivo microdialysis methodology.

RESULTS

Somatostatin increased the locomotor activity of the rat in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was mediated by activation of the sst(1), sst(2), and sst(4) receptors. Selective sst agonists increased locomotor activity in a statistical significant manner, while selective sst(1) and sst(2) antagonists reversed the somatostatin-mediated locomotor activity to control levels. DA levels increased in the striatum after intrapallidal infusion of somatostatin (240 ng/side).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide behavioral and neurochemical evidence of the functional role of somatostatin receptors in the GP-striatum circuitry.

Somatostatin as a regulator of first-trimester human trophoblast functions

We have tested the hypothesis that human early trophoblast is a target for somatostatin (SRIF) regulatory actions. We report for the first time that SSTR2A and 2B transcripts and proteins are present in first-trimester human chorionic villi and the trophoblast-derived HTR-8/SVneo and JAR cells. In both cell lines, SSTR are functional since SRIF inhibits cyclic AMP pathway, stimulates arachidonic acid release and enhances cell proliferation. Moreover, in HTR-8/SVneo cells, considered a good model of first-trimester EVT, SRIF also enhances migration. An involvement of the cyclic AMP pathway in mediating SRIF effects on proliferation and migration is suggested. Our data support the idea that SRIF regulates early trophoblast functions mainly through an interaction with SSTR2.

Novel signals mediating the functions of somatostatin: the emerging role of NO/cGMP

The neuropeptide somatostatin is a cyclic tetradecapeptide, which is widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system. It mediates a plethora of physiological actions and functions as a neurotransmitter, neuromodulator or trophic factor. Somatostatin activates six receptor subtypes that are expressed differentially in different tissues and are coupled to diverse signalling pathways. In order to elucidate the functional role of the individual receptor subtypes, many investigations focused on the assignment of each receptor to a particular signalling pathway. Signalling pathways involving enzyme (adenylate cyclase, phospholipases, phosphatases) and ion channel systems in native and recombinant receptor systems have been extensively studied. A one to one situation (receptor/pathway) has yet to be established, thus justifying the diverse actions of somatostatin. Recently, a NO/cGMP pathway has been shown to mediate the functions of somatostatin and its receptors. This review will present the findings that support the emerging role of NO/cGMP as a novel signal in SRIF's actions in retinal physiology and somatotroph release.

Identification and SAR of potent and selective non-peptide obeline somatostatin sst1 receptor antagonists

A novel class of non-peptide somatostatin receptor ligands bearing the octahydrobenzo[g]quinoline (obeline) structural element has been identified. SAR studies have been performed that led to the discovery of derivatives with high affinity (pK(d) r sst(1) > or = 9) and selectivity (> or = 150-fold for h sst(1) over h sst(2)-h sst(5)) for somatostatin receptor subtype sst(1). In a functional assay, the compounds act as antagonists at human recombinant sst(1) receptors.

SAR of the arylpiperazine moiety of obeline somatostatin sst1 receptor antagonists

The SAR of over 50 derivatives of octahydrobenzo[g]quinoline (obeline)-type somatostatin sst(1) receptor antagonist 1 is presented, focusing on the modification of its arylpiperazine moiety. Sst(1) affinities in this series cover a range of five orders of magnitude with the best derivatives displaying subnanomolar sst(1) affinities and >10,000-fold selectivities over the sst(2) receptor subtype as well as promising pharmacokinetic properties.

Expression, pharmacology, and functional role of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1 and 2 in human macrophages

Somatostatin (SRIF)-14 is recognized as an important mediator between the nervous and the immune system, although the functional role of its receptors (sst(1)-sst(5)) is poorly understood in humans. In our study, we demonstrate that human macrophages, differentiated from PBMC-derived monocytes, express sst(1) and sst(2) mRNAs. sst(1) and sst(2) are mostly localized at the cell surface and display active binding sites. In particular, sst(1)/sst(2) activation results in a weak internalization of sst(1), and the sst(2) internalization appears more efficient. At the functional level, the activation of SRIF receptors by the multiligand analogs SOM230 and KE108, but not by SRIF-14 or cortistatin-14, reduces macrophage viability. Their effects are mimicked by the selective activation of sst(1) and sst(2) using CH-275 and SMS 201-995/L-779,976, respectively. Further, sst(1)- and sst(2)-mediated effects are reversed by the sst(1) antagonist SRA-880 or the sst(2) antagonist CYN 154806, respectively. CH-275, SMS 201-995, and L-779,976, but not SRIF-14, decrease mRNA expression and secretion of the MCP-1. In addition, SRIF-14, CH-275, SMS 201-995, and L-779,976 decrease IL-8 secretion, and they do not affect IL-8 mRNA expression. In contrast, SRIF-14 and sst(1)/sst(2) agonists do not affect the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Collectively, our results suggest that the SRIF system, through sst(1) and sst(2), exerts mainly an immunosuppressive effect in human macrophages and may, therefore, represent a therapeutic window that can be exploited for the development of new strategies in pharmacological therapy of inflammation.

The somatostatin sst1 receptor: an autoreceptor for somatostatin in brain and retina?

The sst1 receptor was the first of the 5 somatostatin receptors to be cloned by homology with the glucagon receptor 13 years ago. It is a 7-transmembrane domain G-protein-coupled receptor that is negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase, but can also trigger other transduction pathways. The distribution of sst1 mRNA, immunolabeling, and radioligand binding are not entirely overlapping, but the recent availability of knockout (KO) mice and a (still limited) number of selective agonists/antagonists has increased our knowledge about this receptor. These new tools have helped to reveal a role for the sst1 receptor in hippocampal, hypothalamic, basal ganglia, and retinal functions. In at least the latter 3 structures, the sst1 receptor appears to act as an inhibitory autoreceptor located on somatostatin neurons, whereas in the hippocampus such a role is still based on circumstantial evidence.

Somatostatin receptor 1 selective analogues: 2. N(alpha)-Methylated scan

Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8)/d-Nal(8),IAmp(9)]SRIF (AA = amino acid, Nal = 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine, IAmp = 4-(N-isopropyl)-aminomethylphenylalanine, SRIF = somatostatin), with or without a tyrosine or monoiodotyrosine, were scanned with the introduction of a backbone N-methyl group and tested for binding affinity at the five human somatostatin receptors (sst(1)(-)(5)). N(alpha)-Methylation resulted in loss of sst affinity (2- to >5-fold) when introduced at residues Lys(4) (6), Phe(6) (7), Phe(7) (8), Thr(10) (11), and Phe(11) (12) of the parent compound Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Nal(8),IAmp(9)]SRIF (4). N(alpha)-Methylation was tolerated at residues Cys(3) (5), d-Nal(8) (9), Thr(12) (13), and Cys(14) (15) with retention of binding sst affinity and selectivity and resulted in an increase in sst binding affinity at positions IAmp(9) (10) and Ser(13) (14). In these series, the d-Trp(8) substitution versus d-Nal(8) is clearly superior. C-Terminally lysine-extended analogues (21-25) retained sst(1) selectivity and binding affinity when compared to their d-Nal(8)- (4) or d-Trp(8)- (3) containing parent. Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8), (N(alpha)Me)IAmp(9)]SRIF (17), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),(N(alpha)Me)Ser(13)]SRIF (19), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),(N(alpha)Me)Cys(14)]SRIF (20), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),(N(alpha)Me)IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]SRIF (34), and Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Agl(8)(N(beta)Me,2-naphthoyl),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]SRIF (42) (Agl = aminoglycine) are sst(1) agonists in their ability to inhibit forskolin-induced cAMP production.

Somatostatin receptors differentially affect spontaneous epileptiform activity in mouse hippocampal slices

Somatostatin-14 [somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF)] reduces hippocampal epileptiform activity but the contribution of its specific receptors (sst1-5) is poorly understood. We have focused on the role of sst1 and sst2 in mediating SRIF modulation of epilepsy using hippocampal slices of wild-type (WT) and sst1 or sst2 knockout (KO) mice. Recordings of epileptiform discharge induced by Mg2+ -free medium with 4-aminopyridine were performed from the CA3 region before and after the application of SRIF compounds. In WT mice, SRIF and the sst1 agonist CH-275 reduce epilepsy whereas sst1 blockade with its antagonist SRA-880 increases the bursting discharge. Activation of sst2 does not affect the bursting frequency unless its agonist octreotide is applied with SRA-880, indicating that sst1 masks sst2-mediated modulation of epilepsy. In sst1 KO mice: (i) the bursting frequency is lower than in WT; (ii) SRIF, CH-275 and SRA-880 are ineffective on epilepsy and (iii) octreotide is also devoid of effects, whereas blockade of sst2 with the antagonist D-Tyr8 Cyn 154806 increases the bursting frequency. In sst2 KO mice, the SRIF ligand effects are similar to those in WT. In the whole hippocampus of sst1 KO mice, sst2 mRNA, protein and binding are higher than in WT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of the CA3 subarea confirms an increase of the sst2 messenger. We conclude that sst1 mediates inhibitory actions of SRIF and that interactions between sst1 and sst2 may prevent sst2 modulation of epilepsy. We suggest that, in sst1 KO mice, activation of over-expressed sst2 reduces the bursting frequency, indicating that sst2 density represents the rate-limiting factor for ss(2-mediated modulation of epilepsy.

The somatostatin receptor (sst1) modulates the release of somatostatin in the nucleus accumbens of the rat

The aim of the present study was to examine the function of the somatostatin receptor (sst(1)) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the basal ganglia. Radioligand binding studies were performed in rats to assess the presence of the receptor, while in vivo microdialysis studies were performed to examine its role in somatostatin release. CH-275, which is selective for sst(1), MK-678, selective for sst(2) and L-803,087, selective for sst(4) receptors displaced [(125)I]-Tyr(11)-somatostatin specific binding in a concentration-dependent manner with IC(50) values of 75, 0.21 and 11 nM, respectively. Infusion of CH-275 (10(-5), 10(-6) or 10(-7) M) in the NAc of freely moving rats resulted in a decrease in somatostatin levels only at the concentration of 10(-5) M. This effect was reversed by 10(-5) M of the selective sst(1) antagonist SRA-880. The sst(1) agonist L-797,591 (10(-5) M) mimicked the effect of CH-275, while MK-678 and L-803,087 at the same concentration were unable to influence somatostatin levels. These results provide functional evidence to demonstrate that the sst(1) receptor modulates somatostatin release in the basal ganglia.